high match confidence
Sentence-level differences:
- Reworded sentence: "We use AI-powered tools and services as part of operating our business, and we also incorporate AI features and applications into our products and solutions."
- Reworded sentence: "Our competitors and other third parties may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively."
- Added sentence: "In the U.S., ongoing tension between the states and the federal government over how best to regulate AI may result in increased uncertainty, risk and compliance costs for our business."
- Reworded sentence: "A number of jurisdictions, including many U.S."
Current (2026):
We use AI-powered tools and services as part of operating our business, and we also incorporate AI features and applications into our products and solutions. We are also making further investments in expanding AI capabilities in our products and solutions. AI technologies can be…
Read full text
We use AI-powered tools and services as part of operating our business, and we also incorporate AI features and applications into our products and solutions. We are also making further investments in expanding AI capabilities in our products and solutions. AI technologies can be complex and are rapidly evolving, and while we believe that product features powered by next generation AI technologies, such as generative AI, will help drive the future growth of our business, there is no guarantee that such new product features will ultimately be successful. Our competitors and other third parties may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, which could impair our ability to compete effectively. Furthermore, we are increasingly developing and deploying agentic AI workflows and autonomous agents designed to perform tasks and make decisions with limited human intervention. These agentic systems may act in ways that are unpredictable, exceed their intended authorization, or fail to align with our corporate policies or legal obligations. Errors, “hallucinations,” or unintended actions taken by these agents—especially in customer-facing or operationally critical environments—could lead to significant financial loss, data breaches, contractual breaches, or regulatory non-compliance. Furthermore, we may face allegations of “AI washing” if our disclosures about our AI capabilities or our AI-related governance are deemed to be exaggerated or misleading, which could result in enforcement actions, litigation or reputational harm. The development and use of AI present various intellectual property, data privacy, and security risks. Significant investment in the development and maintenance of proprietary datasets and training models and the development of appropriate protections, safeguards, and policies for handling the processing of data, including transparency of customer data extraction and usage in training models may be costly and may subject us to legal liability. Additionally, the agentic AI systems described above may inadvertently access or disclose sensitive information beyond their intended scope or be subject to “prompt injection” and other cyberattacks that could cause the agents to take unauthorized or harmful actions. Any integration of third-party AI functionality with our products and solutions relies on safeguards implemented by the third-party developers of the underlying AI models, including those related to the accuracy, bias, and other variables of the data, and these safeguards may be insufficient. The continued use of AI technology to develop our products and solutions may give rise to risks related to intellectual property infringement. If the AI technology we use generates code or materials that are similar to other proprietary code or materials, or to software that is protected by patents, we could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims. We may also not be able to anticipate and detect security vulnerabilities in such AI-generated software code, including those that could be induced by a maliciously trained AI model. To the extent we use third-party AI technology to develop software code, the terms of use of these tools may reserve rights in the generated code. We could also suffer loss of confidentiality, trade secret rights or other intellectual property rights or cause harm to privacy rights of third parties because of our use of AI technology. Existing laws and regulations may be interpreted, or new laws and regulations regarding AI have been and may in the future be adopted and interpreted, in ways which could negatively affect the way we use AI in our products. For example, the EU Artificial Intelligence Act prohibits certain AI applications and systems with unacceptable risk and imposes additional requirements on the use of other high-risk or limited-risk AI applications or systems, which may require the implementation of additional quality assurance controls and measures to be reviewed and approved by regulatory submissions of our products. In the U.S., ongoing tension between the states and the federal government over how best to regulate AI may result in increased uncertainty, risk and compliance costs for our business. Intellectual property ownership issues, licensing and privacy rights surrounding AI technologies are evolving and have not been fully addressed by U.S. federal or state courts or foreign jurisdictions, which may expose us to claims of intellectual property infringement or misappropriation or privacy rights violations, or result in inquiries by government bodies or agencies. A number of jurisdictions, including many U.S. states such as California and Colorado, have proposed or enacted laws regarding automated decision‑making, algorithmic discrimination and so called “high‑risk” AI technologies (mandating, among other provisions, requirements for risk management, impact assessments, consumer notices and human oversight), which may impact our use of AI and AI-powered tools. If the content, analyses, or recommendations arising from our AI product offerings are, or are alleged to be, inaccurate, deficient, offensive, or biased, or if they have a perceived or actual negative impact on human rights, privacy rights, employment, or in other social contexts, we may experience brand and reputational harm or legal liability, and our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected. The significant technical complexity of AI technology also requires specialized expertise and may increase compensation-related expenses. Competition for specialized personnel in the AI industry is intense, and failing to attract, integrate, or retain such expertise could adversely affect our business. Finally, the AI models we develop may not perform as expected when deployed, which could lead to financial losses or harm our competitive position. Any of the foregoing risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
