Restaurant Brands International Inc.: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

Our global operations expose us to risks in managing the differing cultural, regulatory, geopolitical and economic environments in the countries where our restaurants operate. These risks, which can vary substantially by market and may increase in importance as each of our brands enter into new markets and our franchisees expand operations in international markets, are described in many of the risk factors discussed in this report and include the following: •governmental laws, regulations and policies adopted to manage national economic conditions, such as increases in taxes, austerity measures that impact consumer spending, monetary policies that may impact inflation rates and currency fluctuations; •the effects of legal and regulatory changes and the burdens and costs of our compliance with a variety of foreign laws; •changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment and trade in and among the countries in which we operate, including the imposition of or increase in tariffs, import restrictions or controls or similar trade policies; •compliance with U.S., Canadian and other anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, including compliance by our employees, contractors, licensees or agents and those of our strategic partners and joint ventures; •risks and costs associated with political and economic instability, corruption, anti-American or anti-Canadian sentiment, boycotts and social and ethnic unrest in the countries in which we operate; •the risks of operating in developing or emerging markets in which there are significant uncertainties regarding the interpretation, application and enforceability of laws, regulations, contract rights and intellectual property rights; 12 12 12 Table of Contents Table of Contents •risks arising from the significant and rapid fluctuations in currency exchange markets and the decisions and positions that we take to hedge such volatility; •the impact of labor costs on our franchisees' margins given changing labor conditions and difficulties experienced by our franchisees or us in staffing international operations; and •the effects of increases in the taxes we pay and other changes in applicable tax laws. Geopolitical conflicts in the Ukraine and the Middle East have and may continue to adversely impact economic conditions in those regions and elsewhere including through decreased demand for brands associated with the U.S. or Canada and/or increased commodity, labor and energy costs, and/or delays or disruptions in supply chains that may adversely affect us and our franchisees’ restaurants. Decreased profitability of affected franchisees may also delay restaurant development. We recently acquired formerly franchised restaurants in China and we are working to position these businesses for growth. As a result, we have greater exposure to the risks described above that relate to owning and operating restaurants in China, including those related to licensing, administrative challenges, economic and political conditions, tariffs, currency regulation and fluctuations, privacy and information security regulation, leasing real estate, adapting to local consumer preferences, and attracting and retaining talent. Also, we may not be able to identify experienced local partners to take control of these businesses within the expected time frames.

Our global operations expose us to risks in managing the differing cultural, regulatory, geopolitical and economic environments in the countries where our restaurants operate. These risks, which can vary substantially by market and may increase in importance as each of our brands enter into new markets and our franchisees expand operations in international markets, are described in many of the risk factors discussed in this report and include the following: •governmental laws, regulations and policies adopted to manage national economic conditions, such as increases in taxes, austerity measures that impact consumer spending, monetary policies that may impact inflation rates and currency fluctuations; •the effects of legal and regulatory changes and the burdens and costs of our compliance with a variety of foreign laws; •changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment and trade in the countries in which we operate, including the imposition of import restrictions or controls; •compliance with U.S., Canadian and other anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, including compliance by our employees, contractors, licensees or agents and those of our strategic partners and joint ventures; •risks and costs associated with political and economic instability, corruption, anti-American or anti-Canadian sentiment, boycotts and social and ethnic unrest in the countries in which we operate; •the risks of operating in developing or emerging markets in which there are significant uncertainties regarding the interpretation, application and enforceability of laws, regulations, contract rights and intellectual property rights; •risks arising from the significant and rapid fluctuations in currency exchange markets and the decisions and positions that we take to hedge such volatility; •the impact of labor costs on our franchisees' margins given changing labor conditions and difficulties experienced by our franchisees in staffing their international operations; and 14 14 14 Table of Contents Table of Contents •the effects of increases in the taxes we pay and other changes in applicable tax laws. The conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East may continue to adversely impact economic conditions in those regions and elsewhere including through decreased demand for brands associated with the U.S. or Canada and/or increased commodity, labor and energy costs, and/or delays or disruptions in supply chains that may adversely affect us and our franchisees’ restaurants.

