--- ticker: L company: L filing_type: 10-K year_current: 2026 year_prior: 2025 risks_added: 4 risks_removed: 3 risks_modified: 9 risks_unchanged: 52 source: SEC EDGAR url: https://riskdiff.com/l/2026-vs-2025/ markdown_url: https://riskdiff.com/l/2026-vs-2025/index.md generated: 2026-06-01 --- # L: 10-K Risk Factor Changes 2026 vs 2025 > Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR) > Generated: 2026-06-01 > All data extracted directly from official filings. No hallucinated content. ## Summary | Status | Count | |--------|-------| | New risks added | 4 | | Risks removed | 3 | | Risks modified | 9 | | Unchanged | 52 | --- ## New in Current Filing: Changes in U.S. trade policy and the impact of tariffs may have a material adverse effect on Boardwalk Pipelines' business and results of operations. Boardwalk Pipelines' business and results of operations may be adversely affected by uncertainty and changes in U.S. trade policies, including tariffs, trade agreements or other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments. These actions have caused uncertainty and volatility in financial markets, may result in retaliatory measures on U.S. goods and may adversely impact both the U.S. and global economies. Boardwalk Pipelines' business requires access to steel and other materials to construct and maintain its pipelines. While Boardwalk Pipelines' practice is to source steel through domestic producers in the U.S. in most instances, any imposition of or increase in tariffs on imports of steel or other materials, as well as corresponding price increases for such materials available domestically, could increase its construction costs and its costs to maintain its assets. To the extent that Boardwalk Pipelines is unable to pass all or any such cost increases on to its customers, such cost increases could adversely affect its returns on investment. Higher materials costs could also diminish Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to develop new projects at acceptable returns, particularly during times of economic uncertainty, and limit its ability to pursue growth opportunities. Tariffs or other trade restrictions may lead to continuing uncertainty and volatility in U.S. and global economies and commodity markets and inflation, and reduced demand for Boardwalk Pipelines' and its customers' products and services. Such conditions could have a material adverse impact on Boardwalk Pipelines' business, results of operations and cash flows. Also, disruptions and volatility in the financial markets may lead to adverse changes in the availability, terms and cost of capital. Such adverse changes could increase Boardwalk Pipelines' costs of capital and limit its access to external financing sources to fund acquisitions, capital projects, or refinancing of debt maturities on similar terms. --- ## New in Current Filing: Failure to comply with environmental or worker safety laws and regulations or an accidental release of pollutants into the environment may cause Boardwalk Pipelines to incur significant costs and liabilities. Boardwalk Pipelines' operations are subject to extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment and occupational health and safety. Such laws and regulations impose, among other things, restrictions, liabilities and obligations in connection with the generation, handling, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of various substances, including hazardous substances and waste, and in connection with spills, releases, discharges and emissions of various substances into the environment. These laws include, for example, the CAA, the Clean Water Act, CERCLA, the RCRA, ESA, NEPA, OSHA and analogous state laws. These laws and regulations may restrict or impact Boardwalk Pipelines' business activities, including requiring the acquisition or renewal of permits or other approvals to conduct regulated activities, restricting the manner in which Boardwalk Pipelines handles or disposes of wastes, imposing remedial obligations to remove or mitigate contamination resulting from a spill or other release, requiring capital expenditures to comply with pollution control requirements and imposing safety and health criteria addressing worker protection. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of administrative, civil and criminal enforcement measures, including the assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of remedial requirements, the incurrence of capital expenditures, the occurrence of delays, denials or cancellations in the permitting or performance or expansion of projects and the issuance of orders enjoining future operations in a particular area. Under certain of these environmental laws and regulations, Boardwalk Pipelines could be subject to joint and several strict liability for the removal or remediation of previously released pollutants or property contamination, regardless of whether it was responsible for the release or contamination or if its operations were in compliance with applicable laws. Boardwalk Pipelines may not be able to recover some or any of the costs incurred from insurance. Stricter environmental or worker safety laws, regulations or enforcement policies could significantly increase Boardwalk Pipelines' operational or compliance costs and compliance with new or more stringent environmental legal requirements could delay or prohibit its ability to obtain permits for operations or require it to install additional pollution control equipment. For instance, the construction or expansion of pipelines often requires authorizations under the Clean Water Act, which may be subject to challenge. Boardwalk Pipelines relies on NWP 12, alongside other NWPs, as blanket authority for construction, maintenance, repair and removal of pipelines. The NWP process relies upon the Clean Water Act Section 401 certification process, which is subject to ongoing litigation. In September 2023, the EPA finalized its Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification Improvement Rule, effective in November 2023, which expanded the scope of certification authority. However, in September 2023, several states challenged the final rule in federal court, alleging that the rule exceeds the EPA's statutory authority under the Clean Water Act, and the litigation has been held in abeyance pending the administration's review of the rule and litigation. In January 2026, the EPA proposed a rule revising its regulations governing Section 401 Water Quality Certifications. The proposed rule seeks to streamline the permitting process, restrict the ability of state and tribal certifying authorities to reject federal permits, and ensure such reviews are completed within the one-year statutory deadline. A final rule is expected in Spring 2026. However, opponents of the January 2026 proposed rule are pushing back on these efforts, including the EPA's efforts to narrow the scope of state authority. If NWP 12, or the underlying Section 401 certification process, is further amended or revoked, Boardwalk Pipelines may be required to apply for one or more Individual Permits, which would require additional time and resources to obtain, and may result in increased costs and project delays. Additionally, there continues to be uncertainty with respect to the federal government's jurisdictional reach under the Clean Water Act over WOTUS, as the EPA and the Corps have pursued multiple rulemakings under different administrations since 2015 to determine the scope of such reach. In September 2023, the EPA issued a version of the WOTUS rule that, due to injunctions in certain states, is currently in effect in only 24 states. Thus, the operative definition of WOTUS varies by state. However, in November 2025, the EPA and the Corps proposed a rule to further update and narrow the September 2023 definition, guided by the Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. EPA (adopting the "continuous surface connection" test to determine if wetlands are WOTUS). To the extent any judicial ruling or administrative rulemaking or other action further changes the scope of the Clean Water Act's jurisdiction, Boardwalk Pipelines could face increased costs to comply and experience delays with respect to obtaining permits. --- ## New in Current Filing: A failure in Boardwalk Pipelines' computer systems or a cybersecurity attack on any of its computer systems, devices or telecommunications networks or those of certain third parties could cause substantial and catastrophic damage and may materially adversely affect its cash flows, financial condition and ability to operate its business. Boardwalk Pipelines' business is dependent upon its computer systems, devices and networks (operational and information technology), and those of its customers, suppliers and others with whom Boardwalk Pipelines does business, to collect, process and store the data necessary to conduct almost all aspects of its business, including the operation of its pipeline and storage facilities and the recording and reporting of commercial and financial information. Despite Boardwalk Pipelines' security measures, the information and operational technology and infrastructure it relies on may be vulnerable to attacks by third parties, such as hackers, cybercriminals, nation-states, insiders or other third parties, or breached due to human error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Through government intelligence reports, Boardwalk Pipelines is aware of credible global threats to third-party, U.S. critical infrastructure sectors on which it depends, such as the telecommunications sector. Cybersecurity threat actors have attacked and continue to threaten energy infrastructure. The U.S. government has issued public and industry-directed warnings that indicate that energy assets might be specific targets of cybersecurity attacks, which are increasing in sophistication, magnitude and frequency. Vulnerabilities in one environment may affect other interconnected systems. A cybersecurity incident that impacts a third party with whom Boardwalk Pipelines does business may impact Boardwalk Pipelines. 