Valero Energy Corporation: 10-K Risk Factor Changes

2025 vs 2024  ·  SEC EDGAR  ·  2026-10-16
Other years: 2026 vs 2025
⚠ AI Risk Brief Interpretation layer — deterministic data below

Valero strengthened risk disclosures across feedstock costs, climate litigation, and supply chain disruptions, signaling elevated operational uncertainty.

Direction ↑ More concerning
✓ Deterministic extraction — no AI-generated data

Classification is based on semantic text similarity scoring and may include approximations. “No match” means no high-confidence textual match was found — not necessarily that a section was removed.

0
New Risks
0
Removed
18
Modified
5
Unchanged
🟡 Modified Disclosure change7/10

We are subject to risks related to the costs and availability of our feedstocks and other critical supplies.

high match confidence

Sentence-level differences:

  • Reworded sentence: "We source our petroleum-based and low-carbon fuel feedstocks, as well as many other critical supplies, such as catalyst, chemicals, treating materials, and metal-based consumables from suppliers throughout the world."
  • Reworded sentence: "sanctions targeting Russia, Iran, and Venezuela limit or ban the ability of most U.S."
  • Reworded sentence: "and other government sanctions and actions by governments and private market participants to refrain from purchasing or transporting crude oil and petroleum-based products from particular countries have impacted, and may continue to impact, trade flows, and our access to business opportunities in various countries."

Current (2025):

View prior text (2024)

We source our petroleum-based and low-carbon fuels feedstocks from suppliers throughout the world. We are, therefore, subject to the political, geographic, and economic risks attendant to doing business with suppliers located in, and supplies originating from, different areas across the world, including global geopolitical and other conflicts and tensions that may impact trade flows and increase transportation costs. If one or more of our supply contracts were terminated, or if political or other events were to disrupt our traditional feedstock supply, we believe that adequate alternative supplies would be available, but it is possible that we would be unable to find adequate or optimal alternative sources of supply. Our refineries and plants without access to waterborne deliveries or offtake must rely on rail, pipeline, or ground transportation and thus may be more susceptible to such risks. If we are unable to obtain adequate or optimal volumes or are able to obtain such volumes only at unfavorable prices, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity could be materially and adversely affected, including from reduced sales volumes of products or higher operating costs. The U.S. government can also prevent or restrict us from doing business in or with other countries. For example, U.S. sanctions targeting Russia, Iran, and Venezuela limit, but do not necessarily ban, the ability of most U.S. companies to engage in petroleum-related transactions involving these countries. U.S. and other government sanctions and actions by governments and private market participants to refrain from purchasing or transporting crude oil and petroleum-based products from particular countries (such as in response to the Russia-Ukraine conflict) have impacted, and may continue to impact, trade flows, and have limited, and may continue to limit, our access to business opportunities in various countries.

Although Darling, the other joint venture member in DGD, supplies some of DGD’s waste feedstock at competitive pricing, DGD must still secure a significant amount of its waste and renewable feedstock requirements from other sources. If Darling’s supply is disrupted or if supply from other sources becomes limited or only available on unfavorable terms, DGD could be required to develop alternate sources of supply, and it could be required to increase its utilization of waste and renewable feedstocks that produce lower-margin products. As the volume of renewable diesel and other low-carbon fuels produced continues to increase, the competition for feedstocks will likely increase, and DGD will also likely be required to source a greater amount of its waste and renewable feedstocks from international sources, which would increase its exposure to the political, geographic, regulatory, and economic risks associated with international sourcing of supplies. A disruption to DGD’s feedstock supply could adversely impact its and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

Our Ethanol segment relies on corn sourced from local farmers and commercial elevators in the Mid-Continent region of the U.S. The corn supply for our Ethanol segment is acutely exposed to the effects that weather and other environmental events occurring in that region can have on the amount or timing of crop production. Crop production is also affected by government policies (such as farming subsidies) and by market events (such as changes in fertilizer prices and rail disruptions). Reductions or delays in crop production from these or similar events could reduce and disrupt the supply of, or otherwise increase our costs to obtain, corn for our Ethanol segment, and such events have occurred periodically.

🟡 Modified We are subject to risks arising from litigation, government action, and mandatory disclosure rules related to climate-related and other sustainability-related matters, or aimed at the fossil fuel industry. 🔒
🟡 Modified We are subject to risks arising from transportation and logistics disruptions and availability. 🔒
🟡 Modified Our financial results are affected by volatile margins, which are dependent upon factors beyond our control, including the price of feedstocks and the market price at which we can sell our products. 🔒

And 14 more changes in the full comparison.

17 changes in this historical filing

The complete historical comparison (2025 vs 2024) is available on the Pro plan.

Get Pro access Already a Pro subscriber? View full diff →