Clorox Company: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

The Board, through the Audit Committee, is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and IT risks and its framework and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee receives quarterly updates on the topics set forth above from the CISIO, CIDO, and Chief Legal and External Affairs Officer. The Board retains responsibility for the overall process of assessing and managing major risks facing the Company and receives updates regarding information security and cybersecurity risks as part of its oversight of ERM. The CIDO and Chief Legal and External Affairs Officer provide quarterly updates to the Board on topics that may include information security and cybersecurity matters. The Board may also be notified and engaged as part of the Company's cybersecurity incident response plans, depending on the severity of the impact of an incident. The Board and Audit Committee include directors with knowledge, skills and experience in data security, privacy, IT governance, and management of cyber risks.

The Board, through the Audit Committee, is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to data privacy, cybersecurity and IT risks and its framework and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee receives quarterly updates from the CISIO on the topics set forth above, in addition to the Chief Legal Officer and CIDO. The Board retains responsibility for the overall process for assessing and managing major risks facing the Company and receives updates regarding information security and cybersecurity risks as part of its oversight of ERM. The CIDO and Chief Legal Officer provide quarterly updates to the Board on topics that may include information security and cybersecurity matters. The Board may also be notified and engaged as part of the Company's cybersecurity incident response plans, depending on the 22 22 22 Table of Contents Table of Contents severity of the impact of an incident. The Board and Audit Committee include directors with knowledge, skills and experience in data security, privacy, IT governance, and management of cyber risks.

Unfavorable general economic factors that are beyond the Company's control have materially adversely affected, and could continue to materially adversely affect, its business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. These factors include, but are not limited to, inflation, tariffs, recession and economic slowdown, labor shortages, wage pressures, and supply chain disruptions, as well as housing markets, consumer credit availability, consumer debt levels, fuel and energy costs, interest rate fluctuations, tax rates and policy, unemployment trends, natural disasters, pandemics/epidemics, civil disturbances and terrorist activities, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, conditions affecting the retail environment for the Company's products and other factors that influence consumer demand, spending and preferences that could impact the demand for the Company's products and negatively impact its net sales and results of operations. In addition, geopolitical instability (including the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, the potential for escalation in hostilities between the U.S. and Iran, and rising tensions between China and Taiwan); actual and potential shifts in U.S. and foreign trade, economic and other policies (including as a result of escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and its trading 2 The Company's fiscal year 2025 RIR of 0.66 means that for every 100 full-time equivalent Clorox employees globally, the Company averaged less than one recordable incident during the past year. The criteria used to determine RIR follows the U.S. Department of Labor’s OSHA guidelines and is applied globally. The RIR does not include workers at offices with fewer than 10 employees, but it does include remote workers. 6 6 6 Table of Contents Table of Contents partners, including China, particularly due to the imposition of tariffs by the U.S. and retaliatory tariffs by those partners); and other global events, have significantly increased global macroeconomic uncertainty and volatility. Sustained macroeconomic uncertainty and volatility and geopolitical instability could undermine global consumer confidence and could continue to reduce consumer spending and purchasing power, thereby reducing demand for the Company's products, and continue to disrupt global supply chains, impacting the availability and cost of transportation, logistics, raw materials, commodities, labor and packaging. Furthermore, U.S. government policy or election outcomes may prompt nationalist sentiment abroad, potentially resulting in targeted boycotts of U.S. products and services, which could adversely affect demand for the Company’s products in certain international markets and negatively impact financial results. This uncertainty and volatility also make it difficult for the Company, as well as its customers, suppliers, distributors and business partners to anticipate the resulting impacts and to accurately forecast, make financial projections, and plan future business activities, which may, in turn, cause customers to limit their purchase orders or affect their ability to pay amounts owed to the Company in a timely manner or at all, or adversely affect its business partners' ability to supply or provide services. These situations continue to evolve, and there is significant uncertainty as to their full or related impacts on the global economy and geopolitical relations, in general, and on the Company’s business, in particular. These geopolitical conflicts and tensions may also heighten other risks disclosed in this Report, including relating to cybersecurity, any of which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations, cash flows and/or financial condition. The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, the indirect impacts of the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, including increases in the cost of raw and packaging materials and commodities (including the price of