Hormel Foods Corporation: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

The Company’s operations are subject to food safety and other risks inherent to the food industry. The Company's development, production, and distribution of food products for human consumption subjects it to many risks, including:

▪food contamination caused by disease-producing organisms or pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella, and pathogenic E coli., including contamination caused by the introduction of pathogens as a result of improper handling by customers or consumers (over which the Company has no control);

▪food contamination caused by operational errors by suppliers, co-manufacturers, or in Company-owned facilities;

▪mislabeling, including with respect to food allergens;

▪food spoilage;

▪claims of false or deceptive advertising;

▪nutritional and health-related concerns;

▪federal, state, and local food processing controls;

▪consumer product liability claims;

▪product tampering; and

▪the possible unavailability and/or expense of liability insurance.

The Company may face litigation, investigations, and regulatory proceedings and be subject to liability if any of these risks materialize, including if consumption of any of the Company's products causes injury, illness, or death. Furthermore, any such events could damage the Company's relationship with its customers and lead to adverse perceptions of the Company's business and consumer boycotts. In addition, the Company may take marketplace action such as a voluntary product recall in the event of contamination or damage to any of the Company's products. For example, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025, the Company issued a voluntary, class 1 recall related to certain chicken products sold in foodservice channels. In addition, during the third quarter of fiscal 2024, the Company voluntarily recalled a limited number of Planters® products due to the potential for contamination of the product with Listeria monocytogenes. Although the Company has not been made aware of any reports of illness related to the recalled products in connection with either of these recalls, the Company has experienced costs and business impacts associated with the events. If similar events occur in the future or if any other food safety or food industry risks materialize, the Company's reputation, results of operations, and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Outbreaks of disease among livestock and poultry flocks could harm the Company’s revenues and operating margins. The Company is subject to risks associated with the outbreak of disease in pork and beef livestock, and poultry flocks, including African swine fever (ASF), Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), pneumo-virus, Porcine Circovirus 2 (PCV2), Porcine Reproduction & Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD), Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDv), and Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). The outbreak of any such diseases could adversely affect the Company’s supply of raw materials, increase the cost of production, reduce utilization of the Company’s harvest facilities, and reduce earnings. Although the Company has developed business continuity plans for various disease scenarios, there can be no assurance that these plans will be effective in reducing the negative effects of any such diseases on the Company’s results of operations. In recent years, outbreaks of ASF have impacted hog herds in China, Asia, Europe, and the Caribbean. If an outbreak of ASF were to occur in the U.S., the Company’s supply of hogs and pork could be significantly impacted. Furthermore, HPAI was detected within the Company’s turkey supply chain during fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025. HPAI could continue to be detected in the future. Future impacts of HPAI could reduce the production volume in the Company’s turkey facilities. The Company continues to monitor the situation and will take appropriate actions to protect the health of the turkeys across the supply chain.

The impact of a changing climate may also increase disease risks due to changes in weather or migratory patterns, which may result in certain types of diseases occurring more frequently or with more intense effects. Additionally, the outbreak of disease may hinder the Company’s ability to market and sell products both domestically and internationally.

Any of these outcomes could adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuations in commodity prices and availability of raw materials and other inputs could harm the Company’s results of operations. The Company’s results of operations and financial condition are largely dependent upon the cost and supply of pork, poultry, beef, feed grains, nuts, energy, and other inputs, as well as the selling prices for many of the Company’s products, which are determined by dynamic market forces of supply and demand.

The Company takes a balanced approach to sourcing pork raw materials, including hogs purchased for the Austin, Minnesota processing facility, long-term supply agreements for pork, and spot market purchases of pork. This approach is designed to ensure a more stable supply of raw materials while minimizing extreme fluctuations in costs over the long term. However, this may result, in the short term, in higher or lower live hog costs compared to the cash spot market. Market-based pricing on certain product lines, and lead time required to implement pricing adjustments, may prevent all or part of these cost increases from being recovered, and these higher costs could adversely affect the Company’s short-term financial results.

The Company raises turkeys and contracts with turkey growers to meet its raw material requirements for whole birds and processed turkey products. Results in these operations are affected by the cost and supply of feed grains, which fluctuate due to climate conditions, production forecasts, and supply and demand conditions at local, regional, national, and worldwide markets. The Company attempts to manage some of its short-term exposure to fluctuations in feed prices by forward buying, using futures contracts, and pursuing pricing advances. However, these strategies may not be adequate to overcome sustained increases in market prices due to alternate uses for feed grains or other changes in these market conditions.

The Company may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for nuts, tomatoes, avocados, or other produce if poor growing conditions have a negative effect on agricultural productivity. Reductions in crop size or quality due to unfavorable growing conditions may have an adverse effect on the Company’s results. The supplies of natural and organic proteins may impact the Company’s ability to ensure a continuing supply of these products.

International trade barriers and other restrictions or disruptions could result in decreased foreign demand and increased domestic supply of proteins, thereby potentially lowering prices. The Company occasionally utilizes in-country production to limit this exposure.