As of December 31, 2024, approximately 95% of our restaurants are owned and operated by franchisees. Therefore, our future prospects depend on our ability to attract new franchisees for each of our brands that meet our criteria and the willingness and ability of franchisees to open restaurants in existing and new markets. We may be unable to identify franchisees who meet our criteria, or franchisees we identify may not successfully implement their expansion plans. Our franchised business model presents a number of other drawbacks, such as limited influence over franchisee operations, limited ability to facilitate changes in restaurant ownership, limitations on enforcement of franchise obligations due to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, and reliance on franchisees to participate in our strategic initiatives. While we can mandate certain strategic initiatives through enforcement of our franchise agreements, we will need the active support of our franchisees if the implementation of these initiatives is to be successful. In many areas, franchisees have discretion as to the prices they charge to consumers, which, if not well calibrated, could negatively impact consumer demand and decrease overall revenues. The failure of franchisees to support our marketing programs and strategic initiatives could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. On occasion we have encountered, and may in the future encounter, challenges in receiving specific financial and operational results from our franchisees in a consistent and timely manner. Further, the information we receive from franchisees, including regarding their profitability, may not be audited or subject to a similar level of 16 16 16 Table of Contents Table of Contents internal controls as our processes. To the extent that we are not able to obtain transparency into our operations from these systems, it could impair the ability of our management to react quickly when appropriate and our operating results could be negatively impacted. Our competitors that have a significantly higher percentage of company-operated restaurants than we do may have greater influence over their respective restaurant systems and greater ability to implement operational initiatives and business strategies, including their marketing and advertising programs. As part of our growth strategy, we may decide to increase or decrease the number of Company restaurants, by purchasing existing franchised stores, by refranchising existing Company restaurants, or by developing additional stores. Our failure to successfully execute these transactions could have an adverse effect on our operating results. The ability of our franchisees and prospective franchisees to obtain financing for development of new restaurants or reinvestment in existing restaurants depends in part upon financial and economic conditions beyond their control and may be subject to increased development costs. If our franchisees are unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms or otherwise do not devote sufficient resources to develop new restaurants or reinvest in existing restaurants, our business and financial results could be adversely affected. Also, investments in restaurant remodels and upgrades by franchisees and us may not have the expected results with respect to consumer sentiment, increased traffic or return on investment.

Nearly all of our restaurants are owned and operated by franchisees. Therefore, our future prospects depend on our ability to attract new franchisees for each of our brands that meet our criteria and the willingness and ability of franchisees to open restaurants in existing and new markets. We may be unable to identify franchisees who meet our criteria, or franchisees we identify may not successfully implement their expansion plans. Our nearly fully franchised business model presents a number of other drawbacks, such as limited influence over franchisee operations, limited ability to facilitate changes in restaurant ownership, limitations on enforcement of franchise obligations due to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, and reliance on franchisees to participate in our strategic initiatives. While we can mandate certain strategic initiatives through enforcement of our franchise agreements, we will need the active support of our franchisees if the implementation of these initiatives is to be successful. The failure of franchisees to support our marketing programs and strategic initiatives could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and could materially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. On occasion we have encountered, and may in the future encounter, challenges in receiving specific financial and operational results from our franchisees in a consistent and timely manner, which can negatively impact our business and operating results. Our competitors that have a significantly higher percentage of company-operated restaurants than we do may have greater influence over their respective restaurant systems and greater ability to implement operational initiatives and business strategies, including their marketing and advertising programs. As part of our growth strategy, we may decide to increase or decrease the number of Company-owned stores, either by purchasing existing franchised stores or by refranchising existing company-operated stores. Our failure to successfully execute these transactions could have an adverse effect on our operating results and could cause our stock price to decline. The ability of our franchisees and prospective franchisees to obtain financing for development of new restaurants or reinvestment in existing restaurants depends in part upon financial and economic conditions beyond their control. If our franchisees are unable to obtain financing on acceptable terms or otherwise do not devote sufficient resources to develop new restaurants or reinvest in existing restaurants, our business and financial results could be adversely affected. Also, investments in restaurant remodels and upgrades by franchisees and us may not have the expected results with respect to consumer sentiment, increased traffic or return on investment. 18 18 18 Table of Contents Table of Contents