oil), supply chain and logistics challenges, and it is not possible to predict the broader or longer-term consequences of these conflicts or the sanctions and export controls imposed in response to each conflict. Increasing unfavorable macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions have caused, and may also lead to, recession risk, increased credit and collectability risks, higher borrowing costs or reduced availability of capital and credit markets, reduced liquidity, asset impairments, declines in the value of the Company's financial instruments, and failures of counterparties including financial institutions and insurers. If any financial institution party to the Company's credit or other financing arrangements were to declare bankruptcy or become insolvent, they may be unable to perform under their agreements with the Company, which could result in reduced borrowing capacity. In addition, if any parties with which the Company conducts business are unable to access funds pursuant to such instruments or lending arrangements with such a financial institution, such parties’ ability to continue to fund their business and perform their obligations to the Company could be adversely affected. Any of these factors could negatively and materially impact the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Unfavorable general economic factors that are beyond the Company's control have materially adversely affected, and could continue to materially adversely affect, its business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. These factors include, but are not limited to, supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, wage pressures, ongoing elevated levels of inflation, recession and economic slowdown, as well as housing markets, consumer credit availability, consumer debt levels, fuel and energy costs (for example, the price of gasoline or alternative energy sources), rising interest rates, tax rates and policy, unemployment trends, the impact of natural disasters, pandemics/epidemics, civil disturbances and terrorist activities, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, conditions affecting the retail environment for the Company's products and other matters that influence consumer demand, spending and preferences that could impact the demand for the Company's products and negatively impact its net sales and results of operations. In addition, geopolitical instability, including the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and rising tensions between China and Taiwan, actual and potential shifts in U.S. and foreign trade, economic and other policies, including as a result of escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and its trading partners, including China, as well as other global events, have significantly increased global macroeconomic uncertainty and volatility. Sustained macroeconomic uncertainty and volatility and geopolitical instability, including relating to the results of elections, could undermine global consumer confidence and could continue to reduce consumers’ purchasing power, thereby reducing demand for the Company's products, and continue to disrupt global supply chains, impacting the availability and cost of transportation, logistics, raw materials, commodities, labor and packaging. This uncertainty and volatility also make it difficult for the Company, as well as its customers, suppliers, distributors and business partners to anticipate the resulting impacts and to accurately forecast and plan future business activities, which may, in turn, cause customers to limit their purchase orders or affect their ability to pay amounts owed to the Company in a timely manner or at all, or adversely affect its business partners' ability to supply or provide services. These situations are evolving, and there is significant uncertainty as to their full or related impacts on the global economy and geopolitical relations, in general, and on the Company’s business, in particular. These geopolitical conflicts and tensions may also heighten other risks 7 7 7 Table of Contents Table of Contents disclosed in this Report, any of which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, results of operations, cash flows and/or financial condition. The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, the indirect impacts of the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, including increases in the cost of raw and packaging materials and commodities (including the price of oil), supply chain and logistics challenges, and it is not possible to predict the broader or longer-term consequences of these conflicts or the sanctions and export controls imposed in response to each conflict. The situation continues to evolve and significant uncertainties regarding the full impact of these conflicts or the related impacts on the global economy and geopolitical relations remain. Increasing unfavorable macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions have caused, and may also lead to, recession risk, increased credit and collectability risks, higher borrowing costs or reduced availability of capital and credit markets, reduced liquidity, asset impairments, declines in the value of the Company's financial instruments, and failures of counterparties including financial institutions and insurers. If any financial institution party to the Company's credit or other financing arrangements were to declare bankruptcy or become insolvent, they may be unable to perform under their agreements with the Company, which could result in reduced borrowing capacity. In addition, if any parties with which the Company conducts business are unable to access funds pursuant to such instruments or lending arrangements with such a financial institution, such parties’ ability to continue to fund their business and perform their obligations to the Company could be adversely affected. Any of these factors could negatively and materially impact the Company's business, financial condition, and results of operations.