PVH: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

2025 vs 2024  ·  SEC EDGAR  ·  2026-05-10
Other years: 2026 vs 2025
⚠ AI-Generated

The summary below was generated by an AI language model and may contain errors or omissions. All other content on this page is deterministically extracted from the original SEC EDGAR filing.

PVH added four material new risks in 2025, most notably China regulatory exposure following its placement on MOFCOM's Unreliable Entities List, internal control deficiencies in IT systems, and uncertainty around cost-saving initiatives and debt refinancing. Simultaneously, the company substantively modified four existing risks including foreign currency exposure, royalty dependency, ESG regulation, and tax authority decisions, suggesting heightened concerns in these areas without eliminating them entirely.

✓ Deterministic extraction — no AI-generated data

Classification is based on semantic text similarity scoring and may include approximations. “No match” means no high-confidence textual match was found — not necessarily that a section was removed.

4
New Risks
0
Removed
4
Modified
26
Unchanged
🟢 New in Current Filing

China’s Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) conducted an investigation into our business which resulted in PVH Corp. being placed on the List of Unreliable Entities (“UEL”) and could result in fines or restrictions on our ability to do business in China, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and results of operations.

In September 2024, MOFCOM announced that it had initiated an investigation into our business under the UEL Provisions. In October 2024, we submitted a written response to MOFCOM and, in December 2024, we submitted a supplementary response. In January 2025, MOFCOM issued a…

Read full text

In September 2024, MOFCOM announced that it had initiated an investigation into our business under the UEL Provisions. In October 2024, we submitted a written response to MOFCOM and, in December 2024, we submitted a supplementary response. In January 2025, MOFCOM issued a preliminary finding that PVH Corp. had violated normal market trading principles and in February it announced its determination and placed PVH Corp. on the UEL. We do not know if or when MOFCOM will implement any measures as a result of the listing or what they will be if any are imposed. According to the UEL Provisions, potential measures could include monetary fines, restrictions or prohibitions on engaging in import and export activities related to China or making investments in China, entry denial of our relevant personnel into China, restrictions or revocation of work permits, stay or residence status of our relevant personnel in China, or other measures. No measures have been imposed on us at this time. The practical impact of any such restrictions or prohibitions could include our inability to produce goods in China for sale elsewhere, our inability to sell goods on a wholesale or retail basis in China, or our inability to make investments in China. We cannot currently predict the duration or impact of any measures that may ultimately be imposed. The imposition and enforcement of measures against us could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and results of operations. Furthermore, if, as a result of any such measures, it is necessary for us to cease certain or all operations in China, it may result in charges related to excess inventory and difficulty collecting trade receivables, among other things. We may also incur material non-cash impairment charges if we are unable to recover the carrying value of our goodwill, other indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets. Additionally, if the production of our products in China ceases, our business could be impacted more broadly and we may need or decide to shift production to other jurisdictions. Please see the risk factors entitled “We primarily use foreign suppliers for our products and raw materials, which poses risks to our business operations.” and “We depend on third parties to manufacture our products and any disruption in our relationships with these parties or in their businesses may materially adversely affect our business.” for additional information.

🟢 New in Current Filing

Our operating model simplification and cost-saving initiative may not generate the intended benefits or attain the projected cost savings we anticipate.

We have embarked on a multi-year initiative to simplify our operating model by centralizing certain processes and improving systems and automation to drive more efficient and cost-effective ways of working across the organization, through four main pillars: (i) delivering a…

Read full text

We have embarked on a multi-year initiative to simplify our operating model by centralizing certain processes and improving systems and automation to drive more efficient and cost-effective ways of working across the organization, through four main pillars: (i) delivering a single global technology stack, (ii) redesigning our global distribution network, (iii) reengineering the operating model in Europe, and (iv) streamlining and optimizing our support functions globally (referred to as “Growth Driver 5 Actions”). Our ability to realize anticipated benefits and cost savings from this initiative are subject to many estimates and assumptions, which may change during implementation and execution. In addition, there can be no assurance regarding the timing of or extent to which we will realize the anticipated cost savings, if at all. We may also face disruptions to our business or operations as we execute on the initiative.

🟢 New in Current Filing

We identified a material weakness in our internal control related to ineffective information technology general controls (“ITGCs”) which, if not remediated appropriately or timely, could result in loss of investor confidence and adversely impact our stock price.