Any fluctuations in commodity prices or the availability of raw materials and other inputs necessary for the Company's business could adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

Market demand for the Company’s products may fluctuate, including due to private-label products and lower-priced alternatives. The Company faces competition from a variety of sources, including other national brands, private label producers, and producers of alternative meats and protein sources, including pork, beef, turkey, chicken, fish, nuts, nut butters, whey, and plant-based proteins. The factors on which the Company competes include:

▪price;

▪product quality and attributes;

▪brand identification;

▪breadth of product line; and

▪customer service.

For certain products and product categories there has been, and the Company expects there to continue to be, a consumer shift towards more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, including private label products, which could result in lower sales, reduced margins, and lower market share for the Company's products.

Demand for the Company’s products is also affected by competitors’ promotional spending, the effectiveness of the Company’s advertising and marketing programs, and consumer perceptions, including those related to food trends such as sustainability of product sources and animal welfare. The Company’s failure to compete successfully on any of these or other factors could lead to, among other things, reduced demand for the Company’s brands and products, which could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

The Company faces risks related to its ability to respond to changing consumer preferences, diets and eating patterns, including through its innovation and marketing investments. The Company invests in consumer insights and research and development to deliver innovative products that resonate with consumers, appeal to customers, and support sales growth. Consumer preferences for food products are impacted by a variety of factors, including convenience, flavor variety, and developments in options for weight management (e.g., the use of medications). If the Company is unsuccessful in developing and introducing new products that resonate with consumers, the return on the Company’s investment in new product development will be less than anticipated and the Company’s efforts to grow sales through innovation will be less successful than expected. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect the Company's results of operations and financial condition.

Damage to the Company’s reputation or brand image could adversely affect its business. Maintaining and enhancing the reputation of the Company and its key brands is critical to the Company's business success. The Company's reputation is largely based on perceptions. It may be difficult to address negative publicity or sensationalism across media channels, regardless of its accuracy or the reputability of its source, including as a result of fictitious media content (such as content produced by artificial intelligence or bad actors). Negative incidents (including those based on differing perspectives or opinions) involving the Company, its brands, its workforce, or others with whom the Company does business could quickly erode trust and confidence and result in changes in behavior including consumer boycotts, workforce unrest or walkouts, government investigations, and litigation. Negative reputational incidents or negative perceptions of the Company or its brands could adversely affect the Company's business and results of operations, including through lower sales, the termination of business relationships, higher costs, and team member engagement, retention, and recruiting difficulties. The Company has previously experienced negative perceptions of its business, and it could experience similar occurrences in the future. Any of these outcomes could negatively impact the Company's reputation, results of operations, and financial condition.

The Company previously established, and may continue to establish, various goals and initiatives regarding environmental, social, and governance matters, including with respect to sustainability. The Company has modified, and may continue to modify, certain of these goals and initiatives from time to time. The Company's establishment and continuation of any goals or initiatives regarding environmental, social, and governance matters, any modification or termination of such goals or initiatives, or any failure or perceived failure by the Company to achieve them, could result in negative reactions from the Company's shareholders, customers, consumers, team members, suppliers, and other third parties (including governmental entities and officials and non-governmental organizations) and lead to adverse perceptions of the Company's business, consumer boycotts, litigation, investigations, and regulatory proceedings. Any of these outcomes could negatively impact the Company's reputation, results of operations, and financial condition.

Reputational harm can also occur indirectly through companies and others with whom the Company does business or who sell the Company's products. In addition, the Company has previously had, and may in the future have, relationships with celebrities, influencers, and other individuals, including for advertising campaigns and marketing programs. If consumers have negative experiences with, or view unfavorably, any of the companies or individuals with whom the Company has relationships, it could cause them to reduce or stop purchasing the Company's products, which could adversely affect the Company's results of operations.

The potential impacts of a changing climate could have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. The potential impacts of a changing climate may be widespread and unpredictable and present a variety of risks in the short-term and long-term. The physical effects of a changing climate, such as natural disasters, extreme weather conditions, drought, and rising sea levels, could adversely affect the Company's results of operations, including by reducing the availability of necessary raw materials, increasing the cost of raw materials, increasing its energy costs, disrupting its supply chain, negatively impacting its workforce, damaging its facilities, and threatening the habitability of the locations in which the Company operates. In addition to physical risks, the potential impacts of a changing climate also present transition risks, including regulatory and reputational risks. For example, the Company uses commodities and energy inputs in its operations that may face increased regulation due to a changing climate or other environmental concerns, which could increase the Company's costs. Furthermore, the Company's establishment and continuation of sustainability goals and initiatives, or any modification, conclusion, failure, or perceived failure by the Company to achieve them, or to otherwise meet evolving, varied, and potentially conflicting expectations from the Company's shareholders, customers, consumers, team members, suppliers, and other third parties (including governmental entities and officials and non-governmental organizations) regarding the environment and the Company's goals and initiatives, could lead to adverse perceptions of the Company's business, consumer boycotts, litigation, investigations, and regulatory proceedings. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect the Company's reputation, results of operations, and financial condition.