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had approximately $2.5 billion of debt. The Company’s indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could: •require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of its cash flow to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures, future acquisitions, dividends, repurchase the Company’s common stock and for other general corporate purposes; •limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for or reacting to general adverse macroeconomic conditions or changes in its business and the industries in which it operates; •place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt; and •limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in the Company’s debt documents, its ability to borrow additional funds. The Company may also incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund acquisitions, repurchase stock or fund other activities for general business purposes. Certain of the Company’s over-the-counter derivative agreements require the Company to maintain investment-grade credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. As of June 30, 2025, the Company’s credit ratings were both investment-grade. However, a downgrade below investment-grade would allow the Company’s derivative instrument counterparties to request full collateralization, which may negatively impact the Company’s other financial arrangements, including the Company’s supply chain financing, which could, in turn, impact its working capital. The Company has historically declared and paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock and has repurchased stock subject to certain limitations under its stock repurchase programs. The board of directors’ determination to continue these actions will depend on its assessment that they are in the best interests of the Company’s shareholders. In the event the Company ceases these activities, the Company’s stock price could be adversely affected. 19 19 19 Table of Contents Table of Contents ITEM 1.B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. 20 20 20 Table of Contents Table of Contents ITEM 1.C. CYBERSECURITY

As of June 30, 2024, the Company had approximately $2.5 billion of debt. The Company’s indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could: • require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of its cash flow to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures, future acquisitions, dividends, repurchase the Company’s common stock and for other general corporate purposes; • limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for or reacting to general adverse economic conditions or changes in its business and the industries in which it operates; • place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt; and • limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in the Company’s debt documents, its ability to borrow additional funds. The Company may also incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund acquisitions, repurchase stock or fund other activities for general business purposes. Further, certain terms of the agreements governing the Company’s over-the-counter derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company’s credit ratings, assigned by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s to the Company, to remain at investment-grade or above. As of June 30, 2024, the Company’s Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s ratings were both investment-grade. However, if these credit ratings were to fall below investment-grade, the counterparties to the derivative instruments in net liability positions could request full collateralization, and it may negatively impact the Company’s other financial arrangements, including the supply chain financing arrangement offered by a financial institution to the Company's suppliers, which could, in turn, impact its working capital. The Company has historically declared and paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock and has been authorized to repurchase its stock subject to certain limitations under its stock repurchase programs. Any determinations by the board of directors to continue to declare and pay cash dividends on the Company’s common stock or to repurchase the Company’s common stock, however, will be based on a number of factors, including the board of directors’ continuing determination that the repurchase programs and the declaration and payment of dividends are in the best interests of the Company’s stockholders. In the event the Company does not declare and pay a quarterly dividend or repurchase its stock, the Company’s stock price could be adversely affected. ITEM 1.B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 1.C. CYBERSECURITY

In recent years, proxy contests and other forms of shareholder activism have been directed against numerous public companies. During fiscal years 2012 and 2011, the Company was the target of an unsolicited takeover proposal from a shareholder activist, which resulted in significant costs to the Company. If such a proposal were to be made again, the Company would likely incur significant costs, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Shareholder activists may also seek to involve themselves in the governance, strategic direction and operations of the Company through shareholder proposals or otherwise. Such proposals may disrupt the Company’s business and divert the attention of the Company’s management and employees, and any perceived uncertainties as to the Company’s future direction resulting from such a situation could result in the loss of potential business opportunities, the perception that the Company needs a change in the direction of its business, or the perception that the Company is unstable or lacks continuity, which may be exploited by its competitors, cause concern to its current or potential customers, and make it more difficult for the Company to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, which could adversely affect the Company’s business. In addition, actions of activist shareholders may cause significant fluctuations in the Company's stock price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of its business.

