JPMorgan Chase & Co.: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

JPMorganChase relies on accurate, timely and complete data to effectively operate its systems and processes, including: •assessing risk exposures and limits •monitoring and detecting fraudulent transactions and cyber threats •developing or maintaining models and other analytical and judgment-based estimations, including those that use machine learning or artificial intelligence •implementing and maintaining compliance programs, and •preparing financial statements, disclosures and regulatory reports, as well as internal reporting Any deficiencies in JPMorganChase’s data management processes, including with respect to the accuracy or completeness of data, the timeliness of data collection, the analysis or validation of data, or the safeguarding of data could undermine the reliability and effectiveness of its operations, including: •risk management practices, including inaccurate or untimely risk reporting •delivery of regulatory reporting or internal or external financial reporting •compliance practices, such as those relating to transaction monitoring, customer screening, blocking and rejecting transactions, recordkeeping or reporting •business activities, such as those related to managing JPMorganChase's market-making positions and liquidity and capital levels, including reliance on timely data for informed decision-making •providing services to clients and customers, including transaction processing, lending services, account management and customer support, or •fraud detection and prevention processes. Any or all of these factors could impair the ability of JPMorganChase to make sound business decisions, cause it to incur higher operational and compliance costs, result in operational breakdowns or failure to meet its regulatory requirements, negatively affect clients and customers, or lead to reputational harm.

JPMorganChase’s common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Refer to “Five-year stock performance,” on page 51 for a comparison of the cumulative total return for JPMorganChase common stock with the comparable total return of the S&P 500 Index, the KBW Bank Index and the S&P Financials Index over the five-year period ended December 31, 2024. Refer to Capital actions in the Capital Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis on page 105 for information on the common dividend payout ratio. Refer to Note 21 and Note 26 for discussions of restrictions on dividend payments. On January 31, 2025, there were 196,005 holders of record of JPMorganChase common stock. Refer to Part III, Item 12 on page 43 for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under the Firm’s employee share-based incentive plans.Repurchases under the common share repurchase programRefer to Capital actions in the Capital Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis on page 105 for information regarding repurchases under the Firm’s common share repurchase program. Refer to Capital actions in the Capital Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis on page 105 for information on the common dividend payout ratio. Refer to Note 21 and Note 26 for discussions of restrictions on dividend payments. On January 31, 2025, there were 196,005 holders of record of JPMorganChase common stock. Refer to Part III, Item 12 on page 43 for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under the Firm’s employee share-based incentive plans.

Refer to Capital actions in the Capital Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis on page 105 for information regarding repurchases under the Firm’s common share repurchase program. On June 28, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a new $30 billion common share repurchase program, effective July 1, 2024. Through June 30, 2024, the Firm was authorized to purchase up to $30 billion of common shares under its previously-approved common share repurchase program that was announced on April 13, 2022. Shares repurchased pursuant to the common share repurchase programs during 2024 were as follows: Year ended December 31, 2024Total number of shares of common stock repurchasedAverage price paid per share of common stock(a)Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases (in millions)(a)Dollar valueof remainingauthorizedrepurchase(in millions)(a)(b)First quarter15,869,936 $179.50 $2,849 $16,886 Second quarter27,019,730 196.83 5,318 11,568 (c)Third quarter30,343,933 209.61 6,361 23,639 October6,173,254 218.00 1,345 22,294 November5,142,243 241.03 1,240 21,054 December7,170,130 241.10 1,728 19,326 Fourth quarter18,485,627 233.37 4,313 19,326 Full year91,719,226 $205.43 $18,841 $19,326 Total number of shares of common stock repurchased Average price paid per share of common stock(a) Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases (in millions)(a) Dollar value of remaining authorized repurchase (in millions)(a)(b) (c) Full year (a)Excludes excise tax and commissions. As part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, a 1% excise tax is imposed on net share repurchases commencing January 1, 2023. (b)Represents the amount remaining under the $30 billion repurchase program. (c)The remaining $11.6 billion of share repurchase capacity under the prior Board authorization was canceled when the new $30 billion repurchase program was authorized by the Board of Directors effective July 1, 2024. Item 6. ReservedItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, entitled “Management’s discussion and analysis,” appears on pages 52–167. Such information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, which appear on pages 172–321.Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Refer to the Market Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis on pages 141–149 for a discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk. Item 6. ReservedItem 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, entitled “Management’s discussion and analysis,” appears on pages 52–167. Such information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, which appear on pages 172–321. Item 6. Reserved Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, entitled “Management’s discussion and analysis,” appears on pages 52–167. Such information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, which appear on pages 172–321. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Refer to the Market Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis on pages 141–149 for a discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. Refer to the Market Risk Management section of Management’s discussion and analysis on pages 141–149 for a discussion of quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk. 39 39 39 39

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the Notes thereto and the report thereon dated February 14, 2025, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Firm’s independent registered public accounting firm (PCAOB ID 238), appear on pages 169–321.The “Glossary of Terms and Acronyms’’ is included on pages 327–333.Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.None.Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.The internal control framework promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (“COSO 2013”), provides guidance for designing, implementing and conducting internal control and assessing its effectiveness. The Firm used the COSO 2013 framework to assess the effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. Refer to “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” on page 168.As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Firm’s management, including its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Refer to Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 for the Certifications furnished by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively.The Firm is committed to maintaining high standards of internal control over financial reporting. Nevertheless, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Deficiencies or lapses in internal controls may occur from time to time, and there can be no assurance that any such deficiencies will not result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control in the future and collateral consequences therefrom. Refer to “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” on page 168 for further information. There was no change in the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2024, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the Notes thereto and the report thereon dated February 14, 2025, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Firm’s independent registered public accounting firm (PCAOB ID 238), appear on pages 169–321.The “Glossary of Terms and Acronyms’’ is included on pages 327–333.Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.None.Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.The internal control framework promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (“COSO 2013”), provides guidance for designing, implementing and conducting internal control and assessing its effectiveness. The Firm used the COSO 2013 framework to assess the effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. Refer to “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” on page 168.As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Firm’s management, including its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Refer to Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 for the Certifications furnished by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively.The Firm is committed to maintaining high standards of internal control over financial reporting. Nevertheless, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Deficiencies or lapses in internal controls may occur from time to time, and there can be no assurance that any such deficiencies will not result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control in the future and collateral consequences therefrom. Refer to “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” on page 168 for further information. There was no change in the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the Notes thereto and the report thereon dated February 14, 2025, of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Firm’s independent registered public accounting firm (PCAOB ID 238), appear on pages 169–321. The “Glossary of Terms and Acronyms’’ is included on pages 327–333. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. The internal control framework promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (“COSO 2013”), provides guidance for designing, implementing and conducting internal control and assessing its effectiveness. The Firm used the COSO 2013 framework to assess the effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. Refer to “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” on page 168. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Firm’s management, including its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Refer to Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 for the Certifications furnished by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. The Firm is committed to maintaining high standards of internal control over financial reporting. Nevertheless, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Deficiencies or lapses in internal controls may occur from time to time, and there can be no assurance that any such deficiencies will not result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in internal control in the future and collateral consequences therefrom. Refer to “Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting” on page 168 for further information. There was no change in the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2024, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting. Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2024, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting. 40 40 40 40 Item 9B. Other Information.

The following table provides information concerning Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements (as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) adopted in the fourth quarter of 2024 by any director or any officer who is subject to the filing requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 16 Director or Officer”). These trading arrangements are intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c). Certain of the Firm's Section 16 Directors or Officers may participate in employee stock purchase plans, 401(k) plans or dividend reinvestment plans of the Firm that have been designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1(c). No non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements (as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were adopted by any Section 16 Director or Officer during the fourth quarter of 2024. Additionally, no Rule 10b5-1 or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements were terminated by any Section 16 Director or Officer in the fourth quarter of 2024. NameTitleAdoption dateDuration(c)Aggregate number of shares to be soldLori BeerChief Information OfficerNovember 15, 2024November 15, 2024 - March 31, 20254,105 James Dimon(a)Chairman and CEONovember 7, 2024November 7, 2024 - August 1, 20251,000,000 Robin LeopoldHead of Human ResourcesNovember 4, 2024November 4, 2024 - December 31, 20252,500 Jennifer Piepszak(b)Co-CEO, CIBOctober 30, 2024October 30, 2024 - March 31, 20258,545 Troy RohrbaughCo-CEO, CIBNovember 15, 2024November 15, 2024 - June 30, 202575,000 Duration(c) Aggregate number of shares to be sold Lori Beer Chief Information Officer November 15, 2024 - March 31, 2025 James Dimon(a) James Dimon (a) Chairman and CEO November 7, 2024 - August 1, 2025 Robin Leopold Head of Human Resources November 4, 2024 - December 31, 2025 Jennifer Piepszak(b) Jennifer Piepszak (b) Co-CEO, CIB October 30, 2024 - March 31, 2025 Troy Rohrbaugh Co-CEO, CIB November 15, 2024 - June 30, 2025 (a)Transaction by trusts and an entity of which Mr. Dimon has either a direct or indirect pecuniary interest. (b)On January 14, 2025, JPMorganChase announced that Ms. Piepszak became a Chief Operating Officer of the Firm, effective January 14, 2025. (c)Sales under the trading arrangement will not commence until completion of the required cooling off period under Rule 10b5-1. Subject to compliance with Rule 10b5-1, duration could cease earlier than the final date shown above to the extent that the aggregate number of shares to be sold under the trading arrangement have been sold. (c) Item 9C. Disclosure regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.Not applicable. Item 9C. Disclosure regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.Not applicable. Item 9C. Disclosure regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections. Not applicable. 41 41 41 41

AgeName(at December 31, 2024)Positions and officesJames Dimon68Chairman of the Board since December 2006 and Chief Executive Officer since December 2005.Ashley Bacon55Chief Risk Officer since June 2013. Jeremy Barnum52Chief Financial Officer since May 2021, prior to which he was Head of Global Research for the former Corporate & Investment Bank since February 2021. He previously served as Chief Financial Officer of the former Corporate & Investment Bank from July 2013 until February 2021.Lori A. Beer57Chief Information Officer since September 2017.Mary Callahan Erdoes57Chief Executive Officer of Asset & Wealth Management since September 2009.Stacey Friedman56General Counsel since January 2016. Marianne Lake55Chief Executive Officer of Consumer & Community Banking since January 2024, having previously served as its Co-Chief Executive Officer since May 2021. She was Chief Executive Officer of Consumer Lending from May 2019 until May 2021.Robin Leopold60Head of Human Resources since January 2018.Jennifer A. Piepszak(a)(b)54Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank, having previously served as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Consumer & Community Banking since May 2021, prior to which she had been Chief Financial Officer since May 2019.Daniel E. Pinto(a)(b)62President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2022, Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer since January 2018. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the former Corporate & Investment Bank from March 2014 until January 2024.Troy Rohrbaugh(a)54Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank since January 2024, prior to which he had been the Co-Head of Markets & Securities Services since June 2023. He was Head of Global Markets from January 2019 until June 2023. Chairman of the Board since December 2006 and Chief Executive Officer since December 2005. Chief Information Officer since September 2017. General Counsel since January 2016. Marianne Lake Chief Executive Officer of Consumer & Community Banking since January 2024, having previously served as its Co-Chief Executive Officer since May 2021. She was Chief Executive Officer of Consumer Lending from May 2019 until May 2021. Head of Human Resources since January 2018. Jennifer A. Piepszak(a)(b) Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank, having previously served as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Consumer & Community Banking since May 2021, prior to which she had been Chief Financial Officer since May 2019. Daniel E. Pinto(a)(b) President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2022, Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer since January 2018. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of the former Corporate & Investment Bank from March 2014 until January 2024. Troy Rohrbaugh(a) Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank since January 2024, prior to which he had been the Co-Head of Markets & Securities Services since June 2023. He was Head of Global Markets from January 2019 until June 2023. Unless otherwise noted, during the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, all of JPMorganChase’s above-named executive officers have continuously held senior-level positions with JPMorganChase. There are no family relationships among the foregoing executive officers. Information to be provided in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this 2024 Form 10-K and not otherwise included herein is incorporated by reference to the Firm’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 20, 2025, which will be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the end of the Firm’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2024. (a)Effective in the second quarter of 2024, JPMorganChase reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on page 70 for further information. (b)On January 14, 2025, JPMorganChase announced new responsibilities for certain executives: Mr. Pinto will retire at the end of 2026, will relinquish his duties as President and Chief Operating Officer as of June 30, 2025, and will continue to serve as Vice Chairman through the end of 2026; Ms. Piepszak became a Chief Operating Officer of the Firm, effective January 14, 2025; and Doug Petno, Co-Head of Global Banking, succeeded Ms. Piepszak as co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank. Refer to Recent events on page 57 of this 2024 Form 10-K for further information.

JPMorganChase has adopted, and posted on its website at https://www.jpmorganchase.com, a Code of Conduct for all employees of the Firm and a Code of Ethics for its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and all other professionals of the Firm worldwide serving in a finance, accounting, treasury, tax or investor relations role. The Code of Ethics is also available in print upon request to the Firm’s Investor Relations team. Within the time period required by the SEC, JPMorganChase will post on its website any amendment to the Code of Ethics and any waiver applicable to a director or executive officer.

JPMorganChase has adopted an insider trading policy applicable to its directors, officers and employees, as well as to JPMorganChase itself, governing the purchase, sale and other dispositions of the Firm’s securities (the “Insider Trading Policy”). The Firm believes that the Insider Trading Policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable U.S. federal securities laws and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange relating to insider trading. The Insider Trading Policy is filed as Exhibit 19 to this 2024 Form 10-K. 42 42 42 42 Item 11. Executive Compensation.Refer to Item 10. Item 11. Executive Compensation.Refer to Item 10. Item 11. Executive Compensation. Refer to Item 10. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. Refer to Item 10 for security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management. The following table sets forth the total number of shares available for issuance under JPMorganChase’s employee share-based incentive plans (including shares available for issuance to non-employee directors). The Firm is not authorized to grant share-based incentive awards to non-employees, other than to non-employee directors. December 31, 2024Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock appreciation rightsWeighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock appreciation rightsNumber of shares remaining available for future issuance under stock incentive plansPlan categoryEmployee share-based incentive plans approved by shareholders2,250,000 (a)$152.19 81,151,866 (b)Total2,250,000 $152.19 81,151,866 Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock appreciation rights Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding stock appreciation rights (a) (b) (a)Does not include restricted stock units or performance stock units granted under the shareholder-approved Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”), as amended and restated effective May 21, 2024. Refer to Note 9 for further information. (b)Represents shares available for future issuance under the shareholder-approved LTIP. All shares available for future issuance will be issued under the shareholder-approved LTIP. Refer to Note 9 for further discussion. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Refer to Item 10.Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.Refer to Item 10. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Refer to Item 10.Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.Refer to Item 10. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. Refer to Item 10. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services. Refer to Item 10. 43 43 43 43 Part IV Part IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.1Financial statementsThe Consolidated Financial Statements, the Notes thereto and the report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon listed in Item 8 are set forth commencing on page 169.2Financial statement schedules3Exhibits3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective April 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 7, 2006).3.2Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective June 7, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Appendix F to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013).3.3Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series CC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed October 20, 2017).3.4Certificate of Designations for 5.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series DD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 21, 2018).3.5Certificate of Designations for 6.00% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series EE (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 24, 2019).3.6Certificate of Designations for 4.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series GG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed November 7, 2019).3.7Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed February 24, 2020).3.8Certificate of Designations for 4.55% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series JJ (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed March 17, 2021).3.90Certificate of Designations for 3.65% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series KK (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 12, 2021).3.10Certificate of Designations for 4.625% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series LL (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 20, 2021).3.11Certificate of Designations for 4.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series MM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 29, 2021).3.12Certificate of Designations for 6.875% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series NN (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5805) filed March 12, 2024).3.13Certificate of Designations for 6.500% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series OO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on From 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5808) filed February 4, 2025).3.14By-laws of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended, effective September 19, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 22, 2023).4.1(a)Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed October 21, 2010). Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.1Financial statementsThe Consolidated Financial Statements, the Notes thereto and the report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon listed in Item 8 are set forth commencing on page 169.2Financial statement schedules3Exhibits3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective April 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 7, 2006).3.2Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective June 7, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Appendix F to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013).3.3Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series CC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed October 20, 2017).3.4Certificate of Designations for 5.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series DD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 21, 2018).3.5Certificate of Designations for 6.00% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series EE (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 24, 2019).3.6Certificate of Designations for 4.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series GG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed November 7, 2019). Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. 1Financial statementsThe Consolidated Financial Statements, the Notes thereto and the report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon listed in Item 8 are set forth commencing on page 169.2Financial statement schedules3Exhibits3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective April 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 7, 2006).3.2Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective June 7, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Appendix F to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013).3.3Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series CC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed October 20, 2017).3.4Certificate of Designations for 5.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series DD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 21, 2018).3.5Certificate of Designations for 6.00% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series EE (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 24, 2019).3.6Certificate of Designations for 4.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series GG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed November 7, 2019). Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective April 5, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 7, 2006). Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective June 7, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Appendix F to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013). Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series CC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed October 20, 2017). Certificate of Designations for 5.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series DD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 21, 2018). Certificate of Designations for 6.00% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series EE (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 24, 2019). Certificate of Designations for 4.75% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series GG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed November 7, 2019). 3.7Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed February 24, 2020).3.8Certificate of Designations for 4.55% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series JJ (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed March 17, 2021).3.90Certificate of Designations for 3.65% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series KK (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 12, 2021).3.10Certificate of Designations for 4.625% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series LL (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 20, 2021).3.11Certificate of Designations for 4.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series MM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 29, 2021).3.12Certificate of Designations for 6.875% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series NN (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5805) filed March 12, 2024).3.13Certificate of Designations for 6.500% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series OO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on From 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5808) filed February 4, 2025).3.14By-laws of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended, effective September 19, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 22, 2023).4.1(a)Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed October 21, 2010). 3.7Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed February 24, 2020).3.8Certificate of Designations for 4.55% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series JJ (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed March 17, 2021).3.90Certificate of Designations for 3.65% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series KK (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 12, 2021).3.10Certificate of Designations for 4.625% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series LL (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 20, 2021).3.11Certificate of Designations for 4.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series MM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 29, 2021).3.12Certificate of Designations for 6.875% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series NN (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5805) filed March 12, 2024).3.13Certificate of Designations for 6.500% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series OO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on From 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5808) filed February 4, 2025).3.14By-laws of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended, effective September 19, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 22, 2023).4.1(a)Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed October 21, 2010). Certificate of Designations for Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed February 24, 2020). Certificate of Designations for 4.55% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series JJ (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed March 17, 2021). Certificate of Designations for 3.65% Fixed-Rate Reset Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series KK (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 12, 2021). Certificate of Designations for 4.625% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series LL (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed May 20, 2021). Certificate of Designations for 4.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series MM (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 29, 2021). Certificate of Designations for 6.875% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series NN (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5805) filed March 12, 2024). Certificate of Designations for 6.500% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series OO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on From 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File 1-5808) filed February 4, 2025). By-laws of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended, effective September 19, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed September 22, 2023). Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed October 21, 2010). 44 44 44 44 4.1(b)First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.2(a)Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed March 14, 2014).4.2(b)First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee, to the Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.3(a)Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(1) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-52826) filed June 13, 2001).4.3(b)Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.4Indenture, dated as of February 19, 2016, among JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(7) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (File No. 333-209682) filed February 24, 2016).4.5Form of Deposit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-191692) filed October 11, 2013).4.6Description of Securities of JPMorgan Chase & Co. registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (b)Other instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries are omitted pursuant to Section (b)(4)(iii)(A) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. JPMorgan Chase & Co. agrees to furnish copies of these instruments to the SEC upon request.10.1Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated July 2001 and as of December 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a)10.22005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a)10.32005 Deferred Compensation Program of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated effective as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a)10.4JPMorgan Chase & Co. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan, effective May 21, 2024 (incorporated by reference to the Appendix of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 8, 2024).(a)10.5Key Executive Performance Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Appendix G of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013).(a)10.6Excess Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated and amended as of December 31, 2008, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2009).(a)10.7Executive Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a) 4.1(b)First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.2(a)Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed March 14, 2014).4.2(b)First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee, to the Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.3(a)Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(1) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-52826) filed June 13, 2001).4.3(b)Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.4Indenture, dated as of February 19, 2016, among JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(7) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (File No. 333-209682) filed February 24, 2016).4.5Form of Deposit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-191692) filed October 11, 2013). 4.1(b)First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.2(a)Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed March 14, 2014).4.2(b)First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee, to the Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.3(a)Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(1) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-52826) filed June 13, 2001).4.3(b)Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017).4.4Indenture, dated as of February 19, 2016, among JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(7) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (File No. 333-209682) filed February 24, 2016).4.5Form of Deposit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-191692) filed October 11, 2013). First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of October 21, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017). Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No.1-5805) filed March 14, 2014). First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee, to the Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 14, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017). Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(1) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-52826) filed June 13, 2001). Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 13, 2017, between JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bankers Trust Company (succeeded by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas), as Trustee, to the Indenture, dated as of May 25, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed January 13, 2017). Indenture, dated as of February 19, 2016, among JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(7) to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (File No. 333-209682) filed February 24, 2016). Form of Deposit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 333-191692) filed October 11, 2013). 4.6Description of Securities of JPMorgan Chase & Co. registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (b)Other instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries are omitted pursuant to Section (b)(4)(iii)(A) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. JPMorgan Chase & Co. agrees to furnish copies of these instruments to the SEC upon request.10.1Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated July 2001 and as of December 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a)10.22005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a)10.32005 Deferred Compensation Program of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated effective as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a)10.4JPMorgan Chase & Co. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan, effective May 21, 2024 (incorporated by reference to the Appendix of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 8, 2024).(a)10.5Key Executive Performance Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Appendix G of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013).(a)10.6Excess Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated and amended as of December 31, 2008, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2009).(a)10.7Executive Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a) 4.6Description of Securities of JPMorgan Chase & Co. registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (b)Other instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries are omitted pursuant to Section (b)(4)(iii)(A) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K. JPMorgan Chase & Co. agrees to furnish copies of these instruments to the SEC upon request.10.1Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated July 2001 and as of December 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a)10.22005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a)10.32005 Deferred Compensation Program of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated effective as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a)10.4JPMorgan Chase & Co. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan, effective May 21, 2024 (incorporated by reference to the Appendix of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 8, 2024).(a)10.5Key Executive Performance Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Appendix G of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013).(a)10.6Excess Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated and amended as of December 31, 2008, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2009).(a)10.7Executive Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a) Description of Securities of JPMorgan Chase & Co. registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (b) Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated July 2001 and as of December 31, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a) 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors of JPMorgan Chase & Co., effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2007).(a) 2005 Deferred Compensation Program of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated effective as of December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a) JPMorgan Chase & Co. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan, effective May 21, 2024 (incorporated by reference to the Appendix of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 8, 2024).(a) Key Executive Performance Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective January 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Appendix G of the Schedule 14A of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed April 10, 2013).(a) Excess Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., restated and amended as of December 31, 2008, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2009).(a) Executive Retirement Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a) 45 45 45 45 Part IV Part IV 10.8Bank One Corporation Supplemental Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a)10.9Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2016).(a)10.10Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2017).(a)10.11Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2018).(a)10.12Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2019).(a)10.13Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 19, 2021(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2020).(a)10.14Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, dated July 20, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 20, 2021).(a)10.15Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for President and Chief Operating Officer, dated December 14, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed December 15, 2021).(a)10.16Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 18, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a)10.17Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2022).(a)10.18Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2023).(a)10.19Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2025.(a)(b) 10.8Bank One Corporation Supplemental Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a)10.9Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2016).(a)10.10Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2017).(a)10.11Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2018).(a)10.12Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2019).(a)10.13Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 19, 2021(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2020).(a) 10.8Bank One Corporation Supplemental Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a)10.9Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2016).(a)10.10Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2017).(a)10.11Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2018).(a)10.12Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2019).(a)10.13Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 19, 2021(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2020).(a) Bank One Corporation Supplemental Savings and Investment Plan, as amended and restated effective December 31, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2008).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2016).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for performance share units and restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2017).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 15, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2018).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2019).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 19, 2021(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the year ended December 31, 2020).(a) 10.14Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, dated July 20, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 20, 2021).(a)10.15Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for President and Chief Operating Officer, dated December 14, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed December 15, 2021).(a)10.16Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 18, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a)10.17Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2022).(a)10.18Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2023).(a)10.19Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2025.(a)(b) 10.14Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, dated July 20, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 20, 2021).(a)10.15Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for President and Chief Operating Officer, dated December 14, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed December 15, 2021).(a)10.16Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 18, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a)10.17Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2022).(a)10.18Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2023).(a)10.19Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2025.(a)(b) Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, dated July 20, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed July 20, 2021).(a) Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for stock appreciation rights for President and Chief Operating Officer, dated December 14, 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) filed December 15, 2021).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 18, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 17, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2022).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 16, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2023).(a) Forms of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Long-Term Incentive Plan Terms and Conditions for restricted stock units and performance share unit awards for Operating Committee members (U.S. and U.K.), dated as of January 21, 2025.(a)(b) 46 46 46 46 10.20Employee Stock Purchase Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019).10.21Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2021, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a)19Insider Trading Policy - Firmwide(b)21List of subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co.(b)22.1Annual Report on Form 11-K of The JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2024 (to be filed pursuant to Rule 15d-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).22.2Subsidiary Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.(b)23Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.(b)31.1Certification.(b)31.2Certification.(b)32Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(c)97Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Incentive-Based Compensation.(b)101.INSThe instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.(d)101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.(b)101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.(b)101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.(b)101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.(b)101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.(b)104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and included in Exhibit 101).(a) This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.(b) Filed herewith.(c) Furnished herewith. This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.(d) Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, includes the following financial information included in the Firm’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (ii) the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (iii) the Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, (iv) the Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (v) the Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 10.20Employee Stock Purchase Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019).10.21Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2021, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a)19Insider Trading Policy - Firmwide(b)21List of subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co.(b)22.1Annual Report on Form 11-K of The JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2024 (to be filed pursuant to Rule 15d-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).22.2Subsidiary Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.(b)23Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.(b)31.1Certification.(b)31.2Certification.(b)32Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(c)97Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Incentive-Based Compensation.(b)101.INSThe instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.(d)101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.(b)101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.(b)101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.(b)101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.(b)101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.(b) 10.20Employee Stock Purchase Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019).10.21Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2021, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a)19Insider Trading Policy - Firmwide(b)21List of subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co.(b)22.1Annual Report on Form 11-K of The JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2024 (to be filed pursuant to Rule 15d-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).22.2Subsidiary Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.(b)23Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.(b)31.1Certification.(b)31.2Certification.(b)32Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(c)97Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Incentive-Based Compensation.(b)101.INSThe instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.(d)101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.(b)101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.(b)101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.(b)101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.(b)101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.(b) Employee Stock Purchase Plan of JPMorgan Chase & Co., as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5805) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019). Form of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2021, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (File No. 1-5808) for the year ended December 31, 2021).(a) Insider Trading Policy - Firmwide(b) List of subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co.(b) Annual Report on Form 11-K of The JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2024 (to be filed pursuant to Rule 15d-21 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Subsidiary Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities.(b) Consent of independent registered public accounting firm.(b) Certification.(b) Certification.(b) Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(c) Policy for the Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Incentive-Based Compensation.(b) The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.(d) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.(b) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.(b) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.(b) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.(b) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.(b) 104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and included in Exhibit 101).(a) This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.(b) Filed herewith.(c) Furnished herewith. This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.(d) Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, includes the following financial information included in the Firm’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (ii) the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (iii) the Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, (iv) the Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (v) the Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document and included in Exhibit 101). (a) This exhibit is a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. (b) Filed herewith. (c) Furnished herewith. This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (d) Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, includes the following financial information included in the Firm’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (ii) the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (iii) the Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, (iv) the Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, (v) the Consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 47 47 47 47 page 48 not used 48 48 48 48

Financial:Audited financial statements:50Three-Year Summary of Consolidated Financial Highlights168Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting51Five-Year Stock Performance169Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmManagement’s discussion and analysis:172Consolidated Financial Statements52Introduction177Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements54Executive Overview59Consolidated Results of Operations63Consolidated Balance Sheets and Cash Flows AnalysisSupplementary information:67Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures322Distribution of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity; interest rates and interest differentials70Business Segment & Corporate Results327Glossary of Terms and Acronyms91Firmwide Risk Management96Strategic Risk Management97Capital Risk Management108Liquidity Risk Management117Credit and Investment Risk Management141Market Risk Management150Country Risk Management152Climate Risk Management153Operational Risk Management161Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm165Accounting and Reporting Developments167Forward-Looking Statements Three-Year Summary of Consolidated Financial Highlights Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Five-Year Stock Performance Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Financial Statements Introduction Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Executive Overview Consolidated Results of Operations Consolidated Balance Sheets and Cash Flows Analysis Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures Distribution of assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity; interest rates and interest differentials Business Segment & Corporate Results Glossary of Terms and Acronyms Firmwide Risk Management Strategic Risk Management Capital Risk Management Liquidity Risk Management Credit and Investment Risk Management Market Risk Management Country Risk Management Climate Risk Management Operational Risk Management Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm Accounting and Reporting Developments Forward-Looking Statements JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K49 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K49 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K49 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 49 Financial Financial

As of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions, except per share, ratio, employee data and where otherwise noted)202420232022Selected income statement dataTotal net revenue$177,556 (e)$158,104 $128,695 Total noninterest expense91,797 (e)87,172 76,140 Pre-provision profit(a)85,759 70,932 52,555 Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 6,389 Income before income tax expense75,081 61,612 46,166 Income tax expense16,610 12,060 8,490 Net income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Earnings per share dataNet income: Basic$19.79 $16.25 $12.10 Diluted19.75 16.23 12.09 Average shares: Basic2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Diluted2,879.0 2,943.1 2,970.0 Market and per common share dataMarket capitalization670,618 489,320 393,484 Common shares at period-end2,797.6 2,876.6 2,934.2 Book value per share116.07 104.45 90.29 Tangible book value per share (“TBVPS”)(a)97.30 86.08 73.12 Cash dividends declared per share4.80 4.10 4.00 Selected ratios and metricsReturn on common equity (“ROE”)18 %17 %14 %Return on tangible common equity (“ROTCE”)(a)22 21 18 Return on assets (“ROA”)1.43 1.30 0.98 Overhead ratio52 55 59 Loans-to-deposits ratio56 55 49 Firm Liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) (average)(b)113 113 112 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LCR (average)(b)124 129 151 Common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio(c)(d)15.7 15.0 13.2 Tier 1 capital ratio(c)(d)16.8 16.6 14.9 Total capital ratio(c)(d)18.5 18.5 16.8 Tier 1 leverage ratio(b)(c)7.2 7.2 6.6 Supplementary leverage ratio (“SLR”)(b)(c)6.1 6.1 5.6 Selected balance sheet data (period-end)Trading assets$637,784 $540,607 $453,799 Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses681,320 571,552 631,162 Loans1,347,988 1,323,706 1,135,647 Total assets4,002,814 3,875,393 3,665,743 Deposits2,406,032 2,400,688 2,340,179 Long-term debt401,418 391,825 295,865 Common stockholders’ equity324,708 300,474 264,928 Total stockholders’ equity344,758 327,878 292,332 Employees317,233 309,926 293,723 Credit quality metricsAllowances for credit losses$26,866 $24,765 $22,204 Allowance for loan losses to total retained loans1.87 %1.75 %1.81 %Nonperforming assets$9,300 $7,597 $7,247 Net charge-offs8,638 6,209 2,853 Net charge-off rate0.68 %0.52 %0.27 % As of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except per share, ratio, employee data and where otherwise noted) (e) (e)

Tangible book value per share (“TBVPS”)(a) Return on tangible common equity (“ROTCE”)(a) Firm Liquidity coverage ratio (“LCR”) (average)(b) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. LCR (average)(b) Common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio(c)(d) Tier 1 capital ratio(c)(d) Total capital ratio(c)(d) Tier 1 leverage ratio(b)(c) Supplementary leverage ratio (“SLR”)(b)(c)

(a)Pre-provision profit, TBVPS and ROTCE are each non-GAAP financial measures. Tangible common equity (“TCE”) is also a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69 for a discussion of these measures. (b)For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the percentage represents average ratios for the three months ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. (c)The ratios reflect the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. (d)Reflects the Firm’s ratios under the Basel III Standardized approach. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for additional information. (e)Total net revenue included a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares, and total noninterest expense included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation, both recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Executive Overview on pages 54–58, and Notes 2 and 6 for additional information on the exchange offer for Visa Class B-1 common stock. 50JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 50JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 50JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 50 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorganChase” or the “Firm”) common stock with the cumulative return of the S&P 500 Index, the KBW Bank Index and the S&P Financials Index. The S&P 500 Index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the United States of America (“U.S.”), consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors. The KBW Bank Index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the U.S. and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. The S&P Financials Index is an index of financial companies, all of which are components of the S&P 500. The Firm is a component of all three industry indices. The following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $100 on December 31, 2019, in JPMorganChase common stock and in each of the above indices. The comparison assumes that all dividends were reinvested. December 31,(in dollars)201920202021202220232024JPMorganChase$100.00 $94.48 $120.68 $105.48 $137.91 $198.96 KBW Bank Index100.00 89.69 124.08 97.53 96.66 132.62 S&P Financials Index100.00 98.24 132.50 118.54 132.94 173.57 S&P 500 Index100.00 118.39 152.34 124.75 157.54 196.96 December 31, (in dollars) JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K51 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K51 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K51 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 51

The following is Management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) of JPMorganChase for the year ended December 31, 2024. The MD&A is included in both JPMorganChase’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2024 (“Annual Report”) and its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (“2024 Form 10-K” or “Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Refer to the Glossary of terms and acronyms on pages 327–333 for definitions of terms and acronyms used throughout the Annual Report and the 2024 Form 10-K. This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of JPMorganChase’s management, speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Refer to Forward-looking Statements on page 167 and Part 1, Item 1A: Risk Factors in this Form 10-K on pages 10-37 for a discussion of certain of those risks and uncertainties and the factors that could cause JPMorganChase’s actual results to differ materially because of those risks and uncertainties. There is no assurance that actual results will be in line with any outlook information set forth herein, and the Firm does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements. INTRODUCTION JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading financial services firm based in the United States of America (“U.S.”), with operations worldwide. JPMorganChase had $4.0 trillion in assets and $344.8 billion in stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2024. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands, the Firm serves millions of customers, predominantly in the U.S., and many of the world’s most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients globally.JPMorganChase’s principal bank subsidiary is JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (“JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.”), a national banking association with U.S. branches in 48 states and Washington, D.C. JPMorganChase’s principal non-bank subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan Securities”), a U.S. broker-dealer. The bank and non-bank subsidiaries of JPMorganChase operate nationally as well as through overseas branches and subsidiaries, representative offices and subsidiary foreign banks. The Firm’s principal operating subsidiaries outside the U.S. are J.P. Morgan Securities plc and J.P. Morgan SE (“JPMSE”), which are subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and are based in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Germany, respectively.Business segments & Corporate: Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank. As a result of the reorganization, the Firm has three reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking (“CCB”), Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”) and Asset & Wealth Management (“AWM”) – with the remaining activities in Corporate. The Firm’s consumer business segment is CCB, and the Firm’s wholesale business segments are CIB and AWM. A description of each of the Firm’s reportable business segments, and the products and services that they provide to their respective client bases, as well as a description of Corporate activities, is provided in the Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations section of this Form 10-K (“Management’s discussion and analysis” or “MD&A”) under the heading “Business Segment & Corporate Results,” which begins on page 70, and in Note 32. First Republic: On May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the “First Republic acquisition”) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). References in this Form 10-K to “associated with First Republic,” “impact of First Republic” or similar expressions refer to the relevant effects of the First Republic acquisition, as well as subsequent related business and activities, as applicable. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading financial services firm based in the United States of America (“U.S.”), with operations worldwide. JPMorganChase had $4.0 trillion in assets and $344.8 billion in stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2024. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands, the Firm serves millions of customers, predominantly in the U.S., and many of the world’s most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients globally.JPMorganChase’s principal bank subsidiary is JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (“JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.”), a national banking association with U.S. branches in 48 states and Washington, D.C. JPMorganChase’s principal non-bank subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan Securities”), a U.S. broker-dealer. The bank and non-bank subsidiaries of JPMorganChase operate nationally as well as through overseas branches and subsidiaries, representative offices and subsidiary foreign banks. The Firm’s principal operating subsidiaries outside the U.S. are J.P. Morgan Securities plc and J.P. Morgan SE (“JPMSE”), which are subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and are based in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Germany, respectively. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading financial services firm based in the United States of America (“U.S.”), with operations worldwide. JPMorganChase had $4.0 trillion in assets and $344.8 billion in stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2024. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands, the Firm serves millions of customers, predominantly in the U.S., and many of the world’s most prominent corporate, institutional and government clients globally. JPMorganChase’s principal bank subsidiary is JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (“JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.”), a national banking association with U.S. branches in 48 states and Washington, D.C. JPMorganChase’s principal non-bank subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“J.P. Morgan Securities”), a U.S. broker-dealer. The bank and non-bank subsidiaries of JPMorganChase operate nationally as well as through overseas branches and subsidiaries, representative offices and subsidiary foreign banks. The Firm’s principal operating subsidiaries outside the U.S. are J.P. Morgan Securities plc and J.P. Morgan SE (“JPMSE”), which are subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and are based in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Germany, respectively. Business segments & Corporate: Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank. As a result of the reorganization, the Firm has three reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking (“CCB”), Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”) and Asset & Wealth Management (“AWM”) – with the remaining activities in Corporate. The Firm’s consumer business segment is CCB, and the Firm’s wholesale business segments are CIB and AWM. A description of each of the Firm’s reportable business segments, and the products and services that they provide to their respective client bases, as well as a description of Corporate activities, is provided in the Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations section of this Form 10-K (“Management’s discussion and analysis” or “MD&A”) under the heading “Business Segment & Corporate Results,” which begins on page 70, and in Note 32. First Republic: On May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the “First Republic acquisition”) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). References in this Form 10-K to “associated with First Republic,” “impact of First Republic” or similar expressions refer to the relevant effects of the First Republic acquisition, as well as subsequent related business and activities, as applicable. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. Business segments & Corporate: Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank. As a result of the reorganization, the Firm has three reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking (“CCB”), Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”) and Asset & Wealth Management (“AWM”) – with the remaining activities in Corporate. The Firm’s consumer business segment is CCB, and the Firm’s wholesale business segments are CIB and AWM. A description of each of the Firm’s reportable business segments, and the products and services that they provide to their respective client bases, as well as a description of Corporate activities, is provided in the Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations section of this Form 10-K (“Management’s discussion and analysis” or “MD&A”) under the heading “Business Segment & Corporate Results,” which begins on page 70, and in Note 32. First Republic: On May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the “First Republic acquisition”) from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). References in this Form 10-K to “associated with First Republic,” “impact of First Republic” or similar expressions refer to the relevant effects of the First Republic acquisition, as well as subsequent related business and activities, as applicable. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. 52JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 52JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 52JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 52 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The Firm’s website is www.jpmorganchase.com. JPMorganChase makes available on its website, free of charge, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files or furnishes such material to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at www.sec.gov. JPMorganChase makes new and important information about the Firm available on its website at https://www.jpmorganchase.com, including on the Investor Relations section of its website at https://www.jpmorganchase.com/ir. Information on the Firm's website, including documents on the website that are referenced in this Form 10-K, is not incorporated by reference into this 2024 Form 10-K or the Firm’s other filings with the SEC. The Firm’s website is www.jpmorganchase.com. JPMorganChase makes available on its website, free of charge, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files or furnishes such material to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at www.sec.gov. JPMorganChase makes new and important information about the Firm available on its website at https://www.jpmorganchase.com, including on the Investor Relations section of its website at https://www.jpmorganchase.com/ir. Information on the Firm's website, including documents on the website that are referenced in this Form 10-K, is not incorporated by reference into this 2024 Form 10-K or the Firm’s other filings with the SEC. The Firm’s website is www.jpmorganchase.com. JPMorganChase makes available on its website, free of charge, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files or furnishes such material to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at www.sec.gov. JPMorganChase makes new and important information about the Firm available on its website at https://www.jpmorganchase.com, including on the Investor Relations section of its website at https://www.jpmorganchase.com/ir. Information on the Firm's website, including documents on the website that are referenced in this Form 10-K, is not incorporated by reference into this 2024 Form 10-K or the Firm’s other filings with the SEC. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K53 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K53 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K53 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 53 EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW This executive overview of the MD&A highlights selected information and does not contain all of the information that is important to readers of the Firm’s 2024 Form 10-K. For a complete description of the trends and uncertainties, as well as the risks and critical accounting estimates affecting the Firm, the 2024 Form 10-K should be read in its entirety.Financial performance of JPMorganChaseYear ended December 31,(in millions, except per share data and ratios)20242023ChangeSelected income statement dataNoninterest revenue$84,973 $68,837 23%Net interest income92,583 89,267 4Total net revenue177,556 158,104 12Total noninterest expense91,797 87,172 5Pre-provision profit85,759 70,932 21Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 15Net income58,471 49,552 18Diluted earnings per share19.75 16.23 22Selected ratios and metricsReturn on common equity18 %17 %Return on tangible common equity22 21 Book value per share$116.07 $104.45 11Tangible book value per share97.3 86.08 13Capital ratios(a)(b)CET1 capital15.7 %15.0 %Tier 1 capital16.8 16.6 Total capital18.5 18.5 Memo:NII excluding Markets(c)$92,419 $90,041 3NIR excluding Markets(c)58,167 44,361 31Markets(c)30,007 27,964 7Total net revenue - managed basis$180,593 $162,366 11(a) The ratios reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. (b) Reflects the Firm’s ratios under the Basel III Standardized approach. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for additional information.(c) NII and NIR refer to net interest income and noninterest revenue, respectively. Markets consists of CIB's Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets businesses. Visa shares: On April 8, 2024, Visa Inc. commenced an initial exchange offer for its Class B-1 common shares. On May 6, 2024, the Firm announced that Visa had accepted the Firm’s tender of its 37.2 million Visa Class B-1 common shares in exchange for a combination of Visa Class B-2 common shares and Visa Class C common shares (“Visa C shares”), resulting in a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024. As of September 30, 2024, the Firm had disposed of all of its Visa C shares through sales and through a contribution to the Firm’s Foundation. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149, and Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.First Republic: JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank from the FDIC on May 1, 2023. As a result, the year-to-date results include the twelve-month impact of First Republic compared with eight months in the prior-year period. Where meaningful to the results, this is referred to in this Form 10-K as the "timing impact" of First Republic. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information.Comparisons noted in the sections below are for the full year of 2024 versus the full year of 2023, unless otherwise specified.Firmwide overviewJPMorganChase reported net income of $58.5 billion for 2024, up 18%, earnings per share of $19.75, ROE of 18% and ROTCE of 22%.•Total net revenue was $177.6 billion, up 12%, reflecting: –Net interest income (“NII”) of $92.6 billion, up 4%, driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, higher revolving balances in Card Services, the timing impact of First Republic, higher wholesale deposit balances, and higher Markets net interest income, largely offset by deposit margin compression across the lines of business and lower average deposit balances in CCB. NII excluding Markets was $92.4 billion, up 3%. –Noninterest revenue (“NIR”) was $85.0 billion, up 23%, predominantly driven by a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024, higher asset management fees in AWM and CCB, higher investment banking fees, and lower net investment securities losses in Treasury and CIO.The prior year included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion associated with First Republic. This executive overview of the MD&A highlights selected information and does not contain all of the information that is important to readers of the Firm’s 2024 Form 10-K. For a complete description of the trends and uncertainties, as well as the risks and critical accounting estimates affecting the Firm, the 2024 Form 10-K should be read in its entirety.Financial performance of JPMorganChaseYear ended December 31,(in millions, except per share data and ratios)20242023ChangeSelected income statement dataNoninterest revenue$84,973 $68,837 23%Net interest income92,583 89,267 4Total net revenue177,556 158,104 12Total noninterest expense91,797 87,172 5Pre-provision profit85,759 70,932 21Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 15Net income58,471 49,552 18Diluted earnings per share19.75 16.23 22Selected ratios and metricsReturn on common equity18 %17 %Return on tangible common equity22 21 Book value per share$116.07 $104.45 11Tangible book value per share97.3 86.08 13Capital ratios(a)(b)CET1 capital15.7 %15.0 %Tier 1 capital16.8 16.6 Total capital18.5 18.5 Memo:NII excluding Markets(c)$92,419 $90,041 3NIR excluding Markets(c)58,167 44,361 31Markets(c)30,007 27,964 7Total net revenue - managed basis$180,593 $162,366 11(a) The ratios reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. (b) Reflects the Firm’s ratios under the Basel III Standardized approach. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for additional information.(c) NII and NIR refer to net interest income and noninterest revenue, respectively. Markets consists of CIB's Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets businesses. This executive overview of the MD&A highlights selected information and does not contain all of the information that is important to readers of the Firm’s 2024 Form 10-K. For a complete description of the trends and uncertainties, as well as the risks and critical accounting estimates affecting the Firm, the 2024 Form 10-K should be read in its entirety. Financial performance of JPMorganChaseYear ended December 31,(in millions, except per share data and ratios)20242023ChangeSelected income statement dataNoninterest revenue$84,973 $68,837 23%Net interest income92,583 89,267 4Total net revenue177,556 158,104 12Total noninterest expense91,797 87,172 5Pre-provision profit85,759 70,932 21Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 15Net income58,471 49,552 18Diluted earnings per share19.75 16.23 22Selected ratios and metricsReturn on common equity18 %17 %Return on tangible common equity22 21 Book value per share$116.07 $104.45 11Tangible book value per share97.3 86.08 13Capital ratios(a)(b)CET1 capital15.7 %15.0 %Tier 1 capital16.8 16.6 Total capital18.5 18.5 Memo:NII excluding Markets(c)$92,419 $90,041 3NIR excluding Markets(c)58,167 44,361 31Markets(c)30,007 27,964 7Total net revenue - managed basis$180,593 $162,366 11 Return on tangible common equity

Total capital NII excluding Markets(c) NIR excluding Markets(c) Markets(c) (a) The ratios reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. (b) Reflects the Firm’s ratios under the Basel III Standardized approach. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for additional information. (c) NII and NIR refer to net interest income and noninterest revenue, respectively. Markets consists of CIB's Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets businesses. Visa shares: On April 8, 2024, Visa Inc. commenced an initial exchange offer for its Class B-1 common shares. On May 6, 2024, the Firm announced that Visa had accepted the Firm’s tender of its 37.2 million Visa Class B-1 common shares in exchange for a combination of Visa Class B-2 common shares and Visa Class C common shares (“Visa C shares”), resulting in a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024. As of September 30, 2024, the Firm had disposed of all of its Visa C shares through sales and through a contribution to the Firm’s Foundation. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149, and Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.First Republic: JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank from the FDIC on May 1, 2023. As a result, the year-to-date results include the twelve-month impact of First Republic compared with eight months in the prior-year period. Where meaningful to the results, this is referred to in this Form 10-K as the "timing impact" of First Republic. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information.Comparisons noted in the sections below are for the full year of 2024 versus the full year of 2023, unless otherwise specified.Firmwide overviewJPMorganChase reported net income of $58.5 billion for 2024, up 18%, earnings per share of $19.75, ROE of 18% and ROTCE of 22%.•Total net revenue was $177.6 billion, up 12%, reflecting: –Net interest income (“NII”) of $92.6 billion, up 4%, driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, higher revolving balances in Card Services, the timing impact of First Republic, higher wholesale deposit balances, and higher Markets net interest income, largely offset by deposit margin compression across the lines of business and lower average deposit balances in CCB. NII excluding Markets was $92.4 billion, up 3%. –Noninterest revenue (“NIR”) was $85.0 billion, up 23%, predominantly driven by a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024, higher asset management fees in AWM and CCB, higher investment banking fees, and lower net investment securities losses in Treasury and CIO.The prior year included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion associated with First Republic. Visa shares: On April 8, 2024, Visa Inc. commenced an initial exchange offer for its Class B-1 common shares. On May 6, 2024, the Firm announced that Visa had accepted the Firm’s tender of its 37.2 million Visa Class B-1 common shares in exchange for a combination of Visa Class B-2 common shares and Visa Class C common shares (“Visa C shares”), resulting in a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024. As of September 30, 2024, the Firm had disposed of all of its Visa C shares through sales and through a contribution to the Firm’s Foundation. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149, and Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. First Republic: JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank from the FDIC on May 1, 2023. As a result, the year-to-date results include the twelve-month impact of First Republic compared with eight months in the prior-year period. Where meaningful to the results, this is referred to in this Form 10-K as the "timing impact" of First Republic. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information. Comparisons noted in the sections below are for the full year of 2024 versus the full year of 2023, unless otherwise specified.

JPMorganChase reported net income of $58.5 billion for 2024, up 18%, earnings per share of $19.75, ROE of 18% and ROTCE of 22%. •Total net revenue was $177.6 billion, up 12%, reflecting: –Net interest income (“NII”) of $92.6 billion, up 4%, driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, higher revolving balances in Card Services, the timing impact of First Republic, higher wholesale deposit balances, and higher Markets net interest income, largely offset by deposit margin compression across the lines of business and lower average deposit balances in CCB. NII excluding Markets was $92.4 billion, up 3%. –Noninterest revenue (“NIR”) was $85.0 billion, up 23%, predominantly driven by a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024, higher asset management fees in AWM and CCB, higher investment banking fees, and lower net investment securities losses in Treasury and CIO. The prior year included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion associated with First Republic. 54JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 54JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 54JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 54 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K •Noninterest expense was $91.8 billion, up 5%, driven by higher compensation expense, including higher revenue-related compensation and growth in the number of employees, as well as a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, partially offset by lower FDIC-related expense, reflecting a $2.9 billion special assessment recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023, compared with a $725 million increase to the FDIC special assessment recognized in the first quarter of 2024. •The provision for credit losses was $10.7 billion, reflecting $8.6 billion of net charge-offs and a net addition to the allowance for credit losses of $2.0 billion. Net charge-offs increased by $2.4 billion, driven by Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization, and balance growth. The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included a net addition of $2.1 billion in consumer, driven by Card Services, and a net reduction of $19 million in wholesale.The provision in the prior year was $9.3 billion, reflecting $6.2 billion of net charge-offs and a $3.1 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses.•The total allowance for credit losses was $26.9 billion at December 31, 2024. The Firm had an allowance for loan losses to retained loans coverage ratio of 1.87%, compared with 1.75% in the prior year.•The Firm’s nonperforming assets totaled $9.3 billion at December 31, 2024, up 22%, driven by higher wholesale nonaccrual loans, which reflected downgrades in Real Estate, concentrated in Office, partially offset by lower consumer nonaccrual loans, which included loan sales. Refer to Wholesale Credit Portfolio and Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and pages 120–125, respectively, for additional information.•Firmwide average loans of $1.3 trillion were up 6%, driven by higher loans across the lines of business. •Firmwide average deposits of $2.4 trillion were up 1%, reflecting:–net inflows in Payments and net issuances of structured notes in Markets,–the timing impact of First Republic, and–growth in balances in new and existing client accounts in AWM,predominantly offset by–a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information.Selected capital and other metrics•CET1 capital was $275.5 billion, and the Standardized and Advanced CET1 ratios were 15.7% and 15.8%, respectively.•SLR was 6.1%.•TBVPS grew 13.0%, ending 2024 at $97.30.•As of December 31, 2024, the Firm had eligible end-of-period High Quality Liquid Assets (“HQLA”) of approximately $834 billion and unencumbered marketable securities with a fair value of approximately $594 billion, resulting in approximately $1.4 trillion of liquidity sources. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information.Refer to Consolidated Results of Operations and Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 59–62 and pages 63–65, respectively, for a further discussion of the Firm's results, including the provision for credit losses, and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Pre-provision profit, ROTCE, TCE, TBVPS, NII and NIR excluding Markets, and total net revenue on a managed basis are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69 for a further discussion of each of these measures. •Noninterest expense was $91.8 billion, up 5%, driven by higher compensation expense, including higher revenue-related compensation and growth in the number of employees, as well as a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, partially offset by lower FDIC-related expense, reflecting a $2.9 billion special assessment recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023, compared with a $725 million increase to the FDIC special assessment recognized in the first quarter of 2024. •The provision for credit losses was $10.7 billion, reflecting $8.6 billion of net charge-offs and a net addition to the allowance for credit losses of $2.0 billion. Net charge-offs increased by $2.4 billion, driven by Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization, and balance growth. The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included a net addition of $2.1 billion in consumer, driven by Card Services, and a net reduction of $19 million in wholesale.The provision in the prior year was $9.3 billion, reflecting $6.2 billion of net charge-offs and a $3.1 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses.•The total allowance for credit losses was $26.9 billion at December 31, 2024. The Firm had an allowance for loan losses to retained loans coverage ratio of 1.87%, compared with 1.75% in the prior year.•The Firm’s nonperforming assets totaled $9.3 billion at December 31, 2024, up 22%, driven by higher wholesale nonaccrual loans, which reflected downgrades in Real Estate, concentrated in Office, partially offset by lower consumer nonaccrual loans, which included loan sales. Refer to Wholesale Credit Portfolio and Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and pages 120–125, respectively, for additional information.•Firmwide average loans of $1.3 trillion were up 6%, driven by higher loans across the lines of business. •Firmwide average deposits of $2.4 trillion were up 1%, reflecting:–net inflows in Payments and net issuances of structured notes in Markets,–the timing impact of First Republic, and–growth in balances in new and existing client accounts in AWM,predominantly offset by–a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information. •Noninterest expense was $91.8 billion, up 5%, driven by higher compensation expense, including higher revenue-related compensation and growth in the number of employees, as well as a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, partially offset by lower FDIC-related expense, reflecting a $2.9 billion special assessment recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023, compared with a $725 million increase to the FDIC special assessment recognized in the first quarter of 2024. •The provision for credit losses was $10.7 billion, reflecting $8.6 billion of net charge-offs and a net addition to the allowance for credit losses of $2.0 billion. Net charge-offs increased by $2.4 billion, driven by Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization, and balance growth. The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included a net addition of $2.1 billion in consumer, driven by Card Services, and a net reduction of $19 million in wholesale. The provision in the prior year was $9.3 billion, reflecting $6.2 billion of net charge-offs and a $3.1 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses. •The total allowance for credit losses was $26.9 billion at December 31, 2024. The Firm had an allowance for loan losses to retained loans coverage ratio of 1.87%, compared with 1.75% in the prior year. •The Firm’s nonperforming assets totaled $9.3 billion at December 31, 2024, up 22%, driven by higher wholesale nonaccrual loans, which reflected downgrades in Real Estate, concentrated in Office, partially offset by lower consumer nonaccrual loans, which included loan sales. Refer to Wholesale Credit Portfolio and Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and pages 120–125, respectively, for additional information. •Firmwide average loans of $1.3 trillion were up 6%, driven by higher loans across the lines of business. •Firmwide average deposits of $2.4 trillion were up 1%, reflecting: –net inflows in Payments and net issuances of structured notes in Markets, –the timing impact of First Republic, and –growth in balances in new and existing client accounts in AWM, predominantly offset by –a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information. Selected capital and other metrics•CET1 capital was $275.5 billion, and the Standardized and Advanced CET1 ratios were 15.7% and 15.8%, respectively.•SLR was 6.1%.•TBVPS grew 13.0%, ending 2024 at $97.30.•As of December 31, 2024, the Firm had eligible end-of-period High Quality Liquid Assets (“HQLA”) of approximately $834 billion and unencumbered marketable securities with a fair value of approximately $594 billion, resulting in approximately $1.4 trillion of liquidity sources. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information.Refer to Consolidated Results of Operations and Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 59–62 and pages 63–65, respectively, for a further discussion of the Firm's results, including the provision for credit losses, and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Pre-provision profit, ROTCE, TCE, TBVPS, NII and NIR excluding Markets, and total net revenue on a managed basis are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69 for a further discussion of each of these measures.

•CET1 capital was $275.5 billion, and the Standardized and Advanced CET1 ratios were 15.7% and 15.8%, respectively. •SLR was 6.1%. •TBVPS grew 13.0%, ending 2024 at $97.30. •As of December 31, 2024, the Firm had eligible end-of-period High Quality Liquid Assets (“HQLA”) of approximately $834 billion and unencumbered marketable securities with a fair value of approximately $594 billion, resulting in approximately $1.4 trillion of liquidity sources. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information. Refer to Consolidated Results of Operations and Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 59–62 and pages 63–65, respectively, for a further discussion of the Firm's results, including the provision for credit losses, and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. Pre-provision profit, ROTCE, TCE, TBVPS, NII and NIR excluding Markets, and total net revenue on a managed basis are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69 for a further discussion of each of these measures. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K55 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K55 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K55 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 55 Business segment highlightsSelected business metrics for each of the Firm’s lines of business (“LOB”) are presented below for the full year of 2024.CCBROE 32%•Average deposits down 6%; client investment assets up 14% •Average loans up 9%; Card Services net charge-off rate of 3.34% •Debit and credit card sales volume(a) up 8%•Active mobile customers(b) up 7%CIB(c)ROE 18%•Investment Banking fees up 37%; #1 ranking for Global Investment Banking fees with 9.3% wallet share for the year•Markets revenue up 7%, with Fixed Income Markets up 5% and Equity Markets up 13%•Average Banking & Payments loans up 2%; average client deposits(d) up 5%AWMROE 34%•Assets under management ("AUM") of $4.0 trillion, up 18%•Average loans up 3%; average deposits up 9% including the transfer of First Republic deposits to AWM in 4Q23(e)(a) Excludes Commercial Card.(b) Users of all mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days.(c) Reflects the reorganization of the Firm's business segments. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information.(d) Represents client deposits and other third-party liabilities pertaining to the Payments and Securities Services businesses.(e) In the fourth quarter of 2023, CCB transferred certain deposits associated with First Republic to AWM and CIB. Refer to the Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for a detailed discussion of results by business segment.Credit provided and capital raisedJPMorganChase continues to support consumers, businesses and communities around the globe. The Firm provided new and renewed credit and raised capital for wholesale and consumer clients during 2024, consisting of approximately:$2.8 trillionTotal credit provided and capital raised (including loans and commitments)$250billionCredit for consumers$40billionCredit for U.S. small businesses$2.4 trillionCredit and capital for corporations and non-U.S. government entities(a)$65 billionCredit and capital for nonprofit and U.S. government entities(b)(a) Includes Individuals and Individual Entities primarily consisting of Global Private Bank clients within AWM.(b) Includes states, municipalities, hospitals and universities. Business segment highlightsSelected business metrics for each of the Firm’s lines of business (“LOB”) are presented below for the full year of 2024.CCBROE 32%•Average deposits down 6%; client investment assets up 14% •Average loans up 9%; Card Services net charge-off rate of 3.34% •Debit and credit card sales volume(a) up 8%•Active mobile customers(b) up 7%CIB(c)ROE 18%•Investment Banking fees up 37%; #1 ranking for Global Investment Banking fees with 9.3% wallet share for the year•Markets revenue up 7%, with Fixed Income Markets up 5% and Equity Markets up 13%•Average Banking & Payments loans up 2%; average client deposits(d) up 5%AWMROE 34%•Assets under management ("AUM") of $4.0 trillion, up 18%•Average loans up 3%; average deposits up 9% including the transfer of First Republic deposits to AWM in 4Q23(e)(a) Excludes Commercial Card.(b) Users of all mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days.(c) Reflects the reorganization of the Firm's business segments. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information.(d) Represents client deposits and other third-party liabilities pertaining to the Payments and Securities Services businesses.(e) In the fourth quarter of 2023, CCB transferred certain deposits associated with First Republic to AWM and CIB. Refer to the Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for a detailed discussion of results by business segment.

Selected business metrics for each of the Firm’s lines of business (“LOB”) are presented below for the full year of 2024. CCBROE 32%•Average deposits down 6%; client investment assets up 14% •Average loans up 9%; Card Services net charge-off rate of 3.34% •Debit and credit card sales volume(a) up 8%•Active mobile customers(b) up 7%CIB(c)ROE 18%•Investment Banking fees up 37%; #1 ranking for Global Investment Banking fees with 9.3% wallet share for the year•Markets revenue up 7%, with Fixed Income Markets up 5% and Equity Markets up 13%•Average Banking & Payments loans up 2%; average client deposits(d) up 5%AWMROE 34%•Assets under management ("AUM") of $4.0 trillion, up 18%•Average loans up 3%; average deposits up 9% including the transfer of First Republic deposits to AWM in 4Q23(e) CCB ROE 32% •Average deposits down 6%; client investment assets up 14% •Average loans up 9%; Card Services net charge-off rate of 3.34% •Debit and credit card sales volume(a) up 8% •Active mobile customers(b) up 7% CIB(c) ROE 18% •Investment Banking fees up 37%; #1 ranking for Global Investment Banking fees with 9.3% wallet share for the year •Markets revenue up 7%, with Fixed Income Markets up 5% and Equity Markets up 13% •Average Banking & Payments loans up 2%; average client deposits(d) up 5% AWM ROE 34% •Assets under management ("AUM") of $4.0 trillion, up 18% •Average loans up 3%; average deposits up 9% including the transfer of First Republic deposits to AWM in 4Q23(e) (a) Excludes Commercial Card. (b) Users of all mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days. (c) Reflects the reorganization of the Firm's business segments. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information. (d) Represents client deposits and other third-party liabilities pertaining to the Payments and Securities Services businesses. (e) In the fourth quarter of 2023, CCB transferred certain deposits associated with First Republic to AWM and CIB. Refer to the Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for a detailed discussion of results by business segment. Credit provided and capital raisedJPMorganChase continues to support consumers, businesses and communities around the globe. The Firm provided new and renewed credit and raised capital for wholesale and consumer clients during 2024, consisting of approximately:$2.8 trillionTotal credit provided and capital raised (including loans and commitments)$250billionCredit for consumers$40billionCredit for U.S. small businesses$2.4 trillionCredit and capital for corporations and non-U.S. government entities(a)$65 billionCredit and capital for nonprofit and U.S. government entities(b)(a) Includes Individuals and Individual Entities primarily consisting of Global Private Bank clients within AWM.(b) Includes states, municipalities, hospitals and universities.

JPMorganChase continues to support consumers, businesses and communities around the globe. The Firm provided new and renewed credit and raised capital for wholesale and consumer clients during 2024, consisting of approximately: $2.8 trillionTotal credit provided and capital raised (including loans and commitments)$250billionCredit for consumers$40billionCredit for U.S. small businesses$2.4 trillionCredit and capital for corporations and non-U.S. government entities(a)$65 billionCredit and capital for nonprofit and U.S. government entities(b) $2.8 trillion Total credit provided and capital raised (including loans and commitments) $250 billion Credit for consumers $40 billion Credit for U.S. small businesses $2.4 trillion Credit and capital for corporations and non-U.S. government entities(a) $65 billion Credit and capital for nonprofit and U.S. government entities(b) (a) Includes Individuals and Individual Entities primarily consisting of Global Private Bank clients within AWM. (b) Includes states, municipalities, hospitals and universities. 56JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 56JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 56JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 56 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Recent events•On January 14, 2025, JPMorganChase announced new responsibilities for several of its senior executives:–Daniel Pinto, President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), will retire at the end of 2026. Mr. Pinto will relinquish his responsibilities as President and COO as of June 30, 2025. He will continue to serve the Firm as Vice Chairman through the end of 2026.–Jennifer Piepszak, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”), was named a COO of the Firm, effective January 14, 2025.–Doug Petno, Co-head of Global Banking, succeeded Ms. Piepszak as Co-Chief Executive Officer of CIB.•On December 12, 2024, the Firm announced that Michele G. Buck, 63, had been elected as a director of the Firm, effective March 17, 2025. Ms. Buck is Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of The Hershey Company.OutlookThese current expectations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of JPMorganChase’s management, speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Refer to Forward-Looking Statements on page 167 and Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 10-37 of this Form 10-K for a further discussion of certain of those risks and uncertainties and the other factors that could cause JPMorganChase’s actual results to differ materially because of those risks and uncertainties. There is no assurance that actual results in 2025 will be in line with the outlook information set forth below, and the Firm does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements.JPMorganChase’s current outlook for full-year 2025 should be viewed against the backdrop of the global and U.S. economies, financial markets activity, the geopolitical environment, the competitive environment, client and customer activity levels, and regulatory and legislative developments in the U.S. and other countries where the Firm does business. Each of these factors will affect the performance of the Firm. The Firm will continue to make appropriate adjustments to its businesses and operations in response to ongoing developments in the business, economic, regulatory and legal environments in which it operates.Full-year 2025•Management expects net interest income to be approximately $94.0 billion and net interest income excluding Markets to be approximately $90.0 billion, market dependent. •Management expects adjusted expense to be approximately $95.0 billion, market dependent.•Management expects the net charge-off rate in Card Services to be approximately 3.60%.Net interest income excluding Markets and adjusted expense are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69. Recent events•On January 14, 2025, JPMorganChase announced new responsibilities for several of its senior executives:–Daniel Pinto, President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), will retire at the end of 2026. Mr. Pinto will relinquish his responsibilities as President and COO as of June 30, 2025. He will continue to serve the Firm as Vice Chairman through the end of 2026.–Jennifer Piepszak, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”), was named a COO of the Firm, effective January 14, 2025.–Doug Petno, Co-head of Global Banking, succeeded Ms. Piepszak as Co-Chief Executive Officer of CIB.•On December 12, 2024, the Firm announced that Michele G. Buck, 63, had been elected as a director of the Firm, effective March 17, 2025. Ms. Buck is Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of The Hershey Company.

•On January 14, 2025, JPMorganChase announced new responsibilities for several of its senior executives: –Daniel Pinto, President and Chief Operating Officer (“COO”), will retire at the end of 2026. Mr. Pinto will relinquish his responsibilities as President and COO as of June 30, 2025. He will continue to serve the Firm as Vice Chairman through the end of 2026. –Jennifer Piepszak, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”), was named a COO of the Firm, effective January 14, 2025. –Doug Petno, Co-head of Global Banking, succeeded Ms. Piepszak as Co-Chief Executive Officer of CIB. •On December 12, 2024, the Firm announced that Michele G. Buck, 63, had been elected as a director of the Firm, effective March 17, 2025. Ms. Buck is Chairman of the Board, President and CEO of The Hershey Company. OutlookThese current expectations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of JPMorganChase’s management, speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Refer to Forward-Looking Statements on page 167 and Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 10-37 of this Form 10-K for a further discussion of certain of those risks and uncertainties and the other factors that could cause JPMorganChase’s actual results to differ materially because of those risks and uncertainties. There is no assurance that actual results in 2025 will be in line with the outlook information set forth below, and the Firm does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements.JPMorganChase’s current outlook for full-year 2025 should be viewed against the backdrop of the global and U.S. economies, financial markets activity, the geopolitical environment, the competitive environment, client and customer activity levels, and regulatory and legislative developments in the U.S. and other countries where the Firm does business. Each of these factors will affect the performance of the Firm. The Firm will continue to make appropriate adjustments to its businesses and operations in response to ongoing developments in the business, economic, regulatory and legal environments in which it operates.Full-year 2025•Management expects net interest income to be approximately $94.0 billion and net interest income excluding Markets to be approximately $90.0 billion, market dependent. •Management expects adjusted expense to be approximately $95.0 billion, market dependent.•Management expects the net charge-off rate in Card Services to be approximately 3.60%.Net interest income excluding Markets and adjusted expense are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69. Outlook These current expectations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of JPMorganChase’s management, speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Refer to Forward-Looking Statements on page 167 and Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 10-37 of this Form 10-K for a further discussion of certain of those risks and uncertainties and the other factors that could cause JPMorganChase’s actual results to differ materially because of those risks and uncertainties. There is no assurance that actual results in 2025 will be in line with the outlook information set forth below, and the Firm does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements. JPMorganChase’s current outlook for full-year 2025 should be viewed against the backdrop of the global and U.S. economies, financial markets activity, the geopolitical environment, the competitive environment, client and customer activity levels, and regulatory and legislative developments in the U.S. and other countries where the Firm does business. Each of these factors will affect the performance of the Firm. The Firm will continue to make appropriate adjustments to its businesses and operations in response to ongoing developments in the business, economic, regulatory and legal environments in which it operates.

•Management expects net interest income to be approximately $94.0 billion and net interest income excluding Markets to be approximately $90.0 billion, market dependent. •Management expects adjusted expense to be approximately $95.0 billion, market dependent. •Management expects the net charge-off rate in Card Services to be approximately 3.60%. Net interest income excluding Markets and adjusted expense are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K57 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K57 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K57 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 57

First Republic acquisitionOn May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the "First Republic acquisition") from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver. As of December 31, 2024, the Firm had substantially completed the conversion of operations, and the integration of clients, products and services, associated with the First Republic acquisition to align with the Firm’s businesses and operations. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on First Republic. First Republic acquisitionOn May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the "First Republic acquisition") from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver. As of December 31, 2024, the Firm had substantially completed the conversion of operations, and the integration of clients, products and services, associated with the First Republic acquisition to align with the Firm’s businesses and operations. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on First Republic.

On May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the "First Republic acquisition") from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver. As of December 31, 2024, the Firm had substantially completed the conversion of operations, and the integration of clients, products and services, associated with the First Republic acquisition to align with the Firm’s businesses and operations. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on First Republic. 58JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 58JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 58JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 58 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONSThis section provides a comparative discussion of JPMorganChase’s Consolidated Results of Operations on a reported basis for the two-year period ended December 31, 2024, unless otherwise specified. Refer to Consolidated Results of Operations on pages 54-57 of the Firm’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (the “2023 Form 10-K”) for a discussion of the 2023 versus 2022 results. Factors that relate primarily to a single business segment or Corporate are discussed in more detail in the results of that segment or Corporate. Refer to pages 161–164 for a discussion of the Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm that affect the Consolidated Results of Operations. RevenueYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Investment banking fees$8,910 $6,519 $6,686 Principal transactions24,787 24,460 19,912 Lending- and deposit-related fees7,606 7,413 7,098 Asset management fees17,801 15,220 14,096 Commissions and other fees7,530 6,836 6,581 Investment securities losses(1,021)(3,180)(2,380)Mortgage fees and related income1,401 1,176 1,250 Card income5,497 4,784 4,420 Other income(a)(b)12,462 (c)5,609 (d)4,322 Noninterest revenue84,973 68,837 61,985 Net interest income92,583 89,267 66,710 Total net revenue$177,556 $158,104 $128,695 (a)Included operating lease income of $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Refer to Note 6 for additional information.(b)Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm’s alternative energy tax-oriented investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.(c)Included the net gain related to Visa shares of $7.9 billion recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. (d)Included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information.2024 compared with 2023Investment banking fees increased, reflecting in CIB the benefit of favorable market conditions, which resulted in:•higher debt underwriting fees predominantly driven by higher industry-wide issuances in leveraged loans, and in high-grade and high-yield bonds, •higher equity underwriting fees driven by higher industry-wide fees and wallet share gains in IPOs, and in follow-on and convertible securities offerings, and•higher advisory fees driven by higher industry-wide mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) activity and wallet share gains.Refer to CIB segment results on pages 77–83 and Note 6 for additional information.Principal transactions revenue increased driven by CIB, reflecting:•higher Equity Markets revenue in Prime Finance and Equity Derivatives,predominantly offset by•lower Fixed Income Markets revenue, reflecting the net impact of declines in revenue across macro businesses and higher revenue in Securitized Products.Principal transactions revenue in CIB generally has offsets across other revenue lines, including net interest income. The Firm assesses the performance of its Markets business on a total net revenue basis.The increase in CIB was partially offset by a net decrease in Corporate, reflecting lower revenue in Treasury and CIO, and gains compared with a net loss on certain legacy private equity investments in the prior year.Refer to CIB segment and Corporate results on pages 77–83 and pages 88–90, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information.Lending- and deposit-related fees increased, reflecting, in CIB, higher deposit-related fees, including cash management fees in Payments, on higher volume; and higher lending-related fees, including loan commitment fees. These factors were largely offset by a decline in the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic, primarily in AWM, as certain of the commitments have expired. Refer to CIB and AWM segment results on pages 77–83 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information.Asset management fees increased, reflecting, in AWM and CCB, higher average market levels and net inflows, as well as higher performance fees in AWM; and in CCB, the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to CCB and AWM segment results on pages 73–76 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. RevenueYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Investment banking fees$8,910 $6,519 $6,686 Principal transactions24,787 24,460 19,912 Lending- and deposit-related fees7,606 7,413 7,098 Asset management fees17,801 15,220 14,096 Commissions and other fees7,530 6,836 6,581 Investment securities losses(1,021)(3,180)(2,380)Mortgage fees and related income1,401 1,176 1,250 Card income5,497 4,784 4,420 Other income(a)(b)12,462 (c)5,609 (d)4,322 Noninterest revenue84,973 68,837 61,985 Net interest income92,583 89,267 66,710 Total net revenue$177,556 $158,104 $128,695 (a)Included operating lease income of $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Refer to Note 6 for additional information.(b)Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm’s alternative energy tax-oriented investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.(c)Included the net gain related to Visa shares of $7.9 billion recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. (d)Included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information.2024 compared with 2023Investment banking fees increased, reflecting in CIB the benefit of favorable market conditions, which resulted in:•higher debt underwriting fees predominantly driven by higher industry-wide issuances in leveraged loans, and in high-grade and high-yield bonds, •higher equity underwriting fees driven by higher industry-wide fees and wallet share gains in IPOs, and in follow-on and convertible securities offerings, and•higher advisory fees driven by higher industry-wide mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) activity and wallet share gains. RevenueYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Investment banking fees$8,910 $6,519 $6,686 Principal transactions24,787 24,460 19,912 Lending- and deposit-related fees7,606 7,413 7,098 Asset management fees17,801 15,220 14,096 Commissions and other fees7,530 6,836 6,581 Investment securities losses(1,021)(3,180)(2,380)Mortgage fees and related income1,401 1,176 1,250 Card income5,497 4,784 4,420 Other income(a)(b)12,462 (c)5,609 (d)4,322 Noninterest revenue84,973 68,837 61,985 Net interest income92,583 89,267 66,710 Total net revenue$177,556 $158,104 $128,695 Other income(a)(b) (c) (d) (a)Included operating lease income of $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Refer to Note 6 for additional information. (b)Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm’s alternative energy tax-oriented investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information. (c)Included the net gain related to Visa shares of $7.9 billion recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. (d)Included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information.

Investment banking fees increased, reflecting in CIB the benefit of favorable market conditions, which resulted in: •higher debt underwriting fees predominantly driven by higher industry-wide issuances in leveraged loans, and in high-grade and high-yield bonds, •higher equity underwriting fees driven by higher industry-wide fees and wallet share gains in IPOs, and in follow-on and convertible securities offerings, and •higher advisory fees driven by higher industry-wide mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) activity and wallet share gains. Refer to CIB segment results on pages 77–83 and Note 6 for additional information.Principal transactions revenue increased driven by CIB, reflecting:•higher Equity Markets revenue in Prime Finance and Equity Derivatives,predominantly offset by•lower Fixed Income Markets revenue, reflecting the net impact of declines in revenue across macro businesses and higher revenue in Securitized Products.Principal transactions revenue in CIB generally has offsets across other revenue lines, including net interest income. The Firm assesses the performance of its Markets business on a total net revenue basis.The increase in CIB was partially offset by a net decrease in Corporate, reflecting lower revenue in Treasury and CIO, and gains compared with a net loss on certain legacy private equity investments in the prior year.Refer to CIB segment and Corporate results on pages 77–83 and pages 88–90, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information.Lending- and deposit-related fees increased, reflecting, in CIB, higher deposit-related fees, including cash management fees in Payments, on higher volume; and higher lending-related fees, including loan commitment fees. These factors were largely offset by a decline in the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic, primarily in AWM, as certain of the commitments have expired. Refer to CIB and AWM segment results on pages 77–83 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information.Asset management fees increased, reflecting, in AWM and CCB, higher average market levels and net inflows, as well as higher performance fees in AWM; and in CCB, the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to CCB and AWM segment results on pages 73–76 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. Refer to CIB segment results on pages 77–83 and Note 6 for additional information. Principal transactions revenue increased driven by CIB, reflecting: •higher Equity Markets revenue in Prime Finance and Equity Derivatives, predominantly offset by •lower Fixed Income Markets revenue, reflecting the net impact of declines in revenue across macro businesses and higher revenue in Securitized Products. Principal transactions revenue in CIB generally has offsets across other revenue lines, including net interest income. The Firm assesses the performance of its Markets business on a total net revenue basis. The increase in CIB was partially offset by a net decrease in Corporate, reflecting lower revenue in Treasury and CIO, and gains compared with a net loss on certain legacy private equity investments in the prior year. Refer to CIB segment and Corporate results on pages 77–83 and pages 88–90, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. Lending- and deposit-related fees increased, reflecting, in CIB, higher deposit-related fees, including cash management fees in Payments, on higher volume; and higher lending-related fees, including loan commitment fees. These factors were largely offset by a decline in the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic, primarily in AWM, as certain of the commitments have expired. Refer to CIB and AWM segment results on pages 77–83 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. Asset management fees increased, reflecting, in AWM and CCB, higher average market levels and net inflows, as well as higher performance fees in AWM; and in CCB, the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to CCB and AWM segment results on pages 73–76 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K59 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K59 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K59 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 59 Commissions and other fees increased, predominantly due to higher brokerage commissions and fees on higher volume, and higher custody fees, in both CIB and AWM, as well as higher annuity sales commissions in CCB. Refer to CCB, CIB and AWM segment results on pages 73–76, pages 77–83 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. Investment securities losses decreased, reflecting lower losses on sales of securities, primarily U.S. Treasuries and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, associated with repositioning the investment securities portfolio in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90 and Note 10 for additional information.Mortgage fees and related income increased in Home Lending, reflecting higher production revenue, which included the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to CCB segment results on pages 73–76, and Note 6 and 15 for additional information.Card income increased, reflecting higher net interchange on increased debit and credit card sales volume, as well as higher annual fees in CCB, partially offset by an increase in amortization related to new account origination costs. Refer to CCB segment results on pages 73–76 and Note 6 for additional information.Other income increased, reflecting: •in Corporate: –the $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024,partially offset by–the absence of the prior-year $2.8 billion estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition, and •in CIB:–the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024, resulting in the amortization of certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments previously recognized in other income which is now recognized in income tax expense.Both periods included impairment losses related to certain equity investments. The prior year included a gain of $339 million on the original minority interest in China International Fund Management ("CIFM"), partially offset by net investment valuation losses, both in AWM.Refer to AWM segment results on pages 84–87 for additional information on CIFM; Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance; Notes 2 and 6 for additional information on Visa shares; and Notes 6 and 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Net interest income increased driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, higher revolving balances in Card Services, the timing impact of First Republic, higher wholesale deposit balances and higher Markets net interest income. These factors were largely offset by deposit margin compression across the lines of business and lower average deposit balances in CCB.The Firm’s average interest-earning assets were $3.5 trillion, up $212 billion, and the yield was 5.50%, up 36 bps. The net yield on these assets, on an FTE basis, was 2.63%, a decrease of 7 bps. The net yield excluding Markets was 3.84%, relatively flat when compared to the prior year.Refer to the Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and rates schedule on pages 322–326 for additional information. Net yield excluding Markets is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69 for an additional discussion of net yield excluding Markets. Commissions and other fees increased, predominantly due to higher brokerage commissions and fees on higher volume, and higher custody fees, in both CIB and AWM, as well as higher annuity sales commissions in CCB. Refer to CCB, CIB and AWM segment results on pages 73–76, pages 77–83 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. Investment securities losses decreased, reflecting lower losses on sales of securities, primarily U.S. Treasuries and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, associated with repositioning the investment securities portfolio in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90 and Note 10 for additional information.Mortgage fees and related income increased in Home Lending, reflecting higher production revenue, which included the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to CCB segment results on pages 73–76, and Note 6 and 15 for additional information.Card income increased, reflecting higher net interchange on increased debit and credit card sales volume, as well as higher annual fees in CCB, partially offset by an increase in amortization related to new account origination costs. Refer to CCB segment results on pages 73–76 and Note 6 for additional information.Other income increased, reflecting: •in Corporate: –the $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024,partially offset by–the absence of the prior-year $2.8 billion estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition, and •in CIB:–the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024, resulting in the amortization of certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments previously recognized in other income which is now recognized in income tax expense.Both periods included impairment losses related to certain equity investments. The prior year included a gain of $339 million on the original minority interest in China International Fund Management ("CIFM"), partially offset by net investment valuation losses, both in AWM. Commissions and other fees increased, predominantly due to higher brokerage commissions and fees on higher volume, and higher custody fees, in both CIB and AWM, as well as higher annuity sales commissions in CCB. Refer to CCB, CIB and AWM segment results on pages 73–76, pages 77–83 and pages 84–87, respectively, and Note 6 for additional information. Investment securities losses decreased, reflecting lower losses on sales of securities, primarily U.S. Treasuries and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, associated with repositioning the investment securities portfolio in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90 and Note 10 for additional information. Mortgage fees and related income increased in Home Lending, reflecting higher production revenue, which included the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to CCB segment results on pages 73–76, and Note 6 and 15 for additional information. Card income increased, reflecting higher net interchange on increased debit and credit card sales volume, as well as higher annual fees in CCB, partially offset by an increase in amortization related to new account origination costs. Refer to CCB segment results on pages 73–76 and Note 6 for additional information. Other income increased, reflecting: •in Corporate: –the $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024, partially offset by –the absence of the prior-year $2.8 billion estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition, and •in CIB: –the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024, resulting in the amortization of certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments previously recognized in other income which is now recognized in income tax expense. Both periods included impairment losses related to certain equity investments. The prior year included a gain of $339 million on the original minority interest in China International Fund Management ("CIFM"), partially offset by net investment valuation losses, both in AWM. Refer to AWM segment results on pages 84–87 for additional information on CIFM; Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance; Notes 2 and 6 for additional information on Visa shares; and Notes 6 and 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Net interest income increased driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, higher revolving balances in Card Services, the timing impact of First Republic, higher wholesale deposit balances and higher Markets net interest income. These factors were largely offset by deposit margin compression across the lines of business and lower average deposit balances in CCB.The Firm’s average interest-earning assets were $3.5 trillion, up $212 billion, and the yield was 5.50%, up 36 bps. The net yield on these assets, on an FTE basis, was 2.63%, a decrease of 7 bps. The net yield excluding Markets was 3.84%, relatively flat when compared to the prior year.Refer to the Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and rates schedule on pages 322–326 for additional information. Net yield excluding Markets is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69 for an additional discussion of net yield excluding Markets. Refer to AWM segment results on pages 84–87 for additional information on CIFM; Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance; Notes 2 and 6 for additional information on Visa shares; and Notes 6 and 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. Net interest income increased driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, higher revolving balances in Card Services, the timing impact of First Republic, higher wholesale deposit balances and higher Markets net interest income. These factors were largely offset by deposit margin compression across the lines of business and lower average deposit balances in CCB. The Firm’s average interest-earning assets were $3.5 trillion, up $212 billion, and the yield was 5.50%, up 36 bps. The net yield on these assets, on an FTE basis, was 2.63%, a decrease of 7 bps. The net yield excluding Markets was 3.84%, relatively flat when compared to the prior year. Refer to the Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and rates schedule on pages 322–326 for additional information. Net yield excluding Markets is a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 67–69 for an additional discussion of net yield excluding Markets. 60JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 60JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 60JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 60 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Provision for credit lossesYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Consumer, excluding credit card$631 $935 $506 Credit card9,292 6,048 3,353 Total consumer9,923 6,983 3,859 Wholesale731 2,299 2,476 Investment securities24 38 54 Total provision for credit losses$10,678 $9,320 $6,389 2024 compared with 2023 The provision for credit losses was $10.7 billion, reflecting $8.6 billion of net charge-offs and a $2.0 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses. Net charge-offs included $7.8 billion in consumer, predominantly driven by Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth, and $0.8 billion in wholesale, primarily in Real Estate, largely concentrated in Office.The net addition to the allowance for credit losses consisted of:•$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting:–a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by–a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $19 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024. The provision in the prior year was $9.3 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $6.2 billion and a $3.1 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, which included $1.2 billion to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023.Refer to CCB, CIB and AWM segment and Corporate results on pages 73–76, pages 77–83, pages 84–87, and pages 88–90, respectively; Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 137–139; Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164; and Notes 12 and 13 for additional information on the credit portfolio and the allowance for credit losses. Provision for credit lossesYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Consumer, excluding credit card$631 $935 $506 Credit card9,292 6,048 3,353 Total consumer9,923 6,983 3,859 Wholesale731 2,299 2,476 Investment securities24 38 54 Total provision for credit losses$10,678 $9,320 $6,389 2024 compared with 2023 The provision for credit losses was $10.7 billion, reflecting $8.6 billion of net charge-offs and a $2.0 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses. Net charge-offs included $7.8 billion in consumer, predominantly driven by Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth, and $0.8 billion in wholesale, primarily in Real Estate, largely concentrated in Office.The net addition to the allowance for credit losses consisted of:•$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting:–a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by–a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $19 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024. Provision for credit lossesYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Consumer, excluding credit card$631 $935 $506 Credit card9,292 6,048 3,353 Total consumer9,923 6,983 3,859 Wholesale731 2,299 2,476 Investment securities24 38 54 Total provision for credit losses$10,678 $9,320 $6,389 Consumer, excluding credit card

The provision for credit losses was $10.7 billion, reflecting $8.6 billion of net charge-offs and a $2.0 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses. Net charge-offs included $7.8 billion in consumer, predominantly driven by Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth, and $0.8 billion in wholesale, primarily in Real Estate, largely concentrated in Office. The net addition to the allowance for credit losses consisted of: •$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting: –a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by –a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $19 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024. The provision in the prior year was $9.3 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $6.2 billion and a $3.1 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, which included $1.2 billion to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023.Refer to CCB, CIB and AWM segment and Corporate results on pages 73–76, pages 77–83, pages 84–87, and pages 88–90, respectively; Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 137–139; Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164; and Notes 12 and 13 for additional information on the credit portfolio and the allowance for credit losses. The provision in the prior year was $9.3 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $6.2 billion and a $3.1 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, which included $1.2 billion to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023. Refer to CCB, CIB and AWM segment and Corporate results on pages 73–76, pages 77–83, pages 84–87, and pages 88–90, respectively; Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 137–139; Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164; and Notes 12 and 13 for additional information on the credit portfolio and the allowance for credit losses. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K61 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K61 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K61 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 61 Noninterest expenseYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Compensation expense$51,357 $46,465 $41,636 Noncompensation expense:Occupancy5,026 4,590 4,696 Technology, communications and equipment(a)9,831 9,246 9,358 Professional and outside services11,057 10,235 10,174 Marketing4,974 4,591 3,911 Other expense9,552 (c)12,045 6,365 Total noncompensation expense40,440 40,707 34,504 Total noninterest expense$91,797 $87,172 $76,140 Certain components of other expense(b)Legal expense$740 $1,436 $266 FDIC-related expense1,893 4,203 860 Operating losses1,417 1,228 1,101 (a)Includes depreciation expense associated with auto operating lease assets. Refer to Note 18 for additional information.(b)Refer to Note 6 for additional information. (c)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.2024 compared with 2023Compensation expense increased driven by:•higher revenue-related compensation across the LOBs,•growth in the number of employees across the LOBs and Corporate, primarily in front office and technology, and•the impact of First Republic, predominantly in CCB, reflecting timing and the classification of the prior-year expense, which was recognized in other expense in Corporate in the second quarter of 2023 as the individuals associated with First Republic were not employees of the Firm until July 2023.Noncompensation expense decreased as a result of:•lower FDIC-related expense recognized in Corporate, which included the impact of a $2.9 billion special assessment recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023, compared with a $725 million increase to the FDIC special assessment recognized in the first quarter of 2024, and•lower legal expense, reflecting the net impact of declines in CCB, CIB and Corporate, and an increase in AWM,predominantly offset by•a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024 in Corporate,•higher investments in technology in the businesses, as well as marketing, predominantly in CCB,•higher occupancy expense, which included the impact of net additions to the Firm's properties,•higher distribution fees in AWM and brokerage expense in CIB, and•the timing impact associated with First Republic, offset by the alignment of expense to compensation expense, as noted above.Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information on Visa shares; Note 6 for additional information on other expense; and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Income tax expenseYear ended December 31,(in millions, except rate)202420232022Income before income tax expense$75,081$61,612$46,166Income tax expense16,610(a)12,0608,490Effective tax rate22.1 %19.6 %18.4 %(a)Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm’s alternative energy tax-oriented investments is now recognized in income tax expense. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.2024 compared with 2023 The effective tax rate increased predominantly driven by:•the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance on January 1, 2024, and•a higher level of pretax income and changes in the mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal, state and local taxes, including the impact of the net gain on Visa shares and the contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024.The prior year included the impact to income tax expense associated with the First Republic acquisition that was reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain, and an income tax benefit related to the finalization of certain income tax regulations, both of which resulted in a reduction in the Firm's effective tax rate.Refer to Note 25 for additional information. Noninterest expenseYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Compensation expense$51,357 $46,465 $41,636 Noncompensation expense:Occupancy5,026 4,590 4,696 Technology, communications and equipment(a)9,831 9,246 9,358 Professional and outside services11,057 10,235 10,174 Marketing4,974 4,591 3,911 Other expense9,552 (c)12,045 6,365 Total noncompensation expense40,440 40,707 34,504 Total noninterest expense$91,797 $87,172 $76,140 Certain components of other expense(b)Legal expense$740 $1,436 $266 FDIC-related expense1,893 4,203 860 Operating losses1,417 1,228 1,101 (a)Includes depreciation expense associated with auto operating lease assets. Refer to Note 18 for additional information.(b)Refer to Note 6 for additional information. (c)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.2024 compared with 2023Compensation expense increased driven by:•higher revenue-related compensation across the LOBs,•growth in the number of employees across the LOBs and Corporate, primarily in front office and technology, and•the impact of First Republic, predominantly in CCB, reflecting timing and the classification of the prior-year expense, which was recognized in other expense in Corporate in the second quarter of 2023 as the individuals associated with First Republic were not employees of the Firm until July 2023.Noncompensation expense decreased as a result of:•lower FDIC-related expense recognized in Corporate, which included the impact of a $2.9 billion special assessment recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023, compared with a $725 million increase to the FDIC special assessment recognized in the first quarter of 2024, and•lower legal expense, reflecting the net impact of declines in CCB, CIB and Corporate, and an increase in AWM,predominantly offset by•a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024 in Corporate, Noninterest expenseYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Compensation expense$51,357 $46,465 $41,636 Noncompensation expense:Occupancy5,026 4,590 4,696 Technology, communications and equipment(a)9,831 9,246 9,358 Professional and outside services11,057 10,235 10,174 Marketing4,974 4,591 3,911 Other expense9,552 (c)12,045 6,365 Total noncompensation expense40,440 40,707 34,504 Total noninterest expense$91,797 $87,172 $76,140 Certain components of other expense(b)Legal expense$740 $1,436 $266 FDIC-related expense1,893 4,203 860 Operating losses1,417 1,228 1,101 Compensation expense Noncompensation expense: Technology, communications and equipment(a) Professional and outside services (c)

(a)Includes depreciation expense associated with auto operating lease assets. Refer to Note 18 for additional information. (b)Refer to Note 6 for additional information. (c)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.

Compensation expense increased driven by: •higher revenue-related compensation across the LOBs, •growth in the number of employees across the LOBs and Corporate, primarily in front office and technology, and •the impact of First Republic, predominantly in CCB, reflecting timing and the classification of the prior-year expense, which was recognized in other expense in Corporate in the second quarter of 2023 as the individuals associated with First Republic were not employees of the Firm until July 2023. Noncompensation expense decreased as a result of: •lower FDIC-related expense recognized in Corporate, which included the impact of a $2.9 billion special assessment recognized in the fourth quarter of 2023, compared with a $725 million increase to the FDIC special assessment recognized in the first quarter of 2024, and •lower legal expense, reflecting the net impact of declines in CCB, CIB and Corporate, and an increase in AWM, predominantly offset by •a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024 in Corporate, •higher investments in technology in the businesses, as well as marketing, predominantly in CCB,•higher occupancy expense, which included the impact of net additions to the Firm's properties,•higher distribution fees in AWM and brokerage expense in CIB, and•the timing impact associated with First Republic, offset by the alignment of expense to compensation expense, as noted above.Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information on Visa shares; Note 6 for additional information on other expense; and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Income tax expenseYear ended December 31,(in millions, except rate)202420232022Income before income tax expense$75,081$61,612$46,166Income tax expense16,610(a)12,0608,490Effective tax rate22.1 %19.6 %18.4 %(a)Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm’s alternative energy tax-oriented investments is now recognized in income tax expense. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.2024 compared with 2023 The effective tax rate increased predominantly driven by:•the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance on January 1, 2024, and•a higher level of pretax income and changes in the mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal, state and local taxes, including the impact of the net gain on Visa shares and the contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024.The prior year included the impact to income tax expense associated with the First Republic acquisition that was reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain, and an income tax benefit related to the finalization of certain income tax regulations, both of which resulted in a reduction in the Firm's effective tax rate.Refer to Note 25 for additional information. •higher investments in technology in the businesses, as well as marketing, predominantly in CCB, •higher occupancy expense, which included the impact of net additions to the Firm's properties, •higher distribution fees in AWM and brokerage expense in CIB, and •the timing impact associated with First Republic, offset by the alignment of expense to compensation expense, as noted above. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information on Visa shares; Note 6 for additional information on other expense; and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. Income tax expenseYear ended December 31,(in millions, except rate)202420232022Income before income tax expense$75,081$61,612$46,166Income tax expense16,610(a)12,0608,490Effective tax rate22.1 %19.6 %18.4 % Income before income tax expense (a) (a)Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm’s alternative energy tax-oriented investments is now recognized in income tax expense. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.

The effective tax rate increased predominantly driven by: •the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance on January 1, 2024, and •a higher level of pretax income and changes in the mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal, state and local taxes, including the impact of the net gain on Visa shares and the contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. The prior year included the impact to income tax expense associated with the First Republic acquisition that was reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain, and an income tax benefit related to the finalization of certain income tax regulations, both of which resulted in a reduction in the Firm's effective tax rate. Refer to Note 25 for additional information. 62JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 62JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 62JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 62 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CASH FLOWS ANALYSIS

The following is a discussion of the significant changes between December 31, 2024 and 2023. Refer to pages 161–164 for a discussion of the Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm that affect the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Selected Consolidated balance sheets dataDecember 31, (in millions)20242023ChangeAssetsCash and due from banks$23,372 $29,066 (20)%Deposits with banks445,945 595,085 (25)Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements295,001 276,152 7 Securities borrowed219,546 200,436 10 Trading assets637,784 540,607 18 Available-for-sale securities406,852 201,704 102 Held-to-maturity securities274,468 369,848 (26)Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses681,320 571,552 19 Loans1,347,988 1,323,706 2 Allowance for loan losses(24,345)(22,420)9 Loans, net of allowance for loan losses1,323,643 1,301,286 2 Accrued interest and accounts receivable101,223 107,363 (6)Premises and equipment32,223 30,157 7 Goodwill, MSRs and other intangible assets64,560 64,381 — Other assets178,197 159,308 12 Total assets$4,002,814 $3,875,393 3 % Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements Accrued interest and accounts receivable Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks decreased driven by higher investment securities in Treasury and CIO, and Markets activities in CIB.Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements increased driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities.Securities borrowed increased driven by Markets, reflecting a higher demand for securities to cover short positions.Refer to Note 11 for additional information on securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed.Trading assets increased predominantly due to higher levels of debt and equity instruments in Markets related to client-driven market-making activities. Refer to Notes 2 and 5 for additional information.Investment securities increased due to:•higher available-for-sale ("AFS") securities, reflecting net purchases, primarily U.S. Treasuries and non-U.S. government debt securities, partially offset by maturities and paydowns, and•lower held to-maturity (“HTM”) securities driven by maturities and paydowns.Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90, Investment Portfolio Risk Management on page 140, and Notes 2 and 10 for additional information.Loans increased, reflecting:•higher outstanding balances in Card Services driven by growth in new accounts and normalization of revolving balances,•higher wholesale loans in CIB, and•higher securities-based lending in AWM due to higher client demand,partially offset by•a decline in Home Lending as paydowns and loan sales outpaced originations.The allowance for loan losses increased, reflecting a net addition to the allowance for loan losses of $1.9 billion, consisting of:•$2.1 billion net addition in consumer, primarily in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by a net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and•a net reduction of $176 million in wholesale, reflecting:–changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks decreased driven by higher investment securities in Treasury and CIO, and Markets activities in CIB.Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements increased driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities.Securities borrowed increased driven by Markets, reflecting a higher demand for securities to cover short positions.Refer to Note 11 for additional information on securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed.Trading assets increased predominantly due to higher levels of debt and equity instruments in Markets related to client-driven market-making activities. Refer to Notes 2 and 5 for additional information.Investment securities increased due to:•higher available-for-sale ("AFS") securities, reflecting net purchases, primarily U.S. Treasuries and non-U.S. government debt securities, partially offset by maturities and paydowns, and•lower held to-maturity (“HTM”) securities driven by maturities and paydowns.Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90, Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks decreased driven by higher investment securities in Treasury and CIO, and Markets activities in CIB. Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements increased driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities. Securities borrowed increased driven by Markets, reflecting a higher demand for securities to cover short positions. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed. Trading assets increased predominantly due to higher levels of debt and equity instruments in Markets related to client-driven market-making activities. Refer to Notes 2 and 5 for additional information. Investment securities increased due to: •higher available-for-sale ("AFS") securities, reflecting net purchases, primarily U.S. Treasuries and non-U.S. government debt securities, partially offset by maturities and paydowns, and •lower held to-maturity (“HTM”) securities driven by maturities and paydowns. Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90, Investment Portfolio Risk Management on page 140, and Notes 2 and 10 for additional information.Loans increased, reflecting:•higher outstanding balances in Card Services driven by growth in new accounts and normalization of revolving balances,•higher wholesale loans in CIB, and•higher securities-based lending in AWM due to higher client demand,partially offset by•a decline in Home Lending as paydowns and loan sales outpaced originations.The allowance for loan losses increased, reflecting a net addition to the allowance for loan losses of $1.9 billion, consisting of:•$2.1 billion net addition in consumer, primarily in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by a net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and•a net reduction of $176 million in wholesale, reflecting:–changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Investment Portfolio Risk Management on page 140, and Notes 2 and 10 for additional information. Loans increased, reflecting: •higher outstanding balances in Card Services driven by growth in new accounts and normalization of revolving balances, •higher wholesale loans in CIB, and •higher securities-based lending in AWM due to higher client demand, partially offset by •a decline in Home Lending as paydowns and loan sales outpaced originations. The allowance for loan losses increased, reflecting a net addition to the allowance for loan losses of $1.9 billion, consisting of: •$2.1 billion net addition in consumer, primarily in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by a net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $176 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K63 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K63 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K63 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 63 Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by–net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024.There was also a $128 million net addition to the allowance for lending-related commitments recognized in other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Consolidated Results of Operations and Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 59–62 and pages 117–140, respectively, Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164, and Notes 2, 3, 12 and 13 for additional information on loans and the total allowance for credit losses. Accrued interest and accounts receivable decreased primarily driven by lower receivables in Payments related to the timing of processing payment activities, due to December 31, 2023 falling on a weekend, as well as lower client receivables related to client-driven activities in Markets. Premises and equipment increased primarily as a result of the construction-in-process associated with the Firm's headquarters, and purchases of properties. Refer to Notes 16 and 18 for additional information.Goodwill, MSRs and other intangibles: Refer to Note 15 for additional information.Other assets increased primarily due to higher cash collateral placed with central counterparties ("CCP") in Markets, the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024, and higher auto operating lease assets in CCB. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on updates to the accounting guidance. Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by–net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024.There was also a $128 million net addition to the allowance for lending-related commitments recognized in other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Consolidated Results of Operations and Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 59–62 and pages 117–140, respectively, Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164, and Notes 2, 3, 12 and 13 for additional information on loans and the total allowance for credit losses. Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024. There was also a $128 million net addition to the allowance for lending-related commitments recognized in other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Consolidated Results of Operations and Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 59–62 and pages 117–140, respectively, Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164, and Notes 2, 3, 12 and 13 for additional information on loans and the total allowance for credit losses. Accrued interest and accounts receivable decreased primarily driven by lower receivables in Payments related to the timing of processing payment activities, due to December 31, 2023 falling on a weekend, as well as lower client receivables related to client-driven activities in Markets. Premises and equipment increased primarily as a result of the construction-in-process associated with the Firm's headquarters, and purchases of properties. Refer to Notes 16 and 18 for additional information.Goodwill, MSRs and other intangibles: Refer to Note 15 for additional information.Other assets increased primarily due to higher cash collateral placed with central counterparties ("CCP") in Markets, the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024, and higher auto operating lease assets in CCB. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on updates to the accounting guidance. Accrued interest and accounts receivable decreased primarily driven by lower receivables in Payments related to the timing of processing payment activities, due to December 31, 2023 falling on a weekend, as well as lower client receivables related to client-driven activities in Markets. Premises and equipment increased primarily as a result of the construction-in-process associated with the Firm's headquarters, and purchases of properties. Refer to Notes 16 and 18 for additional information. Goodwill, MSRs and other intangibles: Refer to Note 15 for additional information. Other assets increased primarily due to higher cash collateral placed with central counterparties ("CCP") in Markets, the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024, and higher auto operating lease assets in CCB. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on updates to the accounting guidance. Selected Consolidated balance sheets data (continued)December 31, (in millions)20242023ChangeLiabilitiesDeposits$2,406,032 $2,400,688 — Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements296,835 216,535 37 Short-term borrowings52,893 44,712 18 Trading liabilities192,883 180,428 7 Accounts payable and other liabilities280,672 290,307 (3)Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”)27,323 23,020 19 Long-term debt401,418 391,825 2 Total liabilities3,658,056 3,547,515 3 Stockholders’ equity344,758 327,878 5 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$4,002,814 $3,875,393 3 % Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”)

Deposits increased, reflecting:•an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments, largely offset by net maturities of structured notes in Markets,•an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and•a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending and migration into higher-yielding investments, predominantly offset by new accounts.Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements increased driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities and higher secured financing of trading assets.Short-term borrowings increased driven by Markets, reflecting net issuance of structured notes due to client demand, and higher financing requirements.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information on deposits, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and short-term borrowings; Notes 2 and 17 for deposits; and Note 11 for federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements.Trading liabilities increased due to client-driven market-making activities primarily in Fixed Income Markets, which resulted in higher levels of short positions in debt instruments. Refer to Notes 2 and 5 for additional information. Deposits increased, reflecting:•an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments, largely offset by net maturities of structured notes in Markets,•an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and•a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending and migration into higher-yielding investments, predominantly offset by new accounts.Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements increased driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities and higher secured financing of trading assets. Deposits increased, reflecting: •an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments, largely offset by net maturities of structured notes in Markets, •an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and •a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending and migration into higher-yielding investments, predominantly offset by new accounts. Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements increased driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities and higher secured financing of trading assets. Short-term borrowings increased driven by Markets, reflecting net issuance of structured notes due to client demand, and higher financing requirements.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information on deposits, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and short-term borrowings; Notes 2 and 17 for deposits; and Note 11 for federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements.Trading liabilities increased due to client-driven market-making activities primarily in Fixed Income Markets, which resulted in higher levels of short positions in debt instruments. Refer to Notes 2 and 5 for additional information. Short-term borrowings increased driven by Markets, reflecting net issuance of structured notes due to client demand, and higher financing requirements. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for additional information on deposits, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and short-term borrowings; Notes 2 and 17 for deposits; and Note 11 for federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements. Trading liabilities increased due to client-driven market-making activities primarily in Fixed Income Markets, which resulted in higher levels of short positions in debt instruments. Refer to Notes 2 and 5 for additional information. 64JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 64JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 64JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 64 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Accounts payable and other liabilities decreased primarily driven by lower payables in Payments related to the timing of processing payment activities, due to December 31, 2023 falling on a weekend, as well as lower client payables related to client-driven activities in Markets, partially offset by the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024. Refer to Note 19 for additional information on accounts payable; and Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on updates to the accounting guidance.Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs increased driven by the issuance of credit card securitizations in Treasury and CIO, and activity in municipal bond vehicles in CIB.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115; and Notes 14 and 28 for additional information on Firm-sponsored VIEs and loan securitization trusts.Long-term debt increased, primarily driven by:•net issuances of structured notes in Markets due to client demand,partially offset by•a decline in Treasury and CIO, reflecting the net impact of lower FHLB advances and higher long-term debt from net issuances.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Stockholders’ equity increased, reflecting:•net income,largely offset by •the impact of capital actions, including repurchases of common shares, the declaration of common and preferred stock dividends, and net redemption of preferred stock, and •net unrealized losses in AOCI, including the impact of higher interest rates on cash flow hedges in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Consolidated Statements of changes in stockholders’ equity on page 175, Capital Actions on page 105, and Note 24 for additional information. Accounts payable and other liabilities decreased primarily driven by lower payables in Payments related to the timing of processing payment activities, due to December 31, 2023 falling on a weekend, as well as lower client payables related to client-driven activities in Markets, partially offset by the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024. Refer to Note 19 for additional information on accounts payable; and Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on updates to the accounting guidance.Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs increased driven by the issuance of credit card securitizations in Treasury and CIO, and activity in municipal bond vehicles in CIB.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115; and Notes 14 and 28 for additional information on Firm-sponsored VIEs and loan securitization trusts. Accounts payable and other liabilities decreased primarily driven by lower payables in Payments related to the timing of processing payment activities, due to December 31, 2023 falling on a weekend, as well as lower client payables related to client-driven activities in Markets, partially offset by the impact of the adoption of updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024. Refer to Note 19 for additional information on accounts payable; and Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information on updates to the accounting guidance. Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs increased driven by the issuance of credit card securitizations in Treasury and CIO, and activity in municipal bond vehicles in CIB. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115; and Notes 14 and 28 for additional information on Firm-sponsored VIEs and loan securitization trusts. Long-term debt increased, primarily driven by:•net issuances of structured notes in Markets due to client demand,partially offset by•a decline in Treasury and CIO, reflecting the net impact of lower FHLB advances and higher long-term debt from net issuances.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.Stockholders’ equity increased, reflecting:•net income,largely offset by •the impact of capital actions, including repurchases of common shares, the declaration of common and preferred stock dividends, and net redemption of preferred stock, and •net unrealized losses in AOCI, including the impact of higher interest rates on cash flow hedges in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Consolidated Statements of changes in stockholders’ equity on page 175, Capital Actions on page 105, and Note 24 for additional information. Long-term debt increased, primarily driven by: •net issuances of structured notes in Markets due to client demand, partially offset by •a decline in Treasury and CIO, reflecting the net impact of lower FHLB advances and higher long-term debt from net issuances. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. Stockholders’ equity increased, reflecting: •net income, largely offset by •the impact of capital actions, including repurchases of common shares, the declaration of common and preferred stock dividends, and net redemption of preferred stock, and •net unrealized losses in AOCI, including the impact of higher interest rates on cash flow hedges in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Consolidated Statements of changes in stockholders’ equity on page 175, Capital Actions on page 105, and Note 24 for additional information. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K65 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K65 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K65 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 65 Consolidated cash flows analysisThe following is a discussion of cash flow activities during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Refer to Consolidated cash flows analysis on page 61 of the Firm’s 2023 Form 10-K for a discussion of the 2022 activities.(in millions)Year ended December 31,202420232022Net cash provided by/(used in)Operating activities$(42,012)$12,974 $107,119 Investing activities(163,403)67,643 (137,819)Financing activities63,447 (25,571)(126,257)Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(12,866)1,871 (16,643)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks$(154,834)$56,917 $(173,600)Operating activities JPMorganChase’s operating assets and liabilities primarily support the Firm’s lending and capital markets activities. These assets and liabilities can vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows, which are affected by client-driven and risk management activities and market conditions. The Firm believes that cash flows from operations, available cash and other liquidity sources, and its capacity to generate cash through secured and unsecured sources, are sufficient to meet its operating liquidity needs.•In 2024, cash used resulted from higher trading assets and higher securities borrowed, largely offset by net income. •In 2023, cash provided primarily reflected net income, lower other assets, and accrued interest and accounts receivable, predominantly offset by higher trading assets, lower accounts payable and other liabilities, and higher securities borrowed.Investing activitiesThe Firm’s investing activities predominantly include originating held-for-investment loans, investing in the investment securities portfolio and other short-term instruments.•In 2024, cash used resulted from net purchases of investment securities, net loan originations and higher securities purchased under resale agreements, partially offset by proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment. •In 2023, cash provided resulted from net proceeds from investment securities, proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment, and lower securities purchased under resale agreements, largely offset by net originations of loans and net cash used in the First Republic Bank acquisition.Financing activitiesThe Firm’s financing activities include acquiring customer deposits and issuing long-term debt and preferred stock.•In 2024, cash provided primarily reflected higher securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements and net proceeds from long- and short-term borrowings, partially offset by net redemption of preferred stock.•In 2023, cash used reflected lower deposits, which included the impact of the repayment of the deposits provided to First Republic Bank by the consortium of large U.S. banks that the Firm assumed as part of the First Republic acquisition, partially offset by higher securities loaned under repurchase agreements and net proceeds from long- and short-term borrowings.•For both periods, cash was used for repurchases of common stock and cash dividends on common and preferred stock.* * *Refer to Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 63–65, Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107, and Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on page 176 for a further discussion of the activities affecting the Firm’s cash flows. Consolidated cash flows analysisThe following is a discussion of cash flow activities during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Refer to Consolidated cash flows analysis on page 61 of the Firm’s 2023 Form 10-K for a discussion of the 2022 activities.(in millions)Year ended December 31,202420232022Net cash provided by/(used in)Operating activities$(42,012)$12,974 $107,119 Investing activities(163,403)67,643 (137,819)Financing activities63,447 (25,571)(126,257)Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(12,866)1,871 (16,643)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks$(154,834)$56,917 $(173,600)Operating activities JPMorganChase’s operating assets and liabilities primarily support the Firm’s lending and capital markets activities. These assets and liabilities can vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows, which are affected by client-driven and risk management activities and market conditions. The Firm believes that cash flows from operations, available cash and other liquidity sources, and its capacity to generate cash through secured and unsecured sources, are sufficient to meet its operating liquidity needs.•In 2024, cash used resulted from higher trading assets and higher securities borrowed, largely offset by net income. •In 2023, cash provided primarily reflected net income, lower other assets, and accrued interest and accounts receivable, predominantly offset by higher trading assets, lower accounts payable and other liabilities, and higher securities borrowed.

The following is a discussion of cash flow activities during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Refer to Consolidated cash flows analysis on page 61 of the Firm’s 2023 Form 10-K for a discussion of the 2022 activities. (in millions)Year ended December 31,202420232022Net cash provided by/(used in)Operating activities$(42,012)$12,974 $107,119 Investing activities(163,403)67,643 (137,819)Financing activities63,447 (25,571)(126,257)Effect of exchange rate changes on cash(12,866)1,871 (16,643)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks$(154,834)$56,917 $(173,600) Net cash provided by/ (used in) Financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks

JPMorganChase’s operating assets and liabilities primarily support the Firm’s lending and capital markets activities. These assets and liabilities can vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows, which are affected by client-driven and risk management activities and market conditions. The Firm believes that cash flows from operations, available cash and other liquidity sources, and its capacity to generate cash through secured and unsecured sources, are sufficient to meet its operating liquidity needs. •In 2024, cash used resulted from higher trading assets and higher securities borrowed, largely offset by net income. •In 2023, cash provided primarily reflected net income, lower other assets, and accrued interest and accounts receivable, predominantly offset by higher trading assets, lower accounts payable and other liabilities, and higher securities borrowed. Investing activitiesThe Firm’s investing activities predominantly include originating held-for-investment loans, investing in the investment securities portfolio and other short-term instruments.•In 2024, cash used resulted from net purchases of investment securities, net loan originations and higher securities purchased under resale agreements, partially offset by proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment. •In 2023, cash provided resulted from net proceeds from investment securities, proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment, and lower securities purchased under resale agreements, largely offset by net originations of loans and net cash used in the First Republic Bank acquisition.Financing activitiesThe Firm’s financing activities include acquiring customer deposits and issuing long-term debt and preferred stock.•In 2024, cash provided primarily reflected higher securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements and net proceeds from long- and short-term borrowings, partially offset by net redemption of preferred stock.•In 2023, cash used reflected lower deposits, which included the impact of the repayment of the deposits provided to First Republic Bank by the consortium of large U.S. banks that the Firm assumed as part of the First Republic acquisition, partially offset by higher securities loaned under repurchase agreements and net proceeds from long- and short-term borrowings.•For both periods, cash was used for repurchases of common stock and cash dividends on common and preferred stock.* * *Refer to Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 63–65, Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107, and Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on page 176 for a further discussion of the activities affecting the Firm’s cash flows.

The Firm’s investing activities predominantly include originating held-for-investment loans, investing in the investment securities portfolio and other short-term instruments. •In 2024, cash used resulted from net purchases of investment securities, net loan originations and higher securities purchased under resale agreements, partially offset by proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment. •In 2023, cash provided resulted from net proceeds from investment securities, proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment, and lower securities purchased under resale agreements, largely offset by net originations of loans and net cash used in the First Republic Bank acquisition.

The Firm’s financing activities include acquiring customer deposits and issuing long-term debt and preferred stock. •In 2024, cash provided primarily reflected higher securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements and net proceeds from long- and short-term borrowings, partially offset by net redemption of preferred stock. •In 2023, cash used reflected lower deposits, which included the impact of the repayment of the deposits provided to First Republic Bank by the consortium of large U.S. banks that the Firm assumed as part of the First Republic acquisition, partially offset by higher securities loaned under repurchase agreements and net proceeds from long- and short-term borrowings. •For both periods, cash was used for repurchases of common stock and cash dividends on common and preferred stock. * * * Refer to Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 63–65, Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107, and Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115, and the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on page 176 for a further discussion of the activities affecting the Firm’s cash flows. 66JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 66JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 66JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 66 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF THE FIRM’S USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF THE FIRM’S USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

The Firm prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP; these financial statements appear on pages 172–176. That presentation, which is referred to as “reported” basis, provides the reader with an understanding of the Firm’s results that can be tracked consistently from year-to-year and enables a comparison of the Firm’s performance with the U.S. GAAP financial statements of other companies.In addition to analyzing the Firm’s results on a reported basis, management reviews Firmwide results, including the overhead ratio, on a “managed” basis; these Firmwide managed basis results are non-GAAP financial measures. The Firm also reviews the results of the lines of business on a managed basis. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts, in each case, with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm as a whole, and for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate, on an FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities. These financial measures allow management to assess the comparability of revenue from year-to-year arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense. These adjustments have no impact on net income as reported by the Firm as a whole or by each of the lines of business and Corporate.Management also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures at the Firm and business-segment levels because these other non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors about the underlying operational performance and trends of the Firm or of the particular business segment, as the case may be, and therefore facilitate a comparison of the Firm or the business segment with the performance of its relevant competitors. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information on these non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP financial measures used by the Firm may not be comparable to similarly named non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. The Firm prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP; these financial statements appear on pages 172–176. That presentation, which is referred to as “reported” basis, provides the reader with an understanding of the Firm’s results that can be tracked consistently from year-to-year and enables a comparison of the Firm’s performance with the U.S. GAAP financial statements of other companies.In addition to analyzing the Firm’s results on a reported basis, management reviews Firmwide results, including the overhead ratio, on a “managed” basis; these Firmwide managed basis results are non-GAAP financial measures. The Firm also reviews the results of the lines of business on a managed basis. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts, in each case, with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm as a whole, and for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate, on an FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities. These financial measures The Firm prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP; these financial statements appear on pages 172–176. That presentation, which is referred to as “reported” basis, provides the reader with an understanding of the Firm’s results that can be tracked consistently from year-to-year and enables a comparison of the Firm’s performance with the U.S. GAAP financial statements of other companies. In addition to analyzing the Firm’s results on a reported basis, management reviews Firmwide results, including the overhead ratio, on a “managed” basis; these Firmwide managed basis results are non-GAAP financial measures. The Firm also reviews the results of the lines of business on a managed basis. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts, in each case, with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm as a whole, and for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate, on an FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities. These financial measures allow management to assess the comparability of revenue from year-to-year arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense. These adjustments have no impact on net income as reported by the Firm as a whole or by each of the lines of business and Corporate.Management also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures at the Firm and business-segment levels because these other non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors about the underlying operational performance and trends of the Firm or of the particular business segment, as the case may be, and therefore facilitate a comparison of the Firm or the business segment with the performance of its relevant competitors. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information on these non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP financial measures used by the Firm may not be comparable to similarly named non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. allow management to assess the comparability of revenue from year-to-year arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense. These adjustments have no impact on net income as reported by the Firm as a whole or by each of the lines of business and Corporate. Management also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures at the Firm and business-segment levels because these other non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors about the underlying operational performance and trends of the Firm or of the particular business segment, as the case may be, and therefore facilitate a comparison of the Firm or the business segment with the performance of its relevant competitors. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information on these non-GAAP measures. Non-GAAP financial measures used by the Firm may not be comparable to similarly named non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies. The following summary table provides a reconciliation from the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results to managed basis. 202420232022Year ended December 31, (in millions, except ratios)ReportedFully taxable-equivalent adjustments(b)ManagedbasisReportedFully taxable-equivalent adjustments(b)ManagedbasisReportedFully taxable-equivalent adjustments(b)ManagedbasisOther income$12,462 (a)$2,560 (a)$15,022 $5,609 $3,782 $9,391 $4,322 $3,148 $7,470 Total noninterest revenue84,973 2,560 87,533 68,837 3,782 72,619 61,985 3,148 65,133 Net interest income92,583 477 93,060 89,267 480 89,747 66,710 434 67,144 Total net revenue177,556 3,037 180,593 158,104 4,262 162,366 128,695 3,582 132,277 Total noninterest expense91,797 NA91,797 87,172 NA87,172 76,140 NA76,140 Pre-provision profit85,759 3,037 88,796 70,932 4,262 75,194 52,555 3,582 56,137 Provision for credit losses10,678 NA10,678 9,320 NA9,320 6,389 NA6,389 Income before income tax expense75,081 3,037 78,118 61,612 4,262 65,874 46,166 3,582 49,748 Income tax expense16,610 (a)3,037 (a)19,647 12,060 4,262 16,322 8,490 3,582 12,072 Net income$58,471 NA$58,471 $49,552 NA$49,552 $37,676 NA$37,676 Overhead ratio52 %NM51 %55 %NM54 %59 %NM58 % Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(b) Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(b) Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(b) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a)Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information. (b)Predominantly recognized in CIB and Corporate. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K67 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K67 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K67 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 67 Net interest income, net yield, and noninterest revenue excluding MarketsIn addition to reviewing net interest income, net yield, and noninterest revenue on a managed basis, management also reviews these metrics excluding Markets, as shown below. Markets consists of CIB’s Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. These metrics, which exclude Markets, are non-GAAP financial measures. Management reviews these metrics to assess the performance of the Firm’s lending, investing (including asset-liability management) and deposit-raising activities, apart from any volatility associated with Markets activities. In addition, management also assesses Markets business performance on a total revenue basis as offsets may occur across revenue lines. Management believes that these measures provide investors and analysts with alternative measures to analyze the revenue trends of the Firm.Year ended December 31, (in millions, except rates)202420232022Net interest income – reported(a)$92,583 $89,267 $66,710 Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments477 480 434 Net interest income – managed basis$93,060 $89,747 $67,144 Less: Markets net interest income(b)641 (294)4,789 Net interest income excluding Markets$92,419 $90,041 $62,355 Average interest-earning assets(a)$3,537,567 $3,325,708 $3,349,079 Less: Average Markets interest-earning assets(b)1,128,153 985,777 953,195 Average interest-earning assets excluding Markets$2,409,414 $2,339,931 $2,395,884 Net yield on average interest-earning assets – managed basis2.63 %2.70 %2.00 %Net yield on average Markets interest-earning assets(b)0.06 (0.03)0.50 Net yield on average interest-earning assets excluding Markets3.84 %3.85 %2.60 %Noninterest revenue – reported(c)$84,973 $68,837 $61,985 Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(c)2,560 3,782 3,148 Noninterest revenue – managed basis$87,533 $72,619 $65,133 Less: Markets noninterest revenue(b)(d)29,366 28,258 24,373 Noninterest revenue excluding Markets$58,167 $44,361 $40,760 Memo: Total Markets net revenue(b)$30,007 $27,964 $29,162 (a)Includes the effect of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used, also where applicable. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on hedge accounting.(b)Refer to pages 81–82 for further information on Markets.(c)Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investment in Tax Credit Stricture guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.(d)Includes the market-related revenues of the former Commercial Banking business segment. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation.Calculation of certain U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP financial measuresCertain U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are calculated as follows:Book value per share (“BVPS”)Common stockholders’ equity at period-end /Common shares at period-endOverhead ratioTotal noninterest expense / Total net revenueROAReported net income / Total average assetsROENet income* / Average common stockholders’ equityROTCENet income* / Average tangible common equityTBVPSTangible common equity at period-end / Common shares at period-end* Represents net income applicable to common equityIn addition, the Firm reviews other non-GAAP measures such as:•Adjusted expense, which represents noninterest expense excluding Firmwide legal expense, and•Pre-provision profit, which represents total net revenue less total noninterest expense.Management believes that these measures help investors to understand the effect of these items on reported results and provide an alternative presentation of the Firm’s performance. Net interest income, net yield, and noninterest revenue excluding MarketsIn addition to reviewing net interest income, net yield, and noninterest revenue on a managed basis, management also reviews these metrics excluding Markets, as shown below. Markets consists of CIB’s Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. These metrics, which exclude Markets, are non-GAAP financial measures. Management reviews these metrics to assess the performance of the Firm’s lending, investing (including asset-liability management) and deposit-raising activities, apart from any volatility associated with Markets activities. In addition, management also assesses Markets business performance on a total revenue basis as offsets may occur across revenue lines. Management believes that these measures provide investors and analysts with alternative measures to analyze the revenue trends of the Firm.Year ended December 31, (in millions, except rates)202420232022Net interest income – reported(a)$92,583 $89,267 $66,710 Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments477 480 434 Net interest income – managed basis$93,060 $89,747 $67,144 Less: Markets net interest income(b)641 (294)4,789 Net interest income excluding Markets$92,419 $90,041 $62,355 Average interest-earning assets(a)$3,537,567 $3,325,708 $3,349,079 Less: Average Markets interest-earning assets(b)1,128,153 985,777 953,195 Average interest-earning assets excluding Markets$2,409,414 $2,339,931 $2,395,884 Net yield on average interest-earning assets – managed basis2.63 %2.70 %2.00 %Net yield on average Markets interest-earning assets(b)0.06 (0.03)0.50 Net yield on average interest-earning assets excluding Markets3.84 %3.85 %2.60 %Noninterest revenue – reported(c)$84,973 $68,837 $61,985 Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(c)2,560 3,782 3,148 Noninterest revenue – managed basis$87,533 $72,619 $65,133 Less: Markets noninterest revenue(b)(d)29,366 28,258 24,373 Noninterest revenue excluding Markets$58,167 $44,361 $40,760 Memo: Total Markets net revenue(b)$30,007 $27,964 $29,162

In addition to reviewing net interest income, net yield, and noninterest revenue on a managed basis, management also reviews these metrics excluding Markets, as shown below. Markets consists of CIB’s Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. These metrics, which exclude Markets, are non-GAAP financial measures. Management reviews these metrics to assess the performance of the Firm’s lending, investing (including asset-liability management) and deposit-raising activities, apart from any volatility associated with Markets activities. In addition, management also assesses Markets business performance on a total revenue basis as offsets may occur across revenue lines. Management believes that these measures provide investors and analysts with alternative measures to analyze the revenue trends of the Firm. Year ended December 31, (in millions, except rates)202420232022Net interest income – reported(a)$92,583 $89,267 $66,710 Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments477 480 434 Net interest income – managed basis$93,060 $89,747 $67,144 Less: Markets net interest income(b)641 (294)4,789 Net interest income excluding Markets$92,419 $90,041 $62,355 Average interest-earning assets(a)$3,537,567 $3,325,708 $3,349,079 Less: Average Markets interest-earning assets(b)1,128,153 985,777 953,195 Average interest-earning assets excluding Markets$2,409,414 $2,339,931 $2,395,884 Net yield on average interest-earning assets – managed basis2.63 %2.70 %2.00 %Net yield on average Markets interest-earning assets(b)0.06 (0.03)0.50 Net yield on average interest-earning assets excluding Markets3.84 %3.85 %2.60 %

Noninterest revenue – reported(c)$84,973 $68,837 $61,985 Fully taxable-equivalent adjustments(c)2,560 3,782 3,148 Noninterest revenue – managed basis$87,533 $72,619 $65,133 Less: Markets noninterest revenue(b)(d)29,366 28,258 24,373 Noninterest revenue excluding Markets$58,167 $44,361 $40,760 Memo: Total Markets net revenue(b)$30,007 $27,964 $29,162

(a)Includes the effect of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used, also where applicable. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on hedge accounting.(b)Refer to pages 81–82 for further information on Markets.(c)Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investment in Tax Credit Stricture guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.(d)Includes the market-related revenues of the former Commercial Banking business segment. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation.Calculation of certain U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP financial measuresCertain U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are calculated as follows:Book value per share (“BVPS”)Common stockholders’ equity at period-end /Common shares at period-endOverhead ratioTotal noninterest expense / Total net revenueROAReported net income / Total average assetsROENet income* / Average common stockholders’ equityROTCENet income* / Average tangible common equityTBVPSTangible common equity at period-end / Common shares at period-end* Represents net income applicable to common equityIn addition, the Firm reviews other non-GAAP measures such as:•Adjusted expense, which represents noninterest expense excluding Firmwide legal expense, and•Pre-provision profit, which represents total net revenue less total noninterest expense.Management believes that these measures help investors to understand the effect of these items on reported results and provide an alternative presentation of the Firm’s performance. (a)Includes the effect of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used, also where applicable. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on hedge accounting. (b)Refer to pages 81–82 for further information on Markets. (c)Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investment in Tax Credit Stricture guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information. (d)Includes the market-related revenues of the former Commercial Banking business segment. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Calculation of certain U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP financial measuresCertain U.S. GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are calculated as follows:Book value per share (“BVPS”)Common stockholders’ equity at period-end /Common shares at period-endOverhead ratioTotal noninterest expense / Total net revenueROAReported net income / Total average assetsROENet income* / Average common stockholders’ equityROTCENet income* / Average tangible common equityTBVPSTangible common equity at period-end / Common shares at period-end* Represents net income applicable to common equity

Total noninterest expense / Total net revenue ROA Reported net income / Total average assets ROE Net income* / Average common stockholders’ equity ROTCE Net income* / Average tangible common equity TBVPS Tangible common equity at period-end / Common shares at period-end * Represents net income applicable to common equity In addition, the Firm reviews other non-GAAP measures such as: •Adjusted expense, which represents noninterest expense excluding Firmwide legal expense, and •Pre-provision profit, which represents total net revenue less total noninterest expense. Management believes that these measures help investors to understand the effect of these items on reported results and provide an alternative presentation of the Firm’s performance. 68JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 68JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 68JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 68 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

TCE, ROTCE and TBVPS are each non-GAAP financial measures. TCE represents the Firm’s common stockholders’ equity (i.e., total stockholders’ equity less preferred stock) less goodwill and identifiable intangible assets (other than MSRs), net of related deferred tax liabilities. ROTCE measures the Firm’s net income applicable to common equity as a percentage of average TCE. TBVPS represents the Firm’s TCE at period-end divided by common shares at period-end. TCE, ROTCE and TBVPS are utilized by the Firm, as well as investors and analysts, in assessing the Firm’s use of equity. The following summary table provides a reconciliation from the Firm’s common stockholders’ equity to TCE. Period-endAverageDec 31,2024Dec 31,2023Year ended December 31,(in millions, except per share and ratio data)202420232022Common stockholders’ equity$324,708 $300,474 $312,370 $282,056 $253,068 Less: Goodwill52,565 52,634 52,627 52,258 50,952 Less: Other intangible assets2,874 3,225 3,042 2,572 1,112 Add: Certain deferred tax liabilities(a)2,943 2,996 2,970 2,883 2,505 Tangible common equity$272,212 $247,611 $259,671 $230,109 $203,509 Return on tangible common equityNANA22 %21 %18 %Tangible book value per share$97.30 $86.08 NANANA Common stockholders’ equity Less: Other intangible assets Add: Certain deferred tax liabilities(a) (a)Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating TCE. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K69 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K69 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K69 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 69 BUSINESS SEGMENT & CORPORATE RESULTS The Firm is managed on an LOB basis. Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”). As a result of the reorganization, the Firm has three reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking, Commercial & Investment Bank, and Asset & Wealth Management – with the remaining activities in Corporate. The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the type of customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is evaluated by the Firm’s Operating Committee, whose members act collectively as the Firm’s chief operating decision maker. Segment results are presented on a managed basis. Refer to Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures, on pages 67–69 for a definition of managed basis. The following table depicts the Firm’s reportable business segments.

Results of the reportable business segments are intended to present each segment as if it were a stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results includes the allocation of certain income and expense items. The Firm periodically assesses the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and therefore further refinements may be implemented in future periods. The Firm also assesses the level of capital required for each LOB on at least an annual basis. The Firm’s LOBs also provide various business metrics which are utilized by the Firm and its investors and analysts in assessing performance.Revenue sharing When business segments or businesses within each segment join efforts to sell products and services to the Firm’s clients and customers, the participating businesses may agree to share revenue from those transactions. Revenue is generally recognized in the segment responsible for the related product or service, with allocations to the other segments or businesses involved in the transaction. The segment and business results reflect these revenue-sharing agreements. Results of the reportable business segments are intended to present each segment as if it were a stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results includes the allocation of certain income and expense items. The Firm periodically assesses the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and therefore further refinements may be implemented in future periods. The Firm also assesses the level of capital required for each LOB on at least an annual basis. The Firm’s LOBs also provide various business metrics which are utilized by the Firm and its investors and analysts in assessing performance. Results of the reportable business segments are intended to present each segment as if it were a stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results includes the allocation of certain income and expense items. The Firm periodically assesses the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and therefore further refinements may be implemented in future periods. The Firm also assesses the level of capital required for each LOB on at least an annual basis. The Firm’s LOBs also provide various business metrics which are utilized by the Firm and its investors and analysts in assessing performance. Revenue sharing When business segments or businesses within each segment join efforts to sell products and services to the Firm’s clients and customers, the participating businesses may agree to share revenue from those transactions. Revenue is generally recognized in the segment responsible for the related product or service, with allocations to the other segments or businesses involved in the transaction. The segment and business results reflect these revenue-sharing agreements. Revenue sharing When business segments or businesses within each segment join efforts to sell products and services to the Firm’s clients and customers, the participating businesses may agree to share revenue from those transactions. Revenue is generally recognized in the segment responsible for the related product or service, with allocations to the other segments or businesses involved in the transaction. The segment and business results reflect these revenue-sharing agreements. 70JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 70JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 70JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 70 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Expense allocationWhere business segments use services provided by Corporate support units, or another business segment, the costs of those services are allocated to the respective business segments. The expense is generally allocated based on the actual cost and use of services provided. In contrast, certain costs and investments related to Corporate that are not currently utilized by any LOB are not allocated to the business segments and are retained in Corporate. Expense retained in Corporate generally includes costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses, and other items not solely aligned with a particular reportable business segment.Funds transfer pricing Funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) is the process by which the Firm allocates interest income and expense to the LOBs and Other Corporate and transfers the primary interest rate risk and liquidity risk to Treasury and CIO.The funds transfer pricing process considers the interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics of assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet products. Periodically, the methodology and assumptions utilized in the FTP process are adjusted to reflect economic conditions and other factors, which may impact the allocation of net interest income to the segments. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Firm updated its FTP with respect to consumer deposits, which resulted in an increase in the funding benefit reflected within CCB’s net interest income that is fully offset in Corporate, with no effect on the Firm’s net interest income.As a result of higher average interest rates, the cost of funds for assets and the FTP benefit earned for liabilities have generally increased in the current year, impacting the net interest income of the business segments. During the period ended December 31, 2024, this has resulted in a higher cost of funds for loans and Markets activities. In addition, rates paid to deposit holders increased more than the FTP benefit increase during the year, resulting in deposit margin compression.Foreign exchange riskForeign exchange risk is transferred from the LOBs and Other Corporate to Treasury and CIO for certain revenues and expenses. Treasury and CIO manages these risks centrally and reports the impact of foreign exchange rate movements related to the transferred risk in its results. Refer to Market Risk Management on page 149 for additional information.Debt expense and preferred stock dividend allocationAs part of the FTP process, almost all of the cost of the credit spread component of outstanding unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends is allocated to the reportable business segments, while the balance of the cost is retained in Corporate. The methodology to allocate the cost of unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends to the business segments is aligned with the relevant regulatory capital requirements and funding needs of the LOBs, as applicable. The allocated cost of unsecured long-term debt is included in a business segment’s net interest income, and net income is reduced by preferred stock dividends, to arrive at a business segment’s net income applicable to common equity. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for additional information.Capital allocation The amount of capital assigned to each LOB and Corporate is referred to as equity. The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized risk-weighted assets (“RWA”) and the global systemically important banks (“GSIB”) surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. Refer to Line of business and Corporate equity on page 104 for additional information on capital allocation. Expense allocationWhere business segments use services provided by Corporate support units, or another business segment, the costs of those services are allocated to the respective business segments. The expense is generally allocated based on the actual cost and use of services provided. In contrast, certain costs and investments related to Corporate that are not currently utilized by any LOB are not allocated to the business segments and are retained in Corporate. Expense retained in Corporate generally includes costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses, and other items not solely aligned with a particular reportable business segment.Funds transfer pricing Funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) is the process by which the Firm allocates interest income and expense to the LOBs and Other Corporate and transfers the primary interest rate risk and liquidity risk to Treasury and CIO.The funds transfer pricing process considers the interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics of assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet products. Periodically, the methodology and assumptions utilized in the FTP process are adjusted to reflect economic conditions and other factors, which may impact the allocation of net interest income to the segments. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Firm updated its FTP with respect to consumer deposits, which resulted in an increase in the funding benefit reflected within CCB’s net interest income that is fully offset in Corporate, with no effect on the Firm’s net interest income.As a result of higher average interest rates, the cost of funds for assets and the FTP benefit earned for liabilities have generally increased in the current year, impacting the net interest income of the business segments. During the period ended December 31, 2024, this has resulted in a higher cost of funds for loans and Markets activities. In addition, rates paid to deposit holders increased more than the FTP benefit increase during the year, resulting in deposit margin compression.Foreign exchange riskForeign exchange risk is transferred from the LOBs and Other Corporate to Treasury and CIO for certain revenues and expenses. Treasury and CIO manages these risks centrally and reports the impact of foreign exchange rate movements related to the transferred risk in its results. Refer to Market Risk Management on page 149 for additional information. Expense allocation Where business segments use services provided by Corporate support units, or another business segment, the costs of those services are allocated to the respective business segments. The expense is generally allocated based on the actual cost and use of services provided. In contrast, certain costs and investments related to Corporate that are not currently utilized by any LOB are not allocated to the business segments and are retained in Corporate. Expense retained in Corporate generally includes costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses, and other items not solely aligned with a particular reportable business segment. Funds transfer pricing Funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) is the process by which the Firm allocates interest income and expense to the LOBs and Other Corporate and transfers the primary interest rate risk and liquidity risk to Treasury and CIO. The funds transfer pricing process considers the interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics of assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet products. Periodically, the methodology and assumptions utilized in the FTP process are adjusted to reflect economic conditions and other factors, which may impact the allocation of net interest income to the segments. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Firm updated its FTP with respect to consumer deposits, which resulted in an increase in the funding benefit reflected within CCB’s net interest income that is fully offset in Corporate, with no effect on the Firm’s net interest income. As a result of higher average interest rates, the cost of funds for assets and the FTP benefit earned for liabilities have generally increased in the current year, impacting the net interest income of the business segments. During the period ended December 31, 2024, this has resulted in a higher cost of funds for loans and Markets activities. In addition, rates paid to deposit holders increased more than the FTP benefit increase during the year, resulting in deposit margin compression. Foreign exchange risk Foreign exchange risk is transferred from the LOBs and Other Corporate to Treasury and CIO for certain revenues and expenses. Treasury and CIO manages these risks centrally and reports the impact of foreign exchange rate movements related to the transferred risk in its results. Refer to Market Risk Management on page 149 for additional information. Debt expense and preferred stock dividend allocationAs part of the FTP process, almost all of the cost of the credit spread component of outstanding unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends is allocated to the reportable business segments, while the balance of the cost is retained in Corporate. The methodology to allocate the cost of unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends to the business segments is aligned with the relevant regulatory capital requirements and funding needs of the LOBs, as applicable. The allocated cost of unsecured long-term debt is included in a business segment’s net interest income, and net income is reduced by preferred stock dividends, to arrive at a business segment’s net income applicable to common equity. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for additional information.Capital allocation The amount of capital assigned to each LOB and Corporate is referred to as equity. The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized risk-weighted assets (“RWA”) and the global systemically important banks (“GSIB”) surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. Refer to Line of business and Corporate equity on page 104 for additional information on capital allocation. Debt expense and preferred stock dividend allocation As part of the FTP process, almost all of the cost of the credit spread component of outstanding unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends is allocated to the reportable business segments, while the balance of the cost is retained in Corporate. The methodology to allocate the cost of unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends to the business segments is aligned with the relevant regulatory capital requirements and funding needs of the LOBs, as applicable. The allocated cost of unsecured long-term debt is included in a business segment’s net interest income, and net income is reduced by preferred stock dividends, to arrive at a business segment’s net income applicable to common equity. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for additional information. Capital allocation The amount of capital assigned to each LOB and Corporate is referred to as equity. The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized risk-weighted assets (“RWA”) and the global systemically important banks (“GSIB”) surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. Refer to Line of business and Corporate equity on page 104 for additional information on capital allocation. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K71 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K71 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K71 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 71

The following tables summarize the Firm’s results by business segments and Corporate for the periods indicated. Year ended December 31,Consumer & Community BankingCommercial & Investment BankAsset & Wealth Management(in millions, except ratios)202420232022202420232022202420232022Total net revenue$71,507$70,148$54,814(a)$70,114 $64,353$59,635(a)$21,578 $19,827$17,748Total noninterest expense38,03634,81931,208(a)35,353 33,97232,069(a)14,414 12,78011,829Pre-provision profit/(loss)33,47135,32923,60634,761 30,38127,5667,164 7,0475,919Provision for credit losses9,9746,8993,813762 2,0912,426(68)159128Net income/(loss)17,60321,23214,916(a)24,846 20,27219,138(a)5,421 5,2274,365Return on equity (“ROE”)32 %38 %29 %18 %14 %14 %34 %31 %25 %Year ended December 31,CorporateTotal(in millions, except ratios)202420232022202420232022Total net revenue$17,394(b)$8,038$80$180,593(b)$162,366$132,277Total noninterest expense3,994(c)5,6011,03491,797(c)87,17276,140Pre-provision profit/(loss)13,4002,437(954)88,79675,19456,137Provision for credit losses101712210,6789,3206,389Net income/(loss)10,6012,821(743)58,47149,55237,676Return on equity (“ROE”) NM NMNM18 %17 %14 % (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (a) (b) (b) (c) (c) (a)In the first quarter of 2023, the allocations of revenue and expense to CCB associated with a Merchant Services revenue sharing agreement were discontinued and are now retained in Payments in CIB. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. (b)Included a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. (c)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. Refer to Note 32 for further details on total net revenue and total noninterest expense. The following sections provide a comparative discussion of the Firm’s results by business segments and Corporate as of or for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, unless otherwise specified. 72JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 72JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 72JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 72 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CONSUMER & COMMUNITY BANKING Consumer & Community Banking offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Banking & Wealth Management (including Consumer Banking, Business Banking and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card Services & Auto. Banking & Wealth Management offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, payments and services. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card Services issues credit cards and offers travel services. Auto originates and services auto loans and leases.Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022RevenueLending- and deposit-related fees$3,387 $3,356 $3,316 Asset management fees4,014 3,282 2,734 Mortgage fees and related income1,378 1,175 1,236 Card income3,139 2,532 2,469 All other income(a)4,731 4,773 5,131 Noninterest revenue16,649 15,118 14,886 Net interest income54,858 55,030 39,928 Total net revenue71,507 70,148 54,814 Provision for credit losses9,974 6,899 3,813 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense17,045 15,171 13,092 Noncompensation expense(b)20,991 19,648 18,116 Total noninterest expense38,036 34,819 (d)31,208 Income before income tax expense23,497 28,430 19,793 Income tax expense5,894 7,198 4,877 Net income$17,603 $21,232 $14,916 Revenue by businessBanking & Wealth Management$40,943 $43,199 $30,059 Home Lending5,097 4,140 3,674 Card Services & Auto25,467 22,809 21,081 Mortgage fees and related income details:Production revenue627 421 497 Net mortgage servicing revenue(c)751 754 739 Mortgage fees and related income$1,378 $1,175 $1,236 Financial ratiosReturn on equity32 %38 %29 %Overhead ratio53 50 57 (a)Primarily includes operating lease income and commissions and other fees. Operating lease income was $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(b)Included depreciation expense on leased assets of $1.7 billion, $1.7 billion and $2.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(c)Included MSR risk management results of $159 million, $131 million and $93 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(d)In the second quarter of 2023, substantially all of the expense associated with First Republic was reported in Corporate. Commencing in the third quarter of 2023, the expense was aligned to the appropriate LOB. Consumer & Community Banking offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Banking & Wealth Management (including Consumer Banking, Business Banking and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card Services & Auto. Banking & Wealth Management offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, payments and services. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card Services issues credit cards and offers travel services. Auto originates and services auto loans and leases. Consumer & Community Banking offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Banking & Wealth Management (including Consumer Banking, Business Banking and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card Services & Auto. Banking & Wealth Management offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, payments and services. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card Services issues credit cards and offers travel services. Auto originates and services auto loans and leases. Consumer & Community Banking offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Banking & Wealth Management (including Consumer Banking, Business Banking and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card Services & Auto. Banking & Wealth Management offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, payments and services. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card Services issues credit cards and offers travel services. Auto originates and services auto loans and leases. Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022RevenueLending- and deposit-related fees$3,387 $3,356 $3,316 Asset management fees4,014 3,282 2,734 Mortgage fees and related income1,378 1,175 1,236 Card income3,139 2,532 2,469 All other income(a)4,731 4,773 5,131 Noninterest revenue16,649 15,118 14,886 Net interest income54,858 55,030 39,928 Total net revenue71,507 70,148 54,814 Provision for credit losses9,974 6,899 3,813 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense17,045 15,171 13,092 Noncompensation expense(b)20,991 19,648 18,116 Total noninterest expense38,036 34,819 (d)31,208 Income before income tax expense23,497 28,430 19,793 Income tax expense5,894 7,198 4,877 Net income$17,603 $21,232 $14,916 Revenue by businessBanking & Wealth Management$40,943 $43,199 $30,059 Home Lending5,097 4,140 3,674 Card Services & Auto25,467 22,809 21,081 Mortgage fees and related income details:Production revenue627 421 497 Net mortgage servicing revenue(c)751 754 739 Mortgage fees and related income$1,378 $1,175 $1,236 Financial ratiosReturn on equity32 %38 %29 %Overhead ratio53 50 57 (a)Primarily includes operating lease income and commissions and other fees. Operating lease income was $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(b)Included depreciation expense on leased assets of $1.7 billion, $1.7 billion and $2.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(c)Included MSR risk management results of $159 million, $131 million and $93 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(d)In the second quarter of 2023, substantially all of the expense associated with First Republic was reported in Corporate. Commencing in the third quarter of 2023, the expense was aligned to the appropriate LOB. Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022RevenueLending- and deposit-related fees$3,387 $3,356 $3,316 Asset management fees4,014 3,282 2,734 Mortgage fees and related income1,378 1,175 1,236 Card income3,139 2,532 2,469 All other income(a)4,731 4,773 5,131 Noninterest revenue16,649 15,118 14,886 Net interest income54,858 55,030 39,928 Total net revenue71,507 70,148 54,814 Provision for credit losses9,974 6,899 3,813 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense17,045 15,171 13,092 Noncompensation expense(b)20,991 19,648 18,116 Total noninterest expense38,036 34,819 (d)31,208 Income before income tax expense23,497 28,430 19,793 Income tax expense5,894 7,198 4,877 Net income$17,603 $21,232 $14,916 Revenue by businessBanking & Wealth Management$40,943 $43,199 $30,059 Home Lending5,097 4,140 3,674 Card Services & Auto25,467 22,809 21,081 Mortgage fees and related income details:Production revenue627 421 497 Net mortgage servicing revenue(c)751 754 739 Mortgage fees and related income$1,378 $1,175 $1,236 Financial ratiosReturn on equity32 %38 %29 %Overhead ratio53 50 57 All other income(a) Noncompensation expense(b) (d) Net mortgage servicing revenue(c) (a)Primarily includes operating lease income and commissions and other fees. Operating lease income was $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (b)Included depreciation expense on leased assets of $1.7 billion, $1.7 billion and $2.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (c)Included MSR risk management results of $159 million, $131 million and $93 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (d)In the second quarter of 2023, substantially all of the expense associated with First Republic was reported in Corporate. Commencing in the third quarter of 2023, the expense was aligned to the appropriate LOB. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K73 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K73 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K73 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 73 2024 compared with 2023Net income was $17.6 billion, down 17%.Net revenue was $71.5 billion, up 2%.Net interest income was $54.9 billion, flat when compared with the prior year, reflecting:•lower NII in Banking & Wealth Management ("BWM"), predominantly driven by deposit margin compression and lower average deposits,offset by•higher Card Services NII, predominantly driven by higher revolving balances, and•the timing impact of First Republic in Home Lending.Noninterest revenue was $16.6 billion, up 10%, predominantly driven by:•higher asset management fees reflecting higher average market levels, including the timing impact of First Republic and, to a lesser extent, net inflows, as well as higher commissions from annuity sales in BWM,•higher card income, driven by higher net interchange reflecting increased debit and credit card sales volume, and higher annual fees, partially offset by an increase in amortization related to new account origination costs, as well as•higher production revenue in Home Lending, including the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to Note 6 for additional information on card income, asset management fees, and commissions and other fees; and Critical Accounting Estimates on pages 161–164 for additional information on the credit card rewards liability. Refer to Executive Overview on page 54 and Note 34 for additional information on First Republic.Noninterest expense was $38.0 billion, up 9%, reflecting First Republic-related expense that was aligned to CCB from Corporate starting in the third quarter of 2023, impacting both compensation and noncompensation expense.The increase in expense also reflected:•higher compensation expense, largely driven by higher revenue-related compensation predominantly for advisors and bankers, and an increase in the number of employees, including in technology, and•higher noncompensation expense, largely driven by continued investments in technology and marketing, as well as higher operating losses, partially offset by lower legal expense.The provision for credit losses was $10.0 billion, reflecting:•net charge-offs of $7.9 billion, up $2.6 billion, including $2.4 billion in Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth, and•a $2.0 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, consisting of:–$2.2 billion in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years,partially offset by–a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending, primarily due to improvements in the outlook for home prices in the first quarter of 2024. The provision in the prior year was $6.9 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $5.3 billion, a $1.2 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, predominantly driven by Card Services, and a $408 million net addition to the allowance for credit losses to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023.Refer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 117–140 and Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 137–139 for a further discussion of the credit portfolios and the allowance for credit losses. 2024 compared with 2023Net income was $17.6 billion, down 17%.Net revenue was $71.5 billion, up 2%.Net interest income was $54.9 billion, flat when compared with the prior year, reflecting:•lower NII in Banking & Wealth Management ("BWM"), predominantly driven by deposit margin compression and lower average deposits,offset by•higher Card Services NII, predominantly driven by higher revolving balances, and•the timing impact of First Republic in Home Lending.Noninterest revenue was $16.6 billion, up 10%, predominantly driven by:•higher asset management fees reflecting higher average market levels, including the timing impact of First Republic and, to a lesser extent, net inflows, as well as higher commissions from annuity sales in BWM,•higher card income, driven by higher net interchange reflecting increased debit and credit card sales volume, and higher annual fees, partially offset by an increase in amortization related to new account origination costs, as well as•higher production revenue in Home Lending, including the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to Note 6 for additional information on card income, asset management fees, and commissions and other fees; and Critical Accounting Estimates on pages 161–164 for additional information on the credit card rewards liability. Refer to Executive Overview on page 54 and Note 34 for additional information on First Republic.Noninterest expense was $38.0 billion, up 9%, reflecting First Republic-related expense that was aligned to CCB from Corporate starting in the third quarter of 2023, impacting both compensation and noncompensation expense.The increase in expense also reflected:•higher compensation expense, largely driven by higher revenue-related compensation predominantly for advisors and bankers, and an increase in the number of employees, including in technology, and•higher noncompensation expense, largely driven by continued investments in technology and marketing, as well as higher operating losses, partially offset by lower legal expense.

Net income was $17.6 billion, down 17%. Net revenue was $71.5 billion, up 2%. Net interest income was $54.9 billion, flat when compared with the prior year, reflecting: •lower NII in Banking & Wealth Management ("BWM"), predominantly driven by deposit margin compression and lower average deposits, offset by •higher Card Services NII, predominantly driven by higher revolving balances, and •the timing impact of First Republic in Home Lending. Noninterest revenue was $16.6 billion, up 10%, predominantly driven by: •higher asset management fees reflecting higher average market levels, including the timing impact of First Republic and, to a lesser extent, net inflows, as well as higher commissions from annuity sales in BWM, •higher card income, driven by higher net interchange reflecting increased debit and credit card sales volume, and higher annual fees, partially offset by an increase in amortization related to new account origination costs, as well as •higher production revenue in Home Lending, including the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to Note 6 for additional information on card income, asset management fees, and commissions and other fees; and Critical Accounting Estimates on pages 161–164 for additional information on the credit card rewards liability. Refer to Executive Overview on page 54 and Note 34 for additional information on First Republic. Noninterest expense was $38.0 billion, up 9%, reflecting First Republic-related expense that was aligned to CCB from Corporate starting in the third quarter of 2023, impacting both compensation and noncompensation expense. The increase in expense also reflected: •higher compensation expense, largely driven by higher revenue-related compensation predominantly for advisors and bankers, and an increase in the number of employees, including in technology, and •higher noncompensation expense, largely driven by continued investments in technology and marketing, as well as higher operating losses, partially offset by lower legal expense. The provision for credit losses was $10.0 billion, reflecting:•net charge-offs of $7.9 billion, up $2.6 billion, including $2.4 billion in Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth, and•a $2.0 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, consisting of:–$2.2 billion in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years,partially offset by–a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending, primarily due to improvements in the outlook for home prices in the first quarter of 2024. The provision in the prior year was $6.9 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $5.3 billion, a $1.2 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, predominantly driven by Card Services, and a $408 million net addition to the allowance for credit losses to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023.Refer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 117–140 and Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 137–139 for a further discussion of the credit portfolios and the allowance for credit losses. The provision for credit losses was $10.0 billion, reflecting: •net charge-offs of $7.9 billion, up $2.6 billion, including $2.4 billion in Card Services, reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth, and •a $2.0 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, consisting of: –$2.2 billion in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by –a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending, primarily due to improvements in the outlook for home prices in the first quarter of 2024. The provision in the prior year was $6.9 billion, reflecting net charge-offs of $5.3 billion, a $1.2 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, predominantly driven by Card Services, and a $408 million net addition to the allowance for credit losses to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023. Refer to Credit and Investment Risk Management on pages 117–140 and Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 137–139 for a further discussion of the credit portfolios and the allowance for credit losses. 74JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 74JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 74JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 74 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions, except employees)202420232022Selected balance sheet data (period-end)Total assets$650,268$642,951$514,085 Loans:Banking & Wealth Management33,22131,14229,008 Home Lending(a)246,498259,181172,554 Card Services233,016211,175185,175 Auto73,61977,70568,191 Total loans586,354579,203454,928 Deposits(b)1,056,6521,094,7381,131,611 Equity54,50055,50050,000 Selected balance sheet data (average)Total assets$631,648$584,367$497,263 Loans:Banking & Wealth Management31,54430,14231,545 Home Lending(c)252,542232,115176,285 Card Services214,139191,424163,335 Auto75,00972,67468,098 Total loans573,234526,355439,263 Deposits(b)1,064,2151,126,5521,162,680 Equity54,50054,34950,000 Employees144,989141,640135,347 (a)At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, Home Lending loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were $8.1 billion, $3.4 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively.(b)In the fourth quarter of 2023, CCB transferred approximately $18.8 billion of deposits associated with First Republic to AWM and CIB.(c)Average Home Lending loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were $7.1 billion, $4.8 billion and $7.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions, except ratio data)202420232022Credit data and quality statisticsNonaccrual loans(a)$3,366 $3,740 $3,899 Net charge-offs/(recoveries)Banking & Wealth Management442 340 370 Home Lending(106)(56)(229)Card Services7,148 4,699 2,403 Auto 444 357 144 Total net charge-offs/(recoveries)$7,928 $5,340 $2,688 Net charge-off/(recovery) rateBanking & Wealth Management1.40 %1.13 %1.17 %Home Lending(0.04)(0.02)(0.14)Card Services3.34 2.45 1.47 Auto0.59 0.49 0.21 Total net charge-off/(recovery) rate1.40 %1.02 %0.62 %30+ day delinquency rateHome Lending(b)0.78 %0.66 %0.83 %Card Services2.17 2.14 1.45 Auto1.43 1.19 1.01 90+ day delinquency rate - Card Services1.14 %1.05 %0.68 %Allowance for loan lossesBanking & Wealth Management$764 $685 $722 Home Lending447 578 867 Card Services14,608 12,453 11,200 Auto 692 742 715 Total allowance for loan losses$16,511 $14,458 $13,504 (a)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $84 million, $123 million and $187 million, respectively. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance(b)At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $122 million, $176 million and $258 million, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions, except employees)202420232022Selected balance sheet data (period-end)Total assets$650,268$642,951$514,085 Loans:Banking & Wealth Management33,22131,14229,008 Home Lending(a)246,498259,181172,554 Card Services233,016211,175185,175 Auto73,61977,70568,191 Total loans586,354579,203454,928 Deposits(b)1,056,6521,094,7381,131,611 Equity54,50055,50050,000 Selected balance sheet data (average)Total assets$631,648$584,367$497,263 Loans:Banking & Wealth Management31,54430,14231,545 Home Lending(c)252,542232,115176,285 Card Services214,139191,424163,335 Auto75,00972,67468,098 Total loans573,234526,355439,263 Deposits(b)1,064,2151,126,5521,162,680 Equity54,50054,34950,000 Employees144,989141,640135,347 (a)At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, Home Lending loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were $8.1 billion, $3.4 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively.(b)In the fourth quarter of 2023, CCB transferred approximately $18.8 billion of deposits associated with First Republic to AWM and CIB.(c)Average Home Lending loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were $7.1 billion, $4.8 billion and $7.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions, except employees)202420232022Selected balance sheet data (period-end)Total assets$650,268$642,951$514,085 Loans:Banking & Wealth Management33,22131,14229,008 Home Lending(a)246,498259,181172,554 Card Services233,016211,175185,175 Auto73,61977,70568,191 Total loans586,354579,203454,928 Deposits(b)1,056,6521,094,7381,131,611 Equity54,50055,50050,000 Selected balance sheet data (average)Total assets$631,648$584,367$497,263 Loans:Banking & Wealth Management31,54430,14231,545 Home Lending(c)252,542232,115176,285 Card Services214,139191,424163,335 Auto75,00972,67468,098 Total loans573,234526,355439,263 Deposits(b)1,064,2151,126,5521,162,680 Equity54,50054,34950,000 Employees144,989141,640135,347 (in millions, except employees) Home Lending(a) Deposits(b) Home Lending(c) Deposits(b) Employees (a)At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, Home Lending loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were $8.1 billion, $3.4 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively. (b)In the fourth quarter of 2023, CCB transferred approximately $18.8 billion of deposits associated with First Republic to AWM and CIB. (c)Average Home Lending loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were $7.1 billion, $4.8 billion and $7.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions, except ratio data)202420232022Credit data and quality statisticsNonaccrual loans(a)$3,366 $3,740 $3,899 Net charge-offs/(recoveries)Banking & Wealth Management442 340 370 Home Lending(106)(56)(229)Card Services7,148 4,699 2,403 Auto 444 357 144 Total net charge-offs/(recoveries)$7,928 $5,340 $2,688 Net charge-off/(recovery) rateBanking & Wealth Management1.40 %1.13 %1.17 %Home Lending(0.04)(0.02)(0.14)Card Services3.34 2.45 1.47 Auto0.59 0.49 0.21 Total net charge-off/(recovery) rate1.40 %1.02 %0.62 %30+ day delinquency rateHome Lending(b)0.78 %0.66 %0.83 %Card Services2.17 2.14 1.45 Auto1.43 1.19 1.01 90+ day delinquency rate - Card Services1.14 %1.05 %0.68 %Allowance for loan lossesBanking & Wealth Management$764 $685 $722 Home Lending447 578 867 Card Services14,608 12,453 11,200 Auto 692 742 715 Total allowance for loan losses$16,511 $14,458 $13,504 (a)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $84 million, $123 million and $187 million, respectively. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance(b)At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $122 million, $176 million and $258 million, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions, except ratio data)202420232022Credit data and quality statisticsNonaccrual loans(a)$3,366 $3,740 $3,899 Net charge-offs/(recoveries)Banking & Wealth Management442 340 370 Home Lending(106)(56)(229)Card Services7,148 4,699 2,403 Auto 444 357 144 Total net charge-offs/(recoveries)$7,928 $5,340 $2,688 Net charge-off/(recovery) rateBanking & Wealth Management1.40 %1.13 %1.17 %Home Lending(0.04)(0.02)(0.14)Card Services3.34 2.45 1.47 Auto0.59 0.49 0.21 Total net charge-off/(recovery) rate1.40 %1.02 %0.62 %30+ day delinquency rateHome Lending(b)0.78 %0.66 %0.83 %Card Services2.17 2.14 1.45 Auto1.43 1.19 1.01 90+ day delinquency rate - Card Services1.14 %1.05 %0.68 %Allowance for loan lossesBanking & Wealth Management$764 $685 $722 Home Lending447 578 867 Card Services14,608 12,453 11,200 Auto 692 742 715 Total allowance for loan losses$16,511 $14,458 $13,504 Nonaccrual loans(a) Home Lending(b) 90+ day delinquency rate - Card Services (a)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $84 million, $123 million and $187 million, respectively. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance (b)At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $122 million, $176 million and $258 million, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K75 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K75 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K75 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 75 Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted)202420232022Business MetricsCCB Consumer customers (in millions)84.4 82.1 79.2 CCB Small business customers (in millions)7.0 6.4 5.7 Number of branches4,966 4,897 4,787 Active digital customers (in thousands)(a)70,813 66,983 63,136 Active mobile customers (in thousands)(b)57,821 53,828 49,710 Debit and credit card sales volume$1,805.4 $1,678.6 $1,555.4 Total payments transaction volume (in trillions)(c)6.4 5.9 5.6 Banking & Wealth ManagementAverage deposits$1,049.3 $1,111.7 $1,145.7 Deposit margin2.66 %2.84 %1.71 %Business Banking average loans$19.5 $19.6 $22.3 Business Banking origination volume4.5 4.8 4.3 Client investment assets(d)1,087.6 951.1 647.1 Number of client advisors 5,755 5,456 5,029 Home LendingMortgage origination volume by channelRetail$25.5 $22.4 $38.5 Correspondent 15.3 12.7 26.9 Total mortgage origination volume(e)$40.8 $35.1 $65.4 Third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end)$648.0 $631.2 $584.3 MSR carrying value (period-end)9.1 8.5 8.0 Card ServicesSales volume, excluding commercial card$1,259.3 $1,163.6 $1,064.7 Net revenue rate10.03 %9.72 %9.87 %Net yield on average loans9.73 9.61 9.77 New credit card accounts opened (in millions)10.0 10.0 9.6 AutoLoan and lease origination volume$40.3 $41.3 $30.4 Average auto operating lease assets11.1 10.9 14.3 (a)Users of all web and/or mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days.(b)Users of all mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days.(c)Total payments transaction volume includes debit and credit card sales volume and gross outflows of ACH, ATM, teller, wires, BillPay, PayChase, Zelle, person-to-person and checks. (d)Includes assets invested in managed accounts and J.P. Morgan mutual funds where AWM is the investment manager. Refer to AWM segment results on pages 84–87 for additional information.(e)Firmwide mortgage origination volume was $47.4 billion, $41.4 billion and $81.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted)202420232022Business MetricsCCB Consumer customers (in millions)84.4 82.1 79.2 CCB Small business customers (in millions)7.0 6.4 5.7 Number of branches4,966 4,897 4,787 Active digital customers (in thousands)(a)70,813 66,983 63,136 Active mobile customers (in thousands)(b)57,821 53,828 49,710 Debit and credit card sales volume$1,805.4 $1,678.6 $1,555.4 Total payments transaction volume (in trillions)(c)6.4 5.9 5.6 Banking & Wealth ManagementAverage deposits$1,049.3 $1,111.7 $1,145.7 Deposit margin2.66 %2.84 %1.71 %Business Banking average loans$19.5 $19.6 $22.3 Business Banking origination volume4.5 4.8 4.3 Client investment assets(d)1,087.6 951.1 647.1 Number of client advisors 5,755 5,456 5,029 Home LendingMortgage origination volume by channelRetail$25.5 $22.4 $38.5 Correspondent 15.3 12.7 26.9 Total mortgage origination volume(e)$40.8 $35.1 $65.4 Third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end)$648.0 $631.2 $584.3 MSR carrying value (period-end)9.1 8.5 8.0 Card ServicesSales volume, excluding commercial card$1,259.3 $1,163.6 $1,064.7 Net revenue rate10.03 %9.72 %9.87 %Net yield on average loans9.73 9.61 9.77 New credit card accounts opened (in millions)10.0 10.0 9.6 AutoLoan and lease origination volume$40.3 $41.3 $30.4 Average auto operating lease assets11.1 10.9 14.3 Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31,(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted)202420232022Business MetricsCCB Consumer customers (in millions)84.4 82.1 79.2 CCB Small business customers (in millions)7.0 6.4 5.7 Number of branches4,966 4,897 4,787 Active digital customers (in thousands)(a)70,813 66,983 63,136 Active mobile customers (in thousands)(b)57,821 53,828 49,710 Debit and credit card sales volume$1,805.4 $1,678.6 $1,555.4 Total payments transaction volume (in trillions)(c)6.4 5.9 5.6 Banking & Wealth ManagementAverage deposits$1,049.3 $1,111.7 $1,145.7 Deposit margin2.66 %2.84 %1.71 %Business Banking average loans$19.5 $19.6 $22.3 Business Banking origination volume4.5 4.8 4.3 Client investment assets(d)1,087.6 951.1 647.1 Number of client advisors 5,755 5,456 5,029 Home LendingMortgage origination volume by channelRetail$25.5 $22.4 $38.5 Correspondent 15.3 12.7 26.9 Total mortgage origination volume(e)$40.8 $35.1 $65.4 Third-party mortgage loans serviced (period-end)$648.0 $631.2 $584.3 MSR carrying value (period-end)9.1 8.5 8.0 Card ServicesSales volume, excluding commercial card$1,259.3 $1,163.6 $1,064.7 Net revenue rate10.03 %9.72 %9.87 %Net yield on average loans9.73 9.61 9.77 New credit card accounts opened (in millions)10.0 10.0 9.6 AutoLoan and lease origination volume$40.3 $41.3 $30.4 Average auto operating lease assets11.1 10.9 14.3 CCB Consumer customers (in millions) CCB Small business customers (in millions) Active digital customers (in thousands)(a) Active mobile customers (in thousands)(b) Debit and credit card sales volume Total payments transaction volume (in trillions)(c) Business Banking average loans Business Banking origination volume Client investment assets(d)

MSR carrying value (period-end) Net yield on average loans New credit card accounts opened (in millions) Loan and lease origination volume Average auto operating lease assets (a)Users of all web and/or mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days.(b)Users of all mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days.(c)Total payments transaction volume includes debit and credit card sales volume and gross outflows of ACH, ATM, teller, wires, BillPay, PayChase, Zelle, person-to-person and checks. (d)Includes assets invested in managed accounts and J.P. Morgan mutual funds where AWM is the investment manager. Refer to AWM segment results on pages 84–87 for additional information.(e)Firmwide mortgage origination volume was $47.4 billion, $41.4 billion and $81.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (a)Users of all web and/or mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days. (b)Users of all mobile platforms who have logged in within the past 90 days. (c)Total payments transaction volume includes debit and credit card sales volume and gross outflows of ACH, ATM, teller, wires, BillPay, PayChase, Zelle, person-to-person and checks. (d)Includes assets invested in managed accounts and J.P. Morgan mutual funds where AWM is the investment manager. Refer to AWM segment results on pages 84–87 for additional information. (e)Firmwide mortgage origination volume was $47.4 billion, $41.4 billion and $81.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. 76JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 76JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 76JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 76 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K COMMERCIAL & INVESTMENT BANK(a) COMMERCIAL & INVESTMENT BANK(a) The Commercial & Investment Bank is comprised of the Banking & Payments and Markets & Securities Services businesses. These businesses offer investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. Banking & Payments offers products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, and loan origination and syndication. Banking & Payments also provides services that enable clients to manage payments globally across liquidity and account solutions, commerce solutions, clearing, trade, and working capital. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, which is a global market-maker across products, including cash and derivative instruments, and also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, lending, prime brokerage, clearing and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian that provides custody, fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products.(a)Reflects the reorganization of the Firm's business segments in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information.Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022RevenueInvestment banking fees$9,116 $6,631 $6,977 Principal transactions24,382 23,794 19,792 Lending- and deposit-related fees3,914 3,423 3,662 Commissions and other fees5,278 4,879 5,113 Card income2,310 2,213 1,934 All other income3,253 2,869 2,060 Noninterest revenue48,253 43,809 39,538 Net interest income21,861 20,544 20,097 Total net revenue(a)70,114 64,353 59,635 Provision for credit losses762 2,091 2,426 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense18,191 17,105 16,214 Noncompensation expense17,162 16,867 15,855 Total noninterest expense35,353 33,972 32,069 Income before income tax expense33,999 28,290 25,140 Income tax expense9,153 8,018 6,002 Net income$24,846 $20,272 $19,138 (a)Included tax equivalent adjustments primarily from income tax credits from investments in alternative energy, affordable housing and new markets, income from tax-exempt securities and loans, and the related amortization and other tax benefits of the investments in alternative energy and affordable housing of $2.8 billion, $4.0 billion and $3.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022Financial ratiosReturn on equity18 %14 %14 %Overhead ratio50 53 54 Compensation expense aspercentage of total net revenue26 27 27 Revenue by businessInvestment Banking$9,636$7,076$7,205Payments18,08517,81813,490Lending7,4706,8965,882Other76107244Total Banking & Payments35,26731,89726,821Fixed Income Markets(a)20,06619,18019,074Equity Markets(a)9,9418,78410,088Securities Services5,0844,7724,488Credit Adjustments & Other(b)(244)(280)(836)Total Markets & Securities Services34,84732,45632,814Total net revenue$70,114 $64,353$59,635 (a)In the fourth quarter of 2024, certain net funding costs that were previously allocated to Fixed Income Markets were reclassified to Equity Markets. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation.(b)Consists primarily of centrally-managed credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”), funding valuation adjustments (“FVA”) on derivatives, other valuation adjustments, and certain components of fair value option elected liabilities, which are primarily reported in principal transactions revenue. Results are presented net of associated hedging activities and net of CVA and FVA amounts allocated to Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Refer to Notes 2, 3 and 24 for additional information. The Commercial & Investment Bank is comprised of the Banking & Payments and Markets & Securities Services businesses. These businesses offer investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. Banking & Payments offers products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, and loan origination and syndication. Banking & Payments also provides services that enable clients to manage payments globally across liquidity and account solutions, commerce solutions, clearing, trade, and working capital. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, which is a global market-maker across products, including cash and derivative instruments, and also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, lending, prime brokerage, clearing and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian that provides custody, fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products.(a)Reflects the reorganization of the Firm's business segments in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information.Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022RevenueInvestment banking fees$9,116 $6,631 $6,977 Principal transactions24,382 23,794 19,792 Lending- and deposit-related fees3,914 3,423 3,662 Commissions and other fees5,278 4,879 5,113 Card income2,310 2,213 1,934 All other income3,253 2,869 2,060 Noninterest revenue48,253 43,809 39,538 Net interest income21,861 20,544 20,097 Total net revenue(a)70,114 64,353 59,635 Provision for credit losses762 2,091 2,426 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense18,191 17,105 16,214 Noncompensation expense17,162 16,867 15,855 Total noninterest expense35,353 33,972 32,069 Income before income tax expense33,999 28,290 25,140 Income tax expense9,153 8,018 6,002 Net income$24,846 $20,272 $19,138 The Commercial & Investment Bank is comprised of the Banking & Payments and Markets & Securities Services businesses. These businesses offer investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. Banking & Payments offers products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, and loan origination and syndication. Banking & Payments also provides services that enable clients to manage payments globally across liquidity and account solutions, commerce solutions, clearing, trade, and working capital. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, which is a global market-maker across products, including cash and derivative instruments, and also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, lending, prime brokerage, clearing and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian that provides custody, fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products. The Commercial & Investment Bank is comprised of the Banking & Payments and Markets & Securities Services businesses. These businesses offer investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. Banking & Payments offers products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, and loan origination and syndication. Banking & Payments also provides services that enable clients to manage payments globally across liquidity and account solutions, commerce solutions, clearing, trade, and working capital. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, which is a global market-maker across products, including cash and derivative instruments, and also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, lending, prime brokerage, clearing and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian that provides custody, fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products. (a)Reflects the reorganization of the Firm's business segments in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information. Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022RevenueInvestment banking fees$9,116 $6,631 $6,977 Principal transactions24,382 23,794 19,792 Lending- and deposit-related fees3,914 3,423 3,662 Commissions and other fees5,278 4,879 5,113 Card income2,310 2,213 1,934 All other income3,253 2,869 2,060 Noninterest revenue48,253 43,809 39,538 Net interest income21,861 20,544 20,097 Total net revenue(a)70,114 64,353 59,635 Provision for credit losses762 2,091 2,426 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense18,191 17,105 16,214 Noncompensation expense17,162 16,867 15,855 Total noninterest expense35,353 33,972 32,069 Income before income tax expense33,999 28,290 25,140 Income tax expense9,153 8,018 6,002 Net income$24,846 $20,272 $19,138

(a)Included tax equivalent adjustments primarily from income tax credits from investments in alternative energy, affordable housing and new markets, income from tax-exempt securities and loans, and the related amortization and other tax benefits of the investments in alternative energy and affordable housing of $2.8 billion, $4.0 billion and $3.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022Financial ratiosReturn on equity18 %14 %14 %Overhead ratio50 53 54 Compensation expense aspercentage of total net revenue26 27 27 Revenue by businessInvestment Banking$9,636$7,076$7,205Payments18,08517,81813,490Lending7,4706,8965,882Other76107244Total Banking & Payments35,26731,89726,821Fixed Income Markets(a)20,06619,18019,074Equity Markets(a)9,9418,78410,088Securities Services5,0844,7724,488Credit Adjustments & Other(b)(244)(280)(836)Total Markets & Securities Services34,84732,45632,814Total net revenue$70,114 $64,353$59,635 (a)In the fourth quarter of 2024, certain net funding costs that were previously allocated to Fixed Income Markets were reclassified to Equity Markets. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation.(b)Consists primarily of centrally-managed credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”), funding valuation adjustments (“FVA”) on derivatives, other valuation adjustments, and certain components of fair value option elected liabilities, which are primarily reported in principal transactions revenue. Results are presented net of associated hedging activities and net of CVA and FVA amounts allocated to Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Refer to Notes 2, 3 and 24 for additional information. (a)Included tax equivalent adjustments primarily from income tax credits from investments in alternative energy, affordable housing and new markets, income from tax-exempt securities and loans, and the related amortization and other tax benefits of the investments in alternative energy and affordable housing of $2.8 billion, $4.0 billion and $3.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information. Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022Financial ratiosReturn on equity18 %14 %14 %Overhead ratio50 53 54 Compensation expense aspercentage of total net revenue26 27 27 Revenue by businessInvestment Banking$9,636$7,076$7,205Payments18,08517,81813,490Lending7,4706,8965,882Other76107244Total Banking & Payments35,26731,89726,821Fixed Income Markets(a)20,06619,18019,074Equity Markets(a)9,9418,78410,088Securities Services5,0844,7724,488Credit Adjustments & Other(b)(244)(280)(836)Total Markets & Securities Services34,84732,45632,814Total net revenue$70,114 $64,353$59,635 Compensation expense as percentage of total net revenue Fixed Income Markets(a) Equity Markets(a) Credit Adjustments & Other(b)

Services (a)In the fourth quarter of 2024, certain net funding costs that were previously allocated to Fixed Income Markets were reclassified to Equity Markets. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. (b)Consists primarily of centrally-managed credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”), funding valuation adjustments (“FVA”) on derivatives, other valuation adjustments, and certain components of fair value option elected liabilities, which are primarily reported in principal transactions revenue. Results are presented net of associated hedging activities and net of CVA and FVA amounts allocated to Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Refer to Notes 2, 3 and 24 for additional information. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K77 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K77 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K77 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 77 Banking & Payments Revenue by Client Coverage Segment: (a)Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking provides banking products and services generally to large corporations, financial institutions and merchants. Commercial Banking provides banking products and services generally to middle market clients, including start-ups, small and mid-sized companies, local governments, municipalities, and nonprofits, as well as to commercial real estate clients. Other includes amounts related to credit protection purchased against certain retained loans and lending-related commitments in Lending, the impact of equity investments in Payments and revenues not aligned with a primary client coverage segment.(a)Global Banking is a client coverage view within the Banking & Payments business and is comprised of the Global Corporate Banking, Global Investment Banking and Commercial Banking client coverage segments.

Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking provides banking products and services generally to large corporations, financial institutions and merchants. Commercial Banking provides banking products and services generally to middle market clients, including start-ups, small and mid-sized companies, local governments, municipalities, and nonprofits, as well as to commercial real estate clients. Other includes amounts related to credit protection purchased against certain retained loans and lending-related commitments in Lending, the impact of equity investments in Payments and revenues not aligned with a primary client coverage segment. (a)Global Banking is a client coverage view within the Banking & Payments business and is comprised of the Global Corporate Banking, Global Investment Banking and Commercial Banking client coverage segments. Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Banking & Payments revenue by client coverage segmentGlobal Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$24,549 $21,700 $19,325 Commercial Banking11,487 11,050 7,906 Middle Market Banking7,759 7,740 5,443 Commercial Real Estate Banking3,728 3,310 2,463 Other(769)(853)(410)Total Banking & Payments revenue$35,267 $31,897 $26,821 Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Banking & Payments revenue by client coverage segmentGlobal Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$24,549 $21,700 $19,325 Commercial Banking11,487 11,050 7,906 Middle Market Banking7,759 7,740 5,443 Commercial Real Estate Banking3,728 3,310 2,463 Other(769)(853)(410)Total Banking & Payments revenue$35,267 $31,897 $26,821 Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Banking & Payments revenue by client coverage segmentGlobal Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$24,549 $21,700 $19,325 Commercial Banking11,487 11,050 7,906 Middle Market Banking7,759 7,740 5,443 Commercial Real Estate Banking3,728 3,310 2,463 Other(769)(853)(410)Total Banking & Payments revenue$35,267 $31,897 $26,821 Year ended December 31, (in millions) Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking Commercial Banking Other 78JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 78JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 78JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 78 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 2024 compared with 2023Net income was $24.8 billion, up 23%.Net revenue was $70.1 billion, up 9%.Banking & Payments revenue was $35.3 billion, up 11%.•Investment Banking revenue was $9.6 billion, up 36%. Investment Banking fees were up 37%, driven by higher fees across products. The Firm ranked #1 for Global Investment Banking fees, according to Dealogic.–Debt underwriting fees were $4.1 billion, up 55%, predominantly driven by higher industry-wide issuances in leveraged loans, and in high-grade and high-yield bonds.–Equity underwriting fees were $1.7 billion, up 47%, driven by increased industry-wide fees and wallet share gains in IPOs, and in follow-on and convertible securities offerings.–Advisory fees were $3.3 billion, up 17%, driven by increased industry-wide M&A activity and wallet share gains.•Payments revenue was $18.1 billion, up 1%, driven by fee growth on higher volumes as well as higher average deposits, predominantly offset by deposit margin compression, reflecting higher rates paid, and higher deposit-related client credits. •Lending revenue was $7.5 billion, up 8%, predominantly driven by the impacts of higher rates and the First Republic acquisition.Markets & Securities Services revenue was $34.8 billion, up 7%. Markets revenue was $30.0 billion, up 7%.•Equity Markets revenue was $9.9 billion, up 13%, driven by higher revenue in Equity Derivatives and Prime Finance.•Fixed Income Markets revenue was $20.1 billion, up 5%, driven by higher revenue in the Securitized Products Group, Currencies & Emerging Markets, and Credit, largely offset by lower revenue in Rates and Commodities. •Securities Services revenue was $5.1 billion, up 7%, predominantly driven by fee growth on higher client activity and market levels.•Credit Adjustments & Other was a loss of $244 million, compared with a loss of $280 million in the prior year.Noninterest expense was $35.4 billion, up 4%, driven by higher compensation expense, including revenue-related compensation and an increase in the number of employees, as well as higher technology and brokerage expense partially offset by lower legal expense.The provision for credit losses was $762 million, reflecting: •net charge-offs of $617 million, primarily in Real Estate, largely concentrated in Office, and•a $145 million net addition to the allowance for credit losses, driven by–net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm's modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024, predominantly offset by–changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs predominantly from collateral-dependent loans. The provision in the prior year was $2.1 billion, reflecting a $1.5 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, which included $608 million to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023, and net charge-offs of $588 million. 2024 compared with 2023Net income was $24.8 billion, up 23%.Net revenue was $70.1 billion, up 9%.Banking & Payments revenue was $35.3 billion, up 11%.•Investment Banking revenue was $9.6 billion, up 36%. Investment Banking fees were up 37%, driven by higher fees across products. The Firm ranked #1 for Global Investment Banking fees, according to Dealogic.–Debt underwriting fees were $4.1 billion, up 55%, predominantly driven by higher industry-wide issuances in leveraged loans, and in high-grade and high-yield bonds.–Equity underwriting fees were $1.7 billion, up 47%, driven by increased industry-wide fees and wallet share gains in IPOs, and in follow-on and convertible securities offerings.–Advisory fees were $3.3 billion, up 17%, driven by increased industry-wide M&A activity and wallet share gains.•Payments revenue was $18.1 billion, up 1%, driven by fee growth on higher volumes as well as higher average deposits, predominantly offset by deposit margin compression, reflecting higher rates paid, and higher deposit-related client credits. •Lending revenue was $7.5 billion, up 8%, predominantly driven by the impacts of higher rates and the First Republic acquisition.Markets & Securities Services revenue was $34.8 billion, up 7%. Markets revenue was $30.0 billion, up 7%.•Equity Markets revenue was $9.9 billion, up 13%, driven by higher revenue in Equity Derivatives and Prime Finance.•Fixed Income Markets revenue was $20.1 billion, up 5%, driven by higher revenue in the Securitized Products Group, Currencies & Emerging Markets, and Credit, largely offset by lower revenue in Rates and Commodities. •Securities Services revenue was $5.1 billion, up 7%, predominantly driven by fee growth on higher client activity and market levels.•Credit Adjustments & Other was a loss of $244 million, compared with a loss of $280 million in the prior year.

Net income was $24.8 billion, up 23%. Net revenue was $70.1 billion, up 9%. Banking & Payments revenue was $35.3 billion, up 11%. •Investment Banking revenue was $9.6 billion, up 36%. Investment Banking fees were up 37%, driven by higher fees across products. The Firm ranked #1 for Global Investment Banking fees, according to Dealogic. –Debt underwriting fees were $4.1 billion, up 55%, predominantly driven by higher industry-wide issuances in leveraged loans, and in high-grade and high-yield bonds. –Equity underwriting fees were $1.7 billion, up 47%, driven by increased industry-wide fees and wallet share gains in IPOs, and in follow-on and convertible securities offerings. –Advisory fees were $3.3 billion, up 17%, driven by increased industry-wide M&A activity and wallet share gains. •Payments revenue was $18.1 billion, up 1%, driven by fee growth on higher volumes as well as higher average deposits, predominantly offset by deposit margin compression, reflecting higher rates paid, and higher deposit-related client credits. •Lending revenue was $7.5 billion, up 8%, predominantly driven by the impacts of higher rates and the First Republic acquisition. Markets & Securities Services revenue was $34.8 billion, up 7%. Markets revenue was $30.0 billion, up 7%. •Equity Markets revenue was $9.9 billion, up 13%, driven by higher revenue in Equity Derivatives and Prime Finance. •Fixed Income Markets revenue was $20.1 billion, up 5%, driven by higher revenue in the Securitized Products Group, Currencies & Emerging Markets, and Credit, largely offset by lower revenue in Rates and Commodities. •Securities Services revenue was $5.1 billion, up 7%, predominantly driven by fee growth on higher client activity and market levels. •Credit Adjustments & Other was a loss of $244 million, compared with a loss of $280 million in the prior year. Noninterest expense was $35.4 billion, up 4%, driven by higher compensation expense, including revenue-related compensation and an increase in the number of employees, as well as higher technology and brokerage expense partially offset by lower legal expense.The provision for credit losses was $762 million, reflecting: •net charge-offs of $617 million, primarily in Real Estate, largely concentrated in Office, and•a $145 million net addition to the allowance for credit losses, driven by–net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm's modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024, predominantly offset by–changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs predominantly from collateral-dependent loans. The provision in the prior year was $2.1 billion, reflecting a $1.5 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, which included $608 million to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023, and net charge-offs of $588 million. Noninterest expense was $35.4 billion, up 4%, driven by higher compensation expense, including revenue-related compensation and an increase in the number of employees, as well as higher technology and brokerage expense partially offset by lower legal expense. The provision for credit losses was $762 million, reflecting: •net charge-offs of $617 million, primarily in Real Estate, largely concentrated in Office, and •a $145 million net addition to the allowance for credit losses, driven by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm's modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024, predominantly offset by –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs predominantly from collateral-dependent loans. The provision in the prior year was $2.1 billion, reflecting a $1.5 billion net addition to the allowance for credit losses, which included $608 million to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023, and net charge-offs of $588 million. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K79 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K79 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K79 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 79 Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except employees)202420232022Selected balance sheet data (period-end)Total assets$1,773,194 $1,638,493 $1,591,402 Loans:Loans retained483,043 475,186 421,521 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)40,324 39,464 43,011 Total loans523,367 514,650 464,532 Equity132,000 138,000 128,000 Banking & Payments loans by client coverage segment (period-end)(b)Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$125,083 $128,097 $128,165 Commercial Banking217,674 221,550 180,624 Middle Market Banking72,814 78,043 72,625 Commercial Real Estate Banking144,860 143,507 107,999 Other187 526 122 Total Banking & Payments loans342,944 350,173 308,911 Selected balance sheet data (average)Total assets$1,912,466 $1,716,755 $1,649,358 Trading assets-debt and equity instruments624,032 508,792 405,948 Trading assets-derivative receivables57,028 63,862 77,822 Loans:Loans retained$475,426 $457,886 $395,015 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)43,621 40,891 48,196 Total loans$519,047 $498,777 $443,211 Deposits(c)1,061,488 996,295 1,033,880 Equity132,000 137,507 128,000 Banking & Payments loans by client coverage segment (average)(b)Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$128,142 $131,230 $122,174 Commercial Banking220,285 209,244 173,289 Middle Market Banking75,605 77,130 67,830 Commercial Real Estate Banking144,680 132,114 105,459 Other354 331 168 Total Banking & Payments loans$348,781 $340,805 $295,631 Employees93,231 92,271 88,139 (a)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value primarily reflect lending-related positions originated and purchased in Markets, including loans held for securitization.(b)Refer to page 78 for a description of each of the client coverage segments.(c)In the fourth quarter of 2023, certain deposits associated with First Republic were transferred to CIB from CCB.Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ratios)202420232022Credit data and quality statisticsNet charge-offs/(recoveries)$689 (d)$588 $166 Nonperforming assets:Nonaccrual loans:Nonaccrual loans retained(a)$3,258 $1,675 $1,484 Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(b)1,502 828 848 Total nonaccrual loans4,760 2,503 2,332 Derivative receivables145 364 296 Assets acquired in loan satisfactions213 169 87 Total nonperforming assets$5,118 $3,036 $2,715 Allowance for credit losses:Allowance for loan losses$7,294 $7,326 $5,616 Allowance for lending-related commitments1,976 1,849 2,278 Total allowance for credit losses$9,270 $9,175 $7,894 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(c)0.14 %0.13 %0.04 %Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained1.51 1.54 1.33 Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a)224 437 378 Nonaccrual loans to total period-end loans0.91 0.49 0.50 (a)Allowance for loan losses of $435 million, $251 million and $257 million were held against these nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(b)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $37 million, $59 million and $115 million, respectively.(c)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the net charge-off/(recovery) rate.(d)Includes $72 million related to a purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loan that was charged off in the fourth quarter of 2024. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except employees)202420232022Selected balance sheet data (period-end)Total assets$1,773,194 $1,638,493 $1,591,402 Loans:Loans retained483,043 475,186 421,521 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)40,324 39,464 43,011 Total loans523,367 514,650 464,532 Equity132,000 138,000 128,000 Banking & Payments loans by client coverage segment (period-end)(b)Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$125,083 $128,097 $128,165 Commercial Banking217,674 221,550 180,624 Middle Market Banking72,814 78,043 72,625 Commercial Real Estate Banking144,860 143,507 107,999 Other187 526 122 Total Banking & Payments loans342,944 350,173 308,911 Selected balance sheet data (average)Total assets$1,912,466 $1,716,755 $1,649,358 Trading assets-debt and equity instruments624,032 508,792 405,948 Trading assets-derivative receivables57,028 63,862 77,822 Loans:Loans retained$475,426 $457,886 $395,015 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)43,621 40,891 48,196 Total loans$519,047 $498,777 $443,211 Deposits(c)1,061,488 996,295 1,033,880 Equity132,000 137,507 128,000 Banking & Payments loans by client coverage segment (average)(b)Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$128,142 $131,230 $122,174 Commercial Banking220,285 209,244 173,289 Middle Market Banking75,605 77,130 67,830 Commercial Real Estate Banking144,680 132,114 105,459 Other354 331 168 Total Banking & Payments loans$348,781 $340,805 $295,631 Employees93,231 92,271 88,139 (a)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value primarily reflect lending-related positions originated and purchased in Markets, including loans held for securitization.(b)Refer to page 78 for a description of each of the client coverage segments.(c)In the fourth quarter of 2023, certain deposits associated with First Republic were transferred to CIB from CCB. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except employees)202420232022Selected balance sheet data (period-end)Total assets$1,773,194 $1,638,493 $1,591,402 Loans:Loans retained483,043 475,186 421,521 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)40,324 39,464 43,011 Total loans523,367 514,650 464,532 Equity132,000 138,000 128,000 Banking & Payments loans by client coverage segment (period-end)(b)Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$125,083 $128,097 $128,165 Commercial Banking217,674 221,550 180,624 Middle Market Banking72,814 78,043 72,625 Commercial Real Estate Banking144,860 143,507 107,999 Other187 526 122 Total Banking & Payments loans342,944 350,173 308,911 Selected balance sheet data (average)Total assets$1,912,466 $1,716,755 $1,649,358 Trading assets-debt and equity instruments624,032 508,792 405,948 Trading assets-derivative receivables57,028 63,862 77,822 Loans:Loans retained$475,426 $457,886 $395,015 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)43,621 40,891 48,196 Total loans$519,047 $498,777 $443,211 Deposits(c)1,061,488 996,295 1,033,880 Equity132,000 137,507 128,000 Banking & Payments loans by client coverage segment (average)(b)Global Corporate Banking & Global Investment Banking$128,142 $131,230 $122,174 Commercial Banking220,285 209,244 173,289 Middle Market Banking75,605 77,130 67,830 Commercial Real Estate Banking144,680 132,114 105,459 Other354 331 168 Total Banking & Payments loans$348,781 $340,805 $295,631 Employees93,231 92,271 88,139

Employees (a)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value primarily reflect lending-related positions originated and purchased in Markets, including loans held for securitization. (b)Refer to page 78 for a description of each of the client coverage segments. (c)In the fourth quarter of 2023, certain deposits associated with First Republic were transferred to CIB from CCB. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ratios)202420232022Credit data and quality statisticsNet charge-offs/(recoveries)$689 (d)$588 $166 Nonperforming assets:Nonaccrual loans:Nonaccrual loans retained(a)$3,258 $1,675 $1,484 Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(b)1,502 828 848 Total nonaccrual loans4,760 2,503 2,332 Derivative receivables145 364 296 Assets acquired in loan satisfactions213 169 87 Total nonperforming assets$5,118 $3,036 $2,715 Allowance for credit losses:Allowance for loan losses$7,294 $7,326 $5,616 Allowance for lending-related commitments1,976 1,849 2,278 Total allowance for credit losses$9,270 $9,175 $7,894 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(c)0.14 %0.13 %0.04 %Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained1.51 1.54 1.33 Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a)224 437 378 Nonaccrual loans to total period-end loans0.91 0.49 0.50 (a)Allowance for loan losses of $435 million, $251 million and $257 million were held against these nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.(b)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $37 million, $59 million and $115 million, respectively.(c)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the net charge-off/(recovery) rate.(d)Includes $72 million related to a purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loan that was charged off in the fourth quarter of 2024. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ratios)202420232022Credit data and quality statisticsNet charge-offs/(recoveries)$689 (d)$588 $166 Nonperforming assets:Nonaccrual loans:Nonaccrual loans retained(a)$3,258 $1,675 $1,484 Nonaccrual loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(b)1,502 828 848 Total nonaccrual loans4,760 2,503 2,332 Derivative receivables145 364 296 Assets acquired in loan satisfactions213 169 87 Total nonperforming assets$5,118 $3,036 $2,715 Allowance for credit losses:Allowance for loan losses$7,294 $7,326 $5,616 Allowance for lending-related commitments1,976 1,849 2,278 Total allowance for credit losses$9,270 $9,175 $7,894 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(c)0.14 %0.13 %0.04 %Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained1.51 1.54 1.33 Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a)224 437 378 Nonaccrual loans to total period-end loans0.91 0.49 0.50

Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(c) Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans retained Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans retained(a) (a)Allowance for loan losses of $435 million, $251 million and $257 million were held against these nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (b)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $37 million, $59 million and $115 million, respectively. (c)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the net charge-off/(recovery) rate. (d)Includes $72 million related to a purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loan that was charged off in the fourth quarter of 2024. 80JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 80JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 80JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 80 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Investment banking feesYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Advisory$3,290 $2,814 $3,051 Equity underwriting1,692 1,151 1,034 Debt underwriting(a)4,134 2,666 2,892 Total investment banking fees$9,116 $6,631 $6,977 Investment banking feesYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Advisory$3,290 $2,814 $3,051 Equity underwriting1,692 1,151 1,034 Debt underwriting(a)4,134 2,666 2,892 Total investment banking fees$9,116 $6,631 $6,977 Investment banking feesYear ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Advisory$3,290 $2,814 $3,051 Equity underwriting1,692 1,151 1,034 Debt underwriting(a)4,134 2,666 2,892 Total investment banking fees$9,116 $6,631 $6,977 Year ended December 31, (in millions) Advisory Equity underwriting Debt underwriting(a)

(a)Represents long-term debt and loan syndications. League table results – wallet share202420232022Year ended December 31,RankShareRankShareRankShareBased on fees(a)M&A(b)Global#1 9.6 %#2 9.0 %#2 7.9 %U.S.1 11.4 2 10.9 2 8.9 Equity and equity-related(c)Global1 11.0 1 7.7 2 5.7 U.S.1 14.7 1 14.4 1 14.0 Long-term debt(d)Global1 7.6 1 7.0 1 6.9 U.S.1 11.4 1 10.9 1 12.1 Loan syndicationsGlobal1 10.2 1 11.9 1 11.0 U.S.1 11.8 1 15.1 1 12.9 Global investment banking fees(e)#1 9.3 %#1 8.6 %#1 7.8 % Based on fees(a) M&A(b) Global U.S.

(a)Source: Dealogic as of January 2, 2025. Reflects the ranking of revenue wallet and market share. (b)Global M&A excludes any withdrawn transactions. U.S. M&A revenue wallet represents wallet from client parents based in the U.S. (c)Global equity and equity-related ranking includes rights offerings and Chinese A-Shares. (d)Long-term debt rankings include investment-grade, high-yield, supranationals, sovereigns, agencies, covered bonds, asset-backed securities ("ABS") and mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"); and exclude money market, short-term debt and U.S. municipal securities. (e)Global investment banking fees exclude money market, short-term debt and shelf securities.