The success of any restaurant depends in substantial part on its location. Neighborhood or economic conditions where our restaurants are located could decline in the future as demographic patterns change, resulting in potentially reduced sales in those locations. Our sales and growth strategies may be adversely affected if we or franchisees cannot obtain and renew desirable locations for restaurants at reasonable prices due to, among other things, higher than anticipated acquisition, construction, development or remodel costs, difficulty negotiating leases with acceptable terms, delays or cancellation of new site developments by developers, onerous land use or zoning restrictions, or challenges in securing required governmental permits. Competition for restaurant locations can be intense and other restaurant companies may be able to use their size and financial resources to negotiate more favorable lease terms, priority or exclusivity with landlords and developers.

The success of any restaurant depends in substantial part on its location. Neighborhood or economic conditions where our restaurants are located could decline in the future as demographic patterns change, resulting in potentially reduced sales in those locations. Competition for restaurant locations can also be intense and there may be delays or cancellation of new site developments by developers and landlords or difficulties renewing existing sites, which may be exacerbated by factors related to the commercial real estate or credit markets. If franchisees cannot obtain and renew desirable locations for their restaurants at reasonable prices due to, among other things, higher than anticipated acquisition, construction and/or development costs of new restaurants, difficulty negotiating leases with acceptable terms, onerous land use or zoning restrictions, or challenges in securing required governmental permits, then their ability to execute their respective growth strategies may be adversely affected. Based on their size advantage and/or their greater financial resources, some of our competitors may have the ability to negotiate more favorable lease terms than we can and some landlords and developers may offer priority or grant exclusivity to some of our competitors for desirable locations. As a result, we or our franchisees may not be able to obtain new leases or renew existing leases on acceptable terms, if at all, which could adversely affect our sales and brand-building initiatives.

Our franchisees and Company restaurants are dependent upon their ability to attract and retain qualified employees in an intensely competitive labor market. The inability of our franchisees and Company restaurants to recruit and retain qualified individuals or increased costs to do so, including due to labor market dynamics or increases in legally required wages, may delay openings of new restaurants and could adversely impact existing restaurant operations and franchisee and Company restaurant profitability, which could slow our growth. Boycotts, protests, work stoppages or other campaigns by labor organizations at either franchisee or Company restaurants could increase costs, decrease flexibility or otherwise disrupt the business. Responses to labor organizing efforts by our franchisees or us could negatively impact brand perception and our business and financial results. Effective April 2024, California set the minimum wage for fast food restaurant employees at $20 per hour and established a council to set future wage increases and to make recommendations to state agencies for other sector-wide workplace standards. This law and other labor related laws enacted or currently proposed at the federal, state, provincial or local level could increase our and our franchisees’ labor costs and decrease profitability. Joint employer status is a developing area of franchise and labor and employment law that has changed significantly in recent years and could be subject to additional changes that may impact our liability as a franchisor. Under this doctrine, we could potentially be liable for unfair labor practices and other violations by franchisees, or we could be required to conduct collective bargaining negotiations regarding employees of franchisees, who are independent employers. In the event of a finding of joint employment by the National Labor Relations Board or applicable state authorities, our operating costs may increase as a result of required modifications to business practices, increased litigation, governmental investigations or proceedings, administrative enforcement actions, fines and 17 17 17 Table of Contents Table of Contents civil liability. Employee claims that are brought against us as a result of joint employer standards and status may also, in addition to legal and financial liability, create negative publicity that could adversely affect our brands and divert financial and management resources. A material increase in the number of these claims, or an increase in the number of successful claims, could adversely impact our brands’ reputation, which may cause significant harm.

