high match confidence
Sentence-level differences:
- Removed sentence: "For example, ESG issues have been the subject of increased focus by regulators, clients and other stakeholders."
- Removed sentence: "Various clients and stakeholders have divergent views on ESG matters, with some aiming to increase their exposure to ESG investing and some choosing not to invest in products or strategies with an ESG investment objective, including in the countries in which we operate and invest, as well as states and localities where we serve public sector clients."
- Removed sentence: "These differences pose challenges for us to manage divergent goals and preferences, and increase the risk that any action or lack thereof by us concerning ESG, or any actual or perceived failure to adequately address the ESG expectations will be viewed negatively by some stakeholders, which could adversely impact our reputation and business."
- Removed sentence: "We also communicate certain initiatives and goals for our corporate and investing activities related to ESG matters."
- Removed sentence: "We could be scrutinized or criticized for the scope or nature of any such initiatives or goals, and may not be able to accomplish them within our anticipated timeframe or at all."
Current (2026):
We have spent many years developing our reputation for integrity, strong investment performance, and superior client service. Our brand is a valuable intangible asset, but it is vulnerable to a variety of threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or even…
Read full text
We have spent many years developing our reputation for integrity, strong investment performance, and superior client service. Our brand is a valuable intangible asset, but it is vulnerable to a variety of threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or even impossible to remediate, if damaged. Regulatory inquiries and rumors can tarnish or substantially damage our reputation, even if those inquiries are satisfactorily addressed. Our global presence and investments on behalf of our clients around the world could also lead to heightened scrutiny and criticism in an increasingly fragmented geopolitical landscape. Misconduct by our personnel or third-party service providers could likewise adversely impact our reputation and lead to a loss of client assets. While we maintain policies, procedures, and controls to reduce the likelihood of unauthorized activities, we are subject to the risk that our personnel or third parties acting on our behalf may circumvent controls or act in a manner inconsistent with our policies and procedures. Real or perceived conflicts Page 14 Page 14 Page 14 Table of Contents Table of Contents between our clients’ interests and our own, as well as any fraudulent activity or other exposure of client assets or information, may impair our reputation and subject us to litigation or regulatory action. In addition, should we be subject to a cybersecurity event or data breach, or the target of cyber criminals who seek to defraud our clients, our reputation could be harmed and we could suffer financial loss. Any damage to our brand could impede our ability to attract and retain clients and key personnel, and reduce the amount of assets under our management, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and net income.
View prior text (2025)
We have spent many years developing our reputation for integrity, strong investment performance, and superior client service. Our brand is a valuable intangible asset, but it is vulnerable to a variety of threats that can be difficult or impossible to control, and costly or even impossible to remediate, if damaged. Regulatory inquiries and rumors can tarnish or substantially damage our reputation, even if those inquiries are satisfactorily addressed. For example, ESG issues have been the subject of increased focus by regulators, clients and other stakeholders. Various clients and stakeholders have divergent views on ESG matters, with some aiming to increase their exposure to ESG investing and some choosing not to invest in products or strategies with an ESG investment objective, including in the countries in which we operate and invest, as well as states and localities where we serve public sector clients. These differences pose challenges for us to manage divergent goals and preferences, and increase the risk that any action or lack thereof by us concerning ESG, or any actual or perceived failure to adequately address the ESG expectations will be viewed negatively by some stakeholders, which could adversely impact our reputation and business. We also communicate certain initiatives and goals for our corporate and investing activities related to ESG matters. We could be scrutinized or criticized for the scope or nature of any such initiatives or goals, and may not be able to accomplish them within our anticipated timeframe or at all. Our global presence and investments on behalf of our clients around the world could also lead to heightened scrutiny and criticism in an increasingly fragmented geopolitical landscape. Misconduct by our personnel or third-party service providers could likewise adversely impact our reputation and lead to a loss of client assets. While we maintain policies, procedures, and controls to reduce the likelihood of unauthorized activities, we are subject to the risk that our personnel or third parties acting on our behalf may circumvent controls or act in a manner inconsistent with our policies and procedures. Real or perceived conflicts between our clients’ interests and our own, as well as any fraudulent activity or other exposure of client assets or information, may impair our reputation and subject us to litigation or regulatory action. Any damage to our brand could impede our ability to attract and retain clients and key personnel, and reduce the amount of assets under our management, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and net income.