The following table summarizes selected income statement data for the Markets businesses. Markets includes both Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Markets revenue consists of principal transactions, fees, commissions and other income, as well as net interest income. The Firm assesses its Markets business performance on a total revenue basis, as offsets generally occur across revenue line items. For example, securities that generate net interest income may be risk-managed by derivatives that are reflected at fair value in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Notes 6 and 7 for a description of the composition of these income statement line items. Principal transactions reflects revenue on financial instruments and commodities transactions that arise from client-driven market-making activity. Principal transactions revenue includes amounts recognized upon executing new transactions with market participants, as well as “inventory-related revenue,” which is revenue recognized from gains and losses on derivatives and other instruments that the Firm has been holding in anticipation of, or in response to, client demand, and changes in the fair value of instruments used by the Firm to actively manage the risk exposure arising from such inventory. Principal transactions revenue recognized upon executing new transactions with market participants is affected by many factors including the level of client activity, the bid-offer spread (which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa), market liquidity and volatility. These factors are interrelated and sensitive to the same factors that drive inventory-related revenue, which include general market conditions, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, and equity and commodity prices, as well as other macroeconomic conditions. The following table summarizes selected income statement data for the Markets businesses. Markets includes both Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Markets revenue consists of principal transactions, fees, commissions and other income, as well as net interest income. The Firm assesses its Markets business performance on a total revenue basis, as offsets generally occur across revenue line items. For example, securities that generate net interest income may be risk-managed by derivatives that are reflected at fair value in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Notes 6 and 7 for a description of the composition of these income statement line items. Principal transactions reflects revenue on financial instruments and commodities transactions that arise from client-driven market-making activity. Principal transactions revenue includes amounts recognized upon executing new transactions with market participants, as well as “inventory-related revenue,” which is revenue recognized from gains and losses on derivatives and other instruments that the Firm has been holding in anticipation of, or in response to, client demand, and changes in the fair value of instruments The following table summarizes selected income statement data for the Markets businesses. Markets includes both Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Markets revenue consists of principal transactions, fees, commissions and other income, as well as net interest income. The Firm assesses its Markets business performance on a total revenue basis, as offsets generally occur across revenue line items. For example, securities that generate net interest income may be risk-managed by derivatives that are reflected at fair value in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Notes 6 and 7 for a description of the composition of these income statement line items. Principal transactions reflects revenue on financial instruments and commodities transactions that arise from client-driven market-making activity. Principal transactions revenue includes amounts recognized upon executing new transactions with market participants, as well as “inventory-related revenue,” which is revenue recognized from gains and losses on derivatives and other instruments that the Firm has been holding in anticipation of, or in response to, client demand, and changes in the fair value of instruments used by the Firm to actively manage the risk exposure arising from such inventory. Principal transactions revenue recognized upon executing new transactions with market participants is affected by many factors including the level of client activity, the bid-offer spread (which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa), market liquidity and volatility. These factors are interrelated and sensitive to the same factors that drive inventory-related revenue, which include general market conditions, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, and equity and commodity prices, as well as other macroeconomic conditions. used by the Firm to actively manage the risk exposure arising from such inventory. Principal transactions revenue recognized upon executing new transactions with market participants is affected by many factors including the level of client activity, the bid-offer spread (which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa), market liquidity and volatility. These factors are interrelated and sensitive to the same factors that drive inventory-related revenue, which include general market conditions, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, credit spreads, and equity and commodity prices, as well as other macroeconomic conditions. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K81 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K81 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K81 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 81 For the periods presented below, the primary source of principal transactions revenue was the amount recognized upon executing new transactions. 202420232022Year ended December 31, (in millions, except where otherwise noted)Fixed Income MarketsEquity MarketsTotal MarketsFixed Income Markets(c)Equity Markets(c)Total MarketsFixed Income Markets(c)Equity Markets(c)Total MarketsPrincipal transactions$10,603 $13,526 $24,129 $13,198 $10,380 $23,578 $12,244 $8,284 $20,528 Lending- and deposit-related fees391 100 491 307 40 347 303 22 325 Commissions and other fees605 2,086 2,691 596 1,908 2,504 550 1,975 2,525 All other income2,120 (65)2,055 1,908 (79)1,829 1,083 (88)995 Noninterest revenue13,719 15,647 29,366 16,009 12,249 28,258 14,180 10,193 24,373 Net interest income(a)6,347 (5,706)641 3,171 (3,465)(294)4,894 (105)4,789 Total net revenue$20,066 $9,941 $30,007 $19,180 $8,784 $27,964 $19,074 $10,088 $29,162 Loss days(b)127 Fixed Income Markets(c) Equity Markets(c) Fixed Income Markets(c) Equity Markets(c) Principal transactions Net interest income(a)

(a)The decline in Equity Markets net interest income was driven by higher funding costs. (b)Markets consists of Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets. Loss days represent the number of days for which Markets recorded losses in total net revenue, which includes revenue related to both trading and non-trading positions. The loss days determined under this measure differ from the measure used to determine backtesting gains and losses. Daily backtesting gains and losses include positions in the Firm’s Risk Management value-at-risk ("VaR") measure and exclude certain components of total net revenue, which may more than offset backtesting gains or losses on a particular day. For more information on daily backtesting gains and losses, refer to the VaR discussion on pages 143–145. (c)In the fourth quarter of 2024, certain net funding costs that were previously allocated to Fixed Income Markets were reclassified to Equity Markets. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except where otherwise noted)202420232022Assets under custody ("AUC") by asset class (period-end) (in billions):Fixed Income$16,409 $15,543 $14,361 Equity14,848 12,927 10,748 Other(a)4,023 3,922 3,526 Total AUC$35,280 $32,392 $28,635 Client deposits and other third-party liabilities (average)(b)$961,646 $912,859 $981,653 Other(a) Client deposits and other third-party liabilities (average)(b) (a)Consists of mutual funds, unit investment trusts, currencies, annuities, insurance contracts, options and other contracts. (b)Client deposits and other third-party liabilities pertain to the Payments and Securities Services businesses. 82JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 82JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 82JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 82 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K International metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except where otherwise noted)202420232022Total net revenue(a)Europe/Middle East/Africa$15,191 $14,418 $15,716 Asia-Pacific8,867 7,891 8,043 Latin America/Caribbean2,427 2,161 2,288 Total international net revenue26,485 24,470 26,047 North America43,629 39,883 33,588 Total net revenue$70,114 $64,353 $59,635 Loans retained (period-end)(a)Europe/Middle East/Africa$44,374 $44,793 $40,715 Asia-Pacific16,107 15,506 16,764 Latin America/Caribbean10,331 8,610 8,866 Total international loans70,812 68,909 66,345 North America412,231 406,277 355,176 Total loans retained$483,043 $475,186 $421,521 Client deposits and other third-party liabilities (average)(b)Europe/Middle East/Africa$264,227 $247,804 $265,061 Asia-Pacific141,042 135,388 136,539 Latin America/Caribbean42,716 39,861 40,531 Total international$447,985 $423,053 $442,131 North America513,661 489,806 539,522 Total client deposits and other third-party liabilities$961,646 $912,859 $981,653 AUC (period-end)(b)(in billions)North America$23,845 $21,792 $19,219 All other regions11,435 10,600 9,416 Total AUC$35,280 $32,392 $28,635

(a)Total net revenue and loans retained (excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value) are based on the location of the trading desk, booking location, or domicile of the client, as applicable. (b)Client deposits and other third-party liabilities pertaining to the Payments and Securities Services businesses, and AUC, are based on the domicile of the client or booking location, as applicable. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K83 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K83 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K83 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 83 ASSET & WEALTH MANAGEMENT Asset & Wealth Management, with client assets of $5.9 trillion, is a global leader in investment and wealth management. Asset Management Offers multi-asset investment management solutions across equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market funds to institutional and retail investors providing for a broad range of clients’ investment needs.Global Private BankProvides retirement products and services, brokerage, custody, estate planning, lending, deposits and investment management to high net worth clients.The majority of AWM’s client assets are in actively managed portfolios.Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022RevenueAsset management fees$13,693 $11,826 $11,510 Commissions and other fees874 697 $662 All other income456 (a)1,037 (a)(b)335 Noninterest revenue15,023 13,560 12,507 Net interest income6,555 6,267 5,241 Total net revenue21,578 19,827 17,748 Provision for credit losses(68)159 128 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense7,984 7,115 6,336 Noncompensation expense6,430 5,665 5,493 Total noninterest expense14,414 12,780 11,829 Income before income tax expense7,232 6,888 5,791 Income tax expense1,811 1,661 1,426 Net income$5,421 $5,227 $4,365 Revenue by line of businessAsset Management $10,175 $9,129 $8,818 Global Private Bank11,403 10,698 8,930 Total net revenue$21,578 $19,827 $17,748 Financial ratiosReturn on equity34 %31 %25 %Overhead ratio67 64 67 Pre-tax margin ratio:Asset Management31 31 30 Global Private Bank35 38 35 Asset & Wealth Management34 35 33 (a)Includes the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic. The discount is deferred in other liabilities and recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period and was largely recognized in 2023 as the commitments were generally short term. Refer to Note 34 for additional information.(b)Includes the gain on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in the entity.2024 compared with 2023Net income was $5.4 billion, up 4%.Net revenue was $21.6 billion, up 9%. Net interest income was $6.6 billion, up 5%. Noninterest revenue was $15.0 billion, up 11%.Revenue from Asset Management was $10.2 billion, up 11%, driven by: •higher asset management fees, reflecting higher average market levels and strong net inflows, as well as•higher performance fees.The prior year included a gain of $339 million on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in the entity.Revenue from Global Private Bank was $11.4 billion, up 7%, driven by: •higher noninterest revenue, reflecting:–higher management fees on strong net inflows and higher average market levels, as well as higher brokerage fees, partially offset by–a decline in the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic that have expired, and•higher net interest income driven by:–higher average deposits associated with First Republic, which were transferred to AWM from CCB in the fourth quarter of 2023, as well as wider spreads on loans and higher average loans, largely offset by–deposit margin compression reflecting higher rates paid.The prior year included net investment valuation losses. Noninterest expense was $14.4 billion, up 13%, predominantly driven by:•higher compensation, including revenue-related compensation, and continued growth in private banking advisor teams, and•higher distribution fees and legal expense,The provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $68 million. The provision in the prior year was $159 million, reflecting a $146 million addition to the allowance for credit losses to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023. Asset & Wealth Management, with client assets of $5.9 trillion, is a global leader in investment and wealth management. Asset Management Offers multi-asset investment management solutions across equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market funds to institutional and retail investors providing for a broad range of clients’ investment needs.Global Private BankProvides retirement products and services, brokerage, custody, estate planning, lending, deposits and investment management to high net worth clients.The majority of AWM’s client assets are in actively managed portfolios.Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022RevenueAsset management fees$13,693 $11,826 $11,510 Commissions and other fees874 697 $662 All other income456 (a)1,037 (a)(b)335 Noninterest revenue15,023 13,560 12,507 Net interest income6,555 6,267 5,241 Total net revenue21,578 19,827 17,748 Provision for credit losses(68)159 128 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense7,984 7,115 6,336 Noncompensation expense6,430 5,665 5,493 Total noninterest expense14,414 12,780 11,829 Income before income tax expense7,232 6,888 5,791 Income tax expense1,811 1,661 1,426 Net income$5,421 $5,227 $4,365 Revenue by line of businessAsset Management $10,175 $9,129 $8,818 Global Private Bank11,403 10,698 8,930 Total net revenue$21,578 $19,827 $17,748 Financial ratiosReturn on equity34 %31 %25 %Overhead ratio67 64 67 Pre-tax margin ratio:Asset Management31 31 30 Global Private Bank35 38 35 Asset & Wealth Management34 35 33 (a)Includes the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic. The discount is deferred in other liabilities and recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period and was largely recognized in 2023 as the commitments were generally short term. Refer to Note 34 for additional information.(b)Includes the gain on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in the entity.

Selected income statement dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)202420232022RevenueAsset management fees$13,693 $11,826 $11,510 Commissions and other fees874 697 $662 All other income456 (a)1,037 (a)(b)335 Noninterest revenue15,023 13,560 12,507 Net interest income6,555 6,267 5,241 Total net revenue21,578 19,827 17,748 Provision for credit losses(68)159 128 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense7,984 7,115 6,336 Noncompensation expense6,430 5,665 5,493 Total noninterest expense14,414 12,780 11,829 Income before income tax expense7,232 6,888 5,791 Income tax expense1,811 1,661 1,426 Net income$5,421 $5,227 $4,365 Revenue by line of businessAsset Management $10,175 $9,129 $8,818 Global Private Bank11,403 10,698 8,930 Total net revenue$21,578 $19,827 $17,748 Financial ratiosReturn on equity34 %31 %25 %Overhead ratio67 64 67 Pre-tax margin ratio:Asset Management31 31 30 Global Private Bank35 38 35 Asset & Wealth Management34 35 33 (a) (a)(b) (a)Includes the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic. The discount is deferred in other liabilities and recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period and was largely recognized in 2023 as the commitments were generally short term. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. (b)Includes the gain on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in the entity. 2024 compared with 2023Net income was $5.4 billion, up 4%.Net revenue was $21.6 billion, up 9%. Net interest income was $6.6 billion, up 5%. Noninterest revenue was $15.0 billion, up 11%.Revenue from Asset Management was $10.2 billion, up 11%, driven by: •higher asset management fees, reflecting higher average market levels and strong net inflows, as well as•higher performance fees.The prior year included a gain of $339 million on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in the entity.Revenue from Global Private Bank was $11.4 billion, up 7%, driven by: •higher noninterest revenue, reflecting:–higher management fees on strong net inflows and higher average market levels, as well as higher brokerage fees, partially offset by–a decline in the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic that have expired, and•higher net interest income driven by:–higher average deposits associated with First Republic, which were transferred to AWM from CCB in the fourth quarter of 2023, as well as wider spreads on loans and higher average loans, largely offset by–deposit margin compression reflecting higher rates paid.The prior year included net investment valuation losses. Noninterest expense was $14.4 billion, up 13%, predominantly driven by:•higher compensation, including revenue-related compensation, and continued growth in private banking advisor teams, and•higher distribution fees and legal expense,The provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $68 million. The provision in the prior year was $159 million, reflecting a $146 million addition to the allowance for credit losses to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023.

Net income was $5.4 billion, up 4%. Net revenue was $21.6 billion, up 9%. Net interest income was $6.6 billion, up 5%. Noninterest revenue was $15.0 billion, up 11%. Revenue from Asset Management was $10.2 billion, up 11%, driven by: •higher asset management fees, reflecting higher average market levels and strong net inflows, as well as •higher performance fees. The prior year included a gain of $339 million on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in the entity. Revenue from Global Private Bank was $11.4 billion, up 7%, driven by: •higher noninterest revenue, reflecting: –higher management fees on strong net inflows and higher average market levels, as well as higher brokerage fees, partially offset by –a decline in the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic that have expired, and •higher net interest income driven by: –higher average deposits associated with First Republic, which were transferred to AWM from CCB in the fourth quarter of 2023, as well as wider spreads on loans and higher average loans, largely offset by –deposit margin compression reflecting higher rates paid. The prior year included net investment valuation losses. Noninterest expense was $14.4 billion, up 13%, predominantly driven by: •higher compensation, including revenue-related compensation, and continued growth in private banking advisor teams, and •higher distribution fees and legal expense, The provision for credit losses was a net benefit of $68 million. The provision in the prior year was $159 million, reflecting a $146 million addition to the allowance for credit losses to establish the allowance for the First Republic loans and lending-related commitments in the second quarter of 2023. 84JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 84JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 84JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 84 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Asset Management has two high-level measures of its overall fund performance.• Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds rated 4- or 5-star: Mutual fund rating services rank funds based on their risk adjusted performance over various periods. A 5-star rating is the best rating and represents the top 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 4-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 3-star rating represents the next 35% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 2-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 1-star rating is the worst rating and represents the bottom 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. An overall Morningstar rating is derived from a weighted average of the performance associated with a fund’s three-, five and ten- year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. For U.S.-domiciled funds, separate star ratings are provided at the individual share class level. The Nomura “star rating” is based on three-year risk-adjusted performance only. Funds with fewer than three years of history are not rated and hence excluded from these rankings. All ratings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the applicable fund rating provider. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on star ratings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, and at a “primary share class” level to represent the star rating of all other funds, except for Japan, for which Nomura provides ratings at the fund level. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.• Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds ranked in the 1st or 2nd quartile (one, three and five years):All quartile rankings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the fund rating providers. Quartile rankings are based on the net-of-fee absolute return of each fund. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on fund performance and associated peer rankings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, at a “primary share class” level to represent the quartile ranking for U.K., Luxembourg and Hong Kong SAR funds and at the fund level for all other funds. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.“Primary share class” means the C share class for European funds and Acc share class for Hong Kong SAR and Taiwan funds. If these share classes are not available, the oldest share class is used as the primary share class.Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ranking data, ratios and employees)202420232022% of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs rated as 4- or 5-star(a)69 %69 %73 %% of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs ranked in 1st or 2nd quartile:(b)1 year73 40 68 3 years75 67 76 5 years77 71 81 Selected balance sheet data (period-end)(c)Total assets$255,385 $245,512 $232,037 Loans236,303 227,929 214,006 Deposits248,287 233,232 (d)233,130 Equity15,500 17,000 17,000 Selected balance sheet data (average)(c)Total assets$246,254 $240,222 $232,438 Loans227,676 220,487 215,582 Deposits235,146 216,178 (d)261,489 Equity15,500 16,671 17,000 Employees29,40328,48526,041Number of Global Private Bank client advisors3,7753,5153,137Credit data and quality statistics(c)Net charge-offs/(recoveries)$21 $13 $(7)Nonaccrual loans700 650 459 Allowance for credit losses:Allowance for loan losses$539 $633 $494 Allowance for lending-related commitments35 28 20 Total allowance for credit losses$574 $661 $514 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate0.01 %0.01 %— %Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans0.23 0.28 0.23 Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans77 97 108 Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans0.30 0.29 0.21 (a)Represents the Morningstar Rating for all domiciled funds except for Japan domiciled funds which use Nomura. Includes only Asset Management retail active open-ended mutual funds and active ETFs that have a rating. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil domiciled funds. Asset Management has two high-level measures of its overall fund performance.• Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds rated 4- or 5-star: Mutual fund rating services rank funds based on their risk adjusted performance over various periods. A 5-star rating is the best rating and represents the top 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 4-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 3-star rating represents the next 35% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 2-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 1-star rating is the worst rating and represents the bottom 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. An overall Morningstar rating is derived from a weighted average of the performance associated with a fund’s three-, five and ten- year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. For U.S.-domiciled funds, separate star ratings are provided at the individual share class level. The Nomura “star rating” is based on three-year risk-adjusted performance only. Funds with fewer than three years of history are not rated and hence excluded from these rankings. All ratings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the applicable fund rating provider. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on star ratings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, and at a “primary share class” level to represent the star rating of all other funds, except for Japan, for which Nomura provides ratings at the fund level. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.• Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds ranked in the 1st or 2nd quartile (one, three and five years):All quartile rankings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the fund rating providers. Quartile rankings are based on the net-of-fee absolute return of each fund. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on fund performance and associated peer rankings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, at a “primary share class” level to represent the quartile ranking for U.K., Luxembourg and Hong Kong SAR funds and at the fund level for all other funds. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.“Primary share class” means the C share class for European funds and Acc share class for Hong Kong SAR and Taiwan funds. If these share classes are not available, the oldest share class is used as the primary share class. Asset Management has two high-level measures of its overall fund performance.• Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds rated 4- or 5-star: Mutual fund rating services rank funds based on their risk adjusted performance over various periods. A 5-star rating is the best rating and represents the top 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 4-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 3-star rating represents the next 35% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 2-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 1-star rating is the worst rating and represents the bottom 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. An overall Morningstar rating is derived from a weighted average of the performance associated with a fund’s three-, five and ten- year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. For U.S.-domiciled funds, separate star ratings are provided at the individual share class level. The Nomura “star rating” is based on three-year risk-adjusted performance only. Funds with fewer than three years of history are not rated and hence excluded from these rankings. All ratings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the applicable fund rating provider. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on star ratings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, and at a “primary share class” level to represent the star rating of all other funds, except for Japan, for which Nomura provides ratings at the fund level. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.• Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds ranked in the 1st or 2nd quartile (one, three and five years):All quartile rankings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the fund rating providers. Quartile rankings are based on the net-of-fee absolute return of each fund. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on fund performance and associated peer rankings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, at a “primary share class” level to represent the quartile ranking for U.K., Luxembourg and Hong Kong SAR funds and at the fund level for all other funds. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results.“Primary share class” means the C share class for European funds and Acc share class for Hong Kong SAR and Taiwan funds. If these share classes are not available, the oldest share class is used as the primary share class. • Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds rated 4- or 5-star: Mutual fund rating services rank funds based on their risk adjusted performance over various periods. A 5-star rating is the best rating and represents the top 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 4-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 3-star rating represents the next 35% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 2-star rating represents the next 22.5% of industry-wide ranked funds. A 1-star rating is the worst rating and represents the bottom 10% of industry-wide ranked funds. An overall Morningstar rating is derived from a weighted average of the performance associated with a fund’s three-, five and ten- year (if applicable) Morningstar Rating metrics. For U.S.-domiciled funds, separate star ratings are provided at the individual share class level. The Nomura “star rating” is based on three-year risk-adjusted performance only. Funds with fewer than three years of history are not rated and hence excluded from these rankings. All ratings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the applicable fund rating provider. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on star ratings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, and at a “primary share class” level to represent the star rating of all other funds, except for Japan, for which Nomura provides ratings at the fund level. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results. • Percentage of active mutual fund and active ETF assets under management in funds ranked in the 1st or 2nd quartile (one, three and five years):All quartile rankings, the assigned peer categories and the asset values used to derive these rankings are sourced from the fund rating providers. Quartile rankings are based on the net-of-fee absolute return of each fund. Where applicable, the fund rating providers redenominate asset values into U.S. dollars. The percentage of AUM is based on fund performance and associated peer rankings at the share class level for U.S.-domiciled funds, at a “primary share class” level to represent the quartile ranking for U.K., Luxembourg and Hong Kong SAR funds and at the fund level for all other funds. The performance data may have been different if all share classes had been included. Past performance is not indicative of future results. “Primary share class” means the C share class for European funds and Acc share class for Hong Kong SAR and Taiwan funds. If these share classes are not available, the oldest share class is used as the primary share class. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ranking data, ratios and employees)202420232022% of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs rated as 4- or 5-star(a)69 %69 %73 %% of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs ranked in 1st or 2nd quartile:(b)1 year73 40 68 3 years75 67 76 5 years77 71 81 Selected balance sheet data (period-end)(c)Total assets$255,385 $245,512 $232,037 Loans236,303 227,929 214,006 Deposits248,287 233,232 (d)233,130 Equity15,500 17,000 17,000 Selected balance sheet data (average)(c)Total assets$246,254 $240,222 $232,438 Loans227,676 220,487 215,582 Deposits235,146 216,178 (d)261,489 Equity15,500 16,671 17,000 Employees29,40328,48526,041Number of Global Private Bank client advisors3,7753,5153,137Credit data and quality statistics(c)Net charge-offs/(recoveries)$21 $13 $(7)Nonaccrual loans700 650 459 Allowance for credit losses:Allowance for loan losses$539 $633 $494 Allowance for lending-related commitments35 28 20 Total allowance for credit losses$574 $661 $514 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate0.01 %0.01 %— %Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans0.23 0.28 0.23 Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans77 97 108 Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans0.30 0.29 0.21 (a)Represents the Morningstar Rating for all domiciled funds except for Japan domiciled funds which use Nomura. Includes only Asset Management retail active open-ended mutual funds and active ETFs that have a rating. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil domiciled funds. Selected metricsAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ranking data, ratios and employees)202420232022% of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs rated as 4- or 5-star(a)69 %69 %73 %% of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs ranked in 1st or 2nd quartile:(b)1 year73 40 68 3 years75 67 76 5 years77 71 81 Selected balance sheet data (period-end)(c)Total assets$255,385 $245,512 $232,037 Loans236,303 227,929 214,006 Deposits248,287 233,232 (d)233,130 Equity15,500 17,000 17,000 Selected balance sheet data (average)(c)Total assets$246,254 $240,222 $232,438 Loans227,676 220,487 215,582 Deposits235,146 216,178 (d)261,489 Equity15,500 16,671 17,000 Employees29,40328,48526,041Number of Global Private Bank client advisors3,7753,5153,137Credit data and quality statistics(c)Net charge-offs/(recoveries)$21 $13 $(7)Nonaccrual loans700 650 459 Allowance for credit losses:Allowance for loan losses$539 $633 $494 Allowance for lending-related commitments35 28 20 Total allowance for credit losses$574 $661 $514 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate0.01 %0.01 %— %Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans0.23 0.28 0.23 Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans77 97 108 Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans0.30 0.29 0.21 As of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ranking data, ratios and employees) % of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs rated as 4- or 5-star(a) % of JPM mutual fund assets and ETFs ranked in 1st or 2nd quartile:(b)

Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans Nonaccrual loans to period-end loans (a)Represents the Morningstar Rating for all domiciled funds except for Japan domiciled funds which use Nomura. Includes only Asset Management retail active open-ended mutual funds and active ETFs that have a rating. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil domiciled funds. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K85 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K85 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K85 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 85 (b)Quartile ranking sourced from Morningstar, Lipper and Nomura based on country of domicile. Includes only Asset Management retail active open-ended mutual funds and active ETFs that are ranked by the aforementioned sources. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil domiciled funds.(c)Loans, deposits and related credit data and quality statistics relate to the Global Private Bank business.(d)In the fourth quarter of 2023, certain deposits associated with First Republic were transferred to AWM from CCB.Client assets2024 compared with 2023Assets under management were $4.0 trillion and client assets were $5.9 trillion, each up 18%, driven by continued net inflows and higher market levels.Client assetsDecember 31, (in billions)202420232022Assets by asset classLiquidity$1,083 $926 $654 Fixed income851 751 638 Equity1,128 868 670 Multi-asset764 680 603 Alternatives219 197 201 Total assets under management4,045 3,422 2,766 Custody/brokerage/administration/deposits1,887 1,590 1,282 Total client assets(a)$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 Assets by client segmentPrivate Banking$1,234 $974 $751 Global Institutional1,692 1,488 1,252 Global Funds1,119 960 763 Total assets under management$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Private Banking$2,974 $2,452 $1,964 Global Institutional1,820 1,594 1,314 Global Funds1,138 966 770 Total client assets(a)$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 (a)Includes CCB client investment assets invested in managed accounts and J.P. Morgan mutual funds where AWM is the investment manager.Client assets (continued)Year ended December 31,(in billions)202420232022Assets under management rollforwardBeginning balance$3,422 $2,766 $3,113 Net asset flows:Liquidity140 242 (55)Fixed income91 70 13 Equity114 70 35 Multi-asset19 1 (9)Alternatives10 (1)8 Market/performance/other impacts249 274 (339)Ending balance, December 31$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Client assets rollforwardBeginning balance$5,012 $4,048 $4,295 Net asset flows486 490 49 Market/performance/other impacts434 474 (296)Ending balance, December 31$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 Selected MetricsAs of December 31,20242023ChangeFirmwide Wealth ManagementClient assets (in billions)(a)$3,756 $3,177 18 %Number of client advisors9,530 8,971 6 Stock Plan Administration(b)Number of stock plan participants (in thousands)1,327 974 36 Client assets (in billions)$270 $230 17 %(a) Consists of Global Private Bank in AWM and client investment assets in J.P. Morgan Wealth Management in CCB.(b)Relates to an equity plan administration business which was acquired in 2022 with the Firm’s purchase of Global Shares. The increase in 2024 includes the impact of onboarding participants in the Firm’s employee stock plans during the fourth quarter of 2024. (b)Quartile ranking sourced from Morningstar, Lipper and Nomura based on country of domicile. Includes only Asset Management retail active open-ended mutual funds and active ETFs that are ranked by the aforementioned sources. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil domiciled funds.(c)Loans, deposits and related credit data and quality statistics relate to the Global Private Bank business.(d)In the fourth quarter of 2023, certain deposits associated with First Republic were transferred to AWM from CCB.Client assets2024 compared with 2023Assets under management were $4.0 trillion and client assets were $5.9 trillion, each up 18%, driven by continued net inflows and higher market levels.Client assetsDecember 31, (in billions)202420232022Assets by asset classLiquidity$1,083 $926 $654 Fixed income851 751 638 Equity1,128 868 670 Multi-asset764 680 603 Alternatives219 197 201 Total assets under management4,045 3,422 2,766 Custody/brokerage/administration/deposits1,887 1,590 1,282 Total client assets(a)$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 Assets by client segmentPrivate Banking$1,234 $974 $751 Global Institutional1,692 1,488 1,252 Global Funds1,119 960 763 Total assets under management$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Private Banking$2,974 $2,452 $1,964 Global Institutional1,820 1,594 1,314 Global Funds1,138 966 770 Total client assets(a)$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 (a)Includes CCB client investment assets invested in managed accounts and J.P. Morgan mutual funds where AWM is the investment manager. (b)Quartile ranking sourced from Morningstar, Lipper and Nomura based on country of domicile. Includes only Asset Management retail active open-ended mutual funds and active ETFs that are ranked by the aforementioned sources. Excludes money market funds, Undiscovered Managers Fund, and Brazil domiciled funds. (c)Loans, deposits and related credit data and quality statistics relate to the Global Private Bank business. (d)In the fourth quarter of 2023, certain deposits associated with First Republic were transferred to AWM from CCB.

Assets under management were $4.0 trillion and client assets were $5.9 trillion, each up 18%, driven by continued net inflows and higher market levels. Client assetsDecember 31, (in billions)202420232022Assets by asset classLiquidity$1,083 $926 $654 Fixed income851 751 638 Equity1,128 868 670 Multi-asset764 680 603 Alternatives219 197 201 Total assets under management4,045 3,422 2,766 Custody/brokerage/administration/deposits1,887 1,590 1,282 Total client assets(a)$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 Assets by client segmentPrivate Banking$1,234 $974 $751 Global Institutional1,692 1,488 1,252 Global Funds1,119 960 763 Total assets under management$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Private Banking$2,974 $2,452 $1,964 Global Institutional1,820 1,594 1,314 Global Funds1,138 966 770 Total client assets(a)$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 Custody/brokerage/ administration/deposits

(a)Includes CCB client investment assets invested in managed accounts and J.P. Morgan mutual funds where AWM is the investment manager. Client assets (continued)Year ended December 31,(in billions)202420232022Assets under management rollforwardBeginning balance$3,422 $2,766 $3,113 Net asset flows:Liquidity140 242 (55)Fixed income91 70 13 Equity114 70 35 Multi-asset19 1 (9)Alternatives10 (1)8 Market/performance/other impacts249 274 (339)Ending balance, December 31$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Client assets rollforwardBeginning balance$5,012 $4,048 $4,295 Net asset flows486 490 49 Market/performance/other impacts434 474 (296)Ending balance, December 31$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 Selected MetricsAs of December 31,20242023ChangeFirmwide Wealth ManagementClient assets (in billions)(a)$3,756 $3,177 18 %Number of client advisors9,530 8,971 6 Stock Plan Administration(b)Number of stock plan participants (in thousands)1,327 974 36 Client assets (in billions)$270 $230 17 %(a) Consists of Global Private Bank in AWM and client investment assets in J.P. Morgan Wealth Management in CCB.(b)Relates to an equity plan administration business which was acquired in 2022 with the Firm’s purchase of Global Shares. The increase in 2024 includes the impact of onboarding participants in the Firm’s employee stock plans during the fourth quarter of 2024. Client assets (continued)Year ended December 31,(in billions)202420232022Assets under management rollforwardBeginning balance$3,422 $2,766 $3,113 Net asset flows:Liquidity140 242 (55)Fixed income91 70 13 Equity114 70 35 Multi-asset19 1 (9)Alternatives10 (1)8 Market/performance/other impacts249 274 (339)Ending balance, December 31$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Client assets rollforwardBeginning balance$5,012 $4,048 $4,295 Net asset flows486 490 49 Market/performance/other impacts434 474 (296)Ending balance, December 31$5,932 $5,012 $4,048

Selected MetricsAs of December 31,20242023ChangeFirmwide Wealth ManagementClient assets (in billions)(a)$3,756 $3,177 18 %Number of client advisors9,530 8,971 6 Stock Plan Administration(b)Number of stock plan participants (in thousands)1,327 974 36 Client assets (in billions)$270 $230 17 %

(a) Consists of Global Private Bank in AWM and client investment assets in J.P. Morgan Wealth Management in CCB. (b)Relates to an equity plan administration business which was acquired in 2022 with the Firm’s purchase of Global Shares. The increase in 2024 includes the impact of onboarding participants in the Firm’s employee stock plans during the fourth quarter of 2024. 86JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 86JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 86JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 86 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K International metricsYear ended December 31,(in billions, except where otherwise noted)202420232022Total net revenue (in millions)(a)Europe/Middle East/Africa$3,563 $3,377 $3,240 Asia-Pacific2,023 1,876 1,836 Latin America/Caribbean1,065 985 967 Total international net revenue6,651 6,238 6,043 North America14,927 13,589 11,705 Total net revenue$21,578 $19,827 $17,748 Assets under managementEurope/Middle East/Africa$604 $539 $487 Asia-Pacific302 263 218 Latin America/Caribbean106 86 69 Total international assets under management1,012 888 774 North America3,033 2,534 1,992 Total assets under management$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Client assetsEurope/Middle East/Africa$841 $740 $610 Asia-Pacific482 406 331 Latin America/Caribbean254 232 189 Total international client assets1,577 1,378 1,130 North America4,355 3,634 2,918 Total client assets$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 (a)Regional revenue is based on the domicile of the client. International metricsYear ended December 31,(in billions, except where otherwise noted)202420232022Total net revenue (in millions)(a)Europe/Middle East/Africa$3,563 $3,377 $3,240 Asia-Pacific2,023 1,876 1,836 Latin America/Caribbean1,065 985 967 Total international net revenue6,651 6,238 6,043 North America14,927 13,589 11,705 Total net revenue$21,578 $19,827 $17,748 Assets under managementEurope/Middle East/Africa$604 $539 $487 Asia-Pacific302 263 218 Latin America/Caribbean106 86 69 Total international assets under management1,012 888 774 North America3,033 2,534 1,992 Total assets under management$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Client assetsEurope/Middle East/Africa$841 $740 $610 Asia-Pacific482 406 331 Latin America/Caribbean254 232 189 Total international client assets1,577 1,378 1,130 North America4,355 3,634 2,918 Total client assets$5,932 $5,012 $4,048 (a)Regional revenue is based on the domicile of the client. International metricsYear ended December 31,(in billions, except where otherwise noted)202420232022Total net revenue (in millions)(a)Europe/Middle East/Africa$3,563 $3,377 $3,240 Asia-Pacific2,023 1,876 1,836 Latin America/Caribbean1,065 985 967 Total international net revenue6,651 6,238 6,043 North America14,927 13,589 11,705 Total net revenue$21,578 $19,827 $17,748 Assets under managementEurope/Middle East/Africa$604 $539 $487 Asia-Pacific302 263 218 Latin America/Caribbean106 86 69 Total international assets under management1,012 888 774 North America3,033 2,534 1,992 Total assets under management$4,045 $3,422 $2,766 Client assetsEurope/Middle East/Africa$841 $740 $610 Asia-Pacific482 406 331 Latin America/Caribbean254 232 189 Total international client assets1,577 1,378 1,130 North America4,355 3,634 2,918 Total client assets$5,932 $5,012 $4,048

(a)Regional revenue is based on the domicile of the client. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K87 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K87 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K87 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 87 CORPORATE CORPORATE Corporate consists of Treasury and Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) and Other Corporate. Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Other Corporate includes staff functions and expense that is centrally managed as well as certain Firm initiatives and activities not solely aligned to a specific LOB. The major Other Corporate functions include Real Estate, Technology, Legal, Corporate Finance, Human Resources, Internal Audit, Risk Management, Compliance, Control Management, Corporate Responsibility and various Other Corporate groups.Selected income statement and balance sheet dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except employees)202420232022RevenuePrincipal transactions$152 $302 $(227)Investment securities losses(1,020)(3,180)(2,380)All other income8,476 (c)3,010 (f)809 Noninterest revenue7,608 132 (1,798)Net interest income9,786 7,906 1,878 Total net revenue(a)17,394 8,038 80 Provision for credit losses10 171 22 Noninterest expense3,994 (d)(e)5,601 (e)(g)1,034 Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)13,390 2,266 (976)Income tax expense/(benefit)2,789 (555)(h)(233)Net income/(loss)$10,601 $2,821 $(743)Total net revenueTreasury and CIO9,638 6,072 (439)Other Corporate7,756 1,966 519 Total net revenue$17,394 $8,038 $80 Net income/(loss)Treasury and CIO7,013 4,206 (197)Other Corporate3,588 (e)(1,385)(e)(546)Total net income/(loss)$10,601 $2,821 $(743)Total assets (period-end)$1,323,967 $1,348,437 $1,328,219 Loans (period-end)1,964 1,924 2,181 Deposits(b)27,581 21,826 14,203 Employees49,610 47,530 44,196 (a)Included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly driven by tax-exempt income from municipal bonds, of $182 million, $211 million and $235 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (b)Predominantly relates to the Firm's international consumer initiatives.(c)Included the net gain related to Visa shares of $7.9 billion recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.(d)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.(e)The first quarter of 2024 included an increase of $725 million to the FDIC special assessment reflecting the FDIC's revised estimate of Deposit Insurance Fund losses. The fourth quarter of 2023 included the $2.9 billion FDIC special assessment.(f)Included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information.(g)In the second quarter of 2023, substantially all of the expense associated with First Republic was reported in Corporate. Commencing in the third quarter of 2023, the expense was aligned to the appropriate LOBs.(h)Income taxes associated with the First Republic acquisition were reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain. Corporate consists of Treasury and Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) and Other Corporate. Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Other Corporate includes staff functions and expense that is centrally managed as well as certain Firm initiatives and activities not solely aligned to a specific LOB. The major Other Corporate functions include Real Estate, Technology, Legal, Corporate Finance, Human Resources, Internal Audit, Risk Management, Compliance, Control Management, Corporate Responsibility and various Other Corporate groups.Selected income statement and balance sheet dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except employees)202420232022RevenuePrincipal transactions$152 $302 $(227)Investment securities losses(1,020)(3,180)(2,380)All other income8,476 (c)3,010 (f)809 Noninterest revenue7,608 132 (1,798)Net interest income9,786 7,906 1,878 Total net revenue(a)17,394 8,038 80 Provision for credit losses10 171 22 Noninterest expense3,994 (d)(e)5,601 (e)(g)1,034 Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)13,390 2,266 (976)Income tax expense/(benefit)2,789 (555)(h)(233)Net income/(loss)$10,601 $2,821 $(743)Total net revenueTreasury and CIO9,638 6,072 (439)Other Corporate7,756 1,966 519 Total net revenue$17,394 $8,038 $80 Net income/(loss)Treasury and CIO7,013 4,206 (197)Other Corporate3,588 (e)(1,385)(e)(546)Total net income/(loss)$10,601 $2,821 $(743)Total assets (period-end)$1,323,967 $1,348,437 $1,328,219 Loans (period-end)1,964 1,924 2,181 Deposits(b)27,581 21,826 14,203 Employees49,610 47,530 44,196 (a)Included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly driven by tax-exempt income from municipal bonds, of $182 million, $211 Corporate consists of Treasury and Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) and Other Corporate. Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Other Corporate includes staff functions and expense that is centrally managed as well as certain Firm initiatives and activities not solely aligned to a specific LOB. The major Other Corporate functions include Real Estate, Technology, Legal, Corporate Finance, Human Resources, Internal Audit, Risk Management, Compliance, Control Management, Corporate Responsibility and various Other Corporate groups.

Selected income statement and balance sheet dataYear ended December 31,(in millions, except employees)202420232022RevenuePrincipal transactions$152 $302 $(227)Investment securities losses(1,020)(3,180)(2,380)All other income8,476 (c)3,010 (f)809 Noninterest revenue7,608 132 (1,798)Net interest income9,786 7,906 1,878 Total net revenue(a)17,394 8,038 80 Provision for credit losses10 171 22 Noninterest expense3,994 (d)(e)5,601 (e)(g)1,034 Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)13,390 2,266 (976)Income tax expense/(benefit)2,789 (555)(h)(233)Net income/(loss)$10,601 $2,821 $(743)Total net revenueTreasury and CIO9,638 6,072 (439)Other Corporate7,756 1,966 519 Total net revenue$17,394 $8,038 $80 Net income/(loss)Treasury and CIO7,013 4,206 (197)Other Corporate3,588 (e)(1,385)(e)(546)Total net income/(loss)$10,601 $2,821 $(743)Total assets (period-end)$1,323,967 $1,348,437 $1,328,219 Loans (period-end)1,964 1,924 2,181 Deposits(b)27,581 21,826 14,203 Employees49,610 47,530 44,196 Year ended December 31, (in millions, except employees) Investment securities losses (c) (f)

(d)(e) (e)(g) (h) (e) (e) Deposits(b) Employees (a)Included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly driven by tax-exempt income from municipal bonds, of $182 million, $211 million and $235 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (b)Predominantly relates to the Firm's international consumer initiatives.(c)Included the net gain related to Visa shares of $7.9 billion recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.(d)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information.(e)The first quarter of 2024 included an increase of $725 million to the FDIC special assessment reflecting the FDIC's revised estimate of Deposit Insurance Fund losses. The fourth quarter of 2023 included the $2.9 billion FDIC special assessment.(f)Included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information.(g)In the second quarter of 2023, substantially all of the expense associated with First Republic was reported in Corporate. Commencing in the third quarter of 2023, the expense was aligned to the appropriate LOBs.(h)Income taxes associated with the First Republic acquisition were reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain. million and $235 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (b)Predominantly relates to the Firm's international consumer initiatives. (c)Included the net gain related to Visa shares of $7.9 billion recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. (d)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. (e)The first quarter of 2024 included an increase of $725 million to the FDIC special assessment reflecting the FDIC's revised estimate of Deposit Insurance Fund losses. The fourth quarter of 2023 included the $2.9 billion FDIC special assessment. (f)Included the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 associated with the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Notes 6 and 34 for additional information. (g)In the second quarter of 2023, substantially all of the expense associated with First Republic was reported in Corporate. Commencing in the third quarter of 2023, the expense was aligned to the appropriate LOBs. (h)Income taxes associated with the First Republic acquisition were reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain. 88JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 88JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 88JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 88 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 2024 compared with 2023Net income was $10.6 billion, compared with $2.8 billion in the prior year.Net revenue was $17.4 billion, compared with $8.0 billion in the prior year.Net interest income was $9.8 billion, up 24%, driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, partially offset by the net impact of rates. Noninterest revenue was $7.6 billion, compared with $132 million in the prior year. Excluding the $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024 and the prior-year $2.8 billion estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition, revenue was up $2.4 billion, predominantly driven by lower investment securities losses, primarily on sales of U.S. Treasuries and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, associated with repositioning the investment securities portfolio in Treasury and CIO. Noninterest expense was $4.0 billion, down 29%, driven by: •a lower FDIC special assessment,•lower expense associated with the First Republic acquisition as the prior year expense in Corporate included individuals associated with First Republic who were not employees of the Firm until July 2023, and this expense was subsequently aligned to the appropriate LOBs starting in the third quarter of 2023, and•lower legal expense, partially offset by•a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, and•higher costs associated with the Firm's international consumer initiatives. The provision for credit losses was $10 million.The provision in the prior year was $171 million, reflecting a net addition to the allowance for credit losses related to a single name exposure, which was subsequently charged off upon the restructuring of a loan.Refer to Note 10 and Note 13 for additional information on the investment securities portfolio and the allowance for credit losses.The current period income tax expense was driven by changes in the level and mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal and state and local taxes, including the impact of the net gain on Visa shares and the contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, partially offset by benefits related to tax audit settlements.Other Corporate includes the Firm's international consumer initiatives, which primarily consists of Chase U.K., Nutmeg, and an ownership stake in C6 Bank.The deposits within Corporate relate to the Firm’s international consumer initiatives and have increased as a result of growth in client accounts, reflecting the impact of additional product offerings. 2024 compared with 2023Net income was $10.6 billion, compared with $2.8 billion in the prior year.Net revenue was $17.4 billion, compared with $8.0 billion in the prior year.Net interest income was $9.8 billion, up 24%, driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, partially offset by the net impact of rates. Noninterest revenue was $7.6 billion, compared with $132 million in the prior year. Excluding the $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024 and the prior-year $2.8 billion estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition, revenue was up $2.4 billion, predominantly driven by lower investment securities losses, primarily on sales of U.S. Treasuries and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, associated with repositioning the investment securities portfolio in Treasury and CIO. Noninterest expense was $4.0 billion, down 29%, driven by: •a lower FDIC special assessment,•lower expense associated with the First Republic acquisition as the prior year expense in Corporate included individuals associated with First Republic who were not employees of the Firm until July 2023, and this expense was subsequently aligned to the appropriate LOBs starting in the third quarter of 2023, and•lower legal expense, partially offset by•a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, and•higher costs associated with the Firm's international consumer initiatives. The provision for credit losses was $10 million.The provision in the prior year was $171 million, reflecting a net addition to the allowance for credit losses related to a single name exposure, which was subsequently charged off upon the restructuring of a loan.Refer to Note 10 and Note 13 for additional information on the investment securities portfolio and the allowance for credit losses.The current period income tax expense was driven by changes in the level and mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal and state and local taxes, including the impact of the net gain on Visa shares and the contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, partially offset by benefits related to tax audit settlements.

Net income was $10.6 billion, compared with $2.8 billion in the prior year. Net revenue was $17.4 billion, compared with $8.0 billion in the prior year. Net interest income was $9.8 billion, up 24%, driven by the impact of balance sheet actions, primarily reinvestments in the investment securities portfolio, partially offset by the net impact of rates. Noninterest revenue was $7.6 billion, compared with $132 million in the prior year. Excluding the $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024 and the prior-year $2.8 billion estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition, revenue was up $2.4 billion, predominantly driven by lower investment securities losses, primarily on sales of U.S. Treasuries and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, associated with repositioning the investment securities portfolio in Treasury and CIO. Noninterest expense was $4.0 billion, down 29%, driven by: •a lower FDIC special assessment, •lower expense associated with the First Republic acquisition as the prior year expense in Corporate included individuals associated with First Republic who were not employees of the Firm until July 2023, and this expense was subsequently aligned to the appropriate LOBs starting in the third quarter of 2023, and •lower legal expense, partially offset by •a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, and •higher costs associated with the Firm's international consumer initiatives. The provision for credit losses was $10 million. The provision in the prior year was $171 million, reflecting a net addition to the allowance for credit losses related to a single name exposure, which was subsequently charged off upon the restructuring of a loan. Refer to Note 10 and Note 13 for additional information on the investment securities portfolio and the allowance for credit losses. The current period income tax expense was driven by changes in the level and mix of income and expenses subject to U.S. federal and state and local taxes, including the impact of the net gain on Visa shares and the contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024, partially offset by benefits related to tax audit settlements. Other Corporate includes the Firm's international consumer initiatives, which primarily consists of Chase U.K., Nutmeg, and an ownership stake in C6 Bank.The deposits within Corporate relate to the Firm’s international consumer initiatives and have increased as a result of growth in client accounts, reflecting the impact of additional product offerings. Other Corporate includes the Firm's international consumer initiatives, which primarily consists of Chase U.K., Nutmeg, and an ownership stake in C6 Bank. The deposits within Corporate relate to the Firm’s international consumer initiatives and have increased as a result of growth in client accounts, reflecting the impact of additional product offerings. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K89 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K89 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K89 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 89 Treasury and CIO overview Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. The risks managed by Treasury and CIO arise from the activities undertaken by the Firm’s three reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases, which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities.Treasury and CIO seeks to achieve the Firm’s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the Firm’s investment securities portfolio. Treasury and CIO also uses derivatives to meet the Firm’s asset-liability management objectives. Refer to Note 5 for further information on derivatives. In addition, Treasury and CIO manages the Firm’s cash position primarily through deposits at central banks and investments in short-term instruments. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on liquidity and funding risk. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149 for information on interest rate and foreign exchange risks.The investment securities portfolio predominantly consists of U.S. and non-U.S. government securities, U.S. GSE and government agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and other ABS. At December 31, 2024, the Treasury and CIO investment securities portfolio, net of the allowance for credit losses, was $678.3 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Refer to Note 10 for further information on the Firm’s investment securities portfolio and internal risk ratings.Selected income statement and balance sheet dataAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Investment securities losses$(1,020)$(3,180)$(2,380)Available-for-sale securities (average)$287,260 $200,708 $239,924 Held-to-maturity securities (average)(a)321,384 402,010 412,180 Investment securities portfolio (average) $608,644 $602,718 $652,104 Available-for-sale securities (period-end)$403,796 $199,354 $203,981 Held-to-maturity securities (period–end)(a)274,468 369,848 425,305 Investment securities portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses (period–end)(b)$678,264 $569,202 $629,286 (a)Effective January 1, 2023, the Firm adopted the portfolio layer method hedge accounting guidance. As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected to transfer $7.1 billion of investment securities from HTM to AFS. During 2022, the Firm transferred $78.3 billion of investment securities from AFS to HTM for capital management purposes. Refer to Note 1 and Note 10 for additional information on the portfolio layer method hedge accounting guidance.(b)As of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the allowance for credit losses on investment securities was $105 million, $94 million and $67 million, respectively. Treasury and CIO overview Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. The risks managed by Treasury and CIO arise from the activities undertaken by the Firm’s three reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases, which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities.Treasury and CIO seeks to achieve the Firm’s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the Firm’s investment securities portfolio. Treasury and CIO also uses derivatives to meet the Firm’s asset-liability management objectives. Refer to Note 5 for further information on derivatives. In addition, Treasury and CIO manages the Firm’s cash position primarily through deposits at central banks and investments in short-term instruments. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on liquidity and funding risk. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149 for information on interest rate and foreign exchange risks.The investment securities portfolio predominantly consists of U.S. and non-U.S. government securities, U.S. GSE and government agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and other ABS. At December 31, 2024, the Treasury and CIO investment securities portfolio, net of the allowance for credit losses, was $678.3 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Refer to Note 10 for further information on the Firm’s investment securities portfolio and internal risk ratings.

Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. The risks managed by Treasury and CIO arise from the activities undertaken by the Firm’s three reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases, which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities. Treasury and CIO seeks to achieve the Firm’s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the Firm’s investment securities portfolio. Treasury and CIO also uses derivatives to meet the Firm’s asset-liability management objectives. Refer to Note 5 for further information on derivatives. In addition, Treasury and CIO manages the Firm’s cash position primarily through deposits at central banks and investments in short-term instruments. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on liquidity and funding risk. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149 for information on interest rate and foreign exchange risks. The investment securities portfolio predominantly consists of U.S. and non-U.S. government securities, U.S. GSE and government agency and nonagency mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and other ABS. At December 31, 2024, the Treasury and CIO investment securities portfolio, net of the allowance for credit losses, was $678.3 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available and, where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Refer to Note 10 for further information on the Firm’s investment securities portfolio and internal risk ratings. Selected income statement and balance sheet dataAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Investment securities losses$(1,020)$(3,180)$(2,380)Available-for-sale securities (average)$287,260 $200,708 $239,924 Held-to-maturity securities (average)(a)321,384 402,010 412,180 Investment securities portfolio (average) $608,644 $602,718 $652,104 Available-for-sale securities (period-end)$403,796 $199,354 $203,981 Held-to-maturity securities (period–end)(a)274,468 369,848 425,305 Investment securities portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses (period–end)(b)$678,264 $569,202 $629,286 (a)Effective January 1, 2023, the Firm adopted the portfolio layer method hedge accounting guidance. As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected to transfer $7.1 billion of investment securities from HTM to AFS. During 2022, the Firm transferred $78.3 billion of investment securities from AFS to HTM for capital management purposes. Refer to Note 1 and Note 10 for additional information on the portfolio layer method hedge accounting guidance.(b)As of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the allowance for credit losses on investment securities was $105 million, $94 million and $67 million, respectively. Selected income statement and balance sheet dataAs of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Investment securities losses$(1,020)$(3,180)$(2,380)Available-for-sale securities (average)$287,260 $200,708 $239,924 Held-to-maturity securities (average)(a)321,384 402,010 412,180 Investment securities portfolio (average) $608,644 $602,718 $652,104 Available-for-sale securities (period-end)$403,796 $199,354 $203,981 Held-to-maturity securities (period–end)(a)274,468 369,848 425,305 Investment securities portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses (period–end)(b)$678,264 $569,202 $629,286 Held-to-maturity securities (average)(a) Investment securities portfolio (average) Held-to-maturity securities (period–end)(a) Investment securities portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses (period–end)(b) (a)Effective January 1, 2023, the Firm adopted the portfolio layer method hedge accounting guidance. As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected to transfer $7.1 billion of investment securities from HTM to AFS. During 2022, the Firm transferred $78.3 billion of investment securities from AFS to HTM for capital management purposes. Refer to Note 1 and Note 10 for additional information on the portfolio layer method hedge accounting guidance. (b)As of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, the allowance for credit losses on investment securities was $105 million, $94 million and $67 million, respectively. 90JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 90JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 90JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 90 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K FIRMWIDE RISK MANAGEMENT FIRMWIDE RISK MANAGEMENT Risk is an inherent part of JPMorganChase’s business activities. When the Firm extends a consumer or wholesale loan, advises customers and clients on their investment decisions, makes markets in securities, or offers other products or services, the Firm takes on some degree of risk. The Firm’s overall objective is to manage its business, and the associated risks, in a manner that balances serving the interests of its clients, customers and investors, and protecting the safety and soundness of the Firm. The Firm believes that effective risk management requires, among other things: •Acceptance of responsibility, including identification and escalation of risks by all individuals within the Firm; •Ownership of risk identification, assessment, data and management within each of the LOBs and Corporate; and •A Firmwide risk governance and oversight structure.The Firm follows a disciplined and balanced compensation framework with strong internal governance and independent oversight by the Board of Directors (the “Board”). The impact of risk and control issues is carefully considered in the Firm’s performance evaluation and incentive compensation processes. Risk governance frameworkThe Firm’s risk governance framework involves understanding drivers of risks, types of risks and impacts of risks. Drivers of risks are factors that cause a risk to exist. Drivers of risks include the economic environment, regulatory or government policy, competitor or market evolution, business decisions, process or judgment error, deliberate wrongdoing, dysfunctional markets and natural disasters.Types of risks are categories by which risks manifest themselves. The Firm’s risks are generally categorized in the following four risk types: •Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, liquidity or reputation associated with poorly-designed or failed business plans or an inadequate response to changes in the operating environment. •Credit and investment risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer; or loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments, including consumer credit risk, wholesale credit risk and investment portfolio risk. •Market risk is the risk associated with the effect of changes in market factors, such as interest and foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, credit spreads or implied volatilities, on the value of assets and liabilities held for both the short and long term. •Operational risk is the risk of an adverse outcome resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems; human factors; or external events impacting the Firm’s processes or systems. Operational risk includes cybersecurity, compliance, conduct, legal, and estimations and model risk.Impacts of risks are consequences of risks, both quantitative and qualitative. There may be many consequences when risks manifest themselves, including quantitative impacts such as a reduction in earnings and capital, liquidity outflows, and fines or penalties, or qualitative impacts such as damage to the Firm’s reputation, loss of clients and customers, and regulatory and enforcement actions.The Firm’s risk governance framework is managed on a Firmwide basis. The Firm has an Independent Risk Management (“IRM”) function, which is comprised of Risk Management and Compliance. The Firm’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) appoints, subject to approval by the Risk Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board Risk Committee”), the Firm’s Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) to lead the IRM function and maintain the risk governance framework of the Firm. The framework is subject to approval by the Board Risk Committee through its review and approval of the Risk Governance and Oversight Policy.The Firm’s CRO oversees and delegates authority to the Firmwide Risk Executives (“FREs”), the Chief Risk Officers of the LOBs and Corporate (“LOB CROs”), and the Firm’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), who, in turn, establish Risk Management and Compliance organizations, develop the Firm’s risk governance policies and standards, and define and oversee the implementation of the Firm’s risk governance framework. The LOB CROs oversee risks that arise in their LOBs and Corporate, while FREs oversee risks that span across the LOBs and Corporate, as well as functions and regions. Each area of the Firm that gives rise to risk is expected to operate within the parameters identified by the IRM function, and within the risk and control standards established by its own management. Risk is an inherent part of JPMorganChase’s business activities. When the Firm extends a consumer or wholesale loan, advises customers and clients on their investment decisions, makes markets in securities, or offers other products or services, the Firm takes on some degree of risk. The Firm’s overall objective is to manage its business, and the associated risks, in a manner that balances serving the interests of its clients, customers and investors, and protecting the safety and soundness of the Firm. The Firm believes that effective risk management requires, among other things: •Acceptance of responsibility, including identification and escalation of risks by all individuals within the Firm; •Ownership of risk identification, assessment, data and management within each of the LOBs and Corporate; and •A Firmwide risk governance and oversight structure.The Firm follows a disciplined and balanced compensation framework with strong internal governance and independent oversight by the Board of Directors (the “Board”). The impact of risk and control issues is carefully considered in the Firm’s performance evaluation and incentive compensation processes. Risk governance frameworkThe Firm’s risk governance framework involves understanding drivers of risks, types of risks and impacts of risks. Drivers of risks are factors that cause a risk to exist. Drivers of risks include the economic environment, regulatory or government policy, competitor or market evolution, business decisions, process or judgment error, deliberate wrongdoing, dysfunctional markets and natural disasters.Types of risks are categories by which risks manifest themselves. The Firm’s risks are generally categorized in the following four risk types: •Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, liquidity or reputation associated with poorly-designed or failed business plans or an inadequate response to changes in the operating environment. Risk is an inherent part of JPMorganChase’s business activities. When the Firm extends a consumer or wholesale loan, advises customers and clients on their investment decisions, makes markets in securities, or offers other products or services, the Firm takes on some degree of risk. The Firm’s overall objective is to manage its business, and the associated risks, in a manner that balances serving the interests of its clients, customers and investors, and protecting the safety and soundness of the Firm. The Firm believes that effective risk management requires, among other things: •Acceptance of responsibility, including identification and escalation of risks by all individuals within the Firm; •Ownership of risk identification, assessment, data and management within each of the LOBs and Corporate; and •A Firmwide risk governance and oversight structure. The Firm follows a disciplined and balanced compensation framework with strong internal governance and independent oversight by the Board of Directors (the “Board”). The impact of risk and control issues is carefully considered in the Firm’s performance evaluation and incentive compensation processes.

The Firm’s risk governance framework involves understanding drivers of risks, types of risks and impacts of risks. Drivers of risks are factors that cause a risk to exist. Drivers of risks include the economic environment, regulatory or government policy, competitor or market evolution, business decisions, process or judgment error, deliberate wrongdoing, dysfunctional markets and natural disasters. Types of risks are categories by which risks manifest themselves. The Firm’s risks are generally categorized in the following four risk types: •Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, liquidity or reputation associated with poorly-designed or failed business plans or an inadequate response to changes in the operating environment. •Credit and investment risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer; or loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments, including consumer credit risk, wholesale credit risk and investment portfolio risk. •Market risk is the risk associated with the effect of changes in market factors, such as interest and foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, credit spreads or implied volatilities, on the value of assets and liabilities held for both the short and long term. •Operational risk is the risk of an adverse outcome resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems; human factors; or external events impacting the Firm’s processes or systems. Operational risk includes cybersecurity, compliance, conduct, legal, and estimations and model risk.Impacts of risks are consequences of risks, both quantitative and qualitative. There may be many consequences when risks manifest themselves, including quantitative impacts such as a reduction in earnings and capital, liquidity outflows, and fines or penalties, or qualitative impacts such as damage to the Firm’s reputation, loss of clients and customers, and regulatory and enforcement actions.The Firm’s risk governance framework is managed on a Firmwide basis. The Firm has an Independent Risk Management (“IRM”) function, which is comprised of Risk Management and Compliance. The Firm’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) appoints, subject to approval by the Risk Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board Risk Committee”), the Firm’s Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) to lead the IRM function and maintain the risk governance framework of the Firm. The framework is subject to approval by the Board Risk Committee through its review and approval of the Risk Governance and Oversight Policy.The Firm’s CRO oversees and delegates authority to the Firmwide Risk Executives (“FREs”), the Chief Risk Officers of the LOBs and Corporate (“LOB CROs”), and the Firm’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), who, in turn, establish Risk Management and Compliance organizations, develop the Firm’s risk governance policies and standards, and define and oversee the implementation of the Firm’s risk governance framework. The LOB CROs oversee risks that arise in their LOBs and Corporate, while FREs oversee risks that span across the LOBs and Corporate, as well as functions and regions. Each area of the Firm that gives rise to risk is expected to operate within the parameters identified by the IRM function, and within the risk and control standards established by its own management. •Credit and investment risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer; or loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments, including consumer credit risk, wholesale credit risk and investment portfolio risk. •Market risk is the risk associated with the effect of changes in market factors, such as interest and foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, credit spreads or implied volatilities, on the value of assets and liabilities held for both the short and long term. •Operational risk is the risk of an adverse outcome resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems; human factors; or external events impacting the Firm’s processes or systems. Operational risk includes cybersecurity, compliance, conduct, legal, and estimations and model risk. Impacts of risks are consequences of risks, both quantitative and qualitative. There may be many consequences when risks manifest themselves, including quantitative impacts such as a reduction in earnings and capital, liquidity outflows, and fines or penalties, or qualitative impacts such as damage to the Firm’s reputation, loss of clients and customers, and regulatory and enforcement actions. The Firm’s risk governance framework is managed on a Firmwide basis. The Firm has an Independent Risk Management (“IRM”) function, which is comprised of Risk Management and Compliance. The Firm’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) appoints, subject to approval by the Risk Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Board Risk Committee”), the Firm’s Chief Risk Officer (“CRO”) to lead the IRM function and maintain the risk governance framework of the Firm. The framework is subject to approval by the Board Risk Committee through its review and approval of the Risk Governance and Oversight Policy. The Firm’s CRO oversees and delegates authority to the Firmwide Risk Executives (“FREs”), the Chief Risk Officers of the LOBs and Corporate (“LOB CROs”), and the Firm’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”), who, in turn, establish Risk Management and Compliance organizations, develop the Firm’s risk governance policies and standards, and define and oversee the implementation of the Firm’s risk governance framework. The LOB CROs oversee risks that arise in their LOBs and Corporate, while FREs oversee risks that span across the LOBs and Corporate, as well as functions and regions. Each area of the Firm that gives rise to risk is expected to operate within the parameters identified by the IRM function, and within the risk and control standards established by its own management. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K91 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K91 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K91 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 91

Three lines of defenseThe Firm’s “three lines of defense” are as follows: The first line of defense consists of each LOB, Treasury and CIO, and certain Other Corporate initiatives, including their aligned Operations, Technology and Control Management. The first line of defense owns the risks, and identification of risks, associated with their respective activities and the design and execution of controls to manage those risks. Responsibilities also include adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and implementation of the risk governance framework established by IRM, which may include policies, standards, limits, thresholds and controls. The second line of defense is the IRM function, which is separate from the first line of defense and is responsible for independently measuring risk, as well as assessing and challenging the risk management activities of the first line of defense. IRM is also responsible for the identification of risks within its organization, its own adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and for the development and implementation of policies and standards with respect to its own processes. The third line of defense is Internal Audit, an independent function that provides objective assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of Firmwide processes, controls, governance and risk management. The Internal Audit function is led by the General Auditor, who reports to the Audit Committee and administratively to the CEO.In addition, there are other functions that contribute to the Firmwide control environment but are not considered part of a particular line of defense, including Corporate Finance, Human Resources and Legal. These other functions are responsible for the identification of risks within their respective organizations, adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and implementation of the risk governance framework established by IRM.Risk identification and ownershipThe LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the identification of risks within their respective organizations, as well as the design and execution of controls, including IRM-specified controls, to manage those risks. To support this activity, the Firm has a risk identification framework designed to facilitate the responsibility of each LOB and Corporate to identify material risks inherent to the Firm’s businesses and operational activities, catalog them in a central repository and review material risks on a regular basis. The IRM function reviews and challenges the risks identified by each LOB and Corporate, maintains the central repository and provides the consolidated Firmwide results to the Firmwide Risk Committee (“FRC”) and the Board Risk Committee. Risk appetiteThe Firm’s overall appetite for risk is governed by Risk Appetite frameworks for quantitative and qualitative risks. The Firm’s risk appetite is periodically set and approved by senior management (including the CEO and CRO) and approved by the Board Risk Committee. Quantitative and qualitative risks are assessed to monitor and measure the Firm’s capacity to take risk consistent with its stated risk appetite. Risk appetite results are reported to the Board Risk Committee. Three lines of defenseThe Firm’s “three lines of defense” are as follows: The first line of defense consists of each LOB, Treasury and CIO, and certain Other Corporate initiatives, including their aligned Operations, Technology and Control Management. The first line of defense owns the risks, and identification of risks, associated with their respective activities and the design and execution of controls to manage those risks. Responsibilities also include adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and implementation of the risk governance framework established by IRM, which may include policies, standards, limits, thresholds and controls. The second line of defense is the IRM function, which is separate from the first line of defense and is responsible for independently measuring risk, as well as assessing and challenging the risk management activities of the first line of defense. IRM is also responsible for the identification of risks within its organization, its own adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and for the development and implementation of policies and standards with respect to its own processes. The third line of defense is Internal Audit, an independent function that provides objective assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of Firmwide processes, controls, governance and risk management. The Internal Audit function is led by the General Auditor, who reports to the Audit Committee and administratively to the CEO.In addition, there are other functions that contribute to the Firmwide control environment but are not considered part of a particular line of defense, including Corporate Finance, Human Resources and Legal. These other functions are responsible for the identification of risks within their respective organizations, adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and implementation of the risk governance framework established by IRM.

The Firm’s “three lines of defense” are as follows: The first line of defense consists of each LOB, Treasury and CIO, and certain Other Corporate initiatives, including their aligned Operations, Technology and Control Management. The first line of defense owns the risks, and identification of risks, associated with their respective activities and the design and execution of controls to manage those risks. Responsibilities also include adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and implementation of the risk governance framework established by IRM, which may include policies, standards, limits, thresholds and controls. The second line of defense is the IRM function, which is separate from the first line of defense and is responsible for independently measuring risk, as well as assessing and challenging the risk management activities of the first line of defense. IRM is also responsible for the identification of risks within its organization, its own adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and for the development and implementation of policies and standards with respect to its own processes. The third line of defense is Internal Audit, an independent function that provides objective assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of Firmwide processes, controls, governance and risk management. The Internal Audit function is led by the General Auditor, who reports to the Audit Committee and administratively to the CEO. In addition, there are other functions that contribute to the Firmwide control environment but are not considered part of a particular line of defense, including Corporate Finance, Human Resources and Legal. These other functions are responsible for the identification of risks within their respective organizations, adherence to applicable laws, rules and regulations and implementation of the risk governance framework established by IRM. Risk identification and ownershipThe LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the identification of risks within their respective organizations, as well as the design and execution of controls, including IRM-specified controls, to manage those risks. To support this activity, the Firm has a risk identification framework designed to facilitate the responsibility of each LOB and Corporate to identify material risks inherent to the Firm’s businesses and operational activities, catalog them in a central repository and review material risks on a regular basis. The IRM function reviews and challenges the risks identified by each LOB and Corporate, maintains the central repository and provides the consolidated Firmwide results to the Firmwide Risk Committee (“FRC”) and the Board Risk Committee. Risk appetiteThe Firm’s overall appetite for risk is governed by Risk Appetite frameworks for quantitative and qualitative risks. The Firm’s risk appetite is periodically set and approved by senior management (including the CEO and CRO) and approved by the Board Risk Committee. Quantitative and qualitative risks are assessed to monitor and measure the Firm’s capacity to take risk consistent with its stated risk appetite. Risk appetite results are reported to the Board Risk Committee.

The LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the identification of risks within their respective organizations, as well as the design and execution of controls, including IRM-specified controls, to manage those risks. To support this activity, the Firm has a risk identification framework designed to facilitate the responsibility of each LOB and Corporate to identify material risks inherent to the Firm’s businesses and operational activities, catalog them in a central repository and review material risks on a regular basis. The IRM function reviews and challenges the risks identified by each LOB and Corporate, maintains the central repository and provides the consolidated Firmwide results to the Firmwide Risk Committee (“FRC”) and the Board Risk Committee.

The Firm’s overall appetite for risk is governed by Risk Appetite frameworks for quantitative and qualitative risks. The Firm’s risk appetite is periodically set and approved by senior management (including the CEO and CRO) and approved by the Board Risk Committee. Quantitative and qualitative risks are assessed to monitor and measure the Firm’s capacity to take risk consistent with its stated risk appetite. Risk appetite results are reported to the Board Risk Committee. 92JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 92JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 92JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 92 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The independent status of the IRM function is supported by a risk governance and oversight structure that provides channels for the escalation of risks and issues to senior management, the FRC and the Board of Directors, as appropriate. The chart below illustrates the principal standing committees of the Board of Directors and key senior management-level committees in the Firm’s risk governance and oversight structure. In addition, there are other committees, forums and channels of escalation that support the oversight of risk that are not shown in the chart below or described in this Form 10-K. The Firm’s Operating Committee, which consists of the Firm’s CEO, CRO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), General Counsel, CEOs of the LOBs and other senior executives, is accountable to and may refer matters to the Firm’s Board of Directors. The Operating Committee and certain other members of senior management are responsible for escalating to the Board the information necessary to facilitate the Board’s exercise of its duties.Board oversightThe Firm’s Board of Directors actively oversees the business and affairs of the Firm. This includes monitoring the Firm’s financial performance and condition and reviewing the strategic objectives and plans of the Firm. The Board carries out a significant portion of its oversight responsibilities through its principal standing committees, each of which consists solely of independent members of the Board. The Board Risk Committee is the principal committee that oversees risk matters. The Audit Committee oversees the control environment, and the Compensation & Management Development Committee oversees compensation and other management-related matters. Each committee of the Board oversees reputation risks, conduct risks, and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters within its scope of responsibility.The JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight of management of the bank, which it discharges both acting directly and through the principal standing committees of the Firm’s Board of Directors. Risk and control oversight on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. is primarily the responsibility of the Board Risk Committee and the Audit Committee, respectively, and, with respect to compensation and other management-related matters, the Compensation & Management Development Committee.The Board Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of management’s responsibility to implement a global risk management framework reasonably designed to identify, assess and manage the Firm’s risks. The Board Risk Committee’s responsibilities include approval of applicable primary risk policies and review of certain associated frameworks, analysis and reporting established by The Firm’s Operating Committee, which consists of the Firm’s CEO, CRO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), General Counsel, CEOs of the LOBs and other senior executives, is accountable to and may refer matters to the Firm’s Board of Directors. The Operating Committee and certain other members of senior management are responsible for escalating to the Board the information necessary to facilitate the Board’s exercise of its duties.Board oversightThe Firm’s Board of Directors actively oversees the business and affairs of the Firm. This includes monitoring the Firm’s financial performance and condition and reviewing the strategic objectives and plans of the Firm. The Board carries out a significant portion of its oversight responsibilities through its principal standing committees, each of which consists solely of independent members of the Board. The Board Risk Committee is the principal committee that oversees risk matters. The Audit Committee oversees the control environment, and the Compensation & Management Development Committee oversees compensation and other management-related The Firm’s Operating Committee, which consists of the Firm’s CEO, CRO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), General Counsel, CEOs of the LOBs and other senior executives, is accountable to and may refer matters to the Firm’s Board of Directors. The Operating Committee and certain other members of senior management are responsible for escalating to the Board the information necessary to facilitate the Board’s exercise of its duties.

The Firm’s Board of Directors actively oversees the business and affairs of the Firm. This includes monitoring the Firm’s financial performance and condition and reviewing the strategic objectives and plans of the Firm. The Board carries out a significant portion of its oversight responsibilities through its principal standing committees, each of which consists solely of independent members of the Board. The Board Risk Committee is the principal committee that oversees risk matters. The Audit Committee oversees the control environment, and the Compensation & Management Development Committee oversees compensation and other management-related matters. Each committee of the Board oversees reputation risks, conduct risks, and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters within its scope of responsibility.The JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight of management of the bank, which it discharges both acting directly and through the principal standing committees of the Firm’s Board of Directors. Risk and control oversight on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. is primarily the responsibility of the Board Risk Committee and the Audit Committee, respectively, and, with respect to compensation and other management-related matters, the Compensation & Management Development Committee.The Board Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of management’s responsibility to implement a global risk management framework reasonably designed to identify, assess and manage the Firm’s risks. The Board Risk Committee’s responsibilities include approval of applicable primary risk policies and review of certain associated frameworks, analysis and reporting established by matters. Each committee of the Board oversees reputation risks, conduct risks, and environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters within its scope of responsibility. The JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight of management of the bank, which it discharges both acting directly and through the principal standing committees of the Firm’s Board of Directors. Risk and control oversight on behalf of JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. is primarily the responsibility of the Board Risk Committee and the Audit Committee, respectively, and, with respect to compensation and other management-related matters, the Compensation & Management Development Committee. The Board Risk Committee assists the Board in its oversight of management’s responsibility to implement a global risk management framework reasonably designed to identify, assess and manage the Firm’s risks. The Board Risk Committee’s responsibilities include approval of applicable primary risk policies and review of certain associated frameworks, analysis and reporting established by JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K93 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K93 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K93 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 93

management. Breaches in risk appetite and parameters, issues that may have a material adverse impact on the Firm, including capital and liquidity issues, and other significant risk-related matters are escalated to the Board Risk Committee, as appropriate.The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of management’s responsibilities to ensure that there is an effective system of controls reasonably designed to safeguard the Firm’s assets and income, ensure the integrity of the Firm’s financial statements, and maintain compliance with the Firm’s ethical standards, policies, plans and procedures, and with laws and regulations. It also assists the Board in its oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of the Firm’s independent registered public accounting firm, and of the performance of the Firm’s Internal Audit function.The Compensation & Management Development Committee (“CMDC”) assists the Board in its oversight of the Firm’s compensation principles and practices. The CMDC reviews and approves the Firm’s compensation and qualified benefits programs. The Committee reviews the performance of Operating Committee members against their goals, and approves their compensation awards. In addition, the CEO’s compensation award is subject to ratification by the independent directors of the Board. The CMDC also reviews the development of and succession for key executives. As part of the Board’s role of reinforcing, demonstrating and communicating the “tone at the top,” the CMDC oversees the Firm’s culture, including reviewing updates from management regarding significant conduct issues and any related actions with respect to employees, including compensation actions.The Public Responsibility Committee oversees and reviews the Firm's positions and practices on public responsibility matters such as community investment, fair lending, sustainability, consumer practices and other public policy issues that reflect the Firm's values and character and could impact the Firm's reputation among its stakeholders. The Committee also provides guidance on these matters to management and the Board, as appropriate.The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee exercises general oversight with respect to the governance of the Board of Directors. It reviews the qualifications of and recommends to the Board proposed nominees for election to the Board. The Committee evaluates and recommends to the Board corporate governance practices applicable to the Firm. It also reviews the framework for assessing the Board’s performance and self-evaluation. Management oversightThe Firm’s senior management-level committees that are primarily responsible for key risk-related functions include:The Firmwide Risk Committee (“FRC”) is the Firm’s highest management-level risk committee. It oversees the risks inherent in the Firm’s business and provides a forum for discussion of risk-related and other topics and issues that are raised or escalated by its members and other committees.The Firmwide Control Committee (“FCC”) is an escalation committee for senior management to review and discuss the Firmwide compliance and operational risk environment, including identified issues, compliance and operational risk metrics and significant events that have been escalated. Line of Business and Regional Risk Committees are responsible for overseeing the governance, limits and controls that have been established within the scope of their respective activities. These committees review the ways in which the particular LOB or the businesses operating in a particular region could be exposed to adverse outcomes, with a focus on identifying, accepting, escalating and/or requiring remediation of matters brought to these committees. management. Breaches in risk appetite and parameters, issues that may have a material adverse impact on the Firm, including capital and liquidity issues, and other significant risk-related matters are escalated to the Board Risk Committee, as appropriate.The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of management’s responsibilities to ensure that there is an effective system of controls reasonably designed to safeguard the Firm’s assets and income, ensure the integrity of the Firm’s financial statements, and maintain compliance with the Firm’s ethical standards, policies, plans and procedures, and with laws and regulations. It also assists the Board in its oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of the Firm’s independent registered public accounting firm, and of the performance of the Firm’s Internal Audit function.The Compensation & Management Development Committee (“CMDC”) assists the Board in its oversight of the Firm’s compensation principles and practices. The CMDC reviews and approves the Firm’s compensation and qualified benefits programs. The Committee reviews the performance of Operating Committee members against their goals, and approves their compensation awards. In addition, the CEO’s compensation award is subject to ratification by the independent directors of the Board. The CMDC also reviews the development of and succession for key executives. As part of the Board’s role of reinforcing, demonstrating and communicating the “tone at the top,” the CMDC oversees the Firm’s culture, including reviewing updates from management regarding significant conduct issues and any related actions with respect to employees, including compensation actions.The Public Responsibility Committee oversees and reviews the Firm's positions and practices on public responsibility matters such as community investment, fair lending, sustainability, consumer practices and other public policy issues that reflect the Firm's values and character and could impact the Firm's reputation among its stakeholders. The Committee also provides guidance on these matters to management and the Board, as appropriate.The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee exercises general oversight with respect to the governance of the Board of Directors. It reviews the qualifications of and recommends to the Board proposed nominees for election to the Board. The Committee evaluates and recommends to the Board corporate governance practices applicable to the Firm. It also reviews the framework for assessing the Board’s performance and self-evaluation. management. Breaches in risk appetite and parameters, issues that may have a material adverse impact on the Firm, including capital and liquidity issues, and other significant risk-related matters are escalated to the Board Risk Committee, as appropriate. The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of management’s responsibilities to ensure that there is an effective system of controls reasonably designed to safeguard the Firm’s assets and income, ensure the integrity of the Firm’s financial statements, and maintain compliance with the Firm’s ethical standards, policies, plans and procedures, and with laws and regulations. It also assists the Board in its oversight of the qualifications, independence and performance of the Firm’s independent registered public accounting firm, and of the performance of the Firm’s Internal Audit function. The Compensation & Management Development Committee (“CMDC”) assists the Board in its oversight of the Firm’s compensation principles and practices. The CMDC reviews and approves the Firm’s compensation and qualified benefits programs. The Committee reviews the performance of Operating Committee members against their goals, and approves their compensation awards. In addition, the CEO’s compensation award is subject to ratification by the independent directors of the Board. The CMDC also reviews the development of and succession for key executives. As part of the Board’s role of reinforcing, demonstrating and communicating the “tone at the top,” the CMDC oversees the Firm’s culture, including reviewing updates from management regarding significant conduct issues and any related actions with respect to employees, including compensation actions. The Public Responsibility Committee oversees and reviews the Firm's positions and practices on public responsibility matters such as community investment, fair lending, sustainability, consumer practices and other public policy issues that reflect the Firm's values and character and could impact the Firm's reputation among its stakeholders. The Committee also provides guidance on these matters to management and the Board, as appropriate. The Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee exercises general oversight with respect to the governance of the Board of Directors. It reviews the qualifications of and recommends to the Board proposed nominees for election to the Board. The Committee evaluates and recommends to the Board corporate governance practices applicable to the Firm. It also reviews the framework for assessing the Board’s performance and self-evaluation. Management oversightThe Firm’s senior management-level committees that are primarily responsible for key risk-related functions include:The Firmwide Risk Committee (“FRC”) is the Firm’s highest management-level risk committee. It oversees the risks inherent in the Firm’s business and provides a forum for discussion of risk-related and other topics and issues that are raised or escalated by its members and other committees.The Firmwide Control Committee (“FCC”) is an escalation committee for senior management to review and discuss the Firmwide compliance and operational risk environment, including identified issues, compliance and operational risk metrics and significant events that have been escalated. Line of Business and Regional Risk Committees are responsible for overseeing the governance, limits and controls that have been established within the scope of their respective activities. These committees review the ways in which the particular LOB or the businesses operating in a particular region could be exposed to adverse outcomes, with a focus on identifying, accepting, escalating and/or requiring remediation of matters brought to these committees.

The Firm’s senior management-level committees that are primarily responsible for key risk-related functions include: The Firmwide Risk Committee (“FRC”) is the Firm’s highest management-level risk committee. It oversees the risks inherent in the Firm’s business and provides a forum for discussion of risk-related and other topics and issues that are raised or escalated by its members and other committees. The Firmwide Control Committee (“FCC”) is an escalation committee for senior management to review and discuss the Firmwide compliance and operational risk environment, including identified issues, compliance and operational risk metrics and significant events that have been escalated. Line of Business and Regional Risk Committees are responsible for overseeing the governance, limits and controls that have been established within the scope of their respective activities. These committees review the ways in which the particular LOB or the businesses operating in a particular region could be exposed to adverse outcomes, with a focus on identifying, accepting, escalating and/or requiring remediation of matters brought to these committees. 94JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 94JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 94JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 94 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Line of Business and Corporate Function Control Committees oversee the risk and control environment of their respective business or function, inclusive of Operational Risk, Compliance and Conduct Risks. As part of that mandate, they are responsible for reviewing indicators of elevated or emerging risks and other data that may impact the level of compliance and operational risk in a business or function, addressing key compliance and operational risk issues, with an emphasis on processes with control concerns, and overseeing control remediation. The Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is responsible for overseeing the Firm’s asset and liability management (“ALM”), including the activities and frameworks supporting management of the balance sheet, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and capital risk. The Firmwide Valuation Governance Forum (“VGF”) is composed of senior finance and risk executives and is responsible for overseeing the management of risks arising from valuation activities conducted across the Firm.Risk governance and oversight functionsThe Firm monitors and measures its risk through risk governance and oversight functions. The scope of a particular function or business activity may include one or more drivers, types and/or impacts of risk. For example, Country Risk Management oversees country risk which may be a driver of risk or an aggregation of exposures that could give rise to multiple risk types such as credit or market risk. The following sections discuss the risk governance and oversight functions that have been established to oversee the risks inherent in the Firm’s business activities.Risk governance and oversight functionsPageStrategic Risk96Capital Risk97–107Liquidity Risk108-115Reputation Risk116Consumer Credit Risk120-125Wholesale Credit Risk126-136Investment Portfolio Risk140Market Risk141-149Country Risk150-151Climate Risk152Operational Risk153-156Compliance Risk157Conduct Risk158Legal Risk159Estimations and Model Risk160 Line of Business and Corporate Function Control Committees oversee the risk and control environment of their respective business or function, inclusive of Operational Risk, Compliance and Conduct Risks. As part of that mandate, they are responsible for reviewing indicators of elevated or emerging risks and other data that may impact the level of compliance and operational risk in a business or function, addressing key compliance and operational risk issues, with an emphasis on processes with control concerns, and overseeing control remediation. The Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is responsible for overseeing the Firm’s asset and liability management (“ALM”), including the activities and frameworks supporting management of the balance sheet, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and capital risk. The Firmwide Valuation Governance Forum (“VGF”) is composed of senior finance and risk executives and is responsible for overseeing the management of risks arising from valuation activities conducted across the Firm.Risk governance and oversight functionsThe Firm monitors and measures its risk through risk governance and oversight functions. The scope of a particular function or business activity may include one or more drivers, types and/or impacts of risk. For example, Country Risk Management oversees country risk which may be a driver of risk or an aggregation of exposures that could give rise to multiple risk types such as credit or market risk. The following sections discuss the risk governance and oversight functions that have been established to oversee the risks inherent in the Firm’s business activities.Risk governance and oversight functionsPageStrategic Risk96Capital Risk97–107Liquidity Risk108-115Reputation Risk116Consumer Credit Risk120-125Wholesale Credit Risk126-136Investment Portfolio Risk140Market Risk141-149Country Risk150-151Climate Risk152Operational Risk153-156Compliance Risk157Conduct Risk158Legal Risk159Estimations and Model Risk160 Line of Business and Corporate Function Control Committees oversee the risk and control environment of their respective business or function, inclusive of Operational Risk, Compliance and Conduct Risks. As part of that mandate, they are responsible for reviewing indicators of elevated or emerging risks and other data that may impact the level of compliance and operational risk in a business or function, addressing key compliance and operational risk issues, with an emphasis on processes with control concerns, and overseeing control remediation. The Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is responsible for overseeing the Firm’s asset and liability management (“ALM”), including the activities and frameworks supporting management of the balance sheet, liquidity risk, interest rate risk and capital risk. The Firmwide Valuation Governance Forum (“VGF”) is composed of senior finance and risk executives and is responsible for overseeing the management of risks arising from valuation activities conducted across the Firm.

The Firm monitors and measures its risk through risk governance and oversight functions. The scope of a particular function or business activity may include one or more drivers, types and/or impacts of risk. For example, Country Risk Management oversees country risk which may be a driver of risk or an aggregation of exposures that could give rise to multiple risk types such as credit or market risk. The following sections discuss the risk governance and oversight functions that have been established to oversee the risks inherent in the Firm’s business activities. Risk governance and oversight functionsPageStrategic Risk96Capital Risk97–107Liquidity Risk108-115Reputation Risk116Consumer Credit Risk120-125Wholesale Credit Risk126-136Investment Portfolio Risk140Market Risk141-149Country Risk150-151Climate Risk152Operational Risk153-156Compliance Risk157Conduct Risk158Legal Risk159Estimations and Model Risk160 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K95 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K95 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K95 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 95

STRATEGIC RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC RISK MANAGEMENT Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, liquidity or reputation associated with poorly-designed or failed business plans or an inadequate response to changes in the operating environment. Management and oversightThe Operating Committee, together with the senior leadership of each LOB and Corporate, are responsible for managing the Firm’s most significant strategic risks. IRM engages regularly in strategic business discussions and decision-making, including participation in relevant business reviews and senior management meetings, risk and control committees and other relevant governance forums, and review of acquisitions and new business initiatives. The Board of Directors oversees management’s strategic decisions, and the Board Risk Committee oversees IRM and the Firm’s risk governance framework.In the process of developing business plans and strategic initiatives, LOB and Corporate senior management identify the associated risks that are incorporated into the Firmwide Risk Identification framework and their impact on risk appetite. In addition, IRM conducts a qualitative assessment of the LOB and Corporate strategic initiatives to assess their impact on the risk profile of the Firm. The Firm’s strategic planning process, which includes the development of the Firm’s strategic plan and other strategic initiatives, is one component of managing the Firm’s strategic risk. The strategic plan outlines the Firm’s strategic framework and initiatives, and includes components such as budget, risk appetite, capital, earnings and asset-liability management objectives. Guided by the Firm’s Business Principles, the Operating Committee and senior management teams in each LOB and Corporate review and update the strategic plan periodically, including evaluating the strategic framework and performance of strategic initiatives, assessing the operating environment, refining existing strategies and developing new strategies.The Firm’s strategic plan, together with IRM’s assessment, are provided to the Board as part of its review and approval of the Firm’s strategic plan, and the plan is also reflected in the Firm's budget. The Firm’s balance sheet strategy, which focuses on risk-adjusted returns, strong capital and robust liquidity, is also a component in the management of strategic risk. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for further information on capital risk. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on liquidity risk. Refer to Reputation Risk Management on page 116 for further information on reputation risk. Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, liquidity or reputation associated with poorly-designed or failed business plans or an inadequate response to changes in the operating environment. Management and oversightThe Operating Committee, together with the senior leadership of each LOB and Corporate, are responsible for managing the Firm’s most significant strategic risks. IRM engages regularly in strategic business discussions and decision-making, including participation in relevant business reviews and senior management meetings, risk and control committees and other relevant governance forums, and review of acquisitions and new business initiatives. The Board of Directors oversees management’s strategic decisions, and the Board Risk Committee oversees IRM and the Firm’s risk governance framework.In the process of developing business plans and strategic initiatives, LOB and Corporate senior management identify the associated risks that are incorporated into the Firmwide Risk Identification framework and their impact on risk appetite. In addition, IRM conducts a qualitative assessment of the LOB and Corporate strategic initiatives to assess their impact on the risk profile of the Firm. Strategic risk is the risk to earnings, capital, liquidity or reputation associated with poorly-designed or failed business plans or an inadequate response to changes in the operating environment.

The Operating Committee, together with the senior leadership of each LOB and Corporate, are responsible for managing the Firm’s most significant strategic risks. IRM engages regularly in strategic business discussions and decision-making, including participation in relevant business reviews and senior management meetings, risk and control committees and other relevant governance forums, and review of acquisitions and new business initiatives. The Board of Directors oversees management’s strategic decisions, and the Board Risk Committee oversees IRM and the Firm’s risk governance framework. In the process of developing business plans and strategic initiatives, LOB and Corporate senior management identify the associated risks that are incorporated into the Firmwide Risk Identification framework and their impact on risk appetite. In addition, IRM conducts a qualitative assessment of the LOB and Corporate strategic initiatives to assess their impact on the risk profile of the Firm. The Firm’s strategic planning process, which includes the development of the Firm’s strategic plan and other strategic initiatives, is one component of managing the Firm’s strategic risk. The strategic plan outlines the Firm’s strategic framework and initiatives, and includes components such as budget, risk appetite, capital, earnings and asset-liability management objectives. Guided by the Firm’s Business Principles, the Operating Committee and senior management teams in each LOB and Corporate review and update the strategic plan periodically, including evaluating the strategic framework and performance of strategic initiatives, assessing the operating environment, refining existing strategies and developing new strategies.The Firm’s strategic plan, together with IRM’s assessment, are provided to the Board as part of its review and approval of the Firm’s strategic plan, and the plan is also reflected in the Firm's budget. The Firm’s balance sheet strategy, which focuses on risk-adjusted returns, strong capital and robust liquidity, is also a component in the management of strategic risk. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for further information on capital risk. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on liquidity risk. Refer to Reputation Risk Management on page 116 for further information on reputation risk. The Firm’s strategic planning process, which includes the development of the Firm’s strategic plan and other strategic initiatives, is one component of managing the Firm’s strategic risk. The strategic plan outlines the Firm’s strategic framework and initiatives, and includes components such as budget, risk appetite, capital, earnings and asset-liability management objectives. Guided by the Firm’s Business Principles, the Operating Committee and senior management teams in each LOB and Corporate review and update the strategic plan periodically, including evaluating the strategic framework and performance of strategic initiatives, assessing the operating environment, refining existing strategies and developing new strategies. The Firm’s strategic plan, together with IRM’s assessment, are provided to the Board as part of its review and approval of the Firm’s strategic plan, and the plan is also reflected in the Firm's budget. The Firm’s balance sheet strategy, which focuses on risk-adjusted returns, strong capital and robust liquidity, is also a component in the management of strategic risk. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for further information on capital risk. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on liquidity risk. Refer to Reputation Risk Management on page 116 for further information on reputation risk. 96JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 96JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 96JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 96 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT CAPITAL RISK MANAGEMENT Capital risk is the risk that the Firm has an insufficient level or composition of capital to support the Firm’s business activities and associated risks during normal economic environments and under stressed conditions.A strong capital position is essential to the Firm’s business strategy and competitive position. Maintaining a strong balance sheet to manage through economic volatility is a strategic imperative of the Firm’s Board of Directors, CEO and Operating Committee. The Firm’s “fortress balance sheet” philosophy focuses on risk-adjusted returns, strong capital and robust liquidity. The Firm’s capital risk management strategy focuses on maintaining long-term stability to enable the Firm to build and invest in market-leading businesses, including in highly stressed environments. Senior management considers the implications on the Firm’s capital prior to making significant decisions that could impact future business activities. In addition to considering the Firm’s earnings outlook, senior management evaluates all sources and uses of capital with a view to ensuring the Firm’s capital strength.Capital risk managementThe Firm has a Capital Risk Management function whose primary objective is to provide independent oversight of capital risk across the Firm.Capital Risk Management’s responsibilities include:•Defining, monitoring and reporting capital risk metrics;•Establishing, calibrating and monitoring capital risk limits and indicators, including capital risk appetite;•Developing processes to classify, monitor and report capital limit breaches; •Performing assessments of the Firm’s capital management activities, including changes made to the Contingency Capital Plan described below; and•Conducting assessments of the Firm's regulatory capital framework intended to ensure compliance with applicable regulatory capital rules.Capital managementTreasury and CIO is responsible for capital management.The primary objectives of the Firm’s capital management are to:•Maintain sufficient capital in order to continue to build and invest in the Firm’s businesses through normal economic cycles and in stressed environments;•Retain flexibility to take advantage of future investment opportunities;•Promote the Parent Company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiaries;•Ensure the Firm operates above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as well as maintain “well-capitalized” status for the Firm and its principal insured depository institution (“IDI”) subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., at all times under applicable regulatory capital requirements;•Meet capital distribution objectives; and•Maintain sufficient capital resources to operate throughout a resolution period in accordance with the Firm’s preferred resolution strategy.The Firm addresses these objectives through: •Establishing internal minimum capital requirements and maintaining a strong capital governance framework. The internal minimum capital levels consider the Firm’s regulatory capital requirements as well as an internal assessment of capital adequacy, in normal economic cycles and in stress events;•Retaining flexibility in order to react to a range of potential events; and•Regularly monitoring the Firm’s capital position and following prescribed escalation protocols, both at the Firm and material legal entity levels.GovernanceCommittees responsible for overseeing the Firm’s capital management include the Capital Governance Committee, the Firmwide ALCO as well as regional ALCOs, and the CIO, Treasury and Corporate (“CTC”) Risk Committee. In addition, the Board Risk Committee periodically reviews the Firm’s capital risk tolerance. Refer to Firmwide Risk Management on pages 91–95 for additional discussion of the Firmwide ALCO and other risk-related committees.Capital planning and stress testingComprehensive Capital Analysis and Review The Federal Reserve requires the Firm, as a large Bank Holding Company (“BHC”), to submit at least annually a capital plan that has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. The Federal Reserve uses Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”) and other stress testing processes to assess whether large BHCs, such as the Firm, have sufficient capital during periods of economic and financial stress, and have robust, forward-looking capital assessment and planning processes in place that address each BHC’s unique risks to enable it to absorb losses under certain stress scenarios. Through CCAR, the Federal Reserve evaluates each BHC’s capital adequacy and internal capital adequacy assessment processes (“ICAAP”), as well as its plans to make capital distributions, such as dividend payments or stock repurchases. The Federal Capital risk is the risk that the Firm has an insufficient level or composition of capital to support the Firm’s business activities and associated risks during normal economic environments and under stressed conditions.A strong capital position is essential to the Firm’s business strategy and competitive position. Maintaining a strong balance sheet to manage through economic volatility is a strategic imperative of the Firm’s Board of Directors, CEO and Operating Committee. The Firm’s “fortress balance sheet” philosophy focuses on risk-adjusted returns, strong capital and robust liquidity. The Firm’s capital risk management strategy focuses on maintaining long-term stability to enable the Firm to build and invest in market-leading businesses, including in highly stressed environments. Senior management considers the implications on the Firm’s capital prior to making significant decisions that could impact future business activities. In addition to considering the Firm’s earnings outlook, senior management evaluates all sources and uses of capital with a view to ensuring the Firm’s capital strength.Capital risk managementThe Firm has a Capital Risk Management function whose primary objective is to provide independent oversight of capital risk across the Firm.Capital Risk Management’s responsibilities include:•Defining, monitoring and reporting capital risk metrics;•Establishing, calibrating and monitoring capital risk limits and indicators, including capital risk appetite;•Developing processes to classify, monitor and report capital limit breaches; •Performing assessments of the Firm’s capital management activities, including changes made to the Contingency Capital Plan described below; and•Conducting assessments of the Firm's regulatory capital framework intended to ensure compliance with applicable regulatory capital rules.Capital managementTreasury and CIO is responsible for capital management.The primary objectives of the Firm’s capital management are to:•Maintain sufficient capital in order to continue to build and invest in the Firm’s businesses through normal economic cycles and in stressed environments;•Retain flexibility to take advantage of future investment opportunities; Capital risk is the risk that the Firm has an insufficient level or composition of capital to support the Firm’s business activities and associated risks during normal economic environments and under stressed conditions. A strong capital position is essential to the Firm’s business strategy and competitive position. Maintaining a strong balance sheet to manage through economic volatility is a strategic imperative of the Firm’s Board of Directors, CEO and Operating Committee. The Firm’s “fortress balance sheet” philosophy focuses on risk-adjusted returns, strong capital and robust liquidity. The Firm’s capital risk management strategy focuses on maintaining long-term stability to enable the Firm to build and invest in market-leading businesses, including in highly stressed environments. Senior management considers the implications on the Firm’s capital prior to making significant decisions that could impact future business activities. In addition to considering the Firm’s earnings outlook, senior management evaluates all sources and uses of capital with a view to ensuring the Firm’s capital strength.

The Firm has a Capital Risk Management function whose primary objective is to provide independent oversight of capital risk across the Firm. Capital Risk Management’s responsibilities include: •Defining, monitoring and reporting capital risk metrics; •Establishing, calibrating and monitoring capital risk limits and indicators, including capital risk appetite; •Developing processes to classify, monitor and report capital limit breaches; •Performing assessments of the Firm’s capital management activities, including changes made to the Contingency Capital Plan described below; and •Conducting assessments of the Firm's regulatory capital framework intended to ensure compliance with applicable regulatory capital rules.

Treasury and CIO is responsible for capital management. The primary objectives of the Firm’s capital management are to: •Maintain sufficient capital in order to continue to build and invest in the Firm’s businesses through normal economic cycles and in stressed environments; •Retain flexibility to take advantage of future investment opportunities; •Promote the Parent Company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiaries;•Ensure the Firm operates above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as well as maintain “well-capitalized” status for the Firm and its principal insured depository institution (“IDI”) subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., at all times under applicable regulatory capital requirements;•Meet capital distribution objectives; and•Maintain sufficient capital resources to operate throughout a resolution period in accordance with the Firm’s preferred resolution strategy.The Firm addresses these objectives through: •Establishing internal minimum capital requirements and maintaining a strong capital governance framework. The internal minimum capital levels consider the Firm’s regulatory capital requirements as well as an internal assessment of capital adequacy, in normal economic cycles and in stress events;•Retaining flexibility in order to react to a range of potential events; and•Regularly monitoring the Firm’s capital position and following prescribed escalation protocols, both at the Firm and material legal entity levels.GovernanceCommittees responsible for overseeing the Firm’s capital management include the Capital Governance Committee, the Firmwide ALCO as well as regional ALCOs, and the CIO, Treasury and Corporate (“CTC”) Risk Committee. In addition, the Board Risk Committee periodically reviews the Firm’s capital risk tolerance. Refer to Firmwide Risk Management on pages 91–95 for additional discussion of the Firmwide ALCO and other risk-related committees.Capital planning and stress testingComprehensive Capital Analysis and Review The Federal Reserve requires the Firm, as a large Bank Holding Company (“BHC”), to submit at least annually a capital plan that has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. The Federal Reserve uses Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”) and other stress testing processes to assess whether large BHCs, such as the Firm, have sufficient capital during periods of economic and financial stress, and have robust, forward-looking capital assessment and planning processes in place that address each BHC’s unique risks to enable it to absorb losses under certain stress scenarios. Through CCAR, the Federal Reserve evaluates each BHC’s capital adequacy and internal capital adequacy assessment processes (“ICAAP”), as well as its plans to make capital distributions, such as dividend payments or stock repurchases. The Federal •Promote the Parent Company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its subsidiaries; •Ensure the Firm operates above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as well as maintain “well-capitalized” status for the Firm and its principal insured depository institution (“IDI”) subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., at all times under applicable regulatory capital requirements; •Meet capital distribution objectives; and •Maintain sufficient capital resources to operate throughout a resolution period in accordance with the Firm’s preferred resolution strategy. The Firm addresses these objectives through: •Establishing internal minimum capital requirements and maintaining a strong capital governance framework. The internal minimum capital levels consider the Firm’s regulatory capital requirements as well as an internal assessment of capital adequacy, in normal economic cycles and in stress events; •Retaining flexibility in order to react to a range of potential events; and •Regularly monitoring the Firm’s capital position and following prescribed escalation protocols, both at the Firm and material legal entity levels. Governance Committees responsible for overseeing the Firm’s capital management include the Capital Governance Committee, the Firmwide ALCO as well as regional ALCOs, and the CIO, Treasury and Corporate (“CTC”) Risk Committee. In addition, the Board Risk Committee periodically reviews the Firm’s capital risk tolerance. Refer to Firmwide Risk Management on pages 91–95 for additional discussion of the Firmwide ALCO and other risk-related committees.

Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review The Federal Reserve requires the Firm, as a large Bank Holding Company (“BHC”), to submit at least annually a capital plan that has been reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. The Federal Reserve uses Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (“CCAR”) and other stress testing processes to assess whether large BHCs, such as the Firm, have sufficient capital during periods of economic and financial stress, and have robust, forward-looking capital assessment and planning processes in place that address each BHC’s unique risks to enable it to absorb losses under certain stress scenarios. Through CCAR, the Federal Reserve evaluates each BHC’s capital adequacy and internal capital adequacy assessment processes (“ICAAP”), as well as its plans to make capital distributions, such as dividend payments or stock repurchases. The Federal JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K97 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K97 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K97 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 97

Reserve uses results under the severely adverse scenario from its supervisory stress test to determine each firm’s Stress Capital Buffer (“SCB”) requirement for the coming year. The Firm's current SCB requirement is 3.3% and will remain in effect until September 30, 2025. The Firm’s Standardized CET1 capital ratio requirement, including regulatory buffers, was 12.3% as of December 31, 2024.Refer to Capital actions on page 105 for information on actions taken by the Firm’s Board of Directors. Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process Annually, the Firm prepares the ICAAP, which informs the Board of Directors of the ongoing assessment of the Firm’s processes for managing the sources and uses of capital as well as compliance with supervisory expectations for capital planning and capital adequacy. The Firm’s ICAAP integrates stress testing protocols with capital planning. The Firm’s Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the capital planning framework.Stress testing assesses the potential impact of alternative economic and business scenarios on the Firm’s earnings and capital. Economic scenarios, and the parameters underlying those scenarios, are defined centrally and applied uniformly across the businesses. These scenarios are articulated in terms of macroeconomic factors, which are key drivers of business results; global market shocks, which generate short-term but severe trading losses; and idiosyncratic operational risk events. The scenarios are intended to capture and stress key vulnerabilities and idiosyncratic risks facing the Firm. In addition to CCAR and other periodic stress testing, management also considers tailored stress scenarios and sensitivity analyses, as necessary. Contingency Capital PlanThe Firm’s Contingency Capital Plan establishes the capital management framework for the Firm and specifies the principles underlying the Firm’s approach towards capital management in normal economic conditions and in stressed environments. The Contingency Capital Plan defines how the Firm calibrates its targeted capital levels and meets minimum capital requirements, monitors the ongoing appropriateness of planned capital distributions, and sets out the capital contingency actions that are expected to be taken or considered at various levels of capital depletion during a period of stress.Regulatory capitalThe Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the Firm as a consolidated financial holding company. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") establishes similar minimum capital requirements and standards for the Firm’s principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The U.S. capital requirements generally follow the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee, as amended from time to time.Basel III Overview The capital rules under Basel III establish minimum capital ratios and overall capital adequacy standards for large and internationally active U.S. BHCs and banks, including the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The minimum amount of regulatory capital that must be held by BHCs and banks is determined by calculating RWA, which are on-balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposures, weighted according to risk. Under the rules currently in effect, two comprehensive approaches are prescribed for calculating RWA: a standardized approach (“Basel III Standardized”), and an advanced approach (“Basel III Advanced”). For each of these risk-based capital ratios, the capital adequacy of the Firm is evaluated against the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements.The current Basel III rules establish capital requirements for calculating credit risk RWA and market risk RWA, and in the case of Basel III Advanced, operational risk RWA. Key differences in the calculation of credit risk RWA between the Standardized and Advanced approaches are that for Basel III Advanced, credit risk RWA is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters, whereas for Basel III Standardized, credit risk RWA is generally based on supervisory risk-weightings which vary primarily by counterparty type and asset class. Market risk RWA is generally calculated consistently between Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced. In addition to the RWA calculated under these approaches, the Firm may supplement such amounts to incorporate management judgment and feedback from its regulators.As of December 31, 2024, the Firm’s Basel III Standardized ratios risk-based ratios were more binding than the Basel III Advanced risk-based ratios. Additionally, Basel III requires that Advanced Approaches banking organizations, including the Firm, calculate their SLRs. Refer to page 104 for additional information on SLR. Reserve uses results under the severely adverse scenario from its supervisory stress test to determine each firm’s Stress Capital Buffer (“SCB”) requirement for the coming year. The Firm's current SCB requirement is 3.3% and will remain in effect until September 30, 2025. The Firm’s Standardized CET1 capital ratio requirement, including regulatory buffers, was 12.3% as of December 31, 2024.Refer to Capital actions on page 105 for information on actions taken by the Firm’s Board of Directors. Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process Annually, the Firm prepares the ICAAP, which informs the Board of Directors of the ongoing assessment of the Firm’s processes for managing the sources and uses of capital as well as compliance with supervisory expectations for capital planning and capital adequacy. The Firm’s ICAAP integrates stress testing protocols with capital planning. The Firm’s Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the capital planning framework.Stress testing assesses the potential impact of alternative economic and business scenarios on the Firm’s earnings and capital. Economic scenarios, and the parameters underlying those scenarios, are defined centrally and applied uniformly across the businesses. These scenarios are articulated in terms of macroeconomic factors, which are key drivers of business results; global market shocks, which generate short-term but severe trading losses; and idiosyncratic operational risk events. The scenarios are intended to capture and stress key vulnerabilities and idiosyncratic risks facing the Firm. In addition to CCAR and other periodic stress testing, management also considers tailored stress scenarios and sensitivity analyses, as necessary. Contingency Capital PlanThe Firm’s Contingency Capital Plan establishes the capital management framework for the Firm and specifies the principles underlying the Firm’s approach towards capital management in normal economic conditions and in stressed environments. The Contingency Capital Plan defines how the Firm calibrates its targeted capital levels and meets minimum capital requirements, monitors the ongoing appropriateness of planned capital distributions, and sets out the capital contingency actions that are expected to be taken or considered at various levels of capital depletion during a period of stress. Reserve uses results under the severely adverse scenario from its supervisory stress test to determine each firm’s Stress Capital Buffer (“SCB”) requirement for the coming year. The Firm's current SCB requirement is 3.3% and will remain in effect until September 30, 2025. The Firm’s Standardized CET1 capital ratio requirement, including regulatory buffers, was 12.3% as of December 31, 2024. Refer to Capital actions on page 105 for information on actions taken by the Firm’s Board of Directors. Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process Annually, the Firm prepares the ICAAP, which informs the Board of Directors of the ongoing assessment of the Firm’s processes for managing the sources and uses of capital as well as compliance with supervisory expectations for capital planning and capital adequacy. The Firm’s ICAAP integrates stress testing protocols with capital planning. The Firm’s Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the capital planning framework. Stress testing assesses the potential impact of alternative economic and business scenarios on the Firm’s earnings and capital. Economic scenarios, and the parameters underlying those scenarios, are defined centrally and applied uniformly across the businesses. These scenarios are articulated in terms of macroeconomic factors, which are key drivers of business results; global market shocks, which generate short-term but severe trading losses; and idiosyncratic operational risk events. The scenarios are intended to capture and stress key vulnerabilities and idiosyncratic risks facing the Firm. In addition to CCAR and other periodic stress testing, management also considers tailored stress scenarios and sensitivity analyses, as necessary.

The Firm’s Contingency Capital Plan establishes the capital management framework for the Firm and specifies the principles underlying the Firm’s approach towards capital management in normal economic conditions and in stressed environments. The Contingency Capital Plan defines how the Firm calibrates its targeted capital levels and meets minimum capital requirements, monitors the ongoing appropriateness of planned capital distributions, and sets out the capital contingency actions that are expected to be taken or considered at various levels of capital depletion during a period of stress. Regulatory capitalThe Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the Firm as a consolidated financial holding company. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") establishes similar minimum capital requirements and standards for the Firm’s principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The U.S. capital requirements generally follow the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee, as amended from time to time.Basel III Overview The capital rules under Basel III establish minimum capital ratios and overall capital adequacy standards for large and internationally active U.S. BHCs and banks, including the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The minimum amount of regulatory capital that must be held by BHCs and banks is determined by calculating RWA, which are on-balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposures, weighted according to risk. Under the rules currently in effect, two comprehensive approaches are prescribed for calculating RWA: a standardized approach (“Basel III Standardized”), and an advanced approach (“Basel III Advanced”). For each of these risk-based capital ratios, the capital adequacy of the Firm is evaluated against the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements.The current Basel III rules establish capital requirements for calculating credit risk RWA and market risk RWA, and in the case of Basel III Advanced, operational risk RWA. Key differences in the calculation of credit risk RWA between the Standardized and Advanced approaches are that for Basel III Advanced, credit risk RWA is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters, whereas for Basel III Standardized, credit risk RWA is generally based on supervisory risk-weightings which vary primarily by counterparty type and asset class. Market risk RWA is generally calculated consistently between Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced. In addition to the RWA calculated under these approaches, the Firm may supplement such amounts to incorporate management judgment and feedback from its regulators.As of December 31, 2024, the Firm’s Basel III Standardized ratios risk-based ratios were more binding than the Basel III Advanced risk-based ratios. Additionally, Basel III requires that Advanced Approaches banking organizations, including the Firm, calculate their SLRs. Refer to page 104 for additional information on SLR.

The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the Firm as a consolidated financial holding company. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") establishes similar minimum capital requirements and standards for the Firm’s principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The U.S. capital requirements generally follow the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee, as amended from time to time. Basel III Overview The capital rules under Basel III establish minimum capital ratios and overall capital adequacy standards for large and internationally active U.S. BHCs and banks, including the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The minimum amount of regulatory capital that must be held by BHCs and banks is determined by calculating RWA, which are on-balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet exposures, weighted according to risk. Under the rules currently in effect, two comprehensive approaches are prescribed for calculating RWA: a standardized approach (“Basel III Standardized”), and an advanced approach (“Basel III Advanced”). For each of these risk-based capital ratios, the capital adequacy of the Firm is evaluated against the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements. The current Basel III rules establish capital requirements for calculating credit risk RWA and market risk RWA, and in the case of Basel III Advanced, operational risk RWA. Key differences in the calculation of credit risk RWA between the Standardized and Advanced approaches are that for Basel III Advanced, credit risk RWA is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters, whereas for Basel III Standardized, credit risk RWA is generally based on supervisory risk-weightings which vary primarily by counterparty type and asset class. Market risk RWA is generally calculated consistently between Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced. In addition to the RWA calculated under these approaches, the Firm may supplement such amounts to incorporate management judgment and feedback from its regulators. As of December 31, 2024, the Firm’s Basel III Standardized ratios risk-based ratios were more binding than the Basel III Advanced risk-based ratios. Additionally, Basel III requires that Advanced Approaches banking organizations, including the Firm, calculate their SLRs. Refer to page 104 for additional information on SLR. 98JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 98JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 98JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 98 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Key Regulatory Developments U.S. Basel III FinalizationIn July 2023, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC released a proposal to amend the risk-based capital framework, entitled "Regulatory capital rule: Amendments applicable to large banking organizations and to banking organizations with significant trading activity", which is referred to in this Form 10-K as the "U.S. Basel III proposal". Under this proposal, changes to the framework would include replacement of the Advanced approach with an expanded risk-based approach for the calculation of RWA. In addition, the stress capital buffer requirement would be applicable to both the expanded risk-based approach and the Standardized approach.GSIB Surcharge and TLAC and Eligible LTD RequirementsIn July 2023, the Federal Reserve released a proposal to amend the calculation of the GSIB surcharge. Under the proposal, the annual GSIB surcharge would be based on an average of the quarterly surcharge calculations throughout the calendar year, with daily averaging required for certain measures. The proposal would also reduce surcharge increments from 50 bps to 10 bps and includes other technical amendments to the “Method 2” calculation. The proposed changes would revise risk-based capital requirements for the Firm and other U.S. GSIBs. Refer to Risk-based Capital Regulatory Requirements on page 100 for further information on the GSIB surcharge. Additionally, in August 2023, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC released a proposal to expand the eligible long-term debt ("eligible LTD") and clean holding company requirements under the existing total loss-absorbing capacity ("TLAC") rule to apply to non-GSIB banks with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets. The proposal would also reduce the amount of LTD with remaining maturities of less than two years that count towards a U.S. GSIB's TLAC requirement and expand the existing capital deduction framework for LTD issued by GSIBs to include LTD issued by non-GSIB banks subject to the LTD requirements. Finalization of the above proposals, including the required implementation dates, is uncertain. The Firm continues to monitor developments and potential impacts. Key Regulatory Developments U.S. Basel III FinalizationIn July 2023, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC released a proposal to amend the risk-based capital framework, entitled "Regulatory capital rule: Amendments applicable to large banking organizations and to banking organizations with significant trading activity", which is referred to in this Form 10-K as the "U.S. Basel III proposal". Under this proposal, changes to the framework would include replacement of the Advanced approach with an expanded risk-based approach for the calculation of RWA. In addition, the stress capital buffer requirement would be applicable to both the expanded risk-based approach and the Standardized approach.GSIB Surcharge and TLAC and Eligible LTD RequirementsIn July 2023, the Federal Reserve released a proposal to amend the calculation of the GSIB surcharge. Under the proposal, the annual GSIB surcharge would be based on an average of the quarterly surcharge calculations throughout the calendar year, with daily averaging required for certain measures. The proposal would also reduce surcharge increments from 50 bps to 10 bps and includes other technical amendments to the “Method 2” calculation. The proposed changes would revise risk-based capital requirements for the Firm and other U.S. GSIBs. Refer to Risk-based Capital Regulatory Requirements on page 100 for further information on the GSIB surcharge. Additionally, in August 2023, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC released a proposal to expand the eligible long-term debt ("eligible LTD") and clean holding company requirements under the existing total loss-absorbing capacity ("TLAC") rule to apply to non-GSIB banks with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets. The proposal would also reduce the amount of LTD with remaining maturities of less than two years that count towards a U.S. GSIB's TLAC requirement and expand the existing capital deduction framework for LTD issued by GSIBs to include LTD issued by non-GSIB banks subject to the LTD requirements. Finalization of the above proposals, including the required implementation dates, is uncertain. The Firm continues to monitor developments and potential impacts. Key Regulatory Developments U.S. Basel III Finalization In July 2023, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC released a proposal to amend the risk-based capital framework, entitled "Regulatory capital rule: Amendments applicable to large banking organizations and to banking organizations with significant trading activity", which is referred to in this Form 10-K as the "U.S. Basel III proposal". Under this proposal, changes to the framework would include replacement of the Advanced approach with an expanded risk-based approach for the calculation of RWA. In addition, the stress capital buffer requirement would be applicable to both the expanded risk-based approach and the Standardized approach. GSIB Surcharge and TLAC and Eligible LTD Requirements In July 2023, the Federal Reserve released a proposal to amend the calculation of the GSIB surcharge. Under the proposal, the annual GSIB surcharge would be based on an average of the quarterly surcharge calculations throughout the calendar year, with daily averaging required for certain measures. The proposal would also reduce surcharge increments from 50 bps to 10 bps and includes other technical amendments to the “Method 2” calculation. The proposed changes would revise risk-based capital requirements for the Firm and other U.S. GSIBs. Refer to Risk-based Capital Regulatory Requirements on page 100 for further information on the GSIB surcharge. Additionally, in August 2023, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC released a proposal to expand the eligible long-term debt ("eligible LTD") and clean holding company requirements under the existing total loss-absorbing capacity ("TLAC") rule to apply to non-GSIB banks with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets. The proposal would also reduce the amount of LTD with remaining maturities of less than two years that count towards a U.S. GSIB's TLAC requirement and expand the existing capital deduction framework for LTD issued by GSIBs to include LTD issued by non-GSIB banks subject to the LTD requirements. Finalization of the above proposals, including the required implementation dates, is uncertain. The Firm continues to monitor developments and potential impacts. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K99 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K99 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K99 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 99

Risk-based Capital Regulatory Requirements The following chart presents the Firm’s Basel III CET1 capital ratio requirements under the Basel III rules currently in effect. All banking institutions are currently required to have a minimum CET1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets.Certain banking organizations, including the Firm, are required to hold additional levels of capital to serve as a “capital conservation buffer”. The capital conservation buffer incorporates a GSIB surcharge, a discretionary countercyclical capital buffer and a fixed capital conservation buffer of 2.5% for Advanced regulatory capital requirements, as well as a variable SCB requirement, floored at 2.5%, for Standardized regulatory capital requirements. Under the Federal Reserve’s GSIB rule, the Firm is required to assess its GSIB surcharge on an annual basis under two separately prescribed methods based on data for the previous fiscal year-end, and is subject to the higher of the two. “Method 1” reflects the GSIB surcharge as prescribed by the Basel Committee’s assessment methodology, and is calculated across five criteria: size, cross-jurisdictional activity, interconnectedness, complexity and substitutability. “Method 2” modifies the Method 1 requirements to include a measure of short-term wholesale funding in place of substitutability, and introduces a GSIB score “multiplication factor”. The following table presents the Firm’s effective GSIB surcharge for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. For 2025, the Firm’s effective regulatory minimum GSIB surcharge calculated under both Method 1 and Method 2 remains unchanged at 2.5% and 4.5%, respectively.20242023Method 12.5 %2.5 %Method 24.5 %4.0 %The U.S. federal regulatory capital standards include a framework for setting a discretionary countercyclical capital buffer taking into account the macro financial environment in which large, internationally active banks function. As of December 31, 2024, the U.S. countercyclical capital buffer remained at 0%. The Federal Reserve will continue to review the buffer at least annually. The buffer can be increased if the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC determine that systemic risks are meaningfully above normal and can be calibrated up to an additional 2.5% of RWA subject to a 12-month implementation period. Failure to maintain regulatory capital equal to or in excess of the risk-based regulatory capital minimum plus the capital conservation buffer (inclusive of the GSIB surcharge) and any countercyclical buffer will result in limitations to the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute, such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers. All banking institutions are currently required to have a minimum CET1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets.Certain banking organizations, including the Firm, are required to hold additional levels of capital to serve as a “capital conservation buffer”. The capital conservation buffer incorporates a GSIB surcharge, a discretionary countercyclical capital buffer and a fixed capital conservation buffer of 2.5% for Advanced regulatory capital requirements, as well as a variable SCB requirement, floored at 2.5%, for Standardized regulatory capital requirements. Under the Federal Reserve’s GSIB rule, the Firm is required to assess its GSIB surcharge on an annual basis under two separately prescribed methods based on data for the previous fiscal year-end, and is subject to the higher of the two. “Method 1” reflects the GSIB surcharge as prescribed by the Basel Committee’s assessment methodology, and is calculated across five criteria: size, cross-jurisdictional activity, interconnectedness, complexity and substitutability. “Method 2” modifies the Method 1 requirements to include a measure of short-term wholesale funding in place of substitutability, and introduces a GSIB score “multiplication factor”. The following table presents the Firm’s effective GSIB surcharge for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. For 2025, the Firm’s effective regulatory minimum GSIB surcharge calculated under both All banking institutions are currently required to have a minimum CET1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets. Certain banking organizations, including the Firm, are required to hold additional levels of capital to serve as a “capital conservation buffer”. The capital conservation buffer incorporates a GSIB surcharge, a discretionary countercyclical capital buffer and a fixed capital conservation buffer of 2.5% for Advanced regulatory capital requirements, as well as a variable SCB requirement, floored at 2.5%, for Standardized regulatory capital requirements. Under the Federal Reserve’s GSIB rule, the Firm is required to assess its GSIB surcharge on an annual basis under two separately prescribed methods based on data for the previous fiscal year-end, and is subject to the higher of the two. “Method 1” reflects the GSIB surcharge as prescribed by the Basel Committee’s assessment methodology, and is calculated across five criteria: size, cross-jurisdictional activity, interconnectedness, complexity and substitutability. “Method 2” modifies the Method 1 requirements to include a measure of short-term wholesale funding in place of substitutability, and introduces a GSIB score “multiplication factor”. The following table presents the Firm’s effective GSIB surcharge for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. For 2025, the Firm’s effective regulatory minimum GSIB surcharge calculated under both Method 1 and Method 2 remains unchanged at 2.5% and 4.5%, respectively.20242023Method 12.5 %2.5 %Method 24.5 %4.0 %The U.S. federal regulatory capital standards include a framework for setting a discretionary countercyclical capital buffer taking into account the macro financial environment in which large, internationally active banks function. As of December 31, 2024, the U.S. countercyclical capital buffer remained at 0%. The Federal Reserve will continue to review the buffer at least annually. The buffer can be increased if the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC determine that systemic risks are meaningfully above normal and can be calibrated up to an additional 2.5% of RWA subject to a 12-month implementation period. Failure to maintain regulatory capital equal to or in excess of the risk-based regulatory capital minimum plus the capital conservation buffer (inclusive of the GSIB surcharge) and any countercyclical buffer will result in limitations to the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute, such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers. Method 1 and Method 2 remains unchanged at 2.5% and 4.5%, respectively. 20242023Method 12.5 %2.5 %Method 24.5 %4.0 % The U.S. federal regulatory capital standards include a framework for setting a discretionary countercyclical capital buffer taking into account the macro financial environment in which large, internationally active banks function. As of December 31, 2024, the U.S. countercyclical capital buffer remained at 0%. The Federal Reserve will continue to review the buffer at least annually. The buffer can be increased if the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC determine that systemic risks are meaningfully above normal and can be calibrated up to an additional 2.5% of RWA subject to a 12-month implementation period. Failure to maintain regulatory capital equal to or in excess of the risk-based regulatory capital minimum plus the capital conservation buffer (inclusive of the GSIB surcharge) and any countercyclical buffer will result in limitations to the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute, such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers. 100JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 100JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 100JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 100 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Total Loss-Absorbing CapacityThe Federal Reserve’s TLAC rule requires the U.S. GSIB top-tier holding companies, including the Firm, to maintain minimum levels of external TLAC and eligible LTD. Refer to TLAC on page 106 for additional information.Leverage-based Capital Regulatory RequirementsSupplementary leverage ratioBanking organizations subject to the Basel III Advanced approach are currently required to have a minimum SLR of 3.0%. Certain banking organizations, including the Firm, are also required to hold an additional 2.0% leverage buffer. The SLR is defined as Tier 1 capital under Basel III divided by the Firm’s total leverage exposure. Total leverage exposure is calculated by taking the Firm’s total average on-balance sheet assets, less amounts permitted to be deducted for Tier 1 capital, and adding certain off-balance sheet exposures, as defined in regulatory capital rules. Refer to SLR on page 104 for additional information.Failure to maintain an SLR equal to or greater than the regulatory requirement will result in limitations on the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers.Other regulatory capitalIn addition to meeting the capital ratio requirements of Basel III, the Firm and its principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., must also maintain minimum capital and leverage ratios in order to be “well-capitalized” under the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve and the Prompt Corrective Action requirements of the FDIC Improvement Act, respectively. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. Additional information regarding the Firm’s capital ratios, as well as the U.S. federal regulatory capital standards to which the Firm is subject, is presented in Note 27. Refer to the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for further information on the Firm’s current capital measures. Total Loss-Absorbing CapacityThe Federal Reserve’s TLAC rule requires the U.S. GSIB top-tier holding companies, including the Firm, to maintain minimum levels of external TLAC and eligible LTD. Refer to TLAC on page 106 for additional information.Leverage-based Capital Regulatory RequirementsSupplementary leverage ratioBanking organizations subject to the Basel III Advanced approach are currently required to have a minimum SLR of 3.0%. Certain banking organizations, including the Firm, are also required to hold an additional 2.0% leverage buffer. The SLR is defined as Tier 1 capital under Basel III divided by the Firm’s total leverage exposure. Total leverage exposure is calculated by taking the Firm’s total average on-balance sheet assets, less amounts permitted to be deducted for Tier 1 capital, and adding certain off-balance sheet exposures, as defined in regulatory capital rules. Refer to SLR on page 104 for additional information.Failure to maintain an SLR equal to or greater than the regulatory requirement will result in limitations on the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers. Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity The Federal Reserve’s TLAC rule requires the U.S. GSIB top-tier holding companies, including the Firm, to maintain minimum levels of external TLAC and eligible LTD. Refer to TLAC on page 106 for additional information. Leverage-based Capital Regulatory Requirements Supplementary leverage ratio Banking organizations subject to the Basel III Advanced approach are currently required to have a minimum SLR of 3.0%. Certain banking organizations, including the Firm, are also required to hold an additional 2.0% leverage buffer. The SLR is defined as Tier 1 capital under Basel III divided by the Firm’s total leverage exposure. Total leverage exposure is calculated by taking the Firm’s total average on-balance sheet assets, less amounts permitted to be deducted for Tier 1 capital, and adding certain off-balance sheet exposures, as defined in regulatory capital rules. Refer to SLR on page 104 for additional information. Failure to maintain an SLR equal to or greater than the regulatory requirement will result in limitations on the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers. Other regulatory capitalIn addition to meeting the capital ratio requirements of Basel III, the Firm and its principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., must also maintain minimum capital and leverage ratios in order to be “well-capitalized” under the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve and the Prompt Corrective Action requirements of the FDIC Improvement Act, respectively. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. Additional information regarding the Firm’s capital ratios, as well as the U.S. federal regulatory capital standards to which the Firm is subject, is presented in Note 27. Refer to the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for further information on the Firm’s current capital measures. Other regulatory capital In addition to meeting the capital ratio requirements of Basel III, the Firm and its principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., must also maintain minimum capital and leverage ratios in order to be “well-capitalized” under the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve and the Prompt Corrective Action requirements of the FDIC Improvement Act, respectively. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. Additional information regarding the Firm’s capital ratios, as well as the U.S. federal regulatory capital standards to which the Firm is subject, is presented in Note 27. Refer to the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for further information on the Firm’s current capital measures. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K101 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K101 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K101 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 101

The following tables present the Firm’s risk-based capital metrics under both the Basel III Standardized and Advanced approaches and leverage-based capital metrics. Refer to Note 27 for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics. First Republic Bank was not subject to Advanced approach regulatory capital requirements. As a result, for certain exposures associated with the First Republic acquisition, Advanced RWA and any impact on Advanced Total capital is calculated under the Standardized approach as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. StandardizedAdvanced(in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Capital ratio requirements(b)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Capital ratio requirements(b)Risk-based capital metrics:(a)CET1 capital$275,513 $250,585 $275,513 $250,585 Tier 1 capital294,881 277,306 294,881 277,306 Total capital325,589 308,497 311,898 (c)295,417 (c)Risk-weighted assets1,757,460 1,671,995 1,740,429 (c)1,669,156 (c)CET1 capital ratio15.7 %15.0 %12.3 %15.8 %15.0 %11.5 %Tier 1 capital ratio16.8 16.6 13.8 16.9 16.6 13.0 Total capital ratio18.5 18.5 15.8 17.9 17.7 15.0 (in millions, except ratios)

(c) (c) (c) (c) (a)The capital metrics reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. As of December 31, 2024, CET1 capital reflected the remaining $720 million CECL benefit and were fully phased in as of January 1, 2025; as of December 31, 2023, CET1 capital reflected a $1.4 billion benefit. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. (b)Represents minimum requirements and regulatory buffers applicable to the Firm for the period ended December 31, 2024. For the period ended December 31, 2023, the Basel III Standardized CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm were 11.4%, 12.9%, and 14.9%, respectively; the Basel III Advanced CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm were 11.0%, 12.5%, and 14.5%, respectively. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. (c)Includes the impacts of certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Three months ended(in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Capital ratio requirements(c)Leverage-based capital metrics:(a)Adjusted average assets(b)$4,070,499 $3,831,200 Tier 1 leverage ratio7.2 %7.2 %4.0 %Total leverage exposure$4,837,568 $4,540,465 SLR6.1 %6.1 %5.0 % December 31, 2023 Capital ratio requirements(c)

Adjusted average assets(b) (a)The capital metrics reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. (b)Adjusted average assets, for purposes of calculating the leverage ratios, includes quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill, inclusive of estimated equity method goodwill, and other intangible assets. (c)Represents minimum requirements and regulatory buffers applicable to the Firm. Refer to Note 27 for additional information. 102JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 102JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 102JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 102 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Capital components The following table presents reconciliations of total stockholders’ equity to Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.(in millions)December 31,2024December 31,2023Total stockholders’ equity$344,758 $327,878 Less: Preferred stock20,050 27,404 Common stockholders’ equity324,708 300,474 Add: Certain deferred tax liabilities(a)2,943 2,996 Other CET1 capital adjustments(b)4,499 4,717 Less:Goodwill(c)53,763 54,377 Other intangible assets2,874 3,225 Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital275,513 250,585 Add: Preferred stock20,050 27,404 Less: Other Tier 1 adjustments682 683 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital$294,881 $277,306 Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 capital$10,312 $11,779 Qualifying allowance for credit losses(d)20,992 20,102 Other(596)(690)Standardized Tier 2 capital$30,708 $31,191 Standardized Total capital$325,589 $308,497 Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses for Advanced Tier 2 capital(e)(f)(13,691)(13,080)Advanced Tier 2 capital$17,017 $18,111 Advanced Total capital$311,898 $295,417 (a)Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating CET1 capital.(b)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included a net benefit associated with cash flow hedges and debit valuation adjustments ("DVA") related to structured notes recorded in AOCI of $5.2 billion and $4.3 billion and the benefit from the CECL capital transition provisions of $720 million and $1.4 billion, respectively.(c)Goodwill deducted from capital includes goodwill associated with equity method investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions based on regulatory requirements. Refer to page 140 for additional information on principal investment risk.(d)Represents the allowance for credit losses eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 capital up to 1.25% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. Refer to Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition.(e)Represents an adjustment to qualifying allowance for credit losses for the excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses up to 0.6% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. (f)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included an incremental $541 million and $655 million allowance for credit losses, respectively, on certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied, as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules.Capital rollforward The following table presents the changes in Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital for the year ended December 31, 2024.Year ended December 31, (in millions)2024Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2023$250,585 Net income applicable to common equity57,212 Dividends declared on common stock(13,786)Net purchase of treasury stock(17,801)Changes in additional paid-in capital783 Changes related to AOCI applicable to capital:Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities(87)Translation adjustments, net of hedges(a)(858)Fair value hedges(87)Defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit (“OPEB”) plans(63)Changes related to other CET1 capital adjustments(b)(385)Change in Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital24,928 Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2024$275,513 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2023$277,306 Change in CET1 capital(b)24,928 Net redemptions of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock(7,354)Other1 Change in Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital17,575 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2024$294,881 Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023$31,191 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2(1,467)Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b)890 Other94 Change in Standardized Tier 2 capital(483)Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2024$30,708 Standardized Total capital at December 31, 2024$325,589 Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023$18,111 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2(1,467)Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b)(c)279 Other94 Change in Advanced Tier 2 capital(1,094)Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2024$17,017 Advanced Total capital at December 31, 2024$311,898 (a)Includes foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of related derivatives.(b)Includes the impact of the CECL capital transition provisions and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Refer to Note 1 for additional information on changes in accounting principles and Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition provisions.(c)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included an incremental $541 million and $655 million allowance for credit losses, respectively, on certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied, as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Capital components The following table presents reconciliations of total stockholders’ equity to Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.(in millions)December 31,2024December 31,2023Total stockholders’ equity$344,758 $327,878 Less: Preferred stock20,050 27,404 Common stockholders’ equity324,708 300,474 Add: Certain deferred tax liabilities(a)2,943 2,996 Other CET1 capital adjustments(b)4,499 4,717 Less:Goodwill(c)53,763 54,377 Other intangible assets2,874 3,225 Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital275,513 250,585 Add: Preferred stock20,050 27,404 Less: Other Tier 1 adjustments682 683 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital$294,881 $277,306 Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 capital$10,312 $11,779 Qualifying allowance for credit losses(d)20,992 20,102 Other(596)(690)Standardized Tier 2 capital$30,708 $31,191 Standardized Total capital$325,589 $308,497 Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses for Advanced Tier 2 capital(e)(f)(13,691)(13,080)Advanced Tier 2 capital$17,017 $18,111 Advanced Total capital$311,898 $295,417 (a)Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating CET1 capital.(b)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included a net benefit associated with cash flow hedges and debit valuation adjustments ("DVA") related to structured notes recorded in AOCI of $5.2 billion and $4.3 billion and the benefit from the CECL capital transition provisions of $720 million and $1.4 billion, respectively.(c)Goodwill deducted from capital includes goodwill associated with equity method investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions based on regulatory requirements. Refer to page 140 for additional information on principal investment risk.(d)Represents the allowance for credit losses eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 capital up to 1.25% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. Refer to Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition.(e)Represents an adjustment to qualifying allowance for credit losses for the excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses up to 0.6% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. (f)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included an incremental $541 million and $655 million allowance for credit losses, respectively, on certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied, as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Capital components The following table presents reconciliations of total stockholders’ equity to Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. (in millions)December 31,2024December 31,2023Total stockholders’ equity$344,758 $327,878 Less: Preferred stock20,050 27,404 Common stockholders’ equity324,708 300,474 Add: Certain deferred tax liabilities(a)2,943 2,996 Other CET1 capital adjustments(b)4,499 4,717 Less:Goodwill(c)53,763 54,377 Other intangible assets2,874 3,225 Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital275,513 250,585 Add: Preferred stock20,050 27,404 Less: Other Tier 1 adjustments682 683 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital$294,881 $277,306 Long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 capital$10,312 $11,779 Qualifying allowance for credit losses(d)20,992 20,102 Other(596)(690)Standardized Tier 2 capital$30,708 $31,191 Standardized Total capital$325,589 $308,497 Adjustment in qualifying allowance for credit losses for Advanced Tier 2 capital(e)(f)(13,691)(13,080)Advanced Tier 2 capital$17,017 $18,111 Advanced Total capital$311,898 $295,417 Certain deferred tax liabilities(a) Other CET1 capital adjustments(b) Goodwill(c)

(a)Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating CET1 capital. (b)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included a net benefit associated with cash flow hedges and debit valuation adjustments ("DVA") related to structured notes recorded in AOCI of $5.2 billion and $4.3 billion and the benefit from the CECL capital transition provisions of $720 million and $1.4 billion, respectively. (c)Goodwill deducted from capital includes goodwill associated with equity method investments in nonconsolidated financial institutions based on regulatory requirements. Refer to page 140 for additional information on principal investment risk. (d)Represents the allowance for credit losses eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 capital up to 1.25% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. Refer to Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition. (e)Represents an adjustment to qualifying allowance for credit losses for the excess of eligible credit reserves over expected credit losses up to 0.6% of credit risk RWA, including the impact of the CECL capital transition provision with any excess deducted from RWA. (f)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included an incremental $541 million and $655 million allowance for credit losses, respectively, on certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied, as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Capital rollforward The following table presents the changes in Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital for the year ended December 31, 2024.Year ended December 31, (in millions)2024Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2023$250,585 Net income applicable to common equity57,212 Dividends declared on common stock(13,786)Net purchase of treasury stock(17,801)Changes in additional paid-in capital783 Changes related to AOCI applicable to capital:Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities(87)Translation adjustments, net of hedges(a)(858)Fair value hedges(87)Defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit (“OPEB”) plans(63)Changes related to other CET1 capital adjustments(b)(385)Change in Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital24,928 Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2024$275,513 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2023$277,306 Change in CET1 capital(b)24,928 Net redemptions of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock(7,354)Other1 Change in Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital17,575 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2024$294,881 Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023$31,191 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2(1,467)Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b)890 Other94 Change in Standardized Tier 2 capital(483)Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2024$30,708 Standardized Total capital at December 31, 2024$325,589 Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023$18,111 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2(1,467)Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b)(c)279 Other94 Change in Advanced Tier 2 capital(1,094)Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2024$17,017 Advanced Total capital at December 31, 2024$311,898 (a)Includes foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of related derivatives.(b)Includes the impact of the CECL capital transition provisions and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Refer to Note 1 for additional information on changes in accounting principles and Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition provisions.(c)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included an incremental $541 million and $655 million allowance for credit losses, respectively, on certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied, as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Capital rollforward The following table presents the changes in Basel III CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital for the year ended December 31, 2024. Year ended December 31, (in millions)2024Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2023$250,585 Net income applicable to common equity57,212 Dividends declared on common stock(13,786)Net purchase of treasury stock(17,801)Changes in additional paid-in capital783 Changes related to AOCI applicable to capital:Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities(87)Translation adjustments, net of hedges(a)(858)Fair value hedges(87)Defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit (“OPEB”) plans(63)Changes related to other CET1 capital adjustments(b)(385)Change in Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital24,928 Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2024$275,513 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2023$277,306 Change in CET1 capital(b)24,928 Net redemptions of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock(7,354)Other1 Change in Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital17,575 Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2024$294,881 Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023$31,191 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2(1,467)Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b)890 Other94 Change in Standardized Tier 2 capital(483)Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2024$30,708 Standardized Total capital at December 31, 2024$325,589 Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023$18,111 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2(1,467)Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b)(c)279 Other94 Change in Advanced Tier 2 capital(1,094)Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2024$17,017 Advanced Total capital at December 31, 2024$311,898 Standardized/Advanced CET1 capital at December 31, 2023 Net purchase of treasury stock Changes in additional paid-in capital Translation adjustments, net of hedges(a) Changes related to other CET1 capital adjustments(b)

Standardized/Advanced Tier 1 capital at December 31, 2023 Change in CET1 capital(b) Net redemptions of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock Standardized Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b) Other Change in Standardized Tier 2 capital Advanced Tier 2 capital at December 31, 2023 Change in long-term debt and other instruments qualifying as Tier 2 Change in qualifying allowance for credit losses(b)(c) Other Change in Advanced Tier 2 capital (a)Includes foreign currency translation adjustments and the impact of related derivatives. (b)Includes the impact of the CECL capital transition provisions and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Refer to Note 1 for additional information on changes in accounting principles and Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition provisions. (c)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included an incremental $541 million and $655 million allowance for credit losses, respectively, on certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied, as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K103 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K103 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K103 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 103

RWA rollforward RWA rollforward RWA rollforward The following table presents changes in the components of RWA under Basel III Standardized and Advanced approaches for the year ended December 31, 2024. The amounts in the rollforward categories are estimates, based on the predominant driver of the change. StandardizedAdvancedYear ended December 31, 2024(in millions)Credit risk RWA(c)Market risk RWATotal RWACredit risk RWA(c)(d)Market risk RWAOperational risk RWATotal RWADecember 31, 2023$1,603,851 $68,144 $1,671,995 $1,155,261 $68,603 $445,292 $1,669,156 Model & data changes(a)4,743 (366)4,377 4,811 (366)— 4,445 Movement in portfolio levels(b)64,169 16,919 81,088 57,933 16,895 (8,000)66,828 Changes in RWA68,912 16,553 85,465 62,744 16,529 (8,000)71,273 December 31, 2024$1,672,763 $84,697 $1,757,460 $1,218,005 $85,132 $437,292 $1,740,429 Credit risk RWA(c) Credit risk RWA(c)(d) Model & data changes(a) Movement in portfolio levels(b) (a)Model & data changes refer to material movements in levels of RWA as a result of revised methodologies and/or treatment per regulatory guidance (exclusive of rule changes). (b)Movement in portfolio levels (inclusive of rule changes) refers to: for Credit risk RWA, changes in book size, changes in composition and credit quality, market movements, and deductions for excess eligible allowances for credit losses not eligible for inclusion in Tier 2 capital; for Market risk RWA, changes in position and market movements; and for Operational risk RWA, updates to cumulative losses and macroeconomic model inputs. (c)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Basel III Standardized Credit risk RWA included wholesale and retail off balance-sheet RWA of $208.0 billion and $208.5 billion, respectively; and the Basel III Advanced Credit risk RWA included wholesale and retail off balance-sheet RWA of $192.1 billion and $188.5 billion, respectively. (d)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, Credit risk RWA reflected approximately $43.3 billion and $52.4 billion, respectively, of RWA calculated under the Standardized approach for certain assets associated with First Republic as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Refer to the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for further information on Credit risk RWA, Market risk RWA and Operational risk RWA. Supplementary leverage ratio The following table presents the components of the Firm’s SLR.Three months ended(in millions, except ratio)December 31,2024December 31,2023Tier 1 capital$294,881 $277,306 Total average assets4,125,167 3,885,632 Less: Regulatory capital adjustments(a)54,668 54,432 Total adjusted average assets(b)4,070,499 3,831,200 Add: Off-balance sheet exposures(c)767,069 709,265 Total leverage exposure$4,837,568 $4,540,465 SLR6.1 %6.1 %(a)For purposes of calculating the SLR, includes quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill, inclusive of estimated equity method goodwill, other intangible assets and adjustments for the CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition.(b)Adjusted average assets used for the calculation of Tier 1 leverage ratio. (c)Off-balance sheet exposures are calculated as the average of the three month-end spot balances on applicable regulatory exposures during the reporting quarter. Refer to the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports for additional information.Line of business and Corporate equity Each LOB and Corporate is allocated capital by taking into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. ROE is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as key measures of an LOB’s performance. The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized RWA and the GSIB surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. As of January 1, 2025, changes to the Firm’s capital allocations are primarily a result of updates to the Firm’s current capital requirements and changes in RWA for each LOB under rules currently in effect. Any capital that the Firm has accumulated in excess of these current requirements, including the capital required to meet the potential increased requirements of the U.S. Basel III proposal, has been retained in Corporate in addition to its allocated balance. The following table presents the capital allocated to each LOB and Corporate. December 31,(in billions)January 1, 202520242023Consumer & Community Banking$56.0 $54.5 $55.5 Commercial & Investment Bank149.5 132.0 138.0 Asset & Wealth Management16.0 15.5 17.0 Corporate103.2 122.7 90.0 Total common stockholders’ equity$324.7 $324.7 $300.5 Supplementary leverage ratio The following table presents the components of the Firm’s SLR.Three months ended(in millions, except ratio)December 31,2024December 31,2023Tier 1 capital$294,881 $277,306 Total average assets4,125,167 3,885,632 Less: Regulatory capital adjustments(a)54,668 54,432 Total adjusted average assets(b)4,070,499 3,831,200 Add: Off-balance sheet exposures(c)767,069 709,265 Total leverage exposure$4,837,568 $4,540,465 SLR6.1 %6.1 %(a)For purposes of calculating the SLR, includes quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill, inclusive of estimated equity method goodwill, other intangible assets and adjustments for the CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition.(b)Adjusted average assets used for the calculation of Tier 1 leverage ratio. (c)Off-balance sheet exposures are calculated as the average of the three month-end spot balances on applicable regulatory exposures during the reporting quarter. Refer to the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports for additional information.Line of business and Corporate equity Each LOB and Corporate is allocated capital by taking into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. ROE is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as key measures of an LOB’s performance. Supplementary leverage ratio The following table presents the components of the Firm’s SLR. Three months ended(in millions, except ratio)December 31,2024December 31,2023Tier 1 capital$294,881 $277,306 Total average assets4,125,167 3,885,632 Less: Regulatory capital adjustments(a)54,668 54,432 Total adjusted average assets(b)4,070,499 3,831,200 Add: Off-balance sheet exposures(c)767,069 709,265 Total leverage exposure$4,837,568 $4,540,465 SLR6.1 %6.1 % Three months ended (in millions, except ratio)

SLR (a)For purposes of calculating the SLR, includes quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill, inclusive of estimated equity method goodwill, other intangible assets and adjustments for the CECL capital transition provisions. Refer to Note 27 for additional information on the CECL capital transition. (b)Adjusted average assets used for the calculation of Tier 1 leverage ratio. (c)Off-balance sheet exposures are calculated as the average of the three month-end spot balances on applicable regulatory exposures during the reporting quarter. Refer to the Firm’s Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports for additional information.

Each LOB and Corporate is allocated capital by taking into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. ROE is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as key measures of an LOB’s performance. The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized RWA and the GSIB surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. As of January 1, 2025, changes to the Firm’s capital allocations are primarily a result of updates to the Firm’s current capital requirements and changes in RWA for each LOB under rules currently in effect. Any capital that the Firm has accumulated in excess of these current requirements, including the capital required to meet the potential increased requirements of the U.S. Basel III proposal, has been retained in Corporate in addition to its allocated balance. The following table presents the capital allocated to each LOB and Corporate. December 31,(in billions)January 1, 202520242023Consumer & Community Banking$56.0 $54.5 $55.5 Commercial & Investment Bank149.5 132.0 138.0 Asset & Wealth Management16.0 15.5 17.0 Corporate103.2 122.7 90.0 Total common stockholders’ equity$324.7 $324.7 $300.5 The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized RWA and the GSIB surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. As of January 1, 2025, changes to the Firm’s capital allocations are primarily a result of updates to the Firm’s current capital requirements and changes in RWA for each LOB under rules currently in effect. Any capital that the Firm has accumulated in excess of these current requirements, including the capital required to meet the potential increased requirements of the U.S. Basel III proposal, has been retained in Corporate in addition to its allocated balance. The following table presents the capital allocated to each LOB and Corporate. December 31,(in billions)January 1, 202520242023Consumer & Community Banking$56.0 $54.5 $55.5 Commercial & Investment Bank149.5 132.0 138.0 Asset & Wealth Management16.0 15.5 17.0 Corporate103.2 122.7 90.0 Total common stockholders’ equity$324.7 $324.7 $300.5

104JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 104JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 104JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 104 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Capital actionsCommon stock dividends The Firm’s common stock dividends are planned as part of the Capital Management governance framework in line with the Firm’s capital management objectives.On December 9, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $1.25 per share, payable on January 31, 2025. The Firm’s dividends are subject to approval by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.Refer to Note 21 and Note 26 for information regarding dividend restrictions.The following table shows the common dividend payout ratio based on net income applicable to common equity.Year ended December 31,202420232022Common dividend payout ratio24 %25 %33 %Common stockOn June 28, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a new $30 billion common share repurchase program, effective July 1, 2024. Through June 30, 2024, the Firm was authorized to purchase up to $30 billion of common shares under its previously-approved common share repurchase program that was announced on April 13, 2022.The following table sets forth the Firm’s repurchases of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022(b)Total number of shares of common stock repurchased91.7 69.5 23.1 Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a)$18,841 $9,898 $3,122 (a)Excludes excise tax and commissions. As part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, a 1% excise tax is imposed on net share repurchases commencing January 1, 2023.(b)In the second half of 2022, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases, which it resumed in the first quarter of 2023 under its common share repurchase program.The Board of Directors’ authorization to repurchase common shares is utilized at management’s discretion. The $30 billion common share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors does not establish specific price targets or timetables. Management determines the amount and timing of common share repurchases based on various factors, including market conditions; legal and regulatory considerations affecting the amount and timing of repurchase activity; the Firm’s capital position (taking into account goodwill and intangibles); organic capital generation; current and proposed future capital requirements; and other investment opportunities. The amount of common shares that the Firm repurchases in any period may be substantially more or less than the amounts estimated or actually repurchased in prior periods, reflecting the dynamic nature of the decision-making process. The Firm’s common share repurchases may be suspended by management at any time; and may be executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 plans, which are written trading plans that the Firm may enter into from time to time under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and which allow the Firm to repurchase its common shares during periods when it may otherwise not be repurchasing common shares — for example, during internal trading blackout periods.Refer to capital planning and stress testing on pages 97–98 for additional information.Refer to Part II, Item 5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on page 39 of this 2024 Form 10-K for additional information regarding repurchases of the Firm’s equity securities.Preferred stock Preferred stock dividends were $1.3 billion, $1.5 billion, and $1.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.During the year ended and subsequent to December 31, 2024, the Firm issued and redeemed certain series of non-cumulative preferred stock. Refer to Note 21 for additional information on the Firm’s preferred stock, including the issuance and redemption of preferred stock.Subordinated Debt Refer to Long-term funding on page 114 and Note 20 for additional information on the Firm’s subordinated debt. Capital actionsCommon stock dividends The Firm’s common stock dividends are planned as part of the Capital Management governance framework in line with the Firm’s capital management objectives.On December 9, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $1.25 per share, payable on January 31, 2025. The Firm’s dividends are subject to approval by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.Refer to Note 21 and Note 26 for information regarding dividend restrictions.The following table shows the common dividend payout ratio based on net income applicable to common equity.Year ended December 31,202420232022Common dividend payout ratio24 %25 %33 %Common stockOn June 28, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a new $30 billion common share repurchase program, effective July 1, 2024. Through June 30, 2024, the Firm was authorized to purchase up to $30 billion of common shares under its previously-approved common share repurchase program that was announced on April 13, 2022.The following table sets forth the Firm’s repurchases of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022(b)Total number of shares of common stock repurchased91.7 69.5 23.1 Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a)$18,841 $9,898 $3,122 (a)Excludes excise tax and commissions. As part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, a 1% excise tax is imposed on net share repurchases commencing January 1, 2023.(b)In the second half of 2022, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases, which it resumed in the first quarter of 2023 under its common share repurchase program.

Common stock dividends The Firm’s common stock dividends are planned as part of the Capital Management governance framework in line with the Firm’s capital management objectives. On December 9, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had declared a quarterly common stock dividend of $1.25 per share, payable on January 31, 2025. The Firm’s dividends are subject to approval by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. Refer to Note 21 and Note 26 for information regarding dividend restrictions. The following table shows the common dividend payout ratio based on net income applicable to common equity. Year ended December 31,202420232022Common dividend payout ratio24 %25 %33 % Common stock On June 28, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a new $30 billion common share repurchase program, effective July 1, 2024. Through June 30, 2024, the Firm was authorized to purchase up to $30 billion of common shares under its previously-approved common share repurchase program that was announced on April 13, 2022. The following table sets forth the Firm’s repurchases of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022(b)Total number of shares of common stock repurchased91.7 69.5 23.1 Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a)$18,841 $9,898 $3,122 Year ended December 31, (in millions) 2024 2022(b) Total number of shares of common stock repurchased Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a) (a)Excludes excise tax and commissions. As part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, a 1% excise tax is imposed on net share repurchases commencing January 1, 2023. (b)In the second half of 2022, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases, which it resumed in the first quarter of 2023 under its common share repurchase program. The Board of Directors’ authorization to repurchase common shares is utilized at management’s discretion. The $30 billion common share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors does not establish specific price targets or timetables. Management determines the amount and timing of common share repurchases based on various factors, including market conditions; legal and regulatory considerations affecting the amount and timing of repurchase activity; the Firm’s capital position (taking into account goodwill and intangibles); organic capital generation; current and proposed future capital requirements; and other investment opportunities. The amount of common shares that the Firm repurchases in any period may be substantially more or less than the amounts estimated or actually repurchased in prior periods, reflecting the dynamic nature of the decision-making process. The Firm’s common share repurchases may be suspended by management at any time; and may be executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 plans, which are written trading plans that the Firm may enter into from time to time under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and which allow the Firm to repurchase its common shares during periods when it may otherwise not be repurchasing common shares — for example, during internal trading blackout periods.Refer to capital planning and stress testing on pages 97–98 for additional information.Refer to Part II, Item 5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on page 39 of this 2024 Form 10-K for additional information regarding repurchases of the Firm’s equity securities.Preferred stock Preferred stock dividends were $1.3 billion, $1.5 billion, and $1.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively.During the year ended and subsequent to December 31, 2024, the Firm issued and redeemed certain series of non-cumulative preferred stock. Refer to Note 21 for additional information on the Firm’s preferred stock, including the issuance and redemption of preferred stock.Subordinated Debt Refer to Long-term funding on page 114 and Note 20 for additional information on the Firm’s subordinated debt. The Board of Directors’ authorization to repurchase common shares is utilized at management’s discretion. The $30 billion common share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors does not establish specific price targets or timetables. Management determines the amount and timing of common share repurchases based on various factors, including market conditions; legal and regulatory considerations affecting the amount and timing of repurchase activity; the Firm’s capital position (taking into account goodwill and intangibles); organic capital generation; current and proposed future capital requirements; and other investment opportunities. The amount of common shares that the Firm repurchases in any period may be substantially more or less than the amounts estimated or actually repurchased in prior periods, reflecting the dynamic nature of the decision-making process. The Firm’s common share repurchases may be suspended by management at any time; and may be executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 plans, which are written trading plans that the Firm may enter into from time to time under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and which allow the Firm to repurchase its common shares during periods when it may otherwise not be repurchasing common shares — for example, during internal trading blackout periods. Refer to capital planning and stress testing on pages 97–98 for additional information. Refer to Part II, Item 5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities on page 39 of this 2024 Form 10-K for additional information regarding repurchases of the Firm’s equity securities. Preferred stock Preferred stock dividends were $1.3 billion, $1.5 billion, and $1.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. During the year ended and subsequent to December 31, 2024, the Firm issued and redeemed certain series of non-cumulative preferred stock. Refer to Note 21 for additional information on the Firm’s preferred stock, including the issuance and redemption of preferred stock. Subordinated Debt Refer to Long-term funding on page 114 and Note 20 for additional information on the Firm’s subordinated debt. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K105 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K105 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K105 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 105

Other capital requirements Total Loss-Absorbing CapacityThe Federal Reserve’s TLAC rule requires the U.S. GSIB top-tier holding companies, including the Firm, to maintain minimum levels of external TLAC and eligible long-term debt.The external TLAC requirements and the minimum level of eligible long-term debt requirements are shown below:(a)RWA is the greater of Standardized and Advanced compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements.Failure to maintain TLAC equal to or in excess of the regulatory minimum plus applicable buffers will result in limitations on the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute, such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers.The following table presents the eligible external TLAC and eligible LTD amounts, as well as a representation of these amounts as a percentage of the Firm’s total RWA and total leverage exposure applying the impact of the CECL capital transition provisions as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.December 31, 2024December 31, 2023(in billions, except ratio)External TLACLTDExternal TLACLTDTotal eligible amount$546.6 $236.8 $513.8 $222.6 % of RWA31.1 %13.5 %30.7 %13.3 %Regulatory requirements23.0 10.5 23.0 10.0 Surplus/(shortfall)$142.3 $52.3 $129.2 $55.4 % of total leverage exposure11.3 %4.9 %11.3 %4.9 %Regulatory requirements9.5 4.5 9.5 4.5 Surplus/(shortfall)$87.0 $19.2 $82.5 $18.3 Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm's regulatory requirement for its eligible LTD to RWA ratio increased by 50 bps to 10.5%, due to the increase in the Firm’s GSIB Method 2 requirements. The Firm's regulatory requirement for its TLAC to RWA ratio remained at 23.0%. Refer to Risk-based Capital Regulatory Requirements on pages 100–101 for further information on the GSIB surcharge.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on long-term debt issued by the Parent Company.Refer to Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 10-37 of this 2024 Form 10-K for information on the financial consequences to holders of the Firm’s debt and equity securities in a resolution scenario. Other capital requirements Total Loss-Absorbing CapacityThe Federal Reserve’s TLAC rule requires the U.S. GSIB top-tier holding companies, including the Firm, to maintain minimum levels of external TLAC and eligible long-term debt.The external TLAC requirements and the minimum level of eligible long-term debt requirements are shown below:(a)RWA is the greater of Standardized and Advanced compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements.Failure to maintain TLAC equal to or in excess of the regulatory minimum plus applicable buffers will result in limitations on the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute, such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers.

Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity The Federal Reserve’s TLAC rule requires the U.S. GSIB top-tier holding companies, including the Firm, to maintain minimum levels of external TLAC and eligible long-term debt. The external TLAC requirements and the minimum level of eligible long-term debt requirements are shown below: (a)RWA is the greater of Standardized and Advanced compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements. Failure to maintain TLAC equal to or in excess of the regulatory minimum plus applicable buffers will result in limitations on the amount of capital that the Firm may distribute, such as through dividends and common share repurchases, as well as on discretionary bonus payments for certain executive officers. The following table presents the eligible external TLAC and eligible LTD amounts, as well as a representation of these amounts as a percentage of the Firm’s total RWA and total leverage exposure applying the impact of the CECL capital transition provisions as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.December 31, 2024December 31, 2023(in billions, except ratio)External TLACLTDExternal TLACLTDTotal eligible amount$546.6 $236.8 $513.8 $222.6 % of RWA31.1 %13.5 %30.7 %13.3 %Regulatory requirements23.0 10.5 23.0 10.0 Surplus/(shortfall)$142.3 $52.3 $129.2 $55.4 % of total leverage exposure11.3 %4.9 %11.3 %4.9 %Regulatory requirements9.5 4.5 9.5 4.5 Surplus/(shortfall)$87.0 $19.2 $82.5 $18.3 Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm's regulatory requirement for its eligible LTD to RWA ratio increased by 50 bps to 10.5%, due to the increase in the Firm’s GSIB Method 2 requirements. The Firm's regulatory requirement for its TLAC to RWA ratio remained at 23.0%. Refer to Risk-based Capital Regulatory Requirements on pages 100–101 for further information on the GSIB surcharge.Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on long-term debt issued by the Parent Company.Refer to Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 10-37 of this 2024 Form 10-K for information on the financial consequences to holders of the Firm’s debt and equity securities in a resolution scenario. The following table presents the eligible external TLAC and eligible LTD amounts, as well as a representation of these amounts as a percentage of the Firm’s total RWA and total leverage exposure applying the impact of the CECL capital transition provisions as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. December 31, 2024December 31, 2023(in billions, except ratio)External TLACLTDExternal TLACLTDTotal eligible amount$546.6 $236.8 $513.8 $222.6 % of RWA31.1 %13.5 %30.7 %13.3 %Regulatory requirements23.0 10.5 23.0 10.0 Surplus/(shortfall)$142.3 $52.3 $129.2 $55.4 % of total leverage exposure11.3 %4.9 %11.3 %4.9 %Regulatory requirements9.5 4.5 9.5 4.5 Surplus/(shortfall)$87.0 $19.2 $82.5 $18.3 December 31, 2023 Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm's regulatory requirement for its eligible LTD to RWA ratio increased by 50 bps to 10.5%, due to the increase in the Firm’s GSIB Method 2 requirements. The Firm's regulatory requirement for its TLAC to RWA ratio remained at 23.0%. Refer to Risk-based Capital Regulatory Requirements on pages 100–101 for further information on the GSIB surcharge. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on long-term debt issued by the Parent Company. Refer to Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors on pages 10-37 of this 2024 Form 10-K for information on the financial consequences to holders of the Firm’s debt and equity securities in a resolution scenario. 106JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 106JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 106JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 106 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K U.S. broker-dealer regulatory capitalJ.P. Morgan SecuritiesJPMorganChase’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities. J.P. Morgan Securities is subject to the regulatory capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Net Capital Rule”). J.P. Morgan Securities is also registered as a futures commission merchant and is subject to regulatory capital requirements, including those imposed by the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the National Futures Association (“NFA”).J.P. Morgan Securities has elected to compute its minimum net capital requirements in accordance with the “Alternative Net Capital Requirements” of the Net Capital Rule.The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities’ net capital. December 31, 2024(in millions)ActualMinimumNet Capital$24,980 $5,999 J.P. Morgan Securities is registered with the SEC as a security-based swap dealer and with the CFTC as a swap dealer. As a result of additional SEC and CFTC capital and financial reporting requirements for security-based swap dealers and swap dealers, J.P. Morgan Securities is subject to alternative minimum net capital requirements and required to hold “tentative net capital” in excess of $5.0 billion. J.P. Morgan Securities is also required to notify the SEC and CFTC in the event that its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. Tentative net capital is net capital before deducting market and credit risk charges as defined by the Net Capital Rule. As of December 31, 2024, J.P. Morgan Securities maintained tentative net capital in excess of the minimum and notification requirements.Non-U.S. subsidiary regulatory capitalJ.P. Morgan Securities plcJ.P. Morgan Securities plc is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and has authority to engage in banking, investment banking and broker-dealer activities. J.P. Morgan Securities plc is jointly regulated in the U.K. by the Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). J.P. Morgan Securities plc is subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”), as adopted and amended in the U.K., and the capital rules in the PRA Rulebook. These requirements collectively represent the U.K.’s implementation of the Basel III standards. The PRA announced that it intends to delay the U.K.’s implementation of the final Basel III standards until January 1, 2027, with a three-year transitional period for certain aspects.The Bank of England requires that U.K. banks, including U.K. regulated subsidiaries of overseas groups, maintain minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (“MREL”). As of December 31, 2024, J.P. Morgan Securities plc was compliant with its MREL requirements. The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities plc’s risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics. December 31, 2024Regulatory Minimum ratios(a)(in millions, except ratios)ActualTotal capital$53,120 CET1 capital ratio17.0 %4.5 %Tier 1 capital ratio22.1 6.0 Total capital ratio27.1 8.0 Tier 1 leverage ratio7.1 3.3 (b)(a)Represents minimum Pillar 1 requirements specified by the PRA. J.P. Morgan Securities plc's capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 exceeded the minimum requirements, including the additional capital requirements specified by the PRA.(b)At least 75% of the Tier 1 leverage ratio minimum must be met with CET1 capital.J.P. Morgan SEJPMSE is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and has authority to engage in banking, investment banking and markets activities. JPMSE is regulated by the European Central Bank (“ECB”), the German Financial Supervisory Authority and the German Central Bank, as well as the local regulators in each of the countries in which it operates, and it is subject to EU capital requirements under Basel III. JPMSE is subject to the EU implementation of the final Basel III standards. Those standards became effective beginning on January 1, 2025, with the exception of market risk aspects for which the effective date is January 1, 2026.JPMSE is required by the EU Single Resolution Board to maintain MREL. As of December 31, 2024, JPMSE was compliant with its MREL requirements.The following table presents JPMSE’s risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics. December 31, 2024Regulatory Minimum ratios(a)(in millions, except ratios)ActualTotal capital$43,298 CET1 capital ratio20.0 %4.5 %Tier 1 capital ratio20.0 6.0 Total capital ratio34.8 8.0 Tier 1 leverage ratio6.1 3.0 (a)Represents minimum Pillar 1 requirements specified by the EU CRR. J.P. Morgan SE’s capital and leverage ratios as of December 31, 2024 exceeded the minimum requirements, including the additional capital requirements specified by EU regulators. U.S. broker-dealer regulatory capitalJ.P. Morgan SecuritiesJPMorganChase’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities. J.P. Morgan Securities is subject to the regulatory capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Net Capital Rule”). J.P. Morgan Securities is also registered as a futures commission merchant and is subject to regulatory capital requirements, including those imposed by the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the National Futures Association (“NFA”).J.P. Morgan Securities has elected to compute its minimum net capital requirements in accordance with the “Alternative Net Capital Requirements” of the Net Capital Rule.The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities’ net capital. December 31, 2024(in millions)ActualMinimumNet Capital$24,980 $5,999 J.P. Morgan Securities is registered with the SEC as a security-based swap dealer and with the CFTC as a swap dealer. As a result of additional SEC and CFTC capital and financial reporting requirements for security-based swap dealers and swap dealers, J.P. Morgan Securities is subject to alternative minimum net capital requirements and required to hold “tentative net capital” in excess of $5.0 billion. J.P. Morgan Securities is also required to notify the SEC and CFTC in the event that its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. Tentative net capital is net capital before deducting market and credit risk charges as defined by the Net Capital Rule. As of December 31, 2024, J.P. Morgan Securities maintained tentative net capital in excess of the minimum and notification requirements.Non-U.S. subsidiary regulatory capitalJ.P. Morgan Securities plcJ.P. Morgan Securities plc is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and has authority to engage in banking, investment banking and broker-dealer activities. J.P. Morgan Securities plc is jointly regulated in the U.K. by the Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). J.P. Morgan Securities plc is subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”), as adopted and amended in the U.K., and the capital rules in the PRA Rulebook. These requirements collectively represent the U.K.’s implementation of the Basel III standards. The PRA announced that it intends to delay the U.K.’s implementation of the final Basel III

J.P. Morgan Securities JPMorganChase’s principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary is J.P. Morgan Securities. J.P. Morgan Securities is subject to the regulatory capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Net Capital Rule”). J.P. Morgan Securities is also registered as a futures commission merchant and is subject to regulatory capital requirements, including those imposed by the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and the National Futures Association (“NFA”). J.P. Morgan Securities has elected to compute its minimum net capital requirements in accordance with the “Alternative Net Capital Requirements” of the Net Capital Rule. The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities’ net capital. December 31, 2024(in millions)ActualMinimumNet Capital$24,980 $5,999 J.P. Morgan Securities is registered with the SEC as a security-based swap dealer and with the CFTC as a swap dealer. As a result of additional SEC and CFTC capital and financial reporting requirements for security-based swap dealers and swap dealers, J.P. Morgan Securities is subject to alternative minimum net capital requirements and required to hold “tentative net capital” in excess of $5.0 billion. J.P. Morgan Securities is also required to notify the SEC and CFTC in the event that its tentative net capital is less than $6.0 billion. Tentative net capital is net capital before deducting market and credit risk charges as defined by the Net Capital Rule. As of December 31, 2024, J.P. Morgan Securities maintained tentative net capital in excess of the minimum and notification requirements.

J.P. Morgan Securities plc J.P. Morgan Securities plc is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and has authority to engage in banking, investment banking and broker-dealer activities. J.P. Morgan Securities plc is jointly regulated in the U.K. by the Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). J.P. Morgan Securities plc is subject to the Capital Requirements Regulation (“CRR”), as adopted and amended in the U.K., and the capital rules in the PRA Rulebook. These requirements collectively represent the U.K.’s implementation of the Basel III standards. The PRA announced that it intends to delay the U.K.’s implementation of the final Basel III standards until January 1, 2027, with a three-year transitional period for certain aspects.The Bank of England requires that U.K. banks, including U.K. regulated subsidiaries of overseas groups, maintain minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (“MREL”). As of December 31, 2024, J.P. Morgan Securities plc was compliant with its MREL requirements. The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities plc’s risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics. December 31, 2024Regulatory Minimum ratios(a)(in millions, except ratios)ActualTotal capital$53,120 CET1 capital ratio17.0 %4.5 %Tier 1 capital ratio22.1 6.0 Total capital ratio27.1 8.0 Tier 1 leverage ratio7.1 3.3 (b)(a)Represents minimum Pillar 1 requirements specified by the PRA. J.P. Morgan Securities plc's capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 exceeded the minimum requirements, including the additional capital requirements specified by the PRA.(b)At least 75% of the Tier 1 leverage ratio minimum must be met with CET1 capital.J.P. Morgan SEJPMSE is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and has authority to engage in banking, investment banking and markets activities. JPMSE is regulated by the European Central Bank (“ECB”), the German Financial Supervisory Authority and the German Central Bank, as well as the local regulators in each of the countries in which it operates, and it is subject to EU capital requirements under Basel III. JPMSE is subject to the EU implementation of the final Basel III standards. Those standards became effective beginning on January 1, 2025, with the exception of market risk aspects for which the effective date is January 1, 2026.JPMSE is required by the EU Single Resolution Board to maintain MREL. As of December 31, 2024, JPMSE was compliant with its MREL requirements.The following table presents JPMSE’s risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics. December 31, 2024Regulatory Minimum ratios(a)(in millions, except ratios)ActualTotal capital$43,298 CET1 capital ratio20.0 %4.5 %Tier 1 capital ratio20.0 6.0 Total capital ratio34.8 8.0 Tier 1 leverage ratio6.1 3.0 (a)Represents minimum Pillar 1 requirements specified by the EU CRR. J.P. Morgan SE’s capital and leverage ratios as of December 31, 2024 exceeded the minimum requirements, including the additional capital requirements specified by EU regulators. standards until January 1, 2027, with a three-year transitional period for certain aspects. The Bank of England requires that U.K. banks, including U.K. regulated subsidiaries of overseas groups, maintain minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (“MREL”). As of December 31, 2024, J.P. Morgan Securities plc was compliant with its MREL requirements. The following table presents J.P. Morgan Securities plc’s risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics. December 31, 2024Regulatory Minimum ratios(a)(in millions, except ratios)ActualTotal capital$53,120 CET1 capital ratio17.0 %4.5 %Tier 1 capital ratio22.1 6.0 Total capital ratio27.1 8.0 Tier 1 leverage ratio7.1 3.3 (b) Regulatory Minimum ratios(a) (a)Represents minimum Pillar 1 requirements specified by the PRA. J.P. Morgan Securities plc's capital ratios as of December 31, 2024 exceeded the minimum requirements, including the additional capital requirements specified by the PRA. (b)At least 75% of the Tier 1 leverage ratio minimum must be met with CET1 capital. J.P. Morgan SE JPMSE is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and has authority to engage in banking, investment banking and markets activities. JPMSE is regulated by the European Central Bank (“ECB”), the German Financial Supervisory Authority and the German Central Bank, as well as the local regulators in each of the countries in which it operates, and it is subject to EU capital requirements under Basel III. JPMSE is subject to the EU implementation of the final Basel III standards. Those standards became effective beginning on January 1, 2025, with the exception of market risk aspects for which the effective date is January 1, 2026. JPMSE is required by the EU Single Resolution Board to maintain MREL. As of December 31, 2024, JPMSE was compliant with its MREL requirements. The following table presents JPMSE’s risk-based and leverage-based capital metrics. December 31, 2024Regulatory Minimum ratios(a)(in millions, except ratios)ActualTotal capital$43,298 CET1 capital ratio20.0 %4.5 %Tier 1 capital ratio20.0 6.0 Total capital ratio34.8 8.0 Tier 1 leverage ratio6.1 3.0 Regulatory Minimum ratios(a) (a)Represents minimum Pillar 1 requirements specified by the EU CRR. J.P. Morgan SE’s capital and leverage ratios as of December 31, 2024 exceeded the minimum requirements, including the additional capital requirements specified by EU regulators. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K107 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K107 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K107 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 107

LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT Liquidity risk is the risk that the Firm will be unable to meet its cash and collateral needs as they arise or that it does not have the appropriate amount, composition and tenor of funding and liquidity to support its assets and liabilities. Liquidity risk managementThe Firm has a Liquidity Risk Management (“LRM”) function whose primary objective is to provide independent oversight of liquidity risk across the Firm. Liquidity Risk Management’s responsibilities include: •Defining, monitoring and reporting liquidity risk metrics; •Independently establishing and monitoring limits and indicators, including liquidity risk appetite; •Developing a process to classify, monitor and report limit breaches; •Performing an independent review of liquidity risk management processes to evaluate their adequacy and effectiveness; •Monitoring and reporting internal Firmwide and legal entity liquidity stress tests, regulatory defined metrics, as well as liquidity positions, balance sheet variances and funding activities; and •Approving or escalating for review new or updated liquidity stress assumptions.Liquidity management Treasury and CIO is responsible for liquidity management.The primary objectives of the Firm’s liquidity management are to: •Ensure that the Firm’s core businesses and material legal entities are able to operate in support of client needs and meet contractual and contingent financial obligations through normal economic cycles as well as during stress events, and •Manage an optimal funding mix and availability of liquidity sources. The Firm addresses these objectives through: •Analyzing and understanding the liquidity characteristics of the assets and liabilities of the Firm, LOBs, legal entities, as well as currencies, taking into account legal, regulatory, and operational restrictions; •Developing and maintaining internal liquidity stress testing assumptions; •Defining and monitoring Firmwide and legal entity-specific liquidity strategies, policies, reporting and contingency funding plans; •Managing liquidity within the Firm’s approved limits and indicators, including liquidity risk appetite tolerances; •Managing compliance with regulatory requirements related to funding and liquidity risk; and •Setting FTP in accordance with underlying liquidity characteristics of balance sheet assets and liabilities as well as certain off-balance sheet items. As part of the Firm’s overall liquidity management strategy, the Firm manages liquidity and funding using a centralized, global approach designed to: •Optimize liquidity sources and uses; •Monitor exposures; •Identify constraints on the transfer of liquidity between the Firm’s legal entities; and •Maintain the appropriate amount of surplus liquidity at a Firmwide and legal entity level, where relevant. GovernanceCommittees responsible for liquidity governance include the Firmwide ALCO, as well as regional ALCOs, the Treasurer Committee, and the CTC Risk Committee. In addition, the Board Risk Committee reviews and recommends to the Board of Directors, for approval, the Firm’s liquidity risk tolerances, liquidity strategy, and liquidity policy. Refer to Firmwide Risk Management on pages 91–95 for further discussion of ALCO and other risk-related committees. Internal stress testingThe Firm conducts internal liquidity stress testing to monitor liquidity positions at the Firm and its material legal entities under a variety of adverse scenarios, including scenarios analyzed as part of the Firm’s resolution and recovery planning. Internal stress tests are produced on a daily basis, and other stress tests are performed in response to specific market events or concerns. Liquidity stress tests assume all of the Firm’s contractual financial obligations are met and take into consideration: •Varying levels of access to unsecured and secured funding markets; •Estimated non-contractual and contingent cash outflows;•Credit rating downgrades; •Collateral haircuts; and •Potential impediments to the availability and transferability of liquidity between jurisdictions and material legal entities such as regulatory, legal or other restrictions. Liquidity outflows are modeled across a range of time horizons and currency dimensions and contemplate both market and idiosyncratic stresses. Results of stress tests are considered in the formulation of the Firm’s funding plan and assessment of its liquidity position. The Parent Company acts as a source of funding for the Firm through equity and Liquidity risk is the risk that the Firm will be unable to meet its cash and collateral needs as they arise or that it does not have the appropriate amount, composition and tenor of funding and liquidity to support its assets and liabilities. Liquidity risk managementThe Firm has a Liquidity Risk Management (“LRM”) function whose primary objective is to provide independent oversight of liquidity risk across the Firm. Liquidity Risk Management’s responsibilities include: •Defining, monitoring and reporting liquidity risk metrics; •Independently establishing and monitoring limits and indicators, including liquidity risk appetite; •Developing a process to classify, monitor and report limit breaches; •Performing an independent review of liquidity risk management processes to evaluate their adequacy and effectiveness; •Monitoring and reporting internal Firmwide and legal entity liquidity stress tests, regulatory defined metrics, as well as liquidity positions, balance sheet variances and funding activities; and •Approving or escalating for review new or updated liquidity stress assumptions.Liquidity management Treasury and CIO is responsible for liquidity management.The primary objectives of the Firm’s liquidity management are to: •Ensure that the Firm’s core businesses and material legal entities are able to operate in support of client needs and meet contractual and contingent financial obligations through normal economic cycles as well as during stress events, and •Manage an optimal funding mix and availability of liquidity sources. The Firm addresses these objectives through: •Analyzing and understanding the liquidity characteristics of the assets and liabilities of the Firm, LOBs, legal entities, as well as currencies, taking into account legal, regulatory, and operational restrictions; •Developing and maintaining internal liquidity stress testing assumptions; •Defining and monitoring Firmwide and legal entity-specific liquidity strategies, policies, reporting and contingency funding plans; •Managing liquidity within the Firm’s approved limits and indicators, including liquidity risk appetite tolerances; Liquidity risk is the risk that the Firm will be unable to meet its cash and collateral needs as they arise or that it does not have the appropriate amount, composition and tenor of funding and liquidity to support its assets and liabilities.

The Firm has a Liquidity Risk Management (“LRM”) function whose primary objective is to provide independent oversight of liquidity risk across the Firm. Liquidity Risk Management’s responsibilities include: •Defining, monitoring and reporting liquidity risk metrics; •Independently establishing and monitoring limits and indicators, including liquidity risk appetite; •Developing a process to classify, monitor and report limit breaches; •Performing an independent review of liquidity risk management processes to evaluate their adequacy and effectiveness; •Monitoring and reporting internal Firmwide and legal entity liquidity stress tests, regulatory defined metrics, as well as liquidity positions, balance sheet variances and funding activities; and •Approving or escalating for review new or updated liquidity stress assumptions.

Treasury and CIO is responsible for liquidity management. The primary objectives of the Firm’s liquidity management are to: •Ensure that the Firm’s core businesses and material legal entities are able to operate in support of client needs and meet contractual and contingent financial obligations through normal economic cycles as well as during stress events, and •Manage an optimal funding mix and availability of liquidity sources. The Firm addresses these objectives through: •Analyzing and understanding the liquidity characteristics of the assets and liabilities of the Firm, LOBs, legal entities, as well as currencies, taking into account legal, regulatory, and operational restrictions; •Developing and maintaining internal liquidity stress testing assumptions; •Defining and monitoring Firmwide and legal entity-specific liquidity strategies, policies, reporting and contingency funding plans; •Managing liquidity within the Firm’s approved limits and indicators, including liquidity risk appetite tolerances; •Managing compliance with regulatory requirements related to funding and liquidity risk; and •Setting FTP in accordance with underlying liquidity characteristics of balance sheet assets and liabilities as well as certain off-balance sheet items. As part of the Firm’s overall liquidity management strategy, the Firm manages liquidity and funding using a centralized, global approach designed to: •Optimize liquidity sources and uses; •Monitor exposures; •Identify constraints on the transfer of liquidity between the Firm’s legal entities; and •Maintain the appropriate amount of surplus liquidity at a Firmwide and legal entity level, where relevant. GovernanceCommittees responsible for liquidity governance include the Firmwide ALCO, as well as regional ALCOs, the Treasurer Committee, and the CTC Risk Committee. In addition, the Board Risk Committee reviews and recommends to the Board of Directors, for approval, the Firm’s liquidity risk tolerances, liquidity strategy, and liquidity policy. Refer to Firmwide Risk Management on pages 91–95 for further discussion of ALCO and other risk-related committees. Internal stress testingThe Firm conducts internal liquidity stress testing to monitor liquidity positions at the Firm and its material legal entities under a variety of adverse scenarios, including scenarios analyzed as part of the Firm’s resolution and recovery planning. Internal stress tests are produced on a daily basis, and other stress tests are performed in response to specific market events or concerns. Liquidity stress tests assume all of the Firm’s contractual financial obligations are met and take into consideration: •Varying levels of access to unsecured and secured funding markets; •Estimated non-contractual and contingent cash outflows;•Credit rating downgrades; •Collateral haircuts; and •Potential impediments to the availability and transferability of liquidity between jurisdictions and material legal entities such as regulatory, legal or other restrictions. Liquidity outflows are modeled across a range of time horizons and currency dimensions and contemplate both market and idiosyncratic stresses. Results of stress tests are considered in the formulation of the Firm’s funding plan and assessment of its liquidity position. The Parent Company acts as a source of funding for the Firm through equity and •Managing compliance with regulatory requirements related to funding and liquidity risk; and •Setting FTP in accordance with underlying liquidity characteristics of balance sheet assets and liabilities as well as certain off-balance sheet items. As part of the Firm’s overall liquidity management strategy, the Firm manages liquidity and funding using a centralized, global approach designed to: •Optimize liquidity sources and uses; •Monitor exposures; •Identify constraints on the transfer of liquidity between the Firm’s legal entities; and •Maintain the appropriate amount of surplus liquidity at a Firmwide and legal entity level, where relevant. Governance Committees responsible for liquidity governance include the Firmwide ALCO, as well as regional ALCOs, the Treasurer Committee, and the CTC Risk Committee. In addition, the Board Risk Committee reviews and recommends to the Board of Directors, for approval, the Firm’s liquidity risk tolerances, liquidity strategy, and liquidity policy. Refer to Firmwide Risk Management on pages 91–95 for further discussion of ALCO and other risk-related committees.

The Firm conducts internal liquidity stress testing to monitor liquidity positions at the Firm and its material legal entities under a variety of adverse scenarios, including scenarios analyzed as part of the Firm’s resolution and recovery planning. Internal stress tests are produced on a daily basis, and other stress tests are performed in response to specific market events or concerns. Liquidity stress tests assume all of the Firm’s contractual financial obligations are met and take into consideration: •Varying levels of access to unsecured and secured funding markets; •Estimated non-contractual and contingent cash outflows; •Credit rating downgrades; •Collateral haircuts; and •Potential impediments to the availability and transferability of liquidity between jurisdictions and material legal entities such as regulatory, legal or other restrictions. Liquidity outflows are modeled across a range of time horizons and currency dimensions and contemplate both market and idiosyncratic stresses. Results of stress tests are considered in the formulation of the Firm’s funding plan and assessment of its liquidity position. The Parent Company acts as a source of funding for the Firm through equity and 108JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 108JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 108JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 108 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K long-term debt issuances, and its intermediate holding company, JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC (the “IHC”), provides funding to support the ongoing operations of the Parent Company and its subsidiaries. The Firm manages liquidity at the Parent Company, the IHC, and operating subsidiaries at levels sufficient to comply with liquidity risk tolerances and minimum liquidity requirements, and to manage through periods of stress when access to normal funding sources may be disrupted.Contingency funding planThe Firm’s Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”) sets out the strategies for addressing and managing liquidity resource needs during a liquidity stress event and incorporates liquidity risk limits, indicators and risk appetite tolerances. The CFP also identifies the alternative contingent funding and liquidity resources available to the Firm and its legal entities in a period of stress. LCR and HQLAThe LCR rule requires that the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. maintain an amount of eligible HQLA that is sufficient to meet their respective estimated total net cash outflows over a prospective 30 calendar-day period of significant stress. Eligible HQLA, for purposes of calculating the LCR, is the amount of unencumbered HQLA that satisfy certain operational considerations as defined in the LCR rule. HQLA primarily consist of cash and certain high-quality liquid securities as defined in the LCR rule.Under the LCR rule, the amount of eligible HQLA held by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that is in excess of its stand-alone 100% minimum LCR requirement, and that is not transferable to non-bank affiliates, must be excluded from the Firm’s reported eligible HQLA.Estimated net cash outflows are based on standardized stress outflow and inflow rates prescribed in the LCR rule, which are applied to the balances of the Firm’s assets, sources of funds, and obligations. The LCR for both the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is required to be a minimum of 100%. The following table summarizes the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s average LCR for the three months ended December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023 based on the Firm’s interpretation of the LCR framework.Three months endedAverage amount(in millions)December 31, 2024September 30, 2024December 31, 2023JPMorgan Chase & Co.:HQLAEligible cash(a)$396,123 $412,389 $485,263 Eligible securities(b)(c)464,877 453,899 313,365 Total HQLA(d)$861,000 $866,288 $798,628 Net cash outflows$763,648 $762,072 $704,857 LCR113 %114 %113 %Net excess eligible HQLA(d)$97,352 $104,216 $93,771 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.:LCR124 %121 %129 %Net excess eligible HQLA$193,682 $168,137 $215,190 (a)Represents cash on deposit at central banks, primarily the Federal Reserve Banks. (b)Eligible HQLA securities may be reported in securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements, trading assets, or investment securities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. For purposes of calculating the LCR, HQLA securities are included at fair value, which may differ from the accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP.(c)Predominantly U.S. Treasuries, U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, and sovereign bonds net of regulatory haircuts under the LCR rule.(d)Excludes average excess eligible HQLA at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s average LCR increased during the three months ended December 31, 2024, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2024, driven by activities in CIB Markets, partially offset by lower market values of HQLA-eligible investment securities and funding maturities.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s average LCR for the three months ended December 31, 2024 decreased compared with the three months ended December 31, 2023, driven by dividend payments to the Parent Company and lending activity, largely offset by higher market values of HQLA-eligible investment securities, a reduction in unencumbered non-HQLA AFS securities, activities in CIB Markets, and long-term debt issuances. long-term debt issuances, and its intermediate holding company, JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC (the “IHC”), provides funding to support the ongoing operations of the Parent Company and its subsidiaries. The Firm manages liquidity at the Parent Company, the IHC, and operating subsidiaries at levels sufficient to comply with liquidity risk tolerances and minimum liquidity requirements, and to manage through periods of stress when access to normal funding sources may be disrupted.Contingency funding planThe Firm’s Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”) sets out the strategies for addressing and managing liquidity resource needs during a liquidity stress event and incorporates liquidity risk limits, indicators and risk appetite tolerances. The CFP also identifies the alternative contingent funding and liquidity resources available to the Firm and its legal entities in a period of stress. LCR and HQLAThe LCR rule requires that the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. maintain an amount of eligible HQLA that is sufficient to meet their respective estimated total net cash outflows over a prospective 30 calendar-day period of significant stress. Eligible HQLA, for purposes of calculating the LCR, is the amount of unencumbered HQLA that satisfy certain operational considerations as defined in the LCR rule. HQLA primarily consist of cash and certain high-quality liquid securities as defined in the LCR rule.Under the LCR rule, the amount of eligible HQLA held by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that is in excess of its stand-alone 100% minimum LCR requirement, and that is not transferable to non-bank affiliates, must be excluded from the Firm’s reported eligible HQLA.Estimated net cash outflows are based on standardized stress outflow and inflow rates prescribed in the LCR rule, which are applied to the balances of the Firm’s assets, sources of funds, and obligations. The LCR for both the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is required to be a minimum of 100%. long-term debt issuances, and its intermediate holding company, JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC (the “IHC”), provides funding to support the ongoing operations of the Parent Company and its subsidiaries. The Firm manages liquidity at the Parent Company, the IHC, and operating subsidiaries at levels sufficient to comply with liquidity risk tolerances and minimum liquidity requirements, and to manage through periods of stress when access to normal funding sources may be disrupted.

The Firm’s Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”) sets out the strategies for addressing and managing liquidity resource needs during a liquidity stress event and incorporates liquidity risk limits, indicators and risk appetite tolerances. The CFP also identifies the alternative contingent funding and liquidity resources available to the Firm and its legal entities in a period of stress.

The LCR rule requires that the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. maintain an amount of eligible HQLA that is sufficient to meet their respective estimated total net cash outflows over a prospective 30 calendar-day period of significant stress. Eligible HQLA, for purposes of calculating the LCR, is the amount of unencumbered HQLA that satisfy certain operational considerations as defined in the LCR rule. HQLA primarily consist of cash and certain high-quality liquid securities as defined in the LCR rule. Under the LCR rule, the amount of eligible HQLA held by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that is in excess of its stand-alone 100% minimum LCR requirement, and that is not transferable to non-bank affiliates, must be excluded from the Firm’s reported eligible HQLA. Estimated net cash outflows are based on standardized stress outflow and inflow rates prescribed in the LCR rule, which are applied to the balances of the Firm’s assets, sources of funds, and obligations. The LCR for both the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is required to be a minimum of 100%. The following table summarizes the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s average LCR for the three months ended December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023 based on the Firm’s interpretation of the LCR framework.Three months endedAverage amount(in millions)December 31, 2024September 30, 2024December 31, 2023JPMorgan Chase & Co.:HQLAEligible cash(a)$396,123 $412,389 $485,263 Eligible securities(b)(c)464,877 453,899 313,365 Total HQLA(d)$861,000 $866,288 $798,628 Net cash outflows$763,648 $762,072 $704,857 LCR113 %114 %113 %Net excess eligible HQLA(d)$97,352 $104,216 $93,771 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.:LCR124 %121 %129 %Net excess eligible HQLA$193,682 $168,137 $215,190 (a)Represents cash on deposit at central banks, primarily the Federal Reserve Banks. (b)Eligible HQLA securities may be reported in securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements, trading assets, or investment securities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. For purposes of calculating the LCR, HQLA securities are included at fair value, which may differ from the accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP.(c)Predominantly U.S. Treasuries, U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, and sovereign bonds net of regulatory haircuts under the LCR rule.(d)Excludes average excess eligible HQLA at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s average LCR increased during the three months ended December 31, 2024, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2024, driven by activities in CIB Markets, partially offset by lower market values of HQLA-eligible investment securities and funding maturities.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s average LCR for the three months ended December 31, 2024 decreased compared with the three months ended December 31, 2023, driven by dividend payments to the Parent Company and lending activity, largely offset by higher market values of HQLA-eligible investment securities, a reduction in unencumbered non-HQLA AFS securities, activities in CIB Markets, and long-term debt issuances. The following table summarizes the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s average LCR for the three months ended December 31, 2024, September 30, 2024 and December 31, 2023 based on the Firm’s interpretation of the LCR framework. Three months endedAverage amount(in millions)December 31, 2024September 30, 2024December 31, 2023JPMorgan Chase & Co.:HQLAEligible cash(a)$396,123 $412,389 $485,263 Eligible securities(b)(c)464,877 453,899 313,365 Total HQLA(d)$861,000 $866,288 $798,628 Net cash outflows$763,648 $762,072 $704,857 LCR113 %114 %113 %Net excess eligible HQLA(d)$97,352 $104,216 $93,771 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.:LCR124 %121 %129 %Net excess eligible HQLA$193,682 $168,137 $215,190

(a)Represents cash on deposit at central banks, primarily the Federal Reserve Banks. (b)Eligible HQLA securities may be reported in securities borrowed or purchased under resale agreements, trading assets, or investment securities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. For purposes of calculating the LCR, HQLA securities are included at fair value, which may differ from the accounting treatment under U.S. GAAP. (c)Predominantly U.S. Treasuries, U.S. GSE and government agency MBS, and sovereign bonds net of regulatory haircuts under the LCR rule. (d)Excludes average excess eligible HQLA at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s average LCR increased during the three months ended December 31, 2024, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2024, driven by activities in CIB Markets, partially offset by lower market values of HQLA-eligible investment securities and funding maturities. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s average LCR for the three months ended December 31, 2024 decreased compared with the three months ended December 31, 2023, driven by dividend payments to the Parent Company and lending activity, largely offset by higher market values of HQLA-eligible investment securities, a reduction in unencumbered non-HQLA AFS securities, activities in CIB Markets, and long-term debt issuances. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K109 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K109 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K109 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 109

Each of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s average LCR may fluctuate from period to period due to changes in their respective eligible HQLA and estimated net cash outflows as a result of ongoing business activity and from the impacts of Federal Reserve actions as well as other factors. Refer to the Firm’s U.S. LCR Disclosure reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for a further discussion of the Firm’s LCR.Liquidity sourcesIn addition to the assets reported in the Firm’s eligible HQLA discussed above, the Firm had unencumbered marketable securities, such as equity and debt securities, that the Firm believes would be available to raise liquidity. This includes excess eligible HQLA securities at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates. The fair value of these securities was approximately $594 billion and $649 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, although the amount of liquidity that could be raised at any particular time would be dependent on prevailing market conditions. The decrease compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by reductions in unencumbered AFS securities in Treasury and CIO, excess eligible HQLA securities at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and unencumbered CIB trading assets.The Firm had approximately $1.4 trillion of available cash and securities as of both December 31, 2024 and 2023. For each respective period, the amount was comprised of eligible end-of-period HQLA, excluding the impact of regulatory haircuts, of approximately $834 billion and $798 billion, and unencumbered marketable securities with a fair value of approximately $594 billion and $649 billion.The Firm also had available borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLBs”) and the discount window at the Federal Reserve Banks as a result of collateral pledged by the Firm to such banks of approximately $413 billion and $340 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This borrowing capacity excludes the benefit of cash and securities reported in the Firm’s eligible HQLA or other unencumbered securities that are currently pledged at the Federal Reserve Banks discount window and other central banks. Available borrowing capacity increased from December 31, 2023 primarily due to a higher amount of commercial loans and credit card receivables pledged at the Federal Reserve Banks. Although available, the Firm does not view this borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Banks discount window and the other central banks as a primary source of liquidity.NSFRThe net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”) is a liquidity requirement for large banking organizations that is intended to measure the adequacy of “available” stable funding that is sufficient to meet their “required” amounts of stable funding over a one-year horizon. For the three months ended December 31, 2024, both the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were compliant with the 100% minimum NSFR requirement, based on the Firm’s interpretation of the final NSFR rule. Refer to the Firm's U.S. NSFR Disclosure report on the Firm’s website for additional information. Each of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s average LCR may fluctuate from period to period due to changes in their respective eligible HQLA and estimated net cash outflows as a result of ongoing business activity and from the impacts of Federal Reserve actions as well as other factors. Refer to the Firm’s U.S. LCR Disclosure reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for a further discussion of the Firm’s LCR.Liquidity sourcesIn addition to the assets reported in the Firm’s eligible HQLA discussed above, the Firm had unencumbered marketable securities, such as equity and debt securities, that the Firm believes would be available to raise liquidity. This includes excess eligible HQLA securities at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates. The fair value of these securities was approximately $594 billion and $649 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, although the amount of liquidity that could be raised at any particular time would be dependent on prevailing market conditions. The decrease compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by reductions in unencumbered AFS securities in Treasury and CIO, excess eligible HQLA securities at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and unencumbered CIB trading assets.The Firm had approximately $1.4 trillion of available cash and securities as of both December 31, 2024 and 2023. For each respective period, the amount was comprised of eligible end-of-period HQLA, excluding the impact of regulatory haircuts, of approximately $834 billion and $798 billion, and unencumbered marketable securities with a fair value of approximately $594 billion and $649 billion.The Firm also had available borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLBs”) and the discount window at the Federal Reserve Banks as a result of collateral pledged by the Firm to such banks of approximately $413 billion and $340 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This borrowing capacity excludes the benefit of cash and securities reported in the Firm’s eligible HQLA or other unencumbered securities that are currently pledged at the Federal Reserve Banks discount window and other central banks. Available borrowing capacity increased from December 31, 2023 primarily due to a higher amount of commercial loans and credit card receivables pledged at the Federal Reserve Banks. Although available, the Firm does not view this borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Banks discount window and the other central banks as a primary source of liquidity. Each of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s average LCR may fluctuate from period to period due to changes in their respective eligible HQLA and estimated net cash outflows as a result of ongoing business activity and from the impacts of Federal Reserve actions as well as other factors. Refer to the Firm’s U.S. LCR Disclosure reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for a further discussion of the Firm’s LCR.

In addition to the assets reported in the Firm’s eligible HQLA discussed above, the Firm had unencumbered marketable securities, such as equity and debt securities, that the Firm believes would be available to raise liquidity. This includes excess eligible HQLA securities at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. that are not transferable to non-bank affiliates. The fair value of these securities was approximately $594 billion and $649 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, although the amount of liquidity that could be raised at any particular time would be dependent on prevailing market conditions. The decrease compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by reductions in unencumbered AFS securities in Treasury and CIO, excess eligible HQLA securities at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and unencumbered CIB trading assets. The Firm had approximately $1.4 trillion of available cash and securities as of both December 31, 2024 and 2023. For each respective period, the amount was comprised of eligible end-of-period HQLA, excluding the impact of regulatory haircuts, of approximately $834 billion and $798 billion, and unencumbered marketable securities with a fair value of approximately $594 billion and $649 billion. The Firm also had available borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLBs”) and the discount window at the Federal Reserve Banks as a result of collateral pledged by the Firm to such banks of approximately $413 billion and $340 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. This borrowing capacity excludes the benefit of cash and securities reported in the Firm’s eligible HQLA or other unencumbered securities that are currently pledged at the Federal Reserve Banks discount window and other central banks. Available borrowing capacity increased from December 31, 2023 primarily due to a higher amount of commercial loans and credit card receivables pledged at the Federal Reserve Banks. Although available, the Firm does not view this borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Banks discount window and the other central banks as a primary source of liquidity. NSFRThe net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”) is a liquidity requirement for large banking organizations that is intended to measure the adequacy of “available” stable funding that is sufficient to meet their “required” amounts of stable funding over a one-year horizon. For the three months ended December 31, 2024, both the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were compliant with the 100% minimum NSFR requirement, based on the Firm’s interpretation of the final NSFR rule. Refer to the Firm's U.S. NSFR Disclosure report on the Firm’s website for additional information. NSFR The net stable funding ratio (“NSFR”) is a liquidity requirement for large banking organizations that is intended to measure the adequacy of “available” stable funding that is sufficient to meet their “required” amounts of stable funding over a one-year horizon. For the three months ended December 31, 2024, both the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were compliant with the 100% minimum NSFR requirement, based on the Firm’s interpretation of the final NSFR rule. Refer to the Firm's U.S. NSFR Disclosure report on the Firm’s website for additional information. 110JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 110JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 110JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 110 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Funding

Management believes that the Firm’s unsecured and secured funding capacity is sufficient to meet its on- and off-balance sheet obligations, which includes both short- and long-term cash requirements.The Firm funds its global balance sheet through diverse sources of funding including deposits, secured and unsecured funding in the capital markets and stockholders’ equity. Deposits are the primary funding source for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Additionally, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. may access funding through short- or long-term secured borrowings, the issuance of unsecured long-term debt, or from borrowings from the IHC. The Firm’s non-bank subsidiaries are primarily funded from long-term unsecured borrowings and short-term secured borrowings which are primarily securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements. Excess funding is invested by Treasury and CIO in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio or deployed in cash or other short-term liquid investments based on their interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics. Refer to Note 28 for additional information on off–balance sheet obligations. Management believes that the Firm’s unsecured and secured funding capacity is sufficient to meet its on- and off-balance sheet obligations, which includes both short- and long-term cash requirements.The Firm funds its global balance sheet through diverse sources of funding including deposits, secured and unsecured funding in the capital markets and stockholders’ equity. Deposits are the primary funding source for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Additionally, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. may access funding through short- or long-term secured borrowings, the issuance of unsecured long-term debt, or from Management believes that the Firm’s unsecured and secured funding capacity is sufficient to meet its on- and off-balance sheet obligations, which includes both short- and long-term cash requirements. The Firm funds its global balance sheet through diverse sources of funding including deposits, secured and unsecured funding in the capital markets and stockholders’ equity. Deposits are the primary funding source for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Additionally, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. may access funding through short- or long-term secured borrowings, the issuance of unsecured long-term debt, or from borrowings from the IHC. The Firm’s non-bank subsidiaries are primarily funded from long-term unsecured borrowings and short-term secured borrowings which are primarily securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements. Excess funding is invested by Treasury and CIO in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio or deployed in cash or other short-term liquid investments based on their interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics. Refer to Note 28 for additional information on off–balance sheet obligations. borrowings from the IHC. The Firm’s non-bank subsidiaries are primarily funded from long-term unsecured borrowings and short-term secured borrowings which are primarily securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements. Excess funding is invested by Treasury and CIO in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio or deployed in cash or other short-term liquid investments based on their interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics. Refer to Note 28 for additional information on off–balance sheet obligations. Deposits The table below summarizes, by LOB and Corporate, the period-end and average deposit balances as of and for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. As of or for the year ended December 31,Average(in millions)2024202320242023Consumer & Community Banking(a)$1,056,652 $1,094,738 $1,064,215 $1,126,552 Commercial & Investment Bank(a)1,073,512 1,050,892 1,061,488 996,295 Asset & Wealth Management(a)248,287 233,232 235,146 216,178 Corporate27,581 21,826 25,793 20,042 Total Firm$2,406,032 $2,400,688 $2,386,642 $2,359,067 Consumer & Community Banking(a) Commercial & Investment Bank(a) Asset & Wealth Management(a) Corporate (a)In the fourth quarter of 2023, CCB transferred certain deposits associated with First Republic to AWM and CIB. The Firm believes that deposits provide a stable source of funding and reduce the Firm’s reliance on the wholesale funding markets. A significant portion of the Firm’s deposits are consumer deposits and wholesale operating deposits, which are both considered to be stable sources of liquidity. Wholesale operating deposits are generally considered to be stable sources of liquidity because they are generated from customers that maintain operating service relationships with the Firm. The Firm believes that average deposit balances are generally more representative of deposit trends than period-end deposit balances. However, during periods of market disruption, average deposit trends may be impacted.The following discussion excludes the impact of the transfer of certain First Republic deposits in the fourth quarter of 2023 from CCB to the other LOBs as the transfers had no net impact on Firmwide deposits.Average deposits increased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting:•an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments and net issuances of structured notes as a result of client demand in Markets, partially offset by deposit attrition, which included actions taken to reduce certain deposits,•the timing impact of First Republic,•an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and•a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending, largely offset by new accounts. Period-end deposits increased from December 31, 2023, reflecting:•an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments, largely offset by net maturities of structured notes in Markets,•an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and•a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending and migration into higher-yielding investments, predominantly offset by new accounts.Refer to the Firm’s Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis and the Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 63–65 and pages 70–90, respectively, for further information on deposit and liability balance trends, as well as Executive Overview The Firm believes that deposits provide a stable source of funding and reduce the Firm’s reliance on the wholesale funding markets. A significant portion of the Firm’s deposits are consumer deposits and wholesale operating deposits, which are both considered to be stable sources of liquidity. Wholesale operating deposits are generally considered to be stable sources of liquidity because they are generated from customers that maintain operating service relationships with the Firm. The Firm believes that average deposit balances are generally more representative of deposit trends than period-end deposit balances. However, during periods of market disruption, average deposit trends may be impacted.The following discussion excludes the impact of the transfer of certain First Republic deposits in the fourth quarter of 2023 from CCB to the other LOBs as the transfers had no net impact on Firmwide deposits.Average deposits increased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting:•an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments and net issuances of structured notes as a result of client demand in Markets, partially offset by deposit attrition, which included actions taken to reduce certain deposits,•the timing impact of First Republic, The Firm believes that deposits provide a stable source of funding and reduce the Firm’s reliance on the wholesale funding markets. A significant portion of the Firm’s deposits are consumer deposits and wholesale operating deposits, which are both considered to be stable sources of liquidity. Wholesale operating deposits are generally considered to be stable sources of liquidity because they are generated from customers that maintain operating service relationships with the Firm. The Firm believes that average deposit balances are generally more representative of deposit trends than period-end deposit balances. However, during periods of market disruption, average deposit trends may be impacted. The following discussion excludes the impact of the transfer of certain First Republic deposits in the fourth quarter of 2023 from CCB to the other LOBs as the transfers had no net impact on Firmwide deposits. Average deposits increased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting: •an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments and net issuances of structured notes as a result of client demand in Markets, partially offset by deposit attrition, which included actions taken to reduce certain deposits, •the timing impact of First Republic, •an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and•a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending, largely offset by new accounts. Period-end deposits increased from December 31, 2023, reflecting:•an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments, largely offset by net maturities of structured notes in Markets,•an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and•a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending and migration into higher-yielding investments, predominantly offset by new accounts.Refer to the Firm’s Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis and the Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 63–65 and pages 70–90, respectively, for further information on deposit and liability balance trends, as well as Executive Overview •an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and •a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending, largely offset by new accounts. Period-end deposits increased from December 31, 2023, reflecting: •an increase in CIB due to net inflows predominantly in Payments, largely offset by net maturities of structured notes in Markets, •an increase in AWM as a result of growth in balances in new and existing client accounts, reflecting the impact of higher-yielding product offerings, largely offset by continued migration into other investments, and •a decline in CCB primarily driven by a decrease in balances in existing accounts due to increased customer spending and migration into higher-yielding investments, predominantly offset by new accounts. Refer to the Firm’s Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis and the Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 63–65 and pages 70–90, respectively, for further information on deposit and liability balance trends, as well as Executive Overview JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K111 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K111 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K111 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 111

on pages 54–58 and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Note 3 for further information on structured notes. Certain deposits are covered by insurance protection that provides additional funding stability and results in a benefit to the LCR. Deposit insurance protection may be available to depositors in the countries in which the deposits are placed. For example, the FDIC provides deposit insurance protection for deposits placed in a U.S. depository institution. At December 31, 2024 and 2023(a), the Firmwide estimated uninsured deposits were $1,414.0 billion and $1,347.8 billion, respectively, primarily reflecting wholesale operating deposits.Total uninsured deposits include time deposits. The table below presents an estimate of uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. time deposits, and their remaining maturities. The Firm’s estimates of its uninsured U.S. time deposits are based on data that the Firm calculates periodically under applicable FDIC regulations. For purposes of this presentation, all non-U.S. time deposits are deemed to be uninsured. (in millions)December 31,2024December 31,2023U.S.Non-U.S.U.S.Non-U.S.Three months or less$119,333 $77,253 $98,606 (a)$77,466 Over three months but within 6 months11,040 12,229 17,736 5,358 Over six months but within 12 months7,056 1,542 10,294 4,820 Over 12 months823 1,924 710 2,543 Total$138,252 $92,948 $127,346 (a)$90,187 (a)Prior-period amounts have been revised to include cash collateral for certain derivatives to align with a change in the methodology for calculating uninsured U.S. time deposits.The table below shows the loan and deposit balances, the loans-to-deposits ratios, and deposits as a percentage of total liabilities, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.As of December 31, (in billions except ratios)20242023Deposits$2,406.0 $2,400.7 Deposits as a % of total liabilities66 %68 %Loans$1,348.0 $1,323.7 Loans-to-deposits ratio56 %55 % on pages 54–58 and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Note 3 for further information on structured notes. Certain deposits are covered by insurance protection that provides additional funding stability and results in a benefit to the LCR. Deposit insurance protection may be available to depositors in the countries in which the deposits are placed. For example, the FDIC provides deposit insurance protection for deposits placed in a U.S. depository institution. At December 31, 2024 and 2023(a), the Firmwide estimated uninsured deposits were $1,414.0 billion and $1,347.8 billion, respectively, primarily reflecting wholesale operating deposits. on pages 54–58 and Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Note 3 for further information on structured notes. Certain deposits are covered by insurance protection that provides additional funding stability and results in a benefit to the LCR. Deposit insurance protection may be available to depositors in the countries in which the deposits are placed. For example, the FDIC provides deposit insurance protection for deposits placed in a U.S. depository institution. At December 31, 2024 and 2023(a), the Firmwide estimated uninsured deposits were $1,414.0 billion and $1,347.8 billion, respectively, primarily reflecting wholesale operating deposits. Total uninsured deposits include time deposits. The table below presents an estimate of uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. time deposits, and their remaining maturities. The Firm’s estimates of its uninsured U.S. time deposits are based on data that the Firm calculates periodically under applicable FDIC regulations. For purposes of this presentation, all non-U.S. time deposits are deemed to be uninsured. (in millions)December 31,2024December 31,2023U.S.Non-U.S.U.S.Non-U.S.Three months or less$119,333 $77,253 $98,606 (a)$77,466 Over three months but within 6 months11,040 12,229 17,736 5,358 Over six months but within 12 months7,056 1,542 10,294 4,820 Over 12 months823 1,924 710 2,543 Total$138,252 $92,948 $127,346 (a)$90,187 (a)Prior-period amounts have been revised to include cash collateral for certain derivatives to align with a change in the methodology for calculating uninsured U.S. time deposits.The table below shows the loan and deposit balances, the loans-to-deposits ratios, and deposits as a percentage of total liabilities, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.As of December 31, (in billions except ratios)20242023Deposits$2,406.0 $2,400.7 Deposits as a % of total liabilities66 %68 %Loans$1,348.0 $1,323.7 Loans-to-deposits ratio56 %55 % Total uninsured deposits include time deposits. The table below presents an estimate of uninsured U.S. and non-U.S. time deposits, and their remaining maturities. The Firm’s estimates of its uninsured U.S. time deposits are based on data that the Firm calculates periodically under applicable FDIC regulations. For purposes of this presentation, all non-U.S. time deposits are deemed to be uninsured. (in millions)December 31,2024December 31,2023U.S.Non-U.S.U.S.Non-U.S.Three months or less$119,333 $77,253 $98,606 (a)$77,466 Over three months but within 6 months11,040 12,229 17,736 5,358 Over six months but within 12 months7,056 1,542 10,294 4,820 Over 12 months823 1,924 710 2,543 Total$138,252 $92,948 $127,346 (a)$90,187 (a) (a) (a)Prior-period amounts have been revised to include cash collateral for certain derivatives to align with a change in the methodology for calculating uninsured U.S. time deposits. The table below shows the loan and deposit balances, the loans-to-deposits ratios, and deposits as a percentage of total liabilities, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. As of December 31, (in billions except ratios)20242023Deposits$2,406.0 $2,400.7 Deposits as a % of total liabilities66 %68 %Loans$1,348.0 $1,323.7 Loans-to-deposits ratio56 %55 % The following table provides a summary of the average balances and average interest rates of JPMorganChase’s deposits for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022. Year ended December 31,Average balancesAverage interest rates(in millions, except interest rates)202420232022202420232022U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing$611,734 $635,791 $691,206 NANANAInterest-bearingDemand(a)282,533 279,725 324,512 3.90 %3.50 %0.92 %Savings(b)800,964 864,558 971,788 1.39 1.10 0.28 Time223,503 145,827 62,022 4.93 4.74 2.07 Total interest-bearing deposits1,307,000 1,290,110 1,358,322 2.54 2.03 0.52 Total deposits in U.S. offices1,918,734 1,925,901 2,049,528 1.73 1.36 0.34 Non-U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing26,858 24,747 28,043 NANANAInterest-bearingDemand346,179 321,976 324,740 3.13 2.71 0.57 Time94,871 86,443 65,604 5.86 5.82 1.85 Total interest-bearing deposits441,050 408,419 390,344 3.72 3.37 0.78 Total deposits in non-U.S. offices467,908 433,166 418,387 3.50 3.18 0.73 Total deposits$2,386,642 $2,359,067 $2,467,915 2.08 %1.70 %0.41 % Year ended December 31, Demand(a) Savings(b) (a)Includes Negotiable Order of Withdrawal accounts, and certain trust accounts. (b)Includes Money Market Deposit Accounts. Refer to Note 17 for additional information on deposits. 112JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 112JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 112JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 112 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following table summarizes short-term and long-term funding, excluding deposits, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and average balances for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Refer to the Consolidated Balance Sheets Analysis on pages 63–65 and Note 11 for additional information. Sources of funds (excluding deposits)As of or for the year ended December 31, Average(in millions)2024202320242023Commercial paper$14,932 $14,737 $11,398 $12,675 Other borrowed funds13,018 8,200 12,040 9,712 Federal funds purchased567 787 1,547 1,754 Total short-term unsecured funding$28,517 $23,724 $24,985 $24,141 Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(a)$291,500 $212,804 $357,144 $249,661 Securities loaned(a)4,768 2,944 5,129 4,671 Other borrowed funds24,943 21,775 25,504 22,010 Obligations of Firm-administered multi-seller conduits(b)18,228 17,781 18,620 14,918 Total short-term secured funding$339,439 $255,304 $406,397 $291,260 Senior notes$203,639 $191,202 $199,908 $181,803 Subordinated debt16,060 19,708 18,614 20,374 Structured notes(c)98,792 86,056 93,483 76,574 Total long-term unsecured funding$318,491 $296,966 $312,005 $278,751 Credit card securitization(b)$5,312 $2,998 $5,138 $1,634 FHLB advances29,257 41,246 35,040 (g)28,865 Purchase Money Note(d)49,207 $48,989$49,090 $32,829Other long-term secured funding(e)4,463 4,624 4,676 4,513 Total long-term secured funding$88,239 $97,857 $93,944 $67,841 Preferred stock(f)$20,050 $27,404 $24,054 $27,404 Common stockholders’ equity(f)$324,708 $300,474 $312,370 $282,056 Commercial paper Other borrowed funds Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(a) Securities loaned(a) Obligations of Firm-administered multi-seller conduits(b)

(a)Primarily consists of short-term securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase. (b)Included in beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. (c)Includes certain TLAC-eligible long-term unsecured debt issued by the Parent Company. (d)Reflects the Purchase Money Note associated with the First Republic acquisition on May 1, 2023. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. (e)Includes long-term structured notes that are secured. (f)Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107, Consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity on page 175, Note 21 and Note 22 for additional information on preferred stock and common stockholders’ equity. (g)Includes the timing impact of First Republic. Refer to the Executive Overview on pages 54–58 and Note 34 for additional information.