Our franchisees are dependent upon their ability to attract and retain qualified employees in an intensely competitive labor market. The inability of our franchisees to recruit and retain qualified individuals or increased costs to do so, including due to labor market dynamics or increases in legally required wages, may delay openings of new restaurants by our franchisees and could adversely impact existing franchised restaurant operations and franchisee profitability, which could slow our growth. Boycotts, protests, work stoppages or other campaigns by labor organizations at either franchisee or company restaurants could increase costs, decrease flexibility or otherwise disrupt the business and responses to labor organizing efforts by our franchisees or us could negatively impact brand perception and our business and financial results. In September 2023, California passed legislation setting the minimum wage for fast food restaurant employees at $20 per hour effective April 1, 2024 and establishing a council to set future wage increases and to make recommendations to state agencies for other sector-wide workplace standards. This law and other labor related laws enacted or currently proposed at the federal, state, provincial or local level could increase our franchisees’ labor costs and decrease profitability. Joint employer status is a developing area of franchise and labor and employment law that could be subject to changes in legislation, administrative agency interpretation or jurisprudential developments that may increase franchisor liability. In October 2023, the National Labor Relations Board issued its final rule addressing the standard for determining joint-employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. Under the new standard, effective February 26, 2024, a party may assert a joint-employment relationship to establish joint-employer status by using evidence of indirect and reserved forms of control bearing on an employee’s essential terms and conditions of employment. The rule is facing legal challenges, but if it becomes effective in its current form, we could potentially be liable for unfair labor practices and other violations by franchisees or we could be required to conduct collective bargaining negotiations regarding employees of franchisees, who are independent employers. In such event, our operating costs may increase as a result of required modifications to business practices, increased litigation, governmental investigations or proceedings, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil liability. Employee claims that are brought against us as a result of joint employer standards and status may also, in addition to legal and financial liability, create negative publicity that could adversely affect our brands and divert financial and management resources. A significant increase in the number of these claims, or an increase in the number of successful claims, could adversely impact our brands’ reputation, which may cause significant harm.

