We are subject to income taxes as well as non-income based taxes, tariffs, and duties in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Tax laws and regulations could change on a prospective or retroactive basis and any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Following the issuance of any new law or regulation, interpretations are made by the Company, using any regulatory guidance and judicial interpretations issued after the law change. The Company's application of such tax laws, before and after any guidance or interpretations are issued, or in the absence of such guidance or interpretations, may have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions. Tax authorities may disagree with certain positions we have taken and assess additional taxes. We regularly assess the likely outcomes of these audits to determine the appropriateness of our tax provision, and we have established contingency reserves for material, known tax exposures. However, the calculation of such tax exposures involves the application of complex tax laws and regulations in many jurisdictions, as well as interpretations as to the legality under European Union state aid rules of tax advantages granted in certain jurisdictions. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will accurately predict the outcomes of these disputes or other tax audits or that issues raised by tax authorities will be resolved at a financial cost that does not exceed our related reserves. The actual outcomes of these disputes and other tax audits could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our operations in Puerto Rico, Costa Rica, China and Malaysia presently benefit from various tax rate incentives and grants. Unless these incentives and grants are extended, they will expire between 2026 and 2034. If we are unable to renew, extend, or obtain new incentives and grants, the expiration of the existing incentives and grants could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations in future periods.
Many provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) enacted in the U.S. in 2017 expire at the end of 2025. Other provisions of the TCJA are modified beginning in 2026. The U.S. Congress and the current administration have indicated that they intend to pursue legislation in 2025 to make permanent the 2017 TCJA provisions but there is no guarantee that this initiative will be successful. Any new U.S. corporate tax legislation that is enacted in 2025 could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The Group of Twenty (G20), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the European Commission (EC) and individual taxing jurisdictions where we and our affiliates do business have recently focused on issues related to the taxation of multinational corporations. The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework (IF) on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) includes actions intended to equip governments with domestic and international rules and instruments to address tax avoidance, ensuring that profits are taxed where economic activities generating the profits are performed and where value is created. The actions include a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges of the digitalized economy. Pillar One focuses on how profits are allocated between taxing jurisdictions and Pillar Two creates a 15% global minimum tax. Many countries where we do business have already implemented the Pillar Two global minimum tax into their national laws. Other countries are considering enacting laws consistent with the Pillar Two rules, while still others have yet to announce their intention to adopt. The United States has not enacted the Pillar Two global minimum tax and the current administration recently announced its intention to effectively withdraw from the OECD Inclusive Framework as well as its intention to enact retaliatory measures against countries who assert extraterritorial taxes against U.S. taxpayers. The OECD continues to issue guidance on the Pillar Two framework, with new rules released as recently as January, 2025. While we continue to monitor legislative adoption of Pillar Two by country, as well as for additional guidance from the OECD, there is significant uncertainty that exists regarding the interpretation of the detailed Pillar Two rules, whether such rules will be implemented consistently across taxing jurisdictions, how such rules interact with existing national tax laws and whether such rules are consistent with existing tax treaty obligations. Accordingly, the final adoption, implementation, and interpretation of Pillar Two across all jurisdictions where we do business could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
President Trump has indicated his willingness to increase the use of tariffs by the U.S. to accomplish certain U.S. policy goals. On February 1, 2025, President Trump signed three executive orders announcing his intent to impose 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico and a 10% additional tariff on imports from China. While the implementation of tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada were paused, the Chinese tariffs took effect as scheduled and China responded by implementing 15% tariffs on certain U.S. imports. The implementation of new tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China or other countries for an extended period and without specific exemptions for our products, and any reciprocal tariffs or other reactions by other countries thereto, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.