In recent years, proxy contests and other forms of stockholder activism have been directed against numerous public companies. During fiscal years 2012 and 2011, the Company was the target of an unsolicited takeover proposal from a stockholder activist, which resulted in significant costs to the Company. If such a proposal were to be made again, the Company would likely incur significant costs, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Stockholder activists may also seek to involve themselves in the governance, strategic direction and operations of the Company through stockholder proposals or otherwise. Such proposals may disrupt the Company’s business and divert the attention of the Company’s management and employees, and any perceived uncertainties as to the Company’s future direction resulting from such a situation could result in the loss of potential business opportunities, the perception that the Company needs a change in the direction of its business, or the perception that the Company is unstable or lacks continuity, which may be exploited by its competitors, cause concern to its current or potential customers, and make it more difficult for the Company to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, which could adversely affect the Company’s business. In addition, actions of activist stockholders may cause significant fluctuations in the Company's stock price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of its business.

The Company’s manufacturing, processing, formulation, packaging, labeling, storage, distribution, advertising, and sale of its products and business operations must comply with extensive, increasingly varied, and complex federal, state, and foreign laws and regulations. In the U.S., this includes oversight from agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration (including applicable current good manufacturing practice regulations), the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Additionally, significant and wide-ranging reforms, regulatory changes, policies, and executive orders, changing enforcement priorities, and staffing reductions at governmental agencies at the federal level in 2025 have introduced uncertainty regarding future regulatory impacts, including around product safety standards, labeling requirements, or approval processes, which may delay product launches, increase compliance risk, or impact the Company’s ability to bring new products to market expeditiously or efficiently. The Company could also be subject to future inquiries or investigations by governmental or other regulatory bodies, and any determination of non-compliance with applicable laws could result in impairment charges, significant fines, penalties, or other sanctions that may adversely affect its business, reputation, and financial performance. Moreover, federal, state, and foreign governments may introduce new or expand existing legislation and regulations, or impose more stringent interpretations of current laws, requiring the Company to enhance its resources, capabilities, and expertise. For instance, the Company is subject to environmental regulations related to the transportation, storage, and use of certain chemicals. It may also face increased costs or mandatory funding obligations under extended producer responsibility regulations (such as plastic or packaging taxes, recycling, and waste management programs) or restrictions on materials and packaging types. These requirements could raise raw material acquisition and compliance costs, limit material availability, or make the Company’s products more expensive and less competitive, thereby reducing consumer demand. Furthermore, the Company is subject to rapidly evolving and increasingly complex legal and regulatory requirements in areas such as sustainability disclosure, sustainable packaging (including plastic packaging), data privacy, executive compensation, and corporate governance. The lack of regulatory convergence across jurisdictions, especially at the state level, may further increase compliance costs. Due to its extensive international operations, the Company could be adversely affected by violations, or allegations of violations, of the FCPA and similar international anti-bribery laws. The Company cannot provide assurance that its internal controls policies and procedures that mandate compliance with these laws will protect the Company from reckless, intentional or unintentional criminal acts committed by its employees, joint-venture partners or agents. Alleged or actual violations of these laws could disrupt the Company's business and adversely affect its reputation and its business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company's multi-year phased upgrade to its digital capabilities, including replacement of its ERP system, will result in changes to its processes and procedures which, in turn, could result in changes to its internal controls over financial reporting, which may require significant effort and judgment. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, including as a result of failure of the ERP system to work properly, could limit the Company’s ability to report its results of operations accurately and on a timely basis, or to detect and prevent fraud and could expose it to regulatory 15 15 15 Table of Contents Table of Contents enforcement action and shareholder claims, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Fluctuations in federal, state, local and foreign taxes or a change to uncertain tax positions, including related interest and penalties, may also impact the Company’s effective tax rate and the Company’s results of operations. Changes in tax laws, including additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or similar bodies of state, local and foreign governments could create uncertainty, impact the Company's recorded liability in future periods and have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations. For example, on July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was enacted in the United States. The act contains a number of provisions that are applicable to U.S. corporate taxpayers. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this legislation on its consolidated financial statements. Additionally, on December 20, 2021, the Organization for Economic Development released a set of model rules, known as the Global Anti-Base Erosion rules (GloBE rules) or “Pillar Two,” designed to ensure that large multinational enterprises pay a minimum 15% tax on income arising in each jurisdiction in which they operate. Many countries have implemented Pillar Two, and the Company has been subject to Pillar Two in certain foreign jurisdictions beginning this past fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The Company has evaluated and will continue to monitor the impact of the GloBE rules but does not anticipate that they will have a material impact on the Company's effective tax rate and cash flows. See also “Critical Accounting Estimates—Income Taxes” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ” in Exhibit 99.1 for more information on factors influencing the determination of our effective tax rate and tax positions. If the Company is found to be noncompliant with applicable laws and regulations in these or other areas, it could be subject to governmental or regulatory actions, including fines, import detentions, injunctions, product withdrawals or recalls or asset seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business. Loss of or failure to obtain necessary permits and registrations, particularly with respect to its charcoal business, could delay or prevent the Company from meeting current product demand, introducing new products, building new facilities or acquiring new businesses and could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. In order to comply with any changes in these laws and regulations, the Company may be required to make changes to product formulation, labeling or marketing claims, perform additional testing to substantiate its product claims, make costly changes in its manufacturing processes or supply chain or stop selling certain products until corrective actions have been taken. Any of these developments could increase the Company’s costs significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Generally, the manufacture, processing, formulation, packaging, labeling, storage, distribution, advertising and sale of the Company’s products and its business operations must comply with extensive federal, state and foreign laws and regulations, including, in the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration (including applicable current good manufacturing practice regulations), the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. There is also an increased risk of fraud or corruption in certain foreign jurisdictions and related difficulties in maintaining effective internal controls. Additionally, the Company could be subject to future inquiries or investigations by governmental and other regulatory bodies. Any determination that the Company’s operations or activities are not in compliance with applicable law could expose the Company to future impairment charges or significant fines, penalties or other sanctions that may result in a reduction in net income or otherwise adversely impact the business and reputation of the Company. The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company's multi-year phased upgrade to its digital capabilities will result in changes to its processes and procedures which, in turn, could result in changes to its internal controls over financial reporting, which may require significant effort and judgment. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit the Company’s ability to report its results of operations accurately and on a timely basis, or to detect and prevent fraud and could expose it to regulatory enforcement action and stockholder claims, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Fluctuations in federal, state, local and foreign taxes or a change to uncertain tax positions, including related interest and penalties, may also impact the Company’s effective tax rate and the Company’s results of operations. Changes in tax laws, including additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury Department, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service or similar bodies of state, local and foreign governments could create uncertainty, impact the Company's recorded liability in future periods and have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations. For example, on December 20, 2021, the Organization for Economic Development released a set of model rules designed to ensure that large multinational enterprises pay a minimum 15% tax on income arising in each jurisdiction in which they operate. The model rules are known as the Global Anti-Base Erosion rules (GloBE rules) or “Pillar Two”. Many countries have agreed to implement Pillar Two, and the Company will be subject to Pillar Two in certain foreign jurisdictions beginning with its fiscal year ending June 30, 2025. The Company does not expect Pillar Two to materially impact its effective tax rate or cash flows. The Company will continue to monitor and evaluate new legislation and guidance, which could impact this assessment. The, Company, because of the its extensive international operations, could be adversely affected by violations, or allegations of violations, of the FCPA and similar international anti-bribery laws. These anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other third parties for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The Company cannot provide assurance that its internal controls policies and procedures that mandate compliance with these laws will protect the Company from reckless, intentional or unintentional criminal acts committed by its employees, joint-venture partners or agents. Alleged or actual violations of these laws could disrupt the Company's business and adversely affect its reputation and its business, financial condition and results of operations. Federal, state and foreign governments may introduce new or expand existing legislation and regulations, or courts or governmental authorities could impose more stringent interpretations of existing legislation and regulations, affecting the Company’s operations, which may require the Company to increase its resources, capabilities and expertise in certain areas. For example, the Company is subject to regulations regarding the transportation, storage or use of certain chemicals to protect the environment, including as a result of evolving climate change standards, and is and may become subject to increased costs or mandatory funding or financial support requirements for recycling and waste management programs under extended producer responsibility regulation