The Firm’s primary source of short-term secured funding is securities sold under agreements to repurchase. These instruments are secured predominantly by high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased at December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities and higher secured financing of trading assets.The increase in secured other borrowed funds at December 31, 2024 from December 31, 2023, as well as the increase for the average year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year period, were both due to higher financing requirements in Markets, partially offset by FHLB maturities in Treasury and CIO.The balances associated with securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase fluctuate over time due to investment and financing activities of clients, the Firm’s demand for financing, the ongoing management of the mix of the Firm’s liabilities, including its secured and unsecured financing (for both the investment securities and market-making portfolios), and other market and portfolio factors.The Firm’s primary sources of short-term unsecured funding consist of issuances of wholesale commercial paper and other borrowed funds. The decrease in average commercial paper for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year period was due to lower issuances primarily as a result of short-term liquidity management.The increase in unsecured other borrowed funds at December 31, 2024 from December 31, 2023, was predominantly driven by net issuances of structured notes in Markets. The Firm’s primary source of short-term secured funding is securities sold under agreements to repurchase. These instruments are secured predominantly by high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased at December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities and higher secured financing of trading assets.The increase in secured other borrowed funds at December 31, 2024 from December 31, 2023, as well as the increase for the average year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year period, were both due to higher financing requirements in Markets, partially offset by FHLB maturities in Treasury and CIO.The balances associated with securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase fluctuate over time due to investment and financing activities of clients, The Firm’s primary source of short-term secured funding is securities sold under agreements to repurchase. These instruments are secured predominantly by high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased at December 31, 2024, compared with December 31, 2023, driven by Markets, reflecting higher client-driven market-making activities and higher secured financing of trading assets. The increase in secured other borrowed funds at December 31, 2024 from December 31, 2023, as well as the increase for the average year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year period, were both due to higher financing requirements in Markets, partially offset by FHLB maturities in Treasury and CIO. The balances associated with securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase fluctuate over time due to investment and financing activities of clients, the Firm’s demand for financing, the ongoing management of the mix of the Firm’s liabilities, including its secured and unsecured financing (for both the investment securities and market-making portfolios), and other market and portfolio factors.The Firm’s primary sources of short-term unsecured funding consist of issuances of wholesale commercial paper and other borrowed funds. The decrease in average commercial paper for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year period was due to lower issuances primarily as a result of short-term liquidity management.The increase in unsecured other borrowed funds at December 31, 2024 from December 31, 2023, was predominantly driven by net issuances of structured notes in Markets. the Firm’s demand for financing, the ongoing management of the mix of the Firm’s liabilities, including its secured and unsecured financing (for both the investment securities and market-making portfolios), and other market and portfolio factors. The Firm’s primary sources of short-term unsecured funding consist of issuances of wholesale commercial paper and other borrowed funds. The decrease in average commercial paper for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year period was due to lower issuances primarily as a result of short-term liquidity management. The increase in unsecured other borrowed funds at December 31, 2024 from December 31, 2023, was predominantly driven by net issuances of structured notes in Markets. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K113 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K113 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K113 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 113

Long-term funding provides an additional source of stable funding and liquidity for the Firm. The Firm’s long-term funding plan is driven primarily by expected client activity, liquidity considerations and regulatory requirements, including TLAC. Long-term funding objectives include maintaining diversification, maximizing market access and optimizing funding costs. The Firm evaluates various funding markets, tenors and currencies in creating its optimal long-term funding plan. Unsecured funding and issuance The significant majority of the Firm’s total outstanding long-term debt has been issued by the Parent Company to provide flexibility in support of the funding needs of both bank and non-bank subsidiaries. The Parent Company advances substantially all net funding proceeds to its subsidiary, the IHC. The IHC does not issue debt to external counterparties. The increase in structured notes at December 31, 2024 from December 31, 2023, and for the average year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the prior year period, was primarily driven by net issuances of structured notes in Markets due to client demand. The following table summarizes long-term unsecured issuance and maturities or redemptions for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Refer to Note 20 for additional information on the IHC and long-term debt. Long-term unsecured fundingYear ended December 31,2024202320242023(Notional in millions)Parent CompanySubsidiariesIssuanceSenior notes issued in the U.S. market$37,000 $14,256 $— $3,750 Senior notes issued in non-U.S. markets4,079 2,141 — — Total senior notes41,079 16,397 — 3,750 Structured notes(a)3,944 3,013 54,993 35,281 Total long-term unsecured funding – issuance$45,023 $19,410 $54,993 $39,031 Maturities/redemptionsSenior notes$25,765 $21,483 $65 $67 Subordinated debt3,097 2,090 250 — Structured notes892 1,532 47,425 28,777 Total long-term unsecured funding – maturities/redemptions$29,754 $25,105 $47,740 $28,844 Structured notes(a)

(a)Includes certain TLAC-eligible long-term unsecured debt issued by the Parent Company. Secured funding and issuance The Firm can also raise secured long-term funding through securitization of consumer credit card loans and FHLB advances. The following table summarizes the securitization issuance, the FHLB advances and their respective maturities or redemptions, as applicable for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Long-term secured fundingYear ended December 31,IssuanceMaturities/Redemptions(in millions)2024202320242023Credit card securitization$2,348 $1,998 $— $1,000 FHLB advances6,000 39,775 (c)18,050 9,485 Purchase Money Note(a)— 50,000 — $—Other long-term secured funding(b)1,578 991 1,049 432 Total long-term secured funding$9,926 $92,764 $19,099 $10,917 Credit card securitization (c) Purchase Money Note(a) Other long-term secured funding(b)

(a)Reflects the Purchase Money Note associated with the First Republic acquisition. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. (b)Includes long-term structured notes that are secured. (c)Includes FHLB advances associated with the First Republic acquisition on May 1, 2023. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. The Firm’s wholesale businesses also securitize loans for client-driven transactions; those client-driven loan securitizations are not considered to be a source of funding for the Firm and are not included in the table above. Refer to Note 14 for a further description of client-driven loan securitizations. 114JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 114JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 114JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 114 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The cost and availability of financing are influenced by credit ratings. Reductions in these ratings could have an adverse effect on the Firm’s access to liquidity sources, increase the cost of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements and decrease the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to the Firm. The nature and magnitude of the impact of ratings downgrades depends on numerous contractual and behavioral factors, which the Firm believes are incorporated in its liquidity risk and stress testing metrics. The Firm believes that it maintains sufficient liquidity to withstand a potential decrease in funding capacity due to ratings downgrades.Additionally, the Firm’s funding requirements for VIEs and other third-party commitments may be adversely affected by a decline in credit ratings. Refer to Notes 5 and 14 for additional information. The cost and availability of financing are influenced by credit ratings. Reductions in these ratings could have an adverse effect on the Firm’s access to liquidity sources, increase the cost of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements and decrease the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to the Firm. The nature and magnitude of the impact of ratings downgrades depends on numerous contractual and behavioral factors, which the Firm The cost and availability of financing are influenced by credit ratings. Reductions in these ratings could have an adverse effect on the Firm’s access to liquidity sources, increase the cost of funds, trigger additional collateral or funding requirements and decrease the number of investors and counterparties willing to lend to the Firm. The nature and magnitude of the impact of ratings downgrades depends on numerous contractual and behavioral factors, which the Firm believes are incorporated in its liquidity risk and stress testing metrics. The Firm believes that it maintains sufficient liquidity to withstand a potential decrease in funding capacity due to ratings downgrades.Additionally, the Firm’s funding requirements for VIEs and other third-party commitments may be adversely affected by a decline in credit ratings. Refer to Notes 5 and 14 for additional information. believes are incorporated in its liquidity risk and stress testing metrics. The Firm believes that it maintains sufficient liquidity to withstand a potential decrease in funding capacity due to ratings downgrades. Additionally, the Firm’s funding requirements for VIEs and other third-party commitments may be adversely affected by a decline in credit ratings. Refer to Notes 5 and 14 for additional information. The credit ratings of the Parent Company and certain of its principal subsidiaries as of December 31, 2024 were as follows: JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.J.P. Morgan Securities LLC J.P. Morgan Securities plc J.P. Morgan SE(a)December 31, 2024Long-term issuerShort-term issuerOutlookLong-term issuerShort-term issuerOutlookLong-term issuerShort-term issuerOutlookMoody’s Investors Service(a)A1P-1PositiveAa2P-1DevelopingAa3P-1PositiveStandard & Poor’s(b)AA-1StableAA-A-1+StableAA-A-1+StableFitch RatingsAA-F1+StableAAF1+StableAAF1+Stable J.P. Morgan Securities LLC J.P. Morgan Securities plc J.P. Morgan SE(a) Moody’s Investors Service(a) Standard & Poor’s(b) (a)On November 11, 2024, Moody’s (i) affirmed the credit ratings of the Parent Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the other subsidiaries listed above; (ii) revised its outlook for the Parent Company, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities plc from stable to positive; (iii) revised its outlook for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. from negative to developing, reflecting its view with respect to possible support from the U.S. government; and (iv) assessed its outlook for J.P. Morgan SE as negative with an “(m)” modifier, reflecting a negative outlook for long-term bank deposits and a positive outlook for the long-term issuer rating. (b)The credit ratings of the Parent Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the other subsidiaries presented in the table reflect ratings upgrades by Standard & Poor’s on November 15, 2024. Standard & Poor’s also revised its outlook for the Parent Company and such subsidiaries from positive to stable. JPMorganChase’s unsecured debt does not contain requirements that would call for an acceleration of payments, maturities or changes in the structure of the existing debt, provide any limitations on future borrowings or require additional collateral, based on unfavorable changes in the Firm’s credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, or stock price.Critical factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a stable and diverse earnings stream, strong capital and liquidity ratios, strong credit quality and risk management controls, and diverse funding sources. Rating agencies continue to evaluate economic and geopolitical trends, regulatory developments, future profitability, risk management practices, and litigation matters, as well as their broader ratings methodologies. Changes in any of these factors could lead to changes in the Firm’s credit ratings. JPMorganChase’s unsecured debt does not contain requirements that would call for an acceleration of payments, maturities or changes in the structure of the existing debt, provide any limitations on future borrowings or require additional collateral, based on unfavorable changes in the Firm’s credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, or stock price. JPMorganChase’s unsecured debt does not contain requirements that would call for an acceleration of payments, maturities or changes in the structure of the existing debt, provide any limitations on future borrowings or require additional collateral, based on unfavorable changes in the Firm’s credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings, or stock price. Critical factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a stable and diverse earnings stream, strong capital and liquidity ratios, strong credit quality and risk management controls, and diverse funding sources. Rating agencies continue to evaluate economic and geopolitical trends, regulatory developments, future profitability, risk management practices, and litigation matters, as well as their broader ratings methodologies. Changes in any of these factors could lead to changes in the Firm’s credit ratings. Critical factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a stable and diverse earnings stream, strong capital and liquidity ratios, strong credit quality and risk management controls, and diverse funding sources. Rating agencies continue to evaluate economic and geopolitical trends, regulatory developments, future profitability, risk management practices, and litigation matters, as well as their broader ratings methodologies. Changes in any of these factors could lead to changes in the Firm’s credit ratings. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K115 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K115 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K115 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 115 REPUTATION RISK MANAGEMENT REPUTATION RISK MANAGEMENT Reputation risk is the risk that an action or inaction may negatively impact perception of the Firm’s integrity and reduce confidence in the Firm’s competence by various stakeholders, including clients, counterparties, customers, communities, investors, regulators, or employees. The types of events that may result in reputation risk are wide-ranging and can be introduced by the Firm’s employees, business strategies and activities, clients, customers and counterparties with which the Firm does business. These events could contribute to financial losses, litigation, regulatory enforcement actions, fines, penalties or other sanctions, as well as other harm to the Firm. Organization and management Reputation Risk Management is an independent risk management function that establishes the governance framework for managing reputation risk across the Firm’s LOBs and Corporate. Reputation risk is inherently challenging to identify, manage, and quantify.The Firm’s reputation risk management function includes the following activities:•Maintaining a Firmwide Reputation Risk Governance policy and a standard consistent with the reputation risk framework •Providing oversight of the governance framework through processes and infrastructure to support consistent identification, escalation and monitoring of reputation risk issues FirmwideGovernance and oversightThe Reputation Risk Governance policy establishes the principles for managing reputation risk for the Firm. It is the responsibility of each LOB and Corporate, and the Firm’s employees, to consider the reputation of the Firm when deciding whether to offer a new product, engage in a transaction or client relationship, enter a new jurisdiction, initiate a business process or consider any other activity. Environmental impacts and social concerns are important considerations in assessing the Firm’s reputation risk, and are a component of the Firm’s reputation risk governance. Reputation risk is the risk that an action or inaction may negatively impact perception of the Firm’s integrity and reduce confidence in the Firm’s competence by various stakeholders, including clients, counterparties, customers, communities, investors, regulators, or employees. The types of events that may result in reputation risk are wide-ranging and can be introduced by the Firm’s employees, business strategies and activities, clients, customers and counterparties with which the Firm does business. These events could contribute to financial losses, litigation, regulatory enforcement actions, fines, penalties or other sanctions, as well as other harm to the Firm. Organization and management Reputation Risk Management is an independent risk management function that establishes the governance framework for managing reputation risk across the Firm’s LOBs and Corporate. Reputation risk is inherently challenging to identify, manage, and quantify.The Firm’s reputation risk management function includes the following activities:•Maintaining a Firmwide Reputation Risk Governance policy and a standard consistent with the reputation risk framework •Providing oversight of the governance framework through processes and infrastructure to support consistent identification, escalation and monitoring of reputation risk issues Firmwide Reputation risk is the risk that an action or inaction may negatively impact perception of the Firm’s integrity and reduce confidence in the Firm’s competence by various stakeholders, including clients, counterparties, customers, communities, investors, regulators, or employees. The types of events that may result in reputation risk are wide-ranging and can be introduced by the Firm’s employees, business strategies and activities, clients, customers and counterparties with which the Firm does business. These events could contribute to financial losses, litigation, regulatory enforcement actions, fines, penalties or other sanctions, as well as other harm to the Firm.

Reputation Risk Management is an independent risk management function that establishes the governance framework for managing reputation risk across the Firm’s LOBs and Corporate. Reputation risk is inherently challenging to identify, manage, and quantify. The Firm’s reputation risk management function includes the following activities: •Maintaining a Firmwide Reputation Risk Governance policy and a standard consistent with the reputation risk framework •Providing oversight of the governance framework through processes and infrastructure to support consistent identification, escalation and monitoring of reputation risk issues Firmwide Governance and oversightThe Reputation Risk Governance policy establishes the principles for managing reputation risk for the Firm. It is the responsibility of each LOB and Corporate, and the Firm’s employees, to consider the reputation of the Firm when deciding whether to offer a new product, engage in a transaction or client relationship, enter a new jurisdiction, initiate a business process or consider any other activity. Environmental impacts and social concerns are important considerations in assessing the Firm’s reputation risk, and are a component of the Firm’s reputation risk governance.

The Reputation Risk Governance policy establishes the principles for managing reputation risk for the Firm. It is the responsibility of each LOB and Corporate, and the Firm’s employees, to consider the reputation of the Firm when deciding whether to offer a new product, engage in a transaction or client relationship, enter a new jurisdiction, initiate a business process or consider any other activity. Environmental impacts and social concerns are important considerations in assessing the Firm’s reputation risk, and are a component of the Firm’s reputation risk governance. 116JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 116JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 116JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 116 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CREDIT AND INVESTMENT RISK MANAGEMENT Credit and investment risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer; or loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments, including consumer credit risk, wholesale credit risk, and investment portfolio risk.Credit risk managementCredit risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer. The Firm provides credit to a variety of clients and customers, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to individual consumers and small businesses. In its consumer businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk primarily through its home lending, credit card, auto, and business banking businesses. In its wholesale businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk through its underwriting, lending, market-making, and hedging activities with and for clients and counterparties, as well as through its operating services activities (such as cash management and clearing activities), and securities financing activities. The Firm is also exposed to credit risk through its investment securities portfolio and cash placed with banks.Credit Risk Management monitors and measures credit risk throughout the Firm, and defines credit risk policies, procedures and limits. The Firm’s credit risk management governance includes the following activities:•Maintaining a credit risk policy framework•Monitoring and measuring credit risk across all portfolio segments, including transaction and exposure approval•Setting industry and geographic concentration limits, as appropriate, and setting guidelines for credit review and analysis•Assigning and maintaining credit approval authorities in connection with the approval of credit exposure•Monitoring and independent assessment of criticized exposures and delinquent loans, and•Estimating credit losses and supporting appropriate credit risk-based capital managementRisk identification and measurementTo measure credit risk, the Firm employs several methodologies for estimating the likelihood of obligor or counterparty default. Methodologies for measuring credit risk vary depending on several factors, including type of asset (e.g., consumer versus wholesale), risk measurement parameters (e.g., delinquency status and borrower’s credit score versus wholesale risk-rating) and risk management and collection processes (e.g., retail collection center versus centrally managed workout groups). Credit risk measurement is based on the probability of default of an obligor or counterparty, the loss severity given a default event and the exposure at default.Based on these factors and the methodology and estimates described in Note 13 and Note 10, the Firm estimates credit losses for its exposures. The allowance for loan losses reflects estimated credit losses related to the consumer and wholesale held-for-investment loan portfolios, the allowance for lending-related commitments reflects estimated credit losses related to the Firm’s lending-related commitments and the allowance for investment securities reflects estimated credit losses related to the investment securities portfolio. Refer to Note 13, Note 10 and Critical Accounting Estimates used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information.In addition, potential and unexpected credit losses are reflected in the allocation of credit risk capital and represent the potential volatility of actual losses relative to the established allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments. The analyses for these losses include stress testing that considers alternative economic scenarios as described below.Stress testingStress testing is important in measuring and managing credit risk in the Firm’s credit portfolio. The stress testing process assesses the potential impact of alternative economic and business scenarios on estimated credit losses for the Firm. Economic scenarios and the underlying parameters are defined centrally, articulated in terms of macroeconomic factors and applied across the businesses. The stress test results may indicate credit migration, changes in delinquency trends and potential losses in the credit portfolio. In addition to the periodic stress testing processes, management also considers additional stresses outside these scenarios, including industry and country- specific stress scenarios, as appropriate. The Firm uses stress testing to inform decisions on setting risk appetite both at a Firm and LOB level, as well as to assess the impact of stress on individual counterparties. Credit and investment risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer; or loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments, including consumer credit risk, wholesale credit risk, and investment portfolio risk.Credit risk managementCredit risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer. The Firm provides credit to a variety of clients and customers, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to individual consumers and small businesses. In its consumer businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk primarily through its home lending, credit card, auto, and business banking businesses. In its wholesale businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk through its underwriting, lending, market-making, and hedging activities with and for clients and counterparties, as well as through its operating services activities (such as cash management and clearing activities), and securities financing activities. The Firm is also exposed to credit risk through its investment securities portfolio and cash placed with banks.Credit Risk Management monitors and measures credit risk throughout the Firm, and defines credit risk policies, procedures and limits. The Firm’s credit risk management governance includes the following activities:•Maintaining a credit risk policy framework•Monitoring and measuring credit risk across all portfolio segments, including transaction and exposure approval•Setting industry and geographic concentration limits, as appropriate, and setting guidelines for credit review and analysis•Assigning and maintaining credit approval authorities in connection with the approval of credit exposure•Monitoring and independent assessment of criticized exposures and delinquent loans, and•Estimating credit losses and supporting appropriate credit risk-based capital management Credit and investment risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer; or loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments, including consumer credit risk, wholesale credit risk, and investment portfolio risk.

Credit risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer. The Firm provides credit to a variety of clients and customers, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to individual consumers and small businesses. In its consumer businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk primarily through its home lending, credit card, auto, and business banking businesses. In its wholesale businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk through its underwriting, lending, market-making, and hedging activities with and for clients and counterparties, as well as through its operating services activities (such as cash management and clearing activities), and securities financing activities. The Firm is also exposed to credit risk through its investment securities portfolio and cash placed with banks. Credit Risk Management monitors and measures credit risk throughout the Firm, and defines credit risk policies, procedures and limits. The Firm’s credit risk management governance includes the following activities: •Maintaining a credit risk policy framework •Monitoring and measuring credit risk across all portfolio segments, including transaction and exposure approval •Setting industry and geographic concentration limits, as appropriate, and setting guidelines for credit review and analysis •Assigning and maintaining credit approval authorities in connection with the approval of credit exposure •Monitoring and independent assessment of criticized exposures and delinquent loans, and •Estimating credit losses and supporting appropriate credit risk-based capital management Risk identification and measurementTo measure credit risk, the Firm employs several methodologies for estimating the likelihood of obligor or counterparty default. Methodologies for measuring credit risk vary depending on several factors, including type of asset (e.g., consumer versus wholesale), risk measurement parameters (e.g., delinquency status and borrower’s credit score versus wholesale risk-rating) and risk management and collection processes (e.g., retail collection center versus centrally managed workout groups). Credit risk measurement is based on the probability of default of an obligor or counterparty, the loss severity given a default event and the exposure at default.Based on these factors and the methodology and estimates described in Note 13 and Note 10, the Firm estimates credit losses for its exposures. The allowance for loan losses reflects estimated credit losses related to the consumer and wholesale held-for-investment loan portfolios, the allowance for lending-related commitments reflects estimated credit losses related to the Firm’s lending-related commitments and the allowance for investment securities reflects estimated credit losses related to the investment securities portfolio. Refer to Note 13, Note 10 and Critical Accounting Estimates used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information.In addition, potential and unexpected credit losses are reflected in the allocation of credit risk capital and represent the potential volatility of actual losses relative to the established allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments. The analyses for these losses include stress testing that considers alternative economic scenarios as described below.Stress testingStress testing is important in measuring and managing credit risk in the Firm’s credit portfolio. The stress testing process assesses the potential impact of alternative economic and business scenarios on estimated credit losses for the Firm. Economic scenarios and the underlying parameters are defined centrally, articulated in terms of macroeconomic factors and applied across the businesses. The stress test results may indicate credit migration, changes in delinquency trends and potential losses in the credit portfolio. In addition to the periodic stress testing processes, management also considers additional stresses outside these scenarios, including industry and country- specific stress scenarios, as appropriate. The Firm uses stress testing to inform decisions on setting risk appetite both at a Firm and LOB level, as well as to assess the impact of stress on individual counterparties.

To measure credit risk, the Firm employs several methodologies for estimating the likelihood of obligor or counterparty default. Methodologies for measuring credit risk vary depending on several factors, including type of asset (e.g., consumer versus wholesale), risk measurement parameters (e.g., delinquency status and borrower’s credit score versus wholesale risk-rating) and risk management and collection processes (e.g., retail collection center versus centrally managed workout groups). Credit risk measurement is based on the probability of default of an obligor or counterparty, the loss severity given a default event and the exposure at default. Based on these factors and the methodology and estimates described in Note 13 and Note 10, the Firm estimates credit losses for its exposures. The allowance for loan losses reflects estimated credit losses related to the consumer and wholesale held-for-investment loan portfolios, the allowance for lending-related commitments reflects estimated credit losses related to the Firm’s lending-related commitments and the allowance for investment securities reflects estimated credit losses related to the investment securities portfolio. Refer to Note 13, Note 10 and Critical Accounting Estimates used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information. In addition, potential and unexpected credit losses are reflected in the allocation of credit risk capital and represent the potential volatility of actual losses relative to the established allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments. The analyses for these losses include stress testing that considers alternative economic scenarios as described below.

Stress testing is important in measuring and managing credit risk in the Firm’s credit portfolio. The stress testing process assesses the potential impact of alternative economic and business scenarios on estimated credit losses for the Firm. Economic scenarios and the underlying parameters are defined centrally, articulated in terms of macroeconomic factors and applied across the businesses. The stress test results may indicate credit migration, changes in delinquency trends and potential losses in the credit portfolio. In addition to the periodic stress testing processes, management also considers additional stresses outside these scenarios, including industry and country- specific stress scenarios, as appropriate. The Firm uses stress testing to inform decisions on setting risk appetite both at a Firm and LOB level, as well as to assess the impact of stress on individual counterparties. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K117 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K117 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K117 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 117

Risk monitoring and managementThe Firm has developed policies and practices that are designed to preserve the independence and integrity of the approval and decision-making process for extending credit so that credit risks are assessed accurately, approved properly, monitored regularly and managed actively at both the transaction and portfolio levels. The policy framework establishes credit approval authorities, concentration limits, risk-rating methodologies, portfolio review parameters and guidelines for management of distressed exposures. In addition, certain models, assumptions and inputs used in evaluating and monitoring credit risk are independently validated by groups that are separate from the LOBs.Consumer credit risk is monitored for delinquency and other trends, including any concentrations at the portfolio level, as certain of these trends can be addressed through changes in underwriting policies and portfolio guidelines. Consumer Risk Management evaluates delinquency and other trends against business expectations, current and forecasted economic conditions, and industry benchmarks. Historical and forecasted economic performance and trends are incorporated into the modeling of estimated consumer credit losses and are part of the monitoring of the credit risk profile of the portfolio. Wholesale credit risk is monitored regularly at an aggregate portfolio, industry, and individual client and counterparty level with established concentration limits that are reviewed and revised periodically as deemed appropriate by management. Industry and counterparty limits, as measured in terms of exposure and economic risk appetite, are subject to stress-based loss constraints.Management of the Firm’s wholesale credit risk exposure is accomplished through a number of means, including:•Loan underwriting and credit approval processes•Loan syndications and participations•Loan sales and securitizations•Credit derivatives•Master netting agreements, and•Collateral and other risk-reduction techniquesIn addition to Credit Risk Management, an independent Credit Review function is responsible for: •Independently assessing risk grades assigned to exposures in the Firm’s wholesale credit portfolio and the timeliness of risk grade changes initiated by responsible business units; and •Evaluating the effectiveness of the credit management processes of the LOBs and Corporate, including the adequacy of credit analyses and risk grading/loss given default (“LGD”) rationales, proper monitoring and management of credit exposures, and compliance with applicable grading policies and underwriting guidelines. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion of consumer and wholesale loans.Risk reportingTo enable monitoring of credit risk and effective decision-making, aggregate credit exposure, credit quality forecasts, concentration levels and risk profile changes are reported regularly to senior members of Credit Risk Management. Detailed portfolio reporting of industry, clients, counterparties and customers, product and geography are prepared, and the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by senior management at least on a quarterly basis. Through the risk reporting and governance structure, credit risk trends and limit exceptions are provided regularly to, and discussed with, risk committees, senior management and the Board of Directors. Risk monitoring and managementThe Firm has developed policies and practices that are designed to preserve the independence and integrity of the approval and decision-making process for extending credit so that credit risks are assessed accurately, approved properly, monitored regularly and managed actively at both the transaction and portfolio levels. The policy framework establishes credit approval authorities, concentration limits, risk-rating methodologies, portfolio review parameters and guidelines for management of distressed exposures. In addition, certain models, assumptions and inputs used in evaluating and monitoring credit risk are independently validated by groups that are separate from the LOBs.Consumer credit risk is monitored for delinquency and other trends, including any concentrations at the portfolio level, as certain of these trends can be addressed through changes in underwriting policies and portfolio guidelines. Consumer Risk Management evaluates delinquency and other trends against business expectations, current and forecasted economic conditions, and industry benchmarks. Historical and forecasted economic performance and trends are incorporated into the modeling of estimated consumer credit losses and are part of the monitoring of the credit risk profile of the portfolio. Wholesale credit risk is monitored regularly at an aggregate portfolio, industry, and individual client and counterparty level with established concentration limits that are reviewed and revised periodically as deemed appropriate by management. Industry and counterparty limits, as measured in terms of exposure and economic risk appetite, are subject to stress-based loss constraints.Management of the Firm’s wholesale credit risk exposure is accomplished through a number of means, including:•Loan underwriting and credit approval processes•Loan syndications and participations•Loan sales and securitizations•Credit derivatives•Master netting agreements, and•Collateral and other risk-reduction techniques

The Firm has developed policies and practices that are designed to preserve the independence and integrity of the approval and decision-making process for extending credit so that credit risks are assessed accurately, approved properly, monitored regularly and managed actively at both the transaction and portfolio levels. The policy framework establishes credit approval authorities, concentration limits, risk-rating methodologies, portfolio review parameters and guidelines for management of distressed exposures. In addition, certain models, assumptions and inputs used in evaluating and monitoring credit risk are independently validated by groups that are separate from the LOBs. Consumer credit risk is monitored for delinquency and other trends, including any concentrations at the portfolio level, as certain of these trends can be addressed through changes in underwriting policies and portfolio guidelines. Consumer Risk Management evaluates delinquency and other trends against business expectations, current and forecasted economic conditions, and industry benchmarks. Historical and forecasted economic performance and trends are incorporated into the modeling of estimated consumer credit losses and are part of the monitoring of the credit risk profile of the portfolio. Wholesale credit risk is monitored regularly at an aggregate portfolio, industry, and individual client and counterparty level with established concentration limits that are reviewed and revised periodically as deemed appropriate by management. Industry and counterparty limits, as measured in terms of exposure and economic risk appetite, are subject to stress-based loss constraints. Management of the Firm’s wholesale credit risk exposure is accomplished through a number of means, including: •Loan underwriting and credit approval processes •Loan syndications and participations •Loan sales and securitizations •Credit derivatives •Master netting agreements, and •Collateral and other risk-reduction techniques In addition to Credit Risk Management, an independent Credit Review function is responsible for: •Independently assessing risk grades assigned to exposures in the Firm’s wholesale credit portfolio and the timeliness of risk grade changes initiated by responsible business units; and •Evaluating the effectiveness of the credit management processes of the LOBs and Corporate, including the adequacy of credit analyses and risk grading/loss given default (“LGD”) rationales, proper monitoring and management of credit exposures, and compliance with applicable grading policies and underwriting guidelines. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion of consumer and wholesale loans.Risk reportingTo enable monitoring of credit risk and effective decision-making, aggregate credit exposure, credit quality forecasts, concentration levels and risk profile changes are reported regularly to senior members of Credit Risk Management. Detailed portfolio reporting of industry, clients, counterparties and customers, product and geography are prepared, and the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by senior management at least on a quarterly basis. Through the risk reporting and governance structure, credit risk trends and limit exceptions are provided regularly to, and discussed with, risk committees, senior management and the Board of Directors. In addition to Credit Risk Management, an independent Credit Review function is responsible for: •Independently assessing risk grades assigned to exposures in the Firm’s wholesale credit portfolio and the timeliness of risk grade changes initiated by responsible business units; and •Evaluating the effectiveness of the credit management processes of the LOBs and Corporate, including the adequacy of credit analyses and risk grading/loss given default (“LGD”) rationales, proper monitoring and management of credit exposures, and compliance with applicable grading policies and underwriting guidelines. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion of consumer and wholesale loans.

To enable monitoring of credit risk and effective decision-making, aggregate credit exposure, credit quality forecasts, concentration levels and risk profile changes are reported regularly to senior members of Credit Risk Management. Detailed portfolio reporting of industry, clients, counterparties and customers, product and geography are prepared, and the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by senior management at least on a quarterly basis. Through the risk reporting and governance structure, credit risk trends and limit exceptions are provided regularly to, and discussed with, risk committees, senior management and the Board of Directors. 118JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 118JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 118JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 118 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CREDIT PORTFOLIO CREDIT PORTFOLIO Credit risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer.In the following tables, total loans include loans retained (i.e., held-for-investment); loans held-for-sale; and certain loans accounted for at fair value. The following tables do not include loans which the Firm accounts for at fair value and classifies as trading assets; refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further information regarding these loans. Refer to Notes 12, 28, and 5 for additional information on the Firm’s loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables, including the Firm’s related accounting policies. Refer to Note 10 for information regarding the credit risk inherent in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio; and refer to Note 11 for information regarding credit risk inherent in the securities financing portfolio. Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 120–125 and Note 12 for further discussions of the consumer credit environment, consumer loans and nonperforming exposure. Refer to Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and Note 12 for further discussions of the wholesale credit environment and wholesale loans.Total credit portfolioDecember 31,(in millions)Credit exposureNonperforming(c)2024202320242023Loans retained$1,299,590 $1,280,870 $7,175 $5,989 Loans held-for-sale7,048 3,985 160 184 Loans at fair value 41,350 38,851 1,502 744 Total loans 1,347,988 1,323,706 8,837 6,917 Derivative receivables60,967 54,864 145 364 Receivables from customers(a)51,929 47,625 — — Total credit-related assets1,460,884 1,426,195 8,982 7,281 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate ownedNANA284 274 OtherNANA34 42 Total assets acquired in loan satisfactionsNANA318 316 Lending-related commitments1,577,622 1,497,847 737 464 Total credit portfolio$3,038,506 $2,924,042 $10,037 $8,061 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)$(41,367)$(37,779)$— $— Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(28,160)(22,461)NANA(a) Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM; these are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets.(b) Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage credit exposures.(c) Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $121 million and $182 million, respectively. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance.The following table provides information on Firmwide nonaccrual loans to total loans.December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Total nonaccrual loans$8,837 $6,917 Total loans1,347,988 1,323,706 Firmwide nonaccrual loans to total loans outstanding0.66 %0.52 %The following table provides information about the Firm’s net charge-offs and recoveries.December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Net charge-offs$8,638 $6,209 Average retained loans1,271,344 1,202,348 Net charge-off rates0.68 %0.52 % Credit risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer.In the following tables, total loans include loans retained (i.e., held-for-investment); loans held-for-sale; and certain loans accounted for at fair value. The following tables do not include loans which the Firm accounts for at fair value and classifies as trading assets; refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further information regarding these loans. Refer to Notes 12, 28, and 5 for additional information on the Firm’s loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables, including the Firm’s related accounting policies. Refer to Note 10 for information regarding the credit risk inherent in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio; and refer to Note 11 for information regarding credit risk inherent in the securities financing portfolio. Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 120–125 and Note 12 for further discussions of the consumer credit environment, consumer loans and nonperforming exposure. Refer to Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and Note 12 for further discussions of the wholesale credit environment and wholesale loans. Credit risk is the risk associated with the default or change in credit profile of a client, counterparty or customer. In the following tables, total loans include loans retained (i.e., held-for-investment); loans held-for-sale; and certain loans accounted for at fair value. The following tables do not include loans which the Firm accounts for at fair value and classifies as trading assets; refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further information regarding these loans. Refer to Notes 12, 28, and 5 for additional information on the Firm’s loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables, including the Firm’s related accounting policies. Refer to Note 10 for information regarding the credit risk inherent in the Firm’s investment securities portfolio; and refer to Note 11 for information regarding credit risk inherent in the securities financing portfolio. Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 120–125 and Note 12 for further discussions of the consumer credit environment, consumer loans and nonperforming exposure. Refer to Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and Note 12 for further discussions of the wholesale credit environment and wholesale loans. Total credit portfolioDecember 31,(in millions)Credit exposureNonperforming(c)2024202320242023Loans retained$1,299,590 $1,280,870 $7,175 $5,989 Loans held-for-sale7,048 3,985 160 184 Loans at fair value 41,350 38,851 1,502 744 Total loans 1,347,988 1,323,706 8,837 6,917 Derivative receivables60,967 54,864 145 364 Receivables from customers(a)51,929 47,625 — — Total credit-related assets1,460,884 1,426,195 8,982 7,281 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate ownedNANA284 274 OtherNANA34 42 Total assets acquired in loan satisfactionsNANA318 316 Lending-related commitments1,577,622 1,497,847 737 464 Total credit portfolio$3,038,506 $2,924,042 $10,037 $8,061 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)$(41,367)$(37,779)$— $— Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(28,160)(22,461)NANA(a) Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM; these are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets.(b) Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage credit exposures.(c) Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $121 million and $182 million, respectively. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance.The following table provides information on Firmwide nonaccrual loans to total loans.December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Total nonaccrual loans$8,837 $6,917 Total loans1,347,988 1,323,706 Firmwide nonaccrual loans to total loans outstanding0.66 %0.52 %The following table provides information about the Firm’s net charge-offs and recoveries.December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Net charge-offs$8,638 $6,209 Average retained loans1,271,344 1,202,348 Net charge-off rates0.68 %0.52 % Total credit portfolioDecember 31,(in millions)Credit exposureNonperforming(c)2024202320242023Loans retained$1,299,590 $1,280,870 $7,175 $5,989 Loans held-for-sale7,048 3,985 160 184 Loans at fair value 41,350 38,851 1,502 744 Total loans 1,347,988 1,323,706 8,837 6,917 Derivative receivables60,967 54,864 145 364 Receivables from customers(a)51,929 47,625 — — Total credit-related assets1,460,884 1,426,195 8,982 7,281 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate ownedNANA284 274 OtherNANA34 42 Total assets acquired in loan satisfactionsNANA318 316 Lending-related commitments1,577,622 1,497,847 737 464 Total credit portfolio$3,038,506 $2,924,042 $10,037 $8,061 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)$(41,367)$(37,779)$— $— Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(28,160)(22,461)NANA Nonperforming(c) Receivables from customers(a)

Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b) (a) Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM; these are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets. (b) Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage credit exposures. (c) Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $121 million and $182 million, respectively. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance. The following table provides information on Firmwide nonaccrual loans to total loans. December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Total nonaccrual loans$8,837 $6,917 Total loans1,347,988 1,323,706 Firmwide nonaccrual loans to total loans outstanding0.66 %0.52 % The following table provides information about the Firm’s net charge-offs and recoveries. December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Net charge-offs$8,638 $6,209 Average retained loans1,271,344 1,202,348 Net charge-off rates0.68 %0.52 % JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K119 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K119 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K119 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 119

CONSUMER CREDIT PORTFOLIO The Firm’s retained consumer portfolio consists primarily of loans and lending-related commitments for residential real estate, credit card, scored auto and business banking. The consumer credit portfolio also includes loans at fair value, predominantly in residential real estate. The Firm’s focus is on serving primarily the prime segment of the consumer credit market. Originated mortgage loans are retained in the residential real estate portfolio, securitized or sold to U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises; other types of consumer loans are typically retained on the balance sheet. Refer to Note 12 for further information on the consumer loan portfolio. Refer to Note 28 for further information on lending-related commitments. The Firm’s retained consumer portfolio consists primarily of loans and lending-related commitments for residential real estate, credit card, scored auto and business banking. The consumer credit portfolio also includes loans at fair value, predominantly in residential real estate. The Firm’s focus is on serving primarily the prime segment of the consumer credit market. Originated mortgage loans are retained in the residential real estate portfolio, securitized or sold to U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises; other types of consumer loans are typically retained on the balance sheet. Refer to Note 12 for further information on the consumer loan portfolio. Refer to Note 28 for further information on lending-related commitments. The Firm’s retained consumer portfolio consists primarily of loans and lending-related commitments for residential real estate, credit card, scored auto and business banking. The consumer credit portfolio also includes loans at fair value, predominantly in residential real estate. The Firm’s focus is on serving primarily the prime segment of the consumer credit market. Originated mortgage loans are retained in the residential real estate portfolio, securitized or sold to U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises; other types of consumer loans are typically retained on the balance sheet. Refer to Note 12 for further information on the consumer loan portfolio. Refer to Note 28 for further information on lending-related commitments. 120JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 120JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 120JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 120 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following tables present consumer credit-related information with respect to the scored credit portfolio held in CCB, AWM, CIB and Corporate. Consumer credit portfolioDecember 31,(in millions)Credit exposureNonaccrual loans(i)2024202320242023Consumer, excluding credit cardResidential real estate(a)$309,513 $326,409 $2,984 $3,466 Auto and other(b)(c)66,821 70,866 249 177 Total loans - retained376,334 397,275 3,233 3,643 Loans held-for-sale945 487 155 95 Loans at fair value(d)15,531 12,331 538 465 Total consumer, excluding credit card loans392,810 410,093 3,926 4,203 Lending-related commitments(e)44,844 45,403 Total consumer exposure, excluding credit card437,654 455,496 Credit cardLoans retained(f)232,860 211,123 NANATotal credit card loans232,860 211,123 NANALending-related commitments(e)(g)1,001,311 915,658 Total credit card exposure1,234,171 1,126,781 Total consumer credit portfolio$1,671,825 $1,582,277 $3,926 $4,203 Credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(h)$(479)$(790) Nonaccrual loans(i) Residential real estate(a) Auto and other(b)(c) Loans at fair value(d) Lending-related commitments(e) Loans retained(f) Lending-related commitments(e)(g) Credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(h) Year ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)Net charge-offs/(recoveries)Average loans - retainedNet charge-off/(recovery) rate(j)202420232024202320242023Consumer, excluding credit cardResidential real estate$(101)$(52)$316,042 $296,515 (0.03)%(0.02)%Auto and other775 684 67,959 67,546 1.14 1.01 Total consumer, excluding credit card - retained674 632 384,001 364,061 0.18 0.17 Credit card - retained7,142 4,698 214,033 191,412 3.34 2.45 Total consumer - retained$7,816 $5,330 $598,034 $555,473 1.31 %0.96 % Net charge-off/(recovery) rate(j) (a)Includes scored mortgage and home equity loans held in CCB and AWM. (b)At December 31, 2024 and 2023, excluded operating lease assets of $12.8 billion and $10.4 billion, respectively. These operating lease assets are included in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 18 for further information. (c)Includes scored auto and business banking loans, and overdrafts. (d)Includes scored mortgage loans held in CCB and CIB, and other consumer unsecured loans in CIB. (e)Credit card, home equity and certain business banking lending-related commitments represent the total available lines of credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit would be used at the same time. Refer to Note 28 for further information. (f)Includes billed interest and fees. (g)Also includes commercial card lending-related commitments primarily in CIB. (h)Represents the notional amount of protection obtained through the issuance of credit-related notes that reference certain pools of residential real estate and auto loans in the retained consumer portfolio. (i)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $121 million and $182 million, respectively. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status, as permitted by regulatory guidance. (j)Average consumer loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were $17.2 billion and $12.9 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating net charge-off/(recovery) rates. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K121 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K121 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K121 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 121

The table below sets forth loan maturities by scheduled repayments, by class of loan and the distribution between fixed and floating interest rates based on the stated terms of the loan agreements. The Firm estimated the principal repayment amounts for both the residential real estate and auto and other loan classes by calculating the weighted-average loan balance and interest rates for loan pools based on remaining loan term. Refer to Note 12 for further information on loan classes. December 31, 2024(in millions)Within1 year(a) 1-5years5-15yearsAfter 15 yearsTotalConsumer, excluding credit cardResidential real estate$21,442 $26,712 $109,608 $166,715 $324,477 Auto and other19,404 (b)43,701 5,224 4 68,333 Total consumer, excluding credit card loans$40,846 $70,413 $114,832 $166,719 $392,810 Total credit card loans$231,799 $1,048 $13 $— $232,860 Total consumer loans$272,645 $71,461 $114,845 $166,719 $625,670 Loans due after one year at fixed interest ratesResidential real estate$19,639 $57,351 $77,865 Auto and other43,565 2,957 4 Credit card1,048 13 — Loans due after one year at variable interest ratesResidential real estate$7,073 $52,257 $88,850 Auto and other136 2,267 — Total consumer loans$71,461 $114,845 $166,719 Within 1 year(a) (b) (a)Includes loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value. (b)Includes overdrafts. 122JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 122JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 122JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 122 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Portfolio analysisLoans decreased from December 31, 2023 driven by residential real estate loans and scored auto loans.The following discussions provide information concerning individual loan products. Refer to Note 12 for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators.Residential real estate: The residential real estate portfolio, including loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value, predominantly consists of prime mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit. Retained loans decreased compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by paydowns and loan sales, net of originations. Retained nonaccrual loans decreased compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by loan sales. Net recoveries were higher for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year, driven by loan sales. Loans held-for-sale and nonaccrual loans held-for-sale increased from December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by transfers of certain retained loans in anticipation of securitization and loan sales, respectively. Loans at fair value increased from December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by higher Home Lending loans, as originations outpaced warehouse loan sales. Nonaccrual loans at fair value increased compared to December 31, 2023, driven by CIB.At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying values of retained interest-only residential mortgage loans were $88.9 billion and $90.6 billion, respectively. These loans have an interest-only payment period generally followed by an adjustable-rate or fixed-rate fully amortizing payment period to maturity and are typically originated as higher-balance loans to higher-income borrowers. The credit performance of this portfolio is comparable to the performance of the broader prime mortgage portfolio.The carrying value of retained home equity lines of credit outstanding was $14.5 billion at December 31, 2024, including $3.8 billion of HELOCs that have recast from interest-only to fully amortizing payments or have been modified, and $3.6 billion of interest-only balloon HELOCs, which primarily mature after 2030. The Firm manages the risk of HELOCs during their revolving period by reducing or canceling the undrawn line in accordance with the contract or to the extent otherwise permitted by law, including when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower or significant decrease in the value of the underlying property.The following table provides a summary of the Firm’sresidential mortgage portfolio insured and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, predominantly loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value. The Firm monitors its exposure to certain potential unrecoverable claim payments related to government-insured loans and considers this exposure in estimating the allowance for loan losses. (in millions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Current$462 $446 30-89 days past due72 102 90 or more days past due121 182 Total government guaranteed loans$655 $730 Geographic composition and current estimated loan-to-value ratio of residential real estate loansAt December 31, 2024, $217.7 billion, or 70% of the total retained residential real estate loan portfolio, was concentrated in California, New York, Florida, Texas and Massachusetts, compared to $228.4 billion, or 70% at December 31, 2023.Average current estimated loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios have improved, reflecting an increase in home prices.Refer to Note 12 for information on the geographic composition and current estimated LTVs of the Firm’s residential real estate loans. Portfolio analysisLoans decreased from December 31, 2023 driven by residential real estate loans and scored auto loans.The following discussions provide information concerning individual loan products. Refer to Note 12 for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators.Residential real estate: The residential real estate portfolio, including loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value, predominantly consists of prime mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit. Retained loans decreased compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by paydowns and loan sales, net of originations. Retained nonaccrual loans decreased compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by loan sales. Net recoveries were higher for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year, driven by loan sales. Loans held-for-sale and nonaccrual loans held-for-sale increased from December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by transfers of certain retained loans in anticipation of securitization and loan sales, respectively. Loans at fair value increased from December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by higher Home Lending loans, as originations outpaced warehouse loan sales. Nonaccrual loans at fair value increased compared to December 31, 2023, driven by CIB.At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying values of retained interest-only residential mortgage loans were $88.9 billion and $90.6 billion, respectively. These loans have an interest-only payment period generally followed by an adjustable-rate or fixed-rate fully amortizing payment period to maturity and are typically originated as higher-balance loans to higher-income borrowers. The credit performance of this portfolio is comparable to the performance of the broader prime mortgage portfolio.The carrying value of retained home equity lines of credit outstanding was $14.5 billion at December 31, 2024, including $3.8 billion of HELOCs that have recast from interest-only to fully amortizing payments or have been modified, and $3.6 billion of interest-only balloon HELOCs, which primarily mature after 2030. The Firm manages the risk of HELOCs during their revolving period by reducing or canceling the undrawn line in accordance with the contract or to the extent otherwise permitted by law, including when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower or significant decrease in the value of the underlying property.

Loans decreased from December 31, 2023 driven by residential real estate loans and scored auto loans. The following discussions provide information concerning individual loan products. Refer to Note 12 for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators. Residential real estate: The residential real estate portfolio, including loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value, predominantly consists of prime mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit. Retained loans decreased compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by paydowns and loan sales, net of originations. Retained nonaccrual loans decreased compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by loan sales. Net recoveries were higher for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year, driven by loan sales. Loans held-for-sale and nonaccrual loans held-for-sale increased from December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by transfers of certain retained loans in anticipation of securitization and loan sales, respectively. Loans at fair value increased from December 31, 2023, predominantly driven by higher Home Lending loans, as originations outpaced warehouse loan sales. Nonaccrual loans at fair value increased compared to December 31, 2023, driven by CIB. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying values of retained interest-only residential mortgage loans were $88.9 billion and $90.6 billion, respectively. These loans have an interest-only payment period generally followed by an adjustable-rate or fixed-rate fully amortizing payment period to maturity and are typically originated as higher-balance loans to higher-income borrowers. The credit performance of this portfolio is comparable to the performance of the broader prime mortgage portfolio. The carrying value of retained home equity lines of credit outstanding was $14.5 billion at December 31, 2024, including $3.8 billion of HELOCs that have recast from interest-only to fully amortizing payments or have been modified, and $3.6 billion of interest-only balloon HELOCs, which primarily mature after 2030. The Firm manages the risk of HELOCs during their revolving period by reducing or canceling the undrawn line in accordance with the contract or to the extent otherwise permitted by law, including when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower or significant decrease in the value of the underlying property. The following table provides a summary of the Firm’sresidential mortgage portfolio insured and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, predominantly loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value. The Firm monitors its exposure to certain potential unrecoverable claim payments related to government-insured loans and considers this exposure in estimating the allowance for loan losses. (in millions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Current$462 $446 30-89 days past due72 102 90 or more days past due121 182 Total government guaranteed loans$655 $730 Geographic composition and current estimated loan-to-value ratio of residential real estate loansAt December 31, 2024, $217.7 billion, or 70% of the total retained residential real estate loan portfolio, was concentrated in California, New York, Florida, Texas and Massachusetts, compared to $228.4 billion, or 70% at December 31, 2023.Average current estimated loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios have improved, reflecting an increase in home prices.Refer to Note 12 for information on the geographic composition and current estimated LTVs of the Firm’s residential real estate loans. The following table provides a summary of the Firm’s residential mortgage portfolio insured and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, predominantly loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value. The Firm monitors its exposure to certain potential unrecoverable claim payments related to government-insured loans and considers this exposure in estimating the allowance for loan losses. (in millions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Current$462 $446 30-89 days past due72 102 90 or more days past due121 182 Total government guaranteed loans$655 $730

At December 31, 2024, $217.7 billion, or 70% of the total retained residential real estate loan portfolio, was concentrated in California, New York, Florida, Texas and Massachusetts, compared to $228.4 billion, or 70% at December 31, 2023. Average current estimated loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios have improved, reflecting an increase in home prices. Refer to Note 12 for information on the geographic composition and current estimated LTVs of the Firm’s residential real estate loans. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K123 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K123 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K123 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 123

Auto and other: The auto and other loan portfolio, including loans at fair value, generally consists of prime-quality scored auto and business banking loans, other consumer unsecured loans, and overdrafts. The portfolio decreased when compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly due to loan securitizations. Net charge-offs increased compared to the prior year, predominantly due to net charge-offs of scored auto loans of $445 million compared to $357 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting a decline in used vehicle valuations. Refer to Note 14 for further information on securitization activity.Nonperforming assetsThe following table presents information as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, about consumer, excluding credit card, nonperforming assets.Nonperforming assets(a)December 31, (in millions)20242023Nonaccrual loansResidential real estate$3,665 $4,015 Auto and other261 188 Total nonaccrual loans3,926 4,203 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate owned78 120 Other34 42 Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions112 162 Total nonperforming assets$4,038 $4,365 (a)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $121 million and $182 million, respectively.Nonaccrual loansThe following table presents changes in consumer, excluding credit card, nonaccrual loans for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Nonaccrual loan activityYear ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Beginning balance$4,203 $4,325 Additions:3,225 2,894 Reductions:Principal payments and other894 1,030 Sales803 276 Charge-offs665 472 Returned to performing status963 1,052 Foreclosures and other liquidations177 186 Total reductions3,502 3,016 Net changes(277)(122)Ending balance$3,926 $4,203 Refer to Note 12 for further information about the consumer credit portfolio, including information about delinquencies, other credit quality indicators and loans that were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure. Auto and other: The auto and other loan portfolio, including loans at fair value, generally consists of prime-quality scored auto and business banking loans, other consumer unsecured loans, and overdrafts. The portfolio decreased when compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly due to loan securitizations. Net charge-offs increased compared to the prior year, predominantly due to net charge-offs of scored auto loans of $445 million compared to $357 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting a decline in used vehicle valuations. Refer to Note 14 for further information on securitization activity.Nonperforming assetsThe following table presents information as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, about consumer, excluding credit card, nonperforming assets.Nonperforming assets(a)December 31, (in millions)20242023Nonaccrual loansResidential real estate$3,665 $4,015 Auto and other261 188 Total nonaccrual loans3,926 4,203 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate owned78 120 Other34 42 Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions112 162 Total nonperforming assets$4,038 $4,365 (a)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $121 million and $182 million, respectively. Auto and other: The auto and other loan portfolio, including loans at fair value, generally consists of prime-quality scored auto and business banking loans, other consumer unsecured loans, and overdrafts. The portfolio decreased when compared to December 31, 2023, predominantly due to loan securitizations. Net charge-offs increased compared to the prior year, predominantly due to net charge-offs of scored auto loans of $445 million compared to $357 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, reflecting a decline in used vehicle valuations. Refer to Note 14 for further information on securitization activity.

The following table presents information as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, about consumer, excluding credit card, nonperforming assets. Nonperforming assets(a)December 31, (in millions)20242023Nonaccrual loansResidential real estate$3,665 $4,015 Auto and other261 188 Total nonaccrual loans3,926 4,203 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate owned78 120 Other34 42 Total assets acquired in loan satisfactions112 162 Total nonperforming assets$4,038 $4,365

December 31, (in millions) Residential real estate Auto and other (a)Excludes mortgage loans past due and insured by U.S. government agencies, which are primarily 90 or more days past due. These loans have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, mortgage loans 90 or more days past due and insured by U.S. government agencies were $121 million and $182 million, respectively. Nonaccrual loansThe following table presents changes in consumer, excluding credit card, nonaccrual loans for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Nonaccrual loan activityYear ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Beginning balance$4,203 $4,325 Additions:3,225 2,894 Reductions:Principal payments and other894 1,030 Sales803 276 Charge-offs665 472 Returned to performing status963 1,052 Foreclosures and other liquidations177 186 Total reductions3,502 3,016 Net changes(277)(122)Ending balance$3,926 $4,203 Refer to Note 12 for further information about the consumer credit portfolio, including information about delinquencies, other credit quality indicators and loans that were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure.

The following table presents changes in consumer, excluding credit card, nonaccrual loans for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Nonaccrual loan activityYear ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Beginning balance$4,203 $4,325 Additions:3,225 2,894 Reductions:Principal payments and other894 1,030 Sales803 276 Charge-offs665 472 Returned to performing status963 1,052 Foreclosures and other liquidations177 186 Total reductions3,502 3,016 Net changes(277)(122)Ending balance$3,926 $4,203 Refer to Note 12 for further information about the consumer credit portfolio, including information about delinquencies, other credit quality indicators and loans that were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure. 124JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 124JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 124JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 124 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Credit cardTotal credit card loans increased from December 31, 2023 reflecting growth from new accounts and revolving balances. The December 31, 2024 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 2.17% and 1.14%, respectively, increased compared to the December 31, 2023 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 2.14% and 1.05%, respectively, in line with the Firm’s expectations. Net charge-offs increased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth.Consistent with the Firm’s policy, all credit card loans typically remain on accrual status until charged off. However, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses includes the estimated uncollectible portion of accrued and billed interest and fee income. Geographic and FICO composition of credit card loansAt December 31, 2024, $109.0 billion, or 47% of the total retained credit card loan portfolio, was concentrated in California, Texas, New York, Florida and Illinois, compared to $98.1 billion, or 46%, at December 31, 2023. Refer to Note 12 for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies, geographic and FICO composition. Credit cardTotal credit card loans increased from December 31, 2023 reflecting growth from new accounts and revolving balances. The December 31, 2024 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 2.17% and 1.14%, respectively, increased compared to the December 31, 2023 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 2.14% and 1.05%, respectively, in line with the Firm’s expectations. Net charge-offs increased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth.Consistent with the Firm’s policy, all credit card loans typically remain on accrual status until charged off. However, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses includes the estimated uncollectible portion of accrued and billed interest and fee income. Geographic and FICO composition of credit card loansAt December 31, 2024, $109.0 billion, or 47% of the total retained credit card loan portfolio, was concentrated in California, Texas, New York, Florida and Illinois, compared to $98.1 billion, or 46%, at December 31, 2023. Refer to Note 12 for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies, geographic and FICO composition.

Total credit card loans increased from December 31, 2023 reflecting growth from new accounts and revolving balances. The December 31, 2024 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 2.17% and 1.14%, respectively, increased compared to the December 31, 2023 30+ and 90+ day delinquency rates of 2.14% and 1.05%, respectively, in line with the Firm’s expectations. Net charge-offs increased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the prior year reflecting the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, credit normalization and balance growth. Consistent with the Firm’s policy, all credit card loans typically remain on accrual status until charged off. However, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses includes the estimated uncollectible portion of accrued and billed interest and fee income.

At December 31, 2024, $109.0 billion, or 47% of the total retained credit card loan portfolio, was concentrated in California, Texas, New York, Florida and Illinois, compared to $98.1 billion, or 46%, at December 31, 2023. Refer to Note 12 for further information about this portfolio, including information about delinquencies, geographic and FICO composition. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K125 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K125 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K125 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 125

WHOLESALE CREDIT PORTFOLIO WHOLESALE CREDIT PORTFOLIO In its wholesale businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk primarily through its underwriting, lending, market-making, and hedging activities with and for clients and counterparties, as well as through various operating services (such as cash management and clearing activities), securities financing activities and cash placed with banks. A portion of the loans originated or acquired by the Firm’s wholesale businesses is generally retained on the balance sheet. The Firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans that it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk. The wholesale portfolio is actively managed, in part by conducting ongoing, in-depth reviews of client credit quality and transaction structure, inclusive of collateral where applicable, and of industry, product and client concentrations. Refer to the industry discussion on pages 128–131 for further information.The Firm’s wholesale credit portfolio includes exposure held in CIB, AWM and Corporate, and risk-rated exposure held in CCB, for which the wholesale methodology is applied when determining the allowance for loan losses.As of December 31, 2024, loans increased $19.8 billion, driven by higher loans in CIB and higher securities-based lending in AWM. Lending-related commitments decreased $5.3 billion, with decreases in AWM and CCB, largely offset by higher commitments in CIB.As of December 31, 2024, nonperforming exposure increased by $2.3 billion, predominantly driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, Healthcare and Consumer & Retail, in each case resulting from downgrades.For the year ended December 31, 2024, wholesale net charge-offs were $822 million, largely driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, and client-specific charge-offs across multiple industries including Consumer & Retail and Individuals.Wholesale credit portfolioDecember 31,(in millions)Credit exposureNonperforming2024202320242023Loans retained$690,396 $672,472 $3,942 $2,346 Loans held-for-sale6,103 3,498 5 89 Loans at fair value 25,819 26,520 964 279 Loans 722,318 702,490 4,911 2,714 Derivative receivables60,967 54,864 145 364 Receivables from customers(a)51,929 47,625 — — Total wholesale credit-related assets835,214 804,979 5,056 3,078 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate owned NANA206 154 OtherNANA— — Total assets acquired in loan satisfactionsNANA206 154 Lending-related commitments 531,467 536,786 737 464 Total wholesale credit portfolio$1,366,681 $1,341,765 $5,999 $3,696 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)$(40,888)$(36,989)$— $— Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(28,160)(22,461)NANA(a)Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM; these are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets.(b)Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. Refer to Credit derivatives on page 136 and Note 5 for additional information. In its wholesale businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk primarily through its underwriting, lending, market-making, and hedging activities with and for clients and counterparties, as well as through various operating services (such as cash management and clearing activities), securities financing activities and cash placed with banks. A portion of the loans originated or acquired by the Firm’s wholesale businesses is generally retained on the balance sheet. The Firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans that it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk. The wholesale portfolio is actively managed, in part by conducting ongoing, in-depth reviews of client credit quality and transaction structure, inclusive of collateral where applicable, and of industry, product and client concentrations. Refer to the industry discussion on pages 128–131 for further information.The Firm’s wholesale credit portfolio includes exposure held in CIB, AWM and Corporate, and risk-rated exposure held in CCB, for which the wholesale methodology is applied when determining the allowance for loan losses.As of December 31, 2024, loans increased $19.8 billion, driven by higher loans in CIB and higher securities-based lending in AWM. Lending-related commitments decreased $5.3 billion, with decreases in AWM and CCB, largely offset by higher commitments in CIB.As of December 31, 2024, nonperforming exposure increased by $2.3 billion, predominantly driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, Healthcare and Consumer & Retail, in each case resulting from downgrades.For the year ended December 31, 2024, wholesale net charge-offs were $822 million, largely driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, and client-specific charge-offs across multiple industries including Consumer & Retail and Individuals. In its wholesale businesses, the Firm is exposed to credit risk primarily through its underwriting, lending, market-making, and hedging activities with and for clients and counterparties, as well as through various operating services (such as cash management and clearing activities), securities financing activities and cash placed with banks. A portion of the loans originated or acquired by the Firm’s wholesale businesses is generally retained on the balance sheet. The Firm distributes a significant percentage of the loans that it originates into the market as part of its syndicated loan business and to manage portfolio concentrations and credit risk. The wholesale portfolio is actively managed, in part by conducting ongoing, in-depth reviews of client credit quality and transaction structure, inclusive of collateral where applicable, and of industry, product and client concentrations. Refer to the industry discussion on pages 128–131 for further information. The Firm’s wholesale credit portfolio includes exposure held in CIB, AWM and Corporate, and risk-rated exposure held in CCB, for which the wholesale methodology is applied when determining the allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2024, loans increased $19.8 billion, driven by higher loans in CIB and higher securities-based lending in AWM. Lending-related commitments decreased $5.3 billion, with decreases in AWM and CCB, largely offset by higher commitments in CIB. As of December 31, 2024, nonperforming exposure increased by $2.3 billion, predominantly driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, Healthcare and Consumer & Retail, in each case resulting from downgrades. For the year ended December 31, 2024, wholesale net charge-offs were $822 million, largely driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, and client-specific charge-offs across multiple industries including Consumer & Retail and Individuals. Wholesale credit portfolioDecember 31,(in millions)Credit exposureNonperforming2024202320242023Loans retained$690,396 $672,472 $3,942 $2,346 Loans held-for-sale6,103 3,498 5 89 Loans at fair value 25,819 26,520 964 279 Loans 722,318 702,490 4,911 2,714 Derivative receivables60,967 54,864 145 364 Receivables from customers(a)51,929 47,625 — — Total wholesale credit-related assets835,214 804,979 5,056 3,078 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate owned NANA206 154 OtherNANA— — Total assets acquired in loan satisfactionsNANA206 154 Lending-related commitments 531,467 536,786 737 464 Total wholesale credit portfolio$1,366,681 $1,341,765 $5,999 $3,696 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)$(40,888)$(36,989)$— $— Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(28,160)(22,461)NANA(a)Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM; these are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets.(b)Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. Refer to Credit derivatives on page 136 and Note 5 for additional information. Wholesale credit portfolioDecember 31,(in millions)Credit exposureNonperforming2024202320242023Loans retained$690,396 $672,472 $3,942 $2,346 Loans held-for-sale6,103 3,498 5 89 Loans at fair value 25,819 26,520 964 279 Loans 722,318 702,490 4,911 2,714 Derivative receivables60,967 54,864 145 364 Receivables from customers(a)51,929 47,625 — — Total wholesale credit-related assets835,214 804,979 5,056 3,078 Assets acquired in loan satisfactionsReal estate owned NANA206 154 OtherNANA— — Total assets acquired in loan satisfactionsNANA206 154 Lending-related commitments 531,467 536,786 737 464 Total wholesale credit portfolio$1,366,681 $1,341,765 $5,999 $3,696 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)$(40,888)$(36,989)$— $— Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(28,160)(22,461)NANA Receivables from customers(a)

Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b) (a)Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM; these are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets. (b)Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. Refer to Credit derivatives on page 136 and Note 5 for additional information. 126JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 126JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 126JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 126 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The following tables present the maturity and internal risk ratings profiles of the wholesale credit portfolio as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Firm generally considers internal ratings with qualitative characteristics equivalent to BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment grade, and takes into consideration collateral and structural support when determining the internal risk rating for each credit facility. Refer to Note 12 for further information on internal risk ratings. Maturity profile(d)Ratings profileDecember 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)1 year or lessAfter 1 year through 5 yearsAfter 5 yearsTotalInvestment-gradeNoninvestment-gradeTotalTotal % of IGLoans retained$225,982 $289,199 $175,215 $690,396 $471,670 $218,726 $690,396 68 %Derivative receivables60,967 60,967 Less: Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(28,160)(28,160)Total derivative receivables, net of collateral11,515 7,418 13,874 32,807 24,707 8,100 32,807 75 Lending-related commitments121,283 384,529 25,655 531,467 352,082 179,385 531,467 66 Subtotal358,780 681,146 214,744 1,254,670 848,459 406,211 1,254,670 68 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)31,922 31,922 Receivables from customers 51,929 51,929 Total exposure – net of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives$1,338,521 $1,338,521 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)(c)$(5,442)$(33,751)$(1,695)$(40,888)$(31,691)$(9,197)$(40,888)78 % Maturity profile(d)

(in millions, except ratios) Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a) Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)(c) Maturity profile(d)Ratings profileDecember 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)1 year or lessAfter 1 year through 5 yearsAfter 5 yearsTotalInvestment-gradeNoninvestment-gradeTotalTotal % of IGLoans retained$211,104 $280,821 $180,547 $672,472 $458,838 $213,634 $672,472 68 %Derivative receivables54,864 54,864 Less: Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives(22,461)(22,461)Total derivative receivables, net of collateral8,007 8,970 15,426 32,403 24,919 7,484 32,403 77 Lending-related commitments143,337 368,646 24,803 536,786 341,611 195,175 536,786 64 Subtotal362,448 658,437 220,776 1,241,661 825,368 416,293 1,241,661 66 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a)30,018 30,018 Receivables from customers47,625 47,625 Total exposure – net of liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives$1,319,304 $1,319,304 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)(c)$(3,311)$(28,353)$(5,325)$(36,989)$(28,869)$(8,120)$(36,989)78 % Maturity profile(d) Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(a) Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities(b)(c) (a)Loans held-for-sale are primarily related to syndicated loans and loans transferred from the retained portfolio. (b)These derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. (c)The notional amounts are presented on a net basis by underlying reference entity and the ratings profile shown is based on the ratings of the reference entity on which protection has been purchased. Predominantly all of the credit derivatives entered into by the Firm where it has purchased protection used in credit portfolio management activities are executed with investment-grade counterparties. In addition, the Firm obtains credit protection against certain loans in the retained loan portfolio through the issuance of credit-related notes. (d)The maturity profile of retained loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables is generally based on remaining contractual maturity. Derivative contracts that are in a receivable position at December 31, 2024, may become payable prior to maturity based on their cash flow profile or changes in market conditions. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K127 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K127 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K127 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 127

The Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry exposures, and pays particular attention to industries with actual or potential credit concerns. Exposures that are deemed to be criticized align with the U.S. banking regulators’ definition of criticized exposures, which consist of the special mention, substandard and doubtful categories. Total criticized exposure, excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value, was $44.7 billion and $41.4 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, representing approximately 3.5% and 3.3% of total wholesale credit exposure, respectively; of the $44.7 billion, $39.9 billion was performing. The increase in criticized exposure was driven by Real Estate resulting from downgrades, primarily in Multifamily and Office, and new commitments in Technology and Media, partially offset by Consumer & Retail resulting from net portfolio activity and upgrades. The table below summarizes by industry the Firm’s exposures as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. The industry of risk category is generally based on the client or counterparty’s primary business activity. Refer to Note 4 for additional information on industry concentrations. Wholesale credit exposure – industries(a)Selected metricsNoninvestment-grade30 days or more past due and accruingloansNet charge-offs/(recoveries)Credit derivative and credit-related notes(h)Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivativereceivablesAs of or for the year ended December 31, 2024(in millions)Creditexposure(f)(g)Investment- gradeNoncriticizedCriticized performingCriticized nonperformingReal Estate$207,050 $143,803 $50,865 $10,858 $1,524 $913 $345 $(584)$— Individuals and Individual Entities(b)144,145 118,650 24,831 217 447 831 122 — — Asset Managers135,541 101,150 34,148 206 37 375 2 — (9,194)Consumer & Retail129,815 62,800 60,141 6,055 819 252 123 (4,320)— Technology, Media & Telecommunications84,716 45,021 28,629 10,592 474 79 94 (4,800)— Industrials72,530 37,572 30,912 3,807 239 185 91 (2,312)— Healthcare64,224 44,135 17,062 2,219 808 245 56 (3,286)(34)Banks & Finance Companies61,287 36,884 24,119 257 27 36 — (702)(729)Utilities35,871 24,205 10,256 1,273 137 1 — (2,700)— State & Municipal Govt(c)35,039 33,303 1,711 9 16 90 — (2)(1)Automotive34,336 22,015 11,353 931 37 121 1 (997)— Oil & Gas31,724 19,053 12,479 188 4 9 (3)(1,711)(2)Insurance24,267 17,847 6,198 222 — 2 — (1,077)(9,184)Chemicals & Plastics20,782 11,013 8,152 1,521 96 31 14 (1,164)— Transportation17,019 9,462 7,135 391 31 17 (20)(658)— Metals & Mining15,860 7,373 7,860 590 37 9 — (246)(2)Central Govt13,862 13,580 157 125 — 4 — (1,490)(2,051)Securities Firms9,443 5,424 4,014 5 — — — (13)(2,635)Financial Markets Infrastructure4,446 4,201 245 — — — — (1)— All other(d)140,873 117,986 22,398 398 91 10 (3)(14,825)(4,328)Subtotal$1,282,830 $875,477 $362,665 $39,864 $4,824 $3,210 $822 $(40,888)$(28,160)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value31,922 Receivables from customers51,929 Total(e)$1,366,681

(in millions) Credit exposure(f)(g) Individuals and Individual Entities(b) Asset Managers State & Municipal Govt(c) All other(d) Total(e) 128JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 128JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 128JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 128 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Selected metricsNoninvestment-grade30 days or more past due and accruingloansNet charge-offs/(recoveries)Credit derivative and credit-related notes (h)Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivativereceivablesAs of or for the year ended December 31, 2023(in millions)Creditexposure(f)(g)Investment- gradeNoncriticizedCriticized performingCriticized nonperformingReal Estate$208,261 $148,866 $50,190 $8,558 $647 $717 $275 $(574)$— Individuals and Individual Entities(b)145,849 110,673 34,261 334 581 861 10 — — Asset Managers 129,574 83,857 45,623 90 4 201 1 — (7,209)Consumer & Retail127,086 60,168 58,606 7,863 449 318 161 (4,204)— Technology, Media & Telecommunications77,296 40,468 27,094 9,388 346 36 81 (4,287)— Industrials75,092 40,951 30,586 3,419 136 213 31 (2,949)— Healthcare65,025 43,163 18,396 3,005 461 130 17 (3,070)— Banks & Finance Companies57,177 33,881 22,744 545 7 9 277 (511)(412)Utilities36,061 25,242 9,929 765 125 1 (3)(2,373)— State & Municipal Govt(c)35,986 33,561 2,390 27 8 31 — (4)— Automotive33,977 23,152 10,060 640 125 59 — (653)— Oil & Gas34,475 18,276 16,076 111 12 45 11 (1,927)(5)Insurance20,501 14,503 5,700 298 — 2 — (961)(6,898)Chemicals & Plastics20,773 11,353 8,352 916 152 106 2 (1,045)— Transportation16,060 8,865 5,943 1,196 56 23 (26)(574)— Metals & Mining15,508 8,403 6,514 536 55 12 44 (229)— Central Govt17,704 17,264 312 127 1 — — (3,490)(2,085)Securities Firms8,689 4,570 4,118 1 — — — (14)(2,765)Financial Markets Infrastructure4,251 4,052 199 — — — — — — All other(d)134,777 115,711 18,618 439 9 21 (2)(10,124)(3,087)Subtotal$1,264,122 $846,979 $375,711 $38,258 $3,174 $2,785 $879 $(36,989)$(22,461)Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value30,018 Receivables from customers47,625 Total(e)$1,341,765 Credit derivative and credit-related notes (h) Credit exposure(f)(g) Individuals and Individual Entities(b) Asset Managers State & Municipal Govt(c) All other(d) Total(e) (a)The industry rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2023, are based on the industry rankings of the corresponding exposures at December 31, 2024, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2023. (b)Individuals and Individual Entities predominantly consists of Global Private Bank clients within AWM and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management within CCB, and includes exposure to personal investment companies and personal and testamentary trusts. (c)In addition to the credit risk exposure to states and municipal governments (both U.S. and non-U.S.) at December 31, 2024 and 2023, noted above, the Firm held: $6.1 billion and $5.9 billion, respectively, of trading assets; $17.9 billion and $21.4 billion, respectively, of AFS securities; and $9.3 billion and $9.9 billion, respectively, of HTM securities, issued by U.S. state and municipal governments. Refer to Note 2 and Note 10 for further information. (d)All other includes: SPEs and Private education and civic organizations, representing approximately 94% and 6%, respectively, at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. (e)Excludes cash placed with banks of $459.2 billion and $614.1 billion, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which is predominantly placed with various central banks, primarily Federal Reserve Banks. (f)Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities held against derivative receivables or loans and liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables. (g)Credit exposure includes held-for-sale and fair value option elected lending-related commitments. (h)Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. The All other category includes purchased credit protection on certain credit indices. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K129 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K129 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K129 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 129

Real Estate exposure was $207.1 billion as of December 31, 2024. Criticized exposure increased by $3.2 billion from $9.2 billion at December 31, 2023 to $12.4 billion at December 31, 2024, predominantly driven by downgrades, primarily in Multifamily and Office. December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Loans and Lending-related CommitmentsDerivative ReceivablesCredit exposure% Investment-grade% Drawn(d)Multifamily(a)$124,074 $7 $124,081 77 %92 %Industrial19,092 17 19,109 65 72 Other Income Producing Properties(b)16,411 158 16,569 50 63 Office16,331 29 16,360 47 81 Services and Non Income Producing14,047 57 14,104 62 46 Retail12,230 23 12,253 77 75 Lodging4,555 19 4,574 31 53 Total Real Estate Exposure(c)$206,740 $310 $207,050 69 %82 %December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Loans and Lending-related CommitmentsDerivative ReceivablesCredit exposure% Investment-grade% Drawn(d)Multifamily(a)$121,946 $21 $121,967 79 %90 %Industrial20,254 18 20,272 70 72 Other Income Producing Properties(b)15,542 208 15,750 55 63 Office16,462 32 16,494 51 81 Services and Non Income Producing16,145 74 16,219 62 46 Retail12,763 48 12,811 75 73 Lodging4,729 19 4,748 30 48 Total Real Estate Exposure$207,841 $420 $208,261 71 %80 % % Drawn(d) Multifamily(a) Other Income Producing Properties(b) Office

% Drawn(d) Multifamily(a) Other Income Producing Properties(b) Office (a)Total Multifamily exposure is approximately 99% performing. Multifamily exposure is largely in California. (b)Other Income Producing Properties consists of clients with diversified property types or other property types outside of categories listed in the table above. (c)Real Estate exposure is approximately 84% secured; unsecured exposure is largely investment-grade primarily to Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”) and Real Estate Operating Companies (“REOCs”) whose underlying assets are generally diversified. (d)Represents drawn exposure as a percentage of credit exposure. 130JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 130JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 130JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 130 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Consumer & Retail exposure was $129.8 billion as of December 31, 2024. Criticized exposure decreased by $1.4 billion from $8.3 billion at December 31, 2023 to $6.9 billion at December 31, 2024, driven by net portfolio activity and upgrades, largely offset by downgrades. December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Loans and Lending-related CommitmentsDerivative ReceivablesCredit exposure% Investment-grade% Drawn(d)Food and Beverage$34,774 $683 $35,457 61 %34 %Retail34,917 261 35,178 51 31 Business and Consumer Services(a)34,534 412 34,946 42 41 Consumer Hard Goods13,796 208 14,004 43 35 Leisure(b)10,186 44 10,230 26 43 Total Consumer & Retail(c)$128,207 $1,608 $129,815 48 %36 %December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Loans and Lending-related CommitmentsDerivative ReceivablesCredit exposure% Investment-grade% Drawn(d)Food and Beverage$32,256 $930 $33,186 57 %36 %Retail36,042 334 36,376 51 30 Business and Consumer Services(a)34,822 392 35,214 42 42 Consumer Hard Goods13,169 197 13,366 43 33 Leisure(b)8,784 160 8,944 25 47 Total Consumer & Retail$125,073 $2,013 $127,086 47 %36 % % Drawn(d) Business and Consumer Services(a) Leisure(b)

(a)Retail consists of Home Improvement & Specialty Retailers, Restaurants, Discount & Drug Stores, Specialty Apparel, Department Stores and Supermarkets. (b)Leisure consists of Arts & Culture, Travel Services, Gaming and Sports & Recreation. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 90% of the noninvestment-grade Leisure portfolio is secured. (c)Consumer & Retail exposure is approximately 57% secured; unsecured exposure is approximately 80% investment-grade. (d)Represents drawn exposure as a percent of credit exposure. Oil & Gas Oil & Gas exposure was $31.7 billion as of December 31, 2024. Criticized exposure was $192 million and $123 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Loans and Lending-related CommitmentsDerivative ReceivablesCredit exposure% Investment-grade% Drawn(c)Exploration & Production ("E&P") and Oil field Services$14,265 $848 $15,113 55 %27 %Other Oil & Gas(a)16,306 305 16,611 65 19 Total Oil & Gas(b)$30,571 $1,153 $31,724 60 %23 %December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Loans and Lending-related CommitmentsDerivative ReceivablesCredit exposure% Investment-grade% Drawn(c)Exploration & Production ("E&P") and Oil field Services$18,121 $536 $18,657 51 %26 %Other Oil & Gas(a)15,649 169 15,818 55 22 Total Oil & Gas$33,770 $705 $34,475 53 %25 % % Drawn(c) Other Oil & Gas(a)

% Drawn(c) Other Oil & Gas(a) (a)Other Oil & Gas includes Integrated Oil & Gas companies, Midstream/Oil Pipeline companies and refineries. (b)Oil & Gas exposure is approximately 33% secured, and includes reserve-based lending to the Exploration & Production sub-sector; unsecured exposure is approximately 69% investment-grade. (c)Represents drawn exposure as a percent of credit exposure. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K131 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K131 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K131 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 131

LoansIn its wholesale businesses, the Firm provides loans to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to high-net-worth individuals. Refer to Note 12 for a further discussion on loans, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators.The following table presents the change in the nonaccrual loan portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Since December 31, 2023, nonaccrual loan exposure increased by $2.2 billion, predominantly driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, Healthcare and Consumer & Retail, in each case resulting from downgrades.Wholesale nonaccrual loan activityYear ended December 31, (in millions)20242023Beginning balance$2,714 $2,395 Additions5,841 3,543 Reductions:Paydowns and other2,387 1,336 Gross charge-offs780 965 Returned to performing status392 616 Sales85 307 Total reductions3,644 3,224 Net changes2,197 319 Ending balance$4,911 $2,714 The following table presents net charge-offs/recoveries, which are defined as gross charge-offs less recoveries, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The amounts in the table below do not include gains or losses from sales of nonaccrual loans recognized in noninterest revenue.Wholesale net charge-offs/(recoveries)Year ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Loans Average loans retained$673,310 $646,875 Gross charge-offs1,022 1,011 Gross recoveries collected(200)(132)Net charge-offs/(recoveries)822 879 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate0.12 %0.14 % LoansIn its wholesale businesses, the Firm provides loans to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to high-net-worth individuals. Refer to Note 12 for a further discussion on loans, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators.The following table presents the change in the nonaccrual loan portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Since December 31, 2023, nonaccrual loan exposure increased by $2.2 billion, predominantly driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, Healthcare and Consumer & Retail, in each case resulting from downgrades.Wholesale nonaccrual loan activityYear ended December 31, (in millions)20242023Beginning balance$2,714 $2,395 Additions5,841 3,543 Reductions:Paydowns and other2,387 1,336 Gross charge-offs780 965 Returned to performing status392 616 Sales85 307 Total reductions3,644 3,224 Net changes2,197 319 Ending balance$4,911 $2,714 Loans In its wholesale businesses, the Firm provides loans to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to high-net-worth individuals. Refer to Note 12 for a further discussion on loans, including information about delinquencies, loan modifications and other credit quality indicators. The following table presents the change in the nonaccrual loan portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Since December 31, 2023, nonaccrual loan exposure increased by $2.2 billion, predominantly driven by Real Estate, concentrated in Office, Healthcare and Consumer & Retail, in each case resulting from downgrades. Wholesale nonaccrual loan activityYear ended December 31, (in millions)20242023Beginning balance$2,714 $2,395 Additions5,841 3,543 Reductions:Paydowns and other2,387 1,336 Gross charge-offs780 965 Returned to performing status392 616 Sales85 307 Total reductions3,644 3,224 Net changes2,197 319 Ending balance$4,911 $2,714 The following table presents net charge-offs/recoveries, which are defined as gross charge-offs less recoveries, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The amounts in the table below do not include gains or losses from sales of nonaccrual loans recognized in noninterest revenue.Wholesale net charge-offs/(recoveries)Year ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Loans Average loans retained$673,310 $646,875 Gross charge-offs1,022 1,011 Gross recoveries collected(200)(132)Net charge-offs/(recoveries)822 879 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate0.12 %0.14 % The following table presents net charge-offs/recoveries, which are defined as gross charge-offs less recoveries, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The amounts in the table below do not include gains or losses from sales of nonaccrual loans recognized in noninterest revenue. Wholesale net charge-offs/(recoveries)Year ended December 31,(in millions, except ratios)20242023Loans Average loans retained$673,310 $646,875 Gross charge-offs1,022 1,011 Gross recoveries collected(200)(132)Net charge-offs/(recoveries)822 879 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate0.12 %0.14 % 132JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 132JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 132JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 132 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The table below sets forth wholesale loan maturities and the distribution between fixed and floating interest rates based on the stated terms of the loan agreements by loan class. Refer to Note 12 for further information on loan classes. December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios) 1 year or less(b)After 1 year through 5 yearsAfter 5 years through 15 yearsAfter 15 yearsTotalWholesale loans:Secured by real estate$12,474 $57,125 $57,967 $42,597 $170,163 Commercial and industrial55,731 109,839 8,587 94 174,251 Other182,722 150,346 36,281 8,555 377,904 Total wholesale loans$250,927 $317,310 $102,835 $51,246 $722,318 Loans due after one year at fixed interest ratesSecured by real estate$13,119 $17,943 $935 Commercial and industrial3,964 1,231 7 Other26,929 15,542 5,824 Loans due after one year at variable interest rates(a)Secured by real estate$44,006 $40,024 $41,662 Commercial and industrial105,875 7,356 87 Other123,417 20,739 2,731 Total wholesale loans$317,310 $102,835 $51,246

(a)Includes loans that have an initial fixed interest rate that resets to a variable rate as the variable rate will be the prevailing rate over the life of the loan. (b)Includes loans held-for-sale, demand loans and overdrafts. The following table presents net charge-offs/recoveries, average retained loans and net charge-off/recovery rate by loan class for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Year ended December 31,Secured by real estateCommercial and industrialOtherTotal(in millions, except ratios)20242023202420232024202320242023Net charge-offs/(recoveries)$313 $178 $381 $370 $128 $331 $822 $879 Average retained loans 162,653 151,214 169,363 170,503 341,294 325,158 673,310 646,875 Net charge-off/(recovery) rate0.19 %0.12 %0.22 %0.22 %0.04 %0.10 %0.12 %0.14 % JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K133 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K133 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K133 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 133

Lending-related commitmentsThe Firm uses lending-related financial instruments, such as commitments (including revolving credit facilities) and guarantees, to address the financing needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or when the Firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees, and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts. Most of these commitments and guarantees have historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expired without being drawn upon or a default occurring. As a result, the Firm does not believe that the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is representative of the Firm’s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. Refer to Note 28 for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments.Receivables from customersReceivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM that are collateralized by assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts (including cash on deposit, and primarily liquid and readily marketable debt or equity securities). To manage its credit risk, the Firm establishes margin requirements and monitors the required margin levels on an ongoing basis, and requires clients to deposit additional cash or other collateral, or to reduce positions, when appropriate. Credit risk arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements is generally mitigated by factors such as the short-term nature of the activity, the fair value of collateral held and the Firm’s right to call for, and the borrower’s obligation to provide, additional margin when the fair value of the collateral declines. Because of these mitigating factors, these receivables generally do not require an allowance for credit losses. However, if in management’s judgment, an allowance for credit losses is required, the Firm estimates expected credit losses based on the value of the collateral and probability of borrower default. These receivables are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets.Refer to Note 13 for further information on the Firm’s accounting policies for the allowance for credit losses.Derivative contractsDerivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risk, including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange and equities and commodities prices. The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. The Firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit risk and other market risk exposure. The nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the Firm is exposed. For over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives, the Firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty. For exchange-traded derivatives (“ETD”), such as futures and options, and cleared over-the-counter (“OTC-cleared”) derivatives, the Firm can also be exposed to the credit risk of the relevant CCP. Where possible, the Firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements. The percentage of the Firm’s OTC derivative transactions subject to collateral agreements — excluding foreign exchange spot trades, which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily — was approximately 86% and 87% at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on the Firm’s use of collateral agreements and for a further discussion of derivative contracts, counterparties and settlement types.The fair value of derivative receivables reported on the Consolidated balance sheets was $61.0 billion and $54.9 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase was primarily as a result of market movements. Derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and the related cash collateral held by the Firm.In addition, the Firm holds liquid securities and other cash collateral that may be used as security when the fair value of the client’s exposure is in the Firm’s favor. For these purposes, the definition of liquid securities is consistent with the definition of high quality liquid assets as defined in the LCR rule.In management’s view, the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration other collateral, which generally represents securities that do not qualify as high quality liquid assets under the LCR rule. The benefits of these additional collateral amounts for each counterparty are subject to a legally enforceable master netting agreement and limited to the net amount of the derivative receivables for each counterparty.The Firm also holds additional collateral (primarily cash, G7 government securities, other liquid government agency and guaranteed securities, and corporate debt and equity securities) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions, as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the Firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date. Although this collateral does not reduce the receivables balances and is not included in the tables below, it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client’s derivative contracts move in the Firm’s favor. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on the Firm’s use of collateral agreements for derivative transactions. Lending-related commitmentsThe Firm uses lending-related financial instruments, such as commitments (including revolving credit facilities) and guarantees, to address the financing needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or when the Firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees, and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts. Most of these commitments and guarantees have historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expired without being drawn upon or a default occurring. As a result, the Firm does not believe that the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is representative of the Firm’s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. Refer to Note 28 for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments.Receivables from customersReceivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM that are collateralized by assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts (including cash on deposit, and primarily liquid and readily marketable debt or equity securities). To manage its credit risk, the Firm establishes margin requirements and monitors the required margin levels on an ongoing basis, and requires clients to deposit additional cash or other collateral, or to reduce positions, when appropriate. Credit risk arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements is generally mitigated by factors such as the short-term nature of the activity, the fair value of collateral held and the Firm’s right to call for, and the borrower’s obligation to provide, additional margin when the fair value of the collateral declines. Because of these mitigating factors, these receivables generally do not require an allowance for credit losses. However, if in management’s judgment, an allowance for credit losses is required, the Firm estimates expected credit losses based on the value of the collateral and probability of borrower default. These receivables are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets.Refer to Note 13 for further information on the Firm’s accounting policies for the allowance for credit losses.Derivative contractsDerivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risk, including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange and equities and commodities prices. The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. The Firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit risk and other market risk exposure. The nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the

The Firm uses lending-related financial instruments, such as commitments (including revolving credit facilities) and guarantees, to address the financing needs of its clients. The contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or when the Firm fulfills its obligations under these guarantees, and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts. Most of these commitments and guarantees have historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expired without being drawn upon or a default occurring. As a result, the Firm does not believe that the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is representative of the Firm’s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. Refer to Note 28 for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments.

Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM that are collateralized by assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts (including cash on deposit, and primarily liquid and readily marketable debt or equity securities). To manage its credit risk, the Firm establishes margin requirements and monitors the required margin levels on an ongoing basis, and requires clients to deposit additional cash or other collateral, or to reduce positions, when appropriate. Credit risk arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements is generally mitigated by factors such as the short-term nature of the activity, the fair value of collateral held and the Firm’s right to call for, and the borrower’s obligation to provide, additional margin when the fair value of the collateral declines. Because of these mitigating factors, these receivables generally do not require an allowance for credit losses. However, if in management’s judgment, an allowance for credit losses is required, the Firm estimates expected credit losses based on the value of the collateral and probability of borrower default. These receivables are reported within accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 13 for further information on the Firm’s accounting policies for the allowance for credit losses.

Derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risk, including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange and equities and commodities prices. The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. The Firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit risk and other market risk exposure. The nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the Firm is exposed. For over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives, the Firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty. For exchange-traded derivatives (“ETD”), such as futures and options, and cleared over-the-counter (“OTC-cleared”) derivatives, the Firm can also be exposed to the credit risk of the relevant CCP. Where possible, the Firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements. The percentage of the Firm’s OTC derivative transactions subject to collateral agreements — excluding foreign exchange spot trades, which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily — was approximately 86% and 87% at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on the Firm’s use of collateral agreements and for a further discussion of derivative contracts, counterparties and settlement types.The fair value of derivative receivables reported on the Consolidated balance sheets was $61.0 billion and $54.9 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase was primarily as a result of market movements. Derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and the related cash collateral held by the Firm.In addition, the Firm holds liquid securities and other cash collateral that may be used as security when the fair value of the client’s exposure is in the Firm’s favor. For these purposes, the definition of liquid securities is consistent with the definition of high quality liquid assets as defined in the LCR rule.In management’s view, the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration other collateral, which generally represents securities that do not qualify as high quality liquid assets under the LCR rule. The benefits of these additional collateral amounts for each counterparty are subject to a legally enforceable master netting agreement and limited to the net amount of the derivative receivables for each counterparty.The Firm also holds additional collateral (primarily cash, G7 government securities, other liquid government agency and guaranteed securities, and corporate debt and equity securities) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions, as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the Firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date. Although this collateral does not reduce the receivables balances and is not included in the tables below, it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client’s derivative contracts move in the Firm’s favor. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on the Firm’s use of collateral agreements for derivative transactions. derivative affect the credit risk to which the Firm is exposed. For over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives, the Firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty. For exchange-traded derivatives (“ETD”), such as futures and options, and cleared over-the-counter (“OTC-cleared”) derivatives, the Firm can also be exposed to the credit risk of the relevant CCP. Where possible, the Firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements. The percentage of the Firm’s OTC derivative transactions subject to collateral agreements — excluding foreign exchange spot trades, which are not typically covered by collateral agreements due to their short maturity and centrally cleared trades that are settled daily — was approximately 86% and 87% at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on the Firm’s use of collateral agreements and for a further discussion of derivative contracts, counterparties and settlement types. The fair value of derivative receivables reported on the Consolidated balance sheets was $61.0 billion and $54.9 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase was primarily as a result of market movements. Derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and the related cash collateral held by the Firm. In addition, the Firm holds liquid securities and other cash collateral that may be used as security when the fair value of the client’s exposure is in the Firm’s favor. For these purposes, the definition of liquid securities is consistent with the definition of high quality liquid assets as defined in the LCR rule. In management’s view, the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration other collateral, which generally represents securities that do not qualify as high quality liquid assets under the LCR rule. The benefits of these additional collateral amounts for each counterparty are subject to a legally enforceable master netting agreement and limited to the net amount of the derivative receivables for each counterparty. The Firm also holds additional collateral (primarily cash, G7 government securities, other liquid government agency and guaranteed securities, and corporate debt and equity securities) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions, as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the Firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date. Although this collateral does not reduce the receivables balances and is not included in the tables below, it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client’s derivative contracts move in the Firm’s favor. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on the Firm’s use of collateral agreements for derivative transactions. 134JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 134JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 134JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 134 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following tables summarize the net derivative receivables and the internal ratings profile for the periods presented. Derivative receivablesDecember 31, (in millions)20242023Total, net of cash collateral$60,967 $54,864 Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables(28,160)(22,461)Total, net of liquid securities and other cash collateral$32,807 $32,403 Other collateral held against derivative receivables(1,021)(993)Total, net of collateral$31,786 $31,410 Ratings profile of derivative receivables20242023December 31,(in millions, except ratios)Exposure net of collateral% of exposure net of collateralExposure net of collateral% of exposure net of collateralInvestment-grade$23,783 75 %$24,004 76 %Noninvestment-grade8,003 25 7,406 24 Total$31,786 100 %$31,410 100 % 2024 2023 While useful as a current view of credit exposure, the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure. To capture this variability, the Firm calculates, on a client-by-client basis, three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss: Peak, Derivative Risk Equivalent (“DRE”), and Average exposure (“AVG”). These measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits, where applicable.Peak represents a conservative measure of potential derivative exposure, including the benefit of collateral, to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% confidence level over the life of the transaction. Peak is the primary measure used by the Firm for setting credit limits for derivative contracts, senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management.DRE exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure, including the benefit of collateral, on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures. DRE is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than Peak.Finally, AVG is a measure of the expected fair value of the Firm’s derivative exposures, including the benefit of collateral, at future time periods. AVG over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and CVA, as further described below. The fair value of the Firm’s derivative receivables incorporates CVA to reflect the credit quality of counterparties. CVA is based on the Firm’s AVG to a counterparty and the counterparty’s credit spread in the credit derivatives market. The Firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio. In addition, the Firm’s risk management process for derivatives exposures takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk, which is broadly defined as the risk that exposure to a counterparty is positively correlated with the impact of a default by the same counterparty, which could cause exposure to increase at the same time as the counterparty’s capacity to meet its obligations is decreasing. Many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time. To the extent that these correlations are identified, the Firm may adjust the CVA associated with a particular counterparty’s AVG. The Firm risk manages exposure to changes in CVA by entering into credit derivative contracts, as well as interest rate, foreign exchange, equity and commodity derivative contracts.The below graph shows exposure profiles to the Firm’s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the Peak, DRE and AVG metrics. The three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year, if no new trades are added to the portfolio.Exposure profile of derivatives measuresDecember 31, 2024(in billions) While useful as a current view of credit exposure, the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure. To capture this variability, the Firm calculates, on a client-by-client basis, three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss: Peak, Derivative Risk Equivalent (“DRE”), and Average exposure (“AVG”). These measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits, where applicable.Peak represents a conservative measure of potential derivative exposure, including the benefit of collateral, to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% confidence level over the life of the transaction. Peak is the primary measure used by the Firm for setting credit limits for derivative contracts, senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management.DRE exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure, including the benefit of collateral, on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures. DRE is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than Peak.Finally, AVG is a measure of the expected fair value of the Firm’s derivative exposures, including the benefit of collateral, at future time periods. AVG over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and CVA, as further described below. The fair value of the Firm’s derivative receivables incorporates CVA to reflect the credit quality of counterparties. CVA is based on the Firm’s AVG to a counterparty and the counterparty’s credit spread in the credit derivatives market. The Firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio. In addition, the Firm’s risk management process for derivatives exposures takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk, which is broadly While useful as a current view of credit exposure, the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure. To capture this variability, the Firm calculates, on a client-by-client basis, three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss: Peak, Derivative Risk Equivalent (“DRE”), and Average exposure (“AVG”). These measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits, where applicable. Peak represents a conservative measure of potential derivative exposure, including the benefit of collateral, to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% confidence level over the life of the transaction. Peak is the primary measure used by the Firm for setting credit limits for derivative contracts, senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management. DRE exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure, including the benefit of collateral, on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures. DRE is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than Peak. Finally, AVG is a measure of the expected fair value of the Firm’s derivative exposures, including the benefit of collateral, at future time periods. AVG over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit risk capital and CVA, as further described below. The fair value of the Firm’s derivative receivables incorporates CVA to reflect the credit quality of counterparties. CVA is based on the Firm’s AVG to a counterparty and the counterparty’s credit spread in the credit derivatives market. The Firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio. In addition, the Firm’s risk management process for derivatives exposures takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk, which is broadly defined as the risk that exposure to a counterparty is positively correlated with the impact of a default by the same counterparty, which could cause exposure to increase at the same time as the counterparty’s capacity to meet its obligations is decreasing. Many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time. To the extent that these correlations are identified, the Firm may adjust the CVA associated with a particular counterparty’s AVG. The Firm risk manages exposure to changes in CVA by entering into credit derivative contracts, as well as interest rate, foreign exchange, equity and commodity derivative contracts.The below graph shows exposure profiles to the Firm’s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the Peak, DRE and AVG metrics. The three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year, if no new trades are added to the portfolio.Exposure profile of derivatives measuresDecember 31, 2024(in billions) defined as the risk that exposure to a counterparty is positively correlated with the impact of a default by the same counterparty, which could cause exposure to increase at the same time as the counterparty’s capacity to meet its obligations is decreasing. Many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time. To the extent that these correlations are identified, the Firm may adjust the CVA associated with a particular counterparty’s AVG. The Firm risk manages exposure to changes in CVA by entering into credit derivative contracts, as well as interest rate, foreign exchange, equity and commodity derivative contracts. The below graph shows exposure profiles to the Firm’s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the Peak, DRE and AVG metrics. The three measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year, if no new trades are added to the portfolio.

Credit derivativesThe Firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes: first, in its capacity as a market-maker, and second, as an end-user to manage the Firm’s own credit risk associated with various exposures.Credit portfolio management activitiesIncluded in the Firm’s end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities (loans and lending-related commitments) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the Firm’s wholesale businesses (collectively, “credit portfolio management activities”). Information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below. The Firm also uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures, including credit risk arising from certain securities held in the Firm’s market-making businesses. These credit derivatives are not included in credit portfolio management activities.Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activitiesNotional amount of protection purchased and sold(a)December 31, (in millions)20242023Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage:Loans and lending-related commitments$25,216 $24,157 Derivative receivables 15,672 12,832 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities$40,888 $36,989 (a)Amounts are presented net, considering the Firm’s net protection purchased or sold with respect to each underlying reference entity or index. The credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP; these derivatives are reported at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in principal transactions revenue. In contrast, the loans and lending-related commitments being risk-managed are accounted for on an accrual basis. This asymmetry in accounting treatment, between loans and lending-related commitments and the credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities, causes earnings volatility that is not representative, in the Firm’s view, of the true changes in value of the Firm’s overall credit exposure.The effectiveness of credit default swaps (“CDS”) as a hedge against the Firm’s exposures may vary depending on a number of factors, including the named reference entity (i.e., the Firm may experience losses on specific exposures that are different than the named reference entities in the purchased CDS); the contractual terms of the CDS (which may have a defined credit event that does not align with an actual loss realized by the Firm); and the maturity of the Firm’s CDS protection (which in some cases may be shorter than the Firm’s exposures). However, the Firm generally seeks to purchase credit protection with a maturity date that is the same or similar to the maturity date of the exposure for which the protection was purchased, and remaining differences in maturity are actively monitored and managed by the Firm. Refer to Credit derivatives in Note 5 for further information on credit derivatives and derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities. Credit derivativesThe Firm uses credit derivatives for two primary purposes: first, in its capacity as a market-maker, and second, as an end-user to manage the Firm’s own credit risk associated with various exposures.Credit portfolio management activitiesIncluded in the Firm’s end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities (loans and lending-related commitments) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the Firm’s wholesale businesses (collectively, “credit portfolio management activities”). Information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below. The Firm also uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures, including credit risk arising from certain securities held in the Firm’s market-making businesses. These credit derivatives are not included in credit portfolio management activities.

Included in the Firm’s end-user activities are credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk associated with traditional lending activities (loans and lending-related commitments) and derivatives counterparty exposure in the Firm’s wholesale businesses (collectively, “credit portfolio management activities”). Information on credit portfolio management activities is provided in the table below. The Firm also uses credit derivatives as an end-user to manage other exposures, including credit risk arising from certain securities held in the Firm’s market-making businesses. These credit derivatives are not included in credit portfolio management activities. Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activitiesNotional amount of protection purchased and sold(a)December 31, (in millions)20242023Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage:Loans and lending-related commitments$25,216 $24,157 Derivative receivables 15,672 12,832 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities$40,888 $36,989 (a)Amounts are presented net, considering the Firm’s net protection purchased or sold with respect to each underlying reference entity or index. The credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP; these derivatives are reported at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in principal transactions revenue. In contrast, the loans and lending-related commitments being risk-managed are accounted for on an accrual basis. This asymmetry in accounting treatment, between loans and lending-related commitments and the credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities, causes earnings volatility that is not representative, in the Firm’s view, of the true changes in value of the Firm’s overall credit exposure.The effectiveness of credit default swaps (“CDS”) as a hedge against the Firm’s exposures may vary depending on a number of factors, including the named reference entity (i.e., the Firm may experience losses on specific exposures that are different than the named reference entities in the purchased CDS); the contractual terms of the CDS (which may have a defined credit event that does not align with an actual loss realized by the Firm); and the maturity of the Firm’s CDS protection (which in some cases may be shorter than the Firm’s exposures). However, the Firm generally seeks to purchase credit protection with a maturity date that is the same or similar to the maturity date of the exposure for which the protection was purchased, and remaining differences in maturity are actively monitored and managed by the Firm. Refer to Credit derivatives in Note 5 for further information on credit derivatives and derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities. Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activitiesNotional amount of protection purchased and sold(a)December 31, (in millions)20242023Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used to manage:Loans and lending-related commitments$25,216 $24,157 Derivative receivables 15,672 12,832 Credit derivatives and credit-related notes used in credit portfolio management activities$40,888 $36,989 Notional amount of protection purchased and sold(a) (a)Amounts are presented net, considering the Firm’s net protection purchased or sold with respect to each underlying reference entity or index. The credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP; these derivatives are reported at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in principal transactions revenue. In contrast, the loans and lending-related commitments being risk-managed are accounted for on an accrual basis. This asymmetry in accounting treatment, between loans and lending-related commitments and the credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities, causes earnings volatility that is not representative, in the Firm’s view, of the true changes in value of the Firm’s overall credit exposure. The effectiveness of credit default swaps (“CDS”) as a hedge against the Firm’s exposures may vary depending on a number of factors, including the named reference entity (i.e., the Firm may experience losses on specific exposures that are different than the named reference entities in the purchased CDS); the contractual terms of the CDS (which may have a defined credit event that does not align with an actual loss realized by the Firm); and the maturity of the Firm’s CDS protection (which in some cases may be shorter than the Firm’s exposures). However, the Firm generally seeks to purchase credit protection with a maturity date that is the same or similar to the maturity date of the exposure for which the protection was purchased, and remaining differences in maturity are actively monitored and managed by the Firm. Refer to Credit derivatives in Note 5 for further information on credit derivatives and derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities. 136JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 136JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 136JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 136 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES The Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management's estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The Firm's allowance for credit losses generally consists of:•the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated) and is presented separately on the Consolidated balance sheets,•the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is reflected in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets, and •the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which is reflected in investment securities on the Consolidated balance sheets.Discussion of changes in the allowanceThe allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 was $26.9 billion, reflecting a net addition of $2.1 billion from December 31, 2023.The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included:•$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting:–a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by–a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $30 million in wholesale, reflecting:–changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024.The Firm’s qualitative adjustments continued to include additional weight placed on the adverse scenarios to reflect ongoing uncertainties and downside risks related to the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment.The Firm's allowance for credit losses is estimated using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios. The adverse scenarios incorporate more punitive macroeconomic factors than the central case assumptions provided in the table below, resulting in:•a weighted average U.S. unemployment rate peaking at 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, and•a weighted average U.S. real GDP level that is 1.9% lower than the central case at the end of the second quarter of 2026.The following table presents the Firm’s central case assumptions for the periods presented:Central case assumptions at December 31, 20242Q254Q252Q26U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.5 %4.3 %4.3 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)2.0 %1.9 %1.8 %Central case assumptions at December 31, 20232Q244Q242Q25U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.1 %4.4 %4.1 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)1.8 %0.7 %1.0 %(a)Reflects quarterly average of forecasted U.S. unemployment rate.(b)The year over year growth in U.S. real GDP in the forecast horizon of the central scenario is calculated as the percentage change in U.S. real GDP levels from the prior year.Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods. Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 120–125, Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and Note 12 for additional information on the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios.Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information on the allowance for credit losses and related management judgments. The Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management's estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The Firm's allowance for credit losses generally consists of:•the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated) and is presented separately on the Consolidated balance sheets,•the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is reflected in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets, and •the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which is reflected in investment securities on the Consolidated balance sheets.Discussion of changes in the allowanceThe allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 was $26.9 billion, reflecting a net addition of $2.1 billion from December 31, 2023.The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included:•$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting:–a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by–a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $30 million in wholesale, reflecting:–changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024.The Firm’s qualitative adjustments continued to include additional weight placed on the adverse scenarios to reflect ongoing uncertainties and downside risks related to the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment.The Firm's allowance for credit losses is estimated using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios. The adverse scenarios incorporate more punitive macroeconomic factors than the central case assumptions provided in the table below, resulting in: The Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management's estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The Firm's allowance for credit losses generally consists of: •the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated) and is presented separately on the Consolidated balance sheets, •the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is reflected in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets, and •the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which is reflected in investment securities on the Consolidated balance sheets. Discussion of changes in the allowance The allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 was $26.9 billion, reflecting a net addition of $2.1 billion from December 31, 2023. The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included: •$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting: –a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by –a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $30 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024. The Firm’s qualitative adjustments continued to include additional weight placed on the adverse scenarios to reflect ongoing uncertainties and downside risks related to the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment. The Firm's allowance for credit losses is estimated using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios. The adverse scenarios incorporate more punitive macroeconomic factors than the central case assumptions provided in the table below, resulting in: •a weighted average U.S. unemployment rate peaking at 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, and•a weighted average U.S. real GDP level that is 1.9% lower than the central case at the end of the second quarter of 2026.The following table presents the Firm’s central case assumptions for the periods presented:Central case assumptions at December 31, 20242Q254Q252Q26U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.5 %4.3 %4.3 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)2.0 %1.9 %1.8 %Central case assumptions at December 31, 20232Q244Q242Q25U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.1 %4.4 %4.1 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)1.8 %0.7 %1.0 %(a)Reflects quarterly average of forecasted U.S. unemployment rate.(b)The year over year growth in U.S. real GDP in the forecast horizon of the central scenario is calculated as the percentage change in U.S. real GDP levels from the prior year.Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods. Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 120–125, Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and Note 12 for additional information on the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios.Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information on the allowance for credit losses and related management judgments. •a weighted average U.S. unemployment rate peaking at 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, and •a weighted average U.S. real GDP level that is 1.9% lower than the central case at the end of the second quarter of 2026. The following table presents the Firm’s central case assumptions for the periods presented: Central case assumptions at December 31, 20242Q254Q252Q26U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.5 %4.3 %4.3 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)2.0 %1.9 %1.8 % U.S. unemployment rate(a) YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b) Central case assumptions at December 31, 20232Q244Q242Q25U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.1 %4.4 %4.1 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)1.8 %0.7 %1.0 % U.S. unemployment rate(a) YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b) (a)Reflects quarterly average of forecasted U.S. unemployment rate. (b)The year over year growth in U.S. real GDP in the forecast horizon of the central scenario is calculated as the percentage change in U.S. real GDP levels from the prior year. Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods. Refer to Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 120–125, Wholesale Credit Portfolio on pages 126–136 and Note 12 for additional information on the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios. Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information on the allowance for credit losses and related management judgments. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K137 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K137 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K137 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 137

Allowance for credit losses and related information20242023Year ended December 31,Consumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotalConsumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotal(in millions, except ratios)Allowance for loan lossesBeginning balance at January 1,$1,856 $12,450 $8,114 $22,420 $2,040 $11,200 $6,486 $19,726 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle(a)NANANANA(489)(100)2(587)Gross charge-offs1,299 8,198 1,022 10,519 1,151 5,491 1,011 7,653 Gross recoveries collected(625)(1,056)(200)(1,881)(519)(793)(132)(1,444)Net charge-offs674 7,142 822 8,638 632 4,698 879 6,209 Provision for loan losses624 9,292 578 10,494 936 6,048 2,484 9,468 Other1 — 68 69 1 — 21 22 Ending balance at December 31,$1,807 $14,600 $7,938 $24,345 $1,856 $12,450 $8,114 $22,420 Allowance for lending-related commitmentsBeginning balance at January 1,$75 $— $1,899 $1,974 $76 $— $2,306 $2,382 Provision for lending-related commitments7 — 121 128 (1)— (407)(408)Other— — (1)(1)— — — — Ending balance at December 31,$82 $— $2,019 $2,101 $75 $— $1,899 $1,974 Impairment methodologyAsset-specific(b)$(728)$— $526 $(202)$(876)$— $392 $(484)Portfolio-based2,535 14,600 7,412 24,547 2,732 12,450 7,722 22,904 Total allowance for loan losses$1,807 $14,600 $7,938 $24,345 $1,856 $12,450 $8,114 $22,420 Impairment methodologyAsset-specific$— $— $109 $109 $— $— $89 $89 Portfolio-based82 — 1,910 1,992 75 — 1,810 1,885 Total allowance for lending-related commitments$82 $— $2,019 $2,101 $75 $— $1,899 $1,974 Total allowance for investment securitiesNANANA$152 NANANA$128 Total allowance for credit losses(c)$1,889 $14,600 $9,957 $26,598 $1,931 $12,450 $10,013 $24,522 Memo:Retained loans, end of period$376,334 $232,860 $690,396 $1,299,590 $397,275 $211,123 $672,472$1,280,870Retained loans, average384,001 214,033 673,310 1,271,344 364,061 191,412 646,8751,202,348Credit ratiosAllowance for loan losses to retained loans0.48 %6.27 %1.15 %1.87 %0.47 %5.90 %1.21 %1.75 %Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans(d)56 NA201 339 51 NA346 374 Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans excluding credit card56 NA201 136 51 NA346 166 Net charge-off rates0.183.340.120.680.17 2.45 0.14 0.52 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle(a) Asset-specific(b)

Allowance for loan losses to retained nonaccrual loans(d) (a)Represents the impact to the allowance for loan losses upon the adoption of the Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Troubled Debt Restructurings accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information. (b)Includes collateral-dependent loans, including those for which foreclosure is deemed probable, and nonaccrual risk-rated loans. (c)At December 31, 2024 and 2023, in addition to the allowance for credit losses in the table above, the Firm also had an allowance for credit losses of $268 million and $243 million, respectively, associated with certain accounts receivable in CIB. (d)The Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance. 138JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 138JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 138JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 138 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The table below presents a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan class. Refer to Note 12 for further information on loan classes. 20242023December 31,(in millions, except ratios)Allowance for loan lossesPercent of retained loans to total retained loansAllowance for loan lossesPercent of retained loans to total retained loansResidential real estate$666 24 %$817 25 %Auto and other1,141 5 1,039 6 Consumer, excluding credit card1,807 29 1,856 31 Credit card14,600 18 12,450 16 Total consumer16,407 47 14,306 47 Secured by real estate2,978 12 2,997 13 Commercial and industrial3,350 13 3,519 13 Other1,610 28 1,598 27 Total wholesale7,938 53 8,114 53 Total$24,345 100 %$22,420 100 % JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K139 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K139 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K139 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 139

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO RISK MANAGEMENT Investment portfolio risk is the risk associated with the loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments arising from the investment securities portfolio or from principal investments. The investment securities portfolio is predominantly held by Treasury and CIO in connection with the Firm's balance sheet and asset-liability management objectives. Principal investments are predominantly privately-held financial instruments and are managed in the LOBs and Corporate. Investments are typically intended to be held over extended periods and, accordingly, the Firm has no expectation for short-term realized gains with respect to these investments.Investment securities risk Investment securities risk includes the exposure associated with a default in the payment of principal and interest. This risk is mitigated given that the investment securities portfolio held by Treasury and CIO predominantly consists of high-quality securities. At December 31, 2024, the Treasury and CIO investment securities portfolio, net of the allowance for credit losses, was $678.3 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90 and Note 10 for further information on the investment securities portfolio and internal risk ratings. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on related liquidity risk. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149 for further information on the market risk inherent in the portfolio.Governance and oversightInvestment securities risks are governed by the Firm’s Risk Appetite framework, and reviewed at the CTC Risk Committee with regular updates provided to the Board Risk Committee. The Firm’s independent control functions are responsible for reviewing the appropriateness of the carrying value of investment securities in accordance with relevant policies. Approved levels for investment securities are established for each risk category, including capital and credit risks.Principal investment risk Principal investments are typically privately-held financial instruments representing ownership interests or other forms of junior capital. In general, principal investments include tax-oriented investments and investments made to enhance or accelerate the Firm’s business strategies and exclude those that are consolidated on the Firm's balance sheets. These investments are made by dedicated investing businesses or as part of a broader business strategy. The Firm’s principal investments are managed by the LOBs and Corporate and are reflected within their respective financial results. The Firm’s investments will continue to evolve based on market circumstances and in line with its strategic initiatives.The table below presents the aggregate carrying values of the principal investment portfolios as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.(in billions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Tax-oriented investments, primarily in alternative energy and affordable housing(a)$33.3 $28.8 Private equity, various debt and equity instruments, and real assets9.1 10.5 Total carrying value$42.4 $39.3 (a)Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.Governance and oversightThe Firm’s approach to managing principal investment risk is consistent with the Firm’s risk governance structure. The Firm has established a Firmwide risk policy framework for all principal investing activities that includes approval by executives who are independent from the investing businesses, as appropriate.The Firm’s independent control functions are responsible for reviewing the appropriateness of the carrying value of investments in accordance with relevant policies. As part of the risk governance structure, approved levels for investments are established and monitored for each relevant business or segment in order to manage the overall size of the portfolios. The Firm also conducts stress testing on these portfolios using specific scenarios that estimate losses based on significant market moves and/or other risk events. Investment portfolio risk is the risk associated with the loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments arising from the investment securities portfolio or from principal investments. The investment securities portfolio is predominantly held by Treasury and CIO in connection with the Firm's balance sheet and asset-liability management objectives. Principal investments are predominantly privately-held financial instruments and are managed in the LOBs and Corporate. Investments are typically intended to be held over extended periods and, accordingly, the Firm has no expectation for short-term realized gains with respect to these investments.Investment securities risk Investment securities risk includes the exposure associated with a default in the payment of principal and interest. This risk is mitigated given that the investment securities portfolio held by Treasury and CIO predominantly consists of high-quality securities. At December 31, 2024, the Treasury and CIO investment securities portfolio, net of the allowance for credit losses, was $678.3 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90 and Note 10 for further information on the investment securities portfolio and internal risk ratings. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on related liquidity risk. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149 for further information on the market risk inherent in the portfolio.Governance and oversightInvestment securities risks are governed by the Firm’s Risk Appetite framework, and reviewed at the CTC Risk Committee with regular updates provided to the Board Risk Committee. The Firm’s independent control functions are responsible for reviewing the appropriateness of the carrying value of investment securities in accordance with relevant policies. Approved levels for investment securities are established for each risk category, including capital and credit risks. Investment portfolio risk is the risk associated with the loss of principal or a reduction in expected returns on investments arising from the investment securities portfolio or from principal investments. The investment securities portfolio is predominantly held by Treasury and CIO in connection with the Firm's balance sheet and asset-liability management objectives. Principal investments are predominantly privately-held financial instruments and are managed in the LOBs and Corporate. Investments are typically intended to be held over extended periods and, accordingly, the Firm has no expectation for short-term realized gains with respect to these investments.

Investment securities risk includes the exposure associated with a default in the payment of principal and interest. This risk is mitigated given that the investment securities portfolio held by Treasury and CIO predominantly consists of high-quality securities. At December 31, 2024, the Treasury and CIO investment securities portfolio, net of the allowance for credit losses, was $678.3 billion, and the average credit rating of the securities comprising the portfolio was AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Refer to Corporate results on pages 88–90 and Note 10 for further information on the investment securities portfolio and internal risk ratings. Refer to Liquidity Risk Management on pages 108–115 for further information on related liquidity risk. Refer to Market Risk Management on pages 141–149 for further information on the market risk inherent in the portfolio. Governance and oversight Investment securities risks are governed by the Firm’s Risk Appetite framework, and reviewed at the CTC Risk Committee with regular updates provided to the Board Risk Committee. The Firm’s independent control functions are responsible for reviewing the appropriateness of the carrying value of investment securities in accordance with relevant policies. Approved levels for investment securities are established for each risk category, including capital and credit risks. Principal investment risk Principal investments are typically privately-held financial instruments representing ownership interests or other forms of junior capital. In general, principal investments include tax-oriented investments and investments made to enhance or accelerate the Firm’s business strategies and exclude those that are consolidated on the Firm's balance sheets. These investments are made by dedicated investing businesses or as part of a broader business strategy. The Firm’s principal investments are managed by the LOBs and Corporate and are reflected within their respective financial results. The Firm’s investments will continue to evolve based on market circumstances and in line with its strategic initiatives.The table below presents the aggregate carrying values of the principal investment portfolios as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.(in billions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Tax-oriented investments, primarily in alternative energy and affordable housing(a)$33.3 $28.8 Private equity, various debt and equity instruments, and real assets9.1 10.5 Total carrying value$42.4 $39.3 (a)Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.Governance and oversightThe Firm’s approach to managing principal investment risk is consistent with the Firm’s risk governance structure. The Firm has established a Firmwide risk policy framework for all principal investing activities that includes approval by executives who are independent from the investing businesses, as appropriate.The Firm’s independent control functions are responsible for reviewing the appropriateness of the carrying value of investments in accordance with relevant policies. As part of the risk governance structure, approved levels for investments are established and monitored for each relevant business or segment in order to manage the overall size of the portfolios. The Firm also conducts stress testing on these portfolios using specific scenarios that estimate losses based on significant market moves and/or other risk events.

Principal investments are typically privately-held financial instruments representing ownership interests or other forms of junior capital. In general, principal investments include tax-oriented investments and investments made to enhance or accelerate the Firm’s business strategies and exclude those that are consolidated on the Firm's balance sheets. These investments are made by dedicated investing businesses or as part of a broader business strategy. The Firm’s principal investments are managed by the LOBs and Corporate and are reflected within their respective financial results. The Firm’s investments will continue to evolve based on market circumstances and in line with its strategic initiatives. The table below presents the aggregate carrying values of the principal investment portfolios as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. (in billions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Tax-oriented investments, primarily in alternative energy and affordable housing(a)$33.3 $28.8 Private equity, various debt and equity instruments, and real assets9.1 10.5 Total carrying value$42.4 $39.3 Tax-oriented investments, primarily in alternative energy and affordable housing(a) Private equity, various debt and equity instruments, and real assets (a)Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information. Governance and oversight The Firm’s approach to managing principal investment risk is consistent with the Firm’s risk governance structure. The Firm has established a Firmwide risk policy framework for all principal investing activities that includes approval by executives who are independent from the investing businesses, as appropriate. The Firm’s independent control functions are responsible for reviewing the appropriateness of the carrying value of investments in accordance with relevant policies. As part of the risk governance structure, approved levels for investments are established and monitored for each relevant business or segment in order to manage the overall size of the portfolios. The Firm also conducts stress testing on these portfolios using specific scenarios that estimate losses based on significant market moves and/or other risk events. 140JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 140JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 140JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 140 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT Market risk is the risk associated with the effect of changes in market factors such as interest and foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, credit spreads or implied volatilities, on the value of assets and liabilities held for both the short and long term. Market Risk ManagementMarket Risk Management monitors market risks throughout the Firm and defines market risk policies and procedures. Market Risk Management seeks to facilitate efficient risk/return decisions, reduce volatility in operating performance and provide transparency into the Firm’s market risk profile for senior management, the Board of Directors and regulators. Market Risk Management is responsible for the following functions:•Maintaining a market risk policy framework•Independently measuring and monitoring LOB, Corporate, and Firmwide market risk•Defining, approving and monitoring limits•Performing stress testing and qualitative risk assessmentsRisk measurementMeasures used to capture market risk There is no single measure to capture market risk and therefore Market Risk Management uses various metrics, both statistical and nonstatistical, to assess risk including:•Value-at-risk •Stress testing•Profit and loss drawdowns •Earnings-at-risk•Economic Value Sensitivity•Other sensitivity-based measuresRisk monitoring and control Market risk exposure is managed primarily through a series of limits set in the context of the market environment and business strategy. In setting limits, Market Risk Management takes into consideration factors such as market volatility, product liquidity, accommodation of client business, and management judgment. Market Risk Management maintains different levels of limits. Firm level limits include VaR and stress limits. Similarly, LOB and Corporate limits include VaR and stress limits and may be supplemented by certain nonstatistical risk measures such as profit and loss drawdowns. Limits may also be set within the LOBs and Corporate, as well as at the legal entity level.Market Risk Management sets limits and regularly reviews and updates them as appropriate. Senior management is responsible for reviewing and approving certain of these risk limits on an ongoing basis. Limits that have not been reviewed within specified time periods by Market Risk Management are reported to senior management. The LOBs and Corporate are responsible for adhering to established limits against which exposures are monitored and reported.Limit breaches are required to be reported in a timely manner to limit approvers, which include Market Risk Management and senior management. In the event of a breach, Market Risk Management consults with senior members of appropriate groups within the Firm to determine the suitable course of action required to return the applicable positions to compliance, which may include a reduction in risk in order to remedy the breach or granting a temporary increase in limits to accommodate an expected increase in client activity and/or market volatility. Firm, Corporate or LOB-level limit breaches are escalated as appropriate.Models used to measure market risk are inherently imprecise and are limited in their ability to measure certain risks or to predict losses. This imprecision may be heightened when sudden or severe shifts in market conditions occur. For additional discussion on model uncertainty refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 160.Market Risk Management periodically reviews the Firm’s existing market risk measures to identify opportunities for enhancement, and to the extent appropriate, will calibrate those measures accordingly over time. Market risk is the risk associated with the effect of changes in market factors such as interest and foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, credit spreads or implied volatilities, on the value of assets and liabilities held for both the short and long term. Market Risk ManagementMarket Risk Management monitors market risks throughout the Firm and defines market risk policies and procedures. Market Risk Management seeks to facilitate efficient risk/return decisions, reduce volatility in operating performance and provide transparency into the Firm’s market risk profile for senior management, the Board of Directors and regulators. Market Risk Management is responsible for the following functions:•Maintaining a market risk policy framework•Independently measuring and monitoring LOB, Corporate, and Firmwide market risk•Defining, approving and monitoring limits•Performing stress testing and qualitative risk assessmentsRisk measurementMeasures used to capture market risk There is no single measure to capture market risk and therefore Market Risk Management uses various metrics, both statistical and nonstatistical, to assess risk including:•Value-at-risk •Stress testing•Profit and loss drawdowns •Earnings-at-risk•Economic Value Sensitivity•Other sensitivity-based measuresRisk monitoring and control Market risk exposure is managed primarily through a series of limits set in the context of the market environment and business strategy. In setting limits, Market Risk Management takes into consideration factors such as market volatility, product liquidity, accommodation of client business, and management judgment. Market Risk Management maintains different levels of limits. Firm level limits include VaR and stress limits. Similarly, LOB and Corporate limits include VaR and stress limits and may be supplemented by certain nonstatistical risk measures such as profit and loss drawdowns. Limits may also be set within the LOBs and Corporate, as well as at the legal entity level. Market risk is the risk associated with the effect of changes in market factors such as interest and foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, credit spreads or implied volatilities, on the value of assets and liabilities held for both the short and long term.

Market Risk Management monitors market risks throughout the Firm and defines market risk policies and procedures. Market Risk Management seeks to facilitate efficient risk/return decisions, reduce volatility in operating performance and provide transparency into the Firm’s market risk profile for senior management, the Board of Directors and regulators. Market Risk Management is responsible for the following functions: •Maintaining a market risk policy framework •Independently measuring and monitoring LOB, Corporate, and Firmwide market risk •Defining, approving and monitoring limits •Performing stress testing and qualitative risk assessments

There is no single measure to capture market risk and therefore Market Risk Management uses various metrics, both statistical and nonstatistical, to assess risk including: •Value-at-risk •Stress testing •Profit and loss drawdowns •Earnings-at-risk •Economic Value Sensitivity •Other sensitivity-based measures

Market risk exposure is managed primarily through a series of limits set in the context of the market environment and business strategy. In setting limits, Market Risk Management takes into consideration factors such as market volatility, product liquidity, accommodation of client business, and management judgment. Market Risk Management maintains different levels of limits. Firm level limits include VaR and stress limits. Similarly, LOB and Corporate limits include VaR and stress limits and may be supplemented by certain nonstatistical risk measures such as profit and loss drawdowns. Limits may also be set within the LOBs and Corporate, as well as at the legal entity level. Market Risk Management sets limits and regularly reviews and updates them as appropriate. Senior management is responsible for reviewing and approving certain of these risk limits on an ongoing basis. Limits that have not been reviewed within specified time periods by Market Risk Management are reported to senior management. The LOBs and Corporate are responsible for adhering to established limits against which exposures are monitored and reported.Limit breaches are required to be reported in a timely manner to limit approvers, which include Market Risk Management and senior management. In the event of a breach, Market Risk Management consults with senior members of appropriate groups within the Firm to determine the suitable course of action required to return the applicable positions to compliance, which may include a reduction in risk in order to remedy the breach or granting a temporary increase in limits to accommodate an expected increase in client activity and/or market volatility. Firm, Corporate or LOB-level limit breaches are escalated as appropriate.Models used to measure market risk are inherently imprecise and are limited in their ability to measure certain risks or to predict losses. This imprecision may be heightened when sudden or severe shifts in market conditions occur. For additional discussion on model uncertainty refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 160.Market Risk Management periodically reviews the Firm’s existing market risk measures to identify opportunities for enhancement, and to the extent appropriate, will calibrate those measures accordingly over time. Market Risk Management sets limits and regularly reviews and updates them as appropriate. Senior management is responsible for reviewing and approving certain of these risk limits on an ongoing basis. Limits that have not been reviewed within specified time periods by Market Risk Management are reported to senior management. The LOBs and Corporate are responsible for adhering to established limits against which exposures are monitored and reported. Limit breaches are required to be reported in a timely manner to limit approvers, which include Market Risk Management and senior management. In the event of a breach, Market Risk Management consults with senior members of appropriate groups within the Firm to determine the suitable course of action required to return the applicable positions to compliance, which may include a reduction in risk in order to remedy the breach or granting a temporary increase in limits to accommodate an expected increase in client activity and/or market volatility. Firm, Corporate or LOB-level limit breaches are escalated as appropriate. Models used to measure market risk are inherently imprecise and are limited in their ability to measure certain risks or to predict losses. This imprecision may be heightened when sudden or severe shifts in market conditions occur. For additional discussion on model uncertainty refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 160. Market Risk Management periodically reviews the Firm’s existing market risk measures to identify opportunities for enhancement, and to the extent appropriate, will calibrate those measures accordingly over time. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K141 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K141 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K141 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 141

The following table summarizes the predominant business activities and related market risks, as well as positions which give rise to market risk and certain measures used to capture those risks, for each LOB and Corporate. In addition to the predominant business activities, each LOB and Corporate may engage in principal investing activities. To the extent principal investments are deemed market risk sensitive, they are reflected in relevant risk measures and captured in the table below. Refer to Investment Portfolio Risk Management on page 140 for additional discussion on principal investments. LOBs and CorporatePredominant business activities Related market risksPositions included in Risk Management VaRPositions included in earnings-at-risk Positions included in other sensitivity-based measuresCCB•Originates and services mortgage loans •Originates loans and takes deposits•Risk from changes in the probability of newly originated mortgage commitments closing•Interest rate risk and prepayment risk•Mortgage commitments, classified as derivatives•Warehouse loans that are fair value option elected, classified as loans – debt instruments•MSRs•Hedges of mortgage commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs, classified as derivatives•Interest-only and mortgage-backed securities, classified as trading assets debt instruments, and related hedges, classified as derivatives•Fair value option elected liabilities(b)•Retained and held-for-sale loan portfolios•Deposits•Fair value option elected liabilities DVA(b)CIB(a)•Makes markets and services clients across fixed income, foreign exchange, equities and commodities•Originates loans and takes deposits•Risk of loss from adverse movements in market prices and implied volatilities across interest rate, foreign exchange, credit, commodity and equity instruments•Basis and correlation risk from changes in the way asset values move relative to one another •Interest rate risk and prepayment risk•Trading assets/liabilities – debt and marketable equity instruments, and derivatives, including hedges of the retained loan portfolio•Certain securities purchased, loaned or sold under resale agreements and securities borrowed•Fair value option elected liabilities(b)•Certain fair value option elected loans•Derivative CVA and associated hedges•Marketable equity investments •Retained and held-for-sale loan portfolios•Deposits•Privately held equity and other investments measured at fair value; and certain real estate-related fair value option elected loans•Derivatives FVA and fair value option elected liabilities DVA(b)•Credit risk component of CVA and associated hedges for counterparties with credit spreads that have widened to elevated levelsCAWM•Provides initial capital investments in products such as mutual funds and capital invested alongside third-party investors•Originates loans and takes deposits•Risk from adverse movements in market factors (e.g., market prices, rates and credit spreads)•Interest rate risk and prepayment risk•Debt securities held in advance of distribution to clients, classified as trading assets - debt instruments•Trading assets/liabilities - derivatives that hedge the retained loan portfolio•Retained and held-for-sale loan portfolios•Deposits•Initial seed capital investments and related hedges, classified as derivatives•Certain deferred compensation and related hedges, classified as derivatives•Capital invested alongside third-party investors, typically in privately distributed collective vehicles managed by AWM (i.e., co-investments), as well as in third-party fundsCorporate•Manages the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks •Structural interest rate risk from the Firm’s traditional banking activities•Structural non-USD foreign exchange risks•Derivative positions measured through noninterest revenue in earnings•Marketable equity investments •Deposits with banks and financing activities•Investment securities portfolio and related interest rate hedges•Cash flow hedges on retained loan portfolios in the LOBs•Long-term and short-term funding and related interest rate hedges•Deposits•Foreign exchange hedges of non-U.S. dollar capital investments•Privately held equity and other investments measured at fair value•Foreign exchange exposure related to Firm-issued non-USD long-term debt (“LTD”) and related hedges

•Originates and services mortgage loans •Originates loans and takes deposits •Risk from changes in the probability of newly originated mortgage commitments closing •Interest rate risk and prepayment risk •Mortgage commitments, classified as derivatives •Warehouse loans that are fair value option elected, classified as loans – debt instruments •MSRs •Hedges of mortgage commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs, classified as derivatives •Interest-only and mortgage-backed securities, classified as trading assets debt instruments, and related hedges, classified as derivatives •Fair value option elected liabilities(b) •Retained and held-for-sale loan portfolios •Deposits •Fair value option elected liabilities DVA(b) CIB(a) •Makes markets and services clients across fixed income, foreign exchange, equities and commodities •Originates loans and takes deposits •Risk of loss from adverse movements in market prices and implied volatilities across interest rate, foreign exchange, credit, commodity and equity instruments •Basis and correlation risk from changes in the way asset values move relative to one another •Interest rate risk and prepayment risk •Trading assets/liabilities – debt and marketable equity instruments, and derivatives, including hedges of the retained loan portfolio •Certain securities purchased, loaned or sold under resale agreements and securities borrowed •Fair value option elected liabilities(b) •Certain fair value option elected loans •Derivative CVA and associated hedges •Marketable equity investments •Retained and held-for-sale loan portfolios •Deposits •Privately held equity and other investments measured at fair value; and certain real estate-related fair value option elected loans •Derivatives FVA and fair value option elected liabilities DVA(b) •Credit risk component of CVA and associated hedges for counterparties with credit spreads that have widened to elevated levels C •Provides initial capital investments in products such as mutual funds and capital invested alongside third-party investors •Originates loans and takes deposits •Risk from adverse movements in market factors (e.g., market prices, rates and credit spreads) •Interest rate risk and prepayment risk •Debt securities held in advance of distribution to clients, classified as trading assets - debt instruments •Trading assets/liabilities - derivatives that hedge the retained loan portfolio •Retained and held-for-sale loan portfolios •Deposits •Initial seed capital investments and related hedges, classified as derivatives •Certain deferred compensation and related hedges, classified as derivatives •Capital invested alongside third-party investors, typically in privately distributed collective vehicles managed by AWM (i.e., co-investments), as well as in third-party funds •Manages the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks •Structural interest rate risk from the Firm’s traditional banking activities •Structural non-USD foreign exchange risks •Derivative positions measured through noninterest revenue in earnings •Marketable equity investments •Deposits with banks and financing activities •Investment securities portfolio and related interest rate hedges •Cash flow hedges on retained loan portfolios in the LOBs •Long-term and short-term funding and related interest rate hedges •Deposits •Foreign exchange hedges of non-U.S. dollar capital investments •Privately held equity and other investments measured at fair value •Foreign exchange exposure related to Firm-issued non-USD long-term debt (“LTD”) and related hedges (a)Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank (“CIB”). Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information. (b)Reflects structured notes in Risk Management VaR and the DVA on structured notes in other sensitivity-based measures. 142JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 142JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 142JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 142 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

JPMorganChase utilizes value-at-risk (“VaR”), a statistical risk measure, to estimate the potential loss from adverse market moves in the current market environment. The Firm has a single VaR framework used as a basis for calculating Risk Management VaR and Regulatory VaR.The framework is employed across the Firm using historical simulation based on data for the previous 12 months. The framework’s approach assumes that historical changes in market values are representative of the distribution of potential outcomes in the immediate future. The Firm believes the use of Risk Management VaR provides a daily measure of risk that is closely aligned to risk management decisions made by the LOBs and Corporate and, along with other market risk measures, provides the appropriate information needed to respond to risk events. The Firm’s Risk Management VaR is calculated assuming a one-day holding period and an expected tail-loss methodology which approximates a 95% confidence level. Risk Management VaR provides a consistent framework to measure risk profiles and levels of diversification across product types and is used for aggregating risks and monitoring limits across businesses. VaR results are reported as appropriate to various groups including senior management, the Board Risk Committee and regulators. Underlying the overall VaR model framework are individual VaR models that simulate historical market returns for individual risk factors and/or product types. To capture material market risks as part of the Firm’s risk management framework, comprehensive VaR model calculations are performed daily for businesses whose activities give rise to market risk. These VaR models are granular and incorporate numerous risk factors and inputs to simulate daily changes in market values over the historical period; inputs are selected based on the risk profile of each portfolio, as sensitivities and historical time series used to generate daily market values may be different across product types or risk management systems. The VaR model results across all portfolios are aggregated at the Firm level.As VaR is based on historical data, it is an imperfect measure of market risk exposure and potential future losses. In addition, based on their reliance on available historical data, limited time horizons, and other factors, VaR measures are inherently limited in their ability to measure certain risks and to predict losses, particularly those associated with market illiquidity and sudden or severe shifts in market conditions. For certain products, specific risk parameters are not captured in VaR due to the lack of liquidity and availability of appropriate historical data. The Firm uses proxies to estimate the VaR for these and other products when daily time series are not available. It is likely that using an actual price-based time series for these products, if available, would affect the VaR results presented. The Firm therefore considers other nonstatistical measures such as stress testing, in addition to VaR, to capture and manage its market risk positions. As VaR model calculations require daily data and a consistent source for valuation, the daily market data used may be different than the independent third-party data collected for VCG price testing in its monthly valuation process. For example, in cases where market prices are not observable, or where proxies are used in VaR historical time series, the data sources may differ. Refer to Valuation process in Note 2 for further information on the Firm’s valuation process. The Firm’s VaR model calculations are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s portfolios, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s modeling techniques and measurements, and other factors. Such changes may affect historical comparisons of VaR results. Refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 160 for information regarding model reviews and approvals.The Firm calculates separately a daily aggregated VaR in accordance with regulatory rules (“Regulatory VaR”), which is used to derive the Firm’s regulatory VaR-based capital requirements under Basel III capital rules. This Regulatory VaR model framework currently assumes a ten business-day holding period and an expected tail-loss methodology which approximates a 99% confidence level. Regulatory VaR is applied to “covered” positions as defined by Basel III capital rules, which may be different than the positions included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR. For example, credit derivative hedges of accrual loans are included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR, while Regulatory VaR excludes these credit derivative hedges. In addition, in contrast to the Firm’s Risk Management VaR, Regulatory VaR currently excludes the diversification benefit for certain VaR models.Refer to JPMorganChase’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for additional information on Regulatory VaR and the other components of market risk regulatory capital for the Firm (e.g., VaR-based measure, stressed VaR-based measure and the respective backtesting). JPMorganChase utilizes value-at-risk (“VaR”), a statistical risk measure, to estimate the potential loss from adverse market moves in the current market environment. The Firm has a single VaR framework used as a basis for calculating Risk Management VaR and Regulatory VaR.The framework is employed across the Firm using historical simulation based on data for the previous 12 months. The framework’s approach assumes that historical changes in market values are representative of the distribution of potential outcomes in the immediate future. The Firm believes the use of Risk Management VaR provides a daily measure of risk that is closely aligned to risk management decisions made by the LOBs and Corporate and, along with other market risk measures, provides the appropriate information needed to respond to risk events. The Firm’s Risk Management VaR is calculated assuming a one-day holding period and an expected tail-loss methodology which approximates a 95% confidence level. Risk Management VaR provides a consistent framework to measure risk profiles and levels of diversification across product types and is used for aggregating risks and monitoring limits across businesses. VaR results are reported as appropriate to various groups including senior management, the Board Risk Committee and regulators. Underlying the overall VaR model framework are individual VaR models that simulate historical market returns for individual risk factors and/or product types. To capture material market risks as part of the Firm’s risk management framework, comprehensive VaR model calculations are performed daily for businesses whose activities give rise to market risk. These VaR models are granular and incorporate numerous risk factors and inputs to simulate daily changes in market values over the historical period; inputs are selected based on the risk profile of each portfolio, as sensitivities and historical time series used to generate daily market values may be different across product types or risk management systems. The VaR model results across all portfolios are aggregated at the Firm level.As VaR is based on historical data, it is an imperfect measure of market risk exposure and potential future losses. In addition, based on their reliance on available historical data, limited time horizons, and other factors, VaR measures are inherently limited in their ability to measure certain risks and to predict losses, particularly those associated with market illiquidity and sudden or severe shifts in market conditions. JPMorganChase utilizes value-at-risk (“VaR”), a statistical risk measure, to estimate the potential loss from adverse market moves in the current market environment. The Firm has a single VaR framework used as a basis for calculating Risk Management VaR and Regulatory VaR. The framework is employed across the Firm using historical simulation based on data for the previous 12 months. The framework’s approach assumes that historical changes in market values are representative of the distribution of potential outcomes in the immediate future. The Firm believes the use of Risk Management VaR provides a daily measure of risk that is closely aligned to risk management decisions made by the LOBs and Corporate and, along with other market risk measures, provides the appropriate information needed to respond to risk events. The Firm’s Risk Management VaR is calculated assuming a one-day holding period and an expected tail-loss methodology which approximates a 95% confidence level. Risk Management VaR provides a consistent framework to measure risk profiles and levels of diversification across product types and is used for aggregating risks and monitoring limits across businesses. VaR results are reported as appropriate to various groups including senior management, the Board Risk Committee and regulators. Underlying the overall VaR model framework are individual VaR models that simulate historical market returns for individual risk factors and/or product types. To capture material market risks as part of the Firm’s risk management framework, comprehensive VaR model calculations are performed daily for businesses whose activities give rise to market risk. These VaR models are granular and incorporate numerous risk factors and inputs to simulate daily changes in market values over the historical period; inputs are selected based on the risk profile of each portfolio, as sensitivities and historical time series used to generate daily market values may be different across product types or risk management systems. The VaR model results across all portfolios are aggregated at the Firm level. As VaR is based on historical data, it is an imperfect measure of market risk exposure and potential future losses. In addition, based on their reliance on available historical data, limited time horizons, and other factors, VaR measures are inherently limited in their ability to measure certain risks and to predict losses, particularly those associated with market illiquidity and sudden or severe shifts in market conditions. For certain products, specific risk parameters are not captured in VaR due to the lack of liquidity and availability of appropriate historical data. The Firm uses proxies to estimate the VaR for these and other products when daily time series are not available. It is likely that using an actual price-based time series for these products, if available, would affect the VaR results presented. The Firm therefore considers other nonstatistical measures such as stress testing, in addition to VaR, to capture and manage its market risk positions. As VaR model calculations require daily data and a consistent source for valuation, the daily market data used may be different than the independent third-party data collected for VCG price testing in its monthly valuation process. For example, in cases where market prices are not observable, or where proxies are used in VaR historical time series, the data sources may differ. Refer to Valuation process in Note 2 for further information on the Firm’s valuation process. The Firm’s VaR model calculations are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s portfolios, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s modeling techniques and measurements, and other factors. Such changes may affect historical comparisons of VaR results. Refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 160 for information regarding model reviews and approvals.The Firm calculates separately a daily aggregated VaR in accordance with regulatory rules (“Regulatory VaR”), which is used to derive the Firm’s regulatory VaR-based capital requirements under Basel III capital rules. This Regulatory VaR model framework currently assumes a ten business-day holding period and an expected tail-loss methodology which approximates a 99% confidence level. Regulatory VaR is applied to “covered” positions as defined by Basel III capital rules, which may be different than the positions included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR. For example, credit derivative hedges of accrual loans are included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR, while Regulatory VaR excludes these credit derivative hedges. In addition, in contrast to the Firm’s Risk Management VaR, Regulatory VaR currently excludes the diversification benefit for certain VaR models.Refer to JPMorganChase’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for additional information on Regulatory VaR and the other components of market risk regulatory capital for the Firm (e.g., VaR-based measure, stressed VaR-based measure and the respective backtesting). For certain products, specific risk parameters are not captured in VaR due to the lack of liquidity and availability of appropriate historical data. The Firm uses proxies to estimate the VaR for these and other products when daily time series are not available. It is likely that using an actual price-based time series for these products, if available, would affect the VaR results presented. The Firm therefore considers other nonstatistical measures such as stress testing, in addition to VaR, to capture and manage its market risk positions. As VaR model calculations require daily data and a consistent source for valuation, the daily market data used may be different than the independent third-party data collected for VCG price testing in its monthly valuation process. For example, in cases where market prices are not observable, or where proxies are used in VaR historical time series, the data sources may differ. Refer to Valuation process in Note 2 for further information on the Firm’s valuation process. The Firm’s VaR model calculations are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s portfolios, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s modeling techniques and measurements, and other factors. Such changes may affect historical comparisons of VaR results. Refer to Estimations and Model Risk Management on page 160 for information regarding model reviews and approvals. The Firm calculates separately a daily aggregated VaR in accordance with regulatory rules (“Regulatory VaR”), which is used to derive the Firm’s regulatory VaR-based capital requirements under Basel III capital rules. This Regulatory VaR model framework currently assumes a ten business-day holding period and an expected tail-loss methodology which approximates a 99% confidence level. Regulatory VaR is applied to “covered” positions as defined by Basel III capital rules, which may be different than the positions included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR. For example, credit derivative hedges of accrual loans are included in the Firm’s Risk Management VaR, while Regulatory VaR excludes these credit derivative hedges. In addition, in contrast to the Firm’s Risk Management VaR, Regulatory VaR currently excludes the diversification benefit for certain VaR models. Refer to JPMorganChase’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are available on the Firm’s website, for additional information on Regulatory VaR and the other components of market risk regulatory capital for the Firm (e.g., VaR-based measure, stressed VaR-based measure and the respective backtesting). JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K143 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K143 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K143 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 143

The table below shows the results of the Firm’s Risk Management VaR measure using a 95% confidence level. VaR can vary significantly as positions change, market volatility fluctuates, and diversification benefits change. Total VaRAs of or for the year ended December 31,20242023(in millions) Avg.MinMax Avg.MinMaxCIB trading VaR by risk type(a)Fixed income$34 $26 $53 $49 $31 $71 Foreign exchange15 7 23 12 6 26 Equities8 4 15 7 3 11 Commodities and other8 6 13 11 6 19 Diversification benefit to CIB trading VaR (b)(32)NMNM(42)NMNMCIB trading VaR33 27 42 37 24 55 Credit Portfolio VaR(c)22 18 28 14 8 26 Diversification benefit to CIB VaR(b)(16)NMNM(11)NMNMCIB VaR39 27 52 40 23 58 CCB VaR3 1 6 7 1 15 AWM VaR(d)9 5 10 1 — 10 Corporate VaR(d)(e)23 7 102 12 9 17 Diversification benefit to other VaR(b)(10)NMNM(6)NMNMOther VaR25 10 101 14 9 22 Diversification benefit to CIB and other VaR(b)(17)NMNM(11)NMNMTotal VaR$47 $30 $91 $43 $26 $57

Diversification benefit to CIB trading VaR (b) Credit Portfolio VaR(c) Diversification benefit to CIB VaR(b) CIB VaR CCB VaR AWM VaR(d) Corporate VaR(d)(e) Diversification benefit to other VaR(b) Diversification benefit to CIB and other VaR(b) (a)The impact of the business segment reorganization in the second quarter of 2024 was not material to Total CIB VaR. Prior periods have not been revised. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on pages 70–90 for additional information. (b)Diversification benefit represents the difference between the portfolio VaR and the sum of its individual components. This reflects the non-additive nature of VaR due to imperfect correlation across LOBs, Corporate, and risk types. For maximum and minimum VaR, diversification benefit is not meaningful as the maximum and minimum VaR for each portfolio may have occurred on different trading days than the components. (c)Includes the derivative CVA, hedges of the CVA and credit protection purchased against certain retained loans and lending-related commitments, which are reported in principal transactions revenue. This VaR does not include the retained loan portfolio, which is not reported at fair value. In line with the Firm's internal model governance, the credit risk component of CVA related to certain counterparties was removed from Credit Portfolio VaR due to the widening of the credit spreads for those counterparties to elevated levels. The related hedges were also removed to maintain consistency. This exposure is now reflected in other sensitivity-based measures. (d)In the second quarter of 2024, the presentation of Corporate and other LOB VaR was updated to disaggregate AWM VaR due to the increase associated with credit protection purchased against certain retained loans and lending-related commitments. The VaR does not include the retained loan portfolio, which is not reported at fair value. (e)Includes a legacy private equity position which is publicly traded, as well as Visa C shares which the Firm disposed of in the second and third quarters of 2024. The impact of Visa C shares resulted in elevated average and maximum Corporate VaR, Other VaR and Total VaR. Refer to Executive Overview on pages 54–58 for additional information.

Average Total VaR increased by $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 when compared with the prior year. The increase was predominantly driven by the impact of the Firm’s receipt of Visa C shares on Corporate VaR and increases associated with credit protection purchased against certain retained loans and lending-related commitments within Credit Portfolio VaR and AWM VaR, largely offset by market volatility rolling out of the one-year historical look-back period impacting the Fixed income risk type. Average Total VaR increased by $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 when compared with the prior year. The increase was predominantly driven by the impact of the Firm’s receipt of Visa C shares on Corporate VaR and increases associated with credit Average Total VaR increased by $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 when compared with the prior year. The increase was predominantly driven by the impact of the Firm’s receipt of Visa C shares on Corporate VaR and increases associated with credit protection purchased against certain retained loans and lending-related commitments within Credit Portfolio VaR and AWM VaR, largely offset by market volatility rolling out of the one-year historical look-back period impacting the Fixed income risk type. protection purchased against certain retained loans and lending-related commitments within Credit Portfolio VaR and AWM VaR, largely offset by market volatility rolling out of the one-year historical look-back period impacting the Fixed income risk type. The following graph presents daily Risk Management VaR for the four trailing quarters. The increase in VaR and subsequent decline observed in the second quarter of 2024 was primarily driven by changes in Visa C share exposure in the Firm's Corporate VaR.

The Firm performs daily VaR model backtesting, which compares the daily Risk Management VaR results with the daily gains and losses that are utilized for VaR backtesting purposes. The gains and losses depicted in the chart below do not reflect the Firm’s reported revenue as they exclude certain components of total net revenue, such as those associated with the execution of new transactions (i.e., intraday client-driven trading and intraday risk management activities), fees, commissions, other valuation adjustments and net interest income. These excluded components of total net revenue may more than offset the backtesting gain or loss on a particular day. The definition of backtesting gains and losses above is consistent with the requirements for backtesting under Basel III capital rules.A backtesting exception occurs when the daily backtesting loss exceeds the daily Risk Management VaR for the prior day. Under the Firm’s Risk Management VaR methodology, assuming current changes in market values are consistent with the historical changes used in the simulation, the Firm would expect to incur VaR backtesting exceptions five times every 100 trading days on average. The number of VaR backtesting exceptions observed can differ from the statistically expected number of backtesting exceptions if the current level of market volatility is materially different from the level of market volatility during the 12 months of historical data used in the VaR calculation.For the 12 months ended December 31, 2024, the Firm posted backtesting gains on 179 of the 260 days, and observed eight VaR backtesting exceptions, of which three were in the three months ended December 31, 2024. Firmwide backtesting loss days can differ from the loss days for which Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets posted losses, as disclosed in CIB Markets revenue, as the population of positions which comprise each metric are different and due to the exclusion of certain components of total net revenue in backtesting gains and losses as described above. The following chart presents the distribution of Firmwide daily backtesting gains and losses for the trailing 12 months and three months ended December 31, 2024. The daily backtesting losses are displayed as a percentage of the corresponding daily Risk Management VaR. The count of days with backtesting losses are shown in aggregate, in fifty percentage point intervals. Backtesting exceptions are displayed within the intervals that are greater than one hundred percent. The results in the chart below differ from the results of backtesting disclosed in the Market Risk section of the Firm’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are based on Regulatory VaR applied to the Firm’s covered positions. The Firm performs daily VaR model backtesting, which compares the daily Risk Management VaR results with the daily gains and losses that are utilized for VaR backtesting purposes. The gains and losses depicted in the chart below do not reflect the Firm’s reported revenue as they exclude certain components of total net revenue, such as those associated with the execution of new transactions (i.e., intraday client-driven trading and intraday risk management activities), fees, commissions, other valuation adjustments and net interest income. These excluded components of total net revenue may more than offset the backtesting gain or loss on a particular day. The definition of backtesting gains and losses above is consistent with the requirements for backtesting under Basel III capital rules.A backtesting exception occurs when the daily backtesting loss exceeds the daily Risk Management VaR for the prior day. Under the Firm’s Risk Management VaR methodology, assuming current changes in market values are consistent with the historical changes used in the simulation, the Firm would expect to incur VaR backtesting exceptions five times every 100 trading days on average. The number of VaR backtesting exceptions observed can differ from the statistically expected number of backtesting exceptions if the current level of market volatility is materially different from the level of market volatility during the 12 months of historical data used in the VaR calculation. The Firm performs daily VaR model backtesting, which compares the daily Risk Management VaR results with the daily gains and losses that are utilized for VaR backtesting purposes. The gains and losses depicted in the chart below do not reflect the Firm’s reported revenue as they exclude certain components of total net revenue, such as those associated with the execution of new transactions (i.e., intraday client-driven trading and intraday risk management activities), fees, commissions, other valuation adjustments and net interest income. These excluded components of total net revenue may more than offset the backtesting gain or loss on a particular day. The definition of backtesting gains and losses above is consistent with the requirements for backtesting under Basel III capital rules. A backtesting exception occurs when the daily backtesting loss exceeds the daily Risk Management VaR for the prior day. Under the Firm’s Risk Management VaR methodology, assuming current changes in market values are consistent with the historical changes used in the simulation, the Firm would expect to incur VaR backtesting exceptions five times every 100 trading days on average. The number of VaR backtesting exceptions observed can differ from the statistically expected number of backtesting exceptions if the current level of market volatility is materially different from the level of market volatility during the 12 months of historical data used in the VaR calculation. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2024, the Firm posted backtesting gains on 179 of the 260 days, and observed eight VaR backtesting exceptions, of which three were in the three months ended December 31, 2024. Firmwide backtesting loss days can differ from the loss days for which Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets posted losses, as disclosed in CIB Markets revenue, as the population of positions which comprise each metric are different and due to the exclusion of certain components of total net revenue in backtesting gains and losses as described above. The following chart presents the distribution of Firmwide daily backtesting gains and losses for the trailing 12 months and three months ended December 31, 2024. The daily backtesting losses are displayed as a percentage of the corresponding daily Risk Management VaR. The count of days with backtesting losses are shown in aggregate, in fifty percentage point intervals. Backtesting exceptions are displayed within the intervals that are greater than one hundred percent. The results in the chart below differ from the results of backtesting disclosed in the Market Risk section of the Firm’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are based on Regulatory VaR applied to the Firm’s covered positions. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2024, the Firm posted backtesting gains on 179 of the 260 days, and observed eight VaR backtesting exceptions, of which three were in the three months ended December 31, 2024. Firmwide backtesting loss days can differ from the loss days for which Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets posted losses, as disclosed in CIB Markets revenue, as the population of positions which comprise each metric are different and due to the exclusion of certain components of total net revenue in backtesting gains and losses as described above. The following chart presents the distribution of Firmwide daily backtesting gains and losses for the trailing 12 months and three months ended December 31, 2024. The daily backtesting losses are displayed as a percentage of the corresponding daily Risk Management VaR. The count of days with backtesting losses are shown in aggregate, in fifty percentage point intervals. Backtesting exceptions are displayed within the intervals that are greater than one hundred percent. The results in the chart below differ from the results of backtesting disclosed in the Market Risk section of the Firm’s Basel III Pillar 3 Regulatory Capital Disclosures reports, which are based on Regulatory VaR applied to the Firm’s covered positions.

Stress testing Along with VaR, stress testing is an important tool used to assess risk. While VaR reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior, stress testing reflects the risk of loss from hypothetical changes in the value of market risk sensitive positions applied simultaneously. Stress testing measures the Firm’s vulnerability to losses under a range of stressed but possible economic and market scenarios. The results are used to understand the exposures responsible for those potential losses and are measured against limits. The Firm’s stress framework covers market risk sensitive positions in the LOBs and Corporate. The framework is used to calculate multiple magnitudes of potential stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs, assuming significant changes in market factors such as credit spreads, equity prices, interest rates, currency rates and commodity prices, and combines them in multiple ways to capture an array of hypothetical economic and market scenarios. The Firm generates a number of scenarios that focus on tail events in specific asset classes and geographies, including how the event may impact multiple market factors simultaneously. Scenarios also incorporate specific idiosyncratic risks and stress basis risk between different products. The flexibility in the stress framework allows the Firm to construct new scenarios that can test the outcomes against possible future stress events. Stress testing results are reported periodically to senior management of the Firm, as appropriate. Stress methodologies are governed by the overall stress framework, under the oversight of Market Risk Management. The Firmwide Market Risk Stress Methodology Committee reviews and approves changes to stress testing methodology and scenarios across the Firm. Significant changes to the framework are escalated to senior management, as appropriate. In addition, stress methodology and the models to calculate the stress results are subject to the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy The Firm’s stress testing framework is utilized in calculating the Firm’s CCAR and other stress test results, which are reported periodically to the Board of Directors. In addition, stress testing results are incorporated into the Firm’s Risk Appetite framework, and are reported periodically to the Board Risk Committee. Profit and loss drawdowns Profit and loss drawdowns are used to highlight trading losses above certain levels of risk tolerance. A profit and loss drawdown is a decline in revenue from its year-to-date peak level.Structural interest rate risk management The effect of interest rate exposure on the Firm’s reported net income is important as interest rate risk represents one of the Firm’s significant market risks. Interest rate risk arises not only from trading activities which are included in VaR, but also from the Firm’s traditional banking activities, which include extension of loans and credit facilities, taking deposits, issuing debt, as well as the investment securities portfolio, and associated derivative instruments. Refer to the table on page 142 for a summary by LOB and Corporate identifying positions included in earnings-at-risk.GovernanceThe CTC Risk Committee establishes the Firm’s interest rate risk management policy and related limits, which are subject to approval by the Board Risk Committee. Treasury and CIO, working in partnership with the LOBs, calculates the Firm’s structural interest rate risk profile and reviews it with senior management, including the CTC Risk Committee. In addition, oversight of structural interest rate risk is managed through a dedicated risk function reporting to the CTC CRO. This risk function is responsible for providing independent oversight and governance around assumptions and establishing and monitoring limits for structural interest rate risk, including limits related to Earnings-at-Risk and Economic Value Sensitivity. The Firm manages structural interest rate risk generally through its investment securities portfolio and interest rate derivatives.Key risk drivers and risk management processStructural interest rate risk can arise due to a variety of factors, including:•Differences in timing among the maturity or repricing of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments•Differences in the amounts of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments that are maturing or repricing at the same time•Differences in the amounts by which short-term and long-term market interest rates change (for example, changes in the slope of the yield curve)•The impact of changes in the maturity of various assets, liabilities or off-balance sheet instruments as interest rates changeThe Firm manages interest rate exposure related to its assets and liabilities on a consolidated, Firmwide basis. Business units transfer their interest rate risk to Treasury and CIO through funds transfer pricing, which takes into account the elements of interest rate exposure that can be risk-managed in financial markets. These elements include asset and liability balances and contractual rates of interest, contractual principal payment schedules, expected prepayment Stress testing Along with VaR, stress testing is an important tool used to assess risk. While VaR reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior, stress testing reflects the risk of loss from hypothetical changes in the value of market risk sensitive positions applied simultaneously. Stress testing measures the Firm’s vulnerability to losses under a range of stressed but possible economic and market scenarios. The results are used to understand the exposures responsible for those potential losses and are measured against limits. The Firm’s stress framework covers market risk sensitive positions in the LOBs and Corporate. The framework is used to calculate multiple magnitudes of potential stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs, assuming significant changes in market factors such as credit spreads, equity prices, interest rates, currency rates and commodity prices, and combines them in multiple ways to capture an array of hypothetical economic and market scenarios. The Firm generates a number of scenarios that focus on tail events in specific asset classes and geographies, including how the event may impact multiple market factors simultaneously. Scenarios also incorporate specific idiosyncratic risks and stress basis risk between different products. The flexibility in the stress framework allows the Firm to construct new scenarios that can test the outcomes against possible future stress events. Stress testing results are reported periodically to senior management of the Firm, as appropriate. Stress methodologies are governed by the overall stress framework, under the oversight of Market Risk Management. The Firmwide Market Risk Stress Methodology Committee reviews and approves changes to stress testing methodology and scenarios across the Firm. Significant changes to the framework are escalated to senior management, as appropriate. In addition, stress methodology and the models to calculate the stress results are subject to the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy The Firm’s stress testing framework is utilized in calculating the Firm’s CCAR and other stress test results, which are reported periodically to the Board of Directors. In addition, stress testing results are incorporated into the Firm’s Risk Appetite framework, and are reported periodically to the Board Risk Committee. Profit and loss drawdowns Profit and loss drawdowns are used to highlight trading losses above certain levels of risk tolerance. A profit and loss drawdown is a decline in revenue from its year-to-date peak level.

Along with VaR, stress testing is an important tool used to assess risk. While VaR reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior, stress testing reflects the risk of loss from hypothetical changes in the value of market risk sensitive positions applied simultaneously. Stress testing measures the Firm’s vulnerability to losses under a range of stressed but possible economic and market scenarios. The results are used to understand the exposures responsible for those potential losses and are measured against limits. The Firm’s stress framework covers market risk sensitive positions in the LOBs and Corporate. The framework is used to calculate multiple magnitudes of potential stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs, assuming significant changes in market factors such as credit spreads, equity prices, interest rates, currency rates and commodity prices, and combines them in multiple ways to capture an array of hypothetical economic and market scenarios. The Firm generates a number of scenarios that focus on tail events in specific asset classes and geographies, including how the event may impact multiple market factors simultaneously. Scenarios also incorporate specific idiosyncratic risks and stress basis risk between different products. The flexibility in the stress framework allows the Firm to construct new scenarios that can test the outcomes against possible future stress events. Stress testing results are reported periodically to senior management of the Firm, as appropriate. Stress methodologies are governed by the overall stress framework, under the oversight of Market Risk Management. The Firmwide Market Risk Stress Methodology Committee reviews and approves changes to stress testing methodology and scenarios across the Firm. Significant changes to the framework are escalated to senior management, as appropriate. In addition, stress methodology and the models to calculate the stress results are subject to the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy The Firm’s stress testing framework is utilized in calculating the Firm’s CCAR and other stress test results, which are reported periodically to the Board of Directors. In addition, stress testing results are incorporated into the Firm’s Risk Appetite framework, and are reported periodically to the Board Risk Committee.

Profit and loss drawdowns are used to highlight trading losses above certain levels of risk tolerance. A profit and loss drawdown is a decline in revenue from its year-to-date peak level. Structural interest rate risk management The effect of interest rate exposure on the Firm’s reported net income is important as interest rate risk represents one of the Firm’s significant market risks. Interest rate risk arises not only from trading activities which are included in VaR, but also from the Firm’s traditional banking activities, which include extension of loans and credit facilities, taking deposits, issuing debt, as well as the investment securities portfolio, and associated derivative instruments. Refer to the table on page 142 for a summary by LOB and Corporate identifying positions included in earnings-at-risk.GovernanceThe CTC Risk Committee establishes the Firm’s interest rate risk management policy and related limits, which are subject to approval by the Board Risk Committee. Treasury and CIO, working in partnership with the LOBs, calculates the Firm’s structural interest rate risk profile and reviews it with senior management, including the CTC Risk Committee. In addition, oversight of structural interest rate risk is managed through a dedicated risk function reporting to the CTC CRO. This risk function is responsible for providing independent oversight and governance around assumptions and establishing and monitoring limits for structural interest rate risk, including limits related to Earnings-at-Risk and Economic Value Sensitivity. The Firm manages structural interest rate risk generally through its investment securities portfolio and interest rate derivatives.Key risk drivers and risk management processStructural interest rate risk can arise due to a variety of factors, including:•Differences in timing among the maturity or repricing of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments•Differences in the amounts of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments that are maturing or repricing at the same time•Differences in the amounts by which short-term and long-term market interest rates change (for example, changes in the slope of the yield curve)•The impact of changes in the maturity of various assets, liabilities or off-balance sheet instruments as interest rates changeThe Firm manages interest rate exposure related to its assets and liabilities on a consolidated, Firmwide basis. Business units transfer their interest rate risk to Treasury and CIO through funds transfer pricing, which takes into account the elements of interest rate exposure that can be risk-managed in financial markets. These elements include asset and liability balances and contractual rates of interest, contractual principal payment schedules, expected prepayment

The effect of interest rate exposure on the Firm’s reported net income is important as interest rate risk represents one of the Firm’s significant market risks. Interest rate risk arises not only from trading activities which are included in VaR, but also from the Firm’s traditional banking activities, which include extension of loans and credit facilities, taking deposits, issuing debt, as well as the investment securities portfolio, and associated derivative instruments. Refer to the table on page 142 for a summary by LOB and Corporate identifying positions included in earnings-at-risk. Governance The CTC Risk Committee establishes the Firm’s interest rate risk management policy and related limits, which are subject to approval by the Board Risk Committee. Treasury and CIO, working in partnership with the LOBs, calculates the Firm’s structural interest rate risk profile and reviews it with senior management, including the CTC Risk Committee. In addition, oversight of structural interest rate risk is managed through a dedicated risk function reporting to the CTC CRO. This risk function is responsible for providing independent oversight and governance around assumptions and establishing and monitoring limits for structural interest rate risk, including limits related to Earnings-at-Risk and Economic Value Sensitivity. The Firm manages structural interest rate risk generally through its investment securities portfolio and interest rate derivatives.

Structural interest rate risk can arise due to a variety of factors, including: •Differences in timing among the maturity or repricing of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments •Differences in the amounts of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments that are maturing or repricing at the same time •Differences in the amounts by which short-term and long-term market interest rates change (for example, changes in the slope of the yield curve) •The impact of changes in the maturity of various assets, liabilities or off-balance sheet instruments as interest rates change The Firm manages interest rate exposure related to its assets and liabilities on a consolidated, Firmwide basis. Business units transfer their interest rate risk to Treasury and CIO through funds transfer pricing, which takes into account the elements of interest rate exposure that can be risk-managed in financial markets. These elements include asset and liability balances and contractual rates of interest, contractual principal payment schedules, expected prepayment 146JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 146JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 146JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 146 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K experience, interest rate reset dates and maturities, rate indices used for repricing, and any interest rate ceilings or floors for adjustable rate products.Earnings-at-RiskOne way that the Firm evaluates its structural interest rate risk is through earnings-at-risk. Earnings-at-risk estimates the Firm’s interest rate exposure for a given interest rate scenario. It is presented as a sensitivity to a baseline, which includes net interest income and certain interest rate sensitive fees. The baseline uses market interest rates and, in the case of deposits, pricing assumptions. The Firm conducts simulations of changes to this baseline for interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies (“non-U.S. dollar” currencies). These simulations primarily include retained and held-for-sale loans, deposits, deposits with banks and financing activities, investment securities, long-term debt, related interest rate hedges, and funds transfer pricing of other positions in risk management VaR and other sensitivity-based measures as described on page 142. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024, these simulations also include hedges of non-U.S. dollar foreign exchange exposures arising from capital investments. Refer to non-U.S. dollar foreign exchange risk on page 149 for more information.Earnings-at-risk scenarios estimate the potential change to a baseline over the following 12 months utilizing multiple assumptions. These scenarios include a parallel shift involving changes to both short-term and long-term rates by an equal amount; a steeper yield curve involving holding short-term rates constant and increasing long-term rates; and a flatter yield curve involving increasing short-term rates and holding long-term rates constant or holding short-term rates constant and decreasing long-term rates. These scenarios consider many different factors, including: •The impact on exposures as a result of instantaneous changes in interest rates from baseline rates.•Forecasted balance sheet, as well as modeled prepayment and reinvestment behavior, but excluding assumptions about actions that could be taken by the Firm or its clients and customers in response to instantaneous rate changes. Mortgage prepayment assumptions are based on the interest rates used in the scenarios compared with underlying contractual rates, the time since origination, and other factors which are updated periodically based on historical experience. Deposit forecasts are a key assumption in the Firm’s earnings-at-risk. The baseline reflects certain assumptions relating to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet policy (e.g., quantitative tightening and usage at the Reverse Repurchase Facility) that require management judgment. The amount of deposits that the Firm holds at any given time may be influenced by Federal Reserve actions, as well as broader monetary conditions and competition for deposits.•The pricing sensitivity of deposits, known as deposit betas, represent the amount by which deposit rates paid could change upon a given change in market interest rates. Actual deposit rates paid may differ from the modeled assumptions, primarily due to customer behavior and competition for deposits.The Firm performs sensitivity analyses of the assumptions used in earnings-at-risk scenarios, including with respect to deposit betas and forecasts of deposit balances, both of which are especially significant in the case of consumer deposits. The results of these sensitivity analyses are reported to the CTC Risk Committee and the Board Risk Committee.The Firm’s earnings-at-risk scenarios are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s balance sheet, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s simulation and other factors. In the second quarter of 2024, the Firm updated certain deposit rates paid assumptions which take into account observed pricing and client and customer behavior during the most recent economic cycle. These updated deposit rates paid assumptions impacted the U.S. dollar scenarios, resulting in an increase in positive sensitivity in higher interest rate scenarios, and an increase in negative sensitivity in lower interest rate scenarios. The Firm’s earnings-at-risk sensitivities are measures of the Firm’s interest rate exposure. The Firm’s actual net interest income for the rate changes presented may differ as the earnings-at-risk scenarios are modelled as instantaneous changes and exclude any actions that could be taken by the Firm or its clients or customers in response to rate changes. Other significant assumptions in the earnings-at-risk scenarios, including mortgage prepayments and deposit rates paid, may also differ from actual results. The Firm’s forecast for net interest income is included in the Firm’s outlook on page 57. experience, interest rate reset dates and maturities, rate indices used for repricing, and any interest rate ceilings or floors for adjustable rate products.Earnings-at-RiskOne way that the Firm evaluates its structural interest rate risk is through earnings-at-risk. Earnings-at-risk estimates the Firm’s interest rate exposure for a given interest rate scenario. It is presented as a sensitivity to a baseline, which includes net interest income and certain interest rate sensitive fees. The baseline uses market interest rates and, in the case of deposits, pricing assumptions. The Firm conducts simulations of changes to this baseline for interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies (“non-U.S. dollar” currencies). These simulations primarily include retained and held-for-sale loans, deposits, deposits with banks and financing activities, investment securities, long-term debt, related interest rate hedges, and funds transfer pricing of other positions in risk management VaR and other sensitivity-based measures as described on page 142. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024, these simulations also include hedges of non-U.S. dollar foreign exchange exposures arising from capital investments. Refer to non-U.S. dollar foreign exchange risk on page 149 for more information.Earnings-at-risk scenarios estimate the potential change to a baseline over the following 12 months utilizing multiple assumptions. These scenarios include a parallel shift involving changes to both short-term and long-term rates by an equal amount; a steeper yield curve involving holding short-term rates constant and increasing long-term rates; and a flatter yield curve involving increasing short-term rates and holding long-term rates constant or holding short-term rates constant and decreasing long-term rates. These scenarios consider many different factors, including: •The impact on exposures as a result of instantaneous changes in interest rates from baseline rates.•Forecasted balance sheet, as well as modeled prepayment and reinvestment behavior, but excluding assumptions about actions that could be taken by the Firm or its clients and customers in response to instantaneous rate changes. Mortgage prepayment assumptions are based on the interest rates used in the scenarios compared with underlying contractual rates, the time since origination, and other factors which are updated periodically based on historical experience. Deposit forecasts are a key assumption in the Firm’s earnings-at-risk. The baseline reflects certain assumptions relating to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet policy (e.g., quantitative tightening and usage at the Reverse Repurchase Facility) that experience, interest rate reset dates and maturities, rate indices used for repricing, and any interest rate ceilings or floors for adjustable rate products.

One way that the Firm evaluates its structural interest rate risk is through earnings-at-risk. Earnings-at-risk estimates the Firm’s interest rate exposure for a given interest rate scenario. It is presented as a sensitivity to a baseline, which includes net interest income and certain interest rate sensitive fees. The baseline uses market interest rates and, in the case of deposits, pricing assumptions. The Firm conducts simulations of changes to this baseline for interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies (“non-U.S. dollar” currencies). These simulations primarily include retained and held-for-sale loans, deposits, deposits with banks and financing activities, investment securities, long-term debt, related interest rate hedges, and funds transfer pricing of other positions in risk management VaR and other sensitivity-based measures as described on page 142. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024, these simulations also include hedges of non-U.S. dollar foreign exchange exposures arising from capital investments. Refer to non-U.S. dollar foreign exchange risk on page 149 for more information. Earnings-at-risk scenarios estimate the potential change to a baseline over the following 12 months utilizing multiple assumptions. These scenarios include a parallel shift involving changes to both short-term and long-term rates by an equal amount; a steeper yield curve involving holding short-term rates constant and increasing long-term rates; and a flatter yield curve involving increasing short-term rates and holding long-term rates constant or holding short-term rates constant and decreasing long-term rates. These scenarios consider many different factors, including: •The impact on exposures as a result of instantaneous changes in interest rates from baseline rates. •Forecasted balance sheet, as well as modeled prepayment and reinvestment behavior, but excluding assumptions about actions that could be taken by the Firm or its clients and customers in response to instantaneous rate changes. Mortgage prepayment assumptions are based on the interest rates used in the scenarios compared with underlying contractual rates, the time since origination, and other factors which are updated periodically based on historical experience. Deposit forecasts are a key assumption in the Firm’s earnings-at-risk. The baseline reflects certain assumptions relating to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet policy (e.g., quantitative tightening and usage at the Reverse Repurchase Facility) that require management judgment. The amount of deposits that the Firm holds at any given time may be influenced by Federal Reserve actions, as well as broader monetary conditions and competition for deposits.•The pricing sensitivity of deposits, known as deposit betas, represent the amount by which deposit rates paid could change upon a given change in market interest rates. Actual deposit rates paid may differ from the modeled assumptions, primarily due to customer behavior and competition for deposits.The Firm performs sensitivity analyses of the assumptions used in earnings-at-risk scenarios, including with respect to deposit betas and forecasts of deposit balances, both of which are especially significant in the case of consumer deposits. The results of these sensitivity analyses are reported to the CTC Risk Committee and the Board Risk Committee.The Firm’s earnings-at-risk scenarios are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s balance sheet, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s simulation and other factors. In the second quarter of 2024, the Firm updated certain deposit rates paid assumptions which take into account observed pricing and client and customer behavior during the most recent economic cycle. These updated deposit rates paid assumptions impacted the U.S. dollar scenarios, resulting in an increase in positive sensitivity in higher interest rate scenarios, and an increase in negative sensitivity in lower interest rate scenarios. The Firm’s earnings-at-risk sensitivities are measures of the Firm’s interest rate exposure. The Firm’s actual net interest income for the rate changes presented may differ as the earnings-at-risk scenarios are modelled as instantaneous changes and exclude any actions that could be taken by the Firm or its clients or customers in response to rate changes. Other significant assumptions in the earnings-at-risk scenarios, including mortgage prepayments and deposit rates paid, may also differ from actual results. The Firm’s forecast for net interest income is included in the Firm’s outlook on page 57. require management judgment. The amount of deposits that the Firm holds at any given time may be influenced by Federal Reserve actions, as well as broader monetary conditions and competition for deposits. •The pricing sensitivity of deposits, known as deposit betas, represent the amount by which deposit rates paid could change upon a given change in market interest rates. Actual deposit rates paid may differ from the modeled assumptions, primarily due to customer behavior and competition for deposits. The Firm performs sensitivity analyses of the assumptions used in earnings-at-risk scenarios, including with respect to deposit betas and forecasts of deposit balances, both of which are especially significant in the case of consumer deposits. The results of these sensitivity analyses are reported to the CTC Risk Committee and the Board Risk Committee. The Firm’s earnings-at-risk scenarios are periodically evaluated and enhanced in response to changes in the composition of the Firm’s balance sheet, changes in market conditions, improvements in the Firm’s simulation and other factors. In the second quarter of 2024, the Firm updated certain deposit rates paid assumptions which take into account observed pricing and client and customer behavior during the most recent economic cycle. These updated deposit rates paid assumptions impacted the U.S. dollar scenarios, resulting in an increase in positive sensitivity in higher interest rate scenarios, and an increase in negative sensitivity in lower interest rate scenarios. The Firm’s earnings-at-risk sensitivities are measures of the Firm’s interest rate exposure. The Firm’s actual net interest income for the rate changes presented may differ as the earnings-at-risk scenarios are modelled as instantaneous changes and exclude any actions that could be taken by the Firm or its clients or customers in response to rate changes. Other significant assumptions in the earnings-at-risk scenarios, including mortgage prepayments and deposit rates paid, may also differ from actual results. The Firm’s forecast for net interest income is included in the Firm’s outlook on page 57. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K147 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K147 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K147 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 147

The Firm’s sensitivities are presented in the table below. December 31,(in billions)2024(a)2023(b)Parallel shift:+100 bps shift in rates$2.3 $3.1 -100 bps shift in rates(2.5)(2.8)+200 bps shift in rates4.6 6.2 -200 bps shift in rates(4.9)(6.1)Steeper yield curve:+100 bps shift in long-term rates1.0 0.6 -100 bps shift in short-term rates(1.4)(2.2)Flatter yield curve:+100 bps shift in short-term rates1.2 2.5 -100 bps shift in long-term rates(1.1)(0.6)(a)Reflects the simultaneous shift of U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar rates, and the inclusion of the hedges of non-U.S. dollar capital investments. This inclusion had no impact on total sensitivities but increased U.S. dollar and decreased non-U.S. dollar sensitivities. Subsequent to this change, non-U.S. dollar sensitivities were insignificant.(b)At December 31, 2023, represents the total of the Firm’s U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar sensitivities as previously reported.The change in the Firm’s sensitivities as of December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, were primarily driven by Treasury and CIO balance sheet actions where the Firm added duration through investment securities activity, cash flow hedges of retained loans and fair value hedges of Firm debt. The impact on the sensitivities of the Treasury and CIO balance sheet actions were largely offset by the impact of deposits, primarily from the second quarter of 2024 update of the deposit rates paid assumptions for certain consumer and wholesale deposit products. Additionally, the results as of December 31, 2024 reflected the update to include hedges of the Firm’s non-U.S. dollar capital investments. Although total results were not impacted, these hedges increase U.S. dollar sensitivities and decrease non-U.S. dollar sensitivities. In the absence of these updates the Firm’s sensitivities as of December 31, 2024, would have been different by the amounts reported in the following table:Amounts by which reported sensitivities would have been differentDecember 31, 2024(in billions)Impact from update in the second quarter of 2024Impact from update in the fourth quarter of 2024U.S. dollar:Parallel shift:+100 bps shift in rates$(1.0)$(0.6)-100 bps shift in rates0.9 0.6 +200 bps shift in rates(1.9)(1.3)-200 bps shift in rates1.5 1.3 Steeper yield curve:+100 bps shift in long-term rates— — -100 bps shift in short-term rates0.9 0.6 Flatter yield curve:+100 bps shift in short-term rates(1.0)(0.6)-100 bps shift in long-term rates— — Non-U.S. dollar:Parallel shift: +100 bps shift in rates— 0.6 -100 bps shift in rates— (0.6)Economic Value SensitivityIn addition to earnings-at-risk, which is measured as a sensitivity to a baseline of earnings over the next 12 months, the Firm also measures Economic Value Sensitivity (“EVS”). EVS stress tests the longer-term economic value of equity by measuring the sensitivity of the Firm’s current balance sheet, primarily retained loans, deposits, debt and investment securities as well as related hedges, under various interest rate scenarios. The Firm's pricing and cash flow assumptions associated with deposits, as well as prepayment assumptions for loans and securities, are significant factors in the EVS measure. In accordance with the CTC interest rate risk management policy, the Firm has established limits on EVS as a percentage of TCE.Certain assumptions used in the EVS measure may differ from those required in the fair value measurement note to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For example, certain assets and liabilities with no stated maturity, such as credit card receivables and deposits, have longer assumed durations in the EVS measure. Additional information on long-term debt and held to maturity investment securities is disclosed on page 201 in Note 2. The Firm’s sensitivities are presented in the table below. December 31,(in billions)2024(a)2023(b)Parallel shift:+100 bps shift in rates$2.3 $3.1 -100 bps shift in rates(2.5)(2.8)+200 bps shift in rates4.6 6.2 -200 bps shift in rates(4.9)(6.1)Steeper yield curve:+100 bps shift in long-term rates1.0 0.6 -100 bps shift in short-term rates(1.4)(2.2)Flatter yield curve:+100 bps shift in short-term rates1.2 2.5 -100 bps shift in long-term rates(1.1)(0.6)(a)Reflects the simultaneous shift of U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar rates, and the inclusion of the hedges of non-U.S. dollar capital investments. This inclusion had no impact on total sensitivities but increased U.S. dollar and decreased non-U.S. dollar sensitivities. Subsequent to this change, non-U.S. dollar sensitivities were insignificant.(b)At December 31, 2023, represents the total of the Firm’s U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar sensitivities as previously reported.The change in the Firm’s sensitivities as of December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, were primarily driven by Treasury and CIO balance sheet actions where the Firm added duration through investment securities activity, cash flow hedges of retained loans and fair value hedges of Firm debt. The impact on the sensitivities of the Treasury and CIO balance sheet actions were largely offset by the impact of deposits, primarily from the second quarter of 2024 update of the deposit rates paid assumptions for certain consumer and wholesale deposit products. Additionally, the results as of December 31, 2024 reflected the update to include hedges of the Firm’s non-U.S. dollar capital investments. Although total results were not impacted, these hedges increase U.S. dollar sensitivities and decrease non-U.S. dollar sensitivities. In the absence of these updates the Firm’s sensitivities as of December 31, 2024, would have been different by the amounts reported in the following table: The Firm’s sensitivities are presented in the table below. December 31,(in billions)2024(a)2023(b)Parallel shift:+100 bps shift in rates$2.3 $3.1 -100 bps shift in rates(2.5)(2.8)+200 bps shift in rates4.6 6.2 -200 bps shift in rates(4.9)(6.1)Steeper yield curve:+100 bps shift in long-term rates1.0 0.6 -100 bps shift in short-term rates(1.4)(2.2)Flatter yield curve:+100 bps shift in short-term rates1.2 2.5 -100 bps shift in long-term rates(1.1)(0.6) 2024(a) 2023(b)

(a)Reflects the simultaneous shift of U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar rates, and the inclusion of the hedges of non-U.S. dollar capital investments. This inclusion had no impact on total sensitivities but increased U.S. dollar and decreased non-U.S. dollar sensitivities. Subsequent to this change, non-U.S. dollar sensitivities were insignificant. (b)At December 31, 2023, represents the total of the Firm’s U.S. dollar and non-U.S. dollar sensitivities as previously reported. The change in the Firm’s sensitivities as of December 31, 2024, compared to December 31, 2023, were primarily driven by Treasury and CIO balance sheet actions where the Firm added duration through investment securities activity, cash flow hedges of retained loans and fair value hedges of Firm debt. The impact on the sensitivities of the Treasury and CIO balance sheet actions were largely offset by the impact of deposits, primarily from the second quarter of 2024 update of the deposit rates paid assumptions for certain consumer and wholesale deposit products. Additionally, the results as of December 31, 2024 reflected the update to include hedges of the Firm’s non-U.S. dollar capital investments. Although total results were not impacted, these hedges increase U.S. dollar sensitivities and decrease non-U.S. dollar sensitivities. In the absence of these updates the Firm’s sensitivities as of December 31, 2024, would have been different by the amounts reported in the following table: Amounts by which reported sensitivities would have been differentDecember 31, 2024(in billions)Impact from update in the second quarter of 2024Impact from update in the fourth quarter of 2024U.S. dollar:Parallel shift:+100 bps shift in rates$(1.0)$(0.6)-100 bps shift in rates0.9 0.6 +200 bps shift in rates(1.9)(1.3)-200 bps shift in rates1.5 1.3 Steeper yield curve:+100 bps shift in long-term rates— — -100 bps shift in short-term rates0.9 0.6 Flatter yield curve:+100 bps shift in short-term rates(1.0)(0.6)-100 bps shift in long-term rates— — Non-U.S. dollar:Parallel shift: +100 bps shift in rates— 0.6 -100 bps shift in rates— (0.6)Economic Value SensitivityIn addition to earnings-at-risk, which is measured as a sensitivity to a baseline of earnings over the next 12 months, the Firm also measures Economic Value Sensitivity (“EVS”). EVS stress tests the longer-term economic value of equity by measuring the sensitivity of the Firm’s current balance sheet, primarily retained loans, deposits, debt and investment securities as well as related hedges, under various interest rate scenarios. The Firm's pricing and cash flow assumptions associated with deposits, as well as prepayment assumptions for loans and securities, are significant factors in the EVS measure. In accordance with the CTC interest rate risk management policy, the Firm has established limits on EVS as a percentage of TCE.Certain assumptions used in the EVS measure may differ from those required in the fair value measurement note to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For example, certain assets and liabilities with no stated maturity, such as credit card receivables and deposits, have longer assumed durations in the EVS measure. Additional information on long-term debt and held to maturity investment securities is disclosed on page 201 in Note 2. Amounts by which reported sensitivities would have been differentDecember 31, 2024(in billions)Impact from update in the second quarter of 2024Impact from update in the fourth quarter of 2024U.S. dollar:Parallel shift:+100 bps shift in rates$(1.0)$(0.6)-100 bps shift in rates0.9 0.6 +200 bps shift in rates(1.9)(1.3)-200 bps shift in rates1.5 1.3 Steeper yield curve:+100 bps shift in long-term rates— — -100 bps shift in short-term rates0.9 0.6 Flatter yield curve:+100 bps shift in short-term rates(1.0)(0.6)-100 bps shift in long-term rates— — Non-U.S. dollar:Parallel shift: +100 bps shift in rates— 0.6 -100 bps shift in rates— (0.6)

In addition to earnings-at-risk, which is measured as a sensitivity to a baseline of earnings over the next 12 months, the Firm also measures Economic Value Sensitivity (“EVS”). EVS stress tests the longer-term economic value of equity by measuring the sensitivity of the Firm’s current balance sheet, primarily retained loans, deposits, debt and investment securities as well as related hedges, under various interest rate scenarios. The Firm's pricing and cash flow assumptions associated with deposits, as well as prepayment assumptions for loans and securities, are significant factors in the EVS measure. In accordance with the CTC interest rate risk management policy, the Firm has established limits on EVS as a percentage of TCE. Certain assumptions used in the EVS measure may differ from those required in the fair value measurement note to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For example, certain assets and liabilities with no stated maturity, such as credit card receivables and deposits, have longer assumed durations in the EVS measure. Additional information on long-term debt and held to maturity investment securities is disclosed on page 201 in Note 2. 148JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 148JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 148JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 148 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Non-U.S. dollar FX risk is the risk that changes in foreign exchange rates affect the value of the Firm’s assets or liabilities or future results. The Firm has structural non-U.S. dollar FX exposures arising from capital investments, forecasted expense and revenue, the investment securities portfolio and non-U.S. dollar-denominated debt issuance. Treasury and CIO, working in partnership with the LOBs, primarily manage these risks on behalf of the Firm. Treasury and CIO may hedge certain of these risks using derivatives. Refer to Business Segment & Corporate Results on page 71 for additional information.

The Firm quantifies the market risk of certain debt and equity and credit and funding-related exposures by assessing the potential impact on net revenue, other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and noninterest expense due to changes in relevant market variables. Refer to the predominant business activities that give rise to market risk on page 142 for additional information on the positions captured in other sensitivity-based measures. The table below represents the potential impact to net revenue, OCI or noninterest expense for market risk sensitive instruments that are not included in VaR or earnings-at-risk. Where appropriate, instruments used for hedging purposes are reported net of the positions being hedged. The sensitivities disclosed in the table below may not be representative of the actual gain or loss that would have been realized at December 31, 2024 and 2023, as the movement in market parameters across maturities may vary and are not intended to imply management’s expectation of future changes in these sensitivities. Gain/(loss) (in millions)ActivityDescriptionSensitivity measureDecember 31, 2024December 31, 2023Debt and equity(a) Asset Management activitiesConsists of seed capital and related hedges; fund co-investments(c); and certain deferred compensation and related hedges(d)10% decline in market value$(53)$(61)Other debt and equityConsists of certain real estate-related fair value option elected loans, privately held equity and other investments held at fair value(c)10% decline in market value(1,030)(1,044)Credit- and funding-related exposuresNon-USD LTD cross-currency basisRepresents the basis risk on derivatives used to hedge the foreign exchange risk on the non-USD LTD(e)1 basis point parallel tightening of cross currency basis(10)(12)Non-USD LTD hedges foreign currency (“FX”) exposurePrimarily represents the foreign exchange revaluation on the fair value of the derivative hedges(e)10% depreciation of currency28 16 Derivatives – funding spread riskImpact of changes in the spread related to derivatives FVA(c)1 basis point parallel increase in spread(2)(3)CVA - counterparty credit risk(b)Credit risk component of CVA and associated hedges10% credit spread widening— — Fair value option elected liabilities - funding spread riskImpact of changes in the spread related to fair value option elected liabilities DVA(e)1 basis point parallel increase in spread47 46

Consists of seed capital and related hedges; fund co-investments(c); and certain deferred compensation and related hedges(d) Consists of certain real estate-related fair value option elected loans, privately held equity and other investments held at fair value(c) Non-USD LTD cross-currency basis Represents the basis risk on derivatives used to hedge the foreign exchange risk on the non-USD LTD(e) Non-USD LTD hedges foreign currency (“FX”) exposure Primarily represents the foreign exchange revaluation on the fair value of the derivative hedges(e) Impact of changes in the spread related to derivatives FVA(c) CVA - counterparty credit risk(b) Impact of changes in the spread related to fair value option elected liabilities DVA(e) (a)Excludes equity securities without readily determinable fair values that are measured under the measurement alternative. Refer to Note 2 for additional information. (b)In line with the Firm's internal model governance, the credit risk component of CVA related to certain counterparties was removed from Credit Portfolio VaR due to the widening of the credit spreads for those counterparties to elevated levels. The related hedges were also removed to maintain consistency. This exposure is now reflected in the table above. (c)Impact recognized through net revenue. (d)Impact recognized through noninterest expense. (e)Impact recognized through OCI. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K149 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K149 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K149 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 149

COUNTRY RISK MANAGEMENT COUNTRY RISK MANAGEMENT The Firm, through its LOBs and Corporate, may be exposed to country risk resulting from financial, economic, political or other significant developments which adversely affect the value of the Firm’s exposures related to a particular country or set of countries. The Country Risk Management group actively monitors the various portfolios which may be impacted by these developments and measures the extent to which the Firm’s exposures are diversified given the Firm’s strategy and risk tolerance relative to a country.Organization and managementCountry Risk Management is an independent risk management function that assesses and monitors exposure to country risk across the Firm. The Firm’s country risk management function includes the following activities:•Maintaining policies, procedures and standards consistent with a comprehensive country risk framework•Assigning sovereign ratings, assessing country risks and establishing risk tolerance relative to a country•Measuring and monitoring country risk exposure and stress across the Firm•Managing and approving country limits and reporting trends and limit breaches to senior management•Developing surveillance tools, such as signaling models and ratings indicators, for early identification of potential country risk concerns•Providing country risk scenario analysisSources and measurementThe Firm is exposed to country risk through its lending and deposits, investing, and market-making activities, whether cross-border or locally funded. Country exposure includes activity with both government and private-sector entities in a country. Under the Firm’s internal country risk management approach, attribution of exposure to an individual country is based on the country where the largest proportion of the assets of the counterparty, issuer, obligor or guarantor are located or where the largest proportion of its revenue is derived, which may be different than the domicile (i.e. legal residence) or country of incorporation. Individual country exposures reflect an aggregation of the Firm’s risk to an immediate default, with zero recovery, of the counterparties, issuers, obligors or guarantors attributed to that country. Activities which result in contingent or indirect exposure to a country are not included in the country exposure measure (for example, providing clearing services or secondary exposure to collateral on securities financing receivables).Assumptions are sometimes required in determining the measurement and allocation of country exposure, particularly in the case of certain non-linear or index products, or where the nature of the counterparty, issuer, obligor or guarantor is not suitable for attribution to an individual country. The use of different measurement approaches or assumptions could affect the amount of reported country exposure.Under the Firm’s internal country risk measurement framework:•Deposits with banks are measured as the cash balances placed with central banks, commercial banks, and other financial institutions•Lending exposures are measured at the total committed amount (funded and unfunded), net of the allowance for credit losses and eligible cash and marketable securities collateral received•Securities financing exposures are measured at their receivable balance, net of eligible collateral received•Debt and equity securities are measured at the fair value of all positions, including both long and short positions•Counterparty exposure on derivative receivables is measured at the derivative’s fair value, net of the fair value of the eligible collateral received•Credit derivatives exposure is measured at the net notional amount of protection purchased or sold for the same underlying reference entity, inclusive of the fair value of the derivative receivable or payable, reflecting the manner in which the Firm manages these exposuresThe Firm’s internal country risk reporting differs from the reporting provided under the FFIEC bank regulatory requirements. The Firm, through its LOBs and Corporate, may be exposed to country risk resulting from financial, economic, political or other significant developments which adversely affect the value of the Firm’s exposures related to a particular country or set of countries. The Country Risk Management group actively monitors the various portfolios which may be impacted by these developments and measures the extent to which the Firm’s exposures are diversified given the Firm’s strategy and risk tolerance relative to a country.Organization and managementCountry Risk Management is an independent risk management function that assesses and monitors exposure to country risk across the Firm. The Firm’s country risk management function includes the following activities:•Maintaining policies, procedures and standards consistent with a comprehensive country risk framework•Assigning sovereign ratings, assessing country risks and establishing risk tolerance relative to a country•Measuring and monitoring country risk exposure and stress across the Firm•Managing and approving country limits and reporting trends and limit breaches to senior management•Developing surveillance tools, such as signaling models and ratings indicators, for early identification of potential country risk concerns•Providing country risk scenario analysisSources and measurementThe Firm is exposed to country risk through its lending and deposits, investing, and market-making activities, whether cross-border or locally funded. Country exposure includes activity with both government and private-sector entities in a country. Under the Firm’s internal country risk management approach, attribution of exposure to an individual country is based on the country where the largest proportion of the assets of the counterparty, issuer, obligor or guarantor are located or where the largest proportion of its revenue is derived, which may be different than the domicile (i.e. legal residence) or country of incorporation. The Firm, through its LOBs and Corporate, may be exposed to country risk resulting from financial, economic, political or other significant developments which adversely affect the value of the Firm’s exposures related to a particular country or set of countries. The Country Risk Management group actively monitors the various portfolios which may be impacted by these developments and measures the extent to which the Firm’s exposures are diversified given the Firm’s strategy and risk tolerance relative to a country.

