Intercontinental Exchange Inc.: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

2026 vs 2025  ·  SEC EDGAR  ·  2026-05-22
Other years: 2025 vs 2024 · 2024 vs 2023
⚠ AI-Generated

The summary below was generated by an AI language model and may contain errors or omissions. All other content on this page is deterministically extracted from the original SEC EDGAR filing.

Intercontinental Exchange Inc. reframed its digital asset business risk disclosure by replacing language specific to Bakkt with broader language encompassing its digital asset custody operations, reflecting the evolution of that business segment. Six substantive modifications to existing risk factors addressed clearing house operations, benchmark administration, and regulatory requirements, suggesting heightened focus on operational and compliance vulnerabilities across core business lines. The minimal net change of only one added and one removed risk factor indicates the company's risk profile remained relatively stable year-over-year, with refinements concentrated on clarifying exposure in existing risk categories.

✓ Deterministic extraction — no AI-generated data

Classification is based on semantic text similarity scoring and may include approximations. “No match” means no high-confidence textual match was found — not necessarily that a section was removed.

1
New Risks
1
Removed
6
Modified
37
Unchanged
🟢 New in Current Filing

Our ownership of a digital asset custody business may introduce additional risks to our business due to its evolving business model.

In May 2025, we acquired a digital asset custody business now known as ICE Digital Trust, LLC. Our new initiatives in connection with our digital asset custody business present operational, reputational, and financial risks, including increased risk of a security breach, system…

Read full text

In May 2025, we acquired a digital asset custody business now known as ICE Digital Trust, LLC. Our new initiatives in connection with our digital asset custody business present operational, reputational, and financial risks, including increased risk of a security breach, system failure, or in connection with a decline in demand for digital assets. More specifically, the failure to safeguard and manage digital asset accounts could adversely impact our business, operating results, and financial condition. The theft, loss, or destruction of private keys required to access any crypto assets held in custody may be irreversible, and we could be held liable for customer losses. Our insurance policies may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches or incidents, and we may lose crypto assets valued in excess of the insurance policy without any recourse. Unlike bank accounts or accounts at some other financial institutions, in the event of loss or loss of utility value, there is no public insurer to offer recourse to us or to any consumer and the misappropriated crypto may not be easily traced to the bad actor. Additionally, custodial platforms are prime targets for hackers. A breach of our custody systems could lead to the theft of customer assets and unauthorized transfers, for which the company might be held liable, and traditional insurance may not adequately cover losses related to digital assets. Further, our ownership of a digital asset custody business may also involve dependencies on decentralized or other third party blockchain services and the protocols, which we do not control and in turn may expose us to new and evolving technological risks. The digital asset industry is subject to rapidly evolving and uncertain regulations at both the state and federal levels. Changes in laws or enforcement patterns, such as those related to anti-money laundering (AML) and tax reporting, could impact our ability to operate the business. Further, recent developments in the digital asset economy have led to increased volatility in digital asset markets, which in turn may increase the potential for loss of confidence in the digital asset ecosystem, or negative publicity surrounding digital assets impacting our reputation. ICE Digital Trust is a New York limited purpose trust company that is subject to extensive regulation by the NYDFS. Compliance with any such regulatory requirements increases our regulatory burden and gives rise to costs and expenses that may have a material impact on our financial condition.

🔴 No Match in Current Filing Our majority investment in Bakkt may introduce additional risks to our business due to its evolving business model. 🔒
🟡 Modified Owning clearing houses exposes us to risks, including risks related to defaults by clearing members, risks related to investing margin and guaranty funds and the cost of operating the clearing houses. 🔒
🟡 Modified Risks relating to the administration of benchmarks and indices, and changes to, cessations of and the replacement of, or transition from, benchmarks and indices may result in legal risks and could adversely affect our business. 🔒
🟡 Modified We have in the past been, and may in the future be, required to recognize impairments of our goodwill, other intangible assets or investments. 🔒
🟡 Modified Our role in the global financial system positions us at a greater risk for cyberattacks, cyberterrorism and other cybersecurity risks. 🔒
🟡 Modified Ongoing impacts and uncertainty following the U.K.'s exit from the EU, commonly referred to as Brexit, could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. 🔒
🟡 Modified Climate-related risks pose operational, commercial, reputational, regulatory and financial risks. 🔒
7 more changes in this filing

Full diff access, historical comparisons, and cross-company signal tracking.

Get full access — from $29/month Already a Pro subscriber? View full diff →