or laws, through plastic or packaging taxes, or restrictions on certain products and materials or on the use of certain types of packaging. Such regulations could negatively impact the Company’s ability to obtain raw materials or could increase its acquisition and compliance costs or cause the Company to contribute funds to recycling and other waste management infrastructure, thus making its products more costly, less competitive than other competitive products or reduce 16 16 16 Table of Contents Table of Contents consumer demand. Furthermore, additional or amended legislation in the areas of ESG disclosure, healthcare reform, sustainability of packaging, including plastic packaging, executive compensation and corporate governance, could also increase the Company’s costs. The Company is also required to comply with increasingly complex and changing laws and regulations enacted to protect business and personal data in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, which have and could continue to subject the Company to additional compliance costs. If the Company is found to be noncompliant with applicable laws and regulations in these or other areas, it could be subject to governmental or regulatory actions, including fines, import detentions, injunctions, product withdrawals or recalls or asset seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business. Loss of or failure to obtain necessary permits and registrations, particularly with respect to its charcoal business, could delay or prevent the Company from meeting current product demand, introducing new products, building new facilities or acquiring new businesses and could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company markets and sells products that are subject to regulations relating to dietary supplements. In order to comply with any changes in these laws and regulations, including any changes that result from newly published clinical studies and emerging studies that may assert or prove that ingredients in the Company's products or the products themselves are ineffective or harmful to consumers, the Company may be required to make changes to product formulation, labeling or marketing claims, perform additional testing to substantiate its product claims, make costly changes in its manufacturing processes or supply chain or stop selling certain products until corrective actions have been taken. Any of these developments could increase the Company’s costs significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their sustainability policies and practices. In particular, there is increasing focus by governmental and non-governmental organizations, investors, customers, consumers, employees and other stakeholders on sustainability matters, such as climate change, water use, deforestation, biodiversity, plastic waste, responsible sourcing, animal welfare, labor and employment practices and human rights, as well as diversity and inclusion efforts. Changing consumer preferences may also result in increased demands regarding plastics and packaging materials, including single-use and non-recyclable plastic packaging, and other components of the Company's products and their environmental impact on sustainability; a growing demand for natural or organic products and ingredients; or increasing consumer concerns or perceptions (whether accurate or inaccurate) regarding the effects of ingredients or substances present in certain consumer products. These demands could impact the profitability of some of the Company's products, or cause it to incur additional manufacturing or other costs which may not be recoverable through price increases or increased sales volumes, make changes to its operations, make additional commitments, set targets or establish additional goals and take actions to meet them, which could expose the Company to market, operational and execution costs or risks. Certain investors and other stakeholders have expressed negative sentiment regarding corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives, including sustainability and diversity and inclusion practices. In addition, recent regulatory actions and executive orders issued by the current U.S. presidential administration have targeted these areas. The Company’s practices and efforts in these areas may not align with the expectations of all stakeholders, which could negatively affect our relationships with certain stakeholders. Furthermore, our activities in these areas could expose us to increased regulatory or legal scrutiny, potential product boycotts, or other actions that may harm our reputation or adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. The Company is subject to climate-related transition risks, including increased energy costs due to increasing demand for alternative energy sources and new or increased legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate impacts to the environment. Evolving and increasing regulatory requirements, including in relation to sustainability, such as extended producer responsibility or environmental or emissions standards could cause disruptions in the Company's manufacturing processes or increase operating, energy, raw materials and compliance costs. The Company may undertake additional costs to control, assess and report on sustainability metrics as the nature, scope and complexity of sustainability reporting, diligence and disclosure requirements expand. The ability to achieve any stated goal, target, or objective is subject to numerous factors and 16 16 16 Table of Contents Table of Contents conditions, many of which are outside of the Company's control. For example, working towards achieving the Company's goals will require significant effort by and resources from the Company and stakeholders, including suppliers and business partners, governmental entities and the development and adoption of technology that may not currently exist or exist at scale. Stakeholder perception of, or opposition to, the Company’s actions or inaction with respect to the environment and other sustainability matters or its ability to effectively respond to new, or changes in, related legal or regulatory requirements could lead to negative publicity, which could result in reduced demand for the Company’s products, damage to its reputation or increase the risk of litigation, regulatory proceedings, inquiries or investigations and could adversely affect the Company’s business and reputation.