View prior text (2025)
We use AI-powered tools and services as part of operating our business, and also incorporate AI features and applications into our products and solutions and are making further investments in expanding AI capabilities in our products and solutions. AI technologies can be complex and are rapidly evolving, and while we believe that product features powered by next generation AI technologies, such as generative AI, will help drive the future growth of our business, there is no guarantee that such new product features will ultimately be successful. Our competitors and other third parties may incorporate AI into their products more quickly or more successfully than us, all of which could impair our ability to compete effectively and may adversely affect our results of operations. This use of AI in our products and solutions may present new and evolving challenges, including reputational harm, competitive harm, and legal liability, and adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, AI technology may lower barriers to entry in our industry and we may be unable to effectively compete with the products or services offered by new competitors. AI-related changes to the products and services on offer may affect our customers’ expectations or requirements in ways we cannot adequately anticipate or adapt to, causing our business to lose sales, market share, or the ability to operate profitably and sustainably. The development and use of AI features and applications present various intellectual property, data privacy, security and reliability risks that may impact our business. We may choose to significantly invest in the development and maintenance of proprietary datasets and training models and the development of appropriate protections, safeguards, and policies for handling the processing of data, including transparency of customer data extraction and usage in training models, with our AI features and applications, which may be costly and subject us to legal liability. Furthermore, any integration of third-party AI models with our products and solutions relies on certain safeguards implemented by the third-party developers of the underlying AI models, including those related to the accuracy, bias, and other variables of the data, and these safeguards may be insufficient. These risks could negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Existing laws and regulations may be interpreted, or new laws and regulations regarding AI have been and may in the future be adopted and interpreted, in ways which could negatively affect the way we use AI in our products. For example, the EU Artificial Intelligence Act prohibits certain AI applications and systems with unacceptable risk and imposes additional requirements on the use of other high-risk or limited-risk AI applications or systems, which may require the implementation of additional quality assurance controls and measures to be reviewed and approved by regulatory submissions of our products. Intellectual property ownership issues, licensing and privacy rights surrounding AI technologies are evolving and have not been fully addressed by U.S. federal or state courts or foreign jurisdictions, which may expose us to claims of intellectual property infringement or misappropriation or privacy rights violations, or result in inquiries by government bodies or agencies. For example, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission initiated multiple AI-related inquiries over the past several years and sent requests to technology companies, including Docusign, seeking additional information about their AI usage and policies. The rapid evolution of AI technologies will require significant resources in research and development in order to develop, test and maintain our platform and products to minimize any potential harmful impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The continued use in our business and incorporation of AI-powered features and applications into our products and solutions may subject us to new and evolving regulatory scrutiny, litigation, social or ethical concerns, unforeseen operational failures, potential for biased or incorrect outputs, or other risks that could harm our business, reputation, brand, and our results of operations. For example, if the content, analyses, or recommendations arising from our AI product offerings are, or are alleged to be, inaccurate, deficient, offensive, or biased, or if they have a perceived or actual negative impact on human rights, privacy rights, employment, or in other social contexts, we may experience brand and reputational harm or legal liability, and our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected. Additionally, the significant technical complexity of AI technology will require specialized expertise and may increase compensation-related expenses. Competition for specialized personnel in the AI industry is intense, and failing to attract, integrate, or retain such specialized expertise in AI could adversely affect our business and results of operations. There is also the possibility that the AI models we develop may not perform as expected when deployed, which could hinder our product offerings, impact our competitiveness in the market, or lead to financial losses.