31 31 31 31 Table of Contents Table of Contents Some cyber incidents, such as surveillance, may go unnoticed for a long period of time. Any investigation of a cybersecurity attack or other security incident will be inherently unpredictable and complex, and it may take significant time before the completion of any investigation and availability of full and reliable information. During such time, Boardwalk Pipelines may not know the extent of the harm or how best to remediate it, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated, any or all of which could further increase the costs and consequences of a cybersecurity attack or other security incident, and its remediation efforts may not be successful. As the cybersecurity threat landscape continues to evolve, Boardwalk Pipelines may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance its protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities. Advances in computer capabilities, discoveries in the field of artificial intelligence, cryptography, inadequate facility security or other developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology Boardwalk Pipelines uses to safeguard its operational and information technology systems and confidential, personal, or otherwise protected information. As the breadth and complexity of the technologies Boardwalk Pipelines uses continue to grow, including as a result of the use of mobile devices, cloud services, artificial intelligence, open-source software, social media and the increased reliance on devices connected to the internet, the potential risk of cyberattacks and cybersecurity incidents also increases. No security measure is infallible. Despite ongoing efforts to improve its ability to protect its systems from compromise, Boardwalk Pipelines may not be able to protect all of its diverse systems. Boardwalk Pipelines' efforts to improve security and protect data and its systems may also identify previously undiscovered instances of security breaches or other cyber incidents. TSA has issued a series of security directives applicable to pipeline owners and operators, which require the implementation of a variety of cybersecurity measures and reporting. Other regulators, such as PHMSA and the SEC, have also established requirements for reporting certain cybersecurity incidents. As cybersecurity incidents continue to evolve, more legislation could be enacted to seek to mitigate cybersecurity threats. This may require Boardwalk Pipelines to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance its protective measures or to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities to cybersecurity incidents at significantly increased costs. Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict the potential impact to its business of potential future legislation, regulations or orders relating to cybersecurity. A failure, security breach, disruption or degradation impacting Boardwalk Pipelines' operational or information technology systems or those of third parties with whom it does business could negatively affect its ability to safely and reliably operate its assets and/or result in delays in providing services for its customers, contamination or degradation of the products it transports and store, damage to or destruction of its or third-party pipelines, property or facilities, catastrophic events, injury or death to its employees or other persons, the inadvertent release of hydrocarbons or the release or destruction of confidential, proprietary or business-critical information or intellectual property, which could result in outages, reduced revenue, unexpected costs and expenses, litigation and reputational damage, any or all of which may be irreversible and may materially adversely affect its results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to operate its business. In addition, access, disclosure or other loss of information or other consequences could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information or personally identifiable information, regulatory penalties for divulging or failing to adequately protect such information, disruption of Boardwalk Pipelines' operations, incident response and remediation costs, damage to its reputation, and loss of confidence in its services. --- ## New in Current Filing: Boardwalk Pipelines relies on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of its revenues. For 2025, one customer comprised 10% or more of Boardwalk Pipelines' operating revenues. Additionally, as of December 31, 2025, the top ten customers under committed firm agreements comprised approximately 66% of Boardwalk Pipelines' total projected operating revenues. If any of Boardwalk Pipelines' significant customers have credit or financial problems that result in bankruptcy, a delay or failure to pay for services Boardwalk Pipelines provided, to post the required credit support for construction associated with Boardwalk Pipelines' growth projects or existing contracts or to repay the gas they owe Boardwalk Pipelines, it could have a material adverse effect on Boardwalk Pipelines' revenues, results of operations and financial condition. --- ## No Match in Current: The COVID-19 pandemic, including new or emerging variants, other potential pandemics and related measures to mitigate the spread of the foregoing may continue to have adverse impacts on its business, results of operations and financial condition and could be material. *This section from the 2025 filing does not have a high-confidence textual match in 2026. It may have been removed, merged, or substantially reworded.* CNA has experienced, and may continue to experience, claim submissions and litigation related to denial of claims based on policy coverage, or the facts of the claim, in certain lines of business that are implicated by the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigating actions taken by its customers and governmental authorities in response to its spread. These lines include primarily commercial property-related business interruption coverage, healthcare professional liability, management liability (directors and officers, employment practices and professional liability lines) and workers' compensation. CNA 19 19 19 19 Table of Contents Table of Contents recorded significant losses during 2020, a portion of which remain classified as incurred but not reported ("IBNR") reserves, in these areas and may experience continued losses, which could be material. Increased frequency or severity in any or all of the foregoing lines, or others where the exposure has yet to emerge, relating to long-term effects of COVID-19, new or emerging variants, or other potential pandemics, and related measures to mitigate the spread of the foregoing may have a material impact on CNA's business, results of operations and financial condition. CNA has incurred and may continue to incur substantial expenses related to litigation activity in connection with COVID-related legal claims. These actions primarily relate to denial of claims submitted as a result of the pandemic and the mitigating actions taken, including lockdowns and closing of certain businesses. The significance of such litigation or any other litigation relating to new or emerging variants of COVID-19 or other potential pandemics and related measures to mitigate the spread of the foregoing, both in substance and volume, and the resultant CNA-initiated activities, including external counsel engagement, and the costs related thereto, may have a material impact on CNA's business, results of operations and financial condition. --- ## No Match in Current: Pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases and the measures to mitigate their spread could materially adversely affect Boardwalk Pipelines' business, financial condition and results of operations and those of its customers, suppliers and other business partners. *This section from the 2025 filing does not have a high-confidence textual match in 2026. It may have been removed, merged, or substantially reworded.* The global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 caused unprecedented disruptions to the global and U.S. economies and impacted global demand for oil and petrochemical products. Future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases could result in similar or worse impacts and significant business and operational disruptions, including business closures, supply chain disruptions, travel restrictions, stay-at-home orders and limitations on the availability of workforces. Although Boardwalk Pipelines' operations are considered essential critical infrastructure under current Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency guidelines, if significant portions of Boardwalk Pipelines' workforce are unable to work effectively, including because of illness or quarantines or from the impacts of any potential future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases, its business could be materially adversely affected. Boardwalk Pipelines may also be unable to perform fully on its contracts, and its costs may increase as a result of any potential future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases. These cost increases may not be fully recoverable. It is possible that future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases could cause disruption in Boardwalk Pipelines' customers' businesses, cause delays, or limit the ability of its customers to perform, including in making timely payments to it. Future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases could impact capital markets, which may impact Boardwalk Pipelines' customers' financial position. Future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases may also have the effect of exacerbating several of the other risk factors contained herein. --- ## No Match in Current: Pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases and efforts to mitigate their spread have had, and could in the future have, material adverse impacts on Loews Hotels & Co's results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. *This section from the 2025 filing does not have a high-confidence textual match in 2026. It may have been removed, merged, or substantially reworded.