Roper Technologies Inc.: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

2026 vs 2025  ·  SEC EDGAR  ·  2026-05-22
Other years: 2025 vs 2024 · 2024 vs 2023
⚠ AI-Generated

The summary below was generated by an AI language model and may contain errors or omissions. All other content on this page is deterministically extracted from the original SEC EDGAR filing.

Roper Technologies added one new risk disclosure in 2026 addressing AI regulation and compliance costs, reflecting heightened regulatory scrutiny in this area. Three existing risks underwent substantive modifications, including expanded disclosures on large customer concentration, third-party technology dependencies, and AI management challenges - indicating the company increased emphasis on these vulnerabilities. The overall risk factor structure remained largely stable, with 20 risks carried forward unchanged from 2025.

✓ Deterministic extraction — no AI-generated data

Classification is based on semantic text similarity scoring and may include approximations. “No match” means no high-confidence textual match was found — not necessarily that a section was removed.

1
New Risks
0
Removed
3
Modified
20
Unchanged
🟢 New in Current Filing

Regulation limiting or controlling the use of AI may restrict our ability to use AI, our ability to create new products, and create increased compliance costs.

We are subject to an evolving landscape of laws and regulations governing the use of AI. The EU AI Act classifies AI systems by risk level and may prohibit certain high-risk applications, requiring significant change to product design, documentation, governance processes, and…

Read full text

We are subject to an evolving landscape of laws and regulations governing the use of AI. The EU AI Act classifies AI systems by risk level and may prohibit certain high-risk applications, requiring significant change to product design, documentation, governance processes, and risk management practices to achieve compliance. In the U.S., several states, including Colorado and California, have enacted or are considering AI-specific regulations addressing transparency, bias, and accountability, particularly in the housing and employment fields. Regulatory uncertainty regarding how these laws will be interpreted and enforced creates additional compliance challenges, and may cause us to modify our data handling and compliance practices, limit our ability to use certain data to support our products or product development efforts, hinder our customers’ ability to adopt or continue to use our products, or require us to cease offering or using certain AI-enabled features or services in particular jurisdictions.

🟡 Modified Our operating results could be adversely affected by a reduction in business with our large customers. 🔒
🟡 Modified We rely on information and technology, including third-party cloud computing platforms and other third-party business partners, for many of our business operations which could fail and cause disruption to our business operations. 🔒
🟡 Modified We use AI in our business, and challenges with properly managing its use could result in reputational harm, competitive harm, and legal liability, and adversely affect our results of operations. 🔒
3 more changes in this filing

Full diff access, historical comparisons, and cross-company signal tracking.

Get full access — from $29/month Already a Pro subscriber? View full diff →