37 matched sections have text edits; 2 have identical text after formatting cleanup. 12 current and 8 earlier sections lack a one-to-one match.
Business-risk direction: Undetermined.
Section matches and text edits do not measure financial impact. Related passages may explain reorganized disclosures; review them in context.
Added factors have no prior-year match; removed factors have no current-year match. Changed wording describes edits within matched factors. Check whether unmatched wording was reorganised elsewhere: an added factor does not establish a new risk, and a removed factor does not establish resolved exposure.
Sentence-level differences:
Current (2026):
A wide variety of laws, regulations, industry standards, contractual requirements, and other obligations apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal data in jurisdictions where we and our customers operate.…
A wide variety of laws, regulations, industry standards, contractual requirements, and other obligations apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal data in jurisdictions where we and our customers operate. Compliance with these laws and other obligations is difficult and costly, and they are subject to frequent and unexpected changes. For example, we are subject to the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation (“E.U. GDPR”) and the U.K. General Data Protection Regulation (“U.K. GDPR,” and collectively the “GDPR”), each of which imposes stringent data protection requirements and provides for costly penalties for noncompliance (up to the greater of (a) €20 million under the E.U. GDPR or £17.5 million under the U.K. GDPR, and (b) 4% of annual worldwide turnover), and confers the right upon data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations.
The GDPR restricts transfers of personal data outside of the European Economic Area (“EEA”) (or, in the case of the U.K. GDPR, the U.K.) to non-EEA countries, such as the United States, unless adequate safeguards are implemented or a derogation applies. We rely on standard contractual clauses approved under the GDPR to carry out such transfers and to receive personal data subject to the GDPR (directly or indirectly) in the United States. In addition, with respect to the personal data that we process on behalf of our customers, we self-certified to the E.U.-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (“E.U.-U.S. DPF”), the UK Extension to the E.U.-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (collectively, the "DPF") as set forth by the U.S. Department of Commerce for such transfers. However, the DPF may be subject to legal challenges that could invalidate its use. In addition, the U.K. Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 includes changes to the U.K.'s data protection regime that deviate from the GDPR, creating new compliance challenges. We anticipate future legal challenges and developments to approved data transfer mechanisms, including to the E.U.-U.S. DPF, which could result in additional compliance costs and harm our business. Among other effects of these developments, we may also experience reduced demand for our products and subscriptions from current or prospective customers in the EEA, Switzerland, and the U.K. (collectively, “Europe”) on account of the risks identified in the Schrems II decision or other developments relating to cross-border data transfers, and we may find it necessary or desirable to make further changes to our processing of personal data of European residents. The regulatory environment applicable to the handling of European residents’ personal data and cross-border data transfers, and our actions taken in response, may cause us to assume additional liabilities or incur additional costs.
We are also subject to U.S. privacy and data protection laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (the "CCPA"), which, among other requirements, requires enhanced disclosures, affords California residents with certain rights regarding their personal data, and creates a private right of action for data breaches caused by a lack of reasonable security. Over twenty other U.S. states have enacted similar privacy laws. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Justice has issued rules regarding access to or transfer of certain bulk sensitive personal data by countries of concern or covered persons, and we are subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA"), both of which carry significant enforcement penalties for non-compliance. These and other increasingly complex federal and state privacy laws and their enforcement may also require us to modify our data practices and incur additional substantial compliance costs.
We are also subject to obligations relating to personal data and data protection by contract and self-regulatory and industry standards. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general are more regularly bringing enforcement actions for deceptive practices related to the collection and security of personal data.
We and our customers could face risk of regulatory investigations, enforcement actions, private litigation (including class action litigation), and adverse publicity, including reputational damage and loss of customer confidence, for actual or perceived violations of any of the foregoing data protection obligations. Any such claims could result in substantial costs, remedial and reporting obligations, distraction of management, and diversion of resources. Our insurance may not cover all types of claims that may arise, and we cannot guarantee that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Moreover, new legislation affecting the scope of personal data and information, especially relating to IP addresses, machine identification, AI and machine learning, location data, health information, and other information, may limit or inhibit our ability to operate or expand our business and may require significant additional expenditures to comply. Data localization laws may mandate that personal data collected in a foreign country be processed and stored within that country, potentially requiring costly restructuring of our cloud infrastructure. Public perception of privacy or information security concerns, whether or not valid, may harm our reputation and inhibit adoption of our products and subscriptions. Additionally, existing laws and regulations, and any changes to them, or new laws and regulations, could impose significant limitations or require changes to our business model, which may increase our compliance costs.
We are also subject to federal, state, provincial, and foreign laws regarding cybersecurity and the protection of our systems and confidential information. Many jurisdictions have enacted laws, such as the GDPR and the E.U. Network and Information Systems Directive II, requiring companies to adopt cybersecurity risk management measures and notify regulators (and individuals) of data breaches or cybersecurity incidents. If our data security measures fail to adequately protect our systems or confidential information, we could be liable to both our customers and their users for any related losses. Additionally, we could face regulatory action or face litigation, and our customers could terminate or materially change their relationships with us, any of which could harm our business, financial condition, or operating results.
A wide variety of laws and regulations apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer, and other processing of personal data in jurisdictions where we and our customers operate. Compliance with these laws and regulations is difficult and costly. These laws and regulations are also subject to frequent, inconsistent and unexpected changes; new, modified or additional laws or regulations may be adopted; and rulings that invalidate prior laws, regulations, or interpretations of such laws or regulations may be issued. For example, we are subject to the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation (“E.U. GDPR”) and the U.K. General Data Protection Regulation (“U.K. GDPR,” and collectively the “GDPR”), each of which imposes stringent data protection requirements, provide for costly penalties for noncompliance (up to the greater of (a) €20 million under the E.U. GDPR or £17.5 million under the U.K. GDPR, and (b) 4% of annual worldwide turnover), and confer the right upon data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations.