* In response to the spread of COVID-19, governments across the globe implemented measures to mitigate the spread of the virus, such as through lockdowns or stay-at-home orders, business closures, restrictions on travel, limitations on large group gatherings and quarantines, among others. Beyond the existence of governmental restrictions, the perception of health risks associated with COVID-19 limited business and leisure travel. The spread of the coronavirus and related containment efforts caused unprecedented disruptions to the global economy, including supply chains, air travel and normal business operations across sectors, including the hospitality industry that depends on active levels of business and leisure travel. Future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases may result in similar or more severe mitigation measures, perceptions of health risks and economic disruptions. In response to COVID-19, Loews Hotels & Co temporarily suspended operations at the majority of its properties and, for a period after general operations resumed, occupancy rates were considerably lower for certain of its hotels compared to occupancy rates prior to the pandemic. As a result of the suspended operations and lower occupancy levels, revenues were lower, while operating costs were not reduced to the same extent. In addition, Loews Hotels & Co had to implement a number of new measures for the health and safety of its guests and employees, which increased its costs. Loews Hotels & Co may have to implement similar responses to future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases, which may lead to similar or more severe effects. As part of cost containment efforts at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Loews Hotels & Co and many of its service providers and suppliers severed or put employees on unpaid leaves of absence. When conditions improved such that increased staffing levels were required, finding and attracting talent to fill certain roles that were furloughed or eliminated was challenging for Loews Hotels & Co and certain of its service providers and suppliers, which affected Loews Hotels & Co's ability to return to normal operations at certain of its hotels. Loews Hotels & Co and its service providers and suppliers may have to take similar actions in response to future pandemics or other outbreaks of contagious diseases, which may lead to similar or more severe effects. The negative impacts of a pandemic or other outbreak of contagious disease on Loews Hotels & Co's business may substantially exacerbate the other risks facing Loews Hotels & Co, including those described in this section, and such impacts may linger beyond the containment and mitigation of any such pandemic or outbreak. --- ## Modified: Changes in the debt markets and increases in interest rates could adversely affect Boardwalk Pipelines' business. **Key changes:** - Added sentence: "Boardwalk Pipelines expects to construct approximately $3.3 billion of growth projects over the next five years and is evaluating additional growth projects involving substantial capital commitments." - Reworded sentence: "Changes in the debt markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and an increase in interest rates, may increase the cost of financing for these growth projects as well as the risks of refinancing maturing debt." - Reworded sentence: "If the debt markets were not available, it is not certain if other adequate financing options would be available to Boardwalk Pipelines on terms and conditions that it would find acceptable." - Added sentence: "29 29 29 29 Table of Contents Table of Contents" **Prior (2025):** Boardwalk Pipelines anticipates funding its capital and other spending requirements through its available financing options, including cash generated from operations, borrowings under its revolving credit facility and issuances of additional debt. Changes in the debt markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and an increase in interest rates, may increase the cost of financing as well as the risks of refinancing maturing debt. This may affect its ability to raise needed funding and reduce the amount of cash available to fund its operations or growth projects or refinance maturing debt. If the 31 31 31 31 Table of Contents Table of Contents debt markets were not available, it is not certain if other adequate financing options would be available to Boardwalk Pipelines on terms and conditions that it would find acceptable. Any disruption in the debt markets could require Boardwalk Pipelines to take additional measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until it can arrange alternative credit arrangements or other funding for its business needs. Such measures could include reducing or delaying business activities, reducing its operations to lower expenses and reducing other discretionary uses of cash. Boardwalk Pipelines may be unable to execute its growth strategy or take advantage of certain business opportunities. **Current (2026):** Boardwalk Pipelines expects to construct approximately $3.3 billion of growth projects over the next five years and is evaluating additional growth projects involving substantial capital commitments. Boardwalk Pipelines anticipates funding its capital and other spending requirements through its available financing options, including cash generated from operations, borrowings under its revolving credit facility and issuances of additional debt. Changes in the debt markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity, and an increase in interest rates, may increase the cost of financing for these growth projects as well as the risks of refinancing maturing debt. This may affect its ability to raise needed funding and reduce the amount of cash available to fund its operations or growth projects or refinance maturing debt. If the debt markets were not available, it is not certain if other adequate financing options would be available to Boardwalk Pipelines on terms and conditions that it would find acceptable. Any disruption in the debt markets could require Boardwalk Pipelines to take additional measures to conserve cash until the markets stabilize or until it can arrange alternative credit arrangements or other funding for its business needs. Such measures could include reducing or delaying business activities, reducing its operations to lower expenses and reducing other discretionary uses of cash. Boardwalk Pipelines may be unable to execute its growth strategy or take advantage of certain business opportunities. 29 29 29 29 Table of Contents Table of Contents --- ## Modified: Boardwalk Pipelines' indebtedness could affect its ability to meet its obligations and may otherwise restrict its activities. **Key changes:** - Reworded sentence: "As of December 31, 2025, Boardwalk Pipelines had $3.8 billion in principal amount of debt outstanding, of which $550.0 million was called for redemption on January 31, 2026." - Reworded sentence: "For example, it could: •limit Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to borrow money for its working capital, capital expenditures, including its growth projects, debt service requirements or other general business activities; •impact Boardwalk Pipelines' ratings received from credit rating agencies; •increase Boardwalk Pipelines' vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and •limit Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to respond to business opportunities, including growing its business through acquisitions." **Prior (2025):** As of December 31, 2024, Boardwalk Pipelines had $3.3 billion in principal amount of long-term debt outstanding. This level of debt requires significant interest payments. Boardwalk Pipelines' inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, or to refinance its obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have a material adverse effect on its business. Boardwalk Pipelines' indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could: •limit Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to borrow money for its working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other general business activities; •impact Boardwalk Pipelines' ratings received from credit rating agencies; •increase Boardwalk Pipelines' vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and •limit Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to respond to business opportunities, including growing its business through acquisitions. Boardwalk Pipelines is permitted, under its revolving credit facility and the indentures governing its notes, to incur additional debt, subject to certain limitations under its revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the notes. If Boardwalk Pipelines incurs additional debt, its increased leverage could also result in or exacerbate the consequences described above. **Current (2026):** As of December 31, 2025, Boardwalk Pipelines had $3.8 billion in principal amount of debt outstanding, of which $550.0 million was called for redemption on January 31, 2026. Boardwalk Pipelines expects to construct approximately $3.3 billion of growth projects over the next five years (and is evaluating additional growth projects involving substantial capital commitments) and anticipates having to finance a substantial portion of these capital commitments. This level of debt requires significant interest payments. Boardwalk Pipelines' inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, or to refinance its obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have a material adverse effect on its business. Boardwalk Pipelines' indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could: •limit Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to borrow money for its working capital, capital expenditures, including its growth projects, debt service requirements or other general business activities; •impact Boardwalk Pipelines' ratings received from credit rating agencies; •increase Boardwalk Pipelines' vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and •limit Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to respond to business opportunities, including growing its business through acquisitions. Boardwalk Pipelines is permitted, under its revolving credit facility and the indentures governing its notes, to incur additional debt, subject to certain limitations under its revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the notes. If Boardwalk Pipelines incurs additional debt, its increased leverage could also result in or exacerbate the consequences described above. --- ## Modified: Loews Hotels & Co's properties are geographically concentrated, which exposes its business to the effects of regional events and occurrences. **Key changes:** - Reworded sentence: "Specifically, as of December 31, 2025, eleven hotels, representing 59% of rooms in its system, were located at Universal Orlando in Orlando, Florida and thirteen hotels, representing approximately 64% of rooms in its system, were located in Florida." - Reworded sentence: "These developments could include, 41 41 41 41 Table of Contents Table of Contents among others, regional economic downturns, an increase in burdensome governmental regulation, changes in the local political climate, a decline in the popularity of or access to area tourist attractions, such as theme parks and stadiums, the failure of new nearby tourist attractions to be developed or be successful in markets where new hotels are under development or of existing attractions to be maintained or upgraded in existing markets, significant increases in the number of Loews Hotels & Co's competitors' hotels in these markets, the development of new tourist attractions which are competitive with those nearby Loews Hotels & Co's properties and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes, property insurance costs or other expenses in the geographic markets in which it is concentrated." - Added sentence: "Because all Loews Hotels & Co's properties are located within the United States, its business is exposed directly and indirectly to risks arising from United States-specific risks, including economic downturns, regulatory changes, international arrival travel regulations and patterns and other disruptions." **Prior (2025):** Loews Hotels & Co has a concentration of hotels in Florida. Specifically, as