We collect, use, and retain personal and financial information regarding our employees, franchisees and their employees, vendors, contractors, and guests. As we continue to expand our development and management of our brands’ digital ordering platforms, in-restaurant kiosks and loyalty programs in home markets and certain international markets, to facilitate our primary goals of generating incremental sales, improving operations at our restaurants, and increasing guest awareness in our brands, we collect larger volumes and additional categories of personal information, in some cases including geo-location tracking information, about our guests. In connection with the handling of this information, we are subject to numerous privacy and data protection laws and regulations, including the Canadian Consumer Privacy Protection Act, the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, Quebec's Law 25, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”), the U.K. General Data Protection Regulation, the China Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”), and other laws governing data protection, the use of biometrics and artificial intelligence. Existing privacy laws and their interpretation and enforcement criteria are subject to frequent change, and new privacy laws continue to emerge. These laws impose stringent data protection requirements and costly penalties for non-compliance, and allow individuals to bring complaints with supervisory authorities and seek damages. Due to the complex and evolving nature of these laws, the scope of our operations, and the increased sophistication of cyber threats, we may incur significant expenses relating to compliance and non-compliance with privacy and data protection legislation. If we fail to comply with these laws, or experience a major breach, theft, or loss of personal information that we hold, or that third parties hold on our behalf (whether or not due to our failure to comply with data security rules and standards), we could be subject to regulatory investigations and actions, substantial fines, legal proceedings, and civil and criminal penalties, which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. For example, in Canada, we have been the subject of government 18 18 18 Table of Contents Table of Contents investigation and purported class action lawsuits based on the use of certain geolocation data for Tim Hortons mobile app users. Non-compliance with data protection laws, data breaches or misuse of data by us, our franchisees or vendors, has and in the future could adversely affect the reputation of our brands and guest engagement which could adversely affect our future results of operations.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect, process, transmit, disclose, and retain personal information regarding our employees and their families, our franchisees and their employees, vendors, contractors, and guests (which can include social security numbers, social insurance numbers, banking and tax identification information, health care information for employees, and credit card information) and our franchisees collect similar information. In recent years we expanded our development and management of our brands’ mobile apps, online ordering platforms, and in-restaurant kiosks and home market loyalty programs. While our deployment of such technology facilitates our primary goals of generating incremental sales and improving operations at our franchisees’ restaurants as well as additional customer awareness and interest in our brands, such deployment also means that we are collecting and entrusted with additional personal information, in some cases including geo-location tracking information, about our customers. In connection with the collection and retention of this information, we are subject to legal and compliance risks and associated liability related to privacy and data protection requirements. These types of legislation, which include the Canadian Consumer Privacy Protection Act, the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, Quebec's Law 25, the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (the “GDPR”) and the U.K. General Data Protection Regulation, can impose stringent data protection requirements, provide for costly penalties for noncompliance (eg. up to 4% of annual worldwide revenue for a breach of the GDPR), and confer the right upon data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations. In China, the Personal Information Protection Law (“PIPL”), has established personal information processing rules, data subject rights, and obligations for personal information processors, among other things. In addition to the PIPL, China’s Data Security Law regulates data processing activities associated with personal and non-personal data. Due to enhanced scrutiny from the general public, these regulations as well as their interpretation and criteria for enforcement continue to be subject to frequent change, and there are likely to be other jurisdictions that propose or enact new or emerging data privacy requirements in the future. The complexity of these privacy and data protection laws may result in significant costs arising from compliance and from any non-compliance, whether or not due to our negligence, and could affect our brand reputation and our results of operations. We have and are expected to continue to have significant investments arising from compliance with these regulatory regimes due to changes in the scope of our operations and the ever-changing techniques and sophistication used to conduct cyber-attacks and breaches. In addition, to the extent that we are not in compliance with these laws or experience a major breach, theft, or loss of personal information that is held by us, or third parties on our behalf (whether or not due to our failure to comply with data security rules and standards), we could be subject to substantial fines, penalties, indemnification claims, and potential litigation which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. For example, in Canada, we have been the subject of government investigation and purported class action lawsuits based on the use of certain geolocation data for Tim Hortons mobile app users. As a result of any breach, we may incur additional expenditures arising from additional security technologies, personnel, experts, and credit monitoring services for those whose data has been breached. These costs could adversely impact our results of operations during the period in which they are incurred. In addition, negative publicity regarding a breach or potential security vulnerabilities in our systems or those of our franchisees or vendors, has and in the future could adversely affect the reputation of our brands and acceptance of digital engagement by our customers which in turn could adversely affect our future results of operations. 20 20 20 Table of Contents Table of Contents

Our effective tax rate, cash taxes and financial results could be adversely impacted by changes in applicable tax laws (including regulatory, administrative, and judicial interpretations and guidance relating to such laws) in the jurisdictions in which we operate. On June 20, 2024, Canada enacted Bill C-59 which included significant tax law changes, including the new limitation on the deductibility of interest and similar expenses (“EIFEL”) as well as the 2% tax on certain share buy backs. The EIFEL rules are effective for taxation years beginning on or after October 1, 2023, while the tax on share buy backs applies to certain share 20 20 20 Table of Contents Table of Contents repurchases on or after January 1, 2024. The EIFEL rules have been implemented and as a result, we have restricted interest and financing deductions which can be carried forward indefinitely. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) has developed model rules which address numerous long-standing tax principles impacting how large multinational enterprises are taxed in an effort to limit perceived base erosion and profit shifting incentives, including a 15% global minimum tax applied on a country-by-country basis. Global Minimum Tax Act addressing the OECD “Pillar Two” model rules were enacted by both Canada and Switzerland and are effective for taxation years beginning on or after January 1, 2024. The adoption of the “Pillar Two” framework by countries in which we operate may increase our future cash taxes, adversely impacting our effective tax rate and financial results. We continue to evaluate the potential impact on future periods of the “Pillar Two” framework as additional guidance is released and other individual countries adopt such enabling legislation. Additionally, on January 15, 2025, the OECD released Administrative Guidance (the “Guidance) on Article 9.1 of the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (the “Model Rules”) which amends the Pillar Two Framework. Jurisdictions that have adopted the Framework may implement and administer their domestic laws consistent with the Model Rules and such guidance. The Guidance may eliminate the tax basis in certain deferred tax assets and tax credit carryforwards for purposes of global minimum tax established under the Framework. This Guidance may lead to an adjustment to our deferred tax assets. We are continuing to analyze the impacts of the Guidance and will recognize any resulting provisions in the first quarter of 2025.