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny relating to their ESG policies. In particular, customers, consumers, investors and other stakeholders are increasingly focusing on environmental issues, including climate change, water use, deforestation, biodiversity, plastic waste, responsible sourcing and other sustainability concerns. Changing consumer preferences may also result in increased demands regarding plastics and packaging materials, including single-use and non-recyclable plastic packaging, and other components of the Company's products and their environmental impact on sustainability; a growing demand for natural or organic products and ingredients; or increasing consumer concerns or perceptions (whether accurate or inaccurate) regarding the effects of ingredients or substances present in certain consumer products. These demands could impact the profitability of some of the Company's products, cause it to incur additional costs, to make changes to its operations, or to make additional commitments, set targets or establish additional goals and take actions to meet them, which could expose the Company to market, operational and execution costs or risks. In addition, governmental and non-governmental organizations, investors, customers, consumers, employees and other stakeholders have placed increasing importance on ESG matters, such as animal welfare, labor and employment practices and human rights, and depending on their assessment of its ESG practices, certain investors may reconsider their investment in the Company, which may hinder the Company’s access to capital. The Company is subject to climate-related transition risks, including increased energy costs due to increasing demand for alternative energy sources and new or increased legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate impacts to the environment. Increased regulatory requirements, including in relation to various aspects of ESG, such as extended producer responsibility, or environmental causes may result in increased compliance or input costs of energy, raw materials or compliance with emissions standards, which may cause disruptions in the manufacture of the Company's products or an increase in operating costs. The Company may undertake additional costs to control, assess and report on ESG metrics as the nature, scope and complexity of ESG reporting, diligence and disclosure requirements expand. The ability to achieve any stated goal, target, or objective is subject to numerous factors and conditions, many of which are outside of the Company's control. For example, working towards achieving the Company's goals will require significant effort by and resources from the Company and stakeholders, including suppliers and business partners, governmental entities and the development and adoption of technology that may not currently exist or exist at scale. Lack of progress on or failure to achieve its ESG goals or a perception (whether or not valid) of its failure to act responsibly with respect to the environment and other sustainability matters, such as single-use plastic, or to effectively respond to new, or changes in, legal or regulatory requirements concerning environmental or other ESG matters, or increased operating or manufacturing costs due to increased regulation or environmental causes could lead to negative publicity, which could result in reduced demand for the Company’s products, damage to its reputation or increase the risk of litigation, regulatory proceedings, inquiries or investigations and could adversely affect the Company’s business and reputation.