of December 31, 2024, eight hotels, representing 54% of rooms in its system, were located at Universal Orlando in Orlando, Florida and ten hotels, representing approximately 60% of rooms in its system, were located in Florida. Furthermore, there are three additional hotels under development in Orlando, Florida that will increase these numbers to 11 hotels in Orlando, representing approximately 59% of rooms in its system, and 13 hotels in Florida, representing approximately 64% of rooms in its system. Loews Hotels & Co also has multiple hotels in other geographies, including Arlington, Texas and the Chicago, Illinois metropolitan area. In the future, other existing or new geographies may present opportunities for new or additional investment that may create new or increased concentration risk. The concentration of hotels in one region, jurisdiction or a limited number of markets may expose Loews Hotels & Co to risks of adverse economic and other developments that are greater than if its portfolio were more geographically diverse. These developments could include, among others, regional economic downturns, an increase in burdensome governmental regulation, changes in the local political climate, a decline in the popularity of or access to area tourist attractions, such as theme parks and stadiums, the failure of new nearby tourist attractions to be developed or be successful in markets where new hotels are under development or of existing attractions to be maintained or upgraded in existing markets, significant increases in the number of Loews Hotels & Co's competitors' hotels in these markets, the development of new tourist attractions which are competitive with those nearby Loews Hotels & Co's properties and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes, property insurance costs or other expenses in the geographic markets in which it is concentrated. In addition, Loews Hotels & Co's properties in Florida are subject to the effects of adverse acts of nature, such as hurricanes, strong winds and flooding, which have in the past caused damage to its 37 37 37 37 Table of Contents Table of Contents hotels in Florida, and which may in the future be intensified as a result of climate change. Loews Hotels & Co's business may be significantly affected by other risks common to the Florida tourism industry. For example, the cost and availability of air services and the impact of any events that disrupt or reduce air travel to and from Florida for any reason can materially adversely affect its business. **Current (2026):** Loews Hotels & Co has a concentration of hotels in Florida. Specifically, as of December 31, 2025, eleven hotels, representing 59% of rooms in its system, were located at Universal Orlando in Orlando, Florida and thirteen hotels, representing approximately 64% of rooms in its system, were located in Florida. Loews Hotels & Co also has multiple hotels in other geographies, including Arlington, Texas (where a third hotel development has recently been announced) and the Chicago, Illinois metropolitan area. In the future, other existing or new geographies may present opportunities for new or additional investment that may create new or increased concentration risk. The concentration of hotels in one region, jurisdiction or a limited number of markets may expose Loews Hotels & Co to risks of adverse economic and other developments that are greater than if its portfolio were more geographically diverse. These developments could include, 41 41 41 41 Table of Contents Table of Contents among others, regional economic downturns, an increase in burdensome governmental regulation, changes in the local political climate, a decline in the popularity of or access to area tourist attractions, such as theme parks and stadiums, the failure of new nearby tourist attractions to be developed or be successful in markets where new hotels are under development or of existing attractions to be maintained or upgraded in existing markets, significant increases in the number of Loews Hotels & Co's competitors' hotels in these markets, the development of new tourist attractions which are competitive with those nearby Loews Hotels & Co's properties and potentially higher local property, sales and income taxes, property insurance costs or other expenses in the geographic markets in which it is concentrated. In addition, Loews Hotels & Co's properties in Florida are subject to the effects of adverse acts of nature, such as hurricanes, strong winds and flooding, which have in the past caused damage to its hotels in Florida, and which may in the future be intensified as a result of climate change. Loews Hotels & Co's business may be significantly affected by other risks common to the Florida tourism industry. For example, the cost and availability of air services and the impact of any events that disrupt or reduce air travel to and from Florida for any reason can materially adversely affect its business. Because all Loews Hotels & Co's properties are located within the United States, its business is exposed directly and indirectly to risks arising from United States-specific risks, including economic downturns, regulatory changes, international arrival travel regulations and patterns and other disruptions. --- ## Modified: Inability to detect and prevent significant employee or third party service provider misconduct, inadvertent errors and omissions, or exposure relating to functions performed on CNA's behalf could result in a material adverse effect on CNA's business, results of operations and financial condition. **Key changes:** - Reworded sentence: "When new technologies, such as AI, are incorporated into CNA's or its third-party service providers' processes, they may introduce additional complexity and present greater risk to the effectiveness of these controls." **Prior (2025):** CNA may incur losses which arise from employees or third party service providers engaging in intentional, negligent or inadvertent misconduct, fraud, errors and omissions, failure to comply with internal guidelines, including with respect to underwriting authority, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements. CNA's or its third party service providers' controls may not be able to detect all possible circumstances of such non-compliant activity and the internal structures in place to prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. Any losses relating to such non-compliant activity could materially adversely affect CNA's business, results of operations and financial condition. Portions of CNA's insurance business are underwritten and serviced by third parties. With respect to underwriting, CNA's contractual arrangements with third parties will typically grant them limited rights to write new and renewal policies, subject to contractual restrictions and obligations, including requiring them to underwrite within the terms of CNA's licenses. Should these third parties issue policies that exceed these contractual restrictions, CNA could be deemed liable for such policies and subject to regulatory fines and penalties for any breach of licensing requirements. It is possible that in such circumstance CNA might not be fully indemnified for such third parties' contractual breaches. Additionally, CNA relies on certain third-party claims administrators, including the administrator of its long-term care claims, to handle policyholder services and perform significant claim administration and claim adjudication functions. Any failure by such administrator to properly perform service functions may result in losses as a result of over-payment of claims, legal claims against CNA and adverse regulatory enforcement exposure. CNA has also licensed certain systems from third parties. CNA cannot be certain that it will have access to these systems or that its information technology or application systems will continue to operate as intended. These risks could adversely impact CNA's reputation and client relationships and have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. **Current (2026):** CNA may incur losses which arise from employees or third party service providers engaging in intentional, negligent or inadvertent misconduct, fraud, errors and omissions, failure to comply with internal guidelines, including with respect to underwriting authority, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements. CNA's or its third party service providers' controls may not be able to detect all possible circumstances of such non-compliant activity and the internal structures in place to prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. When new technologies, such as AI, are incorporated into CNA's or its third-party service providers' processes, they may introduce additional complexity and present greater risk to the effectiveness of these controls. For example, generative AI systems may "hallucinate" producing inaccurate or misleading information, and model performance may degrade over time, leading to flawed recommendations. AI models may perpetuate or amplify biases present in underlying data, which could result in discriminatory or unfair outcomes in areas such as underwriting and claims. The potential for employees or third-party service providers, through intentional or inadvertent actions, to enable AI models to be trained on CNA's data or its insureds' data introduces risks of unauthorized use or disclosure of sensitive information and erosion of data privacy. AI may also be used to perpetuate fraud, or to manipulate or evade monitoring and detection controls. Portions of CNA's insurance business are underwritten and serviced by third parties. With respect to underwriting, CNA's contractual arrangements with third parties will typically grant them limited rights to write new and renewal policies, subject to contractual restrictions and obligations, including requiring them to underwrite within the terms of CNA's licenses. Should these third parties issue policies that exceed these contractual restrictions, CNA could be deemed liable for such policies and subject to regulatory fines and penalties for any breach of licensing requirements. It is possible that in such circumstance CNA might not be fully indemnified for such third parties' contractual breaches. Additionally, CNA relies on certain third-party claims administrators, including the administrator of its long-term care claims, to handle policyholder services and perform significant claim administration and claim adjudication functions. Any failure by such administrator to properly perform service functions may result in losses as a result of over-payment of claims, legal claims against CNA and adverse regulatory enforcement exposure. CNA has also licensed certain systems from third parties. CNA cannot be certain that it will have access to these systems or that its information technology or application systems will continue to operate