Internal controls related to the operation of technology systems are critical to maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As disclosed in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in Part II. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures…

Read full text

Internal controls related to the operation of technology systems are critical to maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As disclosed in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in Part II. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, management identified a material weakness in internal control related to ineffective ITGCs in the area of user access management over our enterprise resource planning system and the related systems in our Europe, the Middle East and Africa region. As a result, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of February 2, 2025. We have been implementing and continue to implement measures designed to ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material weakness are remediated such that these controls are designed, implemented and operating effectively. While there can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful, we plan to remediate the material weakness expeditiously. These measures will result in additional technology, payroll and other expenses. If we are unable to remediate the material weakness, or are otherwise unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, it could adversely affect our ability to accurately report our financial results, resulting in material misstatements in our financial statements or causing us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, which could subject us to litigation or investigations requiring management resources and payment of legal and other expenses, negatively affect investor confidence in our financial statements and adversely impact our stock price.

🟢 New in Current Filing

Our ability to obtain financing or refinance existing debt on terms that are acceptable to us could be adversely affected by general macroeconomic conditions or our financial performance and credit ratings.

Disruption or volatility in the financial and credit markets, including as a result of macroeconomic pressures and/or geopolitical events, could limit the availability of funds or the ability or willingness of financial institutions to extend capital to us in the future. In…

Read full text

Disruption or volatility in the financial and credit markets, including as a result of macroeconomic pressures and/or geopolitical events, could limit the availability of funds or the ability or willingness of financial institutions to extend capital to us in the future. In addition, our ability to access financial and credit markets in the future as a source of funding, and the borrowing costs associated with such financing, is dependent upon our financial performance, outlook and credit rating. An inability to obtain additional financing or refinance existing debt on terms that are acceptable to us, if at all, could impact our ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividend payments, share repurchases and general corporate requirements and/or significantly increase our cost of capital, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Furthermore, if our investment rating is downgraded in the future, in addition to it resulting in a higher cost of capital, it could also result in reduced access to the financial and credit markets and more restrictive covenants for future debt issuances.

🟡 Modified

Our business is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and control regulations.

high match confidence

Sentence-level differences:

  • Reworded sentence: "Our results of operations will be unfavorably impacted by foreign currency translation during times of a strengthening United States dollar, particularly against the euro, the Australian dollar, the Japanese yen, the Korean won, the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Mexican peso, the Brazilian real and the Chinese yuan, and favorably impacted during times of a weakening United States dollar against those currencies."

Current (2025):

Our Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein businesses each have substantial international components that expose us to significant foreign exchange risk. Changes in exchange rates between the United States dollar and other currencies impact our financial results in two ways: a…

Read full text

Our Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein businesses each have substantial international components that expose us to significant foreign exchange risk. Changes in exchange rates between the United States dollar and other currencies impact our financial results in two ways: a translational impact and a transactional impact. Please see our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 of this report for further discussion. Our results of operations will be unfavorably impacted by foreign currency translation during times of a strengthening United States dollar, particularly against the euro, the Australian dollar, the Japanese yen, the Korean won, the British pound, the Canadian dollar, the Mexican peso, the Brazilian real and the Chinese yuan, and favorably impacted during times of a weakening United States dollar against those currencies. There also is a transactional impact of foreign exchange because our foreign subsidiaries purchase inventory in a currency other than their functional currency. We currently use and plan to 24 24 24 24 24 24 continue to use foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the cash flow or market risks associated with these inventory transactions, but we are unable to eliminate these risks entirely. We conduct business in countries that have laws and regulations that restrict the ability of our foreign subsidiaries to pay dividends and remit cash to affiliated companies and, as a result, limit our ability to repatriate or use outside of the country the cash generated by the impacted subsidiaries, which may have an adverse impact on the funding of our business and operations.

View prior text (2024)

Our Tommy Hilfiger and Calvin Klein businesses each have substantial international components that expose us to significant foreign exchange risk. Changes in exchange rates between the United States dollar and other currencies impact our financial results in two ways: a translational impact and a transactional impact. Please see our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 of this report for further discussion. Our results of operations will be unfavorably impacted by foreign currency translation during times of a strengthening United States dollar, particularly against the euro, the Australian dollar, the Japanese yen, the Korean won, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Chinese yuan, and favorably impacted during times of a weakening United States dollar against those currencies. There also is a transactional impact of foreign exchange because our foreign subsidiaries purchase inventory in a currency other than their functional currency, and movements in the functional currency in relation to the transactional currency can increase or decrease the local currency value of inventory which results in higher or lower cost of goods sold when the goods are sold. The functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are generally their local currencies. We currently use and plan to continue to use foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the cash flow or market risks associated with these inventory transactions, but we are unable to eliminate these risks entirely. We conduct business in countries that have laws and regulations that restrict the ability of our foreign subsidiaries to pay dividends and remit cash to affiliated companies and, as a result, limit our ability to repatriate or use outside of the country the cash generated by the impacted subsidiaries, which may have an adverse impact on our funding of our business and operations.