Country Risk Management is an independent risk management function that assesses and monitors exposure to country risk across the Firm. The Firm’s country risk management function includes the following activities: •Maintaining policies, procedures and standards consistent with a comprehensive country risk framework •Assigning sovereign ratings, assessing country risks and establishing risk tolerance relative to a country •Measuring and monitoring country risk exposure and stress across the Firm •Managing and approving country limits and reporting trends and limit breaches to senior management •Developing surveillance tools, such as signaling models and ratings indicators, for early identification of potential country risk concerns •Providing country risk scenario analysis

The Firm is exposed to country risk through its lending and deposits, investing, and market-making activities, whether cross-border or locally funded. Country exposure includes activity with both government and private-sector entities in a country. Under the Firm’s internal country risk management approach, attribution of exposure to an individual country is based on the country where the largest proportion of the assets of the counterparty, issuer, obligor or guarantor are located or where the largest proportion of its revenue is derived, which may be different than the domicile (i.e. legal residence) or country of incorporation. Individual country exposures reflect an aggregation of the Firm’s risk to an immediate default, with zero recovery, of the counterparties, issuers, obligors or guarantors attributed to that country. Activities which result in contingent or indirect exposure to a country are not included in the country exposure measure (for example, providing clearing services or secondary exposure to collateral on securities financing receivables).Assumptions are sometimes required in determining the measurement and allocation of country exposure, particularly in the case of certain non-linear or index products, or where the nature of the counterparty, issuer, obligor or guarantor is not suitable for attribution to an individual country. The use of different measurement approaches or assumptions could affect the amount of reported country exposure.Under the Firm’s internal country risk measurement framework:•Deposits with banks are measured as the cash balances placed with central banks, commercial banks, and other financial institutions•Lending exposures are measured at the total committed amount (funded and unfunded), net of the allowance for credit losses and eligible cash and marketable securities collateral received•Securities financing exposures are measured at their receivable balance, net of eligible collateral received•Debt and equity securities are measured at the fair value of all positions, including both long and short positions•Counterparty exposure on derivative receivables is measured at the derivative’s fair value, net of the fair value of the eligible collateral received•Credit derivatives exposure is measured at the net notional amount of protection purchased or sold for the same underlying reference entity, inclusive of the fair value of the derivative receivable or payable, reflecting the manner in which the Firm manages these exposuresThe Firm’s internal country risk reporting differs from the reporting provided under the FFIEC bank regulatory requirements. Individual country exposures reflect an aggregation of the Firm’s risk to an immediate default, with zero recovery, of the counterparties, issuers, obligors or guarantors attributed to that country. Activities which result in contingent or indirect exposure to a country are not included in the country exposure measure (for example, providing clearing services or secondary exposure to collateral on securities financing receivables). Assumptions are sometimes required in determining the measurement and allocation of country exposure, particularly in the case of certain non-linear or index products, or where the nature of the counterparty, issuer, obligor or guarantor is not suitable for attribution to an individual country. The use of different measurement approaches or assumptions could affect the amount of reported country exposure. Under the Firm’s internal country risk measurement framework: •Deposits with banks are measured as the cash balances placed with central banks, commercial banks, and other financial institutions •Lending exposures are measured at the total committed amount (funded and unfunded), net of the allowance for credit losses and eligible cash and marketable securities collateral received •Securities financing exposures are measured at their receivable balance, net of eligible collateral received •Debt and equity securities are measured at the fair value of all positions, including both long and short positions •Counterparty exposure on derivative receivables is measured at the derivative’s fair value, net of the fair value of the eligible collateral received •Credit derivatives exposure is measured at the net notional amount of protection purchased or sold for the same underlying reference entity, inclusive of the fair value of the derivative receivable or payable, reflecting the manner in which the Firm manages these exposures The Firm’s internal country risk reporting differs from the reporting provided under the FFIEC bank regulatory requirements. 150JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 150JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 150JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 150 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Stress testingStress testing is an important component of the Firm’s country risk management framework, which aims to estimate and limit losses arising from a country crisis by measuring the impact of adverse asset price movements to a country based on market shocks combined with counterparty specific assumptions. Country Risk Management periodically designs and runs tailored stress scenarios to test vulnerabilities to individual countries or sets of countries in response to specific or potential market events, sector performance concerns, sovereign actions and geopolitical risks. These tailored stress results are used to inform potential risk reduction across the Firm, as necessary.Risk reportingCountry exposure and stress are measured and reported regularly, and used by Country Risk Management to identify trends and monitor high usages and breaches against limits. For country risk management purposes, the Firm may report exposure to jurisdictions that are not fully autonomous, including dependent territories and Special Administrative Regions (“SAR”) such as Hong Kong SAR, separately from the independent sovereign states with which they are associated.The following table presents the Firm’s top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.) as of December 31, 2024, and their comparative exposures as of December 31, 2023. The top 20 country exposures represent the Firm’s largest total exposures by individual country. Country exposures may fluctuate from period to period due to a variety of factors, including client activity, market flows and liquidity management activities undertaken by the Firm. The increase in exposure to Germany when compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by an increase in cash placed with the central bank of Germany, predominantly due to client-driven market-making activities and higher client deposits.The increase in exposure to Japan when compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by an increase in cash placed with the central bank of Japan as a result of client-driven market-making activities.The Firm continues to monitor its exposure to Russia, which corresponds to cash placed with the central bank, but which excludes deposits placed on behalf of clients at the Deposit Insurance Agency of Russia. The Firm currently believes that its remaining exposure to Russia is not material. Refer to Note 30 on pages 310–311 for information concerning Russian litigation.Top 20 country exposures (excluding the U.S.)(a)December 31, (in billions)20242023(f)Deposits with banks(b)Lending(c)Trading and investing(d)Other(e)Total exposureTotal exposureGermany$89.7 $12.6 $0.9 $0.7 $103.9 $84.8 United Kingdom24.6 22.4 27.7 1.4 76.1 77.1 Japan55.1 3.1 4.5 0.4 63.1 36.0 France0.6 12.3 4.2 0.9 18.0 10.1 Canada1.6 10.6 2.7 0.2 15.1 16.0 Brazil3.5 4.2 7.0 — 14.7 16.7 Australia5.0 7.4 1.9 — 14.3 18.3 Switzerland4.7 4.2 1.4 3.3 13.6 10.9 Mainland China3.1 6.2 4.1 — 13.4 14.0 India1.1 5.2 4.1 0.9 11.3 9.7 Italy0.1 8.2 1.8 0.3 10.4 6.0 South Korea0.6 2.9 6.3 0.5 10.3 7.8 Saudi Arabia0.8 5.7 2.9 — 9.4 7.7 Singapore1.5 2.0 3.5 0.4 7.4 9.8 Mexico1.3 4.4 1.5 — 7.2 8.2 Spain0.2 4.6 1.2 0.1 6.1 6.3 Netherlands— 6.6 (0.9)0.2 5.9 5.6 Belgium4.0 1.3 0.1 — 5.4 8.0 Malaysia2.1 0.2 1.0 0.3 3.6 4.2 Luxembourg0.9 1.7 1.0 — 3.6 4.0 (a)Country exposures presented in the table reflect 89% and 88% of total Firmwide non-U.S. exposure, where exposure is attributed to an individual country based on the Firm’s internal country risk management approach, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.(b)Predominantly represents cash placed with central banks.(c)Includes loans and accrued interest receivable, lending-related commitments (net of eligible collateral and the allowance for credit losses). Excludes intra-day and operating exposures, such as those from settlement and clearing activities.(d)Includes market-making positions and hedging, investment securities, and counterparty exposure on derivative and securities financings net of eligible collateral. Market-making positions and hedging includes exposure from single reference entity (“single-name”), index and other multiple reference entity transactions for which one or more of the underlying reference entities is in a country listed in the above table.(e)Includes physical commodities inventory and clearing house guarantee funds.(f)The country rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2023, are based on the country rankings of the corresponding exposures at December 31, 2024, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2023. Stress testingStress testing is an important component of the Firm’s country risk management framework, which aims to estimate and limit losses arising from a country crisis by measuring the impact of adverse asset price movements to a country based on market shocks combined with counterparty specific assumptions. Country Risk Management periodically designs and runs tailored stress scenarios to test vulnerabilities to individual countries or sets of countries in response to specific or potential market events, sector performance concerns, sovereign actions and geopolitical risks. These tailored stress results are used to inform potential risk reduction across the Firm, as necessary.Risk reportingCountry exposure and stress are measured and reported regularly, and used by Country Risk Management to identify trends and monitor high usages and breaches against limits. For country risk management purposes, the Firm may report exposure to jurisdictions that are not fully autonomous, including dependent territories and Special Administrative Regions (“SAR”) such as Hong Kong SAR, separately from the independent sovereign states with which they are associated.The following table presents the Firm’s top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.) as of December 31, 2024, and their comparative exposures as of December 31, 2023. The top 20 country exposures represent the Firm’s largest total exposures by individual country. Country exposures may fluctuate from period to period due to a variety of factors, including client activity, market flows and liquidity management activities undertaken by the Firm. The increase in exposure to Germany when compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by an increase in cash placed with the central bank of Germany, predominantly due to client-driven market-making activities and higher client deposits.The increase in exposure to Japan when compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by an increase in cash placed with the central bank of Japan as a result of client-driven market-making activities.The Firm continues to monitor its exposure to Russia, which corresponds to cash placed with the central bank, but which excludes deposits placed on behalf of clients at the Deposit Insurance Agency of Russia. The Firm currently believes that its remaining exposure to Russia is not material. Refer to Note 30 on pages 310–311 for information concerning Russian litigation.

Stress testing is an important component of the Firm’s country risk management framework, which aims to estimate and limit losses arising from a country crisis by measuring the impact of adverse asset price movements to a country based on market shocks combined with counterparty specific assumptions. Country Risk Management periodically designs and runs tailored stress scenarios to test vulnerabilities to individual countries or sets of countries in response to specific or potential market events, sector performance concerns, sovereign actions and geopolitical risks. These tailored stress results are used to inform potential risk reduction across the Firm, as necessary.

Country exposure and stress are measured and reported regularly, and used by Country Risk Management to identify trends and monitor high usages and breaches against limits. For country risk management purposes, the Firm may report exposure to jurisdictions that are not fully autonomous, including dependent territories and Special Administrative Regions (“SAR”) such as Hong Kong SAR, separately from the independent sovereign states with which they are associated. The following table presents the Firm’s top 20 exposures by country (excluding the U.S.) as of December 31, 2024, and their comparative exposures as of December 31, 2023. The top 20 country exposures represent the Firm’s largest total exposures by individual country. Country exposures may fluctuate from period to period due to a variety of factors, including client activity, market flows and liquidity management activities undertaken by the Firm. The increase in exposure to Germany when compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by an increase in cash placed with the central bank of Germany, predominantly due to client-driven market-making activities and higher client deposits. The increase in exposure to Japan when compared to December 31, 2023, was driven by an increase in cash placed with the central bank of Japan as a result of client-driven market-making activities. The Firm continues to monitor its exposure to Russia, which corresponds to cash placed with the central bank, but which excludes deposits placed on behalf of clients at the Deposit Insurance Agency of Russia. The Firm currently believes that its remaining exposure to Russia is not material. Refer to Note 30 on pages 310–311 for information concerning Russian litigation. Top 20 country exposures (excluding the U.S.)(a)December 31, (in billions)20242023(f)Deposits with banks(b)Lending(c)Trading and investing(d)Other(e)Total exposureTotal exposureGermany$89.7 $12.6 $0.9 $0.7 $103.9 $84.8 United Kingdom24.6 22.4 27.7 1.4 76.1 77.1 Japan55.1 3.1 4.5 0.4 63.1 36.0 France0.6 12.3 4.2 0.9 18.0 10.1 Canada1.6 10.6 2.7 0.2 15.1 16.0 Brazil3.5 4.2 7.0 — 14.7 16.7 Australia5.0 7.4 1.9 — 14.3 18.3 Switzerland4.7 4.2 1.4 3.3 13.6 10.9 Mainland China3.1 6.2 4.1 — 13.4 14.0 India1.1 5.2 4.1 0.9 11.3 9.7 Italy0.1 8.2 1.8 0.3 10.4 6.0 South Korea0.6 2.9 6.3 0.5 10.3 7.8 Saudi Arabia0.8 5.7 2.9 — 9.4 7.7 Singapore1.5 2.0 3.5 0.4 7.4 9.8 Mexico1.3 4.4 1.5 — 7.2 8.2 Spain0.2 4.6 1.2 0.1 6.1 6.3 Netherlands— 6.6 (0.9)0.2 5.9 5.6 Belgium4.0 1.3 0.1 — 5.4 8.0 Malaysia2.1 0.2 1.0 0.3 3.6 4.2 Luxembourg0.9 1.7 1.0 — 3.6 4.0 (a)Country exposures presented in the table reflect 89% and 88% of total Firmwide non-U.S. exposure, where exposure is attributed to an individual country based on the Firm’s internal country risk management approach, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.(b)Predominantly represents cash placed with central banks.(c)Includes loans and accrued interest receivable, lending-related commitments (net of eligible collateral and the allowance for credit losses). Excludes intra-day and operating exposures, such as those from settlement and clearing activities.(d)Includes market-making positions and hedging, investment securities, and counterparty exposure on derivative and securities financings net of eligible collateral. Market-making positions and hedging includes exposure from single reference entity (“single-name”), index and other multiple reference entity transactions for which one or more of the underlying reference entities is in a country listed in the above table.(e)Includes physical commodities inventory and clearing house guarantee funds.(f)The country rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2023, are based on the country rankings of the corresponding exposures at December 31, 2024, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2023. Top 20 country exposures (excluding the U.S.)(a)December 31, (in billions)20242023(f)Deposits with banks(b)Lending(c)Trading and investing(d)Other(e)Total exposureTotal exposureGermany$89.7 $12.6 $0.9 $0.7 $103.9 $84.8 United Kingdom24.6 22.4 27.7 1.4 76.1 77.1 Japan55.1 3.1 4.5 0.4 63.1 36.0 France0.6 12.3 4.2 0.9 18.0 10.1 Canada1.6 10.6 2.7 0.2 15.1 16.0 Brazil3.5 4.2 7.0 — 14.7 16.7 Australia5.0 7.4 1.9 — 14.3 18.3 Switzerland4.7 4.2 1.4 3.3 13.6 10.9 Mainland China3.1 6.2 4.1 — 13.4 14.0 India1.1 5.2 4.1 0.9 11.3 9.7 Italy0.1 8.2 1.8 0.3 10.4 6.0 South Korea0.6 2.9 6.3 0.5 10.3 7.8 Saudi Arabia0.8 5.7 2.9 — 9.4 7.7 Singapore1.5 2.0 3.5 0.4 7.4 9.8 Mexico1.3 4.4 1.5 — 7.2 8.2 Spain0.2 4.6 1.2 0.1 6.1 6.3 Netherlands— 6.6 (0.9)0.2 5.9 5.6 Belgium4.0 1.3 0.1 — 5.4 8.0 Malaysia2.1 0.2 1.0 0.3 3.6 4.2 Luxembourg0.9 1.7 1.0 — 3.6 4.0

2023(f) Deposits with banks(b) Lending(c) Trading and investing(d) Other(e) Mexico Spain (a)Country exposures presented in the table reflect 89% and 88% of total Firmwide non-U.S. exposure, where exposure is attributed to an individual country based on the Firm’s internal country risk management approach, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (b)Predominantly represents cash placed with central banks. (c)Includes loans and accrued interest receivable, lending-related commitments (net of eligible collateral and the allowance for credit losses). Excludes intra-day and operating exposures, such as those from settlement and clearing activities. (d)Includes market-making positions and hedging, investment securities, and counterparty exposure on derivative and securities financings net of eligible collateral. Market-making positions and hedging includes exposure from single reference entity (“single-name”), index and other multiple reference entity transactions for which one or more of the underlying reference entities is in a country listed in the above table. (e)Includes physical commodities inventory and clearing house guarantee funds. (f)The country rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2023, are based on the country rankings of the corresponding exposures at December 31, 2024, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2023. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K151 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K151 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K151 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 151

CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT Climate risk refers to the potential threats posed by climate change to the Firm and its clients, customers, operations and business strategy. Climate change is viewed as a driver of risk that may impact existing types of risks managed by the Firm. Climate risk is categorized into physical risk and transition risk.Physical risk involves economic costs and financial losses due to a changing climate. Acute physical risk drivers include the increased frequency or severity of climate and weather events, such as floods, wildfires and tropical cyclones. Chronic physical risk drivers include more gradual shifts in the climate, such as sea level rise, persistent changes in precipitation levels and increases in average ambient temperatures.Transition risk involves the financial and economic consequences of society’s shift toward a lower-carbon economy. Transition risk drivers include possible changes in public policy, adoption of new technologies and shifts in consumer preferences. Transition risks may also be influenced by changes in the physical climate.Organization and managementThe Firm has a Climate Risk Management function that is responsible for establishing and maintaining the Firmwide framework and strategy for managing climate risks that may impact the Firm.Other responsibilities of Climate Risk Management include:•Setting policies, standards, procedures and processes to support identification, escalation, monitoring and management of climate risk across the Firm•Developing metrics, scenarios and stress testing mechanisms designed to assess the range of potential climate-related financial and economic impacts to the Firm•Establishing a Firmwide climate risk data strategy and the supporting climate risk technology infrastructureThe LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the identification, assessment and management of climate risks present in their business activities and for the adherence to applicable climate-related laws, rules and regulations.Governance and oversightThe Firm’s framework and strategy for managing climate risk is integrated into the Firm’s risk governance structure. This framework allows for the escalation of significant climate risk-related issues to LOB Risk Committees. The Board Risk Committee also receives information on significant climate risks and climate-related initiatives, as appropriate. Climate risk refers to the potential threats posed by climate change to the Firm and its clients, customers, operations and business strategy. Climate change is viewed as a driver of risk that may impact existing types of risks managed by the Firm. Climate risk is categorized into physical risk and transition risk.Physical risk involves economic costs and financial losses due to a changing climate. Acute physical risk drivers include the increased frequency or severity of climate and weather events, such as floods, wildfires and tropical cyclones. Chronic physical risk drivers include more gradual shifts in the climate, such as sea level rise, persistent changes in precipitation levels and increases in average ambient temperatures.Transition risk involves the financial and economic consequences of society’s shift toward a lower-carbon economy. Transition risk drivers include possible changes in public policy, adoption of new technologies and shifts in consumer preferences. Transition risks may also be influenced by changes in the physical climate.Organization and managementThe Firm has a Climate Risk Management function that is responsible for establishing and maintaining the Firmwide framework and strategy for managing climate risks that may impact the Firm.Other responsibilities of Climate Risk Management include:•Setting policies, standards, procedures and processes to support identification, escalation, monitoring and management of climate risk across the Firm•Developing metrics, scenarios and stress testing mechanisms designed to assess the range of potential climate-related financial and economic impacts to the Firm•Establishing a Firmwide climate risk data strategy and the supporting climate risk technology infrastructureThe LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the identification, assessment and management of climate risks present in their business activities and for the adherence to applicable climate-related laws, rules and regulations. Climate risk refers to the potential threats posed by climate change to the Firm and its clients, customers, operations and business strategy. Climate change is viewed as a driver of risk that may impact existing types of risks managed by the Firm. Climate risk is categorized into physical risk and transition risk. Physical risk involves economic costs and financial losses due to a changing climate. Acute physical risk drivers include the increased frequency or severity of climate and weather events, such as floods, wildfires and tropical cyclones. Chronic physical risk drivers include more gradual shifts in the climate, such as sea level rise, persistent changes in precipitation levels and increases in average ambient temperatures. Transition risk involves the financial and economic consequences of society’s shift toward a lower-carbon economy. Transition risk drivers include possible changes in public policy, adoption of new technologies and shifts in consumer preferences. Transition risks may also be influenced by changes in the physical climate.

The Firm has a Climate Risk Management function that is responsible for establishing and maintaining the Firmwide framework and strategy for managing climate risks that may impact the Firm. Other responsibilities of Climate Risk Management include: •Setting policies, standards, procedures and processes to support identification, escalation, monitoring and management of climate risk across the Firm •Developing metrics, scenarios and stress testing mechanisms designed to assess the range of potential climate-related financial and economic impacts to the Firm •Establishing a Firmwide climate risk data strategy and the supporting climate risk technology infrastructure The LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the identification, assessment and management of climate risks present in their business activities and for the adherence to applicable climate-related laws, rules and regulations. Governance and oversightThe Firm’s framework and strategy for managing climate risk is integrated into the Firm’s risk governance structure. This framework allows for the escalation of significant climate risk-related issues to LOB Risk Committees. The Board Risk Committee also receives information on significant climate risks and climate-related initiatives, as appropriate.

The Firm’s framework and strategy for managing climate risk is integrated into the Firm’s risk governance structure. This framework allows for the escalation of significant climate risk-related issues to LOB Risk Committees. The Board Risk Committee also receives information on significant climate risks and climate-related initiatives, as appropriate. 152JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 152JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 152JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 152 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT Operational risk is the risk of an adverse outcome resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems; human factors; or external events impacting the Firm’s processes or systems. Operational Risk includes compliance, conduct, legal, and estimations and model risk. Operational risk is inherent in the Firm’s activities and can manifest itself in various ways, including fraudulent acts, business disruptions (including those caused by extraordinary events beyond the Firm's control), cyber attacks, inappropriate employee behavior, failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations or failure of vendors or other third party providers to perform in accordance with their agreements. Operational Risk Management attempts to manage operational risk at appropriate levels in light of the Firm’s financial position, the characteristics of its businesses, and the markets and regulatory environments in which it operates. Operational Risk Management FrameworkThe Firm’s Compliance, Conduct, and Operational Risk (“CCOR”) Management Framework is designed to enable the Firm to govern, identify, measure, monitor and test, manage and report on the Firm’s operational risk. Operational Risk GovernanceThe LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the management of operational risk. The Control Management Organization, which consists of control managers within each LOB and Corporate, is responsible for the day-to-day execution of the CCOR Framework. The Firm’s Global Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite is responsible for defining the CCOR Management Framework and establishing the minimum standards for its execution. The LOB and Corporate aligned CCOR Lead Officers report to the Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite and are independent of the respective businesses or functions they oversee. The CCOR Management Framework is included in the Risk Governance and Oversight Policy that is reviewed and approved by the Board Risk Committee periodically.Operational Risk IdentificationThe Firm utilizes a structured risk and control self-assessment process that is executed by the LOBs and Corporate. As part of this process, the LOBs and Corporate evaluate the effectiveness of their respective control environment to assess circumstances in which controls have failed, and to determine where remediation efforts may be required. The Firm’s Operational Risk and Compliance organization (“Operational Risk and Compliance”) provides oversight of and challenge to these evaluations and may also perform independent assessments of significant operational risk events and areas of concentrated or emerging risk.Operational Risk MeasurementOperational Risk and Compliance performs an independent assessment of the operational risks inherent within the LOBs and Corporate, which includes evaluating the effectiveness of the control environments and reporting the results to senior management.In addition, Operational Risk and Compliance assesses operational risks through quantitative means, including operational risk-based capital and estimation of operational risk losses under both baseline and stressed conditions. The primary component of the operational risk-based capital estimate is the Loss Distribution Approach (“LDA”) statistical model, which simulates the projected frequency and severity of operational risk losses based on historical data. The LDA model is used to estimate an aggregate operational risk loss over a one-year time horizon, at a 99.9% confidence level. The LDA model incorporates actual internal operational risk losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized, and the calculation generally continues to reflect such losses even after the issues or business activities giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced.As required under the Basel III capital framework, the Firm’s operational risk capital methodology, which uses the Advanced Measurement Approach (“AMA”), incorporates internal and external losses as well as management’s view of tail risk captured through operational risk scenario analysis, and evaluation of key business environment and internal control metrics. The Firm does not reflect the impact of insurance in its AMA estimate of operational risk capital. The Firm considers the impact of stressed economic conditions on operational risk losses and develops a forward looking view of material operational risk events that may occur in a stressed environment. The Firm’s operational risk stress testing framework is utilized in calculating results for the Firm’s CCAR and other stress testing processes. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for information related to operational risk RWA, and CCAR.Operational Risk Monitoring and TestingThe results of risk assessments performed by Operational Risk and Compliance are used in connection with their independent monitoring and testing compliance of the LOBs and Corporate with Operational risk is the risk of an adverse outcome resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems; human factors; or external events impacting the Firm’s processes or systems. Operational Risk includes compliance, conduct, legal, and estimations and model risk. Operational risk is inherent in the Firm’s activities and can manifest itself in various ways, including fraudulent acts, business disruptions (including those caused by extraordinary events beyond the Firm's control), cyber attacks, inappropriate employee behavior, failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations or failure of vendors or other third party providers to perform in accordance with their agreements. Operational Risk Management attempts to manage operational risk at appropriate levels in light of the Firm’s financial position, the characteristics of its businesses, and the markets and regulatory environments in which it operates. Operational Risk Management FrameworkThe Firm’s Compliance, Conduct, and Operational Risk (“CCOR”) Management Framework is designed to enable the Firm to govern, identify, measure, monitor and test, manage and report on the Firm’s operational risk. Operational Risk GovernanceThe LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the management of operational risk. The Control Management Organization, which consists of control managers within each LOB and Corporate, is responsible for the day-to-day execution of the CCOR Framework. The Firm’s Global Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite is responsible for defining the CCOR Management Framework and establishing the minimum standards for its execution. The LOB and Corporate aligned CCOR Lead Officers report to the Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite and are independent of the respective businesses or functions they oversee. The CCOR Management Framework is included in the Risk Governance and Oversight Policy that is reviewed and approved by the Board Risk Committee periodically.Operational Risk IdentificationThe Firm utilizes a structured risk and control self-assessment process that is executed by the LOBs and Corporate. As part of this process, the LOBs and Corporate evaluate the effectiveness of their respective control environment to assess circumstances in which controls have failed, and to determine where remediation efforts may be required. The Firm’s Operational Risk and Compliance organization (“Operational Risk and Compliance”) Operational risk is the risk of an adverse outcome resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes or systems; human factors; or external events impacting the Firm’s processes or systems. Operational Risk includes compliance, conduct, legal, and estimations and model risk. Operational risk is inherent in the Firm’s activities and can manifest itself in various ways, including fraudulent acts, business disruptions (including those caused by extraordinary events beyond the Firm's control), cyber attacks, inappropriate employee behavior, failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations or failure of vendors or other third party providers to perform in accordance with their agreements. Operational Risk Management attempts to manage operational risk at appropriate levels in light of the Firm’s financial position, the characteristics of its businesses, and the markets and regulatory environments in which it operates.

The Firm’s Compliance, Conduct, and Operational Risk (“CCOR”) Management Framework is designed to enable the Firm to govern, identify, measure, monitor and test, manage and report on the Firm’s operational risk. Operational Risk Governance The LOBs and Corporate are responsible for the management of operational risk. The Control Management Organization, which consists of control managers within each LOB and Corporate, is responsible for the day-to-day execution of the CCOR Framework. The Firm’s Global Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite is responsible for defining the CCOR Management Framework and establishing the minimum standards for its execution. The LOB and Corporate aligned CCOR Lead Officers report to the Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite and are independent of the respective businesses or functions they oversee. The CCOR Management Framework is included in the Risk Governance and Oversight Policy that is reviewed and approved by the Board Risk Committee periodically. Operational Risk Identification The Firm utilizes a structured risk and control self-assessment process that is executed by the LOBs and Corporate. As part of this process, the LOBs and Corporate evaluate the effectiveness of their respective control environment to assess circumstances in which controls have failed, and to determine where remediation efforts may be required. The Firm’s Operational Risk and Compliance organization (“Operational Risk and Compliance”) provides oversight of and challenge to these evaluations and may also perform independent assessments of significant operational risk events and areas of concentrated or emerging risk.Operational Risk MeasurementOperational Risk and Compliance performs an independent assessment of the operational risks inherent within the LOBs and Corporate, which includes evaluating the effectiveness of the control environments and reporting the results to senior management.In addition, Operational Risk and Compliance assesses operational risks through quantitative means, including operational risk-based capital and estimation of operational risk losses under both baseline and stressed conditions. The primary component of the operational risk-based capital estimate is the Loss Distribution Approach (“LDA”) statistical model, which simulates the projected frequency and severity of operational risk losses based on historical data. The LDA model is used to estimate an aggregate operational risk loss over a one-year time horizon, at a 99.9% confidence level. The LDA model incorporates actual internal operational risk losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized, and the calculation generally continues to reflect such losses even after the issues or business activities giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced.As required under the Basel III capital framework, the Firm’s operational risk capital methodology, which uses the Advanced Measurement Approach (“AMA”), incorporates internal and external losses as well as management’s view of tail risk captured through operational risk scenario analysis, and evaluation of key business environment and internal control metrics. The Firm does not reflect the impact of insurance in its AMA estimate of operational risk capital. The Firm considers the impact of stressed economic conditions on operational risk losses and develops a forward looking view of material operational risk events that may occur in a stressed environment. The Firm’s operational risk stress testing framework is utilized in calculating results for the Firm’s CCAR and other stress testing processes. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for information related to operational risk RWA, and CCAR.Operational Risk Monitoring and TestingThe results of risk assessments performed by Operational Risk and Compliance are used in connection with their independent monitoring and testing compliance of the LOBs and Corporate with provides oversight of and challenge to these evaluations and may also perform independent assessments of significant operational risk events and areas of concentrated or emerging risk. Operational Risk Measurement Operational Risk and Compliance performs an independent assessment of the operational risks inherent within the LOBs and Corporate, which includes evaluating the effectiveness of the control environments and reporting the results to senior management. In addition, Operational Risk and Compliance assesses operational risks through quantitative means, including operational risk-based capital and estimation of operational risk losses under both baseline and stressed conditions. The primary component of the operational risk-based capital estimate is the Loss Distribution Approach (“LDA”) statistical model, which simulates the projected frequency and severity of operational risk losses based on historical data. The LDA model is used to estimate an aggregate operational risk loss over a one-year time horizon, at a 99.9% confidence level. The LDA model incorporates actual internal operational risk losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized, and the calculation generally continues to reflect such losses even after the issues or business activities giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced. As required under the Basel III capital framework, the Firm’s operational risk capital methodology, which uses the Advanced Measurement Approach (“AMA”), incorporates internal and external losses as well as management’s view of tail risk captured through operational risk scenario analysis, and evaluation of key business environment and internal control metrics. The Firm does not reflect the impact of insurance in its AMA estimate of operational risk capital. The Firm considers the impact of stressed economic conditions on operational risk losses and develops a forward looking view of material operational risk events that may occur in a stressed environment. The Firm’s operational risk stress testing framework is utilized in calculating results for the Firm’s CCAR and other stress testing processes. Refer to Capital Risk Management on pages 97–107 for information related to operational risk RWA, and CCAR. Operational Risk Monitoring and Testing The results of risk assessments performed by Operational Risk and Compliance are used in connection with their independent monitoring and testing compliance of the LOBs and Corporate with JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K153 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K153 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K153 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 153

laws, rules and regulations. Through monitoring and testing, Operational Risk and Compliance independently identify areas of heightened operational risk and tests the effectiveness of controls within the LOBs and Corporate. Management of Operational RiskThe operational risk areas or issues identified through monitoring and testing are escalated to the LOBs and Corporate to be remediated through action plans, as needed, to mitigate operational risk. Operational Risk and Compliance may advise the LOBs and Corporate in the development and implementation of action plans.Operational Risk ReportingAll employees of the Firm are expected to escalate risks appropriately. Risks identified by Operational Risk and Compliance are escalated to the appropriate LOB and Corporate Control Committees, as needed. Operational Risk and Compliance has established standards designed to ensure that consistent operational risk reporting and operational risk reports are produced on a Firmwide basis as well as by the LOBs and Corporate. Reporting includes the evaluation of key risk and performance indicators against established thresholds as well as the assessment of different types of operational risk against stated risk appetite. The standards establish escalation protocols to senior management and to the Board of Directors.InsuranceOne of the ways in which operational risk may be mitigated is through insurance maintained by the Firm. The Firm purchases insurance from commercial insurers and maintains a wholly-owned captive insurer, Park Assurance Company. Insurance may also be required by third parties with whom the Firm does business.Subcategories and examples of operational risksOperational risk can manifest itself in various ways. Operational risk subcategories include Compliance risk, Conduct risk, Legal risk, and Estimations and Model risk. Refer to pages 157, 158, 159 and 160, respectively for more information on Compliance, Conduct, Legal, and Estimations and Model risk. Details on other select examples of operational risks such as business and technology resiliency, payment fraud and third-party outsourcing, as well as cybersecurity, are provided below. Firmwide resiliency risk Disruptions of the Firm’s business and operations can occur due to forces beyond the Firm’s control such as the spread of infectious diseases or pandemics, severe weather, natural disasters, the effects of climate change, power or telecommunications loss, failure of a third party to provide expected services, cyberattacks, civil or political unrest or terrorism. The Firm’s resiliency framework is intended to enable the Firm to prepare for and adapt to changing conditions and withstand and recover from, and address adverse effects on its operations caused by, disruptions that may impact critical business functions and supporting assets, including its staff, technology, data and facilities, as well as those of third-party service providers. The framework includes governance, awareness training, planning and testing of recovery strategies, as well as strategic and tactical initiatives to identify, assess, and manage resiliency risks. The framework operates in accordance with the Firm’s overall approach to Operational Risk Management, including alignment with technology, cybersecurity, data, physical security, crisis management, real estate and outsourcing programs.Payment fraud riskPayment fraud risk is the risk of external and internal parties unlawfully obtaining personal monetary benefit through misdirected or otherwise improper payment. The Firm employs various controls for managing payment fraud risk as well as providing employee and client education and awareness trainings.Third-party outsourcing riskThe Firm‘s Third-Party Oversight (“TPO”) and Inter-affiliates Oversight (“IAO”) frameworks assist the LOBs and Corporate in selecting, documenting, onboarding, monitoring and managing their supplier relationships including services provided by affiliates. The objectives of the TPO framework are to hold suppliers and other third parties to an appropriate standard of operational performance and to mitigate key risks, including data loss and business disruptions. The Corporate Third-Party Oversight group is responsible for Firmwide training, monitoring, reporting and standards with respect to third-party outsourcing risks. laws, rules and regulations. Through monitoring and testing, Operational Risk and Compliance independently identify areas of heightened operational risk and tests the effectiveness of controls within the LOBs and Corporate. Management of Operational RiskThe operational risk areas or issues identified through monitoring and testing are escalated to the LOBs and Corporate to be remediated through action plans, as needed, to mitigate operational risk. Operational Risk and Compliance may advise the LOBs and Corporate in the development and implementation of action plans.Operational Risk ReportingAll employees of the Firm are expected to escalate risks appropriately. Risks identified by Operational Risk and Compliance are escalated to the appropriate LOB and Corporate Control Committees, as needed. Operational Risk and Compliance has established standards designed to ensure that consistent operational risk reporting and operational risk reports are produced on a Firmwide basis as well as by the LOBs and Corporate. Reporting includes the evaluation of key risk and performance indicators against established thresholds as well as the assessment of different types of operational risk against stated risk appetite. The standards establish escalation protocols to senior management and to the Board of Directors.InsuranceOne of the ways in which operational risk may be mitigated is through insurance maintained by the Firm. The Firm purchases insurance from commercial insurers and maintains a wholly-owned captive insurer, Park Assurance Company. Insurance may also be required by third parties with whom the Firm does business.Subcategories and examples of operational risksOperational risk can manifest itself in various ways. Operational risk subcategories include Compliance risk, Conduct risk, Legal risk, and Estimations and Model risk. Refer to pages 157, 158, 159 and 160, respectively for more information on Compliance, Conduct, Legal, and Estimations and Model risk. Details on other select examples of operational risks such as business and technology resiliency, payment fraud and third-party outsourcing, as well as cybersecurity, are provided below. laws, rules and regulations. Through monitoring and testing, Operational Risk and Compliance independently identify areas of heightened operational risk and tests the effectiveness of controls within the LOBs and Corporate. Management of Operational Risk The operational risk areas or issues identified through monitoring and testing are escalated to the LOBs and Corporate to be remediated through action plans, as needed, to mitigate operational risk. Operational Risk and Compliance may advise the LOBs and Corporate in the development and implementation of action plans. Operational Risk Reporting All employees of the Firm are expected to escalate risks appropriately. Risks identified by Operational Risk and Compliance are escalated to the appropriate LOB and Corporate Control Committees, as needed. Operational Risk and Compliance has established standards designed to ensure that consistent operational risk reporting and operational risk reports are produced on a Firmwide basis as well as by the LOBs and Corporate. Reporting includes the evaluation of key risk and performance indicators against established thresholds as well as the assessment of different types of operational risk against stated risk appetite. The standards establish escalation protocols to senior management and to the Board of Directors. Insurance One of the ways in which operational risk may be mitigated is through insurance maintained by the Firm. The Firm purchases insurance from commercial insurers and maintains a wholly-owned captive insurer, Park Assurance Company. Insurance may also be required by third parties with whom the Firm does business.

Operational risk can manifest itself in various ways. Operational risk subcategories include Compliance risk, Conduct risk, Legal risk, and Estimations and Model risk. Refer to pages 157, 158, 159 and 160, respectively for more information on Compliance, Conduct, Legal, and Estimations and Model risk. Details on other select examples of operational risks such as business and technology resiliency, payment fraud and third-party outsourcing, as well as cybersecurity, are provided below. Firmwide resiliency risk Disruptions of the Firm’s business and operations can occur due to forces beyond the Firm’s control such as the spread of infectious diseases or pandemics, severe weather, natural disasters, the effects of climate change, power or telecommunications loss, failure of a third party to provide expected services, cyberattacks, civil or political unrest or terrorism. The Firm’s resiliency framework is intended to enable the Firm to prepare for and adapt to changing conditions and withstand and recover from, and address adverse effects on its operations caused by, disruptions that may impact critical business functions and supporting assets, including its staff, technology, data and facilities, as well as those of third-party service providers. The framework includes governance, awareness training, planning and testing of recovery strategies, as well as strategic and tactical initiatives to identify, assess, and manage resiliency risks. The framework operates in accordance with the Firm’s overall approach to Operational Risk Management, including alignment with technology, cybersecurity, data, physical security, crisis management, real estate and outsourcing programs.Payment fraud riskPayment fraud risk is the risk of external and internal parties unlawfully obtaining personal monetary benefit through misdirected or otherwise improper payment. The Firm employs various controls for managing payment fraud risk as well as providing employee and client education and awareness trainings.Third-party outsourcing riskThe Firm‘s Third-Party Oversight (“TPO”) and Inter-affiliates Oversight (“IAO”) frameworks assist the LOBs and Corporate in selecting, documenting, onboarding, monitoring and managing their supplier relationships including services provided by affiliates. The objectives of the TPO framework are to hold suppliers and other third parties to an appropriate standard of operational performance and to mitigate key risks, including data loss and business disruptions. The Corporate Third-Party Oversight group is responsible for Firmwide training, monitoring, reporting and standards with respect to third-party outsourcing risks. Firmwide resiliency risk Disruptions of the Firm’s business and operations can occur due to forces beyond the Firm’s control such as the spread of infectious diseases or pandemics, severe weather, natural disasters, the effects of climate change, power or telecommunications loss, failure of a third party to provide expected services, cyberattacks, civil or political unrest or terrorism. The Firm’s resiliency framework is intended to enable the Firm to prepare for and adapt to changing conditions and withstand and recover from, and address adverse effects on its operations caused by, disruptions that may impact critical business functions and supporting assets, including its staff, technology, data and facilities, as well as those of third-party service providers. The framework includes governance, awareness training, planning and testing of recovery strategies, as well as strategic and tactical initiatives to identify, assess, and manage resiliency risks. The framework operates in accordance with the Firm’s overall approach to Operational Risk Management, including alignment with technology, cybersecurity, data, physical security, crisis management, real estate and outsourcing programs. Payment fraud risk Payment fraud risk is the risk of external and internal parties unlawfully obtaining personal monetary benefit through misdirected or otherwise improper payment. The Firm employs various controls for managing payment fraud risk as well as providing employee and client education and awareness trainings. Third-party outsourcing risk The Firm‘s Third-Party Oversight (“TPO”) and Inter-affiliates Oversight (“IAO”) frameworks assist the LOBs and Corporate in selecting, documenting, onboarding, monitoring and managing their supplier relationships including services provided by affiliates. The objectives of the TPO framework are to hold suppliers and other third parties to an appropriate standard of operational performance and to mitigate key risks, including data loss and business disruptions. The Corporate Third-Party Oversight group is responsible for Firmwide training, monitoring, reporting and standards with respect to third-party outsourcing risks. 154JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 154JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 154JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 154 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Cybersecurity riskCybersecurity risk is the risk of harm or loss resulting from misuse or abuse of technology or the unauthorized disclosure of data. OverviewCybersecurity risk is an important and continuously evolving focus for the Firm. Significant resources are devoted to protecting and enhancing the security of computer systems, software, networks, storage devices, and other technology. The Firm’s security efforts are designed to protect against, among other things, cybersecurity attacks that can result in unauthorized access to confidential information, the destruction of data, disruptions to or degradations of service, the sabotaging of systems or other damage. The Firm has experienced, and expects that it will continue to experience, a higher volume and complexity of cyber attacks against the backdrop of heightened geopolitical tensions. The Firm has implemented measures and controls reasonably designed to address this evolving environment, including enhanced threat monitoring. In addition, the Firm continues to review and enhance its capabilities to address associated risks, such as those relating to the management of administrative access to systems.Third parties with which the Firm does business, that facilitate the Firm’s business activities (e.g., vendors, supply chain, exchanges, clearing houses, central depositories, and financial intermediaries) or that the Firm has acquired are also sources of cybersecurity risk to the Firm. Third party incidents such as system breakdowns or failures, misconduct by the employees of such parties, or cyber attacks, including ransomware and supply-chain compromises, could have a material adverse effect on the Firm, including in circumstances in which an affected third party is unable to deliver a product or service to the Firm or where the incident delivers compromised software to the Firm or results in lost or compromised information of the Firm or its clients or customers.Clients and customers are also sources of cybersecurity risk to the Firm and its information assets, particularly when their activities and systems are beyond the Firm’s own security and control systems. The Firm engages in periodic discussions with its clients, customers and other external parties concerning cybersecurity risks including opportunities to improve cybersecurity.Risks from cybersecurity threats, including any previous cybersecurity events, have not materially affected the Firm or its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Notwithstanding the comprehensive approach that the Firm takes to address cybersecurity risk, the Firm may not be successful in preventing or mitigating a future cybersecurity incident that could have a material adverse effect on the Firm or its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition.Organization and management The Global Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) reports to the Global Chief Information Officer, and is a member of key cybersecurity governance forums. The CISO leads the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization, which is responsible for identifying technology and cybersecurity risks and for implementing and maintaining controls to manage cybersecurity threats. The CISO and the members of senior management within Global Technology and the Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organizations all have relevant expertise and experience in cybersecurity and information technology risk management, including relevant experience at the Firm, at other financial services companies or in other highly-regulated industries.The CISO is responsible for the Firm’s Information Security Program, which is designed to prevent, detect and respond to cyber attacks in order to help safeguard the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the Firm's infrastructure, resources and information. The program includes managing the Firm’s global cybersecurity operations centers, providing training, conducting cybersecurity event simulation exercises, implementing the Firm’s policies and standards relating to technology risk and cybersecurity management, and enhancing, as needed, the Firm’s cybersecurity capabilities. The Firm’s Information Security Program includes the following functions:Cyber Operations, which is responsible for implementing and maintaining controls designed to detect and defend the Firm against cyber attacks, and includes a dedicated function for incident response and ongoing monitoring for cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities, including those among the Firm’s third-party suppliers.Technology Governance, Risk & Controls, which is responsible for operationalizing technology risk and control frameworks, analyzing regulatory developments that may impact the Firm, and developing control catalogs and assessments of controls, as well as overseeing governance and reporting of technology and cybersecurity risk.Security Awareness, which provides awareness and training that reinforces information risk and security management practices and compliance with the Firm's policies, standards and practices. The training is mandatory for all employees globally on a periodic basis, and it is supplemented by Firmwide testing initiatives, including periodic phishing tests. The Firm also provides specialized security training to Cybersecurity riskCybersecurity risk is the risk of harm or loss resulting from misuse or abuse of technology or the unauthorized disclosure of data. OverviewCybersecurity risk is an important and continuously evolving focus for the Firm. Significant resources are devoted to protecting and enhancing the security of computer systems, software, networks, storage devices, and other technology. The Firm’s security efforts are designed to protect against, among other things, cybersecurity attacks that can result in unauthorized access to confidential information, the destruction of data, disruptions to or degradations of service, the sabotaging of systems or other damage. The Firm has experienced, and expects that it will continue to experience, a higher volume and complexity of cyber attacks against the backdrop of heightened geopolitical tensions. The Firm has implemented measures and controls reasonably designed to address this evolving environment, including enhanced threat monitoring. In addition, the Firm continues to review and enhance its capabilities to address associated risks, such as those relating to the management of administrative access to systems.Third parties with which the Firm does business, that facilitate the Firm’s business activities (e.g., vendors, supply chain, exchanges, clearing houses, central depositories, and financial intermediaries) or that the Firm has acquired are also sources of cybersecurity risk to the Firm. Third party incidents such as system breakdowns or failures, misconduct by the employees of such parties, or cyber attacks, including ransomware and supply-chain compromises, could have a material adverse effect on the Firm, including in circumstances in which an affected third party is unable to deliver a product or service to the Firm or where the incident delivers compromised software to the Firm or results in lost or compromised information of the Firm or its clients or customers.Clients and customers are also sources of cybersecurity risk to the Firm and its information assets, particularly when their activities and systems are beyond the Firm’s own security and control systems. The Firm engages in periodic discussions with its clients, customers and other external parties concerning cybersecurity risks including opportunities to improve cybersecurity.Risks from cybersecurity threats, including any previous cybersecurity events, have not materially affected the Firm or its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Notwithstanding the comprehensive approach that the Firm takes to address cybersecurity risk, the Firm may not be successful in preventing or mitigating a future Cybersecurity risk Cybersecurity risk is the risk of harm or loss resulting from misuse or abuse of technology or the unauthorized disclosure of data. Overview Cybersecurity risk is an important and continuously evolving focus for the Firm. Significant resources are devoted to protecting and enhancing the security of computer systems, software, networks, storage devices, and other technology. The Firm’s security efforts are designed to protect against, among other things, cybersecurity attacks that can result in unauthorized access to confidential information, the destruction of data, disruptions to or degradations of service, the sabotaging of systems or other damage. The Firm has experienced, and expects that it will continue to experience, a higher volume and complexity of cyber attacks against the backdrop of heightened geopolitical tensions. The Firm has implemented measures and controls reasonably designed to address this evolving environment, including enhanced threat monitoring. In addition, the Firm continues to review and enhance its capabilities to address associated risks, such as those relating to the management of administrative access to systems. Third parties with which the Firm does business, that facilitate the Firm’s business activities (e.g., vendors, supply chain, exchanges, clearing houses, central depositories, and financial intermediaries) or that the Firm has acquired are also sources of cybersecurity risk to the Firm. Third party incidents such as system breakdowns or failures, misconduct by the employees of such parties, or cyber attacks, including ransomware and supply-chain compromises, could have a material adverse effect on the Firm, including in circumstances in which an affected third party is unable to deliver a product or service to the Firm or where the incident delivers compromised software to the Firm or results in lost or compromised information of the Firm or its clients or customers. Clients and customers are also sources of cybersecurity risk to the Firm and its information assets, particularly when their activities and systems are beyond the Firm’s own security and control systems. The Firm engages in periodic discussions with its clients, customers and other external parties concerning cybersecurity risks including opportunities to improve cybersecurity. Risks from cybersecurity threats, including any previous cybersecurity events, have not materially affected the Firm or its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Notwithstanding the comprehensive approach that the Firm takes to address cybersecurity risk, the Firm may not be successful in preventing or mitigating a future cybersecurity incident that could have a material adverse effect on the Firm or its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition.Organization and management The Global Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) reports to the Global Chief Information Officer, and is a member of key cybersecurity governance forums. The CISO leads the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization, which is responsible for identifying technology and cybersecurity risks and for implementing and maintaining controls to manage cybersecurity threats. The CISO and the members of senior management within Global Technology and the Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organizations all have relevant expertise and experience in cybersecurity and information technology risk management, including relevant experience at the Firm, at other financial services companies or in other highly-regulated industries.The CISO is responsible for the Firm’s Information Security Program, which is designed to prevent, detect and respond to cyber attacks in order to help safeguard the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the Firm's infrastructure, resources and information. The program includes managing the Firm’s global cybersecurity operations centers, providing training, conducting cybersecurity event simulation exercises, implementing the Firm’s policies and standards relating to technology risk and cybersecurity management, and enhancing, as needed, the Firm’s cybersecurity capabilities. The Firm’s Information Security Program includes the following functions:Cyber Operations, which is responsible for implementing and maintaining controls designed to detect and defend the Firm against cyber attacks, and includes a dedicated function for incident response and ongoing monitoring for cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities, including those among the Firm’s third-party suppliers.Technology Governance, Risk & Controls, which is responsible for operationalizing technology risk and control frameworks, analyzing regulatory developments that may impact the Firm, and developing control catalogs and assessments of controls, as well as overseeing governance and reporting of technology and cybersecurity risk.Security Awareness, which provides awareness and training that reinforces information risk and security management practices and compliance with the Firm's policies, standards and practices. The training is mandatory for all employees globally on a periodic basis, and it is supplemented by Firmwide testing initiatives, including periodic phishing tests. The Firm also provides specialized security training to cybersecurity incident that could have a material adverse effect on the Firm or its business strategy, results of operations or financial condition.

The Global Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) reports to the Global Chief Information Officer, and is a member of key cybersecurity governance forums. The CISO leads the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization, which is responsible for identifying technology and cybersecurity risks and for implementing and maintaining controls to manage cybersecurity threats. The CISO and the members of senior management within Global Technology and the Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organizations all have relevant expertise and experience in cybersecurity and information technology risk management, including relevant experience at the Firm, at other financial services companies or in other highly-regulated industries. The CISO is responsible for the Firm’s Information Security Program, which is designed to prevent, detect and respond to cyber attacks in order to help safeguard the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the Firm's infrastructure, resources and information. The program includes managing the Firm’s global cybersecurity operations centers, providing training, conducting cybersecurity event simulation exercises, implementing the Firm’s policies and standards relating to technology risk and cybersecurity management, and enhancing, as needed, the Firm’s cybersecurity capabilities. The Firm’s Information Security Program includes the following functions: Cyber Operations, which is responsible for implementing and maintaining controls designed to detect and defend the Firm against cyber attacks, and includes a dedicated function for incident response and ongoing monitoring for cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities, including those among the Firm’s third-party suppliers. Cyber Operations , which is responsible for implementing and maintaining controls designed to detect and defend the Firm against cyber attacks, and includes a dedicated function for incident response and ongoing monitoring for cybersecurity threats and vulnerabilities, including those among the Firm’s third-party suppliers. Technology Governance, Risk & Controls, which is responsible for operationalizing technology risk and control frameworks, analyzing regulatory developments that may impact the Firm, and developing control catalogs and assessments of controls, as well as overseeing governance and reporting of technology and cybersecurity risk. Security Awareness, which provides awareness and training that reinforces information risk and security management practices and compliance with the Firm's policies, standards and practices. The training is mandatory for all employees globally on a periodic basis, and it is supplemented by Firmwide testing initiatives, including periodic phishing tests. The Firm also provides specialized security training to JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K155 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K155 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K155 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 155

employees in specific roles, such as application developers. The Firm’s Global Privacy Program requires all employees to take periodic training on data privacy that focuses on confidentiality and security, as well as responding to unauthorized access to or use of information.Technology Resiliency, which establishes control requirements for planning and testing the prioritized recovery of technology services in the event of degradation or outage, including incident response planning, data backup and retention, and recovery readiness in support of the Firmwide Business Resiliency Program and operational risk management practices.The Firm has a cybersecurity incident response plan designed to enable the Firm to respond to attempted cybersecurity incidents, coordinate as appropriate with law enforcement and other government agencies, notify clients and customers, as applicable, and recover from such incidents. In addition, the Firm actively partners with appropriate government and law enforcement agencies and peer industry forums, participating in discussions and simulations to assist in understanding the full spectrum of cybersecurity risks and in enhancing defenses and improving resiliency in the Firm’s operating environment.Governance and oversightThe governance structure for the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization is designed to appropriately identify, escalate and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Cybersecurity risk management and its governance and oversight are integrated into the Firm’s operational risk management framework, including through the escalation of key risk and control issues to management and the development of risk mitigation plans for heightened risk and control issues. IRM independently assesses and challenges the activities and risk management practices of the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization related to the identification, assessment, measurement and mitigation of cybersecurity risk. As needed, the Firm engages third-party assessors or auditing firms with industry-recognized expertise on cybersecurity matters to review specific aspects of the Firm’s cybersecurity risk management framework, processes and controls.The governance and oversight for cybersecurity risk management includes governance forums that inform management of key areas of concern regarding the prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity risks. The Cybersecurity and Technology Controls Operating Committee (“CTOC”) is the principal management committee that oversees the Firm’s assessment and management of cybersecurity risk, including oversight of the implementation and maintenance of appropriate controls in support of the Firm’s Information Security Program. The membership of the CTOC includes senior representatives from the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization and relevant corporate functions, including IRM and Internal Audit. The CTOC escalates key operational risk and control issues, as appropriate, to the Global Technology Operating Committee (“GTOC”) or its business control committee or to the appropriate LOB and Corporate Control Committees. The GTOC is responsible for the governance of the Firmwide Global Technology organization, including oversight of Firmwide technology strategies, the delivery of technology and technology operations, the effective use of information technology resources, and monitoring and resolving key operational risk and control matters arising in the Global Technology organization.As part of its oversight of management’s implementation and maintenance of the Firm’s risk management framework, the Firm’s Board of Directors receives periodic updates from the CIO, the CISO and senior members of the CTOC concerning cybersecurity matters. These updates generally include information regarding cybersecurity and technology developments, the Firm’s Information Security Program and recommended changes to that program, cybersecurity policies and practices, and ongoing initiatives to improve information security, as well as any significant cybersecurity incidents and the Firm's efforts to address those incidents. The Audit Committee and the Risk Committee assist the Board in this oversight. employees in specific roles, such as application developers. The Firm’s Global Privacy Program requires all employees to take periodic training on data privacy that focuses on confidentiality and security, as well as responding to unauthorized access to or use of information.Technology Resiliency, which establishes control requirements for planning and testing the prioritized recovery of technology services in the event of degradation or outage, including incident response planning, data backup and retention, and recovery readiness in support of the Firmwide Business Resiliency Program and operational risk management practices.The Firm has a cybersecurity incident response plan designed to enable the Firm to respond to attempted cybersecurity incidents, coordinate as appropriate with law enforcement and other government agencies, notify clients and customers, as applicable, and recover from such incidents. In addition, the Firm actively partners with appropriate government and law enforcement agencies and peer industry forums, participating in discussions and simulations to assist in understanding the full spectrum of cybersecurity risks and in enhancing defenses and improving resiliency in the Firm’s operating environment.Governance and oversightThe governance structure for the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization is designed to appropriately identify, escalate and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Cybersecurity risk management and its governance and oversight are integrated into the Firm’s operational risk management framework, including through the escalation of key risk and control issues to management and the development of risk mitigation plans for heightened risk and control issues. IRM independently assesses and challenges the activities and risk management practices of the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization related to the identification, assessment, measurement and mitigation of cybersecurity risk. As needed, the Firm engages third-party assessors or auditing firms with industry-recognized expertise on cybersecurity matters to review specific aspects of the Firm’s cybersecurity risk management framework, processes and controls.The governance and oversight for cybersecurity risk management includes governance forums that inform management of key areas of concern regarding the prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity risks. employees in specific roles, such as application developers. The Firm’s Global Privacy Program requires all employees to take periodic training on data privacy that focuses on confidentiality and security, as well as responding to unauthorized access to or use of information. Technology Resiliency, which establishes control requirements for planning and testing the prioritized recovery of technology services in the event of degradation or outage, including incident response planning, data backup and retention, and recovery readiness in support of the Firmwide Business Resiliency Program and operational risk management practices. The Firm has a cybersecurity incident response plan designed to enable the Firm to respond to attempted cybersecurity incidents, coordinate as appropriate with law enforcement and other government agencies, notify clients and customers, as applicable, and recover from such incidents. In addition, the Firm actively partners with appropriate government and law enforcement agencies and peer industry forums, participating in discussions and simulations to assist in understanding the full spectrum of cybersecurity risks and in enhancing defenses and improving resiliency in the Firm’s operating environment.

The governance structure for the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization is designed to appropriately identify, escalate and mitigate cybersecurity risks. Cybersecurity risk management and its governance and oversight are integrated into the Firm’s operational risk management framework, including through the escalation of key risk and control issues to management and the development of risk mitigation plans for heightened risk and control issues. IRM independently assesses and challenges the activities and risk management practices of the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization related to the identification, assessment, measurement and mitigation of cybersecurity risk. As needed, the Firm engages third-party assessors or auditing firms with industry-recognized expertise on cybersecurity matters to review specific aspects of the Firm’s cybersecurity risk management framework, processes and controls. The governance and oversight for cybersecurity risk management includes governance forums that inform management of key areas of concern regarding the prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity risks. The Cybersecurity and Technology Controls Operating Committee (“CTOC”) is the principal management committee that oversees the Firm’s assessment and management of cybersecurity risk, including oversight of the implementation and maintenance of appropriate controls in support of the Firm’s Information Security Program. The membership of the CTOC includes senior representatives from the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization and relevant corporate functions, including IRM and Internal Audit. The CTOC escalates key operational risk and control issues, as appropriate, to the Global Technology Operating Committee (“GTOC”) or its business control committee or to the appropriate LOB and Corporate Control Committees. The GTOC is responsible for the governance of the Firmwide Global Technology organization, including oversight of Firmwide technology strategies, the delivery of technology and technology operations, the effective use of information technology resources, and monitoring and resolving key operational risk and control matters arising in the Global Technology organization.As part of its oversight of management’s implementation and maintenance of the Firm’s risk management framework, the Firm’s Board of Directors receives periodic updates from the CIO, the CISO and senior members of the CTOC concerning cybersecurity matters. These updates generally include information regarding cybersecurity and technology developments, the Firm’s Information Security Program and recommended changes to that program, cybersecurity policies and practices, and ongoing initiatives to improve information security, as well as any significant cybersecurity incidents and the Firm's efforts to address those incidents. The Audit Committee and the Risk Committee assist the Board in this oversight. The Cybersecurity and Technology Controls Operating Committee (“CTOC”) is the principal management committee that oversees the Firm’s assessment and management of cybersecurity risk, including oversight of the implementation and maintenance of appropriate controls in support of the Firm’s Information Security Program. The membership of the CTOC includes senior representatives from the Global Cybersecurity and Technology Controls organization and relevant corporate functions, including IRM and Internal Audit. The CTOC escalates key operational risk and control issues, as appropriate, to the Global Technology Operating Committee (“GTOC”) or its business control committee or to the appropriate LOB and Corporate Control Committees. The GTOC is responsible for the governance of the Firmwide Global Technology organization, including oversight of Firmwide technology strategies, the delivery of technology and technology operations, the effective use of information technology resources, and monitoring and resolving key operational risk and control matters arising in the Global Technology organization. As part of its oversight of management’s implementation and maintenance of the Firm’s risk management framework, the Firm’s Board of Directors receives periodic updates from the CIO, the CISO and senior members of the CTOC concerning cybersecurity matters. These updates generally include information regarding cybersecurity and technology developments, the Firm’s Information Security Program and recommended changes to that program, cybersecurity policies and practices, and ongoing initiatives to improve information security, as well as any significant cybersecurity incidents and the Firm's efforts to address those incidents. The Audit Committee and the Risk Committee assist the Board in this oversight. 156JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 156JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 156JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 156 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE RISK MANAGEMENT Compliance risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk of failing to comply with laws, rules, regulations or codes of conduct and standards of self-regulatory organizations. OverviewEach of the LOBs and Corporate hold primary ownership of and accountability for managing their compliance risk. The Firm’s Operational Risk and Compliance Organization (“Operational Risk and Compliance”), which is independent of the LOBs and Corporate, provides independent review, monitoring and oversight of business operations with a focus on compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to the delivery of the Firm’s products and services to clients and customers.These compliance risks relate to a wide variety of laws, rules and regulations across the LOBs and Corporate, and jurisdictions, and include risks related to financial products and services, relationships and interactions with clients and customers, and employee activities. For example, compliance risks include those associated with anti-money laundering compliance, trading activities, market conduct, and complying with the laws, rules, and regulations related to the offering of products and services across jurisdictional borders. Compliance risk is also inherent in the Firm’s fiduciary activities, including the failure to exercise the applicable standard of care to act in the best interest of fiduciary clients and customers or to treat fiduciary clients and customers fairly.Other functions provide oversight of significant regulatory obligations that are specific to their respective areas of responsibility.Operational Risk and Compliance implements policies and standards designed to govern, identify, measure, monitor and test, manage, and report on compliance risk.Governance and oversightOperational Risk and Compliance is led by the Firm’s Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite.The Firm maintains oversight and coordination of its compliance risk through the CCOR Management Framework. The Firm’s Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite also provides regular updates to the Board Risk Committee and the Audit Committee on significant compliance risk issues, as appropriate. Code of ConductThe Firm has a Code of Conduct (the “Code”) that sets forth the Firm’s expectation that employees will conduct themselves with integrity, at all times. The Code provides the principles that help govern employee conduct with clients, customers, suppliers, vendors, shareholders, regulators, other employees, as well as with the markets and communities in which the Firm operates. The Code requires employees to promptly report any potential or actual violation of the Code, Firm policies, or laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Firm’s business. It also requires employees to report any illegal or unethical conduct, or conduct that violates the underlying principles of the Code, by any of the Firm’s employees, consultants, clients, customers, suppliers, contract or temporary workers, or business partners or agents. Training is assigned to newly hired employees after joining the Firm, and to current employees periodically thereafter. Employees are required to affirm their compliance with the Code annually. Employees can report any potential or actual violations of the Code through the Firm’s Conduct Hotline (the “Hotline”) by phone, mobile device or the internet. The Hotline is anonymous, where permitted by law, is available at all times globally, has translation services, and is administered by an outside service provider. The Code prohibits retaliation against anyone who raises an issue or concern in good faith or assists with an inquiry or investigation. Periodically, the Audit Committee receives reports on the Code of Conduct program. Compliance risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk of failing to comply with laws, rules, regulations or codes of conduct and standards of self-regulatory organizations. OverviewEach of the LOBs and Corporate hold primary ownership of and accountability for managing their compliance risk. The Firm’s Operational Risk and Compliance Organization (“Operational Risk and Compliance”), which is independent of the LOBs and Corporate, provides independent review, monitoring and oversight of business operations with a focus on compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to the delivery of the Firm’s products and services to clients and customers.These compliance risks relate to a wide variety of laws, rules and regulations across the LOBs and Corporate, and jurisdictions, and include risks related to financial products and services, relationships and interactions with clients and customers, and employee activities. For example, compliance risks include those associated with anti-money laundering compliance, trading activities, market conduct, and complying with the laws, rules, and regulations related to the offering of products and services across jurisdictional borders. Compliance risk is also inherent in the Firm’s fiduciary activities, including the failure to exercise the applicable standard of care to act in the best interest of fiduciary clients and customers or to treat fiduciary clients and customers fairly.Other functions provide oversight of significant regulatory obligations that are specific to their respective areas of responsibility.Operational Risk and Compliance implements policies and standards designed to govern, identify, measure, monitor and test, manage, and report on compliance risk. Compliance risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk of failing to comply with laws, rules, regulations or codes of conduct and standards of self-regulatory organizations. Overview Each of the LOBs and Corporate hold primary ownership of and accountability for managing their compliance risk. The Firm’s Operational Risk and Compliance Organization (“Operational Risk and Compliance”), which is independent of the LOBs and Corporate, provides independent review, monitoring and oversight of business operations with a focus on compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations applicable to the delivery of the Firm’s products and services to clients and customers. These compliance risks relate to a wide variety of laws, rules and regulations across the LOBs and Corporate, and jurisdictions, and include risks related to financial products and services, relationships and interactions with clients and customers, and employee activities. For example, compliance risks include those associated with anti-money laundering compliance, trading activities, market conduct, and complying with the laws, rules, and regulations related to the offering of products and services across jurisdictional borders. Compliance risk is also inherent in the Firm’s fiduciary activities, including the failure to exercise the applicable standard of care to act in the best interest of fiduciary clients and customers or to treat fiduciary clients and customers fairly. Other functions provide oversight of significant regulatory obligations that are specific to their respective areas of responsibility. Operational Risk and Compliance implements policies and standards designed to govern, identify, measure, monitor and test, manage, and report on compliance risk. Governance and oversightOperational Risk and Compliance is led by the Firm’s Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite.The Firm maintains oversight and coordination of its compliance risk through the CCOR Management Framework. The Firm’s Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite also provides regular updates to the Board Risk Committee and the Audit Committee on significant compliance risk issues, as appropriate. Code of ConductThe Firm has a Code of Conduct (the “Code”) that sets forth the Firm’s expectation that employees will conduct themselves with integrity, at all times. The Code provides the principles that help govern employee conduct with clients, customers, suppliers, vendors, shareholders, regulators, other employees, as well as with the markets and communities in which the Firm operates. The Code requires employees to promptly report any potential or actual violation of the Code, Firm policies, or laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Firm’s business. It also requires employees to report any illegal or unethical conduct, or conduct that violates the underlying principles of the Code, by any of the Firm’s employees, consultants, clients, customers, suppliers, contract or temporary workers, or business partners or agents. Training is assigned to newly hired employees after joining the Firm, and to current employees periodically thereafter. Employees are required to affirm their compliance with the Code annually. Employees can report any potential or actual violations of the Code through the Firm’s Conduct Hotline (the “Hotline”) by phone, mobile device or the internet. The Hotline is anonymous, where permitted by law, is available at all times globally, has translation services, and is administered by an outside service provider. The Code prohibits retaliation against anyone who raises an issue or concern in good faith or assists with an inquiry or investigation. Periodically, the Audit Committee receives reports on the Code of Conduct program.

Operational Risk and Compliance is led by the Firm’s Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite. The Firm maintains oversight and coordination of its compliance risk through the CCOR Management Framework. The Firm’s Global CCO and FRE for Operational Risk and Qualitative Risk Appetite also provides regular updates to the Board Risk Committee and the Audit Committee on significant compliance risk issues, as appropriate. Code of Conduct The Firm has a Code of Conduct (the “Code”) that sets forth the Firm’s expectation that employees will conduct themselves with integrity, at all times. The Code provides the principles that help govern employee conduct with clients, customers, suppliers, vendors, shareholders, regulators, other employees, as well as with the markets and communities in which the Firm operates. The Code requires employees to promptly report any potential or actual violation of the Code, Firm policies, or laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Firm’s business. It also requires employees to report any illegal or unethical conduct, or conduct that violates the underlying principles of the Code, by any of the Firm’s employees, consultants, clients, customers, suppliers, contract or temporary workers, or business partners or agents. Training is assigned to newly hired employees after joining the Firm, and to current employees periodically thereafter. Employees are required to affirm their compliance with the Code annually. Employees can report any potential or actual violations of the Code through the Firm’s Conduct Hotline (the “Hotline”) by phone, mobile device or the internet. The Hotline is anonymous, where permitted by law, is available at all times globally, has translation services, and is administered by an outside service provider. The Code prohibits retaliation against anyone who raises an issue or concern in good faith or assists with an inquiry or investigation. Periodically, the Audit Committee receives reports on the Code of Conduct program. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K157 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K157 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K157 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 157

CONDUCT RISK MANAGEMENT CONDUCT RISK MANAGEMENT Conduct risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk that any action or misconduct by an employee could lead to unfair client or customer outcomes, impact the integrity of the markets in which the Firm operates, harm employees or the Firm, or compromise the Firm’s reputation.OverviewEach LOB and Corporate is accountable for identifying and managing its conduct risk to provide appropriate engagement, ownership and sustainability of a culture consistent with the Firm’s Business Principles. The Business Principles serve as a guide for how employees are expected to conduct themselves. With the Business Principles serving as a guide, the Firm’s Code sets out the Firm’s expectations for each employee and provides information and resources to help employees conduct business ethically and in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations everywhere the Firm operates. Refer to Compliance Risk Management on page 157 for further discussion of the Code.Governance and oversightThe Firm’s oversight and coordination of conduct risk is managed in the same manner as Compliance risk. Refer to Compliance Risk Management on page 157 for further information.Conduct risk management encompasses various aspects of people management practices throughout the employee life cycle, including recruiting, onboarding, training and development, performance management, promotion and compensation processes. Each LOB, Treasury and CIO, and each designated corporate function completes an assessment of conduct risk periodically, reviews metrics and issues which may involve conduct risk, and provides conduct education as appropriate. Conduct risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk that any action or misconduct by an employee could lead to unfair client or customer outcomes, impact the integrity of the markets in which the Firm operates, harm employees or the Firm, or compromise the Firm’s reputation.OverviewEach LOB and Corporate is accountable for identifying and managing its conduct risk to provide appropriate engagement, ownership and sustainability of a culture consistent with the Firm’s Business Principles. The Business Principles serve as a guide for how employees are expected to conduct themselves. With the Business Principles serving as a guide, the Firm’s Code sets out the Firm’s expectations for each employee and provides information and resources to help employees conduct business ethically and in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations everywhere the Firm operates. Refer to Compliance Risk Management on page 157 for further discussion of the Code. Conduct risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk that any action or misconduct by an employee could lead to unfair client or customer outcomes, impact the integrity of the markets in which the Firm operates, harm employees or the Firm, or compromise the Firm’s reputation. Overview Each LOB and Corporate is accountable for identifying and managing its conduct risk to provide appropriate engagement, ownership and sustainability of a culture consistent with the Firm’s Business Principles. The Business Principles serve as a guide for how employees are expected to conduct themselves. With the Business Principles serving as a guide, the Firm’s Code sets out the Firm’s expectations for each employee and provides information and resources to help employees conduct business ethically and in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations everywhere the Firm operates. Refer to Compliance Risk Management on page 157 for further discussion of the Code. Governance and oversightThe Firm’s oversight and coordination of conduct risk is managed in the same manner as Compliance risk. Refer to Compliance Risk Management on page 157 for further information.Conduct risk management encompasses various aspects of people management practices throughout the employee life cycle, including recruiting, onboarding, training and development, performance management, promotion and compensation processes. Each LOB, Treasury and CIO, and each designated corporate function completes an assessment of conduct risk periodically, reviews metrics and issues which may involve conduct risk, and provides conduct education as appropriate.

The Firm’s oversight and coordination of conduct risk is managed in the same manner as Compliance risk. Refer to Compliance Risk Management on page 157 for further information. Conduct risk management encompasses various aspects of people management practices throughout the employee life cycle, including recruiting, onboarding, training and development, performance management, promotion and compensation processes. Each LOB, Treasury and CIO, and each designated corporate function completes an assessment of conduct risk periodically, reviews metrics and issues which may involve conduct risk, and provides conduct education as appropriate. 158JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 158JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 158JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 158 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K LEGAL RISK MANAGEMENT LEGAL RISK MANAGEMENT Legal risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk of loss primarily caused by the actual or alleged failure to meet legal obligations that arise from the rule of law in jurisdictions in which the Firm operates, agreements with clients and customers, and products and services offered by the Firm. OverviewThe global Legal function (“Legal”) provides legal services and advice to the Firm. Legal is responsible for managing the Firm’s exposure to legal risk by:•managing actual and potential litigation and enforcement matters, including internal reviews and investigations related to such matters•advising on products and services, including contract negotiation and documentation•advising on offering and marketing documents and new business initiatives•managing dispute resolution•interpreting existing laws, rules and regulations, and advising on changes to them•advising on advocacy in connection with contemplated and proposed laws, rules and regulations, and •providing legal advice to the LOBs, Corporate and the Board. Legal selects, engages and manages outside counsel for the Firm on all matters in which outside counsel is engaged. In addition, Legal advises the Firm’s Conflicts Office which reviews the Firm’s wholesale transactions that may have the potential to create conflicts of interest for the Firm. Governance and oversightThe Firm’s General Counsel reports to the CEO and is a member of the Operating Committee, the Firmwide Risk Committee and the Firmwide Control Committee. The Firm’s General Counsel and other members of Legal report on significant legal matters to the Firm’s Board of Directors and to the Audit Committee. Legal serves on and advises various committees and advises the Firm’s LOBs and Corporate on potential reputation risk issues. Legal risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk of loss primarily caused by the actual or alleged failure to meet legal obligations that arise from the rule of law in jurisdictions in which the Firm operates, agreements with clients and customers, and products and services offered by the Firm. OverviewThe global Legal function (“Legal”) provides legal services and advice to the Firm. Legal is responsible for managing the Firm’s exposure to legal risk by:•managing actual and potential litigation and enforcement matters, including internal reviews and investigations related to such matters•advising on products and services, including contract negotiation and documentation•advising on offering and marketing documents and new business initiatives•managing dispute resolution•interpreting existing laws, rules and regulations, and advising on changes to them•advising on advocacy in connection with contemplated and proposed laws, rules and regulations, and •providing legal advice to the LOBs, Corporate and the Board. Legal risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the risk of loss primarily caused by the actual or alleged failure to meet legal obligations that arise from the rule of law in jurisdictions in which the Firm operates, agreements with clients and customers, and products and services offered by the Firm. Overview The global Legal function (“Legal”) provides legal services and advice to the Firm. Legal is responsible for managing the Firm’s exposure to legal risk by: •managing actual and potential litigation and enforcement matters, including internal reviews and investigations related to such matters •advising on products and services, including contract negotiation and documentation •advising on offering and marketing documents and new business initiatives •managing dispute resolution •interpreting existing laws, rules and regulations, and advising on changes to them •advising on advocacy in connection with contemplated and proposed laws, rules and regulations, and •providing legal advice to the LOBs, Corporate and the Board. Legal selects, engages and manages outside counsel for the Firm on all matters in which outside counsel is engaged. In addition, Legal advises the Firm’s Conflicts Office which reviews the Firm’s wholesale transactions that may have the potential to create conflicts of interest for the Firm. Governance and oversightThe Firm’s General Counsel reports to the CEO and is a member of the Operating Committee, the Firmwide Risk Committee and the Firmwide Control Committee. The Firm’s General Counsel and other members of Legal report on significant legal matters to the Firm’s Board of Directors and to the Audit Committee. Legal serves on and advises various committees and advises the Firm’s LOBs and Corporate on potential reputation risk issues. Legal selects, engages and manages outside counsel for the Firm on all matters in which outside counsel is engaged. In addition, Legal advises the Firm’s Conflicts Office which reviews the Firm’s wholesale transactions that may have the potential to create conflicts of interest for the Firm.

The Firm’s General Counsel reports to the CEO and is a member of the Operating Committee, the Firmwide Risk Committee and the Firmwide Control Committee. The Firm’s General Counsel and other members of Legal report on significant legal matters to the Firm’s Board of Directors and to the Audit Committee. Legal serves on and advises various committees and advises the Firm’s LOBs and Corporate on potential reputation risk issues. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K159 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K159 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K159 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 159

ESTIMATIONS AND MODEL RISK MANAGEMENT ESTIMATIONS AND MODEL RISK MANAGEMENT Estimations and Model risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused estimation outputs. The Firm uses models and other analytical and judgment-based estimations, including those based upon machine learning or artificial intelligence techniques, across various businesses and functions. The estimation methods are of varying levels of sophistication and are used for many purposes, such as the valuation of positions and measurement of risk, assessing regulatory capital requirements, conducting stress testing, evaluating the allowance for credit losses and making business decisions. A dedicated independent function, Model Risk Governance and Review (“MRGR”), defines and governs the Firm’s policies relating to the management of model risk and risks associated with certain analytical and judgment-based estimations, such as those used in risk management, budget forecasting and capital planning and analysis. Model risks are owned by the users of the models within the LOBs and Corporate based on the specific purposes of such models. Users and developers of models are responsible for developing, implementing and testing their models, as well as referring models to MRGR for review and approval. Once models have been approved, model users and developers are responsible for maintaining a robust operating environment, and must monitor and evaluate the performance of the models on an ongoing basis. Model users and developers may seek to enhance models in response to changes in the relevant portfolios and in product and market developments, as well as to capture improvements in available modeling techniques and systems capabilities. Models are tiered based on an internal standard according to their complexity, the exposure associated with the model and the Firm’s reliance on the model. This tiering is subject to the approval of MRGR. In its review of a model, MRGR considers whether the model is suitable for the specific purposes for which it will be used. When reviewing a model, MRGR analyzes and challenges the model methodology and the reasonableness of model assumptions, and may perform or require additional testing, including back-testing of model outcomes. Model reviews are approved by the appropriate level of management within MRGR based on the relevant model tier.Under the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy, MRGR reviews and approves new models, as well as material changes to existing models, prior to their use. In certain circumstances, exceptions may be granted to the Firm’s policy to allow a model to be used prior to review or approval. MRGR may also require the user to take appropriate actions to mitigate the model risk if it is to be used in the interim. These actions will depend on the model and may include, for example, limitation of trading activity.While models are inherently imprecise, the degree of imprecision or uncertainty can be heightened by the market or economic environment. This is particularly true when the current and forecasted environments are significantly different from the historical environments upon which the models were developed. This increased uncertainty may necessitate a greater degree of judgment and analytics to inform any adjustments that the Firm may make to model outputs than would otherwise be the case. In addition, the Firm may experience increased uncertainty in its estimates if assets acquired differ from those used to develop the models. Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 and Note 2 for a summary of model-based valuations and other valuation techniques. Estimations and Model risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused estimation outputs. The Firm uses models and other analytical and judgment-based estimations, including those based upon machine learning or artificial intelligence techniques, across various businesses and functions. The estimation methods are of varying levels of sophistication and are used for many purposes, such as the valuation of positions and measurement of risk, assessing regulatory capital requirements, conducting stress testing, evaluating the allowance for credit losses and making business decisions. A dedicated independent function, Model Risk Governance and Review (“MRGR”), defines and governs the Firm’s policies relating to the management of model risk and risks associated with certain analytical and judgment-based estimations, such as those used in risk management, budget forecasting and capital planning and analysis. Model risks are owned by the users of the models within the LOBs and Corporate based on the specific purposes of such models. Users and developers of models are responsible for developing, implementing and testing their models, as well as referring models to MRGR for review and approval. Once models have been approved, model users and developers are responsible for maintaining a robust operating environment, and must monitor and evaluate the performance of the models on an ongoing basis. Model users and developers may seek to enhance models in response to changes in the relevant portfolios and in product and market developments, as well as to capture improvements in available modeling techniques and systems capabilities. Estimations and Model risk, a subcategory of operational risk, is the potential for adverse consequences from decisions based on incorrect or misused estimation outputs. The Firm uses models and other analytical and judgment-based estimations, including those based upon machine learning or artificial intelligence techniques, across various businesses and functions. The estimation methods are of varying levels of sophistication and are used for many purposes, such as the valuation of positions and measurement of risk, assessing regulatory capital requirements, conducting stress testing, evaluating the allowance for credit losses and making business decisions. A dedicated independent function, Model Risk Governance and Review (“MRGR”), defines and governs the Firm’s policies relating to the management of model risk and risks associated with certain analytical and judgment-based estimations, such as those used in risk management, budget forecasting and capital planning and analysis. Model risks are owned by the users of the models within the LOBs and Corporate based on the specific purposes of such models. Users and developers of models are responsible for developing, implementing and testing their models, as well as referring models to MRGR for review and approval. Once models have been approved, model users and developers are responsible for maintaining a robust operating environment, and must monitor and evaluate the performance of the models on an ongoing basis. Model users and developers may seek to enhance models in response to changes in the relevant portfolios and in product and market developments, as well as to capture improvements in available modeling techniques and systems capabilities. Models are tiered based on an internal standard according to their complexity, the exposure associated with the model and the Firm’s reliance on the model. This tiering is subject to the approval of MRGR. In its review of a model, MRGR considers whether the model is suitable for the specific purposes for which it will be used. When reviewing a model, MRGR analyzes and challenges the model methodology and the reasonableness of model assumptions, and may perform or require additional testing, including back-testing of model outcomes. Model reviews are approved by the appropriate level of management within MRGR based on the relevant model tier.Under the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy, MRGR reviews and approves new models, as well as material changes to existing models, prior to their use. In certain circumstances, exceptions may be granted to the Firm’s policy to allow a model to be used prior to review or approval. MRGR may also require the user to take appropriate actions to mitigate the model risk if it is to be used in the interim. These actions will depend on the model and may include, for example, limitation of trading activity.While models are inherently imprecise, the degree of imprecision or uncertainty can be heightened by the market or economic environment. This is particularly true when the current and forecasted environments are significantly different from the historical environments upon which the models were developed. This increased uncertainty may necessitate a greater degree of judgment and analytics to inform any adjustments that the Firm may make to model outputs than would otherwise be the case. In addition, the Firm may experience increased uncertainty in its estimates if assets acquired differ from those used to develop the models. Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 and Note 2 for a summary of model-based valuations and other valuation techniques. Models are tiered based on an internal standard according to their complexity, the exposure associated with the model and the Firm’s reliance on the model. This tiering is subject to the approval of MRGR. In its review of a model, MRGR considers whether the model is suitable for the specific purposes for which it will be used. When reviewing a model, MRGR analyzes and challenges the model methodology and the reasonableness of model assumptions, and may perform or require additional testing, including back-testing of model outcomes. Model reviews are approved by the appropriate level of management within MRGR based on the relevant model tier. Under the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy, MRGR reviews and approves new models, as well as material changes to existing models, prior to their use. In certain circumstances, exceptions may be granted to the Firm’s policy to allow a model to be used prior to review or approval. MRGR may also require the user to take appropriate actions to mitigate the model risk if it is to be used in the interim. These actions will depend on the model and may include, for example, limitation of trading activity. While models are inherently imprecise, the degree of imprecision or uncertainty can be heightened by the market or economic environment. This is particularly true when the current and forecasted environments are significantly different from the historical environments upon which the models were developed. This increased uncertainty may necessitate a greater degree of judgment and analytics to inform any adjustments that the Firm may make to model outputs than would otherwise be the case. In addition, the Firm may experience increased uncertainty in its estimates if assets acquired differ from those used to develop the models. Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 and Note 2 for a summary of model-based valuations and other valuation techniques. 160JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 160JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 160JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 160 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES USED BY THE FIRM JPMorganChase’s accounting policies and use of estimates are integral to understanding its reported results. The Firm’s most complex accounting estimates require management’s judgment to ascertain the appropriate carrying value of assets and liabilities. The Firm has established policies and control procedures intended to ensure that estimation methods, including any judgments made as part of such methods, are well-controlled, independently reviewed and applied consistently from period to period. The methods used and judgments made reflect, among other factors, the nature of the assets or liabilities and the related business and risk management strategies, which may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The Firm believes its estimates for determining the carrying value of its assets and liabilities are appropriate. The following is a brief description of the Firm’s critical accounting estimates involving significant judgments.Allowance for credit lossesThe Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm’s financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The allowance for credit losses generally comprises:•The allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated),•The allowance for lending-related commitments, and•The allowance for credit losses on investment securities.The allowance for credit losses involves significant judgment on a number of matters including development and weighting of macroeconomic forecasts, incorporation of historical loss experience, assessment of risk characteristics, assignment of risk ratings, valuation of collateral, and the determination of remaining expected life. Refer to Note 10 and Note 13 for further information on these judgments as well as the Firm’s policies and methodologies used to determine the Firm’s allowance for credit losses.One of the most significant judgments involved in estimating the Firm’s allowance for credit losses relates to the macroeconomic forecasts used to estimate credit losses over the eight-quarter forecast period within the Firm’s methodology. The eight-quarter forecast incorporates hundreds of macroeconomic variables (“MEVs”) that are relevant for exposures across the Firm, with modeled credit losses being driven primarily by a subset of less than twenty variables. The specific variables that have the greatest effect on the modeled losses vary by portfolio and geography.•Key MEVs for the consumer portfolio include regional U.S. unemployment rates and U.S. HPI.•Key MEVs for the wholesale portfolio include U.S. unemployment, U.S. real GDP, U.S. equity prices, U.S. interest rates, U.S. corporate credit spreads, oil prices, U.S. commercial real estate prices and U.S. HPI.Changes in the Firm’s assumptions and forecasts of economic conditions could significantly affect its estimate of expected credit losses in the portfolio at the balance sheet date or lead to significant changes in the estimate from one reporting period to the next.As a result of the First Republic acquisition, the Firm recorded an allowance for credit losses for the loans acquired and lending-related commitments assumed as of May 1, 2023. Due to differences in risk rating methodologies for the First Republic portfolio and the ongoing integration of products and systems, the allowance for credit losses for the acquired wholesale portfolio was initially measured based on similar risk characteristics from other facilities underwritten by the Firm. Starting in the second quarter of 2024, the acquired portfolio was incorporated into the Firm's modeled credit loss estimates and is now reflected in the wholesale sensitivity analysis below. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one factor or input might affect the overall allowance for credit losses because management considers a wide variety of factors and inputs in estimating the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or product types, and changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor or input may offset deterioration in others.To consider the impact of a hypothetical alternate macroeconomic forecast, the Firm compared the modeled credit losses determined using its central and relative adverse macroeconomic scenarios, which are two of the five scenarios considered in estimating the allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments. The central and relative adverse scenarios each included a full suite of MEVs, but differed in the levels, paths and peaks/troughs of those variables over the eight-quarter forecast period. For example, compared to the Firm’s central scenario shown on page 137 and in Note 13, the Firm’s relative adverse scenario assumes an elevated U.S. JPMorganChase’s accounting policies and use of estimates are integral to understanding its reported results. The Firm’s most complex accounting estimates require management’s judgment to ascertain the appropriate carrying value of assets and liabilities. The Firm has established policies and control procedures intended to ensure that estimation methods, including any judgments made as part of such methods, are well-controlled, independently reviewed and applied consistently from period to period. The methods used and judgments made reflect, among other factors, the nature of the assets or liabilities and the related business and risk management strategies, which may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The Firm believes its estimates for determining the carrying value of its assets and liabilities are appropriate. The following is a brief description of the Firm’s critical accounting estimates involving significant judgments.Allowance for credit lossesThe Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm’s financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The allowance for credit losses generally comprises:•The allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated),•The allowance for lending-related commitments, and•The allowance for credit losses on investment securities.The allowance for credit losses involves significant judgment on a number of matters including development and weighting of macroeconomic forecasts, incorporation of historical loss experience, assessment of risk characteristics, assignment of risk ratings, valuation of collateral, and the determination of remaining expected life. Refer to Note 10 and Note 13 for further information on these judgments as well as the Firm’s policies and methodologies used to determine the Firm’s allowance for credit losses.One of the most significant judgments involved in estimating the Firm’s allowance for credit losses relates to the macroeconomic forecasts used to estimate credit losses over the eight-quarter forecast period within the Firm’s methodology. The eight-quarter forecast incorporates hundreds of macroeconomic variables (“MEVs”) that are relevant for exposures across the Firm, with modeled credit JPMorganChase’s accounting policies and use of estimates are integral to understanding its reported results. The Firm’s most complex accounting estimates require management’s judgment to ascertain the appropriate carrying value of assets and liabilities. The Firm has established policies and control procedures intended to ensure that estimation methods, including any judgments made as part of such methods, are well-controlled, independently reviewed and applied consistently from period to period. The methods used and judgments made reflect, among other factors, the nature of the assets or liabilities and the related business and risk management strategies, which may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for changing methodologies occurs in an appropriate manner. The Firm believes its estimates for determining the carrying value of its assets and liabilities are appropriate. The following is a brief description of the Firm’s critical accounting estimates involving significant judgments.

The Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm’s financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The allowance for credit losses generally comprises: •The allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated), •The allowance for lending-related commitments, and •The allowance for credit losses on investment securities. The allowance for credit losses involves significant judgment on a number of matters including development and weighting of macroeconomic forecasts, incorporation of historical loss experience, assessment of risk characteristics, assignment of risk ratings, valuation of collateral, and the determination of remaining expected life. Refer to Note 10 and Note 13 for further information on these judgments as well as the Firm’s policies and methodologies used to determine the Firm’s allowance for credit losses. One of the most significant judgments involved in estimating the Firm’s allowance for credit losses relates to the macroeconomic forecasts used to estimate credit losses over the eight-quarter forecast period within the Firm’s methodology. The eight-quarter forecast incorporates hundreds of macroeconomic variables (“MEVs”) that are relevant for exposures across the Firm, with modeled credit losses being driven primarily by a subset of less than twenty variables. The specific variables that have the greatest effect on the modeled losses vary by portfolio and geography.•Key MEVs for the consumer portfolio include regional U.S. unemployment rates and U.S. HPI.•Key MEVs for the wholesale portfolio include U.S. unemployment, U.S. real GDP, U.S. equity prices, U.S. interest rates, U.S. corporate credit spreads, oil prices, U.S. commercial real estate prices and U.S. HPI.Changes in the Firm’s assumptions and forecasts of economic conditions could significantly affect its estimate of expected credit losses in the portfolio at the balance sheet date or lead to significant changes in the estimate from one reporting period to the next.As a result of the First Republic acquisition, the Firm recorded an allowance for credit losses for the loans acquired and lending-related commitments assumed as of May 1, 2023. Due to differences in risk rating methodologies for the First Republic portfolio and the ongoing integration of products and systems, the allowance for credit losses for the acquired wholesale portfolio was initially measured based on similar risk characteristics from other facilities underwritten by the Firm. Starting in the second quarter of 2024, the acquired portfolio was incorporated into the Firm's modeled credit loss estimates and is now reflected in the wholesale sensitivity analysis below. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one factor or input might affect the overall allowance for credit losses because management considers a wide variety of factors and inputs in estimating the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or product types, and changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor or input may offset deterioration in others.To consider the impact of a hypothetical alternate macroeconomic forecast, the Firm compared the modeled credit losses determined using its central and relative adverse macroeconomic scenarios, which are two of the five scenarios considered in estimating the allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments. The central and relative adverse scenarios each included a full suite of MEVs, but differed in the levels, paths and peaks/troughs of those variables over the eight-quarter forecast period. For example, compared to the Firm’s central scenario shown on page 137 and in Note 13, the Firm’s relative adverse scenario assumes an elevated U.S. losses being driven primarily by a subset of less than twenty variables. The specific variables that have the greatest effect on the modeled losses vary by portfolio and geography. •Key MEVs for the consumer portfolio include regional U.S. unemployment rates and U.S. HPI. •Key MEVs for the wholesale portfolio include U.S. unemployment, U.S. real GDP, U.S. equity prices, U.S. interest rates, U.S. corporate credit spreads, oil prices, U.S. commercial real estate prices and U.S. HPI. Changes in the Firm’s assumptions and forecasts of economic conditions could significantly affect its estimate of expected credit losses in the portfolio at the balance sheet date or lead to significant changes in the estimate from one reporting period to the next. As a result of the First Republic acquisition, the Firm recorded an allowance for credit losses for the loans acquired and lending-related commitments assumed as of May 1, 2023. Due to differences in risk rating methodologies for the First Republic portfolio and the ongoing integration of products and systems, the allowance for credit losses for the acquired wholesale portfolio was initially measured based on similar risk characteristics from other facilities underwritten by the Firm. Starting in the second quarter of 2024, the acquired portfolio was incorporated into the Firm's modeled credit loss estimates and is now reflected in the wholesale sensitivity analysis below. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. It is difficult to estimate how potential changes in any one factor or input might affect the overall allowance for credit losses because management considers a wide variety of factors and inputs in estimating the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the factors and inputs considered may not occur at the same rate and may not be consistent across all geographies or product types, and changes in factors and inputs may be directionally inconsistent, such that improvement in one factor or input may offset deterioration in others. To consider the impact of a hypothetical alternate macroeconomic forecast, the Firm compared the modeled credit losses determined using its central and relative adverse macroeconomic scenarios, which are two of the five scenarios considered in estimating the allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments. The central and relative adverse scenarios each included a full suite of MEVs, but differed in the levels, paths and peaks/troughs of those variables over the eight-quarter forecast period. For example, compared to the Firm’s central scenario shown on page 137 and in Note 13, the Firm’s relative adverse scenario assumes an elevated U.S. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K161 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K161 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K161 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 161

unemployment rate, averaging approximately 2.1% higher over the eight-quarter forecast, with a peak difference of approximately 3.0% in the fourth quarter of 2025.This analysis is not intended to estimate expected future changes in the allowance for credit losses, for a number of reasons, including:•The allowance as of December 31, 2024, reflects credit losses beyond those estimated under the central scenario due to the weight placed on the adverse scenarios.•The impacts of changes in many MEVs are both interrelated and nonlinear, so the results of this analysis cannot be simply extrapolated for more severe changes in macroeconomic variables. •Expectations of future changes in portfolio composition and borrower behavior can significantly affect the allowance for credit losses.To demonstrate the sensitivity of credit loss estimates to macroeconomic forecasts as of December 31, 2024, the Firm compared the modeled estimates under its relative adverse scenario to its central scenario. Without considering offsetting or correlated effects in other qualitative components of the Firm’s allowance for credit losses, the comparison between these two scenarios for the exposures below reflect the following differences:•An increase of approximately $850 million for residential real estate loans and lending-related commitments•An increase of approximately $3.7 billion for credit card loans•An increase of approximately $4.1 billion for wholesale loans and lending-related commitmentsThis analysis relates only to the modeled credit loss estimates and is not intended to estimate changes in the overall allowance for credit losses as it does not reflect any potential changes in other adjustments to the quantitative calculation, which would also be influenced by the judgment management applies to the modeled lifetime loss estimates to reflect the uncertainty and imprecision of these modeled lifetime loss estimates based on then-current circumstances and conditions.Recognizing that forecasts of macroeconomic conditions are inherently uncertain, the Firm believes that its process to consider the available information and associated risks and uncertainties is appropriately governed and that its estimates of expected credit losses were reasonable and appropriate for the period ended December 31, 2024.Fair valueJPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. The majority of such assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including derivatives, structured note products and certain securities financing agreements. Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including certain mortgage, home equity and other loans, where the carrying value is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.Assets measured at fair value The following table includes the Firm’s assets measured at fair value and the portion of such assets that are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 2 for further information.December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Total assets at fair valueTotal level 3 assetsFederal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$286,771 $— Securities borrowed83,962 — Trading assets: Trading-debt and equity instruments576,817 2,442 Derivative receivables(a)60,967 8,452 Total trading assets637,784 10,894 AFS securities406,852 8 Loans41,350 2,416 MSRs9,121 9,121 Other14,073 1,344 Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis1,479,913 23,783 Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis2,489 1,742 Total assets measured at fair value $1,482,402 $25,525 Total Firm assets$4,002,814 Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets(a)1 %Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets at fair value(a)2 %(a)For purposes of the table above, the derivative receivables total reflects the impact of netting adjustments; however, the $8.5 billion of derivative receivables classified as level 3 does not reflect the netting adjustment as such netting is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset. The level 3 balances would be reduced if netting were applied, including the netting benefit associated with cash collateral. unemployment rate, averaging approximately 2.1% higher over the eight-quarter forecast, with a peak difference of approximately 3.0% in the fourth quarter of 2025.This analysis is not intended to estimate expected future changes in the allowance for credit losses, for a number of reasons, including:•The allowance as of December 31, 2024, reflects credit losses beyond those estimated under the central scenario due to the weight placed on the adverse scenarios.•The impacts of changes in many MEVs are both interrelated and nonlinear, so the results of this analysis cannot be simply extrapolated for more severe changes in macroeconomic variables. •Expectations of future changes in portfolio composition and borrower behavior can significantly affect the allowance for credit losses.To demonstrate the sensitivity of credit loss estimates to macroeconomic forecasts as of December 31, 2024, the Firm compared the modeled estimates under its relative adverse scenario to its central scenario. Without considering offsetting or correlated effects in other qualitative components of the Firm’s allowance for credit losses, the comparison between these two scenarios for the exposures below reflect the following differences:•An increase of approximately $850 million for residential real estate loans and lending-related commitments•An increase of approximately $3.7 billion for credit card loans•An increase of approximately $4.1 billion for wholesale loans and lending-related commitmentsThis analysis relates only to the modeled credit loss estimates and is not intended to estimate changes in the overall allowance for credit losses as it does not reflect any potential changes in other adjustments to the quantitative calculation, which would also be influenced by the judgment management applies to the modeled lifetime loss estimates to reflect the uncertainty and imprecision of these modeled lifetime loss estimates based on then-current circumstances and conditions.Recognizing that forecasts of macroeconomic conditions are inherently uncertain, the Firm believes that its process to consider the available information and associated risks and uncertainties is appropriately governed and that its estimates of expected credit losses were reasonable and appropriate for the period ended December 31, 2024. unemployment rate, averaging approximately 2.1% higher over the eight-quarter forecast, with a peak difference of approximately 3.0% in the fourth quarter of 2025. This analysis is not intended to estimate expected future changes in the allowance for credit losses, for a number of reasons, including: •The allowance as of December 31, 2024, reflects credit losses beyond those estimated under the central scenario due to the weight placed on the adverse scenarios. •The impacts of changes in many MEVs are both interrelated and nonlinear, so the results of this analysis cannot be simply extrapolated for more severe changes in macroeconomic variables. •Expectations of future changes in portfolio composition and borrower behavior can significantly affect the allowance for credit losses. To demonstrate the sensitivity of credit loss estimates to macroeconomic forecasts as of December 31, 2024, the Firm compared the modeled estimates under its relative adverse scenario to its central scenario. Without considering offsetting or correlated effects in other qualitative components of the Firm’s allowance for credit losses, the comparison between these two scenarios for the exposures below reflect the following differences: •An increase of approximately $850 million for residential real estate loans and lending-related commitments •An increase of approximately $3.7 billion for credit card loans •An increase of approximately $4.1 billion for wholesale loans and lending-related commitments This analysis relates only to the modeled credit loss estimates and is not intended to estimate changes in the overall allowance for credit losses as it does not reflect any potential changes in other adjustments to the quantitative calculation, which would also be influenced by the judgment management applies to the modeled lifetime loss estimates to reflect the uncertainty and imprecision of these modeled lifetime loss estimates based on then-current circumstances and conditions. Recognizing that forecasts of macroeconomic conditions are inherently uncertain, the Firm believes that its process to consider the available information and associated risks and uncertainties is appropriately governed and that its estimates of expected credit losses were reasonable and appropriate for the period ended December 31, 2024. Fair valueJPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. The majority of such assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including derivatives, structured note products and certain securities financing agreements. Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including certain mortgage, home equity and other loans, where the carrying value is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.Assets measured at fair value The following table includes the Firm’s assets measured at fair value and the portion of such assets that are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 2 for further information.December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Total assets at fair valueTotal level 3 assetsFederal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$286,771 $— Securities borrowed83,962 — Trading assets: Trading-debt and equity instruments576,817 2,442 Derivative receivables(a)60,967 8,452 Total trading assets637,784 10,894 AFS securities406,852 8 Loans41,350 2,416 MSRs9,121 9,121 Other14,073 1,344 Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis1,479,913 23,783 Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis2,489 1,742 Total assets measured at fair value $1,482,402 $25,525 Total Firm assets$4,002,814 Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets(a)1 %Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets at fair value(a)2 %(a)For purposes of the table above, the derivative receivables total reflects the impact of netting adjustments; however, the $8.5 billion of derivative receivables classified as level 3 does not reflect the netting adjustment as such netting is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset. The level 3 balances would be reduced if netting were applied, including the netting benefit associated with cash collateral. Fair value JPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. The majority of such assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including derivatives, structured note products and certain securities financing agreements. Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including certain mortgage, home equity and other loans, where the carrying value is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Assets measured at fair value The following table includes the Firm’s assets measured at fair value and the portion of such assets that are classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Note 2 for further information. December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Total assets at fair valueTotal level 3 assetsFederal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$286,771 $— Securities borrowed83,962 — Trading assets: Trading-debt and equity instruments576,817 2,442 Derivative receivables(a)60,967 8,452 Total trading assets637,784 10,894 AFS securities406,852 8 Loans41,350 2,416 MSRs9,121 9,121 Other14,073 1,344 Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis1,479,913 23,783 Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis2,489 1,742 Total assets measured at fair value $1,482,402 $25,525 Total Firm assets$4,002,814 Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets(a)1 %Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets at fair value(a)2 % Derivative receivables(a)

Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets(a) Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets at fair value(a) (a)For purposes of the table above, the derivative receivables total reflects the impact of netting adjustments; however, the $8.5 billion of derivative receivables classified as level 3 does not reflect the netting adjustment as such netting is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset. The level 3 balances would be reduced if netting were applied, including the netting benefit associated with cash collateral. 162JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 162JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 162JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 162 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K ValuationDetails of the Firm’s processes for determining fair value are set out in Note 2. Estimating fair value requires the application of judgment. The type and level of judgment required is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to the Firm. For instruments valued using internally developed valuation models and other valuation techniques that use significant unobservable inputs and are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value are more significant than those required when estimating the fair value of instruments classified within levels 1 and 2.In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3, management must first determine the appropriate valuation model or other valuation technique to use. Second, the lack of observability of certain significant inputs requires management to assess relevant empirical data in deriving valuation inputs including, for example, transaction details, yield curves, interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, volatilities, correlations, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), valuations of comparable instruments, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of the valuation of level 3 instruments, including unobservable inputs used.For instruments classified in levels 2 and 3, management judgment must be applied to assess the appropriate level of valuation adjustments to reflect counterparty credit quality, the Firm’s creditworthiness, market funding rates, liquidity considerations, unobservable parameters, and for portfolios that meet specified criteria, the size of the net open risk position. The judgments made are typically affected by the type of product and its specific contractual terms, and the level of liquidity for the product or within the market as a whole. In periods of heightened market volatility and uncertainty judgments are further affected by the wider variation of reasonable valuation estimates, particularly for positions that are less liquid. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of valuation adjustments applied by the Firm.Imprecision in estimating unobservable market inputs or other factors can affect the amount of gain or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the methods and assumptions used reflect management judgment and may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios.The Firm uses various methodologies and assumptions in the determination of fair value. The use of methodologies or assumptions different than those used by the Firm could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Refer to Note 2 for a detailed discussion of the Firm’s valuation process and hierarchy, and its determination of fair value for individual financial instruments.Goodwill impairment Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill must be allocated to reporting units and tested for impairment at least annually. The Firm’s process and methodology used to conduct goodwill impairment testing is described in Note 15.Management applies significant judgment when testing goodwill for impairment. The goodwill associated with each business combination is allocated to the related reporting units for goodwill impairment testing.For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Firm reviewed current economic conditions, estimated market cost of equity, as well as actual business results and projections of business performance. Based on such reviews, the Firm has concluded that goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2024. For each of the reporting units, fair value exceeded carrying value by at least 10% and there was no indication of a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations. The projections for the Firm’s reporting units are consistent with management’s current business outlook assumptions in the short term, and the Firm’s best estimates of long-term growth and return on equity in the longer term. Where possible, the Firm uses third-party and peer data to benchmark its assumptions and estimates.Refer to Note 15 for additional information on goodwill, including the goodwill impairment assessment as of December 31, 2024.Credit card rewards liabilityJPMorganChase offers credit cards with various rewards programs which allow cardholders to earn rewards points based on their account activity and the terms and conditions of the rewards program. Generally, there are no limits on the points that an eligible cardholder can earn, nor do the points expire, and the points can be redeemed for a variety of rewards, including cash (predominantly in the form of account credits), gift cards and travel. The Firm maintains a rewards liability which represents the estimated cost of rewards points earned and expected to be redeemed by cardholders. The liability is accrued as the cardholder earns the benefit and is reduced when the cardholder redeems points. This liability was $14.4 billion and $13.2 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. The increase in the liability was driven by continued growth in rewards points earned on higher spend and promotional offers outpacing redemptions throughout 2024.The rewards liability is sensitive to redemption rate (“RR”) and cost per point (“CPP”) assumptions. The RR ValuationDetails of the Firm’s processes for determining fair value are set out in Note 2. Estimating fair value requires the application of judgment. The type and level of judgment required is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to the Firm. For instruments valued using internally developed valuation models and other valuation techniques that use significant unobservable inputs and are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value are more significant than those required when estimating the fair value of instruments classified within levels 1 and 2.In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3, management must first determine the appropriate valuation model or other valuation technique to use. Second, the lack of observability of certain significant inputs requires management to assess relevant empirical data in deriving valuation inputs including, for example, transaction details, yield curves, interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, volatilities, correlations, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), valuations of comparable instruments, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of the valuation of level 3 instruments, including unobservable inputs used.For instruments classified in levels 2 and 3, management judgment must be applied to assess the appropriate level of valuation adjustments to reflect counterparty credit quality, the Firm’s creditworthiness, market funding rates, liquidity considerations, unobservable parameters, and for portfolios that meet specified criteria, the size of the net open risk position. The judgments made are typically affected by the type of product and its specific contractual terms, and the level of liquidity for the product or within the market as a whole. In periods of heightened market volatility and uncertainty judgments are further affected by the wider variation of reasonable valuation estimates, particularly for positions that are less liquid. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of valuation adjustments applied by the Firm.Imprecision in estimating unobservable market inputs or other factors can affect the amount of gain or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the methods and assumptions used reflect management judgment and may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios.The Firm uses various methodologies and assumptions in the determination of fair value. The use of methodologies or assumptions different than those used by the Firm could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Refer to Note 2 for a detailed discussion of the Firm’s valuation process and Valuation Details of the Firm’s processes for determining fair value are set out in Note 2. Estimating fair value requires the application of judgment. The type and level of judgment required is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to the Firm. For instruments valued using internally developed valuation models and other valuation techniques that use significant unobservable inputs and are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value are more significant than those required when estimating the fair value of instruments classified within levels 1 and 2. In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3, management must first determine the appropriate valuation model or other valuation technique to use. Second, the lack of observability of certain significant inputs requires management to assess relevant empirical data in deriving valuation inputs including, for example, transaction details, yield curves, interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, volatilities, correlations, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), valuations of comparable instruments, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of the valuation of level 3 instruments, including unobservable inputs used. For instruments classified in levels 2 and 3, management judgment must be applied to assess the appropriate level of valuation adjustments to reflect counterparty credit quality, the Firm’s creditworthiness, market funding rates, liquidity considerations, unobservable parameters, and for portfolios that meet specified criteria, the size of the net open risk position. The judgments made are typically affected by the type of product and its specific contractual terms, and the level of liquidity for the product or within the market as a whole. In periods of heightened market volatility and uncertainty judgments are further affected by the wider variation of reasonable valuation estimates, particularly for positions that are less liquid. Refer to Note 2 for a further discussion of valuation adjustments applied by the Firm. Imprecision in estimating unobservable market inputs or other factors can affect the amount of gain or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the methods and assumptions used reflect management judgment and may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. The Firm uses various methodologies and assumptions in the determination of fair value. The use of methodologies or assumptions different than those used by the Firm could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Refer to Note 2 for a detailed discussion of the Firm’s valuation process and hierarchy, and its determination of fair value for individual financial instruments.Goodwill impairment Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill must be allocated to reporting units and tested for impairment at least annually. The Firm’s process and methodology used to conduct goodwill impairment testing is described in Note 15.Management applies significant judgment when testing goodwill for impairment. The goodwill associated with each business combination is allocated to the related reporting units for goodwill impairment testing.For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Firm reviewed current economic conditions, estimated market cost of equity, as well as actual business results and projections of business performance. Based on such reviews, the Firm has concluded that goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2024. For each of the reporting units, fair value exceeded carrying value by at least 10% and there was no indication of a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations. The projections for the Firm’s reporting units are consistent with management’s current business outlook assumptions in the short term, and the Firm’s best estimates of long-term growth and return on equity in the longer term. Where possible, the Firm uses third-party and peer data to benchmark its assumptions and estimates.Refer to Note 15 for additional information on goodwill, including the goodwill impairment assessment as of December 31, 2024.Credit card rewards liabilityJPMorganChase offers credit cards with various rewards programs which allow cardholders to earn rewards points based on their account activity and the terms and conditions of the rewards program. Generally, there are no limits on the points that an eligible cardholder can earn, nor do the points expire, and the points can be redeemed for a variety of rewards, including cash (predominantly in the form of account credits), gift cards and travel. The Firm maintains a rewards liability which represents the estimated cost of rewards points earned and expected to be redeemed by cardholders. The liability is accrued as the cardholder earns the benefit and is reduced when the cardholder redeems points. This liability was $14.4 billion and $13.2 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. The increase in the liability was driven by continued growth in rewards points earned on higher spend and promotional offers outpacing redemptions throughout 2024.The rewards liability is sensitive to redemption rate (“RR”) and cost per point (“CPP”) assumptions. The RR hierarchy, and its determination of fair value for individual financial instruments.

Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill must be allocated to reporting units and tested for impairment at least annually. The Firm’s process and methodology used to conduct goodwill impairment testing is described in Note 15. Management applies significant judgment when testing goodwill for impairment. The goodwill associated with each business combination is allocated to the related reporting units for goodwill impairment testing. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Firm reviewed current economic conditions, estimated market cost of equity, as well as actual business results and projections of business performance. Based on such reviews, the Firm has concluded that goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2024. For each of the reporting units, fair value exceeded carrying value by at least 10% and there was no indication of a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations. The projections for the Firm’s reporting units are consistent with management’s current business outlook assumptions in the short term, and the Firm’s best estimates of long-term growth and return on equity in the longer term. Where possible, the Firm uses third-party and peer data to benchmark its assumptions and estimates. Refer to Note 15 for additional information on goodwill, including the goodwill impairment assessment as of December 31, 2024.

JPMorganChase offers credit cards with various rewards programs which allow cardholders to earn rewards points based on their account activity and the terms and conditions of the rewards program. Generally, there are no limits on the points that an eligible cardholder can earn, nor do the points expire, and the points can be redeemed for a variety of rewards, including cash (predominantly in the form of account credits), gift cards and travel. The Firm maintains a rewards liability which represents the estimated cost of rewards points earned and expected to be redeemed by cardholders. The liability is accrued as the cardholder earns the benefit and is reduced when the cardholder redeems points. This liability was $14.4 billion and $13.2 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and is recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. The increase in the liability was driven by continued growth in rewards points earned on higher spend and promotional offers outpacing redemptions throughout 2024. The rewards liability is sensitive to redemption rate (“RR”) and cost per point (“CPP”) assumptions. The RR JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K163 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K163 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K163 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 163

assumption is used to estimate the number of points earned by customers that will be redeemed over the life of the account. The CPP assumption is used to estimate the cost of future point redemptions. These assumptions are evaluated periodically considering historical actuals, cardholder redemption behavior and management judgment. Updates to these assumptions will impact the rewards liability. As of December 31, 2024, a combined increase of 25 basis points in RR and 1 basis point in CPP would increase the rewards liability by approximately $442 million.Income taxes JPMorganChase is subject to the income tax laws of the various jurisdictions in which it operates, including U.S. federal, state and local, and non-U.S. jurisdictions. These laws are often complex and may be subject to different interpretations. To determine the financial statement impact of accounting for income taxes, including the provision for income tax expense and unrecognized tax benefits, JPMorganChase must make assumptions and judgments about how to interpret and apply these complex tax laws to numerous transactions and business events, as well as make judgments regarding the timing of when certain items may affect taxable income in the U.S. and non-U.S. tax jurisdictions.JPMorganChase’s interpretations of tax laws around the world are subject to review and examination by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions where the Firm operates, and disputes may occur regarding its view on a tax position. These disputes over interpretations with the various taxing authorities may be settled by audit, administrative appeals or adjudication in the court systems of the tax jurisdictions in which the Firm operates. JPMorganChase regularly reviews whether it may be assessed additional income taxes as a result of the resolution of these matters, and the Firm records additional unrecognized tax benefits, as appropriate. In addition, the Firm may revise its estimate of income taxes due to changes in income tax laws, legal interpretations, and business strategies. It is possible that revisions in the Firm’s estimate of income taxes may materially affect the Firm’s results of operations in any reporting period.Deferred taxes arise from differences between assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting versus income tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized if, in management’s judgment, their realizability is determined to be more likely than not. Deferred taxes are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized within the provision for income taxes in the period enacted.The Firm has also recognized deferred tax assets in connection with certain tax attributes, including net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and foreign tax credit (“FTC”) carryforwards. The Firm performs regular reviews to ascertain whether its deferred tax assets are realizable. These reviews include management’s estimates and assumptions regarding future taxable income, including foreign source income, and may incorporate various tax planning strategies, including strategies that may be available to utilize NOLs and FTCs before they expire. In connection with these reviews, if it is determined that a deferred tax asset is not realizable, a valuation allowance is established. The valuation allowance may be reversed in a subsequent reporting period if the Firm determines that, based on revised estimates of future taxable income or changes in tax planning strategies, it is more likely than not that all or part of the deferred tax asset will become realizable. As of December 31, 2024, management has determined it is more likely than not that the Firm will realize its deferred tax assets, net of the existing valuation allowance.The Firm adjusts its unrecognized tax benefits as necessary when new information becomes available, including changes in tax law and regulations, and interactions with taxing authorities. Uncertain tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that management believes is more likely than not to be realized upon settlement. It is possible that the reassessment of JPMorganChase’s unrecognized tax benefits may have a material impact on its effective income tax rate in the period in which the reassessment occurs. Although the Firm believes that its estimates are reasonable, the final tax amount could be different from the amounts reflected in the Firm’s income tax provisions and accruals. To the extent that the final outcome of these amounts is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will generally impact the Firm’s provision for income taxes in the period in which such a determination is made.The Firm’s provision for income taxes is composed of current and deferred taxes. The current and deferred tax provisions are calculated based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed during the subsequent year. Adjustments based on filed returns are generally recorded in the period when the tax returns are filed and the global tax implications are known, which could impact the Firm’s effective tax rate.Refer to Note 25 for additional information on income taxes.Litigation reserves Refer to Note 30 for a description of the significant estimates and judgments associated with establishing litigation reserves. assumption is used to estimate the number of points earned by customers that will be redeemed over the life of the account. The CPP assumption is used to estimate the cost of future point redemptions. These assumptions are evaluated periodically considering historical actuals, cardholder redemption behavior and management judgment. Updates to these assumptions will impact the rewards liability. As of December 31, 2024, a combined increase of 25 basis points in RR and 1 basis point in CPP would increase the rewards liability by approximately $442 million.Income taxes JPMorganChase is subject to the income tax laws of the various jurisdictions in which it operates, including U.S. federal, state and local, and non-U.S. jurisdictions. These laws are often complex and may be subject to different interpretations. To determine the financial statement impact of accounting for income taxes, including the provision for income tax expense and unrecognized tax benefits, JPMorganChase must make assumptions and judgments about how to interpret and apply these complex tax laws to numerous transactions and business events, as well as make judgments regarding the timing of when certain items may affect taxable income in the U.S. and non-U.S. tax jurisdictions.JPMorganChase’s interpretations of tax laws around the world are subject to review and examination by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions where the Firm operates, and disputes may occur regarding its view on a tax position. These disputes over interpretations with the various taxing authorities may be settled by audit, administrative appeals or adjudication in the court systems of the tax jurisdictions in which the Firm operates. JPMorganChase regularly reviews whether it may be assessed additional income taxes as a result of the resolution of these matters, and the Firm records additional unrecognized tax benefits, as appropriate. In addition, the Firm may revise its estimate of income taxes due to changes in income tax laws, legal interpretations, and business strategies. It is possible that revisions in the Firm’s estimate of income taxes may materially affect the Firm’s results of operations in any reporting period.Deferred taxes arise from differences between assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting versus income tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized if, in management’s judgment, their realizability is determined to be more likely than not. Deferred taxes are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized within the provision for income taxes in the period enacted.The Firm has also recognized deferred tax assets in connection with certain tax attributes, including net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and foreign tax assumption is used to estimate the number of points earned by customers that will be redeemed over the life of the account. The CPP assumption is used to estimate the cost of future point redemptions. These assumptions are evaluated periodically considering historical actuals, cardholder redemption behavior and management judgment. Updates to these assumptions will impact the rewards liability. As of December 31, 2024, a combined increase of 25 basis points in RR and 1 basis point in CPP would increase the rewards liability by approximately $442 million.

JPMorganChase is subject to the income tax laws of the various jurisdictions in which it operates, including U.S. federal, state and local, and non-U.S. jurisdictions. These laws are often complex and may be subject to different interpretations. To determine the financial statement impact of accounting for income taxes, including the provision for income tax expense and unrecognized tax benefits, JPMorganChase must make assumptions and judgments about how to interpret and apply these complex tax laws to numerous transactions and business events, as well as make judgments regarding the timing of when certain items may affect taxable income in the U.S. and non-U.S. tax jurisdictions. JPMorganChase’s interpretations of tax laws around the world are subject to review and examination by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions where the Firm operates, and disputes may occur regarding its view on a tax position. These disputes over interpretations with the various taxing authorities may be settled by audit, administrative appeals or adjudication in the court systems of the tax jurisdictions in which the Firm operates. JPMorganChase regularly reviews whether it may be assessed additional income taxes as a result of the resolution of these matters, and the Firm records additional unrecognized tax benefits, as appropriate. In addition, the Firm may revise its estimate of income taxes due to changes in income tax laws, legal interpretations, and business strategies. It is possible that revisions in the Firm’s estimate of income taxes may materially affect the Firm’s results of operations in any reporting period. Deferred taxes arise from differences between assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting versus income tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized if, in management’s judgment, their realizability is determined to be more likely than not. Deferred taxes are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized within the provision for income taxes in the period enacted. The Firm has also recognized deferred tax assets in connection with certain tax attributes, including net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and foreign tax credit (“FTC”) carryforwards. The Firm performs regular reviews to ascertain whether its deferred tax assets are realizable. These reviews include management’s estimates and assumptions regarding future taxable income, including foreign source income, and may incorporate various tax planning strategies, including strategies that may be available to utilize NOLs and FTCs before they expire. In connection with these reviews, if it is determined that a deferred tax asset is not realizable, a valuation allowance is established. The valuation allowance may be reversed in a subsequent reporting period if the Firm determines that, based on revised estimates of future taxable income or changes in tax planning strategies, it is more likely than not that all or part of the deferred tax asset will become realizable. As of December 31, 2024, management has determined it is more likely than not that the Firm will realize its deferred tax assets, net of the existing valuation allowance.The Firm adjusts its unrecognized tax benefits as necessary when new information becomes available, including changes in tax law and regulations, and interactions with taxing authorities. Uncertain tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that management believes is more likely than not to be realized upon settlement. It is possible that the reassessment of JPMorganChase’s unrecognized tax benefits may have a material impact on its effective income tax rate in the period in which the reassessment occurs. Although the Firm believes that its estimates are reasonable, the final tax amount could be different from the amounts reflected in the Firm’s income tax provisions and accruals. To the extent that the final outcome of these amounts is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will generally impact the Firm’s provision for income taxes in the period in which such a determination is made.The Firm’s provision for income taxes is composed of current and deferred taxes. The current and deferred tax provisions are calculated based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed during the subsequent year. Adjustments based on filed returns are generally recorded in the period when the tax returns are filed and the global tax implications are known, which could impact the Firm’s effective tax rate.Refer to Note 25 for additional information on income taxes.Litigation reserves Refer to Note 30 for a description of the significant estimates and judgments associated with establishing litigation reserves. credit (“FTC”) carryforwards. The Firm performs regular reviews to ascertain whether its deferred tax assets are realizable. These reviews include management’s estimates and assumptions regarding future taxable income, including foreign source income, and may incorporate various tax planning strategies, including strategies that may be available to utilize NOLs and FTCs before they expire. In connection with these reviews, if it is determined that a deferred tax asset is not realizable, a valuation allowance is established. The valuation allowance may be reversed in a subsequent reporting period if the Firm determines that, based on revised estimates of future taxable income or changes in tax planning strategies, it is more likely than not that all or part of the deferred tax asset will become realizable. As of December 31, 2024, management has determined it is more likely than not that the Firm will realize its deferred tax assets, net of the existing valuation allowance. The Firm adjusts its unrecognized tax benefits as necessary when new information becomes available, including changes in tax law and regulations, and interactions with taxing authorities. Uncertain tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. An uncertain tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that management believes is more likely than not to be realized upon settlement. It is possible that the reassessment of JPMorganChase’s unrecognized tax benefits may have a material impact on its effective income tax rate in the period in which the reassessment occurs. Although the Firm believes that its estimates are reasonable, the final tax amount could be different from the amounts reflected in the Firm’s income tax provisions and accruals. To the extent that the final outcome of these amounts is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will generally impact the Firm’s provision for income taxes in the period in which such a determination is made. The Firm’s provision for income taxes is composed of current and deferred taxes. The current and deferred tax provisions are calculated based on estimates and assumptions that could differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed during the subsequent year. Adjustments based on filed returns are generally recorded in the period when the tax returns are filed and the global tax implications are known, which could impact the Firm’s effective tax rate. Refer to Note 25 for additional information on income taxes.

Refer to Note 30 for a description of the significant estimates and judgments associated with establishing litigation reserves. 164JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 164JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 164JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 164 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DEVELOPMENTS Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Standards Adopted since January 1, 2024StandardSummary of guidance Effects on financial statementsFair Value Measurement: Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale RestrictionsIssued June 2022•Clarifies that a contractual sale restriction is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value.•Requires disclosure for investments in equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions, including: 1) fair value of these investments, 2) nature and remaining duration of the restriction(s) and 3) circumstances that could cause a lapse in the restriction(s).•Adopted prospectively on January 1, 2024, with no impact to the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements.Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization MethodIssued March 2023•Expands the ability to elect proportional amortization on a program-by-program basis, for additional types of tax-oriented investments (beyond affordable housing tax credit investments).•May be adopted using a full retrospective method, or a modified retrospective method wherein the effect of adoption is reflected as an adjustment to retained earnings at the effective date.•Adopted under the modified retrospective method on January 1, 2024.•Refer to Note 1 for further information.Segment Reporting: Improvements to Reportable Segment DisclosuresIssued November 2023•Requires disclosure of significant segment expenses that are readily provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included in segment profit or loss.•Requires disclosure of the composition and aggregate amount of other segment items, which represent the difference between profit or loss and segment revenues less significant segment expenses.•Requires disclosure of the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported segment measures in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources.•Adopted retrospectively for the Firm’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024.(a)•The adoption of this guidance resulted in additional reportable segment disclosures, primarily relating to significant segment expenses and the CODM. Refer to Note 32 for further information.

Fair Value Measurement: Fair Value Measurement of Equity Securities Subject to Contractual Sale Restrictions Issued June 2022 •Clarifies that a contractual sale restriction is not considered part of the unit of account of the equity security and, therefore, is not considered in measuring fair value. •Requires disclosure for investments in equity securities subject to contractual sale restrictions, including: 1) fair value of these investments, 2) nature and remaining duration of the restriction(s) and 3) circumstances that could cause a lapse in the restriction(s). •Adopted prospectively on January 1, 2024, with no impact to the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method Issued March 2023 •Expands the ability to elect proportional amortization on a program-by-program basis, for additional types of tax-oriented investments (beyond affordable housing tax credit investments). •May be adopted using a full retrospective method, or a modified retrospective method wherein the effect of adoption is reflected as an adjustment to retained earnings at the effective date. •Adopted under the modified retrospective method on January 1, 2024. •Refer to Note 1 for further information. Segment Reporting: Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures Issued November 2023 •Requires disclosure of significant segment expenses that are readily provided to the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included in segment profit or loss. •Requires disclosure of the composition and aggregate amount of other segment items, which represent the difference between profit or loss and segment revenues less significant segment expenses. •Requires disclosure of the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported segment measures in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. •Adopted retrospectively for the Firm’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024.(a) •The adoption of this guidance resulted in additional reportable segment disclosures, primarily relating to significant segment expenses and the CODM. Refer to Note 32 for further information. (a)The accounting standards update applies to the Firm’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024, and interim financial statements thereafter. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K165 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K165 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K165 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 165

FASB Standards Issued but not yet Adopted as of December 31, 2024StandardSummary of guidance Effects on financial statementsIncome Taxes: Improvements to Income Tax DisclosuresIssued December 2023•Requires disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by 1) federal, state, and foreign taxes and 2) individual jurisdiction on the basis of a quantitative threshold of equal to or greater than 5 percent of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received).•Requires disclosure of the effective tax rate reconciliation by specific categories, at a minimum, with accompanying qualitative disclosures, and separate disclosure of reconciling items based on quantitative thresholds. •Requires categories within the effective tax rate reconciliation to be further disaggregated if quantitative thresholds are met.•Required effective date: Annual financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2025.•The guidance can be applied on a prospective basis with the option to apply the standard retrospectively.•The Firm is evaluating the potential impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements disclosures.Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures: Disaggregation of Income Statement ExpensesIssued November 2024•Requires additional annual and interim disclosures about specific types of expenses presented in the Consolidated statements of income.•Required effective date: Annual financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2027, and interim financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2028. (a)•The guidance can be applied on a prospective basis with the option to apply the standard retrospectively.•The Firm is evaluating the potential impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements disclosures, as well as the Firm’s planned date of adoption.

Income Taxes: Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures Issued December 2023 •Requires disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by 1) federal, state, and foreign taxes and 2) individual jurisdiction on the basis of a quantitative threshold of equal to or greater than 5 percent of total income taxes paid (net of refunds received). •Requires disclosure of the effective tax rate reconciliation by specific categories, at a minimum, with accompanying qualitative disclosures, and separate disclosure of reconciling items based on quantitative thresholds. •Requires categories within the effective tax rate reconciliation to be further disaggregated if quantitative thresholds are met. •Required effective date: Annual financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2025. •The guidance can be applied on a prospective basis with the option to apply the standard retrospectively. •The Firm is evaluating the potential impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements disclosures. Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures: Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses Issued November 2024 •Requires additional annual and interim disclosures about specific types of expenses presented in the Consolidated statements of income. •Required effective date: Annual financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2027, and interim financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2028. (a) •The guidance can be applied on a prospective basis with the option to apply the standard retrospectively. •The Firm is evaluating the potential impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements disclosures, as well as the Firm’s planned date of adoption. (a)Early adoption is permitted. 166JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 166JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 166JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 166 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS From time to time, the Firm has made and will make forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipate,” “target,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “believe,” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements provide JPMorganChase’s current expectations or forecasts of future events, circumstances, results or aspirations. JPMorganChase’s disclosures in this 2024 Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Firm also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished with the SEC. In addition, the Firm’s senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to investors, analysts, representatives of the media and others.All forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Firm’s control. JPMorganChase’s actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in its forward-looking statements. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements:•Local, regional and global business, economic and political conditions and geopolitical events, including geopolitical tensions and hostilities;•Changes in laws, rules and regulatory requirements, including capital and liquidity requirements affecting the Firm’s businesses, and the ability of the Firm to address those requirements;•Heightened regulatory and governmental oversight and scrutiny of JPMorganChase’s business practices, including dealings with retail customers;•Changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws;•Changes in the level of inflation;•Changes in income tax laws, rules, and regulations;•Changes in FDIC assessments;•Securities and capital markets behavior, including changes in market liquidity and volatility;•Changes in investor sentiment or consumer spending or savings behavior;•Ability of the Firm to manage effectively its capital and liquidity;•Changes in credit ratings assigned to the Firm or its subsidiaries;•Damage to the Firm’s reputation;•Ability of the Firm to appropriately address social, environmental and sustainability concerns that may arise, including from its business activities;•Ability of the Firm to deal effectively with an economic slowdown or other economic or market disruption, including, but not limited to, in the interest rate environment;•Technology changes instituted by the Firm, its counterparties or competitors;•The effectiveness of the Firm’s control agenda;•Ability of the Firm to develop or discontinue products and services, and the extent to which products or services previously sold by the Firm require the Firm to incur liabilities or absorb losses not contemplated at their initiation or origination;•Acceptance of the Firm’s new and existing products and services by the marketplace and the ability of the Firm to innovate and to increase market share;•Ability of the Firm to attract and retain qualified employees;•Ability of the Firm to control expenses;•Competitive pressures;•Changes in the credit quality of the Firm’s clients, customers and counterparties;•Adequacy of the Firm’s risk management framework, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;•Adverse judicial or regulatory proceedings;•Ability of the Firm to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities;•Occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or calamities, including health emergencies, the spread of infectious diseases, epidemics or pandemics, an outbreak or escalation of hostilities or other geopolitical instabilities, the effects of climate change or extraordinary events beyond the Firm’s control, and the Firm’s ability to deal effectively with disruptions caused by the foregoing;•Ability of the Firm to maintain the security of its financial, accounting, technology, data processing and other operational systems and facilities;•Ability of the Firm to withstand disruptions that may be caused by any failure of its operational systems or those of third parties;•Ability of the Firm to effectively defend itself against cyber attacks and other attempts by unauthorized parties to access information of the Firm or its customers or to disrupt the Firm’s systems; and•The other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors in JPMorganChase’s 2024 Form 10-K.Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Firm speak only as of the date they are made, and JPMorganChase does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements. The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature the Firm may make in any subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10-Ks, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Qs, or Current Reports on Form 8-K. From time to time, the Firm has made and will make forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipate,” “target,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “believe,” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements provide JPMorganChase’s current expectations or forecasts of future events, circumstances, results or aspirations. JPMorganChase’s disclosures in this 2024 Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Firm also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished with the SEC. In addition, the Firm’s senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to investors, analysts, representatives of the media and others.All forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Firm’s control. JPMorganChase’s actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in its forward-looking statements. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements:•Local, regional and global business, economic and political conditions and geopolitical events, including geopolitical tensions and hostilities;•Changes in laws, rules and regulatory requirements, including capital and liquidity requirements affecting the Firm’s businesses, and the ability of the Firm to address those requirements;•Heightened regulatory and governmental oversight and scrutiny of JPMorganChase’s business practices, including dealings with retail customers;•Changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws;•Changes in the level of inflation;•Changes in income tax laws, rules, and regulations;•Changes in FDIC assessments;•Securities and capital markets behavior, including changes in market liquidity and volatility;•Changes in investor sentiment or consumer spending or savings behavior;•Ability of the Firm to manage effectively its capital and liquidity;•Changes in credit ratings assigned to the Firm or its subsidiaries;•Damage to the Firm’s reputation;•Ability of the Firm to appropriately address social, environmental and sustainability concerns that may arise, including from its business activities;•Ability of the Firm to deal effectively with an economic slowdown or other economic or market disruption, From time to time, the Firm has made and will make forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as “anticipate,” “target,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “believe,” or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements provide JPMorganChase’s current expectations or forecasts of future events, circumstances, results or aspirations. JPMorganChase’s disclosures in this 2024 Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Firm also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished with the SEC. In addition, the Firm’s senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to investors, analysts, representatives of the media and others. All forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Firm’s control. JPMorganChase’s actual future results may differ materially from those set forth in its forward-looking statements. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements: •Local, regional and global business, economic and political conditions and geopolitical events, including geopolitical tensions and hostilities; •Changes in laws, rules and regulatory requirements, including capital and liquidity requirements affecting the Firm’s businesses, and the ability of the Firm to address those requirements; •Heightened regulatory and governmental oversight and scrutiny of JPMorganChase’s business practices, including dealings with retail customers; •Changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws; •Changes in the level of inflation; •Changes in income tax laws, rules, and regulations; •Changes in FDIC assessments; •Securities and capital markets behavior, including changes in market liquidity and volatility; •Changes in investor sentiment or consumer spending or savings behavior; •Ability of the Firm to manage effectively its capital and liquidity; •Changes in credit ratings assigned to the Firm or its subsidiaries; •Damage to the Firm’s reputation; •Ability of the Firm to appropriately address social, environmental and sustainability concerns that may arise, including from its business activities; •Ability of the Firm to deal effectively with an economic slowdown or other economic or market disruption, including, but not limited to, in the interest rate environment;•Technology changes instituted by the Firm, its counterparties or competitors;•The effectiveness of the Firm’s control agenda;•Ability of the Firm to develop or discontinue products and services, and the extent to which products or services previously sold by the Firm require the Firm to incur liabilities or absorb losses not contemplated at their initiation or origination;•Acceptance of the Firm’s new and existing products and services by the marketplace and the ability of the Firm to innovate and to increase market share;•Ability of the Firm to attract and retain qualified employees;•Ability of the Firm to control expenses;•Competitive pressures;•Changes in the credit quality of the Firm’s clients, customers and counterparties;•Adequacy of the Firm’s risk management framework, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;•Adverse judicial or regulatory proceedings;•Ability of the Firm to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities;•Occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or calamities, including health emergencies, the spread of infectious diseases, epidemics or pandemics, an outbreak or escalation of hostilities or other geopolitical instabilities, the effects of climate change or extraordinary events beyond the Firm’s control, and the Firm’s ability to deal effectively with disruptions caused by the foregoing;•Ability of the Firm to maintain the security of its financial, accounting, technology, data processing and other operational systems and facilities;•Ability of the Firm to withstand disruptions that may be caused by any failure of its operational systems or those of third parties;•Ability of the Firm to effectively defend itself against cyber attacks and other attempts by unauthorized parties to access information of the Firm or its customers or to disrupt the Firm’s systems; and•The other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors in JPMorganChase’s 2024 Form 10-K.Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Firm speak only as of the date they are made, and JPMorganChase does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements. The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature the Firm may make in any subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10-Ks, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Qs, or Current Reports on Form 8-K. including, but not limited to, in the interest rate environment; •Technology changes instituted by the Firm, its counterparties or competitors; •The effectiveness of the Firm’s control agenda; •Ability of the Firm to develop or discontinue products and services, and the extent to which products or services previously sold by the Firm require the Firm to incur liabilities or absorb losses not contemplated at their initiation or origination; •Acceptance of the Firm’s new and existing products and services by the marketplace and the ability of the Firm to innovate and to increase market share; •Ability of the Firm to attract and retain qualified employees; •Ability of the Firm to control expenses; •Competitive pressures; •Changes in the credit quality of the Firm’s clients, customers and counterparties; •Adequacy of the Firm’s risk management framework, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting; •Adverse judicial or regulatory proceedings; •Ability of the Firm to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities; •Occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or calamities, including health emergencies, the spread of infectious diseases, epidemics or pandemics, an outbreak or escalation of hostilities or other geopolitical instabilities, the effects of climate change or extraordinary events beyond the Firm’s control, and the Firm’s ability to deal effectively with disruptions caused by the foregoing; •Ability of the Firm to maintain the security of its financial, accounting, technology, data processing and other operational systems and facilities; •Ability of the Firm to withstand disruptions that may be caused by any failure of its operational systems or those of third parties; •Ability of the Firm to effectively defend itself against cyber attacks and other attempts by unauthorized parties to access information of the Firm or its customers or to disrupt the Firm’s systems; and •The other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors in JPMorganChase’s 2024 Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Firm speak only as of the date they are made, and JPMorganChase does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements. The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature the Firm may make in any subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10-Ks, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Qs, or Current Reports on Form 8-K. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K167 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K167 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K167 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 167

Management of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorganChase” or the “Firm”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Firm’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by JPMorganChase’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).JPMorganChase’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records, that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Firm’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Firm are being made only in accordance with authorizations of JPMorganChase’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Firm’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management has completed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making the assessment, management used the “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (“COSO 2013”) promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).Based upon the assessment performed, management concluded that as of December 31, 2024, JPMorganChase’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based upon the COSO 2013 framework. Additionally, based upon management’s assessment, the Firm determined that there were no material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024.The effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.James DimonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerJeremy BarnumExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 14, 2025 Management of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorganChase” or the “Firm”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Firm’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by JPMorganChase’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).JPMorganChase’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records, that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Firm’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Firm are being made only in accordance with authorizations of JPMorganChase’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Firm’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management has completed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making the assessment, management used the “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (“COSO 2013”) promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Management of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorganChase” or the “Firm”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Firm’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by JPMorganChase’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). JPMorganChase’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records, that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Firm’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Firm are being made only in accordance with authorizations of JPMorganChase’s management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Firm’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management has completed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. In making the assessment, management used the “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (“COSO 2013”) promulgated by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon the assessment performed, management concluded that as of December 31, 2024, JPMorganChase’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based upon the COSO 2013 framework. Additionally, based upon management’s assessment, the Firm determined that there were no material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024.The effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.James DimonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerJeremy BarnumExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 14, 2025 Based upon the assessment performed, management concluded that as of December 31, 2024, JPMorganChase’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based upon the COSO 2013 framework. Additionally, based upon management’s assessment, the Firm determined that there were no material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024. The effectiveness of the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein. James Dimon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Jeremy Barnum Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 14, 2025 168JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 168JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 168JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 168 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of JPMorgan Chase & Co.:Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial ReportingWe have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries (the “Firm”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Firm as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Firm maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO. Basis for OpinionsThe Firm’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Firm’s consolidated financial statements and on the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Firm in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial ReportingA company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of JPMorgan Chase & Co.:Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial ReportingWe have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries (the “Firm”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Firm as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Firm maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO. Basis for OpinionsThe Firm’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Firm’s consolidated financial statements and on the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Firm in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries (the “Firm”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Firm as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2024 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Firm maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

The Firm’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Firm’s consolidated financial statements and on the Firm’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Firm in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial ReportingA company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit MattersThe critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.Allowance for Loan Losses – Portfolio-based component of Wholesale Loan and Credit Card Loan Portfolios As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the allowance for loan losses for the portfolio-based component of the wholesale and credit card loan portfolios was $22.0 billion on total portfolio-based retained loans of $919.3 billion at December 31, 2024. The Firm’s allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's loan portfolios and considers expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. The portfolio-based component of the Firm’s allowance for loan losses for the wholesale and credit card retained loan portfolios begins with a quantitative calculation of expected credit losses over the expected life of the loan by applying credit loss factors to the estimated exposure at default. The credit loss factors applied are determined based on the weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios that take into consideration the Firm's economic outlook as derived through forecast macroeconomic variables, the most significant of which are U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product. This quantitative calculation is further adjusted to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate.The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the allowance for loan losses for the portfolio-based component of the wholesale and credit card loan portfolios is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment and estimation by management in the forecast of macroeconomic variables, specifically U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product, as the Firm’s forecasts of economic conditions significantly affect its estimate of expected credit losses at the balance sheet date, (ii) the significant judgment and estimation by management in determining the quantitative calculation utilized in their credit loss estimates and the adjustments to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence obtained relating to the credit loss estimates and the appropriateness of the adjustments to the credit loss estimates, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Firm’s allowance for loan losses, including controls over model validation and generation of macroeconomic scenarios. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for estimating the allowance for loan losses, which involved (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the models and methodologies used in quantitative calculations; (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of forecasts of U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product; (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of data used in the estimate; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s adjustments to the quantitative output for the impacts of model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate. These procedures also included the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of certain models, methodologies and macroeconomic variables.Fair Value of Certain Level 3 Financial InstrumentsAs described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Firm carries $1.5 trillion of its assets and $586.2 billion of its liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Included in these balances are $10.9 billion of trading assets and $51.8 billion of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, collectively financial instruments, which are classified as level 3 as they contain one or more inputs to valuation which are unobservable and significant to their fair value measurement. The Firm utilized internally developed valuation models and unobservable inputs to estimate fair value of the level 3 financial instruments. The unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of certain of these financial instruments include interest rate volatility, equity volatility, Bermudan switch value and correlation relating to interest rates, interest rate-to-foreign exchange, Critical Audit MattersThe critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.Allowance for Loan Losses – Portfolio-based component of Wholesale Loan and Credit Card Loan Portfolios As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the allowance for loan losses for the portfolio-based component of the wholesale and credit card loan portfolios was $22.0 billion on total portfolio-based retained loans of $919.3 billion at December 31, 2024. The Firm’s allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's loan portfolios and considers expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. The portfolio-based component of the Firm’s allowance for loan losses for the wholesale and credit card retained loan portfolios begins with a quantitative calculation of expected credit losses over the expected life of the loan by applying credit loss factors to the estimated exposure at default. The credit loss factors applied are determined based on the weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios that take into consideration the Firm's economic outlook as derived through forecast macroeconomic variables, the most significant of which are U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product. This quantitative calculation is further adjusted to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate.The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the allowance for loan losses for the portfolio-based component of the wholesale and credit card loan portfolios is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment and estimation by management in the forecast of macroeconomic variables, specifically U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product, as the Firm’s forecasts of economic conditions significantly affect its estimate of expected credit losses at the balance sheet date, (ii) the significant

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. Allowance for Loan Losses – Portfolio-based component of Wholesale Loan and Credit Card Loan Portfolios As described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the allowance for loan losses for the portfolio-based component of the wholesale and credit card loan portfolios was $22.0 billion on total portfolio-based retained loans of $919.3 billion at December 31, 2024. The Firm’s allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's loan portfolios and considers expected future changes in macroeconomic conditions. The portfolio-based component of the Firm’s allowance for loan losses for the wholesale and credit card retained loan portfolios begins with a quantitative calculation of expected credit losses over the expected life of the loan by applying credit loss factors to the estimated exposure at default. The credit loss factors applied are determined based on the weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios that take into consideration the Firm's economic outlook as derived through forecast macroeconomic variables, the most significant of which are U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product. This quantitative calculation is further adjusted to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate. The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the allowance for loan losses for the portfolio-based component of the wholesale and credit card loan portfolios is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment and estimation by management in the forecast of macroeconomic variables, specifically U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product, as the Firm’s forecasts of economic conditions significantly affect its estimate of expected credit losses at the balance sheet date, (ii) the significant judgment and estimation by management in determining the quantitative calculation utilized in their credit loss estimates and the adjustments to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence obtained relating to the credit loss estimates and the appropriateness of the adjustments to the credit loss estimates, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Firm’s allowance for loan losses, including controls over model validation and generation of macroeconomic scenarios. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for estimating the allowance for loan losses, which involved (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the models and methodologies used in quantitative calculations; (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of forecasts of U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product; (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of data used in the estimate; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s adjustments to the quantitative output for the impacts of model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate. These procedures also included the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of certain models, methodologies and macroeconomic variables.Fair Value of Certain Level 3 Financial InstrumentsAs described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Firm carries $1.5 trillion of its assets and $586.2 billion of its liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Included in these balances are $10.9 billion of trading assets and $51.8 billion of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, collectively financial instruments, which are classified as level 3 as they contain one or more inputs to valuation which are unobservable and significant to their fair value measurement. The Firm utilized internally developed valuation models and unobservable inputs to estimate fair value of the level 3 financial instruments. The unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of certain of these financial instruments include interest rate volatility, equity volatility, Bermudan switch value and correlation relating to interest rates, interest rate-to-foreign exchange, judgment and estimation by management in determining the quantitative calculation utilized in their credit loss estimates and the adjustments to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence obtained relating to the credit loss estimates and the appropriateness of the adjustments to the credit loss estimates, and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge. Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Firm’s allowance for loan losses, including controls over model validation and generation of macroeconomic scenarios. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for estimating the allowance for loan losses, which involved (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the models and methodologies used in quantitative calculations; (ii) evaluating the reasonableness of forecasts of U.S. unemployment and U.S. real gross domestic product; (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of data used in the estimate; and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s adjustments to the quantitative output for the impacts of model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet otherwise reflected in the credit loss estimate. These procedures also included the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of certain models, methodologies and macroeconomic variables. Fair Value of Certain Level 3 Financial Instruments As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Firm carries $1.5 trillion of its assets and $586.2 billion of its liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis. Included in these balances are $10.9 billion of trading assets and $51.8 billion of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, collectively financial instruments, which are classified as level 3 as they contain one or more inputs to valuation which are unobservable and significant to their fair value measurement. The Firm utilized internally developed valuation models and unobservable inputs to estimate fair value of the level 3 financial instruments. The unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of certain of these financial instruments include interest rate volatility, equity volatility, Bermudan switch value and correlation relating to interest rates, interest rate-to-foreign exchange, 170JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 170JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 170JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 170 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

equity prices, equity-to-foreign exchange and equity-to-interest rate.The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value of certain level 3 financial instruments is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment and estimation by management in determining the inputs to estimate fair value, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence obtained related to the fair value of these financial instruments, and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Firm’s determination of the fair value, including controls over models, inputs, and data. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent estimate of fair value for a sample of these financial instruments and comparing management’s estimate to the independently developed estimate of fair value. Developing the independent estimate involved testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management, developing independent inputs and, as appropriate, evaluating and utilizing management’s aforementioned unobservable inputs. New York, New YorkFebruary 14, 2025We have served as the Firm’s auditor since 1965. equity prices, equity-to-foreign exchange and equity-to-interest rate.The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value of certain level 3 financial instruments is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment and estimation by management in determining the inputs to estimate fair value, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence obtained related to the fair value of these financial instruments, and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Firm’s determination of the fair value, including controls over models, inputs, and data. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent estimate of fair value for a sample of these financial instruments and comparing management’s estimate to the independently developed estimate of fair value. Developing the independent estimate involved testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management, developing independent inputs and, as appropriate, evaluating and utilizing management’s aforementioned unobservable inputs. New York, New YorkFebruary 14, 2025We have served as the Firm’s auditor since 1965. equity prices, equity-to-foreign exchange and equity-to-interest rate. The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value of certain level 3 financial instruments is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment and estimation by management in determining the inputs to estimate fair value, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence obtained related to the fair value of these financial instruments, and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge. Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Firm’s determination of the fair value, including controls over models, inputs, and data. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent estimate of fair value for a sample of these financial instruments and comparing management’s estimate to the independently developed estimate of fair value. Developing the independent estimate involved testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management, developing independent inputs and, as appropriate, evaluating and utilizing management’s aforementioned unobservable inputs. New York, New York February 14, 2025 We have served as the Firm’s auditor since 1965. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K171 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K171 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K171 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 171

Year ended December 31, (in millions, except per share data)202420232022RevenueInvestment banking fees$8,910 $6,519 $6,686 Principal transactions24,787 24,460 19,912 Lending- and deposit-related fees7,606 7,413 7,098 Asset management fees17,801 15,220 14,096 Commissions and other fees7,530 6,836 6,581 Investment securities losses(1,021)(3,180)(2,380)Mortgage fees and related income1,401 1,176 1,250 Card income5,497 4,784 4,420 Other income12,462 5,609 4,322 Noninterest revenue84,973 68,837 61,985 Interest income193,933 170,588 92,807 Interest expense101,350 81,321 26,097 Net interest income92,583 89,267 66,710 Total net revenue177,556 158,104 128,695 Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 6,389 Noninterest expenseCompensation expense51,357 46,465 41,636 Occupancy expense5,026 4,590 4,696 Technology, communications and equipment expense9,831 9,246 9,358 Professional and outside services11,057 10,235 10,174 Marketing4,974 4,591 3,911 Other expense9,552 12,045 6,365 Total noninterest expense91,797 87,172 76,140 Income before income tax expense75,081 61,612 46,166 Income tax expense16,610 12,060 8,490 Net income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Net income applicable to common stockholders$56,868 $47,760 $35,892 Net income per common share dataBasic earnings per share$19.79 $16.25 $12.10 Diluted earnings per share19.75 16.23 12.09 Weighted-average basic shares2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Weighted-average diluted shares2,879.0 2,943.1 2,970.0 The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. Investment securities losses 172JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 172JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 172JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 172 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Net income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Other comprehensive income/(loss), after–taxUnrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities(87)5,381 (11,764)Translation adjustments, net of hedges(858)329 (611)Fair value hedges(87)(101)98 Cash flow hedges(882)1,724 (5,360)Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans(63)373 (1,241)DVA on fair value option elected liabilities(36)(808)1,621 Total other comprehensive income/(loss), after–tax(2,013)6,898 (17,257)Comprehensive income$56,458 $56,450 $20,419 The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K173 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K173 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K173 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 173

December 31, (in millions, except share data)20242023AssetsCash and due from banks$23,372 $29,066 Deposits with banks445,945 595,085 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements (included $286,771 and $259,813 at fair value)295,001 276,152 Securities borrowed (included $83,962 and $70,086 at fair value)219,546 200,436 Trading assets (included assets pledged of $136,070 and $128,994)637,784 540,607 Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $411,045 and $205,456; included assets pledged of $10,162 and $9,219)406,852 201,704 Held-to-maturity securities274,468 369,848 Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses681,320 571,552 Loans (included $41,350 and $38,851 at fair value)1,347,988 1,323,706 Allowance for loan losses(24,345)(22,420)Loans, net of allowance for loan losses1,323,643 1,301,286 Accrued interest and accounts receivable101,223 107,363 Premises and equipment32,223 30,157 Goodwill, MSRs and other intangible assets64,560 64,381 Other assets (included $15,122 and $12,306 at fair value and assets pledged of $6,288 and $6,764)178,197 159,308 Total assets(a)$4,002,814 $3,875,393 LiabilitiesDeposits (included $33,768 and $78,384 at fair value)$2,406,032 $2,400,688 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements (included $226,329 and $169,003 at fair value)296,835 216,535 Short-term borrowings (included $26,521 and $20,042 at fair value)52,893 44,712 Trading liabilities192,883 180,428 Accounts payable and other liabilities (included $5,893 and $5,637 at fair value)280,672 290,307 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (included $1 and $1 at fair value)27,323 23,020 Long-term debt (included $100,780 and $87,924 at fair value)401,418 391,825 Total liabilities(a)3,658,056 3,547,515 Commitments and contingencies (refer to Notes 28, 29 and 30)Stockholders’ equityPreferred stock ($1 par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares: issued 2,005,375 and 2,740,375 shares)20,050 27,404 Common stock ($1 par value; authorized 9,000,000,000 shares; issued 4,104,933,895 shares)4,105 4,105 Additional paid-in capital90,911 90,128 Retained earnings376,166 332,901 Accumulated other comprehensive losses(12,456)(10,443)Treasury stock, at cost (1,307,313,494 and 1,228,275,301 shares)(134,018)(116,217)Total stockholders’ equity344,758 327,878 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$4,002,814 $3,875,393 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements (included $286,771 and $259,813 at fair value) Securities borrowed (included $83,962 and $70,086 at fair value) Trading assets (included assets pledged of $136,070 and $128,994) Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $411,045 and $205,456; included assets pledged of $10,162 and $9,219) Loans (included $41,350 and $38,851 at fair value) Other assets (included $15,122 and $12,306 at fair value and assets pledged of $6,288 and $6,764)

Deposits (included $33,768 and $78,384 at fair value) Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements (included $226,329 and $169,003 at fair value) Short-term borrowings (included $26,521 and $20,042 at fair value) Accounts payable and other liabilities (included $5,893 and $5,637 at fair value) Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (included $1 and $1 at fair value) Long-term debt (included $100,780 and $87,924 at fair value)

Preferred stock ($1 par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares: issued 2,005,375 and 2,740,375 shares) Common stock ($1 par value; authorized 9,000,000,000 shares; issued 4,104,933,895 shares) Treasury stock, at cost (1,307,313,494 and 1,228,275,301 shares) (a)The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are consolidated by the Firm at December 31, 2024 and 2023. The assets of the consolidated VIEs are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The holders of the beneficial interests do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorganChase. The assets and liabilities in the table below include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. Refer to Note 14 for a further discussion. The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are consolidated by the Firm at December 31, 2024 and 2023. The assets of the consolidated VIEs are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The holders of the beneficial interests do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorganChase. The assets and liabilities in the table below include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. Refer to Note 14 for a further discussion. December 31, (in millions)20242023AssetsTrading assets$3,885 $2,170 Loans36,510 37,611 All other assets681 591 Total assets$41,076 $40,372 LiabilitiesBeneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs$27,323 $23,020 All other liabilities454 263 Total liabilities$27,777 $23,283 The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 174JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 174JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 174JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 174 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Year ended December 31, (in millions, except per share data)202420232022Preferred stockBalance at January 1$27,404 $27,404 $34,838 Issuance 2,496 — — Redemption (9,850)— (7,434)Balance at December 3120,050 27,404 27,404 Common stockBalance at January 1 and December 314,105 4,105 4,105 Additional paid-in capitalBalance at January 190,128 89,044 88,415 Shares issued and commitments to issue common stock for employee share-based compensation awards, and related tax effects768 1,084 629 Other15 — — Balance at December 3190,911 90,128 89,044 Retained earningsBalance at January 1332,901 296,456 272,268 Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles(161)449 — Net income58,471 49,552 37,676 Preferred stock dividends(1,259)(1,501)(1,595)Common stock dividends ($4.80, $4.10 and $4.00 per share for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively)(13,786)(12,055)(11,893)Balance at December 31376,166 332,901 296,456 Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)Balance at January 1(10,443)(17,341)(84)Other comprehensive income/(loss), after-tax(2,013)6,898 (17,257)Balance at December 31(12,456)(10,443)(17,341)Treasury stock, at costBalance at January 1(116,217)(107,336)(105,415)Repurchase(19,007)(9,980)(3,122)Reissuance1,206 1,099 1,201 Balance at December 31(134,018)(116,217)(107,336)Total stockholders’ equity$344,758 $327,878 $292,332 Shares issued and commitments to issue common stock for employee share-based compensation awards, and related tax effects Common stock dividends ($4.80, $4.10 and $4.00 per share for 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively) Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted the Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method accounting guidance. Effective January 1, 2023, the Firm adopted the Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Troubled Debt Restructurings, and Derivatives and Hedging: Fair Value Hedging – Portfolio Layer Method accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information. The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K175 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K175 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K175 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 175

Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating activitiesNet income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 6,389 Depreciation and amortization7,938 7,512 7,051 Deferred tax (benefit)/expense2,004 (4,534)(2,738)Estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition(103)(2,775)— Initial gain on the Visa share exchange(7,990)— — Other1,985 4,301 5,174 Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale(212,238)(115,245)(149,167)Proceeds from sales, securitizations and paydowns of loans held-for-sale205,303 116,430 167,709 Net change in:Trading assets(95,729)(74,091)(31,449)Securities borrowed(18,762)(14,902)20,203 Accrued interest and accounts receivable5,735 19,928 (22,970)Other assets(7,650)32,970 (2,882)Trading liabilities2,276 5,315 11,170 Accounts payable and other liabilities(90)(25,388)58,614 Other operating adjustments6,160 4,581 2,339 Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities(42,012)12,974 107,119 Investing activitiesNet change in:Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements(18,706)39,740 (54,278)Held-to-maturity securities:Proceeds from paydowns and maturities99,363 53,056 48,626 Purchases(4,709)(4,141)(33,676)Available-for-sale securities:Proceeds from paydowns and maturities38,499 53,744 39,159 Proceeds from sales104,625 108,434 84,616 Purchases(352,712)(115,499)(126,258)Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans held-for-investment57,921 47,312 44,892 Other changes in loans, net(83,176)(88,343)(128,968)Net cash used in First Republic Acquisition(2,362)(9,920)— All other investing activities, net(2,146)(16,740)(11,932)Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities(163,403)67,643 (137,819)Financing activitiesNet change in:Deposits3,299 (32,196)(136,895)Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements80,288 13,801 8,455 Short-term borrowings7,439 (1,934)(8,984)Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs1,543 9,029 2,205 Proceeds from long-term borrowings109,915 75,417 78,442 Payments of long-term borrowings(96,605)(64,880)(45,556)Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock2,500 — — Redemption of preferred stock(9,850)— (7,434)Treasury stock repurchased(18,830)(9,824)(3,162)Dividends paid(14,783)(13,463)(13,562)All other financing activities, net(1,469)(1,521)234 Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities63,447 (25,571)(126,257)Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks and deposits with banks(12,866)1,871 (16,643)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks(154,834)56,917 (173,600)Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at the beginning of the period624,151 567,234 740,834 Cash and due from banks and deposits with banks at the end of the period$469,317 $624,151 $567,234 Cash interest paid$99,642 $77,114 $23,143 Cash income taxes paid, net11,715 9,908 4,355 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition Initial gain on the Visa share exchange

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorganChase” or the “Firm”), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading financial services firm based in the U.S., with operations worldwide. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Refer to Note 32 for further discussion of the Firm's reportable business segments.The accounting and financial reporting policies of JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries conform to U.S. GAAP. Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities.ConsolidationThe Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of JPMorganChase and other entities in which the Firm has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.Assets held for clients in an agency or fiduciary capacity by the Firm are not assets of JPMorganChase and are not included on the Consolidated balance sheets.The Firm determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity. Voting interest entitiesVoting interest entities are entities that have sufficient equity and provide the equity investors voting rights that enable them to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations. For these types of entities, the Firm’s determination of whether it has a controlling interest is primarily based on the amount of voting equity interests held. Entities in which the Firm has a controlling financial interest, through ownership of the majority of the entities’ voting equity interests, or through other contractual rights that give the Firm control, are consolidated by the Firm.Investments in companies in which the Firm has significant influence over operating and financing decisions (but does not own a majority of the voting equity interests) are accounted for (i) in accordance with the equity method of accounting, or (ii) at fair value if the fair value option was elected. These investments are generally included in other assets, with income or loss included in noninterest revenue.Certain Firm-sponsored asset management funds are structured as limited partnerships or limited liability companies. For many of these entities, the Firm is the general partner or managing member, but the non-affiliated partners or members have the ability to remove the Firm as the general partner or managing member without cause (i.e., kick-out rights), based on a simple majority vote, or the non-affiliated partners or members have rights to participate in important decisions. Accordingly, the Firm does not consolidate these voting interest entities. However, in the limited cases where the non-managing partners or members do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights, the Firm evaluates the funds as VIEs and consolidates the funds if the Firm is the general partner or managing member and has both power and a potentially significant interest. The Firm’s investment companies and asset management funds have investments in both publicly-held and privately-held entities, including investments in buyouts, growth equity and venture opportunities. These investments are accounted for under investment company guidelines and, accordingly, irrespective of the percentage of equity ownership interests held, are carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value, and are recorded in other assets, with income or loss included in noninterest revenue. If consolidated, the Firm retains the accounting under such specialized investment company guidelines.Variable interest entities VIEs are entities that, by design, either (1) lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (2) have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations through voting rights, or do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses, or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity.The most common type of VIE is an SPE. SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. The basic SPE structure involves a company selling assets to the SPE; the SPE funds the purchase of those assets by issuing securities to investors. The legal documents that govern the transaction specify how the cash earned on the assets must be allocated to the SPE’s investors and other parties that have rights to those cash flows. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPE’s assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets. The primary beneficiary of a VIE (i.e., the party that has a controlling financial interest) is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorganChase” or the “Firm”), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading financial services firm based in the U.S., with operations worldwide. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Refer to Note 32 for further discussion of the Firm's reportable business segments.The accounting and financial reporting policies of JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries conform to U.S. GAAP. Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities.ConsolidationThe Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of JPMorganChase and other entities in which the Firm has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.Assets held for clients in an agency or fiduciary capacity by the Firm are not assets of JPMorganChase and are not included on the Consolidated balance sheets.The Firm determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity. Voting interest entitiesVoting interest entities are entities that have sufficient equity and provide the equity investors voting rights that enable them to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations. For these types of entities, the Firm’s determination of whether it has a controlling interest is primarily based on the amount of voting equity interests held. Entities in which the Firm has a controlling financial interest, through ownership of the majority of the entities’ voting equity interests, or through other contractual rights that give the Firm control, are consolidated by the Firm.Investments in companies in which the Firm has significant influence over operating and financing decisions (but does not own a majority of the voting equity interests) are accounted for (i) in accordance with the equity method of accounting, or (ii) at fair value if the fair value option was elected. These investments are generally included in other assets, with income or loss included in noninterest revenue.Certain Firm-sponsored asset management funds are structured as limited partnerships or limited liability companies. For many of these entities, the Firm is the JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorganChase” or the “Firm”), a financial holding company incorporated under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading financial services firm based in the U.S., with operations worldwide. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and small businesses, commercial banking, financial transaction processing and asset management. Refer to Note 32 for further discussion of the Firm's reportable business segments. The accounting and financial reporting policies of JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries conform to U.S. GAAP. Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities.

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of JPMorganChase and other entities in which the Firm has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Assets held for clients in an agency or fiduciary capacity by the Firm are not assets of JPMorganChase and are not included on the Consolidated balance sheets. The Firm determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a variable interest entity. Voting interest entities Voting interest entities are entities that have sufficient equity and provide the equity investors voting rights that enable them to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations. For these types of entities, the Firm’s determination of whether it has a controlling interest is primarily based on the amount of voting equity interests held. Entities in which the Firm has a controlling financial interest, through ownership of the majority of the entities’ voting equity interests, or through other contractual rights that give the Firm control, are consolidated by the Firm. Investments in companies in which the Firm has significant influence over operating and financing decisions (but does not own a majority of the voting equity interests) are accounted for (i) in accordance with the equity method of accounting, or (ii) at fair value if the fair value option was elected. These investments are generally included in other assets, with income or loss included in noninterest revenue. Certain Firm-sponsored asset management funds are structured as limited partnerships or limited liability companies. For many of these entities, the Firm is the general partner or managing member, but the non-affiliated partners or members have the ability to remove the Firm as the general partner or managing member without cause (i.e., kick-out rights), based on a simple majority vote, or the non-affiliated partners or members have rights to participate in important decisions. Accordingly, the Firm does not consolidate these voting interest entities. However, in the limited cases where the non-managing partners or members do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights, the Firm evaluates the funds as VIEs and consolidates the funds if the Firm is the general partner or managing member and has both power and a potentially significant interest. The Firm’s investment companies and asset management funds have investments in both publicly-held and privately-held entities, including investments in buyouts, growth equity and venture opportunities. These investments are accounted for under investment company guidelines and, accordingly, irrespective of the percentage of equity ownership interests held, are carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value, and are recorded in other assets, with income or loss included in noninterest revenue. If consolidated, the Firm retains the accounting under such specialized investment company guidelines.Variable interest entities VIEs are entities that, by design, either (1) lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (2) have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations through voting rights, or do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses, or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity.The most common type of VIE is an SPE. SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. The basic SPE structure involves a company selling assets to the SPE; the SPE funds the purchase of those assets by issuing securities to investors. The legal documents that govern the transaction specify how the cash earned on the assets must be allocated to the SPE’s investors and other parties that have rights to those cash flows. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPE’s assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets. The primary beneficiary of a VIE (i.e., the party that has a controlling financial interest) is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The general partner or managing member, but the non-affiliated partners or members have the ability to remove the Firm as the general partner or managing member without cause (i.e., kick-out rights), based on a simple majority vote, or the non-affiliated partners or members have rights to participate in important decisions. Accordingly, the Firm does not consolidate these voting interest entities. However, in the limited cases where the non-managing partners or members do not have substantive kick-out or participating rights, the Firm evaluates the funds as VIEs and consolidates the funds if the Firm is the general partner or managing member and has both power and a potentially significant interest. The Firm’s investment companies and asset management funds have investments in both publicly-held and privately-held entities, including investments in buyouts, growth equity and venture opportunities. These investments are accounted for under investment company guidelines and, accordingly, irrespective of the percentage of equity ownership interests held, are carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value, and are recorded in other assets, with income or loss included in noninterest revenue. If consolidated, the Firm retains the accounting under such specialized investment company guidelines. Variable interest entities VIEs are entities that, by design, either (1) lack sufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (2) have equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations through voting rights, or do not have the obligation to absorb the expected losses, or do not have the right to receive the residual returns of the entity. The most common type of VIE is an SPE. SPEs are commonly used in securitization transactions in order to isolate certain assets and distribute the cash flows from those assets to investors. The basic SPE structure involves a company selling assets to the SPE; the SPE funds the purchase of those assets by issuing securities to investors. The legal documents that govern the transaction specify how the cash earned on the assets must be allocated to the SPE’s investors and other parties that have rights to those cash flows. SPEs are generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPE’s assets by creditors of other entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets. The primary beneficiary of a VIE (i.e., the party that has a controlling financial interest) is required to consolidate the assets and liabilities of the VIE. The JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K177 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K177 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K177 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 177

primary beneficiary is the party that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and (2) through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.To assess whether the Firm has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, the Firm considers all the facts and circumstances, including its role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers, collateral managers, servicers, or owners of call options or liquidation rights over the VIE’s assets) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.To assess whether the Firm has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, the Firm considers all of its economic interests, including debt and equity investments, servicing fees, and derivatives or other arrangements deemed to be variable interests in the VIE. This assessment requires that the Firm apply judgment in determining whether these interests, in the aggregate, are considered potentially significant to the VIE. Factors considered in assessing significance include: the design of the VIE, including its capitalization structure; subordination of interests; payment priority; relative share of interests held across various classes within the VIE’s capital structure; and the reasons why the interests are held by the Firm.The Firm performs on-going reassessments of: (1) whether entities previously evaluated under the majority voting-interest framework have become VIEs, based on certain events, and are therefore subject to the VIE consolidation framework; and (2) whether changes in the facts and circumstances regarding the Firm’s involvement with a VIE cause the Firm’s consolidation conclusion to change.Refer to Note 14 for further discussion of Firm-sponsored VIEs.Revenue recognition Interest income The Firm recognizes interest income on loans, debt securities, and other debt instruments, generally on a level-yield basis, based on the underlying contractual rate. Refer to Note 7 for further information.Revenue from contracts with customers JPMorganChase recognizes noninterest revenue from certain contracts with customers, in investment banking fees, deposit-related fees, asset management fees, commissions and other fees, and components of card income, when the Firm’s related performance obligations are satisfied. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion of the Firm’s revenue from contracts with customers. Principal transactions revenue JPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value are reported primarily in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further discussion of fair value measurement. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion of principal transactions revenue. Use of estimates in the preparation of consolidated financial statementsThe preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expense, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could be different from these estimates.Foreign currency translationJPMorganChase revalues assets, liabilities, revenue and expense denominated in non-U.S. currencies into U.S. dollars using applicable exchange rates.Gains and losses relating to translating functional currency financial statements for U.S. reporting are included in the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Gains and losses relating to nonfunctional currency transactions, including non-U.S. operations where the functional currency is the U.S. dollar, are reported in the Consolidated statements of income.Offsetting assets and liabilitiesU.S. GAAP permits entities to present derivative receivables and derivative payables with the same counterparty and the related cash collateral receivables and payables on a net basis on the Consolidated balance sheets when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. U.S. GAAP also permits securities sold and purchased under repurchase agreements and securities borrowed or loaned under securities loan agreements to be presented net when specified conditions are met, including the existence of a legally enforceable master netting agreement. The Firm has elected to net such balances where it has determined that the specified conditions are met.The Firm uses master netting agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk in certain transactions, including derivative contracts, resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned primary beneficiary is the party that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and (2) through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.To assess whether the Firm has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, the Firm considers all the facts and circumstances, including its role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers, collateral managers, servicers, or owners of call options or liquidation rights over the VIE’s assets) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE.To assess whether the Firm has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, the Firm considers all of its economic interests, including debt and equity investments, servicing fees, and derivatives or other arrangements deemed to be variable interests in the VIE. This assessment requires that the Firm apply judgment in determining whether these interests, in the aggregate, are considered potentially significant to the VIE. Factors considered in assessing significance include: the design of the VIE, including its capitalization structure; subordination of interests; payment priority; relative share of interests held across various classes within the VIE’s capital structure; and the reasons why the interests are held by the Firm.The Firm performs on-going reassessments of: (1) whether entities previously evaluated under the majority voting-interest framework have become VIEs, based on certain events, and are therefore subject to the VIE consolidation framework; and (2) whether changes in the facts and circumstances regarding the Firm’s involvement with a VIE cause the Firm’s consolidation conclusion to change.Refer to Note 14 for further discussion of Firm-sponsored VIEs.Revenue recognition Interest income The Firm recognizes interest income on loans, debt securities, and other debt instruments, generally on a level-yield basis, based on the underlying contractual rate. Refer to Note 7 for further information. primary beneficiary is the party that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and (2) through its interests in the VIE, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. To assess whether the Firm has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, the Firm considers all the facts and circumstances, including its role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes, first, identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance; and second, identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the parties that make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE (such as asset managers, collateral managers, servicers, or owners of call options or liquidation rights over the VIE’s assets) or have the right to unilaterally remove those decision-makers are deemed to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE. To assess whether the Firm has the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE, the Firm considers all of its economic interests, including debt and equity investments, servicing fees, and derivatives or other arrangements deemed to be variable interests in the VIE. This assessment requires that the Firm apply judgment in determining whether these interests, in the aggregate, are considered potentially significant to the VIE. Factors considered in assessing significance include: the design of the VIE, including its capitalization structure; subordination of interests; payment priority; relative share of interests held across various classes within the VIE’s capital structure; and the reasons why the interests are held by the Firm. The Firm performs on-going reassessments of: (1) whether entities previously evaluated under the majority voting-interest framework have become VIEs, based on certain events, and are therefore subject to the VIE consolidation framework; and (2) whether changes in the facts and circumstances regarding the Firm’s involvement with a VIE cause the Firm’s consolidation conclusion to change. Refer to Note 14 for further discussion of Firm-sponsored VIEs.

Interest income The Firm recognizes interest income on loans, debt securities, and other debt instruments, generally on a level-yield basis, based on the underlying contractual rate. Refer to Note 7 for further information. Revenue from contracts with customers JPMorganChase recognizes noninterest revenue from certain contracts with customers, in investment banking fees, deposit-related fees, asset management fees, commissions and other fees, and components of card income, when the Firm’s related performance obligations are satisfied. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion of the Firm’s revenue from contracts with customers. Principal transactions revenue JPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value are reported primarily in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further discussion of fair value measurement. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion of principal transactions revenue. Use of estimates in the preparation of consolidated financial statementsThe preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expense, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could be different from these estimates.Foreign currency translationJPMorganChase revalues assets, liabilities, revenue and expense denominated in non-U.S. currencies into U.S. dollars using applicable exchange rates.Gains and losses relating to translating functional currency financial statements for U.S. reporting are included in the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Gains and losses relating to nonfunctional currency transactions, including non-U.S. operations where the functional currency is the U.S. dollar, are reported in the Consolidated statements of income.Offsetting assets and liabilitiesU.S. GAAP permits entities to present derivative receivables and derivative payables with the same counterparty and the related cash collateral receivables and payables on a net basis on the Consolidated balance sheets when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. U.S. GAAP also permits securities sold and purchased under repurchase agreements and securities borrowed or loaned under securities loan agreements to be presented net when specified conditions are met, including the existence of a legally enforceable master netting agreement. The Firm has elected to net such balances where it has determined that the specified conditions are met.The Firm uses master netting agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk in certain transactions, including derivative contracts, resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned Revenue from contracts with customers JPMorganChase recognizes noninterest revenue from certain contracts with customers, in investment banking fees, deposit-related fees, asset management fees, commissions and other fees, and components of card income, when the Firm’s related performance obligations are satisfied. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion of the Firm’s revenue from contracts with customers. Principal transactions revenue JPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value are reported primarily in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Notes 2 and 3 for further discussion of fair value measurement. Refer to Note 6 for further discussion of principal transactions revenue.

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expense, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could be different from these estimates.

JPMorganChase revalues assets, liabilities, revenue and expense denominated in non-U.S. currencies into U.S. dollars using applicable exchange rates. Gains and losses relating to translating functional currency financial statements for U.S. reporting are included in the Consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Gains and losses relating to nonfunctional currency transactions, including non-U.S. operations where the functional currency is the U.S. dollar, are reported in the Consolidated statements of income.

U.S. GAAP permits entities to present derivative receivables and derivative payables with the same counterparty and the related cash collateral receivables and payables on a net basis on the Consolidated balance sheets when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. U.S. GAAP also permits securities sold and purchased under repurchase agreements and securities borrowed or loaned under securities loan agreements to be presented net when specified conditions are met, including the existence of a legally enforceable master netting agreement. The Firm has elected to net such balances where it has determined that the specified conditions are met. The Firm uses master netting agreements to mitigate counterparty credit risk in certain transactions, including derivative contracts, resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned 178JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 178JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 178JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 178 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K agreements. A master netting agreement is a single agreement with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that agreement to be terminated or accelerated and settled through a single payment in a single currency in the event of a default (e.g., bankruptcy, failure to make a required payment or securities transfer or deliver collateral or margin when due). Upon the exercise of derivatives termination rights by the non-defaulting party (i) all transactions are terminated, (ii) all transactions are valued and the positive values of “in the money” transactions are netted against the negative values of “out of the money” transactions and (iii) the only remaining payment obligation is of one of the parties to pay the netted termination amount. Upon exercise of default rights under repurchase agreements and securities loan agreements in general (i) all transactions are terminated and accelerated, (ii) all values of securities or cash held or to be delivered are calculated, and all such sums are netted against each other and (iii) the only remaining payment obligation is of one of the parties to pay the netted termination amount.Typical master netting agreements for these types of transactions also often contain a collateral/margin agreement that provides for a security interest in, or title transfer of, securities or cash collateral/margin to the party that has the right to demand margin (the “demanding party”). The collateral/margin agreement typically requires a party to transfer collateral/margin to the demanding party with a value equal to the amount of the margin deficit on a net basis across all transactions governed by the master netting agreement, less any threshold. The collateral/margin agreement grants to the demanding party, upon default by the counterparty, the right to set-off any amounts payable by the counterparty against any posted collateral or the cash equivalent of any posted collateral/margin. It also grants to the demanding party the right to liquidate collateral/margin and to apply the proceeds to an amount payable by the counterparty.Refer to Note 5 for further discussion of the Firm’s derivative instruments. Refer to Note 11 for further discussion of the Firm’s securities financing agreements. Statements of cash flowsFor JPMorganChase’s Consolidated statements of cash flows, cash is defined as those amounts included in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks on the Consolidated balance sheets.Accounting standard adopted January 1, 2024Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method The guidance expanded the types of tax-oriented investments, beyond affordable housing tax credit investments, that the Firm can elect on a program by program basis, to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method. This method requires the cost of eligible investments, within an elected program, to be amortized in proportion to the tax benefits received with the resulting amortization reported directly in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Eligible investments must meet certain criteria, including that substantially all of the return is from income tax credits and other income tax benefits.This guidance was adopted on January 1, 2024 under the modified retrospective method. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a change to the classification and timing of the amortization associated with certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments. As a result of the adoption, the amortization of these investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense. The change in accounting resulted in a decrease to retained earnings of $161 million and increased the Firm’s income tax expense and the effective tax rate by approximately $450 million and two percentage points, respectively, in the first quarter of 2024, with no material impact to net income.The guidance requires additional disclosure for all investments that generate income tax credits and other income tax benefits from a tax-oriented investment program for which the Firm has elected to apply the proportional amortization method. The guidance also requires a reevaluation of eligible investments when significant modifications or events occur that result in a change in the nature of the investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project.Refer to Notes 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.Accounting standards adopted January 1, 2023Derivatives and Hedging: Fair Value Hedging – Portfolio Layer MethodThe adoption of this guidance expanded the ability to hedge a portfolio of fixed-rate assets in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship. As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected to transfer HTM securities to AFS and designated those securities in a portfolio layer method hedge upon adoption. The adoption impact of the transfer on retained earnings was not material. agreements. A master netting agreement is a single agreement with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that agreement to be terminated or accelerated and settled through a single payment in a single currency in the event of a default (e.g., bankruptcy, failure to make a required payment or securities transfer or deliver collateral or margin when due). Upon the exercise of derivatives termination rights by the non-defaulting party (i) all transactions are terminated, (ii) all transactions are valued and the positive values of “in the money” transactions are netted against the negative values of “out of the money” transactions and (iii) the only remaining payment obligation is of one of the parties to pay the netted termination amount. Upon exercise of default rights under repurchase agreements and securities loan agreements in general (i) all transactions are terminated and accelerated, (ii) all values of securities or cash held or to be delivered are calculated, and all such sums are netted against each other and (iii) the only remaining payment obligation is of one of the parties to pay the netted termination amount.Typical master netting agreements for these types of transactions also often contain a collateral/margin agreement that provides for a security interest in, or title transfer of, securities or cash collateral/margin to the party that has the right to demand margin (the “demanding party”). The collateral/margin agreement typically requires a party to transfer collateral/margin to the demanding party with a value equal to the amount of the margin deficit on a net basis across all transactions governed by the master netting agreement, less any threshold. The collateral/margin agreement grants to the demanding party, upon default by the counterparty, the right to set-off any amounts payable by the counterparty against any posted collateral or the cash equivalent of any posted collateral/margin. It also grants to the demanding party the right to liquidate collateral/margin and to apply the proceeds to an amount payable by the counterparty.Refer to Note 5 for further discussion of the Firm’s derivative instruments. Refer to Note 11 for further discussion of the Firm’s securities financing agreements. Statements of cash flowsFor JPMorganChase’s Consolidated statements of cash flows, cash is defined as those amounts included in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks on the Consolidated balance sheets. agreements. A master netting agreement is a single agreement with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that agreement to be terminated or accelerated and settled through a single payment in a single currency in the event of a default (e.g., bankruptcy, failure to make a required payment or securities transfer or deliver collateral or margin when due). Upon the exercise of derivatives termination rights by the non-defaulting party (i) all transactions are terminated, (ii) all transactions are valued and the positive values of “in the money” transactions are netted against the negative values of “out of the money” transactions and (iii) the only remaining payment obligation is of one of the parties to pay the netted termination amount. Upon exercise of default rights under repurchase agreements and securities loan agreements in general (i) all transactions are terminated and accelerated, (ii) all values of securities or cash held or to be delivered are calculated, and all such sums are netted against each other and (iii) the only remaining payment obligation is of one of the parties to pay the netted termination amount. Typical master netting agreements for these types of transactions also often contain a collateral/margin agreement that provides for a security interest in, or title transfer of, securities or cash collateral/margin to the party that has the right to demand margin (the “demanding party”). The collateral/margin agreement typically requires a party to transfer collateral/margin to the demanding party with a value equal to the amount of the margin deficit on a net basis across all transactions governed by the master netting agreement, less any threshold. The collateral/margin agreement grants to the demanding party, upon default by the counterparty, the right to set-off any amounts payable by the counterparty against any posted collateral or the cash equivalent of any posted collateral/margin. It also grants to the demanding party the right to liquidate collateral/margin and to apply the proceeds to an amount payable by the counterparty. Refer to Note 5 for further discussion of the Firm’s derivative instruments. Refer to Note 11 for further discussion of the Firm’s securities financing agreements.

For JPMorganChase’s Consolidated statements of cash flows, cash is defined as those amounts included in cash and due from banks and deposits with banks on the Consolidated balance sheets. Accounting standard adopted January 1, 2024Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method The guidance expanded the types of tax-oriented investments, beyond affordable housing tax credit investments, that the Firm can elect on a program by program basis, to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method. This method requires the cost of eligible investments, within an elected program, to be amortized in proportion to the tax benefits received with the resulting amortization reported directly in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Eligible investments must meet certain criteria, including that substantially all of the return is from income tax credits and other income tax benefits.This guidance was adopted on January 1, 2024 under the modified retrospective method. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a change to the classification and timing of the amortization associated with certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments. As a result of the adoption, the amortization of these investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense. The change in accounting resulted in a decrease to retained earnings of $161 million and increased the Firm’s income tax expense and the effective tax rate by approximately $450 million and two percentage points, respectively, in the first quarter of 2024, with no material impact to net income.The guidance requires additional disclosure for all investments that generate income tax credits and other income tax benefits from a tax-oriented investment program for which the Firm has elected to apply the proportional amortization method. The guidance also requires a reevaluation of eligible investments when significant modifications or events occur that result in a change in the nature of the investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project.Refer to Notes 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.Accounting standards adopted January 1, 2023Derivatives and Hedging: Fair Value Hedging – Portfolio Layer MethodThe adoption of this guidance expanded the ability to hedge a portfolio of fixed-rate assets in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship. As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected to transfer HTM securities to AFS and designated those securities in a portfolio layer method hedge upon adoption. The adoption impact of the transfer on retained earnings was not material.

The guidance expanded the types of tax-oriented investments, beyond affordable housing tax credit investments, that the Firm can elect on a program by program basis, to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method. This method requires the cost of eligible investments, within an elected program, to be amortized in proportion to the tax benefits received with the resulting amortization reported directly in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Eligible investments must meet certain criteria, including that substantially all of the return is from income tax credits and other income tax benefits. This guidance was adopted on January 1, 2024 under the modified retrospective method. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a change to the classification and timing of the amortization associated with certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments. As a result of the adoption, the amortization of these investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense. The change in accounting resulted in a decrease to retained earnings of $161 million and increased the Firm’s income tax expense and the effective tax rate by approximately $450 million and two percentage points, respectively, in the first quarter of 2024, with no material impact to net income. The guidance requires additional disclosure for all investments that generate income tax credits and other income tax benefits from a tax-oriented investment program for which the Firm has elected to apply the proportional amortization method. The guidance also requires a reevaluation of eligible investments when significant modifications or events occur that result in a change in the nature of the investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project. Refer to Notes 6, 14 and 25 for additional information.

The adoption of this guidance expanded the ability to hedge a portfolio of fixed-rate assets in a qualifying hedge accounting relationship. As permitted by the guidance, the Firm elected to transfer HTM securities to AFS and designated those securities in a portfolio layer method hedge upon adoption. The adoption impact of the transfer on retained earnings was not material. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K179 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K179 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K179 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 179

Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) The adoption of this guidance eliminated the requirement to measure the allowance for TDRs using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology and allowed the option of a non-DCF portfolio-based approach for modified loans to troubled borrowers. The Firm elected this option for all portfolios of modified loans to troubled borrowers except collateral-dependent loans and nonaccrual risk-rated loans, for which the Firm elected to continue applying a DCF methodology. The adoption of this guidance under the modified retrospective method on January 1, 2023, resulted in a $446 million increase to retained earnings.Significant accounting policiesThe following table identifies JPMorganChase’s other significant accounting policies and the Note and page where a detailed description of each policy can be found.Fair value measurementNote 2page 181Fair value optionNote 3page 203Derivative instrumentsNote 5page 209Noninterest revenue and noninterest expenseNote 6page 225Interest income and Interest expenseNote 7page 229Pension and other postretirement employee benefit plansNote 8page 230Employee share-based incentivesNote 9page 233Investment securitiesNote 10page 235Securities financing activitiesNote 11page 240LoansNote 12page 243Allowance for credit lossesNote 13page 266Variable interest entitiesNote 14page 271Goodwill, mortgage servicing rights, and other intangible assetsNote 15page 280Premises and equipmentNote 16page 285LeasesNote 18page 286Accounts payable & other liabilitiesNote 19page 288Long-term debtNote 20page 289Earnings per shareNote 23page 294Income taxesNote 25page 296Off–balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitmentsNote 28page 302LitigationNote 30page 309 Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) The adoption of this guidance eliminated the requirement to measure the allowance for TDRs using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology and allowed the option of a non-DCF portfolio-based approach for modified loans to troubled borrowers. The Firm elected this option for all portfolios of modified loans to troubled borrowers except collateral-dependent loans and nonaccrual risk-rated loans, for which the Firm elected to continue applying a DCF methodology. The adoption of this guidance under the modified retrospective method on January 1, 2023, resulted in a $446 million increase to retained earnings.

The adoption of this guidance eliminated the requirement to measure the allowance for TDRs using a discounted cash flow (“DCF”) methodology and allowed the option of a non-DCF portfolio-based approach for modified loans to troubled borrowers. The Firm elected this option for all portfolios of modified loans to troubled borrowers except collateral-dependent loans and nonaccrual risk-rated loans, for which the Firm elected to continue applying a DCF methodology. The adoption of this guidance under the modified retrospective method on January 1, 2023, resulted in a $446 million increase to retained earnings. Significant accounting policiesThe following table identifies JPMorganChase’s other significant accounting policies and the Note and page where a detailed description of each policy can be found.Fair value measurementNote 2page 181Fair value optionNote 3page 203Derivative instrumentsNote 5page 209Noninterest revenue and noninterest expenseNote 6page 225Interest income and Interest expenseNote 7page 229Pension and other postretirement employee benefit plansNote 8page 230Employee share-based incentivesNote 9page 233Investment securitiesNote 10page 235Securities financing activitiesNote 11page 240LoansNote 12page 243Allowance for credit lossesNote 13page 266Variable interest entitiesNote 14page 271Goodwill, mortgage servicing rights, and other intangible assetsNote 15page 280Premises and equipmentNote 16page 285LeasesNote 18page 286Accounts payable & other liabilitiesNote 19page 288Long-term debtNote 20page 289Earnings per shareNote 23page 294Income taxesNote 25page 296Off–balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitmentsNote 28page 302LitigationNote 30page 309

The following table identifies JPMorganChase’s other significant accounting policies and the Note and page where a detailed description of each policy can be found. Fair value measurementNote 2page 181Fair value optionNote 3page 203Derivative instrumentsNote 5page 209Noninterest revenue and noninterest expenseNote 6page 225Interest income and Interest expenseNote 7page 229Pension and other postretirement employee benefit plansNote 8page 230Employee share-based incentivesNote 9page 233Investment securitiesNote 10page 235Securities financing activitiesNote 11page 240LoansNote 12page 243Allowance for credit lossesNote 13page 266Variable interest entitiesNote 14page 271Goodwill, mortgage servicing rights, and other intangible assetsNote 15page 280Premises and equipmentNote 16page 285LeasesNote 18page 286Accounts payable & other liabilitiesNote 19page 288Long-term debtNote 20page 289Earnings per shareNote 23page 294Income taxesNote 25page 296Off–balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitmentsNote 28page 302LitigationNote 30page 309 180JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 180JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 180JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 180 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

JPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. These assets and liabilities are predominantly carried at fair value on a recurring basis (i.e., assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets). Certain assets, liabilities and unfunded lending-related commitments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is based on quoted market prices or inputs, where available. If prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based on valuation models and other valuation techniques that consider relevant transaction characteristics (such as maturity) and use, as inputs, observable or unobservable market parameters, including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), correlations, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. Fair value may also incorporate valuation adjustments. The level of precision in estimating unobservable market inputs or other factors can affect the amount of gain or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the methods and assumptions used reflect management judgment and may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. The Firm uses various methodologies and assumptions in the determination of fair value. The use of different methodologies or assumptions by other market participants compared with those used by the Firm could result in the Firm deriving a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Valuation process Risk-taking functions are responsible for providing fair value estimates for assets and liabilities carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Firm’s Valuation Control Group (“VCG”), which is part of the Firm’s Finance function and independent of the risk-taking functions, is responsible for verifying these estimates and determining any fair value adjustments that may be required to ensure that the Firm’s positions are recorded at fair value. In addition, the Firm’s Valuation Governance Forum (“VGF”), which is composed of senior finance and risk executives, is responsible for overseeing the management of risks arising from valuation activities conducted across the Firm. The Firmwide VGF is chaired by the Firmwide head of the VCG (under the direction of the Firm’s Controller), and includes sub-forums covering the CIB, CCB, AWM and certain corporate functions including Treasury and CIO. Price verification process The VCG verifies fair value estimates provided by the risk-taking functions by leveraging independently derived prices, valuation inputs and other market data, where available. Where independent prices or inputs are not available, the VCG performs additional review to ensure the reasonableness of the estimates. The additional review may include evaluating the limited market activity including client unwinds, benchmarking valuation inputs to those used for similar instruments, decomposing the valuation of structured instruments into individual components, comparing expected to actual cash flows, reviewing profit and loss trends, and reviewing trends in collateral valuation. There are also additional levels of management review for more significant or complex positions.The VCG determines any valuation adjustments that may be required to the estimates provided by the risk-taking functions. No adjustments to quoted prices are applied for instruments classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy (refer to the discussion of the fair value hierarchy on page 182 for further information). For other positions, judgment is required to assess the need for valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect liquidity considerations, unobservable parameters, and, for certain portfolios that meet specified criteria, the size of the net open risk position. The determination of such adjustments follows a consistent framework across the Firm:•Liquidity valuation adjustments are considered where an observable external price or valuation parameter exists but is of lower reliability, potentially due to lower market activity. Liquidity valuation adjustments are made based on current market conditions. Factors that may be considered in determining the liquidity adjustment include analysis of: (1) the estimated bid-offer spread for the instrument being traded; (2) alternative pricing points for similar instruments in active markets; and (3) the range of reasonable values that the price or parameter could take. •The Firm manages certain portfolios of financial instruments on the basis of net open risk exposure and, as permitted by U.S. GAAP, has elected to estimate the fair value of such portfolios on the basis of a transfer of the entire net open risk position in an orderly transaction. Where this is the case, valuation adjustments may be necessary to reflect the cost of exiting a larger-than-normal market-size net open risk position. Where applied, such adjustments are JPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. These assets and liabilities are predominantly carried at fair value on a recurring basis (i.e., assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets). Certain assets, liabilities and unfunded lending-related commitments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is based on quoted market prices or inputs, where available. If prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based on valuation models and other valuation techniques that consider relevant transaction characteristics (such as maturity) and use, as inputs, observable or unobservable market parameters, including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), correlations, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. Fair value may also incorporate valuation adjustments. The level of precision in estimating unobservable market inputs or other factors can affect the amount of gain or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the methods and assumptions used reflect management judgment and may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. The Firm uses various methodologies and assumptions in the determination of fair value. The use of different methodologies or assumptions by other market participants compared with those used by the Firm could result in the Firm deriving a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Valuation process Risk-taking functions are responsible for providing fair value estimates for assets and liabilities carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Firm’s Valuation Control Group (“VCG”), which is part of the Firm’s Finance function and independent of the risk-taking functions, is responsible for verifying these estimates and determining any fair value adjustments that may be required to ensure that the Firm’s positions are recorded at fair value. In addition, the Firm’s Valuation Governance Forum (“VGF”), which is composed of senior finance and risk executives, is responsible for overseeing the management of risks arising from valuation activities conducted across the Firm. The Firmwide VGF is chaired by the Firmwide JPMorganChase carries a portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. These assets and liabilities are predominantly carried at fair value on a recurring basis (i.e., assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets). Certain assets, liabilities and unfunded lending-related commitments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is based on quoted market prices or inputs, where available. If prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based on valuation models and other valuation techniques that consider relevant transaction characteristics (such as maturity) and use, as inputs, observable or unobservable market parameters, including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), correlations, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. Fair value may also incorporate valuation adjustments. The level of precision in estimating unobservable market inputs or other factors can affect the amount of gain or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore, while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the methods and assumptions used reflect management judgment and may vary across the Firm’s businesses and portfolios. The Firm uses various methodologies and assumptions in the determination of fair value. The use of different methodologies or assumptions by other market participants compared with those used by the Firm could result in the Firm deriving a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Risk-taking functions are responsible for providing fair value estimates for assets and liabilities carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Firm’s Valuation Control Group (“VCG”), which is part of the Firm’s Finance function and independent of the risk-taking functions, is responsible for verifying these estimates and determining any fair value adjustments that may be required to ensure that the Firm’s positions are recorded at fair value. In addition, the Firm’s Valuation Governance Forum (“VGF”), which is composed of senior finance and risk executives, is responsible for overseeing the management of risks arising from valuation activities conducted across the Firm. The Firmwide VGF is chaired by the Firmwide head of the VCG (under the direction of the Firm’s Controller), and includes sub-forums covering the CIB, CCB, AWM and certain corporate functions including Treasury and CIO. Price verification process The VCG verifies fair value estimates provided by the risk-taking functions by leveraging independently derived prices, valuation inputs and other market data, where available. Where independent prices or inputs are not available, the VCG performs additional review to ensure the reasonableness of the estimates. The additional review may include evaluating the limited market activity including client unwinds, benchmarking valuation inputs to those used for similar instruments, decomposing the valuation of structured instruments into individual components, comparing expected to actual cash flows, reviewing profit and loss trends, and reviewing trends in collateral valuation. There are also additional levels of management review for more significant or complex positions.The VCG determines any valuation adjustments that may be required to the estimates provided by the risk-taking functions. No adjustments to quoted prices are applied for instruments classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy (refer to the discussion of the fair value hierarchy on page 182 for further information). For other positions, judgment is required to assess the need for valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect liquidity considerations, unobservable parameters, and, for certain portfolios that meet specified criteria, the size of the net open risk position. The determination of such adjustments follows a consistent framework across the Firm:•Liquidity valuation adjustments are considered where an observable external price or valuation parameter exists but is of lower reliability, potentially due to lower market activity. Liquidity valuation adjustments are made based on current market conditions. Factors that may be considered in determining the liquidity adjustment include analysis of: (1) the estimated bid-offer spread for the instrument being traded; (2) alternative pricing points for similar instruments in active markets; and (3) the range of reasonable values that the price or parameter could take. •The Firm manages certain portfolios of financial instruments on the basis of net open risk exposure and, as permitted by U.S. GAAP, has elected to estimate the fair value of such portfolios on the basis of a transfer of the entire net open risk position in an orderly transaction. Where this is the case, valuation adjustments may be necessary to reflect the cost of exiting a larger-than-normal market-size net open risk position. Where applied, such adjustments are head of the VCG (under the direction of the Firm’s Controller), and includes sub-forums covering the CIB, CCB, AWM and certain corporate functions including Treasury and CIO. Price verification process The VCG verifies fair value estimates provided by the risk-taking functions by leveraging independently derived prices, valuation inputs and other market data, where available. Where independent prices or inputs are not available, the VCG performs additional review to ensure the reasonableness of the estimates. The additional review may include evaluating the limited market activity including client unwinds, benchmarking valuation inputs to those used for similar instruments, decomposing the valuation of structured instruments into individual components, comparing expected to actual cash flows, reviewing profit and loss trends, and reviewing trends in collateral valuation. There are also additional levels of management review for more significant or complex positions. The VCG determines any valuation adjustments that may be required to the estimates provided by the risk-taking functions. No adjustments to quoted prices are applied for instruments classified within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy (refer to the discussion of the fair value hierarchy on page 182 for further information). For other positions, judgment is required to assess the need for valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect liquidity considerations, unobservable parameters, and, for certain portfolios that meet specified criteria, the size of the net open risk position. The determination of such adjustments follows a consistent framework across the Firm: •Liquidity valuation adjustments are considered where an observable external price or valuation parameter exists but is of lower reliability, potentially due to lower market activity. Liquidity valuation adjustments are made based on current market conditions. Factors that may be considered in determining the liquidity adjustment include analysis of: (1) the estimated bid-offer spread for the instrument being traded; (2) alternative pricing points for similar instruments in active markets; and (3) the range of reasonable values that the price or parameter could take. •The Firm manages certain portfolios of financial instruments on the basis of net open risk exposure and, as permitted by U.S. GAAP, has elected to estimate the fair value of such portfolios on the basis of a transfer of the entire net open risk position in an orderly transaction. Where this is the case, valuation adjustments may be necessary to reflect the cost of exiting a larger-than-normal market-size net open risk position. Where applied, such adjustments are JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K181 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K181 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K181 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 181

based on factors that a relevant market participant would consider in the transfer of the net open risk position, including the size of the adverse market move that is likely to occur during the period required to sufficiently reduce the net open risk position. •Uncertainty adjustments related to unobservable parameters may be made when positions are valued using prices or input parameters to valuation models that are unobservable due to a lack of market activity or because they cannot be implied from observable market data. Such prices or parameters must be estimated and are, therefore, subject to management judgment. Adjustments are made to reflect the uncertainty inherent in the resulting valuation estimate. •Where appropriate, the Firm also applies adjustments to its estimates of fair value in order to appropriately reflect counterparty credit quality (CVA), the Firm’s own creditworthiness (DVA) and the impact of funding (FVA), using a consistent framework across the Firm. Refer to Credit and funding adjustments on page 198 of this Note for more information on such adjustments.Valuation model review and approval If prices or quotes are not available for an instrument or a similar instrument, fair value is generally determined using valuation models that consider relevant transaction terms such as maturity and use as inputs market-based or independently sourced parameters. Where this is the case the price verification process described above is applied to the inputs in those models. Under the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy, MRGR reviews and approves new models, as well as material changes to existing models, prior to implementation in the operating environment. In certain circumstances exceptions may be granted to the Firm’s policy to allow a model to be used prior to review or approval. MRGR may also require the user to take appropriate actions to mitigate the model risk if it is to be used in the interim. These actions will depend on the model and may include, for example, limitation of trading activity. Fair value hierarchy A three-level fair value hierarchy has been established under U.S. GAAP for disclosure of fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy is based on the observability of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows. •Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. •Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.•Level 3 – one or more inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. based on factors that a relevant market participant would consider in the transfer of the net open risk position, including the size of the adverse market move that is likely to occur during the period required to sufficiently reduce the net open risk position. •Uncertainty adjustments related to unobservable parameters may be made when positions are valued using prices or input parameters to valuation models that are unobservable due to a lack of market activity or because they cannot be implied from observable market data. Such prices or parameters must be estimated and are, therefore, subject to management judgment. Adjustments are made to reflect the uncertainty inherent in the resulting valuation estimate. •Where appropriate, the Firm also applies adjustments to its estimates of fair value in order to appropriately reflect counterparty credit quality (CVA), the Firm’s own creditworthiness (DVA) and the impact of funding (FVA), using a consistent framework across the Firm. Refer to Credit and funding adjustments on page 198 of this Note for more information on such adjustments.Valuation model review and approval If prices or quotes are not available for an instrument or a similar instrument, fair value is generally determined using valuation models that consider relevant transaction terms such as maturity and use as inputs market-based or independently sourced parameters. Where this is the case the price verification process described above is applied to the inputs in those models. Under the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy, MRGR reviews and approves new models, as well as material changes to existing models, prior to implementation in the operating environment. In certain circumstances exceptions may be granted to the Firm’s policy to allow a model to be used prior to review or approval. MRGR may also require the user to take appropriate actions to mitigate the model risk if it is to be used in the interim. These actions will depend on the model and may include, for example, limitation of trading activity. based on factors that a relevant market participant would consider in the transfer of the net open risk position, including the size of the adverse market move that is likely to occur during the period required to sufficiently reduce the net open risk position. •Uncertainty adjustments related to unobservable parameters may be made when positions are valued using prices or input parameters to valuation models that are unobservable due to a lack of market activity or because they cannot be implied from observable market data. Such prices or parameters must be estimated and are, therefore, subject to management judgment. Adjustments are made to reflect the uncertainty inherent in the resulting valuation estimate. •Where appropriate, the Firm also applies adjustments to its estimates of fair value in order to appropriately reflect counterparty credit quality (CVA), the Firm’s own creditworthiness (DVA) and the impact of funding (FVA), using a consistent framework across the Firm. Refer to Credit and funding adjustments on page 198 of this Note for more information on such adjustments.