as intended. These risks could adversely impact CNA's reputation and client relationships and have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. --- ## Modified: Boardwalk Pipelines' operations, and those of Boardwalk Pipelines' customers, are subject to a series of risks regarding climate change. **Key changes:** - Reworded sentence: "Climate change remains a concern in the U.S." - Reworded sentence: "In the U.S., no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal level, though the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 ("IRA") advanced numerous climate-related objectives." - Reworded sentence: "The presumptive standards established under the final rules include advanced monitoring to encourage the deployment of innovative technologies to detect and reduce methane emissions, reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems, zero-emission requirements for certain devices, and the establishment of the "super emitter" response program that would allow third parties to make reports to the EPA of large methane emission events." - Reworded sentence: "However, in January 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order once again withdrawing the U.S." - Reworded sentence: "The full impact these actions may have upon Boardwalk Pipelines' business or financial condition remains uncertain at this time." **Prior (2025):** The threat of climate change continues to attract considerable attention in the U.S. and in other countries. Numerous proposals have been made and could continue to be made at the international, national, regional, state and local levels of government to monitor, limit and eliminate both existing and future emissions of GHGs. These proposals expose Boardwalk Pipelines' operations as well as the operations of its fossil fuel producer customers to a series of regulatory, political, litigation and financial risks. In the U.S., no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal level. Although the Biden Administration has taken legislative, regulatory and executive action to address climate change, policy priorities, such as climate change, are likely to change with the new presidential administration. For example, in August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 ("IRA") passed, which advanced numerous climate-related objectives, including a methane emissions fee that applies to excess methane emissions from certain facilities that starts at $900 per metric ton of leaked methane in 2024 and increases to $1,200 in 2025 and $1,500 in 2026 and thereafter. In November 2024, the EPA issued a final rule implementing the methane emissions fee; however, Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict if Congress may take action to repeal or revise the IRA, with respect to the methane emissions fee. Additionally, the EPA regulates GHGs, including methane and carbon dioxide, under the CAA and has implemented various permitting, reporting and technology-based requirements to reduce GHG emissions by the oil and gas sectors. In December 2023, the EPA finalized its methane rules for new, modified, and reconstructed facilities, known as OOOOb, as well as standards for existing sources for the first time ever, known as OOOOc. Under the final rules, states have two years to prepare and submit their plans to impose methane emission controls on existing sources. The presumptive standards established under the final rules include advanced monitoring to encourage the deployment of innovative technologies to detect and reduce methane emissions, reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems, zero-emission requirements for certain devices, and the establishment of the "super emitter" response program that would allow third parties to make reports to the EPA of large methane emission events. Fines and penalties for violations of these rules can be substantial and compliance with the new rules may affect the amount Boardwalk Pipelines owes under the IRA. The EPA's final methane rules are currently being challenged by 23 states and a coalition of industry groups in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. To the extent not timely repealed or modified by the Trump Administration, the requirements of the EPA's final methane rules could increase Boardwalk Pipelines' operating costs and the costs of Boardwalk Pipelines' customers, thereby adversely affecting its operations. Governmental entities, including certain states and groups of states, have adopted or are considering legislation, regulations or other initiatives such as GHG cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting and tracking programs, and emissions limits. At the international level, in 2021, the U.S. rejoined the Paris Agreement, which requires member nations to submit non-binding GHG emissions reduction goals every five years, and President Biden announced a new target for the U.S. to reduce GHG emissions 50%-52% from 2005 levels by 2030. However, on January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order once again withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and from any other commitments made under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Additionally, President Trump revoked any purported financial commitment made by the U.S. pursuant to the same. The full impact these actions may have upon Boardwalk Pipelines' business or financial condition is uncertain at this time. Governmental, scientific and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in increasing political risks in the U.S. and the federal government has and could in the future take various actions to seek to curtail oil and natural gas production and transportation, including limiting fracturing of oil and natural gas wells, restricting flaring and venting during natural gas production on federal properties, limiting or banning oil and gas leases on federal lands and offshore waters, increasing requirements for construction and permitting of pipeline infrastructure and LNG export facilities, and further restricting GHG emissions from oil and gas facilities. However, on his first day in office, President Trump signed several Executive Orders rescinding many of the previous administration's climate-related initiatives, that included many of the actions noted above. Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict what additional actions the Trump Administration may take with respect to these matters or the timing for such actions. Litigation risks are also increasing, as a number of cities and other governmental entities have brought suit alleging that fossil fuel producers created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to global warming effects such as rising sea levels, are responsible for associated roadway and infrastructure damage, or defrauded investors or customers by failing to timely and adequately disclose adverse effects of climate change. There have also been increasing financial risks for fossil fuel energy companies as certain investors become increasingly concerned about the potential effects of climate change and may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors. Some institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil fuel energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices that favor alternative power sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels), making those sources more attractive, and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel energy companies. While Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict how or to what extent 27 27 27 27 Table of Contents Table of Contents sustainable lending and investment practices may impact it, a material reduction in the capital available to the fossil fuel industry could make it more difficult to secure funding for exploration and production or midstream energy business activities, which could adversely impact its business and operations. Additionally, in March 2024, the SEC released a final rule that establishes a framework for the reporting of climate risks, targets and metrics. However, the future of the SEC climate change rule is uncertain given that its implementation has been stayed pending the outcome of legal challenges; moreover, the SEC under the Trump Administration may seek to repeal or revoke the rule, though Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict whether such action will occur or its timing. As a result, the ultimate impact of the SEC rule, or any similar climate-related disclosure requirements imposed in the future, on Boardwalk Pipelines' business is uncertain and may result in increased compliance costs and increased costs of and restrictions on access to capital. These agency actions also could increase the potential for litigation. The adoption and implementation of new or more stringent international, federal, regional, state or local legislation, regulations or other initiatives that impose more stringent standards for GHG emissions from the oil and gas sector or otherwise restrict fossil fuel production could result in increased costs of compliance for fossil fuel use, result in litigation and reduce demand for fossil fuels, which could reduce demand for Boardwalk Pipelines' transportation and storage services. Political, litigation and financial risks may result in Boardwalk Pipelines' fossil fuel producer customers restricting or canceling production activities, incurring liability for infrastructure and other damages as a result of climatic changes, or impairing their ability to continue to operate in an economic manner, which also could reduce demand for Boardwalk Pipelines' services. Moreover, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources could reduce demand for hydrocarbons and for Boardwalk Pipelines' services. Finally, Boardwalk Pipelines may also be subject to various physical risks from climate change. For more information on these physical risks, see Boardwalk Pipelines' risk factor titled "Climatic conditions and events could adversely impact Boardwalk Pipelines' operations, pipelines and facilities, or those of its customers or suppliers" below. **Current (2026):** Climate change remains a concern in the U.S. and in other countries. Numerous proposals have been made and could continue to be made at the international, national, regional, state and local levels of government to monitor, limit and eliminate both existing and future emissions of GHGs. These proposals expose Boardwalk Pipelines' operations as well as the operations of its fossil fuel producer customers to a series of regulatory, political, litigation and financial risks. In the U.S., no comprehensive climate change legislation has been implemented at the federal level, though the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 ("IRA") advanced numerous climate-related objectives. The IRA required the EPA to impose and collect a methane emissions fee that applies to excess methane emissions from certain facilities that exceed statutory methane emissions thresholds. In November 2024, the EPA issued a final rule implementing the methane emissions fee, although in February 2025, Congress repealed the rule under the Congressional Review Act. Additionally, in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Congress delayed the implementation of the methane emission fee until 2034. While the EPA cannot reissue its rule implementing the methane emissions fee (either in substantially the same form or in a new rule), the underlying requirement in the IRA remains unchanged. Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict if the Trump Administration and/or Congress may take further actions with respect to the IRA or methane emissions fee. However, compliance with this and other air pollution control and permitting requirements has the potential to delay or increase the costs of development 32 32 32 32 Table of Contents Table of Contents of Boardwalk Pipelines' projects, which costs could be significant. Additionally, the EPA has the authority to regulate GHGs, including methane and carbon dioxide, under the CAA and has implemented various permitting, reporting and technology-based requirements to reduce GHG emissions by the oil and gas sectors. In December 2023, the EPA finalized its methane rules for new, modified, and reconstructed facilities, known as Subpart OOOOb, as well as standards for existing sources for the first time ever, known as Subpart OOOOc. Under the final rules, states have two years to prepare and submit their plans to impose methane emission controls on existing sources. The presumptive standards established under the final rules include advanced monitoring to encourage the deployment of innovative technologies to detect and reduce methane emissions, reduction of emissions by 95% through capture and control systems, zero-emission requirements for certain devices, and the establishment of the "super emitter" response program that would allow third parties to make reports to the EPA of large methane emission events. Fines and penalties for violations of these rules can be substantial. However, in March 2025, the EPA announced plans to reconsider Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc, in line with the Trump Administration's deregulatory agenda. Additionally, in November 2025, the EPA finalized an interim rule extending the compliance deadlines for certain provisions provided in Subparts OOOOb and OOOOc. Litigation challenging the EPA's final interim final rule extending such compliance deadlines for new and existing oil and gas sources remains pending. Governmental entities, including certain states and groups of states, have adopted or are considering legislation, regulations or other initiatives such as GHG cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting and tracking programs, and emissions limits. At the international level, in 2021, the U.S. rejoined the Paris Agreement, which requires member nations to submit non-binding GHG emissions reduction goals every five years, and President Biden announced a new target for the U.S. to reduce GHG emissions 50%-52% from 2005 levels by 2030. However, in January 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order once again withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and in January 2026, announced the U.S. withdrawal from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Additionally, President Trump revoked any purported financial commitment made by the U.S. pursuant to the same. The full impact these actions may have upon Boardwalk Pipelines' business or financial condition remains uncertain at this time. Governmental, scientific and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in increasing political risks in the U.S. The Trump Administration rescinded many of the previous administration's climate-related initiatives, which initiatives included curtailing oil and natural gas production and transportation, restricting flaring and venting during natural gas production, limiting or banning oil and gas leases on federal lands and offshore waters, increasing requirements for construction and permitting of pipeline infrastructure and LNG export facilities, and further restricting GHG emissions from oil and gas facilities. The Trump Administration has also taken a number of steps to repeal or otherwise modify several GHG regulations, including some applicable to the oil and gas industry. Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict what additional actions the Trump Administration may take with respect to these matters, or others, or the timing or success of any such actions. Additionally, litigation risks are also increasing with respect to climate change, as a number of cities and other governmental entities have brought suit alleging that fossil fuel producers created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to global warming effects such as rising sea levels, are responsible for associated roadway and infrastructure damage, or defrauded investors or customers by failing to timely and adequately disclose adverse effects of climate change. There have also been increasing financial risks for fossil fuel energy companies as certain investors become concerned about the potential effects of climate change and may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors. Some institutional lenders who provide financing to fossil fuel energy companies also have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices that favor alternative power sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels), making those sources more attractive, and some of them may elect not to provide funding for fossil fuel energy companies, although this trend has decreased in recent times and is impacted by complex factors, including regional, political and legal considerations. While Boardwalk Pipelines cannot predict how or to what extent sustainable lending and investment practices may impact it, a material reduction in the capital available to the fossil fuel industry could make it more difficult to secure funding for exploration and production or midstream energy business activities, which could adversely impact its business and operations. There have also been efforts at the federal, state and international levels seeking more fulsome disclosures relating to climate risks, targets and metrics. Any climate-related disclosure requirements imposed in the future may result in increased compliance costs and increased costs of and restrictions on access to capital. These agency or state or international regulatory actions also could increase the potential for litigation. The adoption and implementation of new or more stringent international, federal, regional, state or local legislation, regulations or other initiatives that impose more stringent standards for GHG emissions from the oil and gas sector or otherwise restrict fossil fuel production could result in increased costs of compliance for fossil fuel use, result in litigation and reduce demand for fossil fuels, which could reduce demand for Boardwalk Pipelines' transportation and storage services. Political, litigation and financial risks may result in Boardwalk Pipelines' fossil fuel producer customers restricting or canceling production activities, incurring liability for infrastructure and other damages as a result of climatic changes, or impairing their ability to continue to operate in an economic manner, which also could reduce demand for 33 33 33 33 Table of Contents Table of Contents Boardwalk Pipelines' services. Moreover, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources could reduce demand for hydrocarbons and for Boardwalk Pipelines' services. Finally, Boardwalk Pipelines may also be subject to various physical risks from climate change. For more information on these physical risks, see Boardwalk Pipelines' risk factor titled "Climatic conditions and events could adversely impact Boardwalk Pipelines' operations, pipelines and facilities, or those of its customers or suppliers" below. --- ## Modified: CNA may be adversely affected by technological changes or disruptions in the insurance marketplace. **Key changes:** - Reworded sentence: "For example, more insurers are utilizing or may begin utilizing "big data" analytics or artificial intelligence ("AI") to make underwriting or other decisions that impact product design and pricing." - Reworded sentence: "CNA's efforts or the efforts of agents and brokers with respect to new products or alternate distribution channels, as well as changes in the way agents and brokers utilize greater levels of data and technology, including AI, could adversely impact CNA's business relationships with independent agents and brokers who currently market its products, resulting in a lower volume and/or profitability of business generated from these sources." **Prior (2025):** Technological changes in the way insurance transactions are completed in the marketplace, and CNA's ability to react effectively to such change, may present significant competitive risks. For example, more insurers are utilizing or may begin utilizing "big data" analytics or artificial intelligence to make underwriting or other decisions that impact product design and pricing. If such utilization is more effective than how CNA uses its data and information, CNA will be at a competitive disadvantage. There can be no assurance that CNA will continue to compete effectively with its industry peers due to technological changes; accordingly this may have a material adverse effect on CNA's business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, agents and brokers, technology companies or other third parties may create alternate distribution channels for commercial business that may adversely impact product differentiation and pricing. For example, they may create a digitally enabled distribution channel that may adversely impact CNA's competitive position. CNA's efforts or the efforts of agents and brokers with respect to new products or alternate distribution channels, as well as changes in the way agents and brokers utilize greater levels of data and technology, including artificial intelligence, could adversely impact CNA's business relationships with independent agents and brokers who currently market its products, resulting in a lower volume and/or profitability of business generated from these sources. 