Our effective tax rate, cash taxes and financial results could be adversely impacted by changes in applicable tax laws (including regulatory, administrative, and judicial interpretations and guidance relating to such laws) in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The 2021 Canadian Federal Budget proposed various tax law changes, including a new limitation on the deductibility of interest and similar expenses; revised draft legislation was released on November 21, 2023, with a proposed effective date for taxation years beginning on or after October 1, 2023. The proposed rules have not yet been enacted. In general, the draft legislation proposes to limit the deductibility of interest and other financing-related expenses to the extent that such expenses, net of interest and financing-related income, exceed a fixed ratio of the entity’s tax EBITDA, with a specified carry-back limit and an indefinite carry-forward limit. The 22 22 22 Table of Contents Table of Contents proposed rules and their application are complex and could materially increase our future income taxes if enacted, adversely impacting our effective tax rate and financial results. On November 21, 2023, Canada released revised, proposed legislation that would impose a 2% equity buyback tax for net equity repurchase transactions that occur on or after January 1, 2024, however, this legislation has not yet been enacted. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) and many countries in which we operate have committed to enacting substantial changes to numerous long-standing tax principles impacting how large multinational enterprises are taxed in an effort to limit perceived base erosion and profit shifting incentives, including a 15% global minimum tax applied on a country-by-country basis, likely applicable to periods beginning on or after December 31, 2023. The OECD has issued model rules with respect to various aspects of such proposed changes and ongoing public consultation with additional guidance expected. On November 21, 2023, Canada released initial draft enabling legislation with respect to aspects of such OECD model rules. The enactment, timing and many details regarding such potential tax law changes remain uncertain as Canada and other individual countries evaluate and pursue their respective approaches to enacting the principles underlying such model rules. Certain countries in which we operate have enacted legislation (with subsequent guidance and details expected to follow) to adopt the “Pillar Two” framework effective for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024, including Switzerland, which will increase our future taxes, adversely impacting our effective tax rate and financial results. We will continue to evaluate the potential impact on future periods of the “Pillar Two” framework as additional guidance is released and other individual countries adopt such enabling legislation.

We rely heavily on information technology systems and infrastructure, including systems of third-party vendors to whom we outsource certain functions across our operations, such as, point-of-sale processing at our restaurants, web and mobile applications and payment services. Despite implementation of controls and security measures, disruptions and security incidents involving our systems and the systems of our third-party providers and franchisees have occurred and may occur in the future. These may include disruption or failures due to physical damage to systems, power loss, telecommunications failure, or other catastrophic events, as well as problems with transitioning systems, and security breaches. Malicious cyber-attacks including the introduction of malware or ransomware, phishing, denial of service attacks, or other disruptive behavior by hackers continue to increase and become more sophisticated. The use of artificial intelligence may heighten our cybersecurity risks by making cyber-attacks more difficult to detect and mitigate. Our cybersecurity program and measures may not be fully implemented or effective to protect our systems and information. If we are unable to protect our systems, or those provided by our third-party vendors and franchisees, from damage, disruption, fraud or cyber-attacks, our results, operations and reputation could be adversely affected. Such incidents could also result in litigation, government investigations and actions, significant costs and penalties and have a material effect on our financial results. We also could suffer loss of data, an inability to access data and the unauthorized use of confidential information about our business and operations. We also may incur significant costs to investigate and remedy cybersecurity incidents, recover lost data, enhance security technology, and engage additional personnel and services, including cybersecurity experts and credit monitoring for individuals whose data may be affected. Further, the standards and technology currently used for transmission and approval of electronic payment transactions are determined and controlled by the payment card industry (“PCI”). If we or our franchisees fail to comply with these standards or if a third party circumvents our data security measures or those of our franchisees or vendors, we and our franchisees could be exposed to litigation, liability, reputational harm, fines from the payment card companies and increased costs, which could impact our results of operations.