🟡 Modified

A portion of our revenue is dependent on royalties and licensing.

high match confidence

Sentence-level differences:

  • Reworded sentence: "Therefore, the loss of a significant licensee, whether due to the termination or expiration of the relationship, the cessation of the licensee’s operations or otherwise (including as a result of financial difficulties of the licensee), without an equivalent replacement, or a significant decline in our licensees’ sales could materially impact our profitability."

Current (2025):

The operating profit associated with our royalty, advertising and other revenue is significant because the operating expenses directly associated with administering and monitoring an individual licensing or similar agreement are minimal. Therefore, the loss of a significant…

Read full text

The operating profit associated with our royalty, advertising and other revenue is significant because the operating expenses directly associated with administering and monitoring an individual licensing or similar agreement are minimal. Therefore, the loss of a significant licensee, whether due to the termination or expiration of the relationship, the cessation of the licensee’s operations or otherwise (including as a result of financial difficulties of the licensee), without an equivalent replacement, or a significant decline in our licensees’ sales could materially impact our profitability. Although the licensing model can be highly profitable, we are planning to, and in the future may pursue further opportunities to, increase direct management of our Calvin Klein and TOMMY HILFIGER brands through takebacks of licensed businesses. Please see the Risk Factor below entitled “We may not be successful in the take-back of licensed businesses.” While we generally have significant control over our licensees’ products and advertising, we rely on them for, among other things, operational and financial controls over their businesses. Our licensees’ failure to successfully market licensed products or our inability to replace our existing licensees could materially and adversely affect our revenue both directly from reduced royalty, advertising and other revenue received and indirectly from reduced sales of our other products. Risks are also associated with our licensees’ ability to obtain capital, execute their business plans, timely deliver quality products, manage their labor relations, maintain relationships with their suppliers, manage their credit risk effectively and maintain relationships with their customers. 22 22 22 22 22 22

View prior text (2024)

The operating profit associated with our royalty, advertising and other revenue is significant because the operating expenses directly associated with administering and monitoring an individual licensing or similar agreement are minimal. 20 20 20 20 20 20 Therefore, the loss of a significant licensee, whether due to the termination or expiration of the relationship, the cessation of the licensee’s operations or otherwise (including as a result of financial difficulties of the licensee), without an equivalent replacement, or a significant decline in our licensees’ sales could materially impact our profitability. Although the licensing model can be highly profitable, we are planning to, and in the future may pursue further opportunities to, increase direct management of our Calvin Klein and TOMMY HILFIGER brands through takebacks of licensed businesses. Please see the Risk Factor below entitled “We may not be successful in the take-back of licensed businesses.” While we generally have significant control over our licensees’ products and advertising, we rely on them for, among other things, operational and financial controls over their businesses. Our licensees’ failure to successfully market licensed products or our inability to replace our existing licensees could materially and adversely affect our revenue both directly from reduced royalty, advertising and other revenue received and indirectly from reduced sales of our other products. Risks are also associated with our licensees’ ability to obtain capital, execute their business plans, timely deliver quality products, manage their labor relations, maintain relationships with their suppliers, manage their credit risk effectively and maintain relationships with their customers.

🟡 Modified

Increased regulation and stakeholder scrutiny regarding our environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters, could result in additional costs or risks and adversely impact our reputation.

high match confidence

Sentence-level differences:

  • Reworded sentence: "There is a focus from certain consumers, investors, our associates and other stakeholders on ESG matters, which has led to increased pressure to expand our disclosures, ensure labor and other sustainability standards within our value chain, make and establish corporate responsibility goals, and take actions to meet them, which could expose us to regulatory, legal, market, 16 16 16 16 16 16 operational and execution costs or risks."
  • Reworded sentence: "This could result in our inability to achieve our targets or comply with ESG reporting regulations."

Current (2025):

There is a focus from certain consumers, investors, our associates and other stakeholders on ESG matters, which has led to increased pressure to expand our disclosures, ensure labor and other sustainability standards within our value chain, make and establish corporate…

Read full text

There is a focus from certain consumers, investors, our associates and other stakeholders on ESG matters, which has led to increased pressure to expand our disclosures, ensure labor and other sustainability standards within our value chain, make and establish corporate responsibility goals, and take actions to meet them, which could expose us to regulatory, legal, market, 16 16 16 16 16 16 operational and execution costs or risks. The emergence of legislation and regulation regarding marketing of goods, business practices, and public reporting and disclosures related to issues under the ESG umbrella, including the European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, could also lead to risks associated with non-compliance. We seek to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and have established focus areas and targets under our corporate responsibility strategy in respect to many ESG measures, including in regard to greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and usage of more environmentally preferred materials and packaging, and human rights. There can be no assurance that we can achieve compliance without significant impact on our business or results of operations or that our stakeholders will agree with our strategy or that we will be successful in achieving our goals. This could result in our inability to achieve our targets or comply with ESG reporting regulations. In addition, we could be criticized by stakeholders, regulators, or other interested parties for the scope or nature of our ESG initiatives or goals or for any revisions to these goals, including negative responses by governmental actors (such as anti-ESG legislation or retaliatory legislative treatment) or consumers (such as boycotts or negative publicity campaigns). Any of these occurrences could adversely affect our reputation and the reputation of our brands, sales and demand for our products, retention of our associates, willingness of our suppliers to do business with us, and investor interest in our securities.