21 21 21 21 Table of Contents Table of Contents **Current (2026):** Technological changes in the way insurance transactions are completed in the marketplace, and CNA's ability to react effectively to such change, may present significant competitive risks. For example, more insurers are utilizing or may begin utilizing "big data" analytics or artificial intelligence ("AI") to make underwriting or other decisions that impact product design and pricing. If such utilization by CNA's industry peers is more effective than how it uses its data and information, including through its own use of AI, CNA will be at a competitive disadvantage. There can be no assurance that CNA will continue to compete effectively with its industry peers due to technological changes; accordingly this may have a material adverse effect on CNA's business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, agents and brokers, technology companies or other third parties may create alternate distribution channels for commercial business that may adversely impact product differentiation and pricing. For example, they may create a digitally enabled distribution channel that may adversely impact CNA's competitive position. CNA's efforts or the efforts of agents and brokers with respect to new products or alternate distribution channels, as well as changes in the way agents and brokers utilize greater levels of data and technology, including AI, could adversely impact CNA's business relationships with independent agents and brokers who currently market its products, resulting in a lower volume and/or profitability of business generated from these sources. Further, CNA's business could be affected as its policyholders adopt AI technologies. Policyholder use of AI could introduce novel exposures that may result in new or increased claims. Widespread adoption of AI could fundamentally disrupt entire industries, which could impact the demand for certain products. --- ## Modified: Boardwalk Pipelines' actual construction and development costs could exceed its forecasts; its anticipated cash flow from construction and development projects will not be immediate and can take several years; and its construction and development projects may not be completed on time or at all. **Key changes:** - Added sentence: "These projects incur significant resources, including technological and human capital, and involve logistical challenges." - Reworded sentence: "On Boardwalk Pipelines' interstate pipelines, there are several years between when the project is announced and when customers begin using the new facilities." - Reworded sentence: "The construction of new assets involves a number of risks, including risks related to regulations (federal, state and local), landowner opposition, environmental matters, activists, legal compliance, political matters and materials and labor costs or shortages, as well as operational and other risks that are difficult to predict and some of which are beyond Boardwalk Pipelines' control." **Prior (2025):** Boardwalk Pipelines is and has been engaged in several construction projects involving its existing assets and the construction of new facilities for which it has expended or will expend significant capital. Boardwalk Pipelines expects to continue to engage in the construction of additional growth projects and modifications of its system. When Boardwalk Pipelines builds a new pipeline or expands or modifies an existing facility, the design, construction and development occurs over an extended period of time, and it will not receive any revenue or cash flow from that project until after it is placed into commercial service. On Boardwalk Pipelines' interstate pipelines there are several years between when the project is announced and when customers begin using the new facilities. During this period, Boardwalk Pipelines spends capital and incurs costs without receiving any of the financial benefits associated with the projects. The construction of new 29 29 29 29 Table of Contents Table of Contents assets involves a number of risks, including risks related to regulations (federal, state and local), landowner opposition, environmental matters, activists, legal compliance, political matters and materials and labor costs, as well as operational and other risks that are difficult to predict and some of which are beyond Boardwalk Pipelines' control. Additionally, the possibility of implementing trade tariffs under the Trump Administration could impact some of Boardwalk Pipelines' pricing and availability of materials with some of its suppliers. A project may not be completed on time or at all due to a variety of factors, may be impacted by significant cost overruns or may be materially changed prior to completion as a result of developments or circumstances that Boardwalk Pipelines is not aware of when it commits to the project. Any of these events could result in material, unexpected costs or have a material adverse effect on Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its growth projects. **Current (2026):** Boardwalk Pipelines is and has been engaged in several construction projects involving its existing assets and the construction of new facilities for which it has expended or will expend significant capital. Boardwalk Pipelines expects to continue to engage in the construction of additional growth projects and modifications of its system. These projects incur significant resources, including technological and human capital, and involve logistical challenges. When Boardwalk Pipelines builds a new pipeline or expands or modifies an existing facility, the design, construction and development occurs over an extended period of time, and it will not receive any revenue or cash flow from that project until after it is placed into commercial service. On Boardwalk Pipelines' interstate pipelines, there are several years between when the project is announced and when customers begin using the new facilities. During this period, Boardwalk Pipelines spends capital and incurs costs without receiving any of the financial benefits associated with the projects. The construction of new assets involves a number of risks, including risks related to regulations (federal, state and local), landowner opposition, environmental matters, activists, legal compliance, political matters and materials and labor costs or shortages, as well as operational and other risks that are difficult to predict and some of which are beyond Boardwalk Pipelines' control. Boardwalk Pipelines' cost and timing estimates for these projects are based on a variety of inputs such 28 28 28 28 Table of Contents Table of Contents as contractor indicative bids, quotes on materials and internally-developed financial models, metrics and timelines and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including obtaining timely regulatory and permit approvals and the cost thereof, adverse weather conditions during construction, its ability to acquire and the cost of obtaining rights to construct and operate on land not owned by Boardwalk Pipelines, delays in obtaining, shortages and price increases for key materials (including pipe, compressor stations and related equipment), tariff implications and shortages and increased costs of qualified labor. Factors in the estimates include, among other things, those related to pipeline costs based on mileage, size and type of pipe, materials, including compressors and related equipment, land, engineering and construction costs and timely receipt of all necessary permits and approvals. Actual costs and timing of in-service dates for Boardwalk Pipelines' growth projects may differ, perhaps materially, from its estimates. In addition, failure to timely meet development milestones may result in, among other things, contractual counterparties having the ability to terminate contracts with Boardwalk Pipelines. A project may not be completed on time or at all due to a variety of factors, may be impacted by significant cost overruns or may be materially changed prior to completion as a result of developments or circumstances that Boardwalk Pipelines is not aware of when it commits to the project. Any of these events could result in material, unexpected costs or have a material adverse effect on Boardwalk Pipelines' ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its growth projects. --- ## Modified: Any significant breach in CNA's data security infrastructure or its vendors' facilities or systems could disrupt business, cause financial losses and damage its reputation, and insurance coverage may not be available for claims related to a breach. **Key changes:** - Reworded sentence: "Further, the increasing use of AI, within CNA's systems and those of its vendors and third-party administrators to achieve operational efficiencies and within threat actors' attack strategies, may further expose its systems or those of its vendors and third-party administrators to the risk of cyber-attacks." - Reworded sentence: "During the fourth quarter of 2025, CNA was notified of a data breach impacting a vendor of a business associate of its current employee health insurance administrator." - Reworded sentence: "While CNA does not believe breaches that have occurred and resultant actions will have a material adverse effect on its business, these or similar incidents, or any other breach of CNA's or its vendors' data security infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition." - Added sentence: "25 25 25 25 Table of Contents Table of Contents" **Prior (2025):** A significant breach of CNA's data security infrastructure may result from actions by its employees, vendors, third-party administrators, or unknown third parties or through cyber attacks. The risk of a breach can exist whether software services are in CNA's or third party administered data centers or are cloud-based software services. The sophistication of cybersecurity threats continues to escalate, and the measures CNA takes to mitigate the risk of cyber incidents and to safeguard its systems and data may be insufficient. Further, the increasing use of artificial intelligence, both within CNA's systems to achieve operational efficiencies and within threat actors' attack strategies, may further expose its systems to the risk of cyber-attacks. Breaches have occurred, and may occur again, in CNA's systems and in the systems of its vendors and third-party administrators, both current and former, in that past vendors and third-party administrators may still retain certain confidential and sensitive information in their systems. During the third quarter of 2024, CNA was notified of a data breach resulting from a ransomware attack that impacted a former vendor. This incident resulted in required breach notifications to CNA's impacted long-term care policyholders, with such notifications made by the subject vendor. In the same quarter, CNA was notified of a data breach resulting from a ransomware attack that impacted a current vendor. This incident resulted in required breach notifications to impacted individuals, which included insurance claimants and their representatives, with such notifications made by the subject vendor. Breaches could affect CNA's data framework or cause a failure to protect the personal information of its customers, claimants or employees, or sensitive and confidential information regarding its business or policyholders and may result in operational impairments and financial losses, significant harm to its reputation and the loss of business with existing or potential customers. The breach of confidential information also could give rise to legal liability and regulatory action under data protection and privacy laws, as well as evolving regulation in this regard. While CNA does not believe such breaches that have occurred and resultant actions will have a material adverse effect on its business, these or similar incidents, or any other such breach of CNA's or its vendors' data security infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. 