We rely heavily on information technology systems and infrastructure, including third-party vendors’ systems to whom we outsource certain functions across operations including, but not limited to, point-of-sale processing at our restaurants and in our mobile apps. Despite implementation of security measures, security incidents or breaches may occur involving our systems, the systems of the parties with whom we communicate or collaborate (including franchisees) or the systems of third-party providers. These may include damage, disruption or failures due to physical damage, power loss, telecommunications failure, or other catastrophic events, as well as from problems with transitioning systems, internal and external security breaches, malicious cyber-attacks including the introduction of malware or ransomware or other disruptive behavior by hackers, which may be exacerbated by artificial intelligence. Such damage, disruption or failures could adversely impact our results of operations and our reputation. From time to time, we have been notified by third party vendors of security incidents or breaches that affect their systems and their ability to provide services to us at expected service levels. If any of our or our vendors' systems were to fail or become subject to ransomware and we were unable to recover in a timely way, we could experience material and adverse impacts to our results of operations. To the extent that some of our worldwide reporting systems require or rely on manual processes, it could increase the risk of a breach due to human error. Further, the standards for systems currently used for transmission and approval of electronic payment transactions, and the technology utilized in electronic payment themselves, all of which can put electronic payment data at risk, are determined and controlled by the payment card industry. If someone can circumvent our data security measures or those of third parties, including our franchisees, they could destroy or steal valuable information received as part of electronic payments. Such destruction or loss could expose us to litigation or liability and could impact our results of operations. Any resulting negative publicity could significantly harm our or our brands’ reputations. Finally, we may need to continue to expend substantial resources to enhance our existing restaurant management systems, financial and management controls, information systems and personnel to accurately capture and reflect the financial and operational activities at our franchised restaurants. On occasion we have encountered, and may in the future encounter, challenges in receiving these results from our franchisees in a consistent and timely manner as a number of our systems relating to tracking the financial and operational activities and processes at our franchised restaurants are not fully integrated worldwide. Further, the information we receive from franchisees, including regarding their profitability, may not be audited or subject to a similar level of internal controls as our processes. To the extent that we are not able to obtain transparency into our operations from these systems, it could impair the ability of our management to react quickly when appropriate and our operating results could be negatively impacted.

We, our franchisees, and our supply chain are subject to risks and costs arising from the effects of changes in climate, greenhouse gases, and diminishing energy and water resources. Changes in climate and weather patterns may have a negative effect on agricultural productivity which may result in decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities used in our 15 15 15 Table of Contents Table of Contents products, such as beef, chicken, coffee beans and dairy. Additionally, increased frequency or severity of weather-related events and natural disasters may lead to disruptions of our operations, restaurant closures or delays in the opening of new restaurants, and/or increases in the costs of (and decreases in the availability of) food and other supplies needed for our operations. In turn this could result in reduced profitability for our franchisees and our Company restaurants and reduced system-wide sales and franchise revenue for us. In addition, various legislative and regulatory efforts to combat climate change may increase in the future, which could result in additional taxes, increased expenses and otherwise disrupt or adversely impact our business and/or our growth prospects.

We, our franchisees, and our supply chain are subject to risks and costs arising from the effects of climate change, greenhouse gases, and diminishing energy and water resources. Climate change may have a negative effect on agricultural productivity which may result in decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities used in our products, such as beef, chicken, coffee beans and dairy. Climate change may also increase the frequency or severity of weather-related events and natural disasters. Such adverse weather-related impacts may disrupt our operations, cause restaurant closures or delay the opening of new restaurants, and/or increase the costs of (and decrease the availability of) food and other supplies needed for our operations. In turn this could result in reduced profitability for our franchisees and our Company restaurants and reduced system-wide sales and franchise revenue for us. In addition, various legislative and regulatory efforts to combat climate change may increase in the future, which could result in additional taxes, increased expenses and otherwise disrupt or adversely impact our business and/or our growth prospects.