View prior text (2024)

There is an increased focus from consumers, investors, our associates and other stakeholders on ESG matters, which has led to increased pressure to expand our disclosures, ensure labor and other sustainability standards within our value chain, make and establish corporate responsibility goals, and take actions to meet them, which could expose us to regulatory, legal, market, operational and execution costs or risks. The emergence of legislation and regulation regarding marketing of goods, business practices, and public reporting and disclosures related to issues under the ESG umbrella could also lead to risks associated with non-compliance. We seek to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and have established focus areas and targets under our Fashion Forward corporate responsibility strategy in respect to many ESG measures, including in regard to greenhouse gas emissions, water usage and usage of more environmentally preferred materials and packaging, human rights, diversity, and more. There can be no assurance that we can achieve compliance without significant impact on our business or results of operations or that our stakeholders will agree with our strategy or that we will be successful in achieving our goals. Our targets are ambitious and inability to achieve them or comply with ESG reporting regulations could adversely affect our reputation and the reputation of our brands, sales and demand for our products, retention of our associates, willingness of our suppliers to do business with us, and investor interest in our securities.

🟡 Modified

Adverse decisions of tax authorities or changes in tax treaties, laws, rules or interpretations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow.

high match confidence

Sentence-level differences:

  • Added sentence: "The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) has proposed updates to long-standing international tax principles, addressing issues such as profit 25 25 25 25 25 25 shifting among affiliated entities in different tax jurisdictions and a global minimum effective tax rate of 15%, generally referred to as “Pillar Two.” In response, some member countries have already implemented or are planning to implement legislation to align their tax rules with the OECD’s recommendations in 2024 and beyond."
  • Added sentence: "The Pillar Two legislation did not have a material impact on our 2024 effective tax rate."
  • Added sentence: "However, the final outcome and application of these rules in the U.S."
  • Added sentence: "and other jurisdictions could potentially have a material adverse financial impact on us."
  • Reworded sentence: "We and our subsidiaries are engaged in various intercompany transactions."

Current (2025):

We have direct operations in many countries and the applicable tax rates vary by jurisdiction. The tax laws and regulations in the countries where we operate are subject to change. Moreover, there may be changes from time to time in interpretation and enforcement of existing tax…

Read full text

We have direct operations in many countries and the applicable tax rates vary by jurisdiction. The tax laws and regulations in the countries where we operate are subject to change. Moreover, there may be changes from time to time in interpretation and enforcement of existing tax law. As a result, we may pay additional taxes if rates increase or if laws, regulations or treaties in the jurisdictions where we operate are modified. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) has proposed updates to long-standing international tax principles, addressing issues such as profit 25 25 25 25 25 25 shifting among affiliated entities in different tax jurisdictions and a global minimum effective tax rate of 15%, generally referred to as “Pillar Two.” In response, some member countries have already implemented or are planning to implement legislation to align their tax rules with the OECD’s recommendations in 2024 and beyond. The Pillar Two legislation did not have a material impact on our 2024 effective tax rate. However, the final outcome and application of these rules in the U.S. and other jurisdictions could potentially have a material adverse financial impact on us. In addition, various national and local taxing authorities periodically audit our returns. The resolution of an audit may result in us paying more than the amount that we may have reserved for a particular tax matter, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, business, financial condition and results of operations for any affected reporting period. We and our subsidiaries are engaged in various intercompany transactions. While we believe these transactions are conducted at arm’s length and are supported by the appropriate transfer pricing documentation, local tax authorities may scrutinize the transfer prices and conditions in place, which could potentially result in additional tax liabilities.

View prior text (2024)

We have direct operations in many countries and the applicable tax rates vary by jurisdiction. The tax laws and regulations in the countries where we operate are subject to change. Moreover, there may be changes from time to time in interpretation and enforcement of existing tax law. As a result, we may pay additional taxes if rates increase or if laws, regulations or treaties in the jurisdictions where we operate are modified. In addition, various national and local taxing authorities periodically audit our returns. The resolution of an audit may result in us paying more than the amount that we may have reserved for a particular tax matter, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, business, financial condition and results of operations for any affected reporting period. We and our subsidiaries are engaged in a number of intercompany transactions. Although we believe that these transactions reflect arm’s length terms and that proper transfer pricing documentation is in place, the transfer prices and conditions may be scrutinized by local tax authorities, which could result in additional tax liabilities.