23 23 23 23 Table of Contents Table of Contents As previously disclosed, CNA sustained a sophisticated cybersecurity attack in March 2021 involving ransomware that caused a network disruption and impacted certain of its systems. CNA's investigation into the incident revealed that an unauthorized third party copied some personal information relating to certain current and former employees, contract workers and their dependents and certain other persons, including some policyholders. Although CNA currently has no indication that the impacted data has been misused, or that CNA or its policyholder data was specifically targeted by the unauthorized third party, it may be subject to subsequent investigations, claims or actions in addition to other costs, fines, penalties, or other obligations related to impacted data, whether or not such data is misused. In addition, the misuse, or perceived misuse, of sensitive or confidential information regarding its business or policyholders could cause harm to CNA's reputation and result in the loss of business with existing or potential customers, which could adversely impact its business, results of operations and financial condition. Although CNA maintains cybersecurity insurance coverage insuring against costs resulting from cyber attacks (including the March 2021 attack), CNA does not expect the amount available under its coverage policy to cover all losses from cyber-attacks. In addition, potential disputes with its insurers about the availability of insurance coverage could occur. Further, should CNA experience future cyber incidents, or should industry trends drive rate increases resulting from growth in volume and significance of cyber incidents broadly, it may incur higher costs for cybersecurity insurance coverage. The risks relating to future breaches in CNA's, or its vendors' data security infrastructure or systems, including in connection with cyber incidents, could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial condition or may result in significant operational impairments and financial losses, as well as significant harm to CNA's reputation. **Current (2026):** A significant breach of CNA's data security infrastructure may result from actions by its employees, vendors, third-party administrators, or unknown third parties or through cyber attacks. The risk of a breach can exist whether software services are in CNA's or third party administered data centers or are cloud-based software services. The sophistication of cybersecurity threats continues to escalate, and the measures CNA takes to mitigate the risk of cyber incidents and to safeguard its systems and data may be insufficient. Further, the increasing use of AI, within CNA's systems and those of its vendors and third-party administrators to achieve operational efficiencies and within threat actors' attack strategies, may further expose its systems or those of its vendors and third-party administrators to the risk of cyber-attacks. Breaches have occurred, and may occur again, in CNA's systems and in the systems of its vendors and third-party administrators, both current and former, in that past vendors and third-party administrators may still retain certain confidential and sensitive information in their systems. During the fourth quarter of 2025, CNA was notified of a data breach impacting a vendor of a business associate of its current employee health insurance administrator. The breach was traced to compromised credentials leveraged by a threat actor, with the impacted vendor shutting down and rebuilding the affected environment upon discovery of the breach. Following a forensics analysis, it was determined that a substantial number of CNA's employees (and dependents of employees) were impacted. CNA understands that the subject vendor will be providing required breach notifications to all impacted individuals. Breaches that affect CNA's data security infrastructure or its vendors' facilities or systems, may cause a failure to protect the personal information of its customers, claimants or employees, or sensitive and confidential information regarding its business or policyholders and may result in operational impairments and financial losses, significant harm to its reputation and the loss of business with existing or potential customers. The breach of confidential information also could give rise to legal liability and regulatory action under data protection and privacy laws, as well as evolving regulation in this regard. While CNA does not believe breaches that have occurred and resultant actions will have a material adverse effect on its business, these or similar incidents, or any other breach of CNA's or its vendors' data security infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. Although CNA maintains cybersecurity insurance coverage insuring against costs resulting from cyber attacks, CNA does not expect the amount available under its coverage policy to cover all potential losses from cyber-attacks. In addition, potential disputes with its insurers about the availability of insurance coverage could occur. Further, should CNA experience future cyber incidents, or should industry trends drive rate increases resulting from growth in volume and significance of cyber incidents broadly, it may incur higher costs for cybersecurity insurance coverage. The risks relating to future breaches in CNA's, or its vendors' data security infrastructure or systems, including in connection with cyber incidents, could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations or financial condition or may result in significant operational impairments and financial losses, as well as significant harm to CNA's reputation. 25 25 25 25 Table of Contents Table of Contents --- ## Modified: Scrutiny and changing expectations from stakeholders with respect to sustainability practices may impose additional costs on us and our subsidiaries or expose us and our subsidiaries to new or additional risks. **Key changes:** - Reworded sentence: "Companies across all industries may face scrutiny from stakeholders related to their sustainability practices, including from both those who support and those who oppose such practices." **Prior (2025):** Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from stakeholders related to their ESG practices. Certain influential investors in recent years have been focused on ESG practices and have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. In addition, organizations that provide information on corporate governance and related matters have developed rating processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters, and many of these ratings processes are inconsistent with each other. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and voting decisions. Regardless of the industry, investors' increased focus and activism related to ESG and similar matters may hinder access to, or increase the cost of, capital, as investors may decide to reallocate capital 42 42 42 42 Table of Contents Table of Contents or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company's ESG practices. In addition, other stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, regulators and ratings agencies, have also been focused on ESG matters. Companies have also increasingly been requested by stakeholders to create and publish disclosures regarding their ESG practices. While we and our subsidiaries may make such disclosures from time to time, many of the statements in those disclosures may not be material and may be based on expectations and assumptions that may not be representative of actual risks or events or forecasts of expected risks or events. Such expectations and assumptions are necessarily uncertain and may be prone to error or subject to misinterpretation given the long timelines involved and the lack of an established single approach to identifying, measuring and reporting on many ESG matters. As a holding company, our stakeholders generally focus on the ESG practices across our enterprise, including those at our subsidiaries. As our subsidiaries operate in different industries, the particular ESG issues that stakeholders tend to focus on differ from subsidiary to subsidiary. For instance, as a property and casualty insurer, CNA's stakeholders may focus on the ESG practices of companies in which CNA invests, while Boardwalk Pipelines' stakeholders may focus on climate change and emissions from Boardwalk Pipelines' operations and Loews Hotels & Co's stakeholders may focus on the carbon footprint of its properties. Companies that do not adapt to or comply with investor or other stakeholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or that are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern regarding ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and other adverse consequences. Additionally, to the extent ESG matters negatively impact our reputation, we may not be able to compete as effectively to recruit or retain employees, which may adversely affect our operations. **Current (2026):** Companies across all industries may face scrutiny from stakeholders related to their sustainability practices, including from both those who support and those who oppose such practices. Regardless of the industry, investors' focus and activism related to sustainability and similar matters may hinder access to, or increase the cost of, capital, as investors may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company's sustainability practices. In addition, other stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, regulators and ratings agencies, may also focus on sustainability matters. Companies that do not adapt to or comply with investor or other stakeholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or that are perceived to have not responded appropriately to concerns regarding sustainability issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and other adverse consequences. Additionally, to the extent sustainability matters negatively impact our reputation, we may not be able to compete as effectively to recruit or retain employees, which may adversely affect our operations. --- *Data sourced from SEC EDGAR. Last updated 2026-06-01.*