Historically, we operated a nearly fully-franchised business model. However, in 2024 we completed the Carrols Acquisition and the PLK China Acquisition which include operating approximately 1,100 restaurants. In 2023 and 2024, we also acquired approximately 125 BK restaurants unrelated to the acquisition of Carrols. As of December 31, 2024, we operate 17% of our BK restaurants in the U.S. and Canada and 4% of our total restaurants. In addition, on February 14, 2025, we acquired substantially all of the remaining equity interest of Burger King China from our former joint venture partners and as result we now operate most of the nearly 1,500 Burger King restaurants in China. Acquisition activities inherently subject us to a number of risks and uncertainties as the acquired restaurants may fail to achieve the benefits we expected and may be subject to debt or other liabilities that are difficult to 14 14 14 Table of Contents Table of Contents refinance or restructure at attractive rates, or at all, particularly if we are required to place greater reliance on the financial and operational representations and warranties of the sellers. Operating a material portfolio of restaurants can expose us to additional risks or exacerbate those risks to which we are already exposed as a franchisor. For example, as a result of the Carrols Acquisition, we increased our number of employees by approximately 24,000. This increase in employees exposes us to additional liability and costs, such as risks associated with minimum wage increases and other mandated benefits, increased costs arising from third-party and self-insured health care insurance, employment and labor liability, and regulatory compliance risks. We could also be subject to additional liability such as property, environmental and other liability as a result of being a direct operator and lessee of additional restaurants and liability arising from regulatory compliance. Furthermore, risks arising from increases in commodity prices, fuel prices or other costs associated with operating restaurants could adversely affect our operating margins if we are unable to increase pricing proportionately. Additionally, we are and plan to continue to fund the remodel of a large number of BK restaurants acquired in the Carrols acquisition. Any future adverse pressure on acquired Carrols restaurants’ cash flow may delay these plans. We also plan to refranchise the vast majority of these restaurants over the next several years to new and existing franchisees. Our ability to successfully refranchise is dependent upon our ability to source qualified franchisees in the local markets, available financing, and our ability to close acceptable transactions. While we are identifying a new controlling shareholder for Burger King China and expect over time to find a new partner for PLK China and new investors for FHS Brazil, we may be unable to source and onboard experienced local partners in the expected time frames.

Historically, we operated a nearly fully franchised business model. However, in connection with the acquisition of Carrols, which we expect to complete in the second quarter of 2024, we will acquire approximately 1,100 restaurants, the vast majority of which are BK restaurants. In addition, we have recently acquired approximately 125 BK restaurants unrelated to the acquisition of Carrols, 38 of which were acquired in January 2024. Upon completing the Carrols acquisition, we will operate approximately 18% of our BK restaurants in the U.S. and Canada and 4% of our total restaurants. We expect to operate these acquired restaurants before refranchising most of them. Operating a material portfolio of restaurants can expose us to additional risks or exacerbate those risks to which we are already exposed as a franchisor. For example, as a result of the Carrols acquisition, we expect to increase our number of employees by approximately 24,000. This increase in employees may expose us to additional liability and costs, such as risks associated with minimum wage increases and other mandated benefits, increased costs arising from third party and self-insured health care insurance, employment and labor liability, and regulatory compliance risks. We could also be subject to additional liability such as property, 16 16 16 Table of Contents Table of Contents environmental and other liability as a result of being a direct operator and lessee of additional restaurants and liability arising from regulatory compliance. Furthermore, risks arising from increases in commodity prices, fuel prices or other costs associated with operating restaurants could adversely affect our operating margins if we are unable to increase pricing proportionately. Additionally, as we previously announced, we plan to fund the remodel of substantially all BK restaurants acquired in the Carrols acquisition utilizing Carrols restaurants’ operating cash flow. Any future adverse pressure on acquired Carrols restaurants’ cash flow may delay these plans or impact consolidated RBI cash flow if we need to use funds from other sources to complete these remodels.