KeyCorp: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

2025 vs 2024  ·  SEC EDGAR  ·  2026-05-22
Other years: 2026 vs 2025 · 2024 vs 2023
⚠ AI-Generated

The summary below was generated by an AI language model and may contain errors or omissions. All other content on this page is deterministically extracted from the original SEC EDGAR filing.

KeyCorp added four new risk disclosures in its 2025 10-K, including explicit risks related to model risk management effectiveness, Scotiabank's significant equity stake and board influence, and estimation uncertainty in financial statement preparation. The company substantively modified 21 existing risk factors while retaining 23 unchanged risks and removing none, indicating a net expansion of risk disclosure with particular attention to operational, governance, and financial reporting uncertainties.

✓ Deterministic extraction — no AI-generated data

Classification is based on semantic text similarity scoring and may include approximations. “No match” means no high-confidence textual match was found — not necessarily that a section was removed.

4
New Risks
0
Removed
21
Modified
23
Unchanged
🟢 New in Current Filing •Model Risk 🔒
🟢 New in Current Filing Our framework for managing risks and mitigating losses may not be effective. 🔒
🟢 New in Current Filing Scotiabank holds a significant equity interest in our business and may exercise influence over us, including through its ability to designate up to two directors to our Board of Directors. 🔒
🟢 New in Current Filing The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make subjective determinations and use estimates that may vary from actual results and materially impact our financial condition and results of operations. 🔒
🟡 Modified A worsening of the U.S. economy and volatile or recessionary conditions in the U.S. or abroad could negatively affect our business or our access to capital markets. 🔒
🟡 Modified We are subject to interest rate risk, which could adversely affect net interest income. 🔒
🟡 Modified We operate in a highly competitive industry. 🔒
🟡 Modified We are subject to extensive government regulation, supervision, and tax legislation. 🔒
🟡 Modified We are, and may in the future be, subject to claims, litigation, arbitration, investigations, and governmental proceedings, which could result in significant financial liability and/or reputational harm. 🔒
🟡 Modified •Operational Risk 🔒
🟡 Modified Declining asset prices could adversely affect us. 🔒
🟡 Modified Capital and liquidity requirements imposed by banking regulations require banks and BHCs to maintain more and higher quality capital and more and higher quality liquid assets. 🔒
🟡 Modified •Strategic Risk 🔒
🟡 Modified Our credit ratings affect our liquidity position. 🔒
🟡 Modified The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us. 🔒
🟡 Modified •Market Risk 🔒
🟡 Modified Societal and governmental responses to climate change could adversely affect our business and performance, including indirectly through impacts on our customers. 🔒
🟡 Modified We are subject to liquidity risk, which could negatively affect our funding levels. 🔒
🟡 Modified •Compliance Risk 🔒
🟡 Modified •Reputation Risk 🔒
🟡 Modified Federal agencies’ actions to ensure stability of the U.S. economy and financial system may have costly or disruptive effects on us. 🔒
🟡 Modified •Estimates and Assumptions Risk 🔒
🟡 Modified Impairment of goodwill could require charges to earnings, which could result in a negative impact on our results of operations. 🔒
🟡 Modified Key is subject to corporate responsibility and sustainability efforts risks that could adversely affect our reputation and our business and results of operations. 🔒
🟡 Modified We rely on third parties to perform significant operational services for us, and their failure to perform to our standards or other issues of concern with them could harm us. 🔒
25 changes in this historical filing

Historical year-over-year comparisons (2025 vs 2024 and earlier) are available on the Pro plan.

Get full access — from $29/month Already a Pro subscriber? View full diff →