If prices or quotes are not available for an instrument or a similar instrument, fair value is generally determined using valuation models that consider relevant transaction terms such as maturity and use as inputs market-based or independently sourced parameters. Where this is the case the price verification process described above is applied to the inputs in those models. Under the Firm’s Estimations and Model Risk Management Policy, MRGR reviews and approves new models, as well as material changes to existing models, prior to implementation in the operating environment. In certain circumstances exceptions may be granted to the Firm’s policy to allow a model to be used prior to review or approval. MRGR may also require the user to take appropriate actions to mitigate the model risk if it is to be used in the interim. These actions will depend on the model and may include, for example, limitation of trading activity. Fair value hierarchy A three-level fair value hierarchy has been established under U.S. GAAP for disclosure of fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy is based on the observability of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows. •Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. •Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.•Level 3 – one or more inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A three-level fair value hierarchy has been established under U.S. GAAP for disclosure of fair value measurements. The fair value hierarchy is based on the observability of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows. •Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. •Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. •Level 3 – one or more inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. 182JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 182JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 182JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 182 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following table describes the valuation methodologies generally used by the Firm to measure its significant products/instruments at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the fair value hierarchy. Product/instrumentValuation methodologyClassifications in the fair value hierarchySecurities financing agreementsValuations are based on discounted cash flows, which consider:Predominantly level 2• Derivative features: refer to the discussion of derivatives below for further information• Market rates for the respective maturity• Collateral characteristicsLoans and lending-related commitments — wholesaleLoans carried at fair value(trading loans and non-trading loans) and associatedlending-related commitmentsWhere observable market data is available, valuations are based on:Level 2 or 3• Observed market prices (circumstances are infrequent)• Relevant broker quotes• Observed market prices for similar instrumentsWhere observable market data is unavailable or limited, valuations are based on discounted cash flows, which consider the following:• Credit spreads derived from the cost of CDS; or benchmark credit curves developed by the Firm, by industry and credit rating• Prepayment speed• Collateral characteristicsLoans — consumerFair value is based on observable market prices for mortgage-backed securities with similar collateral and incorporates adjustments to these prices to account for differences between the securities and the value of the underlying loans, which include credit characteristics, portfolio composition, and liquidity.Predominantly level 2Loans carried at fair value — residential mortgage loans expected to be soldInvestment and trading securitiesQuoted market pricesLevel 1In the absence of quoted market prices, securities are valued based on:Level 2 or 3• Observable market prices for similar securities• Relevant broker quotes• Discounted cash flowsIn addition, the following inputs to discounted cash flows are used for the following products:Mortgage- and asset-backed securities specific inputs:• Collateral characteristics• Deal-specific payment and loss allocations• Current market assumptions related to yield, prepayment speed, conditional default rates and loss severityCollateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) specific inputs:• Collateral characteristics• Deal-specific payment and loss allocations• Expected prepayment speed, conditional default rates, loss severity• Credit spreads• Credit rating dataPhysical commoditiesValued using observable market prices or data.Predominantly Level 1 or 2 Predominantly level 2 • Market rates for the respective maturity • Collateral characteristics Loans and lending-related commitments — wholesale Loans carried at fair value (trading loans and non-trading loans) and associated lending-related commitments Where observable market data is available, valuations are based on: • Observed market prices (circumstances are infrequent) • Relevant broker quotes • Observed market prices for similar instruments • Credit spreads derived from the cost of CDS; or benchmark credit curves developed by the Firm, by industry and credit rating • Prepayment speed • Collateral characteristics Predominantly level 2 Loans carried at fair value — residential mortgage loans expected to be sold • Relevant broker quotes • Discounted cash flows • Collateral characteristics • Current market assumptions related to yield, prepayment speed, conditional default rates and loss severity • Collateral characteristics • Deal-specific payment and loss allocations • Expected prepayment speed, conditional default rates, loss severity • Credit spreads Predominantly Level 1 or 2 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K183 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K183 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K183 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 183

Product/instrumentValuation methodologyClassifications in the fair value hierarchyDerivativesActively traded derivatives, e.g., exchange-traded derivatives, that are valued using quoted prices.Level 1Derivatives that are valued using models such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model, simulation models, or a combination of models that may use observable or unobservable valuation inputs as well as considering the contractual terms.The key valuation inputs used will depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instruments and may include equity prices, commodity prices, foreign exchange rates, volatilities, correlations, CDS spreads, recovery rates and prepayment speed.Level 2 or 3In addition, specific inputs used for derivatives that are valued based on models with significant unobservable inputs are as follows:Interest rate and FX exotic derivatives specific inputs include:• Interest rate curve• Interest rate volatility• Interest rate spread volatility• Bermudan switch value• Interest rate correlation• Interest rate-FX correlation• Foreign exchange correlationCredit derivatives specific inputs include:• Credit correlation between the underlying debt instrumentsEquity derivatives specific inputs include:• Forward equity price• Equity volatility• Equity correlation• Equity-FX correlation• Equity-IR correlationCommodity derivatives specific inputs include:• Forward commodity price• Commodity volatility• Commodity correlationAdditionally, adjustments are made to reflect counterparty credit quality (CVA) and the impact of funding (FVA). Refer to page 198 of this Note.Mortgage servicing rightsRefer to Mortgage servicing rights in Note 15.Level 3Private equity direct investmentsFair value is estimated using all available information; the range of potential inputs include:Level 2 or 3• Transaction prices• Trading multiples of comparable public companies• Operating performance of the underlying portfolio company• Adjustments as required, since comparable public companies are not identical to the company being valued, and for company-specific issues including lack of liquidity• Additional available inputs relevant to the investment Derivatives that are valued using models such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model, simulation models, or a combination of models that may use observable or unobservable valuation inputs as well as considering the contractual terms. The key valuation inputs used will depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instruments and may include equity prices, commodity prices, foreign exchange rates, volatilities, correlations, CDS spreads, recovery rates and prepayment speed. • Interest rate curve • Interest rate volatility • Interest rate spread volatility • Bermudan switch value • Interest rate correlation • Interest rate-FX correlation • Foreign exchange correlation • Credit correlation between the underlying debt instruments • Forward equity price • Equity volatility • Equity correlation • Equity-FX correlation • Equity-IR correlation • Forward commodity price • Commodity volatility • Commodity correlation Additionally, adjustments are made to reflect counterparty credit quality (CVA) and the impact of funding (FVA). Refer to page 198 of this Note. Refer to Mortgage servicing rights in Note 15. • Transaction prices • Adjustments as required, since comparable public companies are not identical to the company being valued, and for company-specific issues including lack of liquidity 184JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 184JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 184JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 184 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Product/instrumentValuation methodologyClassification in the fair value hierarchyFund investments (e.g., mutual/collective investment funds, private equity funds, hedge funds, and real estate funds)Net asset value• NAV is supported by the ability to redeem and purchase at the NAV levelLevel 1• Adjustments to the NAV as required, for restrictions on redemption (e.g., lock-up periods or withdrawal limitations) or where observable activity is limitedLevel 2 or 3(a)Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEsValued using observable market information, where available.Level 2 or 3In the absence of observable market information, valuations are based on the fair value of the underlying assets held by the VIE.Structured notes (included in deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt)Valuations are based on discounted cash flow analyses that consider the embedded derivative and the terms and payment structure of the note.The embedded derivative features are considered using models such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model, simulation models, or a combination of models that may use observable or unobservable valuation inputs, depending on the embedded derivative. The specific inputs used vary according to the nature of the embedded derivative features, as described in the discussion above regarding derivatives valuation. Adjustments are then made to this base valuation to reflect the Firm’s own credit risk (DVA). Refer to page 198 of this Note.Level 2 or 3 Level 2 or 3(a) Valuations are based on discounted cash flow analyses that consider the embedded derivative and the terms and payment structure of the note. The embedded derivative features are considered using models such as the Black-Scholes option pricing model, simulation models, or a combination of models that may use observable or unobservable valuation inputs, depending on the embedded derivative. The specific inputs used vary according to the nature of the embedded derivative features, as described in the discussion above regarding derivatives valuation. Adjustments are then made to this base valuation to reflect the Firm’s own credit risk (DVA). Refer to page 198 of this Note. (a)Excludes certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K185 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K185 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K185 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 185

The following table presents the assets and liabilities reported at fair value as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, by major product category and fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basisFair value hierarchyDecember 31, 2024 (in millions)Level 1Level 2Level 3Derivative netting adjustments(e)Total fair valueFederal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$— $286,771 $— $— $286,771 Securities borrowed— 83,962 — — 83,962 Trading assets:Debt instruments:Mortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a)— 104,312 488 — 104,800 Residential – nonagency— 2,282 5 — 2,287 Commercial – nonagency— 1,283 10 — 1,293 Total mortgage-backed securities— 107,877 503 — 108,380 U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies(a)150,580 11,702 — — 162,282 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities— 6,100 1 — 6,101 Certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and commercial paper— 3,950 — — 3,950 Non-U.S. government debt securities34,108 54,335 152 — 88,595 Corporate debt securities— 33,591 390 — 33,981 Loans— 10,228 1,088 — 11,316 Asset-backed securities— 2,813 10 — 2,823 Total debt instruments184,688 230,596 2,144 — 417,428 Equity securities130,307 1,359 62 — 131,728 Physical commodities(b)5,957 1,533 26 — 7,516 Other— 19,935 210 — 20,145 Total debt and equity instruments(c)320,952 253,423 2,442 — 576,817 Derivative receivables:Interest rate4,934 282,019 3,781 (265,789)24,945 Credit— 10,379 708 (10,273)814 Foreign exchange196 261,520 1,204 (237,608)25,312 Equity— 82,855 2,365 (79,935)5,285 Commodity— 15,232 394 (11,015)4,611 Total derivative receivables5,130 652,005 8,452 (604,620)60,967 Total trading assets(d)326,082 905,428 10,894 (604,620)637,784 Available-for-sale securities:Mortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a)— 91,893 — — 91,893 Residential – nonagency— 4,811 — — 4,811 Commercial – nonagency— 4,057 8 — 4,065 Total mortgage-backed securities— 100,761 8 — 100,769 U.S. Treasury and government agencies234,491 288 — — 234,779 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities— 17,913 — — 17,913 Non-U.S. government debt securities23,973 12,272 — — 36,245 Corporate debt securities— 70 — — 70 Asset-backed securities:Collateralized loan obligations— 14,943 — — 14,943 Other(a)— 2,133 — — 2,133 Total available-for-sale securities258,464 148,380 8 — 406,852 Loans(e)— 38,934 2,416 — 41,350 Mortgage servicing rights— — 9,121 — 9,121 Other assets(d)5,732 6,997 1,344 — 14,073 Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis$590,278 $1,470,472 $23,783 $(604,620)$1,479,913 Deposits$— $31,583 $2,185 $— $33,768 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements— 226,329 — — 226,329 Short-term borrowings— 23,045 3,476 — 26,521 Trading liabilities:Debt and equity instruments(c)120,719 32,457 46 — 153,222 Derivative payables:Interest rate3,981 266,767 3,480 (264,989)9,239 Credit— 12,725 1,071 (11,898)1,898 Foreign exchange187 253,196 1,184 (238,970)15,597 Equity— 90,908 5,231 (87,491)8,648 Commodity— 14,021 467 (10,209)4,279 Total derivative payables4,168 637,617 11,433 (613,557)39,661 Total trading liabilities124,887 670,074 11,479 (613,557)192,883 Accounts payable and other liabilities3,100 2,717 76 — 5,893 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs— 1 — — 1 Long-term debt— 66,216 34,564 — 100,780 Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis$127,987 $1,019,965 $51,780 $(613,557)$586,175 Derivative netting adjustments(e) U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies(a) Certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and commercial paper Physical commodities(b)

U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) Other(a) Loans(e) Other assets(d) Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements Debt and equity instruments(c) 186JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 186JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 186JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 186 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Fair value hierarchyDecember 31, 2023 (in millions)Level 1Level 2Level 3Derivative netting adjustments(e)Total fair valueFederal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$— $259,813 $— $— $259,813 Securities borrowed— 70,086 — — 70,086 Trading assets:Debt instruments:Mortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a)— 73,840 758 — 74,598 Residential – nonagency— 1,921 5 — 1,926 Commercial – nonagency— 1,362 12 — 1,374 Total mortgage-backed securities— 77,123 775 — 77,898 U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies(a)133,997 9,998 — — 143,995 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities— 5,858 10 — 5,868 Certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and commercial paper— 756 — — 756 Non-U.S. government debt securities24,846 55,557 179 — 80,582 Corporate debt securities— 32,854 484 — 33,338 Loans— 7,872 684 — 8,556 Asset-backed securities— 2,199 6 — 2,205 Total debt instruments158,843 192,217 2,138 — 353,198 Equity securities107,926 679 127 — 108,732 Physical commodities(b)2,479 3,305 7 — 5,791 Other— 17,879 101 — 17,980 Total debt and equity instruments(c)269,248 214,080 2,373 — 485,701 Derivative receivables:Interest rate 2,815 243,578 4,298 (224,367)26,324 Credit — 8,644 1,010 (9,103)551 Foreign exchange149 204,737 889 (187,756)18,019 Equity— 55,167 2,522 (52,761)4,928 Commodity— 15,234 205 (10,397)5,042 Total derivative receivables2,964 527,360 8,924 (484,384)54,864 Total trading assets(d)272,212 741,440 11,297 (484,384)540,565 Available-for-sale securities:Mortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a)— 85,170 — — 85,170 Residential – nonagency— 3,639 — — 3,639 Commercial – nonagency— 2,803 — — 2,803 Total mortgage-backed securities— 91,612 — — 91,612 U.S. Treasury and government agencies57,683 122 — — 57,805 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities— 21,367 — — 21,367 Non-U.S. government debt securities13,095 8,187 — — 21,282 Corporate debt securities— 100 — — 100 Asset-backed securities:Collateralized loan obligations— 6,752 — — 6,752 Other(a)— 2,786 — — 2,786 Total available-for-sale securities70,778 130,926 — — 201,704 Loans(e)— 35,772 3,079 — 38,851 Mortgage servicing rights— — 8,522 — 8,522 Other assets(d)6,635 3,929 758 — 11,322 Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis$349,625 $1,241,966 $23,656 $(484,384)$1,130,863 Deposits$— $76,551 $1,833 $— $78,384 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements— 169,003 — — 169,003 Short-term borrowings— 18,284 1,758 — 20,042 Trading liabilities:Debt and equity instruments(c)107,292 32,252 37 — 139,581 Derivative payables:Interest rate 4,409 232,277 3,796 (228,586)11,896 Credit — 11,293 745 (10,949)1,089 Foreign exchange147 211,289 827 (199,643)12,620 Equity— 60,887 4,924 (56,443)9,368 Commodity— 15,894 484 (10,504)5,874 Total derivative payables4,556 531,640 10,776 (506,125)40,847 Total trading liabilities111,848 563,892 10,813 (506,125)180,428 Accounts payable and other liabilities3,968 1,617 52 — 5,637 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs— 1 — — 1 Long-term debt— 60,198 27,726 — 87,924 Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis$115,816 $889,546 $42,182 $(506,125)$541,419 Derivative netting adjustments(e) U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies(a) Certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances and commercial paper Physical commodities(b)

U.S. GSEs and government agencies(a) Other(a) Loans(e) Other assets(d) Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements Debt and equity instruments(c) (a)At December 31, 2024 and 2023, included total U.S. GSE obligations of $120.1 billion and $78.5 billion, respectively, which were mortgage-related. (b)Physical commodities inventories are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or net realizable value. “Net realizable value” is a term defined in U.S. GAAP as not exceeding fair value less costs to sell (“transaction costs”). Transaction costs for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories are either not applicable or immaterial to the value of the inventory. Therefore, net realizable value approximates fair value for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories. When fair value hedging has been applied (or when net realizable value is below cost), the carrying value of physical commodities approximates fair value, because under fair value hedge accounting, the cost basis is adjusted for changes in fair value. Refer to Note 5 for a further discussion of the Firm’s hedge accounting relationships. To provide consistent fair value disclosure information, all physical commodities inventories have been included in each period presented. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K187 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K187 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K187 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 187

(c)Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of identical securities sold but not yet purchased (short positions). (d)Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) as a practical expedient are not required to be classified in the fair value hierarchy. At both December 31, 2024 and 2023, the fair values of these investments, which include certain hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate and other funds, were $1.0 billion, primarily reported in other assets. (e)As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. The level 3 balances would be reduced if netting were applied, including the netting benefit associated with cash collateral. 188JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 188JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 188JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 188 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The Firm has established well-structured processes for determining fair value, including for instruments where fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs (level 3). Refer to pages 181–185 of this Note for further information on the Firm’s valuation process and a detailed discussion of the determination of fair value for individual financial instruments. Estimating fair value requires the application of judgment. The type and level of judgment required is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to the Firm. For instruments valued using internally developed valuation models and other valuation techniques that use significant unobservable inputs and are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value are more significant than those required when estimating the fair value of instruments classified within levels 1 and 2. In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3, management must first determine the appropriate valuation model or other valuation technique to use. Second, due to the lack of observability of significant inputs, management must assess relevant empirical data in deriving valuation inputs including transaction details, yield curves, interest rates, prepayment speed, default rates, volatilities, correlations, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), valuations of comparable instruments, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. The following table presents the Firm’s primary level 3 financial instruments, the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of those financial instruments, the significant unobservable inputs, the range of values for those inputs and the weighted or arithmetic averages of such inputs. While the determination to classify an instrument within level 3 is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement, level 3 financial instruments typically include observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources) in addition to the unobservable components. The level 1 and/or level 2 inputs are not included in the table. In addition, the Firm manages the risk of the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within levels 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The range of values presented in the table is representative of the highest and lowest level input used to value the significant groups of instruments within a product/instrument classification. Where provided, the weighted averages of the input values presented in the table are calculated based on the fair value of the instruments that the input is being used to value. In the Firm’s view, the input range, weighted and arithmetic average values do not reflect the degree of input uncertainty or an assessment of the reasonableness of the Firm’s estimates and assumptions. Rather, they reflect the characteristics of the various instruments held by the Firm and the relative distribution of instruments within the range of characteristics. For example, two option contracts may have similar levels of market risk exposure and valuation uncertainty, but may have significantly different implied volatility levels because the option contracts have different underlyings, tenors, or strike prices. The input range and weighted and arithmetic average values will therefore vary from period-to-period and parameter-to-parameter based on the characteristics of the instruments held by the Firm at each balance sheet date. The Firm has established well-structured processes for determining fair value, including for instruments where fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs (level 3). Refer to pages 181–185 of this Note for further information on the Firm’s valuation process and a detailed discussion of the determination of fair value for individual financial instruments. Estimating fair value requires the application of judgment. The type and level of judgment required is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to the Firm. For instruments valued using internally developed valuation models and other valuation techniques that use significant unobservable inputs and are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value are more significant than those required when estimating the fair value of instruments classified within levels 1 and 2. In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3, management must first determine the appropriate valuation model or other valuation technique to use. Second, due to the lack of observability of significant inputs, management must assess relevant empirical data in deriving valuation inputs including transaction details, yield curves, interest rates, prepayment speed, default rates, volatilities, correlations, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), valuations of comparable instruments, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. The following table presents the Firm’s primary level 3 financial instruments, the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of those financial instruments, the significant unobservable inputs, the range of values for those inputs and the weighted or arithmetic averages of such inputs. While the determination to classify an instrument within level 3 is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement, level 3 financial instruments typically include observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources) in addition to the unobservable components. The level 1 and/or level 2 inputs are not included in the table. In addition, the Firm manages the risk of the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within levels 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The range of values presented in the table is representative of the highest and lowest level input used to value the significant groups of instruments within a product/instrument classification. Where provided, the weighted averages of the input values presented in the table are calculated based on the fair value of the instruments that the input is being used to value. The Firm has established well-structured processes for determining fair value, including for instruments where fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs (level 3). Refer to pages 181–185 of this Note for further information on the Firm’s valuation process and a detailed discussion of the determination of fair value for individual financial instruments. Estimating fair value requires the application of judgment. The type and level of judgment required is largely dependent on the amount of observable market information available to the Firm. For instruments valued using internally developed valuation models and other valuation techniques that use significant unobservable inputs and are therefore classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, judgments used to estimate fair value are more significant than those required when estimating the fair value of instruments classified within levels 1 and 2. In arriving at an estimate of fair value for an instrument within level 3, management must first determine the appropriate valuation model or other valuation technique to use. Second, due to the lack of observability of significant inputs, management must assess relevant empirical data in deriving valuation inputs including transaction details, yield curves, interest rates, prepayment speed, default rates, volatilities, correlations, prices (such as commodity, equity or debt prices), valuations of comparable instruments, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. The following table presents the Firm’s primary level 3 financial instruments, the valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of those financial instruments, the significant unobservable inputs, the range of values for those inputs and the weighted or arithmetic averages of such inputs. While the determination to classify an instrument within level 3 is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement, level 3 financial instruments typically include observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources) in addition to the unobservable components. The level 1 and/or level 2 inputs are not included in the table. In addition, the Firm manages the risk of the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within levels 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The range of values presented in the table is representative of the highest and lowest level input used to value the significant groups of instruments within a product/instrument classification. Where provided, the weighted averages of the input values presented in the table are calculated based on the fair value of the instruments that the input is being used to value. In the Firm’s view, the input range, weighted and arithmetic average values do not reflect the degree of input uncertainty or an assessment of the reasonableness of the Firm’s estimates and assumptions. Rather, they reflect the characteristics of the various instruments held by the Firm and the relative distribution of instruments within the range of characteristics. For example, two option contracts may have similar levels of market risk exposure and valuation uncertainty, but may have significantly different implied volatility levels because the option contracts have different underlyings, tenors, or strike prices. The input range and weighted and arithmetic average values will therefore vary from period-to-period and parameter-to-parameter based on the characteristics of the instruments held by the Firm at each balance sheet date. In the Firm’s view, the input range, weighted and arithmetic average values do not reflect the degree of input uncertainty or an assessment of the reasonableness of the Firm’s estimates and assumptions. Rather, they reflect the characteristics of the various instruments held by the Firm and the relative distribution of instruments within the range of characteristics. For example, two option contracts may have similar levels of market risk exposure and valuation uncertainty, but may have significantly different implied volatility levels because the option contracts have different underlyings, tenors, or strike prices. The input range and weighted and arithmetic average values will therefore vary from period-to-period and parameter-to-parameter based on the characteristics of the instruments held by the Firm at each balance sheet date. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K189 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K189 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K189 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 189

Level 3 inputs(a) December 31, 2024Product/InstrumentFair value (in millions)Principal valuation techniqueUnobservable inputs(g)Range of input valuesAverage(i)Residential mortgage-backed securities and loans(b)$861 Discounted cash flowsYield0%103%8%Prepayment speed3%13%8%Conditional default rate0%7%0%Loss severity0%110%5%Commercial mortgage-backed securities and loans(c)1,424 Market comparablesPrice$0$90$81Corporate debt securities390 Market comparablesPrice$0$148$95Loans(d)1,730 Market comparablesPrice$0$107$79Non-U.S. government debt securities152 Market comparablesPrice$0$103$95Net interest rate derivatives293 Option pricingInterest rate volatility9bps1,097bps115bpsInterest rate spread volatility37bps77bps64bpsBermudan switch value0%45%17%Interest rate correlation(82)%97%64%IR-FX correlation(35)%60%8%8 Discounted cash flowsPrepayment speed0%21%7%Net credit derivatives(393)Discounted cash flowsCredit correlation31%79%47%Credit spread0bps2,717bps331bpsRecovery rate10%90%61%30 Market comparablesPrice$0$115$74Net foreign exchange derivatives62 Option pricingIR-FX correlation(40)%60%22%(42)Discounted cash flowsPrepayment speed11%11%Interest rate curve1%27%7%Net equity derivatives(2,866)Option pricingForward equity price(h)76%153%100%Equity volatility5%135%32%Equity correlation17%100%56%Equity-FX correlation(80)%65%(32)%Equity-IR correlation5%25%14%Net commodity derivatives(73)Option pricingOil commodity forward$87 / BBL$291 / BBL$160 / BBLNatural gas commodity forward$2 / MMBTU$7 / MMBTU$4 / MMBTUCommodity volatility2%43%5%Commodity correlation(35)%98%(9)%MSRs9,121 Discounted cash flowsRefer to Note 15Long-term debt, short-term borrowings, and deposits(e)38,901 Option pricingInterest rate volatility9bps1,097bps115bpsBermudan switch value0%45%17%Interest rate correlation(82)%97%64%IR-FX correlation(35)%60%8%Equity volatility2%137%28%Equity correlation17%100%56%Equity-FX correlation(80)%65%(32)%Equity-IR correlation5%25%14%1,324 Discounted cash flowsCredit correlation30%57%46%Credit spread2bps270bps83bpsRecovery rate20%40%35%Yield5%20%10%Loss severity0%100%50%Other level 3 assets and liabilities, net(f)1,531

Residential mortgage-backed securities and loans(b) Commercial mortgage-backed securities and loans(c) Loans(d) Forward equity price(h) Long-term debt, short-term borrowings, and deposits(e) Other level 3 assets and liabilities, net(f) (a)The categories presented in the table have been aggregated based upon the product type, which may differ from their classification on the Consolidated balance sheets. Furthermore, the inputs presented for each valuation technique in the table are, in some cases, not applicable to every instrument valued using the technique as the characteristics of the instruments can differ. (b)Comprises U.S. GSE and government agency securities of $488 million, nonagency securities of $5 million and non-trading loans of $368 million. (c)Comprises nonagency securities of $18 million, trading loans of $65 million and non-trading loans of $1.3 billion. (d)Comprises trading loans of $1.0 billion and non-trading loans of $707 million. (e)Long-term debt, short-term borrowings and deposits include structured notes issued by the Firm that are financial instruments that typically contain embedded derivatives. The estimation of the fair value of structured notes includes the derivative features embedded within the instrument. The significant unobservable inputs are broadly consistent with those presented for derivative receivables. (f)Includes equity securities of $734 million including $672 million in Other assets, for which quoted prices are not readily available and the fair value is generally based on internal valuation techniques such as EBITDA multiples and comparable analysis. All other level 3 assets and liabilities are insignificant both individually and in aggregate. (g)Price is a significant unobservable input for certain instruments. When quoted market prices are not readily available, reliance is generally placed on price-based internal valuation techniques. The price input is expressed assuming a par value of $100. (h)Forward equity price is expressed as a percentage of the current equity price. (i)Amounts represent weighted averages except for derivative related inputs where arithmetic averages are used. 190JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 190JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 190JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 190 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Changes in and ranges of unobservable inputs The following discussion provides a description of the impact on a fair value measurement of a change in each unobservable input in isolation, and the interrelationship between unobservable inputs, where relevant and significant. The impact of changes in inputs may not be independent, as a change in one unobservable input may give rise to a change in another unobservable input. Where relationships do exist between two unobservable inputs, those relationships are discussed below. Relationships may also exist between observable and unobservable inputs (for example, as observable interest rates rise, unobservable prepayment rates decline); such relationships have not been included in the discussion below. In addition, for each of the individual relationships described below, the inverse relationship would also generally apply. The following discussion also provides a description of attributes of the underlying instruments and external market factors that affect the range of inputs used in the valuation of the Firm’s positions. Yield – The yield of an asset is the interest rate used to discount future cash flows in a discounted cash flow calculation. An increase in the yield, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. Credit spread – The credit spread is the amount of additional annualized return over the market interest rate that a market participant would demand for taking exposure to the credit risk of an instrument. The credit spread for an instrument forms part of the discount rate used in a discounted cash flow calculation. Generally, an increase in the credit spread would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. The yield and the credit spread of a particular mortgage-backed security primarily reflect the risk inherent in the instrument. The yield is also impacted by the absolute level of the coupon paid by the instrument (which may not correspond directly to the level of inherent risk). Therefore, the range of yield and credit spreads reflects the range of risk inherent in various instruments owned by the Firm. The risk inherent in mortgage-backed securities is driven by the subordination of the security being valued and the characteristics of the underlying mortgages within the collateralized pool, including borrower FICO scores, LTV ratios for residential mortgages and the nature of the property and/or any tenants for commercial mortgages. For corporate debt securities, obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and other similar instruments, credit spreads reflect the credit quality of the obligor and the tenor of the obligation. Prepayment speed – The prepayment speed is a measure of the voluntary unscheduled principal repayments of a prepayable obligation in a collateralized pool. Prepayment speeds generally decline as borrower delinquencies rise. An increase in prepayment speeds, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement of assets valued at a premium to par and an increase in a fair value measurement of assets valued at a discount to par. Prepayment speeds may vary from collateral pool to collateral pool, and are driven by the type and location of the underlying borrower, and the remaining tenor of the obligation as well as the level and type (e.g., fixed or floating) of interest rate being paid by the borrower. Typically collateral pools with higher borrower credit quality have a higher prepayment rate than those with lower borrower credit quality, all other factors being equal. Conditional default rate – The conditional default rate is a measure of the reduction in the outstanding collateral balance underlying a collateralized obligation as a result of defaults. While there is typically no direct relationship between conditional default rates and prepayment speeds, collateralized obligations for which the underlying collateral has high prepayment speeds will tend to have lower conditional default rates. An increase in conditional default rates would generally be accompanied by an increase in loss severity and an increase in credit spreads. An increase in the conditional default rate, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. Conditional default rates reflect the quality of the collateral underlying a securitization and the structure of the securitization itself. Based on the types of securities owned in the Firm’s market-making portfolios, conditional default rates are most typically at the lower end of the range presented. Loss severity – The loss severity (the inverse concept is the recovery rate) is the expected amount of future realized losses resulting from the ultimate liquidation of a particular loan, expressed as the net amount of loss relative to the outstanding loan balance. An increase in loss severity is generally accompanied by an increase in conditional default rates. An increase in the loss severity, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. The loss severity applied in valuing a mortgage-backed security depends on factors relating to the underlying mortgages, including the LTV ratio, the nature of the lender’s lien on the property and other instrument-specific factors. Changes in and ranges of unobservable inputs The following discussion provides a description of the impact on a fair value measurement of a change in each unobservable input in isolation, and the interrelationship between unobservable inputs, where relevant and significant. The impact of changes in inputs may not be independent, as a change in one unobservable input may give rise to a change in another unobservable input. Where relationships do exist between two unobservable inputs, those relationships are discussed below. Relationships may also exist between observable and unobservable inputs (for example, as observable interest rates rise, unobservable prepayment rates decline); such relationships have not been included in the discussion below. In addition, for each of the individual relationships described below, the inverse relationship would also generally apply. The following discussion also provides a description of attributes of the underlying instruments and external market factors that affect the range of inputs used in the valuation of the Firm’s positions. Yield – The yield of an asset is the interest rate used to discount future cash flows in a discounted cash flow calculation. An increase in the yield, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. Credit spread – The credit spread is the amount of additional annualized return over the market interest rate that a market participant would demand for taking exposure to the credit risk of an instrument. The credit spread for an instrument forms part of the discount rate used in a discounted cash flow calculation. Generally, an increase in the credit spread would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. The yield and the credit spread of a particular mortgage-backed security primarily reflect the risk inherent in the instrument. The yield is also impacted by the absolute level of the coupon paid by the instrument (which may not correspond directly to the level of inherent risk). Therefore, the range of yield and credit spreads reflects the range of risk inherent in various instruments owned by the Firm. The risk inherent in mortgage-backed securities is driven by the subordination of the security being valued and the characteristics of the underlying mortgages within the collateralized pool, including borrower FICO scores, LTV ratios for residential mortgages and the nature of the property and/or any tenants for commercial mortgages. For corporate debt securities, obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and other similar instruments, credit spreads reflect the credit quality of the obligor and the tenor of the obligation.

The following discussion provides a description of the impact on a fair value measurement of a change in each unobservable input in isolation, and the interrelationship between unobservable inputs, where relevant and significant. The impact of changes in inputs may not be independent, as a change in one unobservable input may give rise to a change in another unobservable input. Where relationships do exist between two unobservable inputs, those relationships are discussed below. Relationships may also exist between observable and unobservable inputs (for example, as observable interest rates rise, unobservable prepayment rates decline); such relationships have not been included in the discussion below. In addition, for each of the individual relationships described below, the inverse relationship would also generally apply. The following discussion also provides a description of attributes of the underlying instruments and external market factors that affect the range of inputs used in the valuation of the Firm’s positions. Yield – The yield of an asset is the interest rate used to discount future cash flows in a discounted cash flow calculation. An increase in the yield, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. Credit spread – The credit spread is the amount of additional annualized return over the market interest rate that a market participant would demand for taking exposure to the credit risk of an instrument. The credit spread for an instrument forms part of the discount rate used in a discounted cash flow calculation. Generally, an increase in the credit spread would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. The yield and the credit spread of a particular mortgage-backed security primarily reflect the risk inherent in the instrument. The yield is also impacted by the absolute level of the coupon paid by the instrument (which may not correspond directly to the level of inherent risk). Therefore, the range of yield and credit spreads reflects the range of risk inherent in various instruments owned by the Firm. The risk inherent in mortgage-backed securities is driven by the subordination of the security being valued and the characteristics of the underlying mortgages within the collateralized pool, including borrower FICO scores, LTV ratios for residential mortgages and the nature of the property and/or any tenants for commercial mortgages. For corporate debt securities, obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and other similar instruments, credit spreads reflect the credit quality of the obligor and the tenor of the obligation. Prepayment speed – The prepayment speed is a measure of the voluntary unscheduled principal repayments of a prepayable obligation in a collateralized pool. Prepayment speeds generally decline as borrower delinquencies rise. An increase in prepayment speeds, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement of assets valued at a premium to par and an increase in a fair value measurement of assets valued at a discount to par. Prepayment speeds may vary from collateral pool to collateral pool, and are driven by the type and location of the underlying borrower, and the remaining tenor of the obligation as well as the level and type (e.g., fixed or floating) of interest rate being paid by the borrower. Typically collateral pools with higher borrower credit quality have a higher prepayment rate than those with lower borrower credit quality, all other factors being equal. Conditional default rate – The conditional default rate is a measure of the reduction in the outstanding collateral balance underlying a collateralized obligation as a result of defaults. While there is typically no direct relationship between conditional default rates and prepayment speeds, collateralized obligations for which the underlying collateral has high prepayment speeds will tend to have lower conditional default rates. An increase in conditional default rates would generally be accompanied by an increase in loss severity and an increase in credit spreads. An increase in the conditional default rate, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. Conditional default rates reflect the quality of the collateral underlying a securitization and the structure of the securitization itself. Based on the types of securities owned in the Firm’s market-making portfolios, conditional default rates are most typically at the lower end of the range presented. Loss severity – The loss severity (the inverse concept is the recovery rate) is the expected amount of future realized losses resulting from the ultimate liquidation of a particular loan, expressed as the net amount of loss relative to the outstanding loan balance. An increase in loss severity is generally accompanied by an increase in conditional default rates. An increase in the loss severity, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. The loss severity applied in valuing a mortgage-backed security depends on factors relating to the underlying mortgages, including the LTV ratio, the nature of the lender’s lien on the property and other instrument-specific factors. Prepayment speed – The prepayment speed is a measure of the voluntary unscheduled principal repayments of a prepayable obligation in a collateralized pool. Prepayment speeds generally decline as borrower delinquencies rise. An increase in prepayment speeds, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement of assets valued at a premium to par and an increase in a fair value measurement of assets valued at a discount to par. Prepayment speeds may vary from collateral pool to collateral pool, and are driven by the type and location of the underlying borrower, and the remaining tenor of the obligation as well as the level and type (e.g., fixed or floating) of interest rate being paid by the borrower. Typically collateral pools with higher borrower credit quality have a higher prepayment rate than those with lower borrower credit quality, all other factors being equal. Conditional default rate – The conditional default rate is a measure of the reduction in the outstanding collateral balance underlying a collateralized obligation as a result of defaults. While there is typically no direct relationship between conditional default rates and prepayment speeds, collateralized obligations for which the underlying collateral has high prepayment speeds will tend to have lower conditional default rates. An increase in conditional default rates would generally be accompanied by an increase in loss severity and an increase in credit spreads. An increase in the conditional default rate, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. Conditional default rates reflect the quality of the collateral underlying a securitization and the structure of the securitization itself. Based on the types of securities owned in the Firm’s market-making portfolios, conditional default rates are most typically at the lower end of the range presented. Loss severity – The loss severity (the inverse concept is the recovery rate) is the expected amount of future realized losses resulting from the ultimate liquidation of a particular loan, expressed as the net amount of loss relative to the outstanding loan balance. An increase in loss severity is generally accompanied by an increase in conditional default rates. An increase in the loss severity, in isolation, would result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. The loss severity applied in valuing a mortgage-backed security depends on factors relating to the underlying mortgages, including the LTV ratio, the nature of the lender’s lien on the property and other instrument-specific factors. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K191 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K191 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K191 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 191

Correlation – Correlation is a measure of the relationship between the movements of two variables. Correlation is a pricing input for a derivative product where the payoff is driven by one or more underlying risks. Correlation inputs are related to the type of derivative (e.g., interest rate, credit, equity, foreign exchange and commodity) due to the nature of the underlying risks. When parameters are positively correlated, an increase in one parameter will result in an increase in the other parameter. When parameters are negatively correlated, an increase in one parameter will result in a decrease in the other parameter. An increase in correlation can result in an increase or a decrease in a fair value measurement. Given a short correlation position, an increase in correlation, in isolation, would generally result in a decrease in a fair value measurement.The level of correlation used in the valuation of derivatives with multiple underlying risks depends on a number of factors including the nature of those risks. For example, the correlation between two credit risk exposures would be different than that between two interest rate risk exposures. Similarly, the tenor of the transaction may also impact the correlation input, as the relationship between the underlying risks may be different over different time periods. Furthermore, correlation levels are dependent on market conditions and could have a relatively wide range of levels within or across asset classes over time, particularly in volatile market conditions. Volatility – Volatility is a measure of the variability in possible returns for an instrument, parameter or market index given how much the particular instrument, parameter or index changes in value over time. Volatility is a pricing input for options, including equity options, commodity options, and interest rate options. Given a long position in an option, an increase in volatility, in isolation, would generally result in an increase in a fair value measurement. The level of volatility used in the valuation of a particular option-based derivative depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the risk underlying the option (e.g., the volatility of a particular equity security may be significantly different from that of a particular commodity index), the tenor of the derivative as well as the strike price of the option. Bermudan switch value – The switch value is the difference between the overall value of a Bermudan swaption, which can be exercised at multiple points in time, and its most expensive European swaption and reflects the additional value that the multiple exercise dates provide the holder. Switch values are dependent on market conditions and can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, such as the tenor of the underlying swap as well as the strike price of the option. An increase in switch value, in isolation, would generally result in an increase in a fair value measurement.Interest rate curve – The interest rate curve represents the relationship of interest rates over differing tenors. The interest rate curve is used to set interest rate and foreign exchange derivative cash flows and is also a pricing input used in the discounting of any derivative cash flow. Forward price – The forward price is the price at which the buyer agrees to purchase the asset underlying a forward contract on the predetermined future delivery date, and is such that the value of the contract is zero at inception. The forward price is used as an input in the valuation of certain derivatives and depends on a number of factors including interest rates, the current price of the underlying asset, and the expected income to be received and costs to be incurred by the seller as a result of holding that asset until the delivery date. An increase in the forward can result in an increase or a decrease in a fair value measurement. Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements The following tables include a rollforward of the Consolidated balance sheets amounts (including changes in fair value) for financial instruments classified by the Firm within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within level 3, the determination is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. However, level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources); accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology. The Firm risk-manages the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy; as these level 1 and level 2 risk management instruments are not included below, the gains or losses in the following tables do not reflect the effect of the Firm’s risk management activities related to such level 3 instruments. Correlation – Correlation is a measure of the relationship between the movements of two variables. Correlation is a pricing input for a derivative product where the payoff is driven by one or more underlying risks. Correlation inputs are related to the type of derivative (e.g., interest rate, credit, equity, foreign exchange and commodity) due to the nature of the underlying risks. When parameters are positively correlated, an increase in one parameter will result in an increase in the other parameter. When parameters are negatively correlated, an increase in one parameter will result in a decrease in the other parameter. An increase in correlation can result in an increase or a decrease in a fair value measurement. Given a short correlation position, an increase in correlation, in isolation, would generally result in a decrease in a fair value measurement.The level of correlation used in the valuation of derivatives with multiple underlying risks depends on a number of factors including the nature of those risks. For example, the correlation between two credit risk exposures would be different than that between two interest rate risk exposures. Similarly, the tenor of the transaction may also impact the correlation input, as the relationship between the underlying risks may be different over different time periods. Furthermore, correlation levels are dependent on market conditions and could have a relatively wide range of levels within or across asset classes over time, particularly in volatile market conditions. Volatility – Volatility is a measure of the variability in possible returns for an instrument, parameter or market index given how much the particular instrument, parameter or index changes in value over time. Volatility is a pricing input for options, including equity options, commodity options, and interest rate options. Given a long position in an option, an increase in volatility, in isolation, would generally result in an increase in a fair value measurement. The level of volatility used in the valuation of a particular option-based derivative depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the risk underlying the option (e.g., the volatility of a particular equity security may be significantly different from that of a particular commodity index), the tenor of the derivative as well as the strike price of the option. Bermudan switch value – The switch value is the difference between the overall value of a Bermudan swaption, which can be exercised at multiple points in time, and its most expensive European swaption and reflects the additional value that the multiple exercise dates provide the holder. Switch values are dependent on market conditions and can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, such as the tenor of the underlying swap as well as the strike price of the option. An increase in switch value, in isolation, would generally result in an increase in a fair value measurement. Correlation – Correlation is a measure of the relationship between the movements of two variables. Correlation is a pricing input for a derivative product where the payoff is driven by one or more underlying risks. Correlation inputs are related to the type of derivative (e.g., interest rate, credit, equity, foreign exchange and commodity) due to the nature of the underlying risks. When parameters are positively correlated, an increase in one parameter will result in an increase in the other parameter. When parameters are negatively correlated, an increase in one parameter will result in a decrease in the other parameter. An increase in correlation can result in an increase or a decrease in a fair value measurement. Given a short correlation position, an increase in correlation, in isolation, would generally result in a decrease in a fair value measurement. The level of correlation used in the valuation of derivatives with multiple underlying risks depends on a number of factors including the nature of those risks. For example, the correlation between two credit risk exposures would be different than that between two interest rate risk exposures. Similarly, the tenor of the transaction may also impact the correlation input, as the relationship between the underlying risks may be different over different time periods. Furthermore, correlation levels are dependent on market conditions and could have a relatively wide range of levels within or across asset classes over time, particularly in volatile market conditions. Volatility – Volatility is a measure of the variability in possible returns for an instrument, parameter or market index given how much the particular instrument, parameter or index changes in value over time. Volatility is a pricing input for options, including equity options, commodity options, and interest rate options. Given a long position in an option, an increase in volatility, in isolation, would generally result in an increase in a fair value measurement. The level of volatility used in the valuation of a particular option-based derivative depends on a number of factors, including the nature of the risk underlying the option (e.g., the volatility of a particular equity security may be significantly different from that of a particular commodity index), the tenor of the derivative as well as the strike price of the option. Bermudan switch value – The switch value is the difference between the overall value of a Bermudan swaption, which can be exercised at multiple points in time, and its most expensive European swaption and reflects the additional value that the multiple exercise dates provide the holder. Switch values are dependent on market conditions and can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, such as the tenor of the underlying swap as well as the strike price of the option. An increase in switch value, in isolation, would generally result in an increase in a fair value measurement. Interest rate curve – The interest rate curve represents the relationship of interest rates over differing tenors. The interest rate curve is used to set interest rate and foreign exchange derivative cash flows and is also a pricing input used in the discounting of any derivative cash flow. Forward price – The forward price is the price at which the buyer agrees to purchase the asset underlying a forward contract on the predetermined future delivery date, and is such that the value of the contract is zero at inception. The forward price is used as an input in the valuation of certain derivatives and depends on a number of factors including interest rates, the current price of the underlying asset, and the expected income to be received and costs to be incurred by the seller as a result of holding that asset until the delivery date. An increase in the forward can result in an increase or a decrease in a fair value measurement. Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements The following tables include a rollforward of the Consolidated balance sheets amounts (including changes in fair value) for financial instruments classified by the Firm within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within level 3, the determination is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. However, level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources); accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology. The Firm risk-manages the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy; as these level 1 and level 2 risk management instruments are not included below, the gains or losses in the following tables do not reflect the effect of the Firm’s risk management activities related to such level 3 instruments. Interest rate curve – The interest rate curve represents the relationship of interest rates over differing tenors. The interest rate curve is used to set interest rate and foreign exchange derivative cash flows and is also a pricing input used in the discounting of any derivative cash flow. Forward price – The forward price is the price at which the buyer agrees to purchase the asset underlying a forward contract on the predetermined future delivery date, and is such that the value of the contract is zero at inception. The forward price is used as an input in the valuation of certain derivatives and depends on a number of factors including interest rates, the current price of the underlying asset, and the expected income to be received and costs to be incurred by the seller as a result of holding that asset until the delivery date. An increase in the forward can result in an increase or a decrease in a fair value measurement.

The following tables include a rollforward of the Consolidated balance sheets amounts (including changes in fair value) for financial instruments classified by the Firm within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within level 3, the determination is based on the significance of the unobservable inputs to the overall fair value measurement. However, level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources); accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology. The Firm risk-manages the observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions that are classified within level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy; as these level 1 and level 2 risk management instruments are not included below, the gains or losses in the following tables do not reflect the effect of the Firm’s risk management activities related to such level 3 instruments. 192JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 192JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 192JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 192 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsYear endedDecember 31, 2024(in millions)Fair value at Jan. 1, 2024Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses)Transfers into level 3Transfers (out of) level 3Fair value at Dec. 31, 2024Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at Dec. 31, 2024Purchases(g)SalesSettlements(h)Assets:(a)Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$— $— $— $— $— $— $— $— $— Trading assets:Debt instruments:Mortgage-backed securities: U.S. GSEs and government agencies758 18 46 (260) (81)7 — 488 (3)Residential – nonagency5 7 — (5) (2)4 (4)5 — Commercial – nonagency12 (2)— — — — — 10 (1)Total mortgage-backed securities775 23 46 (265)(83)11 (4)503 (4)Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities10 — — — (3)— (6)1 — Non-U.S. government debt securities179 (6)175 (183) — 17 (30)152 (10)Corporate debt securities484 36 459 (354) (181)13 (67)390 45 Loans684 63 800 (642) (74)839 (582)1,088 29 Asset-backed securities6 — 9 (5) (8)8 — 10 — Total debt instruments2,138 116 1,489 (1,449)(349)888 (689)2,144 60 Equity securities127 (21)138 (123) (1)85 (143)62 (308)Physical commodities7 17 3 — (1)— — 26 16 Other101 144 53 — (68)28 (48)210 108 Total trading assets – debt and equity instruments2,373 256 (c)1,683 (1,572)(419)1,001 (880)2,442 (124)(c)Net derivative receivables:(b) Interest rate502 745 387 (197) (608)(172)(356)301 (362)Credit265 (208)(2)(17) (333)(61)(7)(363)(265)Foreign exchange62 248 178 (538) (30)128 (28)20 353 Equity(2,402)(321)904 (2,488) 953 (91)579 (2,866)783 Commodity(279)64 32 (215) 310 15 — (73)102 Total net derivative receivables(1,852)528 (c)1,499 (3,455)292 (181)188 (2,981)611 (c)Available-for-sale securities:Mortgage-backed securities:Commercial – nonagency— — — — — 8 — 8 — Corporate debt securities— — — — — — — — — Total available-for-sale securities— — (d)— — — 8 — 8 — (d)Loans3,079 266 (c)431 (756) (993)816 (427)2,416 251 (c)Mortgage servicing rights8,522 762 (e)926 (21) (1,068)— — 9,121 762 (e)Other assets758 105 (c)623 (62)(58)5 (27)1,344 88 (c)Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsYear endedDecember 31, 2024(in millions)Fair value at Jan. 1, 2024Total realized/unrealized (gains)/lossesTransfers (out of) level 3Fair value at Dec. 31, 2024Change in unrealized (gains)/losses related to financial instruments held at Dec. 31, 2024PurchasesSalesIssuancesSettlements(h)Transfers into level 3Liabilities:(a)Deposits$1,833 $(14)(c)(f)$— $— $2,006 $(1,522)$34 $(152)$2,185 $(44)(c)(f)Short-term borrowings1,758 180 (c)(f)— — 7,752 (6,230)23 (7)3,476 58 (c)(f)Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments37 (47)(c)(45)70 — — 48 (17)46 18 (c)Accounts payable and other liabilities52 (6)(c)(35)63 — — 5 (3)76 (6)(c)Long-term debt27,726 1,475 (c)(f)— — 23,920 (18,432)738 (863)34,564 1,212 (c)(f) Fair value at Jan. 1, 2024 Purchases(g) Settlements(h)

(c)(f) (c)(f) (c)(f) (c)(f) Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments (c) (c) Accounts payable and other liabilities (c) (c) (c)(f) (c)(f) JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K193 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K193 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K193 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 193

Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsYear endedDecember 31, 2023(in millions)Fair value at Jan. 1, 2023Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses)Transfers (out of) level 3Fair value at Dec. 31, 2023Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at Dec. 31, 2023Purchases(g)SalesSettlements(h)Transfers into level 3Assets:(a)Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$— $— $— $— $— $— $— $— $— Trading assets:Debt instruments:Mortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies759 4 249 (133)(107)— (14)758 1 Residential – nonagency5 6 — (6)(1)1 — 5 1 Commercial – nonagency7 6 — — (1)8 (8)12 7 Total mortgage-backed securities771 16 249 (139)(109)9 (22)775 9 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities7 — 1 — (1)3 — 10 — Non-U.S. government debt securities155 74 217 (254)— 22 (35)179 74 Corporate debt securities463 36 322 (172)(41)114 (238)484 35 Loans759 (15)1,027 (499)(441)382 (529)684 30 Asset-backed securities23 — 7 (12)(1)5 (16)6 — Total debt instruments2,178 111 1,823 (1,076)(593)535 (840)2,138 148 Equity securities665 (53)164 (239)(384)192 (218)127 (422)Physical commodities2 — 7 — (2)— — 7 — Other64 (58)141 — (5)1 (42)101 (28)Total trading assets – debt and equity instruments2,909 — 2,135 (1,315)(984)728 (1,100)2,373 (302)(c)Net derivative receivables:(b)Interest rate701 556 251 (255)654 (1,117)(288)502 419 Credit13 304 (60)(25)47 15 (29)265 230 Foreign exchange489 31 151 (144)(187)144 (422)62 (80)Equity(384)191 928 (1,931)(1,306)700 (600)(2,402)(646)Commodity(146)(59)59 (290)(51)(11)219 (279)(144)Total net derivative receivables673 1,023 (c)1,329 (2,645)(843)(269)(1,120)(1,852)(221)(c)Available-for-sale securities:Mortgage-backed securities:Commercial – nonagency— — — — — — — — — Corporate debt securities239 24 — (225)— — (38)— — Total available-for-sale securities239 24 (d)— (225)— — (38)— — (d)Loans1,418 289 (c)2,398 (120)(1,147)1,306 (1,065)3,079 293 (c)Mortgage servicing rights7,973 467 (e)1,281 (188)(1,011)— — 8,522 467 (e)Other assets405 (36)(c)525 (20)(147)45 (14)758 (82)(c)Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsYear endedDecember 31, 2023(in millions)Fair value at Jan. 1, 2023Total realized/unrealized (gains)/losses Transfers (out of) level 3Fair value at Dec. 31, 2023Change in unrealized (gains)/losses related to financial instruments held at Dec. 31, 2023PurchasesSalesIssuancesSettlements(h)Transfers into level 3Liabilities:(a)Deposits$2,162 $95 (c)(f)$— $— $940 $(1,043)$— $(321)$1,833 $73 (c)(f)Short-term borrowings1,401 201 (c)(f)— — 4,522 (4,345)3 (24)1,758 14 (c)(f)Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments84 (21)(c)(32)9 — (2)19 (20)37 — Accounts payable and other liabilities53 (4)(c)(16)24 — — 8 (13)52 (4)(c)Long-term debt24,092 3,010 (c)(f)— — 12,679 (11,555)229 (729)27,726 2,870 (c)(f) Fair value at Jan. 1, 2023 Purchases(g) Settlements(h)

(c)(f) (c)(f) (c)(f) (c)(f) Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments (c) Accounts payable and other liabilities (c) (c) (c)(f) (c)(f) 194JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 194JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 194JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 194 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsYear endedDecember 31, 2022(in millions)Fair value at Jan. 1, 2022Total realized/unrealized gains/(losses)Transfers (out of) level 3Fair value atDec. 31, 2022Change in unrealized gains/(losses) related to financial instruments held at Dec. 31, 2022Purchases(g)SalesSettlements(h)Transfers into level 3Assets:(a)Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$— $— $1 $(1)$(1)$1 $— $— $— Trading assets:Debt instruments:Mortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies265 31 673 (125)(84)4 (5)759 29 Residential – nonagency28 (1)7 (5)(12)— (12)5 — Commercial – nonagency10 — — (1)— 3 (5)7 — Total mortgage-backed securities303 30 680 (131)(96)7 (22)771 29 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities7 — — — — — — 7 — Non-U.S. government debt securities81 (92)494 (338)(4)84 (70)155 (153)Corporate debt securities332 (30)404 (178)(100)357 (322)463 (48)Loans708 (51)652 (605)(230)925 (640)759 (26)Asset-backed securities26 5 19 (24)(1)5 (7)23 1 Total debt instruments1,457 (138)2,249 (1,276)(431)1,378 (1,061)2,178 (197)Equity securities662 (1,036)473 (377)(2)1,066 (121)665 (840)Physical commodities— (1)3 — — — — 2 (1)Other160 93 37 — (221)1 (6)64 46 Total trading assets – debt and equity instruments2,279 (1,082)(c)2,762 (1,653)(654)2,445 (1,188)2,909 (992)(c)Net derivative receivables:(b)Interest rate(16)187 325 (483)329 732 (373)701 332 Credit74 226 17 (9)(271)5 (29)13 170 Foreign exchange(419)726 215 (114)83 3 (5)489 459 Equity(3,626)5,016 1,226 (2,530)96 (656)90 (384)3,435 Commodity(907)571 110 (331)350 5 56 (146)369 Total net derivative receivables(4,894)6,726 (c)1,893 (3,467)587 89 (261)673 4,765 (c)Available-for-sale securities:Mortgage-backed securities:Commercial – nonagency— — — — — — — — — Corporate debt securities161 5 88 — (15)— — 239 5 Total available-for-sale securities161 5 (d)88 — (15)— — 239 5 (d)Loans1,933 (158)(c)568 (261)(886)1,053 (831)1,418 (76)(c)Mortgage servicing rights5,494 2,039 (e)2,198 (822)(936)— — 7,973 2,039 (e)Other assets306 194 (c)50 (38)(103)2 (6)405 191 (c)Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsYear endedDecember 31, 2022(in millions)Fair value at Jan. 1, 2022Total realized/unrealized (gains)/lossesTransfers into level 3Transfers (out of) level 3Fair value atDec. 31, 2022Change in unrealized (gains)/losses related to financial instruments held at Dec. 31, 2022PurchasesSalesIssuancesSettlements(h)Liabilities:(a)Deposits$2,317 $(292)(c)(f)$— $— $531 $(114)$— $(280)$2,162 $(76)(c)(f)Short-term borrowings2,481 (358)(c)(f)— — 3,963 (4,685)15 (15)1,401 90 (c)(f)Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments30 (31)(c)(41)77 — — 57 (8)84 101 (c)Accounts payable and other liabilities69 (16)(c)(37)42 — — 1 (6)53 (16)(c)Long-term debt24,374 (3,869)(c)(f)— — 12,714 (8,876)793 (1,044)24,092 (3,447)(c)(f) Fair value at Jan. 1, 2022 Purchases(g) Settlements(h)

(c)(f) (c)(f) (c)(f) (c)(f) Trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments (c) (c) Accounts payable and other liabilities (c) (c) (c)(f) (c)(f) JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K195 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K195 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K195 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 195

(a)Level 3 assets at fair value as a percentage of total Firm assets at fair value (including assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) were 2% at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Level 3 liabilities at fair value as a percentage of total Firm liabilities at fair value (including liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) were 9% at December 31, 2024, and 8% at both December 31, 2023 and 2022. (b)All level 3 derivatives are presented on a net basis, irrespective of the underlying counterparty. (c)Primarily reported in principal transactions revenue, except for changes in fair value for CCB mortgage loans and lending-related commitments originated with the intent to sell, and mortgage loan purchase commitments, which are reported in mortgage fees and related income. (d)Realized gains/(losses) on AFS securities are reported in investment securities gains/(losses). Unrealized gains/(losses) are reported in OCI. Realized and unrealized gains/(losses) recorded on level 3 AFS securities were not material for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. (e)Changes in fair value for MSRs are reported in mortgage fees and related income. (f)Realized (gains)/losses due to DVA for fair value option elected liabilities are reported in principal transactions revenue, and were not material for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Unrealized (gains)/losses are reported in OCI, and were $(50) million, $(158) million and $(529) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (g)Loan originations are included in purchases. (h)Includes financial assets and liabilities that have matured, been partially or fully repaid, impacts of modifications, deconsolidations associated with beneficial interests in VIEs and other items.

Consolidated balance sheets changes The following describes significant changes to level 3 assets since December 31, 2023, for those items measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Refer to Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on page 199 for further information on changes impacting items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. For the year ended December 31, 2024Level 3 assets were $23.8 billion at December 31, 2024, reflecting an increase of $127 million from December 31, 2023.The increase for the year ended December 31, 2024 was driven by:•$599 million increase in MSRs.•$586 million increase in other assets primarily due to purchases,offset by:•$472 million decrease in gross derivative receivables due to sales and settlements predominantly offset by gains, purchases and net transfers.•$663 million decrease in non-trading loans due to sales and settlements largely offset by gains, purchases and net transfers.Refer to Note 15 for information on MSRs.Refer to the sections below for additional information.Transfers between levels for instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basisDuring the year ended December 31, 2024, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following:•$1.0 billion of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly trading loans, driven by a decrease in observability.•$959 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $1.1 billion of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.6 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.7 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$816 million of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability.During the year ended December 31, 2024, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following:•$880 million of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly trading loans and equity securities, driven by an increase in observability.•$1.4 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.0 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$863 million of long-term debt as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.During the year ended December 31, 2023, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following:•$951 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs and $2.1 billion of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of transition to term SOFR for certain interest rate options.•$1.5 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $829 million of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.3 billion of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability. Consolidated balance sheets changes The following describes significant changes to level 3 assets since December 31, 2023, for those items measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Refer to Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on page 199 for further information on changes impacting items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. For the year ended December 31, 2024Level 3 assets were $23.8 billion at December 31, 2024, reflecting an increase of $127 million from December 31, 2023.The increase for the year ended December 31, 2024 was driven by:•$599 million increase in MSRs.•$586 million increase in other assets primarily due to purchases,offset by:•$472 million decrease in gross derivative receivables due to sales and settlements predominantly offset by gains, purchases and net transfers.•$663 million decrease in non-trading loans due to sales and settlements largely offset by gains, purchases and net transfers.Refer to Note 15 for information on MSRs.Refer to the sections below for additional information.Transfers between levels for instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basisDuring the year ended December 31, 2024, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following:•$1.0 billion of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly trading loans, driven by a decrease in observability.•$959 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $1.1 billion of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.6 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.7 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a Consolidated balance sheets changes The following describes significant changes to level 3 assets since December 31, 2023, for those items measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Refer to Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on page 199 for further information on changes impacting items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. For the year ended December 31, 2024 Level 3 assets were $23.8 billion at December 31, 2024, reflecting an increase of $127 million from December 31, 2023. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2024 was driven by: •$599 million increase in MSRs. •$586 million increase in other assets primarily due to purchases, offset by: •$472 million decrease in gross derivative receivables due to sales and settlements predominantly offset by gains, purchases and net transfers. •$663 million decrease in non-trading loans due to sales and settlements largely offset by gains, purchases and net transfers. Refer to Note 15 for information on MSRs. Refer to the sections below for additional information.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following: •$1.0 billion of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly trading loans, driven by a decrease in observability. •$959 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $1.1 billion of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$1.6 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.7 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$816 million of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability.During the year ended December 31, 2024, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following:•$880 million of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly trading loans and equity securities, driven by an increase in observability.•$1.4 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.0 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$863 million of long-term debt as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.During the year ended December 31, 2023, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following:•$951 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs and $2.1 billion of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of transition to term SOFR for certain interest rate options.•$1.5 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $829 million of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.3 billion of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability. result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$816 million of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability. During the year ended December 31, 2024, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following: •$880 million of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly trading loans and equity securities, driven by an increase in observability. •$1.4 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.0 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$863 million of long-term debt as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. During the year ended December 31, 2023, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following: •$951 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs and $2.1 billion of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of transition to term SOFR for certain interest rate options. •$1.5 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $829 million of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$1.3 billion of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability. 196JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 196JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 196JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 196 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K During the year ended December 31, 2023, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following:•$1.1 billion of total debt and equity instruments, partially due to trading loans, driven by an increase in observability.•$921 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$2.3 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.7 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.1 billion of non-trading loans as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.During the year ended December 31, 2022, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following:•$2.4 billion of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly due to equity securities of $1.1 billion driven by a decrease in observability predominantly as a result of restricted access to certain markets and trading loans of $925 million driven by a decrease in observability.•$1.6 billion of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $878 million of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.6 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.3 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.1 billion of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability.•$793 million of long-term debt driven by a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs for structured notes.During the year ended December 31, 2022, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following:•$1.2 billion of total debt and equity instruments, largely due to trading loans, driven by an increase in observability.•$1.2 billion of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $807 million of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$2.2 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.3 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$831 million of non-trading loans driven by an increase in observability.•$1.0 billion of long-term debt driven by an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs for structured notes.All transfers are based on changes in the observability and/or significance of the valuation inputs and are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarterly reporting period in which they occur. Gains and losses The following describes significant components of total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. These amounts exclude any effects of the Firm’s risk management activities where the financial instruments are classified as level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements rollforward tables on pages 192–196 for further information on these instruments. 2024•$1.9 billion of net gains on assets, predominantly driven by gains in net interest rate derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates.•$1.6 billion of net losses on liabilities, predominantly driven by losses in long-term debt due to market movements.2023•$1.8 billion of net gains on assets, largely driven by gains in net interest rate derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates. •$3.3 billion of net losses on liabilities, predominantly driven by losses in long-term debt due to market movements.2022•$7.7 billion of net gains on assets, predominantly driven by gains in net equity derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates. •$4.6 billion of net gains on liabilities, predominantly driven by a decline in the fair value of long-term debt due to market movements.Refer to Note 15 for information on MSRs. During the year ended December 31, 2023, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following:•$1.1 billion of total debt and equity instruments, partially due to trading loans, driven by an increase in observability.•$921 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$2.3 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.7 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.1 billion of non-trading loans as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.During the year ended December 31, 2022, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following:•$2.4 billion of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly due to equity securities of $1.1 billion driven by a decrease in observability predominantly as a result of restricted access to certain markets and trading loans of $925 million driven by a decrease in observability.•$1.6 billion of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $878 million of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.6 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.3 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$1.1 billion of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability.•$793 million of long-term debt driven by a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs for structured notes.During the year ended December 31, 2022, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following:•$1.2 billion of total debt and equity instruments, largely due to trading loans, driven by an increase in observability.•$1.2 billion of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $807 million of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs.•$2.2 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.3 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. During the year ended December 31, 2023, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following: •$1.1 billion of total debt and equity instruments, partially due to trading loans, driven by an increase in observability. •$921 million of gross interest rate derivative receivables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$2.3 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $1.7 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$1.1 billion of non-trading loans as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. During the year ended December 31, 2022, significant transfers from level 2 into level 3 included the following: •$2.4 billion of total debt and equity instruments, predominantly due to equity securities of $1.1 billion driven by a decrease in observability predominantly as a result of restricted access to certain markets and trading loans of $925 million driven by a decrease in observability. •$1.6 billion of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $878 million of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$1.6 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.3 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$1.1 billion of non-trading loans driven by a decrease in observability. •$793 million of long-term debt driven by a decrease in observability and an increase in the significance of unobservable inputs for structured notes. During the year ended December 31, 2022, significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 included the following: •$1.2 billion of total debt and equity instruments, largely due to trading loans, driven by an increase in observability. •$1.2 billion of gross interest rate derivative receivables and $807 million of gross interest rate derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$2.2 billion of gross equity derivative receivables and $2.3 billion of gross equity derivative payables as a result of an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs. •$831 million of non-trading loans driven by an increase in observability.•$1.0 billion of long-term debt driven by an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs for structured notes.All transfers are based on changes in the observability and/or significance of the valuation inputs and are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarterly reporting period in which they occur. Gains and losses The following describes significant components of total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. These amounts exclude any effects of the Firm’s risk management activities where the financial instruments are classified as level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements rollforward tables on pages 192–196 for further information on these instruments. 2024•$1.9 billion of net gains on assets, predominantly driven by gains in net interest rate derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates.•$1.6 billion of net losses on liabilities, predominantly driven by losses in long-term debt due to market movements.2023•$1.8 billion of net gains on assets, largely driven by gains in net interest rate derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates. •$3.3 billion of net losses on liabilities, predominantly driven by losses in long-term debt due to market movements.2022•$7.7 billion of net gains on assets, predominantly driven by gains in net equity derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates. •$4.6 billion of net gains on liabilities, predominantly driven by a decline in the fair value of long-term debt due to market movements.Refer to Note 15 for information on MSRs. •$831 million of non-trading loans driven by an increase in observability. •$1.0 billion of long-term debt driven by an increase in observability and a decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs for structured notes. All transfers are based on changes in the observability and/or significance of the valuation inputs and are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarterly reporting period in which they occur. Gains and losses The following describes significant components of total realized/unrealized gains/(losses) for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. These amounts exclude any effects of the Firm’s risk management activities where the financial instruments are classified as level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Refer to Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements rollforward tables on pages 192–196 for further information on these instruments. 2024 •$1.9 billion of net gains on assets, predominantly driven by gains in net interest rate derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates. •$1.6 billion of net losses on liabilities, predominantly driven by losses in long-term debt due to market movements. 2023 •$1.8 billion of net gains on assets, largely driven by gains in net interest rate derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates. •$3.3 billion of net losses on liabilities, predominantly driven by losses in long-term debt due to market movements. 2022 •$7.7 billion of net gains on assets, predominantly driven by gains in net equity derivative receivables due to market movements and gains in MSRs reflecting lower prepayment speeds on higher rates. •$4.6 billion of net gains on liabilities, predominantly driven by a decline in the fair value of long-term debt due to market movements. Refer to Note 15 for information on MSRs. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K197 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K197 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K197 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 197

Credit and funding adjustments – derivativesDerivatives are generally valued using models that use as their basis observable market parameters. These market parameters generally do not consider factors such as counterparty nonperformance risk, the Firm’s own credit quality, and funding costs. Therefore, it is generally necessary to make adjustments to the base estimate of fair value to reflect these factors.CVA represents the adjustment, relative to the relevant benchmark interest rate, necessary to reflect counterparty nonperformance risk. The Firm estimates CVA using a scenario analysis to estimate the expected positive credit exposure across all of the Firm’s existing positions with each counterparty, and then estimates losses based on the probability of default and estimated recovery rate as a result of a counterparty credit event considering contractual factors designed to mitigate the Firm’s credit exposure, such as collateral and legal rights of offset. The key inputs to this methodology are (i) the probability of a default event occurring for each counterparty, as derived from observed or estimated CDS spreads; and (ii) estimated recovery rates implied by CDS spreads, adjusted to consider the differences in recovery rates as a derivative creditor relative to those reflected in CDS spreads, which generally reflect senior unsecured creditor risk.FVA represents the adjustment to reflect the impact of funding and is recognized where there is evidence that a market participant in the principal market would incorporate it in a transfer of the instrument. The Firm’s FVA framework, applied to uncollateralized (including partially collateralized) over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives incorporates key inputs such as: (i) the expected funding requirements arising from the Firm’s positions with each counterparty and collateral arrangements; and (ii) the estimated market funding cost in the principal market which, for derivative liabilities, considers the Firm’s credit risk (DVA). For collateralized derivatives, the fair value is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at the relevant overnight indexed swap rate given the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty, and therefore a separate FVA is not necessary.The following table provides the impact of credit and funding adjustments on principal transactions revenue in the respective periods, excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities. The FVA presented below includes the impact of the Firm’s own credit quality on the inception value of liabilities as well as the impact of changes in the Firm’s own credit quality over time.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Credit and funding adjustments:Derivatives CVA$29 $221 $22 Derivatives FVA99 114 42 Valuation adjustments on fair value option elected liabilitiesThe valuation of the Firm’s liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected requires consideration of the Firm’s own credit risk. DVA on fair value option elected liabilities reflects changes (subsequent to the issuance of the liability) in the Firm’s probability of default and LGD, which are estimated based on changes in the Firm’s credit spread observed in the bond market. Realized (gains)/losses due to DVA for fair value option elected liabilities are reported in principal transactions revenue. Unrealized (gains)/losses are reported in OCI. Refer to page 196 in this Note and Note 24 for further information. Credit and funding adjustments – derivativesDerivatives are generally valued using models that use as their basis observable market parameters. These market parameters generally do not consider factors such as counterparty nonperformance risk, the Firm’s own credit quality, and funding costs. Therefore, it is generally necessary to make adjustments to the base estimate of fair value to reflect these factors.CVA represents the adjustment, relative to the relevant benchmark interest rate, necessary to reflect counterparty nonperformance risk. The Firm estimates CVA using a scenario analysis to estimate the expected positive credit exposure across all of the Firm’s existing positions with each counterparty, and then estimates losses based on the probability of default and estimated recovery rate as a result of a counterparty credit event considering contractual factors designed to mitigate the Firm’s credit exposure, such as collateral and legal rights of offset. The key inputs to this methodology are (i) the probability of a default event occurring for each counterparty, as derived from observed or estimated CDS spreads; and (ii) estimated recovery rates implied by CDS spreads, adjusted to consider the differences in recovery rates as a derivative creditor relative to those reflected in CDS spreads, which generally reflect senior unsecured creditor risk.FVA represents the adjustment to reflect the impact of funding and is recognized where there is evidence that a market participant in the principal market would incorporate it in a transfer of the instrument. The Firm’s FVA framework, applied to uncollateralized (including partially collateralized) over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives incorporates key inputs such as: (i) the expected funding requirements arising from the Firm’s positions with each counterparty and collateral arrangements; and (ii) the estimated market funding cost in the principal market which, for derivative liabilities, considers the Firm’s credit risk (DVA). For collateralized derivatives, the fair value is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at the relevant overnight indexed swap rate given the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty, and therefore a separate FVA is not necessary.

Derivatives are generally valued using models that use as their basis observable market parameters. These market parameters generally do not consider factors such as counterparty nonperformance risk, the Firm’s own credit quality, and funding costs. Therefore, it is generally necessary to make adjustments to the base estimate of fair value to reflect these factors. CVA represents the adjustment, relative to the relevant benchmark interest rate, necessary to reflect counterparty nonperformance risk. The Firm estimates CVA using a scenario analysis to estimate the expected positive credit exposure across all of the Firm’s existing positions with each counterparty, and then estimates losses based on the probability of default and estimated recovery rate as a result of a counterparty credit event considering contractual factors designed to mitigate the Firm’s credit exposure, such as collateral and legal rights of offset. The key inputs to this methodology are (i) the probability of a default event occurring for each counterparty, as derived from observed or estimated CDS spreads; and (ii) estimated recovery rates implied by CDS spreads, adjusted to consider the differences in recovery rates as a derivative creditor relative to those reflected in CDS spreads, which generally reflect senior unsecured creditor risk. FVA represents the adjustment to reflect the impact of funding and is recognized where there is evidence that a market participant in the principal market would incorporate it in a transfer of the instrument. The Firm’s FVA framework, applied to uncollateralized (including partially collateralized) over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives incorporates key inputs such as: (i) the expected funding requirements arising from the Firm’s positions with each counterparty and collateral arrangements; and (ii) the estimated market funding cost in the principal market which, for derivative liabilities, considers the Firm’s credit risk (DVA). For collateralized derivatives, the fair value is estimated by discounting expected future cash flows at the relevant overnight indexed swap rate given the underlying collateral agreement with the counterparty, and therefore a separate FVA is not necessary. The following table provides the impact of credit and funding adjustments on principal transactions revenue in the respective periods, excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities. The FVA presented below includes the impact of the Firm’s own credit quality on the inception value of liabilities as well as the impact of changes in the Firm’s own credit quality over time.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Credit and funding adjustments:Derivatives CVA$29 $221 $22 Derivatives FVA99 114 42 Valuation adjustments on fair value option elected liabilitiesThe valuation of the Firm’s liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected requires consideration of the Firm’s own credit risk. DVA on fair value option elected liabilities reflects changes (subsequent to the issuance of the liability) in the Firm’s probability of default and LGD, which are estimated based on changes in the Firm’s credit spread observed in the bond market. Realized (gains)/losses due to DVA for fair value option elected liabilities are reported in principal transactions revenue. Unrealized (gains)/losses are reported in OCI. Refer to page 196 in this Note and Note 24 for further information. The following table provides the impact of credit and funding adjustments on principal transactions revenue in the respective periods, excluding the effect of any associated hedging activities. The FVA presented below includes the impact of the Firm’s own credit quality on the inception value of liabilities as well as the impact of changes in the Firm’s own credit quality over time. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Credit and funding adjustments:Derivatives CVA$29 $221 $22 Derivatives FVA99 114 42

The valuation of the Firm’s liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected requires consideration of the Firm’s own credit risk. DVA on fair value option elected liabilities reflects changes (subsequent to the issuance of the liability) in the Firm’s probability of default and LGD, which are estimated based on changes in the Firm’s credit spread observed in the bond market. Realized (gains)/losses due to DVA for fair value option elected liabilities are reported in principal transactions revenue. Unrealized (gains)/losses are reported in OCI. Refer to page 196 in this Note and Note 24 for further information. 198JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 198JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 198JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 198 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The following tables present the assets held as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, for which nonrecurring fair value adjustments were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, by major product category and fair value hierarchy. There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. December 31, 2024(in millions)Fair value hierarchyTotal fair valueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Loans$— $738 $694 $1,432 Other assets(a)— 9 1,048 1,057 Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis$— $747 $1,742 $2,489 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other assets(a) December 31, 2023(in millions)Fair value hierarchyTotal fair valueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Loans$— $599 $1,156 $1,755 Other assets— 52 1,334 1,386 Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis$— $651 $2,490 $3,141 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (a) Included equity securities without readily determinable fair values that were adjusted based on observable price changes in orderly transactions from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer (measurement alternative). Of the $1.0 billion in level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2024, $668 million related to equity securities adjusted based on the measurement alternative. These equity securities are classified as level 3 due to the infrequency of the observable prices and/or the restrictions on the shares. Also, included impairments on certain equity method investments.

The following table presents the total change in value of assets and liabilities for which fair value adjustments have been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, related to assets and liabilities held at those dates. December 31, (in millions)202420232022Loans$(302) $(276)$(55)Other assets(a)(610) (789)(409)Accounts payable and other liabilities— — (83)Total nonrecurring fair value gains/(losses)$(912)$(1,065)$(547)(a)Included $(197) million, $(232) million and $(338) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, of net gains/(losses) as a result of the measurement alternative. The current period also included impairments on certain equity method investments. The following table presents the total change in value of assets and liabilities for which fair value adjustments have been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, related to assets and liabilities held at those dates. December 31, (in millions)202420232022Loans$(302) $(276)$(55)Other assets(a)(610) (789)(409)Accounts payable and other liabilities— — (83)Total nonrecurring fair value gains/(losses)$(912)$(1,065)$(547)(a)Included $(197) million, $(232) million and $(338) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, of net gains/(losses) as a result of the measurement alternative. The current period also included impairments on certain equity method investments. The following table presents the total change in value of assets and liabilities for which fair value adjustments have been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, related to assets and liabilities held at those dates. December 31, (in millions)202420232022Loans$(302) $(276)$(55)Other assets(a)(610) (789)(409)Accounts payable and other liabilities— — (83)Total nonrecurring fair value gains/(losses)$(912)$(1,065)$(547) Other assets(a)

(a)Included $(197) million, $(232) million and $(338) million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, of net gains/(losses) as a result of the measurement alternative. The current period also included impairments on certain equity method investments. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K199 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K199 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K199 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 199

The Firm measures certain equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost less impairment (if any), plus or minus observable price changes from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer (i.e., measurement alternative), with such changes recognized in other income. In its determination of the new carrying values upon observable price changes, the Firm may adjust the prices if deemed necessary to arrive at the Firm’s estimated fair values. Such adjustments may include adjustments to reflect the different rights and obligations of similar securities, and other adjustments that are consistent with the Firm’s valuation techniques for private equity direct investments. The following table presents the carrying value of equity securities without readily determinable fair values held as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, that are measured under the measurement alternative and the related adjustments recorded during the periods presented for those securities with observable price changes. These securities are included in the nonrecurring fair value tables when applicable price changes are observable. As of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Other assetsCarrying value(a)$3,737 $4,457 Upward carrying value changes(b)89 93 Downward carrying value changes/impairment(c)(286)(325) Carrying value(a) Upward carrying value changes(b) Downward carrying value changes/impairment(c) (a)The period-end carrying values reflect cumulative purchases and sales in addition to upward and downward carrying value changes. (b)The cumulative upward carrying value changes between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2024 were $1.1 billion. (c)The cumulative downward carrying value changes/impairment between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2024 were $(1.5) billion. (c) The cumulative downward carrying value changes/impairment between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2024 were $(1.5) billion Included in other assets above is the Firm’s interest in approximately 18.6 million Visa Class B-2 common shares ("Visa B-2 shares") and 37.2 million Visa Class B common shares (“Visa B shares”) reflected in the Firm's principal investment portfolio as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Visa B shares were redenominated to Visa Class B-1 common shares (“Visa B-1 shares”) on January 24, 2024. On April 8, 2024, Visa commenced an initial exchange offer for any and all outstanding Visa B-1 shares. On May 6, 2024, the Firm announced that Visa had accepted the Firm’s tender of its 37.2 million Visa B-1 shares in exchange for a combination of Visa B-2 shares and Visa Class C common shares (“Visa C shares”), resulting in an initial gain of $8.0 billion based on the fair value of the Visa C shares. In addition, the second quarter of 2024 also reflected other Visa-related activity, including the fair value changes of the Visa C shares and derivative instruments, as well as dividends, resulting in the $7.9 billion net gain on Visa shares in the quarter. As of September 30, 2024, the Firm had disposed of all of its Visa C shares through sales in the second and third quarters of 2024 and through a $1.0 billion contribution to the Firm’s Foundation in the second quarter of 2024. The Visa B-2 shares are subject to certain transfer restrictions and are convertible into Visa Class A common shares (“Visa A shares”) at a specified conversion rate upon final resolution of certain litigation matters involving Visa. The conversion rate of Visa B-2 shares to Visa A shares was 1.5430 at December 31, 2024 and may be adjusted by Visa depending on developments related to the litigation matters. The outcome of those litigation matters, and the effect that the resolution of those matters may have on the conversion rate, is unknown. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2024, there is significant uncertainty regarding when the transfer restrictions on Visa B-2 shares may be terminated and what the final conversion rate for the Visa B-2 shares will be. As a result of these considerations, as well as differences in voting rights, Visa B-2 shares are not considered to be similar to Visa A shares, and are held at their nominal carryover basis. Separately, in connection with sales of Visa B shares prior to 2024, the Firm has entered into derivative instruments with the purchasers of the shares under which the Firm retains the risk associated with changes in the conversion rate. Under the terms of the derivative instruments, the Firm will (a) make or receive payments based on subsequent changes in the conversion rate and (b) make periodic interest payments to the purchasers of the Visa B shares. The payments under the derivative instruments will continue as long as the Visa B-2 shares associated with the previously sold Visa B shares remain subject to transfer restrictions. The derivative instruments are accounted for at fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology based upon the Firm’s estimate of the timing and magnitude of final resolution of the litigation matters. The derivative instruments are recorded in trading liabilities, and changes in fair value are recognized in other income. The notional amount of shares associated with those derivative instruments has been adjusted as a result of the Visa exchange offer. As of December 31, 2024, the Firm held derivative instruments associated with 11.6 million Visa B-2 shares related to Visa B share sales prior to 2024, which are all subject to similar terms and conditions. 200JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 200JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 200JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 200 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Additional disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments that are not carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value U.S. GAAP requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, which are included in the following table. However, this table does not include other items, such as nonfinancial assets, intangible assets, certain financial instruments, and customer relationships. In the opinion of management, these items, in the aggregate, add significant value to JPMorganChase.Financial instruments for which carrying value approximates fair value Certain financial instruments that are not carried at fair value on the Consolidated balance sheets are carried at amounts that approximate fair value, due to their short-term nature and generally negligible credit risk. These instruments include cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed, short-term receivables and accrued interest receivable, short-term borrowings, federal funds purchased, securities loaned and sold under repurchase agreements, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. In addition, U.S. GAAP requires that the fair value of deposit liabilities with no stated maturity (i.e., demand, savings and certain money market deposits) be equal to their carrying value; recognition of the inherent funding value of these instruments is not permitted. Additional disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments that are not carried on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value U.S. GAAP requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, which are included in the following table. However, this table does not include other items, such as nonfinancial assets, intangible assets, certain financial instruments, and customer relationships. In the opinion of management, these items, in the aggregate, add significant value to JPMorganChase.Financial instruments for which carrying value approximates fair value Certain financial instruments that are not carried at fair value on the Consolidated balance sheets are carried

U.S. GAAP requires disclosure of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, which are included in the following table. However, this table does not include other items, such as nonfinancial assets, intangible assets, certain financial instruments, and customer relationships. In the opinion of management, these items, in the aggregate, add significant value to JPMorganChase. Financial instruments for which carrying value approximates fair value Certain financial instruments that are not carried at fair value on the Consolidated balance sheets are carried at amounts that approximate fair value, due to their short-term nature and generally negligible credit risk. These instruments include cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed, short-term receivables and accrued interest receivable, short-term borrowings, federal funds purchased, securities loaned and sold under repurchase agreements, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. In addition, U.S. GAAP requires that the fair value of deposit liabilities with no stated maturity (i.e., demand, savings and certain money market deposits) be equal to their carrying value; recognition of the inherent funding value of these instruments is not permitted. at amounts that approximate fair value, due to their short-term nature and generally negligible credit risk. These instruments include cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, federal funds sold, securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed, short-term receivables and accrued interest receivable, short-term borrowings, federal funds purchased, securities loaned and sold under repurchase agreements, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. In addition, U.S. GAAP requires that the fair value of deposit liabilities with no stated maturity (i.e., demand, savings and certain money market deposits) be equal to their carrying value; recognition of the inherent funding value of these instruments is not permitted. The following table presents, by fair value hierarchy classification, the carrying values and estimated fair values at December 31, 2024 and 2023, of financial assets and liabilities, excluding financial instruments that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis, and their classification within the fair value hierarchy. December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Estimated fair value hierarchyEstimated fair value hierarchy(in billions)Carrying valueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total estimated fair valueCarrying valueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total estimated fair valueFinancial assetsCash and due from banks$23.4 $23.4 $— $— $23.4 $29.1 $29.1 $— $— $29.1 Deposits with banks445.9 445.8 0.1 — 445.9 595.1 594.6 0.5 — 595.1 Accrued interest and accounts receivable101.1 — 101.0 0.1 101.1 107.1 — 107.0 0.1 107.1 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements8.2 — 8.2 — 8.2 16.3 — 16.3 — 16.3 Securities borrowed135.6 — 135.6 — 135.6 130.3 — 130.3 — 130.3 Investment securities, held-to-maturity274.5 97.4 150.5 — 247.9 369.8 160.6 182.2 — 342.8 Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(a)1,282.3 — 268.7 1,007.8 1,276.5 1,262.5 — 285.6 964.6 1,250.2 Other82.7 — 81.3 1.6 82.9 76.1 — 74.9 1.4 76.3 Financial liabilitiesDeposits$2,372.3 $— $2,372.5 $— $2,372.5 $2,322.3 $— $2,322.6 $— $2,322.6 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements70.5 — 70.5 — 70.5 47.5 — 47.5 — 47.5 Short-term borrowings26.4 — 26.3 — 26.3 24.7 — 24.7 — 24.7 Accounts payable and other liabilities(b)232.8 — 219.6 12.6 232.2 241.8 — 233.3 8.1 241.4 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs27.3 — 27.4 — 27.4 23.0 — 23.0 — 23.0 Long-term debt300.6 — 251.2 50.7 301.9 303.9 — 252.2 51.3 303.5 Accrued interest and accounts receivable Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements Securities borrowed Investment securities, held-to-maturity Loans, net of allowance for loan losses(a) Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements Accounts payable and other liabilities(b) Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (a)Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the characteristics of the underlying loans (including principal, contractual interest rate and contractual fees) and other key inputs, including expected lifetime credit losses, interest rates, prepayment rates, and primary origination or secondary market spreads. For certain loans, the fair value is measured based on the value of the underlying collateral. Carrying value of the loan takes into account the loan’s allowance for loan losses, which represents the loan’s expected credit losses over its remaining expected life. The difference between the estimated fair value and carrying value of a loan is generally attributable to changes in market interest rates, including credit spreads, market liquidity premiums and other factors that affect the fair value of a loan but do not affect its carrying value. (b)Excludes lending-related commitments disclosed in the table below. (b) JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K201 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K201 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K201 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 201

The majority of the Firm’s lending-related commitments are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated balance sheets. The carrying value and the estimated fair value of these wholesale lending-related commitments were as follows for the periods indicated. December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Estimated fair value hierarchyEstimated fair value hierarchy(in billions)Carrying value(a)(b)(c)Level 1Level 2Level 3Total estimated fair valueCarrying value(a)(b)(c)Level 1Level 2Level 3Total estimated fair valueWholesale lending-related commitments$2.7 $— $— $4.4 $4.4 $3.0 $— $— $4.8 $4.8 Carrying value(a)(b)(c) Carrying value(a)(b)(c) Wholesale lending-related commitments (a)Excludes the current carrying values of the guarantee liability and the offsetting asset, each of which is recognized at fair value at the inception of the guarantees. (b)Includes the wholesale allowance for lending-related commitments. (c)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, included fair value adjustments associated with First Republic for other unfunded commitments to extend credit totaling $699 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Notes 28 and 34 for additional information. The Firm does not estimate the fair value of consumer off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. In many cases, the Firm can reduce or cancel these commitments with or without notice to the borrower, as permitted by law, or in accordance with the contract. Refer to page 183 of this Note for a further discussion of the valuation of lending-related commitments. 202JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 202JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 202JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 202 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The fair value option provides an option to elect fair value for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments.The Firm has elected to measure certain instruments at fair value for several reasons including to mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences between the measurement basis of elected instruments (e.g., certain instruments that otherwise would be accounted for on an accrual basis) and the associated risk management arrangements that are accounted for on a fair value basis, as well as to better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis. The Firm’s election of fair value includes the following instruments: •Loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity, subject to bifurcation accounting, or managed on a fair value basis, including lending-related commitments•Certain securities financing agreements•Owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives, which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument •Structured notes and other hybrid instruments, which are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives, that are issued or transacted as part of client-driven activities •Certain long-term beneficial interests issued by CIB’s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value The fair value option provides an option to elect fair value for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments.The Firm has elected to measure certain instruments at fair value for several reasons including to mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences between the measurement basis of elected instruments (e.g., certain instruments that otherwise would be accounted for on an accrual basis) and the associated risk management arrangements that are accounted for on a fair value basis, as well as to better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis. The fair value option provides an option to elect fair value for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments. The Firm has elected to measure certain instruments at fair value for several reasons including to mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences between the measurement basis of elected instruments (e.g., certain instruments that otherwise would be accounted for on an accrual basis) and the associated risk management arrangements that are accounted for on a fair value basis, as well as to better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis. The Firm’s election of fair value includes the following instruments: •Loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity, subject to bifurcation accounting, or managed on a fair value basis, including lending-related commitments•Certain securities financing agreements•Owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives, which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument •Structured notes and other hybrid instruments, which are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives, that are issued or transacted as part of client-driven activities •Certain long-term beneficial interests issued by CIB’s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value The Firm’s election of fair value includes the following instruments: •Loans purchased or originated as part of securitization warehousing activity, subject to bifurcation accounting, or managed on a fair value basis, including lending-related commitments •Certain securities financing agreements •Owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives, which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative instrument •Structured notes and other hybrid instruments, which are predominantly financial instruments that contain embedded derivatives, that are issued or transacted as part of client-driven activities •Certain long-term beneficial interests issued by CIB’s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value • JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K203 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K203 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K203 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 203

The following table presents the changes in fair value included in the Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, for items for which the fair value option was elected. The profit and loss information presented below only includes the financial instruments that were elected to be measured at fair value; related risk management instruments, which are required to be measured at fair value, are not included in the table. 202420232022December 31, (in millions)Principal transactionsAll other incomeTotal changes in fair value recorded(e)Principal transactionsAll other incomeTotal changes in fair value recorded(e)Principal transactionsAll other incomeTotal changes in fair value recorded(e)Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements$144 $— $144 $300 $— $300 $(384)$— $(384)Securities borrowed347 — 347 164 — 164 (499)— (499)Trading assets:Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans7,205 — 7,205 3,656 — 3,656 (1,703)— (1,703)Loans reported as trading assets:Changes in instrument-specific credit risk346 — 346 248 — 248 (136)— (136)Other changes in fair value9 10 (c)19 3 5 (c)8 (59)— (59)Loans:Changes in instrument-specific credit risk517 (6)(c)511 322 (4)(c)318 (242)21 (c)(221)Other changes in fair value75 371 (c)446 427 216 (c)643 (1,421)(794)(c)(2,215)Other assets63 — 63 282 (4)(d)278 39 (6)(d)33 Deposits(a)(3,398)— (3,398)(2,582)— (2,582)901 — 901 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements(12)— (12)(121)— (121)181 — 181 Short-term borrowings(a) (922)— (922)(567)— (567)473 — 473 Trading liabilities(1)— (1)(24)— (24)43 — 43 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs— — — — — — (1)— (1)Other liabilities(11)— (11)(16)— (16)(11)— (11)Long-term debt(a)(b)(2,711)(6)(c)(d)(2,717)(5,875)(78)(c)(d)(5,953)8,990 98 (c)(d)9,088 Total changes in fair value recorded(e) Total changes in fair value recorded(e) Total changes in fair value recorded(e) Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans Loans reported as trading assets: (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) (c) (d) (d) Deposits(a) Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements Short-term borrowings(a) Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs Other liabilities Long-term debt(a)(b) (c)(d) (c)(d) (c)(d) (a)Unrealized gains/(losses) due to instrument-specific credit risk (DVA) for liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected are recorded in OCI, while realized gains/(losses) are recorded in principal transactions revenue. Realized gains/(losses) due to instrument-specific credit risk recorded in principal transactions revenue were not material for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. (b)Long-term debt measured at fair value predominantly relates to structured notes. Although the risk associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains/(losses) reported in this table do not include the income statement impact of the risk management instruments used to manage such risk. (c)Reported in mortgage fees and related income. (d)Reported in other income. (e)Changes in fair value exclude contractual interest, which is included in interest income and interest expense for all instruments other than certain hybrid financial instruments in CIB. Refer to Note 7 for further information regarding interest income and interest expense. 204JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 204JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 204JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 204 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Determination of instrument-specific credit risk for items for which the fair value option was elected The following describes how the gains and losses that are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk, were determined. •Loans and lending-related commitments: For floating-rate instruments, all changes in value are attributed to instrument-specific credit risk. For fixed-rate instruments, an allocation of the changes in value for the period is made between those changes in value that are interest rate-related and changes in value that are credit-related. Allocations are generally based on an analysis of borrower-specific credit spread and recovery information, where available, or benchmarking to similar entities or industries. •Long-term debt: Changes in value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk were derived principally from observable changes in the Firm’s credit spread as observed in the bond market. •Securities financing agreements: Generally, for these types of agreements, there is a requirement that collateral be maintained with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned; as a result, there would be no adjustment or an immaterial adjustment for instrument-specific credit risk related to these agreements. Determination of instrument-specific credit risk for items for which the fair value option was elected The following describes how the gains and losses that are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk, were determined. •Loans and lending-related commitments: For floating-rate instruments, all changes in value are attributed to instrument-specific credit risk. For fixed-rate instruments, an allocation of the changes in value for the period is made between those changes in value that are interest rate-related and changes in value that are credit-related. Allocations are generally based on an analysis of borrower-specific credit spread and recovery information,

The following describes how the gains and losses that are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk, were determined. •Loans and lending-related commitments: For floating-rate instruments, all changes in value are attributed to instrument-specific credit risk. For fixed-rate instruments, an allocation of the changes in value for the period is made between those changes in value that are interest rate-related and changes in value that are credit-related. Allocations are generally based on an analysis of borrower-specific credit spread and recovery information, where available, or benchmarking to similar entities or industries. •Long-term debt: Changes in value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk were derived principally from observable changes in the Firm’s credit spread as observed in the bond market. •Securities financing agreements: Generally, for these types of agreements, there is a requirement that collateral be maintained with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned; as a result, there would be no adjustment or an immaterial adjustment for instrument-specific credit risk related to these agreements. where available, or benchmarking to similar entities or industries. •Long-term debt: Changes in value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk were derived principally from observable changes in the Firm’s credit spread as observed in the bond market. •Securities financing agreements: Generally, for these types of agreements, there is a requirement that collateral be maintained with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned; as a result, there would be no adjustment or an immaterial adjustment for instrument-specific credit risk related to these agreements.

The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, for loans, long-term debt and long-term beneficial interests for which the fair value option has been elected. 20242023December 31, (in millions)Contractual principal outstandingFair valueFair value over/(under) contractual principal outstandingContractual principal outstandingFair valueFair value over/(under) contractual principal outstandingLoansNonaccrual loansLoans reported as trading assets$3,429 $464 $(2,965)$2,987 $588 $(2,399)Loans1,711 1,492 (219)838 732 (106)Subtotal5,140 1,956 (3,184)3,825 1,320 (2,505)90 or more days past due and government guaranteedLoans(a)50 45 (5)65 59 (6)All other performing loans(b)Loans reported as trading assets12,171 10,852 (1,319)9,547 7,968 (1,579)Loans(c)40,342 39,813 (529)38,948 38,060 (888)Subtotal52,513 50,665 (1,848)48,495 46,028 (2,467)Total loans$57,703 $52,666 $(5,037)$52,385 $47,407 $(4,978)Long-term debtPrincipal-protected debt$57,414 (e)$47,780 $(9,634)$47,768 (e)$38,882 $(8,886)Nonprincipal-protected debt(d)NA53,000 NANA49,042 NATotal long-term debtNA$100,780 NANA$87,924 NALong-term beneficial interestsNonprincipal-protected debt(d)NA$1 NANA$1 NATotal long-term beneficial interestsNA$1 NANA$1 NA Loans(a)

Loans(c) (e) (e) Nonprincipal-protected debt(d) Nonprincipal-protected debt(d) (a)These balances are excluded from nonaccrual loans as the loans are insured and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. (b)There were no performing loans that were ninety days or more past due as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. (c)Includes loans insured and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies less than 90 days past due. (d)Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected structured notes and long-term beneficial interests. Unlike principal-protected structured notes and long-term beneficial interests, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, nonprincipal-protected structured notes and long-term beneficial interests do not obligate the Firm to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but for structured notes to return an amount based on the performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note. However, investors are exposed to the credit risk of the Firm as issuer for both nonprincipal-protected and principal-protected notes. (e)Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance reflects the contractual principal payment at maturity or, if applicable, the contractual principal payment at the Firm’s next call date. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the contractual amount of lending-related commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $12.2 billion and $9.7 billion, respectively, with a corresponding fair value of $50 million and $97 million, respectively. Refer to Note 28 for further information regarding off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K205 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K205 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K205 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 205

The following table presents the fair value of structured notes, by balance sheet classification and the primary risk type. December 31, 2024December 31, 2023(in millions)Long-term debtShort-term borrowingsDepositsTotalLong-term debtShort-term borrowingsDepositsTotalRisk exposureInterest rate$46,220 $1,065 $28,871 $76,156 $38,604 $654 $74,526 $113,784 Credit6,213 1,242 — 7,455 5,444 350 — 5,794 Foreign exchange2,309 1,058 416 3,783 2,605 941 187 3,733 Equity44,149 7,881 2,986 55,016 38,685 5,483 2,905 47,073 Commodity1,331 62 1 (a)1,394 1,862 11 1 (a)1,874 Total structured notes$100,222 $11,308 $32,274 $143,804 $87,200 $7,439 $77,619 $172,258 (a) (a) (a)Excludes deposits linked to precious metals for which the fair value option has not been elected of $869 million and $627 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. 206JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 206JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 206JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 206 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of clients, counterparties or customers are engaged in similar business activities or activities in the same geographic region, or when they have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions.JPMorganChase regularly monitors various segments of its credit portfolios to assess potential credit risk concentrations and to obtain additional collateral when deemed necessary and permitted under the Firm’s agreements. Senior management is significantly involved in the credit approval and review process, and risk levels are adjusted as needed to reflect the Firm’s risk appetite.In the Firm’s consumer portfolio, concentrations are managed primarily by product and by U.S. geographic region, with a key focus on trends and concentrations at the portfolio level, where potential credit risk concentrations can be remedied through changes in underwriting policies and portfolio guidelines. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the geographic composition of the Firm’s consumer loan portfolios. In the wholesale portfolio, credit risk concentrations are evaluated primarily by industry and monitored regularly on both an aggregate portfolio level and on an individual client or counterparty basis. The Firm’s wholesale exposure is managed through loan syndications and participations, loan sales, securitizations, credit derivatives, master netting agreements, collateral and other risk-reduction techniques. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on loans. The Firm does not believe that its exposure to any particular loan product or industry segment results in a significant concentration of credit risk. Terms of loan products and collateral coverage are included in the Firm’s assessment when extending credit and establishing its allowance for credit losses. Refer to Note 13 for additional information on the allowance for credit losses. Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of clients, counterparties or customers are engaged in similar business activities or activities in the same geographic region, or when they have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions.JPMorganChase regularly monitors various segments of its credit portfolios to assess potential credit risk concentrations and to obtain additional collateral when deemed necessary and permitted under the Firm’s agreements. Senior management is significantly involved in the credit approval and review process, and risk levels are adjusted as needed to reflect the Firm’s risk appetite.In the Firm’s consumer portfolio, concentrations are managed primarily by product and by U.S. geographic region, with a key focus on trends and concentrations at the portfolio level, where potential credit risk concentrations can be remedied through changes in underwriting policies and portfolio guidelines. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the geographic composition of the Firm’s consumer loan portfolios. In the wholesale portfolio, credit risk concentrations are evaluated primarily by industry and monitored regularly on both an aggregate portfolio level and on an individual client or counterparty basis. Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of clients, counterparties or customers are engaged in similar business activities or activities in the same geographic region, or when they have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. JPMorganChase regularly monitors various segments of its credit portfolios to assess potential credit risk concentrations and to obtain additional collateral when deemed necessary and permitted under the Firm’s agreements. Senior management is significantly involved in the credit approval and review process, and risk levels are adjusted as needed to reflect the Firm’s risk appetite. In the Firm’s consumer portfolio, concentrations are managed primarily by product and by U.S. geographic region, with a key focus on trends and concentrations at the portfolio level, where potential credit risk concentrations can be remedied through changes in underwriting policies and portfolio guidelines. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the geographic composition of the Firm’s consumer loan portfolios. In the wholesale portfolio, credit risk concentrations are evaluated primarily by industry and monitored regularly on both an aggregate portfolio level and on an individual client or counterparty basis. The Firm’s wholesale exposure is managed through loan syndications and participations, loan sales, securitizations, credit derivatives, master netting agreements, collateral and other risk-reduction techniques. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on loans. The Firm does not believe that its exposure to any particular loan product or industry segment results in a significant concentration of credit risk. Terms of loan products and collateral coverage are included in the Firm’s assessment when extending credit and establishing its allowance for credit losses. Refer to Note 13 for additional information on the allowance for credit losses. The Firm’s wholesale exposure is managed through loan syndications and participations, loan sales, securitizations, credit derivatives, master netting agreements, collateral and other risk-reduction techniques. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on loans. The Firm does not believe that its exposure to any particular loan product or industry segment results in a significant concentration of credit risk. Terms of loan products and collateral coverage are included in the Firm’s assessment when extending credit and establishing its allowance for credit losses. Refer to Note 13 for additional information on the allowance for credit losses. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K207 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K207 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K207 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 207

The table below presents both on–balance sheet and off–balance sheet consumer and wholesale credit exposure by the Firm’s three credit portfolio segments as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. The wholesale industry of risk category is generally based on the client or counterparty’s primary business activity. 20242023Credit exposure(h)On-balance sheetOff-balance sheet(i)Credit exposure(h)On-balance sheetOff-balance sheet(i)December 31, (in millions)LoansDerivativesLoansDerivativesConsumer, excluding credit card$437,654 $392,810 $— $44,844 $455,496 $410,093 $— $45,403 Credit card(a)1,234,171 232,860 — 1,001,311 1,126,781 211,123 — 915,658 Total consumer(a)1,671,825 625,670 — 1,046,155 1,582,277 621,216 — 961,061 Wholesale(b)Real Estate207,050 169,506 310 37,234 208,261 166,372 420 41,469 Individuals and Individual Entities(c)144,145 130,317 1,259 12,569 145,849 126,339 725 18,785 Asset Managers135,541 58,720 15,695 61,126 129,574 52,178 9,925 67,471 Consumer & Retail129,815 46,509 1,608 81,698 127,086 46,274 2,013 78,799 Technology, Media & Telecommunications84,716 21,449 2,448 60,819 77,296 22,450 2,451 52,395 Industrials72,530 24,011 2,035 46,484 75,092 26,548 1,335 47,209 Healthcare64,224 23,243 616 40,365 65,025 23,169 1,577 40,279 Banks & Finance Companies61,287 40,239 3,890 17,158 57,177 33,941 2,898 20,338 Utilities35,871 6,172 2,631 27,068 36,061 7,067 3,396 25,598 State & Municipal Govt(d)35,039 19,279 372 15,388 35,986 20,019 442 15,525 Automotive34,336 17,696 794 15,846 33,977 17,459 428 16,090 Oil & Gas31,724 7,226 1,153 23,345 34,475 8,480 705 25,290 Insurance24,267 2,533 9,703 12,031 20,501 2,535 7,138 10,828 Chemicals & Plastics20,782 6,176 267 14,339 20,773 6,458 441 13,874 Transportation17,019 5,380 769 10,870 16,060 5,080 555 10,425 Metals & Mining15,860 4,425 564 10,871 15,508 4,655 274 10,579 Central Govt13,862 4,715 6,285 2,862 17,704 5,463 10,669 1,572 Securities Firms9,443 1,878 3,197 4,368 8,689 865 3,285 4,539 Financial Markets Infrastructure4,446 16 2,410 2,020 4,251 86 2,155 2,010 All other(e)140,873 100,906 4,961 35,006 134,777 97,034 4,032 33,711 Subtotal1,282,830 690,396 60,967 531,467 1,264,122 672,472 54,864 536,786 Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value31,922 31,922 — — 30,018 30,018 — — Receivables from customers(f)51,929 — — — 47,625 — — — Total wholesale1,366,681 722,318 60,967 531,467 1,341,765 702,490 54,864 536,786 Total exposure(g)$3,038,506 $1,347,988 $60,967 $1,577,622 $2,924,042 $1,323,706 $54,864 $1,497,847 Credit exposure(h) Off-balance sheet(i) Credit exposure(h) Off-balance sheet(i)

(a)Also includes commercial card lending-related commitments primarily in CIB. (b)The industry rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2023, are based on the industry rankings of the corresponding exposures at December 31, 2024, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2023. (c)Individuals and Individual Entities predominantly consists of Global Private Bank clients within AWM and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management within CCB, and includes exposure to personal investment companies and personal and testamentary trusts. (d)In addition to the credit risk exposure to states and municipal governments (both U.S. and non-U.S.) at December 31, 2024 and 2023, noted above, the Firm held: $6.1 billion and $5.9 billion, respectively, of trading assets; $17.9 billion and $21.4 billion, respectively, of AFS securities; and $9.3 billion and $9.9 billion, respectively, of HTM securities, issued by U.S. state and municipal governments. Refer to Note 2 and Note 10 for further information. (e)All other includes: SPEs and Private education and civic organizations, representing approximately 94% and 6%, respectively, at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. Refer to Note 14 for more information on exposures to SPEs. (f)Receivables from customers reflect held-for-investment margin loans to brokerage clients in CIB, CCB and AWM that are collateralized by assets maintained in the clients’ brokerage accounts (including cash on deposit, and primarily liquid and readily marketable debt or equity securities). (g)Excludes cash placed with banks of $459.2 billion and $614.1 billion, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which is predominantly placed with various central banks, primarily Federal Reserve Banks. (h)Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities held against derivative receivables or loans and liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables. (i)Represents lending-related financial instruments. 208JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 208JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 208JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 208 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Derivative contracts derive their value from underlying asset prices, indices, reference rates, other inputs or a combination of these factors and may expose counterparties to risks and rewards of an underlying asset or liability without having to initially invest in, own or exchange the asset or liability. JPMorganChase makes markets in derivatives for clients and also uses derivatives to hedge or manage its own risk exposures. Predominantly all of the Firm’s derivatives are entered into for market-making or risk management purposes. Market-making derivatives The majority of the Firm’s derivatives are entered into for market-making purposes. Clients use derivatives to mitigate or modify interest rate, credit, foreign exchange, equity and commodity risks. The Firm actively manages the risks from its exposure to these derivatives by entering into other derivative contracts or by purchasing or selling other financial instruments that partially or fully offset the exposure from client derivatives. Risk management derivatives The Firm manages certain market and credit risk exposures using derivative instruments, including derivatives in hedge accounting relationships and other derivatives that are used to manage risks associated with specified assets and liabilities. The Firm generally uses interest rate derivatives to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates. Fixed-rate assets and liabilities appreciate or depreciate in market value as interest rates change. Similarly, interest income and expense increase or decrease as a result of variable-rate assets and liabilities resetting to current market rates, and as a result of the repayment and subsequent origination or issuance of fixed-rate assets and liabilities at current market rates. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments related to these assets and liabilities are expected to substantially offset this variability. Foreign currency derivatives are used to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with certain foreign currency–denominated (i.e., non-U.S. dollar) assets and liabilities and forecasted transactions, as well as the Firm’s net investments in certain non-U.S. subsidiaries or branches whose functional currencies are not the U.S. dollar. As a result of fluctuations in foreign currencies, the U.S. dollar–equivalent values of the foreign currency–denominated assets and liabilities or the forecasted revenues or expenses increase or decrease. Gains or losses on the derivative instruments related to these foreign currency–denominated assets or liabilities, or forecasted transactions, are expected to substantially offset this variability. Commodities derivatives are used to manage the price risk of certain commodities inventories. Gains or losses on these derivative instruments are expected to substantially offset the depreciation or appreciation of the related inventory. Credit derivatives are used to manage the counterparty credit risk associated with loans and lending-related commitments. Credit derivatives compensate the purchaser when the entity referenced in the contract experiences a credit event, such as bankruptcy or a failure to pay an obligation when due. Credit derivatives primarily consist of CDS. Refer to the Credit derivatives section on pages 222–224 of this Note for a further discussion of credit derivatives. Refer to the risk management derivatives gains and losses table on page 221 and the hedge accounting gains and losses tables on pages 218–221 of this Note for more information about risk management derivatives. Derivative counterparties and settlement types The Firm enters into OTC derivatives, which are negotiated and settled bilaterally with the derivative counterparty. The Firm also enters into, as principal, certain ETD such as futures and options, and OTC-cleared derivative contracts with CCPs. ETD contracts are generally standardized contracts traded on an exchange and cleared by the CCP, which is the Firm’s counterparty from the inception of the transactions. OTC-cleared derivatives are traded on a bilateral basis and then novated to the CCP for clearing. Derivative clearing services The Firm provides clearing services for clients in which the Firm acts as a clearing member at certain exchanges and clearing houses. The Firm does not reflect the clients’ derivative contracts in its Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note 28 for further information on the Firm’s clearing services. Accounting for derivatives All free-standing derivatives that the Firm executes for its own account are required to be recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm nets derivative assets and liabilities, and the related cash collateral receivables and payables, when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists between the Firm and the derivative counterparty. Refer to Note 1 for further discussion of the offsetting of assets and liabilities. The accounting for changes in value of a derivative depends on whether or not the transaction has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges are reported and measured at fair value through earnings. The tabular disclosures on pages 213–221 of this Note provide additional information on the amount of, and reporting for, derivative assets, liabilities, gains and losses. Refer to Notes 2 and 3 for a further discussion of derivatives embedded in structured notes. Derivative contracts derive their value from underlying asset prices, indices, reference rates, other inputs or a combination of these factors and may expose counterparties to risks and rewards of an underlying asset or liability without having to initially invest in, own or exchange the asset or liability. JPMorganChase makes markets in derivatives for clients and also uses derivatives to hedge or manage its own risk exposures. Predominantly all of the Firm’s derivatives are entered into for market-making or risk management purposes. Market-making derivatives The majority of the Firm’s derivatives are entered into for market-making purposes. Clients use derivatives to mitigate or modify interest rate, credit, foreign exchange, equity and commodity risks. The Firm actively manages the risks from its exposure to these derivatives by entering into other derivative contracts or by purchasing or selling other financial instruments that partially or fully offset the exposure from client derivatives. Risk management derivatives The Firm manages certain market and credit risk exposures using derivative instruments, including derivatives in hedge accounting relationships and other derivatives that are used to manage risks associated with specified assets and liabilities. The Firm generally uses interest rate derivatives to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates. Fixed-rate assets and liabilities appreciate or depreciate in market value as interest rates change. Similarly, interest income and expense increase or decrease as a result of variable-rate assets and liabilities resetting to current market rates, and as a result of the repayment and subsequent origination or issuance of fixed-rate assets and liabilities at current market rates. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments related to these assets and liabilities are expected to substantially offset this variability. Foreign currency derivatives are used to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with certain foreign currency–denominated (i.e., non-U.S. dollar) assets and liabilities and forecasted transactions, as well as the Firm’s net investments in certain non-U.S. subsidiaries or branches whose functional currencies are not the U.S. dollar. As a result of fluctuations in foreign currencies, the U.S. dollar–equivalent values of the foreign currency–denominated assets and liabilities or the forecasted revenues or expenses increase or decrease. Gains or losses on the derivative instruments related to these foreign currency–denominated assets or liabilities, or forecasted transactions, are expected to substantially offset this variability. Commodities derivatives are used to manage the price risk of certain commodities inventories. Gains or losses on these derivative instruments are expected to Derivative contracts derive their value from underlying asset prices, indices, reference rates, other inputs or a combination of these factors and may expose counterparties to risks and rewards of an underlying asset or liability without having to initially invest in, own or exchange the asset or liability. JPMorganChase makes markets in derivatives for clients and also uses derivatives to hedge or manage its own risk exposures. Predominantly all of the Firm’s derivatives are entered into for market-making or risk management purposes. Market-making derivatives The majority of the Firm’s derivatives are entered into for market-making purposes. Clients use derivatives to mitigate or modify interest rate, credit, foreign exchange, equity and commodity risks. The Firm actively manages the risks from its exposure to these derivatives by entering into other derivative contracts or by purchasing or selling other financial instruments that partially or fully offset the exposure from client derivatives. Risk management derivatives The Firm manages certain market and credit risk exposures using derivative instruments, including derivatives in hedge accounting relationships and other derivatives that are used to manage risks associated with specified assets and liabilities. The Firm generally uses interest rate derivatives to manage the risk associated with changes in interest rates. Fixed-rate assets and liabilities appreciate or depreciate in market value as interest rates change. Similarly, interest income and expense increase or decrease as a result of variable-rate assets and liabilities resetting to current market rates, and as a result of the repayment and subsequent origination or issuance of fixed-rate assets and liabilities at current market rates. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments related to these assets and liabilities are expected to substantially offset this variability. Foreign currency derivatives are used to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with certain foreign currency–denominated (i.e., non-U.S. dollar) assets and liabilities and forecasted transactions, as well as the Firm’s net investments in certain non-U.S. subsidiaries or branches whose functional currencies are not the U.S. dollar. As a result of fluctuations in foreign currencies, the U.S. dollar–equivalent values of the foreign currency–denominated assets and liabilities or the forecasted revenues or expenses increase or decrease. Gains or losses on the derivative instruments related to these foreign currency–denominated assets or liabilities, or forecasted transactions, are expected to substantially offset this variability. Commodities derivatives are used to manage the price risk of certain commodities inventories. Gains or losses on these derivative instruments are expected to substantially offset the depreciation or appreciation of the related inventory. Credit derivatives are used to manage the counterparty credit risk associated with loans and lending-related commitments. Credit derivatives compensate the purchaser when the entity referenced in the contract experiences a credit event, such as bankruptcy or a failure to pay an obligation when due. Credit derivatives primarily consist of CDS. Refer to the Credit derivatives section on pages 222–224 of this Note for a further discussion of credit derivatives. Refer to the risk management derivatives gains and losses table on page 221 and the hedge accounting gains and losses tables on pages 218–221 of this Note for more information about risk management derivatives. Derivative counterparties and settlement types The Firm enters into OTC derivatives, which are negotiated and settled bilaterally with the derivative counterparty. The Firm also enters into, as principal, certain ETD such as futures and options, and OTC-cleared derivative contracts with CCPs. ETD contracts are generally standardized contracts traded on an exchange and cleared by the CCP, which is the Firm’s counterparty from the inception of the transactions. OTC-cleared derivatives are traded on a bilateral basis and then novated to the CCP for clearing. Derivative clearing services The Firm provides clearing services for clients in which the Firm acts as a clearing member at certain exchanges and clearing houses. The Firm does not reflect the clients’ derivative contracts in its Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note 28 for further information on the Firm’s clearing services. Accounting for derivatives All free-standing derivatives that the Firm executes for its own account are required to be recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm nets derivative assets and liabilities, and the related cash collateral receivables and payables, when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists between the Firm and the derivative counterparty. Refer to Note 1 for further discussion of the offsetting of assets and liabilities. The accounting for changes in value of a derivative depends on whether or not the transaction has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges are reported and measured at fair value through earnings. The tabular disclosures on pages 213–221 of this Note provide additional information on the amount of, and reporting for, derivative assets, liabilities, gains and losses. Refer to Notes 2 and 3 for a further discussion of derivatives embedded in structured notes. substantially offset the depreciation or appreciation of the related inventory. Credit derivatives are used to manage the counterparty credit risk associated with loans and lending-related commitments. Credit derivatives compensate the purchaser when the entity referenced in the contract experiences a credit event, such as bankruptcy or a failure to pay an obligation when due. Credit derivatives primarily consist of CDS. Refer to the Credit derivatives section on pages 222–224 of this Note for a further discussion of credit derivatives. Refer to the risk management derivatives gains and losses table on page 221 and the hedge accounting gains and losses tables on pages 218–221 of this Note for more information about risk management derivatives. Derivative counterparties and settlement types The Firm enters into OTC derivatives, which are negotiated and settled bilaterally with the derivative counterparty. The Firm also enters into, as principal, certain ETD such as futures and options, and OTC-cleared derivative contracts with CCPs. ETD contracts are generally standardized contracts traded on an exchange and cleared by the CCP, which is the Firm’s counterparty from the inception of the transactions. OTC-cleared derivatives are traded on a bilateral basis and then novated to the CCP for clearing. Derivative clearing services The Firm provides clearing services for clients in which the Firm acts as a clearing member at certain exchanges and clearing houses. The Firm does not reflect the clients’ derivative contracts in its Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Note 28 for further information on the Firm’s clearing services.

All free-standing derivatives that the Firm executes for its own account are required to be recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets at fair value. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm nets derivative assets and liabilities, and the related cash collateral receivables and payables, when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists between the Firm and the derivative counterparty. Refer to Note 1 for further discussion of the offsetting of assets and liabilities. The accounting for changes in value of a derivative depends on whether or not the transaction has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges are reported and measured at fair value through earnings. The tabular disclosures on pages 213–221 of this Note provide additional information on the amount of, and reporting for, derivative assets, liabilities, gains and losses. Refer to Notes 2 and 3 for a further discussion of derivatives embedded in structured notes. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K209 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K209 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K209 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 209

Derivatives designated as hedges The Firm applies hedge accounting to certain derivatives executed for risk management purposes – generally interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity derivatives. However, JPMorganChase does not seek to apply hedge accounting to all of the derivatives associated with the Firm’s risk management activities. For example, the Firm does not apply hedge accounting to purchased CDS used to manage the credit risk of loans and lending-related commitments, because of the difficulties in qualifying such contracts as hedges. For the same reason, the Firm does not apply hedge accounting to certain interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity derivatives used for risk management purposes. To qualify for hedge accounting, a derivative must be highly effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged. In addition, for a derivative to be designated as a hedge, the risk management objective and strategy must be documented. Hedge documentation must identify the derivative hedging instrument, the asset or liability or forecasted transaction and type of risk to be hedged, and how the effectiveness of the derivative is assessed prospectively and retrospectively. To assess effectiveness, the Firm uses statistical methods such as regression analysis, nonstatistical methods such as dollar-value comparisons of the change in the fair value of the derivative to the change in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, and qualitative comparisons of critical terms and the evaluation of any changes in those terms. The extent to which a derivative has been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item must be assessed and documented at least quarterly. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective at hedging the designated exposure, hedge accounting is discontinued. There are three types of hedge accounting designations: fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and net investment hedges. JPMorganChase uses fair value hedges primarily to hedge fixed-rate long-term debt, AFS securities and certain commodities inventories. For qualifying fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of the derivative, and in the value of the hedged item for the risk being hedged, are recognized in earnings. Certain amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recorded in OCI and recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative. If the hedge relationship is terminated, then the adjustment to the hedged item continues to be reported as part of the basis of the hedged item and, for interest-bearing financial instruments, is amortized to earnings as a yield adjustment. Derivative amounts affecting earnings are recognized consistent with the classification of the hedged item – primarily net interest income and principal transactions revenue. The Firm employs the portfolio layer method to manage the interest rate risk of portfolios of fixed-rate assets. Throughout the life of the open hedge, basis adjustments are maintained at the portfolio level and are only allocated to individual assets under certain circumstances. These include instances where the portfolio amount falls below the hedged layer amounts, or in cases of voluntary de-designation.JPMorganChase uses cash flow hedges primarily to hedge the exposure to variability in forecasted cash flows from floating-rate assets and liabilities and foreign currency–denominated revenue and expense. For qualifying cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in OCI and recognized in earnings as the hedged item affects earnings. Derivative amounts affecting earnings are recognized consistent with the classification of the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue, net interest income and compensation expense. If the hedge relationship is terminated, then the change in value of the derivative recorded in AOCI is recognized in earnings when the cash flows that were hedged affect earnings. For hedge relationships that are discontinued because a forecasted transaction is expected to not occur according to the original hedge forecast, any related derivative values recorded in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings. JPMorganChase uses net investment hedges to protect the value of the Firm’s net investments in certain non-U.S. subsidiaries or branches whose functional currencies are not the U.S. dollar. For qualifying net investment hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives due to changes in spot foreign exchange rates are recorded in OCI as translation adjustments. Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recorded directly in earnings. Derivatives designated as hedges The Firm applies hedge accounting to certain derivatives executed for risk management purposes – generally interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity derivatives. However, JPMorganChase does not seek to apply hedge accounting to all of the derivatives associated with the Firm’s risk management activities. For example, the Firm does not apply hedge accounting to purchased CDS used to manage the credit risk of loans and lending-related commitments, because of the difficulties in qualifying such contracts as hedges. For the same reason, the Firm does not apply hedge accounting to certain interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity derivatives used for risk management purposes. To qualify for hedge accounting, a derivative must be highly effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged. In addition, for a derivative to be designated as a hedge, the risk management objective and strategy must be documented. Hedge documentation must identify the derivative hedging instrument, the asset or liability or forecasted transaction and type of risk to be hedged, and how the effectiveness of the derivative is assessed prospectively and retrospectively. To assess effectiveness, the Firm uses statistical methods such as regression analysis, nonstatistical methods such as dollar-value comparisons of the change in the fair value of the derivative to the change in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, and qualitative comparisons of critical terms and the evaluation of any changes in those terms. The extent to which a derivative has been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item must be assessed and documented at least quarterly. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective at hedging the designated exposure, hedge accounting is discontinued. There are three types of hedge accounting designations: fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and net investment hedges. JPMorganChase uses fair value hedges primarily to hedge fixed-rate long-term debt, AFS securities and certain commodities inventories. For qualifying fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of the derivative, and in the value of the hedged item for the risk being hedged, are recognized in earnings. Certain amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recorded in OCI and recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative. If the hedge relationship is terminated, then the adjustment to the hedged item continues to be reported as part of the basis of the hedged item and, for interest-bearing financial instruments, is amortized to earnings as a yield adjustment. Derivative amounts affecting earnings are recognized consistent with the classification of the hedged item – primarily net interest income and principal transactions revenue. Derivatives designated as hedges The Firm applies hedge accounting to certain derivatives executed for risk management purposes – generally interest rate, foreign exchange and commodity derivatives. However, JPMorganChase does not seek to apply hedge accounting to all of the derivatives associated with the Firm’s risk management activities. For example, the Firm does not apply hedge accounting to purchased CDS used to manage the credit risk of loans and lending-related commitments, because of the difficulties in qualifying such contracts as hedges. For the same reason, the Firm does not apply hedge accounting to certain interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity derivatives used for risk management purposes. To qualify for hedge accounting, a derivative must be highly effective at reducing the risk associated with the exposure being hedged. In addition, for a derivative to be designated as a hedge, the risk management objective and strategy must be documented. Hedge documentation must identify the derivative hedging instrument, the asset or liability or forecasted transaction and type of risk to be hedged, and how the effectiveness of the derivative is assessed prospectively and retrospectively. To assess effectiveness, the Firm uses statistical methods such as regression analysis, nonstatistical methods such as dollar-value comparisons of the change in the fair value of the derivative to the change in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item, and qualitative comparisons of critical terms and the evaluation of any changes in those terms. The extent to which a derivative has been, and is expected to continue to be, highly effective at offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item must be assessed and documented at least quarterly. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective at hedging the designated exposure, hedge accounting is discontinued. There are three types of hedge accounting designations: fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and net investment hedges. JPMorganChase uses fair value hedges primarily to hedge fixed-rate long-term debt, AFS securities and certain commodities inventories. For qualifying fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of the derivative, and in the value of the hedged item for the risk being hedged, are recognized in earnings. Certain amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recorded in OCI and recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative. If the hedge relationship is terminated, then the adjustment to the hedged item continues to be reported as part of the basis of the hedged item and, for interest-bearing financial instruments, is amortized to earnings as a yield adjustment. Derivative amounts affecting earnings are recognized consistent with the classification of the hedged item – primarily net interest income and principal transactions revenue. The Firm employs the portfolio layer method to manage the interest rate risk of portfolios of fixed-rate assets. Throughout the life of the open hedge, basis adjustments are maintained at the portfolio level and are only allocated to individual assets under certain circumstances. These include instances where the portfolio amount falls below the hedged layer amounts, or in cases of voluntary de-designation.JPMorganChase uses cash flow hedges primarily to hedge the exposure to variability in forecasted cash flows from floating-rate assets and liabilities and foreign currency–denominated revenue and expense. For qualifying cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in OCI and recognized in earnings as the hedged item affects earnings. Derivative amounts affecting earnings are recognized consistent with the classification of the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue, net interest income and compensation expense. If the hedge relationship is terminated, then the change in value of the derivative recorded in AOCI is recognized in earnings when the cash flows that were hedged affect earnings. For hedge relationships that are discontinued because a forecasted transaction is expected to not occur according to the original hedge forecast, any related derivative values recorded in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings. JPMorganChase uses net investment hedges to protect the value of the Firm’s net investments in certain non-U.S. subsidiaries or branches whose functional currencies are not the U.S. dollar. For qualifying net investment hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives due to changes in spot foreign exchange rates are recorded in OCI as translation adjustments. Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recorded directly in earnings. The Firm employs the portfolio layer method to manage the interest rate risk of portfolios of fixed-rate assets. Throughout the life of the open hedge, basis adjustments are maintained at the portfolio level and are only allocated to individual assets under certain circumstances. These include instances where the portfolio amount falls below the hedged layer amounts, or in cases of voluntary de-designation. JPMorganChase uses cash flow hedges primarily to hedge the exposure to variability in forecasted cash flows from floating-rate assets and liabilities and foreign currency–denominated revenue and expense. For qualifying cash flow hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in OCI and recognized in earnings as the hedged item affects earnings. Derivative amounts affecting earnings are recognized consistent with the classification of the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue, net interest income and compensation expense. If the hedge relationship is terminated, then the change in value of the derivative recorded in AOCI is recognized in earnings when the cash flows that were hedged affect earnings. For hedge relationships that are discontinued because a forecasted transaction is expected to not occur according to the original hedge forecast, any related derivative values recorded in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings. JPMorganChase uses net investment hedges to protect the value of the Firm’s net investments in certain non-U.S. subsidiaries or branches whose functional currencies are not the U.S. dollar. For qualifying net investment hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivatives due to changes in spot foreign exchange rates are recorded in OCI as translation adjustments. Amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recorded directly in earnings. 210JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 210JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 210JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 210 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following table outlines the Firm’s primary uses of derivatives and the related hedge accounting designation or disclosure category. Type of DerivativeUse of DerivativeDesignation and disclosureAffected segment or unitPage referenceManage specifically identified risk exposures in qualifying hedge accounting relationships:•Interest rateHedge fixed rate assets and liabilitiesFair value hedgeCorporate218-219•Interest rateHedge floating-rate assets and liabilitiesCash flow hedgeCorporate220•Foreign exchange Hedge foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilitiesFair value hedgeCorporate218-219•Foreign exchange Hedge foreign currency-denominated forecasted revenue and expenseCash flow hedgeCorporate220•Foreign exchange Hedge the value of the Firm’s investments in non-U.S. dollar functional currency entitiesNet investment hedgeCorporate221•Commodity Hedge commodity inventoryFair value hedgeCIB, AWM218-219Manage specifically identified risk exposures not designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships:•Interest rateManage the risk associated with mortgage commitments, warehouse loans and MSRsSpecified risk managementCCB221•CreditManage the credit risk associated with wholesale lending exposuresSpecified risk managementCIB, AWM221•Interest rate and foreign exchangeManage the risk associated with certain other specified assets and liabilitiesSpecified risk managementCorporate, CIB221Market-making derivatives and other activities:•VariousMarket-making and related risk managementMarket-making and otherCIB221•VariousOther derivativesMarket-making and otherCIB, AWM, Corporate221 •Interest rate Corporate •Interest rate Corporate •Foreign exchange Hedge foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities Fair value hedge Corporate •Foreign exchange Hedge foreign currency-denominated forecasted revenue and expense Corporate •Foreign exchange Hedge the value of the Firm’s investments in non-U.S. dollar functional currency entities Net investment hedge Corporate •Commodity Fair value hedge Manage specifically identified risk exposures not designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships: •Interest rate Manage the risk associated with mortgage commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs •Credit Manage the credit risk associated with wholesale lending exposures Specified risk management CIB, AWM •Interest rate and foreign exchange Specified risk management Corporate, CIB Market-making derivatives and other activities: •Various Market-making and other •Various Market-making and other JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K211 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K211 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K211 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 211

Notional amount of derivative contracts The following table summarizes the notional amount of free-standing derivative contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.Notional amounts(b)December 31, (in billions)20242023Interest rate contractsSwaps$20,437 $23,251 Futures and forwards3,067 2,690 Written options3,067 3,370 Purchased options3,089 3,362 Total interest rate contracts29,660 32,673 Credit derivatives(a)1,191 1,045 Foreign exchange contractsCross-currency swaps4,509 4,721 Spot, futures and forwards7,005 6,957 Written options1,015 830 Purchased options984 798 Total foreign exchange contracts13,513 13,306 Equity contractsSwaps850 639 Futures and forwards206 157 Written options914 778 Purchased options788 698 Total equity contracts2,758 2,272 Commodity contractsSwaps148 115 Spot, futures and forwards191 157 Written options137 130 Purchased options125 115 Total commodity contracts601 517 Total derivative notional amounts$47,723 $49,813 (a)Refer to the Credit derivatives discussion on pages 222–224 for more information on volumes and types of credit derivative contracts.(b)Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts.While the notional amounts disclosed above give an indication of the volume of the Firm’s derivatives activity, the notional amounts significantly exceed, in the Firm’s view, the possible losses that could arise from such transactions. For most derivative contracts, the notional amount is not exchanged; it is simply a reference amount used to calculate payments. Notional amount of derivative contracts The following table summarizes the notional amount of free-standing derivative contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.Notional amounts(b)December 31, (in billions)20242023Interest rate contractsSwaps$20,437 $23,251 Futures and forwards3,067 2,690 Written options3,067 3,370 Purchased options3,089 3,362 Total interest rate contracts29,660 32,673 Credit derivatives(a)1,191 1,045 Foreign exchange contractsCross-currency swaps4,509 4,721 Spot, futures and forwards7,005 6,957 Written options1,015 830 Purchased options984 798 Total foreign exchange contracts13,513 13,306 Equity contractsSwaps850 639 Futures and forwards206 157 Written options914 778 Purchased options788 698 Total equity contracts2,758 2,272 Commodity contractsSwaps148 115 Spot, futures and forwards191 157 Written options137 130 Purchased options125 115 Total commodity contracts601 517 Total derivative notional amounts$47,723 $49,813 (a)Refer to the Credit derivatives discussion on pages 222–224 for more information on volumes and types of credit derivative contracts.(b)Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts.While the notional amounts disclosed above give an indication of the volume of the Firm’s derivatives activity, the notional amounts significantly exceed, in the Firm’s view, the possible losses that could arise from such transactions. For most derivative contracts, the notional amount is not exchanged; it is simply a reference amount used to calculate payments. Notional amount of derivative contracts The following table summarizes the notional amount of free-standing derivative contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Notional amounts(b)December 31, (in billions)20242023Interest rate contractsSwaps$20,437 $23,251 Futures and forwards3,067 2,690 Written options3,067 3,370 Purchased options3,089 3,362 Total interest rate contracts29,660 32,673 Credit derivatives(a)1,191 1,045 Foreign exchange contractsCross-currency swaps4,509 4,721 Spot, futures and forwards7,005 6,957 Written options1,015 830 Purchased options984 798 Total foreign exchange contracts13,513 13,306 Equity contractsSwaps850 639 Futures and forwards206 157 Written options914 778 Purchased options788 698 Total equity contracts2,758 2,272 Commodity contractsSwaps148 115 Spot, futures and forwards191 157 Written options137 130 Purchased options125 115 Total commodity contracts601 517 Total derivative notional amounts$47,723 $49,813 Notional amounts(b) Swaps Futures and forwards Written options Purchased options

(a)Refer to the Credit derivatives discussion on pages 222–224 for more information on volumes and types of credit derivative contracts. (b)Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts. While the notional amounts disclosed above give an indication of the volume of the Firm’s derivatives activity, the notional amounts significantly exceed, in the Firm’s view, the possible losses that could arise from such transactions. For most derivative contracts, the notional amount is not exchanged; it is simply a reference amount used to calculate payments. 212JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 212JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 212JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 212 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The following table summarizes information on derivative receivables and payables (before and after netting adjustments) that are reflected on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, by accounting designation (e.g., whether the derivatives were designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships or not) and contract type. Free-standing derivative receivables and payables(a)Gross derivative receivablesGross derivative payablesDecember 31, 2024(in millions)Not designated as hedgesDesignated as hedgesTotal derivative receivablesNet derivative receivables(b)Not designated as hedgesDesignated as hedgesTotal derivative payablesNet derivative payables(b)Trading assets and liabilitiesInterest rate$290,734 $— $290,734 $24,945 $274,226 $2 $274,228 $9,239 Credit11,087 — 11,087 814 13,796 — 13,796 1,898 Foreign exchange261,035 1,885 262,920 25,312 253,289 1,278 254,567 15,597 Equity85,220 — 85,220 5,285 96,139 — 96,139 8,648 Commodity15,490 136 15,626 4,611 14,415 73 14,488 4,279 Total fair value of trading assets and liabilities$663,566 $2,021 $665,587 $60,967 $651,865 $1,353 $653,218 $39,661 Gross derivative receivablesGross derivative payablesDecember 31, 2023(in millions)Not designated as hedgesDesignated as hedgesTotal derivative receivablesNet derivative receivables(b)Not designated as hedgesDesignated as hedgesTotal derivative payablesNetderivative payables(b)Trading assets and liabilitiesInterest rate$250,689 $2 $250,691 $26,324 $240,482 $— $240,482 $11,896 Credit9,654 — 9,654 551 12,038 — 12,038 1,089 Foreign exchange205,010 765 205,775 18,019 210,623 1,640 212,263 12,620 Equity57,689 — 57,689 4,928 65,811 — 65,811 9,368 Commodity15,228 211 15,439 5,042 16,286 92 16,378 5,874 Total fair value of trading assets and liabilities$538,270 $978 $539,248 $54,864 $545,240 $1,732 $546,972 $40,847 Free-standing derivative receivables and payables(a) Net derivative receivables(b) Net derivative payables(b)

(a)Balances exclude structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected. Refer to Note 3 for further information. (b)As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral receivables and payables when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K213 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K213 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K213 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 213

The following tables present, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, gross and net derivative receivables and payables by contract and settlement type. Derivative receivables and payables, as well as the related cash collateral from the same counterparty, have been netted on the Consolidated balance sheets where the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the master netting agreement. Where such a legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained, amounts are not eligible for netting on the Consolidated balance sheets, and those derivative receivables and payables are shown separately in the tables. In addition to the cash collateral received and transferred that is presented on a net basis with derivative receivables and payables, the Firm receives and transfers additional collateral (financial instruments and cash). These amounts mitigate counterparty credit risk associated with the Firm’s derivative instruments, but are not eligible for net presentation: •collateral that consists of liquid securities and other cash collateral held at third-party custodians, which are shown separately as "Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets" in the tables, up to the fair value exposure amount. For the purpose of this disclosure, the definition of liquid securities is consistent with the definition of high quality liquid assets as defined in the LCR rule; •the amount of collateral held or transferred that exceeds the fair value exposure at the individual counterparty level, as of the date presented, which is excluded from the tables; and •collateral held or transferred that relates to derivative receivables or payables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained with respect to the master netting agreement, which is excluded from the tables. 214JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 214JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 214JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 214 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 20242023December 31, (in millions)Gross derivative receivablesAmounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheetsNet derivative receivablesGross derivative receivablesAmounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheetsNetderivative receivablesU.S. GAAP nettable derivative receivablesInterest rate contracts:OTC$158,202 $(134,791)$23,411 $176,901 $(152,703)$24,198 OTC–cleared130,989 (130,810)179 71,419 (71,275)144 Exchange-traded(a)190 (188)2 402 (389)13 Total interest rate contracts289,381 (265,789)23,592 248,722 (224,367)24,355 Credit contracts:OTC8,680 (8,030)650 7,637 (7,226)411 OTC–cleared2,267 (2,243)24 1,904 (1,877)27 Total credit contracts10,947 (10,273)674 9,541 (9,103)438 Foreign exchange contracts:OTC259,608 (236,931)22,677 203,624 (187,295)16,329 OTC–cleared685 (677)8 469 (459)10 Exchange-traded(a)34 — 34 6 (2)4 Total foreign exchange contracts260,327 (237,608)22,719 204,099 (187,756)16,343 Equity contracts:OTC33,269 (30,742)2,527 25,001 (23,677)1,324 Exchange-traded(a)51,040 (49,193)1,847 30,462 (29,084)1,378 Total equity contracts84,309 (79,935)4,374 55,463 (52,761)2,702 Commodity contracts:OTC8,340 (5,848)2,492 8,049 (5,084)2,965 OTC–cleared126 (84)42 133 (123)10 Exchange-traded(a)5,179 (5,083)96 5,214 (5,190)24 Total commodity contracts13,645 (11,015)2,630 13,396 (10,397)2,999 Derivative receivables with appropriate legal opinion658,609 (604,620)53,989 (d)531,221 (484,384)46,837 (d)Derivative receivables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained6,978 6,978 8,027 8,027 Total derivative receivables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets$665,587 $60,967 $539,248 $54,864 Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c)(28,160)(22,461)Net amounts$32,807 $32,403

20242023December 31, (in millions)Gross derivative payablesAmounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheetsNet derivative payablesGross derivative payablesAmounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheetsNetderivative payablesU.S. GAAP nettable derivative payablesInterest rate contracts:OTC$138,215 $(130,375)$7,840 $161,901 $(152,467)$9,434 OTC–cleared134,555 (134,262)293 76,007 (75,729)278 Exchange-traded(a)363 (352)11 436 (390)46 Total interest rate contracts273,133 (264,989)8,144 238,344 (228,586)9,758 Credit contracts:OTC11,381 (10,133)1,248 10,332 (9,313)1,019 OTC–cleared1,779 (1,765)14 1,639 (1,636)3 Total credit contracts13,160 (11,898)1,262 11,971 (10,949)1,022 Foreign exchange contracts:OTC251,860 (238,292)13,568 209,386 (199,173)10,213 OTC–cleared772 (678)94 552 (470)82 Exchange-traded(a)14 — 14 6 — 6 Total foreign exchange contracts252,646 (238,970)13,676 209,944 (199,643)10,301 Equity contracts:OTC44,394 (38,298)6,096 29,999 (27,360)2,639 Exchange-traded(a)49,578 (49,193)385 33,137 (29,083)4,054 Total equity contracts93,972 (87,491)6,481 63,136 (56,443)6,693 Commodity contracts:OTC6,918 (5,206)1,712 8,788 (5,192)3,596 OTC–cleared84 (84)— 120 (120)— Exchange-traded(a)5,182 (4,919)263 5,376 (5,192)184 Total commodity contracts12,184 (10,209)1,975 14,284 (10,504)3,780 Derivative payables with appropriate legal opinion645,095 (613,557)31,538 (d)537,679 (506,125)31,554 (d)Derivative payables where an appropriate legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained8,123 8,123 9,293 9,293 Total derivative payables recognized on the Consolidated balance sheets$653,218 $39,661 $546,972 $40,847 Collateral not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b)(c)(10,163)(4,547)Net amounts$29,498 $36,300

(a)Exchange-traded derivative balances that relate to futures contracts are settled daily. (b)Includes liquid securities and other cash collateral held at third-party custodians related to derivative instruments where an appropriate legal opinion has been obtained. For some counterparties, the collateral amounts of financial instruments may exceed the derivative receivables and derivative payables balances. Where this is the case, the total amount reported is limited to the net derivative receivables and net derivative payables balances with that counterparty. (c)Derivative collateral relates only to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative instruments. (d)Net derivatives receivable included cash collateral netted of $51.9 billion and $48.3 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Net derivatives payable included cash collateral netted of $60.8 billion and $70.0 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Derivative cash collateral relates to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative instruments. 216JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 216JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 216JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 216 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

In addition to the specific market risks introduced by each derivative contract type, derivatives expose JPMorganChase to credit risk — the risk that derivative counterparties may fail to meet their payment obligations under the derivative contracts and the collateral, if any, held by the Firm proves to be of insufficient value to cover the payment obligation. It is the policy of JPMorganChase to actively pursue, where possible, the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements to mitigate derivative counterparty credit risk inherent in derivative receivables. While derivative receivables expose the Firm to credit risk, derivative payables expose the Firm to liquidity risk, as the derivative contracts typically require the Firm to post cash or securities collateral with counterparties as the fair value of the contracts moves in the counterparties’ favor or upon specified downgrades in the Firm’s and its subsidiaries’ respective credit ratings. Certain derivative contracts also provide for termination of the contract, generally upon a downgrade of either the Firm or the counterparty, at the fair value of the derivative contracts. The following table shows the aggregate fair value of net derivative payables related to OTC and OTC-cleared derivatives that contain contingent collateral or termination features that may be triggered upon a ratings downgrade, and the associated collateral the Firm has posted in the normal course of business, at December 31, 2024 and 2023. OTC and OTC-cleared derivative payables containing downgrade triggers(in millions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Aggregate fair value of net derivative payables$15,371 $14,655 Collateral posted15,204 14,673 The following table shows the impact of a single-notch and two-notch downgrade of the long-term issuer ratings of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries, predominantly JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., at December 31, 2024 and 2023, related to OTC and OTC-cleared derivative contracts with contingent collateral or termination features that may be triggered upon a ratings downgrade. Derivatives contracts generally require additional collateral to be posted or terminations to be triggered when the predefined rating threshold is breached. A downgrade by a single rating agency that does not result in a rating lower than a preexisting corresponding rating provided by another major rating agency will generally not result in additional collateral (except in certain instances in which additional initial margin may be required upon a ratings downgrade), nor in termination payment requirements. The liquidity impact in the table is calculated based upon a downgrade below the lowest current rating of the rating agencies referred to in the derivative contract. Liquidity impact of downgrade triggers on OTC and OTC-cleared derivativesDecember 31, 2024December 31, 2023(in millions)Single-notch downgradeTwo-notch downgradeSingle-notch downgradeTwo-notch downgradeAmount of additional collateral to be posted upon downgrade(a)$119 $1,205 $75 $1,153 Amount required to settle contracts with termination triggers upon downgrade(b)78 458 93 592 Amount of additional collateral to be posted upon downgrade(a) Amount required to settle contracts with termination triggers upon downgrade(b) (a)Includes the additional collateral to be posted for initial margin. (b)Amounts represent fair values of derivative payables, and do not reflect collateral posted. Derivatives executed in contemplation of a sale of the underlying financial asset In certain instances the Firm enters into transactions in which it transfers financial assets but maintains the economic exposure to the transferred assets by entering into a derivative with the same counterparty in contemplation of the initial transfer. The Firm generally accounts for such transfers as collateralized financing transactions as described in Note 11, but in limited circumstances they may qualify to be accounted for as a sale and a derivative under U.S. GAAP. The amount of such transfers accounted for as a sale where the associated derivative was outstanding was not material at December 31, 2024 and 2023. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K217 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K217 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K217 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 217

The following tables provide information related to gains and losses recorded on derivatives based on their hedge accounting designation or purpose. Fair value hedge gains and losses The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in fair value hedge accounting relationships, as well as pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives and the related hedged items for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Firm includes gains/(losses) on the hedging derivative in the same line item in the Consolidated statements of income as the related hedged item. Gains/(losses) recorded in incomeIncome statement impact of excluded components(e)OCI impactYear ended December 31, 2024(in millions)DerivativesHedged itemsIncome statement impactAmortization approachChanges in fair valueDerivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f)Contract typeInterest rate(a)(b)$711 $(65)$646 $— $699 $— Foreign exchange(c)(177)402 225 (532)225 (115)Commodity(d)293 (160)133 — 122 — Total$827 $177 $1,004 $(532)$1,046 $(115)Gains/(losses) recorded in incomeIncome statement impact of excluded components(e)OCI impactYear ended December 31, 2023(in millions)DerivativesHedged itemsIncome statement impactAmortization approachChanges in fair valueDerivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f)Contract typeInterest rate(a)(b)$1,554 $(1,248)$306 $— $157 $— Foreign exchange(c)722 (483)239 (601)239 (134)Commodity(d)1,227 (706)521 — 525 — Total$3,503 $(2,437)$1,066 $(601)$921 $(134)Gains/(losses) recorded in incomeIncome statement impact of excluded components(e)OCI impactYear ended December 31, 2022(in millions)DerivativesHedged itemsIncome statement impactAmortization approachChanges in fair valueDerivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f)Contract typeInterest rate(a)(b)$(14,352)$14,047 $(305)$— $(262)$— Foreign exchange(c)(1,317)1,423 106 (528)106 130 Commodity(d)106 (70)36 — 48 — Total$(15,563)$15,400 $(163)$(528)$(108)$130 Income statement impact of excluded components(e) Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) Interest rate(a)(b) Foreign exchange(c) Commodity(d) Income statement impact of excluded components(e) Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) Interest rate(a)(b) Foreign exchange(c) Commodity(d) Income statement impact of excluded components(e) Derivatives - Gains/(losses) recorded in OCI(f) Interest rate(a)(b) Foreign exchange(c) Commodity(d) (a)Primarily consists of hedges of the benchmark (e.g., Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”)) interest rate risk of fixed-rate long-term debt and AFS securities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income. (b)Includes the amortization of income/expense associated with the inception hedge accounting adjustment applied to the hedged item. Excludes the accrual of interest on interest rate swaps and the related hedged items. (c)Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of long-term debt and AFS securities for changes in spot foreign currency rates. Gains and losses related to the derivatives and the hedged items due to changes in foreign currency rates and the income statement impact of excluded components were recorded primarily in principal transactions revenue and net interest income. (d)Consists of overall fair value hedges of physical commodities inventories that are generally carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value (net realizable value approximates fair value). Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. (e)The assessment of hedge effectiveness excludes certain components of the changes in fair values of the derivatives and hedged items such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts, time values and cross-currency basis spreads. Excluded components may impact earnings either through amortization of the initial amount over the life of the derivative or through fair value changes recognized in the current period. (f)Represents the change in value of amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness under the amortization approach, predominantly cross-currency basis spreads. The amount excluded at inception of the hedge is recognized in earnings over the life of the derivative. 218JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 218JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 218JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 218 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the following amounts were recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets related to certain cumulative fair value hedge basis adjustments that are expected to reverse through the income statement in future periods as an adjustment to yield. Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b)Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items: (d)December 31, 2024(in millions)Active hedging relationshipsDiscontinued hedging relationships(e)TotalAssetsInvestment securities - AFS$203,141 (c)$(1,675)$(1,959)$(3,634)LiabilitiesLong-term debt$211,288 $(3,711)$(9,332)$(13,043)Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs$5,312 $(30)$(5)$(35)Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b)Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items: (d)December 31, 2023(in millions)Active hedging relationshipsDiscontinued hedging relationships(e)TotalAssetsInvestment securities - AFS$151,752 (c)$549 $(2,010)$(1,461)LiabilitiesLong-term debt$195,455 $(2,042)$(9,727)$(11,769)Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs$— $— $— $— Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items: (d) Active hedging relationships Discontinued hedging relationships(e) (c) Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs Carrying amount of the hedged items(a)(b) Cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount of hedged items: (d) Active hedging relationships Discontinued hedging relationships(e) (c) Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs (a)Excludes physical commodities with a carrying value of $6.2 billion and $5.6 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, to which the Firm applies fair value hedge accounting. As a result of the application of hedge accounting, these inventories are carried at fair value, thus recognizing unrealized gains and losses in current periods. Since the Firm exits these positions at fair value, there is no incremental impact to net income in future periods. (b)Excludes hedged items where only foreign currency risk is the designated hedged risk, as basis adjustments related to foreign currency hedges will not reverse through the income statement in future periods. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying amount excluded for AFS securities was $28.7 billion and $19.3 billion, respectively. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the carrying amount excluded for long-term debt was $518 million and zero, respectively. (c)Carrying amount represents the amortized cost, net of allowance if applicable. At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the amortized cost of the portfolio layer method closed portfolios was $72.8 billion and $83.9 billion, of which $41.2 billion and $68.0 billion was designated as hedged, respectively. The amount designated as hedged is the sum of the notional amounts of all outstanding layers in each portfolio, which includes both spot starting and forward starting layers. At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the cumulative amount of basis adjustments was $(1.7) billion and $(165) million, which is comprised of $(1.2) billion and $73 million for active hedging relationships, and $(566) million and $(238) million for discontinued hedging relationships, respectively. Refer to Note 10 for additional information. (d)Positive (negative) amounts related to assets represent cumulative fair value hedge basis adjustments that will reduce (increase) net interest income in future periods. Positive (negative) amounts related to liabilities represent cumulative fair value hedge basis adjustments that will increase (reduce) net interest income in future periods. (e)Represents basis adjustments existing on the balance sheet date associated with hedged items that have been de-designated from qualifying fair value hedging relationships. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K219 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K219 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K219 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 219

Cash flow hedge gains and losses The following tables present derivative instruments, by contract type, used in cash flow hedge accounting relationships, and the pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on such derivatives, for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The Firm includes the gains/(losses) on the hedging derivative in the same line item in the Consolidated statements of income as the change in cash flows on the related hedged item. Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)Year ended December 31, 2024(in millions)Amounts reclassifiedfrom AOCI to incomeAmounts recordedin OCITotal changein OCI for periodContract typeInterest rate(a)$(2,668)$(3,603)$(935)Foreign exchange(b)89 (139)(228)Total$(2,579)$(3,742)$(1,163) Total change in OCI for period Interest rate(a) Foreign exchange(b) Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)Year ended December 31, 2023(in millions)Amounts reclassifiedfrom AOCI to incomeAmounts recordedin OCITotal change in OCI for periodContract typeInterest rate(a)$(1,839)$274 $2,113 Foreign exchange(b)64 209 145 Total$(1,775)$483 $2,258 Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in income and other comprehensive income/(loss)Year ended December 31, 2022(in millions)Amounts reclassifiedfrom AOCI to incomeAmounts recordedin OCITotal change in OCI for periodContract typeInterest rate(a)$(153)$(7,131)$(6,978)Foreign exchange(b)(267)(342)(75)Total$(420)$(7,473)$(7,053) Total change in OCI for period Interest rate(a) Foreign exchange(b) Total change in OCI for period Interest rate(a) Foreign exchange(b) (a)Primarily consists of hedges of SOFR-indexed floating-rate assets. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income. (b)Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and expense. The income statement classification of gains and losses follows the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue and compensation expense. The Firm did not experience any forecasted transactions that failed to occur for the years ended 2024, 2023 and 2022. Over the next 12 months, the Firm expects that approximately $(1.6) billion (after-tax) of net losses recorded in AOCI at December 31, 2024, related to cash flow hedges will be recognized in income. For cash flow hedges that have been terminated, the maximum length of time over which the derivative results recorded in AOCI will be recognized in earnings is approximately seven years, corresponding to the timing of the originally hedged forecasted cash flows. For open cash flow hedges, the maximum length of time over which forecasted transactions are hedged is approximately seven years. The Firm’s longer-dated forecasted transactions relate to core lending and borrowing activities. 220JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 220JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 220JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 220 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Net investment hedge gains and losses The following table presents hedging instruments, by contract type, that were used in net investment hedge accounting relationships, and the pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on such instruments for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. 202420232022Year ended December 31,(in millions)Amounts recorded in income(a)(b)Amounts recorded in OCI Amounts recorded in income(a)(b)Amounts recorded inOCIAmounts recorded in income(a)(b)Amounts recorded inOCIForeign exchange derivatives$467$4,411$384$(1,732)$(123)$3,591 Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) Amounts recorded in income(a)(b) (a)Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. The Firm elects to record changes in fair value of these amounts directly in other income. (b)Excludes amounts reclassified from AOCI to income on the sale or liquidation of hedged entities. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Firm reclassified a net pre-tax gain of $89 million to other income/expense. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Firm reclassified a net pre-tax loss of $(35) million to other revenue including the impact of the acquisition of CIFM. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Firm reclassified net pre-tax gains of $38 million to other income/expense related to the liquidation of certain legal entities. Refer to Note 24 for further information. Gains and losses on derivatives used for specified risk management purposes The following table presents pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on a limited number of derivatives, not designated in hedge accounting relationships, that are used to manage risks associated with certain specified assets and liabilities, including certain risks arising from mortgage commitments, warehouse loans, MSRs, wholesale lending exposures, and foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Contract typeInterest rate(a)$(425)$(135)$(827)Credit(b)(604)(441)51 Foreign exchange(c)(10)(2)(48)Total$(1,039)$(578)$(824)(a)Primarily represents interest rate derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk inherent in mortgage commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs, as well as written commitments to originate warehouse loans. Gains and losses were recorded predominantly in mortgage fees and related income.(b)Relates to credit derivatives used to mitigate credit risk associated with lending exposures in the Firm’s wholesale businesses. These derivatives do not include credit derivatives used to mitigate counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables, which is included in gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.(c)Primarily relates to derivatives used to mitigate foreign exchange risk of specified foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.Gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet the needs of customers and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. All derivatives not included in the hedge accounting or specified risk management categories above are included in this category. Gains and losses on these derivatives are primarily recorded in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Note 6 for information on principal transactions revenue. Gains and losses on derivatives used for specified risk management purposes The following table presents pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on a limited number of derivatives, not designated in hedge accounting relationships, that are used to manage risks associated with certain specified assets and liabilities, including certain risks arising from mortgage commitments, warehouse loans, MSRs, wholesale lending exposures, and foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Contract typeInterest rate(a)$(425)$(135)$(827)Credit(b)(604)(441)51 Foreign exchange(c)(10)(2)(48)Total$(1,039)$(578)$(824)(a)Primarily represents interest rate derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk inherent in mortgage commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs, as well as written commitments to originate warehouse loans. Gains and losses were recorded predominantly in mortgage fees and related income.(b)Relates to credit derivatives used to mitigate credit risk associated with lending exposures in the Firm’s wholesale businesses. These derivatives do not include credit derivatives used to mitigate counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables, which is included in gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.(c)Primarily relates to derivatives used to mitigate foreign exchange risk of specified foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. Gains and losses on derivatives used for specified risk management purposes The following table presents pre-tax gains/(losses) recorded on a limited number of derivatives, not designated in hedge accounting relationships, that are used to manage risks associated with certain specified assets and liabilities, including certain risks arising from mortgage commitments, warehouse loans, MSRs, wholesale lending exposures, and foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Derivatives gains/(losses) recorded in incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Contract typeInterest rate(a)$(425)$(135)$(827)Credit(b)(604)(441)51 Foreign exchange(c)(10)(2)(48)Total$(1,039)$(578)$(824) Interest rate(a) Credit(b) Foreign exchange(c) (a)Primarily represents interest rate derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk inherent in mortgage commitments, warehouse loans and MSRs, as well as written commitments to originate warehouse loans. Gains and losses were recorded predominantly in mortgage fees and related income. (b)Relates to credit derivatives used to mitigate credit risk associated with lending exposures in the Firm’s wholesale businesses. These derivatives do not include credit derivatives used to mitigate counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables, which is included in gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. (c)Primarily relates to derivatives used to mitigate foreign exchange risk of specified foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue. Gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet the needs of customers and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. All derivatives not included in the hedge accounting or specified risk management categories above are included in this category. Gains and losses on these derivatives are primarily recorded in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Note 6 for information on principal transactions revenue. Gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives The Firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet the needs of customers and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities, including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables. All derivatives not included in the hedge accounting or specified risk management categories above are included in this category. Gains and losses on these derivatives are primarily recorded in principal transactions revenue. Refer to Note 6 for information on principal transactions revenue. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K221 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K221 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K221 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 221

Credit derivatives Credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer (the reference entity) and which allow one party (the protection purchaser) to transfer that risk to another party (the protection seller). Credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller, as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event, such as a bankruptcy, a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring. The seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event. The Firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes. First, in its capacity as a market-maker, the Firm actively manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection, predominantly on corporate debt obligations, to meet the needs of customers. Second, as an end-user, the Firm uses credit derivatives to manage credit risk associated with lending exposures (loans and unfunded commitments) in its wholesale and consumer businesses and derivatives counterparty exposures in its wholesale businesses, and to manage the credit risk arising from certain financial instruments in the Firm’s market-making businesses. Following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives. Credit default swaps Credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single reference entity (“single-name”), broad-based index or portfolio. The Firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations. Single-name CDS and index CDS contracts are either OTC or OTC-cleared derivative contracts. Single-name CDS are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity, while index CDS contracts are used to manage the credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments. Like the S&P 500 and other market indices, a CDS index consists of a portfolio of CDS across many reference entities. New series of CDS indices are periodically established with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets. If one of the reference entities in the index experiences a credit event, then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index. CDS can also be referenced against specific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels: for example, to provide protection against the first $1 million of realized credit losses in a $10 million portfolio of exposure. Such structures are commonly known as tranche CDS. For both single-name CDS contracts and index CDS contracts, upon the occurrence of a credit event, under the terms of a CDS contract neither party to the CDS contract has recourse to the reference entity. The protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the CDS contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at settlement of the credit derivative contract, also known as the recovery value. The protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the CDS contract when a credit event occurs. Credit-related notes A credit-related note is a funded derivative with a credit risk component where the issuer of the credit-related note purchases from the note investor credit protection on a reference entity or an index. Under the contract, the investor pays the issuer the par value of the note at the inception of the transaction, and in return, the issuer makes periodic payments to the investor, based on the credit risk of the referenced entity. The issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity (or one of the entities that makes up a reference index) experiences a specified credit event. If a credit event occurs, the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note, but rather, the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note and the fair value of the defaulted reference obligation at the time of settlement. Neither party to the credit-related note has recourse to the defaulting reference entity.The following tables present a summary of the notional amounts of credit derivatives and credit-related notes the Firm sold and purchased as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Upon a credit event, the Firm as a seller of protection would typically pay out a percentage of the full notional amount of net protection sold, as the amount actually required to be paid on the contracts takes into account the recovery value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement. The Firm manages the credit risk on contracts to sell protection by purchasing protection with identical or similar underlying reference entities. Other purchased protection referenced in the following tables includes credit derivatives bought on related, but not identical, reference positions (including indices, portfolio coverage and other reference points) as well as protection purchased by CIB through credit-related notes. Other purchased protection also includes credit protection against certain loans in the retained lending portfolio through the issuance of credit derivatives and credit-related notes. Credit derivatives Credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer (the reference entity) and which allow one party (the protection purchaser) to transfer that risk to another party (the protection seller). Credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller, as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event, such as a bankruptcy, a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring. The seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event. The Firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes. First, in its capacity as a market-maker, the Firm actively manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection, predominantly on corporate debt obligations, to meet the needs of customers. Second, as an end-user, the Firm uses credit derivatives to manage credit risk associated with lending exposures (loans and unfunded commitments) in its wholesale and consumer businesses and derivatives counterparty exposures in its wholesale businesses, and to manage the credit risk arising from certain financial instruments in the Firm’s market-making businesses. Following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives. Credit default swaps Credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single reference entity (“single-name”), broad-based index or portfolio. The Firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations. Single-name CDS and index CDS contracts are either OTC or OTC-cleared derivative contracts. Single-name CDS are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity, while index CDS contracts are used to manage the credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments. Like the S&P 500 and other market indices, a CDS index consists of a portfolio of CDS across many reference entities. New series of CDS indices are periodically established with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets. If one of the reference entities in the index experiences a credit event, then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index. CDS can also be referenced against specific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels: for example, to provide protection against the first $1 million of realized credit losses in a

Credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer (the reference entity) and which allow one party (the protection purchaser) to transfer that risk to another party (the protection seller). Credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller, as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event, such as a bankruptcy, a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring. The seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event. The Firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes. First, in its capacity as a market-maker, the Firm actively manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection, predominantly on corporate debt obligations, to meet the needs of customers. Second, as an end-user, the Firm uses credit derivatives to manage credit risk associated with lending exposures (loans and unfunded commitments) in its wholesale and consumer businesses and derivatives counterparty exposures in its wholesale businesses, and to manage the credit risk arising from certain financial instruments in the Firm’s market-making businesses. Following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives. Credit default swaps Credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single reference entity (“single-name”), broad-based index or portfolio. The Firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations. Single-name CDS and index CDS contracts are either OTC or OTC-cleared derivative contracts. Single-name CDS are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity, while index CDS contracts are used to manage the credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments. Like the S&P 500 and other market indices, a CDS index consists of a portfolio of CDS across many reference entities. New series of CDS indices are periodically established with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets. If one of the reference entities in the index experiences a credit event, then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index. CDS can also be referenced against specific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels: for example, to provide protection against the first $1 million of realized credit losses in a $10 million portfolio of exposure. Such structures are commonly known as tranche CDS. For both single-name CDS contracts and index CDS contracts, upon the occurrence of a credit event, under the terms of a CDS contract neither party to the CDS contract has recourse to the reference entity. The protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the CDS contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at settlement of the credit derivative contract, also known as the recovery value. The protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the CDS contract when a credit event occurs. Credit-related notes A credit-related note is a funded derivative with a credit risk component where the issuer of the credit-related note purchases from the note investor credit protection on a reference entity or an index. Under the contract, the investor pays the issuer the par value of the note at the inception of the transaction, and in return, the issuer makes periodic payments to the investor, based on the credit risk of the referenced entity. The issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity (or one of the entities that makes up a reference index) experiences a specified credit event. If a credit event occurs, the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note, but rather, the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note and the fair value of the defaulted reference obligation at the time of settlement. Neither party to the credit-related note has recourse to the defaulting reference entity.The following tables present a summary of the notional amounts of credit derivatives and credit-related notes the Firm sold and purchased as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Upon a credit event, the Firm as a seller of protection would typically pay out a percentage of the full notional amount of net protection sold, as the amount actually required to be paid on the contracts takes into account the recovery value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement. The Firm manages the credit risk on contracts to sell protection by purchasing protection with identical or similar underlying reference entities. Other purchased protection referenced in the following tables includes credit derivatives bought on related, but not identical, reference positions (including indices, portfolio coverage and other reference points) as well as protection purchased by CIB through credit-related notes. Other purchased protection also includes credit protection against certain loans in the retained lending portfolio through the issuance of credit derivatives and credit-related notes. $10 million portfolio of exposure. Such structures are commonly known as tranche CDS. For both single-name CDS contracts and index CDS contracts, upon the occurrence of a credit event, under the terms of a CDS contract neither party to the CDS contract has recourse to the reference entity. The protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the CDS contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at settlement of the credit derivative contract, also known as the recovery value. The protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the CDS contract when a credit event occurs. Credit-related notes A credit-related note is a funded derivative with a credit risk component where the issuer of the credit-related note purchases from the note investor credit protection on a reference entity or an index. Under the contract, the investor pays the issuer the par value of the note at the inception of the transaction, and in return, the issuer makes periodic payments to the investor, based on the credit risk of the referenced entity. The issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity (or one of the entities that makes up a reference index) experiences a specified credit event. If a credit event occurs, the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note, but rather, the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note and the fair value of the defaulted reference obligation at the time of settlement. Neither party to the credit-related note has recourse to the defaulting reference entity. The following tables present a summary of the notional amounts of credit derivatives and credit-related notes the Firm sold and purchased as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Upon a credit event, the Firm as a seller of protection would typically pay out a percentage of the full notional amount of net protection sold, as the amount actually required to be paid on the contracts takes into account the recovery value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement. The Firm manages the credit risk on contracts to sell protection by purchasing protection with identical or similar underlying reference entities. Other purchased protection referenced in the following tables includes credit derivatives bought on related, but not identical, reference positions (including indices, portfolio coverage and other reference points) as well as protection purchased by CIB through credit-related notes. Other purchased protection also includes credit protection against certain loans in the retained lending portfolio through the issuance of credit derivatives and credit-related notes. 222JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 222JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 222JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 222 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The Firm does not use notional amounts of credit derivatives as the primary measure of risk management for such derivatives, because the notional amount does not take into account the probability of the occurrence of a credit event, the recovery value of the reference obligation, or related cash instruments and economic hedges, each of which reduces, in the Firm’s view, the risks associated with such derivatives. Total credit derivatives and credit-related notesMaximum payout/Notional amountDecember 31, 2024(in millions)Protection soldProtection purchased with identical underlyings(c)Net protection (sold)/purchased(d)Other protection purchased(e)Credit derivativesCredit default swaps$(450,184)$474,554 $24,370 $6,858 Other credit derivatives(a)(110,913)137,927 27,014 10,169 Total credit derivatives(561,097)612,481 51,384 17,027 Credit-related notes(b)— — — 10,471 Total$(561,097)$612,481 $51,384 $27,498 Maximum payout/Notional amountDecember 31, 2023(in millions)Protection soldProtection purchased with identical underlyings(c)Net protection (sold)/purchased(d)Other protection purchased(e)Credit derivativesCredit default swaps$(450,172)$473,823 $23,651 $7,517 Other credit derivatives(a)(38,846)45,416 6,570 29,206 Total credit derivatives(489,018)519,239 30,221 36,723 Credit-related notes(b)— — — 9,788 Total$(489,018)$519,239 $30,221 $46,511

Protection purchased with identical underlyings(c) Net protection (sold)/purchased(d) Other protection purchased(e) Other credit derivatives(a) Credit-related notes(b) Protection purchased with identical underlyings(c) Net protection (sold)/purchased(d) Other protection purchased(e) Other credit derivatives(a) Credit-related notes(b) (a)Other credit derivatives predominantly consist of credit swap options and total return swaps. (b)Predominantly represents Other protection purchased by CIB. (c)Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference instrument is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold. (d)Does not take into account the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement, which would generally reduce the amount the seller of protection pays to the buyer of protection in determining settlement value. (e)Represents protection purchased by the Firm on referenced instruments (single-name, portfolio or index) where the Firm has not sold any protection on the identical reference instrument. Also includes credit protection against certain loans and lending-related commitments in the retained lending portfolio through the issuance of credit derivatives and credit-related notes. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K223 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K223 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K223 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 223

The following tables summarize the notional amounts by the ratings, maturity profile, and total fair value, of credit derivatives as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, where JPMorganChase is the seller of protection. The maturity profile is based on the remaining contractual maturity of the credit derivative contracts. The ratings profile is based on the rating of the reference entity on which the credit derivative contract is based. The ratings and maturity profile of credit derivatives where JPMorganChase is the purchaser of protection are comparable to the profile reflected below.

Fair value of receivables(b) Fair value of payables(b) December 31, 2023(in millions)<1 year1–5 years>5 yearsTotal notional amountFair value of receivables(b)Fair value of payables(b)Net fair valueRisk rating of reference entityInvestment-grade$(89,981)$(263,834)$(29,470)$(383,285)$3,659 $(1,144)$2,515 Noninvestment-grade(31,419)(69,515)(4,799)(105,733)2,466 (1,583)883 Total$(121,400)$(333,349)$(34,269)$(489,018)$6,125 $(2,727)$3,398 Fair value of receivables(b) Fair value of payables(b) (a)The ratings scale is primarily based on external credit ratings defined by S&P and Moody’s. (b)Amounts are shown on a gross basis, before the benefit of legally enforceable master netting agreements including cash collateral netting. 224JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 224JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 224JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 224 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Noninterest revenueThe Firm records noninterest revenue from certain contracts with customers in investment banking fees, deposit-related fees, asset management fees, commissions and other fees, and components of card income. The related contracts are often terminable on demand and the Firm has no remaining obligation to deliver future services. For arrangements with a fixed term, the Firm may commit to deliver services in the future. Revenue associated with these remaining performance obligations typically depends on the occurrence of future events or underlying asset values, and is not recognized until the outcome of those events or values are known.Investment banking fees This revenue category includes debt and equity underwriting and advisory fees. As an underwriter, the Firm helps clients raise capital via public offering and private placement of various types of debt and equity instruments. Underwriting fees are primarily based on the issuance price and quantity of the underlying instruments, and are recognized as revenue typically upon execution of the client’s transaction. The Firm also manages and syndicates loan arrangements. Credit arrangement and syndication fees, included within debt underwriting fees, are recorded as revenue after satisfying certain retention, timing and yield criteria. The Firm also provides advisory services by assisting its clients with mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, restructuring and other complex transactions. Advisory fees are recognized as revenue typically upon execution of the client’s transaction.The following table presents the components of investment banking fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022UnderwritingEquity$1,687 $1,149 $975 Debt3,945 2,610 2,732 Total underwriting5,632 3,759 3,707 Advisory3,278 2,760 2,979 Total investment banking fees$8,910 $6,519 $6,686 Investment banking fees are earned primarily by CIB.Principal transactions Principal transactions revenue is driven by many factors, including: •the bid-offer spread, which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa; and •realized and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments and commodities transactions, including those accounted for under the fair value option, primarily used in client-driven market-making activities. –Realized gains and losses result from the sale of instruments, closing out or termination of transactions, or interim cash payments. –Unrealized gains and losses result from changes in valuation. In connection with its client-driven market-making activities, the Firm transacts in debt and equity instruments, derivatives and commodities, including physical commodities inventories and financial instruments that reference commodities. Principal transactions revenue also includes realized and unrealized gains and losses related to: •derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships, primarily fair value hedges of commodity and foreign exchange risk; •derivatives used for specific risk management purposes, primarily to mitigate credit, foreign exchange and interest rate risks.Refer to Note 5 for further information on the income statement classification of gains and losses from derivatives activities. In the financial commodity markets, the Firm transacts in OTC derivatives (e.g., swaps, forwards, options) and ETD that reference a wide range of underlying commodities. In the physical commodity markets, the Firm primarily purchases and sells precious and base metals, natural gas, and may hold other commodities inventories under financing and other arrangements with clients. The following table presents all realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded in principal transactions revenue. This table excludes interest income and interest expense on trading assets and liabilities, which are an integral part of the overall performance of the Firm’s client-driven market-making activities in CIB and fund deployment activities in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Note 7 for further information on interest income and interest expense. Trading revenue is presented primarily by instrument type. The Firm’s client-driven market-making businesses generally utilize a variety of instrument Noninterest revenueThe Firm records noninterest revenue from certain contracts with customers in investment banking fees, deposit-related fees, asset management fees, commissions and other fees, and components of card income. The related contracts are often terminable on demand and the Firm has no remaining obligation to deliver future services. For arrangements with a fixed term, the Firm may commit to deliver services in the future. Revenue associated with these remaining performance obligations typically depends on the occurrence of future events or underlying asset values, and is not recognized until the outcome of those events or values are known.Investment banking fees This revenue category includes debt and equity underwriting and advisory fees. As an underwriter, the Firm helps clients raise capital via public offering and private placement of various types of debt and equity instruments. Underwriting fees are primarily based on the issuance price and quantity of the underlying instruments, and are recognized as revenue typically upon execution of the client’s transaction. The Firm also manages and syndicates loan arrangements. Credit arrangement and syndication fees, included within debt underwriting fees, are recorded as revenue after satisfying certain retention, timing and yield criteria. The Firm also provides advisory services by assisting its clients with mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, restructuring and other complex transactions. Advisory fees are recognized as revenue typically upon execution of the client’s transaction.The following table presents the components of investment banking fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022UnderwritingEquity$1,687 $1,149 $975 Debt3,945 2,610 2,732 Total underwriting5,632 3,759 3,707 Advisory3,278 2,760 2,979 Total investment banking fees$8,910 $6,519 $6,686 Investment banking fees are earned primarily by CIB.

The Firm records noninterest revenue from certain contracts with customers in investment banking fees, deposit-related fees, asset management fees, commissions and other fees, and components of card income. The related contracts are often terminable on demand and the Firm has no remaining obligation to deliver future services. For arrangements with a fixed term, the Firm may commit to deliver services in the future. Revenue associated with these remaining performance obligations typically depends on the occurrence of future events or underlying asset values, and is not recognized until the outcome of those events or values are known.

This revenue category includes debt and equity underwriting and advisory fees. As an underwriter, the Firm helps clients raise capital via public offering and private placement of various types of debt and equity instruments. Underwriting fees are primarily based on the issuance price and quantity of the underlying instruments, and are recognized as revenue typically upon execution of the client’s transaction. The Firm also manages and syndicates loan arrangements. Credit arrangement and syndication fees, included within debt underwriting fees, are recorded as revenue after satisfying certain retention, timing and yield criteria. The Firm also provides advisory services by assisting its clients with mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, restructuring and other complex transactions. Advisory fees are recognized as revenue typically upon execution of the client’s transaction. The following table presents the components of investment banking fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022UnderwritingEquity$1,687 $1,149 $975 Debt3,945 2,610 2,732 Total underwriting5,632 3,759 3,707 Advisory3,278 2,760 2,979 Total investment banking fees$8,910 $6,519 $6,686 Investment banking fees are earned primarily by CIB. Principal transactions Principal transactions revenue is driven by many factors, including: •the bid-offer spread, which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa; and •realized and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments and commodities transactions, including those accounted for under the fair value option, primarily used in client-driven market-making activities. –Realized gains and losses result from the sale of instruments, closing out or termination of transactions, or interim cash payments. –Unrealized gains and losses result from changes in valuation. In connection with its client-driven market-making activities, the Firm transacts in debt and equity instruments, derivatives and commodities, including physical commodities inventories and financial instruments that reference commodities. Principal transactions revenue also includes realized and unrealized gains and losses related to: •derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships, primarily fair value hedges of commodity and foreign exchange risk; •derivatives used for specific risk management purposes, primarily to mitigate credit, foreign exchange and interest rate risks.Refer to Note 5 for further information on the income statement classification of gains and losses from derivatives activities. In the financial commodity markets, the Firm transacts in OTC derivatives (e.g., swaps, forwards, options) and ETD that reference a wide range of underlying commodities. In the physical commodity markets, the Firm primarily purchases and sells precious and base metals, natural gas, and may hold other commodities inventories under financing and other arrangements with clients. The following table presents all realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded in principal transactions revenue. This table excludes interest income and interest expense on trading assets and liabilities, which are an integral part of the overall performance of the Firm’s client-driven market-making activities in CIB and fund deployment activities in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Note 7 for further information on interest income and interest expense. Trading revenue is presented primarily by instrument type. The Firm’s client-driven market-making businesses generally utilize a variety of instrument

Principal transactions revenue is driven by many factors, including: •the bid-offer spread, which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa; and •realized and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments and commodities transactions, including those accounted for under the fair value option, primarily used in client-driven market-making activities. –Realized gains and losses result from the sale of instruments, closing out or termination of transactions, or interim cash payments. –Unrealized gains and losses result from changes in valuation. In connection with its client-driven market-making activities, the Firm transacts in debt and equity instruments, derivatives and commodities, including physical commodities inventories and financial instruments that reference commodities. Principal transactions revenue also includes realized and unrealized gains and losses related to: •derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships, primarily fair value hedges of commodity and foreign exchange risk; •derivatives used for specific risk management purposes, primarily to mitigate credit, foreign exchange and interest rate risks. Refer to Note 5 for further information on the income statement classification of gains and losses from derivatives activities. In the financial commodity markets, the Firm transacts in OTC derivatives (e.g., swaps, forwards, options) and ETD that reference a wide range of underlying commodities. In the physical commodity markets, the Firm primarily purchases and sells precious and base metals, natural gas, and may hold other commodities inventories under financing and other arrangements with clients. The following table presents all realized and unrealized gains and losses recorded in principal transactions revenue. This table excludes interest income and interest expense on trading assets and liabilities, which are an integral part of the overall performance of the Firm’s client-driven market-making activities in CIB and fund deployment activities in Treasury and CIO. Refer to Note 7 for further information on interest income and interest expense. Trading revenue is presented primarily by instrument type. The Firm’s client-driven market-making businesses generally utilize a variety of instrument JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K225 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K225 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K225 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 225

types in connection with their market-making and related risk-management activities; accordingly, the trading revenue presented in the table below is not representative of the total revenue of any individual LOB.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Trading revenue by instrument typeInterest rate(a)$3,631 $5,607 $3,010 Credit(b)1,545 1,434 1,412 (c)Foreign exchange4,874 5,082 5,119 Equity13,476 10,229 8,068 Commodity1,194 2,202 2,348 Total trading revenue24,720 24,554 19,957 Private equity gains/(losses)67 (94)(45)Principal transactions$24,787 $24,460 $19,912 (a)Includes the impact of changes in funding valuation adjustments on derivatives.(b)Includes the impact of changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivatives, net of the associated hedging activities.(c)Includes net markdowns on held-for-sale positions, primarily unfunded commitments, in the bridge financing portfolio.Principal transactions revenue is earned primarily by CIB.Lending- and deposit-related fees Lending-related fees include fees earned from loan commitments, standby letters of credit, financial guarantees, and other loan-servicing activities. Deposit-related fees include fees earned from performing cash management activities, and providing overdraft and other deposit account services. Deposit-related fees also include the impact of credits earned by clients that reduce such fees. Lending- and deposit-related fees are recognized over the period in which the related service is provided. Refer to Note 28 for further information on lending-related commitments.The following table presents the components of lending- and deposit-related fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Lending-related fees$2,192 (a)$2,365 (a)$1,468 Deposit-related fees5,414 5,048 5,630 Total lending- and deposit-related fees$7,606 $7,413 $7,098 (a) Includes the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic, predominantly in AWM and CIB. The discount is deferred in other liabilities and recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period and was largely recognized in 2023 as the commitments were generally short term. Refer to Note 34 for additional information.Lending- and deposit-related fees are earned by CCB, CIB and AWM. Asset management feesInvestment management fees include fees associated with assets the Firm manages on behalf of its clients, including investors in Firm-sponsored funds and owners of separately managed investment accounts. Management fees are typically based on the value of assets under management and are collected and recognized at the end of each period over which the management services are provided and the value of the managed assets is known. The Firm also receives performance-based management fees, which are earned based on exceeding certain benchmarks or other performance targets and are accrued and recognized when the probability of reversal is remote, typically at the end of the related billing period.All other asset management fees include commissions earned on the sales or distribution of mutual funds to clients. These fees are recorded as revenue at the time the service is rendered or, in the case of certain distribution fees, based on the underlying fund’s asset value or investor redemption activity.The following table presents the components of asset management fees.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Asset management feesInvestment management fees$17,425 $14,908 $13,765 All other asset management fees376 312 331 Total asset management fees$17,801 $15,220 $14,096 Asset management fees earned primarily by AWM and CCB.Commissions and other feesThis revenue category includes commissions and fees from brokerage and custody services, and other products.Brokerage commissions represents commissions earned when the Firm acts as a broker, by facilitating its clients’ purchases and sales of securities and other financial instruments. Brokerage commissions are collected and recognized as revenue upon occurrence of the client transaction. The Firm reports certain costs paid to third-party clearing houses and exchanges net against commission revenue.Administration fees predominantly include fees for custody, funds services, securities lending and securities clearance. These fees are recorded as revenue over the period in which the related service is provided. types in connection with their market-making and related risk-management activities; accordingly, the trading revenue presented in the table below is not representative of the total revenue of any individual LOB.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Trading revenue by instrument typeInterest rate(a)$3,631 $5,607 $3,010 Credit(b)1,545 1,434 1,412 (c)Foreign exchange4,874 5,082 5,119 Equity13,476 10,229 8,068 Commodity1,194 2,202 2,348 Total trading revenue24,720 24,554 19,957 Private equity gains/(losses)67 (94)(45)Principal transactions$24,787 $24,460 $19,912 (a)Includes the impact of changes in funding valuation adjustments on derivatives.(b)Includes the impact of changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivatives, net of the associated hedging activities.(c)Includes net markdowns on held-for-sale positions, primarily unfunded commitments, in the bridge financing portfolio.Principal transactions revenue is earned primarily by CIB.Lending- and deposit-related fees Lending-related fees include fees earned from loan commitments, standby letters of credit, financial guarantees, and other loan-servicing activities. Deposit-related fees include fees earned from performing cash management activities, and providing overdraft and other deposit account services. Deposit-related fees also include the impact of credits earned by clients that reduce such fees. Lending- and deposit-related fees are recognized over the period in which the related service is provided. Refer to Note 28 for further information on lending-related commitments.The following table presents the components of lending- and deposit-related fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Lending-related fees$2,192 (a)$2,365 (a)$1,468 Deposit-related fees5,414 5,048 5,630 Total lending- and deposit-related fees$7,606 $7,413 $7,098 (a) Includes the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic, predominantly in AWM and CIB. The discount is deferred in other liabilities and recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period and was largely recognized in 2023 as the commitments were generally short term. Refer to Note 34 for additional information.Lending- and deposit-related fees are earned by CCB, CIB and AWM. types in connection with their market-making and related risk-management activities; accordingly, the trading revenue presented in the table below is not representative of the total revenue of any individual LOB. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Trading revenue by instrument typeInterest rate(a)$3,631 $5,607 $3,010 Credit(b)1,545 1,434 1,412 (c)Foreign exchange4,874 5,082 5,119 Equity13,476 10,229 8,068 Commodity1,194 2,202 2,348 Total trading revenue24,720 24,554 19,957 Private equity gains/(losses)67 (94)(45)Principal transactions$24,787 $24,460 $19,912

Interest rate(a) Credit(b) (a)Includes the impact of changes in funding valuation adjustments on derivatives. (b)Includes the impact of changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivatives, net of the associated hedging activities. (c)Includes net markdowns on held-for-sale positions, primarily unfunded commitments, in the bridge financing portfolio. Principal transactions revenue is earned primarily by CIB.

Lending-related fees include fees earned from loan commitments, standby letters of credit, financial guarantees, and other loan-servicing activities. Deposit-related fees include fees earned from performing cash management activities, and providing overdraft and other deposit account services. Deposit-related fees also include the impact of credits earned by clients that reduce such fees. Lending- and deposit-related fees are recognized over the period in which the related service is provided. Refer to Note 28 for further information on lending-related commitments. The following table presents the components of lending- and deposit-related fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Lending-related fees$2,192 (a)$2,365 (a)$1,468 Deposit-related fees5,414 5,048 5,630 Total lending- and deposit-related fees$7,606 $7,413 $7,098 (a) (a)

(a) Includes the amortization of the fair value discount on certain acquired lending-related commitments associated with First Republic, predominantly in AWM and CIB. The discount is deferred in other liabilities and recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period and was largely recognized in 2023 as the commitments were generally short term. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. Lending- and deposit-related fees are earned by CCB, CIB and AWM. Asset management feesInvestment management fees include fees associated with assets the Firm manages on behalf of its clients, including investors in Firm-sponsored funds and owners of separately managed investment accounts. Management fees are typically based on the value of assets under management and are collected and recognized at the end of each period over which the management services are provided and the value of the managed assets is known. The Firm also receives performance-based management fees, which are earned based on exceeding certain benchmarks or other performance targets and are accrued and recognized when the probability of reversal is remote, typically at the end of the related billing period.All other asset management fees include commissions earned on the sales or distribution of mutual funds to clients. These fees are recorded as revenue at the time the service is rendered or, in the case of certain distribution fees, based on the underlying fund’s asset value or investor redemption activity.The following table presents the components of asset management fees.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Asset management feesInvestment management fees$17,425 $14,908 $13,765 All other asset management fees376 312 331 Total asset management fees$17,801 $15,220 $14,096 Asset management fees earned primarily by AWM and CCB.Commissions and other feesThis revenue category includes commissions and fees from brokerage and custody services, and other products.Brokerage commissions represents commissions earned when the Firm acts as a broker, by facilitating its clients’ purchases and sales of securities and other financial instruments. Brokerage commissions are collected and recognized as revenue upon occurrence of the client transaction. The Firm reports certain costs paid to third-party clearing houses and exchanges net against commission revenue.Administration fees predominantly include fees for custody, funds services, securities lending and securities clearance. These fees are recorded as revenue over the period in which the related service is provided.

Investment management fees include fees associated with assets the Firm manages on behalf of its clients, including investors in Firm-sponsored funds and owners of separately managed investment accounts. Management fees are typically based on the value of assets under management and are collected and recognized at the end of each period over which the management services are provided and the value of the managed assets is known. The Firm also receives performance-based management fees, which are earned based on exceeding certain benchmarks or other performance targets and are accrued and recognized when the probability of reversal is remote, typically at the end of the related billing period. All other asset management fees include commissions earned on the sales or distribution of mutual funds to clients. These fees are recorded as revenue at the time the service is rendered or, in the case of certain distribution fees, based on the underlying fund’s asset value or investor redemption activity. The following table presents the components of asset management fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Asset management feesInvestment management fees$17,425 $14,908 $13,765 All other asset management fees376 312 331 Total asset management fees$17,801 $15,220 $14,096 Investment management fees Asset management fees earned primarily by AWM and CCB.

This revenue category includes commissions and fees from brokerage and custody services, and other products. Brokerage commissions represents commissions earned when the Firm acts as a broker, by facilitating its clients’ purchases and sales of securities and other financial instruments. Brokerage commissions are collected and recognized as revenue upon occurrence of the client transaction. The Firm reports certain costs paid to third-party clearing houses and exchanges net against commission revenue. Administration fees predominantly include fees for custody, funds services, securities lending and securities clearance. These fees are recorded as revenue over the period in which the related service is provided. 226JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 226JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 226JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 226 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following table presents the components of commissions and other fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Commissions and other feesBrokerage commissions and fees$3,119 $2,820 $2,831 Administration fees2,526 2,310 2,348 All other commissions and fees(a)1,885 1,706 1,402 Total commissions and other fees$7,530 $6,836 $6,581 (a)Includes annuity sales commissions, depositary receipt-related service fees and travel-related sales commissions, as well as other service fees, which are recognized as revenue when the services are rendered. Commissions and other fees are earned primarily by CIB, CCB and AWM.Mortgage fees and related incomeThis revenue category reflects CCB’s Home Lending production and net mortgage servicing revenue. Production revenue includes fees and income recognized as earned on mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell, and the impact of risk management activities associated with the mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans. Production revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held-for-sale (excluding certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies), and changes in the fair value of financial instruments measured under the fair value option. Net mortgage servicing revenue includes operating revenue earned from servicing third-party mortgage loans, which is recognized over the period in which the service is provided; changes in the fair value of MSRs; the impact of risk management activities associated with MSRs; and gains and losses on securitization of excess mortgage servicing. Net mortgage servicing revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments of certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies. Refer to Note 15 for further information on risk management activities and MSRs. Net interest income from mortgage loans is recorded in interest income. Card incomeThis revenue category includes interchange and other income from credit and debit card transactions; and fees earned from processing card transactions for merchants, both of which are recognized when purchases are made by a cardholder and presented net of certain transaction-related costs. Card income also includes account origination costs and annual fees, which are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period.Certain credit card products offer the cardholder the ability to earn points based on account activity, which the cardholder can choose to redeem for cash and non-cash rewards. The cost to the Firm related to these proprietary rewards programs varies based on multiple factors including the terms and conditions of the rewards programs, cardholder activity, cardholder reward redemption rates and cardholder reward selections. The Firm maintains a liability for its obligations under its rewards programs and reports the current-period cost as a reduction of card income. Credit card revenue sharing agreements The Firm has contractual agreements with numerous co-brand partners that grant the Firm exclusive rights to issue co-branded credit card products and market them to the customers of such partners. These partners endorse the co-brand credit card programs and provide their customer or member lists to the Firm. The partners may also conduct marketing activities and provide rewards redeemable under their own loyalty programs that the Firm will grant to co-brand credit cardholders based on account activity. The terms of these agreements generally range from five to ten years.The Firm typically makes payments to the co-brand credit card partners based on the cost of partners’ marketing activities and loyalty program rewards provided to credit cardholders, new account originations and sales volumes. Payments to partners based on marketing efforts undertaken by the partners are expensed by the Firm as incurred and reported as marketing expense. Payments for partner loyalty program rewards are reported as a reduction of card income when incurred. Payments to partners based on new credit card account originations are accounted for as direct loan origination costs and are deferred and recognized as a reduction of card income on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. Payments to partners based on sales volumes are reported as a reduction of card income when the related interchange income is earned. The following table presents the components of card income: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Interchange and merchant processing income$33,847 $31,021 $28,085 Reward costs and partner payments(26,784)(24,601)(22,162)All other(a)(1,566)(1,636)(1,503)Total card income$5,497 $4,784 $4,420 (a)Predominantly represents the amortization of account origination costs and annual fees, which are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. Card income is earned primarily by CCB and CIB. The following table presents the components of commissions and other fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Commissions and other feesBrokerage commissions and fees$3,119 $2,820 $2,831 Administration fees2,526 2,310 2,348 All other commissions and fees(a)1,885 1,706 1,402 Total commissions and other fees$7,530 $6,836 $6,581 (a)Includes annuity sales commissions, depositary receipt-related service fees and travel-related sales commissions, as well as other service fees, which are recognized as revenue when the services are rendered. Commissions and other fees are earned primarily by CIB, CCB and AWM.Mortgage fees and related incomeThis revenue category reflects CCB’s Home Lending production and net mortgage servicing revenue. Production revenue includes fees and income recognized as earned on mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell, and the impact of risk management activities associated with the mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans. Production revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held-for-sale (excluding certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies), and changes in the fair value of financial instruments measured under the fair value option. Net mortgage servicing revenue includes operating revenue earned from servicing third-party mortgage loans, which is recognized over the period in which the service is provided; changes in the fair value of MSRs; the impact of risk management activities associated with MSRs; and gains and losses on securitization of excess mortgage servicing. Net mortgage servicing revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments of certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies. Refer to Note 15 for further information on risk management activities and MSRs. Net interest income from mortgage loans is recorded in interest income. Card incomeThis revenue category includes interchange and other income from credit and debit card transactions; and fees earned from processing card transactions for merchants, both of which are recognized when purchases are made by a cardholder and presented net of certain transaction-related costs. Card income also includes account origination costs and annual fees, which are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. The following table presents the components of commissions and other fees. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Commissions and other feesBrokerage commissions and fees$3,119 $2,820 $2,831 Administration fees2,526 2,310 2,348 All other commissions and fees(a)1,885 1,706 1,402 Total commissions and other fees$7,530 $6,836 $6,581 Administration fees All other commissions and fees(a) (a)Includes annuity sales commissions, depositary receipt-related service fees and travel-related sales commissions, as well as other service fees, which are recognized as revenue when the services are rendered. (a) Commissions and other fees are earned primarily by CIB, CCB and AWM.

This revenue category reflects CCB’s Home Lending production and net mortgage servicing revenue. Production revenue includes fees and income recognized as earned on mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell, and the impact of risk management activities associated with the mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans. Production revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held-for-sale (excluding certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies), and changes in the fair value of financial instruments measured under the fair value option. Net mortgage servicing revenue includes operating revenue earned from servicing third-party mortgage loans, which is recognized over the period in which the service is provided; changes in the fair value of MSRs; the impact of risk management activities associated with MSRs; and gains and losses on securitization of excess mortgage servicing. Net mortgage servicing revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments of certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies. Refer to Note 15 for further information on risk management activities and MSRs. Net interest income from mortgage loans is recorded in interest income.

This revenue category includes interchange and other income from credit and debit card transactions; and fees earned from processing card transactions for merchants, both of which are recognized when purchases are made by a cardholder and presented net of certain transaction-related costs. Card income also includes account origination costs and annual fees, which are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. Certain credit card products offer the cardholder the ability to earn points based on account activity, which the cardholder can choose to redeem for cash and non-cash rewards. The cost to the Firm related to these proprietary rewards programs varies based on multiple factors including the terms and conditions of the rewards programs, cardholder activity, cardholder reward redemption rates and cardholder reward selections. The Firm maintains a liability for its obligations under its rewards programs and reports the current-period cost as a reduction of card income. Credit card revenue sharing agreements The Firm has contractual agreements with numerous co-brand partners that grant the Firm exclusive rights to issue co-branded credit card products and market them to the customers of such partners. These partners endorse the co-brand credit card programs and provide their customer or member lists to the Firm. The partners may also conduct marketing activities and provide rewards redeemable under their own loyalty programs that the Firm will grant to co-brand credit cardholders based on account activity. The terms of these agreements generally range from five to ten years.The Firm typically makes payments to the co-brand credit card partners based on the cost of partners’ marketing activities and loyalty program rewards provided to credit cardholders, new account originations and sales volumes. Payments to partners based on marketing efforts undertaken by the partners are expensed by the Firm as incurred and reported as marketing expense. Payments for partner loyalty program rewards are reported as a reduction of card income when incurred. Payments to partners based on new credit card account originations are accounted for as direct loan origination costs and are deferred and recognized as a reduction of card income on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. Payments to partners based on sales volumes are reported as a reduction of card income when the related interchange income is earned. The following table presents the components of card income: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Interchange and merchant processing income$33,847 $31,021 $28,085 Reward costs and partner payments(26,784)(24,601)(22,162)All other(a)(1,566)(1,636)(1,503)Total card income$5,497 $4,784 $4,420 (a)Predominantly represents the amortization of account origination costs and annual fees, which are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. Card income is earned primarily by CCB and CIB. Certain credit card products offer the cardholder the ability to earn points based on account activity, which the cardholder can choose to redeem for cash and non-cash rewards. The cost to the Firm related to these proprietary rewards programs varies based on multiple factors including the terms and conditions of the rewards programs, cardholder activity, cardholder reward redemption rates and cardholder reward selections. The Firm maintains a liability for its obligations under its rewards programs and reports the current-period cost as a reduction of card income. Credit card revenue sharing agreements The Firm has contractual agreements with numerous co-brand partners that grant the Firm exclusive rights to issue co-branded credit card products and market them to the customers of such partners. These partners endorse the co-brand credit card programs and provide their customer or member lists to the Firm. The partners may also conduct marketing activities and provide rewards redeemable under their own loyalty programs that the Firm will grant to co-brand credit cardholders based on account activity. The terms of these agreements generally range from five to ten years. five The Firm typically makes payments to the co-brand credit card partners based on the cost of partners’ marketing activities and loyalty program rewards provided to credit cardholders, new account originations and sales volumes. Payments to partners based on marketing efforts undertaken by the partners are expensed by the Firm as incurred and reported as marketing expense. Payments for partner loyalty program rewards are reported as a reduction of card income when incurred. Payments to partners based on new credit card account originations are accounted for as direct loan origination costs and are deferred and recognized as a reduction of card income on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. Payments to partners based on sales volumes are reported as a reduction of card income when the related interchange income is earned. The following table presents the components of card income: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Interchange and merchant processing income$33,847 $31,021 $28,085 Reward costs and partner payments(26,784)(24,601)(22,162)All other(a)(1,566)(1,636)(1,503)Total card income$5,497 $4,784 $4,420 Interchange and merchant processing income All other(a) (a)Predominantly represents the amortization of account origination costs and annual fees, which are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over a 12-month period. (a) Card income is earned primarily by CCB and CIB. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K227 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K227 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K227 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 227

Other incomeThis revenue category includes operating lease income, as well as losses associated with the Firm’s tax-oriented investments, predominantly alternative energy equity-method investments in CIB. The losses associated with these tax-oriented investments are more than offset by lower income tax expense from the associated tax credits.The following table presents certain components of other income:Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating lease income$2,795 $2,843 $3,654 Losses on tax-oriented investments(97)(1,538)(1,491)Gain on Visa shares7,990 (b)— 914 (c)Estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition103 2,775 — Gain related to the acquisition of CIFM (a)— 339 — (a) Gain on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm's acquisition of the remaining 51% of the entity.(b) Relates to the initial gain recognized on May 6, 2024 on the Visa C shares. Refer to Note 2 for additional information.(c) Relates to the sale of Visa B shares.Refer to Note 18 for additional information on operating leases.Proportional Amortization Method: Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Refer to Notes 1, 14 and 25 for additional information.Noninterest expenseOther expense Other expense on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income included: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Legal expense$740 $1,436 $266 FDIC-related expense 1,893 (c)4,203 (c)860 Operating losses1,417 1,228 1,101 Contribution of Visa shares(a)1,000 — — First Republic-related expense(b)777 1,060 — (a) Represents the contribution of a portion of Visa C shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Note 2 for additional information.(b) Reflects the expenses classified within other expense, including $488 million and $360 million of integration and restructuring costs associated with First Republic for the full years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Additionally, the second quarter of 2023 included payments to the FDIC for the First Republic individuals who were not employees of the Firm until July 2, 2023. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.(c) The first quarter of 2024 included an increase of $725 million to the FDIC special assessment reflecting the FDIC's revised estimate of Deposit Insurance Fund losses. The fourth quarter of 2023 included the $2.9 billion FDIC special assessment.Refer to Note 32 for additional information on noninterest revenue and expense by segment. Other incomeThis revenue category includes operating lease income, as well as losses associated with the Firm’s tax-oriented investments, predominantly alternative energy equity-method investments in CIB. The losses associated with these tax-oriented investments are more than offset by lower income tax expense from the associated tax credits.The following table presents certain components of other income:Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating lease income$2,795 $2,843 $3,654 Losses on tax-oriented investments(97)(1,538)(1,491)Gain on Visa shares7,990 (b)— 914 (c)Estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition103 2,775 — Gain related to the acquisition of CIFM (a)— 339 — (a) Gain on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm's acquisition of the remaining 51% of the entity.(b) Relates to the initial gain recognized on May 6, 2024 on the Visa C shares. Refer to Note 2 for additional information.(c) Relates to the sale of Visa B shares.Refer to Note 18 for additional information on operating leases.Proportional Amortization Method: Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Refer to Notes 1, 14 and 25 for additional information.