The Company’s success depends, in part, on its continuing ability to identify, hire, develop and retain highly qualified personnel with diverse perspectives, experiences, and backgrounds that reflect the Company’s varied and diverse consumer base, at all levels of the business, including management and in its manufacturing facilities. The Company's ability to attract and retain talent has been and may continue to be impacted by a number of factors, including employee morale, its reputation, competition from other employers and availability of qualified individuals in key geographic areas such as the San Francisco Bay Area, and challenges in the labor market, particularly in the U.S., which has increasing labor costs, sustained labor shortages, and changing worker and talent market expectations around flexible work models and relocation. Increased labor costs as a result of increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover rates, increased employee benefit costs, or labor union organizing efforts could increase the Company’s operating expenses, and its growth and results of operations could be adversely impacted. The Company continues executing organizational change, which may impact hiring and retention efforts. Related activities to identify, hire and onboard qualified talent at increasing compensation costs may require significant time and expense which could further adversely affect the Company’s operations and financial results. The Company’s success also depends on its 11 11 11 Table of Contents Table of Contents ability to retain its key personnel, including its executive officers and senior management team, and to continue to implement its succession plans for senior management and other key employees. The unexpected loss or unavailability of one or more of the Company’s key leaders could disrupt its business.

The Company’s success depends, in part, on its continuing ability to identify, hire, develop and retain highly qualified and diverse personnel. The Company's ability to attract and retain talent has been and may continue to be impacted by a number of factors, including employee morale, its reputation, competition from other employers and availability of qualified individuals in key geographic areas such as the San Francisco Bay Area, and challenges in the labor market, particularly in the U.S., which has increasing labor costs, sustained labor shortages, and changing worker and talent market expectations around flexible work models and relocation. Increased labor costs as a result of increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover rates, increased employee benefit costs, or labor union organizing efforts could increase the Company’s operating expenses, and its growth and results of operations could be adversely impacted. The Company continues executing organizational change, which may impact hiring and retention efforts. Related activities to identify, hire and onboard qualified talent at increasing compensation costs may require significant time and expense which could further adversely affect the Company’s operations and financial results. The Company’s success also depends on its ability to retain its key personnel, including its executive officers and senior management team, and to continue to implement its succession plans for senior management and other key employees. The unexpected loss or unavailability of one or more of the Company’s key leaders could disrupt its business.

A large percentage of the Company’s revenues comes from mature markets that are subject to high levels of competition. During fiscal year 2025, 86% of the Company’s net sales were attributable to U.S. markets, including U.S. territories. U.S. markets for consumer goods are considered more mature and commonly characterized by high household penetration, particularly with respect to our most significant product categories. The Company’s ability to achieve its sales growth targets depends on its ability to successfully introduce new products, brands, line extensions, and product innovations, or enter or expand into adjacent product categories, sales channels, markets or countries. Even if we are successful at increasing sales, a general decline in the markets for the Company’s product categories has had, and may in the future have, a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and ability to meet its sales growth targets. Further, the Company’s product, category and/or geographic mix may hinder the Company’s ability to meet these strategic targets, especially in conjunction with ongoing macroeconomic volatility, which would adversely impact its profitability and financial results.

A large percentage of the Company’s revenues comes from mature markets that are subject to high levels of competition. During fiscal year 2024, 84% of the Company’s net sales were attributable to U.S. markets, including U.S. territories. The Company’s ability to achieve sales growth depends on its ability to drive growth through innovation, including as part of its IGNITE Strategy, expand into new products and categories, channels and countries, invest in its established brands and enhanced merchandising, grow categories with retailers and capture market share from competitors. The Company has implemented price increases and may implement additional price increases in the future, including to account for increasing costs, which may adversely affect sales volumes. In addition, competitors may or may not take competitive actions, which may lead to sales declines and loss of market share. If the Company is unable to increase market share in existing product lines, develop product innovations, undertake sales, marketing and advertising initiatives that grow its product categories, effectively adopt and leverage existing and emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence or machine learning, and/or develop, acquire or successfully launch new products or brands, it may not achieve its sales growth objectives. Furthermore, a general decline in the markets for certain product categories has had and may in the future have a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, changes to the mix of products that the Company sells, as well as the mix of countries in which its products are sold, may adversely impact the Company’s net sales, profitability and cash flow.