There is increasing governmental and stakeholder interest in ESG matters. In addition, the nature, scope, and complexity of the matters that our Company must assess, quantify and disclose are expanding due to current, proposed, and recently enacted federal and state reporting requirements related to climate-related risks and other topics, such as water usage, waste production, labor, human capital, environmental justice, cybersecurity and privacy, and risk oversight. For example, see Item 1. Business – Regulation – Recent Developments and Focus Areas in Policy and Regulation – Climate and Sustainability for information about California’s recently-adopted Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act and Climate-Related Financial Risk Act and the SEC’s proposed climate-related disclosure rule. Methodology and timelines for mandatory emissions reporting requirements, such as the recently passed California Corporate Data Accountability Act, may be inconsistent with requirements enacted by other governmental entities, including disclosure requirements that are ultimately adopted by the SEC, which could further increase costs and divert management time and attention. Disclosures related to GHG emissions data or potential climate-related impacts could also negatively affect our reputation to the extent we are perceived as not meeting individual stakeholder climate-related expectations.
Our industry faces challenges to implement these rapidly developing disclosure requirements, as well as the risk of enforcement actions by governmental and regulatory agencies for noncompliance. Significant expenditures and commitment of time by management, employees and consultants is involved in developing, implementing and overseeing policies, practices, additional disclosures and internal controls related to environmental and sustainability risk and performance. Public statements with respect to ESG matters are becoming increasingly subject to heightened scrutiny from public and governmental authorities related to the risk of potential “greenwashing,” i.e., misleading information or false claims overstating potential ESG benefits. We are aware that non-governmental organizations and other private actors have filed lawsuits against certain companies under various securities and consumer protection laws alleging that certain ESG-related statements, goals or standards were misleading, false or otherwise deceptive. An inability to implement such policies, practices, and internal controls and maintain compliance with laws and regulations, or a perception among stakeholders that our ESG disclosures and sustainability goals are insufficient or our goals are unattainable, could harm our reputation and competitive position and negatively impact our stock price and business performance.