This revenue category includes operating lease income, as well as losses associated with the Firm’s tax-oriented investments, predominantly alternative energy equity-method investments in CIB. The losses associated with these tax-oriented investments are more than offset by lower income tax expense from the associated tax credits. The following table presents certain components of other income: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating lease income$2,795 $2,843 $3,654 Losses on tax-oriented investments(97)(1,538)(1,491)Gain on Visa shares7,990 (b)— 914 (c)Estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition103 2,775 — Gain related to the acquisition of CIFM (a)— 339 — Losses on tax-oriented investments Gain on Visa shares (b) (c) Estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition Estimated bargain purchase gain associated with the First Republic acquisition Gain related to the acquisition of CIFM (a) (a) Gain on the original minority interest in CIFM upon the Firm's acquisition of the remaining 51% of the entity. (b) Relates to the initial gain recognized on May 6, 2024 on the Visa C shares. Refer to Note 2 for additional information. (c) Relates to the sale of Visa B shares. Refer to Note 18 for additional information on operating leases. Proportional Amortization Method: Effective January 1, 2024, as a result of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, the amortization of certain of the Firm's alternative energy tax-oriented investments that was previously recognized in other income is now recognized in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Refer to Notes 1, 14 and 25 for additional information. Noninterest expenseOther expense Other expense on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income included: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Legal expense$740 $1,436 $266 FDIC-related expense 1,893 (c)4,203 (c)860 Operating losses1,417 1,228 1,101 Contribution of Visa shares(a)1,000 — — First Republic-related expense(b)777 1,060 — (a) Represents the contribution of a portion of Visa C shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Note 2 for additional information.(b) Reflects the expenses classified within other expense, including $488 million and $360 million of integration and restructuring costs associated with First Republic for the full years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Additionally, the second quarter of 2023 included payments to the FDIC for the First Republic individuals who were not employees of the Firm until July 2, 2023. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.(c) The first quarter of 2024 included an increase of $725 million to the FDIC special assessment reflecting the FDIC's revised estimate of Deposit Insurance Fund losses. The fourth quarter of 2023 included the $2.9 billion FDIC special assessment.Refer to Note 32 for additional information on noninterest revenue and expense by segment.

Other expense on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income included: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Legal expense$740 $1,436 $266 FDIC-related expense 1,893 (c)4,203 (c)860 Operating losses1,417 1,228 1,101 Contribution of Visa shares(a)1,000 — — First Republic-related expense(b)777 1,060 — (c) (c) Contribution of Visa shares(a) First Republic-related expense(b) (a) Represents the contribution of a portion of Visa C shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Note 2 for additional information. (b) Reflects the expenses classified within other expense, including $488 million and $360 million of integration and restructuring costs associated with First Republic for the full years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Additionally, the second quarter of 2023 included payments to the FDIC for the First Republic individuals who were not employees of the Firm until July 2, 2023. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. (c) The first quarter of 2024 included an increase of $725 million to the FDIC special assessment reflecting the FDIC's revised estimate of Deposit Insurance Fund losses. The fourth quarter of 2023 included the $2.9 billion FDIC special assessment. Refer to Note 32 for additional information on noninterest revenue and expense by segment. 228JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 228JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 228JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 228 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Interest income and interest expense are recorded in the Consolidated statements of income and classified based on the nature of the underlying asset or liability.Interest income and interest expense includes the current-period interest accruals for financial instruments measured at fair value, except for derivatives and certain financial instruments containing embedded derivatives; for those instruments, all changes in fair value including any interest elements, are primarily reported in principal transactions revenue. For financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, the related interest is included within interest income or interest expense, as applicable. Interest income and interest expense also includes the effect of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting where applicable.Interest income on loans and securities include the amortization and accretion of purchase premiums and discounts, as well as net deferred fees and costs on loans. These amounts are deferred in loans and investment securities, respectively, and recognized on a level-yield basis.Refer to Notes 5, 10, 11, 12, and 20 for further information on accounting for interest income and interest expense related to hedge accounting, investment securities, securities financing activities (i.e., securities purchased or sold under resale or repurchase agreements; securities borrowed; and securities loaned), loans and long-term debt, respectively.The following table presents the components of interest income and interest expense: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Interest incomeLoans$92,353 (d)$83,384 (d)$52,736 Taxable securities21,947 17,390 10,372 Non-taxable securities(a)1,197 1,336 975 Total investment securities23,144 (d)18,726 (d)11,347 Trading assets - debt instruments20,327 15,950 9,053 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements18,299 15,079 4,632 Securities borrowed9,208 7,983 2,237 Deposits with banks22,297 21,797 9,039 All other interest-earning assets(b)8,305 7,669 3,763 Total interest income$193,933 $170,588 $92,807 Interest expenseInterest bearing deposits$49,559 $40,016 $10,082 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements19,149 13,259 3,721 Short-term borrowings2,101 1,894 747 Trading liabilities - debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(c)10,238 9,396 3,246 Long-term debt18,920 15,803 8,075 Beneficial interest issued by consolidated VIEs1,383 953 226 Total interest expense$101,350 $81,321 $26,097 Net interest income$92,583 $89,267 $66,710 Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 6,389 Net interest income after provision for credit losses$81,905 $79,947 $60,321 (a)Represents securities that are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes.(b)Includes interest earned on brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables, which are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable, and all other interest-earning assets, which are classified in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets.(c)All other interest-bearing liabilities includes interest expense on brokerage-related customer payables.(d)Includes the accretion of the purchase discount on certain acquired loans and investment securities associated with First Republic. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. Interest income and interest expense are recorded in the Consolidated statements of income and classified based on the nature of the underlying asset or liability.Interest income and interest expense includes the current-period interest accruals for financial instruments measured at fair value, except for derivatives and certain financial instruments containing embedded derivatives; for those instruments, all changes in fair value including any interest elements, are primarily reported in principal transactions revenue. For financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, the related interest is included within interest income or interest expense, as applicable. Interest income and interest expense also includes the effect of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting where applicable.Interest income on loans and securities include the amortization and accretion of purchase premiums and discounts, as well as net deferred fees and costs on loans. These amounts are deferred in loans and investment securities, respectively, and recognized on a level-yield basis.Refer to Notes 5, 10, 11, 12, and 20 for further information on accounting for interest income and interest expense related to hedge accounting, investment securities, securities financing activities (i.e., securities purchased or sold under resale or repurchase agreements; securities borrowed; and securities loaned), loans and long-term debt, respectively. Interest income and interest expense are recorded in the Consolidated statements of income and classified based on the nature of the underlying asset or liability. Interest income and interest expense includes the current-period interest accruals for financial instruments measured at fair value, except for derivatives and certain financial instruments containing embedded derivatives; for those instruments, all changes in fair value including any interest elements, are primarily reported in principal transactions revenue. For financial instruments that are not measured at fair value, the related interest is included within interest income or interest expense, as applicable. Interest income and interest expense also includes the effect of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting where applicable. Interest income on loans and securities include the amortization and accretion of purchase premiums and discounts, as well as net deferred fees and costs on loans. These amounts are deferred in loans and investment securities, respectively, and recognized on a level-yield basis. Refer to Notes 5, 10, 11, 12, and 20 for further information on accounting for interest income and interest expense related to hedge accounting, investment securities, securities financing activities (i.e., securities purchased or sold under resale or repurchase agreements; securities borrowed; and securities loaned), loans and long-term debt, respectively. The following table presents the components of interest income and interest expense: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Interest incomeLoans$92,353 (d)$83,384 (d)$52,736 Taxable securities21,947 17,390 10,372 Non-taxable securities(a)1,197 1,336 975 Total investment securities23,144 (d)18,726 (d)11,347 Trading assets - debt instruments20,327 15,950 9,053 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements18,299 15,079 4,632 Securities borrowed9,208 7,983 2,237 Deposits with banks22,297 21,797 9,039 All other interest-earning assets(b)8,305 7,669 3,763 Total interest income$193,933 $170,588 $92,807 Interest expenseInterest bearing deposits$49,559 $40,016 $10,082 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements19,149 13,259 3,721 Short-term borrowings2,101 1,894 747 Trading liabilities - debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(c)10,238 9,396 3,246 Long-term debt18,920 15,803 8,075 Beneficial interest issued by consolidated VIEs1,383 953 226 Total interest expense$101,350 $81,321 $26,097 Net interest income$92,583 $89,267 $66,710 Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 6,389 Net interest income after provision for credit losses$81,905 $79,947 $60,321 (a)Represents securities that are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes.(b)Includes interest earned on brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables, which are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable, and all other interest-earning assets, which are classified in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets.(c)All other interest-bearing liabilities includes interest expense on brokerage-related customer payables.(d)Includes the accretion of the purchase discount on certain acquired loans and investment securities associated with First Republic. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. The following table presents the components of interest income and interest expense: Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Interest incomeLoans$92,353 (d)$83,384 (d)$52,736 Taxable securities21,947 17,390 10,372 Non-taxable securities(a)1,197 1,336 975 Total investment securities23,144 (d)18,726 (d)11,347 Trading assets - debt instruments20,327 15,950 9,053 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements18,299 15,079 4,632 Securities borrowed9,208 7,983 2,237 Deposits with banks22,297 21,797 9,039 All other interest-earning assets(b)8,305 7,669 3,763 Total interest income$193,933 $170,588 $92,807 Interest expenseInterest bearing deposits$49,559 $40,016 $10,082 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements19,149 13,259 3,721 Short-term borrowings2,101 1,894 747 Trading liabilities - debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(c)10,238 9,396 3,246 Long-term debt18,920 15,803 8,075 Beneficial interest issued by consolidated VIEs1,383 953 226 Total interest expense$101,350 $81,321 $26,097 Net interest income$92,583 $89,267 $66,710 Provision for credit losses10,678 9,320 6,389 Net interest income after provision for credit losses$81,905 $79,947 $60,321 Loans (d) (d) Non-taxable securities(a) Total investment securities (d) (d) Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements All other interest-earning assets(b) Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements Short-term borrowings Trading liabilities - debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(c) Beneficial interest issued by consolidated VIEs

(a)Represents securities that are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes. (b)Includes interest earned on brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables, which are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable, and all other interest-earning assets, which are classified in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets. (c)All other interest-bearing liabilities includes interest expense on brokerage-related customer payables. (d)Includes the accretion of the purchase discount on certain acquired loans and investment securities associated with First Republic. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. (d) JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K229 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K229 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K229 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 229

The Firm has various defined benefit pension plans and OPEB plans that provide benefits to its employees in the U.S. and certain non-U.S. locations. Substantially all the defined benefit pension plans are closed to new participants. The principal defined benefit pension plan in the U.S., which covered substantially all U.S. employees, was closed to new participants and frozen for existing participants on January 1, 2020, (and January 1, 2019 for new hires on or after December 2, 2017). Interest credits continue to accrue to participants’ accounts based on their accumulated balances.The Firm maintains funded and unfunded postretirement benefit plans that provide medical and life insurance for certain eligible employees and retirees as well as their dependents covered under these programs. None of these plans have a material impact on the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Firm also provides a qualified defined contribution plan in the U.S. and maintains other similar arrangements in certain non-U.S. locations. The most significant of these plans is the JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan (“the 401(k) Savings Plan”), which covers substantially all U.S. employees. Employees can contribute to the 401(k) Savings Plan on a pretax and/or Roth 401(k) after-tax basis. The Firm makes annual matching and pay credit contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan on behalf of eligible participants. The Firm has various defined benefit pension plans and OPEB plans that provide benefits to its employees in the U.S. and certain non-U.S. locations. Substantially all the defined benefit pension plans are closed to new participants. The principal defined benefit pension plan in the U.S., which covered substantially all U.S. employees, was closed to new participants and frozen for existing participants on January 1, 2020, (and January 1, 2019 for new hires on or after December 2, 2017). Interest credits continue to accrue to participants’ accounts based on their accumulated balances.The Firm maintains funded and unfunded postretirement benefit plans that provide medical and life insurance for certain eligible employees and retirees The Firm has various defined benefit pension plans and OPEB plans that provide benefits to its employees in the U.S. and certain non-U.S. locations. Substantially all the defined benefit pension plans are closed to new participants. The principal defined benefit pension plan in the U.S., which covered substantially all U.S. employees, was closed to new participants and frozen for existing participants on January 1, 2020, (and January 1, 2019 for new hires on or after December 2, 2017). Interest credits continue to accrue to participants’ accounts based on their accumulated balances. The Firm maintains funded and unfunded postretirement benefit plans that provide medical and life insurance for certain eligible employees and retirees as well as their dependents covered under these programs. None of these plans have a material impact on the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Firm also provides a qualified defined contribution plan in the U.S. and maintains other similar arrangements in certain non-U.S. locations. The most significant of these plans is the JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan (“the 401(k) Savings Plan”), which covers substantially all U.S. employees. Employees can contribute to the 401(k) Savings Plan on a pretax and/or Roth 401(k) after-tax basis. The Firm makes annual matching and pay credit contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan on behalf of eligible participants. as well as their dependents covered under these programs. None of these plans have a material impact on the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The Firm also provides a qualified defined contribution plan in the U.S. and maintains other similar arrangements in certain non-U.S. locations. The most significant of these plans is the JPMorgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan (“the 401(k) Savings Plan”), which covers substantially all U.S. employees. Employees can contribute to the 401(k) Savings Plan on a pretax and/or Roth 401(k) after-tax basis. The Firm makes annual matching and pay credit contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan on behalf of eligible participants. The following table presents the pretax benefit obligations, plan assets, the net funded status, and the amounts recorded in AOCI on the Consolidated balance sheets for the Firm’s significant defined benefit pension and OPEB plans. As of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Projected benefit obligations$(14,459)$(14,740)Fair value of plan assets22,201 22,013 Net funded status7,742 7,273 Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)(1,649)(1,517) The weighted-average discount rate used to value the benefit obligations as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, was 5.49% and 5.16%, respectively.

Gains or losses resulting from changes in the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets are recorded in OCI. Amortization of net gains or losses are recognized as part of the net periodic benefit cost over subsequent periods, if, as of the beginning of the year, the net gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of the plan assets. Amortization is generally over the average expected remaining lifetime of plan participants, given the frozen status of most plans. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the net loss was attributable to lower than expected returns on plan assets, partially offset by projected benefit obligation net gains primarily related to changes in the discount rate. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the net gain was attributable to market-driven increases in the fair value of plan assets, partially offset by changes in the discount rate and interest crediting rate. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets are recorded in OCI. Amortization of net gains or losses are recognized as part of the net periodic benefit cost over subsequent periods, if, as of the beginning of the year, the net gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of the plan assets. Amortization is generally over the average expected remaining lifetime of plan participants, given the frozen status of most plans. For the year ended Gains or losses resulting from changes in the benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets are recorded in OCI. Amortization of net gains or losses are recognized as part of the net periodic benefit cost over subsequent periods, if, as of the beginning of the year, the net gain or loss exceeds 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of the plan assets. Amortization is generally over the average expected remaining lifetime of plan participants, given the frozen status of most plans. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the net loss was attributable to lower than expected returns on plan assets, partially offset by projected benefit obligation net gains primarily related to changes in the discount rate. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the net gain was attributable to market-driven increases in the fair value of plan assets, partially offset by changes in the discount rate and interest crediting rate. December 31, 2024, the net loss was attributable to lower than expected returns on plan assets, partially offset by projected benefit obligation net gains primarily related to changes in the discount rate. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the net gain was attributable to market-driven increases in the fair value of plan assets, partially offset by changes in the discount rate and interest crediting rate. The following table presents the net periodic benefit costs reported in the Consolidated statements of income for the Firm’s defined benefit pension, defined contribution and OPEB plans, and in other comprehensive income for the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Total net periodic defined benefit plan cost/(credit)(a)$(462)$(393)$(192)(b)Total defined contribution plans1,733 1,609 1,408 Total pension and OPEB cost included in noninterest expense$1,271 $1,216 $1,216 Total recognized in other comprehensive (income)/loss$131 $(421)$1,459 Total net periodic defined benefit plan cost/(credit)(a) (b) (a)The service cost component of net periodic defined benefit cost is reported in compensation expense; all other components of net periodic defined benefit costs are reported in other expense in the Consolidated statements of income. (b)Includes pension settlement losses of $92 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. (b) 230JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 230JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 230JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 230 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following table presents the weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit costs for the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans. Year ended December 31,202420232022Discount rate5.16 %5.14 %2.54 %Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.15 %5.74 %3.68 % Plan assumptionsThe Firm’s expected long-term rate of return is a blended weighted average, by asset allocation of the projected long-term returns for the various asset classes, taking into consideration local market conditions and the specific allocation of plan assets. Returns on asset classes are developed using a forward-looking approach and are not strictly based on historical returns, with consideration given to current market conditions and the portfolio mix of each plan. The discount rates used in determining the benefit obligations are generally provided by the Firm’s actuaries, with the Firm’s principal defined benefit pension plan using a rate that was selected by reference to the yields on portfolios of bonds with maturity dates and coupons that closely match the plan’s projected annual cash flows. Investment strategy and asset allocationThe assets of the Firm’s defined benefit pension plans are held in various trusts and are invested in well-diversified portfolios of equity and fixed income securities, cash and cash equivalents, and alternative investments. The Firm regularly reviews the asset allocations and asset managers, as well as other factors that could impact the portfolios, which are rebalanced when deemed necessary. As of December 31, 2024, the approved asset allocation ranges by asset class for the Firm’s principal defined benefit plan are 41-100% debt securities, 0-40% equity securities, 0-1% real estate, and 0-8% alternatives.Assets held by the Firm’s defined benefit pension and OPEB plans do not include securities issued by JPMorganChase or its affiliates, except through indirect exposures through investments in exchange traded funds, mutual funds and collective investment funds managed by third-parties. The defined benefit pension and OPEB plans hold investments that are sponsored or managed by affiliates of JPMorganChase in the amount of $1.8 billion as of both December 31, 2024 and 2023. Plan assumptionsThe Firm’s expected long-term rate of return is a blended weighted average, by asset allocation of the projected long-term returns for the various asset classes, taking into consideration local market conditions and the specific allocation of plan assets. Returns on asset classes are developed using a forward-looking approach and are not strictly based on historical returns, with consideration given to current market conditions and the portfolio mix of each plan. The discount rates used in determining the benefit obligations are generally provided by the Firm’s actuaries, with the Firm’s principal defined benefit pension plan using a rate that was selected by reference to the yields on portfolios of bonds with maturity dates and coupons that closely match the plan’s projected annual cash flows.

The Firm’s expected long-term rate of return is a blended weighted average, by asset allocation of the projected long-term returns for the various asset classes, taking into consideration local market conditions and the specific allocation of plan assets. Returns on asset classes are developed using a forward-looking approach and are not strictly based on historical returns, with consideration given to current market conditions and the portfolio mix of each plan. The discount rates used in determining the benefit obligations are generally provided by the Firm’s actuaries, with the Firm’s principal defined benefit pension plan using a rate that was selected by reference to the yields on portfolios of bonds with maturity dates and coupons that closely match the plan’s projected annual cash flows. Investment strategy and asset allocationThe assets of the Firm’s defined benefit pension plans are held in various trusts and are invested in well-diversified portfolios of equity and fixed income securities, cash and cash equivalents, and alternative investments. The Firm regularly reviews the asset allocations and asset managers, as well as other factors that could impact the portfolios, which are rebalanced when deemed necessary. As of December 31, 2024, the approved asset allocation ranges by asset class for the Firm’s principal defined benefit plan are 41-100% debt securities, 0-40% equity securities, 0-1% real estate, and 0-8% alternatives.Assets held by the Firm’s defined benefit pension and OPEB plans do not include securities issued by JPMorganChase or its affiliates, except through indirect exposures through investments in exchange traded funds, mutual funds and collective investment funds managed by third-parties. The defined benefit pension and OPEB plans hold investments that are sponsored or managed by affiliates of JPMorganChase in the amount of $1.8 billion as of both December 31, 2024 and 2023.

The assets of the Firm’s defined benefit pension plans are held in various trusts and are invested in well-diversified portfolios of equity and fixed income securities, cash and cash equivalents, and alternative investments. The Firm regularly reviews the asset allocations and asset managers, as well as other factors that could impact the portfolios, which are rebalanced when deemed necessary. As of December 31, 2024, the approved asset allocation ranges by asset class for the Firm’s principal defined benefit plan are 41-100% debt securities, 0-40% equity securities, 0-1% real estate, and 0-8% alternatives. Assets held by the Firm’s defined benefit pension and OPEB plans do not include securities issued by JPMorganChase or its affiliates, except through indirect exposures through investments in exchange traded funds, mutual funds and collective investment funds managed by third-parties. The defined benefit pension and OPEB plans hold investments that are sponsored or managed by affiliates of JPMorganChase in the amount of $1.8 billion as of both December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Refer to Note 2 for information on fair value measurements, including descriptions of level 1, 2, and 3 of the fair value hierarchy and the valuation methods employed by the Firm. Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans assets and liabilities measured at fair value20242023December 31, (in millions)Level 1(a)Level 2(b)Level 3(c)Total fair valueLevel 1(a)Level 2(b)Level 3(c)Total fair valueAssets measured at fair value classified in the fair value hierarchy$6,910 $9,693 $3,956 $20,559 $6,521 $10,713 $3,124 $20,358 Assets measured at fair value using NAV as a practical expedient2,101 2,097 Net defined benefit pension plan payables(459)(442)Total fair value of plan assets$22,201 $22,013

Level 1(a) Level 2(b) Level 3(c) Level 1(a) Level 2(b) Level 3(c) Assets measured at fair value classified in the fair value hierarchy Assets measured at fair value using NAV as a practical expedient Net defined benefit pension plan payables (a) Consists predominantly of equity securities, U.S. federal, state, and local and non-U.S. government debt securities, and cash equivalents. (b) Consists of corporate debt securities, fund investments, mortgage-backed securities, and U.S. federal, state, and local and non-U.S. government debt securities. (c) Consists predominantly of corporate-owned life insurance policies. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K231 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K231 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K231 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 231

Changes in level 3 fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsInvestments classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy increased in 2024 to $4.0 billion, due to $536 million of transfers in and $415 million in unrealized gains, partially offset by $123 million in settlements. The net increase in 2023 was due to $400 million in unrealized gains and $173 million of transfers in, partially offset by $59 million in settlements.Estimated future benefit payments The following table presents benefit payments expected to be paid for the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans for the years indicated.Year ended December 31,(in millions)2025$1,186 20261,155 20271,134 20281,095 20291,093 Years 2030–20345,229 Changes in level 3 fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputsInvestments classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy increased in 2024 to $4.0 billion, due to $536 million of transfers in and $415 million in unrealized gains, partially offset by $123 million in settlements. The net increase in 2023 was due to $400 million in unrealized gains and $173 million of transfers in, partially offset by $59 million in settlements.

Investments classified in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy increased in 2024 to $4.0 billion, due to $536 million of transfers in and $415 million in unrealized gains, partially offset by $123 million in settlements. The net increase in 2023 was due to $400 million in unrealized gains and $173 million of transfers in, partially offset by $59 million in settlements. Estimated future benefit payments The following table presents benefit payments expected to be paid for the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans for the years indicated.Year ended December 31,(in millions)2025$1,186 20261,155 20271,134 20281,095 20291,093 Years 2030–20345,229

The following table presents benefit payments expected to be paid for the defined benefit pension and OPEB plans for the years indicated. Year ended December 31,(in millions)2025$1,186 20261,155 20271,134 20281,095 20291,093 Years 2030–20345,229 232JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 232JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 232JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 232 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Employee share-based awardsIn 2024, 2023 and 2022, JPMorganChase granted long-term share-based awards to certain employees under its LTIP, as amended and restated effective May 18, 2021, and subsequently amended effective May 21, 2024. Under the terms of the LTIP, as of December 31, 2024, 81 million shares of common stock were available for issuance through May 2028. The LTIP is the only active plan under which the Firm is currently granting share-based incentive awards. In the following discussion, the LTIP constitutes the Firm’s share-based incentive plans. RSUs are awarded at no cost to the recipient upon their grant. Generally, RSUs are granted annually and vest at a rate of 50% after two years and 50% after three years and are converted into shares of common stock as of the vesting date. In addition, RSUs typically include full-career eligibility provisions, which allow employees to continue to vest upon voluntary termination based on age and/or service-related requirements, subject to post-employment and other restrictions. All RSU awards are subject to forfeiture until vested and contain clawback provisions that may result in cancellation under certain specified circumstances. Predominantly all RSUs entitle the recipient to receive cash payments equivalent to any dividends paid on the underlying common stock during the period the RSUs are outstanding. Performance share units (“PSUs”) are granted annually, and approved by the Firm’s Board of Directors, to members of the Firm’s Operating Committee under the variable compensation program. PSUs are subject to the Firm’s achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year period. The number of awards that vest can range from zero to 150% of the grant amount. In addition, dividends that accrue during the vesting period are reinvested in dividend equivalent share units. PSUs and the related dividend equivalent share units are converted into shares of common stock after vesting.Once the PSUs and dividend equivalent share units have vested, the shares of common stock that are delivered, after applicable tax withholding, must be retained for an additional holding period, for a total combined vesting and holding period of approximately five to eight years from the grant date depending on regulations in certain countries. Under the LTI Plans, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of JPMorganChase’s common stock on the grant date. SARs expire ten years after the grant date. There were no grants of SARs in 2024, 2023 or 2022. The Firm separately recognizes compensation expense for each tranche of each award, net of estimated forfeitures, as if it were a separate award with its own vesting date. Generally, for each tranche granted, compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis from the grant date until the vesting date of the respective tranche, provided that the employees will not become full-career eligible during the vesting period. For awards with full-career eligibility provisions and awards granted with no future substantive service requirement, the Firm accrues the estimated value of awards expected to be awarded to employees as of the grant date without giving consideration to the impact of post-employment restrictions. For each tranche granted to employees who will become full-career eligible during the vesting period, compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis from the grant date until the earlier of the employee’s full-career eligibility date or the vesting date of the respective tranche. The Firm’s policy for issuing shares upon settlement of employee share-based incentive awards is to issue either new shares of common stock or treasury shares. During 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Firm settled all of its employee share-based awards by issuing treasury shares. Refer to Note 23 for further information on the classification of share-based awards for purposes of calculating earnings per share. Employee share-based awardsIn 2024, 2023 and 2022, JPMorganChase granted long-term share-based awards to certain employees under its LTIP, as amended and restated effective May 18, 2021, and subsequently amended effective May 21, 2024. Under the terms of the LTIP, as of December 31, 2024, 81 million shares of common stock were available for issuance through May 2028. The LTIP is the only active plan under which the Firm is currently granting share-based incentive awards. In the following discussion, the LTIP constitutes the Firm’s share-based incentive plans. RSUs are awarded at no cost to the recipient upon their grant. Generally, RSUs are granted annually and vest at a rate of 50% after two years and 50% after three years and are converted into shares of common stock as of the vesting date. In addition, RSUs typically include full-career eligibility provisions, which allow employees to continue to vest upon voluntary termination based on age and/or service-related requirements, subject to post-employment and other restrictions. All RSU awards are subject to forfeiture until vested and contain clawback provisions that may result in cancellation under certain specified circumstances. Predominantly all RSUs entitle the recipient to receive cash payments equivalent to any dividends paid on the underlying common stock during the period the RSUs are outstanding. Performance share units (“PSUs”) are granted annually, and approved by the Firm’s Board of Directors, to members of the Firm’s Operating Committee under the variable compensation program. PSUs are subject to the Firm’s achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year period. The number of awards that vest can range from zero to 150% of the grant amount. In addition, dividends that accrue during the vesting period are reinvested in dividend equivalent share units. PSUs and the related dividend equivalent share units are converted into shares of common stock after vesting.

In 2024, 2023 and 2022, JPMorganChase granted long-term share-based awards to certain employees under its LTIP, as amended and restated effective May 18, 2021, and subsequently amended effective May 21, 2024. Under the terms of the LTIP, as of December 31, 2024, 81 million shares of common stock were available for issuance through May 2028. The LTIP is the only active plan under which the Firm is currently granting share-based incentive awards. In the following discussion, the LTIP constitutes the Firm’s share-based incentive plans. RSUs are awarded at no cost to the recipient upon their grant. Generally, RSUs are granted annually and vest at a rate of 50% after two years and 50% after three years and are converted into shares of common stock as of the vesting date. In addition, RSUs typically include full-career eligibility provisions, which allow employees to continue to vest upon voluntary termination based on age and/or service-related requirements, subject to post-employment and other restrictions. All RSU awards are subject to forfeiture until vested and contain clawback provisions that may result in cancellation under certain specified circumstances. Predominantly all RSUs entitle the recipient to receive cash payments equivalent to any dividends paid on the underlying common stock during the period the RSUs are outstanding. Performance share units (“PSUs”) are granted annually, and approved by the Firm’s Board of Directors, to members of the Firm’s Operating Committee under the variable compensation program. PSUs are subject to the Firm’s achievement of specified performance criteria over a three-year period. The number of awards that vest can range from zero to 150% of the grant amount. In addition, dividends that accrue during the vesting period are reinvested in dividend equivalent share units. PSUs and the related dividend equivalent share units are converted into shares of common stock after vesting. Once the PSUs and dividend equivalent share units have vested, the shares of common stock that are delivered, after applicable tax withholding, must be retained for an additional holding period, for a total combined vesting and holding period of approximately five to eight years from the grant date depending on regulations in certain countries. Under the LTI Plans, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of JPMorganChase’s common stock on the grant date. SARs expire ten years after the grant date. There were no grants of SARs in 2024, 2023 or 2022. The Firm separately recognizes compensation expense for each tranche of each award, net of estimated forfeitures, as if it were a separate award with its own vesting date. Generally, for each tranche granted, compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis from the grant date until the vesting date of the respective tranche, provided that the employees will not become full-career eligible during the vesting period. For awards with full-career eligibility provisions and awards granted with no future substantive service requirement, the Firm accrues the estimated value of awards expected to be awarded to employees as of the grant date without giving consideration to the impact of post-employment restrictions. For each tranche granted to employees who will become full-career eligible during the vesting period, compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis from the grant date until the earlier of the employee’s full-career eligibility date or the vesting date of the respective tranche. The Firm’s policy for issuing shares upon settlement of employee share-based incentive awards is to issue either new shares of common stock or treasury shares. During 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Firm settled all of its employee share-based awards by issuing treasury shares. Refer to Note 23 for further information on the classification of share-based awards for purposes of calculating earnings per share. Once the PSUs and dividend equivalent share units have vested, the shares of common stock that are delivered, after applicable tax withholding, must be retained for an additional holding period, for a total combined vesting and holding period of approximately five to eight years from the grant date depending on regulations in certain countries. five Under the LTI Plans, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair value of JPMorganChase’s common stock on the grant date. SARs expire ten years after the grant date. There were no grants of SARs in 2024, 2023 or 2022. The Firm separately recognizes compensation expense for each tranche of each award, net of estimated forfeitures, as if it were a separate award with its own vesting date. Generally, for each tranche granted, compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis from the grant date until the vesting date of the respective tranche, provided that the employees will not become full-career eligible during the vesting period. For awards with full-career eligibility provisions and awards granted with no future substantive service requirement, the Firm accrues the estimated value of awards expected to be awarded to employees as of the grant date without giving consideration to the impact of post-employment restrictions. For each tranche granted to employees who will become full-career eligible during the vesting period, compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis from the grant date until the earlier of the employee’s full-career eligibility date or the vesting date of the respective tranche. The Firm’s policy for issuing shares upon settlement of employee share-based incentive awards is to issue either new shares of common stock or treasury shares. During 2024, 2023 and 2022, the Firm settled all of its employee share-based awards by issuing treasury shares. Refer to Note 23 for further information on the classification of share-based awards for purposes of calculating earnings per share. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K233 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K233 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K233 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 233

Generally, compensation expense for RSUs and PSUs is measured based on the number of units granted multiplied by the stock price at the grant date, and for SARs, is measured at the grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Compensation expense for these awards is recognized in net income as described previously. The following table summarizes JPMorganChase’s RSUs, PSUs and SARs activity for 2024. RSUs/PSUsSARsYear ended December 31, 2024Number of unitsWeighted-average grantdate fair valueNumber of awardsWeighted-average exercise priceWeighted-average remaining contractual life (in years)Aggregate intrinsic value(in thousands, except weighted-average data, and where otherwise stated)Outstanding, January 152,243 $141.31 2,250 $152.19 Granted20,020 166.74 — — Exercised or vested(19,542)143.02 — — Forfeited(2,112)147.41 — — CanceledNANA— — Outstanding, December 3150,609 $150.41 2,250 $152.19 6.7$198,113 Exercisable, December 31NANA— — — — SARs (in thousands, except weighted-average data, and where otherwise stated) The total fair value of RSUs and PSUs that vested during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, was $3.5 billion, $2.5 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively. There were no SARs exercised in 2024. The total intrinsic value of SARs exercised during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, was $24 million and $75 million, respectively. Compensation expenseThe Firm recognized the following noncash compensation expense related to its various employee share-based incentive plans in its Consolidated statements of income. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Cost of prior grants of RSUs, PSUs and SARs that are amortized over their applicable vesting periods$1,622 $1,510 $1,253 Accrual of estimated costs of share-based awards to be granted in future periods, predominantly those to full-career eligible employees1,882 1,607 1,541 Total noncash compensation expense related to employee share-based incentive plans$3,504 $3,117 $2,794 At December 31, 2024, approximately $963 million (pretax) of compensation expense related to unvested awards had not yet been charged to net income. That cost is expected to be amortized into compensation expense over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years. The Firm does not capitalize any compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards to employees. Tax benefitsIncome tax benefits (including tax benefits from dividends or dividend equivalents) related to share-based incentive arrangements recognized in the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, were $1.0 billion, $836 million and $901 million, respectively. Compensation expenseThe Firm recognized the following noncash compensation expense related to its various employee share-based incentive plans in its Consolidated statements of income. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Cost of prior grants of RSUs, PSUs and SARs that are amortized over their applicable vesting periods$1,622 $1,510 $1,253 Accrual of estimated costs of share-based awards to be granted in future periods, predominantly those to full-career eligible employees1,882 1,607 1,541 Total noncash compensation expense related to employee share-based incentive plans$3,504 $3,117 $2,794 At December 31, 2024, approximately $963 million (pretax) of compensation expense related to unvested awards had not yet been charged to net income. That cost is expected to be amortized into compensation expense over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years. The Firm does not capitalize any compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards to employees.

The Firm recognized the following noncash compensation expense related to its various employee share-based incentive plans in its Consolidated statements of income. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Cost of prior grants of RSUs, PSUs and SARs that are amortized over their applicable vesting periods$1,622 $1,510 $1,253 Accrual of estimated costs of share-based awards to be granted in future periods, predominantly those to full-career eligible employees1,882 1,607 1,541 Total noncash compensation expense related to employee share-based incentive plans$3,504 $3,117 $2,794 Cost of prior grants of RSUs, PSUs and SARs that are amortized over their applicable vesting periods

At December 31, 2024, approximately $963 million (pretax) of compensation expense related to unvested awards had not yet been charged to net income. That cost is expected to be amortized into compensation expense over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years. The Firm does not capitalize any compensation expense related to share-based compensation awards to employees. Tax benefitsIncome tax benefits (including tax benefits from dividends or dividend equivalents) related to share-based incentive arrangements recognized in the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, were $1.0 billion, $836 million and $901 million, respectively.

Income tax benefits (including tax benefits from dividends or dividend equivalents) related to share-based incentive arrangements recognized in the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, were $1.0 billion, $836 million and $901 million, respectively. 234JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 234JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 234JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 234 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Investment securities consist of debt securities that are classified as AFS or HTM. Debt securities classified as trading assets are discussed in Note 2. Predominantly all of the Firm’s AFS and HTM securities are held by Treasury and CIO in connection with its asset-liability management activities.AFS securities are carried at fair value on the Consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains and losses, after any applicable hedge accounting adjustments or allowance for credit losses, are reported in AOCI. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on AFS securities, which are included in investment securities gains/(losses) on the Consolidated statements of income. HTM securities, which the Firm has the intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at amortized cost, net of allowance for credit losses, on the Consolidated balance sheets.For both AFS and HTM securities, purchase discounts or premiums are generally amortized into interest income on a level-yield basis over the contractual life of the security. However, premiums on certain callable debt securities are amortized to the earliest call date. Investment securities consist of debt securities that are classified as AFS or HTM. Debt securities classified as trading assets are discussed in Note 2. Predominantly all of the Firm’s AFS and HTM securities are held by Treasury and CIO in connection with its asset-liability management activities.AFS securities are carried at fair value on the Consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains and losses, after any applicable hedge accounting adjustments or allowance for credit losses, are reported in AOCI. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on AFS securities, which are included in investment securities gains/(losses) on the Consolidated statements of income. HTM securities, which the Firm has the intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at amortized cost, net of allowance for credit losses, on the Consolidated balance sheets.For both AFS and HTM securities, purchase discounts or premiums are generally amortized into interest income on a level-yield basis over the contractual life of the security. However, premiums on certain callable debt securities are amortized to the earliest call date. Investment securities consist of debt securities that are classified as AFS or HTM. Debt securities classified as trading assets are discussed in Note 2. Predominantly all of the Firm’s AFS and HTM securities are held by Treasury and CIO in connection with its asset-liability management activities. AFS securities are carried at fair value on the Consolidated balance sheets. Unrealized gains and losses, after any applicable hedge accounting adjustments or allowance for credit losses, are reported in AOCI. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on AFS securities, which are included in investment securities gains/(losses) on the Consolidated statements of income. HTM securities, which the Firm has the intent and ability to hold until maturity, are carried at amortized cost, net of allowance for credit losses, on the Consolidated balance sheets. For both AFS and HTM securities, purchase discounts or premiums are generally amortized into interest income on a level-yield basis over the contractual life of the security. However, premiums on certain callable debt securities are amortized to the earliest call date. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K235 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K235 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K235 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 235

The amortized costs and estimated fair values of the investment securities portfolio were as follows for the dates indicated. 20242023December 31, (in millions)Amortized cost(d)(e)Gross unrealized gainsGross unrealized lossesFair valueAmortized cost(d)(e)Gross unrealized gainsGross unrealized lossesFair valueAvailable-for-sale securitiesMortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies$95,671 $251 $4,029 $91,893 $88,377 $870 $4,077 $85,170 Residential:U.S.4,242 16 50 4,208 2,086 10 68 2,028 Non-U.S.600 3 — 603 1,608 4 1 1,611 Commercial4,115 20 70 4,065 2,930 12 139 2,803 Total mortgage-backed securities104,628 290 4,149 100,769 95,001 896 4,285 91,612 U.S. Treasury and government agencies235,495 545 1,261 234,779 58,051 276 522 57,805 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities18,337 110 534 17,913 21,243 390 266 21,367 Non-U.S. government debt securities36,655 94 504 36,245 21,387 254 359 21,282 Corporate debt securities71 — 1 70 128 — 28 100 Asset-backed securities:Collateralized loan obligations14,887 59 3 14,943 6,769 11 28 6,752 Other2,125 17 9 2,133 2,804 8 26 2,786 Unallocated portfolio layer fair value basis adjustments(a)(1,153)— (1,153)NA73 (73)— NATotal available-for-sale securities411,045 1,115 5,308 406,852 205,456 1,762 5,514 201,704 Held-to-maturity securities(b)Mortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies97,177 6 13,531 83,652 105,614 39 11,643 94,010 U.S. Residential8,605 4 904 7,705 9,709 4 970 8,743 Commercial8,817 24 389 8,452 10,534 13 581 9,966 Total mortgage-backed securities114,599 34 14,824 99,809 125,857 56 13,194 112,719 U.S. Treasury and government agencies108,632 — 11,212 97,420 173,666 — 13,074 160,592 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities9,310 32 631 8,711 9,945 74 591 9,428 Asset-backed securities:Collateralized loan obligations40,573 84 14 40,643 58,565 47 352 58,260 Other1,354 2 39 1,317 1,815 1 61 1,755 Total held-to-maturity securities(c)274,468 152 26,720 247,900 369,848 178 27,272 342,754 Total investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses$685,513 $1,267 $32,028 $654,752 $575,304 $1,940 $32,786 $544,458 Amortized cost(d)(e) Amortized cost(d)(e) Unallocated portfolio layer fair value basis adjustments(a)

(a)Represents the amount of portfolio layer method basis adjustments related to AFS securities hedged in a closed portfolio. Under U.S. GAAP portfolio layer method basis adjustments are not allocated to individual securities, however the amounts impact the unrealized gains or losses in the table for the types of securities being hedged. Refer to Note 1 and Note 5 for additional information. (b)The Firm purchased $4.7 billion, $4.1 billion and $33.7 billion of HTM securities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (c)Effective January 1, 2023, the Firm adopted the portfolio layer method hedge accounting guidance which permitted a transfer of HTM securities to AFS upon adoption. The Firm transferred obligations of U.S. states and municipalities with a carrying value of $7.1 billion resulting in the recognition of $38 million net pre-tax unrealized losses in AOCI. This transfer was a non-cash transaction. Refer to Note 24 for additional information. (d)The amortized cost of investment securities is reported net of allowance for credit losses of $152 million, $128 million and $96 million at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (e)Excludes $3.7 billion and $2.8 billion of accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated balance sheets. The Firm generally does not recognize an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable, consistent with its policy to write them off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income. The Firm did not reverse through interest income any accrued interest receivable for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. 236JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 236JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 236JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 236 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K At December 31, 2024, the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities with an average credit rating of AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of securities and differentiate risk within the portfolio. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”)) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions. Risk ratings are assigned at acquisition, reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and adjusted as necessary over the life of the investment for updated information affecting the issuer’s ability to fulfill its obligations. At December 31, 2024, the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities with an average credit rating of AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of securities and differentiate risk within the portfolio. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and At December 31, 2024, the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities with an average credit rating of AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings). Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of securities and differentiate risk within the portfolio. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”)) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions. Risk ratings are assigned at acquisition, reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and adjusted as necessary over the life of the investment for updated information affecting the issuer’s ability to fulfill its obligations. Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”)) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions. Risk ratings are assigned at acquisition, reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and adjusted as necessary over the life of the investment for updated information affecting the issuer’s ability to fulfill its obligations.

The following tables present the fair value and gross unrealized losses by aging category for AFS securities at December 31, 2024 and 2023. The tables exclude U.S. Treasury and government agency securities and U.S. GSE and government agency MBS with unrealized losses of $5.3 billion and $4.6 billion, at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively; changes in the value of these securities are generally driven by changes in interest rates rather than changes in their credit profile given the explicit or implicit guarantees provided by the U.S. government. Available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized lossesLess than 12 months12 months or moreYear ended December 31, 2024(in millions)Fair valueGross unrealized lossesFair valueGross unrealized lossesTotal fair valueTotal gross unrealized lossesAvailable-for-sale securitiesMortgage-backed securities:Residential:U.S.$1,505 $6 $925 $44 $2,430 $50 Non-U.S.— — 30 — 30 — Commercial763 8 1,184 62 1,947 70 Total mortgage-backed securities2,268 14 2,139 106 4,407 120 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities10,037 233 2,412 301 12,449 534 Non-U.S. government debt securities14,234 234 4,184 270 18,418 504 Corporate debt securities9 — 30 1 39 1 Asset-backed securities:Collateralized loan obligations2 — 375 3 377 3 Other214 1 200 8 414 9 Total available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses$26,764 $482 $9,340 $689 $36,104 $1,171 Available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized lossesLess than 12 months12 months or moreYear ended December 31, 2023(in millions)Fair valueGross unrealized lossesFair valueGross unrealized lossesTotal fair valueTotal gross unrealized lossesAvailable-for-sale securitiesMortgage-backed securities:Residential:U.S.$81 $— $1,160 $68 $1,241 $68 Non-U.S.— — 722 1 722 1 Commercial228 3 1,775 136 2,003 139 Total mortgage-backed securities309 3 3,657 205 3,966 208 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities2,134 20 2,278 246 4,412 266 Non-U.S. government debt securities7,145 23 4,987 336 12,132 359 Corporate debt securities9 — 79 28 88 28 Asset-backed securities:Collateralized loan obligations932 2 3,744 26 4,676 28 Other208 1 1,288 25 1,496 26 Total available-for-sale securities with gross unrealized losses$10,737 $49 $16,033 $866 $26,770 $915 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K237 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K237 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K237 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 237

AFS securities are considered impaired if the fair value is less than the amortized cost. The Firm recognizes impairment losses in earnings if the Firm has the intent to sell the debt security, or if it is more likely than not that the Firm will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost. In these circumstances the impairment loss is recognized in investment securities gains/(losses) in the Consolidated Statements of Income and is equal to the full difference between the amortized cost (net of allowance if applicable) and the fair value of the security. For impaired debt securities that the Firm has the intent and ability to hold, the securities are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. If it is determined that a credit loss exists, that loss is recognized as an allowance for credit losses through the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income, limited by the amount of impairment. Any impairment on debt securities that the Firm has the intent and ability to hold not due to credit losses is recorded in OCI. Factors considered in evaluating credit losses include adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or underlying collateral of a security; and payment structure of the security. When assessing securities issued in a securitization for credit losses, the Firm estimates cash flows considering relevant market and economic data, underlying loan-level data, and structural features of the securitization, such as subordination, excess spread, overcollateralization or other forms of credit enhancement, and compares the losses projected for the underlying collateral (“pool losses”) against the level of credit enhancement in the securitization structure to determine whether these features are sufficient to absorb the pool losses, or whether a credit loss exists. For beneficial interests in securitizations that are rated below “AA” at their acquisition, or that can be contractually prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the Firm would not recover substantially all of its recorded investment, the Firm evaluates impairment for credit losses when there is an adverse change in expected cash flows. HTM securities – credit riskAllowance for credit lossesThe allowance for credit losses on HTM securities represents expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the securities.The allowance for credit losses on HTM obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and commercial mortgage-backed securities is calculated by applying statistical credit loss factors (estimated PD and LGD) to the amortized cost. The credit loss factors are derived using a weighted average of five internally developed eight-quarter macroeconomic scenarios, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the forecast period. Refer to Note 13 for further information on the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast. The allowance for credit losses on HTM collateralized loan obligations and U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities is calculated as the difference between the amortized cost and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the security’s effective interest rate. These cash flow estimates are developed based on expectations of underlying collateral performance derived using the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast and the single year straight-line interpolation, as well as considering the structural features of the security. The application of different inputs and assumptions into the calculation of the allowance for credit losses is subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses on HTM securities. Credit quality indicatorThe primary credit quality indicator for HTM securities is the risk rating assigned to each security. At both December 31, 2024 and 2023, all HTM securities were rated investment grade and were current and accruing, with approximately 99% rated at least AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings).Allowance for credit losses on investment securitiesThe allowance for credit losses on investment securities was $152 million, $128 million and $96 million as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, which included a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings related to the transfer of HTM securities to AFS for the year ended December 31, 2023.Selected impacts of investment securities on the Consolidated statements of incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Realized gains$593 $622 $198 Realized losses(1,614)(3,802)(2,578)Investment securities losses$(1,021)$(3,180)$(2,380)Provision for credit losses$24 $38 $54 AFS securities are considered impaired if the fair value is less than the amortized cost. The Firm recognizes impairment losses in earnings if the Firm has the intent to sell the debt security, or if it is more likely than not that the Firm will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost. In these circumstances the impairment loss is recognized in investment securities gains/(losses) in the Consolidated Statements of Income and is equal to the full difference between the amortized cost (net of allowance if applicable) and the fair value of the security. For impaired debt securities that the Firm has the intent and ability to hold, the securities are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. If it is determined that a credit loss exists, that loss is recognized as an allowance for credit losses through the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income, limited by the amount of impairment. Any impairment on debt securities that the Firm has the intent and ability to hold not due to credit losses is recorded in OCI. Factors considered in evaluating credit losses include adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or underlying collateral of a security; and payment structure of the security. When assessing securities issued in a securitization for credit losses, the Firm estimates cash flows considering relevant market and economic data, underlying loan-level data, and structural features of the securitization, such as subordination, excess spread, overcollateralization or other forms of credit enhancement, and compares the losses projected for the underlying collateral (“pool losses”) against the level of credit enhancement in the securitization structure to determine whether these features are sufficient to absorb the pool losses, or whether a credit loss exists. For beneficial interests in securitizations that are rated below “AA” at their acquisition, or that can be contractually prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the Firm would not recover substantially all of its recorded investment, the Firm evaluates impairment for credit losses when there is an adverse change in expected cash flows. HTM securities – credit riskAllowance for credit lossesThe allowance for credit losses on HTM securities represents expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the securities.The allowance for credit losses on HTM obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and commercial mortgage-backed securities is calculated by applying statistical credit loss factors (estimated PD and LGD) AFS securities are considered impaired if the fair value is less than the amortized cost. The Firm recognizes impairment losses in earnings if the Firm has the intent to sell the debt security, or if it is more likely than not that the Firm will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost. In these circumstances the impairment loss is recognized in investment securities gains/(losses) in the Consolidated Statements of Income and is equal to the full difference between the amortized cost (net of allowance if applicable) and the fair value of the security. For impaired debt securities that the Firm has the intent and ability to hold, the securities are evaluated to determine if a credit loss exists. If it is determined that a credit loss exists, that loss is recognized as an allowance for credit losses through the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statements of Income, limited by the amount of impairment. Any impairment on debt securities that the Firm has the intent and ability to hold not due to credit losses is recorded in OCI. Factors considered in evaluating credit losses include adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or underlying collateral of a security; and payment structure of the security. When assessing securities issued in a securitization for credit losses, the Firm estimates cash flows considering relevant market and economic data, underlying loan-level data, and structural features of the securitization, such as subordination, excess spread, overcollateralization or other forms of credit enhancement, and compares the losses projected for the underlying collateral (“pool losses”) against the level of credit enhancement in the securitization structure to determine whether these features are sufficient to absorb the pool losses, or whether a credit loss exists. For beneficial interests in securitizations that are rated below “AA” at their acquisition, or that can be contractually prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the Firm would not recover substantially all of its recorded investment, the Firm evaluates impairment for credit losses when there is an adverse change in expected cash flows.

Allowance for credit losses The allowance for credit losses on HTM securities represents expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the securities. The allowance for credit losses on HTM obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and commercial mortgage-backed securities is calculated by applying statistical credit loss factors (estimated PD and LGD) to the amortized cost. The credit loss factors are derived using a weighted average of five internally developed eight-quarter macroeconomic scenarios, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the forecast period. Refer to Note 13 for further information on the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast. The allowance for credit losses on HTM collateralized loan obligations and U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities is calculated as the difference between the amortized cost and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the security’s effective interest rate. These cash flow estimates are developed based on expectations of underlying collateral performance derived using the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast and the single year straight-line interpolation, as well as considering the structural features of the security. The application of different inputs and assumptions into the calculation of the allowance for credit losses is subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses on HTM securities. Credit quality indicatorThe primary credit quality indicator for HTM securities is the risk rating assigned to each security. At both December 31, 2024 and 2023, all HTM securities were rated investment grade and were current and accruing, with approximately 99% rated at least AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings).Allowance for credit losses on investment securitiesThe allowance for credit losses on investment securities was $152 million, $128 million and $96 million as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, which included a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings related to the transfer of HTM securities to AFS for the year ended December 31, 2023.Selected impacts of investment securities on the Consolidated statements of incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Realized gains$593 $622 $198 Realized losses(1,614)(3,802)(2,578)Investment securities losses$(1,021)$(3,180)$(2,380)Provision for credit losses$24 $38 $54 to the amortized cost. The credit loss factors are derived using a weighted average of five internally developed eight-quarter macroeconomic scenarios, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the forecast period. Refer to Note 13 for further information on the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast. The allowance for credit losses on HTM collateralized loan obligations and U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities is calculated as the difference between the amortized cost and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the security’s effective interest rate. These cash flow estimates are developed based on expectations of underlying collateral performance derived using the eight-quarter macroeconomic forecast and the single year straight-line interpolation, as well as considering the structural features of the security. The application of different inputs and assumptions into the calculation of the allowance for credit losses is subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for credit losses on HTM securities. Credit quality indicator The primary credit quality indicator for HTM securities is the risk rating assigned to each security. At both December 31, 2024 and 2023, all HTM securities were rated investment grade and were current and accruing, with approximately 99% rated at least AA+ (based upon external ratings where available, and where not available, based primarily upon internal risk ratings).

The allowance for credit losses on investment securities was $152 million, $128 million and $96 million as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, which included a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings related to the transfer of HTM securities to AFS for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Realized gains$593 $622 $198 Realized losses(1,614)(3,802)(2,578)Investment securities losses$(1,021)$(3,180)$(2,380)Provision for credit losses$24 $38 $54 Year ended December 31, (in millions) 238JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 238JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 238JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 238 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The following table presents the amortized cost and estimated fair value at December 31, 2024, of JPMorganChase’s investment securities portfolio by contractual maturity. By remaining maturityDecember 31, 2024 (in millions)Due in one year or lessDue after one year through five yearsDue after five years through 10 yearsDue after 10 years(c)TotalAvailable-for-sale securitiesMortgage-backed securitiesAmortized cost$132 $9,410 $4,059 $91,027 $104,628 Fair value130 9,345 4,041 87,253 100,769 Average yield(a)3.32 %4.58 %5.25 %4.75 %4.75 %U.S. Treasury and government agenciesAmortized cost$20,685 $169,162 $38,667 $6,981 $235,495 Fair value20,730 169,145 38,619 6,285 234,779 Average yield(a)4.50 %4.57 %4.96 %5.53 %4.65 %Obligations of U.S. states and municipalitiesAmortized cost$4 $16 $92 $18,225 $18,337 Fair value4 16 90 17,803 17,913 Average yield(a)1.59 %3.95 %4.46 %5.32 %5.32 %Non-U.S. government debt securitiesAmortized cost$13,331 $11,769 $7,609 $3,946 $36,655 Fair value13,327 11,701 7,403 3,814 36,245 Average yield(a)4.24 %4.32 %2.82 %4.15 %3.96 %Corporate debt securitiesAmortized cost$106 $9 $5 $— $120 Fair value57 9 4 — 70 Average yield(a)14.09 %4.06 %4.19 %— %12.92 %Asset-backed securitiesAmortized cost$— $368 $1,609 $15,035 $17,012 Fair value— 370 1,619 15,087 17,076 Average yield(a)— %6.14 %6.04 %5.96 %5.97 %Total available-for-sale securitiesAmortized cost(b)$34,258 $190,734 $52,041 $135,214 $412,247 Fair value34,248 190,586 51,776 130,242 406,852 Average yield(a)4.42 %4.56 %4.70 %4.98 %4.70 %Held-to-maturity securitiesMortgage-backed securitiesAmortized cost$104 $7,994 $6,077 $100,495 $114,670 Fair value101 7,453 5,352 86,903 99,809 Average yield(a)0.97 %2.63 %2.67 %2.95 %2.92 %U.S. Treasury and government agenciesAmortized cost$20,083 $40,497 $48,052 $— $108,632 Fair value19,500 37,715 40,205 — 97,420 Average yield(a)0.43 %1.23 %1.25 %— %1.09 %Obligations of U.S. states and municipalitiesAmortized cost$— $9 $307 $9,026 $9,342 Fair value— 9 276 8,426 8,711 Average yield(a)— %4.76 %3.25 %3.97 %3.95 %Asset-backed securitiesAmortized cost$— $134 $22,433 $19,360 $41,927 Fair value— 134 22,466 19,360 41,960 Average yield(a)— %5.94 %5.57 %5.73 %5.65 %Total held-to-maturity securitiesAmortized cost(b)$20,187 $48,634 $76,869 $128,881 $274,571 Fair value19,601 45,311 68,299 114,689 247,900 Average yield(a)0.43 %1.47 %2.63 %3.44 %2.64 % Due after 10 years(c) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Amortized cost(b) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Average yield(a) Amortized cost(b) Average yield(a) (a)Average yield is computed using the effective yield of each security owned at the end of the period, weighted based on the amortized cost of each security. The effective yield considers the contractual coupon, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and the effect of related hedging derivatives, including closed portfolio hedges. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. The effective yield excludes unscheduled principal prepayments; and accordingly, actual maturities of securities may differ from their contractual or expected maturities as certain securities may be prepaid. However, for certain callable debt securities, the average yield is calculated to the earliest call date. (b)For purposes of this table, the amortized cost of available-for-sale securities excludes the allowance for credit losses of $49 million and the portfolio layer fair value hedge basis adjustments of $(1.2) billion at December 31, 2024. The amortized cost of held-to-maturity securities also excludes the allowance for credit losses of $103 million at December 31, 2024. (c)Substantially all of the Firm’s U.S. residential MBS and collateralized mortgage obligations are due in 10 years or more, based on contractual maturity. The estimated weighted-average life, which reflects anticipated future prepayments, is approximately eight years for agency residential MBS, six years for agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations, and five years for nonagency residential collateralized mortgage obligations. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K239 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K239 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K239 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 239

JPMorganChase enters into resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned agreements (collectively, “securities financing agreements”) primarily to finance the Firm’s inventory positions, acquire securities to cover short sales, accommodate customers’ financing needs, settle other securities obligations and to deploy the Firm’s excess cash. Securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. Where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance, securities financing agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis. Refer to Note 1 for further discussion of the offsetting of assets and liabilities. Fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded over the life of the agreement in interest income and interest expense on the Consolidated statements of income. The Firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements. Refer to Note 3 for further information regarding the fair value option. The securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements, securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and securities borrowed on the Consolidated balance sheets. Generally, for agreements carried at fair value, current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense, with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue. However, for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments, all changes in fair value, including any interest elements, are reported in principal transactions revenue. Securities financing agreements not elected under the fair value option are measured at amortized cost. As a result of the Firm’s credit risk mitigation practices described below, the Firm did not hold any allowance for credit losses with respect to resale and securities borrowed arrangements as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.Credit risk mitigation practicesSecurities financing agreements expose the Firm primarily to credit and liquidity risk. To manage these risks, the Firm monitors the value of the underlying securities (predominantly high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSEs and government agencies MBS) that it has received from or provided to its counterparties compared to the value of cash proceeds and exchanged collateral, and either requests additional collateral or returns securities or collateral when appropriate. Margin levels are initially established based upon the counterparty, the type of underlying securities, and the permissible collateral, and are monitored on an ongoing basis. In resale and securities borrowed agreements, the Firm is exposed to credit risk to the extent that the value of the securities received is less than initial cash principal advanced and any collateral amounts exchanged. In repurchase and securities loaned agreements, credit risk exposure arises to the extent that the value of underlying securities advanced exceeds the value of the initial cash principal received, and any collateral amounts exchanged. Additionally, the Firm typically enters into master netting agreements and other similar arrangements with its counterparties, which provide for the right to liquidate the underlying securities and any collateral amounts exchanged in the event of a counterparty default. It is also the Firm’s policy to take possession, where possible, of the securities underlying resale and securities borrowed agreements. Refer to Note 29 for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements. JPMorganChase enters into resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned agreements (collectively, “securities financing agreements”) primarily to finance the Firm’s inventory positions, acquire securities to cover short sales, accommodate customers’ financing needs, settle other securities obligations and to deploy the Firm’s excess cash. Securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. Where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance, securities financing agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis. Refer to Note 1 for further discussion of the offsetting of assets and liabilities. Fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded over the life of the agreement in interest income and interest expense on the Consolidated statements of income. The Firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements. Refer to Note 3 for further information regarding the fair value option. The securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements, securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and securities borrowed on the Consolidated balance sheets. Generally, for agreements carried at fair value, current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense, with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue. However, for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments, all changes in fair value, including any interest elements, are reported in principal transactions revenue. Securities financing agreements not elected under the fair value option are measured at amortized cost. As a result of the Firm’s credit risk mitigation practices described below, the Firm did not hold any allowance for credit losses with respect to resale and securities borrowed arrangements as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. JPMorganChase enters into resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned agreements (collectively, “securities financing agreements”) primarily to finance the Firm’s inventory positions, acquire securities to cover short sales, accommodate customers’ financing needs, settle other securities obligations and to deploy the Firm’s excess cash. Securities financing agreements are treated as collateralized financings on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. Where appropriate under applicable accounting guidance, securities financing agreements with the same counterparty are reported on a net basis. Refer to Note 1 for further discussion of the offsetting of assets and liabilities. Fees received and paid in connection with securities financing agreements are recorded over the life of the agreement in interest income and interest expense on the Consolidated statements of income. The Firm has elected the fair value option for certain securities financing agreements. Refer to Note 3 for further information regarding the fair value option. The securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected are reported within securities purchased under resale agreements, securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, and securities borrowed on the Consolidated balance sheets. Generally, for agreements carried at fair value, current-period interest accruals are recorded within interest income and interest expense, with changes in fair value reported in principal transactions revenue. However, for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with accounting guidance for hybrid instruments, all changes in fair value, including any interest elements, are reported in principal transactions revenue. Securities financing agreements not elected under the fair value option are measured at amortized cost. As a result of the Firm’s credit risk mitigation practices described below, the Firm did not hold any allowance for credit losses with respect to resale and securities borrowed arrangements as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Credit risk mitigation practicesSecurities financing agreements expose the Firm primarily to credit and liquidity risk. To manage these risks, the Firm monitors the value of the underlying securities (predominantly high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSEs and government agencies MBS) that it has received from or provided to its counterparties compared to the value of cash proceeds and exchanged collateral, and either requests additional collateral or returns securities or collateral when appropriate. Margin levels are initially established based upon the counterparty, the type of underlying securities, and the permissible collateral, and are monitored on an ongoing basis. In resale and securities borrowed agreements, the Firm is exposed to credit risk to the extent that the value of the securities received is less than initial cash principal advanced and any collateral amounts exchanged. In repurchase and securities loaned agreements, credit risk exposure arises to the extent that the value of underlying securities advanced exceeds the value of the initial cash principal received, and any collateral amounts exchanged. Additionally, the Firm typically enters into master netting agreements and other similar arrangements with its counterparties, which provide for the right to liquidate the underlying securities and any collateral amounts exchanged in the event of a counterparty default. It is also the Firm’s policy to take possession, where possible, of the securities underlying resale and securities borrowed agreements. Refer to Note 29 for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements.

Securities financing agreements expose the Firm primarily to credit and liquidity risk. To manage these risks, the Firm monitors the value of the underlying securities (predominantly high-quality securities collateral, including government-issued debt and U.S. GSEs and government agencies MBS) that it has received from or provided to its counterparties compared to the value of cash proceeds and exchanged collateral, and either requests additional collateral or returns securities or collateral when appropriate. Margin levels are initially established based upon the counterparty, the type of underlying securities, and the permissible collateral, and are monitored on an ongoing basis. In resale and securities borrowed agreements, the Firm is exposed to credit risk to the extent that the value of the securities received is less than initial cash principal advanced and any collateral amounts exchanged. In repurchase and securities loaned agreements, credit risk exposure arises to the extent that the value of underlying securities advanced exceeds the value of the initial cash principal received, and any collateral amounts exchanged. Additionally, the Firm typically enters into master netting agreements and other similar arrangements with its counterparties, which provide for the right to liquidate the underlying securities and any collateral amounts exchanged in the event of a counterparty default. It is also the Firm’s policy to take possession, where possible, of the securities underlying resale and securities borrowed agreements. Refer to Note 29 for further information regarding assets pledged and collateral received in securities financing agreements. 240JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 240JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 240JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 240 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The table below summarizes the gross and net amounts of the Firm’s securities financing agreements, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. When the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to a master netting agreement with a counterparty and where other relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP are met, the Firm nets, on the Consolidated balance sheets, the balances outstanding under its securities financing agreements with the same counterparty. In addition, the Firm exchanges securities and/or cash collateral with its counterparty to reduce the economic exposure with the counterparty, but such collateral is not eligible for net Consolidated balance sheet presentation. Where the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the counterparty master netting agreement, such collateral, along with securities financing balances that do not meet all these relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP, is presented in the table below as “Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets,” and reduces the “Net amounts” presented. Where a legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained, the securities financing balances are presented gross in the “Net amounts” below. In transactions where the Firm is acting as the lender in a securities-for-securities lending agreement and receives securities that can be pledged or sold as collateral, the Firm recognizes the securities received at fair value within other assets and the obligation to return those securities within accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. The table below summarizes the gross and net amounts of the Firm’s securities financing agreements, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. When the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to a master netting agreement with a counterparty and where other relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP are met, the Firm nets, on the Consolidated balance sheets, the balances outstanding under its securities financing agreements with the same counterparty. In addition, the Firm exchanges securities and/or cash collateral with its counterparty to reduce the economic exposure with the counterparty, but such collateral is not eligible for net Consolidated balance sheet presentation. Where the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the counterparty master netting agreement, such The table below summarizes the gross and net amounts of the Firm’s securities financing agreements, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. When the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to a master netting agreement with a counterparty and where other relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP are met, the Firm nets, on the Consolidated balance sheets, the balances outstanding under its securities financing agreements with the same counterparty. In addition, the Firm exchanges securities and/or cash collateral with its counterparty to reduce the economic exposure with the counterparty, but such collateral is not eligible for net Consolidated balance sheet presentation. Where the Firm has obtained an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the counterparty master netting agreement, such collateral, along with securities financing balances that do not meet all these relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP, is presented in the table below as “Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets,” and reduces the “Net amounts” presented. Where a legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained, the securities financing balances are presented gross in the “Net amounts” below. In transactions where the Firm is acting as the lender in a securities-for-securities lending agreement and receives securities that can be pledged or sold as collateral, the Firm recognizes the securities received at fair value within other assets and the obligation to return those securities within accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. collateral, along with securities financing balances that do not meet all these relevant netting criteria under U.S. GAAP, is presented in the table below as “Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets,” and reduces the “Net amounts” presented. Where a legal opinion has not been either sought or obtained, the securities financing balances are presented gross in the “Net amounts” below. In transactions where the Firm is acting as the lender in a securities-for-securities lending agreement and receives securities that can be pledged or sold as collateral, the Firm recognizes the securities received at fair value within other assets and the obligation to return those securities within accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. December 31, 2024(in millions)Gross amountsAmounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheetsAmounts presented on the Consolidated balance sheetsAmounts notnettable on the Consolidatedbalance sheets(b)Net amounts(c)AssetsSecurities purchased under resale agreements$607,154 $(312,183)$294,971 $(282,220)$12,751 Securities borrowed267,917 (48,371)219,546 (170,702)48,844 LiabilitiesSecurities sold under repurchase agreements$603,683 $(312,183)$291,500 $(249,763)$41,737 Securities loaned and other(a)58,989 (48,371)10,618 (10,557)61 Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b) Net amounts(c) Assets Securities purchased under resale agreements Securities borrowed

Securities loaned and other(a) December 31, 2023(in millions)Gross amountsAmounts netted on the Consolidated balance sheetsAmounts presented on the Consolidated balance sheetsAmounts notnettable on the Consolidatedbalance sheets(b)Net amounts(c)AssetsSecurities purchased under resale agreements$523,308 $(247,181)$276,127 $(267,582)$8,545 Securities borrowed244,046 (43,610)200,436 (144,543)55,893 LiabilitiesSecurities sold under repurchase agreements$459,985 $(247,181)$212,804 $(182,011)$30,793 Securities loaned and other(a)52,142 (43,610)8,532 (8,501)31 Amounts not nettable on the Consolidated balance sheets(b) Net amounts(c) Assets Securities purchased under resale agreements Securities borrowed

Securities loaned and other(a) (a)Includes securities-for-securities lending agreements of $5.9 billion and $5.6 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, accounted for at fair value, where the Firm is acting as lender. (b)In some cases, collateral exchanged with a counterparty exceeds the net asset or liability balance with that counterparty. In such cases, the amounts reported in this column are limited to the related net asset or liability with that counterparty. (c)Includes securities financing agreements that provide collateral rights, but where an appropriate legal opinion with respect to the master netting agreement has not been either sought or obtained. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, included $8.7 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively, of securities purchased under resale agreements; $42.9 billion and $50.7 billion, respectively, of securities borrowed; $40.9 billion and $30.0 billion, respectively, of securities sold under repurchase agreements; and securities loaned and other which were not material. (c) JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K241 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K241 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K241 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 241

The tables below present as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 the types of financial assets pledged in securities financing agreements and the remaining contractual maturity of the securities financing agreements. Gross liability balance20242023December 31, (in millions)Securities sold under repurchase agreementsSecurities loaned and otherSecurities sold under repurchase agreementsSecurities loaned and otherMortgage-backed securities:U.S. GSEs and government agencies$82,645 $— $71,064 $— Residential - nonagency2,610 — 2,292 — Commercial - nonagency2,344 — 2,669 — U.S. Treasury, GSEs and government agencies300,022 759 216,467 1,034 Obligations of U.S. states and municipalities1,872 — 2,323 — Non-U.S. government debt117,614 1,852 97,400 1,455 Corporate debt securities44,495 4,033 39,247 2,025 Asset-backed securities4,619 — 2,703 — Equity securities47,462 52,345 25,820 47,628 Total$603,683 $58,989 $459,985 $52,142 Total Remaining contractual maturity of the agreementsDecember 31, 2024(in millions)Overnight and continuousUp to 30 days30 – 90 daysGreater than 90 daysTotalTotal securities sold under repurchase agreements$308,392 $171,346 $19,932 $104,013 $603,683 Total securities loaned and other54,066 1,463 1 3,459 58,989

Remaining contractual maturity of the agreementsDecember 31, 2023(in millions)Overnight and continuousUp to 30 days30 – 90 daysGreater than 90 daysTotalTotal securities sold under repurchase agreements$259,048 $102,941 $20,960 $77,036 $459,985 Total securities loaned and other49,610 1,544 — 988 52,142

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm held $805 million and $505 million, respectively, of financial assets for which the rights have been transferred to third parties; however, the transfers did not qualify as a sale in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These transfers have been recognized as collateralized financing transactions. The transferred assets are recorded in trading assets and loans, and the corresponding liabilities are recorded primarily in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the Consolidated balance sheets. 242JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 242JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 242JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 242 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Loan accounting frameworkThe accounting for a loan depends on management’s strategy for the loan. The Firm accounts for loans based on the following categories:•Originated or purchased loans held-for-investment (i.e., “retained”)•Loans held-for-sale•Loans at fair valueThe following provides a detailed accounting discussion of the Firm’s loans by category:Loans held-for-investmentOriginated or purchased loans held-for-investment, including PCD, are recorded at amortized cost, reflecting the principal amount outstanding, net of the following: unamortized deferred loan fees, costs, premiums or discounts; charge-offs; collection of cash; and foreign exchange. Credit card loans also include billed finance charges and fees.Interest incomeInterest income on performing loans held-for-investment is accrued and recognized as interest income at the contractual rate of interest. Purchase price discounts or premiums, as well as net deferred loan fees or costs, are recognized in interest income over the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment of yield.The Firm classifies accrued interest on loans, including accrued but unbilled interest on credit card loans, in accrued interest and accounts receivables on the Consolidated balance sheets. For credit card loans, accrued interest once billed is then recognized in the loan balances, with the related allowance recorded in the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the allowance for credit losses on accrued interest on credit card loans are recognized in the provision for credit losses and charge-offs are recognized by reversing interest income. For other loans, the Firm generally does not recognize an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivables, consistent with its policy to write them off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income. Nonaccrual loans Nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest has been suspended. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status and considered nonperforming when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. A loan is determined to be past due when the minimum payment is not received from the borrower by the contractually specified due date or for certain loans (e.g., residential real estate loans), when a monthly payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. Finally, collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status. On the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income. In addition, the amortization of deferred amounts is suspended. Interest income on nonaccrual loans may be recognized as cash interest payments are received (i.e., on a cash basis) if the recorded loan balance is deemed fully collectible; however, if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectibility of the recorded loan balance, all interest cash receipts are applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan (the cost recovery method). For consumer loans, application of this policy typically results in the Firm recognizing interest income on nonaccrual consumer loans on a cash basis.A loan may be returned to accrual status when repayment is reasonably assured and there has been demonstrated performance under the terms of the loan or, if applicable, the terms of the restructured loan. As permitted by regulatory guidance, credit card loans are generally exempt from being placed on nonaccrual status; accordingly, interest and fees related to credit card loans continue to accrue until the loan is charged off or paid in full. Allowance for loan losses The allowance for loan losses represents the estimated expected credit losses in the held-for-investment loan portfolio at the balance sheet date and is recognized on the balance sheet as a contra asset, which brings the amortized cost to the net carrying value. Changes in the allowance for loan losses resulting from lending-related activity, macroeconomic variables, changes in credit and other inputs are recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 13 for further information on the Firm’s accounting policies for the allowance for loan losses. Charge-offs Consumer loans are generally charged off or charged down to the lower of the amortized cost or the net realizable value of the underlying collateral (i.e., fair value less estimated costs to sell), with an offset to the allowance for loan losses, upon reaching specified stages of delinquency in accordance with standards established by the FFIEC. Residential real estate loans, unmodified credit card loans and scored business banking loans are generally charged off no later than 180 days past due. Scored auto and closed-end consumer loans, including modified credit card Loan accounting frameworkThe accounting for a loan depends on management’s strategy for the loan. The Firm accounts for loans based on the following categories:•Originated or purchased loans held-for-investment (i.e., “retained”)•Loans held-for-sale•Loans at fair valueThe following provides a detailed accounting discussion of the Firm’s loans by category:Loans held-for-investmentOriginated or purchased loans held-for-investment, including PCD, are recorded at amortized cost, reflecting the principal amount outstanding, net of the following: unamortized deferred loan fees, costs, premiums or discounts; charge-offs; collection of cash; and foreign exchange. Credit card loans also include billed finance charges and fees.Interest incomeInterest income on performing loans held-for-investment is accrued and recognized as interest income at the contractual rate of interest. Purchase price discounts or premiums, as well as net deferred loan fees or costs, are recognized in interest income over the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment of yield.The Firm classifies accrued interest on loans, including accrued but unbilled interest on credit card loans, in accrued interest and accounts receivables on the Consolidated balance sheets. For credit card loans, accrued interest once billed is then recognized in the loan balances, with the related allowance recorded in the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the allowance for credit losses on accrued interest on credit card loans are recognized in the provision for credit losses and charge-offs are recognized by reversing interest income. For other loans, the Firm generally does not recognize an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivables, consistent with its policy to write them off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income. Nonaccrual loans Nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest has been suspended. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status and considered nonperforming when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. A loan is determined to be past due when the minimum payment is not received from

The accounting for a loan depends on management’s strategy for the loan. The Firm accounts for loans based on the following categories: •Originated or purchased loans held-for-investment (i.e., “retained”) •Loans held-for-sale •Loans at fair value The following provides a detailed accounting discussion of the Firm’s loans by category:

Originated or purchased loans held-for-investment, including PCD, are recorded at amortized cost, reflecting the principal amount outstanding, net of the following: unamortized deferred loan fees, costs, premiums or discounts; charge-offs; collection of cash; and foreign exchange. Credit card loans also include billed finance charges and fees. Interest income Interest income on performing loans held-for-investment is accrued and recognized as interest income at the contractual rate of interest. Purchase price discounts or premiums, as well as net deferred loan fees or costs, are recognized in interest income over the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment of yield. The Firm classifies accrued interest on loans, including accrued but unbilled interest on credit card loans, in accrued interest and accounts receivables on the Consolidated balance sheets. For credit card loans, accrued interest once billed is then recognized in the loan balances, with the related allowance recorded in the allowance for credit losses. Changes in the allowance for credit losses on accrued interest on credit card loans are recognized in the provision for credit losses and charge-offs are recognized by reversing interest income. For other loans, the Firm generally does not recognize an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivables, consistent with its policy to write them off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income. Nonaccrual loans Nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest has been suspended. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status and considered nonperforming when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. A loan is determined to be past due when the minimum payment is not received from the borrower by the contractually specified due date or for certain loans (e.g., residential real estate loans), when a monthly payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. Finally, collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status. On the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income. In addition, the amortization of deferred amounts is suspended. Interest income on nonaccrual loans may be recognized as cash interest payments are received (i.e., on a cash basis) if the recorded loan balance is deemed fully collectible; however, if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectibility of the recorded loan balance, all interest cash receipts are applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan (the cost recovery method). For consumer loans, application of this policy typically results in the Firm recognizing interest income on nonaccrual consumer loans on a cash basis.A loan may be returned to accrual status when repayment is reasonably assured and there has been demonstrated performance under the terms of the loan or, if applicable, the terms of the restructured loan. As permitted by regulatory guidance, credit card loans are generally exempt from being placed on nonaccrual status; accordingly, interest and fees related to credit card loans continue to accrue until the loan is charged off or paid in full. Allowance for loan losses The allowance for loan losses represents the estimated expected credit losses in the held-for-investment loan portfolio at the balance sheet date and is recognized on the balance sheet as a contra asset, which brings the amortized cost to the net carrying value. Changes in the allowance for loan losses resulting from lending-related activity, macroeconomic variables, changes in credit and other inputs are recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 13 for further information on the Firm’s accounting policies for the allowance for loan losses. Charge-offs Consumer loans are generally charged off or charged down to the lower of the amortized cost or the net realizable value of the underlying collateral (i.e., fair value less estimated costs to sell), with an offset to the allowance for loan losses, upon reaching specified stages of delinquency in accordance with standards established by the FFIEC. Residential real estate loans, unmodified credit card loans and scored business banking loans are generally charged off no later than 180 days past due. Scored auto and closed-end consumer loans, including modified credit card the borrower by the contractually specified due date or for certain loans (e.g., residential real estate loans), when a monthly payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. Finally, collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status. On the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income. In addition, the amortization of deferred amounts is suspended. Interest income on nonaccrual loans may be recognized as cash interest payments are received (i.e., on a cash basis) if the recorded loan balance is deemed fully collectible; however, if there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectibility of the recorded loan balance, all interest cash receipts are applied to reduce the carrying value of the loan (the cost recovery method). For consumer loans, application of this policy typically results in the Firm recognizing interest income on nonaccrual consumer loans on a cash basis. A loan may be returned to accrual status when repayment is reasonably assured and there has been demonstrated performance under the terms of the loan or, if applicable, the terms of the restructured loan. As permitted by regulatory guidance, credit card loans are generally exempt from being placed on nonaccrual status; accordingly, interest and fees related to credit card loans continue to accrue until the loan is charged off or paid in full. Allowance for loan losses The allowance for loan losses represents the estimated expected credit losses in the held-for-investment loan portfolio at the balance sheet date and is recognized on the balance sheet as a contra asset, which brings the amortized cost to the net carrying value. Changes in the allowance for loan losses resulting from lending-related activity, macroeconomic variables, changes in credit and other inputs are recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Firm’s Consolidated statements of income. Refer to Note 13 for further information on the Firm’s accounting policies for the allowance for loan losses. Charge-offs Consumer loans are generally charged off or charged down to the lower of the amortized cost or the net realizable value of the underlying collateral (i.e., fair value less estimated costs to sell), with an offset to the allowance for loan losses, upon reaching specified stages of delinquency in accordance with standards established by the FFIEC. Residential real estate loans, unmodified credit card loans and scored business banking loans are generally charged off no later than 180 days past due. Scored auto and closed-end consumer loans, including modified credit card JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K243 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K243 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K243 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 243

accounts placed on a fixed payment plan, are charged off no later than 120 days past due. Certain consumer loans are charged off or charged down to their net realizable value earlier than the FFIEC charge-off standards in the following circumstances: •Loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that are determined to be collateral-dependent. •Loans to borrowers who have experienced an event that suggests a loss is either known or highly certain are subject to accelerated charge-off standards (e.g., residential real estate and auto loans are charged off or charged down within 60 days of receiving notification of a bankruptcy filing). •Auto loans upon repossession of the automobile. Other than in certain limited circumstances, the Firm typically does not recognize charge-offs on the government-guaranteed portion of loans. Wholesale loans are charged off when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized. The determination of whether to recognize a charge-off includes many factors, including the prioritization of the Firm’s claim in bankruptcy, expectations of the workout/restructuring of the loan and valuation of the borrower’s equity or the loan collateral. When a loan is charged down to the lower of its amortized cost or the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, the determination of the fair value of the collateral depends on the type of collateral (e.g., securities, real estate). In cases where the collateral is in the form of liquid securities, the fair value is based on quoted market prices or broker quotes. For illiquid securities or other financial assets, the fair value of the collateral is generally estimated using a discounted cash flow model. For residential real estate loans, collateral values are based upon external valuation sources. When it becomes likely that a borrower is either unable or unwilling to pay, the Firm utilizes a broker’s price opinion, appraisal and/or an automated valuation model of the home based on an exterior-only valuation (“exterior opinions”), which is then updated at least every 12 months, or more frequently depending on various market factors. As soon as practicable after the Firm receives the property in satisfaction of a debt (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession), the Firm generally obtains an appraisal based on an inspection that includes the interior of the home (“interior appraisals”). Exterior opinions and interior appraisals are discounted based upon the Firm’s experience with actual liquidation values as compared with the estimated values provided by exterior opinions and interior appraisals, considering state-specific factors. For commercial real estate loans, collateral values are generally based on appraisals from internal and external valuation sources. Collateral values are typically updated every six to twelve months, either by obtaining a new appraisal or by performing an internal analysis, in accordance with the Firm’s policies. The Firm also considers both borrower- and market-specific factors, which may result in obtaining appraisal updates or broker price opinions at more frequent intervals.Loans held-for-sale Loans held-for-sale are measured at the lower of cost or fair value, with valuation changes recorded in noninterest revenue. For consumer loans, the valuation is performed on a portfolio basis. For wholesale loans, the valuation is performed on an individual loan basis. Interest income on loans held-for-sale is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Loan origination fees or costs and purchase price discounts or premiums are deferred in a contra loan account until the related loan is sold. The deferred fees or costs and discounts or premiums are an adjustment to the basis of the loan and therefore are included in the periodic determination of the lower of cost or fair value adjustments and/or the gain or loss recognized at the time of sale. Because these loans are recognized at the lower of cost or fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans held-for-sale are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual policies. Loans at fair value Loans for which the fair value option has been elected are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue. Interest income on these loans is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Changes in fair value are recognized in noninterest revenue. Loan origination fees are recognized upfront in noninterest revenue. Loan origination costs are recognized in the associated expense category as incurred. Because these loans are recognized at fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans at fair value are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual policies. Refer to Note 3 for further information on the Firm’s elections of fair value accounting under the fair value option. Refer to Note 2 and Note 3 for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets. accounts placed on a fixed payment plan, are charged off no later than 120 days past due. Certain consumer loans are charged off or charged down to their net realizable value earlier than the FFIEC charge-off standards in the following circumstances: •Loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that are determined to be collateral-dependent. •Loans to borrowers who have experienced an event that suggests a loss is either known or highly certain are subject to accelerated charge-off standards (e.g., residential real estate and auto loans are charged off or charged down within 60 days of receiving notification of a bankruptcy filing). •Auto loans upon repossession of the automobile. Other than in certain limited circumstances, the Firm typically does not recognize charge-offs on the government-guaranteed portion of loans. Wholesale loans are charged off when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized. The determination of whether to recognize a charge-off includes many factors, including the prioritization of the Firm’s claim in bankruptcy, expectations of the workout/restructuring of the loan and valuation of the borrower’s equity or the loan collateral. When a loan is charged down to the lower of its amortized cost or the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, the determination of the fair value of the collateral depends on the type of collateral (e.g., securities, real estate). In cases where the collateral is in the form of liquid securities, the fair value is based on quoted market prices or broker quotes. For illiquid securities or other financial assets, the fair value of the collateral is generally estimated using a discounted cash flow model. For residential real estate loans, collateral values are based upon external valuation sources. When it becomes likely that a borrower is either unable or unwilling to pay, the Firm utilizes a broker’s price opinion, appraisal and/or an automated valuation model of the home based on an exterior-only valuation (“exterior opinions”), which is then updated at least every 12 months, or more frequently depending on various market factors. As soon as practicable after the Firm receives the property in satisfaction of a debt (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession), the Firm generally obtains an appraisal based on an inspection that includes the interior of the home (“interior appraisals”). Exterior opinions and interior appraisals are discounted based upon the Firm’s experience with actual liquidation values as compared with the estimated values provided by exterior opinions and interior appraisals, considering state-specific factors. accounts placed on a fixed payment plan, are charged off no later than 120 days past due. Certain consumer loans are charged off or charged down to their net realizable value earlier than the FFIEC charge-off standards in the following circumstances: •Loans modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that are determined to be collateral-dependent. •Loans to borrowers who have experienced an event that suggests a loss is either known or highly certain are subject to accelerated charge-off standards (e.g., residential real estate and auto loans are charged off or charged down within 60 days of receiving notification of a bankruptcy filing). •Auto loans upon repossession of the automobile. Other than in certain limited circumstances, the Firm typically does not recognize charge-offs on the government-guaranteed portion of loans. Wholesale loans are charged off when it is highly certain that a loss has been realized. The determination of whether to recognize a charge-off includes many factors, including the prioritization of the Firm’s claim in bankruptcy, expectations of the workout/restructuring of the loan and valuation of the borrower’s equity or the loan collateral. When a loan is charged down to the lower of its amortized cost or the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, the determination of the fair value of the collateral depends on the type of collateral (e.g., securities, real estate). In cases where the collateral is in the form of liquid securities, the fair value is based on quoted market prices or broker quotes. For illiquid securities or other financial assets, the fair value of the collateral is generally estimated using a discounted cash flow model. For residential real estate loans, collateral values are based upon external valuation sources. When it becomes likely that a borrower is either unable or unwilling to pay, the Firm utilizes a broker’s price opinion, appraisal and/or an automated valuation model of the home based on an exterior-only valuation (“exterior opinions”), which is then updated at least every 12 months, or more frequently depending on various market factors. As soon as practicable after the Firm receives the property in satisfaction of a debt (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession), the Firm generally obtains an appraisal based on an inspection that includes the interior of the home (“interior appraisals”). Exterior opinions and interior appraisals are discounted based upon the Firm’s experience with actual liquidation values as compared with the estimated values provided by exterior opinions and interior appraisals, considering state-specific factors. For commercial real estate loans, collateral values are generally based on appraisals from internal and external valuation sources. Collateral values are typically updated every six to twelve months, either by obtaining a new appraisal or by performing an internal analysis, in accordance with the Firm’s policies. The Firm also considers both borrower- and market-specific factors, which may result in obtaining appraisal updates or broker price opinions at more frequent intervals.Loans held-for-sale Loans held-for-sale are measured at the lower of cost or fair value, with valuation changes recorded in noninterest revenue. For consumer loans, the valuation is performed on a portfolio basis. For wholesale loans, the valuation is performed on an individual loan basis. Interest income on loans held-for-sale is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Loan origination fees or costs and purchase price discounts or premiums are deferred in a contra loan account until the related loan is sold. The deferred fees or costs and discounts or premiums are an adjustment to the basis of the loan and therefore are included in the periodic determination of the lower of cost or fair value adjustments and/or the gain or loss recognized at the time of sale. Because these loans are recognized at the lower of cost or fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans held-for-sale are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual policies. Loans at fair value Loans for which the fair value option has been elected are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue. Interest income on these loans is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Changes in fair value are recognized in noninterest revenue. Loan origination fees are recognized upfront in noninterest revenue. Loan origination costs are recognized in the associated expense category as incurred. Because these loans are recognized at fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans at fair value are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual policies. Refer to Note 3 for further information on the Firm’s elections of fair value accounting under the fair value option. Refer to Note 2 and Note 3 for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets. For commercial real estate loans, collateral values are generally based on appraisals from internal and external valuation sources. Collateral values are typically updated every six to twelve months, either by obtaining a new appraisal or by performing an internal analysis, in accordance with the Firm’s policies. The Firm also considers both borrower- and market-specific factors, which may result in obtaining appraisal updates or broker price opinions at more frequent intervals. six

Loans held-for-sale are measured at the lower of cost or fair value, with valuation changes recorded in noninterest revenue. For consumer loans, the valuation is performed on a portfolio basis. For wholesale loans, the valuation is performed on an individual loan basis. Interest income on loans held-for-sale is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Loan origination fees or costs and purchase price discounts or premiums are deferred in a contra loan account until the related loan is sold. The deferred fees or costs and discounts or premiums are an adjustment to the basis of the loan and therefore are included in the periodic determination of the lower of cost or fair value adjustments and/or the gain or loss recognized at the time of sale. Because these loans are recognized at the lower of cost or fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans held-for-sale are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual policies.

Loans for which the fair value option has been elected are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue. Interest income on these loans is accrued and recognized based on the contractual rate of interest. Changes in fair value are recognized in noninterest revenue. Loan origination fees are recognized upfront in noninterest revenue. Loan origination costs are recognized in the associated expense category as incurred. Because these loans are recognized at fair value, the Firm’s allowance for loan losses and charge-off policies do not apply to these loans. However, loans at fair value are subject to the Firm’s nonaccrual policies. Refer to Note 3 for further information on the Firm’s elections of fair value accounting under the fair value option. Refer to Note 2 and Note 3 for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as trading assets. 244JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 244JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 244JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 244 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Loan classification changes Loans in the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer. Credit-related losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses; non-credit related losses such as those due to changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates are recognized in noninterest revenue. In the event that management decides to retain a loan in the held-for-sale portfolio, the loan is transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at amortized cost on the date of transfer. These loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the Firm’s allowance methodology. Refer to Note 13 for a further discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the Firm’s allowance for loan losses. Loan modifications The Firm seeks to modify certain loans in conjunction with its loss mitigation activities. Through the modification, JPMorganChase grants one or more concessions to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty in order to minimize the Firm’s economic loss and avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral, and to ultimately maximize payments received by the Firm from the borrower. The concessions granted vary by program and by borrower-specific characteristics, and may include interest rate reductions, term extensions, other-than-insignificant payment delays or principal forgiveness. Loans, except for credit card loans, reported as FDMs are generally placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already on nonaccrual status prior to modification. These loans may be returned to performing status (the accrual of interest is resumed) if the following criteria are met: (i) the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a minimum of six months and/or six payments, and (ii) the Firm has an expectation that repayment of the modified loan is reasonably assured based on, for example, the borrower’s debt capacity and level of future earnings, collateral values, LTV ratios, and other current market considerations. In certain limited and well-defined circumstances in which the loan is current at the modification date, such loans are not placed on nonaccrual status at the time of modification. The allowance for credit losses associated with FDMs is measured using the Firm’s established allowance methodology, which considers the expected default rates for the modified loans. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion. Foreclosed property The Firm acquires property from borrowers through loan restructurings, workouts, and foreclosures. Property acquired may include real property (e.g., residential real estate, land, and buildings) and other commercial and personal property (e.g., automobiles, aircraft, railcars, and ships). The Firm recognizes foreclosed property upon receiving assets in satisfaction of a loan (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession). For loans collateralized by real property, the Firm generally recognizes the asset received at foreclosure sale or upon the execution of a deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction with the borrower. Foreclosed assets are reported in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets and initially recognized at fair value less estimated costs to sell. Each quarter the fair value of the acquired property is reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, to the lower of cost or fair value. Subsequent adjustments to fair value are charged/credited to noninterest revenue. Operating expense, such as real estate taxes and maintenance, are charged to other expense. Loan classification changes Loans in the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer. Credit-related losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses; non-credit related losses such as those due to changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates are recognized in noninterest revenue. In the event that management decides to retain a loan in the held-for-sale portfolio, the loan is transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at amortized cost on the date of transfer. These loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the Firm’s allowance methodology. Refer to Note 13 for a further discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the Firm’s allowance for loan losses. Loan modifications The Firm seeks to modify certain loans in conjunction with its loss mitigation activities. Through the modification, JPMorganChase grants one or more concessions to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty in order to minimize the Firm’s economic loss and avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral, and to ultimately maximize payments received by the Firm from the borrower. The concessions granted vary by program and by borrower-specific characteristics, and may include interest rate reductions, term extensions, other-than-insignificant payment delays or principal forgiveness. Loans, except for credit card loans, reported as FDMs are generally placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already on nonaccrual status prior to modification. These loans may be returned to performing status (the accrual of interest is resumed) if the following criteria are met: (i) the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a minimum of six months and/or six payments, and (ii) the Firm has an expectation that repayment of the modified loan is reasonably assured based on, for example, the borrower’s debt capacity and level of future earnings, collateral values, LTV ratios, and other current market considerations. In certain limited and well-defined circumstances in which the loan is current at the modification date, such loans are not placed on nonaccrual status at the time of modification. The allowance for credit losses associated with FDMs is measured using the Firm’s established allowance methodology, which considers the expected default rates for the modified loans. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion.

Loans in the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to the held-for-sale portfolio at the lower of cost or fair value on the date of transfer. Credit-related losses are charged against the allowance for loan losses; non-credit related losses such as those due to changes in interest rates or foreign currency exchange rates are recognized in noninterest revenue. In the event that management decides to retain a loan in the held-for-sale portfolio, the loan is transferred to the held-for-investment portfolio at amortized cost on the date of transfer. These loans are subsequently assessed for impairment based on the Firm’s allowance methodology. Refer to Note 13 for a further discussion of the methodologies used in establishing the Firm’s allowance for loan losses.

The Firm seeks to modify certain loans in conjunction with its loss mitigation activities. Through the modification, JPMorganChase grants one or more concessions to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulty in order to minimize the Firm’s economic loss and avoid foreclosure or repossession of the collateral, and to ultimately maximize payments received by the Firm from the borrower. The concessions granted vary by program and by borrower-specific characteristics, and may include interest rate reductions, term extensions, other-than-insignificant payment delays or principal forgiveness. Loans, except for credit card loans, reported as FDMs are generally placed on nonaccrual status, although in many cases such loans were already on nonaccrual status prior to modification. These loans may be returned to performing status (the accrual of interest is resumed) if the following criteria are met: (i) the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a minimum of six months and/or six payments, and (ii) the Firm has an expectation that repayment of the modified loan is reasonably assured based on, for example, the borrower’s debt capacity and level of future earnings, collateral values, LTV ratios, and other current market considerations. In certain limited and well-defined circumstances in which the loan is current at the modification date, such loans are not placed on nonaccrual status at the time of modification. The allowance for credit losses associated with FDMs is measured using the Firm’s established allowance methodology, which considers the expected default rates for the modified loans. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion. Foreclosed property The Firm acquires property from borrowers through loan restructurings, workouts, and foreclosures. Property acquired may include real property (e.g., residential real estate, land, and buildings) and other commercial and personal property (e.g., automobiles, aircraft, railcars, and ships). The Firm recognizes foreclosed property upon receiving assets in satisfaction of a loan (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession). For loans collateralized by real property, the Firm generally recognizes the asset received at foreclosure sale or upon the execution of a deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction with the borrower. Foreclosed assets are reported in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets and initially recognized at fair value less estimated costs to sell. Each quarter the fair value of the acquired property is reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, to the lower of cost or fair value. Subsequent adjustments to fair value are charged/credited to noninterest revenue. Operating expense, such as real estate taxes and maintenance, are charged to other expense.

The Firm acquires property from borrowers through loan restructurings, workouts, and foreclosures. Property acquired may include real property (e.g., residential real estate, land, and buildings) and other commercial and personal property (e.g., automobiles, aircraft, railcars, and ships). The Firm recognizes foreclosed property upon receiving assets in satisfaction of a loan (e.g., by taking legal title or physical possession). For loans collateralized by real property, the Firm generally recognizes the asset received at foreclosure sale or upon the execution of a deed in lieu of foreclosure transaction with the borrower. Foreclosed assets are reported in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets and initially recognized at fair value less estimated costs to sell. Each quarter the fair value of the acquired property is reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, to the lower of cost or fair value. Subsequent adjustments to fair value are charged/credited to noninterest revenue. Operating expense, such as real estate taxes and maintenance, are charged to other expense. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K245 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K245 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K245 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 245

The Firm’s loan portfolio is divided into three portfolio segments, which are the same segments used by the Firm to determine the allowance for loan losses: Consumer, excluding credit card; Credit card; and Wholesale. Within each portfolio segment the Firm monitors and assesses the credit risk in the following classes of loans, based on the risk characteristics of each loan class. Consumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesale(c)(d)• Residential real estate(a)• Auto and other(b)• Credit card loans• Secured by real estate• Commercial and industrial• Other(e)

Wholesale(c)(d) • Residential real estate(a) • Auto and other(b) • Secured by real estate • Commercial and industrial • Other(e) (a)Includes scored mortgage and home equity loans held in CCB and AWM, and scored mortgage loans held in CIB. (b)Includes scored auto, business banking and consumer unsecured loans as well as overdrafts, primarily in CCB. (c)Includes loans held in CIB, AWM, Corporate, and risk-rated exposure held in CCB, for which the wholesale methodology is applied when determining the allowance for loan losses. (d)The wholesale portfolio segment's classes align with loan classifications as defined by the bank regulatory agencies, based on the loan's collateral, purpose, and type of borrower. (e)Includes loans to financial institutions, SPEs, personal investment companies and trusts, individuals and individual entities (predominantly Global Private Bank clients within AWM and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management within CCB), states and political subdivisions, as well as loans to nonprofits. Refer to Note 14 for more information on SPEs. The following tables summarize the Firm’s loan balances by portfolio segment. December 31, 2024Consumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotal(a)(b)(in millions)Retained$376,334 $232,860 $690,396 $1,299,590 Held-for-sale945 — 6,103 7,048 At fair value15,531 — 25,819 41,350 Total$392,810 $232,860 $722,318 $1,347,988 December 31, 2023Consumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotal(a)(b)(in millions)Retained$397,275 $211,123 $672,472 $1,280,870 Held-for-sale487 — 3,498 3,985 At fair value12,331 — 26,520 38,851 Total$410,093 $211,123 $702,490 $1,323,706 Total(a)(b) Total(a)(b) (a)Excludes $6.6 billion and $6.8 billion of accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm wrote off accrued interest receivable of $84 million and $49 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (b)Loans (other than those for which the fair value option has been elected) are presented net of unamortized discounts and premiums and net deferred loan fees or costs. These amounts were not material as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. For the discount associated with First Republic loans, refer to Note 34 on pages 319–321. The following tables provide information about the carrying value of retained loans purchased, sold and reclassified to held-for-sale during the periods indicated. Loans that were reclassified to held-for-sale and sold in a subsequent period are excluded from the sales line of these tables. 2024Year ended December 31,(in millions)Consumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotalPurchases$647 (b)(c)$— $1,432 $2,079 Sales10,440 — 45,147 55,587 Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale(a)1,656 — 749 2,405 (b)(c) Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale(a) 2023Year ended December 31,(in millions)Consumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotalPurchases$92,205 (b)(c)(d)$— $60,300 (d)$152,505 Sales2,202 — 43,949 46,151 Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale(a)274 — 1,486 1,760 (b)(c)(d) (d) Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale(a) 246JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 246JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 246JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 246 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 2022Year ended December 31,(in millions)Consumer, excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotalPurchases$1,625 (b)(c)$— $1,088 $2,713 Sales2,884 — 41,934 44,818 Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale(a)229 — 1,055 1,284 (b)(c) Retained loans reclassified to held-for-sale(a) (a)Reclassifications of loans to held-for-sale are non-cash transactions. (b)Includes purchases of residential real estate loans, including the Firm’s voluntary repurchases of certain delinquent loans from loan pools as permitted by Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) guidelines for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. The Firm typically elects to repurchase these delinquent loans as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with applicable requirements of Ginnie Mae, FHA, RHS, and/or VA. (c)Excludes purchases of retained loans of $902 million, $5.1 billion and $12.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, which are predominantly sourced through the correspondent origination channel and underwritten in accordance with the Firm’s standards. (d)Includes loans acquired in the First Republic acquisition consisting of $91.9 billion in Consumer, excluding credit card and $59.2 billion in Wholesale. Refer to Note 34 for additional information.

Net gains/(losses) on sales of loans and lending-related commitments (including adjustments to record loans and lending-related commitments held-for-sale at the lower of cost or fair value) recognized in noninterest revenue were $154 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, of which $113 million were related to loans. Net gains/(losses) on sales of loans and lending-related commitments were $56 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, of which $62 million were related to loans. Net gains/(losses) on sales of loans and lending-related commitments were $(186) million for the year ended December 31, 2022, of which $(48) million were related to loans. In addition, the sale of loans may also result in write downs, recoveries or changes in the allowance recognized in the provision for credit losses. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K247 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K247 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K247 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 247

Consumer loans, excluding credit card loans, consist primarily of scored residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, auto and business banking loans, with a focus on serving the prime consumer credit market. These loans include home equity loans secured by junior liens, prime mortgage loans with an interest-only payment period, and certain payment-option loans that may result in negative amortization. The following table provides information about retained consumer loans, excluding credit card, by class. December 31, (in millions)20242023Residential real estate$309,513 $326,409 Auto and other66,821 70,866 Total retained loans$376,334 $397,275 Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicator for consumer loans. Loans that are more than 30 days past due provide an early warning of borrowers who may be experiencing financial difficulties and/or who may be unable or unwilling to repay the loan. As the loan continues to age, it becomes more clear whether the borrower is likely to be unable or unwilling to pay. In the case of residential real estate loans, late-stage delinquencies (greater than 150 days past due) are a strong indicator of loans that will ultimately result in a foreclosure or similar liquidation transaction. In addition to delinquency rates, other credit quality indicators for consumer loans vary based on the class of loan, as follows: •For residential real estate loans, the current estimated LTV ratio, or the combined LTV ratio in the case of junior lien loans, is an indicator of the potential loss severity in the event of default. Additionally, LTV or combined LTV ratios can provide insight into a borrower’s continued willingness to pay, as the delinquency rate of high-LTV loans tends to be greater than that for loans where the borrower has equity in the collateral. The geographic distribution of the loan collateral also provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio, as factors such as the regional economy, home price changes and specific events such as natural disasters, will affect credit quality. The borrower’s current or “refreshed” FICO score is a secondary credit quality indicator for certain loans, as FICO scores are an indication of the borrower’s credit payment history. Thus, a loan to a borrower with a low FICO score (less than 660) is considered to be of higher risk than a loan to a borrower with a higher FICO score. Further, a loan to a borrower with a high LTV ratio and a low FICO score is at greater risk of default than a loan to a borrower that has both a high LTV ratio and a high FICO score.•For scored auto and business banking loans, geographic distribution is an indicator of the credit performance of the portfolio. Similar to residential real estate loans, geographic distribution provides insights into the portfolio performance based on regional economic activity and events. Consumer loans, excluding credit card loans, consist primarily of scored residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, auto and business banking loans, with a focus on serving the prime consumer credit market. These loans include home equity loans secured by junior liens, prime mortgage loans with an interest-only payment period, and certain payment-option loans that may result in negative amortization. The following table provides information about retained consumer loans, excluding credit card, by class. December 31, (in millions)20242023Residential real estate$309,513 $326,409 Auto and other66,821 70,866 Total retained loans$376,334 $397,275 Consumer loans, excluding credit card loans, consist primarily of scored residential mortgages, home equity loans and lines of credit, auto and business banking loans, with a focus on serving the prime consumer credit market. These loans include home equity loans secured by junior liens, prime mortgage loans with an interest-only payment period, and certain payment-option loans that may result in negative amortization. The following table provides information about retained consumer loans, excluding credit card, by class. December 31, (in millions)20242023Residential real estate$309,513 $326,409 Auto and other66,821 70,866 Total retained loans$376,334 $397,275 December 31, (in millions) Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicator for consumer loans. Loans that are more than 30 days past due provide an early warning of borrowers who may be experiencing financial difficulties and/or who may be unable or unwilling to repay the loan. As the loan continues to age, it becomes more clear whether the borrower is likely to be unable or unwilling to pay. In the case of residential real estate loans, late-stage delinquencies (greater than 150 days past due) are a strong indicator of loans that will ultimately result in a foreclosure or similar liquidation transaction. In addition to delinquency rates, other credit quality indicators for consumer loans vary based on the class of loan, as follows: •For residential real estate loans, the current estimated LTV ratio, or the combined LTV ratio in the case of junior lien loans, is an indicator of the potential loss severity in the event of default. Additionally, LTV or combined LTV ratios can provide insight into a borrower’s continued willingness to pay, as the delinquency rate of high-LTV loans tends to be greater than that for loans where the borrower has equity in the collateral. The geographic distribution of the loan collateral also provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio, as factors such as the regional economy, home price changes and specific events such as natural disasters, will affect credit quality. The borrower’s current or “refreshed” FICO score is a secondary credit quality indicator for certain loans, as FICO scores are an indication of the borrower’s credit payment history. Thus, a loan to a borrower with a low FICO score (less than 660) is considered to be of higher risk than a loan to a borrower with a higher FICO score. Further, a loan to a borrower with a high LTV ratio and a low FICO score is at greater risk of default than a loan to a borrower that has both a high LTV ratio and a high FICO score.•For scored auto and business banking loans, geographic distribution is an indicator of the credit performance of the portfolio. Similar to residential real estate loans, geographic distribution provides insights into the portfolio performance based on regional economic activity and events. Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicator for consumer loans. Loans that are more than 30 days past due provide an early warning of borrowers who may be experiencing financial difficulties and/or who may be unable or unwilling to repay the loan. As the loan continues to age, it becomes more clear whether the borrower is likely to be unable or unwilling to pay. In the case of residential real estate loans, late-stage delinquencies (greater than 150 days past due) are a strong indicator of loans that will ultimately result in a foreclosure or similar liquidation transaction. In addition to delinquency rates, other credit quality indicators for consumer loans vary based on the class of loan, as follows: •For residential real estate loans, the current estimated LTV ratio, or the combined LTV ratio in the case of junior lien loans, is an indicator of the potential loss severity in the event of default. Additionally, LTV or combined LTV ratios can provide insight into a borrower’s continued willingness to pay, as the delinquency rate of high-LTV loans tends to be greater than that for loans where the borrower has equity in the collateral. The geographic distribution of the loan collateral also provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio, as factors such as the regional economy, home price changes and specific events such as natural disasters, will affect credit quality. The borrower’s current or “refreshed” FICO score is a secondary credit quality indicator for certain loans, as FICO scores are an indication of the borrower’s credit payment history. Thus, a loan to a borrower with a low FICO score (less than 660) is considered to be of higher risk than a loan to a borrower with a higher FICO score. Further, a loan to a borrower with a high LTV ratio and a low FICO score is at greater risk of default than a loan to a borrower that has both a high LTV ratio and a high FICO score. •For scored auto and business banking loans, geographic distribution is an indicator of the credit performance of the portfolio. Similar to residential real estate loans, geographic distribution provides insights into the portfolio performance based on regional economic activity and events. 248JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 248JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 248JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 248 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Delinquency is the primary credit quality indicator for retained residential real estate loans. The following tables provide information on delinquency and gross charge-offs. (in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2024Term loans by origination year(c)Revolving loansTotal20242023202220212020Prior to 2020Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansLoan delinquency(a)Current$12,301 $17,280 $61,337 $79,760 $52,289 $70,270 $6,974 $7,088 $307,299 30–149 days past due13 54 139 110 59 747 53 204 1,379 150 or more days past due— 11 71 68 49 501 8 127 835 Total retained loans$12,314 $17,345 $61,547 $79,938 $52,397 $71,518 $7,035 $7,419 $309,513 % of 30+ days past due to total retained loans(b)0.11 %0.37 %0.34 %0.22 %0.21 %1.72 %0.87 %4.46 %0.71 %Gross charge-offs$— $— $1 $1 $— $176 $21 $7 $206 Term loans by origination year(c)

% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans(b) Gross charge-offs (in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2023Term loans by origination year(c)Revolving loansTotal20232022202120202019Prior to 2019Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansLoan delinquency(a)Current$23,216 $64,366 $84,496 $55,546 $21,530 $59,563 $7,479 $8,151 $324,347 30–149 days past due33 74 89 70 41 801 49 223 1,380 150 or more days past due1 10 17 8 21 456 5 164 682 Total retained loans$23,250 $64,450 $84,602 $55,624 $21,592 $60,820 $7,533 $8,538 $326,409 % of 30+ days past due to total retained loans(b)0.15 %0.13 %0.13 %0.14 %0.29 %2.04 %0.72 %4.53 %0.63 %Gross charge-offs$— $— $— $— $4 $167 $26 $7 $204 Term loans by origination year(c)

% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans(b) (a)Individual delinquency classifications include mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies which were not material at December 31, 2024 and 2023. (b)Excludes mortgage loans that are 30 or more days past due insured by U.S. government agencies which were not material at December 31, 2024 and 2023. These amounts have been excluded based upon the government guarantee. (c)Purchased loans are included in the year in which they were originated. Approximately 38% of the total revolving loans are senior lien loans; the remaining balance are junior lien loans. The lien position the Firm holds is considered in the Firm’s allowance for credit losses. Revolving loans that have been converted to term loans have higher delinquency rates than those that are still within the revolving period. That is primarily because the fully-amortizing payment that is generally required for those products is higher than the minimum payment options available for revolving loans within the revolving period. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K249 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K249 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K249 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 249

Nonaccrual loans and other credit quality indicators The following table provides information on nonaccrual and other credit quality indicators for retained residential real estate loans. (in millions, except weighted-average data)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Nonaccrual loans(a)(b)(c)(d)$2,984 $3,466 Current estimated LTV ratios(e)(f)(g)Greater than 125% and refreshed FICO scores:Equal to or greater than 660$72 $72 Less than 6603 — 101% to 125% and refreshed FICO scores:Equal to or greater than 660161 223 Less than 6605 4 80% to 100% and refreshed FICO scores:Equal to or greater than 6604,962 6,491 Less than 66073 102 Less than 80% and refreshed FICO scores:Equal to or greater than 660294,797 309,251 Less than 6608,534 9,277 No FICO/LTV available(h) 906 989 Total retained loans$309,513 $326,409 Weighted-average LTV ratio(e)(i)47 %49 %Weighted-average FICO(f)(i)774 770 Geographic region(h)(j) California$120,944 $127,072 New York46,854 48,815 Florida21,820 22,778 Texas14,531 15,506 Massachusetts13,511 14,213 Colorado10,465 10,800 Illinois9,835 10,856 Washington9,372 9,923 New Jersey7,554 8,050 Connecticut6,854 7,163 All other47,773 51,233 Total retained loans$309,513 $326,409 Nonaccrual loans(a)(b)(c)(d)

(a)Includes collateral-dependent residential real estate loans that are charged down to the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell. The Firm reports, in accordance with regulatory guidance, residential real estate loans that have been discharged under Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower (“Chapter 7 loans”) as collateral-dependent nonaccrual loans, regardless of their delinquency status. At December 31, 2024, approximately 8% of Chapter 7 residential real estate loans were 30 days or more past due. (b)Mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies excluded from nonaccrual loans were not material at December 31, 2024 and 2023. (c)Generally, all consumer nonaccrual loans have an allowance. In accordance with regulatory guidance, certain nonaccrual loans that are considered collateral-dependent have been charged down to the lower of amortized cost or the fair value of their underlying collateral less costs to sell. If the value of the underlying collateral improves subsequent to charge down, the related allowance may be negative. (d)Interest income on nonaccrual loans recognized on a cash basis was $160 million and $180 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (e)Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. (f)Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm on at least a quarterly basis. (g)Includes residential real estate loans, primarily held in LLCs in AWM that did not have a refreshed FICO score. These loans have been included in a FICO band based on management’s estimation of the borrower’s credit quality. (h)Included U.S. government-guaranteed loans as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. (i)Excludes loans with no FICO and/or LTV data available. (j)The geographic regions presented in the table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at December 31, 2024. 250JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 250JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 250JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 250 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Loan modifications The Firm grants certain modifications of residential real estate loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. The Firm's proprietary modification programs as well as government programs, including U.S. GSE programs, that generally provide various modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term extensions, other-than-insignificant payment deferral and principal forgiveness that would otherwise have been required under the terms of the original agreement, are considered FDMs. In addition, the Firm offers trial modifications of residential real estate loans, which generally include a three-month trial payment period during which the borrower makes monthly payments under the proposed modified loan terms. Loans in a trial payment period continue to age and accrue interest in accordance with the original contractual terms. At the completion of a trial period, the loan modification is considered permanent.Financial effects of FDMsFor the year ended December 31, 2024, retained residential real estate FDMs were $206 million. The financial effects of the FDMs, which were predominantly in the form of term extensions and interest rate reductions, included extending the weighted-average life of the loans by 15 years, and reducing the weighted-average contractual interest rate from 7.53% to 5.44% for the year ended December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2023, retained residential real estate FDMs were $136 million. The financial effects of the FDMs, which were predominantly in the form of term extensions and interest rate reductions, included extending the weighted-average life of the loans by 20 years, and reducing the weighted-average contractual interest rate from 7.21% to 4.44% for the year ended December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty whose loans have been modified as FDMs.For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, loans subject to a trial modification, where the terms of the loans have not been permanently modified, and Chapter 7 loans were not material.Payment status of FDMsThe following table provides information on the payment status of retained residential real estate FDMs during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.Year ended December 31,(in millions)Amortized cost basis20242023Current$139 $107 30-149 days past due47 13 150 or more days past due20 16 Total $206 $136 Defaults of FDMsRetained residential real estate FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2024 and that were reported as FDMs in the twelve months prior to the default were $93 million. Retained residential real estate FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2023 and that were reported as FDMs on or after January 1, 2023, the date that the Firm adopted the changes to the TDR accounting guidance were not material. Refer to Note 1 for further information. Loan modifications The Firm grants certain modifications of residential real estate loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. The Firm's proprietary modification programs as well as government programs, including U.S. GSE programs, that generally provide various modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term extensions, other-than-insignificant payment deferral and principal forgiveness that would otherwise have been required under the terms of the original agreement, are considered FDMs. In addition, the Firm offers trial modifications of residential real estate loans, which generally include a three-month trial payment period during which the borrower makes monthly payments under the proposed modified loan terms. Loans in a trial payment period continue to age and accrue interest in accordance with the original contractual terms. At the completion of a trial period, the loan modification is considered permanent.Financial effects of FDMsFor the year ended December 31, 2024, retained residential real estate FDMs were $206 million. The financial effects of the FDMs, which were predominantly in the form of term extensions and interest rate reductions, included extending the weighted-average life of the loans by 15 years, and reducing the weighted-average contractual interest rate from 7.53% to 5.44% for the year ended December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2023, retained residential real estate FDMs were $136 million. The financial effects of the FDMs, which were predominantly in the form of term extensions and interest rate reductions, included extending the weighted-average life of the loans by 20 years, and reducing the weighted-average contractual interest rate from 7.21% to 4.44% for the year ended December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty whose loans have been modified as FDMs.For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, loans subject to a trial modification, where the terms of the loans have not been permanently modified, and Chapter 7 loans were not material.

The Firm grants certain modifications of residential real estate loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. The Firm's proprietary modification programs as well as government programs, including U.S. GSE programs, that generally provide various modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term extensions, other-than-insignificant payment deferral and principal forgiveness that would otherwise have been required under the terms of the original agreement, are considered FDMs. In addition, the Firm offers trial modifications of residential real estate loans, which generally include a three-month trial payment period during which the borrower makes monthly payments under the proposed modified loan terms. Loans in a trial payment period continue to age and accrue interest in accordance with the original contractual terms. At the completion of a trial period, the loan modification is considered permanent. Financial effects of FDMs For the year ended December 31, 2024, retained residential real estate FDMs were $206 million. The financial effects of the FDMs, which were predominantly in the form of term extensions and interest rate reductions, included extending the weighted-average life of the loans by 15 years, and reducing the weighted-average contractual interest rate from 7.53% to 5.44% for the year ended December 31, 2024. For the year ended December 31, 2023, retained residential real estate FDMs were $136 million. The financial effects of the FDMs, which were predominantly in the form of term extensions and interest rate reductions, included extending the weighted-average life of the loans by 20 years, and reducing the weighted-average contractual interest rate from 7.21% to 4.44% for the year ended December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty whose loans have been modified as FDMs. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, loans subject to a trial modification, where the terms of the loans have not been permanently modified, and Chapter 7 loans were not material. Payment status of FDMsThe following table provides information on the payment status of retained residential real estate FDMs during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.Year ended December 31,(in millions)Amortized cost basis20242023Current$139 $107 30-149 days past due47 13 150 or more days past due20 16 Total $206 $136 Defaults of FDMsRetained residential real estate FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2024 and that were reported as FDMs in the twelve months prior to the default were $93 million. Retained residential real estate FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2023 and that were reported as FDMs on or after January 1, 2023, the date that the Firm adopted the changes to the TDR accounting guidance were not material. Refer to Note 1 for further information. Payment status of FDMs The following table provides information on the payment status of retained residential real estate FDMs during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Year ended December 31,(in millions)Amortized cost basis20242023Current$139 $107 30-149 days past due47 13 150 or more days past due20 16 Total $206 $136 Year ended December 31, (in millions) Current 30-149 days past due 150 or more days past due Defaults of FDMs Retained residential real estate FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2024 and that were reported as FDMs in the twelve months prior to the default were $93 million. Retained residential real estate FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2023 and that were reported as FDMs on or after January 1, 2023, the date that the Firm adopted the changes to the TDR accounting guidance were not material. Refer to Note 1 for further information. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K251 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K251 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K251 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 251

Nature and extent of TDRsFor periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of residential real estate loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2022, new TDRs were $362 million, and there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose residential real estate loans were modified in TDRs. The Firm’s proprietary modification programs as well as government programs, including U.S. GSE programs, generally provide various concessions to financially troubled borrowers including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term or payment extensions and delays of principal and/or interest payments that would otherwise have been required under the terms of the original agreement. The following table provides information about how residential real estate loans were modified in TDRs during the period presented. This table excludes loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions.Year ended December 31,2022Number of loans approved for a trial modification3,902 Number of loans permanently modified4,182 Concession granted:(a)Interest rate reduction54 %Term or payment extension67 Principal and/or interest deferred10 Principal forgiveness1 Other(b)37 (a)Represents concessions granted in permanent modifications as a percentage of the number of loans permanently modified. The sum of the percentages exceeds 100% because predominantly all of the modifications include more than one type of concession. Concessions offered on trial modifications are generally consistent with those granted on permanent modifications.(b)Includes variable interest rate to fixed interest rate modifications and payment delays that meet the definition of a TDR. Financial effects of TDRs and defaultsThe following table provides information about the financial effects of the various concessions granted in modifications of residential real estate loans and about defaults of certain loans modified in TDRs for the period presented. The following table presents only the financial effects of permanent modifications and does not include temporary concessions offered through trial modifications. This table also excludes loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions.Year ended December 31,(in millions, except weighted - average data)2022Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – before TDR4.75 %Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – after TDR3.35 Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – before TDR22Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – after TDR38Charge-offs recognized upon permanent modification$1 Principal deferred16 Principal forgiven2 Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of permanent modification(a)$147 (a)Represents loans permanently modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The dollar amounts presented represent the balance of such loans at the end of the reporting period in which such loans defaulted. Active and suspended foreclosure At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm had retained residential real estate loans, excluding those insured by U.S. government agencies, with a carrying value of $576 million and $566 million, respectively, that were not included in REO, but were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure. Nature and extent of TDRsFor periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of residential real estate loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2022, new TDRs were $362 million, and there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose residential real estate loans were modified in TDRs. The Firm’s proprietary modification programs as well as government programs, including U.S. GSE programs, generally provide various concessions to financially troubled borrowers including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term or payment extensions and delays of principal and/or interest payments that would otherwise have been required under the terms of the original agreement. The following table provides information about how residential real estate loans were modified in TDRs during the period presented. This table excludes loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions.Year ended December 31,2022Number of loans approved for a trial modification3,902 Number of loans permanently modified4,182 Concession granted:(a)Interest rate reduction54 %Term or payment extension67 Principal and/or interest deferred10 Principal forgiveness1 Other(b)37 (a)Represents concessions granted in permanent modifications as a percentage of the number of loans permanently modified. The sum of the percentages exceeds 100% because predominantly all of the modifications include more than one type of concession. Concessions offered on trial modifications are generally consistent with those granted on permanent modifications.(b)Includes variable interest rate to fixed interest rate modifications and payment delays that meet the definition of a TDR. Nature and extent of TDRs For periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of residential real estate loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2022, new TDRs were $362 million, and there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose residential real estate loans were modified in TDRs. The Firm’s proprietary modification programs as well as government programs, including U.S. GSE programs, generally provide various concessions to financially troubled borrowers including, but not limited to, interest rate reductions, term or payment extensions and delays of principal and/or interest payments that would otherwise have been required under the terms of the original agreement. The following table provides information about how residential real estate loans were modified in TDRs during the period presented. This table excludes loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions. Year ended December 31,2022Number of loans approved for a trial modification3,902 Number of loans permanently modified4,182 Concession granted:(a)Interest rate reduction54 %Term or payment extension67 Principal and/or interest deferred10 Principal forgiveness1 Other(b)37 2022

Other(b) (a)Represents concessions granted in permanent modifications as a percentage of the number of loans permanently modified. The sum of the percentages exceeds 100% because predominantly all of the modifications include more than one type of concession. Concessions offered on trial modifications are generally consistent with those granted on permanent modifications. (b)Includes variable interest rate to fixed interest rate modifications and payment delays that meet the definition of a TDR. (b) Financial effects of TDRs and defaultsThe following table provides information about the financial effects of the various concessions granted in modifications of residential real estate loans and about defaults of certain loans modified in TDRs for the period presented. The following table presents only the financial effects of permanent modifications and does not include temporary concessions offered through trial modifications. This table also excludes loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions.Year ended December 31,(in millions, except weighted - average data)2022Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – before TDR4.75 %Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – after TDR3.35 Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – before TDR22Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – after TDR38Charge-offs recognized upon permanent modification$1 Principal deferred16 Principal forgiven2 Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of permanent modification(a)$147 (a)Represents loans permanently modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The dollar amounts presented represent the balance of such loans at the end of the reporting period in which such loans defaulted. Active and suspended foreclosure At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm had retained residential real estate loans, excluding those insured by U.S. government agencies, with a carrying value of $576 million and $566 million, respectively, that were not included in REO, but were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure. Financial effects of TDRs and defaults The following table provides information about the financial effects of the various concessions granted in modifications of residential real estate loans and about defaults of certain loans modified in TDRs for the period presented. The following table presents only the financial effects of permanent modifications and does not include temporary concessions offered through trial modifications. This table also excludes loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions. Year ended December 31,(in millions, except weighted - average data)2022Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – before TDR4.75 %Weighted-average interest rate of loans with interest rate reductions – after TDR3.35 Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – before TDR22Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) of loans with term or payment extensions – after TDR38Charge-offs recognized upon permanent modification$1 Principal deferred16 Principal forgiven2 Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of permanent modification(a)$147 Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of permanent modification(a) (a)Represents loans permanently modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The dollar amounts presented represent the balance of such loans at the end of the reporting period in which such loans defaulted.

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm had retained residential real estate loans, excluding those insured by U.S. government agencies, with a carrying value of $576 million and $566 million, respectively, that were not included in REO, but were in the process of active or suspended foreclosure. 252JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 252JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 252JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 252 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Delinquency is the primary credit quality indicator for retained auto and other loans. The following tables provide information on delinquency and gross charge-offs. December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20242023202220212020Prior to 2020Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoan delinquencyCurrent$26,165 $15,953 $9,201 $7,014 $2,895 $624 $3,714 $148 $65,714 30–119 days past due190 283 259 179 53 23 40 34 1,061 120 or more days past due1 1 — 5 6 — 3 30 46 Total retained loans$26,356 $16,237 $9,460 $7,198 $2,954 $647 $3,757 $212 $66,821 % of 30+ days past due to total retained loans0.72 %1.75 %2.74 2.50 %1.76 %3.55 %1.14 %30.19 %1.64 %Gross charge-offs$269 $348 $224 $126 $37 $82 $1 $6 $1,093 December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20232022202120202019Prior to 2019Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoan delinquencyCurrent$30,328 $14,797 $12,825 $6,538 $1,777 $511 $2,984 $102 $69,862 30–119 days past due276 279 231 78 43 17 19 24 967 120 or more days past due1 1 7 8 — — 3 17 37 Total retained loans$30,605 $15,077 $13,063 $6,624 $1,820 $528 $3,006 $143 $70,866 % of 30+ days past due to total retained loans0.91 %1.86 %1.75 %1.15 %2.36 %3.22 %0.73 %28.67 %1.39 %Gross charge-offs$333 $297 $161 $53 $35 $64 $— $4 $947 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K253 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K253 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K253 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 253

Nonaccrual loans and other credit quality indicatorsThe following table provides information on nonaccrual and geographic region as a credit quality indicator for retained auto and other consumer loans.(in millions)Total Auto and otherDecember 31, 2024December 31, 2023Nonaccrual loans(a)(b)$249 $177 Geographic region(c)California$10,321 $10,959 Texas7,772 8,502 Florida5,428 5,684 New York4,905 4,938 Illinois2,890 3,147 New Jersey2,468 2,609 Pennsylvania2,012 1,900 Georgia1,716 1,912 Arizona1,643 1,779 North Carolina1,597 1,714 All other26,069 27,722 Total retained loans$66,821 $70,866 (a)Generally, all consumer nonaccrual loans have an allowance. In accordance with regulatory guidance, certain nonaccrual loans that are considered collateral-dependent have been charged down to the lower of amortized cost or the fair value of their underlying collateral less costs to sell. If the value of the underlying collateral improves subsequent to charge down, the related allowance may be negative.(b)Interest income on nonaccrual loans recognized on a cash basis was not material for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.(c)The geographic regions presented in this table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at December 31, 2024.Loan modifications The Firm grants certain modifications of auto and other loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, retained auto and other FDMs were not material. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers modified as FDMs.For periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of auto and other loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2022, auto and other TDRs were not material. Nonaccrual loans and other credit quality indicatorsThe following table provides information on nonaccrual and geographic region as a credit quality indicator for retained auto and other consumer loans.(in millions)Total Auto and otherDecember 31, 2024December 31, 2023Nonaccrual loans(a)(b)$249 $177 Geographic region(c)California$10,321 $10,959 Texas7,772 8,502 Florida5,428 5,684 New York4,905 4,938 Illinois2,890 3,147 New Jersey2,468 2,609 Pennsylvania2,012 1,900 Georgia1,716 1,912 Arizona1,643 1,779 North Carolina1,597 1,714 All other26,069 27,722 Total retained loans$66,821 $70,866 (a)Generally, all consumer nonaccrual loans have an allowance. In accordance with regulatory guidance, certain nonaccrual loans that are considered collateral-dependent have been charged down to the lower of amortized cost or the fair value of their underlying collateral less costs to sell. If the value of the underlying collateral improves subsequent to charge down, the related allowance may be negative.(b)Interest income on nonaccrual loans recognized on a cash basis was not material for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.(c)The geographic regions presented in this table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at December 31, 2024. Nonaccrual loans and other credit quality indicators The following table provides information on nonaccrual and geographic region as a credit quality indicator for retained auto and other consumer loans. (in millions)Total Auto and otherDecember 31, 2024December 31, 2023Nonaccrual loans(a)(b)$249 $177 Geographic region(c)California$10,321 $10,959 Texas7,772 8,502 Florida5,428 5,684 New York4,905 4,938 Illinois2,890 3,147 New Jersey2,468 2,609 Pennsylvania2,012 1,900 Georgia1,716 1,912 Arizona1,643 1,779 North Carolina1,597 1,714 All other26,069 27,722 Total retained loans$66,821 $70,866

(a)Generally, all consumer nonaccrual loans have an allowance. In accordance with regulatory guidance, certain nonaccrual loans that are considered collateral-dependent have been charged down to the lower of amortized cost or the fair value of their underlying collateral less costs to sell. If the value of the underlying collateral improves subsequent to charge down, the related allowance may be negative. (b)Interest income on nonaccrual loans recognized on a cash basis was not material for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. (c)The geographic regions presented in this table are ordered based on the magnitude of the corresponding loan balances at December 31, 2024. Loan modifications The Firm grants certain modifications of auto and other loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, retained auto and other FDMs were not material. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers modified as FDMs.For periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of auto and other loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2022, auto and other TDRs were not material.

The Firm grants certain modifications of auto and other loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, retained auto and other FDMs were not material. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no additional commitments to lend to borrowers modified as FDMs. For periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of auto and other loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2022, auto and other TDRs were not material. 254JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 254JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 254JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 254 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The credit card portfolio segment includes credit card loans originated and purchased by the Firm. Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicator for credit card loans as they provide an early warning that borrowers may be experiencing difficulties (30 days past due); information on those borrowers that have been delinquent for a longer period of time (90 days past due) is also considered. In addition to delinquency rates, the geographic distribution of the loans provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio based on the regional economy.While the borrower’s credit score is another general indicator of credit quality, the Firm does not view credit scores as a primary indicator of credit quality because the borrower’s credit score tends to be a lagging indicator. The distribution of such scores provides a general indicator of credit quality trends within the portfolio; however, the score does not capture all factors that would be predictive of future credit performance. Refreshed FICO score information, which is obtained at least quarterly, for a statistically significant random sample of the credit card portfolio is indicated in other credit quality indicators. FICO is considered to be the industry benchmark for credit scores.The Firm generally originates new credit card accounts to prime consumer borrowers. However, certain cardholders’ FICO scores may decrease over time, depending on the performance of the cardholder and changes in the credit score calculation. The credit card portfolio segment includes credit card loans originated and purchased by the Firm. Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicator for credit card loans as they provide an early warning that borrowers may be experiencing difficulties (30 days past due); information on those borrowers that have been delinquent for a longer period of time (90 days past due) is also considered. In addition to delinquency rates, the geographic distribution of the loans provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio based on the regional economy.While the borrower’s credit score is another general indicator of credit quality, the Firm does not view credit scores as a primary indicator of credit quality because the borrower’s credit score tends to be a The credit card portfolio segment includes credit card loans originated and purchased by the Firm. Delinquency rates are the primary credit quality indicator for credit card loans as they provide an early warning that borrowers may be experiencing difficulties (30 days past due); information on those borrowers that have been delinquent for a longer period of time (90 days past due) is also considered. In addition to delinquency rates, the geographic distribution of the loans provides insight as to the credit quality of the portfolio based on the regional economy. While the borrower’s credit score is another general indicator of credit quality, the Firm does not view credit scores as a primary indicator of credit quality because the borrower’s credit score tends to be a lagging indicator. The distribution of such scores provides a general indicator of credit quality trends within the portfolio; however, the score does not capture all factors that would be predictive of future credit performance. Refreshed FICO score information, which is obtained at least quarterly, for a statistically significant random sample of the credit card portfolio is indicated in other credit quality indicators. FICO is considered to be the industry benchmark for credit scores.The Firm generally originates new credit card accounts to prime consumer borrowers. However, certain cardholders’ FICO scores may decrease over time, depending on the performance of the cardholder and changes in the credit score calculation. lagging indicator. The distribution of such scores provides a general indicator of credit quality trends within the portfolio; however, the score does not capture all factors that would be predictive of future credit performance. Refreshed FICO score information, which is obtained at least quarterly, for a statistically significant random sample of the credit card portfolio is indicated in other credit quality indicators. FICO is considered to be the industry benchmark for credit scores. The Firm generally originates new credit card accounts to prime consumer borrowers. However, certain cardholders’ FICO scores may decrease over time, depending on the performance of the cardholder and changes in the credit score calculation. The following tables provide information on delinquency and gross charge-offs. (in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2024Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoan delinquencyCurrent and less than 30 days past dueand still accruing$226,532 $1,284 $227,816 30–89 days past due and still accruing2,291 109 2,400 90 or more days past due and still accruing2,591 53 2,644 Total retained loans$231,414 $1,446 $232,860 Loan delinquency ratios% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans2.11 %11.20 %2.17 %% of 90+ days past due to total retained loans1.12 3.67 1.14 Gross charge-offs$7,951 $247 $8,198 (in millions, except ratios)

(in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2023Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoan delinquencyCurrent and less than 30 days past dueand still accruing$205,731 $882 $206,613 30–89 days past due and still accruing2,217 84 2,301 90 or more days past due and still accruing2,169 40 2,209 Total retained loans$210,117 $1,006 $211,123 Loan delinquency ratios% of 30+ days past due to total retained loans2.09 %12.33 %2.14 %% of 90+ days past due to total retained loans1.03 3.98 1.05 Gross charge-offs$5,325 $166 $5,491 (in millions, except ratios)

Other credit quality indicators The following table provides information on other credit quality indicators for retained credit card loans. (in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Geographic region(a)California$36,385 $32,652 Texas24,423 22,086 New York18,525 16,915 Florida17,236 15,103 Illinois12,442 11,364 New Jersey9,644 8,688 Ohio6,976 6,424 Colorado6,962 6,307 Pennsylvania6,558 6,088 Arizona5,796 5,209 All other87,913 80,287 Total retained loans$232,860 $211,123 Percentage of portfolio based on carrying value with estimated refreshed FICO scoresEqual to or greater than 66085.5 %85.8 %Less than 66014.3 14.0 No FICO available0.2 0.2

The Firm grants certain modifications of credit card loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. These modifications may involve placing the customer’s credit card account on a fixed payment plan, generally for 60 months, which typically includes reducing the interest rate on the credit card account. If the borrower does not make the contractual payments when due under the modified payment terms, the credit card loan continues to age and will be charged-off in accordance with the Firm's standard charge-off policy. In most cases, the Firm does not reinstate the borrower's line of credit. Financial effects of FDMs The following table provides information on retained credit card FDMs. Year ended December 31,(in millions)Loan modifications20242023Term extension and interest rate reduction(a)(b)Amortized cost basis$926 $648 % of total modifications to total retained credit card loans0.40 %0.31 %Financial effect of loan modificationsTerm extension with a reduction in the weighted average contractual interest rate from 23.64% to 3.20%Term extension with a reduction in the weighted average contractual interest rate from 23.19% to 3.64% Year ended December 31, (in millions) Loan modifications

Term extension with a reduction in the weighted average contractual interest rate from 23.19% to 3.64% (a)Term extension includes credit card loans whose terms have been modified under long-term programs by placing the customer’s credit card account on a fixed payment plan. (b)The interest rates represent weighted average at the time of modification. 256JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 256JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 256JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 256 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Payment status of FDMsThe following table provides information on the payment status of retained credit card FDMs during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.Amortized cost basisYear ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing$811 $558 30-89 days past due and still accruing74 59 90 or more days past due and still accruing41 31 Total $926 $648 Defaults of FDMsRetained credit card FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2024 and that were reported as FDMs in the twelve months prior to the default were not material. Retained credit card FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2023 and that were reported as FDMs on or after January 1, 2023, the date that the Firm adopted the changes to the TDR accounting guidance were not material. Refer to Note 1 for further information.For credit card loans modified as FDMs, payment default is deemed to have occurred when the borrower misses two consecutive contractual payments. Defaulted modified credit card loans remain in the modification program and continue to be charged off in accordance with the Firm’s standard charge-off policy.Financial effects of TDRs and defaults For periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of credit card loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. The Firm granted concessions for most of the credit card loans under long-term programs. These concessions involved placing the customer’s credit card account on a fixed payment plan, generally for 60 months, and typically included reducing the interest rate on the credit card account. Substantially all modifications under the Firm’s long-term programs were considered to be TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not reported as TDRs.The following table provides information about the financial effects of the concessions granted on credit card loans modified in TDRs and defaults for the periods presented. For the period disclosed, new enrollments were less than 1% of total retained credit card loans. Year ended December 31,(in millions, except weighted-average data)2022Balance of new TDRs(a)$418 Weighted-average interest rate of loans – before TDR 19.86 %Weighted-average interest rate of loans – after TDR4.13 Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of modification(b)$34 (a)Represents the outstanding balance prior to modification.(b)Represents loans modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The amounts presented represent the balance of such loans as of the end of the quarter in which they defaulted.For credit card loans modified in TDRs, payment default was deemed to have occurred when the borrower missed two consecutive contractual payments. Defaulted modified credit card loans remained in the modification program and continued to be charged of in accordance with the Firm’s standard charge-off policy. Payment status of FDMsThe following table provides information on the payment status of retained credit card FDMs during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.Amortized cost basisYear ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing$811 $558 30-89 days past due and still accruing74 59 90 or more days past due and still accruing41 31 Total $926 $648 Defaults of FDMsRetained credit card FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2024 and that were reported as FDMs in the twelve months prior to the default were not material. Retained credit card FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2023 and that were reported as FDMs on or after January 1, 2023, the date that the Firm adopted the changes to the TDR accounting guidance were not material. Refer to Note 1 for further information.For credit card loans modified as FDMs, payment default is deemed to have occurred when the borrower misses two consecutive contractual payments. Defaulted modified credit card loans remain in the modification program and continue to be charged off in accordance with the Firm’s standard charge-off policy. Payment status of FDMs The following table provides information on the payment status of retained credit card FDMs during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Amortized cost basisYear ended December 31,(in millions)20242023Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing$811 $558 30-89 days past due and still accruing74 59 90 or more days past due and still accruing41 31 Total $926 $648 Amortized cost basis Year ended December 31, (in millions) Defaults of FDMs Retained credit card FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2024 and that were reported as FDMs in the twelve months prior to the default were not material. Retained credit card FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2023 and that were reported as FDMs on or after January 1, 2023, the date that the Firm adopted the changes to the TDR accounting guidance were not material. Refer to Note 1 for further information. For credit card loans modified as FDMs, payment default is deemed to have occurred when the borrower misses two consecutive contractual payments. Defaulted modified credit card loans remain in the modification program and continue to be charged off in accordance with the Firm’s standard charge-off policy. Financial effects of TDRs and defaults For periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of credit card loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. The Firm granted concessions for most of the credit card loans under long-term programs. These concessions involved placing the customer’s credit card account on a fixed payment plan, generally for 60 months, and typically included reducing the interest rate on the credit card account. Substantially all modifications under the Firm’s long-term programs were considered to be TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not reported as TDRs.The following table provides information about the financial effects of the concessions granted on credit card loans modified in TDRs and defaults for the periods presented. For the period disclosed, new enrollments were less than 1% of total retained credit card loans. Year ended December 31,(in millions, except weighted-average data)2022Balance of new TDRs(a)$418 Weighted-average interest rate of loans – before TDR 19.86 %Weighted-average interest rate of loans – after TDR4.13 Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of modification(b)$34 (a)Represents the outstanding balance prior to modification.(b)Represents loans modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The amounts presented represent the balance of such loans as of the end of the quarter in which they defaulted.For credit card loans modified in TDRs, payment default was deemed to have occurred when the borrower missed two consecutive contractual payments. Defaulted modified credit card loans remained in the modification program and continued to be charged of in accordance with the Firm’s standard charge-off policy. Financial effects of TDRs and defaults For periods ending prior to January 1, 2023, modifications of credit card loans where the Firm granted concessions to borrowers who were experiencing financial difficulty were generally accounted for and reported as TDRs. The Firm granted concessions for most of the credit card loans under long-term programs. These concessions involved placing the customer’s credit card account on a fixed payment plan, generally for 60 months, and typically included reducing the interest rate on the credit card account. Substantially all modifications under the Firm’s long-term programs were considered to be TDRs. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not reported as TDRs. The following table provides information about the financial effects of the concessions granted on credit card loans modified in TDRs and defaults for the periods presented. For the period disclosed, new enrollments were less than 1% of total retained credit card loans. Year ended December 31,(in millions, except weighted-average data)2022Balance of new TDRs(a)$418 Weighted-average interest rate of loans – before TDR 19.86 %Weighted-average interest rate of loans – after TDR4.13 Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of modification(b)$34 2022 Balance of new TDRs(a) Weighted-average interest rate of loans – after TDR Balance of loans that defaulted within one year of modification(b) (a)Represents the outstanding balance prior to modification. (b)Represents loans modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the periods presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The amounts presented represent the balance of such loans as of the end of the quarter in which they defaulted. For credit card loans modified in TDRs, payment default was deemed to have occurred when the borrower missed two consecutive contractual payments. Defaulted modified credit card loans remained in the modification program and continued to be charged of in accordance with the Firm’s standard charge-off policy. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K257 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K257 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K257 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 257

Wholesale loans include loans made to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to small businesses and high-net-worth individuals.The primary credit quality indicator for wholesale loans is the internal risk rating assigned to each loan. Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of loans and differentiate risk within the portfolio. Risk ratings on loans consider the PD and the LGD. The PD is the likelihood that a loan will default. The LGD is the estimated loss on the loan that would be realized upon the default of the borrower and takes into consideration collateral and structural support for each credit facility. Management considers several factors to determine an appropriate internal risk rating, including the obligor’s debt capacity and financial flexibility, the level of the obligor’s earnings, the amount and sources for repayment, the level and nature of contingencies, management strength, and the industry and geography in which the obligor operates. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., PD and LGD) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions. The Firm generally considers internal ratings with qualitative characteristics equivalent to BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment grade, and these ratings have a lower PD and/or lower LGD than non-investment grade ratings. Noninvestment-grade ratings are further classified as noncriticized and criticized, and the criticized portion is further subdivided into performing and nonaccrual loans, representing management’s assessment of the collectibility of principal and interest. Criticized loans have a higher PD than noncriticized loans. The Firm’s definition of criticized aligns with the U.S. banking regulatory definition of criticized exposures, which consist of special mention, substandard and doubtful categories. Refer to Note 1 for additional information. Risk ratings are reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and are adjusted as necessary for updated information affecting the obligor’s ability to fulfill its obligations.As noted above, the risk rating of a loan considers the industry in which the obligor conducts its operations. As part of the overall credit risk management framework, the Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry and client exposures, with particular attention paid to industries with an actual or potential credit concern. Refer to Note 4 for further detail on industry concentrations. Wholesale loans include loans made to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to small businesses and high-net-worth individuals.The primary credit quality indicator for wholesale loans is the internal risk rating assigned to each loan. Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of loans and differentiate risk within the portfolio. Risk ratings on loans consider the PD and the LGD. The PD is the likelihood that a loan will default. The LGD is the estimated loss on the loan that would be realized upon the default of the borrower and takes into consideration collateral and structural support for each credit facility. Management considers several factors to determine an appropriate internal risk rating, including the obligor’s debt capacity and financial flexibility, the level of the obligor’s earnings, the amount and sources for repayment, the level and nature of contingencies, management strength, and the industry and geography in which the obligor operates. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., PD and LGD) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions. The Firm generally considers internal ratings with qualitative characteristics equivalent to BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment grade, and these ratings have a lower PD and/or lower LGD than non-investment grade ratings. Noninvestment-grade ratings are further classified as noncriticized and criticized, and the criticized portion is further subdivided into performing and nonaccrual Wholesale loans include loans made to a variety of clients, ranging from large corporate and institutional clients to small businesses and high-net-worth individuals. The primary credit quality indicator for wholesale loans is the internal risk rating assigned to each loan. Risk ratings are used to identify the credit quality of loans and differentiate risk within the portfolio. Risk ratings on loans consider the PD and the LGD. The PD is the likelihood that a loan will default. The LGD is the estimated loss on the loan that would be realized upon the default of the borrower and takes into consideration collateral and structural support for each credit facility. Management considers several factors to determine an appropriate internal risk rating, including the obligor’s debt capacity and financial flexibility, the level of the obligor’s earnings, the amount and sources for repayment, the level and nature of contingencies, management strength, and the industry and geography in which the obligor operates. The Firm’s internal risk ratings generally align with the qualitative characteristics (e.g., borrower capacity to meet financial commitments and vulnerability to changes in the economic environment) defined by S&P and Moody’s, however the quantitative characteristics (e.g., PD and LGD) may differ as they reflect internal historical experiences and assumptions. The Firm generally considers internal ratings with qualitative characteristics equivalent to BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment grade, and these ratings have a lower PD and/or lower LGD than non-investment grade ratings. Noninvestment-grade ratings are further classified as noncriticized and criticized, and the criticized portion is further subdivided into performing and nonaccrual loans, representing management’s assessment of the collectibility of principal and interest. Criticized loans have a higher PD than noncriticized loans. The Firm’s definition of criticized aligns with the U.S. banking regulatory definition of criticized exposures, which consist of special mention, substandard and doubtful categories. Refer to Note 1 for additional information. Risk ratings are reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and are adjusted as necessary for updated information affecting the obligor’s ability to fulfill its obligations.As noted above, the risk rating of a loan considers the industry in which the obligor conducts its operations. As part of the overall credit risk management framework, the Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry and client exposures, with particular attention paid to industries with an actual or potential credit concern. Refer to Note 4 for further detail on industry concentrations. loans, representing management’s assessment of the collectibility of principal and interest. Criticized loans have a higher PD than noncriticized loans. The Firm’s definition of criticized aligns with the U.S. banking regulatory definition of criticized exposures, which consist of special mention, substandard and doubtful categories. Refer to Note 1 for additional information. Risk ratings are reviewed on a regular and ongoing basis by Credit Risk Management and are adjusted as necessary for updated information affecting the obligor’s ability to fulfill its obligations. As noted above, the risk rating of a loan considers the industry in which the obligor conducts its operations. As part of the overall credit risk management framework, the Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry and client exposures, with particular attention paid to industries with an actual or potential credit concern. Refer to Note 4 for further detail on industry concentrations. 258JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 258JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 258JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 258 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Internal risk rating is the primary credit quality indicator for retained wholesale loans. The following tables provide information on internal risk rating and gross charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2024. December 31,(in millions, except ratios)Secured by real estateCommercial and industrialOther(a)Total retained loans20242023202420232024202320242023Loans by risk ratingsInvestment-grade$114,280 $120,405 $70,862 $72,624 $286,528 $265,809 $471,670 $458,838 Noninvestment-grade:Noncriticized37,422 34,241 83,191 80,637 72,743 75,178 193,356 190,056 Criticized performing9,291 7,291 10,977 12,684 1,160 1,257 21,428 21,232 Criticized nonaccrual1,439 401 1,760 1,221 743 724 3,942 2,346 Total noninvestment-grade48,152 41,933 95,928 94,542 74,646 77,159 218,726 213,634 Total retained loans$162,432 $162,338 $166,790 $167,166 $361,174 $342,968 $690,396 $672,472 % of investment-grade to total retained loans70.36 %74.17 %42.49 %43.44 %79.33 %77.50 %68.32 %68.23 %% of total criticized to total retained loans6.61 4.74 7.64 8.32 0.53 0.58 3.67 3.51 % of criticized nonaccrual to total retained loans0.89 0.25 1.06 0.73 0.21 0.21 0.57 0.35 Other(a) (a)Includes loans to financial institutions, SPEs, personal investment companies and trusts, individuals and individual entities (predominantly Global Private Bank clients within AWM and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management within CCB), states and political subdivisions, as well as loans to nonprofits. As of December 31, 2024, predominantly consisted of $114.8 billion to individuals and individual entities, $94.0 billion to financial institutions, and $92.5 billion to SPEs. Refer to Note 14 for more information on SPEs. Secured by real estate(in millions)December 31, 2024Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20242023202220212020Prior to 2020Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoans by risk ratingsInvestment-grade$10,002 $9,834 $25,284 $22,796 $15,548 $29,488 $1,328 $— $114,280 Noninvestment-grade4,238 5,366 14,717 8,567 3,462 10,392 1,317 93 48,152 Total retained loans$14,240 $15,200 $40,001 $31,363 $19,010 $39,880 $2,645 $93 $162,432 Gross charge-offs$72 $18 $43 $2 $109 $80 $— $— $324 Secured by real estate(in millions)December 31, 2023Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20232022202120202019Prior to 2019Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoans by risk ratingsInvestment-grade$10,687 $28,874 $25,784 $16,820 $15,677 $21,108 $1,455 $— $120,405 Noninvestment-grade4,477 12,579 7,839 3,840 3,987 7,918 1,291 2 41,933 Total retained loans$15,164 $41,453 $33,623 $20,660 $19,664 $29,026 $2,746 $2 $162,338 Gross charge-offs$20 $48 $22 $— $23 $78 $— $1 $192 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K259 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K259 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K259 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 259

Commercial and industrial(in millions)December 31, 2024Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20242023202220212020Prior to 2020Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoans by risk ratingsInvestment-grade$11,564 $6,285 $6,588 $3,119 $1,067 $1,139 $41,099 $1 $70,862 Noninvestment-grade21,251 11,350 10,942 5,322 783 975 45,181 124 95,928 Total retained loans$32,815 $17,635 $17,530 $8,441 $1,850 $2,114 $86,280 $125 $166,790 Gross charge-offs$25 $22 $128 $24 $1 $50 $270 $5 $525 Commercial and industrial(in millions)December 31, 2023Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20232022202120202019Prior to 2019Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoans by risk ratingsInvestment-grade$14,875 $10,642 $4,276 $2,291 $1,030 $1,115 $38,394 $1 $72,624 Noninvestment-grade18,890 16,444 9,299 1,989 1,144 1,006 45,696 74 94,542 Total retained loans$33,765 $27,086 $13,575 $4,280 $2,174 $2,121 $84,090 $75 $167,166 Gross charge-offs$25 $8 $110 $55 $2 $12 $259 $8 $479 Other(a)(in millions)December 31, 2024Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20242023202220212020Prior to 2020Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoans by risk ratingsInvestment-grade$30,484 $17,039 $13,272 $6,288 $8,632 $7,382 $201,949 $1,482 $286,528 Noninvestment-grade11,784 7,248 5,918 3,296 1,366 1,886 42,954 194 74,646 Total retained loans$42,268 $24,287 $19,190 $9,584 $9,998 $9,268 $244,903 $1,676 $361,174 Gross charge-offs$— $38 $3 $36 $40 $50 $6 $— $173 Other(a) Other(a)(in millions)December 31, 2023Term loans by origination yearRevolving loans20232022202120202019Prior to 2019Within the revolving periodConverted to term loansTotalLoans by risk ratingsInvestment-grade$38,338 $18,034 $10,033 $10,099 $3,721 $6,662 $176,728 $2,194 $265,809 Noninvestment-grade14,054 8,092 6,169 2,172 811 2,001 43,801 59 77,159 Total retained loans$52,392 $26,126 $16,202 $12,271 $4,532 $8,663 $220,529 $2,253 $342,968 Gross charge-offs$5 $298 $8 $8 $— $8 $13 $— $340 Other(a) (a)Includes loans to financial institutions, SPEs, personal investment companies and trusts, individuals and individual entities (predominantly Global Private Bank clients within AWM and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management within CCB), states and political subdivisions, as well as loans to nonprofits. Refer to Note 14 for more information on SPEs. 260JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 260JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 260JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 260 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following table presents additional information on retained loans secured by real estate, which consists of loans secured wholly or substantially by a lien or liens on real property at origination. Multifamily lending includes financing for acquisition, leasing and construction of apartment buildings. Other commercial lending largely includes financing for acquisition, leasing and construction, largely for office, retail and industrial real estate. Included in secured by real estate loans were $12.2 billion and $10.2 billion as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, of construction and development loans made to finance land development and on-site construction of commercial, industrial, residential, or farm buildings. December 31,(in millions, except ratios)MultifamilyOther CommercialTotal retained loans secured by real estate202420232024202320242023Retained loans secured by real estate$101,114 $100,725 $61,318 $61,613 $162,432 $162,338 Criticized4,700 3,596 6,030 4,096 10,730 7,692 % of criticized to total retained loans secured by real estate4.65 %3.57 %9.83 %6.65 %6.61 %4.74 %Criticized nonaccrual$337 $76 $1,102 $325 $1,439 $401 % of criticized nonaccrual loans to total retained loans secured by real estate0.33 %0.08 %1.80 %0.53 %0.89 %0.25 % Geographic distribution and delinquency The following table provides information on the geographic distribution and delinquency for retained wholesale loans. December 31,(in millions)Secured by real estateCommercial and industrialOtherTotal retained loans20242023202420232024202320242023Loans by geographic distribution(a)Total U.S.$159,209 $159,499 $127,626 $127,638 $278,077 $262,499 $564,912 $549,636 Total non-U.S.3,223 2,839 39,164 39,528 83,097 80,469 125,484 122,836 Total retained loans$162,432 $162,338 $166,790 $167,166 $361,174 $342,968 $690,396 $672,472 Loan delinquencyCurrent and less than 30 days past due and still accruing$159,949 $161,314 $164,104 $164,899 $359,191 $341,128 $683,244 $667,341 30–89 days past due and still accruing918 473 868 884 1,152 1,090 2,938 2,447 90 or more days past due and still accruing(b)126 150 58 162 88 26 272 338 Criticized nonaccrual1,439 401 1,760 1,221 743 724 3,942 2,346 Total retained loans$162,432 $162,338 $166,790 $167,166 $361,174 $342,968 $690,396 $672,472

The following table provides information on retained wholesale nonaccrual loans. December 31, (in millions)Secured by real estateCommercial and industrialOtherTotal retained loans20242023202420232024202320242023Nonaccrual loansWith an allowance$366 $129 $1,362 $776 $555 $492 $2,283 $1,397 Without an allowance(a)1,073 272 398 445 188 232 1,659 949 Total nonaccrual loans(b)$1,439 $401 $1,760 $1,221 $743 $724 $3,942 $2,346 Without an allowance(a)

(a)When the discounted cash flows or collateral value equals or exceeds the amortized cost of the loan, the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs when the loans have been partially charged off and/or there have been interest payments received and applied to the loan balance. (b)Interest income on nonaccrual loans recognized on a cash basis was $51 million and $19 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K261 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K261 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K261 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 261

The Firm grants certain modifications of wholesale loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Financial effects of FDMs The following tables provide information on retained wholesale loan modifications considered FDMs. (in millions, except ratios)Secured by real estateYear ended December 31, 2024Amortized cost basis% of loan modifications to total retained Secured by real estate loansFinancial effect of loan modificationsSingle modificationsTerm extension$271 0.17 %Extended loans by a weighted-average of 21 months Other-than-insignificant payment deferral37 0.02 Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts re-amortized over the remaining tenorMultiple modificationsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral and interest rate reduction46 0.03 Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts recaptured at maturity and reduced weighted-average contractual interest by 162 bpsTotal$354 (in millions, except ratios)

Extended loans by a weighted-average of 21 months Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts re-amortized over the remaining tenor Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts recaptured at maturity and reduced weighted-average contractual interest by 162 bps Secured by real estateYear ended December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Amortized cost basis% of loan modifications to total retained Secured by real estate loansFinancial effect of loan modificationsSingle modificationsTerm extension$149 0.09 %Extended loans by a weighted-average of 14 monthsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral3 — Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily re-amortized over the remaining life of the loanMultiple modificationsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral and interest rate reduction5 — Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily recaptured at maturity and reduced weighted-average contractual interest by 184 bpsOther(a)3 — NMTotal$160 Extended loans by a weighted-average of 14 months Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily recaptured at maturity and reduced weighted-average contractual interest by 184 bps Other(a) (a) Includes a loan with multiple modifications. 262JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 262JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 262JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 262 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K (in millions, except ratios)Commercial and industrialYear ended December 31, 2024Amortized cost basis% of loan modifications to total retained Commercial and industrial loansFinancial effect of loan modificationsSingle modificationsTerm extension$1,180 0.71 %Extended loans by a weighted-average of 20 monthsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral464 0.28 Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily re-amortized over the remaining tenorMultiple modificationsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral and term extension175 0.10 Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts recaptured at maturity and extended loans by a weighted-average of 18 monthsInterest rate reduction and term extension51 0.03 Reduced weighted-average contractual interest by 434 bps and extended loans by a weighted-average of 36 monthsOther(a)30 0.02 NMTotal$1,900 (in millions, except ratios)

Extended loans by a weighted-average of 20 months Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts recaptured at maturity and extended loans by a weighted-average of 18 months Reduced weighted-average contractual interest by 434 bps and extended loans by a weighted-average of 36 months Other(a) (a) Includes loans with single and multiple modifications. Commercial and industrialYear ended December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Amortized cost basis% of loan modifications to total retained Commercial and industrial loansFinancial effect of loan modificationsSingle modificationsTerm extension$916 0.55 %Extended loans by a weighted-average of 17 monthsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral4020.24 Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily recaptured at the end of the deferral periodMultiple modificationsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral and term extension350.02 Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily re-amortized over the remaining life of the loan and extended loans by a weighted-average of 7 monthsInterest rate reduction and term extension1— Reduced weighted average contractual interest rate over the life of the loan as a result of converting from variable to fixed rate and extended loans by a weighted-average of 16 monthsOther(a)9 — NMTotal$1,363 Extended loans by a weighted-average of 17 months Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily re-amortized over the remaining life of the loan and extended loans by a weighted-average of 7 months Reduced weighted average contractual interest rate over the life of the loan as a result of converting from variable to fixed rate and extended loans by a weighted-average of 16 months Other(a) (a) Include loans with multiple modifications. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K263 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K263 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K263 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 263

(in millions, except ratios)OtherYear ended December 31, 2024Amortized cost basis% of loan modifications to total retained Other loansFinancial effect of loan modificationSingle modificationsTerm extension$268 0.07 %Extended loans by a weighted-average of 28 monthsMultiple modificationsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral and term extension2 — Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts recaptured at maturity and extended loans by a weighted-average of 6 monthsOther(a)5 — NMTotal$275 (in millions, except ratios)

Extended loans by a weighted-average of 28 months Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts recaptured at maturity and extended loans by a weighted-average of 6 months Other(a) NM (a) Includes loans with a single modification. OtherYear ended December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Amortized cost basis% of loan modifications to total retained Other loansFinancial effect of loan modificationsSingle modificationsTerm extension$355 0.10 %Extended loans by a weighted-average of 23 monthsMultiple modificationsOther-than-insignificant payment deferral and term extension2450.07 Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily recaptured at the end of the deferral period and extended loans by a weighted-average of 137 monthsOther(a)$9 — NMTotal$609 Extended loans by a weighted-average of 23 months Provided payment deferrals with delayed amounts primarily recaptured at the end of the deferral period and extended loans by a weighted-average of 137 months Other(a) (a) Includes a loan with a single modification. 264JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 264JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 264JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 264 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Payment status of FDMs The following table provides information on the payment status of retained wholesale FDMs during the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Amortized cost basisSecured by real estateCommercial and industrialOtherSecured by real estateCommercial and industrialOther(in millions)Year ended December 31, 2024Year ended December 31, 2023Current and less than 30 days past due and still accruing$264 $1,215 $240 $118 $947 $400 30-89 days past due and still accruing3 13 9 2 42 — Criticized nonaccrual87 672 26 40 374 209 Total$354 $1,900 $275 $160 $1,363 $609

Defaults of FDMs The following table provides information on retained wholesale FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2024 that were reported as FDMs in the twelve months prior to the default, and FDMs that defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2023 that were reported as FDMs on or after January 1, 2023, the date that the Firm adopted the changes to the TDR accounting guidance. Amortized cost basisSecured by real estateCommercial and industrialOtherSecured by real estateCommercial and industrialOther(in millions)Year ended December 31, 2024Year ended December 31, 2023Term extension$3 $92 $22 $1 $49 $31 Other-than-insignificant payment deferral— 118 — 2 — — Interest rate reduction and term extension— — — 3 1 — Total(a)$3 $210 $22 $6 $50 $31

Total(a) (a)Represents FDMs that were 30 days or more past due. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, additional unfunded commitments on modified loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty were $1.8 billion at each period in Commercial and industrial, and $69 million and $4 million, respectively, in Other loan class. Additional commitments on modified loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty whose loans have been modified as FDMs in Secured by real estate were not material at each period. Nature and extent of TDRs Prior to January 1, 2023, certain loan modifications were considered TDRs. These loan modifications provided various concessions to borrower who were experiencing financial difficulty. Loans with short-term or other insignificant modifications that were not considered concessions were not TDRs nor were loans for which the Firm elected to suspend TDR accounting guidance under the option provided by the CARES Act. For the year ended December 31, 2022, new TDRs were $801 million. New TDRs for the year ended December 31, 2022 reflected extended maturity dates and covenant waivers primarily in the Commercial and Industrial loan class. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the impact of these modifications resulting in new TDRs was not material to the Firm. As a result of the elimination of the requirement to assess whether a modification is reasonably expected or involves a concession, the population of loans considered FDMs is greater than the population previously considered TDRs. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K265 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K265 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K265 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 265

The Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management's estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The allowance for credit losses generally comprises:•the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated), •the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is presented on the Consolidated balance sheets in accounts payable and other liabilities, and •the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which is reflected in investment securities on the Consolidated balance sheets.The income statement effect of all changes in the allowance for credit losses is recognized in the provision for credit losses. Determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is complex and requires significant judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. At least quarterly, the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by the CRO, the CFO and the Controller of the Firm. Subsequent evaluations of credit exposures, considering the macroeconomic conditions, forecasts and other factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the allowance for credit losses in future periods. The Firm’s policies used to determine its allowance for loan losses and its allowance for lending-related commitments are described in the following paragraphs. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the policies used to determine the allowance for credit losses on investment securities. Methodology for allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitmentsThe allowance for loan losses and allowance for lending-related commitments represents expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of retained loans and lending-related commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable. The Firm does not record an allowance for future draws on unconditionally cancellable lending-related commitments (e.g., credit cards). Expected losses related to accrued interest on credit card loans are considered in the Firm’s allowance for loan losses. However, the Firm does not record an allowance on other accrued interest receivables, due to its policy to write these receivables off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income. The expected life of each instrument is determined by considering its contractual term, expected prepayments, cancellation features, and certain extension and call options. The expected life of funded credit card loans is generally estimated by considering expected future payments on the credit card account, and determining how much of those amounts should be allocated to repayments of the funded loan balance (as of the balance sheet date) versus other account activity. This allocation is made using an approach that incorporates the payment application requirements of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, generally paying down the highest interest rate balances first. The estimate of expected credit losses includes expected recoveries of amounts previously charged off or expected to be charged off, even if such recoveries result in a negative allowance. Collective and Individual AssessmentsWhen calculating the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments, the Firm assesses whether exposures share similar risk characteristics. If similar risk characteristics exist, the Firm estimates expected credit losses collectively, considering the risk associated with a particular pool and the probability that the exposures within the pool will deteriorate or default. The assessment of risk characteristics is subject to significant management judgment. Emphasizing one characteristic over another or considering additional characteristics could affect the allowance. •Relevant risk characteristics for the consumer portfolio include product type, delinquency status, current FICO scores, geographic distribution, and, for collateralized loans, current LTV ratios. •Relevant risk characteristics for the wholesale portfolio include risk rating, delinquency status, tenor, level and type of collateral, LOB, geography, industry, credit enhancement, product type, facility purpose, and payment terms. The majority of the Firm’s credit exposures share risk characteristics with other similar exposures, and as a result are collectively assessed for impairment (“portfolio-based component”). The portfolio-based component covers consumer loans, performing risk-rated loans and certain lending-related commitments. If an exposure does not share risk characteristics with other exposures, the Firm generally estimates expected credit losses on an individual basis, considering expected repayment and conditions impacting that individual exposure (“asset-specific component”). The asset-specific component covers collateral-dependent loans and risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status. Portfolio-based componentThe portfolio-based component begins with a quantitative calculation that considers the likelihood of the borrower changing delinquency status or moving from one risk rating to another. The quantitative calculation covers expected credit losses over an instrument’s expected life and is estimated by applying credit loss factors to the Firm’s estimated exposure at default. The credit loss factors incorporate the The Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management's estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The allowance for credit losses generally comprises:•the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated), •the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is presented on the Consolidated balance sheets in accounts payable and other liabilities, and •the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which is reflected in investment securities on the Consolidated balance sheets.The income statement effect of all changes in the allowance for credit losses is recognized in the provision for credit losses. Determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is complex and requires significant judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. At least quarterly, the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by the CRO, the CFO and the Controller of the Firm. Subsequent evaluations of credit exposures, considering the macroeconomic conditions, forecasts and other factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the allowance for credit losses in future periods. The Firm’s policies used to determine its allowance for loan losses and its allowance for lending-related commitments are described in the following paragraphs. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the policies used to determine the allowance for credit losses on investment securities. Methodology for allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitmentsThe allowance for loan losses and allowance for lending-related commitments represents expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of retained loans and lending-related commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable. The Firm does not record an allowance for future draws on unconditionally cancellable lending-related commitments (e.g., credit cards). Expected losses related to accrued interest on credit card loans are considered in the Firm’s allowance for loan losses. However, the Firm does not record an allowance on other accrued interest receivables, due to its policy to write these receivables off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income. The expected life of each instrument is determined by considering its contractual term, expected prepayments, cancellation features, and certain extension and call options. The expected life of funded credit card loans is generally estimated by considering expected future payments on the credit card account, and determining how much of those amounts should be allocated to repayments of the funded loan balance (as The Firm’s allowance for credit losses represents management's estimate of expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of the Firm's financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. The allowance for credit losses generally comprises: •the allowance for loan losses, which covers the Firm’s retained loan portfolios (scored and risk-rated), •the allowance for lending-related commitments, which is presented on the Consolidated balance sheets in accounts payable and other liabilities, and •the allowance for credit losses on investment securities, which is reflected in investment securities on the Consolidated balance sheets. The income statement effect of all changes in the allowance for credit losses is recognized in the provision for credit losses. Determining the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses is complex and requires significant judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. At least quarterly, the allowance for credit losses is reviewed by the CRO, the CFO and the Controller of the Firm. Subsequent evaluations of credit exposures, considering the macroeconomic conditions, forecasts and other factors then prevailing, may result in significant changes in the allowance for credit losses in future periods. The Firm’s policies used to determine its allowance for loan losses and its allowance for lending-related commitments are described in the following paragraphs. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the policies used to determine the allowance for credit losses on investment securities.

The allowance for loan losses and allowance for lending-related commitments represents expected credit losses over the remaining expected life of retained loans and lending-related commitments that are not unconditionally cancellable. The Firm does not record an allowance for future draws on unconditionally cancellable lending-related commitments (e.g., credit cards). Expected losses related to accrued interest on credit card loans are considered in the Firm’s allowance for loan losses. However, the Firm does not record an allowance on other accrued interest receivables, due to its policy to write these receivables off no later than 90 days past due by reversing interest income. The expected life of each instrument is determined by considering its contractual term, expected prepayments, cancellation features, and certain extension and call options. The expected life of funded credit card loans is generally estimated by considering expected future payments on the credit card account, and determining how much of those amounts should be allocated to repayments of the funded loan balance (as of the balance sheet date) versus other account activity. This allocation is made using an approach that incorporates the payment application requirements of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, generally paying down the highest interest rate balances first. The estimate of expected credit losses includes expected recoveries of amounts previously charged off or expected to be charged off, even if such recoveries result in a negative allowance. Collective and Individual AssessmentsWhen calculating the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments, the Firm assesses whether exposures share similar risk characteristics. If similar risk characteristics exist, the Firm estimates expected credit losses collectively, considering the risk associated with a particular pool and the probability that the exposures within the pool will deteriorate or default. The assessment of risk characteristics is subject to significant management judgment. Emphasizing one characteristic over another or considering additional characteristics could affect the allowance. •Relevant risk characteristics for the consumer portfolio include product type, delinquency status, current FICO scores, geographic distribution, and, for collateralized loans, current LTV ratios. •Relevant risk characteristics for the wholesale portfolio include risk rating, delinquency status, tenor, level and type of collateral, LOB, geography, industry, credit enhancement, product type, facility purpose, and payment terms. The majority of the Firm’s credit exposures share risk characteristics with other similar exposures, and as a result are collectively assessed for impairment (“portfolio-based component”). The portfolio-based component covers consumer loans, performing risk-rated loans and certain lending-related commitments. If an exposure does not share risk characteristics with other exposures, the Firm generally estimates expected credit losses on an individual basis, considering expected repayment and conditions impacting that individual exposure (“asset-specific component”). The asset-specific component covers collateral-dependent loans and risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status. Portfolio-based componentThe portfolio-based component begins with a quantitative calculation that considers the likelihood of the borrower changing delinquency status or moving from one risk rating to another. The quantitative calculation covers expected credit losses over an instrument’s expected life and is estimated by applying credit loss factors to the Firm’s estimated exposure at default. The credit loss factors incorporate the of the balance sheet date) versus other account activity. This allocation is made using an approach that incorporates the payment application requirements of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, generally paying down the highest interest rate balances first. The estimate of expected credit losses includes expected recoveries of amounts previously charged off or expected to be charged off, even if such recoveries result in a negative allowance. Collective and Individual Assessments When calculating the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments, the Firm assesses whether exposures share similar risk characteristics. If similar risk characteristics exist, the Firm estimates expected credit losses collectively, considering the risk associated with a particular pool and the probability that the exposures within the pool will deteriorate or default. The assessment of risk characteristics is subject to significant management judgment. Emphasizing one characteristic over another or considering additional characteristics could affect the allowance. •Relevant risk characteristics for the consumer portfolio include product type, delinquency status, current FICO scores, geographic distribution, and, for collateralized loans, current LTV ratios. •Relevant risk characteristics for the wholesale portfolio include risk rating, delinquency status, tenor, level and type of collateral, LOB, geography, industry, credit enhancement, product type, facility purpose, and payment terms. The majority of the Firm’s credit exposures share risk characteristics with other similar exposures, and as a result are collectively assessed for impairment (“portfolio-based component”). The portfolio-based component covers consumer loans, performing risk-rated loans and certain lending-related commitments. If an exposure does not share risk characteristics with other exposures, the Firm generally estimates expected credit losses on an individual basis, considering expected repayment and conditions impacting that individual exposure (“asset-specific component”). The asset-specific component covers collateral-dependent loans and risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status. Portfolio-based component The portfolio-based component begins with a quantitative calculation that considers the likelihood of the borrower changing delinquency status or moving from one risk rating to another. The quantitative calculation covers expected credit losses over an instrument’s expected life and is estimated by applying credit loss factors to the Firm’s estimated exposure at default. The credit loss factors incorporate the 266JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 266JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 266JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 266 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K probability of borrower default as well as loss severity in the event of default. They are derived using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios over an eight-quarter forecast period, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the eight-quarter forecast period. The five macroeconomic scenarios consist of a central, relative adverse, extreme adverse, relative upside and extreme upside scenario, and are updated by the Firm’s central forecasting team. The scenarios take into consideration the Firm’s macroeconomic outlook, internal perspectives from subject matter experts across the Firm, and market consensus and involve a governed process that incorporates feedback from senior management across LOBs, Corporate Finance and Risk Management.The quantitative calculation is adjusted to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet reflected in the calculation. These adjustments are accomplished in part by analyzing the historical loss experience, including during stressed periods, for each major product or model. Management applies judgment in making this adjustment, including taking into account uncertainties associated with the economic and political conditions, quality of underwriting standards, borrower behavior, credit concentrations or deterioration within an industry, product or portfolio, as well as other relevant internal and external factors affecting the credit quality of the portfolio. In certain instances, the interrelationships between these factors create further uncertainties.The application of different inputs into the quantitative calculation, and the assumptions used by management to adjust the quantitative calculation, are subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments.Asset-specific component To determine the asset-specific component of the allowance, collateral-dependent loans (including those loans for which foreclosure is probable) and nonaccrual risk-rated loans in the wholesale portfolio segment are generally evaluated individually.For collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell, as applicable, is used to determine the charge-off amount for declines in value (to reduce the amortized cost of the loan to the fair value of collateral) or the amount of negative allowance that should be recognized (for recoveries of prior charge-offs associated with improvements in the fair value of the collateral).For non-collateral dependent loans, the Firm generally measures the asset-specific allowance as the difference between the amortized cost of the loan and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Subsequent changes in impairment are generally recognized as an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. The asset-specific component of the allowance for non-collateral dependent loans incorporates the effect of the modification on the loan’s expected cash flows including changes in interest rates, principal forgiveness, and other concessions, as well as management’s expectation of the borrower’s ability to repay under the modified terms. Estimating the timing and amounts of future cash flows is highly judgmental as these cash flow projections rely upon estimates such as loss severities, asset valuations, the amounts and timing of interest or principal payments (including any expected prepayments) or other factors that are reflective of current and expected market conditions. These estimates are, in turn, dependent on factors such as the duration of current overall economic conditions, industry, portfolio, or borrower-specific factors, the expected outcome of insolvency proceedings as well as, in certain circumstances, other economic factors. All of these estimates and assumptions require significant management judgment and certain assumptions are highly subjective. Other financial assetsIn addition to loans and investment securities, the Firm holds other financial assets that are measured at amortized cost on the Consolidated balance sheets, including credit exposures arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements. Management estimates the allowance for other financial assets using various techniques considering historical losses and current economic conditions. Credit risk arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements is generally mitigated by factors such as the short-term nature of the activity, the fair value of collateral held and the Firm’s right to call for, and the borrower’s obligation to provide additional margin when the fair value of the collateral declines. Because of these mitigating factors, these exposures generally do not require an allowance for credit losses. However, management may also consider other factors such as the borrower’s ongoing ability to provide collateral to satisfy margin requirements, or whether collateral is significantly concentrated in an individual issuer or in securities with similar risk characteristics. If in management’s judgment, an allowance for credit losses for these exposures is required, the Firm estimates expected credit losses based on the value of the collateral and probability of borrower default. probability of borrower default as well as loss severity in the event of default. They are derived using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios over an eight-quarter forecast period, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the eight-quarter forecast period. The five macroeconomic scenarios consist of a central, relative adverse, extreme adverse, relative upside and extreme upside scenario, and are updated by the Firm’s central forecasting team. The scenarios take into consideration the Firm’s macroeconomic outlook, internal perspectives from subject matter experts across the Firm, and market consensus and involve a governed process that incorporates feedback from senior management across LOBs, Corporate Finance and Risk Management.The quantitative calculation is adjusted to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet reflected in the calculation. These adjustments are accomplished in part by analyzing the historical loss experience, including during stressed periods, for each major product or model. Management applies judgment in making this adjustment, including taking into account uncertainties associated with the economic and political conditions, quality of underwriting standards, borrower behavior, credit concentrations or deterioration within an industry, product or portfolio, as well as other relevant internal and external factors affecting the credit quality of the portfolio. In certain instances, the interrelationships between these factors create further uncertainties.The application of different inputs into the quantitative calculation, and the assumptions used by management to adjust the quantitative calculation, are subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments.Asset-specific component To determine the asset-specific component of the allowance, collateral-dependent loans (including those loans for which foreclosure is probable) and nonaccrual risk-rated loans in the wholesale portfolio segment are generally evaluated individually.For collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell, as applicable, is used to determine the charge-off amount for declines in value (to reduce the amortized cost of the loan to the fair value of collateral) or the amount of negative allowance that should be recognized (for recoveries of prior charge-offs associated with improvements in the fair value of the collateral).For non-collateral dependent loans, the Firm generally measures the asset-specific allowance as the probability of borrower default as well as loss severity in the event of default. They are derived using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios over an eight-quarter forecast period, followed by a single year straight-line interpolation to revert to long run historical information for periods beyond the eight-quarter forecast period. The five macroeconomic scenarios consist of a central, relative adverse, extreme adverse, relative upside and extreme upside scenario, and are updated by the Firm’s central forecasting team. The scenarios take into consideration the Firm’s macroeconomic outlook, internal perspectives from subject matter experts across the Firm, and market consensus and involve a governed process that incorporates feedback from senior management across LOBs, Corporate Finance and Risk Management. The quantitative calculation is adjusted to take into consideration model imprecision, emerging risk assessments, trends and other subjective factors that are not yet reflected in the calculation. These adjustments are accomplished in part by analyzing the historical loss experience, including during stressed periods, for each major product or model. Management applies judgment in making this adjustment, including taking into account uncertainties associated with the economic and political conditions, quality of underwriting standards, borrower behavior, credit concentrations or deterioration within an industry, product or portfolio, as well as other relevant internal and external factors affecting the credit quality of the portfolio. In certain instances, the interrelationships between these factors create further uncertainties. The application of different inputs into the quantitative calculation, and the assumptions used by management to adjust the quantitative calculation, are subject to significant management judgment, and emphasizing one input or assumption over another, or considering other inputs or assumptions, could affect the estimate of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments. Asset-specific component To determine the asset-specific component of the allowance, collateral-dependent loans (including those loans for which foreclosure is probable) and nonaccrual risk-rated loans in the wholesale portfolio segment are generally evaluated individually. For collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of collateral less estimated costs to sell, as applicable, is used to determine the charge-off amount for declines in value (to reduce the amortized cost of the loan to the fair value of collateral) or the amount of negative allowance that should be recognized (for recoveries of prior charge-offs associated with improvements in the fair value of the collateral). For non-collateral dependent loans, the Firm generally measures the asset-specific allowance as the difference between the amortized cost of the loan and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Subsequent changes in impairment are generally recognized as an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. The asset-specific component of the allowance for non-collateral dependent loans incorporates the effect of the modification on the loan’s expected cash flows including changes in interest rates, principal forgiveness, and other concessions, as well as management’s expectation of the borrower’s ability to repay under the modified terms. Estimating the timing and amounts of future cash flows is highly judgmental as these cash flow projections rely upon estimates such as loss severities, asset valuations, the amounts and timing of interest or principal payments (including any expected prepayments) or other factors that are reflective of current and expected market conditions. These estimates are, in turn, dependent on factors such as the duration of current overall economic conditions, industry, portfolio, or borrower-specific factors, the expected outcome of insolvency proceedings as well as, in certain circumstances, other economic factors. All of these estimates and assumptions require significant management judgment and certain assumptions are highly subjective. Other financial assetsIn addition to loans and investment securities, the Firm holds other financial assets that are measured at amortized cost on the Consolidated balance sheets, including credit exposures arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements. Management estimates the allowance for other financial assets using various techniques considering historical losses and current economic conditions. Credit risk arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements is generally mitigated by factors such as the short-term nature of the activity, the fair value of collateral held and the Firm’s right to call for, and the borrower’s obligation to provide additional margin when the fair value of the collateral declines. Because of these mitigating factors, these exposures generally do not require an allowance for credit losses. However, management may also consider other factors such as the borrower’s ongoing ability to provide collateral to satisfy margin requirements, or whether collateral is significantly concentrated in an individual issuer or in securities with similar risk characteristics. If in management’s judgment, an allowance for credit losses for these exposures is required, the Firm estimates expected credit losses based on the value of the collateral and probability of borrower default. difference between the amortized cost of the loan and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Subsequent changes in impairment are generally recognized as an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. The asset-specific component of the allowance for non-collateral dependent loans incorporates the effect of the modification on the loan’s expected cash flows including changes in interest rates, principal forgiveness, and other concessions, as well as management’s expectation of the borrower’s ability to repay under the modified terms. Estimating the timing and amounts of future cash flows is highly judgmental as these cash flow projections rely upon estimates such as loss severities, asset valuations, the amounts and timing of interest or principal payments (including any expected prepayments) or other factors that are reflective of current and expected market conditions. These estimates are, in turn, dependent on factors such as the duration of current overall economic conditions, industry, portfolio, or borrower-specific factors, the expected outcome of insolvency proceedings as well as, in certain circumstances, other economic factors. All of these estimates and assumptions require significant management judgment and certain assumptions are highly subjective. Other financial assets In addition to loans and investment securities, the Firm holds other financial assets that are measured at amortized cost on the Consolidated balance sheets, including credit exposures arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements. Management estimates the allowance for other financial assets using various techniques considering historical losses and current economic conditions. Credit risk arising from lending activities subject to collateral maintenance requirements is generally mitigated by factors such as the short-term nature of the activity, the fair value of collateral held and the Firm’s right to call for, and the borrower’s obligation to provide additional margin when the fair value of the collateral declines. Because of these mitigating factors, these exposures generally do not require an allowance for credit losses. However, management may also consider other factors such as the borrower’s ongoing ability to provide collateral to satisfy margin requirements, or whether collateral is significantly concentrated in an individual issuer or in securities with similar risk characteristics. If in management’s judgment, an allowance for credit losses for these exposures is required, the Firm estimates expected credit losses based on the value of the collateral and probability of borrower default. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K267 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K267 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K267 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 267

The table below summarizes information about the allowances for credit losses and includes a breakdown of loans and lending-related commitments by impairment methodology. Refer to Note 10 for further information on the allowance for credit losses on investment securities. (Table continued on next page)2024Year ended December 31,(in millions)Consumer,excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotalAllowance for loan lossesBeginning balance at January 1,$1,856 $12,450 $8,114 $22,420 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle(a)NANANANAGross charge-offs1,299 8,198 1,022 10,519 Gross recoveries collected(625)(1,056)(200)(1,881)Net charge-offs674 7,142 822 8,638 Provision for loan losses624 9,292 578 10,494 Other1 — 68 69 Ending balance at December 31,$1,807 $14,600 $7,938 $24,345 Allowance for lending-related commitmentsBeginning balance at January 1,$75 $— $1,899 $1,974 Provision for lending-related commitments7 — 121 128 Other— — (1)(1)Ending balance at December 31,$82 $— $2,019 $2,101 Total allowance for investment securitiesNANANA$152 Total allowance for credit losses(b)$1,889 $14,600 $9,957 $26,598 Allowance for loan losses by impairment methodologyAsset-specific(c)$(728)$— $526 $(202)Portfolio-based2,535 14,600 7,412 24,547 Total allowance for loan losses$1,807 $14,600 $7,938 $24,345 Loans by impairment methodologyAsset-specific(c)$2,805 $— $3,912 $6,717 Portfolio-based373,529 232,860 686,484 1,292,873 Total retained loans$376,334 $232,860 $690,396 $1,299,590 Collateral-dependent loansNet charge-offs$1 $— $324 $325 Loans measured at fair value of collateral less cost to sell2,696 — 1,834 4,530 Allowance for lending-related commitments by impairment methodologyAsset-specific$— $— $109 $109 Portfolio-based82 — 1,910 1,992 Total allowance for lending-related commitments(d)$82 $— $2,019 $2,101 Lending-related commitments by impairment methodologyAsset-specific$— $— $737 $737 Portfolio-based(e)25,608 19 510,254 535,881 Total lending-related commitments$25,608 $19 $510,991 $536,618 2024 Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle(a) Other

(a)Represents the impact to the allowance for loan losses upon the adoption of the Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Troubled Debt Restructurings accounting guidance. Refer to Note 1 for further information. (b)At December 31, 2024 and 2023 and 2022, in addition to the allowance for credit losses in the table above, the Firm also had an allowance for credit losses of $268 million, $243 million and $21 million, respectively, associated with certain accounts receivable in CIB. (c)Includes collateral-dependent loans, including those for which foreclosure is deemed probable, and nonaccrual risk-rated loans. (d)The allowance for lending-related commitments is reported in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. (e)At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, lending-related commitments excluded $19.2 billion, $17.2 billion and $13.1 billion, respectively, for the consumer, excluding credit card portfolio segment; $1.0 trillion, $915.7 billion and $821.3 billion, respectively, for the credit card portfolio segment; and $20.5 billion, $19.7 billion and $9.8 billion, respectively, for the wholesale portfolio segment, which were not subject to the allowance for lending-related commitments. 268JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 268JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 268JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 268 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K (table continued from previous page)20232022Consumer,excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotalConsumer,excluding credit cardCredit cardWholesaleTotal$2,040 $11,200 $6,486 $19,726 $1,765 $10,250 $4,371 $16,386 (489)(100)2 (587)NANANANA1,151 5,491 1,011 7,653 812 3,192 322 4,326 (519)(793)(132)(1,444)(543)(789)(141)(1,473)632 4,698 879 6,209 269 2,403 181 2,853 936 6,048 2,484 9,468 543 3,353 2,293 6,189 1 — 21 22 1 — 3 4 $1,856 $12,450 $8,114 $22,420 $2,040 $11,200 $6,486 $19,726 $76 $— $2,306 $2,382 $113 $— $2,148 $2,261 (1)— (407)(408)(37)— 157 120 — — — — — — 1 1 $75 $— $1,899 $1,974 $76 $— $2,306 $2,382 NANANA$128NANANA$96 $1,931 $12,450 $10,013 $24,522 $2,116 $11,200 $8,792 $22,204 $(876)$— $392 $(484)$(624)$223 $467 $66 2,732 12,450 7,722 22,904 2,664 10,977 6,019 19,660 $1,856 $12,450 $8,114 $22,420 $2,040 $11,200 $6,486 $19,726 $3,287 $— $2,338 $5,625 $11,978 $796 $2,189 $14,963 393,988 211,123 670,134 1,275,245 288,775 184,379 601,481 1,074,635 $397,275 $211,123 $672,472 $1,280,870 $300,753 $185,175 $603,670 $1,089,598 $6 $— $180 $186 $(33)$— $16 $(17)3,216 — 1,012 4,228 3,585 — 464 4,049 $— $— $89 $89 $— $— $90 $90 75 — 1,810 1,885 76 — 2,216 2,292 $75 $— $1,899 $1,974 $76 $— $2,306 $2,382 $— $— $464 $464 $— $— $455 $455 28,248 — 516,577 544,825 20,423 — 461,688 482,111 $28,248 $— $517,041 $545,289 $20,423 $— $462,143 $482,566 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K269 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K269 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K269 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 269

Discussion of changes in the allowance The allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 was $26.9 billion, reflecting a net addition of $2.1 billion from December 31, 2023.The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included:•$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting: –a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by –a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $30 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024.The Firm’s qualitative adjustments continued to include additional weight placed on the adverse scenarios to reflect ongoing uncertainties and downside risks related to the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment.The Firm's allowance for credit losses is estimated using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios. The adverse scenarios incorporate more punitive macroeconomic factors than the central case assumptions provided in the table below, resulting in:•a weighted average U.S. unemployment rate peaking at 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, and•a weighted average U.S. real GDP level that is 1.9% lower than the central case at the end of the second quarter of 2026.The following table presents the Firm’s central case assumptions for the periods presented:Central case assumptions at December 31, 20242Q254Q252Q26U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.5 %4.3 %4.3 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)2.0 %1.9 %1.8 %Central case assumptions at December 31, 20232Q244Q242Q25U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.1 %4.4 %4.1 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)1.8 %0.7 %1.0 %(a)Reflects quarterly average of forecasted U.S. unemployment rate.(b)The year over year growth in U.S. real GDP in the forecast horizon of the central scenario is calculated as the percentage change in U.S. real GDP levels from the prior year.Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods.Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios.Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information on the allowance for credit losses and related management judgments. The allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 was $26.9 billion, reflecting a net addition of $2.1 billion from December 31, 2023.The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included:•$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting: –a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by –a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $30 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024.The Firm’s qualitative adjustments continued to include additional weight placed on the adverse scenarios to reflect ongoing uncertainties and downside risks related to the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment.The Firm's allowance for credit losses is estimated using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios. The adverse scenarios incorporate more punitive macroeconomic factors than the central case assumptions provided in the table below, resulting in:•a weighted average U.S. unemployment rate peaking at 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, and•a weighted average U.S. real GDP level that is 1.9% lower than the central case at the end of the second quarter of 2026. The allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2024 was $26.9 billion, reflecting a net addition of $2.1 billion from December 31, 2023. The net addition to the allowance for credit losses included: •$2.1 billion in consumer, reflecting: –a $2.2 billion net addition in Card Services, predominantly driven by loan growth, reflecting higher revolving balances, including the seasoning of vintages originated in recent years, partially offset by –a $125 million net reduction in Home Lending in the first quarter of 2024, and •a net reduction of $30 million in wholesale, reflecting: –changes in certain macroeconomic variables, an update to loss assumptions on certain loans in Markets, and a reduction due to charge-offs largely from collateral-dependent loans, predominantly offset by –net downgrade activity, primarily in Real Estate, and the impact of incorporating the First Republic portfolio into the Firm’s modeled credit loss estimates in the second quarter of 2024. The Firm’s qualitative adjustments continued to include additional weight placed on the adverse scenarios to reflect ongoing uncertainties and downside risks related to the geopolitical and macroeconomic environment. The Firm's allowance for credit losses is estimated using a weighted average of five internally developed macroeconomic scenarios. The adverse scenarios incorporate more punitive macroeconomic factors than the central case assumptions provided in the table below, resulting in: •a weighted average U.S. unemployment rate peaking at 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, and •a weighted average U.S. real GDP level that is 1.9% lower than the central case at the end of the second quarter of 2026. The following table presents the Firm’s central case assumptions for the periods presented:Central case assumptions at December 31, 20242Q254Q252Q26U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.5 %4.3 %4.3 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)2.0 %1.9 %1.8 %Central case assumptions at December 31, 20232Q244Q242Q25U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.1 %4.4 %4.1 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)1.8 %0.7 %1.0 %(a)Reflects quarterly average of forecasted U.S. unemployment rate.(b)The year over year growth in U.S. real GDP in the forecast horizon of the central scenario is calculated as the percentage change in U.S. real GDP levels from the prior year.Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods.Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios.Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information on the allowance for credit losses and related management judgments. The following table presents the Firm’s central case assumptions for the periods presented: Central case assumptions at December 31, 20242Q254Q252Q26U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.5 %4.3 %4.3 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)2.0 %1.9 %1.8 % U.S. unemployment rate(a) YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b) Central case assumptions at December 31, 20232Q244Q242Q25U.S. unemployment rate(a)4.1 %4.4 %4.1 %YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b)1.8 %0.7 %1.0 % U.S. unemployment rate(a) YoY growth in U.S. real GDP(b) (a)Reflects quarterly average of forecasted U.S. unemployment rate. (b)The year over year growth in U.S. real GDP in the forecast horizon of the central scenario is calculated as the percentage change in U.S. real GDP levels from the prior year. Subsequent changes to this forecast and related estimates will be reflected in the provision for credit losses in future periods. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on the consumer and wholesale credit portfolios. Refer to Critical Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 161–164 for further information on the allowance for credit losses and related management judgments. 270JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 270JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 270JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 270 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Refer to Note 1 on page 177 for a further description of the Firm’s accounting policies regarding consolidation of and involvement with VIEs. The following table summarizes the most significant types of Firm-sponsored VIEs by business segment. The Firm considers a “Firm-sponsored” VIE to include any entity where: (1) JPMorganChase is the primary beneficiary of the structure; (2) the VIE is used by JPMorganChase to securitize Firm assets; (3) the VIE issues financial instruments with the JPMorganChase name; or (4) the entity is a JPMorganChase–administered asset-backed commercial paper conduit. Line of BusinessTransaction TypeActivity2024 Form 10-Kpage referencesCCBCredit card securitization trustsSecuritization of originated credit card receivablespages 271–272Mortgage securitization trustsServicing and securitization of both originated and purchased residential mortgagespages 272–274CIBMortgage and other securitization trustsSecuritization of both originated and purchased residential and commercial mortgages, and other consumer loanspages 272–274Multi-seller conduitsAssisting clients in accessing the financial markets in a cost-efficient manner and structuring transactions to meet investor needspage 274Municipal bond vehiclesFinancing of municipal bond investmentspages 274–275 The Firm’s other business segments and Corporate are also involved with VIEs (both third-party and Firm-sponsored), but to a lesser extent, as follows: •Asset & Wealth Management: AWM sponsors and manages certain funds that are deemed VIEs. As asset manager of the funds, AWM earns a fee based on assets managed; the fee varies with each fund’s investment objective and is competitively priced. For fund entities that qualify as VIEs, AWM’s interests are, in certain cases, considered to be significant variable interests that result in consolidation of the financial results of these entities. •Corporate: Corporate is involved with entities that may meet the definition of VIEs; however these entities are generally subject to specialized investment company accounting, which does not require the consolidation of investments, including VIEs. In addition, Treasury and CIO invest in securities generally issued by third parties which may meet the definition of VIEs (e.g., issuers of asset-backed securities). In general, the Firm does not have the power to direct the significant activities of these entities and therefore does not consolidate these entities. Refer to Note 10 for further information on the Firm’s investment securities portfolio. In addition, CIB also invests in and provides financing, lending-related services and other services to VIEs sponsored by third parties. Refer to page 276 of this Note for more information on the VIEs sponsored by third parties.

Credit card securitizationsCCB’s Card Services business may securitize originated credit card loans, primarily through the Chase Issuance Trust (the “Trust”). The Firm’s continuing involvement in credit card securitizations includes servicing the receivables, retaining an undivided seller’s interest in the receivables, retaining certain senior and subordinated securities and maintaining escrow accounts. The Firm consolidates the assets and liabilities of its sponsored credit card trusts as it is considered to be the primary beneficiary of these securitization trusts based on the Firm’s ability to direct the activities of these VIEs through its servicing responsibilities and other duties, including making decisions as to the receivables that are transferred into those trusts and as to any related modifications and workouts. Additionally, the nature and extent of the Firm’s other continuing involvement with the trusts, as indicated above, obligates the Firm to absorb losses and gives the Firm the right to receive certain benefits from these VIEs that could potentially be significant. The underlying securitized credit card receivables and other assets of the securitization trusts are available only for payment of the beneficial interests issued by the securitization trusts; they are not available to pay the Firm’s other obligations or the claims of the Firm’s creditors. The agreements with the credit card securitization trusts require the Firm to maintain a minimum undivided interest in the credit card trusts (generally 5%). As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm held undivided interests in Firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts of $6.6 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively. The Firm maintained an average undivided interest in principal receivables owned by Credit card securitizationsCCB’s Card Services business may securitize originated credit card loans, primarily through the Chase Issuance Trust (the “Trust”). The Firm’s continuing involvement in credit card securitizations includes servicing the receivables, retaining an undivided seller’s interest in the receivables, retaining certain senior and subordinated securities and maintaining escrow accounts. The Firm consolidates the assets and liabilities of its sponsored credit card trusts as it is considered to be the primary beneficiary of these securitization trusts based on the Firm’s ability to direct the activities of these VIEs through its servicing responsibilities and other duties, including making decisions as to the receivables that are transferred into those trusts and as to any related modifications and workouts. Additionally, the nature and extent of the Firm’s other

CCB’s Card Services business may securitize originated credit card loans, primarily through the Chase Issuance Trust (the “Trust”). The Firm’s continuing involvement in credit card securitizations includes servicing the receivables, retaining an undivided seller’s interest in the receivables, retaining certain senior and subordinated securities and maintaining escrow accounts. The Firm consolidates the assets and liabilities of its sponsored credit card trusts as it is considered to be the primary beneficiary of these securitization trusts based on the Firm’s ability to direct the activities of these VIEs through its servicing responsibilities and other duties, including making decisions as to the receivables that are transferred into those trusts and as to any related modifications and workouts. Additionally, the nature and extent of the Firm’s other continuing involvement with the trusts, as indicated above, obligates the Firm to absorb losses and gives the Firm the right to receive certain benefits from these VIEs that could potentially be significant. The underlying securitized credit card receivables and other assets of the securitization trusts are available only for payment of the beneficial interests issued by the securitization trusts; they are not available to pay the Firm’s other obligations or the claims of the Firm’s creditors. The agreements with the credit card securitization trusts require the Firm to maintain a minimum undivided interest in the credit card trusts (generally 5%). As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm held undivided interests in Firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts of $6.6 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively. The Firm maintained an average undivided interest in principal receivables owned by continuing involvement with the trusts, as indicated above, obligates the Firm to absorb losses and gives the Firm the right to receive certain benefits from these VIEs that could potentially be significant. The underlying securitized credit card receivables and other assets of the securitization trusts are available only for payment of the beneficial interests issued by the securitization trusts; they are not available to pay the Firm’s other obligations or the claims of the Firm’s creditors. The agreements with the credit card securitization trusts require the Firm to maintain a minimum undivided interest in the credit card trusts (generally 5%). As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm held undivided interests in Firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts of $6.6 billion and $4.9 billion, respectively. The Firm maintained an average undivided interest in principal receivables owned by JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K271 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K271 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K271 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 271

those trusts of approximately 45% and 65% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm did not retain any senior securities and retained $1.5 billion of subordinated securities in certain of its credit card securitization trusts at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Firm’s undivided interests in the credit card trusts and securities retained are eliminated in consolidation. Firm-sponsored mortgage and other securitization trustsThe Firm securitizes (or has securitized) originated and purchased residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and other consumer loans primarily in its CCB and CIB businesses. Depending on the particular transaction, as well as the respective business involved, the Firm may act as the servicer of the loans and/or retain certain beneficial interests in the securitization trusts. those trusts of approximately 45% and 65% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm did not retain any senior securities and retained $1.5 billion of subordinated securities in certain of its credit card securitization trusts at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Firm’s undivided interests in the credit card trusts and securities retained are eliminated in consolidation. those trusts of approximately 45% and 65% for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm did not retain any senior securities and retained $1.5 billion of subordinated securities in certain of its credit card securitization trusts at both December 31, 2024 and 2023. The Firm’s undivided interests in the credit card trusts and securities retained are eliminated in consolidation. Firm-sponsored mortgage and other securitization trustsThe Firm securitizes (or has securitized) originated and purchased residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and other consumer loans primarily in its CCB and CIB businesses. Depending on the particular transaction, as well as the respective business involved, the Firm may act as the servicer of the loans and/or retain certain beneficial interests in the securitization trusts.