The GDPR imposes restrictions, among other things, on the transfer of personal data outside of the European Economic Area (“EEA”) (or, in the case of the U.K. GDPR, the U.K.) to non-EEA countries, such as the United States, unless adequate safeguards are implemented or a derogation applies. In practice, we rely on standard contractual clauses approved under the GDPR to carry out such transfers and to receive personal data subject to the GDPR (directly or indirectly) in the United States. In addition, with respect to the personal data that we process on behalf of our customers, we self-certified to the E.U.-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (“E.U.-U.S. DPF”), the UK Extension to the E.U.-U.S. DPF, and the Swiss-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (collectively, the “DPF”), as set forth by the U.S. Department of Commerce, regarding transfers of certain personal data from the E.U., the U.K., and Switzerland to the United States. The DPF has been recognized as adequate under applicable law to allow transfers of personal data from the E.U., U.K., and Switzerland, as the case may be, to companies in the U.S. that have self-certified to the framework. However, the DPF may be subject to legal challenges, which could invalidate its use, disrupt our ability to rely on such data transfer mechanisms, and otherwise cause the legal requirements for such data transfers to be uncertain.
In addition, the U.K. government enacted the U.K. Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 on June 19, 2025, which includes targeted amendments to the U.K.’s data protection regime that cause it to expressly deviate from the GDPR. This development creates new compliance challenges and has created uncertainty with respect to the European Commission’s adequacy determination regarding the U.K.’s data protection regime, which has been extended until December 2025 and must be renewed to permit ongoing relatively unrestricted data flows from the EEA to the UK.
Among other effects of these developments, we may experience additional costs associated with increased compliance burdens, reduced demand for our offerings from current or prospective customers in the EEA, Switzerland, and the U.K. (collectively, “Europe”) to use our products, on account of the risks identified in the Schrems II decision or other developments relating to cross-border data transfers, and we may find it necessary or desirable to make further changes to our processing of personal data of European residents. The regulatory environment applicable to the handling of European residents’ personal data and cross-border data transfers, and our actions taken in response, may cause us to assume additional liabilities or incur additional costs. Moreover, much like with Schrems II, we anticipate future legal challenges to the approved data transfer mechanisms between Europe and the United States, including a challenge to the E.U.-U.S. DPF. Such legal challenges could result in additional legal and regulatory risk, compliance costs, and in our business, operating results, and financial condition being harmed.
We are also subject to the California Consumer Privacy Act, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (collectively, the “CCPA”). The CCPA requires, among other things, covered businesses to provide enhanced disclosures to California consumers and to afford such consumers certain rights regarding their personal data, including the right to opt out of data sales for targeted advertising, and creates a private right of action to individuals affected by a data breach, if the breach was caused by a lack of reasonable security. The effects of the CCPA have been significant, requiring us to modify our data processing practices and policies and to incur substantial costs and expenses for compliance. Moreover, other U.S. states have enacted laws relating to privacy and security that are potentially relevant to us. These include laws enacted in at least 20 U.S. states, a portion of which are expected to come into effect over the course of our fiscal 2026. The U.S. Department of Justice also has issued rules regarding access to, or transfer of, certain bulk sensitive personal data by countries of concern. Increasingly complex federal or state laws and regulations relating to privacy and security, and interpretations and enforcement of existing laws and regulations relating to these matters, may require us to modify our data practices and policies, incur substantial compliance costs and expenses, and add further complexity to our compliance efforts that could adversely affect our business or increase our potential liability if we fail to comply or are alleged to have done so.
We may also from time to time be subject to obligations relating to personal data by contract, or face assertions that we are subject to self-regulatory obligations or industry standards. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission and many state attorneys general are more regularly bringing enforcement actions in connection with federal and state consumer protection laws for false or deceptive acts or practices in relation to the online collection, use, dissemination, and security of personal data. Internationally, data localization laws may mandate that personal data collected in a foreign country be processed and stored within that country.
We and our customers may face risk of enforcement actions by regulators or data protection authorities, private litigation and adverse publicity including reputational damage and loss of customer confidence for alleged violations of any of the foregoing obligations. Any such claims could result in substantial costs, ongoing remedial, audit and reporting obligations, and diversion of resources, and distract management and technical personnel. These potential liabilities and enforcement actions could also have an overall negative effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. The amount and scope of insurance we maintain may not cover all types of claims that may arise.
New legislation affecting the scope of personal data and personal information where we or our customers and partners have operations, especially relating to classification of Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses, machine identification, AI and machine learning, location data, and other information, may limit or inhibit our ability to operate or expand our business, including limiting strategic partnerships that may involve the sharing or uses of data, and may require significant expenditures and efforts in order to comply. Notably, public perception of potential privacy, data protection, or information security concerns—whether or not valid—may harm our reputation and inhibit adoption of our products and subscriptions by current and future end-customers. Each of these laws and regulations, and any changes to these laws and regulations, or new laws and regulations, could impose significant limitations, or require changes to our business model or practices or growth strategy, which may increase our compliance expenses and make our business more costly or less efficient to conduct.
And 53 more changes in the full comparison.
Full diff access, historical comparisons, and cross-company signal tracking.
Get Research access Already a Research subscriber? View full diff →Source filings: 2026 10-K filing on SEC EDGAR · 2025 10-K filing on SEC EDGAR