The Firm securitizes (or has securitized) originated and purchased residential mortgages, commercial mortgages and other consumer loans primarily in its CCB and CIB businesses. Depending on the particular transaction, as well as the respective business involved, the Firm may act as the servicer of the loans and/or retain certain beneficial interests in the securitization trusts. The following tables present the total unpaid principal amount of assets held in Firm-sponsored private-label securitization entities, including those in which the Firm has continuing involvement, and those that are consolidated by the Firm. Continuing involvement includes servicing the loans, holding senior interests or subordinated interests (including amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules), recourse or guarantee arrangements, and derivative contracts. In certain instances, the Firm’s only continuing involvement is servicing the loans. The Firm’s maximum loss exposure from retained and purchased interests is the carrying value of these interests. Refer to page 279 of this Note for information on the securitization-related loan delinquencies and liquidation losses. Principal amount outstandingJPMorganChase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e)December 31, 2024(in millions)Total assets held by securitization VIEsAssets held in consolidated securitization VIEsAssets held in nonconsolidated securitization VIEs with continuing involvementTrading assets Investment securitiesOther financial assetsTotal interests held by JPMorganChaseSecuritization-related(a)Residential mortgage:Prime/Alt-A and option ARMs$71,085 $615 $50,846 $613 $1,850 $614 $3,077 Subprime8,824 — 1,847 44 19 — 63 Commercial and other(b)186,293 243 125,510 530 5,768 1,074 7,372 Total$266,202 $858 $178,203 $1,187 $7,637 $1,688 $10,512 JPMorganChase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e)

Commercial and other(b) Principal amount outstandingJPMorganChase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e)December 31, 2023(in millions)Total assets held by securitization VIEsAssets held in consolidated securitization VIEsAssets held in nonconsolidated securitization VIEs with continuing involvementTrading assets Investment securitiesOther financial assetsTotal interests held by JPMorganChaseSecuritization-related(a)Residential mortgage:Prime/Alt-A and option ARMs$58,570 $675 $39,319 $595 $1,981 $60 $2,636 Subprime8,881 — 1,312 3 — — 3 Commercial and other(b)168,042 — 120,262 831 5,638 1,354 7,823 Total$235,493 $675 $160,893 $1,429 $7,619 $1,414 $10,462 JPMorganChase interest in securitized assets in nonconsolidated VIEs(c)(d)(e)

Commercial and other(b) (a)Excludes U.S. GSEs and government agency securitizations and re-securitizations, which are not Firm-sponsored. (b)Consists of securities backed by commercial real estate loans and non-mortgage-related consumer receivables. (c)Excludes the following: retained servicing; securities retained from loan sales and securitization activity related to U.S. GSEs and government agencies; interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives primarily used to manage interest rate and foreign exchange risks of securitization entities; senior securities of $256 million and $52 million at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and subordinated securities which were not material at December 31, 2024 and 2023, which the Firm purchased in connection with CIB’s secondary market-making activities. (d)Includes interests held in re-securitization transactions. (e)At both December 31, 2024 and 2023, 77% of the Firm’s retained securitization interests, which are predominantly carried at fair value and include amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules, were risk-rated “A” or better, on an S&P-equivalent basis. The retained interests in prime residential mortgages consisted of $2.9 billion and $2.5 billion of investment-grade retained interests at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and $216 million and $88 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The retained interests in commercial and other securitization trusts consisted of $6.0 billion and $6.1 billion of investment-grade retained interests, and $1.4 billion and $1.7 billion of noninvestment-grade retained interests at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. 272JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 272JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 272JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 272 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Residential mortgageThe Firm securitizes residential mortgage loans originated by CCB, as well as residential mortgage loans purchased from third parties by either CCB or CIB. CCB generally retains servicing for all residential mortgage loans it originated or purchased, and for certain mortgage loans purchased by CIB. For securitizations of loans serviced by CCB, the Firm has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE because it is responsible for decisions related to loan modifications and workouts. CCB may also retain an interest upon securitization.In addition, CIB engages in underwriting and trading activities involving securities issued by Firm-sponsored securitization trusts. As a result, CIB at times retains senior and/or subordinated interests (including residual interests and amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules) in residential mortgage securitizations at the time of securitization, and/or reacquires positions in the secondary market in the normal course of business. In certain instances, as a result of the positions retained or reacquired by CIB or held by Treasury and CIO or CCB, when considered together with the servicing arrangements entered into by CCB, the Firm is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of certain securitization trusts. The Firm does not consolidate residential mortgage securitizations (Firm-sponsored or third-party-sponsored) when it is not the servicer (and therefore does not have the power to direct the most significant activities of the trust) or does not hold a beneficial interest in the trust that could potentially be significant to the trust.Commercial mortgages and other consumer securitizationsCIB originates and securitizes commercial mortgage loans, and engages in underwriting and trading activities involving the securities issued by securitization trusts. CIB may retain unsold senior and/or subordinated interests (including amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules) in commercial mortgage securitizations at the time of securitization but, generally, the Firm does not service commercial loan securitizations. Treasury and CIO may choose to invest in these securitizations as well. For commercial mortgage securitizations the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE generally is held by the servicer or investors in a specified class of securities (“controlling class”). The Firm generally does not retain an interest in the controlling class in its sponsored commercial mortgage securitization transactions.Re-securitizationsThe Firm engages in certain re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. These transfers occur in connection with both U.S. GSEs and government agency sponsored VIEs, which are backed by residential mortgages. The Firm’s consolidation analysis is largely dependent on the Firm’s role and interest in the re-securitization trusts.The following table presents the principal amount of securities transferred to re-securitization VIEs.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Transfers of securities to VIEsU.S. GSEs and government agencies$44,456 $18,864 $16,128 Most re-securitizations with which the Firm is involved are client-driven transactions in which a specific client or group of clients is seeking a specific return or risk profile. For these transactions, the Firm has concluded that the decision-making power of the entity is shared between the Firm and its clients, considering the joint effort and decisions in establishing the re-securitization trust and its assets, as well as the significant economic interest the client holds in the re-securitization trust; therefore the Firm does not consolidate the re-securitization VIE.The Firm did not transfer any private label securities to re-securitization VIEs during 2024, 2023 and 2022, and retained interests in any such Firm-sponsored VIEs as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were not material.Additionally, the Firm may invest in beneficial interests of third-party-sponsored re-securitizations and generally purchases these interests in the secondary market. In these circumstances, the Firm does not have the unilateral ability to direct the most significant activities of the re-securitization trust, either because it was not involved in the initial design of the trust, or the Firm was involved with an independent third-party sponsor and demonstrated shared power over the creation of the trust; therefore, the Firm does not consolidate the re-securitization VIE. Residential mortgageThe Firm securitizes residential mortgage loans originated by CCB, as well as residential mortgage loans purchased from third parties by either CCB or CIB. CCB generally retains servicing for all residential mortgage loans it originated or purchased, and for certain mortgage loans purchased by CIB. For securitizations of loans serviced by CCB, the Firm has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE because it is responsible for decisions related to loan modifications and workouts. CCB may also retain an interest upon securitization.In addition, CIB engages in underwriting and trading activities involving securities issued by Firm-sponsored securitization trusts. As a result, CIB at times retains senior and/or subordinated interests (including residual interests and amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules) in residential mortgage securitizations at the time of securitization, and/or reacquires positions in the secondary market in the normal course of business. In certain instances, as a result of the positions retained or reacquired by CIB or held by Treasury and CIO or CCB, when considered together with the servicing arrangements entered into by CCB, the Firm is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of certain securitization trusts. The Firm does not consolidate residential mortgage securitizations (Firm-sponsored or third-party-sponsored) when it is not the servicer (and therefore does not have the power to direct the most significant activities of the trust) or does not hold a beneficial interest in the trust that could potentially be significant to the trust.Commercial mortgages and other consumer securitizationsCIB originates and securitizes commercial mortgage loans, and engages in underwriting and trading activities involving the securities issued by securitization trusts. CIB may retain unsold senior and/or subordinated interests (including amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules) in commercial mortgage securitizations at the time of securitization but, generally, the Firm does not service commercial loan securitizations. Treasury and CIO may choose to invest in these securitizations as well. For commercial mortgage securitizations the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE generally is held by the servicer or investors in a specified class of securities (“controlling class”). The Firm generally does not retain an interest in the controlling class in its sponsored commercial mortgage securitization transactions. Residential mortgage The Firm securitizes residential mortgage loans originated by CCB, as well as residential mortgage loans purchased from third parties by either CCB or CIB. CCB generally retains servicing for all residential mortgage loans it originated or purchased, and for certain mortgage loans purchased by CIB. For securitizations of loans serviced by CCB, the Firm has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE because it is responsible for decisions related to loan modifications and workouts. CCB may also retain an interest upon securitization. In addition, CIB engages in underwriting and trading activities involving securities issued by Firm-sponsored securitization trusts. As a result, CIB at times retains senior and/or subordinated interests (including residual interests and amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules) in residential mortgage securitizations at the time of securitization, and/or reacquires positions in the secondary market in the normal course of business. In certain instances, as a result of the positions retained or reacquired by CIB or held by Treasury and CIO or CCB, when considered together with the servicing arrangements entered into by CCB, the Firm is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of certain securitization trusts. The Firm does not consolidate residential mortgage securitizations (Firm-sponsored or third-party-sponsored) when it is not the servicer (and therefore does not have the power to direct the most significant activities of the trust) or does not hold a beneficial interest in the trust that could potentially be significant to the trust. Commercial mortgages and other consumer securitizations CIB originates and securitizes commercial mortgage loans, and engages in underwriting and trading activities involving the securities issued by securitization trusts. CIB may retain unsold senior and/or subordinated interests (including amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules) in commercial mortgage securitizations at the time of securitization but, generally, the Firm does not service commercial loan securitizations. Treasury and CIO may choose to invest in these securitizations as well. For commercial mortgage securitizations the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE generally is held by the servicer or investors in a specified class of securities (“controlling class”). The Firm generally does not retain an interest in the controlling class in its sponsored commercial mortgage securitization transactions. Re-securitizationsThe Firm engages in certain re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. These transfers occur in connection with both U.S. GSEs and government agency sponsored VIEs, which are backed by residential mortgages. The Firm’s consolidation analysis is largely dependent on the Firm’s role and interest in the re-securitization trusts.The following table presents the principal amount of securities transferred to re-securitization VIEs.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Transfers of securities to VIEsU.S. GSEs and government agencies$44,456 $18,864 $16,128 Most re-securitizations with which the Firm is involved are client-driven transactions in which a specific client or group of clients is seeking a specific return or risk profile. For these transactions, the Firm has concluded that the decision-making power of the entity is shared between the Firm and its clients, considering the joint effort and decisions in establishing the re-securitization trust and its assets, as well as the significant economic interest the client holds in the re-securitization trust; therefore the Firm does not consolidate the re-securitization VIE.The Firm did not transfer any private label securities to re-securitization VIEs during 2024, 2023 and 2022, and retained interests in any such Firm-sponsored VIEs as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were not material.Additionally, the Firm may invest in beneficial interests of third-party-sponsored re-securitizations and generally purchases these interests in the secondary market. In these circumstances, the Firm does not have the unilateral ability to direct the most significant activities of the re-securitization trust, either because it was not involved in the initial design of the trust, or the Firm was involved with an independent third-party sponsor and demonstrated shared power over the creation of the trust; therefore, the Firm does not consolidate the re-securitization VIE. Re-securitizations The Firm engages in certain re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. These transfers occur in connection with both U.S. GSEs and government agency sponsored VIEs, which are backed by residential mortgages. The Firm’s consolidation analysis is largely dependent on the Firm’s role and interest in the re-securitization trusts. The following table presents the principal amount of securities transferred to re-securitization VIEs. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Transfers of securities to VIEsU.S. GSEs and government agencies$44,456 $18,864 $16,128

Most re-securitizations with which the Firm is involved are client-driven transactions in which a specific client or group of clients is seeking a specific return or risk profile. For these transactions, the Firm has concluded that the decision-making power of the entity is shared between the Firm and its clients, considering the joint effort and decisions in establishing the re-securitization trust and its assets, as well as the significant economic interest the client holds in the re-securitization trust; therefore the Firm does not consolidate the re-securitization VIE. The Firm did not transfer any private label securities to re-securitization VIEs during 2024, 2023 and 2022, and retained interests in any such Firm-sponsored VIEs as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were not material. Additionally, the Firm may invest in beneficial interests of third-party-sponsored re-securitizations and generally purchases these interests in the secondary market. In these circumstances, the Firm does not have the unilateral ability to direct the most significant activities of the re-securitization trust, either because it was not involved in the initial design of the trust, or the Firm was involved with an independent third-party sponsor and demonstrated shared power over the creation of the trust; therefore, the Firm does not consolidate the re-securitization VIE. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K273 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K273 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K273 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 273

The following table presents information on the Firm's interests in nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs.December 31, (in millions)Nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs20242023U.S. GSEs and government agenciesInterest in VIEs$3,219 $3,371 As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm did not consolidate any U.S. GSE and government agency re-securitization VIEs or any Firm-sponsored private-label re-securitization VIEs.Multi-seller conduitsMulti-seller conduit entities are separate bankruptcy remote entities that provide secured financing, collateralized by pools of receivables and other financial assets, to customers of the Firm. The conduits fund their financing facilities through the issuance of highly rated commercial paper. The primary source of repayment of the commercial paper is the cash flows from the pools of assets. In most instances, the assets are structured with deal-specific credit enhancements provided to the conduits by the customers (i.e., sellers) or other third parties. Deal-specific credit enhancements are generally structured to cover a multiple of historical losses expected on the pool of assets, and are typically in the form of overcollateralization provided by the seller. The deal-specific credit enhancements mitigate the Firm’s potential losses on its agreements with the conduits.To ensure timely repayment of the commercial paper, and to provide the conduits with funding to provide financing to customers in the event that the conduits do not obtain funding in the commercial paper market, each asset pool financed by the conduits has a minimum 100% deal-specific liquidity facility associated with it provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. also provides the multi-seller conduit vehicles with uncommitted program-wide liquidity facilities and program-wide credit enhancement in the form of standby letters of credit. The amount of program-wide credit enhancement required is based upon commercial paper issuance and approximates 10% of the outstanding balance of commercial paper.The Firm consolidates its Firm-administered multi-seller conduits, as the Firm has both the power to direct the significant activities of the conduits and a potentially significant economic interest in the conduits. As administrative agent and in its role in structuring transactions, the Firm makes decisions regarding asset types and credit quality, and manages the commercial paper funding needs of the conduits. The Firm’s interests that could potentially be significant to the VIEs include the fees received as administrative agent and liquidity and program-wide credit enhancement provider, as well as the potential exposure created by the liquidity and credit enhancement facilities provided to the conduits.In the normal course of business, JPMorganChase makes markets in and invests in commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The Firm held $2.9 billion and $9.8 billion of the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm’s investments reflect the Firm’s funding needs and capacity and were not driven by market illiquidity. Other than the amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules, the Firm is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits.Deal-specific liquidity facilities, program-wide liquidity and credit enhancement provided by the Firm have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm or the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits provide lending-related commitments to certain clients of the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The unfunded commitments were $10.3 billion and $10.8 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and are reported as off-balance sheet lending-related commitments in other unfunded commitments to extend credit. Refer to Note 28 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. Municipal bond vehiclesMunicipal bond vehicles or tender option bond (“TOB”) trusts allow institutions to finance their municipal bond investments at short-term rates. In a typical TOB transaction, the trust purchases highly rated municipal bond(s) of a single issuer and funds the purchase by issuing two types of securities: (1) puttable floating-rate certificates (“floaters”) and (2) inverse floating-rate residual interests (“residuals”). The floaters are typically purchased by money market funds or other short-term investors and may be tendered, with requisite notice, to the TOB trust. The residuals are retained by the investor seeking to finance its municipal bond investment. TOB transactions where the residual is held by a third-party investor are typically known as customer TOB trusts, and non-customer TOB trusts are transactions where the Residual is retained by the Firm. Customer TOB trusts are sponsored by a third party. The Firm serves as sponsor for all non-customer TOB transactions. The Firm may provide various services to a TOB trust, including remarketing agent, liquidity or tender option provider, and/or sponsor.J.P. Morgan Securities LLC may serve as a remarketing agent on the floaters for TOB trusts. The remarketing agent is responsible for establishing the periodic variable rate on the floaters, conducting the initial The following table presents information on the Firm's interests in nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs.December 31, (in millions)Nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs20242023U.S. GSEs and government agenciesInterest in VIEs$3,219 $3,371 As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm did not consolidate any U.S. GSE and government agency re-securitization VIEs or any Firm-sponsored private-label re-securitization VIEs.Multi-seller conduitsMulti-seller conduit entities are separate bankruptcy remote entities that provide secured financing, collateralized by pools of receivables and other financial assets, to customers of the Firm. The conduits fund their financing facilities through the issuance of highly rated commercial paper. The primary source of repayment of the commercial paper is the cash flows from the pools of assets. In most instances, the assets are structured with deal-specific credit enhancements provided to the conduits by the customers (i.e., sellers) or other third parties. Deal-specific credit enhancements are generally structured to cover a multiple of historical losses expected on the pool of assets, and are typically in the form of overcollateralization provided by the seller. The deal-specific credit enhancements mitigate the Firm’s potential losses on its agreements with the conduits.To ensure timely repayment of the commercial paper, and to provide the conduits with funding to provide financing to customers in the event that the conduits do not obtain funding in the commercial paper market, each asset pool financed by the conduits has a minimum 100% deal-specific liquidity facility associated with it provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. also provides the multi-seller conduit vehicles with uncommitted program-wide liquidity facilities and program-wide credit enhancement in the form of standby letters of credit. The amount of program-wide credit enhancement required is based upon commercial paper issuance and approximates 10% of the outstanding balance of commercial paper.The Firm consolidates its Firm-administered multi-seller conduits, as the Firm has both the power to direct the significant activities of the conduits and a potentially significant economic interest in the conduits. As administrative agent and in its role in structuring transactions, the Firm makes decisions regarding asset types and credit quality, and manages the commercial paper funding needs of the conduits. The Firm’s interests that could potentially be significant to the VIEs include the fees received as administrative agent and liquidity and program-wide The following table presents information on the Firm's interests in nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs. December 31, (in millions)Nonconsolidated re-securitization VIEs20242023U.S. GSEs and government agenciesInterest in VIEs$3,219 $3,371

Multi-seller conduit entities are separate bankruptcy remote entities that provide secured financing, collateralized by pools of receivables and other financial assets, to customers of the Firm. The conduits fund their financing facilities through the issuance of highly rated commercial paper. The primary source of repayment of the commercial paper is the cash flows from the pools of assets. In most instances, the assets are structured with deal-specific credit enhancements provided to the conduits by the customers (i.e., sellers) or other third parties. Deal-specific credit enhancements are generally structured to cover a multiple of historical losses expected on the pool of assets, and are typically in the form of overcollateralization provided by the seller. The deal-specific credit enhancements mitigate the Firm’s potential losses on its agreements with the conduits. To ensure timely repayment of the commercial paper, and to provide the conduits with funding to provide financing to customers in the event that the conduits do not obtain funding in the commercial paper market, each asset pool financed by the conduits has a minimum 100% deal-specific liquidity facility associated with it provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. also provides the multi-seller conduit vehicles with uncommitted program-wide liquidity facilities and program-wide credit enhancement in the form of standby letters of credit. The amount of program-wide credit enhancement required is based upon commercial paper issuance and approximates 10% of the outstanding balance of commercial paper. The Firm consolidates its Firm-administered multi-seller conduits, as the Firm has both the power to direct the significant activities of the conduits and a potentially significant economic interest in the conduits. As administrative agent and in its role in structuring transactions, the Firm makes decisions regarding asset types and credit quality, and manages the commercial paper funding needs of the conduits. The Firm’s interests that could potentially be significant to the VIEs include the fees received as administrative agent and liquidity and program-wide credit enhancement provider, as well as the potential exposure created by the liquidity and credit enhancement facilities provided to the conduits.In the normal course of business, JPMorganChase makes markets in and invests in commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The Firm held $2.9 billion and $9.8 billion of the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm’s investments reflect the Firm’s funding needs and capacity and were not driven by market illiquidity. Other than the amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules, the Firm is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits.Deal-specific liquidity facilities, program-wide liquidity and credit enhancement provided by the Firm have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm or the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits provide lending-related commitments to certain clients of the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The unfunded commitments were $10.3 billion and $10.8 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and are reported as off-balance sheet lending-related commitments in other unfunded commitments to extend credit. Refer to Note 28 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. Municipal bond vehiclesMunicipal bond vehicles or tender option bond (“TOB”) trusts allow institutions to finance their municipal bond investments at short-term rates. In a typical TOB transaction, the trust purchases highly rated municipal bond(s) of a single issuer and funds the purchase by issuing two types of securities: (1) puttable floating-rate certificates (“floaters”) and (2) inverse floating-rate residual interests (“residuals”). The floaters are typically purchased by money market funds or other short-term investors and may be tendered, with requisite notice, to the TOB trust. The residuals are retained by the investor seeking to finance its municipal bond investment. TOB transactions where the residual is held by a third-party investor are typically known as customer TOB trusts, and non-customer TOB trusts are transactions where the Residual is retained by the Firm. Customer TOB trusts are sponsored by a third party. The Firm serves as sponsor for all non-customer TOB transactions. The Firm may provide various services to a TOB trust, including remarketing agent, liquidity or tender option provider, and/or sponsor.J.P. Morgan Securities LLC may serve as a remarketing agent on the floaters for TOB trusts. The remarketing agent is responsible for establishing the periodic variable rate on the floaters, conducting the initial credit enhancement provider, as well as the potential exposure created by the liquidity and credit enhancement facilities provided to the conduits. In the normal course of business, JPMorganChase makes markets in and invests in commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The Firm held $2.9 billion and $9.8 billion of the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, which have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm’s investments reflect the Firm’s funding needs and capacity and were not driven by market illiquidity. Other than the amounts required to be held pursuant to credit risk retention rules, the Firm is not obligated under any agreement to purchase the commercial paper issued by the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. Deal-specific liquidity facilities, program-wide liquidity and credit enhancement provided by the Firm have been eliminated in consolidation. The Firm or the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits provide lending-related commitments to certain clients of the Firm-administered multi-seller conduits. The unfunded commitments were $10.3 billion and $10.8 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and are reported as off-balance sheet lending-related commitments in other unfunded commitments to extend credit. Refer to Note 28 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments.

Municipal bond vehicles or tender option bond (“TOB”) trusts allow institutions to finance their municipal bond investments at short-term rates. In a typical TOB transaction, the trust purchases highly rated municipal bond(s) of a single issuer and funds the purchase by issuing two types of securities: (1) puttable floating-rate certificates (“floaters”) and (2) inverse floating-rate residual interests (“residuals”). The floaters are typically purchased by money market funds or other short-term investors and may be tendered, with requisite notice, to the TOB trust. The residuals are retained by the investor seeking to finance its municipal bond investment. TOB transactions where the residual is held by a third-party investor are typically known as customer TOB trusts, and non-customer TOB trusts are transactions where the Residual is retained by the Firm. Customer TOB trusts are sponsored by a third party. The Firm serves as sponsor for all non-customer TOB transactions. The Firm may provide various services to a TOB trust, including remarketing agent, liquidity or tender option provider, and/or sponsor. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC may serve as a remarketing agent on the floaters for TOB trusts. The remarketing agent is responsible for establishing the periodic variable rate on the floaters, conducting the initial 274JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 274JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 274JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 274 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K placement and remarketing tendered floaters. The remarketing agent may, but is not obligated to, make markets in floaters. Floaters held by the Firm were not material during 2024 and 2023.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or J.P. Morgan Securities LLC often serves as the sole liquidity or tender option provider for the TOB trusts. The liquidity provider’s obligation to perform is conditional and is limited by certain events (“Termination Events”), which include bankruptcy or failure to pay by the municipal bond issuer or credit enhancement provider, an event of taxability on the municipal bonds or the immediate downgrade of the municipal bond to below investment grade. In addition, the liquidity provider’s exposure is typically further limited by the high credit quality of the underlying municipal bonds, the excess collateralization in the vehicle, or, in certain transactions, the reimbursement agreements with the Residual holders.Holders of the floaters may “put,” or tender, their floaters to the TOB trust. If the remarketing agent cannot successfully remarket the floaters to another investor, the liquidity provider either provides a loan to the TOB trust for the TOB trust’s purchase of the floaters, or it directly purchases the tendered floaters. TOB trusts are considered to be variable interest entities. The Firm consolidates non-customer TOB trusts because as the Residual holder, the Firm has the right to make decisions that significantly impact the economic performance of the municipal bond vehicle, and it has the right to receive benefits and bear losses that could potentially be significant to the municipal bond vehicle. placement and remarketing tendered floaters. The remarketing agent may, but is not obligated to, make markets in floaters. Floaters held by the Firm were not material during 2024 and 2023.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or J.P. Morgan Securities LLC often serves as the sole liquidity or tender option provider for the TOB trusts. The liquidity provider’s obligation to perform is conditional and is limited by certain events (“Termination Events”), which include bankruptcy or failure to pay by the municipal bond issuer or credit enhancement provider, an event of taxability on the municipal bonds or the immediate downgrade of the municipal bond to below investment grade. In addition, the liquidity provider’s exposure is typically further limited by the high credit quality of the underlying municipal bonds, the excess collateralization in the vehicle, or, in certain placement and remarketing tendered floaters. The remarketing agent may, but is not obligated to, make markets in floaters. Floaters held by the Firm were not material during 2024 and 2023. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or J.P. Morgan Securities LLC often serves as the sole liquidity or tender option provider for the TOB trusts. The liquidity provider’s obligation to perform is conditional and is limited by certain events (“Termination Events”), which include bankruptcy or failure to pay by the municipal bond issuer or credit enhancement provider, an event of taxability on the municipal bonds or the immediate downgrade of the municipal bond to below investment grade. In addition, the liquidity provider’s exposure is typically further limited by the high credit quality of the underlying municipal bonds, the excess collateralization in the vehicle, or, in certain transactions, the reimbursement agreements with the Residual holders.Holders of the floaters may “put,” or tender, their floaters to the TOB trust. If the remarketing agent cannot successfully remarket the floaters to another investor, the liquidity provider either provides a loan to the TOB trust for the TOB trust’s purchase of the floaters, or it directly purchases the tendered floaters. TOB trusts are considered to be variable interest entities. The Firm consolidates non-customer TOB trusts because as the Residual holder, the Firm has the right to make decisions that significantly impact the economic performance of the municipal bond vehicle, and it has the right to receive benefits and bear losses that could potentially be significant to the municipal bond vehicle. transactions, the reimbursement agreements with the Residual holders. Holders of the floaters may “put,” or tender, their floaters to the TOB trust. If the remarketing agent cannot successfully remarket the floaters to another investor, the liquidity provider either provides a loan to the TOB trust for the TOB trust’s purchase of the floaters, or it directly purchases the tendered floaters. TOB trusts are considered to be variable interest entities. The Firm consolidates non-customer TOB trusts because as the Residual holder, the Firm has the right to make decisions that significantly impact the economic performance of the municipal bond vehicle, and it has the right to receive benefits and bear losses that could potentially be significant to the municipal bond vehicle.

The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs consolidated by the Firm as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. AssetsLiabilitiesDecember 31, 2024(in millions)Trading assetsLoansOther(c) Total assets(d)Beneficial interests in VIE assets(e)Other(f)Total liabilitiesVIE program typeFirm-sponsored credit card trusts$— $13,531 $168 $13,699 $5,312 $10 $5,322 Firm-administered multi-seller conduits1 20,383 133 20,517 18,228 26 18,254 Municipal bond vehicles3,388 — 22 3,410 3,617 15 3,632 Mortgage securitization entities(a)— 630 8 638 115 48 163 Other496 1,966 (b)350 2,812 51 355 406 Total$3,885 $36,510 $681 $41,076 $27,323 $454 $27,777 AssetsLiabilitiesDecember 31, 2023(in millions)Trading assetsLoansOther(c) Total assets(d)Beneficial interests in VIE assets(e)Other(f)Total liabilitiesVIE program typeFirm-sponsored credit card trusts$— $9,460 $117 $9,577 $2,998 $6 $3,004 Firm-administered multi-seller conduits1 27,372 194 27,567 17,781 30 17,811 Municipal bond vehicles 2,056 — 22 2,078 2,116 11 2,127 Mortgage securitization entities(a)— 693 8 701 125 57 182 Other113 86 250 449 — 159 159 Total$2,170 $37,611 $591 $40,372 $23,020 $263 $23,283 Other(c) Total assets(d) Beneficial interests in VIE assets(e) Other(f) Mortgage securitization entities(a) (b) Other(c) Total assets(d) Beneficial interests in VIE assets(e) Other(f) Mortgage securitization entities(a) (a)Includes residential mortgage securitizations. (b)Primarily includes consumer loans in CIB. (c)Includes assets classified as cash and other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets. (d)The assets of the consolidated VIEs included in the program types above are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The assets and liabilities include third-party assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. (e)The interest-bearing beneficial interest liabilities issued by consolidated VIEs are classified on the Consolidated balance sheets as “Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs”. The holders of these beneficial interests generally do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorganChase. Included in beneficial interests in VIE assets are long-term beneficial interests of $5.5 billion and $3.1 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (f)Includes liabilities classified as accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K275 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K275 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K275 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 275

VIEs sponsored by third parties The Firm enters into transactions with VIEs structured by other parties. These include, for example, acting as a derivative counterparty, liquidity provider, investor, underwriter, placement agent, remarketing agent, trustee or custodian. These transactions are conducted at arm’s-length, and individual credit decisions are based on the analysis of the specific VIE, taking into consideration the quality of the underlying assets. Where the Firm does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, or a variable interest that could potentially be significant, the Firm generally does not consolidate the VIE, but it records and reports these positions on its Consolidated balance sheets in the same manner it would record and report positions in respect of any other third-party transaction. Tax credit vehicles The Firm holds investments in unconsolidated tax credit vehicles, which are limited partnerships and similar entities that own and operate affordable housing, alternative energy, and other projects. These entities are primarily considered VIEs. A third party is typically the general partner or managing member and has control over the significant activities of the tax credit vehicles, and accordingly the Firm does not consolidate tax credit vehicles. The Firm generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits allocated to the projects. The maximum loss exposure, represented by equity investments and funding commitments, was $35.2 billion and $35.1 billion, of which $15.0 billion and $14.7 billion was unfunded at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm assesses each project and to reduce the risk of loss, may withhold varying amounts of its capital investment until the project qualifies for tax credits. Refer to Note 28 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments.Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance which expanded the types of tax-oriented investments, beyond affordable housing tax credit investments, that the Firm can elect on a program by program basis, to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method. Refer to Notes 1, 6 and 25 for further information.The proportional amortization method requires the cost of eligible investments, within an elected program, be amortized in proportion to the tax benefits received with the resulting amortization reported directly in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Investments must meet certain criteria to be eligible, including that substantially all of the return is from income tax credits and other income tax benefits.In addition, under this method deferred taxes are generally not recorded as the investment is now amortized in proportion to the income tax credits and other income tax benefits received. Delayed equity contributions that are unconditional and legally binding or conditional and probable of occurring are recorded in other liabilities with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the investment. The guidance also requires a reevaluation of eligible investments when significant modifications or events occur that result in a change in the nature of the investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project. During the period, there were no significant modifications or events that resulted in a change in the nature of an eligible investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project.The following table provides information on tax-oriented investments for which the Firm elected to apply the proportional amortization method. Year ended December 31,(in millions)Alternative energy and affordable housing programs(d)202420232022Programs for which the Firm elected proportional amortization:Carrying value(a)$31,978 $14,644 $12,052 Tax credits and other tax benefits(b)6,379 2,044 1,786 Investments that qualify to be accounted for using proportional amortization:Amortization losses recognized as a component of income tax expense(5,018)(1,561)(1,353)Non-income-tax-related gains/(losses) and other returns received that are recognized outside of income tax expense(c)142 (1)(1)(a)Recorded in Other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets. Excludes programs to which the Firm does not apply the proportional amortization method, such as historic tax credit and new market tax credit programs.(b)Reflected in Income tax expense on the Consolidated statements of income and Operating activities on the Consolidated statements of cash flows.(c)Recorded in Other income on the Consolidated statements of income and Operating activities on the Consolidated statements of cash flows.(d)As of December 31, 2023 and 2022 represents eligible affordable housing investments. VIEs sponsored by third parties The Firm enters into transactions with VIEs structured by other parties. These include, for example, acting as a derivative counterparty, liquidity provider, investor, underwriter, placement agent, remarketing agent, trustee or custodian. These transactions are conducted at arm’s-length, and individual credit decisions are based on the analysis of the specific VIE, taking into consideration the quality of the underlying assets. Where the Firm does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, or a variable interest that could potentially be significant, the Firm generally does not consolidate the VIE, but it records and reports these positions on its Consolidated balance sheets in the same manner it would record and report positions in respect of any other third-party transaction. Tax credit vehicles The Firm holds investments in unconsolidated tax credit vehicles, which are limited partnerships and similar entities that own and operate affordable housing, alternative energy, and other projects. These entities are primarily considered VIEs. A third party is typically the general partner or managing member and has control over the significant activities of the tax credit vehicles, and accordingly the Firm does not consolidate tax credit vehicles. The Firm generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits allocated to the projects. The maximum loss exposure, represented by equity investments and funding commitments, was $35.2 billion and $35.1 billion, of which $15.0 billion and $14.7 billion was unfunded at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm assesses each project and to reduce the risk of loss, may withhold varying amounts of its capital investment until the project qualifies for tax credits. Refer to Note 28 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments.Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance which expanded the types of tax-oriented investments, beyond affordable housing tax credit investments, that the Firm can elect on a program by program basis, to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method. Refer to Notes 1, 6 and 25 for further information.The proportional amortization method requires the cost of eligible investments, within an elected program, be amortized in proportion to the tax benefits received with the resulting amortization reported directly in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Investments must meet certain criteria to be eligible,

The Firm enters into transactions with VIEs structured by other parties. These include, for example, acting as a derivative counterparty, liquidity provider, investor, underwriter, placement agent, remarketing agent, trustee or custodian. These transactions are conducted at arm’s-length, and individual credit decisions are based on the analysis of the specific VIE, taking into consideration the quality of the underlying assets. Where the Firm does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, or a variable interest that could potentially be significant, the Firm generally does not consolidate the VIE, but it records and reports these positions on its Consolidated balance sheets in the same manner it would record and report positions in respect of any other third-party transaction. Tax credit vehicles The Firm holds investments in unconsolidated tax credit vehicles, which are limited partnerships and similar entities that own and operate affordable housing, alternative energy, and other projects. These entities are primarily considered VIEs. A third party is typically the general partner or managing member and has control over the significant activities of the tax credit vehicles, and accordingly the Firm does not consolidate tax credit vehicles. The Firm generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits allocated to the projects. The maximum loss exposure, represented by equity investments and funding commitments, was $35.2 billion and $35.1 billion, of which $15.0 billion and $14.7 billion was unfunded at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm assesses each project and to reduce the risk of loss, may withhold varying amounts of its capital investment until the project qualifies for tax credits. Refer to Note 28 for more information on off-balance sheet lending-related commitments. Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance which expanded the types of tax-oriented investments, beyond affordable housing tax credit investments, that the Firm can elect on a program by program basis, to be accounted for using the proportional amortization method. Refer to Notes 1, 6 and 25 for further information. The proportional amortization method requires the cost of eligible investments, within an elected program, be amortized in proportion to the tax benefits received with the resulting amortization reported directly in income tax expense, which aligns with the associated tax credits and other tax benefits. Investments must meet certain criteria to be eligible, including that substantially all of the return is from income tax credits and other income tax benefits.In addition, under this method deferred taxes are generally not recorded as the investment is now amortized in proportion to the income tax credits and other income tax benefits received. Delayed equity contributions that are unconditional and legally binding or conditional and probable of occurring are recorded in other liabilities with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the investment. The guidance also requires a reevaluation of eligible investments when significant modifications or events occur that result in a change in the nature of the investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project. During the period, there were no significant modifications or events that resulted in a change in the nature of an eligible investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project.The following table provides information on tax-oriented investments for which the Firm elected to apply the proportional amortization method. Year ended December 31,(in millions)Alternative energy and affordable housing programs(d)202420232022Programs for which the Firm elected proportional amortization:Carrying value(a)$31,978 $14,644 $12,052 Tax credits and other tax benefits(b)6,379 2,044 1,786 Investments that qualify to be accounted for using proportional amortization:Amortization losses recognized as a component of income tax expense(5,018)(1,561)(1,353)Non-income-tax-related gains/(losses) and other returns received that are recognized outside of income tax expense(c)142 (1)(1)(a)Recorded in Other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets. Excludes programs to which the Firm does not apply the proportional amortization method, such as historic tax credit and new market tax credit programs.(b)Reflected in Income tax expense on the Consolidated statements of income and Operating activities on the Consolidated statements of cash flows.(c)Recorded in Other income on the Consolidated statements of income and Operating activities on the Consolidated statements of cash flows.(d)As of December 31, 2023 and 2022 represents eligible affordable housing investments. including that substantially all of the return is from income tax credits and other income tax benefits. In addition, under this method deferred taxes are generally not recorded as the investment is now amortized in proportion to the income tax credits and other income tax benefits received. Delayed equity contributions that are unconditional and legally binding or conditional and probable of occurring are recorded in other liabilities with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the investment. The guidance also requires a reevaluation of eligible investments when significant modifications or events occur that result in a change in the nature of the investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project. During the period, there were no significant modifications or events that resulted in a change in the nature of an eligible investment or a change in the Firm's relationship with the underlying project. The following table provides information on tax-oriented investments for which the Firm elected to apply the proportional amortization method. Year ended December 31,(in millions)Alternative energy and affordable housing programs(d)202420232022Programs for which the Firm elected proportional amortization:Carrying value(a)$31,978 $14,644 $12,052 Tax credits and other tax benefits(b)6,379 2,044 1,786 Investments that qualify to be accounted for using proportional amortization:Amortization losses recognized as a component of income tax expense(5,018)(1,561)(1,353)Non-income-tax-related gains/(losses) and other returns received that are recognized outside of income tax expense(c)142 (1)(1) Alternative energy and affordable housing programs(d) Carrying value(a) Tax credits and other tax benefits(b)

Amortization losses recognized as a component of income tax expense Amortization losses recognized as a component of income tax expense Amortization losses recognized as a component of income tax expense Amortization losses recognized as a component of income tax expense Non-income-tax-related gains/(losses) and other returns received that are recognized outside of income tax expense(c) (a)Recorded in Other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets. Excludes programs to which the Firm does not apply the proportional amortization method, such as historic tax credit and new market tax credit programs. Other assets Other assets Other assets (b)Reflected in Income tax expense on the Consolidated statements of income and Operating activities on the Consolidated statements of cash flows. Income tax expense Income tax expense Income tax expense Operating activities Operating activities Operating activities (c)Recorded in Other income on the Consolidated statements of income and Operating activities on the Consolidated statements of cash flows. Other income Other income Other income Operating activities Operating activities Operating activities (d)As of December 31, 2023 and 2022 represents eligible affordable housing investments. 276JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 276JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 276JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 276 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Customer municipal bond vehicles (TOB trusts) The Firm may provide various services to customer TOB trusts, including remarketing agent, liquidity or tender option provider. In certain customer TOB transactions, the Firm, as liquidity provider, has entered into a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder. In those transactions, upon the termination of the vehicle, the Firm has recourse to the third-party Residual holders for any shortfall. The Firm does not have any intent to protect Residual holders from potential losses on any of the underlying municipal bonds. The Firm does not consolidate customer TOB trusts, since the Firm does not have the power to make decisions that significantly impact the economic performance of the municipal bond vehicle.The Firm’s maximum exposure as a liquidity provider to customer TOB trusts at December 31, 2024 and 2023, was $5.8 billion and $5.1 billion, respectively. The fair value of assets held by such VIEs at December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $8.1 billion and $7.3 billion, respectively.Loan securitizationsThe Firm has securitized and sold a variety of loans, including residential mortgages, credit card receivables, commercial mortgages and other consumer loans. The purposes of these securitization transactions were to satisfy investor demand and to generate liquidity for the Firm.For loan securitizations in which the Firm is not required to consolidate the trust, the Firm records the transfer of the loan receivable to the trust as a sale when all of the following accounting criteria for a sale are met: (1) the transferred financial assets are legally isolated from the Firm’s creditors; (2) the transferee or beneficial interest holder can pledge or exchange the transferred financial assets; and (3) the Firm does not maintain effective control over the transferred financial assets (e.g., the Firm cannot repurchase the transferred assets before their maturity and it does not have the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return the transferred assets).For loan securitizations accounted for as a sale, the Firm recognizes a gain or loss based on the difference between the value of proceeds received (including cash, beneficial interests, or servicing assets received) and the carrying value of the assets sold. Gains and losses on securitizations are reported in noninterest revenue. Customer municipal bond vehicles (TOB trusts) The Firm may provide various services to customer TOB trusts, including remarketing agent, liquidity or tender option provider. In certain customer TOB transactions, the Firm, as liquidity provider, has entered into a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder. In those transactions, upon the termination of the vehicle, the Firm has recourse to the third-party Residual holders for any shortfall. The Firm does not have any intent to protect Residual holders from potential losses on any of the underlying municipal bonds. The Firm does not consolidate customer TOB trusts, since the Firm does not have the power to make decisions that significantly impact the economic performance of the municipal bond vehicle.The Firm’s maximum exposure as a liquidity provider to customer TOB trusts at December 31, 2024 and 2023, was $5.8 billion and $5.1 billion, respectively. The fair value of assets held by such VIEs at December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $8.1 billion and $7.3 billion, respectively. Customer municipal bond vehicles (TOB trusts) The Firm may provide various services to customer TOB trusts, including remarketing agent, liquidity or tender option provider. In certain customer TOB transactions, the Firm, as liquidity provider, has entered into a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder. In those transactions, upon the termination of the vehicle, the Firm has recourse to the third-party Residual holders for any shortfall. The Firm does not have any intent to protect Residual holders from potential losses on any of the underlying municipal bonds. The Firm does not consolidate customer TOB trusts, since the Firm does not have the power to make decisions that significantly impact the economic performance of the municipal bond vehicle. The Firm’s maximum exposure as a liquidity provider to customer TOB trusts at December 31, 2024 and 2023, was $5.8 billion and $5.1 billion, respectively. The fair value of assets held by such VIEs at December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $8.1 billion and $7.3 billion, respectively. Loan securitizationsThe Firm has securitized and sold a variety of loans, including residential mortgages, credit card receivables, commercial mortgages and other consumer loans. The purposes of these securitization transactions were to satisfy investor demand and to generate liquidity for the Firm.For loan securitizations in which the Firm is not required to consolidate the trust, the Firm records the transfer of the loan receivable to the trust as a sale when all of the following accounting criteria for a sale are met: (1) the transferred financial assets are legally isolated from the Firm’s creditors; (2) the transferee or beneficial interest holder can pledge or exchange the transferred financial assets; and (3) the Firm does not maintain effective control over the transferred financial assets (e.g., the Firm cannot repurchase the transferred assets before their maturity and it does not have the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return the transferred assets).For loan securitizations accounted for as a sale, the Firm recognizes a gain or loss based on the difference between the value of proceeds received (including cash, beneficial interests, or servicing assets received) and the carrying value of the assets sold. Gains and losses on securitizations are reported in noninterest revenue.

The Firm has securitized and sold a variety of loans, including residential mortgages, credit card receivables, commercial mortgages and other consumer loans. The purposes of these securitization transactions were to satisfy investor demand and to generate liquidity for the Firm. For loan securitizations in which the Firm is not required to consolidate the trust, the Firm records the transfer of the loan receivable to the trust as a sale when all of the following accounting criteria for a sale are met: (1) the transferred financial assets are legally isolated from the Firm’s creditors; (2) the transferee or beneficial interest holder can pledge or exchange the transferred financial assets; and (3) the Firm does not maintain effective control over the transferred financial assets (e.g., the Firm cannot repurchase the transferred assets before their maturity and it does not have the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return the transferred assets). For loan securitizations accounted for as a sale, the Firm recognizes a gain or loss based on the difference between the value of proceeds received (including cash, beneficial interests, or servicing assets received) and the carrying value of the assets sold. Gains and losses on securitizations are reported in noninterest revenue. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K277 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K277 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K277 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 277

The following table provides information related to the Firm’s securitization activities for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, related to assets held in Firm-sponsored securitization entities that were not consolidated by the Firm, and where sale accounting was achieved at the time of the securitization. 202420232022Year ended December 31,(in millions)Residential mortgage(d)Commercial and other(e)Residential mortgage(d)Commercial and other(e)Residential mortgage(d)Commercial and other(e)Principal securitized$19,988 $17,683 $7,678 $3,901 $10,218 $9,036 All cash flows during the period:(a)Proceeds received from loan sales as financial instruments(b)(c)$19,870 $17,346 $7,251 $3,896 $9,783 $8,921 Servicing fees collected35 35 24 5 62 2 Cash flows received on interests405 1,303 325 425 489 285 Residential mortgage(d) Commercial and other(e) Residential mortgage(d) Commercial and other(e) Residential mortgage(d) Commercial and other(e)

Proceeds received from loan sales as financial instruments(b)(c) Cash flows received on interests (a)Excludes re-securitization transactions. (b)Primarily includes Level 2 assets. (c)The carrying value of the loans accounted for at fair value approximated the proceeds received upon loan sale. (d)Represents prime mortgages. Excludes loan securitization activity related to U.S. GSEs and government agencies. (e)Includes commercial mortgages and auto loans. Key assumptions used to value retained interests originated during the year are shown in the table below.Year ended December 31,202420232022Residential mortgage retained interest:Weighted-average life (in years)4.39.610.8Weighted-average discount rate7.1 %4.8 %4.0 %Commercial and other retained interest:Weighted-average life (in years)4.53.05.9Weighted-average discount rate6.2 %4.6 %2.9 %Loans and excess MSRs sold to U.S. government-sponsored enterprises and loans in securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelinesIn addition to the amounts reported in the securitization activity tables above, the Firm, in the normal course of business, sells originated and purchased mortgage loans and certain originated excess MSRs on a nonrecourse basis, predominantly to U.S. GSEs. These loans and excess MSRs are sold primarily for the purpose of securitization by the U.S. GSEs, who provide certain guarantee provisions (e.g., credit enhancement of the loans). The Firm also sells loans into securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines; these loans are typically insured or guaranteed by another U.S. government agency. The Firm does not consolidate the securitization vehicles underlying these transactions as it is not the primary beneficiary. For a limited number of loan sales, the Firm is obligated to share a portion of the credit risk associated with the sold loans with the purchaser. Refer to Note 28 for additional information about the Firm’s loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications and Note 15 for additional information about the impact of the Firm’s sale of certain excess MSRs.The following table summarizes the activities related to loans sold to the U.S. GSEs, and loans in securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines.Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Carrying value of loans sold$25,765 $19,906 $48,891 Proceeds received from loan sales as cash$2,380 $300 $22 Proceeds from loan sales as securities(a)(b)23,178 19,389 48,096 Total proceeds received from loan sales(c)$25,558 $19,689 $48,118 Gains/(losses) on loan sales(d)(e)$— $— $(25)(a)Includes securities from U.S. GSEs and Ginnie Mae that are generally sold shortly after receipt or retained as part of the Firm’s investment securities portfolio.(b)Included in level 2 assets.(c)Excludes the value of MSRs retained upon the sale of loans. (d)Gains/(losses) on loan sales include the value of MSRs.(e)The carrying value of the loans accounted for at fair value approximated the proceeds received upon loan sale. Key assumptions used to value retained interests originated during the year are shown in the table below.Year ended December 31,202420232022Residential mortgage retained interest:Weighted-average life (in years)4.39.610.8Weighted-average discount rate7.1 %4.8 %4.0 %Commercial and other retained interest:Weighted-average life (in years)4.53.05.9Weighted-average discount rate6.2 %4.6 %2.9 %Loans and excess MSRs sold to U.S. government-sponsored enterprises and loans in securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelinesIn addition to the amounts reported in the securitization activity tables above, the Firm, in the normal course of business, sells originated and purchased mortgage loans and certain originated excess MSRs on a nonrecourse basis, predominantly to U.S. GSEs. These loans and excess MSRs are sold primarily for the purpose of securitization by the U.S. GSEs, who provide certain guarantee provisions (e.g., credit enhancement of the loans). The Firm also sells loans into securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines; these loans are typically insured or guaranteed by another U.S. government agency. The Firm does not consolidate the securitization vehicles underlying these transactions as it is not the primary beneficiary. For a limited number of loan sales, the Firm is obligated to share a portion of the credit risk associated with the sold loans with the purchaser. Refer to Note 28 for additional information about the Firm’s loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications and Note 15 for additional information about the impact of the Firm’s sale of certain excess MSRs. Key assumptions used to value retained interests originated during the year are shown in the table below. Year ended December 31,202420232022Residential mortgage retained interest:Weighted-average life (in years)4.39.610.8Weighted-average discount rate7.1 %4.8 %4.0 %Commercial and other retained interest:Weighted-average life (in years)4.53.05.9Weighted-average discount rate6.2 %4.6 %2.9 %

In addition to the amounts reported in the securitization activity tables above, the Firm, in the normal course of business, sells originated and purchased mortgage loans and certain originated excess MSRs on a nonrecourse basis, predominantly to U.S. GSEs. These loans and excess MSRs are sold primarily for the purpose of securitization by the U.S. GSEs, who provide certain guarantee provisions (e.g., credit enhancement of the loans). The Firm also sells loans into securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines; these loans are typically insured or guaranteed by another U.S. government agency. The Firm does not consolidate the securitization vehicles underlying these transactions as it is not the primary beneficiary. For a limited number of loan sales, the Firm is obligated to share a portion of the credit risk associated with the sold loans with the purchaser. Refer to Note 28 for additional information about the Firm’s loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications and Note 15 for additional information about the impact of the Firm’s sale of certain excess MSRs. The following table summarizes the activities related to loans sold to the U.S. GSEs, and loans in securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines.Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Carrying value of loans sold$25,765 $19,906 $48,891 Proceeds received from loan sales as cash$2,380 $300 $22 Proceeds from loan sales as securities(a)(b)23,178 19,389 48,096 Total proceeds received from loan sales(c)$25,558 $19,689 $48,118 Gains/(losses) on loan sales(d)(e)$— $— $(25)(a)Includes securities from U.S. GSEs and Ginnie Mae that are generally sold shortly after receipt or retained as part of the Firm’s investment securities portfolio.(b)Included in level 2 assets.(c)Excludes the value of MSRs retained upon the sale of loans. (d)Gains/(losses) on loan sales include the value of MSRs.(e)The carrying value of the loans accounted for at fair value approximated the proceeds received upon loan sale. The following table summarizes the activities related to loans sold to the U.S. GSEs, and loans in securitization transactions pursuant to Ginnie Mae guidelines. Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022Carrying value of loans sold$25,765 $19,906 $48,891 Proceeds received from loan sales as cash$2,380 $300 $22 Proceeds from loan sales as securities(a)(b)23,178 19,389 48,096 Total proceeds received from loan sales(c)$25,558 $19,689 $48,118 Gains/(losses) on loan sales(d)(e)$— $— $(25) Proceeds received from loan sales as cash Proceeds from loan sales as securities(a)(b)

Gains/(losses) on loan sales(d)(e) (a)Includes securities from U.S. GSEs and Ginnie Mae that are generally sold shortly after receipt or retained as part of the Firm’s investment securities portfolio. (b)Included in level 2 assets. (c)Excludes the value of MSRs retained upon the sale of loans. (d)Gains/(losses) on loan sales include the value of MSRs. (e)The carrying value of the loans accounted for at fair value approximated the proceeds received upon loan sale. 278JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 278JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 278JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 278 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Options to repurchase delinquent loansIn addition to the Firm’s obligation to repurchase certain loans due to material breaches of representations and warranties as discussed in Note 28, the Firm also has the option to repurchase delinquent loans that it services for Ginnie Mae loan pools, as well as for other U.S. government agencies under certain arrangements. The Firm typically elects to repurchase delinquent loans from Ginnie Mae loan pools as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with the applicable requirements, and such loans continue to be insured or guaranteed. When the Firm’s repurchase option becomes exercisable, such loans must be reported on the Consolidated balance sheets as a loan with a corresponding liability. Refer to Note 12 for additional information. The following table presents loans the Firm repurchased or had an option to repurchase, real estate owned, and foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans recognized on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Substantially all of these loans and real estate are insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. December 31,(in millions)20242023Loans repurchased or option to repurchase(a)$577 $597 Real estate owned6 8 Foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans(b)10 22 (a)Primarily all of these amounts relate to loans that have been repurchased from Ginnie Mae loan pools.(b)Relates to voluntary repurchases of loans, which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable. Options to repurchase delinquent loansIn addition to the Firm’s obligation to repurchase certain loans due to material breaches of representations and warranties as discussed in Note 28, the Firm also has the option to repurchase delinquent loans that it services for Ginnie Mae loan pools, as well as for other U.S. government agencies under certain arrangements. The Firm typically elects to repurchase delinquent loans from Ginnie Mae loan pools as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with the applicable requirements, and such loans continue to be insured or guaranteed. When the Firm’s repurchase option becomes exercisable, such loans must be reported on the Consolidated balance sheets as a loan with a corresponding liability. Refer to Note 12 for additional information. Options to repurchase delinquent loans In addition to the Firm’s obligation to repurchase certain loans due to material breaches of representations and warranties as discussed in Note 28, the Firm also has the option to repurchase delinquent loans that it services for Ginnie Mae loan pools, as well as for other U.S. government agencies under certain arrangements. The Firm typically elects to repurchase delinquent loans from Ginnie Mae loan pools as it continues to service them and/or manage the foreclosure process in accordance with the applicable requirements, and such loans continue to be insured or guaranteed. When the Firm’s repurchase option becomes exercisable, such loans must be reported on the Consolidated balance sheets as a loan with a corresponding liability. Refer to Note 12 for additional information. The following table presents loans the Firm repurchased or had an option to repurchase, real estate owned, and foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans recognized on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Substantially all of these loans and real estate are insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. December 31,(in millions)20242023Loans repurchased or option to repurchase(a)$577 $597 Real estate owned6 8 Foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans(b)10 22 (a)Primarily all of these amounts relate to loans that have been repurchased from Ginnie Mae loan pools.(b)Relates to voluntary repurchases of loans, which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable. The following table presents loans the Firm repurchased or had an option to repurchase, real estate owned, and foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans recognized on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Substantially all of these loans and real estate are insured or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. December 31,(in millions)20242023Loans repurchased or option to repurchase(a)$577 $597 Real estate owned6 8 Foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans(b)10 22 Loans repurchased or option to repurchase(a) Real estate owned Foreclosed government-guaranteed residential mortgage loans(b) (a)Primarily all of these amounts relate to loans that have been repurchased from Ginnie Mae loan pools. (b)Relates to voluntary repurchases of loans, which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable.

The table below includes information about components of and delinquencies related to nonconsolidated securitized financial assets held in Firm-sponsored private-label securitization entities, in which the Firm has continuing involvement as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. For loans sold or securitized where servicing is the Firm’s only form of continuing involvement, the Firm generally experiences a loss only if the Firm was required to repurchase a delinquent loan or foreclosed asset due to a breach in representations and warranties associated with its loan sale or servicing contracts. As of or for the year ended December 31,(in millions)Securitized assets90 days past dueNet liquidation losses / (recoveries)202420232024202320242023Securitized loansResidential mortgage:Prime/ Alt-A & option ARMs$50,846 $39,319 $501 $440 $10 $14 Subprime1,847 1,312 113 131 2 5 Commercial and other125,510 120,262 1,715 2,874 77 60 Total loans securitized$178,203 $160,893 $2,329 $3,445 $89 $79 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K279 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K279 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K279 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 279

GoodwillGoodwill is recorded upon completion of a business combination as the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired, and can be adjusted up to one year from the acquisition date as additional information pertaining to facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date is obtained about the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Subsequent to initial recognition, goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more often if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be an impairment.The goodwill associated with each business combination is allocated to the related reporting units, which are generally determined based on how the Firm’s businesses are managed and how they are reviewed. The following table presents goodwill attributed to the reportable business segments and Corporate.December 31, (in millions)202420232022Consumer & Community Banking$32,116 $32,116 $32,121 Commercial & Investment Bank11,236 11,251 10,993 Asset & Wealth Management8,521 8,582 7,902 Corporate692 685 646 Total goodwill$52,565 $52,634 $51,662 The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill.(in millions)202420232022Balance at beginning of period$52,634 $51,662 $50,315 Changes during the period from:Business combinations(a)29 917 1,426 Other(b)(98)55 (79)Balance at December 31,$52,565 $52,634 $51,662 (a)For 2024, includes estimated goodwill associated with the acquisition of LayerOne Financial in CIB. For 2023, predominantly represents estimated goodwill associated with the acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in CIFM in AWM and the acquisition of Aumni Inc., predominantly in CIB. For 2022, represents estimated goodwill associated with the acquisitions of Global Shares PLC in AWM, Frosch Travel Group, LLC and Figg, Inc. in CCB, and Renovite Technologies, Inc. and Volkswagen Payments S.A. in CIB.(b)Primarily foreign currency adjustments.Goodwill impairment testingThe Firm’s goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.The goodwill impairment test is generally performed by comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value. If the fair value is in excess of the carrying value, then the reporting unit’s goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then an impairment is recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, up to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The Firm uses the reporting units’ allocated capital plus goodwill and other intangible assets as a proxy for the carrying values of equity for the reporting units in the goodwill impairment testing. Reporting unit equity is determined on a similar basis as the allocation of capital to the LOBs which takes into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. LOB’s allocated capital levels are incorporated into the Firm’s annual budget process, which is reviewed by the Firm’s Board of Directors and Operating Committee. The primary method the Firm uses to estimate the fair value of its reporting units is the income approach. This approach projects cash flows for the forecast period and uses the perpetuity growth method to calculate terminal values. These cash flows and terminal values, which are based on the reporting units’ annual budgets and forecasts are then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. The discount rate used for each reporting unit represents an estimate of the cost of equity for that reporting unit and is determined considering the Firm’s overall estimated cost of equity (estimated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model), as adjusted for the risk characteristics specific to each reporting unit (for example, for higher levels of risk or uncertainty associated with the business or management’s forecasts and assumptions). To assess the reasonableness of the discount rates used for each reporting unit, management compares the discount rate to the estimated cost of equity for publicly traded institutions with similar businesses and risk characteristics. In addition, the weighted average cost of equity (aggregating the various reporting units) is compared with the Firm’s overall estimated cost of equity for reasonableness. The valuations derived from the discounted cash flow analysis are then compared with market-based trading and transaction multiples for relevant competitors. Trading and transaction comparables are used as general indicators to assess the overall reasonableness of the estimated fair values, although precise conclusions generally cannot be drawn due to the differences that GoodwillGoodwill is recorded upon completion of a business combination as the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired, and can be adjusted up to one year from the acquisition date as additional information pertaining to facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date is obtained about the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Subsequent to initial recognition, goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more often if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be an impairment.The goodwill associated with each business combination is allocated to the related reporting units, which are generally determined based on how the Firm’s businesses are managed and how they are reviewed. The following table presents goodwill attributed to the reportable business segments and Corporate.December 31, (in millions)202420232022Consumer & Community Banking$32,116 $32,116 $32,121 Commercial & Investment Bank11,236 11,251 10,993 Asset & Wealth Management8,521 8,582 7,902 Corporate692 685 646 Total goodwill$52,565 $52,634 $51,662 The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill.(in millions)202420232022Balance at beginning of period$52,634 $51,662 $50,315 Changes during the period from:Business combinations(a)29 917 1,426 Other(b)(98)55 (79)Balance at December 31,$52,565 $52,634 $51,662 (a)For 2024, includes estimated goodwill associated with the acquisition of LayerOne Financial in CIB. For 2023, predominantly represents estimated goodwill associated with the acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in CIFM in AWM and the acquisition of Aumni Inc., predominantly in CIB. For 2022, represents estimated goodwill associated with the acquisitions of Global Shares PLC in AWM, Frosch Travel Group, LLC and Figg, Inc. in CCB, and Renovite Technologies, Inc. and Volkswagen Payments S.A. in CIB.(b)Primarily foreign currency adjustments. Goodwill Goodwill is recorded upon completion of a business combination as the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of the net assets acquired, and can be adjusted up to one year from the acquisition date as additional information pertaining to facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date is obtained about the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Subsequent to initial recognition, goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or more often if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be an impairment. The goodwill associated with each business combination is allocated to the related reporting units, which are generally determined based on how the Firm’s businesses are managed and how they are reviewed. The following table presents goodwill attributed to the reportable business segments and Corporate. December 31, (in millions)202420232022Consumer & Community Banking$32,116 $32,116 $32,121 Commercial & Investment Bank11,236 11,251 10,993 Asset & Wealth Management8,521 8,582 7,902 Corporate692 685 646 Total goodwill$52,565 $52,634 $51,662 Corporate The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill. (in millions)202420232022Balance at beginning of period$52,634 $51,662 $50,315 Changes during the period from:Business combinations(a)29 917 1,426 Other(b)(98)55 (79)Balance at December 31,$52,565 $52,634 $51,662 Changes during the period from: Business combinations(a) Other(b) (a)For 2024, includes estimated goodwill associated with the acquisition of LayerOne Financial in CIB. For 2023, predominantly represents estimated goodwill associated with the acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in CIFM in AWM and the acquisition of Aumni Inc., predominantly in CIB. For 2022, represents estimated goodwill associated with the acquisitions of Global Shares PLC in AWM, Frosch Travel Group, LLC and Figg, Inc. in CCB, and Renovite Technologies, Inc. and Volkswagen Payments S.A. in CIB. (b)Primarily foreign currency adjustments. Goodwill impairment testingThe Firm’s goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.The goodwill impairment test is generally performed by comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value. If the fair value is in excess of the carrying value, then the reporting unit’s goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then an impairment is recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, up to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The Firm uses the reporting units’ allocated capital plus goodwill and other intangible assets as a proxy for the carrying values of equity for the reporting units in the goodwill impairment testing. Reporting unit equity is determined on a similar basis as the allocation of capital to the LOBs which takes into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. LOB’s allocated capital levels are incorporated into the Firm’s annual budget process, which is reviewed by the Firm’s Board of Directors and Operating Committee. The primary method the Firm uses to estimate the fair value of its reporting units is the income approach. This approach projects cash flows for the forecast period and uses the perpetuity growth method to calculate terminal values. These cash flows and terminal values, which are based on the reporting units’ annual budgets and forecasts are then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. The discount rate used for each reporting unit represents an estimate of the cost of equity for that reporting unit and is determined considering the Firm’s overall estimated cost of equity (estimated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model), as adjusted for the risk characteristics specific to each reporting unit (for example, for higher levels of risk or uncertainty associated with the business or management’s forecasts and assumptions). To assess the reasonableness of the discount rates used for each reporting unit, management compares the discount rate to the estimated cost of equity for publicly traded institutions with similar businesses and risk characteristics. In addition, the weighted average cost of equity (aggregating the various reporting units) is compared with the Firm’s overall estimated cost of equity for reasonableness. The valuations derived from the discounted cash flow analysis are then compared with market-based trading and transaction multiples for relevant competitors. Trading and transaction comparables are used as general indicators to assess the overall reasonableness of the estimated fair values, although precise conclusions generally cannot be drawn due to the differences that Goodwill impairment testing The Firm’s goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. The goodwill impairment test is generally performed by comparing the current fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying value. If the fair value is in excess of the carrying value, then the reporting unit’s goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then an impairment is recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, up to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The Firm uses the reporting units’ allocated capital plus goodwill and other intangible assets as a proxy for the carrying values of equity for the reporting units in the goodwill impairment testing. Reporting unit equity is determined on a similar basis as the allocation of capital to the LOBs which takes into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. LOB’s allocated capital levels are incorporated into the Firm’s annual budget process, which is reviewed by the Firm’s Board of Directors and Operating Committee. The primary method the Firm uses to estimate the fair value of its reporting units is the income approach. This approach projects cash flows for the forecast period and uses the perpetuity growth method to calculate terminal values. These cash flows and terminal values, which are based on the reporting units’ annual budgets and forecasts are then discounted using an appropriate discount rate. The discount rate used for each reporting unit represents an estimate of the cost of equity for that reporting unit and is determined considering the Firm’s overall estimated cost of equity (estimated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model), as adjusted for the risk characteristics specific to each reporting unit (for example, for higher levels of risk or uncertainty associated with the business or management’s forecasts and assumptions). To assess the reasonableness of the discount rates used for each reporting unit, management compares the discount rate to the estimated cost of equity for publicly traded institutions with similar businesses and risk characteristics. In addition, the weighted average cost of equity (aggregating the various reporting units) is compared with the Firm’s overall estimated cost of equity for reasonableness. The valuations derived from the discounted cash flow analysis are then compared with market-based trading and transaction multiples for relevant competitors. Trading and transaction comparables are used as general indicators to assess the overall reasonableness of the estimated fair values, although precise conclusions generally cannot be drawn due to the differences that 280JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 280JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 280JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 280 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K naturally exist between the Firm’s businesses and competitor institutions. The Firm also takes into consideration a comparison between the aggregate fair values of the Firm’s reporting units and JPMorganChase’s market capitalization. In evaluating this comparison, the Firm considers several factors, including (i) a control premium that would exist in a market transaction, (ii) factors related to the level of execution risk that would exist at the Firmwide level that do not exist at the reporting unit level and (iii) short-term market volatility and other factors that do not directly affect the value of individual reporting units.Unanticipated declines in business performance, increases in credit losses, increases in capital requirements, as well as deterioration in economic or market conditions, adverse regulatory or legislative changes or increases in the estimated market cost of equity, could cause the estimated fair values of the Firm’s reporting units to decline in the future, which could result in a material impairment loss to earnings in a future period related to some portion of the associated goodwill. Mortgage servicing rightsMSRs represent the fair value of expected future cash flows for performing servicing activities for others. The fair value considers estimated future servicing fees and ancillary revenue, offset by estimated costs to service the loans, and generally declines over time as net servicing cash flows are received, effectively amortizing the MSR asset against contractual servicing and ancillary fee income. MSRs are either purchased from third parties or recognized upon sale or securitization of mortgage loans if servicing is retained.As permitted by U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to account for its MSRs at fair value. The Firm treats its MSRs as a single class of servicing assets based on the availability of market inputs used to measure the fair value of its MSR asset and its treatment of MSRs as one aggregate pool for risk management purposes. The Firm estimates the fair value of MSRs using an option-adjusted spread (“OAS”) model, which projects MSR cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios in conjunction with the Firm’s prepayment model, and then discounts these cash flows at risk-adjusted rates. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, costs to service, late charges and other ancillary revenue, and other economic factors. The Firm compares fair value estimates and assumptions to observable market data where available, and also considers recent market activity and actual portfolio experience. naturally exist between the Firm’s businesses and competitor institutions. The Firm also takes into consideration a comparison between the aggregate fair values of the Firm’s reporting units and JPMorganChase’s market capitalization. In evaluating this comparison, the Firm considers several factors, including (i) a control premium that would exist in a market transaction, (ii) factors related to the level of execution risk that would exist at the Firmwide level that do not exist at the reporting unit level and (iii) short-term market volatility and other factors that do not directly affect the value of individual reporting units.Unanticipated declines in business performance, increases in credit losses, increases in capital requirements, as well as deterioration in economic or market conditions, adverse regulatory or legislative changes or increases in the estimated market cost of equity, could cause the estimated fair values of the Firm’s reporting units to decline in the future, which could result in a material impairment loss to earnings in a future period related to some portion of the associated goodwill. naturally exist between the Firm’s businesses and competitor institutions. The Firm also takes into consideration a comparison between the aggregate fair values of the Firm’s reporting units and JPMorganChase’s market capitalization. In evaluating this comparison, the Firm considers several factors, including (i) a control premium that would exist in a market transaction, (ii) factors related to the level of execution risk that would exist at the Firmwide level that do not exist at the reporting unit level and (iii) short-term market volatility and other factors that do not directly affect the value of individual reporting units. Unanticipated declines in business performance, increases in credit losses, increases in capital requirements, as well as deterioration in economic or market conditions, adverse regulatory or legislative changes or increases in the estimated market cost of equity, could cause the estimated fair values of the Firm’s reporting units to decline in the future, which could result in a material impairment loss to earnings in a future period related to some portion of the associated goodwill. Mortgage servicing rightsMSRs represent the fair value of expected future cash flows for performing servicing activities for others. The fair value considers estimated future servicing fees and ancillary revenue, offset by estimated costs to service the loans, and generally declines over time as net servicing cash flows are received, effectively amortizing the MSR asset against contractual servicing and ancillary fee income. MSRs are either purchased from third parties or recognized upon sale or securitization of mortgage loans if servicing is retained.As permitted by U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to account for its MSRs at fair value. The Firm treats its MSRs as a single class of servicing assets based on the availability of market inputs used to measure the fair value of its MSR asset and its treatment of MSRs as one aggregate pool for risk management purposes. The Firm estimates the fair value of MSRs using an option-adjusted spread (“OAS”) model, which projects MSR cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios in conjunction with the Firm’s prepayment model, and then discounts these cash flows at risk-adjusted rates. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, costs to service, late charges and other ancillary revenue, and other economic factors. The Firm compares fair value estimates and assumptions to observable market data where available, and also considers recent market activity and actual portfolio experience.

MSRs represent the fair value of expected future cash flows for performing servicing activities for others. The fair value considers estimated future servicing fees and ancillary revenue, offset by estimated costs to service the loans, and generally declines over time as net servicing cash flows are received, effectively amortizing the MSR asset against contractual servicing and ancillary fee income. MSRs are either purchased from third parties or recognized upon sale or securitization of mortgage loans if servicing is retained. As permitted by U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to account for its MSRs at fair value. The Firm treats its MSRs as a single class of servicing assets based on the availability of market inputs used to measure the fair value of its MSR asset and its treatment of MSRs as one aggregate pool for risk management purposes. The Firm estimates the fair value of MSRs using an option-adjusted spread (“OAS”) model, which projects MSR cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios in conjunction with the Firm’s prepayment model, and then discounts these cash flows at risk-adjusted rates. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, costs to service, late charges and other ancillary revenue, and other economic factors. The Firm compares fair value estimates and assumptions to observable market data where available, and also considers recent market activity and actual portfolio experience. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K281 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K281 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K281 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 281

The fair value of MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates, including their effect on prepayment speeds. MSRs typically decrease in value when interest rates decline because declining interest rates tend to increase prepayments and therefore reduce the expected life of the net servicing cash flows that comprise the MSR asset. Conversely, securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities), and certain derivatives (e.g., those for which the Firm receives fixed-rate interest payments) increase in value when interest rates decline. JPMorganChase uses combinations of derivatives and securities to manage the risk of changes in the fair value of MSRs. The intent is to offset any interest-rate related changes in the fair value of MSRs with changes in the fair value of the related risk management instruments. The fair value of MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates, including their effect on prepayment speeds. MSRs typically decrease in value when interest rates decline because declining interest rates tend to increase prepayments and therefore reduce the expected life of the net servicing cash flows that comprise the MSR asset. Conversely, securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities), and certain derivatives (e.g., those for which the Firm receives fixed-rate The fair value of MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates, including their effect on prepayment speeds. MSRs typically decrease in value when interest rates decline because declining interest rates tend to increase prepayments and therefore reduce the expected life of the net servicing cash flows that comprise the MSR asset. Conversely, securities (e.g., mortgage-backed securities), and certain derivatives (e.g., those for which the Firm receives fixed-rate interest payments) increase in value when interest rates decline. JPMorganChase uses combinations of derivatives and securities to manage the risk of changes in the fair value of MSRs. The intent is to offset any interest-rate related changes in the fair value of MSRs with changes in the fair value of the related risk management instruments. interest payments) increase in value when interest rates decline. JPMorganChase uses combinations of derivatives and securities to manage the risk of changes in the fair value of MSRs. The intent is to offset any interest-rate related changes in the fair value of MSRs with changes in the fair value of the related risk management instruments. The following table summarizes MSR activity for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. As of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except where otherwise noted)202420232022Fair value at beginning of period$8,522 $7,973 $5,494 MSR activity:Originations of MSRs325 253 798 Purchase of MSRs(a)601 1,028 1,400 Disposition of MSRs(b)(21)(188)(822)Net additions/(dispositions)905 1,093 1,376 Changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows(1,068)(1,011)(936)Changes in valuation due to inputs and assumptions:Changes due to market interest rates and other(c)670 424 2,022 Changes in valuation due to other inputs and assumptions:Projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service)102 (22)14 Discount rates14 14 — Prepayment model changes and other(d)(24)51 3 Total changes in valuation due to other inputs and assumptions92 43 17 Total changes in valuation due to inputs and assumptions762 467 2,039 Fair value at December 31,$9,121 $8,522 $7,973 Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in income related to MSRs held at December 31,$762 $467 $2,039 Contractual service fees, late fees and other ancillary fees included in income1,606 1,590 1,535 Third-party mortgage loans serviced at December 31, (in billions)652 632 584 Servicer advances, net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts, at December 31(e)577 659 758 Purchase of MSRs(a) Disposition of MSRs(b) Changes due to collection/realization of expected cash flows Changes due to market interest rates and other(c) Projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service) Discount rates Prepayment model changes and other(d) Change in unrealized gains/(losses) included in income related to MSRs held at December 31, Servicer advances, net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts, at December 31(e) (a)Includes purchase price adjustments associated with MSRs purchased, primarily as a result of loans that prepaid within 90 days of settlement, allowing the Firm to recover the purchase price. (b)Includes excess MSRs transferred to agency-sponsored trusts in exchange for stripped mortgage-backed securities (“SMBS”). In each transaction, a portion of the SMBS was acquired by third parties at the transaction date; the Firm acquired the remaining balance of those SMBS as trading securities. (c)Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments. (d)Represents changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates. (e)Represents amounts the Firm pays as the servicer (e.g., scheduled principal and interest, taxes and insurance), which will generally be reimbursed within a short period of time after the advance from future cash flows from the trust or the underlying loans. The Firm’s credit risk associated with these servicer advances is minimal because reimbursement of the advances is typically senior to all cash payments to investors. In addition, the Firm maintains the right to stop payment to investors if the collateral is insufficient to cover the advance. However, certain of these servicer advances may not be recoverable if they were not made in accordance with applicable rules and agreements. 282JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 282JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 282JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 282 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The following table presents the components of mortgage fees and related income (including the impact of MSR risk management activities) for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022CCB mortgage fees and related incomeProduction revenue$627 $421 $497 Net mortgage servicing revenue: Operating revenue: Loan servicing revenue1,659 1,634 1,582 Changes in MSR asset fair value due to collection/realization of expected cash flows(1,067)(1,011)(936)Total operating revenue592 623 646 Risk management: Changes in MSR asset fair value due to market interest rates and other(a)670 424 2,022 Other changes in MSR asset fair value due to other inputs and assumptions in model(b)92 43 17 Change in derivative fair value and other(603)(336)(1,946)Total risk management159 131 93 Total net mortgage servicing revenue751 754 739 Total CCB mortgage fees and related income1,378 1,175 1,236 All other23 1 14 Mortgage fees and related income$1,401 $1,176 $1,250 (a)Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.(b)Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service), discount rates and changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates (e.g., changes in prepayments due to changes in home prices).Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be easily extrapolated, because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value are often highly interrelated and may not be linear. In the following table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which would either magnify or counteract the impact of the initial change.The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Firm’s MSRs at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and outlines the sensitivities of those fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions, as defined below.December 31,(in millions, except rates)20242023Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (constant prepayment rate)6.19 %6.29 %Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(209)$(206)Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change(406)(401)Weighted-average option adjusted spread(a)5.97 %6.10 %Impact on fair value of 100 basis points adverse change$(391)$(369)Impact on fair value of 200 basis points adverse change(751)(709)(a)Includes the impact of operational risk and regulatory capital. The following table presents the components of mortgage fees and related income (including the impact of MSR risk management activities) for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022CCB mortgage fees and related incomeProduction revenue$627 $421 $497 Net mortgage servicing revenue: Operating revenue: Loan servicing revenue1,659 1,634 1,582 Changes in MSR asset fair value due to collection/realization of expected cash flows(1,067)(1,011)(936)Total operating revenue592 623 646 Risk management: Changes in MSR asset fair value due to market interest rates and other(a)670 424 2,022 Other changes in MSR asset fair value due to other inputs and assumptions in model(b)92 43 17 Change in derivative fair value and other(603)(336)(1,946)Total risk management159 131 93 Total net mortgage servicing revenue751 754 739 Total CCB mortgage fees and related income1,378 1,175 1,236 All other23 1 14 Mortgage fees and related income$1,401 $1,176 $1,250 (a)Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments.(b)Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service), discount rates and changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates (e.g., changes in prepayments due to changes in home prices). The following table presents the components of mortgage fees and related income (including the impact of MSR risk management activities) for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022CCB mortgage fees and related incomeProduction revenue$627 $421 $497 Net mortgage servicing revenue: Operating revenue: Loan servicing revenue1,659 1,634 1,582 Changes in MSR asset fair value due to collection/realization of expected cash flows(1,067)(1,011)(936)Total operating revenue592 623 646 Risk management: Changes in MSR asset fair value due to market interest rates and other(a)670 424 2,022 Other changes in MSR asset fair value due to other inputs and assumptions in model(b)92 43 17 Change in derivative fair value and other(603)(336)(1,946)Total risk management159 131 93 Total net mortgage servicing revenue751 754 739 Total CCB mortgage fees and related income1,378 1,175 1,236 All other23 1 14 Mortgage fees and related income$1,401 $1,176 $1,250

Changes in MSR asset fair value due to collection/realization of expected cash flows Changes in MSR asset fair value due to market interest rates and other(a) Other changes in MSR asset fair value due to other inputs and assumptions in model(b) Change in derivative fair value and other

(a)Represents both the impact of changes in estimated future prepayments due to changes in market interest rates, and the difference between actual and expected prepayments. (b)Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as projected cash flows (e.g., cost to service), discount rates and changes in prepayments other than those attributable to changes in market interest rates (e.g., changes in prepayments due to changes in home prices). Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be easily extrapolated, because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value are often highly interrelated and may not be linear. In the following table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which would either magnify or counteract the impact of the initial change.The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Firm’s MSRs at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and outlines the sensitivities of those fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions, as defined below.December 31,(in millions, except rates)20242023Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (constant prepayment rate)6.19 %6.29 %Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(209)$(206)Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change(406)(401)Weighted-average option adjusted spread(a)5.97 %6.10 %Impact on fair value of 100 basis points adverse change$(391)$(369)Impact on fair value of 200 basis points adverse change(751)(709)(a)Includes the impact of operational risk and regulatory capital. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be easily extrapolated, because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value are often highly interrelated and may not be linear. In the following table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which would either magnify or counteract the impact of the initial change. The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Firm’s MSRs at December 31, 2024 and 2023, and outlines the sensitivities of those fair values to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions, as defined below. December 31,(in millions, except rates)20242023Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (constant prepayment rate)6.19 %6.29 %Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change$(209)$(206)Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change(406)(401)Weighted-average option adjusted spread(a)5.97 %6.10 %Impact on fair value of 100 basis points adverse change$(391)$(369)Impact on fair value of 200 basis points adverse change(751)(709) Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (constant prepayment rate) Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change Weighted-average option adjusted spread(a) Impact on fair value of 100 basis points adverse change Impact on fair value of 200 basis points adverse change (a)Includes the impact of operational risk and regulatory capital. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K283 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K283 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K283 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 283

Other intangible assetsThe Firm’s finite-lived and indefinite-lived other intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair value primarily upon completion of a business combination. Subsequently, the Firm’s finite-lived intangible assets, including core deposit intangibles, customer relationship intangibles, and certain other intangible assets, are amortized over their useful lives, estimated based on the expected future economic benefits to the Firm of the intangible asset. The Firm’s intangible assets with indefinite lives, such as asset management contracts, are not subject to amortization and are assessed periodically for impairment.As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the gross carrying values of other intangible assets were $3.8 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively, and the accumulated amortization was $879 million and $994 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the net carrying values consist of finite-lived intangible assets of $1.7 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, as well as indefinite-lived intangible assets, which are not subject to amortization, of $1.2 billion at both periods.As of December 31, 2024, other intangible assets reflected core deposit and certain wealth management customer relationship intangibles related to the First Republic acquisition, and asset management contracts related to the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in CIFM. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, amortization expense was $339 million and $315 million, respectively. The following table presents estimated future amortization expense.December 31, (in millions)Finite-lived intangible assets2025$288 2026285 2027284 2028267 2029261 Impairment testingThe Firm’s finite-lived and indefinite-lived other intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Once the Firm determines that an impairment exists for an intangible asset, the impairment is recognized in other expense. Other intangible assetsThe Firm’s finite-lived and indefinite-lived other intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair value primarily upon completion of a business combination. Subsequently, the Firm’s finite-lived intangible assets, including core deposit intangibles, customer relationship intangibles, and certain other intangible assets, are amortized over their useful lives, estimated based on the expected future economic benefits to the Firm of the intangible asset. The Firm’s intangible assets with indefinite lives, such as asset management contracts, are not subject to amortization and are assessed periodically for impairment.As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the gross carrying values of other intangible assets were $3.8 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively, and the accumulated amortization was $879 million and $994 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the net carrying values consist of finite-lived intangible assets of $1.7 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, as well as indefinite-lived intangible assets, which are not subject to amortization, of $1.2 billion at both periods.As of December 31, 2024, other intangible assets reflected core deposit and certain wealth management customer relationship intangibles related to the First Republic acquisition, and asset management contracts related to the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in CIFM. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition.For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, amortization expense was $339 million and $315 million, respectively. The following table presents estimated future amortization expense.December 31, (in millions)Finite-lived intangible assets2025$288 2026285 2027284 2028267 2029261

The Firm’s finite-lived and indefinite-lived other intangible assets are initially recorded at their fair value primarily upon completion of a business combination. Subsequently, the Firm’s finite-lived intangible assets, including core deposit intangibles, customer relationship intangibles, and certain other intangible assets, are amortized over their useful lives, estimated based on the expected future economic benefits to the Firm of the intangible asset. The Firm’s intangible assets with indefinite lives, such as asset management contracts, are not subject to amortization and are assessed periodically for impairment. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the gross carrying values of other intangible assets were $3.8 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively, and the accumulated amortization was $879 million and $994 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the net carrying values consist of finite-lived intangible assets of $1.7 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, as well as indefinite-lived intangible assets, which are not subject to amortization, of $1.2 billion at both periods. As of December 31, 2024, other intangible assets reflected core deposit and certain wealth management customer relationship intangibles related to the First Republic acquisition, and asset management contracts related to the Firm’s acquisition of the remaining 51% interest in CIFM. Refer to Note 34 for additional information on the First Republic acquisition. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, amortization expense was $339 million and $315 million, respectively. The following table presents estimated future amortization expense. December 31, (in millions)Finite-lived intangible assets2025$288 2026285 2027284 2028267 2029261 Impairment testingThe Firm’s finite-lived and indefinite-lived other intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Once the Firm determines that an impairment exists for an intangible asset, the impairment is recognized in other expense. Impairment testing The Firm’s finite-lived and indefinite-lived other intangible assets are assessed for impairment annually or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Once the Firm determines that an impairment exists for an intangible asset, the impairment is recognized in other expense. 284JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 284JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 284JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 284 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Note 16 – Premises and equipmentPremises and equipment includes land carried at cost, as well as buildings, leasehold improvements, internal-use software and furniture and equipment carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Firm’s operating lease right-of-use assets are also included in Premises and equipment. Refer to Note 18 for a further discussion of the Firm’s right-of-use assets.The following table presents certain components of Premises and equipment.December 31, (in millions)20242023Land, buildings and leasehold improvements$16,874 $14,862 Right-of-use assets(a)7,930 7,917 Other premises and equipment(b)7,419 7,378 Total premises and equipment$32,223 $30,157 (a)Excluded $564 million and $514 million of right-of-use assets that were recorded in Other assets at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.(b)Other premises and equipment is comprised of internal-use software and furniture and equipment.JPMorganChase computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life for buildings and furniture and equipment. The Firm depreciates leasehold improvements over the lesser of the remainder of the lease term or the estimated useful life. The Firm also capitalizes certain costs associated with the acquisition or development of internal-use software. Once the software is ready for its intended use, these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the software’s expected useful life. The estimated useful lives range from 10 to 50 years for buildings and leasehold improvements, and 3 to 10 years for internal-use software and furniture and equipment.Impairment is assessed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable.Note 17 – Deposits As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits were as follows: December 31, (in millions)20242023U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing (included $28,904 and $75,393 at fair value)(a)$592,500 $643,748 Interest-bearing (included $1,101 and $573 at fair value)(a)1,345,914 1,303,100 Total deposits in U.S. offices1,938,414 1,946,848 Non-U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing (included $2,255 and $1,737 at fair value)(a)26,806 23,097 Interest-bearing (included $1,508 and $681 at fair value)(a)440,812 430,743 Total deposits in non-U.S. offices467,618 453,840 Total deposits$2,406,032 $2,400,688 (a)Includes structured notes classified as deposits for which the fair value option has been elected. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion.As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, time deposits in denominations that met or exceeded the insured limit were as follows:December 31, (in millions)20242023U.S. offices $149,239 $132,654 Non-U.S. offices(a)92,639 90,187 Total$241,878 $222,841 (a)Represents all time deposits in non-U.S. offices as these deposits typically exceed the insured limit. As of December 31, 2024, the remaining maturities of interest-bearing time deposits were as follows:December 31,(in millions) U.S.Non-U.S.Total2025$222,676 $89,427 $312,103 2026749 87 836 2027482 2 484 2028149 18 167 2029314 721 1,035 After 5 years162 129 291 Total$224,532 $90,384 $314,916 Note 16 – Premises and equipmentPremises and equipment includes land carried at cost, as well as buildings, leasehold improvements, internal-use software and furniture and equipment carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Firm’s operating lease right-of-use assets are also included in Premises and equipment. Refer to Note 18 for a further discussion of the Firm’s right-of-use assets.The following table presents certain components of Premises and equipment.December 31, (in millions)20242023Land, buildings and leasehold improvements$16,874 $14,862 Right-of-use assets(a)7,930 7,917 Other premises and equipment(b)7,419 7,378 Total premises and equipment$32,223 $30,157 (a)Excluded $564 million and $514 million of right-of-use assets that were recorded in Other assets at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.(b)Other premises and equipment is comprised of internal-use software and furniture and equipment.JPMorganChase computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life for buildings and furniture and equipment. The Firm depreciates leasehold improvements over the lesser of the remainder of the lease term or the estimated useful life. The Firm also capitalizes certain costs associated with the acquisition or development of internal-use software. Once the software is ready for its intended use, these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the software’s expected useful life. The estimated useful lives range from 10 to 50 years for buildings and leasehold improvements, and 3 to 10 years for internal-use software and furniture and equipment.Impairment is assessed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable.

Premises and equipment includes land carried at cost, as well as buildings, leasehold improvements, internal-use software and furniture and equipment carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Firm’s operating lease right-of-use assets are also included in Premises and equipment. Refer to Note 18 for a further discussion of the Firm’s right-of-use assets. The following table presents certain components of Premises and equipment. December 31, (in millions)20242023Land, buildings and leasehold improvements$16,874 $14,862 Right-of-use assets(a)7,930 7,917 Other premises and equipment(b)7,419 7,378 Total premises and equipment$32,223 $30,157 Right-of-use assets(a) Other premises and equipment(b)

(a)Excluded $564 million and $514 million of right-of-use assets that were recorded in Other assets at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (b)Other premises and equipment is comprised of internal-use software and furniture and equipment. JPMorganChase computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life for buildings and furniture and equipment. The Firm depreciates leasehold improvements over the lesser of the remainder of the lease term or the estimated useful life. The Firm also capitalizes certain costs associated with the acquisition or development of internal-use software. Once the software is ready for its intended use, these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the software’s expected useful life. The estimated useful lives range from 10 to 50 years for buildings and leasehold improvements, and 3 to 10 years for internal-use software and furniture and equipment. Impairment is assessed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be fully recoverable. Note 17 – Deposits As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits were as follows: December 31, (in millions)20242023U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing (included $28,904 and $75,393 at fair value)(a)$592,500 $643,748 Interest-bearing (included $1,101 and $573 at fair value)(a)1,345,914 1,303,100 Total deposits in U.S. offices1,938,414 1,946,848 Non-U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing (included $2,255 and $1,737 at fair value)(a)26,806 23,097 Interest-bearing (included $1,508 and $681 at fair value)(a)440,812 430,743 Total deposits in non-U.S. offices467,618 453,840 Total deposits$2,406,032 $2,400,688 (a)Includes structured notes classified as deposits for which the fair value option has been elected. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion.As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, time deposits in denominations that met or exceeded the insured limit were as follows:December 31, (in millions)20242023U.S. offices $149,239 $132,654 Non-U.S. offices(a)92,639 90,187 Total$241,878 $222,841 (a)Represents all time deposits in non-U.S. offices as these deposits typically exceed the insured limit. As of December 31, 2024, the remaining maturities of interest-bearing time deposits were as follows:December 31,(in millions) U.S.Non-U.S.Total2025$222,676 $89,427 $312,103 2026749 87 836 2027482 2 484 2028149 18 167 2029314 721 1,035 After 5 years162 129 291 Total$224,532 $90,384 $314,916

As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits were as follows: December 31, (in millions)20242023U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing (included $28,904 and $75,393 at fair value)(a)$592,500 $643,748 Interest-bearing (included $1,101 and $573 at fair value)(a)1,345,914 1,303,100 Total deposits in U.S. offices1,938,414 1,946,848 Non-U.S. officesNoninterest-bearing (included $2,255 and $1,737 at fair value)(a)26,806 23,097 Interest-bearing (included $1,508 and $681 at fair value)(a)440,812 430,743 Total deposits in non-U.S. offices467,618 453,840 Total deposits$2,406,032 $2,400,688 Noninterest-bearing (included $28,904 and $75,393 at fair value)(a) Interest-bearing (included $1,101 and $573 at fair value)(a) Noninterest-bearing (included $2,255 and $1,737 at fair value)(a) Interest-bearing (included $1,508 and $681 at fair value)(a) (a)Includes structured notes classified as deposits for which the fair value option has been elected. Refer to Note 3 for further discussion. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, time deposits in denominations that met or exceeded the insured limit were as follows: December 31, (in millions)20242023U.S. offices $149,239 $132,654 Non-U.S. offices(a)92,639 90,187 Total$241,878 $222,841 Non-U.S. offices(a) (a)Represents all time deposits in non-U.S. offices as these deposits typically exceed the insured limit. (a) As of December 31, 2024, the remaining maturities of interest-bearing time deposits were as follows: December 31,(in millions) U.S.Non-U.S.Total2025$222,676 $89,427 $312,103 2026749 87 836 2027482 2 484 2028149 18 167 2029314 721 1,035 After 5 years162 129 291 Total$224,532 $90,384 $314,916 December 31, (in millions) JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K285 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K285 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K285 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 285

Firm as lesseeAt December 31, 2024, JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries were obligated under a number of noncancellable leases, predominantly operating leases for premises and equipment used primarily for business purposes. These leases generally have terms of 20 years or less, determined based on the contractual maturity of the lease, and include periods covered by options to extend or terminate the lease when the Firm is reasonably certain that it will exercise those options. All leases with lease terms greater than twelve months are reported as a lease liability with a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. None of these lease agreements impose restrictions on the Firm’s ability to pay dividends, engage in debt or equity financing transactions or enter into further lease agreements. Certain of these leases contain escalation clauses that will increase rental payments based on maintenance, utility and tax increases, which are non-lease components. The Firm elected not to separate lease and non-lease components of a contract for its real estate leases. As such, real estate lease payments represent payments on both lease and non-lease components. Operating lease liabilities and ROU assets are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The future lease payments are discounted at a rate that estimates the Firm’s collateralized borrowing rate for financing instruments of a similar term and are included in accounts payable and other liabilities. The operating lease ROU assets, predominantly included in premises and equipment, also include any lease prepayments made, plus initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received. Rental expense associated with operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and generally included in occupancy expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The carrying values of the Firm’s operating leases were as follows: December 31,(in millions, except where otherwise noted)20242023Right-of-use assets$8,494$8,431Lease liabilities8,9008,833Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)8.38.4Weighted average discount rate4.24 %4.01 %Supplemental cash flow information Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities - operating cash flows$1,734$1,662Supplemental non-cash information Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations$1,565$2,094Year ended December 31, (in millions)20242023Rental expenseGross rental expense$2,231 $2,079 Sublease rental income(41)(72)Net rental expense$2,190 $2,007 The following table presents future payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2024.Year ended December 31, (in millions)20251,709 20261,553 20271,412 20281,248 20291,048 After 20293,721 Total future minimum lease payments10,691 Less: Imputed interest(1,791)Total$8,900 In addition to the table above, as of December 31, 2024, the Firm had additional future operating lease commitments of $887 million that were signed but had not yet commenced. These operating leases will commence between 2025 and 2027 with lease terms up to 21 years. Firm as lesseeAt December 31, 2024, JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries were obligated under a number of noncancellable leases, predominantly operating leases for premises and equipment used primarily for business purposes. These leases generally have terms of 20 years or less, determined based on the contractual maturity of the lease, and include periods covered by options to extend or terminate the lease when the Firm is reasonably certain that it will exercise those options. All leases with lease terms greater than twelve months are reported as a lease liability with a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. None of these lease agreements impose restrictions on the Firm’s ability to pay dividends, engage in debt or equity financing transactions or enter into further lease agreements. Certain of these leases contain escalation clauses that will increase rental payments based on maintenance, utility and tax increases, which are non-lease components. The Firm elected not to separate lease and non-lease components of a contract for its real estate leases. As such, real estate lease payments represent payments on both lease and non-lease components. Operating lease liabilities and ROU assets are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The future lease payments are discounted at a rate that estimates the Firm’s collateralized borrowing rate for financing instruments of a similar term and are included in accounts payable and other liabilities. The operating lease ROU assets, predominantly included in premises and equipment, also include any lease prepayments made, plus initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received. Rental expense associated with operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and generally included in occupancy expense in the Consolidated statements of income.

At December 31, 2024, JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries were obligated under a number of noncancellable leases, predominantly operating leases for premises and equipment used primarily for business purposes. These leases generally have terms of 20 years or less, determined based on the contractual maturity of the lease, and include periods covered by options to extend or terminate the lease when the Firm is reasonably certain that it will exercise those options. All leases with lease terms greater than twelve months are reported as a lease liability with a corresponding right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. None of these lease agreements impose restrictions on the Firm’s ability to pay dividends, engage in debt or equity financing transactions or enter into further lease agreements. Certain of these leases contain escalation clauses that will increase rental payments based on maintenance, utility and tax increases, which are non-lease components. The Firm elected not to separate lease and non-lease components of a contract for its real estate leases. As such, real estate lease payments represent payments on both lease and non-lease components. Operating lease liabilities and ROU assets are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term. The future lease payments are discounted at a rate that estimates the Firm’s collateralized borrowing rate for financing instruments of a similar term and are included in accounts payable and other liabilities. The operating lease ROU assets, predominantly included in premises and equipment, also include any lease prepayments made, plus initial direct costs incurred, less any lease incentives received. Rental expense associated with operating leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and generally included in occupancy expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The carrying values of the Firm’s operating leases were as follows: December 31,(in millions, except where otherwise noted)20242023Right-of-use assets$8,494$8,431Lease liabilities8,9008,833Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)8.38.4Weighted average discount rate4.24 %4.01 %Supplemental cash flow information Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities - operating cash flows$1,734$1,662Supplemental non-cash information Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations$1,565$2,094Year ended December 31, (in millions)20242023Rental expenseGross rental expense$2,231 $2,079 Sublease rental income(41)(72)Net rental expense$2,190 $2,007 The following table presents future payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2024.Year ended December 31, (in millions)20251,709 20261,553 20271,412 20281,248 20291,048 After 20293,721 Total future minimum lease payments10,691 Less: Imputed interest(1,791)Total$8,900 In addition to the table above, as of December 31, 2024, the Firm had additional future operating lease commitments of $887 million that were signed but had not yet commenced. These operating leases will commence between 2025 and 2027 with lease terms up to 21 years. The carrying values of the Firm’s operating leases were as follows: December 31,(in millions, except where otherwise noted)20242023Right-of-use assets$8,494$8,431Lease liabilities8,9008,833Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)8.38.4Weighted average discount rate4.24 %4.01 %Supplemental cash flow information Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities - operating cash flows$1,734$1,662Supplemental non-cash information Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations$1,565$2,094 Right-of-use assets Right-of-use assets Lease liabilities Lease liabilities Year ended December 31, (in millions)20242023Rental expenseGross rental expense$2,231 $2,079 Sublease rental income(41)(72)Net rental expense$2,190 $2,007 The following table presents future payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2024. Year ended December 31, (in millions)20251,709 20261,553 20271,412 20281,248 20291,048 After 20293,721 Total future minimum lease payments10,691 Less: Imputed interest(1,791)Total$8,900 In addition to the table above, as of December 31, 2024, the Firm had additional future operating lease commitments of $887 million that were signed but had not yet commenced. These operating leases will commence between 2025 and 2027 with lease terms up to 21 years. 286JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 286JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 286JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 286 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Firm as lessorThe Firm provides auto and equipment lease financing to its customers through lease arrangements with lease terms that may contain renewal, termination and/or purchase options. The Firm’s lease financings are predominantly auto operating leases. These assets subject to operating leases are recognized in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lease term to reduce the asset to its estimated residual value. Depreciation expense is included in technology, communications and equipment expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The Firm’s lease income is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in other income in the Consolidated statements of income. On a periodic basis, the Firm assesses leased assets for impairment, and if the carrying amount of the leased asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows from the lease payments and the estimated residual value upon disposition of the leased asset, an impairment is recognized. The risk of loss on auto and equipment leased assets relating to the residual value of the leased assets is monitored through projections of the asset residual values at lease origination and periodic review of residual values, and is mitigated through arrangements with certain manufacturers or lessees. The following table presents the carrying value of assets subject to leases reported on the Consolidated balance sheets. December 31,(in millions)20242023Carrying value of assets subject to operating leases, net of accumulated depreciation$12,988 $10,663 Accumulated depreciation2,509 3,288 The following table presents the Firm’s operating lease income and the related depreciation expense on the Consolidated statements of income. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating lease income$2,795 $2,843 $3,654 Depreciation expense1,685 1,778 2,475 The following table presents future receipts under operating leases as of December 31, 2024. Year ended December 31, (in millions)2025$2,381 20261,707 2027704 202847 20295 After 20294 Total future minimum lease receipts$4,848 Firm as lessorThe Firm provides auto and equipment lease financing to its customers through lease arrangements with lease terms that may contain renewal, termination and/or purchase options. The Firm’s lease financings are predominantly auto operating leases. These assets subject to operating leases are recognized in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lease term to reduce the asset to its estimated residual value. Depreciation expense is included in technology, communications and equipment expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The Firm’s lease income is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in other income in the Consolidated statements of income. On a periodic basis, the Firm assesses leased assets for impairment, and if the carrying amount of the leased asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows from the lease payments and the estimated residual value upon disposition of the leased asset, an impairment is recognized. The risk of loss on auto and equipment leased assets relating to the residual value of the leased assets is monitored through projections of the asset residual values at lease origination and periodic review of residual values, and is mitigated through arrangements with certain manufacturers or lessees. The following table presents the carrying value of assets subject to leases reported on the Consolidated balance sheets. December 31,(in millions)20242023Carrying value of assets subject to operating leases, net of accumulated depreciation$12,988 $10,663 Accumulated depreciation2,509 3,288 The following table presents the Firm’s operating lease income and the related depreciation expense on the Consolidated statements of income. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating lease income$2,795 $2,843 $3,654 Depreciation expense1,685 1,778 2,475

The Firm provides auto and equipment lease financing to its customers through lease arrangements with lease terms that may contain renewal, termination and/or purchase options. The Firm’s lease financings are predominantly auto operating leases. These assets subject to operating leases are recognized in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lease term to reduce the asset to its estimated residual value. Depreciation expense is included in technology, communications and equipment expense in the Consolidated statements of income. The Firm’s lease income is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in other income in the Consolidated statements of income. On a periodic basis, the Firm assesses leased assets for impairment, and if the carrying amount of the leased asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows from the lease payments and the estimated residual value upon disposition of the leased asset, an impairment is recognized. The risk of loss on auto and equipment leased assets relating to the residual value of the leased assets is monitored through projections of the asset residual values at lease origination and periodic review of residual values, and is mitigated through arrangements with certain manufacturers or lessees. The following table presents the carrying value of assets subject to leases reported on the Consolidated balance sheets. December 31,(in millions)20242023Carrying value of assets subject to operating leases, net of accumulated depreciation$12,988 $10,663 Accumulated depreciation2,509 3,288 Carrying value of assets subject to operating leases, net of accumulated depreciation Accumulated depreciation The following table presents the Firm’s operating lease income and the related depreciation expense on the Consolidated statements of income. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating lease income$2,795 $2,843 $3,654 Depreciation expense1,685 1,778 2,475 Operating lease income Operating lease income Operating lease income The following table presents future receipts under operating leases as of December 31, 2024. Year ended December 31, (in millions)2025$2,381 20261,707 2027704 202847 20295 After 20294 Total future minimum lease receipts$4,848 The following table presents future receipts under operating leases as of December 31, 2024. Year ended December 31, (in millions)2025$2,381 20261,707 2027704 202847 20295 After 20294 Total future minimum lease receipts$4,848 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K287 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K287 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K287 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 287

Accounts payable and other liabilities consist of brokerage payables, which include payables to customers and payables related to security purchases that did not settle, as well as other accrued expenses, such as compensation accruals, credit card rewards liability, merchant servicing payables, operating lease liabilities, accrued interest payables, income tax payables and litigation reserves. The following table presents the components of accounts payable and other liabilities. December 31, (in millions)20242023Brokerage payables$153,153 $161,960 Other payables and liabilities(a)127,519 128,347 Total accounts payable and other liabilities$280,672 $290,307 Other payables and liabilities(a)

(a) Includes credit card rewards liability of $14.4 billion and $13.2 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The credit card rewards liability represents the estimated cost of rewards points earned and expected to be redeemed by cardholders. The liability is accrued as the cardholder earns the benefit and is reduced when the cardholder redeems points. The redemption rate and cost per point assumptions are key assumptions to estimate the liability and the current period impact is recognized in Card Income. Refer to Notes 7, 18, 25 and 30 for additional information on accrued interest, operating lease liabilities, income taxes and litigation reserves, respectively. 288JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 288JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 288JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 288 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

JPMorganChase issues long-term debt denominated in various currencies, predominantly U.S. dollars, with both fixed and variable interest rates. Included in senior and subordinated debt below are various equity-linked or other indexed instruments, which the Firm has elected to measure at fair value. Changes in fair value are recorded in principal transactions revenue in the Consolidated statements of income, except for unrealized gains/(losses) due to DVA which are recorded in OCI. The following table is a summary of long-term debt carrying values (including unamortized premiums and discounts, issuance costs, valuation adjustments and fair value adjustments, where applicable) by remaining contractual maturity as of December 31, 2024. By remaining maturity atDecember 31,(in millions, except rates)20242023Under 1 year1-5 yearsAfter 5 yearsTotalTotalParent companySenior debt:Fixed rate$7,112 $90,132 $117,667 $214,911 $200,984 Variable rate255 6,838 1,562 8,655 8,105 Interest rates(f)3.04 %3.40 %4.02 %3.71 %3.32 %Subordinated debt:Fixed rate$302 $5,582 $8,573 $14,457 $17,725 Variable rate— — — — — Interest rates(f)7.75 %4.72 %4.69 %4.76 %4.62 %Subtotal$7,669 $102,552 $127,802 $238,023 $226,814 SubsidiariesFederal Home Loan Banks advances:Fixed rate$7,582 $1,651 $24 $9,257 $23,246 Variable rate4,000 16,000 — 20,000 18,000 Interest rates(f)4.42 %4.84 %5.91 %4.67 %4.89 %Purchase Money Note(a):Fixed rate$— $49,208 $— $49,208 $48,989 Interest rates(f)— %3.40 %— %3.40 %3.40 %Senior debt:Fixed rate$2,361 $16,695 $7,489 $26,545 $20,745 Variable rate19,350 30,981 6,451 56,782 52,048 Interest rates(f)5.39 %5.18%1.44 %3.81 %3.91 %Subordinated debt:Fixed rate$— $— $— $— $255 Variable rate— — — — — Interest rates(f)— %— %— %— %8.25 %Subtotal$33,293 $114,535 $13,964 $161,792 $163,283 Junior subordinated debt:Fixed rate$— $— $488 $488 $518 Variable rate— 421 694 1,115 1,210 Interest rates(f)— %5.35 %7.01 %6.58 %7.14 %Subtotal$— $421 $1,182 $1,603 $1,728 Total long-term debt(b)(c)(d)$40,962 $217,508 $142,948 $401,418 (g)(h)$391,825 Long-term beneficial interests:Fixed rate$999 $4,313 $— $5,312 $2,998 Variable rate— 27 139 166 125 Interest rates(f)3.97 %4.82 %2.92 %4.62 %4.69 %Total long-term beneficial interests(e)$999 $4,340 $139 $5,478 $3,123 Interest rates(f) Interest rates(f) Interest rates(f) Purchase Money Note(a): Interest rates(f) Interest rates(f) Interest rates(f) Interest rates(f) Total long-term debt(b)(c)(d) (g)(h) Interest rates(f)

(a)Reflects the Purchase Money Note associated with First Republic. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. (b)Included long-term debt of $80.9 billion and $93.0 billion secured by assets totaling $185.5 billion and $218.5 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The amount of long-term debt secured by assets does not include amounts related to hybrid instruments. (c)Included $100.8 billion and $87.9 billion of long-term debt accounted for at fair value at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (d)Included $13.5 billion and $12.5 billion of outstanding zero-coupon notes at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The aggregate principal amount of these notes at their respective maturities is $50.2 billion and $47.9 billion, respectively. The aggregate principal amount reflects the contractual principal payment at maturity, which may exceed the contractual principal payment at the Firm’s next call date, if applicable. (e)Included on the Consolidated balance sheets in beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs. Also included amounts accounted for at fair value which were not material as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Excluded short-term commercial paper and other short-term beneficial interests of $21.8 billion and $19.9 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. (f)The interest rates shown are the weighted average of contractual rates in effect at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, including non-U.S. dollar fixed- and variable-rate issuances, which excludes the effects of the associated derivative instruments used in hedge accounting relationships, if applicable. The interest rates shown exclude structured notes accounted for at fair value. (g)As of December 31, 2024, long-term debt in the aggregate of $297.1 billion was redeemable at the option of JPMorganChase, in whole or in part, prior to maturity, based on the terms specified in the respective instruments. (h)The aggregate carrying values of debt that matures in each of the five years subsequent to 2024 is $41.0 billion in 2025, $64.5 billion in 2026, $32.7 billion in 2027, $93.4 billion in 2028 and $26.9 billion in 2029. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K289 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K289 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K289 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 289

The weighted-average contractual interest rates for total long-term debt excluding structured notes accounted for at fair value were 3.82% and 3.65% as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. In order to modify exposure to interest rate and currency exchange rate movements, JPMorganChase utilizes derivative instruments, primarily interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swaps, in conjunction with some of its debt issuances. The use of these instruments modifies the Firm’s interest expense on the associated debt. The modified weighted-average interest rates for total long-term debt, including the effects of related derivative instruments, were 5.15% and 5.20% as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has guaranteed certain long-term debt of its subsidiaries, including structured notes. These guarantees rank pari passu with the Firm’s other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The amount of such guaranteed long-term debt and structured notes was $41.2 billion and $41.1 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm’s unsecured debt does not contain requirements that would call for an acceleration of payments, maturities or changes in the structure of the existing debt, provide any limitations on future borrowings or require additional collateral, based on unfavorable changes in the Firm’s credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings or stock price. The weighted-average contractual interest rates for total long-term debt excluding structured notes accounted for at fair value were 3.82% and 3.65% as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. In order to modify exposure to interest rate and currency exchange rate movements, JPMorganChase utilizes derivative instruments, primarily interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swaps, in conjunction with some of its debt issuances. The use of these instruments modifies the Firm’s interest expense on the associated debt. The modified weighted-average interest rates for total long-term debt, including the effects of related derivative instruments, were 5.15% and 5.20% as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has guaranteed certain long-term debt of its subsidiaries, including structured notes. These guarantees rank pari passu with the Firm’s other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The amount of such guaranteed long-term debt and structured notes was $41.2 billion and $41.1 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm’s unsecured debt does not contain requirements that would call for an acceleration of payments, maturities or changes in the structure of the existing debt, provide any limitations on future borrowings or require additional collateral, based on unfavorable changes in the Firm’s credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings or stock price. The weighted-average contractual interest rates for total long-term debt excluding structured notes accounted for at fair value were 3.82% and 3.65% as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. In order to modify exposure to interest rate and currency exchange rate movements, JPMorganChase utilizes derivative instruments, primarily interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swaps, in conjunction with some of its debt issuances. The use of these instruments modifies the Firm’s interest expense on the associated debt. The modified weighted-average interest rates for total long-term debt, including the effects of related derivative instruments, were 5.15% and 5.20% as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has guaranteed certain long-term debt of its subsidiaries, including structured notes. These guarantees rank pari passu with the Firm’s other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. The amount of such guaranteed long-term debt and structured notes was $41.2 billion and $41.1 billion at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Firm’s unsecured debt does not contain requirements that would call for an acceleration of payments, maturities or changes in the structure of the existing debt, provide any limitations on future borrowings or require additional collateral, based on unfavorable changes in the Firm’s credit ratings, financial ratios, earnings or stock price. 290JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 290JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 290JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 290 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, JPMorganChase was authorized to issue 200 million shares of preferred stock, in one or more series, with a par value of $1 per share. In the event of a liquidation or dissolution of the Firm, JPMorganChase’s preferred stock then outstanding takes precedence over the Firm’s common stock with respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets. The following is a summary of JPMorganChase’s non-cumulative preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the quarterly dividend declarations for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Shares(a)Carrying value (in millions)Issue dateContractual ratein effect atDecember 31, 2024Earliest redemption date(b)Floating annualizedrate(c)Dividend declared per share(d)December 31,December 31,Year ended December 31,2024202320242023202420232022Fixed-rate:Series DD169,625 169,625 1,696 1,696 9/21/20185.750 12/1/2023NA575.00 575.00 575.00 Series EE185,000 185,000 1,850 1,850 1/24/20196.000 3/1/2024NA600.00 600.00 600.00 Series GG90,000 90,000 900 900 11/7/20194.750 12/1/2024NA475.00 475.00 475.00 Series JJ150,000 150,000 1,500 1,500 3/17/20214.550 6/1/2026NA455.00 455.00 455.00 Series LL185,000 185,000 1,850 1,850 5/20/20214.625 6/1/2026NA462.52 462.52 462.52 Series MM200,000 200,000 2,000 2,000 7/29/20214.200 9/1/2026NA420.00 420.00 420.00 Fixed-to-floating rate:Series I— — $— $— 4/23/2008— %4/30/2018— %$— $— $375.03 Series Q— 150,000 — 1,500 4/23/2013— 5/1/2023SOFR + 3.25220.45 801.41 (g)515.00 Series R— 150,000 — 1,500 7/29/2013— 8/1/2023SOFR + 3.30221.70 756.73 (h)600.00 Series S— 200,000 — 2,000 1/22/2014— 2/1/2024SOFR + 3.78233.70 (e)675.00 675.00 Series U— 100,000 — 1,000 3/10/2014— 4/30/2024SOFR + 3.33153.13 612.50 612.50 Series V— — — — 6/9/2014— 7/1/2019— — — 340.91 Series X— 160,000 — 1,600 9/23/2014— 10/1/2024SOFR + 3.33457.50 610.00 610.00 Series CC125,750 125,750 1,258 1,258 10/20/2017SOFR + 2.5811/1/2022SOFR + 2.58812.73 804.08 526.27 (i)Series FF— 225,000 — 2,250 7/31/2019— 8/1/2024SOFR + 3.38250.00 500.00 500.00 Series HH300,000 300,000 3,000 3,000 1/23/20204.600 2/1/2025SOFR + 3.125460.00 460.00 460.00 Series II150,000 150,000 1,500 1,500 2/24/20204.000 4/1/2025SOFR + 2.745400.00 400.00 400.00 Series KK200,000 200,000 2,000 2,000 5/12/20213.650 6/1/2026CMT + 2.85365.00 365.00 365.00 Series NN250,000 NA2,496 NA3/12/20246.875 6/1/2029CMT + 2.737494.63 (f)NANATotal preferred stock2,005,375 2,740,375 $20,050 $27,404 Shares(a) Earliest redemption date(b) Floating annualized rate(c) Dividend declared per share(d) Fixed-rate: Series DD Series EE Series GG Fixed-to-floating rate: Series I Series Q SOFR + 3.25 (g) Series R SOFR + 3.30 (h) SOFR + 3.78 (e) Series U SOFR + 3.33 Series X SOFR + 3.33 Series CC

SOFR + 2.58 (i) Series FF SOFR + 3.38 SOFR + 3.125 SOFR + 2.745 CMT + 2.85 CMT + 2.737 (f) (a)Represented by depositary shares. (b)Each series of fixed-to-floating rate preferred stock converts to a floating rate at the earliest redemption date. (c)Effective June 30, 2023, CME Term SOFR became the replacement reference rate for fixed-to-floating rate preferred stock issued by the Firm that formerly referenced U.S. dollar LIBOR. References in the table to “SOFR” mean a floating annualized rate equal to three-month term SOFR (plus a spread adjustment of 0.26% per annum) plus the spreads noted. References to “CMT” mean a floating annualized rate equal to the five-year Constant Maturity Treasury (“CMT”) rate plus the spreads noted. (d)Dividends on preferred stock are discretionary and non-cumulative. When declared, dividends are declared quarterly. Dividends are payable quarterly on fixed-rate preferred stock. Dividends are payable semiannually on fixed-to-floating rate preferred stock while at a fixed rate, and payable quarterly after converting to a floating rate. (e)The dividend rate for Series S preferred stock became floating and payable quarterly starting on February 1, 2024; prior to which the dividend rate was fixed at 6.75% or $337.50 per share payable semiannually. The dividend rate for each quarterly dividend period commencing on February 1, 2024 was three-month term SOFR (plus a spread adjustment of 0.26% per annum) plus the spread of 3.78%. (f)The initial dividend declared was prorated based on the number of days outstanding for the period. Dividends were declared quarterly thereafter at the contractual rate. (g)The dividend rate for Series Q preferred stock became floating and payable quarterly starting on May 1, 2023; prior to which the dividend rate was fixed at 5.15% or $257.50 per share payable semiannually. The dividend rate for each quarterly dividend period commencing on August 1, 2023 was three-month term SOFR (plus a spread adjustment of 0.26% per annum) plus the spread of 3.25%. (h)The dividend rate for Series R preferred stock became floating and payable quarterly starting on August 1, 2023; prior to which the dividend rate was fixed at 6.00% or $300.00 per share payable semiannually. The dividend rate for each quarterly dividend period commencing on August 1, 2023 was three-month term SOFR (plus a spread adjustment of 0.26% per annum) plus the spread of 3.30%. (i)The dividend rate for Series CC preferred stock became floating and payable quarterly starting on November 1, 2022; prior to which the dividend rate was fixed at 4.625% or $231.25 per share payable semiannually. The dividend rate for each quarterly dividend period commencing on August 1, 2023 was three-month term SOFR (plus a spread adjustment of 0.26% per annum) plus the spread of 2.58%. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K291 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K291 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K291 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 291

Each series of preferred stock has a liquidation value and redemption price per share of $10,000, plus accrued but unpaid dividends. The aggregate liquidation value was $20.2 billion at December 31, 2024. Issuances On February 4, 2025, the Firm issued $3.0 billion of fixed-rate reset non-cumulative preferred stock, Series OO. On March 12, 2024, the Firm issued $2.5 billion of fixed-rate reset non-cumulative preferred stock, Series NN.

On February 1, 2025, the Firm redeemed all $3.0 billion of its fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series HH. On October 1, 2024, the Firm redeemed all $1.6 billion of its fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series X. On August 1, 2024, the Firm redeemed all $2.3 billion of its fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series FF. On May 1, 2024, the Firm redeemed all $5.0 billion of its fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series Q, Series R and Series S. On April 30, 2024, the Firm redeemed all $1.0 billion of its fixed-to-floating rate non-cumulative preferred stock, Series U. Redemption rights Each series of the Firm’s preferred stock may be redeemed on any dividend payment date on or after the earliest redemption date for that series. All outstanding preferred stock series may also be redeemed following a “capital treatment event,” as described in the terms of each series. Any redemption of the Firm’s preferred stock is subject to non-objection from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). 292JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 292JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 292JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 292 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

At December 31, 2024 and 2023, JPMorganChase was authorized to issue 9.0 billion shares of common stock with a par value of $1 per share.Common shares issued which were reissued from treasury by the Firm during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were as follows.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Total issued – balance at January 14,104.9 4,104.9 4,104.9 Treasury – balance at January 1(1,228.3)(1,170.7)(1,160.8)Repurchase(91.7)(69.5)(23.1)Reissuance:Employee benefits and compensation plans11.9 10.9 12.0 Employee stock purchase plans0.8 1.0 1.2 Total reissuance12.7 11.9 13.2 Total treasury – balance at December 31(1,307.3)(1,228.3)(1,170.7)Outstanding at December 312,797.6 2,876.6 2,934.2 On June 28, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a new $30 billion common share repurchase program, effective July 1, 2024. Through June 30, 2024, the Firm was authorized to purchase up to $30 billion of common shares under its previously-approved common share repurchase program that was announced on April 13, 2022.The following table sets forth the Firm’s repurchases of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022(b)Total number of shares of common stock repurchased91.7 69.5 23.1 Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a)$18,841 $9,898 $3,122 (a)Excludes excise tax and commissions. As part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, a 1% excise tax is imposed on net share repurchases commencing January 1, 2023.(b)In the second half of 2022, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases, which it resumed in the first quarter of 2023 under its common share repurchase program.The Board of Directors’ authorization to repurchase common shares is utilized at management’s discretion. The $30 billion common share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors does not establish specific price targets or timetables. Management determines the amount and timing of common share repurchases based on various factors, including market conditions; legal and regulatory considerations affecting the amount and timing of repurchase activity; the Firm’s capital position (taking into account goodwill and intangibles); organic capital generation; current and proposed future capital requirements; and other investment opportunities. The amount of common shares that the Firm repurchases in any period may be substantially more or less than the amounts estimated or actually repurchased in prior periods, reflecting the dynamic nature of the decision-making process. The Firm’s common share repurchases may be suspended by management at any time; and may be executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 plans, which are written trading plans that the Firm may enter into from time to time under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and which allow the Firm to repurchase its common shares during periods when it may otherwise not be repurchasing common shares — for example, during internal trading blackout periods.As of December 31, 2024, approximately 58.8 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under various employee incentive, compensation, option and stock purchase plans, and directors’ compensation plans. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, JPMorganChase was authorized to issue 9.0 billion shares of common stock with a par value of $1 per share.Common shares issued which were reissued from treasury by the Firm during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were as follows.Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Total issued – balance at January 14,104.9 4,104.9 4,104.9 Treasury – balance at January 1(1,228.3)(1,170.7)(1,160.8)Repurchase(91.7)(69.5)(23.1)Reissuance:Employee benefits and compensation plans11.9 10.9 12.0 Employee stock purchase plans0.8 1.0 1.2 Total reissuance12.7 11.9 13.2 Total treasury – balance at December 31(1,307.3)(1,228.3)(1,170.7)Outstanding at December 312,797.6 2,876.6 2,934.2 On June 28, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a new $30 billion common share repurchase program, effective July 1, 2024. Through June 30, 2024, the Firm was authorized to purchase up to $30 billion of common shares under its previously-approved common share repurchase program that was announced on April 13, 2022. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, JPMorganChase was authorized to issue 9.0 billion shares of common stock with a par value of $1 per share. Common shares issued which were reissued from treasury by the Firm during the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 were as follows. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Total issued – balance at January 14,104.9 4,104.9 4,104.9 Treasury – balance at January 1(1,228.3)(1,170.7)(1,160.8)Repurchase(91.7)(69.5)(23.1)Reissuance:Employee benefits and compensation plans11.9 10.9 12.0 Employee stock purchase plans0.8 1.0 1.2 Total reissuance12.7 11.9 13.2 Total treasury – balance at December 31(1,307.3)(1,228.3)(1,170.7)Outstanding at December 312,797.6 2,876.6 2,934.2

On June 28, 2024, the Firm announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a new $30 billion common share repurchase program, effective July 1, 2024. Through June 30, 2024, the Firm was authorized to purchase up to $30 billion of common shares under its previously-approved common share repurchase program that was announced on April 13, 2022. The following table sets forth the Firm’s repurchases of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022(b)Total number of shares of common stock repurchased91.7 69.5 23.1 Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a)$18,841 $9,898 $3,122 (a)Excludes excise tax and commissions. As part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, a 1% excise tax is imposed on net share repurchases commencing January 1, 2023.(b)In the second half of 2022, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases, which it resumed in the first quarter of 2023 under its common share repurchase program.The Board of Directors’ authorization to repurchase common shares is utilized at management’s discretion. The $30 billion common share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors does not establish specific price targets or timetables. Management determines the amount and timing of common share repurchases based on various factors, including market conditions; legal and regulatory considerations affecting the amount and timing of repurchase activity; the Firm’s capital position (taking into account goodwill and intangibles); organic capital generation; current and proposed future capital requirements; and other investment opportunities. The amount of common shares that the Firm repurchases in any period may be substantially more or less than the amounts estimated or actually repurchased in prior periods, reflecting the dynamic nature of the decision-making process. The Firm’s common share repurchases may be suspended by management at any time; and may be executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 plans, which are written trading plans that the Firm may enter into from time to time under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and which allow the Firm to repurchase its common shares during periods when it may otherwise not be repurchasing common shares — for example, during internal trading blackout periods.As of December 31, 2024, approximately 58.8 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under various employee incentive, compensation, option and stock purchase plans, and directors’ compensation plans. The following table sets forth the Firm’s repurchases of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Year ended December 31,(in millions)202420232022(b)Total number of shares of common stock repurchased91.7 69.5 23.1 Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a)$18,841 $9,898 $3,122 2022(b) Aggregate purchase price of common stock repurchases(a) (a)Excludes excise tax and commissions. As part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, a 1% excise tax is imposed on net share repurchases commencing January 1, 2023. (b)In the second half of 2022, the Firm temporarily suspended share repurchases, which it resumed in the first quarter of 2023 under its common share repurchase program. The Board of Directors’ authorization to repurchase common shares is utilized at management’s discretion. The $30 billion common share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors does not establish specific price targets or timetables. Management determines the amount and timing of common share repurchases based on various factors, including market conditions; legal and regulatory considerations affecting the amount and timing of repurchase activity; the Firm’s capital position (taking into account goodwill and intangibles); organic capital generation; current and proposed future capital requirements; and other investment opportunities. The amount of common shares that the Firm repurchases in any period may be substantially more or less than the amounts estimated or actually repurchased in prior periods, reflecting the dynamic nature of the decision-making process. The Firm’s common share repurchases may be suspended by management at any time; and may be executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions, or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 plans, which are written trading plans that the Firm may enter into from time to time under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and which allow the Firm to repurchase its common shares during periods when it may otherwise not be repurchasing common shares — for example, during internal trading blackout periods. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 58.8 million shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under various employee incentive, compensation, option and stock purchase plans, and directors’ compensation plans. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K293 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K293 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K293 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 293

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common stock and participating securities. JPMorganChase grants RSUs under its share-based compensation programs, predominantly all of which entitle recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to dividends paid to holders of the Firm’s common stock. These unvested RSUs meet the definition of participating securities based on their respective rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, and they are treated as a separate class of securities in computing basic EPS. Participating securities are not included as incremental shares in computing diluted EPS; refer to Note 9 for additional information.Diluted EPS incorporates the potential impact of contingently issuable shares, including awards which require future service as a condition of delivery of the underlying common stock. Diluted EPS is calculated under both the two-class and treasury stock methods, and the more dilutive amount is reported. For each of the periods presented in the table below, diluted EPS calculated under the two-class method was more dilutive.The following table presents the calculation of net income applicable to common stockholders and basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.Year ended December 31,(in millions, except per share amounts)202420232022Basic earnings per shareNet income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Less: Preferred stock dividends1,259 1,501 1,595 Net income applicable to common equity57,212 48,051 36,081 Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities344 291 189 Net income applicable to common stockholders$56,868 $47,760 $35,892 Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Net income per share$19.79 $16.25 $12.10 Diluted earnings per shareNet income applicable to common stockholders$56,868 $47,760 $35,892 Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Add: Dilutive impact of unvested PSUs, nondividend-earning RSUs and SARs5.1 4.5 4.2 Total weighted-average diluted shares outstanding2,879.0 2,943.1 2,970.0 Net income per share$19.75 $16.23 $12.09 Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common stock and participating securities. JPMorganChase grants RSUs under its share-based compensation programs, predominantly all of which entitle recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to dividends paid to holders of the Firm’s common stock. These unvested RSUs meet the definition of participating securities based on their respective rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, and they are treated as a separate class of securities in computing basic EPS. Participating securities are not included as incremental shares in computing diluted EPS; refer to Note 9 for additional information.Diluted EPS incorporates the potential impact of contingently issuable shares, including awards which require future service as a condition of delivery of the underlying common stock. Diluted EPS is calculated under both the two-class and treasury stock methods, and the more dilutive amount is reported. For each of the periods presented in the table below, diluted EPS calculated under the two-class method was more dilutive. Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to common stock and participating securities. JPMorganChase grants RSUs under its share-based compensation programs, predominantly all of which entitle recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to dividends paid to holders of the Firm’s common stock. These unvested RSUs meet the definition of participating securities based on their respective rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, and they are treated as a separate class of securities in computing basic EPS. Participating securities are not included as incremental shares in computing diluted EPS; refer to Note 9 for additional information. Diluted EPS incorporates the potential impact of contingently issuable shares, including awards which require future service as a condition of delivery of the underlying common stock. Diluted EPS is calculated under both the two-class and treasury stock methods, and the more dilutive amount is reported. For each of the periods presented in the table below, diluted EPS calculated under the two-class method was more dilutive. The following table presents the calculation of net income applicable to common stockholders and basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022.Year ended December 31,(in millions, except per share amounts)202420232022Basic earnings per shareNet income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Less: Preferred stock dividends1,259 1,501 1,595 Net income applicable to common equity57,212 48,051 36,081 Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities344 291 189 Net income applicable to common stockholders$56,868 $47,760 $35,892 Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Net income per share$19.79 $16.25 $12.10 Diluted earnings per shareNet income applicable to common stockholders$56,868 $47,760 $35,892 Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Add: Dilutive impact of unvested PSUs, nondividend-earning RSUs and SARs5.1 4.5 4.2 Total weighted-average diluted shares outstanding2,879.0 2,943.1 2,970.0 Net income per share$19.75 $16.23 $12.09 The following table presents the calculation of net income applicable to common stockholders and basic and diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022. Year ended December 31,(in millions, except per share amounts)202420232022Basic earnings per shareNet income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Less: Preferred stock dividends1,259 1,501 1,595 Net income applicable to common equity57,212 48,051 36,081 Less: Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities344 291 189 Net income applicable to common stockholders$56,868 $47,760 $35,892 Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Net income per share$19.79 $16.25 $12.10 Diluted earnings per shareNet income applicable to common stockholders$56,868 $47,760 $35,892 Total weighted-average basic shares outstanding2,873.9 2,938.6 2,965.8 Add: Dilutive impact of unvested PSUs, nondividend-earning RSUs and SARs5.1 4.5 4.2 Total weighted-average diluted shares outstanding2,879.0 2,943.1 2,970.0 Net income per share$19.75 $16.23 $12.09

AOCI includes the after-tax change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, foreign currency translation adjustments (including the impact of related derivatives), fair value changes of excluded components on fair value hedges, cash flow hedging activities, net gain/(loss) related to the Firm’s defined benefit pension and OPEB plans, and fair value option-elected liabilities arising from changes in the Firm’s own credit risk (DVA). Year ended December 31, (in millions)Unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securitiesTranslation adjustments, net of hedgesFair valuehedgesCash flow hedgesDefined benefit pension and OPEB plansDVA on fair value option elected liabilitiesAccumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)Balance at December 31, 2021$2,640 $(934)$(131)$(296)$(210)$(1,153)$(84)Net change(11,764)(611)98 (5,360)(1,241)1,621 (17,257)Balance at December 31, 2022$(9,124)(a)$(1,545)$(33)$(5,656)$(1,451)$468 $(17,341)Net change5,381 329 (101)1,724 373 (808)6,898 Balance at December 31, 2023$(3,743)(a)$(1,216)$(134)$(3,932)$(1,078)$(340)$(10,443)Net change(87)(858)(87)(882)(63)(36)(2,013)Balance at December 31, 2024$(3,830)(a)$(2,074)$(221)$(4,814)$(1,141)$(376)$(12,456) (a) (a) (a) (a)Included after-tax net unamortized unrealized gains/(losses) of $(651) million, $(895) million, and $(1.3) billion for the years ended 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, related to AFS securities that have been transferred to HTM. As of December 31, 2023 included after-tax net unamortized unrealized gains/(losses) of $(29) million related to HTM securities that have been transferred to AFS as permitted by the new hedge accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2023. Refer to Note 10 for further information. The following table presents the pre-tax and after-tax changes in the components of OCI. 202420232022Year ended December 31, (in millions)Pre-taxTax effectAfter-taxPre-taxTax effectAfter-taxPre-taxTax effectAfter-taxUnrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities:Net unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period$(1,135)$274 $(861)$3,891 $(922)$2,969 $(17,862)$4,290 $(13,572)Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)/losses included in net income(a)1,021 (247)774 3,180 (768)2,412 2,380 (572)1,808 Net change(114)27 (87)7,071 (1,690)5,381 (15,482)3,718 (11,764)Translation adjustments(b):Translation(4,385)250 (4,135)1,714 (95)1,619 (3,574)265 (3,309)Hedges4,322 (1,045)3,277 (1,697)407 (1,290)3,553 (855)2,698 Net change(63)(795)(858)17 312 329 (21)(590)(611)Fair value hedges, net change(c)(115)28 (87)(134)33 (101)130 (32)98 Cash flow hedges:Net unrealized gains/(losses) arising during the period(3,742)904 (2,838)483 (114)369 (7,473)1,794 (5,679)Reclassification adjustment for realized (gains)/losses included in net income(d)2,579 (623)1,956 1,775 (420)1,355 420 (101)319 Net change(1,163)281 (882)2,258 (534)1,724 (7,053)1,693 (5,360)Defined benefit pension and OPEB plans, net change(e)(131)68 (63)421 (48)373 (1,459)218 (1,241)DVA on fair value option elected liabilities, net change(45)9 (36)(1,066)258 (808)2,141 (520)1,621 Total other comprehensive income/(loss)$(1,631)$(382)$(2,013)$8,567 $(1,669)$6,898 $(21,744)$4,487 $(17,257)

(a)The pre-tax amount is reported in Investment securities gains/(losses) in the Consolidated statements of income. (b)Reclassifications of pre-tax realized gains/(losses) on translation adjustments and related hedges are reported in other income/expense in the Consolidated statements of income. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Firm reclassified a net pre-tax gain of $7 million to other income/expense, of which $89 million gain related to net investment hedges and $(82) million loss related to cumulative translation adjustments. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Firm reclassified a net pre-tax loss of $(3) million. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Firm reclassified a net pre-tax loss of $(8) million. (c)Represents changes in fair value of cross-currency swaps attributable to changes in cross-currency basis spreads, which are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and recorded in other comprehensive income. The initial cost of cross-currency basis spreads is recognized in earnings as part of the accrual of interest on the cross-currency swaps. (d)The pre-tax amounts are primarily recorded in noninterest revenue, net interest income and compensation expense in the Consolidated statements of income. (e)During the year ended December 31, 2022, a remeasurement of the Firm’s U.S. principal defined benefit plan in the third quarter, was required as a result of a pension settlement. The remeasurement resulted in a net decrease of $1.4 billion in pre-tax AOCI. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K295 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K295 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K295 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 295

JPMorganChase and its eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. JPMorganChase uses the asset and liability method to provide for income taxes on all transactions recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. This method requires that income taxes reflect the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities for book and tax purposes. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset or liability for each temporary difference is determined based on the tax rates that the Firm expects to be in effect when the underlying items of income and expense are realized. JPMorganChase’s expense for income taxes includes the current and deferred portions of that expense. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount the Firm expects to realize. Due to the inherent complexities arising from the nature of the Firm’s businesses, and from conducting business and being taxed in a substantial number of jurisdictions, significant judgments and estimates are required to be made. Agreement of tax liabilities between JPMorganChase and the many tax jurisdictions in which the Firm files tax returns may not be finalized for several years. Thus, the Firm’s final tax-related assets and liabilities may ultimately be different from those currently reported.Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6 and 14 for additional information.Effective tax rate and expenseThe following table presents a reconciliation of the applicable statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate. Effective tax rateYear ended December 31,202420232022Statutory U.S. federal tax rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %Increase/(decrease) in tax rate resulting from:U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefit3.1 2.8 3.5 Tax-exempt income(0.7)(0.9)(0.9)Non-U.S. earnings1.4 1.5 0.4 Business tax credits(2.4)(4.4)(5.4)Other, net(0.3)(0.4)(0.2)Effective tax rate22.1 %19.6 %(a)18.4 %(a)Income tax expense associated with the First Republic acquisition was reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain, which resulted in a reduction in the Firm’s effective tax rate.The following table reflects the components of income tax expense/(benefit) included in the Consolidated statements of income. Income tax expense/(benefit)Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Current income tax expense/(benefit)U.S. federal$7,091 $8,973 $5,606 Non-U.S.4,753 4,355 2,992 U.S. state and local2,762 3,266 2,630 Total current income tax expense/(benefit)14,606 16,594 11,228 Deferred income tax expense/(benefit)U.S. federal1,771 (3,475)(2,004)Non-U.S.72 35 (154)U.S. state and local161 (1,094)(580)Total deferred income tax expense/(benefit)2,004 (4,534)(2,738)Total income tax expense$16,610 $12,060 $8,490 Total income tax expense includes $314 million, $68 million and $331 million of tax benefits in 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, resulting from the resolution of tax audits.Tax effect of items recorded in stockholders’ equityThe preceding table does not reflect the tax effect of certain items that are recorded each period directly in stockholders’ equity, which are predominantly reflected in OCI as disclosed in Note 24. For the year ended December 31, 2024, stockholders’ equity reflected the tax effect associated with the Firm’s adoption of the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance. For the year ended December 31, 2023, stockholders’ equity reflected the tax effect associated with the Firm’s adoption of the TDR accounting guidance. Both of the respective adoptions were recognized in retained earnings. Refer to Note 1, 6 and 14 for further information.Results from U.S. and non-U.S. earningsThe following table presents the U.S. and non-U.S. components of income before income tax expense. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022U.S.$59,472 $46,868 $34,626 Non-U.S.(a)15,609 14,744 11,540 Income before income tax expense$75,081 $61,612 $46,166 (a)For purposes of this table, non-U.S. income is defined as income generated from operations located outside the U.S.The Firm will recognize any U.S. income tax expense it may incur on global intangible low tax income as income tax expense in the period in which the tax is incurred. JPMorganChase and its eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. JPMorganChase uses the asset and liability method to provide for income taxes on all transactions recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. This method requires that income taxes reflect the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities for book and tax purposes. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset or liability for each temporary difference is determined based on the tax rates that the Firm expects to be in effect when the underlying items of income and expense are realized. JPMorganChase’s expense for income taxes includes the current and deferred portions of that expense. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount the Firm expects to realize. Due to the inherent complexities arising from the nature of the Firm’s businesses, and from conducting business and being taxed in a substantial number of jurisdictions, significant judgments and estimates are required to be made. Agreement of tax liabilities between JPMorganChase and the many tax jurisdictions in which the Firm files tax returns may not be finalized for several years. Thus, the Firm’s final tax-related assets and liabilities may ultimately be different from those currently reported.Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6 and 14 for additional information.Effective tax rate and expenseThe following table presents a reconciliation of the applicable statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate. Effective tax rateYear ended December 31,202420232022Statutory U.S. federal tax rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %Increase/(decrease) in tax rate resulting from:U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefit3.1 2.8 3.5 Tax-exempt income(0.7)(0.9)(0.9)Non-U.S. earnings1.4 1.5 0.4 Business tax credits(2.4)(4.4)(5.4)Other, net(0.3)(0.4)(0.2)Effective tax rate22.1 %19.6 %(a)18.4 %(a)Income tax expense associated with the First Republic acquisition was reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain, which resulted in a reduction in the Firm’s effective tax rate. JPMorganChase and its eligible subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. JPMorganChase uses the asset and liability method to provide for income taxes on all transactions recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. This method requires that income taxes reflect the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets or liabilities for book and tax purposes. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset or liability for each temporary difference is determined based on the tax rates that the Firm expects to be in effect when the underlying items of income and expense are realized. JPMorganChase’s expense for income taxes includes the current and deferred portions of that expense. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount the Firm expects to realize. Due to the inherent complexities arising from the nature of the Firm’s businesses, and from conducting business and being taxed in a substantial number of jurisdictions, significant judgments and estimates are required to be made. Agreement of tax liabilities between JPMorganChase and the many tax jurisdictions in which the Firm files tax returns may not be finalized for several years. Thus, the Firm’s final tax-related assets and liabilities may ultimately be different from those currently reported. Effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6 and 14 for additional information.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the applicable statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the effective tax rate. Effective tax rateYear ended December 31,202420232022Statutory U.S. federal tax rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %Increase/(decrease) in tax rate resulting from:U.S. state and local income taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefit3.1 2.8 3.5 Tax-exempt income(0.7)(0.9)(0.9)Non-U.S. earnings1.4 1.5 0.4 Business tax credits(2.4)(4.4)(5.4)Other, net(0.3)(0.4)(0.2)Effective tax rate22.1 %19.6 %(a)18.4 % Tax-exempt income Non-U.S. earnings Business tax credits Other, net (a) (a)Income tax expense associated with the First Republic acquisition was reflected in the estimated bargain purchase gain, which resulted in a reduction in the Firm’s effective tax rate. The following table reflects the components of income tax expense/(benefit) included in the Consolidated statements of income. Income tax expense/(benefit)Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Current income tax expense/(benefit)U.S. federal$7,091 $8,973 $5,606 Non-U.S.4,753 4,355 2,992 U.S. state and local2,762 3,266 2,630 Total current income tax expense/(benefit)14,606 16,594 11,228 Deferred income tax expense/(benefit)U.S. federal1,771 (3,475)(2,004)Non-U.S.72 35 (154)U.S. state and local161 (1,094)(580)Total deferred income tax expense/(benefit)2,004 (4,534)(2,738)Total income tax expense$16,610 $12,060 $8,490 Total income tax expense includes $314 million, $68 million and $331 million of tax benefits in 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, resulting from the resolution of tax audits.Tax effect of items recorded in stockholders’ equityThe preceding table does not reflect the tax effect of certain items that are recorded each period directly in stockholders’ equity, which are predominantly reflected in OCI as disclosed in Note 24. For the year ended December 31, 2024, stockholders’ equity reflected the tax effect associated with the Firm’s adoption of the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance. For the year ended December 31, 2023, stockholders’ equity reflected the tax effect associated with the Firm’s adoption of the TDR accounting guidance. Both of the respective adoptions were recognized in retained earnings. Refer to Note 1, 6 and 14 for further information.Results from U.S. and non-U.S. earningsThe following table presents the U.S. and non-U.S. components of income before income tax expense. Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022U.S.$59,472 $46,868 $34,626 Non-U.S.(a)15,609 14,744 11,540 Income before income tax expense$75,081 $61,612 $46,166 (a)For purposes of this table, non-U.S. income is defined as income generated from operations located outside the U.S.The Firm will recognize any U.S. income tax expense it may incur on global intangible low tax income as income tax expense in the period in which the tax is incurred. The following table reflects the components of income tax expense/(benefit) included in the Consolidated statements of income. Income tax expense/(benefit)Year ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Current income tax expense/(benefit)U.S. federal$7,091 $8,973 $5,606 Non-U.S.4,753 4,355 2,992 U.S. state and local2,762 3,266 2,630 Total current income tax expense/(benefit)14,606 16,594 11,228 Deferred income tax expense/(benefit)U.S. federal1,771 (3,475)(2,004)Non-U.S.72 35 (154)U.S. state and local161 (1,094)(580)Total deferred income tax expense/(benefit)2,004 (4,534)(2,738)Total income tax expense$16,610 $12,060 $8,490 Total income tax expense includes $314 million, $68 million and $331 million of tax benefits in 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively, resulting from the resolution of tax audits. Tax effect of items recorded in stockholders’ equity The preceding table does not reflect the tax effect of certain items that are recorded each period directly in stockholders’ equity, which are predominantly reflected in OCI as disclosed in Note 24. For the year ended December 31, 2024, stockholders’ equity reflected the tax effect associated with the Firm’s adoption of the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures Using the Proportional Amortization Method guidance. For the year ended December 31, 2023, stockholders’ equity reflected the tax effect associated with the Firm’s adoption of the TDR accounting guidance. Both of the respective adoptions were recognized in retained earnings. Refer to Note 1, 6 and 14 for further information.

(a)For purposes of this table, non-U.S. income is defined as income generated from operations located outside the U.S. The Firm will recognize any U.S. income tax expense it may incur on global intangible low tax income as income tax expense in the period in which the tax is incurred. 296JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 296JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 296JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 296 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Deferred taxes Deferred income tax expense/(benefit) reflects the differences between assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting purposes versus income tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized if, in management’s judgment, their realizability is determined to be more likely than not. If a deferred tax asset is determined to be unrealizable, a valuation allowance is established. The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected in the following table, the net deferred tax assets are reflected in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. December 31, (in millions)20242023Deferred tax assetsAllowance for loan losses$6,117 $5,809 Employee benefits1,165 1,247 Accrued expenses and other8,881 9,887 (a)Depreciation and amortization386 — Non-U.S. operations948 860 Tax attribute carryforwards352 290 Gross deferred tax assets17,849 18,093 Valuation allowance(249)(183)Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance$17,600 $17,910 Deferred tax liabilitiesDepreciation and amortization$— $779 Mortgage servicing rights, net of hedges1,912 1,794 Leasing transactions2,249 2,254 Other, net1,264 2,935 Gross deferred tax liabilities5,425 7,762 Net deferred tax assets$12,175 $10,148 (a)Includes the estimated net deferred tax asset associated with the First Republic acquisition.JPMorganChase has recorded deferred tax assets of $352 million at December 31, 2024 in connection with tax attribute carryforwards. State and local capital loss carryforwards were $914 million, U.S. federal NOL carryforwards were $496 million, non-U.S. NOL carryforwards were $958 million, and other U.S. federal tax attributes were $111 million. If not utilized, a portion of the U.S. federal NOL carryforwards and other U.S. federal tax attributes will expire between 2026 and 2036 whereas others have an unlimited carryforward period. Similarly, certain non-U.S. NOL carryforwards will expire between 2026 and 2041 whereas others have an unlimited carryforward period. The state and local capital loss carryforwards will expire in 2026. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2024, was predominantly driven by certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, including NOL carryforwards. Deferred taxes Deferred income tax expense/(benefit) reflects the differences between assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting purposes versus income tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized if, in management’s judgment, their realizability is determined to be more likely than not. If a deferred tax asset is determined to be unrealizable, a valuation allowance is established. The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected in the following table, the net deferred tax assets are reflected in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. December 31, (in millions)20242023Deferred tax assetsAllowance for loan losses$6,117 $5,809 Employee benefits1,165 1,247 Accrued expenses and other8,881 9,887 (a)Depreciation and amortization386 — Non-U.S. operations948 860 Tax attribute carryforwards352 290 Gross deferred tax assets17,849 18,093 Valuation allowance(249)(183)Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance$17,600 $17,910 Deferred tax liabilitiesDepreciation and amortization$— $779 Mortgage servicing rights, net of hedges1,912 1,794 Leasing transactions2,249 2,254 Other, net1,264 2,935 Gross deferred tax liabilities5,425 7,762 Net deferred tax assets$12,175 $10,148 (a)Includes the estimated net deferred tax asset associated with the First Republic acquisition.

Deferred income tax expense/(benefit) reflects the differences between assets and liabilities measured for financial reporting purposes versus income tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets are recognized if, in management’s judgment, their realizability is determined to be more likely than not. If a deferred tax asset is determined to be unrealizable, a valuation allowance is established. The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected in the following table, the net deferred tax assets are reflected in other assets on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets. December 31, (in millions)20242023Deferred tax assetsAllowance for loan losses$6,117 $5,809 Employee benefits1,165 1,247 Accrued expenses and other8,881 9,887 (a)Depreciation and amortization386 — Non-U.S. operations948 860 Tax attribute carryforwards352 290 Gross deferred tax assets17,849 18,093 Valuation allowance(249)(183)Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance$17,600 $17,910 Deferred tax liabilitiesDepreciation and amortization$— $779 Mortgage servicing rights, net of hedges1,912 1,794 Leasing transactions2,249 2,254 Other, net1,264 2,935 Gross deferred tax liabilities5,425 7,762 Net deferred tax assets$12,175 $10,148 Accrued expenses and other (a)

(a)Includes the estimated net deferred tax asset associated with the First Republic acquisition. JPMorganChase has recorded deferred tax assets of $352 million at December 31, 2024 in connection with tax attribute carryforwards. State and local capital loss carryforwards were $914 million, U.S. federal NOL carryforwards were $496 million, non-U.S. NOL carryforwards were $958 million, and other U.S. federal tax attributes were $111 million. If not utilized, a portion of the U.S. federal NOL carryforwards and other U.S. federal tax attributes will expire between 2026 and 2036 whereas others have an unlimited carryforward period. Similarly, certain non-U.S. NOL carryforwards will expire between 2026 and 2041 whereas others have an unlimited carryforward period. The state and local capital loss carryforwards will expire in 2026. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2024, was predominantly driven by certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, including NOL carryforwards. JPMorganChase has recorded deferred tax assets of $352 million at December 31, 2024 in connection with tax attribute carryforwards. State and local capital loss carryforwards were $914 million, U.S. federal NOL carryforwards were $496 million, non-U.S. NOL carryforwards were $958 million, and other U.S. federal tax attributes were $111 million. If not utilized, a portion of the U.S. federal NOL carryforwards and other U.S. federal tax attributes will expire between 2026 and 2036 whereas others have an unlimited carryforward period. Similarly, certain non-U.S. NOL carryforwards will expire between 2026 and 2041 whereas others have an unlimited carryforward period. The state and local capital loss carryforwards will expire in 2026. The valuation allowance at December 31, 2024, was predominantly driven by certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, including NOL carryforwards. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K297 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K297 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K297 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 297

Unrecognized tax benefitsAt December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, JPMorganChase’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest expense and penalties, were $6.2 billion, $5.4 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively, of which $4.4 billion, $3.9 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively, if recognized, would reduce the annual effective tax rate. Included in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits are certain items that would not affect the effective tax rate if they were recognized in the Consolidated statements of income. These unrecognized items include the tax effect of certain temporary differences, the portion of gross state and local unrecognized tax benefits that would be offset by the benefit from associated U.S. federal income tax deductions, and the portion of gross non-U.S. unrecognized tax benefits that would have offsets in other jurisdictions. JPMorganChase evaluates the need for changes in unrecognized tax benefits based on its anticipated tax return filing positions as part of its U.S. federal and state and local tax returns. In addition, the Firm is presently under audit by a number of taxing authorities, most notably by the Internal Revenue Service, as summarized in the Tax examination status table below. The evaluation of unrecognized tax benefits as well as the potential for audit settlements make it reasonably possible that over the next 12 months the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease by as much as approximately $2.4 billion. The change in the unrecognized tax benefit would result in a payment or income statement recognition. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits. (in millions)202420232022Balance at January 1,$5,401 $5,043 $4,636 Increases based on tax positions related to the current period1,721 1,440 1,234 Increases based on tax positions related to prior periods92 37 123 Decreases based on tax positions related to prior periods(907)(1,110)(824)Decreases related to cash settlements with taxing authorities(148)(9)(126)Balance at December 31,$6,159 $5,401 $5,043 After-tax interest expense/(benefit) and penalties related to income tax liabilities recognized in income tax expense were $288 million, $229 million and $141 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.At December 31, 2024 and 2023, in addition to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, the Firm had accrued $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, for income tax-related interest and penalties. Tax examination status JPMorganChase is continually under examination by the Internal Revenue Service, by taxing authorities throughout the world, and by many state and local jurisdictions throughout the U.S. The following table summarizes the status of tax years that remain subject to income tax examination of JPMorganChase and its consolidated subsidiaries by significant jurisdictions as of December 31, 2024.Periods under examinationStatusJPMorganChase – U.S.2011 – 2013Field examination of amended returns; certain matters at Appellate levelJPMorganChase – U.S.2014 - 2020Field examination of original and amended returns; certain matters at Appellate levelJPMorganChase – New York City2015 - 2018Field ExaminationJPMorganChase – U.K.2017 – 2022Field examination of certain select entities Unrecognized tax benefitsAt December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, JPMorganChase’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest expense and penalties, were $6.2 billion, $5.4 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively, of which $4.4 billion, $3.9 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively, if recognized, would reduce the annual effective tax rate. Included in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits are certain items that would not affect the effective tax rate if they were recognized in the Consolidated statements of income. These unrecognized items include the tax effect of certain temporary differences, the portion of gross state and local unrecognized tax benefits that would be offset by the benefit from associated U.S. federal income tax deductions, and the portion of gross non-U.S. unrecognized tax benefits that would have offsets in other jurisdictions. JPMorganChase evaluates the need for changes in unrecognized tax benefits based on its anticipated tax return filing positions as part of its U.S. federal and state and local tax returns. In addition, the Firm is presently under audit by a number of taxing authorities, most notably by the Internal Revenue Service, as summarized in the Tax examination status table below. The evaluation of unrecognized tax benefits as well as the potential for audit settlements make it reasonably possible that over the next 12 months the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease by as much as approximately $2.4 billion. The change in the unrecognized tax benefit would result in a payment or income statement recognition. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits. (in millions)202420232022Balance at January 1,$5,401 $5,043 $4,636 Increases based on tax positions related to the current period1,721 1,440 1,234 Increases based on tax positions related to prior periods92 37 123 Decreases based on tax positions related to prior periods(907)(1,110)(824)Decreases related to cash settlements with taxing authorities(148)(9)(126)Balance at December 31,$6,159 $5,401 $5,043 After-tax interest expense/(benefit) and penalties related to income tax liabilities recognized in income tax expense were $288 million, $229 million and $141 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.At December 31, 2024 and 2023, in addition to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, the Firm had accrued $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, for income tax-related interest and penalties.

At December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, JPMorganChase’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest expense and penalties, were $6.2 billion, $5.4 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively, of which $4.4 billion, $3.9 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively, if recognized, would reduce the annual effective tax rate. Included in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits are certain items that would not affect the effective tax rate if they were recognized in the Consolidated statements of income. These unrecognized items include the tax effect of certain temporary differences, the portion of gross state and local unrecognized tax benefits that would be offset by the benefit from associated U.S. federal income tax deductions, and the portion of gross non-U.S. unrecognized tax benefits that would have offsets in other jurisdictions. JPMorganChase evaluates the need for changes in unrecognized tax benefits based on its anticipated tax return filing positions as part of its U.S. federal and state and local tax returns. In addition, the Firm is presently under audit by a number of taxing authorities, most notably by the Internal Revenue Service, as summarized in the Tax examination status table below. The evaluation of unrecognized tax benefits as well as the potential for audit settlements make it reasonably possible that over the next 12 months the gross balance of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease by as much as approximately $2.4 billion. The change in the unrecognized tax benefit would result in a payment or income statement recognition. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits. (in millions)202420232022Balance at January 1,$5,401 $5,043 $4,636 Increases based on tax positions related to the current period1,721 1,440 1,234 Increases based on tax positions related to prior periods92 37 123 Decreases based on tax positions related to prior periods(907)(1,110)(824)Decreases related to cash settlements with taxing authorities(148)(9)(126)Balance at December 31,$6,159 $5,401 $5,043 Increases based on tax positions related to the current period Increases based on tax positions related to prior periods Decreases based on tax positions related to prior periods Decreases related to cash settlements with taxing authorities After-tax interest expense/(benefit) and penalties related to income tax liabilities recognized in income tax expense were $288 million, $229 million and $141 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, in addition to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, the Firm had accrued $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, for income tax-related interest and penalties. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, in addition to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, the Firm had accrued $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, for income tax-related interest and penaltie Tax examination status JPMorganChase is continually under examination by the Internal Revenue Service, by taxing authorities throughout the world, and by many state and local jurisdictions throughout the U.S. The following table summarizes the status of tax years that remain subject to income tax examination of JPMorganChase and its consolidated subsidiaries by significant jurisdictions as of December 31, 2024.Periods under examinationStatusJPMorganChase – U.S.2011 – 2013Field examination of amended returns; certain matters at Appellate levelJPMorganChase – U.S.2014 - 2020Field examination of original and amended returns; certain matters at Appellate levelJPMorganChase – New York City2015 - 2018Field ExaminationJPMorganChase – U.K.2017 – 2022Field examination of certain select entities

JPMorganChase is continually under examination by the Internal Revenue Service, by taxing authorities throughout the world, and by many state and local jurisdictions throughout the U.S. The following table summarizes the status of tax years that remain subject to income tax examination of JPMorganChase and its consolidated subsidiaries by significant jurisdictions as of December 31, 2024. Periods under examinationStatusJPMorganChase – U.S.2011 – 2013Field examination of amended returns; certain matters at Appellate levelJPMorganChase – U.S.2014 - 2020Field examination of original and amended returns; certain matters at Appellate levelJPMorganChase – New York City2015 - 2018Field ExaminationJPMorganChase – U.K.2017 – 2022Field examination of certain select entities 2014 - 2020 2015 - 2018 2017 – 2022 298JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 298JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 298JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 298 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Note 26 – Restricted cash, other restricted assets and intercompany funds transfers Restricted cash and other restricted assets Certain of the Firm’s cash and other assets are restricted as to withdrawal or usage. These restrictions are imposed by various regulatory authorities based on the particular activities of the Firm’s subsidiaries. The business of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is subject to examination and regulation by the OCC. The Bank is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, and its deposits in the U.S. are insured by the FDIC, subject to applicable limits. The Firm is required to maintain cash reserves at certain non-US central banks. The Firm is also subject to rules and regulations established by other U.S. and non U.S. regulators. As part of its compliance with the respective regulatory requirements, the Firm’s broker-dealer activities are subject to certain restrictions on cash and other assets. The following table presents the components of the Firm’s restricted cash: December 31, (in billions)20242023Segregated for the benefit of securities and cleared derivative customers18.7 10.3 Cash reserves at non-U.S. central banks and held for other general purposes8.8 9.3 Total restricted cash(a)$27.5 $19.6 (a)Comprises $26.1 billion and $18.2 billion in deposits with banks, and $1.4 billion and $1.4 billion in cash and due from banks on the Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.Also, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm had the following other restricted assets: •Cash and securities pledged with clearing organizations for the benefit of customers of $40.7 billion and $40.5 billion, respectively. •Securities with a fair value of $26.8 billion and $20.5 billion, respectively, were also restricted in relation to customer activity.Intercompany funds transfers Restrictions imposed by U.S. federal law prohibit JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and its subsidiaries, from lending to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“Parent Company”) and certain of its affiliates unless the loans are secured in specified amounts. Such secured loans provided by any banking subsidiary to the Parent Company or to any particular affiliate, together with certain other transactions with such affiliate (collectively referred to as “covered transactions”), must be made on terms and conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, unless collateralized with cash or US Government debt obligations, covered transactions are generally limited to 10% of the banking subsidiary’s total capital, as determined by the risk-based capital guidelines; the aggregate amount of covered transactions between any banking subsidiary and all of its affiliates is limited to 20% of the banking subsidiary’s total capital.The Parent Company’s two principal subsidiaries are JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC, an intermediate holding company (the “IHC”). The IHC generally holds the stock of JPMorganChase’s subsidiaries other than JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its subsidiaries. The IHC also owns other assets and provides intercompany loans to the Parent Company. The Parent Company is obligated to contribute to the IHC substantially all the net proceeds received from securities issuances (including issuances of senior and subordinated debt securities and of preferred and common stock).The principal sources of income and funding for the Parent Company are dividends from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and dividends and extensions of credit from the IHC. In addition to dividend restrictions set forth in statutes and regulations, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC have authority under the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act to prohibit or to limit the payment of dividends by the banking organizations they supervise, including the Parent Company and its subsidiaries that are banks or bank holding companies, if, in the banking regulator’s opinion, payment of a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in light of the financial condition of the banking organization. The IHC is prohibited from paying dividends or extending credit to the Parent Company if certain capital or liquidity “thresholds” are breached or if limits are otherwise imposed by the Parent Company’s management or Board of Directors.At January 1, 2025, the Parent Company’s banking subsidiaries could pay, in the aggregate, approximately $15.5 billion in dividends to their respective bank holding companies without the prior approval of their relevant banking regulators. The capacity to pay dividends in 2025 will be supplemented by the banking subsidiaries’ earnings during the year. Note 26 – Restricted cash, other restricted assets and intercompany funds transfers Restricted cash and other restricted assets Certain of the Firm’s cash and other assets are restricted as to withdrawal or usage. These restrictions are imposed by various regulatory authorities based on the particular activities of the Firm’s subsidiaries. The business of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is subject to examination and regulation by the OCC. The Bank is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, and its deposits in the U.S. are insured by the FDIC, subject to applicable limits. The Firm is required to maintain cash reserves at certain non-US central banks. The Firm is also subject to rules and regulations established by other U.S. and non U.S. regulators. As part of its compliance with the respective regulatory requirements, the Firm’s broker-dealer activities are subject to certain restrictions on cash and other assets. The following table presents the components of the Firm’s restricted cash: December 31, (in billions)20242023Segregated for the benefit of securities and cleared derivative customers18.7 10.3 Cash reserves at non-U.S. central banks and held for other general purposes8.8 9.3 Total restricted cash(a)$27.5 $19.6 (a)Comprises $26.1 billion and $18.2 billion in deposits with banks, and $1.4 billion and $1.4 billion in cash and due from banks on the Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.Also, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm had the following other restricted assets: •Cash and securities pledged with clearing organizations for the benefit of customers of $40.7 billion and $40.5 billion, respectively. •Securities with a fair value of $26.8 billion and $20.5 billion, respectively, were also restricted in relation to customer activity.

Certain of the Firm’s cash and other assets are restricted as to withdrawal or usage. These restrictions are imposed by various regulatory authorities based on the particular activities of the Firm’s subsidiaries. The business of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is subject to examination and regulation by the OCC. The Bank is a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve System, and its deposits in the U.S. are insured by the FDIC, subject to applicable limits. The Firm is required to maintain cash reserves at certain non-US central banks. The Firm is also subject to rules and regulations established by other U.S. and non U.S. regulators. As part of its compliance with the respective regulatory requirements, the Firm’s broker-dealer activities are subject to certain restrictions on cash and other assets. The following table presents the components of the Firm’s restricted cash: December 31, (in billions)20242023Segregated for the benefit of securities and cleared derivative customers18.7 10.3 Cash reserves at non-U.S. central banks and held for other general purposes8.8 9.3 Total restricted cash(a)$27.5 $19.6 Segregated for the benefit of securities and cleared derivative customers Cash reserves at non-U.S. central banks and held for other general purposes

(a)Comprises $26.1 billion and $18.2 billion in deposits with banks, and $1.4 billion and $1.4 billion in cash and due from banks on the Consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Also, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm had the following other restricted assets: •Cash and securities pledged with clearing organizations for the benefit of customers of $40.7 billion and $40.5 billion, respectively. •Securities with a fair value of $26.8 billion and $20.5 billion, respectively, were also restricted in relation to customer activity. Intercompany funds transfers Restrictions imposed by U.S. federal law prohibit JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and its subsidiaries, from lending to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“Parent Company”) and certain of its affiliates unless the loans are secured in specified amounts. Such secured loans provided by any banking subsidiary to the Parent Company or to any particular affiliate, together with certain other transactions with such affiliate (collectively referred to as “covered transactions”), must be made on terms and conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, unless collateralized with cash or US Government debt obligations, covered transactions are generally limited to 10% of the banking subsidiary’s total capital, as determined by the risk-based capital guidelines; the aggregate amount of covered transactions between any banking subsidiary and all of its affiliates is limited to 20% of the banking subsidiary’s total capital.The Parent Company’s two principal subsidiaries are JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC, an intermediate holding company (the “IHC”). The IHC generally holds the stock of JPMorganChase’s subsidiaries other than JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its subsidiaries. The IHC also owns other assets and provides intercompany loans to the Parent Company. The Parent Company is obligated to contribute to the IHC substantially all the net proceeds received from securities issuances (including issuances of senior and subordinated debt securities and of preferred and common stock).The principal sources of income and funding for the Parent Company are dividends from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and dividends and extensions of credit from the IHC. In addition to dividend restrictions set forth in statutes and regulations, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC have authority under the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act to prohibit or to limit the payment of dividends by the banking organizations they supervise, including the Parent Company and its subsidiaries that are banks or bank holding companies, if, in the banking regulator’s opinion, payment of a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in light of the financial condition of the banking organization. The IHC is prohibited from paying dividends or extending credit to the Parent Company if certain capital or liquidity “thresholds” are breached or if limits are otherwise imposed by the Parent Company’s management or Board of Directors.At January 1, 2025, the Parent Company’s banking subsidiaries could pay, in the aggregate, approximately $15.5 billion in dividends to their respective bank holding companies without the prior approval of their relevant banking regulators. The capacity to pay dividends in 2025 will be supplemented by the banking subsidiaries’ earnings during the year.

Restrictions imposed by U.S. federal law prohibit JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and its subsidiaries, from lending to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“Parent Company”) and certain of its affiliates unless the loans are secured in specified amounts. Such secured loans provided by any banking subsidiary to the Parent Company or to any particular affiliate, together with certain other transactions with such affiliate (collectively referred to as “covered transactions”), must be made on terms and conditions that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices. In addition, unless collateralized with cash or US Government debt obligations, covered transactions are generally limited to 10% of the banking subsidiary’s total capital, as determined by the risk-based capital guidelines; the aggregate amount of covered transactions between any banking subsidiary and all of its affiliates is limited to 20% of the banking subsidiary’s total capital. The Parent Company’s two principal subsidiaries are JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC, an intermediate holding company (the “IHC”). The IHC generally holds the stock of JPMorganChase’s subsidiaries other than JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its subsidiaries. The IHC also owns other assets and provides intercompany loans to the Parent Company. The Parent Company is obligated to contribute to the IHC substantially all the net proceeds received from securities issuances (including issuances of senior and subordinated debt securities and of preferred and common stock). The principal sources of income and funding for the Parent Company are dividends from JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and dividends and extensions of credit from the IHC. In addition to dividend restrictions set forth in statutes and regulations, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and the FDIC have authority under the Financial Institutions Supervisory Act to prohibit or to limit the payment of dividends by the banking organizations they supervise, including the Parent Company and its subsidiaries that are banks or bank holding companies, if, in the banking regulator’s opinion, payment of a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in light of the financial condition of the banking organization. The IHC is prohibited from paying dividends or extending credit to the Parent Company if certain capital or liquidity “thresholds” are breached or if limits are otherwise imposed by the Parent Company’s management or Board of Directors. At January 1, 2025, the Parent Company’s banking subsidiaries could pay, in the aggregate, approximately $15.5 billion in dividends to their respective bank holding companies without the prior approval of their relevant banking regulators. The capacity to pay dividends in 2025 will be supplemented by the banking subsidiaries’ earnings during the year. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K299 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K299 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K299 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 299

The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the Firm as a consolidated financial holding company. The OCC establishes similar minimum capital requirements and standards for the Firm’s principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The capital rules under Basel III establish minimum capital ratios and overall capital adequacy standards for large and internationally active U.S. bank holding companies and banks, including the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Under the rules currently in effect, two comprehensive approaches are prescribed for calculating RWA: a standardized approach (“Basel III Standardized”), and an advanced approach (“Basel III Advanced”). For each of these risk-based capital ratios, the capital adequacy of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is evaluated against the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements.The three components of regulatory capital under the Basel III rules and their primary drivers are as illustrated below:Under the risk-based capital and leverage-based guidelines of the Federal Reserve, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is required to maintain minimum ratios for CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital, Total capital, Tier 1 leverage and the SLR. Failure to meet these minimum requirements could cause the Federal Reserve to take action. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is also subject to these capital requirements established by its primary regulators. The following table presents the risk-based regulatory capital ratio requirements and well-capitalized ratios to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were subject as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Standardized capital ratio requirementsAdvanced capital ratio requirementsWell-capitalized ratios BHC(a)(b)IDI(c)BHC(a)(b)IDI(c)BHC(d) IDI(e)Risk-based capital ratios CET1 capital12.3 %7.0 %11.5 %7.0 %NA6.5 %Tier 1 capital13.8 8.5 13.0 8.5 6.0 %8.0 Total capital15.8 10.5 15.0 10.5 10.0 10.0 Note: The table above is as defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC and to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are subject. (a)Represents the regulatory capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital ratio requirements each include a respective minimum requirement plus a GSIB surcharge of 4.5% as calculated under Method 2; plus a 3.3% SCB for Basel III Standardized ratios and a fixed 2.5% capital conservation buffer for Basel III Advanced ratios. The countercyclical buffer is currently set to 0% by the federal banking agencies.(b)For the period ended December 31, 2023, the CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements under Basel III Standardized applicable to the Firm were 11.4%, 12.9%, and 14.9%, respectively; the Basel III Advanced CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm were 11.0%, 12.5%, and 14.5%, respectively.(c)Represents requirements for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital ratio requirements include a fixed capital conservation buffer requirement of 2.5% that is applicable to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is not subject to the GSIB surcharge.(d)Represents requirements for bank holding companies pursuant to regulations issued by the Federal Reserve.(e)Represents requirements for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. pursuant to regulations issued under the FDIC Improvement Act. The following table presents the leverage-based regulatory capital ratio requirements and well-capitalized ratios to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were subject as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.Capital ratio requirements(a)Well-capitalized ratiosBHCIDIBHC(b)IDILeverage-based capital ratiosTier 1 leverage4.0 %4.0 %NA5.0 %SLR5.0 6.0 NA6.0 Note: The table above is as defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC and to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are subject.(a)Represents minimum SLR requirement of 3.0%, as well as supplementary leverage buffer requirements of 2.0% and 3.0% for BHC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., respectively. (b)The Federal Reserve's regulations do not establish well-capitalized thresholds for these measures for BHCs. The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the Firm as a consolidated financial holding company. The OCC establishes similar minimum capital requirements and standards for the Firm’s principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The capital rules under Basel III establish minimum capital ratios and overall capital adequacy standards for large and internationally active U.S. bank holding companies and banks, including the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Under the rules currently in effect, two comprehensive approaches are prescribed for calculating RWA: a standardized approach (“Basel III Standardized”), and an advanced approach (“Basel III Advanced”). For each of these risk-based capital ratios, the capital adequacy of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is evaluated against the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements.The three components of regulatory capital under the Basel III rules and their primary drivers are as illustrated below:Under the risk-based capital and leverage-based guidelines of the Federal Reserve, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is required to maintain minimum ratios for CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital, Total capital, Tier 1 leverage and the SLR. Failure to meet these minimum requirements could cause the Federal Reserve to take action. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is also subject to these capital requirements established by its primary regulators. The Federal Reserve establishes capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards, for the Firm as a consolidated financial holding company. The OCC establishes similar minimum capital requirements and standards for the Firm’s principal IDI subsidiary, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The capital rules under Basel III establish minimum capital ratios and overall capital adequacy standards for large and internationally active U.S. bank holding companies and banks, including the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Under the rules currently in effect, two comprehensive approaches are prescribed for calculating RWA: a standardized approach (“Basel III Standardized”), and an advanced approach (“Basel III Advanced”). For each of these risk-based capital ratios, the capital adequacy of the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is evaluated against the lower of the Standardized or Advanced approaches compared to their respective regulatory capital ratio requirements. The three components of regulatory capital under the Basel III rules and their primary drivers are as illustrated below: Under the risk-based capital and leverage-based guidelines of the Federal Reserve, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is required to maintain minimum ratios for CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital, Total capital, Tier 1 leverage and the SLR. Failure to meet these minimum requirements could cause the Federal Reserve to take action. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is also subject to these capital requirements established by its primary regulators. The following table presents the risk-based regulatory capital ratio requirements and well-capitalized ratios to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were subject as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Standardized capital ratio requirementsAdvanced capital ratio requirementsWell-capitalized ratios BHC(a)(b)IDI(c)BHC(a)(b)IDI(c)BHC(d) IDI(e)Risk-based capital ratios CET1 capital12.3 %7.0 %11.5 %7.0 %NA6.5 %Tier 1 capital13.8 8.5 13.0 8.5 6.0 %8.0 Total capital15.8 10.5 15.0 10.5 10.0 10.0 Note: The table above is as defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC and to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are subject. (a)Represents the regulatory capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital ratio requirements each include a respective minimum requirement plus a GSIB surcharge of 4.5% as calculated under Method 2; plus a 3.3% SCB for Basel III Standardized ratios and a fixed 2.5% capital conservation buffer for Basel III Advanced ratios. The countercyclical buffer is currently set to 0% by the federal banking agencies.(b)For the period ended December 31, 2023, the CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements under Basel III Standardized applicable to the Firm were 11.4%, 12.9%, and 14.9%, respectively; the Basel III Advanced CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm were 11.0%, 12.5%, and 14.5%, respectively.(c)Represents requirements for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital ratio requirements include a fixed capital conservation buffer requirement of 2.5% that is applicable to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is not subject to the GSIB surcharge.(d)Represents requirements for bank holding companies pursuant to regulations issued by the Federal Reserve.(e)Represents requirements for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. pursuant to regulations issued under the FDIC Improvement Act. The following table presents the leverage-based regulatory capital ratio requirements and well-capitalized ratios to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were subject as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.Capital ratio requirements(a)Well-capitalized ratiosBHCIDIBHC(b)IDILeverage-based capital ratiosTier 1 leverage4.0 %4.0 %NA5.0 %SLR5.0 6.0 NA6.0 Note: The table above is as defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC and to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are subject.(a)Represents minimum SLR requirement of 3.0%, as well as supplementary leverage buffer requirements of 2.0% and 3.0% for BHC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., respectively. (b)The Federal Reserve's regulations do not establish well-capitalized thresholds for these measures for BHCs. The following table presents the risk-based regulatory capital ratio requirements and well-capitalized ratios to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were subject as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Standardized capital ratio requirementsAdvanced capital ratio requirementsWell-capitalized ratios BHC(a)(b)IDI(c)BHC(a)(b)IDI(c)BHC(d) IDI(e)Risk-based capital ratios CET1 capital12.3 %7.0 %11.5 %7.0 %NA6.5 %Tier 1 capital13.8 8.5 13.0 8.5 6.0 %8.0 Total capital15.8 10.5 15.0 10.5 10.0 10.0 Standardized capital ratio requirements Advanced capital ratio requirements BHC(a)(b) IDI(c) BHC(a)(b) IDI(c) BHC(d) IDI(e) Note: The table above is as defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC and to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are subject. (a)Represents the regulatory capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital ratio requirements each include a respective minimum requirement plus a GSIB surcharge of 4.5% as calculated under Method 2; plus a 3.3% SCB for Basel III Standardized ratios and a fixed 2.5% capital conservation buffer for Basel III Advanced ratios. The countercyclical buffer is currently set to 0% by the federal banking agencies. (b)For the period ended December 31, 2023, the CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements under Basel III Standardized applicable to the Firm were 11.4%, 12.9%, and 14.9%, respectively; the Basel III Advanced CET1, Tier 1, and Total capital ratio requirements applicable to the Firm were 11.0%, 12.5%, and 14.5%, respectively. (c)Represents requirements for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The CET1, Tier 1 and Total capital ratio requirements include a fixed capital conservation buffer requirement of 2.5% that is applicable to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is not subject to the GSIB surcharge. (d)Represents requirements for bank holding companies pursuant to regulations issued by the Federal Reserve. (e)Represents requirements for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. pursuant to regulations issued under the FDIC Improvement Act. The following table presents the leverage-based regulatory capital ratio requirements and well-capitalized ratios to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were subject as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. Capital ratio requirements(a)Well-capitalized ratiosBHCIDIBHC(b)IDILeverage-based capital ratiosTier 1 leverage4.0 %4.0 %NA5.0 %SLR5.0 6.0 NA6.0 Capital ratio requirements(a) BHC(b) Note: The table above is as defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC and to which the Firm and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are subject. (a)Represents minimum SLR requirement of 3.0%, as well as supplementary leverage buffer requirements of 2.0% and 3.0% for BHC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., respectively. (b)The Federal Reserve's regulations do not establish well-capitalized thresholds for these measures for BHCs. 300JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 300JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 300JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 300 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K CECL Regulatory Capital TransitionBeginning January 1, 2022, the $2.9 billion CECL capital benefit, provided by the Federal Reserve in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, is being phased out at 25% per year over a three-year period. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm’s CET1 capital reflected the remaining benefit of $720 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, associated with the CECL capital transition provisions. Similarly, as of January 1, 2024, the Firm has phased out 75% of the other CECL capital transition provisions which impacted Tier 2 capital, adjusted average assets, total leverage exposure and RWA, as applicable. CECL Regulatory Capital TransitionBeginning January 1, 2022, the $2.9 billion CECL capital benefit, provided by the Federal Reserve in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, is being phased out at 25% per year over a three-year period. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm’s CET1 capital reflected the remaining benefit of $720 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, associated with the CECL capital transition provisions. CECL Regulatory Capital Transition Beginning January 1, 2022, the $2.9 billion CECL capital benefit, provided by the Federal Reserve in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, is being phased out at 25% per year over a three-year period. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Firm’s CET1 capital reflected the remaining benefit of $720 million and $1.4 billion, respectively, associated with the CECL capital transition provisions. Similarly, as of January 1, 2024, the Firm has phased out 75% of the other CECL capital transition provisions which impacted Tier 2 capital, adjusted average assets, total leverage exposure and RWA, as applicable. Similarly, as of January 1, 2024, the Firm has phased out 75% of the other CECL capital transition provisions which impacted Tier 2 capital, adjusted average assets, total leverage exposure and RWA, as applicable. The following tables present risk-based capital metrics under both the Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced approaches and leverage-based capital metrics for JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. were well-capitalized and met all capital requirements to which each was subject. December 31, 2024(in millions, except ratios)Basel III StandardizedBasel III AdvancedJPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Risk-based capital metrics:(a)CET1 capital$275,513 $275,732 $275,513 $275,732 Tier 1 capital294,881 275,737 294,881 275,737 Total capital325,589 296,041 311,898 (b)282,328 (b)Risk-weighted assets1,757,460 1,718,777 1,740,429 (b)1,594,072 (b)CET1 capital ratio15.7 %16.0 %15.8 %17.3 %Tier 1 capital ratio16.8 16.0 16.9 17.3 Total capital ratio18.5 17.2 17.9 17.7 JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

CET1 capital Tier 1 capital Total capital December 31, 2023(in millions, except ratios)Basel III StandardizedBasel III AdvancedJPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Risk-based capital metrics: (a)CET1 capital$250,585 $262,030 $250,585 $262,030 Tier 1 capital277,306 262,032 277,306 262,032 Total capital308,497 281,308 295,417 (b)268,392 (b)Risk-weighted assets1,671,995 1,621,789 1,669,156 (b)1,526,952 (b)CET1 capital ratio15.0 %16.2 %15.0 %17.2 %Tier 1 capital ratio16.6 16.2 16.6 17.2 Total capital ratio18.5 17.3 17.7 17.6 JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

CET1 capital Tier 1 capital Total capital (a)The capital metrics reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. (b)Includes the impacts of certain assets associated with First Republic to which the Standardized approach has been applied as permitted by the transition provisions in the U.S. capital rules. Three months ended(in millions, except ratios)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.JPMorgan Chase & Co.JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Leverage-based capital metrics: (a)Adjusted average assets(b)$4,070,499 $3,491,283 $3,831,200 $3,337,842 Tier 1 leverage ratio7.2 %7.9 %7.2 %7.9 %Total leverage exposure$4,837,568 $4,246,516 $4,540,465 $4,038,739 SLR6.1 %6.5 %6.1 %6.5 %

Adjusted average assets(b) Tier 1 leverage ratio (a)The capital metrics reflect the CECL capital transition provisions. (b)Adjusted average assets, for purposes of calculating the leverage ratios, includes quarterly average assets adjusted for on-balance sheet assets that are subject to deduction from Tier 1 capital, predominantly goodwill, inclusive of estimated equity method goodwill, and other intangible assets. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K301 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K301 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K301 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 301

JPMorganChase provides lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees) to address the financing needs of its customers and clients. The contractual amount of these financial instruments represents the maximum possible credit risk to the Firm should the customer or client draw upon the commitment or the Firm be required to fulfill its obligation under the guarantee, and should the customer or client subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of the contract. Most of these commitments and guarantees have historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expired without being drawn or a default occurring. As a result, the total contractual amount of these instruments is not, in the Firm’s view, representative of its expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. To provide for expected credit losses in wholesale and certain consumer lending-related commitments, an allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments is maintained. Refer to Note 13 for further information regarding the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments.The following table summarizes the contractual amounts and carrying values of off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments at December 31, 2024 and 2023. The amounts in the table below for credit card, home equity and certain scored business banking lending-related commitments represent the total available credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these commitments will be utilized at the same time. The Firm can reduce or cancel these commitments, in accordance with the contract, or to the extent otherwise permitted by law, including when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower or significant decrease in the value of underlying property. JPMorganChase provides lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees) to address the financing needs of its customers and clients. The contractual amount of these financial instruments represents the maximum possible credit risk to the Firm should the customer or client draw upon the commitment or the Firm be required to fulfill its obligation under the guarantee, and should the customer or client subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of the contract. Most of these commitments and guarantees have historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expired without being drawn or a default occurring. As a result, the total contractual amount of these instruments is not, in the Firm’s view, representative of its expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. To provide for expected credit losses in wholesale and certain consumer lending-related commitments, an allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments is maintained. Refer to Note 13 for further information regarding the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments. JPMorganChase provides lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees) to address the financing needs of its customers and clients. The contractual amount of these financial instruments represents the maximum possible credit risk to the Firm should the customer or client draw upon the commitment or the Firm be required to fulfill its obligation under the guarantee, and should the customer or client subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of the contract. Most of these commitments and guarantees have historically been refinanced, extended, cancelled, or expired without being drawn or a default occurring. As a result, the total contractual amount of these instruments is not, in the Firm’s view, representative of its expected future credit exposure or funding requirements. To provide for expected credit losses in wholesale and certain consumer lending-related commitments, an allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments is maintained. Refer to Note 13 for further information regarding the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments. The following table summarizes the contractual amounts and carrying values of off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments at December 31, 2024 and 2023. The amounts in the table below for credit card, home equity and certain scored business banking lending-related commitments represent the total available credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these commitments will be utilized at the same time. The Firm can reduce or cancel these commitments, in accordance with the contract, or to the extent otherwise permitted by law, including when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower or significant decrease in the value of underlying property. The following table summarizes the contractual amounts and carrying values of off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitments at December 31, 2024 and 2023. The amounts in the table below for credit card, home equity and certain scored business banking lending-related commitments represent the total available credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these commitments will be utilized at the same time. The Firm can reduce or cancel these commitments, in accordance with the contract, or to the extent otherwise permitted by law, including when there has been a demonstrable decline in the creditworthiness of the borrower or significant decrease in the value of underlying property. 302JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 302JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 302JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 302 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Off–balance sheet lending-related financial instruments, guarantees and other commitmentsContractual amountCarrying value(h)(i)2024202320242023By remaining maturityas of December 31, (in millions)Expires in 1 year or lessExpires after 1 year through 3 yearsExpires after 3 years through 5 yearsExpires after 5 yearsTotalTotalLending-relatedConsumer, excluding credit card:Residential Real Estate(a)$10,838 $7,240 $4,601 $7,670 $30,349 $30,125 $534 (j)$678 (j)Auto and other10,833 14 5 3,643 14,495 15,278 37 (j)148 (j)Total consumer, excluding credit card21,671 7,254 4,606 11,313 44,844 45,403 571 826 Credit card(b)1,001,311 — — — 1,001,311 915,658 — — Total consumer(c)1,022,982 7,254 4,606 11,313 1,046,155 961,061 571 826 Wholesale:Other unfunded commitments to extend credit(d)101,500 199,878 172,066 24,993 498,437 503,526 2,608 (j)2,797 (j)Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees(d)15,825 8,506 3,780 565 28,676 28,872 473 479 Other letters of credit(d)3,958 278 21 97 4,354 4,388 37 37 Total wholesale(c)121,283 208,662 175,867 25,655 531,467 536,786 3,118 3,313 Total lending-related$1,144,265 $215,916 $180,473 $36,968 $1,577,622 $1,497,847 $3,689 $4,139 Other guarantees and commitmentsSecurities lending indemnification agreements and guarantees(e)$310,046 $— $— $— $310,046 $283,664 $— $— Derivatives qualifying as guarantees902 343 9,890 38,493 49,628 54,562 113 89 Unsettled resale and securities borrowed agreements 115,939 — — — 115,939 95,106 2 — Unsettled repurchase and securities loaned agreements66,986 — — — 66,986 60,724 (2)— Loan sale and securitization-related indemnifications:Mortgage repurchase liabilityNANANANANANA45 76 Loans sold with recourseNANANANA1,189 803 23 24 Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments(f)401,486 — — — 401,486 265,887 — — Other guarantees and commitments (g)10,652 425 435 884 12,396 15,074 28 38 Carrying value(h)(i) By remaining maturity as of December 31, (in millions) Residential Real Estate(a) (j) (j) (j) (j) Credit card(b)

Securities lending indemnification agreements and guarantees(e) Unsettled resale and securities borrowed agreements Unsettled repurchase and securities loaned agreements Loan sale and securitization-related indemnifications: Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments(f) Other guarantees and commitments (g) (a)Includes certain commitments to purchase loans from correspondents. (b)Also includes commercial card lending-related commitments primarily in CIB. (c)Predominantly all consumer and wholesale lending-related commitments are in the U.S. (d)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, reflected the contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $85 million and $88 million, respectively, for other unfunded commitments to extend credit; $9.5 billion and $8.2 billion, respectively, for standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $556 million and $589 million, respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve these commitments are shown gross of risk participations. (e)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, collateral held by the Firm in support of securities lending indemnification agreements was $328.7 billion and $300.3 billion, respectively. Securities lending collateral primarily consists of cash, G7 government securities, and securities issued by U.S. GSEs and government agencies. (f)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, includes guarantees to the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation under the sponsored member repo program and commitments and guarantees associated with the Firm’s membership in certain clearing houses. (g)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, primarily includes unfunded commitments to purchase secondary market loans, other equity investment commitments, and unfunded commitments related to certain tax-oriented equity investments, and reflects the impact of adopting updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance effective January 1, 2024. (h)For lending-related products, the carrying value includes the allowance for lending-related commitments and the guarantee liability; for derivative-related products, and lending-related commitments for which the fair value option was elected, the carrying value represents the fair value. (i)For lending-related commitments, the carrying value also includes fees and any purchase discounts or premiums that are deferred and recognized in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets. Deferred amounts for revolving commitments and commitments not expected to fund, are amortized to lending- and deposit-related fees on a straight line basis over the commitment period. For all other commitments the deferred amounts remain deferred until the commitment funds or is sold. (j)As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, includes fair value adjustments associated with First Republic for residential real estate lending-related commitments totaling $459 million and $630 million, respectively; for auto and other lending-related commitments totaling $37 million and $148 million, respectively; and for other unfunded commitments to extend credit totaling $699 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. Refer to Note 34 for additional information. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K303 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K303 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K303 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 303

Other unfunded commitments to extend credit Other unfunded commitments to extend credit generally consist of commitments for working capital and general corporate purposes, extensions of credit to support commercial paper facilities and bond financings in the event that those obligations cannot be remarketed to new investors, as well as committed liquidity facilities to clearing organizations. The Firm also issues commitments under multipurpose facilities which could be drawn upon in several forms, including the issuance of a standby letter of credit. Guarantees U.S. GAAP requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability in an amount equal to the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. U.S. GAAP defines a guarantee as a contract that contingently requires the guarantor to pay the guaranteed party based upon: (a) changes in an underlying asset, liability or equity security of the guaranteed party; or (b) a third party’s failure to perform under a specified agreement. The Firm considers the following off–balance sheet arrangements to be guarantees under U.S. GAAP: standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees, securities lending indemnifications, certain indemnification agreements included within third-party contractual arrangements, certain derivative contracts and the guarantees under the sponsored member repo program. As required by U.S. GAAP, the Firm initially records guarantees at the inception date fair value of the non-contingent obligation assumed (e.g., the amount of consideration received or the net present value of the premium receivable). For these obligations, the Firm records this fair value amount in other liabilities with an offsetting entry recorded in cash (for premiums received), or other assets (for premiums receivable). Any premium receivable recorded in other assets is reduced as cash is received under the contract, and the fair value of the liability recorded at inception is amortized into income as lending and deposit-related fees over the life of the guarantee contract. The lending-related contingent obligation is recognized based on expected credit losses in addition to, and separate from, any non-contingent obligation.Non-lending-related contingent obligations are recognized when the liability becomes probable and reasonably estimable. These obligations are not recognized if the estimated amount is less than the carrying amount of any non-contingent liability recognized at inception (adjusted for any amortization). Examples of non-lending-related contingent obligations include indemnifications provided in sales agreements, where a portion of the sale proceeds is allocated to the guarantee, which adjusts the gain or loss that would otherwise result from the transaction. For these indemnifications, the initial liability is amortized to income as the Firm’s risk is reduced (i.e., over time or when the indemnification expires).The contractual amount and carrying value of guarantees and indemnifications are included in the table on page 303.For additional information on the guarantees, see below. Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees are conditional lending commitments issued by the Firm to guarantee the performance of a client or customer to a third party under certain arrangements, such as commercial paper facilities, bond financings, acquisition financings, trade financings and similar transactions. Other unfunded commitments to extend credit Other unfunded commitments to extend credit generally consist of commitments for working capital and general corporate purposes, extensions of credit to support commercial paper facilities and bond financings in the event that those obligations cannot be remarketed to new investors, as well as committed liquidity facilities to clearing organizations. The Firm also issues commitments under multipurpose facilities which could be drawn upon in several forms, including the issuance of a standby letter of credit. Guarantees U.S. GAAP requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability in an amount equal to the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. U.S. GAAP defines a guarantee as a contract that contingently requires the guarantor to pay the guaranteed party based upon: (a) changes in an underlying asset, liability or equity security of the guaranteed party; or (b) a third party’s failure to perform under a specified agreement. The Firm considers the following off–balance sheet arrangements to be guarantees under U.S. GAAP: standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees, securities lending indemnifications, certain indemnification agreements included within third-party contractual arrangements, certain derivative contracts and the guarantees under the sponsored member repo program. As required by U.S. GAAP, the Firm initially records guarantees at the inception date fair value of the non-contingent obligation assumed (e.g., the amount of consideration received or the net present value of the premium receivable). For these obligations, the Firm records this fair value amount in other liabilities with an offsetting entry recorded in cash (for premiums received), or other assets (for premiums receivable). Any premium receivable recorded in other assets is

Other unfunded commitments to extend credit generally consist of commitments for working capital and general corporate purposes, extensions of credit to support commercial paper facilities and bond financings in the event that those obligations cannot be remarketed to new investors, as well as committed liquidity facilities to clearing organizations. The Firm also issues commitments under multipurpose facilities which could be drawn upon in several forms, including the issuance of a standby letter of credit. Guarantees U.S. GAAP requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability in an amount equal to the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. U.S. GAAP defines a guarantee as a contract that contingently requires the guarantor to pay the guaranteed party based upon: (a) changes in an underlying asset, liability or equity security of the guaranteed party; or (b) a third party’s failure to perform under a specified agreement. The Firm considers the following off–balance sheet arrangements to be guarantees under U.S. GAAP: standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees, securities lending indemnifications, certain indemnification agreements included within third-party contractual arrangements, certain derivative contracts and the guarantees under the sponsored member repo program. As required by U.S. GAAP, the Firm initially records guarantees at the inception date fair value of the non-contingent obligation assumed (e.g., the amount of consideration received or the net present value of the premium receivable). For these obligations, the Firm records this fair value amount in other liabilities with an offsetting entry recorded in cash (for premiums received), or other assets (for premiums receivable). Any premium receivable recorded in other assets is reduced as cash is received under the contract, and the fair value of the liability recorded at inception is amortized into income as lending and deposit-related fees over the life of the guarantee contract. The lending-related contingent obligation is recognized based on expected credit losses in addition to, and separate from, any non-contingent obligation.Non-lending-related contingent obligations are recognized when the liability becomes probable and reasonably estimable. These obligations are not recognized if the estimated amount is less than the carrying amount of any non-contingent liability recognized at inception (adjusted for any amortization). Examples of non-lending-related contingent obligations include indemnifications provided in sales agreements, where a portion of the sale proceeds is allocated to the guarantee, which adjusts the gain or loss that would otherwise result from the transaction. For these indemnifications, the initial liability is amortized to income as the Firm’s risk is reduced (i.e., over time or when the indemnification expires).The contractual amount and carrying value of guarantees and indemnifications are included in the table on page 303.For additional information on the guarantees, see below. Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees are conditional lending commitments issued by the Firm to guarantee the performance of a client or customer to a third party under certain arrangements, such as commercial paper facilities, bond financings, acquisition financings, trade financings and similar transactions. reduced as cash is received under the contract, and the fair value of the liability recorded at inception is amortized into income as lending and deposit-related fees over the life of the guarantee contract. The lending-related contingent obligation is recognized based on expected credit losses in addition to, and separate from, any non-contingent obligation. Non-lending-related contingent obligations are recognized when the liability becomes probable and reasonably estimable. These obligations are not recognized if the estimated amount is less than the carrying amount of any non-contingent liability recognized at inception (adjusted for any amortization). Examples of non-lending-related contingent obligations include indemnifications provided in sales agreements, where a portion of the sale proceeds is allocated to the guarantee, which adjusts the gain or loss that would otherwise result from the transaction. For these indemnifications, the initial liability is amortized to income as the Firm’s risk is reduced (i.e., over time or when the indemnification expires). The contractual amount and carrying value of guarantees and indemnifications are included in the table on page 303. For additional information on the guarantees, see below. Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees Standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees are conditional lending commitments issued by the Firm to guarantee the performance of a client or customer to a third party under certain arrangements, such as commercial paper facilities, bond financings, acquisition financings, trade financings and similar transactions. The following table summarizes the contractual amount and carrying value of standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees and other letters of credit arrangements as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.

20242023December 31,(in millions)Standby letters of credit and other financial guaranteesOther letters of creditStandby letters of credit and other financial guaranteesOther letters of creditInvestment-grade(a)$20,443 $3,380 $19,694 $3,552 Noninvestment-grade(a)8,233 974 9,178 836 Total contractual amount$28,676 $4,354 $28,872 $4,388 Allowance for lending-related commitments$94 $37 $110 $37 Guarantee liability379 — 369 — Total carrying value$473 $37 $479 $37 Commitments with collateral$16,805 $357 $16,861 $539 Investment-grade(a) Noninvestment-grade(a) (a)The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal risk ratings. Refer to Note 12 for further information on internal risk ratings. 304JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 304JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 304JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 304 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Securities lending indemnifications Through the Firm’s securities lending program, counterparties’ securities, via custodial and non-custodial arrangements, may be lent to third parties. As part of this program, the Firm provides an indemnification in the lending agreements which protects the lender against the failure of the borrower to return the lent securities. To minimize its liability under these indemnification agreements, the Firm obtains cash or other highly liquid collateral with a market value exceeding 100% of the value of the securities on loan from the borrower. Collateral is marked to market daily to help assure that collateralization is adequate. Additional collateral is called from the borrower if a shortfall exists, or collateral may be released to the borrower in the event of overcollateralization. If a borrower defaults, the Firm would use the collateral held to purchase replacement securities in the market or to credit the lending client or counterparty with the cash equivalent thereof. The cash collateral held by the Firm may be invested on behalf of the client in indemnified resale agreements, whereby the Firm indemnifies the client against the loss of principal invested. To minimize its liability under these agreements, the Firm obtains collateral with a market value exceeding 100% of the principal invested.Derivatives qualifying as guarantees The Firm transacts in certain derivative contracts that have the characteristics of a guarantee under U.S. GAAP. These contracts include written put options that require the Firm to purchase assets upon exercise by the option holder at a specified price by a specified date in the future. The Firm may enter into written put option contracts in order to meet client needs, or for other trading purposes. The terms of written put options are typically five years or less. Derivatives deemed to be guarantees also includes stable value contracts, commonly referred to as “stable value products”, that require the Firm to make a payment of the difference between the market value and the book value of a counterparty’s reference portfolio of assets in the event that market value is less than book value and certain other conditions have been met. Stable value products are transacted in order to allow investors to realize investment returns with less volatility than an unprotected portfolio. These contracts are typically longer-term or may have no stated maturity, but allow the Firm to elect to terminate the contract under certain conditions. The notional value of derivative guarantees generally represents the Firm’s maximum exposure. However, exposure to certain stable value products is contractually limited to a substantially lower percentage of the notional amount. The fair value of derivative guarantees reflects the probability, in the Firm’s view, of whether the Firm will be required to perform under the contract. The Firm reduces exposures to these contracts by entering into offsetting transactions, or by entering into contracts that hedge the market risk related to the derivative guarantees. The following table summarizes the derivatives qualifying as guarantees as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.(in millions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Notional amountsDerivative guarantees$49,628 $54,562 Stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure32,939 32,488 Maximum exposure of stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure1,740 1,652 Fair valueDerivative payables113 89 In addition to derivative contracts that meet the characteristics of a guarantee, the Firm is both a purchaser and seller of credit protection in the credit derivatives market. Refer to Note 5 for a further discussion of credit derivatives. Unsettled securities financing agreements In the normal course of business, the Firm enters into resale and securities borrowed agreements. At settlement, these commitments result in the Firm advancing cash to and receiving securities collateral from the counterparty. The Firm also enters into repurchase and securities loaned agreements. At settlement, these commitments result in the Firm receiving cash from and providing securities collateral to the counterparty. Such agreements settle at a future date. These agreements generally do not meet the definition of a derivative, and therefore, are not recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets until settlement date. These agreements predominantly have regular-way settlement terms. Refer to Note 11 for a further discussion of securities financing agreements. Loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications Mortgage repurchase liability In connection with the Firm’s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with U.S. GSEs the Firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements, and that may require the Firm to repurchase mortgage loans and/or indemnify the loan purchaser if such representations and warranties are breached by the Firm. Securities lending indemnifications Through the Firm’s securities lending program, counterparties’ securities, via custodial and non-custodial arrangements, may be lent to third parties. As part of this program, the Firm provides an indemnification in the lending agreements which protects the lender against the failure of the borrower to return the lent securities. To minimize its liability under these indemnification agreements, the Firm obtains cash or other highly liquid collateral with a market value exceeding 100% of the value of the securities on loan from the borrower. Collateral is marked to market daily to help assure that collateralization is adequate. Additional collateral is called from the borrower if a shortfall exists, or collateral may be released to the borrower in the event of overcollateralization. If a borrower defaults, the Firm would use the collateral held to purchase replacement securities in the market or to credit the lending client or counterparty with the cash equivalent thereof. The cash collateral held by the Firm may be invested on behalf of the client in indemnified resale agreements, whereby the Firm indemnifies the client against the loss of principal invested. To minimize its liability under these agreements, the Firm obtains collateral with a market value exceeding 100% of the principal invested.Derivatives qualifying as guarantees The Firm transacts in certain derivative contracts that have the characteristics of a guarantee under U.S. GAAP. These contracts include written put options that require the Firm to purchase assets upon exercise by the option holder at a specified price by a specified date in the future. The Firm may enter into written put option contracts in order to meet client needs, or for other trading purposes. The terms of written put options are typically five years or less. Derivatives deemed to be guarantees also includes stable value contracts, commonly referred to as “stable value products”, that require the Firm to make a payment of the difference between the market value and the book value of a counterparty’s reference portfolio of assets in the event that market value is less than book value and certain other conditions have been met. Stable value products are transacted in order to allow investors to realize investment returns with less volatility than an unprotected portfolio. These contracts are typically longer-term or may have no stated maturity, but allow the Firm to elect to terminate the contract under certain conditions. The notional value of derivative guarantees generally represents the Firm’s maximum exposure. However, exposure to certain stable value products is contractually limited to a substantially lower percentage of the notional amount. Securities lending indemnifications Through the Firm’s securities lending program, counterparties’ securities, via custodial and non-custodial arrangements, may be lent to third parties. As part of this program, the Firm provides an indemnification in the lending agreements which protects the lender against the failure of the borrower to return the lent securities. To minimize its liability under these indemnification agreements, the Firm obtains cash or other highly liquid collateral with a market value exceeding 100% of the value of the securities on loan from the borrower. Collateral is marked to market daily to help assure that collateralization is adequate. Additional collateral is called from the borrower if a shortfall exists, or collateral may be released to the borrower in the event of overcollateralization. If a borrower defaults, the Firm would use the collateral held to purchase replacement securities in the market or to credit the lending client or counterparty with the cash equivalent thereof. The cash collateral held by the Firm may be invested on behalf of the client in indemnified resale agreements, whereby the Firm indemnifies the client against the loss of principal invested. To minimize its liability under these agreements, the Firm obtains collateral with a market value exceeding 100% of the principal invested. Derivatives qualifying as guarantees The Firm transacts in certain derivative contracts that have the characteristics of a guarantee under U.S. GAAP. These contracts include written put options that require the Firm to purchase assets upon exercise by the option holder at a specified price by a specified date in the future. The Firm may enter into written put option contracts in order to meet client needs, or for other trading purposes. The terms of written put options are typically five years or less. Derivatives deemed to be guarantees also includes stable value contracts, commonly referred to as “stable value products”, that require the Firm to make a payment of the difference between the market value and the book value of a counterparty’s reference portfolio of assets in the event that market value is less than book value and certain other conditions have been met. Stable value products are transacted in order to allow investors to realize investment returns with less volatility than an unprotected portfolio. These contracts are typically longer-term or may have no stated maturity, but allow the Firm to elect to terminate the contract under certain conditions. The notional value of derivative guarantees generally represents the Firm’s maximum exposure. However, exposure to certain stable value products is contractually limited to a substantially lower percentage of the notional amount. The fair value of derivative guarantees reflects the probability, in the Firm’s view, of whether the Firm will be required to perform under the contract. The Firm reduces exposures to these contracts by entering into offsetting transactions, or by entering into contracts that hedge the market risk related to the derivative guarantees. The following table summarizes the derivatives qualifying as guarantees as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.(in millions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Notional amountsDerivative guarantees$49,628 $54,562 Stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure32,939 32,488 Maximum exposure of stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure1,740 1,652 Fair valueDerivative payables113 89 In addition to derivative contracts that meet the characteristics of a guarantee, the Firm is both a purchaser and seller of credit protection in the credit derivatives market. Refer to Note 5 for a further discussion of credit derivatives. Unsettled securities financing agreements In the normal course of business, the Firm enters into resale and securities borrowed agreements. At settlement, these commitments result in the Firm advancing cash to and receiving securities collateral from the counterparty. The Firm also enters into repurchase and securities loaned agreements. At settlement, these commitments result in the Firm receiving cash from and providing securities collateral to the counterparty. Such agreements settle at a future date. These agreements generally do not meet the definition of a derivative, and therefore, are not recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets until settlement date. These agreements predominantly have regular-way settlement terms. Refer to Note 11 for a further discussion of securities financing agreements. Loan sales- and securitization-related indemnifications Mortgage repurchase liability In connection with the Firm’s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with U.S. GSEs the Firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements, and that may require the Firm to repurchase mortgage loans and/or indemnify the loan purchaser if such representations and warranties are breached by the Firm. The fair value of derivative guarantees reflects the probability, in the Firm’s view, of whether the Firm will be required to perform under the contract. The Firm reduces exposures to these contracts by entering into offsetting transactions, or by entering into contracts that hedge the market risk related to the derivative guarantees. The following table summarizes the derivatives qualifying as guarantees as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. (in millions)December 31, 2024December 31, 2023Notional amountsDerivative guarantees$49,628 $54,562 Stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure32,939 32,488 Maximum exposure of stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure1,740 1,652 Fair valueDerivative payables113 89 Stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure Maximum exposure of stable value contracts with contractually limited exposure In addition to derivative contracts that meet the characteristics of a guarantee, the Firm is both a purchaser and seller of credit protection in the credit derivatives market. Refer to Note 5 for a further discussion of credit derivatives.

In the normal course of business, the Firm enters into resale and securities borrowed agreements. At settlement, these commitments result in the Firm advancing cash to and receiving securities collateral from the counterparty. The Firm also enters into repurchase and securities loaned agreements. At settlement, these commitments result in the Firm receiving cash from and providing securities collateral to the counterparty. Such agreements settle at a future date. These agreements generally do not meet the definition of a derivative, and therefore, are not recorded on the Consolidated balance sheets until settlement date. These agreements predominantly have regular-way settlement terms. Refer to Note 11 for a further discussion of securities financing agreements.

Mortgage repurchase liability In connection with the Firm’s mortgage loan sale and securitization activities with U.S. GSEs the Firm has made representations and warranties that the loans sold meet certain requirements, and that may require the Firm to repurchase mortgage loans and/or indemnify the loan purchaser if such representations and warranties are breached by the Firm. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K305 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K305 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K305 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 305

Private label securitizationsThe liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the Firm in establishing its litigation reserves. Refer to Note 30 for additional information regarding litigation. Loans sold with recourse The Firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis. In nonrecourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds (i.e., normal servicing advances). In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance, plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Firm’s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust. The unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse as well as the carrying value of the related liability that the Firm has recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets, which is representative of the Firm’s view of the likelihood it will have to perform under its recourse obligations, are disclosed in the table on page 303.Other off-balance sheet arrangements Indemnification agreements – general In connection with issuing securities to investors outside the U.S., the Firm may agree to pay additional amounts to the holders of the securities in the event that, due to a change in tax law, certain types of withholding taxes are imposed on payments on the securities. The terms of the securities may also give the Firm the right to redeem the securities if such additional amounts are payable. The Firm may also enter into indemnification clauses such as in connection with the licensing of software to clients (“software licensees”) or when it sells a business or assets to a third party (“third-party purchasers”), pursuant to which it indemnifies software licensees for claims of liability or damages that may occur subsequent to the licensing of the software, or third-party purchasers for losses they may incur due to actions taken by the Firm prior to the sale of the business or assets. It is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements, since this would require an assessment of future changes in tax law and future claims that may be made against the Firm that have not yet occurred. However, based on historical experience, management expects the risk of loss to be remote. Merchant charge-backs Under the rules of payment networks, in its role as a merchant acquirer, the Firm’s Merchant Services business in CIB Payments, retains a contingent liability for disputed processed credit and debit card transactions that result in a charge-back to the merchant. If a dispute is resolved in the cardholder’s favor, the Firm will (through the cardholder’s issuing bank) credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and will charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the Firm is unable to collect the amount from the merchant, the Firm will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the cardholder. The Firm mitigates this risk by withholding future settlements, retaining cash reserve accounts or obtaining other collateral. In addition, the Firm recognizes a valuation allowance that covers the payment or performance risk related to charge-backs. Clearing Services – Client Credit Risk The Firm provides clearing services for clients by entering into securities purchases and sales and derivative contracts with CCPs, including ETDs such as futures and options, as well as OTC-cleared derivative contracts. As a clearing member, the Firm stands behind the performance of its clients, collects cash and securities collateral (margin) as well as any settlement amounts due from or to clients, and remits them to the relevant CCP or client in whole or part. There are two types of margin: variation margin is posted on a daily basis based on the value of clients’ derivative contracts and initial margin is posted at inception of a derivative contract, generally on the basis of the potential changes in the variation margin requirement for the contract. As a clearing member, the Firm is exposed to the risk of nonperformance by its clients, but is not liable to clients for the performance of the CCPs. Where possible, the Firm seeks to mitigate its risk to the client through the collection of appropriate amounts of margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions. The Firm can also cease providing clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement. In the event of nonperformance by a client, the Firm would close out the client’s positions and access available margin. The CCP would utilize any margin it holds to make itself whole, with any remaining shortfalls required to be paid by the Firm as a clearing member. Private label securitizationsThe liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the Firm in establishing its litigation reserves. Refer to Note 30 for additional information regarding litigation. Loans sold with recourse The Firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis. In nonrecourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds (i.e., normal servicing advances). In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance, plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Firm’s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust. The unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse as well as the carrying value of the related liability that the Firm has recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets, which is representative of the Firm’s view of the likelihood it will have to perform under its recourse obligations, are disclosed in the table on page 303.Other off-balance sheet arrangements Indemnification agreements – general In connection with issuing securities to investors outside the U.S., the Firm may agree to pay additional amounts to the holders of the securities in the event that, due to a change in tax law, certain types of withholding taxes are imposed on payments on the securities. The terms of the securities may also give the Firm the right to redeem the securities if such additional amounts are payable. The Firm may also enter into indemnification clauses such as in connection with the licensing of software to clients (“software licensees”) or when it sells a business or assets to a third party (“third-party purchasers”), pursuant to which it indemnifies software licensees for claims of liability or damages that may occur subsequent to the licensing of the software, or third-party purchasers for losses they may incur due to actions taken by the Firm prior to the sale of the business or assets. It is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements, since this would require an assessment of future changes in tax law and future claims that may Private label securitizations The liability related to repurchase demands associated with private label securitizations is separately evaluated by the Firm in establishing its litigation reserves. Refer to Note 30 for additional information regarding litigation. Loans sold with recourse The Firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis. In nonrecourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds (i.e., normal servicing advances). In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing predominantly occur when foreclosure sales proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the sum of the outstanding principal balance, plus accrued interest on the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Firm’s securitizations are predominantly nonrecourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchaser of the mortgage-backed securities issued by the trust. The unpaid principal balance of loans sold with recourse as well as the carrying value of the related liability that the Firm has recorded in accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheets, which is representative of the Firm’s view of the likelihood it will have to perform under its recourse obligations, are disclosed in the table on page 303.

Indemnification agreements – general In connection with issuing securities to investors outside the U.S., the Firm may agree to pay additional amounts to the holders of the securities in the event that, due to a change in tax law, certain types of withholding taxes are imposed on payments on the securities. The terms of the securities may also give the Firm the right to redeem the securities if such additional amounts are payable. The Firm may also enter into indemnification clauses such as in connection with the licensing of software to clients (“software licensees”) or when it sells a business or assets to a third party (“third-party purchasers”), pursuant to which it indemnifies software licensees for claims of liability or damages that may occur subsequent to the licensing of the software, or third-party purchasers for losses they may incur due to actions taken by the Firm prior to the sale of the business or assets. It is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum exposure under these indemnification arrangements, since this would require an assessment of future changes in tax law and future claims that may be made against the Firm that have not yet occurred. However, based on historical experience, management expects the risk of loss to be remote. Merchant charge-backs Under the rules of payment networks, in its role as a merchant acquirer, the Firm’s Merchant Services business in CIB Payments, retains a contingent liability for disputed processed credit and debit card transactions that result in a charge-back to the merchant. If a dispute is resolved in the cardholder’s favor, the Firm will (through the cardholder’s issuing bank) credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and will charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the Firm is unable to collect the amount from the merchant, the Firm will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the cardholder. The Firm mitigates this risk by withholding future settlements, retaining cash reserve accounts or obtaining other collateral. In addition, the Firm recognizes a valuation allowance that covers the payment or performance risk related to charge-backs. Clearing Services – Client Credit Risk The Firm provides clearing services for clients by entering into securities purchases and sales and derivative contracts with CCPs, including ETDs such as futures and options, as well as OTC-cleared derivative contracts. As a clearing member, the Firm stands behind the performance of its clients, collects cash and securities collateral (margin) as well as any settlement amounts due from or to clients, and remits them to the relevant CCP or client in whole or part. There are two types of margin: variation margin is posted on a daily basis based on the value of clients’ derivative contracts and initial margin is posted at inception of a derivative contract, generally on the basis of the potential changes in the variation margin requirement for the contract. As a clearing member, the Firm is exposed to the risk of nonperformance by its clients, but is not liable to clients for the performance of the CCPs. Where possible, the Firm seeks to mitigate its risk to the client through the collection of appropriate amounts of margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions. The Firm can also cease providing clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement. In the event of nonperformance by a client, the Firm would close out the client’s positions and access available margin. The CCP would utilize any margin it holds to make itself whole, with any remaining shortfalls required to be paid by the Firm as a clearing member. be made against the Firm that have not yet occurred. However, based on historical experience, management expects the risk of loss to be remote. Merchant charge-backs Under the rules of payment networks, in its role as a merchant acquirer, the Firm’s Merchant Services business in CIB Payments, retains a contingent liability for disputed processed credit and debit card transactions that result in a charge-back to the merchant. If a dispute is resolved in the cardholder’s favor, the Firm will (through the cardholder’s issuing bank) credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and will charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the Firm is unable to collect the amount from the merchant, the Firm will bear the loss for the amount credited or refunded to the cardholder. The Firm mitigates this risk by withholding future settlements, retaining cash reserve accounts or obtaining other collateral. In addition, the Firm recognizes a valuation allowance that covers the payment or performance risk related to charge-backs. Clearing Services – Client Credit Risk The Firm provides clearing services for clients by entering into securities purchases and sales and derivative contracts with CCPs, including ETDs such as futures and options, as well as OTC-cleared derivative contracts. As a clearing member, the Firm stands behind the performance of its clients, collects cash and securities collateral (margin) as well as any settlement amounts due from or to clients, and remits them to the relevant CCP or client in whole or part. There are two types of margin: variation margin is posted on a daily basis based on the value of clients’ derivative contracts and initial margin is posted at inception of a derivative contract, generally on the basis of the potential changes in the variation margin requirement for the contract. As a clearing member, the Firm is exposed to the risk of nonperformance by its clients, but is not liable to clients for the performance of the CCPs. Where possible, the Firm seeks to mitigate its risk to the client through the collection of appropriate amounts of margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions. The Firm can also cease providing clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement. In the event of nonperformance by a client, the Firm would close out the client’s positions and access available margin. The CCP would utilize any margin it holds to make itself whole, with any remaining shortfalls required to be paid by the Firm as a clearing member. 306JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 306JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 306JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 306 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K The Firm reflects its exposure to nonperformance risk of the client through the recognition of margin receivables from clients and margin payables to CCPs; the clients’ underlying securities or derivative contracts are not reflected in the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements. It is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum possible exposure through its role as a clearing member, as this would require an assessment of transactions that clients may execute in the future. However, based upon historical experience, and the credit risk mitigants available to the Firm, management believes it is unlikely that the Firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements and the risk of loss is expected to be remote. Refer to Note 5 for information on the derivatives that the Firm executes for its own account and records in its Consolidated Financial Statements. Exchange & Clearing House Memberships The Firm is a member of several securities and derivative exchanges and clearing houses, both in the U.S. and other countries, and it provides clearing services to its clients. Membership in some of these organizations requires the Firm to pay a pro rata share of the losses incurred by the organization as a result of the default of another member. Such obligations vary with different organizations. These obligations may be limited to the amount (or a multiple of the amount) of the Firm’s contribution to the guarantee fund maintained by a clearing house or exchange as part of the resources available to cover any losses in the event of a member default. Alternatively, these obligations may also include a pro rata share of the residual losses after applying the guarantee fund. Additionally, certain clearing houses require the Firm as a member to pay a pro rata share of losses that may result from the clearing house’s investment of guarantee fund contributions and initial margin, unrelated to and independent of the default of another member. Generally a payment would only be required should such losses exceed the resources of the clearing house or exchange that are contractually required to absorb the losses in the first instance. In certain cases, it is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum possible exposure under these membership agreements, since this would require an assessment of future claims that may be made against the Firm that have not yet occurred. However, based on historical experience, management expects the risk of loss to the Firm to be remote. Where the Firm’s maximum possible exposure can be estimated, the amount is disclosed in the table on page 303, in the Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments line. Sponsored member repo program The Firm acts as a sponsoring member to clear eligible overnight and term resale and repurchase agreements through the Government Securities Division of the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) on behalf of clients that become sponsored members under the FICC’s rules. The Firm also guarantees to the FICC the prompt and full payment and performance of its sponsored member clients’ respective obligations under the FICC’s rules. The Firm minimizes its liability under these guarantees by obtaining a security interest in the cash or high-quality securities collateral that the clients place with the clearing house; therefore, the Firm expects the risk of loss to be remote. The Firm’s maximum possible exposure, without taking into consideration the associated collateral, is included in the Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments line on page 303. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on credit risk mitigation practices on resale agreements and the types of collateral pledged under repurchase agreements. Guarantees of subsidiaries In the normal course of business, the Parent Company may provide counterparties with guarantees of certain of the trading and other obligations of its subsidiaries on a contract-by-contract basis, as negotiated with the Firm’s counterparties. The obligations of the subsidiaries are included on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets or are reflected as off-balance sheet commitments; therefore, the Parent Company has not recognized a separate liability for these guarantees. The Firm believes that the occurrence of any event that would trigger payments by the Parent Company under these guarantees is remote. The Parent Company has guaranteed certain long-term debt and structured notes of its subsidiaries, including JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (“JPMFC”), a 100%-owned finance subsidiary. All securities issued by JPMFC are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent Company and no other subsidiary of the Parent Company guarantees these securities. These guarantees, which rank pari passu with the Firm’s unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, are not included in the table on page 303 of this Note. Refer to Note 20 for additional information. The Firm reflects its exposure to nonperformance risk of the client through the recognition of margin receivables from clients and margin payables to CCPs; the clients’ underlying securities or derivative contracts are not reflected in the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements. It is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum possible exposure through its role as a clearing member, as this would require an assessment of transactions that clients may execute in the future. However, based upon historical experience, and the credit risk mitigants available to the Firm, management believes it is unlikely that the Firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements and the risk of loss is expected to be remote. Refer to Note 5 for information on the derivatives that the Firm executes for its own account and records in its Consolidated Financial Statements. Exchange & Clearing House Memberships The Firm is a member of several securities and derivative exchanges and clearing houses, both in the U.S. and other countries, and it provides clearing services to its clients. Membership in some of these organizations requires the Firm to pay a pro rata share of the losses incurred by the organization as a result of the default of another member. Such obligations vary with different organizations. These obligations may be limited to the amount (or a multiple of the amount) of the Firm’s contribution to the guarantee fund maintained by a clearing house or exchange as part of the resources available to cover any losses in the event of a member default. Alternatively, these obligations may also include a pro rata share of the residual losses after applying the guarantee fund. Additionally, certain clearing houses require the Firm as a member to pay a pro rata share of losses that may result from the clearing house’s investment of guarantee fund contributions and initial margin, unrelated to and independent of the default of another member. Generally a payment would only be required should such losses exceed the resources of the clearing house or exchange that are contractually required to absorb the losses in the first instance. In certain cases, it is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum possible exposure under these membership agreements, since this would require an assessment of future claims that may be made against the Firm that have not yet occurred. However, based on historical experience, management expects the risk of loss to the Firm to be remote. Where the Firm’s maximum possible exposure can be estimated, the amount is disclosed in the table on page 303, in the Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments line. The Firm reflects its exposure to nonperformance risk of the client through the recognition of margin receivables from clients and margin payables to CCPs; the clients’ underlying securities or derivative contracts are not reflected in the Firm’s Consolidated Financial Statements. It is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum possible exposure through its role as a clearing member, as this would require an assessment of transactions that clients may execute in the future. However, based upon historical experience, and the credit risk mitigants available to the Firm, management believes it is unlikely that the Firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements and the risk of loss is expected to be remote. Refer to Note 5 for information on the derivatives that the Firm executes for its own account and records in its Consolidated Financial Statements. Exchange & Clearing House Memberships The Firm is a member of several securities and derivative exchanges and clearing houses, both in the U.S. and other countries, and it provides clearing services to its clients. Membership in some of these organizations requires the Firm to pay a pro rata share of the losses incurred by the organization as a result of the default of another member. Such obligations vary with different organizations. These obligations may be limited to the amount (or a multiple of the amount) of the Firm’s contribution to the guarantee fund maintained by a clearing house or exchange as part of the resources available to cover any losses in the event of a member default. Alternatively, these obligations may also include a pro rata share of the residual losses after applying the guarantee fund. Additionally, certain clearing houses require the Firm as a member to pay a pro rata share of losses that may result from the clearing house’s investment of guarantee fund contributions and initial margin, unrelated to and independent of the default of another member. Generally a payment would only be required should such losses exceed the resources of the clearing house or exchange that are contractually required to absorb the losses in the first instance. In certain cases, it is difficult to estimate the Firm’s maximum possible exposure under these membership agreements, since this would require an assessment of future claims that may be made against the Firm that have not yet occurred. However, based on historical experience, management expects the risk of loss to the Firm to be remote. Where the Firm’s maximum possible exposure can be estimated, the amount is disclosed in the table on page 303, in the Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments line. Sponsored member repo program The Firm acts as a sponsoring member to clear eligible overnight and term resale and repurchase agreements through the Government Securities Division of the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) on behalf of clients that become sponsored members under the FICC’s rules. The Firm also guarantees to the FICC the prompt and full payment and performance of its sponsored member clients’ respective obligations under the FICC’s rules. The Firm minimizes its liability under these guarantees by obtaining a security interest in the cash or high-quality securities collateral that the clients place with the clearing house; therefore, the Firm expects the risk of loss to be remote. The Firm’s maximum possible exposure, without taking into consideration the associated collateral, is included in the Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments line on page 303. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on credit risk mitigation practices on resale agreements and the types of collateral pledged under repurchase agreements. Guarantees of subsidiaries In the normal course of business, the Parent Company may provide counterparties with guarantees of certain of the trading and other obligations of its subsidiaries on a contract-by-contract basis, as negotiated with the Firm’s counterparties. The obligations of the subsidiaries are included on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets or are reflected as off-balance sheet commitments; therefore, the Parent Company has not recognized a separate liability for these guarantees. The Firm believes that the occurrence of any event that would trigger payments by the Parent Company under these guarantees is remote. The Parent Company has guaranteed certain long-term debt and structured notes of its subsidiaries, including JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (“JPMFC”), a 100%-owned finance subsidiary. All securities issued by JPMFC are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent Company and no other subsidiary of the Parent Company guarantees these securities. These guarantees, which rank pari passu with the Firm’s unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, are not included in the table on page 303 of this Note. Refer to Note 20 for additional information. Sponsored member repo program The Firm acts as a sponsoring member to clear eligible overnight and term resale and repurchase agreements through the Government Securities Division of the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”) on behalf of clients that become sponsored members under the FICC’s rules. The Firm also guarantees to the FICC the prompt and full payment and performance of its sponsored member clients’ respective obligations under the FICC’s rules. The Firm minimizes its liability under these guarantees by obtaining a security interest in the cash or high-quality securities collateral that the clients place with the clearing house; therefore, the Firm expects the risk of loss to be remote. The Firm’s maximum possible exposure, without taking into consideration the associated collateral, is included in the Exchange & clearing house guarantees and commitments line on page 303. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on credit risk mitigation practices on resale agreements and the types of collateral pledged under repurchase agreements. Guarantees of subsidiaries In the normal course of business, the Parent Company may provide counterparties with guarantees of certain of the trading and other obligations of its subsidiaries on a contract-by-contract basis, as negotiated with the Firm’s counterparties. The obligations of the subsidiaries are included on the Firm’s Consolidated balance sheets or are reflected as off-balance sheet commitments; therefore, the Parent Company has not recognized a separate liability for these guarantees. The Firm believes that the occurrence of any event that would trigger payments by the Parent Company under these guarantees is remote. The Parent Company has guaranteed certain long-term debt and structured notes of its subsidiaries, including JPMorgan Chase Financial Company LLC (“JPMFC”), a 100%-owned finance subsidiary. All securities issued by JPMFC are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Parent Company and no other subsidiary of the Parent Company guarantees these securities. These guarantees, which rank pari passu with the Firm’s unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, are not included in the table on page 303 of this Note. Refer to Note 20 for additional information. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K307 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K307 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K307 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 307

Pledged assets The Firm pledges financial assets that it owns to maintain potential borrowing capacity at discount windows with Federal Reserve banks, various other central banks and FHLBs. Additionally, the Firm pledges assets for other purposes, including to collateralize repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits. Certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by the secured parties and are parenthetically identified on the Consolidated balance sheets as assets pledged.The following table presents the carrying value of the Firm’s pledged assets.December 31, (in billions)20242023Assets that may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties$152.5 $145.0 Assets that may not be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties297.9 244.2 Assets pledged at Federal Reserve banks and FHLBs724.0 675.6 Total pledged assets$1,174.4 $1,064.8 Total pledged assets do not include assets of consolidated VIEs; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. Refer to Note 14 for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on the Firm’s securities financing activities. Refer to Note 20 for additional information on the Firm’s long-term debt. The significant components of the Firm’s pledged assets were as follows.December 31, (in billions)20242023Investment securities$89.6 $108.6 Loans740.9 681.7 Trading assets and other343.9 274.5 Total pledged assets$1,174.4 $1,064.8 Collateral The Firm accepts financial assets as collateral that it is permitted to sell or repledge, deliver or otherwise use. This collateral is generally obtained under resale and other securities financing agreements, prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables and derivative contracts. Collateral is generally used under repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales, and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits. The following table presents the fair value of collateral accepted. December 31, (in billions)20242023Collateral permitted to be sold or repledged, delivered, or otherwise used$1,544.0 $1,303.9 Collateral sold, repledged, delivered or otherwise used1,210.7 982.8 Pledged assets The Firm pledges financial assets that it owns to maintain potential borrowing capacity at discount windows with Federal Reserve banks, various other central banks and FHLBs. Additionally, the Firm pledges assets for other purposes, including to collateralize repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits. Certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by the secured parties and are parenthetically identified on the Consolidated balance sheets as assets pledged.The following table presents the carrying value of the Firm’s pledged assets.December 31, (in billions)20242023Assets that may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties$152.5 $145.0 Assets that may not be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties297.9 244.2 Assets pledged at Federal Reserve banks and FHLBs724.0 675.6 Total pledged assets$1,174.4 $1,064.8 Total pledged assets do not include assets of consolidated VIEs; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. Refer to Note 14 for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on the Firm’s securities financing activities. Refer to Note 20 for additional information on the Firm’s long-term debt. The significant components of the Firm’s pledged assets were as follows.December 31, (in billions)20242023Investment securities$89.6 $108.6 Loans740.9 681.7 Trading assets and other343.9 274.5 Total pledged assets$1,174.4 $1,064.8

The Firm pledges financial assets that it owns to maintain potential borrowing capacity at discount windows with Federal Reserve banks, various other central banks and FHLBs. Additionally, the Firm pledges assets for other purposes, including to collateralize repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits. Certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by the secured parties and are parenthetically identified on the Consolidated balance sheets as assets pledged. The following table presents the carrying value of the Firm’s pledged assets. December 31, (in billions)20242023Assets that may be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties$152.5 $145.0 Assets that may not be sold or repledged or otherwise used by secured parties297.9 244.2 Assets pledged at Federal Reserve banks and FHLBs724.0 675.6 Total pledged assets$1,174.4 $1,064.8 Total pledged assets do not include assets of consolidated VIEs; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. Refer to Note 14 for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on the Firm’s securities financing activities. Refer to Note 20 for additional information on the Firm’s long-term debt. The significant components of the Firm’s pledged assets were as follows. December 31, (in billions)20242023Investment securities$89.6 $108.6 Loans740.9 681.7 Trading assets and other343.9 274.5 Total pledged assets$1,174.4 $1,064.8 Collateral The Firm accepts financial assets as collateral that it is permitted to sell or repledge, deliver or otherwise use. This collateral is generally obtained under resale and other securities financing agreements, prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables and derivative contracts. Collateral is generally used under repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales, and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits. The following table presents the fair value of collateral accepted. December 31, (in billions)20242023Collateral permitted to be sold or repledged, delivered, or otherwise used$1,544.0 $1,303.9 Collateral sold, repledged, delivered or otherwise used1,210.7 982.8 Collateral The Firm accepts financial assets as collateral that it is permitted to sell or repledge, deliver or otherwise use. This collateral is generally obtained under resale and other securities financing agreements, prime brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables and derivative contracts. Collateral is generally used under repurchase and other securities financing agreements, to cover short sales, and to collateralize derivative contracts and deposits. The following table presents the fair value of collateral accepted. December 31, (in billions)20242023Collateral permitted to be sold or repledged, delivered, or otherwise used$1,544.0 $1,303.9 Collateral sold, repledged, delivered or otherwise used1,210.7 982.8 308JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 308JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 308JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 308 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

As of December 31, 2024, the Firm and its subsidiaries and affiliates are defendants or respondents in numerous evolving legal proceedings, including private proceedings, public proceedings, government investigations, regulatory enforcement matters, and the matters described below. The litigations range from individual actions involving a single plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially millions of class members. Investigations and regulatory enforcement matters involve both formal and informal proceedings, by both governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. These legal proceedings are at varying stages of adjudication, arbitration or investigation, and involve each of the Firm’s lines of business and several geographies and a wide variety of claims (including common law tort and contract claims and statutory antitrust, securities and consumer protection claims), some of which present novel legal theories.The Firm believes the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of reserves established, for its legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $1.4 billion at December 31, 2024. This estimated aggregate range of reasonably possible losses was based upon information available as of that date for those proceedings in which the Firm believes that an estimate of reasonably possible loss can be made. For certain matters, the Firm does not believe that such an estimate can be made, as of that date. The Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses involves significant judgment, given:•the number, variety and varying stages of the proceedings, including the fact that many are in preliminary stages, •the existence in many such proceedings of multiple defendants, including the Firm, whose share of liability (if any) has yet to be determined, •the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, including issues regarding class certification and the scope of many of the claims, and •the uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings, including where the Firm has made assumptions concerning future rulings by the court or other adjudicator, or about the behavior or incentives of adverse parties or regulatory authorities, and those assumptions prove to be incorrect.In addition, the outcome of a particular proceeding may be a result which the Firm did not take into account in its estimate because the Firm had deemed the likelihood of that outcome to be remote. Accordingly, the Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses will change from time to time, and actual losses may vary significantly.Set forth below are descriptions of the Firm’s material legal proceedings.1MDB Litigation. J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA was named as a defendant in a civil litigation filed in May 2021 in Malaysia by 1Malaysia Development Berhad (“1MDB”), a Malaysian state-owned and controlled investment fund. The claim alleges “dishonest assistance” against J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA in relation to payments of $300 million and $500 million, from 2009 and 2010, respectively, received from 1MDB and paid into an account at J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA held by 1MDB PetroSaudi Limited, a joint venture company between 1MDB and PetroSaudi Holdings (Cayman) Limited. In March 2024, the Court upheld the Firm's challenge to the validity of service and the Malaysian Court’s jurisdiction to hear the claim. That decision has been appealed by 1MDB. In August 2023, the Court denied an application by 1MDB to discontinue its claim with permission to re-file a new claim in the future. That decision was appealed by both 1MDB and the Firm, and an appeals court is scheduled to hear both appeals in November 2025. In its appeal, the Firm seeks to prevent any claim from continuing. In addition, in November 2023, the Federal Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in Switzerland notified J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA that it is conducting an investigation into possible criminal liability in connection with transactions arising from J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA’s relationship with the 1MDB PetroSaudi joint venture and its related persons for the period September 2009 through August 2015. The OAG investigation is ongoing. Amrapali. India’s Enforcement Directorate (“ED”) is investigating J.P. Morgan India Private Limited in connection with investments made in 2010 and 2012 by two offshore funds formerly managed by JPMorganChase entities into residential housing projects developed by the Amrapali Group (“Amrapali”) relating to delays in delivering or failure to deliver residential units. In August 2021, the ED issued an order fining J.P. Morgan India Private Limited approximately $31.5 million, and the Firm is appealing that order. Relatedly, in July 2019, the Supreme Court of India issued an order making preliminary findings that Amrapali and other parties, including unspecified JPMorganChase entities and the offshore funds that had invested in the projects, violated certain criminal currency control and money laundering provisions, and ordered the ED to conduct a further inquiry. The Firm is responding to and cooperating with the inquiry. Foreign Exchange Investigations and Litigation. The Firm previously reported settlements with certain government authorities relating to its foreign exchange (“FX”) sales and trading activities and controls related to those activities. Among those resolutions, in May 2015, the Firm pleaded guilty to a single violation of federal antitrust law. The Department of Labor ("DOL") granted the Firm exemptions that permit the Firm and its As of December 31, 2024, the Firm and its subsidiaries and affiliates are defendants or respondents in numerous evolving legal proceedings, including private proceedings, public proceedings, government investigations, regulatory enforcement matters, and the matters described below. The litigations range from individual actions involving a single plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially millions of class members. Investigations and regulatory enforcement matters involve both formal and informal proceedings, by both governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. These legal proceedings are at varying stages of adjudication, arbitration or investigation, and involve each of the Firm’s lines of business and several geographies and a wide variety of claims (including common law tort and contract claims and statutory antitrust, securities and consumer protection claims), some of which present novel legal theories.The Firm believes the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of reserves established, for its legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $1.4 billion at December 31, 2024. This estimated aggregate range of reasonably possible losses was based upon information available as of that date for those proceedings in which the Firm believes that an estimate of reasonably possible loss can be made. For certain matters, the Firm does not believe that such an estimate can be made, as of that date. The Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses involves significant judgment, given:•the number, variety and varying stages of the proceedings, including the fact that many are in preliminary stages, •the existence in many such proceedings of multiple defendants, including the Firm, whose share of liability (if any) has yet to be determined, •the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, including issues regarding class certification and the scope of many of the claims, and •the uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings, including where the Firm has made assumptions concerning future rulings by the court or other adjudicator, or about the behavior or incentives of adverse parties or regulatory authorities, and those assumptions prove to be incorrect.In addition, the outcome of a particular proceeding may be a result which the Firm did not take into account in its estimate because the Firm had deemed the likelihood of that outcome to be remote. Accordingly, the Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses will change from time to time, and actual losses may vary significantly.Set forth below are descriptions of the Firm’s material legal proceedings. As of December 31, 2024, the Firm and its subsidiaries and affiliates are defendants or respondents in numerous evolving legal proceedings, including private proceedings, public proceedings, government investigations, regulatory enforcement matters, and the matters described below. The litigations range from individual actions involving a single plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially millions of class members. Investigations and regulatory enforcement matters involve both formal and informal proceedings, by both governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. These legal proceedings are at varying stages of adjudication, arbitration or investigation, and involve each of the Firm’s lines of business and several geographies and a wide variety of claims (including common law tort and contract claims and statutory antitrust, securities and consumer protection claims), some of which present novel legal theories. The Firm believes the estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of reserves established, for its legal proceedings is from $0 to approximately $1.4 billion at December 31, 2024. This estimated aggregate range of reasonably possible losses was based upon information available as of that date for those proceedings in which the Firm believes that an estimate of reasonably possible loss can be made. For certain matters, the Firm does not believe that such an estimate can be made, as of that date. The Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses involves significant judgment, given: •the number, variety and varying stages of the proceedings, including the fact that many are in preliminary stages, •the existence in many such proceedings of multiple defendants, including the Firm, whose share of liability (if any) has yet to be determined, •the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, including issues regarding class certification and the scope of many of the claims, and •the uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings, including where the Firm has made assumptions concerning future rulings by the court or other adjudicator, or about the behavior or incentives of adverse parties or regulatory authorities, and those assumptions prove to be incorrect. In addition, the outcome of a particular proceeding may be a result which the Firm did not take into account in its estimate because the Firm had deemed the likelihood of that outcome to be remote. Accordingly, the Firm’s estimate of the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses will change from time to time, and actual losses may vary significantly. Set forth below are descriptions of the Firm’s material legal proceedings. 1MDB Litigation. J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA was named as a defendant in a civil litigation filed in May 2021 in Malaysia by 1Malaysia Development Berhad (“1MDB”), a Malaysian state-owned and controlled investment fund. The claim alleges “dishonest assistance” against J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA in relation to payments of $300 million and $500 million, from 2009 and 2010, respectively, received from 1MDB and paid into an account at J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA held by 1MDB PetroSaudi Limited, a joint venture company between 1MDB and PetroSaudi Holdings (Cayman) Limited. In March 2024, the Court upheld the Firm's challenge to the validity of service and the Malaysian Court’s jurisdiction to hear the claim. That decision has been appealed by 1MDB. In August 2023, the Court denied an application by 1MDB to discontinue its claim with permission to re-file a new claim in the future. That decision was appealed by both 1MDB and the Firm, and an appeals court is scheduled to hear both appeals in November 2025. In its appeal, the Firm seeks to prevent any claim from continuing. In addition, in November 2023, the Federal Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in Switzerland notified J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA that it is conducting an investigation into possible criminal liability in connection with transactions arising from J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA’s relationship with the 1MDB PetroSaudi joint venture and its related persons for the period September 2009 through August 2015. The OAG investigation is ongoing. Amrapali. India’s Enforcement Directorate (“ED”) is investigating J.P. Morgan India Private Limited in connection with investments made in 2010 and 2012 by two offshore funds formerly managed by JPMorganChase entities into residential housing projects developed by the Amrapali Group (“Amrapali”) relating to delays in delivering or failure to deliver residential units. In August 2021, the ED issued an order fining J.P. Morgan India Private Limited approximately $31.5 million, and the Firm is appealing that order. Relatedly, in July 2019, the Supreme Court of India issued an order making preliminary findings that Amrapali and other parties, including unspecified JPMorganChase entities and the offshore funds that had invested in the projects, violated certain criminal currency control and money laundering provisions, and ordered the ED to conduct a further inquiry. The Firm is responding to and cooperating with the inquiry. Foreign Exchange Investigations and Litigation. The Firm previously reported settlements with certain government authorities relating to its foreign exchange (“FX”) sales and trading activities and controls related to those activities. Among those resolutions, in May 2015, the Firm pleaded guilty to a single violation of federal antitrust law. The Department of Labor ("DOL") granted the Firm exemptions that permit the Firm and its 1MDB Litigation. J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA was named as a defendant in a civil litigation filed in May 2021 in Malaysia by 1Malaysia Development Berhad (“1MDB”), a Malaysian state-owned and controlled investment fund. The claim alleges “dishonest assistance” against J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA in relation to payments of $300 million and $500 million, from 2009 and 2010, respectively, received from 1MDB and paid into an account at J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA held by 1MDB PetroSaudi Limited, a joint venture company between 1MDB and PetroSaudi Holdings (Cayman) Limited. In March 2024, the Court upheld the Firm's challenge to the validity of service and the Malaysian Court’s jurisdiction to hear the claim. That decision has been appealed by 1MDB. In August 2023, the Court denied an application by 1MDB to discontinue its claim with permission to re-file a new claim in the future. That decision was appealed by both 1MDB and the Firm, and an appeals court is scheduled to hear both appeals in November 2025. In its appeal, the Firm seeks to prevent any claim from continuing. In addition, in November 2023, the Federal Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in Switzerland notified J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA that it is conducting an investigation into possible criminal liability in connection with transactions arising from J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA’s relationship with the 1MDB PetroSaudi joint venture and its related persons for the period September 2009 through August 2015. The OAG investigation is ongoing. Amrapali. India’s Enforcement Directorate (“ED”) is investigating J.P. Morgan India Private Limited in connection with investments made in 2010 and 2012 by two offshore funds formerly managed by JPMorganChase entities into residential housing projects developed by the Amrapali Group (“Amrapali”) relating to delays in delivering or failure to deliver residential units. In August 2021, the ED issued an order fining J.P. Morgan India Private Limited approximately $31.5 million, and the Firm is appealing that order. Relatedly, in July 2019, the Supreme Court of India issued an order making preliminary findings that Amrapali and other parties, including unspecified JPMorganChase entities and the offshore funds that had invested in the projects, violated certain criminal currency control and money laundering provisions, and ordered the ED to conduct a further inquiry. The Firm is responding to and cooperating with the inquiry. Foreign Exchange Investigations and Litigation. The Firm previously reported settlements with certain government authorities relating to its foreign exchange (“FX”) sales and trading activities and controls related to those activities. Among those resolutions, in May 2015, the Firm pleaded guilty to a single violation of federal antitrust law. The Department of Labor ("DOL") granted the Firm exemptions that permit the Firm and its JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K309 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K309 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K309 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 309

affiliates to continue to rely on the Qualified Professional Asset Manager exemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) through the ten-year disqualification period following the antitrust plea. The only remaining FX-related governmental inquiry is a South Africa Competition Commission matter which is currently pending before the South Africa Competition Tribunal.With respect to civil litigation matters, some FX-related individual and putative class actions filed outside the U.S., including in the U.K., Israel, the Netherlands, Brazil and Australia, remain. In July 2023, the U.K. Court of Appeal overturned the Competition Appeal Tribunal's earlier denial of a request for class certification on an opt-out basis. The defendants have appealed this decision to the U.K. Supreme Court. In Israel, a settlement in principle has been reached on the putative class action, which remains subject to court approval. Interchange Litigation. Groups of merchants and retail associations filed a series of class action complaints alleging that Visa and Mastercard, as well as certain banks, conspired to set the price of credit and debit card interchange fees and enacted related rules in violation of antitrust laws.In September 2018, the parties settled the class action seeking monetary relief, with the defendants collectively contributing approximately $6.2 billion. The settlement has been approved by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and affirmed on appeal. Based on the percentage of merchants that opted out of the settlement, $700 million has been returned to the defendants from the settlement escrow. A separate class action seeking injunctive relief continues, and in September 2021, the District Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in part, and denied the motion in part. In June 2024, the District Court denied preliminary approval of a settlement of the injunctive class action in which Visa and Mastercard agreed to certain changes to their respective network rules and system-wide reductions in interchange rates for U.S.-based merchants. The parties are considering next steps. Of the merchants who opted out of the damages class settlement, certain merchants filed individual actions raising similar allegations against Visa and Mastercard, as well as against the Firm and other banks. While some of those actions remain pending, the defendants have reached settlements with the merchants who opted out representing over 70% of the combined Mastercard-branded and Visa-branded payment card sales volume. LIBOR and Other Benchmark Rate Investigations and Litigation. JPMorganChase has responded to inquiries from various governmental agencies and entities around the world relating primarily to the British Bankers Association’s (“BBA”) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) for various currencies and the European Banking Federation’s Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”). The Swiss Competition Commission’s investigation relating to EURIBOR, to which the Firm and one other bank remain subject, continues. The Firm appealed a December 2016 decision by the European Commission against the Firm and other banks finding an infringement of European antitrust rules relating to EURIBOR. In December 2023, the European General Court annulled the fine imposed by the European Commission, but exercised its discretion to re-impose a fine in an identical amount. In March 2024, the Firm filed an appeal of this decision with the Court of Justice of the European Union.In addition, the Firm has been named as a defendant along with other banks in various individual and putative class actions related to benchmark rates, including U.S. dollar LIBOR. In actions related to U.S. dollar LIBOR during the period that it was administered by the BBA, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted class certification of antitrust claims related to bonds and interest rate swaps sold directly by the defendants, including the Firm. The Firm has obtained dismissal of certain actions and resolved certain other actions, and as to all remaining actions has moved for summary judgment. In addition, a lawsuit filed by a group of individual plaintiffs asserting antitrust claims, alleging that the Firm and other defendants were engaged in an unlawful agreement to set U.S. dollar LIBOR and conspired to monopolize the market for LIBOR-based consumer loans and credit cards was dismissed in October 2023 and affirmed on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in December 2024. The Firm has resolved all non-U.S. dollar LIBOR actions.Russian Litigation. The Firm is obligated to comply with international sanctions laws, which mandate the blocking of certain assets. These laws apply when assets associated with individuals, companies, products or services are within the scope of the sanctions. The Firm has faced actual and threatened litigation in Russia seeking payments that the Firm cannot make under, and is contractually excused from paying as a result of, relevant sanctions laws. In claims involving the Firm and claims filed against other financial institutions, Russian courts have disregarded the parties’ contractual agreements concerning forum selection and did not recognize foreign sanctions laws as a basis for not making payment. Russian courts have entered judgment against the Firm in a number of claims, including one for $439 million, and a judgment has been executed against assets held onshore by the Firm in Russia. The total amount of the judgments exceeds the total amount of available assets that the Firm holds in Russia. The Firm continues to appeal the Russian courts' decisions, and judgments may not be executed while on appeal. Russian courts have also ordered interim freezes of Firm assets in Russia (including, among other things, funds in bank accounts, securities, shares in authorized capital, and certain trademarks, of the named defendants) pending a determination of affiliates to continue to rely on the Qualified Professional Asset Manager exemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) through the ten-year disqualification period following the antitrust plea. The only remaining FX-related governmental inquiry is a South Africa Competition Commission matter which is currently pending before the South Africa Competition Tribunal.With respect to civil litigation matters, some FX-related individual and putative class actions filed outside the U.S., including in the U.K., Israel, the Netherlands, Brazil and Australia, remain. In July 2023, the U.K. Court of Appeal overturned the Competition Appeal Tribunal's earlier denial of a request for class certification on an opt-out basis. The defendants have appealed this decision to the U.K. Supreme Court. In Israel, a settlement in principle has been reached on the putative class action, which remains subject to court approval. Interchange Litigation. Groups of merchants and retail associations filed a series of class action complaints alleging that Visa and Mastercard, as well as certain banks, conspired to set the price of credit and debit card interchange fees and enacted related rules in violation of antitrust laws.In September 2018, the parties settled the class action seeking monetary relief, with the defendants collectively contributing approximately $6.2 billion. The settlement has been approved by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and affirmed on appeal. Based on the percentage of merchants that opted out of the settlement, $700 million has been returned to the defendants from the settlement escrow. A separate class action seeking injunctive relief continues, and in September 2021, the District Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in part, and denied the motion in part. In June 2024, the District Court denied preliminary approval of a settlement of the injunctive class action in which Visa and Mastercard agreed to certain changes to their respective network rules and system-wide reductions in interchange rates for U.S.-based merchants. The parties are considering next steps. Of the merchants who opted out of the damages class settlement, certain merchants filed individual actions raising similar allegations against Visa and Mastercard, as well as against the Firm and other banks. While some of those actions remain pending, the defendants have reached settlements with the merchants who opted out representing over 70% of the combined Mastercard-branded and Visa-branded payment card sales volume. LIBOR and Other Benchmark Rate Investigations and Litigation. JPMorganChase has responded to inquiries from various governmental agencies and entities around the world relating primarily to the British Bankers Association’s (“BBA”) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) for various currencies and the European Banking Federation’s Euro Interbank Offered affiliates to continue to rely on the Qualified Professional Asset Manager exemption under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) through the ten-year disqualification period following the antitrust plea. The only remaining FX-related governmental inquiry is a South Africa Competition Commission matter which is currently pending before the South Africa Competition Tribunal. With respect to civil litigation matters, some FX-related individual and putative class actions filed outside the U.S., including in the U.K., Israel, the Netherlands, Brazil and Australia, remain. In July 2023, the U.K. Court of Appeal overturned the Competition Appeal Tribunal's earlier denial of a request for class certification on an opt-out basis. The defendants have appealed this decision to the U.K. Supreme Court. In Israel, a settlement in principle has been reached on the putative class action, which remains subject to court approval. Interchange Litigation. Groups of merchants and retail associations filed a series of class action complaints alleging that Visa and Mastercard, as well as certain banks, conspired to set the price of credit and debit card interchange fees and enacted related rules in violation of antitrust laws. In September 2018, the parties settled the class action seeking monetary relief, with the defendants collectively contributing approximately $6.2 billion. The settlement has been approved by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and affirmed on appeal. Based on the percentage of merchants that opted out of the settlement, $700 million has been returned to the defendants from the settlement escrow. A separate class action seeking injunctive relief continues, and in September 2021, the District Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification in part, and denied the motion in part. In June 2024, the District Court denied preliminary approval of a settlement of the injunctive class action in which Visa and Mastercard agreed to certain changes to their respective network rules and system-wide reductions in interchange rates for U.S.-based merchants. The parties are considering next steps. Of the merchants who opted out of the damages class settlement, certain merchants filed individual actions raising similar allegations against Visa and Mastercard, as well as against the Firm and other banks. While some of those actions remain pending, the defendants have reached settlements with the merchants who opted out representing over 70% of the combined Mastercard-branded and Visa-branded payment card sales volume. LIBOR and Other Benchmark Rate Investigations and Litigation. JPMorganChase has responded to inquiries from various governmental agencies and entities around the world relating primarily to the British Bankers Association’s (“BBA”) London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) for various currencies and the European Banking Federation’s Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”). The Swiss Competition Commission’s investigation relating to EURIBOR, to which the Firm and one other bank remain subject, continues. The Firm appealed a December 2016 decision by the European Commission against the Firm and other banks finding an infringement of European antitrust rules relating to EURIBOR. In December 2023, the European General Court annulled the fine imposed by the European Commission, but exercised its discretion to re-impose a fine in an identical amount. In March 2024, the Firm filed an appeal of this decision with the Court of Justice of the European Union.In addition, the Firm has been named as a defendant along with other banks in various individual and putative class actions related to benchmark rates, including U.S. dollar LIBOR. In actions related to U.S. dollar LIBOR during the period that it was administered by the BBA, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted class certification of antitrust claims related to bonds and interest rate swaps sold directly by the defendants, including the Firm. The Firm has obtained dismissal of certain actions and resolved certain other actions, and as to all remaining actions has moved for summary judgment. In addition, a lawsuit filed by a group of individual plaintiffs asserting antitrust claims, alleging that the Firm and other defendants were engaged in an unlawful agreement to set U.S. dollar LIBOR and conspired to monopolize the market for LIBOR-based consumer loans and credit cards was dismissed in October 2023 and affirmed on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in December 2024. The Firm has resolved all non-U.S. dollar LIBOR actions.Russian Litigation. The Firm is obligated to comply with international sanctions laws, which mandate the blocking of certain assets. These laws apply when assets associated with individuals, companies, products or services are within the scope of the sanctions. The Firm has faced actual and threatened litigation in Russia seeking payments that the Firm cannot make under, and is contractually excused from paying as a result of, relevant sanctions laws. In claims involving the Firm and claims filed against other financial institutions, Russian courts have disregarded the parties’ contractual agreements concerning forum selection and did not recognize foreign sanctions laws as a basis for not making payment. Russian courts have entered judgment against the Firm in a number of claims, including one for $439 million, and a judgment has been executed against assets held onshore by the Firm in Russia. The total amount of the judgments exceeds the total amount of available assets that the Firm holds in Russia. The Firm continues to appeal the Russian courts' decisions, and judgments may not be executed while on appeal. Russian courts have also ordered interim freezes of Firm assets in Russia (including, among other things, funds in bank accounts, securities, shares in authorized capital, and certain trademarks, of the named defendants) pending a determination of Rate (“EURIBOR”). The Swiss Competition Commission’s investigation relating to EURIBOR, to which the Firm and one other bank remain subject, continues. The Firm appealed a December 2016 decision by the European Commission against the Firm and other banks finding an infringement of European antitrust rules relating to EURIBOR. In December 2023, the European General Court annulled the fine imposed by the European Commission, but exercised its discretion to re-impose a fine in an identical amount. In March 2024, the Firm filed an appeal of this decision with the Court of Justice of the European Union. In addition, the Firm has been named as a defendant along with other banks in various individual and putative class actions related to benchmark rates, including U.S. dollar LIBOR. In actions related to U.S. dollar LIBOR during the period that it was administered by the BBA, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted class certification of antitrust claims related to bonds and interest rate swaps sold directly by the defendants, including the Firm. The Firm has obtained dismissal of certain actions and resolved certain other actions, and as to all remaining actions has moved for summary judgment. In addition, a lawsuit filed by a group of individual plaintiffs asserting antitrust claims, alleging that the Firm and other defendants were engaged in an unlawful agreement to set U.S. dollar LIBOR and conspired to monopolize the market for LIBOR-based consumer loans and credit cards was dismissed in October 2023 and affirmed on appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in December 2024. The Firm has resolved all non-U.S. dollar LIBOR actions. Russian Litigation. The Firm is obligated to comply with international sanctions laws, which mandate the blocking of certain assets. These laws apply when assets associated with individuals, companies, products or services are within the scope of the sanctions. The Firm has faced actual and threatened litigation in Russia seeking payments that the Firm cannot make under, and is contractually excused from paying as a result of, relevant sanctions laws. In claims involving the Firm and claims filed against other financial institutions, Russian courts have disregarded the parties’ contractual agreements concerning forum selection and did not recognize foreign sanctions laws as a basis for not making payment. Russian courts have entered judgment against the Firm in a number of claims, including one for $439 million, and a judgment has been executed against assets held onshore by the Firm in Russia. The total amount of the judgments exceeds the total amount of available assets that the Firm holds in Russia. The Firm continues to appeal the Russian courts' decisions, and judgments may not be executed while on appeal. Russian courts have also ordered interim freezes of Firm assets in Russia (including, among other things, funds in bank accounts, securities, shares in authorized capital, and certain trademarks, of the named defendants) pending a determination of 310JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 310JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 310JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 310 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K certain underlying claims against the Firm. The Firm has challenged claims being pursued in the Russian courts and related freeze orders in other jurisdictions provided for by the parties’ contractual forum selections. If further claims are enforced despite the actions taken by the Firm to challenge the claims and orders and to seek the proper application of law, the Firm’s assets in Russia could be seized in full, and certain client assets could also be seized, or the Firm could be prevented from complying with its obligations.SEC Inquiries. In October 2024, the Firm entered into settlements with the SEC to resolve inquiries related to, among other things, conflict disclosures concerning the selection of portfolio managers and the timing of the Firm’s liquidation of shares distributed in-kind to certain investment vehicles that invest in third-party managed private funds and certain other matters. The resolutions required the Firm to pay a combined $151 million in civil penalties and voluntary payments to customers. The Firm continues to cooperate in connection with SEC inquiries concerning the aggregation of accounts for fee billing and various other matters.Shareholder Litigation. Several shareholder putative class actions, as well as shareholder derivative actions purporting to act on behalf of the Firm, have been filed against the Firm, its Board of Directors and certain of its current and former officers. Certain of these shareholder suits relate to historical trading practices by former employees in the precious metals and U.S. treasuries markets and related conduct which were the subject of the Firm’s resolutions with the DOJ, CFTC and SEC in September 2020, and fiduciary activities that were separately the subject of a resolution between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the OCC in November 2020. One of these shareholder derivative suits was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in May 2022, asserting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment claims relating to the historical trading practices and related conduct and fiduciary activities which were the subject of the resolutions described above. In December 2022, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss this action in full, and in July 2023, the plaintiff filed an appeal, which remains pending. A second shareholder derivative action relating to the historical trading practices and related conduct was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in December 2022. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint.Zelle Network Litigation. In December 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) filed a complaint against Early Warning Services, LLC (“EWS”), Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The CFPB alleges that EWS and the defendant banks have failed to take sufficient efforts to prevent fraud on the Zelle network. The defendants will file a response to the complaint.* * *In addition to the various legal proceedings discussed above, JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries are named as defendants or are otherwise involved in a substantial number of other legal proceedings. The Firm believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and it intends to defend itself vigorously. Additional legal proceedings may be initiated from time to time in the future.The Firm has established reserves for several hundred of its currently outstanding legal proceedings. In accordance with the provisions of U.S. GAAP for contingencies, the Firm accrues for a litigation-related liability when it is probable that such a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Firm evaluates its outstanding legal proceedings each quarter to assess its litigation reserves, and makes adjustments in such reserves, upward or downward, as appropriate, based on management’s best judgment after consultation with counsel. The Firm’s legal expense was $740 million, $1.4 billion and $266 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. There is no assurance that the Firm’s litigation reserves will not need to be adjusted in the future. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the matters present novel legal theories, involve a large number of parties or are in early stages of discovery, the Firm cannot state with confidence what will be the eventual outcomes of the currently pending matters, the timing of their ultimate resolution or the eventual losses, fines, penalties or consequences related to those matters. JPMorganChase believes, based upon its current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, consideration of the material legal proceedings described above and after taking into account its current litigation reserves and its estimated aggregate range of possible losses, that the other legal proceedings currently pending against it should not have a material adverse effect on the Firm’s consolidated financial condition. The Firm notes, however, that in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves it has currently accrued or that a matter will not have material reputational consequences. As a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to JPMorganChase’s operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of JPMorganChase’s income for that period. certain underlying claims against the Firm. The Firm has challenged claims being pursued in the Russian courts and related freeze orders in other jurisdictions provided for by the parties’ contractual forum selections. If further claims are enforced despite the actions taken by the Firm to challenge the claims and orders and to seek the proper application of law, the Firm’s assets in Russia could be seized in full, and certain client assets could also be seized, or the Firm could be prevented from complying with its obligations.SEC Inquiries. In October 2024, the Firm entered into settlements with the SEC to resolve inquiries related to, among other things, conflict disclosures concerning the selection of portfolio managers and the timing of the Firm’s liquidation of shares distributed in-kind to certain investment vehicles that invest in third-party managed private funds and certain other matters. The resolutions required the Firm to pay a combined $151 million in civil penalties and voluntary payments to customers. The Firm continues to cooperate in connection with SEC inquiries concerning the aggregation of accounts for fee billing and various other matters.Shareholder Litigation. Several shareholder putative class actions, as well as shareholder derivative actions purporting to act on behalf of the Firm, have been filed against the Firm, its Board of Directors and certain of its current and former officers. Certain of these shareholder suits relate to historical trading practices by former employees in the precious metals and U.S. treasuries markets and related conduct which were the subject of the Firm’s resolutions with the DOJ, CFTC and SEC in September 2020, and fiduciary activities that were separately the subject of a resolution between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the OCC in November 2020. One of these shareholder derivative suits was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in May 2022, asserting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment claims relating to the historical trading practices and related conduct and fiduciary activities which were the subject of the resolutions described above. In December 2022, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss this action in full, and in July 2023, the plaintiff filed an appeal, which remains pending. A second shareholder derivative action relating to the historical trading practices and related conduct was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in December 2022. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint.Zelle Network Litigation. In December 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) filed a complaint against Early Warning Services, LLC (“EWS”), Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The CFPB alleges that EWS and the defendant banks have failed to take sufficient efforts to prevent fraud on the Zelle network. The defendants will file a response to the complaint. certain underlying claims against the Firm. The Firm has challenged claims being pursued in the Russian courts and related freeze orders in other jurisdictions provided for by the parties’ contractual forum selections. If further claims are enforced despite the actions taken by the Firm to challenge the claims and orders and to seek the proper application of law, the Firm’s assets in Russia could be seized in full, and certain client assets could also be seized, or the Firm could be prevented from complying with its obligations. SEC Inquiries. In October 2024, the Firm entered into settlements with the SEC to resolve inquiries related to, among other things, conflict disclosures concerning the selection of portfolio managers and the timing of the Firm’s liquidation of shares distributed in-kind to certain investment vehicles that invest in third-party managed private funds and certain other matters. The resolutions required the Firm to pay a combined $151 million in civil penalties and voluntary payments to customers. The Firm continues to cooperate in connection with SEC inquiries concerning the aggregation of accounts for fee billing and various other matters. Shareholder Litigation. Several shareholder putative class actions, as well as shareholder derivative actions purporting to act on behalf of the Firm, have been filed against the Firm, its Board of Directors and certain of its current and former officers. Certain of these shareholder suits relate to historical trading practices by former employees in the precious metals and U.S. treasuries markets and related conduct which were the subject of the Firm’s resolutions with the DOJ, CFTC and SEC in September 2020, and fiduciary activities that were separately the subject of a resolution between JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the OCC in November 2020. One of these shareholder derivative suits was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in May 2022, asserting breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment claims relating to the historical trading practices and related conduct and fiduciary activities which were the subject of the resolutions described above. In December 2022, the court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss this action in full, and in July 2023, the plaintiff filed an appeal, which remains pending. A second shareholder derivative action relating to the historical trading practices and related conduct was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in December 2022. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint. Zelle Network Litigation. In December 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) filed a complaint against Early Warning Services, LLC (“EWS”), Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The CFPB alleges that EWS and the defendant banks have failed to take sufficient efforts to prevent fraud on the Zelle network. The defendants will file a response to the complaint. * * *In addition to the various legal proceedings discussed above, JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries are named as defendants or are otherwise involved in a substantial number of other legal proceedings. The Firm believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and it intends to defend itself vigorously. Additional legal proceedings may be initiated from time to time in the future.The Firm has established reserves for several hundred of its currently outstanding legal proceedings. In accordance with the provisions of U.S. GAAP for contingencies, the Firm accrues for a litigation-related liability when it is probable that such a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Firm evaluates its outstanding legal proceedings each quarter to assess its litigation reserves, and makes adjustments in such reserves, upward or downward, as appropriate, based on management’s best judgment after consultation with counsel. The Firm’s legal expense was $740 million, $1.4 billion and $266 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. There is no assurance that the Firm’s litigation reserves will not need to be adjusted in the future. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the matters present novel legal theories, involve a large number of parties or are in early stages of discovery, the Firm cannot state with confidence what will be the eventual outcomes of the currently pending matters, the timing of their ultimate resolution or the eventual losses, fines, penalties or consequences related to those matters. JPMorganChase believes, based upon its current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, consideration of the material legal proceedings described above and after taking into account its current litigation reserves and its estimated aggregate range of possible losses, that the other legal proceedings currently pending against it should not have a material adverse effect on the Firm’s consolidated financial condition. The Firm notes, however, that in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves it has currently accrued or that a matter will not have material reputational consequences. As a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to JPMorganChase’s operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of JPMorganChase’s income for that period. * * * In addition to the various legal proceedings discussed above, JPMorganChase and its subsidiaries are named as defendants or are otherwise involved in a substantial number of other legal proceedings. The Firm believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and it intends to defend itself vigorously. Additional legal proceedings may be initiated from time to time in the future. The Firm has established reserves for several hundred of its currently outstanding legal proceedings. In accordance with the provisions of U.S. GAAP for contingencies, the Firm accrues for a litigation-related liability when it is probable that such a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Firm evaluates its outstanding legal proceedings each quarter to assess its litigation reserves, and makes adjustments in such reserves, upward or downward, as appropriate, based on management’s best judgment after consultation with counsel. The Firm’s legal expense was $740 million, $1.4 billion and $266 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. There is no assurance that the Firm’s litigation reserves will not need to be adjusted in the future. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal proceedings, particularly where the claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the matters present novel legal theories, involve a large number of parties or are in early stages of discovery, the Firm cannot state with confidence what will be the eventual outcomes of the currently pending matters, the timing of their ultimate resolution or the eventual losses, fines, penalties or consequences related to those matters. JPMorganChase believes, based upon its current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, consideration of the material legal proceedings described above and after taking into account its current litigation reserves and its estimated aggregate range of possible losses, that the other legal proceedings currently pending against it should not have a material adverse effect on the Firm’s consolidated financial condition. The Firm notes, however, that in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves it has currently accrued or that a matter will not have material reputational consequences. As a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to JPMorganChase’s operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of JPMorganChase’s income for that period. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K311 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K311 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K311 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 311

The following table presents income statement and balance sheet-related information for JPMorganChase by major international geographic area. The Firm defines international activities for purposes of this footnote presentation as business transactions that involve clients residing outside of the U.S., and the information presented below is based predominantly on the domicile of the client, the location from which the client relationship is managed, booking location or the location of the trading desk. However, many of the Firm’s U.S. operations serve international businesses.As the Firm’s operations are highly integrated, estimates and subjective assumptions have been made to apportion revenue and expense between U.S. and international operations. These estimates and assumptions are consistent with the allocations used for the Firm’s segment reporting as set forth in Note 32.The Firm’s long-lived assets for the periods presented are not considered by management to be significant in relation to total assets. The majority of the Firm’s long-lived assets are located in the U.S. The following table presents income statement and balance sheet-related information for JPMorganChase by major international geographic area. The Firm defines international activities for purposes of this footnote presentation as business transactions that involve clients residing outside of the U.S., and the information presented below is based predominantly on the domicile of the client, the location from which the client relationship is managed, booking location or the location of the trading desk. However, many of the Firm’s U.S. operations serve international businesses. The following table presents income statement and balance sheet-related information for JPMorganChase by major international geographic area. The Firm defines international activities for purposes of this footnote presentation as business transactions that involve clients residing outside of the U.S., and the information presented below is based predominantly on the domicile of the client, the location from which the client relationship is managed, booking location or the location of the trading desk. However, many of the Firm’s U.S. operations serve international businesses. As the Firm’s operations are highly integrated, estimates and subjective assumptions have been made to apportion revenue and expense between U.S. and international operations. These estimates and assumptions are consistent with the allocations used for the Firm’s segment reporting as set forth in Note 32.The Firm’s long-lived assets for the periods presented are not considered by management to be significant in relation to total assets. The majority of the Firm’s long-lived assets are located in the U.S. As the Firm’s operations are highly integrated, estimates and subjective assumptions have been made to apportion revenue and expense between U.S. and international operations. These estimates and assumptions are consistent with the allocations used for the Firm’s segment reporting as set forth in Note 32. The Firm’s long-lived assets for the periods presented are not considered by management to be significant in relation to total assets. The majority of the Firm’s long-lived assets are located in the U.S. As of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions)Revenue(b)Expense(c)Income before income tax expenseNet incomeTotal assets2024Europe/Middle East/Africa$22,353 $12,843 $9,510 $6,713 $552,407 (d)Asia-Pacific11,995 6,922 5,073 3,615 296,430 Latin America/Caribbean3,885 1,895 1,990 1,512 73,631 Total international38,233 21,660 16,573 11,840 922,468 North America(a)139,323 80,815 58,508 46,631 3,080,346 Total$177,556 $102,475 $75,081 $58,471 $4,002,814 2023Europe/Middle East/Africa$20,974 $11,947 $9,027 $6,402 $529,335 (d)Asia-Pacific10,605 6,550 4,055 2,709 251,588 Latin America/Caribbean3,294 1,971 1,323 994 83,003 Total international34,873 20,468 14,405 10,105 863,926 North America(a)123,231 76,024 47,207 39,447 3,011,467 Total$158,104 $96,492 $61,612 $49,552 $3,875,393 2022Europe/Middle East/Africa$18,765 $11,754 $7,011 $5,158 $558,430 (d)Asia-Pacific10,025 6,763 3,262 2,119 281,479 Latin America/Caribbean3,178 1,697 1,481 1,156 78,673 Total international31,968 20,214 11,754 8,433 918,582 North America(a)96,727 62,315 34,412 29,243 2,747,161 Total$128,695 $82,529 $46,166 $37,676 $3,665,743 Revenue(b) Expense(c) (d) North America(a) 2023 (d) North America(a) 2022 (d) North America(a) (a)Substantially reflects the U.S. (b)Revenue is composed of net interest income and noninterest revenue. (c)Expense is composed of noninterest expense and the provision for credit losses. (d)Total assets for the U.K. were approximately $369 billion, $352 billion and $357 billion at December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. 312JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 312JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 312JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 312 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

Business segment reorganization: Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank. As a result of the reorganization, the Firm has three reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking, Commercial & Investment Bank, and Asset & Wealth Management – with the remaining activities in Corporate. Adoption of accounting standard — Segment Reporting — Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures: This guidance was adopted retrospectively for the Firm’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. The adoption of this guidance requires additional reportable segment disclosures, primarily relating to significant segment expenses and the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). Adoption of this guidance did not result in changes to the identification of the Firm’s reportable business segments, or of its CODM. The Firm is managed on an LOB basis. The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the type of customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is evaluated by the Firm’s Operating Committee, whose members act collectively as the Firm’s CODM. Segment results are presented on a managed basis. Refer to Segment & Corporate results in this footnote for a further discussion of JPMorganChase’s reportable business segments and Corporate.The following is a description of each of the Firm’s reportable business segments, and the products and services that they provide to their respective client bases, as well as a description of Corporate activities.Consumer & Community Banking Consumer & Community Banking offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Banking & Wealth Management (including Consumer Banking, Business Banking and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card Services & Auto. Banking & Wealth Management offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, payments and services. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card Services issues credit cards and offers travel services. Auto originates and services auto loans and leases. Commercial & Investment BankThe Commercial & Investment Bank is comprised of the Banking & Payments and Markets & Securities Services businesses. These businesses offer investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. Banking & Payments offers products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, and loan origination and syndication. Banking & Payments also provides services that enable clients to manage payments globally across liquidity and account solutions, commerce solutions, clearing, trade, and working capital. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, which is a global market-maker across products, including cash and derivative instruments, and also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, lending, prime brokerage, clearing and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian that provides custody, fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products. Asset & Wealth ManagementAsset & Wealth Management, with client assets of $5.9 trillion, is a global leader in investment and wealth management. Asset Management Offers multi-asset investment management solutions across equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market funds to institutional and retail investors providing for a broad range of clients’ investment needs.Global Private BankProvides retirement products and services, brokerage, custody, estate planning, lending, deposits and investment management to high net worth clients.The majority of AWM’s client assets are in actively managed portfolios.CorporateCorporate consists of Treasury and Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) and Other Corporate. Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Other Corporate includes staff functions and expense that is centrally managed as well as certain Firm initiatives and activities not solely aligned to a specific LOB. The major Other Corporate functions include Real Estate, Technology, Legal, Corporate Finance, Human Resources, Internal Audit, Risk Management, Compliance, Control Management, Corporate Responsibility and various Other Corporate groups. Business segment reorganization: Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank. As a result of the reorganization, the Firm has three reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking, Commercial & Investment Bank, and Asset & Wealth Management – with the remaining activities in Corporate. Adoption of accounting standard — Segment Reporting — Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures: This guidance was adopted retrospectively for the Firm’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. The adoption of this guidance requires additional reportable segment disclosures, primarily relating to significant segment expenses and the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). Adoption of this guidance did not result in changes to the identification of the Firm’s reportable business segments, or of its CODM. The Firm is managed on an LOB basis. The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the type of customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is evaluated by the Firm’s Operating Committee, whose members act collectively as the Firm’s CODM. Segment results are presented on a managed basis. Refer to Segment & Corporate results in this footnote for a further discussion of JPMorganChase’s reportable business segments and Corporate.The following is a description of each of the Firm’s reportable business segments, and the products and services that they provide to their respective client bases, as well as a description of Corporate activities.Consumer & Community Banking Consumer & Community Banking offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Banking & Wealth Management (including Consumer Banking, Business Banking and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card Services & Auto. Banking & Wealth Management offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, payments and services. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card Services issues credit cards and offers travel services. Auto originates and services auto loans and leases. Business segment reorganization: Effective in the second quarter of 2024, the Firm reorganized its reportable business segments by combining the former Corporate & Investment Bank and Commercial Banking business segments to form one reportable segment, the Commercial & Investment Bank. As a result of the reorganization, the Firm has three reportable business segments – Consumer & Community Banking, Commercial & Investment Bank, and Asset & Wealth Management – with the remaining activities in Corporate. Adoption of accounting standard — Segment Reporting — Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures: This guidance was adopted retrospectively for the Firm’s annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. The adoption of this guidance requires additional reportable segment disclosures, primarily relating to significant segment expenses and the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). Adoption of this guidance did not result in changes to the identification of the Firm’s reportable business segments, or of its CODM. The Firm is managed on an LOB basis. The business segments are determined based on the products and services provided, or the type of customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is evaluated by the Firm’s Operating Committee, whose members act collectively as the Firm’s CODM. Segment results are presented on a managed basis. Refer to Segment & Corporate results in this footnote for a further discussion of JPMorganChase’s reportable business segments and Corporate. The following is a description of each of the Firm’s reportable business segments, and the products and services that they provide to their respective client bases, as well as a description of Corporate activities.

Consumer & Community Banking offers products and services to consumers and small businesses through bank branches, ATMs, digital (including mobile and online) and telephone banking. CCB is organized into Banking & Wealth Management (including Consumer Banking, Business Banking and J.P. Morgan Wealth Management), Home Lending (including Home Lending Production, Home Lending Servicing and Real Estate Portfolios) and Card Services & Auto. Banking & Wealth Management offers deposit, investment and lending products, cash management, payments and services. Home Lending includes mortgage origination and servicing activities, as well as portfolios consisting of residential mortgages and home equity loans. Card Services issues credit cards and offers travel services. Auto originates and services auto loans and leases. Commercial & Investment BankThe Commercial & Investment Bank is comprised of the Banking & Payments and Markets & Securities Services businesses. These businesses offer investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. Banking & Payments offers products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, and loan origination and syndication. Banking & Payments also provides services that enable clients to manage payments globally across liquidity and account solutions, commerce solutions, clearing, trade, and working capital. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, which is a global market-maker across products, including cash and derivative instruments, and also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, lending, prime brokerage, clearing and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian that provides custody, fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products. Asset & Wealth ManagementAsset & Wealth Management, with client assets of $5.9 trillion, is a global leader in investment and wealth management. Asset Management Offers multi-asset investment management solutions across equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market funds to institutional and retail investors providing for a broad range of clients’ investment needs.Global Private BankProvides retirement products and services, brokerage, custody, estate planning, lending, deposits and investment management to high net worth clients.The majority of AWM’s client assets are in actively managed portfolios.CorporateCorporate consists of Treasury and Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) and Other Corporate. Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Other Corporate includes staff functions and expense that is centrally managed as well as certain Firm initiatives and activities not solely aligned to a specific LOB. The major Other Corporate functions include Real Estate, Technology, Legal, Corporate Finance, Human Resources, Internal Audit, Risk Management, Compliance, Control Management, Corporate Responsibility and various Other Corporate groups.

The Commercial & Investment Bank is comprised of the Banking & Payments and Markets & Securities Services businesses. These businesses offer investment banking, lending, payments, market-making, financing, custody and securities products and services to a global base of corporate and institutional clients. Banking & Payments offers products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and structure, capital-raising in equity and debt markets, and loan origination and syndication. Banking & Payments also provides services that enable clients to manage payments globally across liquidity and account solutions, commerce solutions, clearing, trade, and working capital. Markets & Securities Services includes Markets, which is a global market-maker across products, including cash and derivative instruments, and also offers sophisticated risk management solutions, lending, prime brokerage, clearing and research. Markets & Securities Services also includes Securities Services, a leading global custodian that provides custody, fund services, liquidity and trading services, and data solutions products.

Asset & Wealth Management, with client assets of $5.9 trillion, is a global leader in investment and wealth management. Asset Management Offers multi-asset investment management solutions across equities, fixed income, alternatives and money market funds to institutional and retail investors providing for a broad range of clients’ investment needs. Global Private Bank Provides retirement products and services, brokerage, custody, estate planning, lending, deposits and investment management to high net worth clients. The majority of AWM’s client assets are in actively managed portfolios. Corporate Corporate consists of Treasury and Chief Investment Office (“CIO”) and Other Corporate. Treasury and CIO is predominantly responsible for measuring, monitoring, reporting and managing the Firm’s liquidity, funding, capital, structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Other Corporate includes staff functions and expense that is centrally managed as well as certain Firm initiatives and activities not solely aligned to a specific LOB. The major Other Corporate functions include Real Estate, Technology, Legal, Corporate Finance, Human Resources, Internal Audit, Risk Management, Compliance, Control Management, Corporate Responsibility and various Other Corporate groups. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K313 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K313 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K313 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 313

Description of business segment reporting methodologyResults of the reportable business segments are intended to present each segment as if it were a stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results includes the allocation of certain income and expense items. The Firm periodically assesses the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and therefore further refinements may be implemented in future periods. The Firm also assesses the level of capital required for each LOB on at least an annual basis. The Firm’s LOBs also provide various business metrics which are utilized by the Firm and its investors and analysts in assessing performance. Revenue sharing When business segments or businesses within each segment join efforts to sell products and services to the Firm’s clients and customers, the participating businesses may agree to share revenue from those transactions. Revenue is generally recognized in the segment responsible for the related product or service, with allocations to the other segments or businesses involved in the transaction. The segment and business results reflect these revenue-sharing agreements.Expense allocationWhere business segments use services provided by Corporate support units, or another business segment, the costs of those services are allocated to the respective business segments. The expense is generally allocated based on the actual cost and use of services provided. In contrast, certain costs and investments related to Corporate that are not currently utilized by any LOB are not allocated to the business segments and are retained in Corporate. Expense retained in Corporate generally includes costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses, and other items not solely aligned with a particular reportable business segment.Funds transfer pricing Funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) is the process by which the Firm allocates interest income and expense to the LOBs and Other Corporate and transfers the primary interest rate risk and liquidity risk to Treasury and CIO.The funds transfer pricing process considers the interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics of assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet products. Periodically, the methodology and assumptions utilized in the FTP process are adjusted to reflect economic conditions and other factors, which may impact the allocation of net interest income to the segments. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Firm updated its FTP with respect to consumer deposits, which resulted in an increase in the funding benefit reflected within CCB’s net interest income that is fully offset in Corporate, with no effect on the Firm’s net interest income.Foreign exchange riskForeign exchange risk is transferred from the LOBs and Other Corporate to Treasury and CIO for certain revenues and expenses. Treasury and CIO manages these risks centrally and reports the impact of foreign exchange rate movements related to the transferred risk in its results.Debt expense and preferred stock dividend allocationAs part of the FTP process, almost all of the cost of the credit spread component of outstanding unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends is allocated to the reportable business segments, while the balance of the cost is retained in Corporate. The methodology to allocate the cost of unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends to the business segments is aligned with the relevant regulatory capital requirements and funding needs of the LOBs, as applicable. The allocated cost of unsecured long-term debt is included in a business segment’s net interest income, and net income is reduced by preferred stock dividends, to arrive at a business segment’s net income applicable to common equity.Capital allocationEach LOB and Corporate is allocated capital by taking into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. ROE is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as key measures of an LOB’s performance.The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized RWA and the GSIB surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. Description of business segment reporting methodologyResults of the reportable business segments are intended to present each segment as if it were a stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results includes the allocation of certain income and expense items. The Firm periodically assesses the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and therefore further refinements may be implemented in future periods. The Firm also assesses the level of capital required for each LOB on at least an annual basis. The Firm’s LOBs also provide various business metrics which are utilized by the Firm and its investors and analysts in assessing performance. Revenue sharing When business segments or businesses within each segment join efforts to sell products and services to the Firm’s clients and customers, the participating businesses may agree to share revenue from those transactions. Revenue is generally recognized in the segment responsible for the related product or service, with allocations to the other segments or businesses involved in the transaction. The segment and business results reflect these revenue-sharing agreements.Expense allocationWhere business segments use services provided by Corporate support units, or another business segment, the costs of those services are allocated to the respective business segments. The expense is generally allocated based on the actual cost and use of services provided. In contrast, certain costs and investments related to Corporate that are not currently utilized by any LOB are not allocated to the business segments and are retained in Corporate. Expense retained in Corporate generally includes costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses, and other items not solely aligned with a particular reportable business segment.Funds transfer pricing Funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) is the process by which the Firm allocates interest income and expense to the LOBs and Other Corporate and transfers the primary interest rate risk and liquidity risk to Treasury and CIO.The funds transfer pricing process considers the interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics of assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet products.

Results of the reportable business segments are intended to present each segment as if it were a stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results includes the allocation of certain income and expense items. The Firm periodically assesses the assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and therefore further refinements may be implemented in future periods. The Firm also assesses the level of capital required for each LOB on at least an annual basis. The Firm’s LOBs also provide various business metrics which are utilized by the Firm and its investors and analysts in assessing performance. Revenue sharing When business segments or businesses within each segment join efforts to sell products and services to the Firm’s clients and customers, the participating businesses may agree to share revenue from those transactions. Revenue is generally recognized in the segment responsible for the related product or service, with allocations to the other segments or businesses involved in the transaction. The segment and business results reflect these revenue-sharing agreements. Expense allocation Where business segments use services provided by Corporate support units, or another business segment, the costs of those services are allocated to the respective business segments. The expense is generally allocated based on the actual cost and use of services provided. In contrast, certain costs and investments related to Corporate that are not currently utilized by any LOB are not allocated to the business segments and are retained in Corporate. Expense retained in Corporate generally includes costs that would not be incurred if the segments were stand-alone businesses, and other items not solely aligned with a particular reportable business segment. Funds transfer pricing Funds transfer pricing (“FTP”) is the process by which the Firm allocates interest income and expense to the LOBs and Other Corporate and transfers the primary interest rate risk and liquidity risk to Treasury and CIO. The funds transfer pricing process considers the interest rate and liquidity risk characteristics of assets and liabilities and off-balance sheet products. Periodically, the methodology and assumptions utilized in the FTP process are adjusted to reflect economic conditions and other factors, which may impact the allocation of net interest income to the segments. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Firm updated its FTP with respect to consumer deposits, which resulted in an increase in the funding benefit reflected within CCB’s net interest income that is fully offset in Corporate, with no effect on the Firm’s net interest income.Foreign exchange riskForeign exchange risk is transferred from the LOBs and Other Corporate to Treasury and CIO for certain revenues and expenses. Treasury and CIO manages these risks centrally and reports the impact of foreign exchange rate movements related to the transferred risk in its results.Debt expense and preferred stock dividend allocationAs part of the FTP process, almost all of the cost of the credit spread component of outstanding unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends is allocated to the reportable business segments, while the balance of the cost is retained in Corporate. The methodology to allocate the cost of unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends to the business segments is aligned with the relevant regulatory capital requirements and funding needs of the LOBs, as applicable. The allocated cost of unsecured long-term debt is included in a business segment’s net interest income, and net income is reduced by preferred stock dividends, to arrive at a business segment’s net income applicable to common equity.Capital allocationEach LOB and Corporate is allocated capital by taking into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. ROE is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as key measures of an LOB’s performance.The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized RWA and the GSIB surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. Periodically, the methodology and assumptions utilized in the FTP process are adjusted to reflect economic conditions and other factors, which may impact the allocation of net interest income to the segments. Effective in the fourth quarter of 2024, the Firm updated its FTP with respect to consumer deposits, which resulted in an increase in the funding benefit reflected within CCB’s net interest income that is fully offset in Corporate, with no effect on the Firm’s net interest income. Foreign exchange risk Foreign exchange risk is transferred from the LOBs and Other Corporate to Treasury and CIO for certain revenues and expenses. Treasury and CIO manages these risks centrally and reports the impact of foreign exchange rate movements related to the transferred risk in its results. Debt expense and preferred stock dividend allocation As part of the FTP process, almost all of the cost of the credit spread component of outstanding unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends is allocated to the reportable business segments, while the balance of the cost is retained in Corporate. The methodology to allocate the cost of unsecured long-term debt and preferred stock dividends to the business segments is aligned with the relevant regulatory capital requirements and funding needs of the LOBs, as applicable. The allocated cost of unsecured long-term debt is included in a business segment’s net interest income, and net income is reduced by preferred stock dividends, to arrive at a business segment’s net income applicable to common equity. Capital allocation Each LOB and Corporate is allocated capital by taking into consideration a variety of factors including capital levels of similarly rated peers and applicable regulatory capital requirements. ROE is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as key measures of an LOB’s performance. The Firm’s current equity allocation methodology incorporates Basel III Standardized RWA and the GSIB surcharge, both under rules currently in effect, as well as a simulation of capital depletion in a severe stress environment. At least annually, the assumptions, judgments and methodologies used to allocate capital are reassessed and, as a result, the capital allocated to the LOBs and Corporate may change. 314JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 314JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 314JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 314 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The following table provides a summary of results for the Firm’s reportable business segments and Corporate activities as of or for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, on a managed basis. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm as a whole (and for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate) on an FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities. This allows management to assess the comparability of revenue from year-to-year arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments have no impact on net income as reported by the Firm as a whole or by the each of the LOBs and Corporate.The Operating Committee reviews segment results including net interest income, noninterest revenue, noninterest expense, provision for credit losses and net income on a managed basis. The Operating Committee uses these measures to evaluate segment performance and to make key operating decisions, including resource and capital allocations. The following table provides a summary of results for the Firm’s reportable business segments and Corporate activities as of or for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, on a managed basis. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm as a whole (and for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate) on an FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities. This allows management to assess the comparability of revenue from year-to-year arising from both taxable and tax-exempt The following table provides a summary of results for the Firm’s reportable business segments and Corporate activities as of or for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, on a managed basis. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications to present total net revenue for the Firm as a whole (and for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate) on an FTE basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable investments and securities. This allows management to assess the comparability of revenue from year-to-year arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments have no impact on net income as reported by the Firm as a whole or by the each of the LOBs and Corporate.The Operating Committee reviews segment results including net interest income, noninterest revenue, noninterest expense, provision for credit losses and net income on a managed basis. The Operating Committee uses these measures to evaluate segment performance and to make key operating decisions, including resource and capital allocations. sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments have no impact on net income as reported by the Firm as a whole or by the each of the LOBs and Corporate. The Operating Committee reviews segment results including net interest income, noninterest revenue, noninterest expense, provision for credit losses and net income on a managed basis. The Operating Committee uses these measures to evaluate segment performance and to make key operating decisions, including resource and capital allocations.

(Table continued on next page)As of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ratios)Consumer & Community BankingCommercial & Investment BankAsset & Wealth Management202420232022202420232022202420232022Noninterest revenue$16,649 $15,118$14,886(e)$48,253 $43,809$39,538 (b)$15,023 $13,560 $12,507 Net interest income54,858 55,03039,92821,861 20,54420,0976,555 6,267 5,241 Total net revenue71,507 70,14854,81470,114 64,35359,63521,578 19,827 17,748 Provision for credit losses9,974 6,8993,813762 2,0912,426(68)159 128 Compensation expense(b)17,045 15,17113,09218,191 17,10516,2147,984 7,115 6,336 Noncompensation expense(c)(d)20,991 19,64818,11617,162 16,86715,8556,430 5,665 5,493 Total noninterest expense38,036 34,81931,208(e)35,353 33,97232,069(b)14,414 12,780 11,829 Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)23,497 28,43019,79333,999 28,29025,1407,232 6,888 5,791 Income tax expense/(benefit)5,894 7,1984,877(e)9,153 8,0186,002(b)1,811 1,661 1,426 Net income/(loss)$17,603 $21,232$14,916$24,846 $20,272$19,138$5,421 $5,227 $4,365 Average equity$54,500 $54,349$50,000$132,000 $137,507$128,000$15,500 $16,671 $17,000 Total assets650,268 642,951514,0851,773,194 1,638,4931,591,402255,385 245,512 232,037 Return on equity32 %38 %29 %18 %14 %14 %34 %31 %25 %Overhead ratio53 50 57 50 53 54 67 64 67 (e) (b) Provision for credit losses Compensation expense(b) Noncompensation expense(c)(d) (e) (b)

(Table continued from previous page)As of or for the year ended December 31, (in millions, except ratios)CorporateReconciling Items(a) Total202420232022202420232022202420232022Noninterest revenue$7,608 (f)$132 $(1,798)$(2,560)$(3,782)$(3,148)$84,973 (f)$68,837 $61,985 Net interest income9,786 7,906 1,878 (477)(480)(434)92,583 89,267 66,710 Total net revenue17,394 8,038 80 (3,037)(4,262)(3,582)177,556 158,104 128,695 Provision for credit losses10 171 22 — — — 10,678 9,320 6,389 Total noninterest expense(d)3,994 (g)5,601 1,034 — — — 91,797 (g)87,172 76,140 Income/(loss) before income tax expense/(benefit)13,390 2,266 (976)(3,037)(4,262)(3,582)75,081 61,612 46,166 Income tax expense/(benefit)2,789 (555)(233)(3,037)(4,262)(3,582)16,610 12,060 8,490 Net income/(loss)$10,601 $2,821 $(743)$— $— $— $58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Average equity$110,370 $73,529 $58,068 $— $— $— $312,370 $282,056 $253,068 Total assets1,323,967 1,348,437 1,328,219 NANANA4,002,814 3,875,393 3,665,743 Return on equityNMNMNMNMNMNM18 %17 %14 %Overhead ratioNMNMNMNMNMNM52 55 59 Reconciling Items(a) (f) (f) Provision for credit losses Total noninterest expense(d) (g) (g)

Income tax expense/(benefit) Average equity Return on equity (a)Segment results on a managed basis reflect revenue on a FTE basis with the corresponding income tax impact recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results. In addition, effective January 1, 2024, the Firm adopted updates to the Accounting for Investments in Tax Credit Structures guidance, under the modified retrospective method. Refer to Notes 1, 6, 14 and 25 for additional information. (b)Excludes expense related to services provided by Corporate support units, which is allocated from Corporate to each respective reportable business segment, as applicable, through noncompensation expense. (c)Reflects occupancy; technology, communications and equipment; professional and outside services; marketing; and other expense. Refer to Note 6 for additional information on other expense. (d)Certain services are provided by Corporate and used by each of the reportable business segments. The costs of these services, including compensation-related costs, are allocated from Corporate to the respective reportable business segments, with the allocations recorded in noncompensation expense. (e)In the first quarter of 2023, the allocations of revenue and expense to CCB associated with a Merchant Services revenue sharing agreement were discontinued and are now retained in Payments in CIB. Prior-period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation. (f)Included a $7.9 billion net gain related to Visa shares recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. (g)Included a $1.0 billion contribution of Visa shares to the JPMorgan Chase Foundation recorded in the second quarter of 2024. Refer to Notes 2 and 6 for additional information. 316JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 316JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 316JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 316 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

The following tables present Parent Company-only financial statements. Statements of income and comprehensive incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022IncomeDividends from subsidiaries and affiliates:Bank and bank holding company$37,000 $61,000 $40,500 Non-bank— — — Interest income from subsidiaries1,228 1,166 498 Other income/(expense) from subsidiaries:Bank and bank holding company555 1,801 (3,497)Non-bank172 250 335 Other income/(expense)1,252 (654)5,271 Total income40,207 63,563 43,107 ExpenseInterest expense/(income) to subsidiaries and affiliates(a)7,433 2,258 22,731 Other interest expense/(income)(a)8,068 11,714 (14,658)Noninterest expense3,280 3,431 2,817 Total expense18,781 17,403 10,890 Income before income tax benefit and undistributed net income of subsidiaries21,426 46,160 32,217 Income tax benefit1,264 1,525 1,260 Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries35,781 1,867 4,199 Net income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Other comprehensive income/(loss), net(2,013)6,898 (17,257)Comprehensive income$56,458 $56,450 $20,419 Balance sheetsDecember 31, (in millions)20242023AssetsCash and due from banks$38 $42 Deposits with banking subsidiaries9,762 9,804 Trading assets43,214 3,198 Advances to, and receivables from, subsidiaries:Bank and bank holding company142 152 Non-bank79 21 Investments (at equity) in subsidiaries and affiliates:Bank and bank holding company603,044 568,472 Non-bank1,238 1,045 Other assets12,097 8,962 Total assets$669,614 $591,696 Liabilities and stockholders’ equityBorrowings from, and payables to, subsidiaries and affiliates$72,881 $22,777 Short-term borrowings— 999 Other liabilities12,349 11,500 Long-term debt(b)(c)239,626 228,542 Total liabilities(c)324,856 263,818 Total stockholders’ equity344,758 327,878 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$669,614 $591,696 The following tables present Parent Company-only financial statements. Statements of income and comprehensive incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022IncomeDividends from subsidiaries and affiliates:Bank and bank holding company$37,000 $61,000 $40,500 Non-bank— — — Interest income from subsidiaries1,228 1,166 498 Other income/(expense) from subsidiaries:Bank and bank holding company555 1,801 (3,497)Non-bank172 250 335 Other income/(expense)1,252 (654)5,271 Total income40,207 63,563 43,107 ExpenseInterest expense/(income) to subsidiaries and affiliates(a)7,433 2,258 22,731 Other interest expense/(income)(a)8,068 11,714 (14,658)Noninterest expense3,280 3,431 2,817 Total expense18,781 17,403 10,890 Income before income tax benefit and undistributed net income of subsidiaries21,426 46,160 32,217 Income tax benefit1,264 1,525 1,260 Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries35,781 1,867 4,199 Net income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Other comprehensive income/(loss), net(2,013)6,898 (17,257)Comprehensive income$56,458 $56,450 $20,419 The following tables present Parent Company-only financial statements. Statements of income and comprehensive incomeYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022IncomeDividends from subsidiaries and affiliates:Bank and bank holding company$37,000 $61,000 $40,500 Non-bank— — — Interest income from subsidiaries1,228 1,166 498 Other income/(expense) from subsidiaries:Bank and bank holding company555 1,801 (3,497)Non-bank172 250 335 Other income/(expense)1,252 (654)5,271 Total income40,207 63,563 43,107 ExpenseInterest expense/(income) to subsidiaries and affiliates(a)7,433 2,258 22,731 Other interest expense/(income)(a)8,068 11,714 (14,658)Noninterest expense3,280 3,431 2,817 Total expense18,781 17,403 10,890 Income before income tax benefit and undistributed net income of subsidiaries21,426 46,160 32,217 Income tax benefit1,264 1,525 1,260 Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries35,781 1,867 4,199 Net income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Other comprehensive income/(loss), net(2,013)6,898 (17,257)Comprehensive income$56,458 $56,450 $20,419

Interest expense/(income) to subsidiaries and affiliates(a) Other interest expense/(income)(a) Balance sheetsDecember 31, (in millions)20242023AssetsCash and due from banks$38 $42 Deposits with banking subsidiaries9,762 9,804 Trading assets43,214 3,198 Advances to, and receivables from, subsidiaries:Bank and bank holding company142 152 Non-bank79 21 Investments (at equity) in subsidiaries and affiliates:Bank and bank holding company603,044 568,472 Non-bank1,238 1,045 Other assets12,097 8,962 Total assets$669,614 $591,696 Liabilities and stockholders’ equityBorrowings from, and payables to, subsidiaries and affiliates$72,881 $22,777 Short-term borrowings— 999 Other liabilities12,349 11,500 Long-term debt(b)(c)239,626 228,542 Total liabilities(c)324,856 263,818 Total stockholders’ equity344,758 327,878 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$669,614 $591,696 Balance sheetsDecember 31, (in millions)20242023AssetsCash and due from banks$38 $42 Deposits with banking subsidiaries9,762 9,804 Trading assets43,214 3,198 Advances to, and receivables from, subsidiaries:Bank and bank holding company142 152 Non-bank79 21 Investments (at equity) in subsidiaries and affiliates:Bank and bank holding company603,044 568,472 Non-bank1,238 1,045 Other assets12,097 8,962 Total assets$669,614 $591,696 Liabilities and stockholders’ equityBorrowings from, and payables to, subsidiaries and affiliates$72,881 $22,777 Short-term borrowings— 999 Other liabilities12,349 11,500 Long-term debt(b)(c)239,626 228,542 Total liabilities(c)324,856 263,818 Total stockholders’ equity344,758 327,878 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$669,614 $591,696 Long-term debt(b)(c)

Statements of cash flowsYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating activitiesNet income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Less: Net income of subsidiaries and affiliates72,781 62,868 44,699 Parent company net loss(14,310)(13,316)(7,023)Cash dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates37,000 61,000 40,500 Other operating adjustments(44,671)9,412 (23,747)Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities(21,981)57,096 9,730 Investing activitiesNet change in:Advances to and investments in subsidiaries and affiliates, net— (25,000)— All other investing activities, net21 25 31 Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities21 (24,975)31 Financing activitiesNet change in:Borrowings from subsidiaries and affiliates49,902 (2,249)(4,491)Short-term borrowings(999)— — Proceeds from long-term borrowings44,997 19,398 41,389 Payments of long-term borrowings(29,753)(25,105)(18,294)Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock2,500 — — Redemption of preferred stock(9,850)— (7,434)Treasury stock repurchased(18,830)(9,824)(3,162)Dividends paid(14,783)(13,463)(13,562)All other financing activities, net(1,270)(879)(1,205)Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities21,914 (32,122)(6,759)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries(46)(1)3,002 Cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries at the beginning of the year9,846 9,847 6,845 Cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries at the end of the year$9,800 $9,846 $9,847 Cash interest paid$14,851 $13,742 $7,462 Cash income taxes paid, net(d)6,252 10,291 6,941 (a)Includes interest expense for intercompany derivative hedges on the Firm’s LTD and related fair value adjustments, which is offset by related amounts in Other interest expense/(income).(b)At December 31, 2024, long-term debt that contractually matures in 2025 through 2029 totaled $7.7 billion, $29.3 billion, $20.2 billion, $35.0 billion, and $18.5 billion, respectively.(c)Refer to Notes 20 and 28 for information regarding the Parent Company’s guarantees of its subsidiaries’ obligations.(d)Represents payments, net of refunds, made by the Parent Company to various taxing authorities and includes taxes paid on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries that are subsequently reimbursed. The reimbursements were $5.0 billion, $13.2 billion, and $11.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Statements of cash flowsYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating activitiesNet income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Less: Net income of subsidiaries and affiliates72,781 62,868 44,699 Parent company net loss(14,310)(13,316)(7,023)Cash dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates37,000 61,000 40,500 Other operating adjustments(44,671)9,412 (23,747)Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities(21,981)57,096 9,730 Investing activitiesNet change in:Advances to and investments in subsidiaries and affiliates, net— (25,000)— All other investing activities, net21 25 31 Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities21 (24,975)31 Financing activitiesNet change in:Borrowings from subsidiaries and affiliates49,902 (2,249)(4,491)Short-term borrowings(999)— — Proceeds from long-term borrowings44,997 19,398 41,389 Payments of long-term borrowings(29,753)(25,105)(18,294)Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock2,500 — — Redemption of preferred stock(9,850)— (7,434)Treasury stock repurchased(18,830)(9,824)(3,162)Dividends paid(14,783)(13,463)(13,562)All other financing activities, net(1,270)(879)(1,205)Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities21,914 (32,122)(6,759)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries(46)(1)3,002 Cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries at the beginning of the year9,846 9,847 6,845 Cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries at the end of the year$9,800 $9,846 $9,847 Cash interest paid$14,851 $13,742 $7,462 Cash income taxes paid, net(d)6,252 10,291 6,941 (a)Includes interest expense for intercompany derivative hedges on the Firm’s LTD and related fair value adjustments, which is offset by related amounts in Other interest expense/(income). Statements of cash flowsYear ended December 31, (in millions)202420232022Operating activitiesNet income$58,471 $49,552 $37,676 Less: Net income of subsidiaries and affiliates72,781 62,868 44,699 Parent company net loss(14,310)(13,316)(7,023)Cash dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates37,000 61,000 40,500 Other operating adjustments(44,671)9,412 (23,747)Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities(21,981)57,096 9,730 Investing activitiesNet change in:Advances to and investments in subsidiaries and affiliates, net— (25,000)— All other investing activities, net21 25 31 Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities21 (24,975)31 Financing activitiesNet change in:Borrowings from subsidiaries and affiliates49,902 (2,249)(4,491)Short-term borrowings(999)— — Proceeds from long-term borrowings44,997 19,398 41,389 Payments of long-term borrowings(29,753)(25,105)(18,294)Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock2,500 — — Redemption of preferred stock(9,850)— (7,434)Treasury stock repurchased(18,830)(9,824)(3,162)Dividends paid(14,783)(13,463)(13,562)All other financing activities, net(1,270)(879)(1,205)Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities21,914 (32,122)(6,759)Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries(46)(1)3,002 Cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries at the beginning of the year9,846 9,847 6,845 Cash and due from banks and deposits with banking subsidiaries at the end of the year$9,800 $9,846 $9,847 Cash interest paid$14,851 $13,742 $7,462 Cash income taxes paid, net(d)6,252 10,291 6,941 Cash income taxes paid, net(d) (a)Includes interest expense for intercompany derivative hedges on the Firm’s LTD and related fair value adjustments, which is offset by related amounts in Other interest expense/(income). (b)At December 31, 2024, long-term debt that contractually matures in 2025 through 2029 totaled $7.7 billion, $29.3 billion, $20.2 billion, $35.0 billion, and $18.5 billion, respectively.(c)Refer to Notes 20 and 28 for information regarding the Parent Company’s guarantees of its subsidiaries’ obligations.(d)Represents payments, net of refunds, made by the Parent Company to various taxing authorities and includes taxes paid on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries that are subsequently reimbursed. The reimbursements were $5.0 billion, $13.2 billion, and $11.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (b)At December 31, 2024, long-term debt that contractually matures in 2025 through 2029 totaled $7.7 billion, $29.3 billion, $20.2 billion, $35.0 billion, and $18.5 billion, respectively. (c)Refer to Notes 20 and 28 for information regarding the Parent Company’s guarantees of its subsidiaries’ obligations. (d)Represents payments, net of refunds, made by the Parent Company to various taxing authorities and includes taxes paid on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries that are subsequently reimbursed. The reimbursements were $5.0 billion, $13.2 billion, and $11.3 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. 318JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 318JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 318JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 318 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

On May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the "First Republic acquisition") from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver. The acquisition resulted in a bargain purchase gain, which represents the excess of the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired above the purchase price. The Firm has determined that this acquisition constitutes a business combination under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, the initial recognition of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were generally measured at their estimated fair values as of May 1, 2023. The determination of those fair values required management to make certain market-based assumptions about expected future cash flows, discount rates and other valuation inputs at the time of the acquisition. The Firm believes that the fair value estimates of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed provide a reasonable basis for determining the estimated bargain purchase gain. The First Republic acquisition resulted in a preliminary estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.7 billion. The final bargain purchase gain of $2.9 billion reflects adjustments of $103 million and $63 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, made during the one-year measurement period, as permitted by U.S. GAAP, to finalize management's fair value estimates for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As of December 31, 2024, certain matters related to the final settlement remained outstanding between the Firm and the FDIC. On January 17, 2025, the Firm reached an agreement with the FDIC with respect to certain outstanding items. As a result of the agreement, the Firm made a payment of $609 million to the FDIC on January 31, 2025 and reduced its additional payable to the FDIC, which will result in a gain of approximately $600 million to be recorded in other income in the first quarter of 2025.In connection with the First Republic acquisition, the Firm and the FDIC entered into two shared-loss agreements with respect to certain loans and lending-related commitments (the "shared-loss assets"): the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement ("CSLA") and the Single-Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SFSLA”). The CSLA covers 80% of credit losses, on a pari passu basis, over 5 years with a subsequent 3-year recovery period for certain acquired commercial loans and other real estate exposure. The SFSLA covers 80% of credit losses, on a pari passu basis, for 7 years for certain acquired loans secured by mortgages on real property or shares in cooperative property constituting a primary residence. The indemnification assets, which represent the fair value of the CSLA and SFSLA on the acquisition date, are reflected in the total assets acquired.As part of the consideration paid, JPMorganChase issued a five-year, $50 billion secured note to the FDIC (the "Purchase Money Note"). The Purchase Money Note bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.4% and is secured by certain of the acquired loans. The Purchase Money Note is prepayable upon notice to the holder.The Firm had placed a $5 billion deposit with First Republic Bank on March 16, 2023, as part of $30 billion of deposits provided by a consortium of large U.S. banks. The Firm's $5 billion deposit was effectively settled as part of the acquisition and the associated allowance for credit losses was released upon closing. The Firm subsequently repaid the remaining $25 billion of deposits to the consortium of banks, including accrued interest through the payment date on May 9, 2023. On May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the "First Republic acquisition") from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver. The acquisition resulted in a bargain purchase gain, which represents the excess of the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired above the purchase price. The Firm has determined that this acquisition constitutes a business combination under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, the initial recognition of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were generally measured at their estimated fair values as of May 1, 2023. The determination of those fair values required management to make certain market-based assumptions about expected future cash flows, discount rates and other valuation inputs at the time of the acquisition. The Firm believes that the fair value estimates of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed provide a reasonable basis for determining the estimated bargain purchase gain. The First Republic acquisition resulted in a preliminary estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.7 billion. The final bargain purchase gain of $2.9 billion reflects adjustments of $103 million and $63 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, made during the one-year measurement period, as permitted by U.S. GAAP, to finalize management's fair value estimates for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As of December 31, 2024, certain matters related to the final settlement remained outstanding between the Firm and the FDIC. On January 17, 2025, the Firm reached an agreement with the FDIC with respect to certain outstanding items. As a result of the agreement, the Firm made a payment of $609 million to the FDIC on January 31, 2025 and reduced its additional payable to the FDIC, which will result in a gain of approximately $600 million to be recorded in other income in the first quarter of 2025. On May 1, 2023, JPMorganChase acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of First Republic Bank (the "First Republic acquisition") from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver. The acquisition resulted in a bargain purchase gain, which represents the excess of the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired above the purchase price. The Firm has determined that this acquisition constitutes a business combination under U.S. GAAP. Accordingly, the initial recognition of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were generally measured at their estimated fair values as of May 1, 2023. The determination of those fair values required management to make certain market-based assumptions about expected future cash flows, discount rates and other valuation inputs at the time of the acquisition. The Firm believes that the fair value estimates of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed provide a reasonable basis for determining the estimated bargain purchase gain. The First Republic acquisition resulted in a preliminary estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.7 billion. The final bargain purchase gain of $2.9 billion reflects adjustments of $103 million and $63 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, made during the one-year measurement period, as permitted by U.S. GAAP, to finalize management's fair value estimates for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. As of December 31, 2024, certain matters related to the final settlement remained outstanding between the Firm and the FDIC. On January 17, 2025, the Firm reached an agreement with the FDIC with respect to certain outstanding items. As a result of the agreement, the Firm made a payment of $609 million to the FDIC on January 31, 2025 and reduced its additional payable to the FDIC, which will result in a gain of approximately $600 million to be recorded in other income in the first quarter of 2025. In connection with the First Republic acquisition, the Firm and the FDIC entered into two shared-loss agreements with respect to certain loans and lending-related commitments (the "shared-loss assets"): the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement ("CSLA") and the Single-Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SFSLA”). The CSLA covers 80% of credit losses, on a pari passu basis, over 5 years with a subsequent 3-year recovery period for certain acquired commercial loans and other real estate exposure. The SFSLA covers 80% of credit losses, on a pari passu basis, for 7 years for certain acquired loans secured by mortgages on real property or shares in cooperative property constituting a primary residence. The indemnification assets, which represent the fair value of the CSLA and SFSLA on the acquisition date, are reflected in the total assets acquired.As part of the consideration paid, JPMorganChase issued a five-year, $50 billion secured note to the FDIC (the "Purchase Money Note"). The Purchase Money Note bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.4% and is secured by certain of the acquired loans. The Purchase Money Note is prepayable upon notice to the holder.The Firm had placed a $5 billion deposit with First Republic Bank on March 16, 2023, as part of $30 billion of deposits provided by a consortium of large U.S. banks. The Firm's $5 billion deposit was effectively settled as part of the acquisition and the associated allowance for credit losses was released upon closing. The Firm subsequently repaid the remaining $25 billion of deposits to the consortium of banks, including accrued interest through the payment date on May 9, 2023. In connection with the First Republic acquisition, the Firm and the FDIC entered into two shared-loss agreements with respect to certain loans and lending-related commitments (the "shared-loss assets"): the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement ("CSLA") and the Single-Family Shared-Loss Agreement (“SFSLA”). The CSLA covers 80% of credit losses, on a pari passu basis, over 5 years with a subsequent 3-year recovery period for certain acquired commercial loans and other real estate exposure. The SFSLA covers 80% of credit losses, on a pari passu basis, for 7 years for certain acquired loans secured by mortgages on real property or shares in cooperative property constituting a primary residence. The indemnification assets, which represent the fair value of the CSLA and SFSLA on the acquisition date, are reflected in the total assets acquired. As part of the consideration paid, JPMorganChase issued a five-year, $50 billion secured note to the FDIC (the "Purchase Money Note"). The Purchase Money Note bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.4% and is secured by certain of the acquired loans. The Purchase Money Note is prepayable upon notice to the holder. The Firm had placed a $5 billion deposit with First Republic Bank on March 16, 2023, as part of $30 billion of deposits provided by a consortium of large U.S. banks. The Firm's $5 billion deposit was effectively settled as part of the acquisition and the associated allowance for credit losses was released upon closing. The Firm subsequently repaid the remaining $25 billion of deposits to the consortium of banks, including accrued interest through the payment date on May 9, 2023. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K319 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K319 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K319 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 319

The computation of the purchase price, the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as part of the First Republic acquisition and the related bargain purchase gain are presented below, which reflects adjustments made during the measurement period to the acquisition-date fair value of the net assets acquired. The measurement period ended on April 30, 2024. Fair value purchaseprice allocation as ofMay 1, 2023(in millions)Purchase price considerationAmounts paid/due to the FDIC, net of cash acquired(a)$13,555 Purchase Money Note (at fair value)(b)48,848 Settlement of First Republic deposit and other related party transactions(c)5,447 Contingent consideration - Shared-loss agreements15 Purchase price consideration$67,865 Assets Securities$30,285 Loans153,242 Core deposit and customer relationship intangibles1,455 Indemnification assets - Shared-loss agreements675 Accounts receivable and other assets(d)6,740 Total assets acquired$192,397 LiabilitiesDeposits$87,572 FHLB advances27,919 Lending-related commitments2,614 Accounts payable and other liabilities(d)2,792 Deferred tax liabilities757 Total liabilities assumed$121,654 Fair value of net assets acquired$70,743 Gain on acquisition, after income taxes$2,878 Amounts paid/due to the FDIC, net of cash acquired(a) Purchase Money Note (at fair value)(b) Settlement of First Republic deposit and other related party transactions(c) Accounts receivable and other assets(d) Accounts payable and other liabilities(d) (a)Net of cash acquired of $680 million, and including disputed amounts with the FDIC as of April 30, 2024. (b)As part of the consideration paid, JPMorganChase issued a five-year, $50 billion secured note to the FDIC (the "Purchase Money Note"). (c)Includes $447 million of securities financing transactions with First Republic Bank that were effectively settled on the acquisition date. (d)Other assets include $1.2 billion in tax-oriented investments and $683 million of lease right-of-use assets. Other liabilities include the related tax-oriented investment liabilities of $669 million and lease liabilities of $748 million. The following describes the accounting policies and fair value methodologies generally used by the Firm for the following assets acquired and liabilities assumed: core deposit and customer relationship intangibles, shared-loss agreements and the related indemnification assets, Purchase Money Note, and FHLB advances. For further discussion of the Firm’s accounting policies and valuation methodologies, refer to Notes 2 and 3 for fair value measurement, Note 10 for investment securities, Note 12 for loans, Note 17 for deposits, and Note 28 for lending-related commitments. Core deposit and customer relationship intangiblesCore deposit and certain wealth management customer relationship intangibles were acquired as part of the First Republic acquisition. The core deposit intangible of $1.3 billion was valued by discounting estimated after-tax cost savings over the remaining useful life of the deposits using the favorable source of funds method. The after-tax cost savings were estimated based on the difference between the cost of maintaining the core deposit base relative to the cost of next best alternative funding sources available to market participants. The customer relationship intangibles of $180 million were valued by discounting estimated after-tax earnings over their remaining useful lives using the multi-period excess earnings method. Both intangible asset valuations utilized assumptions that the Firm believes a market participant would use to estimate fair values, such as growth and attrition rates, projected fee income as well as related costs to service the relationships, and discount rates. The core deposit and customer relationship intangibles are amortized over a projected period of future cash flows of approximately 7 years. Refer to Note 15 for further discussion on other intangible assets. Core deposit and customer relationship intangiblesCore deposit and certain wealth management customer relationship intangibles were acquired as part of the First Republic acquisition. The core deposit intangible of $1.3 billion was valued by discounting estimated after-tax cost savings over the remaining useful life of the deposits using the favorable source of funds method. The after-tax cost savings were estimated based on the difference between the cost of maintaining the core deposit base relative to the cost of next best alternative funding sources available to market participants. The customer relationship intangibles of $180 million were valued by discounting estimated after-tax earnings over their remaining useful lives using the multi-period excess earnings

Core deposit and certain wealth management customer relationship intangibles were acquired as part of the First Republic acquisition. The core deposit intangible of $1.3 billion was valued by discounting estimated after-tax cost savings over the remaining useful life of the deposits using the favorable source of funds method. The after-tax cost savings were estimated based on the difference between the cost of maintaining the core deposit base relative to the cost of next best alternative funding sources available to market participants. The customer relationship intangibles of $180 million were valued by discounting estimated after-tax earnings over their remaining useful lives using the multi-period excess earnings method. Both intangible asset valuations utilized assumptions that the Firm believes a market participant would use to estimate fair values, such as growth and attrition rates, projected fee income as well as related costs to service the relationships, and discount rates. The core deposit and customer relationship intangibles are amortized over a projected period of future cash flows of approximately 7 years. Refer to Note 15 for further discussion on other intangible assets. method. Both intangible asset valuations utilized assumptions that the Firm believes a market participant would use to estimate fair values, such as growth and attrition rates, projected fee income as well as related costs to service the relationships, and discount rates. The core deposit and customer relationship intangibles are amortized over a projected period of future cash flows of approximately 7 years. Refer to Note 15 for further discussion on other intangible assets. 320JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 320JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 320JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 320 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K Indemnification assets - Shared-loss agreementsThe indemnification assets represent forecasted recoveries from the FDIC associated with the shared-loss assets over the respective shared-loss recovery periods. The indemnification assets were recorded at fair value in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets on the acquisition date. The fair values of the indemnification assets were estimated based on the timing of the forecasted losses underlying the related allowance for credit losses. The subsequent quarterly remeasurement of the indemnification assets is based on changes in the amount and timing of forecasted losses in the allowance for credit losses associated with the shared-loss assets and is recorded in other income. Under certain circumstances, the Firm may be required to make a payment to the FDIC upon termination of the shared-loss agreements based on the level of actual losses and recoveries on the shared-loss assets. The estimated potential future payment is reflected as contingent consideration as part of the purchase price consideration.Purchase Money Note and FHLB advancesThe Purchase Money Note is recorded in long-term debt on the Consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the Purchase Money Note was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology and incorporated estimated market discount rates. The FHLB advances assumed in the acquisition are recorded in short-term borrowings and in long-term debt. The fair values of the FHLB advances were based on a discounted cash flow methodology and considered the observed FHLB advance issuance rates. Indemnification assets - Shared-loss agreementsThe indemnification assets represent forecasted recoveries from the FDIC associated with the shared-loss assets over the respective shared-loss recovery periods. The indemnification assets were recorded at fair value in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets on the acquisition date. The fair values of the indemnification assets were estimated based on the timing of the forecasted losses underlying the related allowance for credit losses. The subsequent quarterly remeasurement of the indemnification assets is based on changes in the amount and timing of forecasted losses in the allowance for credit losses associated with the shared-loss assets and is recorded in other income. Under certain circumstances, the Firm may be required to make a payment to the FDIC upon termination of the shared-loss agreements based on the level of actual losses and recoveries on the shared-loss assets. The estimated potential future payment is reflected as contingent consideration as part of the purchase price consideration.

The indemnification assets represent forecasted recoveries from the FDIC associated with the shared-loss assets over the respective shared-loss recovery periods. The indemnification assets were recorded at fair value in other assets on the Consolidated balance sheets on the acquisition date. The fair values of the indemnification assets were estimated based on the timing of the forecasted losses underlying the related allowance for credit losses. The subsequent quarterly remeasurement of the indemnification assets is based on changes in the amount and timing of forecasted losses in the allowance for credit losses associated with the shared-loss assets and is recorded in other income. Under certain circumstances, the Firm may be required to make a payment to the FDIC upon termination of the shared-loss agreements based on the level of actual losses and recoveries on the shared-loss assets. The estimated potential future payment is reflected as contingent consideration as part of the purchase price consideration. Purchase Money Note and FHLB advancesThe Purchase Money Note is recorded in long-term debt on the Consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the Purchase Money Note was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology and incorporated estimated market discount rates. The FHLB advances assumed in the acquisition are recorded in short-term borrowings and in long-term debt. The fair values of the FHLB advances were based on a discounted cash flow methodology and considered the observed FHLB advance issuance rates.

The Purchase Money Note is recorded in long-term debt on the Consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the Purchase Money Note was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology and incorporated estimated market discount rates. The FHLB advances assumed in the acquisition are recorded in short-term borrowings and in long-term debt. The fair values of the FHLB advances were based on a discounted cash flow methodology and considered the observed FHLB advance issuance rates. Loans The following table presents the unpaid principal balance ("UPB") and fair values of the loans acquired as of May 1, 2023, and reflects adjustments made during the measurement period to the acquisition-date fair value of the loans acquired. May 1, 2023 (in millions)UPBFair valueResidential real estate$106,240 $92,053 Auto and other3,093 2,030 Total consumer109,333 94,083 Secured by real estate37,117 33,602 Commercial & industrial4,332 3,932 Other23,499 21,625 Total wholesale64,948 59,159 Total loans $174,281 $153,242

The following table presents certain unaudited pro forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 as if the First Republic acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2022, including recognition of the estimated bargain purchase gain of $2.8 billion and the provision for credit losses of $1.2 billion. Additional adjustments include the interest on the Purchase Money Note and the impact of amortizing and accreting certain estimated fair value adjustments related to intangible assets, loans and lending-related commitments. The Firm expects to achieve operating cost savings and other business synergies resulting from the acquisition that are not reflected in the pro forma amounts. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the historical results of operations had the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2022, nor is it indicative of the results of operations in future periods. Year ended December 31,(in millions)20232022Noninterest revenue$65,816 $66,510 Net interest income90,856 71,005 Net income48,665 41,089 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K321 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K321 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K321 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 321

Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and ratesProvided below is a summary of JPMorganChase’s consolidated average balances, interest and rates on a taxable-equivalent basis for the years 2022 through 2024. Income computed on a taxable-equivalent basis is the income reported in the Consolidated statements of income, adjusted to present interest income and rates earned on assets exempt from income taxes (i.e., federal taxes) on a basis comparable with other taxable investments. The incremental tax rate used for calculating the taxable-equivalent adjustment was approximately 24% in 2024, 2023 and 2022. Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and ratesProvided below is a summary of JPMorganChase’s consolidated average balances, interest and rates on a taxable-equivalent basis for the years 2022 through 2024. Income computed on a taxable-equivalent basis is the income reported in the Consolidated statements

Provided below is a summary of JPMorganChase’s consolidated average balances, interest and rates on a taxable-equivalent basis for the years 2022 through 2024. Income computed on a taxable-equivalent basis is the income reported in the Consolidated statements of income, adjusted to present interest income and rates earned on assets exempt from income taxes (i.e., federal taxes) on a basis comparable with other taxable investments. The incremental tax rate used for calculating the taxable-equivalent adjustment was approximately 24% in 2024, 2023 and 2022. of income, adjusted to present interest income and rates earned on assets exempt from income taxes (i.e., federal taxes) on a basis comparable with other taxable investments. The incremental tax rate used for calculating the taxable-equivalent adjustment was approximately 24% in 2024, 2023 and 2022. (Table continued on next page)(Unaudited)2024Year ended December 31,(Taxable-equivalent interest and rates; in millions, except rates)Averagebalance(f)Interest(f)RateAssetsDeposits with banks$490,205 $22,297 4.55 %Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements359,197 18,299 5.09 Securities borrowed209,744 9,208 4.39 Trading assets – debt instruments456,029 20,373 4.47 Taxable securities583,329 21,947 3.76 Non-taxable securities(a)27,912 1,393 4.99 Total investment securities611,241 23,340 3.82 (i)Loans1,322,425 92,588 (h)7.00 All other interest-earning assets(b)(c)88,726 8,305 9.36 Total interest-earning assets3,537,567 194,410 5.50 Allowance for loan losses(22,877)Cash and due from banks22,591 Trading assets – equity and other instruments208,534 Trading assets – derivative receivables57,005 Goodwill, MSRs and other intangible assets64,393 All other noninterest-earning assets218,709 Total assets$4,085,922 LiabilitiesInterest-bearing deposits$1,748,050 $49,559 2.84 %Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements363,820 19,149 5.26 Short-term borrowings39,593 2,101 5.31 Trading liabilities – debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(d)(e)314,054 10,238 3.26 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs26,515 1,383 5.22 Long-term debt344,346 18,920 5.49 Total interest-bearing liabilities2,836,378 101,350 3.57 Noninterest-bearing deposits638,592 Trading liabilities – equity and other instruments(e)32,025 Trading liabilities – derivative payables39,497 All other liabilities, including the allowance for lending-related commitments203,006 Total liabilities3,749,498 Stockholders’ equityPreferred stock24,054 Common stockholders’ equity312,370 Total stockholders’ equity336,424 (g)Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$4,085,922 Interest rate spread1.93 %Net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets$93,060 2.63 Average balance(f) Interest(f) Rate Non-taxable securities(a) (i) (h) All other interest-earning assets(b)(c) Short-term borrowings Trading liabilities – debt and all other interest-bearing liabilities(d)(e) Trading liabilities – equity and other instruments(e) (g) (a)Represents securities that are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes. (b)Includes brokerage-related held-for-investment customer receivables, which are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable, and all other interest-earning assets, which are classified in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. (c)The rates reflect the impact of interest earned on cash collateral where the cash collateral has been netted against certain derivative payables. (d)All other interest-bearing liabilities include brokerage-related customer payables. (e)The combined balance of trading liabilities – debt and equity instruments was $185.4 billion, $153.3 billion and $138.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (f)Includes the effect of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting where applicable. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used, also where applicable. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on hedge accounting. 322JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 322JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 322JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 322 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K (Table continued from previous page)20232022Averagebalance(f)Interest(f)RateAveragebalance(f)Interest(f)Rate$499,396 $21,797 4.36 %$670,773 $9,039 1.35 %317,159 15,079 4.75 307,150 4,632 1.51 193,228 7,983 4.13 205,516 2,237 1.09 376,928 16,001 4.25 283,108 9,097 3.21 573,914 17,390 3.03 626,122 10,372 1.66 30,886 1,560 5.05 27,863 1,224 4.39 604,800 18,950 3.13 (i)653,985 11,596 1.77 (i)1,248,076 83,589 (h)6.70 1,100,318 52,877 (h)4.81 86,121 7,669 8.90 128,229 3,763 2.93 3,325,708 171,068 5.14 3,349,079 93,241 2.78 (20,762)(17,399)24,853 27,601 160,087 140,778 64,227 78,606 63,212 59,467 204,899 215,408 $3,822,224 $3,853,540 $1,698,529 $40,016 2.36 %$1,748,666 $10,082 0.58 %256,086 13,259 5.18 242,762 3,721 1.53 37,468 1,894 5.05 46,063 747 1.62 286,605 9,396 3.28 268,019 3,246 1.21 18,648 953 5.11 11,208 226 2.02 296,433 15,803 5.33 250,080 8,075 3.23 2,593,769 81,321 3.14 2,566,798 26,097 1.02 660,538 719,249 30,501 39,155 46,355 57,388 181,601 185,989 3,512,764 3,568,579 27,404 31,893 282,056 253,068 309,460 (g)284,961 (g)$3,822,224 $3,853,540 2.00 %1.76 %$89,747 2.70 $67,144 2.00 Average balance(f) Interest(f) Rate Average balance(f) Interest(f) Rate (i) (i) (h) (h) (g) (g) (g)The ratio of average stockholders’ equity to average assets was 8.2%, 8.1% and 7.4% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The return on average stockholders’ equity, based on net income, was 17.4%, 16.0% and 13.2% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (h)Included fees and commissions on loans of $3.6 billion, $2.2 billion and $1.8 billion for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. (i)The annualized rate for securities based on amortized cost was 3.79%, 3.09% and 1.75% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected in AOCI. Within the Consolidated average balance sheets, interest and rates summary, the principal amounts of nonaccrual loans have been included in the average loan balances used to determine the average interest rate earned on loans. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on nonaccrual loans, including interest accrued. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K323 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K323 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K323 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 323

Presented below is a summary of interest and rates segregated between U.S. and non-U.S. operations for the years 2022 through 2024. The segregation of U.S. and non-U.S. components is based on the location of the office recording the transaction. (Table continued on next page)2024(Unaudited)Year ended December 31,(Taxable-equivalent interest and rates; in millions, except rates)Average balanceInterestRateInterest-earning assetsDeposits with banks:U.S.$284,913 $15,157 5.32 %Non-U.S.205,292 7,140 3.48 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements:U.S.193,210 10,686 5.53 Non-U.S.165,987 7,613 4.59 Securities borrowed:U.S.150,251 7,330 4.88 Non-U.S.59,493 1,878 3.16 Trading assets – debt instruments: U.S.309,568 13,579 4.39 Non-U.S.146,461 6,794 4.64 Investment securities:U.S.567,784 21,458 3.78 Non-U.S.43,457 1,882 4.33 Loans:U.S.1,211,978 85,621 7.06 Non-U.S.110,447 6,967 6.31 All other interest-earning assets, predominantly U.S.(a)88,726 8,305 9.36 Total interest-earning assets3,537,567 194,410 5.50 Interest-bearing liabilitiesInterest-bearing deposits:U.S.1,307,000 33,173 2.54 Non-U.S.441,050 16,386 3.72 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements:U.S.294,476 15,949 5.42 Non-U.S.69,344 3,200 4.61 Trading liabilities – debt, short-term and all other interest-bearing liabilities:U.S.222,710 8,289 3.72 Non-U.S.130,937 4,050 3.09 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs, predominantly U.S.26,515 1,383 5.22 Long-term debt:U.S.338,166 18,760 5.55 Non-U.S.6,180 160 2.59 Total interest-bearing liabilities2,836,378 101,350 3.57 Noninterest-bearing liabilities(b)701,189 Total investable funds$3,537,567 $101,350 2.86 %Net interest income and net yield:$93,060 2.63 %U.S.80,913 2.92 Non-U.S.12,147 1.58 Percentage of total assets and liabilities attributable to non-U.S. operations:Assets24.3 Liabilities20.5

Year ended December 31, (Taxable-equivalent interest and rates; in millions, except rates) Securities borrowed: All other interest-earning assets, predominantly U.S.(a) Trading liabilities – debt, short-term and all other interest-bearing liabilities: Noninterest-bearing liabilities(b) (a)The rates reflect the impact of interest earned on cash collateral where that cash collateral has been netted against certain derivative payables. (b)Represents the amount of noninterest-bearing liabilities funding interest-earning assets. Refer to the “Net interest income” discussion in Consolidated Results of Operations on pages 59–62 for further information. 324JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 324JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 324JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 324 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K (Table continued from previous page)20232022Average balanceInterestRateAverage balanceInterestRate$296,784 $15,348 5.17 %$456,366 $7,418 1.63 %202,612 6,449 3.18 214,407 1,621 0.76 155,304 8,330 5.36 130,213 2,191 1.68 161,855 6,749 4.17 176,937 2,441 1.38 133,805 6,239 4.66 142,736 1,811 1.27 59,423 1,744 2.93 62,780 426 0.68 248,541 10,721 4.31 170,975 5,414 3.17 128,387 5,280 4.11 112,133 3,683 3.28 568,505 17,469 3.07 623,285 10,994 1.76 36,295 1,481 4.08 30,700 602 1.96 1,137,162 76,884 6.76 985,187 48,953 4.97 110,914 6,705 6.05 115,131 3,924 3.41 86,121 7,669 8.90 128,229 3,763 2.93 3,325,708 171,068 5.14 3,349,079 93,241 2.78 1,290,110 26,253 2.03 1,358,322 7,026 0.52 408,419 13,763 3.37 390,344 3,056 0.78 197,049 10,639 5.40 173,016 3,083 1.78 59,037 2,620 4.44 69,746 638 0.91 205,388 7,774 3.79 194,570 2,384 1.23 118,685 3,516 2.96 119,512 1,609 1.35 18,648 953 5.11 11,208 226 2.02 293,218 15,749 5.37 246,670 8,026 3.25 3,215 54 1.68 3,410 49 1.44 2,593,769 81,321 3.14 2,566,798 26,097 1.02 731,939 782,281 $3,325,708 $81,321 2.45 %$3,349,079 $26,097 0.78 %$89,747 2.70 %$67,144 2.00 %77,923 3.01 58,950 2.27 11,824 1.61 8,194 1.09 24.7 24.9 20.2 20.6 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K325 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K325 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K325 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 325

The table below presents an attribution of net interest income between volume and rate. The attribution between volume and rate is calculated using annual average balances for each category of assets and liabilities shown in the table and the corresponding annual rates (refer to pages 322-325 for more information on average balances and rates). In this analysis, when the change cannot be isolated to either volume or rate, it has been allocated to volume. The annual rates include the impact of changes in market rates, as well as the impact of any change in composition of the various products within each category of asset or liability. This analysis is calculated separately for each category without consideration of the relationship between categories (for example, the net spread between the rates earned on assets and the rates paid on liabilities that fund those assets). As a result, changes in the granularity or groupings considered in this analysis would produce a different attribution result, and due to the complexities involved, precise allocation of changes in interest rates between volume and rates is inherently complex and judgmental. 2024 versus 20232023 versus 2022(Unaudited)Increase/(decrease) due to change in:Increase/(decrease) due to change in:Year ended December 31,(On a taxable-equivalent basis; in millions)VolumeRateNetchangeVolumeRateNetchangeInterest-earning assetsDeposits with banks:U.S.$(636)$445 $(191)$(8,225)$16,155 $7,930 Non-U.S.83 608 691 (361)5,189 4,828 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements:U.S.2,092 264 2,356 1,347 4,792 6,139 Non-U.S.184 680 864 (629)4,937 4,308 Securities borrowed:U.S.797 294 1,091 (411)4,839 4,428 Non-U.S.(3)137 134 (95)1,413 1,318 Trading assets – debt instruments:U.S.2,659 199 2,858 3,358 1,949 5,307 Non-U.S.834 680 1,514 666 931 1,597 Investment securities:U.S.(47)4,036 3,989 (1,690)8,165 6,475 Non-U.S.310 91 401 228 651 879 Loans: U.S.5,326 3,411 8,737 10,296 17,635 27,931 Non-U.S.(26)288 262 (258)3,039 2,781 All other interest-earning assets, predominantly U.S.240 396 636 (3,749)7,655 3,906 Change in interest income11,813 11,529 23,342 477 77,350 77,827 Interest-bearing liabilitiesInterest-bearing deposits:U.S.340 6,580 6,920 (1,284)20,511 19,227 Non-U.S.1,194 1,429 2,623 597 10,110 10,707 Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements:U.S.5,271 39 5,310 1,293 6,263 7,556 Non-U.S.480 100 580 (480)2,462 1,982 Trading liabilities – debt, short-term and all other interest-bearing liabilities:U.S.659 (144)515 409 4,981 5,390 Non-U.S.380 154 534 (17)1,924 1,907 Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs, predominantly U.S.409 21 430 381 346 727 Long-term debt:U.S.2,483 528 3,011 2,494 5,229 7,723 Non-U.S.77 29 106 (3)8 5 Change in interest expense11,293 8,736 20,029 3,390 51,834 55,224 Change in net interest income$520 $2,793 $3,313 $(2,913)$25,516 $22,603 Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements: Securities borrowed: Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements: Trading liabilities – debt, short-term and all other interest-bearing liabilities: Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs, predominantly U.S. 326JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 326JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 326JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 326 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

2023 Form 10-K: Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. ABS: Asset-backed securities Active foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings are ongoing. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states.AFS: Available-for-sale ALCO: Asset Liability CommitteeAlternative assets “Alternatives”: The following types of assets constitute alternative investments - hedge funds, currency, real estate, private equity and other investment funds designed to focus on nontraditional strategiesAmortized cost: Amount at which a financing receivable or investment is originated or acquired, adjusted for accretion or amortization of premium, discount, and net deferred fees or costs, collection of cash, charge-offs, foreign exchange, and fair value hedge accounting adjustments. For AFS securities, amortized cost is also reduced by any impairment losses recognized in earnings. Amortized cost is not reduced by the allowance for credit losses, except where explicitly presented net.AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) ARM: Adjustable rate mortgage(s)AUC: “Assets under custody”: Represents assets held directly or indirectly on behalf of clients under safekeeping, custody and servicing arrangements.AUM: “Assets under management”: Represent assets managed by AWM on behalf of its Private Banking, Institutional and Retail clients. Includes “Committed capital not Called.”Auto loan and lease origination volume: Dollar amount of auto loans and leases originated.AWM: Asset & Wealth ManagementBeneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs: Represents the interest of third-party holders of debt, equity securities, or other obligations, issued by VIEs that JPMorganChase consolidates. Benefit obligation: Refers to the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for OPEB plans. BHC: Bank holding companyBWM: Banking & Wealth ManagementBridge Financing Portfolio: A portfolio of held-for-sale unfunded loan commitments and funded loans. The unfunded commitments include both short-term bridge loan commitments that will ultimately be replaced by longer term financing as well as term loan commitments. The funded loans include term loans and funded revolver facilities.CB: Commercial BankingCCAR: Comprehensive Capital Analysis and ReviewCCB: Consumer & Community BankingCCB Consumer customer: A unique individual that has financial ownership or decision-making power with respect to accounts; excludes customers under the age of 18. Where a customer uses the same identifier as both a Consumer and a Small business, the customer is included in both metrics.CCB Small business customer: A unique business or legal entity that has financial ownership or decision-making power with respect to accounts. Where a customer uses the same identifier as both a Consumer and a Small business, the customer is included in both metrics.CCO: Chief Compliance OfficerCCP: “Central counterparty” is a clearing house that interposes itself between counterparties to contracts traded in one or more financial markets, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer and thereby ensuring the future performance of open contracts. A CCP becomes a counterparty to trades with market participants through novation, an open offer system, or another legally binding arrangement. CDS: Credit default swaps CECL: Current Expected Credit Losses CEO: Chief Executive Officer CET1 Capital: Common equity Tier 1 capital CFO: Chief Financial Officer CFP: Contingency funding planCFTC: Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCIB: Commercial & Investment BankCIO: Chief Investment Office Client assets: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage, administration and deposit accounts.Client deposits and other third-party liabilities: Deposits, as well as deposits that are swept to on-balance sheet liabilities (e.g., commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements) as part of client cash management programs. Client investment assets: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage and annuity accounts, and deposits held in investment accounts. CLO: Collateralized loan obligations CLTV: Combined loan-to-value CMT: Constant Maturity TreasuryCollateral-dependent: A loan is considered to be collateral-dependent when repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is 2023 Form 10-K: Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. ABS: Asset-backed securities Active foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings are ongoing. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states.AFS: Available-for-sale ALCO: Asset Liability CommitteeAlternative assets “Alternatives”: The following types of assets constitute alternative investments - hedge funds, currency, real estate, private equity and other investment funds designed to focus on nontraditional strategiesAmortized cost: Amount at which a financing receivable or investment is originated or acquired, adjusted for accretion or amortization of premium, discount, and net deferred fees or costs, collection of cash, charge-offs, foreign exchange, and fair value hedge accounting adjustments. For AFS securities, amortized cost is also reduced by any impairment losses recognized in earnings. Amortized cost is not reduced by the allowance for credit losses, except where explicitly presented net.AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) ARM: Adjustable rate mortgage(s)AUC: “Assets under custody”: Represents assets held directly or indirectly on behalf of clients under safekeeping, custody and servicing arrangements.AUM: “Assets under management”: Represent assets managed by AWM on behalf of its Private Banking, Institutional and Retail clients. Includes “Committed capital not Called.”Auto loan and lease origination volume: Dollar amount of auto loans and leases originated.AWM: Asset & Wealth ManagementBeneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs: Represents the interest of third-party holders of debt, equity securities, or other obligations, issued by VIEs that JPMorganChase consolidates. Benefit obligation: Refers to the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for OPEB plans. BHC: Bank holding companyBWM: Banking & Wealth ManagementBridge Financing Portfolio: A portfolio of held-for-sale unfunded loan commitments and funded loans. The unfunded commitments include both short-term bridge loan commitments that will ultimately be replaced by longer term financing as well as term loan commitments. The funded loans include term loans and funded revolver facilities. 2023 Form 10-K: Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. ABS: Asset-backed securities Active foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings are ongoing. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states. AFS: Available-for-sale ALCO: Asset Liability Committee Alternative assets “Alternatives”: The following types of assets constitute alternative investments - hedge funds, currency, real estate, private equity and other investment funds designed to focus on nontraditional strategies Amortized cost: Amount at which a financing receivable or investment is originated or acquired, adjusted for accretion or amortization of premium, discount, and net deferred fees or costs, collection of cash, charge-offs, foreign exchange, and fair value hedge accounting adjustments. For AFS securities, amortized cost is also reduced by any impairment losses recognized in earnings. Amortized cost is not reduced by the allowance for credit losses, except where explicitly presented net. AOCI: Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) ARM: Adjustable rate mortgage(s) AUC: “Assets under custody”: Represents assets held directly or indirectly on behalf of clients under safekeeping, custody and servicing arrangements. AUM: “Assets under management”: Represent assets managed by AWM on behalf of its Private Banking, Institutional and Retail clients. Includes “Committed capital not Called.” Auto loan and lease origination volume: Dollar amount of auto loans and leases originated. AWM: Asset & Wealth Management Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs: Represents the interest of third-party holders of debt, equity securities, or other obligations, issued by VIEs that JPMorganChase consolidates. Benefit obligation: Refers to the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for OPEB plans. BHC: Bank holding company BWM: Banking & Wealth Management Bridge Financing Portfolio: A portfolio of held-for-sale unfunded loan commitments and funded loans. The unfunded commitments include both short-term bridge loan commitments that will ultimately be replaced by longer term financing as well as term loan commitments. The funded loans include term loans and funded revolver facilities. CB: Commercial BankingCCAR: Comprehensive Capital Analysis and ReviewCCB: Consumer & Community BankingCCB Consumer customer: A unique individual that has financial ownership or decision-making power with respect to accounts; excludes customers under the age of 18. Where a customer uses the same identifier as both a Consumer and a Small business, the customer is included in both metrics.CCB Small business customer: A unique business or legal entity that has financial ownership or decision-making power with respect to accounts. Where a customer uses the same identifier as both a Consumer and a Small business, the customer is included in both metrics.CCO: Chief Compliance OfficerCCP: “Central counterparty” is a clearing house that interposes itself between counterparties to contracts traded in one or more financial markets, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer and thereby ensuring the future performance of open contracts. A CCP becomes a counterparty to trades with market participants through novation, an open offer system, or another legally binding arrangement. CDS: Credit default swaps CECL: Current Expected Credit Losses CEO: Chief Executive Officer CET1 Capital: Common equity Tier 1 capital CFO: Chief Financial Officer CFP: Contingency funding planCFTC: Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCIB: Commercial & Investment BankCIO: Chief Investment Office Client assets: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage, administration and deposit accounts.Client deposits and other third-party liabilities: Deposits, as well as deposits that are swept to on-balance sheet liabilities (e.g., commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements) as part of client cash management programs. Client investment assets: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage and annuity accounts, and deposits held in investment accounts. CLO: Collateralized loan obligations CLTV: Combined loan-to-value CMT: Constant Maturity TreasuryCollateral-dependent: A loan is considered to be collateral-dependent when repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is CB: Commercial Banking CCAR: Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review CCB: Consumer & Community Banking CCB Consumer customer: A unique individual that has financial ownership or decision-making power with respect to accounts; excludes customers under the age of 18. Where a customer uses the same identifier as both a Consumer and a Small business, the customer is included in both metrics. CCB Small business customer: A unique business or legal entity that has financial ownership or decision-making power with respect to accounts. Where a customer uses the same identifier as both a Consumer and a Small business, the customer is included in both metrics. CCO: Chief Compliance Officer CCP: “Central counterparty” is a clearing house that interposes itself between counterparties to contracts traded in one or more financial markets, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer and thereby ensuring the future performance of open contracts. A CCP becomes a counterparty to trades with market participants through novation, an open offer system, or another legally binding arrangement. CDS: Credit default swaps CECL: Current Expected Credit Losses CEO: Chief Executive Officer CET1 Capital: Common equity Tier 1 capital CFO: Chief Financial Officer CFP: Contingency funding plan CFTC: Commodity Futures Trading Commission CIB: Commercial & Investment Bank CIO: Chief Investment Office Client assets: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage, administration and deposit accounts. Client deposits and other third-party liabilities: Deposits, as well as deposits that are swept to on-balance sheet liabilities (e.g., commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements) as part of client cash management programs. Client investment assets: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage and annuity accounts, and deposits held in investment accounts. CLO: Collateralized loan obligations CLTV: Combined loan-to-value CMT: Constant Maturity Treasury Collateral-dependent: A loan is considered to be collateral-dependent when repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K327 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K327 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K327 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 327

experiencing financial difficulty, including when foreclosure is deemed probable based on borrower delinquency. Commercial Card: provides a wide range of payment services to corporate and public sector clients worldwide through the commercial card products. Services include procurement, corporate travel and entertainment, expense management services, and business-to-business payment solutions.Credit derivatives: Financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer (the reference entity) which allow one party (the protection purchaser) to transfer that risk to another party (the protection seller). Upon the occurrence of a credit event by the reference entity, which may include, among other events, the bankruptcy or failure to pay its obligations, or certain restructurings of the debt of the reference entity, neither party has recourse to the reference entity. The protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the CDS contract and the fair value at the time of settling the credit derivative contract. The determination as to whether a credit event has occurred is generally made by the relevant International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Determinations Committee. Criticized: Criticized loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables that are classified as special mention, substandard and doubtful categories for regulatory purposes and are generally consistent with a rating of CCC+/Caa1 and below, as defined by S&P and Moody’s. CRO: Chief Risk Officer CRR: Capital Requirements RegulationCTC: CIO, Treasury and CorporateCustom lending: Loans to AWM’s Global Private Bank clients, including loans to private investment funds and loans that are collateralized by nontraditional asset types, such as art work, aircraft, etc.CVA: Credit valuation adjustment Debit and credit card sales volume: Dollar amount of card member purchases, net of returns.Deposit margin: Represents net interest income expressed as a percentage of average deposits.Distributed denial-of-service attack: The use of a large number of remote computer systems to electronically send a high volume of traffic to a target website to create a service outage at the target. This is a form of cyberattack.Dodd-Frank Act: Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act DVA: Debit valuation adjustment EC: European Commission Eligible HQLA: Eligible high-quality liquid assets, for purposes of calculating the LCR, is the amount of unencumbered HQLA that satisfy certain operational considerations as defined in the LCR rule. Eligible LTD: Long-term debt satisfying certain eligibility criteriaEmbedded derivatives: are implicit or explicit terms or features of a financial instrument that affect some or all of the cash flows or the value of the instrument in a manner similar to a derivative. An instrument containing such terms or features is referred to as a “hybrid.” The component of the hybrid that is the non-derivative instrument is referred to as the “host.” For example, callable debt is a hybrid instrument that contains a plain vanilla debt instrument (i.e., the host) and an embedded option that allows the issuer to redeem the debt issue at a specified date for a specified amount (i.e., the embedded derivative). However, a floating rate instrument is not a hybrid composed of a fixed-rate instrument and an interest rate swap. EPS: Earnings per shareERISA: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ETD: “Exchange-traded derivatives”: Derivative contracts that are executed on an exchange and settled via a central clearing house.EU: European Union Expense categories:•Volume- and/or revenue-related expenses generally correlate with changes in the related business/transaction volume or revenue. Examples include commissions and incentive compensation within the LOBs, depreciation expense related to operating lease assets, and brokerage expense related to trading transaction volume.•Investments in the business include expenses associated with supporting medium- to longer-term strategic plans of the Firm. Examples include front office growth, market expansion, initiatives in technology (including related compensation), marketing, and acquisitions.•Structural expenses are those associated with the day-to-day cost of running the Firm and are expenses not included in the above two categories. Examples include employee salaries and benefits, certain other incentive compensation, and costs related to real estate.Fannie Mae: Federal National Mortgage Association FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board FCA: Financial Conduct Authority FCC: Firmwide Control Committee FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationFDM: "Financial difficulty modification" applies to loan modifications effective January 1, 2023, and is deemed experiencing financial difficulty, including when foreclosure is deemed probable based on borrower delinquency. Commercial Card: provides a wide range of payment services to corporate and public sector clients worldwide through the commercial card products. Services include procurement, corporate travel and entertainment, expense management services, and business-to-business payment solutions.Credit derivatives: Financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer (the reference entity) which allow one party (the protection purchaser) to transfer that risk to another party (the protection seller). Upon the occurrence of a credit event by the reference entity, which may include, among other events, the bankruptcy or failure to pay its obligations, or certain restructurings of the debt of the reference entity, neither party has recourse to the reference entity. The protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the CDS contract and the fair value at the time of settling the credit derivative contract. The determination as to whether a credit event has occurred is generally made by the relevant International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Determinations Committee. Criticized: Criticized loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables that are classified as special mention, substandard and doubtful categories for regulatory purposes and are generally consistent with a rating of CCC+/Caa1 and below, as defined by S&P and Moody’s. CRO: Chief Risk Officer CRR: Capital Requirements RegulationCTC: CIO, Treasury and CorporateCustom lending: Loans to AWM’s Global Private Bank clients, including loans to private investment funds and loans that are collateralized by nontraditional asset types, such as art work, aircraft, etc.CVA: Credit valuation adjustment Debit and credit card sales volume: Dollar amount of card member purchases, net of returns.Deposit margin: Represents net interest income expressed as a percentage of average deposits.Distributed denial-of-service attack: The use of a large number of remote computer systems to electronically send a high volume of traffic to a target website to create a service outage at the target. This is a form of cyberattack.Dodd-Frank Act: Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act DVA: Debit valuation adjustment EC: European Commission experiencing financial difficulty, including when foreclosure is deemed probable based on borrower delinquency. Commercial Card: provides a wide range of payment services to corporate and public sector clients worldwide through the commercial card products. Services include procurement, corporate travel and entertainment, expense management services, and business-to-business payment solutions. Credit derivatives: Financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer (the reference entity) which allow one party (the protection purchaser) to transfer that risk to another party (the protection seller). Upon the occurrence of a credit event by the reference entity, which may include, among other events, the bankruptcy or failure to pay its obligations, or certain restructurings of the debt of the reference entity, neither party has recourse to the reference entity. The protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the CDS contract and the fair value at the time of settling the credit derivative contract. The determination as to whether a credit event has occurred is generally made by the relevant International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Determinations Committee. Criticized: Criticized loans, lending-related commitments and derivative receivables that are classified as special mention, substandard and doubtful categories for regulatory purposes and are generally consistent with a rating of CCC+/Caa1 and below, as defined by S&P and Moody’s. CRO: Chief Risk Officer CRR: Capital Requirements Regulation CTC: CIO, Treasury and Corporate Custom lending: Loans to AWM’s Global Private Bank clients, including loans to private investment funds and loans that are collateralized by nontraditional asset types, such as art work, aircraft, etc. CVA: Credit valuation adjustment Debit and credit card sales volume: Dollar amount of card member purchases, net of returns. Deposit margin: Represents net interest income expressed as a percentage of average deposits. Distributed denial-of-service attack: The use of a large number of remote computer systems to electronically send a high volume of traffic to a target website to create a service outage at the target. This is a form of cyberattack. Dodd-Frank Act: Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act DVA: Debit valuation adjustment EC: European Commission Eligible HQLA: Eligible high-quality liquid assets, for purposes of calculating the LCR, is the amount of unencumbered HQLA that satisfy certain operational considerations as defined in the LCR rule. Eligible LTD: Long-term debt satisfying certain eligibility criteriaEmbedded derivatives: are implicit or explicit terms or features of a financial instrument that affect some or all of the cash flows or the value of the instrument in a manner similar to a derivative. An instrument containing such terms or features is referred to as a “hybrid.” The component of the hybrid that is the non-derivative instrument is referred to as the “host.” For example, callable debt is a hybrid instrument that contains a plain vanilla debt instrument (i.e., the host) and an embedded option that allows the issuer to redeem the debt issue at a specified date for a specified amount (i.e., the embedded derivative). However, a floating rate instrument is not a hybrid composed of a fixed-rate instrument and an interest rate swap. EPS: Earnings per shareERISA: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ETD: “Exchange-traded derivatives”: Derivative contracts that are executed on an exchange and settled via a central clearing house.EU: European Union Expense categories:•Volume- and/or revenue-related expenses generally correlate with changes in the related business/transaction volume or revenue. Examples include commissions and incentive compensation within the LOBs, depreciation expense related to operating lease assets, and brokerage expense related to trading transaction volume.•Investments in the business include expenses associated with supporting medium- to longer-term strategic plans of the Firm. Examples include front office growth, market expansion, initiatives in technology (including related compensation), marketing, and acquisitions.•Structural expenses are those associated with the day-to-day cost of running the Firm and are expenses not included in the above two categories. Examples include employee salaries and benefits, certain other incentive compensation, and costs related to real estate.Fannie Mae: Federal National Mortgage Association FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board FCA: Financial Conduct Authority FCC: Firmwide Control Committee FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationFDM: "Financial difficulty modification" applies to loan modifications effective January 1, 2023, and is deemed Eligible HQLA: Eligible high-quality liquid assets, for purposes of calculating the LCR, is the amount of unencumbered HQLA that satisfy certain operational considerations as defined in the LCR rule. Eligible LTD: Long-term debt satisfying certain eligibility criteria Embedded derivatives: are implicit or explicit terms or features of a financial instrument that affect some or all of the cash flows or the value of the instrument in a manner similar to a derivative. An instrument containing such terms or features is referred to as a “hybrid.” The component of the hybrid that is the non-derivative instrument is referred to as the “host.” For example, callable debt is a hybrid instrument that contains a plain vanilla debt instrument (i.e., the host) and an embedded option that allows the issuer to redeem the debt issue at a specified date for a specified amount (i.e., the embedded derivative). However, a floating rate instrument is not a hybrid composed of a fixed-rate instrument and an interest rate swap. EPS: Earnings per share ERISA: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ETD: “Exchange-traded derivatives”: Derivative contracts that are executed on an exchange and settled via a central clearing house. EU: European Union

•Volume- and/or revenue-related expenses generally correlate with changes in the related business/transaction volume or revenue. Examples include commissions and incentive compensation within the LOBs, depreciation expense related to operating lease assets, and brokerage expense related to trading transaction volume. •Investments in the business include expenses associated with supporting medium- to longer-term strategic plans of the Firm. Examples include front office growth, market expansion, initiatives in technology (including related compensation), marketing, and acquisitions. •Structural expenses are those associated with the day-to-day cost of running the Firm and are expenses not included in the above two categories. Examples include employee salaries and benefits, certain other incentive compensation, and costs related to real estate. Fannie Mae: Federal National Mortgage Association FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board FCA: Financial Conduct Authority FCC: Firmwide Control Committee FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDM: "Financial difficulty modification" applies to loan modifications effective January 1, 2023, and is deemed 328JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 328JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 328JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 328 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

to occur when the Firm modifies specific terms of the original loan agreement. The following types of modifications are considered FDMs: principal forgiveness, interest rate reduction, other-than-insignificant payment delay, term extension or a combination of these modifications. Federal Reserve: The Board of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System FFIEC: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council FHA: Federal Housing Administration FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank FICC: The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation FICO score: A measure of consumer credit risk provided by credit bureaus, typically produced from statistical models by Fair Isaac Corporation utilizing data collected by the credit bureaus. FINRA: Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityFirm: JPMorgan Chase & Co.Forward points: Represents the interest rate differential between two currencies, which is either added to or subtracted from the current exchange rate (i.e., “spot rate”) to determine the forward exchange rate.FRC: Firmwide Risk CommitteeFreddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage CorporationFree standing derivatives: a derivative contract entered into either separate and apart from any of the Firm’s other financial instruments or equity transactions. Or, in conjunction with some other transaction and is legally detachable and separately exercisable.FSB: Financial Stability BoardFTE: Fully taxable equivalentFVA: Funding valuation adjustment FX: Foreign exchange G7: Group of Seven nations: Countries in the G7 are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S. G7 government securities: Securities issued by the government of one of the G7 nations. Ginnie Mae: Government National Mortgage Association GSIB: Global systemically important banks HELOC: Home equity line of credit Home equity – senior lien: Represents loans and commitments where JPMorganChase holds the first security interest on the property. Home equity – junior lien: Represents loans and commitments where JPMorganChase holds a security interest that is subordinate in rank to other liens. HQLA: “High-quality liquid assets” consist of cash and certain high-quality liquid securities as defined in the LCR rule.HTM: Held-to-maturity IBOR: Interbank Offered RateICAAP: Internal capital adequacy assessment processIDI: Insured depository institutions IHC: JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC, an intermediate holding companyIndirect tax expense: Refers to taxes that are imposed on goods and services rather than on income. Examples of indirect taxes include value-added tax (“VAT”) and sales tax, among others.Investment-grade: An indication of credit quality based on JPMorganChase’s internal risk assessment. The Firm considers ratings of BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment-grade. IPO: Initial public offeringISDA: International Swaps and Derivatives Association JPMorganChase: JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association JPMorgan Chase Foundation or the Firm’s Foundation: A not-for-profit organization that makes contributions for charitable and educational purposes.J.P. Morgan Securities: J.P. Morgan Securities LLCJPMSE: J.P. Morgan SELCR: Liquidity coverage ratio LDA: Loss Distribution ApproachLGD: Loss given default LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate LLC: Limited Liability Company LOB: Line of businessLOB CROs: Line of Business and CTC Chief Risk OfficersLTIP: Long-term incentive plan LTV: “Loan-to-value”: For residential real estate loans, the relationship, expressed as a percentage, between the principal amount of a loan and the appraised value of the collateral (i.e., residential real estate) securing the loan. Origination date LTV ratio The LTV ratio at the origination date of the loan. Origination date LTV ratios are calculated based on the actual appraised values of collateral (i.e., loan-level data) at the origination date. Current estimated LTV ratioAn estimate of the LTV as of a certain date. The current estimated LTV ratios are calculated using estimated collateral values derived from a nationally recognized to occur when the Firm modifies specific terms of the original loan agreement. The following types of modifications are considered FDMs: principal forgiveness, interest rate reduction, other-than-insignificant payment delay, term extension or a combination of these modifications. Federal Reserve: The Board of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System FFIEC: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council FHA: Federal Housing Administration FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank FICC: The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation FICO score: A measure of consumer credit risk provided by credit bureaus, typically produced from statistical models by Fair Isaac Corporation utilizing data collected by the credit bureaus. FINRA: Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityFirm: JPMorgan Chase & Co.Forward points: Represents the interest rate differential between two currencies, which is either added to or subtracted from the current exchange rate (i.e., “spot rate”) to determine the forward exchange rate.FRC: Firmwide Risk CommitteeFreddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage CorporationFree standing derivatives: a derivative contract entered into either separate and apart from any of the Firm’s other financial instruments or equity transactions. Or, in conjunction with some other transaction and is legally detachable and separately exercisable.FSB: Financial Stability BoardFTE: Fully taxable equivalentFVA: Funding valuation adjustment FX: Foreign exchange G7: Group of Seven nations: Countries in the G7 are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S. G7 government securities: Securities issued by the government of one of the G7 nations. Ginnie Mae: Government National Mortgage Association GSIB: Global systemically important banks HELOC: Home equity line of credit Home equity – senior lien: Represents loans and commitments where JPMorganChase holds the first security interest on the property. Home equity – junior lien: Represents loans and commitments where JPMorganChase holds a security to occur when the Firm modifies specific terms of the original loan agreement. The following types of modifications are considered FDMs: principal forgiveness, interest rate reduction, other-than-insignificant payment delay, term extension or a combination of these modifications. Federal Reserve: The Board of the Governors of the Federal Reserve System FFIEC: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council FHA: Federal Housing Administration FHLB: Federal Home Loan Bank FICC: The Fixed Income Clearing Corporation FICO score: A measure of consumer credit risk provided by credit bureaus, typically produced from statistical models by Fair Isaac Corporation utilizing data collected by the credit bureaus. FINRA: Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Firm: JPMorgan Chase & Co. Forward points: Represents the interest rate differential between two currencies, which is either added to or subtracted from the current exchange rate (i.e., “spot rate”) to determine the forward exchange rate. FRC: Firmwide Risk Committee Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Free standing derivatives: a derivative contract entered into either separate and apart from any of the Firm’s other financial instruments or equity transactions. Or, in conjunction with some other transaction and is legally detachable and separately exercisable. FSB: Financial Stability Board FTE: Fully taxable equivalent FVA: Funding valuation adjustment FX: Foreign exchange G7: Group of Seven nations: Countries in the G7 are Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S. G7 government securities: Securities issued by the government of one of the G7 nations. Ginnie Mae: Government National Mortgage Association GSIB: Global systemically important banks HELOC: Home equity line of credit Home equity – senior lien: Represents loans and commitments where JPMorganChase holds the first security interest on the property. Home equity – junior lien: Represents loans and commitments where JPMorganChase holds a security interest that is subordinate in rank to other liens. HQLA: “High-quality liquid assets” consist of cash and certain high-quality liquid securities as defined in the LCR rule.HTM: Held-to-maturity IBOR: Interbank Offered RateICAAP: Internal capital adequacy assessment processIDI: Insured depository institutions IHC: JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC, an intermediate holding companyIndirect tax expense: Refers to taxes that are imposed on goods and services rather than on income. Examples of indirect taxes include value-added tax (“VAT”) and sales tax, among others.Investment-grade: An indication of credit quality based on JPMorganChase’s internal risk assessment. The Firm considers ratings of BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment-grade. IPO: Initial public offeringISDA: International Swaps and Derivatives Association JPMorganChase: JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association JPMorgan Chase Foundation or the Firm’s Foundation: A not-for-profit organization that makes contributions for charitable and educational purposes.J.P. Morgan Securities: J.P. Morgan Securities LLCJPMSE: J.P. Morgan SELCR: Liquidity coverage ratio LDA: Loss Distribution ApproachLGD: Loss given default LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate LLC: Limited Liability Company LOB: Line of businessLOB CROs: Line of Business and CTC Chief Risk OfficersLTIP: Long-term incentive plan LTV: “Loan-to-value”: For residential real estate loans, the relationship, expressed as a percentage, between the principal amount of a loan and the appraised value of the collateral (i.e., residential real estate) securing the loan. Origination date LTV ratio The LTV ratio at the origination date of the loan. Origination date LTV ratios are calculated based on the actual appraised values of collateral (i.e., loan-level data) at the origination date. Current estimated LTV ratioAn estimate of the LTV as of a certain date. The current estimated LTV ratios are calculated using estimated collateral values derived from a nationally recognized interest that is subordinate in rank to other liens. HQLA: “High-quality liquid assets” consist of cash and certain high-quality liquid securities as defined in the LCR rule. HTM: Held-to-maturity IBOR: Interbank Offered Rate ICAAP: Internal capital adequacy assessment process IDI: Insured depository institutions IHC: JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC, an intermediate holding company Indirect tax expense: Refers to taxes that are imposed on goods and services rather than on income. Examples of indirect taxes include value-added tax (“VAT”) and sales tax, among others. Investment-grade: An indication of credit quality based on JPMorganChase’s internal risk assessment. The Firm considers ratings of BBB-/Baa3 or higher as investment-grade. IPO: Initial public offering ISDA: International Swaps and Derivatives Association JPMorganChase: JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association JPMorgan Chase Foundation or the Firm’s Foundation: A not-for-profit organization that makes contributions for charitable and educational purposes. J.P. Morgan Securities: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC JPMSE: J.P. Morgan SE LCR: Liquidity coverage ratio LDA: Loss Distribution Approach LGD: Loss given default LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate LLC: Limited Liability Company LOB: Line of business LOB CROs: Line of Business and CTC Chief Risk Officers LTIP: Long-term incentive plan LTV: “Loan-to-value”: For residential real estate loans, the relationship, expressed as a percentage, between the principal amount of a loan and the appraised value of the collateral (i.e., residential real estate) securing the loan.

An estimate of the LTV as of a certain date. The current estimated LTV ratios are calculated using estimated collateral values derived from a nationally recognized JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K329 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K329 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K329 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 329

home price index measured at the metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”) level. These MSA-level home price indices consist of actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. As a result, the estimated collateral values used to calculate these ratios do not represent actual appraised loan-level collateral values; as such, the resulting LTV ratios are necessarily imprecise and should therefore be viewed as estimates. Combined LTV ratioThe LTV ratio considering all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. Combined LTV ratios are used for junior lien home equity products. Macro businesses: the macro businesses include Rates, Currencies and Emerging Markets, Fixed Income Financing and Commodities in CIB's Fixed Income Markets.Managed basis: A non-GAAP presentation of Firmwide financial results that includes reclassifications to present revenue on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Management also uses this financial measure at the segment level, because it believes this provides information to enable investors to understand the underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment and facilitates a comparison of the business segment with the performance of competitors. Markets: consists of CIB’s Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets businesses.Master netting agreement: A single agreement with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that agreement to be terminated or accelerated and settled through a single payment in a single currency in the event of a default (e.g., bankruptcy, failure to make a required payment or securities transfer or deliver collateral or margin when due).MBS: Mortgage-backed securities MD&A: Management’s discussion and analysisMeasurement alternative: Measures equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost less impairment (if any), plus or minus observable price changes from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Merchant Services: offers merchants payment processing capabilities, fraud and risk management, data and analytics, and other payments services. Through Merchant Services, merchants of all sizes can accept payments via credit and debit cards and payments in multiple currencies.MEV: Macroeconomic variableMoody’s: Moody’s Investor Services Mortgage origination channels:Retail – Borrowers who buy or refinance a home through direct contact with a mortgage banker employed by the Firm using a branch office, the Internet or by phone. Borrowers are frequently referred to a mortgage banker by a banker in a Chase branch, real estate brokers, home builders or other third parties.Correspondent – Banks, thrifts, other mortgage banks and other financial institutions that sell closed loans to the Firm.Mortgage product types: Alt-A Alt-A loans are generally higher in credit quality than subprime loans but have characteristics that would disqualify the borrower from a traditional prime loan. Alt-A lending characteristics may include one or more of the following: (i) limited documentation; (ii) a high CLTV ratio; (iii) loans secured by non-owner occupied properties; or (iv) a debt-to-income ratio above normal limits. A substantial proportion of the Firm’s Alt-A loans are those where a borrower does not provide complete documentation of his or her assets or the amount or source of his or her income. Option ARMs The option ARM real estate loan product is an adjustable-rate mortgage loan that provides the borrower with the option each month to make a fully amortizing, interest-only or minimum payment. The minimum payment on an option ARM loan is based on the interest rate charged during the introductory period. This introductory rate is usually significantly below the fully indexed rate. The fully indexed rate is calculated using an index rate plus a margin. Once the introductory period ends, the contractual interest rate charged on the loan increases to the fully indexed rate and adjusts monthly to reflect movements in the index. The minimum payment is typically insufficient to cover interest accrued in the prior month, and any unpaid interest is deferred and added to the principal balance of the loan. Option ARM loans are subject to payment recast, which converts the loan to a variable-rate fully amortizing loan upon meeting specified loan balance and anniversary date triggers. Prime Prime mortgage loans are made to borrowers with good credit records who meet specific underwriting requirements, including prescriptive requirements related to income and overall debt levels. New prime mortgage borrowers provide full documentation and generally have reliable payment histories. Subprime Subprime loans are loans that, prior to mid-2008, were offered to certain customers with one or more high risk characteristics, including but not limited to: (i) unreliable or poor payment histories; (ii) a high LTV ratio of greater than 80% (without borrower-paid mortgage insurance); (iii) a high debt-to-income ratio; (iv) an occupancy type for the loan is other than the borrower’s home price index measured at the metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”) level. These MSA-level home price indices consist of actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. As a result, the estimated collateral values used to calculate these ratios do not represent actual appraised loan-level collateral values; as such, the resulting LTV ratios are necessarily imprecise and should therefore be viewed as estimates. Combined LTV ratioThe LTV ratio considering all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. Combined LTV ratios are used for junior lien home equity products. Macro businesses: the macro businesses include Rates, Currencies and Emerging Markets, Fixed Income Financing and Commodities in CIB's Fixed Income Markets.Managed basis: A non-GAAP presentation of Firmwide financial results that includes reclassifications to present revenue on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Management also uses this financial measure at the segment level, because it believes this provides information to enable investors to understand the underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment and facilitates a comparison of the business segment with the performance of competitors. Markets: consists of CIB’s Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets businesses.Master netting agreement: A single agreement with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that agreement to be terminated or accelerated and settled through a single payment in a single currency in the event of a default (e.g., bankruptcy, failure to make a required payment or securities transfer or deliver collateral or margin when due).MBS: Mortgage-backed securities MD&A: Management’s discussion and analysisMeasurement alternative: Measures equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost less impairment (if any), plus or minus observable price changes from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Merchant Services: offers merchants payment processing capabilities, fraud and risk management, data and analytics, and other payments services. Through Merchant Services, merchants of all sizes can accept payments via credit and debit cards and payments in multiple currencies.MEV: Macroeconomic variableMoody’s: Moody’s Investor Services Mortgage origination channels: home price index measured at the metropolitan statistical area (“MSA”) level. These MSA-level home price indices consist of actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. As a result, the estimated collateral values used to calculate these ratios do not represent actual appraised loan-level collateral values; as such, the resulting LTV ratios are necessarily imprecise and should therefore be viewed as estimates.

The LTV ratio considering all available lien positions, as well as unused lines, related to the property. Combined LTV ratios are used for junior lien home equity products. Macro businesses: the macro businesses include Rates, Currencies and Emerging Markets, Fixed Income Financing and Commodities in CIB's Fixed Income Markets. Managed basis: A non-GAAP presentation of Firmwide financial results that includes reclassifications to present revenue on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Management also uses this financial measure at the segment level, because it believes this provides information to enable investors to understand the underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment and facilitates a comparison of the business segment with the performance of competitors. Markets: consists of CIB’s Fixed Income Markets and Equity Markets businesses. Master netting agreement: A single agreement with a counterparty that permits multiple transactions governed by that agreement to be terminated or accelerated and settled through a single payment in a single currency in the event of a default (e.g., bankruptcy, failure to make a required payment or securities transfer or deliver collateral or margin when due). MBS: Mortgage-backed securities MD&A: Management’s discussion and analysis Measurement alternative: Measures equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost less impairment (if any), plus or minus observable price changes from an identical or similar investment of the same issuer. Merchant Services: offers merchants payment processing capabilities, fraud and risk management, data and analytics, and other payments services. Through Merchant Services, merchants of all sizes can accept payments via credit and debit cards and payments in multiple currencies. MEV: Macroeconomic variable Moody’s: Moody’s Investor Services

Retail – Borrowers who buy or refinance a home through direct contact with a mortgage banker employed by the Firm using a branch office, the Internet or by phone. Borrowers are frequently referred to a mortgage banker by a banker in a Chase branch, real estate brokers, home builders or other third parties.Correspondent – Banks, thrifts, other mortgage banks and other financial institutions that sell closed loans to the Firm.Mortgage product types: Alt-A Alt-A loans are generally higher in credit quality than subprime loans but have characteristics that would disqualify the borrower from a traditional prime loan. Alt-A lending characteristics may include one or more of the following: (i) limited documentation; (ii) a high CLTV ratio; (iii) loans secured by non-owner occupied properties; or (iv) a debt-to-income ratio above normal limits. A substantial proportion of the Firm’s Alt-A loans are those where a borrower does not provide complete documentation of his or her assets or the amount or source of his or her income. Option ARMs The option ARM real estate loan product is an adjustable-rate mortgage loan that provides the borrower with the option each month to make a fully amortizing, interest-only or minimum payment. The minimum payment on an option ARM loan is based on the interest rate charged during the introductory period. This introductory rate is usually significantly below the fully indexed rate. The fully indexed rate is calculated using an index rate plus a margin. Once the introductory period ends, the contractual interest rate charged on the loan increases to the fully indexed rate and adjusts monthly to reflect movements in the index. The minimum payment is typically insufficient to cover interest accrued in the prior month, and any unpaid interest is deferred and added to the principal balance of the loan. Option ARM loans are subject to payment recast, which converts the loan to a variable-rate fully amortizing loan upon meeting specified loan balance and anniversary date triggers. Prime Prime mortgage loans are made to borrowers with good credit records who meet specific underwriting requirements, including prescriptive requirements related to income and overall debt levels. New prime mortgage borrowers provide full documentation and generally have reliable payment histories. Subprime Subprime loans are loans that, prior to mid-2008, were offered to certain customers with one or more high risk characteristics, including but not limited to: (i) unreliable or poor payment histories; (ii) a high LTV ratio of greater than 80% (without borrower-paid mortgage insurance); (iii) a high debt-to-income ratio; (iv) an occupancy type for the loan is other than the borrower’s Retail – Borrowers who buy or refinance a home through direct contact with a mortgage banker employed by the Firm using a branch office, the Internet or by phone. Borrowers are frequently referred to a mortgage banker by a banker in a Chase branch, real estate brokers, home builders or other third parties. Correspondent – Banks, thrifts, other mortgage banks and other financial institutions that sell closed loans to the Firm.

Alt-A Alt-A loans are generally higher in credit quality than subprime loans but have characteristics that would disqualify the borrower from a traditional prime loan. Alt-A lending characteristics may include one or more of the following: (i) limited documentation; (ii) a high CLTV ratio; (iii) loans secured by non-owner occupied properties; or (iv) a debt-to-income ratio above normal limits. A substantial proportion of the Firm’s Alt-A loans are those where a borrower does not provide complete documentation of his or her assets or the amount or source of his or her income. Option ARMs The option ARM real estate loan product is an adjustable-rate mortgage loan that provides the borrower with the option each month to make a fully amortizing, interest-only or minimum payment. The minimum payment on an option ARM loan is based on the interest rate charged during the introductory period. This introductory rate is usually significantly below the fully indexed rate. The fully indexed rate is calculated using an index rate plus a margin. Once the introductory period ends, the contractual interest rate charged on the loan increases to the fully indexed rate and adjusts monthly to reflect movements in the index. The minimum payment is typically insufficient to cover interest accrued in the prior month, and any unpaid interest is deferred and added to the principal balance of the loan. Option ARM loans are subject to payment recast, which converts the loan to a variable-rate fully amortizing loan upon meeting specified loan balance and anniversary date triggers. Prime Prime mortgage loans are made to borrowers with good credit records who meet specific underwriting requirements, including prescriptive requirements related to income and overall debt levels. New prime mortgage borrowers provide full documentation and generally have reliable payment histories. Subprime Subprime loans are loans that, prior to mid-2008, were offered to certain customers with one or more high risk characteristics, including but not limited to: (i) unreliable or poor payment histories; (ii) a high LTV ratio of greater than 80% (without borrower-paid mortgage insurance); (iii) a high debt-to-income ratio; (iv) an occupancy type for the loan is other than the borrower’s 330JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 330JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 330JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 330 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

primary residence; or (v) a history of delinquencies or late payments on the loan. MREL: Minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities MSR: Mortgage servicing rights Multi-asset: Any fund or account that allocates assets under management to more than one asset class.NA: Data is not applicable or available for the period presented. NAV: Net Asset Value Net Capital Rule: Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Net charge-off/(recovery) rate: Represents net charge-offs/(recoveries) (annualized) divided by average retained loans for the reporting period.Net interchange income includes the following components:•Interchange income: Fees earned by credit and debit card issuers on sales transactions. •Rewards costs: The cost to the Firm for points earned by cardholders enrolled in credit card rewards programs generally tied to sales transactions.•Partner payments: Payments to co-brand credit card partners based on the cost of loyalty program rewards earned by cardholders on credit card transactions.Net mortgage servicing revenue: Includes operating revenue earned from servicing third-party mortgage loans, which is recognized over the period in which the service is provided; changes in the fair value of MSRs; the impact of risk management activities associated with MSRs; and gains and losses on securitization of excess mortgage servicing. Net mortgage servicing revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments of certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies. Net revenue rate: Represents Card Services net revenue (annualized) expressed as a percentage of average loans for the period.Net yield on interest-earning assets: The average rate for interest-earning assets less the average rate paid for all sources of funds.NFA: National Futures AssociationNM: Not meaningfulNOL: Net operating loss Nonaccrual loans: Loans for which interest income is not recognized on an accrual basis. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest have been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. Collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status. Nonperforming assets: Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, nonperforming derivatives and certain assets acquired in loan satisfactions, predominantly real estate owned and other commercial and personal property.NSFR: Net Stable Funding RatioOAS: Option-adjusted spread OCC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency OCI: Other comprehensive income/(loss)OPEB: Other postretirement employee benefit Operating losses: Primarily refer to fraud losses associated with customer deposit accounts, credit and debit cards; exclude legal expense.Over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives: Derivative contracts that are negotiated, executed and settled bilaterally between two derivative counterparties, where one or both counterparties is a derivatives dealer. Over-the-counter cleared (“OTC-cleared”) derivatives: Derivative contracts that are negotiated and executed bilaterally, but subsequently settled via a central clearing house, such that each derivative counterparty is only exposed to the default of that clearing house. Overhead ratio: Noninterest expense as a percentage of total net revenue.Parent Company: JPMorgan Chase & Co.Participating securities: Represents unvested share-based compensation awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (collectively, “dividends”), which are included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method. JPMorganChase grants RSUs to certain employees under its share-based compensation programs, which entitle the recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating securities, based on their respective rights to receive dividends. PCAOB: Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCD: “Purchased credit deteriorated” assets represent acquired financial assets that as of the date of acquisition have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, as determined by the Firm.PD: Probability of defaultPillar 1: The Basel framework consists of a three “Pillar” approach. Pillar 1 establishes minimum capital primary residence; or (v) a history of delinquencies or late payments on the loan. MREL: Minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities MSR: Mortgage servicing rights Multi-asset: Any fund or account that allocates assets under management to more than one asset class.NA: Data is not applicable or available for the period presented. NAV: Net Asset Value Net Capital Rule: Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Net charge-off/(recovery) rate: Represents net charge-offs/(recoveries) (annualized) divided by average retained loans for the reporting period.Net interchange income includes the following components:•Interchange income: Fees earned by credit and debit card issuers on sales transactions. •Rewards costs: The cost to the Firm for points earned by cardholders enrolled in credit card rewards programs generally tied to sales transactions.•Partner payments: Payments to co-brand credit card partners based on the cost of loyalty program rewards earned by cardholders on credit card transactions.Net mortgage servicing revenue: Includes operating revenue earned from servicing third-party mortgage loans, which is recognized over the period in which the service is provided; changes in the fair value of MSRs; the impact of risk management activities associated with MSRs; and gains and losses on securitization of excess mortgage servicing. Net mortgage servicing revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments of certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies. Net revenue rate: Represents Card Services net revenue (annualized) expressed as a percentage of average loans for the period.Net yield on interest-earning assets: The average rate for interest-earning assets less the average rate paid for all sources of funds.NFA: National Futures AssociationNM: Not meaningfulNOL: Net operating loss Nonaccrual loans: Loans for which interest income is not recognized on an accrual basis. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest have been in default for a period primary residence; or (v) a history of delinquencies or late payments on the loan. MREL: Minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities MSR: Mortgage servicing rights Multi-asset: Any fund or account that allocates assets under management to more than one asset class. NA: Data is not applicable or available for the period presented. NAV: Net Asset Value Net Capital Rule: Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Net charge-off/(recovery) rate: Represents net charge-offs/(recoveries) (annualized) divided by average retained loans for the reporting period. Net interchange income includes the following components: •Interchange income: Fees earned by credit and debit card issuers on sales transactions. •Rewards costs: The cost to the Firm for points earned by cardholders enrolled in credit card rewards programs generally tied to sales transactions. •Partner payments: Payments to co-brand credit card partners based on the cost of loyalty program rewards earned by cardholders on credit card transactions. Net mortgage servicing revenue: Includes operating revenue earned from servicing third-party mortgage loans, which is recognized over the period in which the service is provided; changes in the fair value of MSRs; the impact of risk management activities associated with MSRs; and gains and losses on securitization of excess mortgage servicing. Net mortgage servicing revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments of certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies. Net revenue rate: Represents Card Services net revenue (annualized) expressed as a percentage of average loans for the period. Net yield on interest-earning assets: The average rate for interest-earning assets less the average rate paid for all sources of funds. NFA: National Futures Association NM: Not meaningful NOL: Net operating loss Nonaccrual loans: Loans for which interest income is not recognized on an accrual basis. Loans (other than credit card loans and certain consumer loans insured by U.S. government agencies) are placed on nonaccrual status when full payment of principal and interest is not expected, regardless of delinquency status, or when principal and interest have been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. Collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status. Nonperforming assets: Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, nonperforming derivatives and certain assets acquired in loan satisfactions, predominantly real estate owned and other commercial and personal property.NSFR: Net Stable Funding RatioOAS: Option-adjusted spread OCC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency OCI: Other comprehensive income/(loss)OPEB: Other postretirement employee benefit Operating losses: Primarily refer to fraud losses associated with customer deposit accounts, credit and debit cards; exclude legal expense.Over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives: Derivative contracts that are negotiated, executed and settled bilaterally between two derivative counterparties, where one or both counterparties is a derivatives dealer. Over-the-counter cleared (“OTC-cleared”) derivatives: Derivative contracts that are negotiated and executed bilaterally, but subsequently settled via a central clearing house, such that each derivative counterparty is only exposed to the default of that clearing house. Overhead ratio: Noninterest expense as a percentage of total net revenue.Parent Company: JPMorgan Chase & Co.Participating securities: Represents unvested share-based compensation awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (collectively, “dividends”), which are included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method. JPMorganChase grants RSUs to certain employees under its share-based compensation programs, which entitle the recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating securities, based on their respective rights to receive dividends. PCAOB: Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCD: “Purchased credit deteriorated” assets represent acquired financial assets that as of the date of acquisition have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, as determined by the Firm.PD: Probability of defaultPillar 1: The Basel framework consists of a three “Pillar” approach. Pillar 1 establishes minimum capital of 90 days or more unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. Collateral-dependent loans are typically maintained on nonaccrual status. Nonperforming assets: Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, nonperforming derivatives and certain assets acquired in loan satisfactions, predominantly real estate owned and other commercial and personal property. NSFR: Net Stable Funding Ratio OAS: Option-adjusted spread OCC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency OCI: Other comprehensive income/(loss) OPEB: Other postretirement employee benefit Operating losses: Primarily refer to fraud losses associated with customer deposit accounts, credit and debit cards; exclude legal expense. Over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives: Derivative contracts that are negotiated, executed and settled bilaterally between two derivative counterparties, where one or both counterparties is a derivatives dealer. Over-the-counter cleared (“OTC-cleared”) derivatives: Derivative contracts that are negotiated and executed bilaterally, but subsequently settled via a central clearing house, such that each derivative counterparty is only exposed to the default of that clearing house. Overhead ratio: Noninterest expense as a percentage of total net revenue. Parent Company: JPMorgan Chase & Co. Participating securities: Represents unvested share-based compensation awards containing nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (collectively, “dividends”), which are included in the earnings per share calculation using the two-class method. JPMorganChase grants RSUs to certain employees under its share-based compensation programs, which entitle the recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities. Under the two-class method, all earnings (distributed and undistributed) are allocated to each class of common stock and participating securities, based on their respective rights to receive dividends. PCAOB: Public Company Accounting Oversight Board PCD: “Purchased credit deteriorated” assets represent acquired financial assets that as of the date of acquisition have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, as determined by the Firm. PD: Probability of default Pillar 1: The Basel framework consists of a three “Pillar” approach. Pillar 1 establishes minimum capital JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K331 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K331 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K331 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 331

requirements, defines eligible capital instruments, and prescribes rules for calculating RWA.Pillar 3: The Basel framework consists of a three “Pillar” approach. Pillar 3 encourages market discipline through disclosure requirements which allow market participants to assess the risk and capital profiles of banks.PRA: Prudential Regulation Authority Preferred stock dividends: reflects dividends declared and deemed dividends upon redemption of preferred stockPre-provision profit/(loss): Represents total net revenue less noninterest expense. The Firm believes that this financial measure is useful in assessing the ability of a lending institution to generate income in excess of its provision for credit losses.Pre-tax margin: Represents income before income tax expense divided by total net revenue, which is, in management’s view, a comprehensive measure of pretax performance derived by measuring earnings after all costs are taken into consideration. It is one basis upon which management evaluates the performance of AWM against the performance of their respective competitors.Principal transactions revenue: Principal transactions revenue is driven by many factors, including: •the bid-offer spread, which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa; and •realized and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments and commodities transactions, including those accounted for under the fair value option, primarily used in client-driven market-making activities. –Realized gains and losses result from the sale of instruments, closing out or termination of transactions, or interim cash payments. –Unrealized gains and losses result from changes in valuation. In connection with its client-driven market-making activities, the Firm transacts in debt and equity instruments, derivatives and commodities, including physical commodities inventories and financial instruments that reference commodities. Principal transactions revenue also includes realized and unrealized gains and losses related to: •derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships, primarily fair value hedges of commodity and foreign exchange risk; •derivatives used for specific risk management purposes, primarily to mitigate credit, foreign exchange and interest rate risks.Production revenue: Includes fees and income recognized as earned on mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell, and the impact of risk management activities associated with the mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans. Production revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held-for-sale (excluding certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies), and changes in the fair value of financial instruments measured under the fair value option.PSU(s): Performance share units Regulatory VaR: Daily aggregated VaR calculated in accordance with regulatory rules.REO: Real estate owned Reported basis: Financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP, which excludes the impact of taxable-equivalent adjustments. Retained loans: Loans that are held-for-investment (i.e., excludes loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value). Revenue wallet: Proportion of fee revenue based on estimates of investment banking fees generated across the industry (i.e., the revenue wallet) from investment banking transactions in M&A, equity and debt underwriting, and loan syndications. Source: Dealogic, a third-party provider of investment banking competitive analysis and volume-based league tables for the above noted industry products.RHS: Rural Housing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture ROA: Return on assetsROE: Return on equityROTCE: Return on tangible common equityROU assets: Right-of-use assets RSU(s): Restricted stock units RWA “Risk-weighted assets”: Basel III establishes two comprehensive approaches for calculating RWA (a Standardized approach and an Advanced approach) which include capital requirements for credit risk, market risk, and in the case of Basel III Advanced, also operational risk. Key differences in the calculation of credit risk RWA between the Standardized and Advanced approaches are that for Basel III Advanced, credit risk RWA is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters, whereas for Basel III Standardized, credit risk RWA is generally based on supervisory risk-weightings which vary primarily by counterparty type and asset class. Market risk RWA is calculated on a generally consistent basis between Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced. S&P: Standard and Poor’s SAR as it pertains to Hong Kong: Special Administrative Region requirements, defines eligible capital instruments, and prescribes rules for calculating RWA.Pillar 3: The Basel framework consists of a three “Pillar” approach. Pillar 3 encourages market discipline through disclosure requirements which allow market participants to assess the risk and capital profiles of banks.PRA: Prudential Regulation Authority Preferred stock dividends: reflects dividends declared and deemed dividends upon redemption of preferred stockPre-provision profit/(loss): Represents total net revenue less noninterest expense. The Firm believes that this financial measure is useful in assessing the ability of a lending institution to generate income in excess of its provision for credit losses.Pre-tax margin: Represents income before income tax expense divided by total net revenue, which is, in management’s view, a comprehensive measure of pretax performance derived by measuring earnings after all costs are taken into consideration. It is one basis upon which management evaluates the performance of AWM against the performance of their respective competitors.Principal transactions revenue: Principal transactions revenue is driven by many factors, including: •the bid-offer spread, which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa; and •realized and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments and commodities transactions, including those accounted for under the fair value option, primarily used in client-driven market-making activities. –Realized gains and losses result from the sale of instruments, closing out or termination of transactions, or interim cash payments. –Unrealized gains and losses result from changes in valuation. In connection with its client-driven market-making activities, the Firm transacts in debt and equity instruments, derivatives and commodities, including physical commodities inventories and financial instruments that reference commodities. Principal transactions revenue also includes realized and unrealized gains and losses related to: •derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships, primarily fair value hedges of commodity and foreign exchange risk; •derivatives used for specific risk management purposes, primarily to mitigate credit, foreign exchange and interest rate risks. requirements, defines eligible capital instruments, and prescribes rules for calculating RWA. Pillar 3: The Basel framework consists of a three “Pillar” approach. Pillar 3 encourages market discipline through disclosure requirements which allow market participants to assess the risk and capital profiles of banks. PRA: Prudential Regulation Authority Preferred stock dividends: reflects dividends declared and deemed dividends upon redemption of preferred stock Pre-provision profit/(loss): Represents total net revenue less noninterest expense. The Firm believes that this financial measure is useful in assessing the ability of a lending institution to generate income in excess of its provision for credit losses. Pre-tax margin: Represents income before income tax expense divided by total net revenue, which is, in management’s view, a comprehensive measure of pretax performance derived by measuring earnings after all costs are taken into consideration. It is one basis upon which management evaluates the performance of AWM against the performance of their respective competitors. Principal transactions revenue: Principal transactions revenue is driven by many factors, including: •the bid-offer spread, which is the difference between the price at which a market participant is willing and able to sell an instrument to the Firm and the price at which another market participant is willing and able to buy it from the Firm, and vice versa; and •realized and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments and commodities transactions, including those accounted for under the fair value option, primarily used in client-driven market-making activities. –Realized gains and losses result from the sale of instruments, closing out or termination of transactions, or interim cash payments. –Unrealized gains and losses result from changes in valuation. In connection with its client-driven market-making activities, the Firm transacts in debt and equity instruments, derivatives and commodities, including physical commodities inventories and financial instruments that reference commodities. Principal transactions revenue also includes realized and unrealized gains and losses related to: •derivatives designated in qualifying hedge accounting relationships, primarily fair value hedges of commodity and foreign exchange risk; •derivatives used for specific risk management purposes, primarily to mitigate credit, foreign exchange and interest rate risks. Production revenue: Includes fees and income recognized as earned on mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell, and the impact of risk management activities associated with the mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans. Production revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held-for-sale (excluding certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies), and changes in the fair value of financial instruments measured under the fair value option.PSU(s): Performance share units Regulatory VaR: Daily aggregated VaR calculated in accordance with regulatory rules.REO: Real estate owned Reported basis: Financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP, which excludes the impact of taxable-equivalent adjustments. Retained loans: Loans that are held-for-investment (i.e., excludes loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value). Revenue wallet: Proportion of fee revenue based on estimates of investment banking fees generated across the industry (i.e., the revenue wallet) from investment banking transactions in M&A, equity and debt underwriting, and loan syndications. Source: Dealogic, a third-party provider of investment banking competitive analysis and volume-based league tables for the above noted industry products.RHS: Rural Housing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture ROA: Return on assetsROE: Return on equityROTCE: Return on tangible common equityROU assets: Right-of-use assets RSU(s): Restricted stock units RWA “Risk-weighted assets”: Basel III establishes two comprehensive approaches for calculating RWA (a Standardized approach and an Advanced approach) which include capital requirements for credit risk, market risk, and in the case of Basel III Advanced, also operational risk. Key differences in the calculation of credit risk RWA between the Standardized and Advanced approaches are that for Basel III Advanced, credit risk RWA is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters, whereas for Basel III Standardized, credit risk RWA is generally based on supervisory risk-weightings which vary primarily by counterparty type and asset class. Market risk RWA is calculated on a generally consistent basis between Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced. S&P: Standard and Poor’s SAR as it pertains to Hong Kong: Special Administrative Region Production revenue: Includes fees and income recognized as earned on mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell, and the impact of risk management activities associated with the mortgage pipeline and warehouse loans. Production revenue also includes gains and losses on sales and lower of cost or fair value adjustments on mortgage loans held-for-sale (excluding certain repurchased loans insured by U.S. government agencies), and changes in the fair value of financial instruments measured under the fair value option. PSU(s): Performance share units Regulatory VaR: Daily aggregated VaR calculated in accordance with regulatory rules. REO: Real estate owned Reported basis: Financial statements prepared under U.S. GAAP, which excludes the impact of taxable-equivalent adjustments. Retained loans: Loans that are held-for-investment (i.e., excludes loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value). Revenue wallet: Proportion of fee revenue based on estimates of investment banking fees generated across the industry (i.e., the revenue wallet) from investment banking transactions in M&A, equity and debt underwriting, and loan syndications. Source: Dealogic, a third-party provider of investment banking competitive analysis and volume-based league tables for the above noted industry products. RHS: Rural Housing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture ROA: Return on assets ROE: Return on equity ROTCE: Return on tangible common equity ROU assets: Right-of-use assets RSU(s): Restricted stock units RWA “Risk-weighted assets”: Basel III establishes two comprehensive approaches for calculating RWA (a Standardized approach and an Advanced approach) which include capital requirements for credit risk, market risk, and in the case of Basel III Advanced, also operational risk. Key differences in the calculation of credit risk RWA between the Standardized and Advanced approaches are that for Basel III Advanced, credit risk RWA is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters, whereas for Basel III Standardized, credit risk RWA is generally based on supervisory risk-weightings which vary primarily by counterparty type and asset class. Market risk RWA is calculated on a generally consistent basis between Basel III Standardized and Basel III Advanced. S&P: Standard and Poor’s SAR as it pertains to Hong Kong: Special Administrative Region 332JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 332JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 332JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 332 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K

SAR(s) as it pertains to employee stock awards: Stock appreciation rights SCB: Stress capital bufferScored portfolios: Consumer loan portfolios that predominantly include residential real estate loans, credit card loans, auto loans to individuals and certain small business loans. SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Securities financing agreements: Include resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned agreements Securitized Products Group: Comprised of Securitized Products and tax-oriented investments.Seed capital: Initial JPMorgan capital invested in products, such as mutual funds, with the intention of ensuring the fund is of sufficient size to represent a viable offering to clients, enabling pricing of its shares, and allowing the manager to develop a track record. After these goals are achieved, the intent is to remove the Firm’s capital from the investment.Shelf securities: Securities registered with the SEC under a shelf registration statement that have not been issued, offered or sold. These securities are not included in league tables until they have actually been issued.Single-name: Single reference-entitiesSLR: Supplementary leverage ratio SMBS: Stripped mortgage-backed securities SOFR: Secured Overnight Financing RateSPEs: Special purpose entities Structural interest rate risk: Represents interest rate risk of the non-trading assets and liabilities of the Firm.Structured notes: Structured notes are financial instruments whose cash flows are linked to the movement in one or more indexes, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodities prices, prepayment rates, underlying reference pool of loans or other market variables. The notes typically contain embedded (but not separable or detachable) derivatives. Contractual cash flows for principal, interest, or both can vary in amount and timing throughout the life of the note based on non-traditional indexes or non-traditional uses of traditional interest rates or indexes. Suspended foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings have started but are currently on hold, which could be due to bankruptcy or loss mitigation. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states. Taxable-equivalent basis: In presenting results on a managed basis, the total net revenue for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate, and the Firm as a whole, is presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in managed basis results on a level comparable to taxable investments and securities; the corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense.TBVPS: Tangible book value per shareTCE: Tangible common equityTDR: “Troubled debt restructuring” applies to loan modifications granted prior to January 1, 2023 and is deemed to occur when the Firm modifies the original terms of a loan agreement by granting a concession to a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulty. Loans with short-term and other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions are not TDRs.TLAC: Total Loss Absorbing Capacity U.K.: United Kingdom Unaudited: Financial statements and/or information that have not been subject to auditing procedures by an independent registered public accounting firm.U.S.: United States of America U.S. GAAP: Accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. U.S. government agencies: U.S. government agencies include, but are not limited to, agencies such as Ginnie Mae and FHA, and do not include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which are U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (“U.S. GSEs”). In general, obligations of U.S. government agencies are fully and explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government in the event of a default.U.S. GSE(s): “U.S. government-sponsored enterprises” are quasi-governmental, privately-held entities established or chartered by the U.S. government to serve public purposes as specified by the U.S. Congress to improve the flow of credit to specific sectors of the economy and provide certain essential services to the public. U.S. GSEs include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but do not include Ginnie Mae or FHA. U.S. GSE obligations are not explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. U.S. Treasury: U.S. Department of the TreasuryVA: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs VaR: “Value-at-risk” is a measure of the dollar amount of potential loss from adverse market moves in an ordinary market environment. VCG: Valuation Control Group VGF: Valuation Governance Forum VIEs: Variable interest entities Warehouse loans: Consist of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value and classified as loans. SAR(s) as it pertains to employee stock awards: Stock appreciation rights SCB: Stress capital bufferScored portfolios: Consumer loan portfolios that predominantly include residential real estate loans, credit card loans, auto loans to individuals and certain small business loans. SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Securities financing agreements: Include resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned agreements Securitized Products Group: Comprised of Securitized Products and tax-oriented investments.Seed capital: Initial JPMorgan capital invested in products, such as mutual funds, with the intention of ensuring the fund is of sufficient size to represent a viable offering to clients, enabling pricing of its shares, and allowing the manager to develop a track record. After these goals are achieved, the intent is to remove the Firm’s capital from the investment.Shelf securities: Securities registered with the SEC under a shelf registration statement that have not been issued, offered or sold. These securities are not included in league tables until they have actually been issued.Single-name: Single reference-entitiesSLR: Supplementary leverage ratio SMBS: Stripped mortgage-backed securities SOFR: Secured Overnight Financing RateSPEs: Special purpose entities Structural interest rate risk: Represents interest rate risk of the non-trading assets and liabilities of the Firm.Structured notes: Structured notes are financial instruments whose cash flows are linked to the movement in one or more indexes, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodities prices, prepayment rates, underlying reference pool of loans or other market variables. The notes typically contain embedded (but not separable or detachable) derivatives. Contractual cash flows for principal, interest, or both can vary in amount and timing throughout the life of the note based on non-traditional indexes or non-traditional uses of traditional interest rates or indexes. Suspended foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings have started but are currently on hold, which could be due to bankruptcy or loss mitigation. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states. Taxable-equivalent basis: In presenting results on a managed basis, the total net revenue for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate, and the Firm as a whole, is presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax SAR(s) as it pertains to employee stock awards: Stock appreciation rights SCB: Stress capital buffer Scored portfolios: Consumer loan portfolios that predominantly include residential real estate loans, credit card loans, auto loans to individuals and certain small business loans. SEC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Securities financing agreements: Include resale, repurchase, securities borrowed and securities loaned agreements Securitized Products Group: Comprised of Securitized Products and tax-oriented investments. Seed capital: Initial JPMorgan capital invested in products, such as mutual funds, with the intention of ensuring the fund is of sufficient size to represent a viable offering to clients, enabling pricing of its shares, and allowing the manager to develop a track record. After these goals are achieved, the intent is to remove the Firm’s capital from the investment. Shelf securities: Securities registered with the SEC under a shelf registration statement that have not been issued, offered or sold. These securities are not included in league tables until they have actually been issued. Single-name: Single reference-entities SLR: Supplementary leverage ratio SMBS: Stripped mortgage-backed securities SOFR: Secured Overnight Financing Rate SPEs: Special purpose entities Structural interest rate risk: Represents interest rate risk of the non-trading assets and liabilities of the Firm. Structured notes: Structured notes are financial instruments whose cash flows are linked to the movement in one or more indexes, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodities prices, prepayment rates, underlying reference pool of loans or other market variables. The notes typically contain embedded (but not separable or detachable) derivatives. Contractual cash flows for principal, interest, or both can vary in amount and timing throughout the life of the note based on non-traditional indexes or non-traditional uses of traditional interest rates or indexes. Suspended foreclosures: Loans referred to foreclosure where formal foreclosure proceedings have started but are currently on hold, which could be due to bankruptcy or loss mitigation. Includes both judicial and non-judicial states. Taxable-equivalent basis: In presenting results on a managed basis, the total net revenue for each of the reportable business segments and Corporate, and the Firm as a whole, is presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Accordingly, revenue from investments that receive tax credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in managed basis results on a level comparable to taxable investments and securities; the corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense.TBVPS: Tangible book value per shareTCE: Tangible common equityTDR: “Troubled debt restructuring” applies to loan modifications granted prior to January 1, 2023 and is deemed to occur when the Firm modifies the original terms of a loan agreement by granting a concession to a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulty. Loans with short-term and other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions are not TDRs.TLAC: Total Loss Absorbing Capacity U.K.: United Kingdom Unaudited: Financial statements and/or information that have not been subject to auditing procedures by an independent registered public accounting firm.U.S.: United States of America U.S. GAAP: Accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. U.S. government agencies: U.S. government agencies include, but are not limited to, agencies such as Ginnie Mae and FHA, and do not include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which are U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (“U.S. GSEs”). In general, obligations of U.S. government agencies are fully and explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government in the event of a default.U.S. GSE(s): “U.S. government-sponsored enterprises” are quasi-governmental, privately-held entities established or chartered by the U.S. government to serve public purposes as specified by the U.S. Congress to improve the flow of credit to specific sectors of the economy and provide certain essential services to the public. U.S. GSEs include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but do not include Ginnie Mae or FHA. U.S. GSE obligations are not explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. U.S. Treasury: U.S. Department of the TreasuryVA: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs VaR: “Value-at-risk” is a measure of the dollar amount of potential loss from adverse market moves in an ordinary market environment. VCG: Valuation Control Group VGF: Valuation Governance Forum VIEs: Variable interest entities Warehouse loans: Consist of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value and classified as loans. credits and tax-exempt securities is presented in managed basis results on a level comparable to taxable investments and securities; the corresponding income tax impact related to tax-exempt items is recorded within income tax expense. TBVPS: Tangible book value per share TCE: Tangible common equity TDR: “Troubled debt restructuring” applies to loan modifications granted prior to January 1, 2023 and is deemed to occur when the Firm modifies the original terms of a loan agreement by granting a concession to a borrower that is experiencing financial difficulty. Loans with short-term and other insignificant modifications that are not considered concessions are not TDRs. TLAC: Total Loss Absorbing Capacity U.K.: United Kingdom Unaudited: Financial statements and/or information that have not been subject to auditing procedures by an independent registered public accounting firm. U.S.: United States of America U.S. GAAP: Accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. U.S. government agencies: U.S. government agencies include, but are not limited to, agencies such as Ginnie Mae and FHA, and do not include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which are U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (“U.S. GSEs”). In general, obligations of U.S. government agencies are fully and explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government in the event of a default. U.S. GSE(s): “U.S. government-sponsored enterprises” are quasi-governmental, privately-held entities established or chartered by the U.S. government to serve public purposes as specified by the U.S. Congress to improve the flow of credit to specific sectors of the economy and provide certain essential services to the public. U.S. GSEs include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but do not include Ginnie Mae or FHA. U.S. GSE obligations are not explicitly guaranteed as to the timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. U.S. Treasury: U.S. Department of the Treasury VA: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs VaR: “Value-at-risk” is a measure of the dollar amount of potential loss from adverse market moves in an ordinary market environment. VCG: Valuation Control Group VGF: Valuation Governance Forum VIEs: Variable interest entities Warehouse loans: Consist of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value and classified as loans. JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K333 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K333 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K333 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 333 Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf of the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Registrant) By: /s/ JAMES DIMON (James Dimon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)February 14, 2025 By: /s/ JAMES DIMON Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the date indicated. JPMorgan Chase & Co. does not exercise the power of attorney to sign on behalf of any Director. CapacityDate/s/ JAMES DIMONDirector, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) (James Dimon) /s/ LINDA B. BAMMANNDirector(Linda B. Bammann)/s/ STEPHEN B. BURKEDirector (Stephen B. Burke)/s/ TODD A. COMBSDirector (Todd A. Combs) /s/ ALICIA BOLER DAVISDirector (Alicia Boler Davis)/s/ ALEX GORSKYDirectorFebruary 14, 2025(Alex Gorsky)/s/ MELLODY HOBSONDirector (Mellody Hobson) /s/ PHEBE N. NOVAKOVICDirector(Phebe N. Novakovic)/s/ VIRGINIA M. ROMETTYDirector(Virginia M. Rometty)/s/ BRAD D. SMITHDirector(Brad D. Smith)/s/ MARK A. WEINBERGERDirector(Mark A. Weinberger)/s/ JEREMY BARNUMExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Jeremy Barnum)(Principal Financial Officer)/s/ ELENA KORABLINAManaging Director and Firmwide Controller(Elena Korablina)(Principal Accounting Officer) /s/ JAMES DIMON /s/ LINDA B. BAMMANN /s/ STEPHEN B. BURKE /s/ TODD A. COMBS /s/ ALICIA BOLER DAVIS (Alicia Boler Davis) /s/ ALEX GORSKY /s/ MELLODY HOBSON /s/ PHEBE N. NOVAKOVIC /s/ VIRGINIA M. ROMETTY /s/ BRAD D. SMITH (Brad D. Smith) /s/ MARK A. WEINBERGER (Mark A. Weinberger) /s/ JEREMY BARNUM /s/ ELENA KORABLINA 334JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 334JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 334JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K 334 JPMorgan Chase & Co./2024 Form 10-K